SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Number: 37 /2014/TT-BKHCN
THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM.
Hanoi, December 12, 2014
IT ' S SMART
The management of the basic research topic
The National Science and technology Development Fund is funded.
Base of Protocol 20 /2013/ND-CP 26 February 2013 of the Government stipulated the functions, duties, powers, and organizational structure of the Ministry of Science and Technology;
Base of Protocol 08 /2014/ND-CP January 27, 2014 of the Government rules the details and guidelines that implement some of the provisions of the Law of Science and technology;
Base of Protocol 23 /2014/ND-CP April 03, 2014 of the Government on the Organizational And Operational Charter of the National Science and technology Development Fund;
At the suggestion of Director of the Foundation for Scientific Development and National technology and the Chief of the Legal Affairs;
The Minister of Science and Technology issued the Information Management Regulation of the basic research topic funded by the National Science and Science Development Foundation in the United States. Help.
Number one. Apply Scope and Apply Objects
1. The adjustment range
It provides for the management of basic research (later called the subject) funded by the National Science and Science Foundation (later known as the Foundation) in the field of natural sciences and engineering, social sciences and humorology.
2. Subject applies
a) Vietnam 's scientific and technological organization; the foreign organization operating in Vietnam has scientific research functions; foreign institutions participate in research cooperation with Vietnam' s scientific and technological organization (later known as the scientific organization and the scientific organization of the country). technology).
b) The individual scientist is a Vietnamese citizen; foreign scientists are involved in research cooperation with the scientific and technological organization, the Vietnamese scientist.
c) State agencies, organizations, other individuals are involved.
Article 2. Explain the word
1 The field of natural science and engineering. including natural sciences; technical science and technology; medical science, medicine, and agricultural sciences.
2. The field of social sciences and humorology including social science and humorology.
3 The international magazine has credibility.
a) For the field of natural sciences and engineering, the prestigious international journal is the choice of selected scientific journals from the category SCI (Science Citation Index) and SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) of the International Institute of Scientific Information (USA), which is held by the Society. co-management of the Decision Fund on the basis of consulting of industry scientific assemblies.
b) For the field of social science and humorology, the prestigious international journal is the journals of the following categories:
-The AHCI (Arts and Humanities Citation Index) or SSCI (Social Science Citation Index) of the International Institute of Scientific Information (USA);
-The scientific journal in the field of social science and the hummus of Elsevier ' s Scopus database;
-The international scientific journal in the field of social science and humorology is decided by the Board of Management on the basis of the petition of the scientific, interdisciplinary scientific assemblies.
4. ISI magazine has credibility.
a) For the field of natural sciences and engineering, the prestigious ISI journal is the leading quality scientific journals of the sector, selected from the prestigious international journal, which is decided by the Board of Management Board on the basis of consultation of the countries of the United States. Department of Science.
b) For the field of social science and humanist, the prestigious ISI journal is the journals of the AHCI (Arts and Humanities Citation Index) or SSCI (Social Science Citation Index) of the International Institute of Scientific Information (USA).
5. The national magazine has credibility. is the scientific journal that is decided by the Foundation Management Council on the basis of the petition of the scientific, interdisciplinary scientific assemblies.
6. Strong Research Group It ' s a collective, long-term, long-term research scientist, a research plan, a research plan for each particular stage; the research content is groundbreaking and it takes many members to participate. Key members of the group have prominent research results (prescribed at the Article 4 Article 10).
Third. Sponsor Target
1. Create a favorable research environment aimed at promoting basic scientific research in the scientific and technological institutions in Vietnam.
2. Advanced research capacity, forming strong research volumes; contribute to the training of scientific human resources and high-level technology.
3. Advanced the quality of scientific research, towards international standards.
4. Promotes cooperation and international integration in scientific research.
Article 4. The subject is funded by the Foundation.
The fund considers funding the basic research topics provided by the scientific and technological organization, the scientist personally proposed, in accordance with the basic research directions published by the Foundation, including:
1. The subject of exploration, discovery;
2. Proposed to develop research guidelines that have achieved early-stage results, intensive studies have been conducted in Vietnam.
Article 5. International cooperation in research
The Foundation grants international cooperation and integration activities in basic research in the following forms:
1. Short-term research cooperation abroad serves the study content of the subject (no more than 6 months);
2. Marketing foreign experts to Vietnam working, collaborative research related to the subject matter.
THE PRINCIPLE OF EVALUATION, EXPERT ASSESSMENT,
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL
The fund performs a review of the selection, evaluating the results of the topic in accordance with the following principles:
1. Evaluation by industry experts, interdisciplinary through the Council of Science and the technology (later known as the Scientific Council) by the foundation Foundation and the independent advisory expert (when necessary);
2. Comment based on the profile;
3. Make sure objectiation, democracy, equality;
4. Appropriation of international norms.
1. The assessment expert is that the scientists are consulted by the Foundation in the evaluation review activities, evaluating the results of the implementation of the topic funded by the Fund. The assessment expert must fully meet the following criteria:
a) Under the Foundation expert database;
b) There is a relevant professional research results published in the prestigious international scientific journal (for the field of natural sciences and engineering), in the prestigious international journal or monograph (for the field of social sciences and humorology) in the journal Science and Science. The last five years. The special case was decided by the Chair of the Foundation.
c) There is a condition of engaging in consulting work with high responsibility, honesty, objective.
2. In the case of necessity, the Fund for Foreign Scientist, the Vietnamese scientist who settled abroad is not part of the Foundation ' s expert database as an independent review expert or join the Scientific Council established by the Foundation to assess the proposal. Talent, consulting for the activities of the Fund.
The assessment expert is foreign, Vietnamese residing abroad participating in the activities of the Fund must meet the expert selection criteria set forth at points b, c 1 This and enjoy the prescribed regimes.
3. Expert evaluants in accordance with the research content of the subject are evaluated; are responsible for the advice of their advice, assessment; keep the information confidential concerning the subject matter.
4. The assessment expert does not participate in the topic assessment due to its registration as a host or participant, the subject of the organization where he is registered to the host, the subject of the right and the relevant interest or the other reason affecting the objecposition of its objecposition. The result of the evaluation.
5. The Building Fund Operations Authority and the Foundation Board of Directors approve the Foundation ' s specialist database of experts according to the criteria set at point b, c An Article 1 Article to serve the assessment of the subject.
1. The scientific council is established by the discipline or interdisciplinary of the Scientific Committee that decides on the basis of the Foundation Director to advise the Fund on the following issues:
a) The basic research direction funded by the Foundation;
b) Review the selection, evaluate the results of the implementation of basic research topics provided by the Fund;
c) Other issues related to the operation of the Fund.
2. The scientific council member is selected according to the following criteria:
a) The same criteria as for the specified assessment expert at Clause 1 and Clause 2 Article 7 This Information;
b) introduced by scientists;
c) There is a commitment to participate and implement the provisions of the Fund.
3. Scientific Council for a 2-year term. Membership in the Scientific Council does not continue to be more than 3 continuous terms.
4. The case is needed, the Fund Management Board established another Scientific Council to evaluate the selection, assess the outcome of the subject matter.
5. The Foundation Management Board defines the activities of the Scientific Council.
REGISTER TO EXECUTE TOPIC
1. Every year, the Foundation announces basic research directions due to the Fund for Funding, the condition guidelines, relevant procedures and the filing deadline on the Fund ' s Electronic Information Portal.
2. The fund ' s announcement base, the organizations, the scientist personally proposed the subject, set up the registration case that carried out the topic and sent it to the Fund by Regulation.
3. The registration profile performs the topic in Vietnamese and English according to the template prescribed at the Appendix issued by this message, including:
a) The application of the underlying research topic (Form NCCB01, NCCB01E);
b) The theory of fundamental research (Form NCCB02, NCCB02E);
c) The scientific background of the subject of the subject and each member of the research team (Form NCCB03, NCCB03E) along with the evidence for research achievement;
d) The proof document for the training of the birth study;
e) Other related material at the request of the Foundation.
4. A valid profile is a case that is set up by the forms attached to this message; there is the confirmation of the work agency, the presiding organization or the patron and is filed in the deadline by the Fund ' s announcement.
1. For the holder of the topic:
a) The scientific and technological institutions that register scientific and technological activity, have the functional function in accordance with the specialized field of the subject matter;
b) The full responsibility of the presiding organization for the subject matter has been specified by the Fund for Regulation 1 and is not under the specified case at paragraph 2 Article 20 of this Information.
2. For the topic of subject matter:
a) There is expertise in accordance with the topic of research, which is doing research work at a scientific and technological organization. Where the subject matter is not a scientific and technological institution, it must be respected by a Vietnamese scientific and technological organization in the field of expertise in accordance with the protection and acceptance of the host;
b) There is the ability to study the requirements of the subject: there is a PhD student or associate professor, professor, and has the results of the appropriate specialized research published in the prestigious international journal in the 05-year period as of the time of filing;
c) There is enough time to complete the research content of the specified topic. The case for the topic of work, working abroad, the total time abroad is no more than a third of the subject matter.
d) Do not violate the conditions of the host registration, subject to the subject matter in accordance with Article 5 Article 19 of this Information.
3. The research team member must have the qualifications of expertise and skills that are consistent with the research content of the subject, including:
a) A key research member, scientific secretary: PhD student or associate professor, professor and has a consistent research results published in prestigious national or international journals over the five years to the time of the end of the record.
In the case of a master's degree of consistent research, 01 papers published in the international journal are prestigious for the field of natural science and engineering; 01 articles published in the prestigious international journal or 02 articles published in the national journal. has credibility or 01 monograph on the field of social science and humorology in the 05 years as of the time of the end of the filing;
b) A participant in the topic of the subject matter must have a thesis content consistent with the subject matter, with a decision to hand over the topic of no more than 24 months to the time of the end of the case.
c) Engineering, other support staff.
4. For the strong research team, in addition to the regulatory requirements at Clause 1, 2 and 3 This, must meet the following requirements:
a) The topic of the topic of publication in the ISI journals is well-reputable in the 05-year period as of the time of filing, it is possible to gather many highly specialized scientists to participate in the topic of the subject matter. Scientific research regularly with international research groups of the same industry, interdisciplinary;
b) There are at least 02 key research members of the subject meeting the requirements of the topic topic at paragraph 2;
c) The organization presiding over the subject has sufficient conditions on the basis of matter-engineering, research capacity and support for support during the implementation of the study.
5. Each individual is simultaneously involved in no more than 2 topics in which the dean is not more than 1 topic of basic research funded by the Foundation.
1. Time to execute the topic
a) For the topic of theoretical research, the implementation time is no more than 24 months.
b) For experimental research topics, the implementation time is no more than 36 months.
c) For the topic of the strong research team, the proposed base of the subject of the subject matter and the recommendations of the Council of Science, the Board of Management of the Fund for consideration, determines the right time to make the subject matter.
2. The results of the study of the subject matter in the field of natural sciences and engineering must have at least 02 articles published in the prestigious international journal and 01 articles published in the prestigious national journal.
3. The study results of the topic in the social and humorological field must meet one of the following requirements:
a) There are at least 01 articles published in the prestigious international journal and 02 articles published in the prestigious national journal;
b) There are at least 02 articles published in the prestigious international journal.
The case of research issues cannot be published in the prestigious international journals, resulting in at least 01 monograph books (published or in the form of manuscripts eligible for publication) and 02 articles published in the national journal. I have credibility. The Scientific Council proposed these cases for the Foundation to review, the decision.
4. Subject to exploration, discovery, results of the study must have at least 01 articles published in the prestigious international journal.
5. Proposed by the strong team, the results of the study must have at least 02 articles published in the prestigious ISI journal and 01 articles published in the prestigious national journal.
6. The topic of the topic is the main author (for the field of natural sciences and engineering), the author (for the field of social sciences and humorology and does not belong to the issue of research that cannot be published in the prestigious international journals at paragraph 3). This) of at least 01 paper published in the international journal is reputable as a result of the subject.
7. The construction of regulation at this must be noted as a result of the study of the topic funded by the National Science and Technology Development Fund.
JUDGE SELECTION REVIEW
1. The Fund makes the evaluation of the subject matter through the Scientific Council stipulated at Article 8 of this Information.
2. The criteria for evaluating the selection of the subject:
a) The necessity of the research issue and the right to the basic research direction is funded by the Foundation;
b) The new calculation, the creativity of the proposed research problem;
c) The goal, clear content; the right method and research plan to achieve the goal;
d) Capacity, research experience of the topic of subject matter and team; the physical basis conditions-the engineering of the host organization serving research;
Results expected; successful capabilities of the subject; scientific significance and application of research results;
e) Contributo to graduate training;
g) The cost of rational research.
3. The method of working by the Scientific Council at the selection review sessions is subject to the Regulatory Regulatory Council.
1. The Foundation Executive Fund reports aggregation results review of the topic of the topic, commented on the suitcase of the assessment process and the Board of Directors for the review of the Fund for consideration, decision.
2. The Fund ' s reporting base on the results of the evaluation review results and the financial capabilities of the Fund, the Fund for the Fund to review, decided to approve the proposed funding of the Fund.
In case of necessity, the Foundation Board of Management takes an additional opinion of the independent assessment expert before the decision.
3. The Fund announces the portfolio of topics funded on the Electronic Information Portal of the Foundation.
1. Document Profile
The Executive Authority organizes the appraisal of the theme and the funding of the subject's funding under the Fund Management Board.
2. Financial Review
a) The Appraisal Outcome, the Executive Authority of the Fund Management Board approx the funding of the subject matter.
b) The Foundation Executive sends funding Notice, instructs the necessary procedures to the organization, the individual receiving the funding to complete the presentation of the subject matter in terms of content and funding approved.
THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SUBJECT MATTER
1. The Foundation Executive conducts the agreement, signing a scientific research contract (later known as a contract) with the topic of subject matter and the organization of funds under a budget portfolio approved by the Board of Management. The contract is set up by the prescribed form at the Appendix issued under this message (Form NCCB05). In the case of necessity, the Foundation runs the actual examination for the organization, the individual presiding over the topic before the signing of the contract.
2. In the 03-month period from the time the Fund operates the Fund for Funding, if the topic of the subject matter and the presiding organization does not complete the nomination and contract theory, the Fund Executive recommends the Board of Management review, the decision to cancel. You know, quit your funding for the subject.
3. The contract is a legal base in the course of the execution, examination, evaluation of the subject matter and addressing the violations associated with the subject matter. Persuathy after being approved and modified texts in the course of execution (if any) are the non-detached part of the contract.
4. During the implementation of the contract, if the expected change in the contract content, the presiding organization and the topic of the subject are responsible for reporting by writing to the Fund to review, the decision.
1. The progress base, the study content in the contract, the topic of the topic, and the host organization establishing the Financial Implementation Situation Report, the situation using the funding of the specified template at the Appendix issued by this message (Form NCCB06, Model NCCB07), send the Fund Executive by statute.
2. The Foundation organizes periodically on progress, implementation results and the situation using the funding of the subject through the Report periodically implementing the subject; in the case of a slow motion of progress or other necessary cases, the Foundation organizes the examination. In fact, the situation actually makes the subject matter.
The test results are documented with the confirmation of the relevant parties.
3. Results assessment and actual testing are notified to the topic of the subject matter and as the base to decide on the continued implementation of the contract.
For the subject of violating the terms committed in the contract, the Fund considers the level of violations to handle on the current regulation.
1. The combined results report results in the topic including the following:
a) The results of the results of the results of the implementation of the document in accordance with the specified pattern at the Appendix issued by this (Form NCCB08);
b) The situation is using the proposed budget (Form NCCB07);
c) Annex on the results of publication and other results of the topic.
2. The topic of the topic and organization of the presiding officer is responsible for the construction and sending of the results of the results of the results of the resulting implementation of the Fund in the 30-day deadline after the end of the contract execution time (including the extension period if available).
In the event that the subject matter was completed soon, the topic of the contract, the subject of the subject, and the presiding organization had the right to recommend the Foundation to the Procurement Organization prior to the deadline.
3. The subject case is unlikely to be completed on time of contract, the slowest of 60 days before the end of the contract implementation deadline, the presiding organization and the topic of subject report, the rationing and petition of the extension. The Foundation for the Fund to Investigate The Fund is subject to the implementation of the proposed situation at the time of the proposed extension.
In the 30-day period, the Authority operates the Fund to review and have an answer to the acceptance or not accept the extension of the subject. A maximum duration of 12 months.
4. Time for the publication: For the topics that have completed the study content and submit the report results report by the statute of limitations but the international paper is the result of the publication of the subject not being posted or accepted for official registration, in the statement. time 12 months after the end of the contract execution time (including a time of extension if available), the topic of the topic of updating the results published articles in the internationally recognized international journal for the Foundation to conduct a document-based collection.
1. The Foundation Foundation assessed the results of the subject matter through the Scientific Council specified in Article 8 of this Information.
2. The profile results assessment includes:
a) Report aggregation results
b) The articles posted in the journal of science, the period of conference, scientific seminar, monograph books have been published and other scientific products (if any);
c) Theory of the subject;
) The text adjuvers during the contract execution process (if available).
3. The criteria for evaluating the result of the topic:
a) The degree of achieving research goals, results of research;
b) The results published: published articles in international and national journals with credibility; articles published in international scientific journals, other countries, scientific reports presented at the conference, scientific seminar; monograph; by patent monopoles (if available). Yes);
The published results are recognized as a result of the subject must be published in the time of the contract implementation and the extension time, pending publication (if any).
The paper published in the prestigious ISI magazine was considered a replacement for the 02 published articles in the prestigious international magazine;
c) Other results of the subject matter: graduate training, research cooperation; and
d) The organization made and the use of the funding subject to the contract.
4. The method of working by the Scientific Council at the session review the topic of the topic specified by the Foundation Management Board.
The Executive Fund for the Total Fund results review the topic of the topic, the Board of Directors of the Fund for the review, the decision to recognize. In case of necessity, the Foundation Board of Management takes an additional opinion of the independent assessment expert before the decision.
1. On the basis of the evaluation of the topic of the Board of Science, the presiding organization and the topic of subject responsibility for registering the results of the results performed with the National Bureau of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Science and Technology according to the regulation.
2. The Fund decided to recognize the results of the topic on the basis of the evaluation of the subject matter of the Scientific Council, the certificate of registration of the results of scientific and technological tasks and the announcement to the presiding organization and the topic of the subject matter.
3. The decision to recognize the result made the subject matter as the base for the conduct of the bar procedure, financial decision and contract liquoration.
4. Host organization, topic of subject matter and research team members of the basic research topic funded by the Foundation for Research on the Equivalent Research Achievement to the implementation of scientific mission and national technology.
5. The subject which is evaluated at an unreached level or suspended contract is processed under the regulation of investment and financial mechanisms for scientific and technological activity.
In the event of a non-achievable event, the subject of the subject was not registered to host the new topic in the 02-year period since the announcement of the results.
The case with the wrong leads to the suspension of the execution or rescue of criminal responsibility or violation of the scientific ethics, the subject of the subject and the concerned persons not to participate in the topic funded by the Foundation for the five-year period from the date of the decision. The breach.
1. The responsibility of the organization presiding over the subject:
a) Support and facilitation of the subject of a refund of the funding offer filing; the same topic of contracting the contract to execute the subject matter with the Fund for the Fund;
b) Create a favorable condition of procedure; provide full basis of physical, technical and human resources under contract so that the research team to implement effectively implement the subject;
c) Continuing, supporting the topic of subject matter in the management of use and bar, the funding decision is regulated by the Foundation by the correct Regulation; validation of the progress of execution and the situation using the topic of the subject matter, ensuring the testimony from before the Fund and the authorities. of the state;
d) Provide full information for the Foundation and other agencies involved in the monitoring, inspection and inspection of the subject matter; and the report.
Along with the subject of responsibility for the outcome of the subject matter;
e) Use the cost of management from the funding of the subject for general management, financial and administrative activities related to the subject matter;
g) The organization of management, exploiting the outcome of the subject and the benefit of the rights from these activities by regulation;
h) Perform the publication, register for the protection of intellectual property rights to the outcome of the subject matter;
i) Perform the registration of the results of the resulting study of the subject matter at the National Bureau of Science and technology according to the regulation;
l) The report, responding to the Foundation's survey of development, the application results application of the subject's research, development of the research team involved in the topic and other relevant information, serves effective evaluation and the planning of the Fund's funding program.
2. The scientific organization and technology organization stipulated at Clause 1 This is not registered as the hosting of the sponsored topics funded by the Fund for a period of 1 year, calculated from the time of the conclusion of the competent authority.
1. The organization to implement the subject matter under contract has been signed.
2. Using the right cost of funding, in the right mode, is effective according to the content of the contract; bar execution, the funding decision of the subject in accordance with the existing regulations.
3. Check out the organizations, individuals involved in coordination in the implementation of the contract. The implementation of the report on the study situation, which performs the topic, uses the funding, results in accordance with the Foundation's provisions.
4. Coordinated with the topic of hosting the topic of hosting the results of the results of the results of the topic study at the National Bureau of Science and technology according to the regulation.
5. The theme of the subject and the members of the study are responsible for the publication of the results of the subject's study in the law of science and technology, publishing, intellectual property, and other provisions of Vietnamese law.
1. This information has been in effect since February 1, 2015, replacing the Regulation on the implementation of the basic research topic in the natural sciences led by the National Science and Science Development Foundation issued by the Digital Decision No. 1. 03 /QĐ-QĐQQ December 24, 2008 of the Foundation Management Council and Regulations on the Organizational Implementation of the Basic Research Award in the social sciences and the humorist issued by the National Science and technology Development Foundation issued with Decision No. 1. 03 /QD-QĐICQ on April 8, 2010 of the Fund Management Council.
2. For the topics funded by the Foundation to approve the pre-date funding of this Notice continue to follow the Regulations on the Organizational Implementation of the basic research topic in the natural sciences led by the National Science and Science Development Foundation. Funding issued with Decision No. 03 /QĐ-HĐICQ on December 24, 2008, of the Foundation Management Council and Regulations on the Organization of the Organization for the Implementation Of Fundamental Research in Social Sciences and the humorist funded by the National Science and Science Development Foundation. It was issued with Decision No. 03 /QĐ-QQQQ on April 8, 2010 of the Fund Management Council.
3. The amendment, addition of this Notice by the National Science and Technology Development Foundation of the Ministry of Science and Decision Technology ./.