Circular No. 09/tt-Bkhcn/2012: About The Selection, Direct Delivery Organizations And Individuals Chaired The Task Of Research In Social Sciences And Humanities State Level

Original Language Title: Thông tư 09/2012/TT-BKHCN: Về việc tuyển chọn, giao trực tiếp tổ chức và cá nhân chủ trì thực hiện nhiệm vụ nghiên cứu khoa học xã hội và nhân văn cấp nhà nước

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Numbers: 09 /2012/TT-BKHCN
THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM.
Independence-Freedom-Happiness
Hanoi, April 2, 2012

IT ' S SMART

On the selection, direct delivery of the organization, the individual presiding over the task

study of social science and state-level personnel

_________________________________

University of Science and Technology Law on 9 June 2000;

Base of Protocol 81 /2002/NĐ-CP October 17, 2002 of the Government Regulation Details enforce several of the provisions of the Law of Science and Technology;

Base of Protocol 201 /2004/NĐ-CP December 10, 2004, of the Government of the Governing Statute of Social and Social Sciences.

Base of Protocol 28 /2008/NĐ-CP March 14, 2008 the Government regulates the function, mandate, jurisdiction, and organizational structure of the Ministry of Science and Technology;

At the suggestion of the Director of Social and Natural Sciences;

The Minister of Science and Technology issued the Information on the selection, direct communication of the organization, and the individual presiding over the task of studying social science and the state office.

What? 1. Range and object tuning

1. This information guides the selection, organizational communication and the individual presiding over the task of social science and humorology research, including: subject matter, project belonging to state-level social science programs; subject, state-level independent project, and the project. (The following is a title).

2. The selection, the direct communication organization and the individual presiding over the topic of scientific research and development of the technology, the state-level test production project is not part of the scope of this information.

What? 2. Draft, direct delivery

1. Draft selection is the choice of organization, the best possible individual and experience to carry out the topic under the order of the State through consideration, evaluation of the registration records participating in the selection under the requirements, the criteria stated in the Information Guide. Come on.

The selection applied to the subject has many organizations and individuals capable of taking part in an attempt to achieve the highest efficiency.

2. Direct communication is the designation of the organization, the individual with sufficient capacity, qualities, conditions, and expertise to carry out the subject of the order under the order of the State.

Direct communication applies to:

a) The subject of national secrecy, security of security, defense;

b) The subject is particularly urgent at the request of the State leadership, which has complex, sensitive content under the regulation at paragraph 2, Article 9 of the Regulation of Social Sciences Operations Management and the staff of the Executive Committee under the Digital Protocol. 201 /2004/NĐ-CP December 10, 2004.

What? 3. Draft principle, direct communication

1. The selection was published publicly on popular media: Vietnam Television's VTV1 program, Vietnam Voice, People's Daily News and Saigon Liberation Newspaper. Detailed information is fully posted in the Science and Development Report, on the electronic pages of the Ministry of Science and Technology http://www.most.gov.vn, http://www.vista.gov.vn, http://www.tchdkh.org.vn.

2. The direct delivery is made in a form of text to 1-2 organizations, the individual is assigned to prepare the case and set up protection in front of the scientific board.

3. The Minister of Science and Technology established the scientific council for the advice of the selection, which directly organizes the organization, the individual presiding over the topic.

4. The evaluation of the registration registration profile, direct communication is conducted by grading a point according to specific criteria groups for the specified topic at Article 10 of this Information.

5. Each individual is registered to host one (01) topic. To encourage collaborative implementation of the organization, individuals participate in the selection to mobilize maximum resources to effectively implement the topic.

6. Results of selection, direct communication after approval is notified to organizations, individuals who are hit, the organization ' s governing body, individual hits and published on the electronic site of the Ministry of Science and Technology, http://www.most.gov.vn, said in a statement. http://www.vista.gov.vn, http://www.tchdkh.org.vn.

What? 4. Selected participating conditions, direct communication

1. For the organization:

a) The institutions that have a legal status, registered in scientific and technological activity, have the function of operating in accordance with the subject field of the subject of the right to participate in the registration of the selection, or to be directly assigned to the subject of the subject matter.

b) The organizations are not allowed to register for selection or directly direct communication if within 24 months to the time of filing cases the subject has been evaluated for a slow state-funded record compared to the deadline for the end of the study contract. 12 months or more without the approval of the Ministry of Science and Technology.

2. For the individual:

a) The subject of the subject matter must meet the following requirements:

-There is a higher degree of higher education and expertise in the same scientific field as the subject of the last five years, as of the time of filing.

-As a proponer of the project and presiding over the theory of persuaoration;

-There is sufficient direct ability to perform or organize the implementation and guarantee sufficient time to proactively perform the research work of the subject.

b) The individual is not allowed to participate in the selection, directly assigned to the subject matter if the expiration date of the filing is still on the topic of the state financing: the subject of the program; the independent subject; the mission of international cooperation on science and science. technology according to the Protocol; the mission is funded by the National Science and technology Development Foundation.

c) The owner of the state-funded title was evaluated at an "unreached" level without having to renew the time of execution to complete the outcome or the subject of the suspended execution due to the error that would not be registered to the selection, direct communication. in the second round (02) of the year from the time of the conclusion of the council to evaluate the state income or the decisive moment of the state governing body having the authority to suspend the subject matter.

d) The individual subject of a state-funded title filed a slow basis for a slow basis for the end of the study contract from six (06) months or more without the consent of the Ministry of Science and Technology would not be allowed to register. select, direct communication in the corresponding time is as follows:

-12 months, from the time of the filing of the actual trial assessment if the filing was delayed from 6 months to less than 12 months;

-24 months, from the time of the filing of the actual evaluation rate if you were to slow down from 12 months or more.

3. Confirmate the selection conditions, direct communication

The Ministry of Science and Technology pursues its management range to confirm the regulation condition at Clause 1 and Clause 2 of this prior to the opening of the Profile.

What? 5. Registration Profile for selection, direct communication

1. The registration profile participant, direct communication includes the following documents:

a) The application for the host implementation (Appendix 1, Schedule B1-1).

b) The subject theory (Appendix 1, Schedule B1-2).

c) Summary operation of the host registry (Appendix 1, Schedule B1-3).

d) The scientific calendar of the individual and the individual participants made the subject matter according to the manifest list at Section 10 of the Theory of Topic (Appendix 1, Schedule B1-4).

The text confirmation of the participation of the participants ' participation in coordination of the study of the study is subject to the manifest listing in Section 9 of the Theory of Nomination (Appendix 1, Schedule B1-5).

e) The proof text does not belong to the specified cases at point b 1 and points b, c, d paragraph 2 Article 4 of this Smart (if available).

g) Legal values that demonstrate the ability to raise capital from another source (in the event of an organization and an individual who prescribes raising funds from other capital).

The above documents must have the full marks of the organization and the signature of the corresponding individual as specified on each of the forms.

2. A registered registration profile, direct communication of one (01) of the original profile (marked and direct signature) presented and printed on the A4 paper gauge, using the Vietnamese font of the Unicode character code by the Vietnamese standard TCVN 6909:2001, the size of 14 and one. (01) the electronic record of the record on the optical disk (PDF form, which does not set a password) is packaged in the sealed and external file pocket as follows:

a) The name of the registration subject to the selection, direct communication (writable: name of the title; name, code of the program);

b) Name, address of the host registration organization and the organization participating in the joint implementation of the subject matter (only listing the organization has confirmed the co-ordinated participation);

c) They are the name of the individual who registers the subject of the subject and the list of the main participants performing the subject (only the list of individuals who have confirmed coordination);

d) The manifest document is in the file.

What? 6. File registration for selection, direct communication

1. Place of receiving a profile: Ministry of Science and Technology (113 Chen Zhongxing, Central District, Paper Bridge, Hanoi) or addresses of the Ministry of Science and Technology (in other cases).

2. The filing deadline: According to the announcement by the Ministry of Science and Technology.

3. Date of certificate of certification is the date of the record in the sign of the Hanoi Post Office (case sent via post office) or the arrival of the Ministry of Science and Technology (the case of direct submission).

4. During the rule of filing the filing, the organization and the individual registered to the selection, direct communication has the right to withdraw the submitted records to replace the new record or to add the submitted record. The new case change and the profile addition must be completed before the specified filing deadline; the additional text is the constituent part of the profile.

What? 7. Open the profile

1. The Department of Science and Technology opens the profile, checks and confirms the validity of the profile with the attendance of the relevant agency (if necessary), the organization representative, the individual registered to the selection, direct delivery.

2. The valid profile is the file that is prepared in accordance with the forms and meets the requirements specified at Article 4; Article 5 and Article 6 of this Information.

3. The process and opening results are compiled into a compilation (Annex 2, Schedule B2-1).

4. The profile is entered into consideration, evaluated when responding to the regulation conditions at paragraph 2 of this Article.

What? 8. Scientific Council

1. The Minister of Science and Technology established the selection of the scientific council for selection, direct delivery of the organization, the individual presiding over the topic (later called the council). Each council may advise one (01) or some of the subject (in the case of the topic of the same field).

2. The Council has between 09 and 11 members, including the chairman, vice president, two (02) the protest commissioner and the commissioners, in which:

a) Two-thirds (2/ 3) are reputable, responsible, qualified, qualified experts, and have at least five years of recent operational experience in the field of consultation.

b) A third (1/ 3) Council member is representative of state governing bodies, policy planning or ordering organization (benefication of the research results of the subject).

For the subject of state-level scientific programs, no more than one (01) member from the Board of Programs and is not chaired by the president, the vice president or the commissioner.

3. Experts, the protest commissioners who have joined the advisory council that identify the scientific task are invited to be invited to join the council on their respective topics.

Council members can take from the expert database of the Ministry of Science and Technology.

4. In case of need (when the number of selection records exceeds the capacity of the Council or due to the specificability of the subject matter), the Chair and Vice Chairman of the Board of Science and Technology Invitations the experts outside the Council to do so. The counter-expert.

5. Individuals belonging to the following cases are not members of the council:

a) Personal registration or participation of the subject matter;

b) The individual is registered to host the topic.

6. The Ministry of Science and Technology chaired the council sessions and sent the executive secretary to help the council.

What? 9. The Rules of the Council

1. The executive secretary of the council is responsible for preparing and sending the following documents to all council members and experts (if any) minimum of 5 days before the assembly session:

a) the decision of the assembly and the accompanying list;

b) The list of topics was approved;

c) A copy of the original record or the electronic version of the registration file to the selection or communication;

d) The review form for the subject (Annex 2, Schedule B2-2);

Other related materials.

2. The session of the council must be present at least two-thirds of the council members, including the chairman or vice president and two (02) of the protest commissioner.

3. Chairman of the board of council meetings. In the case of the chairman of the absence of the council, the vice chairman of the council chaired the session of the council. The Council sent the scientific secretary to record the expertise of the members and the council's conclusions in the working and relevant documents of the council. The written opinion of the absent member (if any) only has a reference value.

4. The responsibility of the council members:

a) Evaluation of an honest, objective and fair manner; personally responsible for its assessment results and collective responsibility for the general conclusion of the council. Council members, experts (if present) and the council administrative secretary have the responsibility to keep the information confidential regarding the information assessment process, direct traffic.

b) Research, analysis of each content and information prescribes in the profile; the review of a strong, weak face and assessment of each case according to the prescribed requirements; writing comments, reviews and arguments for evaluation; for points according to the criteria. at the prescribed manifold.

c) The members of the board of points are independent according to the assessment criteria and the regulatory scale. Before the point of time, the panel discussed the general opinion, the point for the point for each criterion.

What? 10. Profile Comments

1. The principle of assessment

The selection profile, directly delivered by the Scientific Council by grading method (with a total score of 100) according to the criteria in two parts: the topic of the theory of the topic (total score is 80) and the competence and experience of the organization, Individuals perform the topic (total score is 20).

2. The criteria and criteria group evaluated the topic of the topic (according to Appendix 1, Schedule B1-2) included:

a) The criteria for the study of the subject's research, a maximum of five points, has 1 criteria:

-Specifically the objective direction of the subject, from one to five points.

b) The criteria group for the rationing of the study situation in the field of the subject matter, a maximum of 15 points, has 2 criteria:

-Full and clear in the description, analysis, assessment of the level of success and limitations of the relevant domestic and foreign research works, ranging from 1 to 7 points;

-The argument of necessity, urgency, the meaning of the subject matter and the new practice of the subject, from one to eight points.

c) The criteria group for the determination of content, the organizational method of carrying out the topic, a maximum of 30 points, has four criteria:

-Systematic, logical, full, clear of the research content to achieve the proposed goal, ranging from 1 to 15 points;

-Rationality, the feasibility of the organization of the organization of activities serving research and planning, the implementation of the subject matter, from one to five points;

-rationality, feasibility, clarity of the coordination of organizations, individuals in the country and abroad (if any) participate in the topic of the subject, from 1 to 5 points;

-The argument about the distribution and use of the expected budget for the activities of the subject, for the product of the subject, from 1 to 5 points.

d) The criteria group on how to approach the topic and study method, a maximum of 10 points, had 2 criteria:

-Clearly, appropriate in the approach of the topic with the study subject, from 1 to 5 points;

-Specific, explicit research methods, consistent with the subject, the study ' s research content, from 1 to 5 points.

The product criteria group, the benefits of the subject matter and the transfer of research results, at a maximum of 20 points, three criteria:

-The products and the scientific requirements of each of the products are clear, full, consistent with the goal and the study content of the subject, from 1 to 5 points.

-The benefits of the subject matter, a maximum of 10 points, namely:

+ The impact on society (which contributes to the construction of the advocated, finalization of policy, building legislation or having the impact of transforming the perception of society) and the impact on the industry, the scientific field (new contribution, opening up new research direction) from 1 to 2017. Seven points.

+ Enhancing the research capacity of the organization, the individual through the implementation of the subject matter (there are public works in the country, in addition to the country and have a contribution to graduate training) from 1 to 3 points.

-The specific and feasibility of the method of transferring the study results from 1 to 5 points.

3. The organization of the organization's competence and experience, individuals perform the subject (in Appendix 1, Schedule B1-3, Schedule B1-4, Schedule B1-5), a maximum of 20 points including 4 criteria:

-Capacity, credibility on the level of expertise and organizational experience, the management of the subject of the subject (Appendix 1, Schedule B1-4), a maximum of nine points, namely:

+ There is a research work published in the country and abroad (monograph, article published in the professional scientific journal), from 1 to 5 points;

+ There are research results that are applied to the construction of the theme, policy, construction of law, serving teaching or having an impact on the perception of society, ranging from one to four points.

-The ability of individuals to participate in the subject matter (Annex 1, Schedule B1-4), from 1 to 6 points;

-The competence of the presiding officer (Appendix 1, Schedule B1-3), from 1 to 3 points;

-The ability of the main co-ordination organizations to implement the subject matter (Annex 1, Schedule B1-5), from 1 to 2 points.

What? 11. The sequence, the work content of the council

The board works in two steps.

1. Preparing for the formal session: The functional units of the Ministry of Science and Technology Exchange with the Chair, Vice Chairman of the Council of the Uniform Method:

-Announces Open Border (Annex 2, Schedule B2-1), report of the number and list of eligible records that are given to the Council reviewing the evaluation as specified in Article 7 of this Information;

-Unity to invite additional experts (if necessary);

-Unity of time and place of official session.

The Council member is responsible for preparing the comments, judging by the text (Annex 2, Schedule B2-2), sending the administrative secretary before the official session of the Council.

2. Official Session: The Council conducts review of the selection profile, direct delivery.

a) Administrative Activity:

-The executive secretary reads the decision to form the council, which is open to the file, introduces the council and the delegates to attend.

-The Ministry of Science and Technology highlights the principal requirements and content of the selection, direct communication of this information.

-The Council for the Exchange of Uniform of the Principles of the Doctrine and the First Nations (01) members as a scientific secretary.

b) For the topics delivered directly to the case, the organization, the individual is given a summary of the summary presentation to the council on the topic of persuathy; answers the questions of the council member (if any) and does not continue the session of the board. The council.

c) The Council conducts review of the selection of participants, direct communication:

-Presentation of the expert ' s response and opinion (if any) of the review of the selection of registration records, direct communication of the subject;

-Countermeasures, experts evaluate each case analysis and comparison between registered records and one (01) subject to regulatory criteria.

-The Council can question the questions of the countermeasures, experts on each assessment criteria associated with each profile.

-After answering the question of the council members, the expert is not a council member who does not continue the council ' s session.

-The scientific secretary reads comments by the text of the absent member (if any) for the council to review, refer to.

d) The council discussed, evaluating the profile;

-Council of exchange, discussion, evaluation of each profile by criteria has been specified and compared between selection records, direct communication to the same (01) topic.

-After the exchange, the council members for the point of independence each file in accordance with the criteria and scale of regulation on the subject (Annex 2, Chart B2).

6. Board of votes and vote.

a) The board of voting consists of three council members (of which one is elected). The executive secretaries are responsible for helping to board the vote.

b) The voting council evaluated the point for each case in accordance with the voting method. A valid review vote is the correct vote in accordance with the vote only on the vote.

7. Total selection assessment, direct delivery.

a) The combined check board and the conference results report (Annex 2, Schedule B2-4).

b) The ranking board of records is assessed to have the total average score from high to low (Annex 2, Schedule B2-5) under the following conditions:

-The profile has a total average score of criteria that must reach a minimum of 70/100. The Council ranked the records with a total average score from high to low.

-For records that have a total score of equal average, the higher points of the council's president (or the point of the vice president's vice president, in the case of the absent council president) are preferred to rank.

-The case of records of equal average score and the point of the President of the Council (or the point of the Vice President of the Council, in the case of the Absent Council) for these records are equal, the highest point of the criteria. part of the ability and experience of the organization, the individual to do it. In the case of equal points, the Council petits the final option.

8. The council passed the border on the work results of the council, the petition for the organization and the individual to be elected or directly assigned to the topic:

a) The organization, the individual being nominated by the assembly is to be held, the individual whose records are ranked with the highest average score at Point b, Section 7 of this Article.

b) The discussion council to unify the petition of additional points of need, modified in the theory of nomination, the main scientific products with corresponding indicators must be reached and the petition of funding for the implementation of the subject; stating the points of note to complete. The profile of the organization and the individual is recommended by the board or directly.

c) The council of construction of work (Annex 2, Schedule B2-6) sends the Ministry of Science and Technology.

What? 12. Approx results

1. Before approval of the organization and individual matrices or is directly assigned to the topic of subject matter, the Ministry of Science and Technology considers, sweeping the records; the necessary case, the Ministry of Science and Technology may offer the council to reconsider or hold the board. To advise assessment of the records with unreasonable assessment results; physical physical examination-engineering, manpower, and financial competability of the organization, the individual was petiated to host the subject.

2. On the basis of the council ' s conclusion, the review results and the offer of the functional units of the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Minister of Science and Technology signed the decision to approve the organization, the individual presiding over the topic.

3. The organization, the host individual who performs the subject of correctology, fining the case according to the council ' s conclusions and sent the Ministry of Science and Technology within 15 days of the date of receiving the draft results or direct delivery to conduct the judge. The content and the budget, the layout of the plan.

What? 13. Save the original profile

In the term one (01) of the year since the day the Minister of Science and Technology signs the decision to approve the organization, the individual presiding over the subject matter, the administrative secretary of the councils is responsible for filing the original profile (including unelected records) to save at the site. Department of Archives, Office of the Ministry of Science and Technology.

What? 14.

1. The organization, the individual with the right to complain, sue for administrative decisions and administrative actions of the agency, the organization with the authority concerning the selection, the direct delivery of the organization and the individual presiding over the subject.

2. Citizens have the right to denounce violations of the law of the selection, direct delivery of the organization and the individual presiding over the subject.

3. The complaint, denouncing and addressing the complaint, the denounce is done under the rule of law.

What? 15.

The ministries, peer agencies, government agencies, the People's Committee of the Provinces, the Central City of the Central Committee, can take the provisions of this information to organize the selection, directly communicating the topic of social science and human rights. scope and jurisdiction.

What? 16. Organization to execute

1. This information comes into effect after 45 days from the date of the issue and replaces the Qui selection, which directly organizes the organization, the individual presiding over the topic of social science research and the state-level staff issued with the Number Decision. 11 /2007/QĐ-BKHCN 04/6/2007 of the Minister of Science and Technology and Digital Information 08 /2011/TT-BKHCN June 30, 2011 by the Minister of Science and Technology of the Amendment, complements some of the provisions of the Qui plan issued by Decision No. 1. 11 /2007/QĐ-BKHCN June 4, 2007.

2. In the course of the execution if the birth is entangled, suggest the agencies, organizations, individuals that reflect on time about the Ministry of Science and Technology for the study, the added amendment ./.

KT. MINISTER.
Chief.

(signed)

Zhou Yu