Decree 92/2012/nd-Cp: Regulations Sanctioning Administrative Violations Of Food Safety

Original Language Title: Nghị định 91/2012/NĐ-CP: Quy định xử phạt vi phạm hành chính về an toàn thực phẩm

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
THE GOVERNMENT.
Number: 91 /2012/NĐ-CP
THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM.
Independence-Freedom-Happiness
Hanoi, November 8, 2012

DECREE

Food Safety Sanctions on Food Safety
_____________________

The Law base. I 25 th Government. Ah! 12 in 2001;
Food Safety Law. 1 June 7, 20 10 ()
The French Base for Administrative Processing of the Administrative violation on 2 July 2002; France l changeover, supplemation of some of the provisions of the Ordinal Executive Order of the Administrative violation on 2 April 2008;
At the request of the Minister of Health. ()
The government issued a decree to rule out the administrative breach of food safety. Oh,
What? 1. The adjustment range
1. This decree provides for the conduct of violation, form, and penalty level, the remediation of the consequences and the authority to punish the administrative violation of food safety.
2. The administrative breach of food safety is the behaviors of the organization, individuals who violate a way c. Stain. Or whether or not the laws of food safety laws that are not criminal and by the provisions of this decree must be subject to administrative offenses.
3. The administrative safety violations of the food safety at this decree include:
a) Violation of the regulation of safety guarantees for food products;
b) V The scope of the provision of food safety guarantees in manufacturing, food business;
c) A violation of the safety regulations. Stain. With reality. Move. Import, export food;
d) Violations of the regulation of food advertising; information, education, media coverage of food safety; food labeling. Move. m;
Violation of the regulation of food testing, risk analysis, prevention, ng and more. What? n It's Serve c. Stain. v Okay. Real safe. Move. m; pennies All Source Stain. c, recall and processing of unsafe food; obstruct state management activity v. Okay. Food safety.
4. The administrative violations of food safety regulated at this decree are simultaneously regulated at the United States of the United States. Oh, It ' s enacted by this decree. Okay. The penalty.
What? 2. Subject applies
1. This decree applies to individuals, the organization that has administrative violations of the safety of the country. Oh. n food, minus the case of the international convention that Vietnam is another regulated member, does follow. Okay. I wish. Stain. c What? Yeah.
2. Individuals are cadres, civil officials, officials who perform the prescribed behavior at this decree while on the job, the assignment is not delivered to the administrative breach without being treated by x. Yeah. the law of discipline under the provisions of the law of cadres, civil officials, officials.
What? 3. The forms of execution of administrative violations and the remediation measure.
1. For each of the administrative violations of food safety, the organization, the individual violation must be subject to one of the following forms of punishment:
a) Warning.
b) A fine.
The maximum penalty level for a food safety behavior is 100,000,000.
2. Depending on the nature, the extent of violation, organization, individual violation of food safety may also be applied to one or more of the following forms of punishment:
a) Title of use: Paper certification is qualified for food safety; Gi All A valid publication of the publication; the Confirmed publication is suitable for food safety; the Certificate of Advertising Content;
b) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used to violate the administrative safety of food safety, which includes the gi ... All medical papers, corrected documents, t Move. y is either deleted or forged or wrongly prescribed.
3. In addition to the prescribed penalty forms at paragraph 1, Clause 2 of this, organization, individual violation of the administrative breach may also be imposed on one or more sc measures. It's c in the following:
a) Forced restoration of the state of the state And u has been altered due to the administrative breach caused;
b) Forced to implement environmental pollution remedied measures, which spread the disease caused by a violation of the administrative range;
c) Forced out of Vietnam territory or forced to re-export food goods, vehicles;
d) Forced to recall, destroy or recycle on food, food materials, food additees, food processing aids, tooling, packaging materials, containing violation of food; forced to take up the food. Oh. i, the destruction of the documents, the means of violation, unless the case has to be seized to make evidence, the evidence for mitochondrial processing. What? p up;
) Other consequable remediation measures specified in Chapter II of this decree;
e) Personally, the organization of administrative violations should be subject to all costs under the rule of law for the implementation of the method. It's Recon.
What? 4. Apply the regulation of the law on administrative violation.
1. Principle x Yeah. Penalty; x Yeah. People have not yet become a member of the administrative population; the mitigation, the situation is reduced; the time and the penalty term; the deadline is considered unpunished; the deadline is, the timing, the effect; the application of the form of a violation of the law. I'm And the solution. It's c in recovery; the identification of the trial i conduct of the administrative offence; the administrative of the administrative breach; the decision to punish the administrative breach; the capital. Okay. Fines of money, collecting fines; procedures of confiscation and processing of the burial, the vehicle. Okay. The administrative breach; the itch. All p commit a decision to punish the administrative breach, adjourn the decision to punish the money, duress What? implement the decision to punish the administrative breach and move the decision to punish the administrative violation of food safety in the country. Okay. role; vi Don't c transfer of criminal charges with criminal signs to retrieve criminal responsibility carried out under the rule of law v. Okay. The administrative breach.
2. M There. Edit and decide to use to The administrative violation of food safety in accordance with the provisions of the Appendix issued by this decree.
The case of the relevant functional force has had a written pattern system, the decision to punish the administrative violation of the enforcement. All In the entire force, according to the rules. n The government ' s h h is applied to the editorial model system, that decision but must make sure it works. And All right. y - And u v Okay. expertise for handling behavior violation v ... Okay. Food safety.

What? 5. Violation of the use of food ingredients
1. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for meat behavior use or curation n Processed from the meat not through veterinary hygiene checks, or through examination, but not required to make a reality. Move. m.
2. A fine of five million dollars. What? n 10,000,000 copper for one of the following acts:
a) The use of food ingredients has been too long to use or have no shelf life for production, food processing; and
b) Use of animal-derived products is in the time monitoring how to quarantine for production, food processing.
3. Fines from 10,000,000 to 15,000,000 co-conduct to the behavior of using raw materials do not guarantee food safety or unknown source, origin for production, ch. What? Food.
4. Fines from 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 people to one of the following acts:
a) Using raw materials is not used as food to produce, processed food;
b) S Yeah. d Okay. Fuck. There. The animals die from the disease, d Sick or dead unknown causes, forced to destroy in love. And The organ of the organ. Move. Scale Okay. Fuck. Okay. production, food processing;
c) Using a food material containing the impurity is introduced and does not guarantee food safety for production, food processing.
5. Penalty of 7 l And The value of the food infringes on the behavior of regulation at paragraph 4 This should be the highest fine. All t of the frame. Okay. No, no, no, no, no, no. All p more than 07 l And n food value violation at the time of the breach Yeah. The Stain. ti Okay. No more than 100,000,000. Oh. Yeah.
6. Additional punishment form:
a) The title of using a certificate of facility is eligible for food safety from 06 Ah! Up to 9 months in the case of a breach in paragraph 2, paragraph 3. Okay. Hey!
b) deprive the use of a certificate of qualified food safety from 9 months to 12 months in the case of remaking. Stain. i with rules of conduct Shit. This is at Section 4.
7 . Consequences of remediation:
a) Forced to stop using meat or product is ch What? variable from the meat to the veterinary hygienal examination to carry out veterinary hygiene checks on the behavior behavior. Shit. This is at the end of this.
b) Force the destruction of the offense to the behavior of the specified behavior at Point 2, paragraph 3, Point a, b Clap 4 Go Okay. Hey!
c) Forcing the treatment to remove the impurity according to the regulation of the state agency has jurisdiction over the material containing impurity but not a ti. Hey. Destroy for h. Oh. The rules are at Point 4.
d) Forcing the destruction of the material that contains the impurity of human health, the h-imp. cell Clearly, the component must be destroyed to the behavior of the specified behavior at Point 4. Okay. Hey.
What? 6. Violation of the regulation of food addiproducts, food processing support in manufacturing, food processing, and food processing.
1. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for the conduct of food additipation, food processing support in the catalogue are located. Okay. p usage to Production bees, food business, but beyond the limit.
2. Fines from 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 co-conduct on food additidias, food processing support is allowed to use the law. Yeah. Fuck. Oh, Time overdue Yeah. Or there ' s no shelf life for manufacturing, food processing.
3. Fine. Yeah. 15,000,000 to 25,000,000 in one of the following acts:
a) Using food addiants, food processing support is unknown to the origin, exported to the country. Okay. production, ch What? variable food;
b) Using a food additive, an agent. Food processing in addition to ns allowed Yeah. Don't Okay. production, food processing.
4. Fines from 20,000,000 to $40,000,000 are on the behavior of using food addiproducts, food processing support containing ch. All Toxic or additive use are hazardous substances for production, food processing.
5. Penalty for seven times the value of the food violation against the behavior of Article 4 of this. What? Ti Okay. Your high penalty. All t of the frame. Okay. The penalty in paragraph 4 is less than 07 times the value of the food violation at the time. Okay. Violation but s. Stain. ti Okay. No more than 100,000,000. Oh. Yeah.
6. Additional punishment form:
a) The claim to use the certification certificate is eligible for food safety from 06 months to 9 months in the case of resin against the prescribed behavior at Clause 2 and Clause 3 This;
b) Deprive the use of a certificate of qualified food safety from 09 months to 12 months in case of rebreaking. Stain. As for the provisions of Article 4 of this Article 4.
7. Consequences of remediation:
a) To make the correct law of law on the behavior of this one.
b) Forcing the destruction of the breach. Stain. i with regulatory behavior on the 2, 3 and 4 terms.
What? 7. Violation of the regulation of chemical use in manufacturing, food processing
1. Fines from 15,000,000 to 25,000,000 coins for the chemical use of chemicals are unknown to the origin, too long term use or no shelf life in manufacturing activity, ch. What? Food.
2. Fines from 30,000,000 to 50,000,000 were used for the use of banned chemicals used in manufacturing, food processing.
3. Penalty for seven times the cost of the food violation. Stain. i with the prescribed behavior at Clause 2 if the highest fines of the penalty frame stipulate at Clause 2 This is less than 07 times the value of the infraction food at the time of travel. Okay. Violation but s. Stain. ti Okay. No more than 100,000,000. Oh. Yeah.
4. Additional punishment form:
a) Deprive the use of a certificate of qualified food safety from the last 6 months. What? 9 months in the case of rebreaking Stain. i with the behavior of this one thing;
b) Deprive the use of a certificate of qualified food safety from 09 months to 12 months in case of rebreaking. Stain. As for the provisions of Article 2 of this.
5. Consequences of remediation:
Forcing the destruction of the breach is the unknown chemical source, prohibited from use in production, ch. What? Tragic. What? n foods; foods that contain cht All I'm Stain. i with the prescribed behavior at paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 This.
What? 8. Violation of the regulation of the use of micronutrition in manufacturing, processing th Well, The food
1. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for a to The following behaviors:
a) Increased micronutrition is vitamins, minerals. All t, ch All Let's get it in the field. Move. H. cell in the category under the provisions of the Ministry of Health;
b) Increased micronutrition is vitamins, minerals, micronuation of food in the category according to the Ministry of Medicine regulation. What? But using the content beyond the rules.
2. Consequences of remediation:
To make the correct law of law on the behavior of this one thing.
What? 9. Violation of the standard of s Come on Base owners and people I ' m going to do business. Food. -The real lady. Move. m, the substance that supports food processing, tools, packaging materials, containing food and food.
1. Treatment for the facility owner has a recurring health exam for the owner and the direct producer, food business, food additive, food processing support, equipment, packaging materials, food storage, but not fully implemented. the prescribed tests or the use of a health certificate have been too long with the following levels:
a) A fine of $500,000 to one. . 000 . $1,000 Oh. The facilities are available. Oh. i 20 people have recurring health exams but do not fully execute the x. Okay. The rules of regulation or s Yeah. The health certificate has been too long;
b) A fine of 1,000,000 to 2,500,000 in violation of a violation of 20 persons to fewer than 100 have a recurring health exam but does not fully execute the prescribed tests or use a health certificate that has been too long;
c) Fines of between $2,500,000 and $5,000,000 for the body in Violations from 100 people to fewer than 500 people have a recurring health exam but do not fully implement the prescribed tests or use a health certificate that has been too long;
d) Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 in violation of the infraction facility range from 500 tr in Having a recurring health exam but not fully implementing the prescribed tests or using a medical certificate has been too long overdue.
2. The treatment for the facility owner has a non-recurring health exam by regulation for the owner and the direct producer, food business, food additive, food processing support, equipment, packaging materials, food storage, food, food, and other products. the following levels:
a) Fines from 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 people with a violation of less than 20 people did not perform a recurring health exam;
b) A fine of two. . The $5,000,000 million in violation of the facility had 20 to fewer than 100 people who did not perform a recurring health exam;
c) A fine of $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 in violation of a 100-person basis to less than 500 people did not perform a recurring health exam;
d) Fines from 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 coins for a violation of 500 people have been unable to perform a recurring health exam.
3. A fine of three. . A million-to-a-million-million-dollar deal is a violation of the criminal behavior, which has a forgery, corrects a health care certificate.
4. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 co-charges on the basis of a violation of the direct use of production, food business, food additid, ch support. What? variable food, tools, packaging materials, containing foods that are suffering from infectious diseases, skin disease or other diseases according to the Ministry of Health regulation.
5. Form x Yeah. Additional penalty:
Confiscate false papers, deleted papers, corrected for behavior in paragraph 3 This.
6. Consequences of remediation:
a) Force execution And Enough medical tests are prescribed to the host and the direct producer, food business, food additive, ch. All T support for real processing Move. m, tooling, packaging materials, which contain food for the behavior of regulation at One Article;
b) Forcing a recurring health exam for the base owner and the direct producer, food business, food additive, ch, and more. All T I have Help. What? Tragic. What? n food, tools, packaging materials, storage of food and food. Stain. i with onions i The rules are on Clap 2. Okay. Hey!
c) Forced to perform medical treatment, healing, rotation of job placement Oh. The online man. What? p manufacturing, food business, food additm, food support to Food processing, tools, packaging materials, food containers are suffering from infectious diseases, skin disease or other diseases according to the Ministry of Health ' s regulations. What? For the prescribed behavior at paragraph 4. Okay. Hey.
What? 10. Violation of the food safety knowledge of the tr Well, Relay Bitch. Export, business. Well, Food, food additiants, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, food containers; technical officers or technical staff, and other food products, including food items.
1. Penalty for owners in There ' s a violation of non-behavioral behavior. Come on c in terms of annual food safety by regulation for grassroots owners and producers of manufacturing, food business, food additiers, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, food storage with the following levels:
a) A fine of 500. . $1,000,000 to 1,000,000. Oh. i 20 people directly produce, food business does not update knowledge of food safety annually by regulation;
b) Fines from 1,000,000 to 1,500,000 are in violation of c Boob From 20 people to under 100 direct producers, food business does not update knowledge of food safety annually according to regulation;
c) Fines of between $1,500,000 and 2,500,000 in violation of the infraction facility range from 100 to under 500 people directly. All t, food business does not update knowledge of food safety annually by regulation;
d) Fines of between 2,500,000 and 5,000,000 in violation of the 500-person infraction facility, the food business does not update knowledge of food safety annually according to regulation.
2. The penalty for the facility owner has a non-certificate violation of the food safety knowledge training of the facility owner and the online person. What? p manufacturing, food business, food additive, food processing support, tools, materials, food, food and food. l How many times Boob i, ch. Come on a food-based food with the following levels:
a) Fines from 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 in violation of the breach facility are under 20 people directly producing, food business has no gigs. All He confirmed his knowledge of food safety.
b) A fine of $2,000,000. What? n 3,000,000 people on the basis of violations from 20 people to less than 100 people. What? p-p All t, food business does not have a certificate of knowledge training. Okay. Food safety;
c) Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 to a breach facility were from 100 people. What? n less than 500 people directly produce, food business does n' t have the hu ' s certificate. All n ki What? n s n Okay. Food safety;
d) A fine of $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 Stain. i with a breach basis from 500 people directly to the coin. All t, food business does n' t have any All Okay, okay, okay. All n ki What? n s n Okay. Food safety.
3. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 to the base. in Violation of forgery, repair, removal of cognitive training. Okay. Food safety;
4. Fines from 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 co-workers with manufacturing facilities, food business, food additiers, food processing support, tools, packaging materials, containing required food properties must have technical cadres or staff. engineering without technical staff or technical staff by regulation.
5. Additional punishment form:
Confiscate counterfeit paper, g i The paper was corrected, erased to the behavior of Article 3.
6. Consequences of remediation:
a) Forcing an update on the annual food safety knowledge to the base owner and the direct producer, food business, food additive, food processing support, tools, packaging materials, which contain prescribed food to a product of food, food, and other products. Paragraph 1. Okay. U Oh. y;
b) Forced to practice ki training What? Food safety for the owner of the direct-to-produce, food business, food additive, food processing support, tools, packaging materials, which contain provisions in accordance with regulatory behavior at Clause 2;
c) Forced to execute b Stain. Technical cadres or technical personnel on the basis of production, food business, food additiers, food processing support, tools, packaging materials, which contain obligate items of food that must have technical staff or technical staff. without the technical staff or the technical staff as specified for the specified behavior at Clause 4 This.
What? 11. Violation of the regulation of food safety practices of the person directly producing, the real business Move. And, um, real women. Move. m, the substance that supports food processing, tools, packaging materials, containing food and food.
1. Treatment for the base holder when c Boob In direct production, the food business violates the use of a dedicated, but incomplete or incomplete labor protection with the following levels:
a) The warning or fines of between $200,000 and 500,000 in violation of the breach facility are under 20 violations;
b) Fines of $500,000 to 1,500,000 in violation of the infraction facility were from 20 to under 100 violiners;
c) Fines of between $1,500,000 and 2,500,000 in violation of the infraction facility were from 100 to under 500 violiners;
d) Fines of between $2,500,000 and 5,000,000 coins were made against a 500-person violation facility.
2. Punishment for the facility owner when the facility has an online person What? p manufacturing, food business, food additive, food processing support, food tools, food, food, and more. Don't All right. Boob i, ch. Come on No, no, no, no. Take it Specialized labor protection by regulation v. Oh. The following levels:
a) Fines of between $500,000 and 1,000,000 on the breach facility were under 20 violations;
b) The fines of 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 are in violation of the infraction facility from 20 to under 100 people.
c) Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 in breach of the facility were from 100 to under 500 people.
d) Fines from the 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 coins were from the 500 people who came to the breach.
3. Fines of between $500,000 and 1,000,000 bronze for the base when the facility has people, live s Bitch. n Xu All T, food business, food addifies, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, contain germ food regulations on personal hygiene conditions or sanitary practices in manufacturing, regulatory food business.
4. Consequences of remediation:
The correct implementation is required for the specified behavior at Clause 1, 2, and Clause 3 This.
What? 12. Violation of regulation on general conditions guarantee food safety on the production facility, k. i Food, food, food, food. What? n food, tools, packaging materials, contain th ... Well, The food
1. Fines from 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 co-facilities for manufacturing facilities, food business, food addits, h ... I have Real help. Move. m, tooling, packaging materials, containing food that violates one of the following behaviors:
a) There is no guarantee of regulation of location or safety gap for the source of malicious, pollution sources and other damaging factors;
b) There are not enough equipment, precautions, anti-insects and regulatory animals.
2. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 in production facilities, food business, food additiers, ch. All T I have Food processing, tools, packaging materials, containing food breaches one of the following behaviors:
a) There are not enough equipment, suitable tools by regulation to process materials, processing, packaging, preserving, transporting foods, food addits, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, which contain different food items;
b) There are not enough equipment, tools, means of washing and disinfection, and the water that is consistent with regulation;
c) Do not maintain the real safety security conditions. Move. m in manufacturing, food business, real estate, food and food. Move. And, um, I have Food processing, tools, packaging materials, food-based food.
3. Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 in one of the following acts:
a) Water use is not standard for production, k i Food sales, food addits, food processing aids;
b) The preliminary process, food processing, food addits, h ... I have Let's go What? n food, tools, packaging materials, containing foods that do not guarantee safety or reality of the product. Move. m exposure to pollutants and toxic substances;
c) No waste management measures p in the manufacturing area, the real business Move. m, food additive, substance I have Food processing, d The tools, the packaging materials, contain the food that pollers the environment.
4. Treatment for non-establishment behavior and the application of good manufacturing practices (GMP), good hygiene practices (GHP, SSOP) good agricultural practice (GAP, VietGAP), risk analysis and critical point control (HACCP) and real safety management systems (GHP). My fairy. What? Different. Stain. i with manufacturing facilities, the business is b. It's t forced to apply by the regulation of the state authority to be competent with the following levels:
a) Fines from 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 coins were issued for the original production facility;
b) Fines of between $5,000,000 and 10,000,000 coins have been produced by manufacturing, processing, and conservation.
5. Consequences of remediation:
Forcing the implementation of the law to the laws of conduct. Shit. Two, two, three and four.
What? 13. Violation of the regulation of food safety guarantee in food preservation, food additias, food processing support, tools, packaging materials, food storage, food, food, and food.
1. Fines of 1,000,000 to 3,000,000. to The following behaviors:
a) Not fully preserved each type of food, food addits, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, food containers that lead to the risk of cross-contamination;
b) There is no specialized equipment that regulates temperature, humidity, ventilation equipment, and other special preservation conditions in accordance with the requirements. And The tumor of every food.
2. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for one of the following acts:
a) Do not guarantee food safety during the regulatory process;
b) Do not comply with the regulations on the preservation of the organization, the individual produced, processed food;
c) Where there are insects, insects, and animals.
d) Violation of other rules of the department l It ' s specialized in ensuring food safety in food preservation.
3. A fine of five. . The million-to-10,000,000 co-practices of food preservation, food additias, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, contain general food with the products of the food industry. All Poisonous.
4. Consequences of remediation:
a) Forcing the execution is correct for the specified behaviors at Clause 1, Points a, b and d 2 This Article;
b) Forced to conduct x measures Yeah. I mean, the insects and animals that are detrimental to the behavior of the behavior. Okay. C, paragraph 2. Okay. Hey!
c) Forcing the destruction of a breach is food, food additive, food processing support, tools, packaging materials, containing food that is preserved in general with the toxic substance on the prescribed behavior at Clause 3 This.
What? 14 . Vi Yes. Scale. Shit. Of course. Don't n ensuring food safety in food transport, food additiers, food processing support, tools, packaging materials, storage containers, food packaging, and more. Well, c Move. Go.
1. Fines from 3,000,000 to 5,000. . $1,000 for one of the following behaviors:
a) Using food transport, food additables, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, containing bland-fabrication foods, and other products. Yes. It ' s a pediatric material. Yes. Food, food.
b) Transport foods that contain packages, containers but do not guarantee safety or broken, tear, deformation during the transport process. Okay. n causing food pollution;
c) Does not guarantee the conditions of preservation during transport; food transport, food additias, food processing support, tools, packaging materials, containing general food with other types of goods that enduse the risk of food pollution. Move. m.
2. Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 in one of the following acts:
a) Using food contaminants, food addits, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, food containers, vehicles that have been transporting harmful substances that have not been cleaned up to transport food, food addits, food supplies, and food supplies. Food, ash. I have Food processing, tools, packaging materials, food containers;
b) Transporting food and toxic goods.
3. Additional punishment form:
Confiscation of the funeral, transportation is used to violate administrative behavior on the prescribed behavior at Clause 2. Okay. Hey.
4. Consequences of remediation:
a) It is required to enforce the law of law on the provisions of Article 1 of this Article;
b) Forced execution of sanctions l In order to ensure food safety for food, food additiation, food support. What? Tragic. What? n food, package material, ch Come on It ' s an pollution food, but it ' s not enough to be destroyed for the behavior of Article 1, paragraph 2. Okay. Hey!
c) Forced food destruction, food additive, ch. All t support for food processing, d tools, packaging materials, contain pediatric food. Yes. The property must be destroyed for the specified behavior at paragraph 1, paragraph 2. Okay. Hey.
What? 15. n h on the conditions of ensuring food safety in manufacturing, the fresh food business has its own aquatic origins.
1. A fine of $3,000,000. Come. A total of 5,000,000 people are on the basis of preservation, transporting the aquatic species from the harvesting facility, the forbidding zone.
2. Fines from $5,000,000 to $7,000,000 for collection, preliminary behavior, business of aquatic species that come from the breeding facility c ... All Harvest, harvest zone.
3. Fines from 10,000,000 to 15,000,000 co-produced fishnet fisheries from the planned raising facility, v. Yeah. - All Harvest.
4. Fines on the behavior that put the impurity into fisheries, collection, preparation, preservation, processing, fisheries business are in the following levels:
a) The warning or fines of between 200,000 and 500,000 are on the person who perform online behavior. What? p. All t in fisheries;
b) A fine of $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 dollars for the owner of a shipping behavior or hiring people to transport fisheries has a magazine. All t, except for the case where the state agency has jurisdiction over it;
c) Fines from 20,000,000 to 30,000,000 in total for collection, probation, preservation, processing, fishnet business are more than 100%. All It was brought in;
d) Fined $30,000,000 to $50,000,000 against the lease, borrowing other people. Yeah. a impurity in the fisheries or the behavior of t socket Put the impurity into the fisheries.
5. Fines for exploitation, collection, probation, processing, processing, business species of aquatic species are toxic. Stain. Natural for the following levels:
a) Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for the intentional act of exploiting the poisonous species. Stain. It's a natural hazard. What? Human health is prohibited from doing food in accordance with the rule of law;
b) Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 dollars for the owner of the shipping behavior or hiring people to transport the poisoned fisheries. Stain. It ' s a natural hazard to human health, except where the state agency has jurisdiction.
c) Fines from 20,000,000 to $40,000,000 to the 40,000,000, probation, maintenance, processing, and business of aquatic species have a natural toxin endangering the human health of food, except for the case being questioned by the state agency. Permission granted.
6. Penalty of seven times the value of the food violation against the prescribed behavior at Point c, d Clap 4, Point 5 This Article if the ti Okay. The highest penalty of the penalty bracket at paragraph 4, paragraph 5 is low. n 7 times the value of the food breach at the time of the breach but the amount of the fine is no more than 100,000,000.
7. Form x Yeah. Additional penalty:
a) The title uses a certificate of sufficient basis for food safety from 06 months to 12 months in the case of resin against the specified behavior at Clause 2, 3, Point c, d Clap 4, Point 5 This Article;
b) Confiscate shipments of fisheries violations at Clause 1, 2, 3, 5, This; confiscate shipments of violinuses and vehicles, tools and tools. Okay. Violation of regulations at the Archive Bitch. n 4 This.
8. Consequences of remediation:
a) Force is required to follow the law of law on provisions of paragraph 1, Clause 2, Clause 3 and Point 4, Go. Okay. A sum of five things.
b) Pressure d These measures of elimination of the impurity, other regulatory measures by the state authority of the state authority. Yes. Ensure food safety l Fisheries, but not part of it. d It must be destroyed.
c) Forcing the destruction of the shipment of aquatic products that are harmful to human health, the impartial impurity of the matter;
d) The destruction of the shipment of fisheries has a natural toxin endangering human health.
What? 16. Violation of the regulation on conditions of food safety in manufacturing, animal business, animal products use as food products and food products.
1. Fines of between $1,500,000 and 3,000,000 in one of the following acts:
a) The fresh food business has a land-based animal origin that has to be regulated by regulation without a ki certificate. Okay. The plague.
b) Switching or altering the amount of fresh food that has a land-based animal origin must be controlled according to the specified regulation. All p certificate of certificate by unaudable product;
c) The raw food business that has a terrestrial animal origin has to be controlled by a non-correct regulation. brew Type, s. Stain. volume in the certification certificate;
d ) Fresh Food Business Stain. They have an animal source on the ground, and they ' re mutated. Oh. The smell, the smell.
Well, the raw food business has a source of terrestrial animals brought to the ground. Hey. m impurity but not yet affecting food safety.
2. Treatment of fresh food business Stain. We have an origin source. Oh. The ground has not yet been examined by the veterinary authority to examine the veterinary hygiene with the following levels:
a) The warning or fines of between $50,000 and $100,000 when the product is worth to less than $500,000;
b) Fines from $100,000 to 200,000 while the product is valuable from 500.000 The copper was under 1,000,000.
c) Fines from 200,000 are to 400,000 copper when the product is valuable from 1.000. And the thousands were under 2,000,000:
d) Fines from $300,000 to 600,000 while the product has value from 2.000. The five thousand were under five million.
) Fines from 1,000,000 dollars to 1,500,000 while the product has a value t Yeah. And five million were under the ten million.
e) Fines from $1,500,000 to 2,500,000 while the product is worth from 10,000,000 to under 20. . The $1 million.
g) And the sum of the money was from 3,000,000 to five million, when the product was from 20,000,000 to under 30 million.
h) Fines were between 6,000,000 and 9,000,000 when the product was worth $30,000,000 to less than $70,000,000;
i) Fines from 10,000,000 to 15,000,000 while the product was worth $70,000,000 to less than 100,000,000;
l) Free money from 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 while the product has gi ... Ah! $100,000,000 or more.
3. Treatment of fresh food business Stain. There are sources of terrestrial animals through veterinary hygiene checks, but not required for the following levels:
a) Fines of between 100,000 and 200,000 while the product is worth less than $500,000;
b) Fines from 200,000 are to 400,000 copper when the product is valuable from 500.000 The copper was under 1,000,000.
c) Fines from 400,000 to 800,000 copper when the product is valid. 1.000. And the thousands were under 2,000,000:
d) Fines from 600,000 are to 1,200,000 when the product is worth from 2,000,000 to less than 5,000,000;
And from 2,000,000 to 3,000,000, when the product was valued from five million to under the 10,000,000;
e) And the sum of the money was from 3,000,000 to five million, when the product was valued from 10,000,000 to the under of 20,000,000;
g) And the sum of the money was from 6,000,000 to 10,000,000, when the product was from 20,000,000 to under 30 million.
h) Fines were between $12,000,000 and 18,000,000 when the product was worth $30,000,000 to less than $70,000,000;
i) Fines from 20,000,000 to 30,000,000 while the product was worth $70,000,000 to less than 100,000,000;
) The money from 30,000,000 to 40,000,000 while the product is worth $100,000,000. in Up.
4 . Fines for the land-based animal business behavior. It's c Don't I die. For The disease or product of that animal has yet to be examined and confirmed to be consumed with the following fines:
a) Fines from 100,000 to 300,000 copper when animals, animal products are worth less than $500,000;
b) Fines of between 200,000 and 500,000 while animals, animal products c ... Boob The value of $500,000 to less than 1,000,000;
c) Fines from 500,000 dollars to less than 1,000,000 when animals, products There. They have a value of 1,000,000 to under 2,000,000.
d) He fined $1,000,000 to 2,000,000 times when animals, animal products valued from 2,000,000 to under five million.
That's $2,000,000. What? n 4,000,000 when animals, animal products are valued from 5,000,000 to less than 8,000,000 animals. Oh. -
e) Fines from $4,000,000 to $8,000,000 when animals, animal products valued from $8,000,000 to less than 15,000,000. Oh. -
g) Fines from $8,000,000 to 15,000,000 while animals, animal products valued at $15 million. . Million to less than 30 million. Oh. -
h) Fines from 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 while the product is priced. Rule. t Yeah. 30.000 . The $50,000 was under $50,000,000.
i) Fines from 20,000,000 to 30,000,000 while the product was worth $50,000,000 to less than $70,000,000;
) The money from 30,000,000 to $40,000,000 when the product is worth $70,000,000 to less than 100,000,000.
l ) Fines from $40.000,000 to $70,000,000 while the product was worth $100,000,000 or more.
5. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for one of the following acts:
a) The new animal product business is vaccinated against v It's c x in Not yet brew times by statute;
b) The animal products business has been used drugs but not enough time to stop drugs. And n What? t in direction of d There. n of Oh. S Bitch. n Xu All t;
c) Animal products business is in the time of tracking quarantine.
6. Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 co-products of fresh animal products. Stain. They're infected or have a limited residual.
7. Fines from 10,000,000 to 15. . The million partners for one of the following acts:
a) The business of animals with the disease of the disease must be published;
b) The animal products business is forced to live in the form of life;
c) The business of animal products suffers from dangerous infectious diseases by regulations that must be destroyed;
d) Animal Products Business What? It is not clear to the cause, the animal has a symbol that is poisoned, poisoned;
The business of animal products has a banned substance in livestock;
e) Manufacturing, food business is not allowed to produce, business to room, ch. Stain. The plague.
g) The business of animal products in fresh form preserved by chemicals is not allowed to use;
h) The product of animal products in the form of raw material is brought in.
8. Consequences of remediation:
a) Forced to halt shipping, food business Fresh life with a terrestrial animal origin must be audable to censure the regulation of the prescribed behavior at Point a, b, c 1 This Article;
b) Force the destruction of a violation of the violation against the specified behavior at Point 1, Clause 6 and paragraph 7 Articles 7 Oh. y;
c) The procedure for the inspection of veterinary hygiene in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of Article 2;
d ) Forced implementation of x Yeah. Regulations to ensure food safety when using or forcing the destruction of raw foods from terrestrial animals has passed through veterinary hygiene checks, but not required for regulatory behavior at Article 3;
) Forced to conduct an examination, perform a prescribed disposal to ensure food safety when used or forced to destroy the infected animals, die of the disease or the product of that animal on the prescribed behavior at Clause 4 This.
What? 17. Microph Yes. Scale. Shit. On the conditions of ensuring food safety in manufacturing, fresh food business is of plant origin and food production.
1. Fines of between 500,000 and 1,500,000 are in the production facility, the preparation, the preparation of fresh food products that are of plant origin in violation of one of the conditions on food safety guarantees.
2. Fines of 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 in production, fresh food businesses are of plant origin in accordance with regulations.
3. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for the following acts:
a) Production of fresh food products derived from plant origin that uses chemicals, c-products and products. All Use, not in the category permitted to use to And the bees grow crops
b) The raw food product of raw food is of plant origin that has a banned substance use in cultivation.
4. Additional punishment form:
The claim to use a certificate of qualified food safety from 3 th. Ah! Up to six months. to This is a violation of the behavior of the three things.
5. Consequences of remediation:
a) It is required by law to follow the provisions of the law on the provisions of Article 1 of this.
b) Forced to apply the regulatory measures by the state agency of the world. Move. The right to ensure the safety of food for the state of Article 2 is not required to be destroyed;
c) Force the destruction of a violation of the destroyed property to the specified behavior at paragraph 2 and paragraph 3. Okay. Hey.
What? 18. Violation of the regulation of food safety guarantee Oh. The food business facility has passed.
1. Fines of between 500,000 and 1,000,000 dollars for the food business facility have passed a non-packaging preparation that violates one of the following acts:
a) There is no guarantee for food that does not fail, mold, exposure to insects, animals, dirt and other medical care. What? A Stain. Other pollutants;
b) Do not guarantee hygiene to the food device, contain food before using the medical device. Stain. I ' ve got food right now.
c) There is no information about the origin and date of production of the food.
2. A fine of 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 coins for a food business facility have been prepared to violate one of the following acts:
a) Do not comply with the safety guarantee conditions for the instrument, packaging materials, food storage, conditions on food safety assurance in food preservation by regulation;
b) There is no guarantee and maintenance of the business.
c) Do not preserve food according to the organization's instructions, the individual produces.
3. Additional form of sanctions: The title uses a certificate of qualified food safety from 1 month to 3 months in the case of resin against the prescribed behavior at Clause 1, Clap 2 Go. Okay. Hey.
4. Consequences of remediation:
a) Forcing the destruction of contaminated food is a violation of the violation of the prescribed behavior. Okay. Go, go, go. Okay. Hey!
b) It is required to follow the law of law on the provisions of Article 1 and Article 2 of this.
What? 19. Violation of the regulation of food safety guarantees to the business-based diet business facility in the United States.
1. The warning or fines of between $500,000 and 1,000,000 are on one of the following acts:
a) The sale of food without a glass cabinet or maintenance device is not hygienal;
b) The sale of food without tables or prices is higher than the ground according to regulation;
c) There is no measure to prevent insects, animals.
2. Fines of 1,000,000 to 3,000,000. with one of the following acts:
a) Food processing does not guarantee safety, sanitation;
b) Do not guarantee the protection of the dining room, where processing, business;
c) Using a diet tool made of unsafe materials, no protection guarantees;
d) No collection tools, no waste disposal, All Protect the sanitation.
No waste of waste, daily waste; sewers in the store area, unreleased kitchen, stagnant;
e) There are no toilets, where they wash their hands;
g) No food or storage samples are stored but not specified.
3. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 in one of the following acts:
a) Use the element. U To make food without a source of the origin of the land;
b) Water use is not standard for processing, food business.
4. Additional punishment form:
a) The title of using a certificate of facility is eligible for food safety from 1 th th. Ah! Three to three months in the case of rebreaking. Stain. As for the behavior of the two-go clause. Okay. Hey!
b) The title of using a certificate is qualified for food safety from 03rd. Ah! Until 06. Ah! In case of a violation of the behavior at paragraph 3. Okay. Hey.
5. Consequences of remediation:
a) Force is required to follow the law of law on the behavior of provisions in Clause 1, 2, and paragraph 3;
b) Force the destruction of the breach against the behavior of the specified behavior at Point 2, point a paragraph 3. Okay. Hey.
What? 20. Violation of the regulation on the conditions of food safety on the basis of a district-based diet business becomes management.
1. A $1,000,000 fine. What? n 3,000,000 partners for one of the following behaviors:
a) The kitchen is not, designed and organized in one dimension.
b) Food is not displayed on sanitary equipment, with no tables or prices higher than the ground according to regulation;
c) There are no knives, sparse for food ripe and raw food;
d) There is no measure to prevent insects, animals.
2. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for one of the following acts:
a) There is no guarantee of environmental hygiene conditions, which are separated from toilets and other sources of pollution;
b) Using a diet tool made of unsafe materials, h ... Sanitation;
c) Use of detergents is not allowed to be used in food and food processing;
d) The ball. What? n food is not safe, sanitary;
The Chamber. What? n, table tables, food processing tables, warehouses or where food preservation does not guarantee safety, sanitary contracts;
g) There are no record records, daily tracking or records that do not fully express the prescribed content;
h) There is no co-responsibility for hygiene and food safety by regulation or contract with the capacity of a yield-processing business facility. What? n assigned n ' s not enough for a real safety toilet. Move. M, according to the rules Stain. i with the restaurant, the collective kitchen, the cooking business facility. All Food is available;
l) There are no collection tools, which contain waste, waste protection.
l) No waste, no waste, every day. Stain. The groove in the store area, the kitchen didn't get away.
) There is no toilet, wash hands;
l ) The monitoring of food safety is not performed;
m) Do not store food or sample samples but are not correct.
3. Fines of between $5,000,000 and 10,000,000 in the following behaviors:
a) Water use does not scale. hide for processing, food business;
b) No female testing. Oh. c periodically,
c) Use ingredients to make food. K Hip source Stain. c, export x Come on ()
d) Restaurant owners, hotels, food processing facilities, cafeteria, food kitcheners, food poisoning, food poisoning, food poisoning, food poisoning, food poisoning.
4. Additional punishment form:
a) Take the right to use the basic certificates. in Enough. Okay. food safety conditions from 01 months to 03 months in the case of recycling. Stain. As for the behavior of the two-go clause. Okay. Hey!
b) Take the right to use the body certificate. Okay. food safety tumor from 03 months to 06 months in the case of recurrenal recycling Stain. i with a prescribed behavior at Point A, b, and c. Okay. Hey.
5. Consequences of remediation:
a) Force is required to follow the law of law on the provisions of paragraph 1, 2, and paragraph 3. Okay. Hey!
b) Force the destruction of the breach of the breach against the specified behavior at Point d, Clause 2 and Point 3 This Article;
c) Incriminate all costs for food poisoning treatment, discovery, treatment of people with food poisoning due to eating, melanoma. Stain. We have to eat. Oh. U Stain. Don't tell me. Bitch. It is safe for infrastructure owners, food kitcheners, food poisoning, and food poisoning in Clause 3, this.
What? 21. Violation of the regulation of food safety guarantee food in the street food business.
1. The warning or fines of between $500,000 and 1,000,000 people on the basis of street food business violated one of the following acts:
a) Selling food without tables, prices, shelves, means of protection of food safety;
b) There are no sunscreens, rain, dirt, stains of insects and animals;
c) The site of the sale is not isolated from the source of the toxic source, the source of pollution;
d) There is no prescribed food preservation device.
2. Fines of $1,000,000 to 3,000,000 are in the food business facility path Violation of one of the following acts:
a) Using raw materials to make street food does not have a clear origin;
b) Use a tumor. Stain. ng, processing, containing, food preservation does not guarantee food safety;
c) Use packaging and online contact materials. What? p with food that pollers and does n' t infect food;
d) Water use does not achieve technical standards for processing, food business.
3. Consequences of remediation:
a) Force is required to follow the law of law on the provisions of Article 1 and paragraph 2;
b) Forcing the destruction of the breach of the breach specified at Section 2 This.
What? 22. Violation of the regulation of safe guarantee conditions for functional foods, genetic transmutation foods, radiation foods, and more.
1. Fines from 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 people to one of the following acts:
a) Manufacturing, the functional food business for the first time in the market does not have an effective test report on the product of the product being recognized by the competent authority or confirmed;
b) Not to comply with the laws of transport laws, food-changing food, genetically modified organisms use as food.
2. Fines from 30,000,000 to $50,000,000 for one of the following acts:
a) Manufacturing, food business from genetically modified organisms, the product of genetically modified organisms does not have a Certificate of genetically modified organisms that are eligible for use as a graph. Move. m or no name in the category of genetically modified organisms issued by the Certificate of Eligible Food for use as a law by law;
b) Manufacturing, the food business that governs by the screening method is not a radiated food group category;
c) Manufacturing, B-based food business Yes. Method of expense What? Radiation but does not comply with the prescribed dose.
3. Consequences of remediation:
a) The correct implementation is required for the specified behavior at Clause 1, paragraph 2 This;
b) Forced recovery, change of purpose of use, recycling or destruction of a violation of the violation against the specified behavior at Point a, Clap 1 and Clause 2 Go Okay. Hey.
What? 23. Violation of the regulation of the certification certificate is eligible for food safety
1. Punishment for s behavior Yeah. Certificate of qualified food safety has expired with the following levels:
a) A warning to the behavior of using a certificate of qualified food safety. What? A deadline for less than 30 days;
b) Fines of between 200,000 and 500,000 are on the basis of the c-management food facility Boob The behavior of using a certificate of adequate food safety has expired from one month to three months.
c) Fines from 500,000 to 1,500,000 co-premises of the management district of the management district have the conduct of using a certificate of qualified safety certificate. Oh. The food is now What? A month or three months.
d) Fines from $4,000,000 to 6,000,000 co-provincial food base return management All Medical certification is limited to a month to 3 months.
2. Punishment for unlicensed behavior. Come on Accept the fully qualified food safety conditions or have a certificate of sufficient food safety conditions, but h has not been accepted. What? t the deadline for three months with the following levels:
a) Fines of between $500,000 and 1,000,000 are on the basis of a food-controlled food facility;
b) Fines from 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 are in the management of the management district;
c) Fines from 10,000,000 to 15,000,000 were issued to the provincial food establishment.
3. Fines from 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 were forged for false conduct, fixing the certificate of sufficient food safety.
4. Additional punishment form:
Confiscate false papers, deleted papers, corrected for behavior in paragraph 3 This.
5. Consequences of remediation:
a) Charge Registration to a to grant a certificate of the basis of sufficient food safety to the specified behavior at Clause 1 Go. Okay. Hey.
b) Forced - signs to issue a certificate of qualified food safety Stain. As for the behavior of the two-go clause. Okay. Hey.
What? 24. Violation of the regulation of food safety guarantee Stain. i v Oh. Imported food, export food.
1. A fine of $10,000,000. What? n 15,000,000 copper on food traffic, food additias, bi-food aid agent What? n food, tooling, packaging materials, containing food importer Move. I'm a member of the Okay. Check the state for food safety but there is no test results for the import shipment to be requested.
2. Fines from 15,000,000 to 25,000,000 are on one of the following acts:
a) Do not perform a state inspection of food safety on food, food additiation, food and food. I have aids in food processing, tools, packaging materials, containing food importer h ... Move. U, go. Move. A d B. It's I'll have to be. Okay. Look at the state. Okay. Food safety in accordance with regulations;
b) Functional food imports, food-enhancing foods, genetically modified foods, radiated foods but there is no free-circulating or giggin ' s certificate. All y certificate What? According to the rules.
3. Consequences of remediation:
a) Forced to stop traffic, recall for food, food additiers, helper support. What? variable food, tools, packaging materials, containing imported foods that have not yet been notified of k What? The test for a shipment of imported goods is required at this 1 Article; food, food additive, compassionate support. What? n food, tools, packaging materials, containing imported food is not controlled by the product. to The state of food safety rules out at Point 2. Okay. Hey!
b) Forced to conduct a state inspection of food safety on the behavior of regulations at Travel. Okay. A Second. Okay. Hey!
c) Force to re-export or destroy or convert the purpose of use to the goods import infringed on the prescribed behavior at Travel. Okay. This is two things.
What? 25. Violate other regulations on food safety guarantee in manufacturing, business, immigration, and business. Move. U, Xu All t h Move. Food tumor.
1. Fines for violations of the regulation of a contract publication contract or the appropriate publication of a real safety regulation. It's moist. Real Move. Food additims, food processing aids, tools, materials, and food. l Package, contain the food that belongs to you. What? Sign of the b Stain. Okay. Of course c The appropriate publication of the food safety regulation with the following levels:
a) Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 in unsaved behavior. What? Either the publication of the contract or the appropriate publication of the food safety or the filing is not fully regulated;
b) Fines from 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 dollars for import behavior Move. u, circulation on the food market that has passed the package packaging preparation, food additive, bi-food aid agent. What? n food, tools, packaging materials Boob i, ch. Come on a food without a Certificate of Public Reception Stain. A contract or a Certificate of Public Confirmation Permit is a food safety or paper, but it's out of force.
2. Fines from $25,000,000 to 30,000,000 dollars for manufacturing conduct, Oh. Food, food, food. I have Let's go What? n food that contains food that does not match the scale. Move. n engineering, regulation of food safety.
3. Fines from 30,000,000 to $50,000,000 for one of the following acts:
a) Manufacturing, food business, food addits, helper support. What? You know, it's just
b) Manufacturing, food business, food addits, helper support. What? variable contains toxic substances or infections. All Poisonous.
4. Pay for seven times the cost of food. differential. It ' s a violation of the behavior. Shit. At The Third. Okay. U. What? The highest fines of the frame. Okay. The penalty in paragraph 3 is less than 07 times the value of the food violation in the world. Yeah. Violation of the number of people. Okay. No more than 100,000,000. Oh. Yeah.
5. Additional punishment form:
Use the power to use the Gi All y Ti What? p accept b Stain. Okay. Of course c Gi All Authentication. Oh. n cell The father is suitable for food safety regulations ranging from 06 months to 12 months in case of resin against the behavior of Clause 2. Okay. Hey.
6. Consequences of remediation:
a) Force is required to follow the rules of law on the behavior of Article 1 of this.
b) Forcing product recovery, goods do not register a contract publication or the right publication of the food safety regulation that is circulating in the market for the prescribed behavior at Travel. Okay. Let's go. Okay. Hey!
c) Forcing product recovery, inappropriate goods are circulating in the market; forcing a change in the purpose of use, recycling or destruction of products, goods or reproducing products, hours and more. Boob a import to the behavior of regulation at paragraph 2;
d) Forcing the destruction of a breach against the behavior of Article 3.
What? 26. Violation of food advertising
1. Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 in one of the following acts:
a) Using the name of state agencies, medical facilities, healers, medical staff in food advertising; and for example.
b) Use d It ' s a document that ' s devoted to the state agency, the medical staff, to advertise the community.
2. Fines from 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 people to one of the following acts:
a) Food advertising does not have a valid publication of a valid publication or a Certificate of Public Safety.
b) Food advertising but no Ad Certificate in accordance with regulations;
c) The food ad is not true to the registered advertising content, which is confirmed by the state authority;
d ) Food advertising for young children over 6 months of age, milk for children aged 24 months without regulation;
Food advertising has a breast-based advertising with artificial breast and fake nipples in all forms.
3. Fines from 20,000,000 to 30. . The million partners for one of the following acts:
a) Food advertising is false, confusing to the consumer. Yeah. The food ad has a change in food. What? collection Stain. c treating the disease in all forms;
b) Dd Food Advertising Yeah. For children under 6 months of age, milk is for children under 24 months of age;
c) The commercial product advertising for young children has a better or better effect than the mother ' s milk;
d) Organizers of the fair, workshop, conference, exhibitions have the release of printed products, recording, recording, storage devices that introduce food additive food products, food processing support, food processing, and food products. Move. M or not correct with the content that has been given the question. Move. Scale Okay. n Move. I intend to follow protocol.
4. Additional punishment form:
Dispower. Yeah. Promotional Content Validation from 03 months to 06 months Stain. i with recurring or violation behavior multiple times specified at points c, d, and Clause 2 Go. Okay. Hey.
5. Consequences of remediation:
a) The main engagement on the mass information media to the advertisement infringes on advertising against the behavior of regulations at Go. Okay. C, paragraph 2, point a, c.
b) Forced to recover, the destruction of the breach was the leaflet, the folding paper, the scattered publication, the unreleased.
c) Force the law to follow the rules of law on paragraph 1 and paragraph 2. Okay. Hey. .
What? 27. Violation of the regulation of information, education, media coverage of food safety
1. Fines of between $500,000 and 1,000,000 on one of the following acts:
a) Do not provide information about food safety at the request of the authority of the state authority;
b) Providing information about food safety is not accurate, not true of food safety.
2. Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 co-conduct on the release of information, education, media, etc. Okay. Food safety is not accurate, not true.
3. The solution It's c in recovery:
a) Forced to provide accurate information about food safety at the request of the state agency with a competent authority. Stain. i with the behavior of this one thing;
b) Forced to recover, destroy the behavior of violations against the behavior of Article 2.
What? 28. Violation of food labeling
1. Fines from 10,000,000 co-workers to 20,000,000 merchants were responsible for food goods in violation of one of the following acts:
a) Functional food circulation; food additions; food has been on radiation; some genetically modified foods (subject to the subject must be labeled as prescribed by the law on the labeling of the genetically modified food); the nutrition products used for children. is not able to show the required phrase;
b) The commodity circulation is food containing genetically modified organisms, the product of the biophysical organism. What? Fuck. socket i gene with a ratio greater than 5% per city And n without showing the relevant information What? n ' s tragic creatures. What? Fuck. socket i genes on the label.
2. Consequences of remediation:
a) Forcing the recovery of the infringement of the label on the label is circulating on the market for the specified behavior at Clause 1 Article;
b) Forced employees responsible for food goods that implement the remedied measure of the goods label. Stain. I have a prescribed behavior on this one.
What? 29. Violation of food testing
1. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 for the testing facility violated one of the following acts:
a) Bringing the wrong information about the experience capacity or the scope is acknowledged, specify the experience of serving the state management of food safety;
b) No testing is done, the report mode is prescribed.
2. Fines of between $5,000,000 and 10,000,000 in a production facility, food business, food additiers, food processing aids, tools, packaging materials, contain food breaches one of the following acts:
a) No periodic food product testing is performed;
b) Switching or forgery of food samples used for testing of state management work;
c) False use or code forgery due to the authorities prescribed by the authorities. All right known to be designated for testing of state management;
d) Forgery, repair of the analysis of the results of analysis, test results, or other papers related to food testing.
3. Additional punishment form:
The confiscation of an object of violation for the behavior of regulation at point b, c and d 2 This.
4. Consequences of remediation:
a) To make the correct implementation of the behavior specified in this One Article;
b) Force the implementation of periodic food product testing by regulation to the behavior of Go. Okay. A Second. Okay. Hey.
What? 30. Violation of regulation on prevention, prevention, recovery of food safety incidents and the implementation of solutions that limit the risk of food safety loss of food.
1. Fines of 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 are uninformed by the uninformed conduct of the agency when the safety of food safety was discovered.
2. Fines from 3,000,000 to 5,000,000 people on the conduct did not fully conduct precautions, preventing incidents of food safety at the request of the competent state agency.
3. Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 for the conduct did not implement restrictive solutions. What? The risk. All t food safety at the request of the competent state agency.
4. Consequences of remediation:
To fully implement the precautions, prevent, rectify the safety of food safety in accordance with the required violation behavior at Clause 2, Clause 3 This.
What? 31. Violation of the regulation of origin retrieval for food does not guarantee safety.
1. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 in unsaved behavior or retention are not full of records of the origin, Xu Xu said. All The land of ingredients, food addits, I have Let's go What? n food and other documents v Okay. production process, food business.
2. Fines from $5,000,000 to 10,000,000 in one of the following acts:
a) No shipment of food products does not guarantee safety;
b) Do not report the number of products of food products that do not guarantee safety, actual inventory and are circulating on the market; k What? Recovery and processing measures.
3. Fines from 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 are required for the conduct of the recall, treatment for food that does not guarantee safety in accordance with the required authority of the state authority.
4. Fines from 20,000,000 to 30,000,000 people on the conduct did not conduct the recall, implementing c handling measures. And n What? I'm Stain. i with food does not guarantee safety And The organ of the organ. Move. Scale Okay. n.
5. Consequences of remediation:
a) Forcing the batch to announce a batch of food products does not guarantee safety; report s Stain. the product of the product batch of food products does not guarantee safety, actual inventory and is circulating on the market; k What? the recovery and disposal measures;
b) Forced to conduct the recall, implement the necessary handling measures for food that does not guarantee safety. Base case Stain. I can't What? n the act of recovery, the execution of the treatment l I mean, What? t for food that does not guarantee safety, the state agency has the authority to organize the recall, implementation of the x-measures. Yeah. I need you What? t for food that does not guarantee safety and the breach facility should be subject to all costs for the recording. Oh. i, take care of it. Stain. i with food does not guarantee safety by regulation.
What? 32. Oh. i conduct obstruction of state management activity on food safety
1. Fines of between $500,000 and 1,000,000 on uncoordinated behavior or obstruction. in Investigative work, collection of data for the assessment of the status quo Bitch. o ensuring the food of the competent authorities.
2. Fines from 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 co-conduct against the act of obstruction of inspection, examination of the agency with a judge Okay. n v Okay. Food safety.
3. Fines from 2,000,000 to 3,000,000 people on a deliberate act of delaying or evasion do not enforce their administrative decisions, the authorities have jurisdiction.
4. Fines from 3,000,000 to $5,000,000 in one of the following acts:
a) Voluntarily unsealed the sealing of the funeral, the violation vehicle is being sealed, suspended or committed to change. socket The scene of the administrative breach;
b) Scattered, changing, swapping the funeral, the vehicle is being checked or temporarily suspended;
c) Insult, humiliate the man on the job, check it out.
5. Fines from $5,000,000 to $7,000,000 for one of the following acts:
a) For example, consumption of mourning, means of inspection, inspection, temporary evacuation;
b) Assaulting the world. i Business.
6. Consequences of remediation:
Forced to recover, resubmit the burial, the vehicle is scattered over the prescribed behavior at Point 4, Point A 5 This.

What? 33. Authority of C ' s administrative violation Oh. The Brew The People's Health Committee.
1. Chairman. Brew The people of the people. All There is a right:
a) The police charge.
b) He was fined $2,000,000;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used for the administrative breach is worth up to 2,000,000;
d) Apply the consequences of remediation at points a, b, d, and a 3-Article 3 clause.
2. The Chairman of the Committee on the District of the District has the right to:
a) The police charge.
b) He fined $30,000,000;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used to violate administrative;
d) Count. q Usage: in sufficient food safety conditions; Paper Receiving A Valid Publication; Paper Confirification Certificate p rules for food safety; Certificate of advertising content;
) Apply regulatory remedied measures at points a, b, d, and a 3-Article 3 clause.
3. The chairman of the Provincial People ' s Committee has the right:
a) The police charge.
b) Pay the money to the point. Stain. Multiscale - at this decree;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used to violate administrative;
d) Title of use: A Certificate in the premises of sufficient food safety; Paper Receiving A Valid Publication; Paper Confirification Paper Stain. suitable for food safety regulation; Ad Certificate of advertising content;
It applies the applicable consequences of Article 3 of this decree.
What? 34. The jurisdiction sanctions the administrative violation of the food safety inspector, who is committed to the task of Inspector of Professional Inspector.
1. Medical inspectors, agriculture and rural development, human injuries were assigned to the task of intensive inspection of the v. Okay. Food safety is in operation. Okay. n:
a) The police charge.
b) It's $500,000.
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the vehicle used to violate the administrative range is worth $500,000;
d) Applying the remediation measures prescribed at the points a, b, d and the Article 3 Article 3 This decree. .
2. Chief Inspector S in Health, Department of Agriculture and Development n Mr. Village, Department of Commerce, Head of State Department of Health Management, Department of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Department of Commerce is assigned to a specialized inspection function; the Chief Inspector General of the Department of Public Affairs, Health, Agriculture and Rural Development, Trade; The Head of the Department of State Management of the State Administration is tasked with implementing specialized inspectors in the industry: Health, Agriculture and Rural Development, Fair Trade in Power:
a) The police charge.
b) He fined $30,000,000;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used to violate administrative;
d) Title of use: Certificate of database brew Food safety conditions; Paper Receiving A Valid Publication; The Confirification Paper Suitable Food Safety Regulations; Advertising Content Confirification Paper;
) Apply regulatory remedied measures at points a, b, d, and a 3-Article 3 clause.
3. Chief Inspector General of the Ministry of Public Affairs of the Ministry: Y t What? , Agriculture and Rural Development, Labor has the right:
a) The police charge.
b) Penalty for $70,000,000;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used to violate administrative;
d) Title of use: A certificate of the basis of sufficient food safety; Paper Receiving A Valid Publication; The Confirification Paper Suitable For Food Safety Regulation; Paper Validation advertising;
) Apply regulatory remedied measures at points a, b, d, and a 3-Article 3 clause.
4. Chief. I He investigis the Ministry of Health, Chief Inspector of Agriculture and Rural Development, Chief Inspector of the Department of Commerce, Head of the Ministry of Health Management of the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Ministry of Trade is delivered to the function of the Ministry of Health. professional inspector with the right:
a) The police charge.
b) A penalty for a maximum of regulation at this decree;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used to violate administrative;
d) Title of use: A Certificate in the premises of sufficient food safety; Paper Receiving A Valid Publication; Paper Confirification Paper Stain. suitable for food safety regulation; Ad Certificate of advertising content;
) Applying the applicable remediation measures at the points a, b, or other. d And this is the three-thing Decree.
What? 35. Move. The right to sentence. i Administrative. l Market idea.
1. The market control is currently in charge of the right:
a) The police charge.
b) A fine of 200. . $5,000.
2. Captain of the Market Management Team Boob power:
a) The police charge.
b) He fined $5,000,000;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the means used to violate the administrative value. What? n 25,000 . 000 Oh. -
d) Forced destruction of the material for human health, livestock and crops;
) Apply the remedied remediation measures at the International Program. II This decree.
3. The Mayor of the Market Management Bureau has the right to:
a) The police charge.
b) He fined $20,000,000;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used to violate administrative;
d) Dispower. Yeah. : Certificate of sufficient facility safety conditions; Gi All Medical Reception Procedure; Paper Confirmed Stain. suitable for food safety regulation; Ad Certificate of advertising content;
) Forced to destroy the harmful material for human health, pets and tr ... Oh. -
e) Apply the remedied remedied measures at this Decree.
4. The Mayor of the Market Administration has the right to:
a) The police charge.
b) A penalty for a maximum of regulation at this decree;
c) Confiscation of the funeral, the medium used to violate administrative;
d) Title of use: A Certificate in the premises of sufficient food safety; Paper Receiving A Valid Publication; The Confirification Paper Suitable For Food Safety Regulation; Paper Validation;
The applicable remediation measures at points a, b and d 3 Article 3 This decree.
What? 36. Authority to punish the administrative violation of other agencies.
Forces: People ' s Public Security, Border Guard, Marine Police, Customs; Tax authorities and those with the rest of the world. Move. Scale Okay. n the administrative violation of the mechanisms a Otherwise, according to the provisions of the Ordination of Administrative infringes within the functional range, the task assigned to the detection of administrative safety violations of food safety is attributed to the law. Okay. n sanctions on the provisions of the Ordination of Administrative Violations and Regulations at this Decree.

EXECUTION CLAUSE The repeal of the terms 15, 17 and 18 at Section 2 Chapter II Decree number 45 /2005/NĐ-CP April 6, 2005, of the Government of the Regulation of the Administrative violation of the Health Sector and Clause 6 Articles 1, Article 21, Article 22 at Section 4 Chapter II Decree No. 31 /2010/NĐ-CP March 29, 2010 by the Government of the Government to rule the administrative breach in the fisheries sector since the date of this Decree is in effect.
Article 37. Oh. Yung I Well, c
1. This decree has been in effect since December 25, 2012. The titles are prescribed at the Administrative Breach Disposal Law: The person assigned to the task of a specialized inspection task; the head of the specialized state governing body of the Department of Medicine. What? , Department of Agriculture and Prophecy Okay. n rural, Department of Trade is entrusted with a specialized inspection function; the head of the specialized state governing body of the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Ministry of Commerce is tasked with performing specialized inspection; Chief Inspector General, Chief of the City. to a senior, the Chief Inspector of the Department of State Management is tasked with the function of specialized inspection. Deal. It was decided by the decree on 1 July 2013.
1. The Minister of Health has the responsibility of guiding, organizing and examining the implementation of this decree.
2. Ministers, peer-to-peer agencies, Head of Government Office, Chairman of the Government Brew The people of the people. All p and the organs, t socket function, the relevant individual is responsible for the implementation of this decree. ./.

TM. THE GOVERNMENT.

Prime Minister

(signed)

Dao Dung