Circular 16/2015/tt-Bgddt To: Enact Regulation Reviews The Results Work Out Of People Who Learned Academic Training System

Original Language Title: Thông tư 16/2015/TT-BGDĐT: Ban hành Quy chế đánh giá kết quả rèn luyện của người học được đào tạo trình độ đại học hệ chính quy

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Number: 16 /2015/TT-BGDT
THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM.
Independence-Freedom-Happiness
Hanoi, August 12, 2015

IT ' S SMART

Issued Q I'm a real man.

have a degree in the main level of the main system y

_____________________

The Higher Education Law Base June 18, 2012;

Base of Protocol 32 /2008/NĐ-CP March 19, 2008 by the Government Regulation, mandate, authority, and organizational structure of the Ministry of Education and Training;

Base of Protocol 75 /2006/NĐ-CP August 2, 2006 the Government regulates the details and guidelines of some of the provisions of the Education Law; the digital decree. 31 /2011/NĐ-CP May 11, 2011 of the Government amended, complements some of the provisions of the Digital Protocol. 75 /2006/NĐ-CP August 2, 2006 the Government regulates the details and guidelines of some of the provisions of the Education Law; the Digital Protocol. 07 /2013/NĐ-CP January 9, 2013 of the Government amended the B point clause 13 Article 1 of the Digital Protocol 31 /2011/NĐ-CP May 11, 2011 modify, add some of the provisions of the Digital Protocol. 75 /2006/NĐ-CP August 2, 2006 the Government regulates the details and guidelines for some of the provisions of the Education Law;

Base of Protocol 141/2013/NĐ-CP October 24/24/2013 of the Government rules the details and guidelines for the implementation of some of the laws of higher education law;

At the suggestion of the Chief of Student Affairs, students;

The Minister of Education and Training issued the Board of Information enacted the practice of evaluating the practice of learnness training of the regular coefficient university system.

Number one. The executive with this message Rules the results of the practice of training of learnmen who are trained in the regular level of the regular system.

Second. This information has been in effect since September 28, 2015 and replaces the regulations that evaluate the practice of training of learnmen who are trained at the regular level of the regular system at Decision No. 1. 60 /2007/QD-BGDT October 16, 2007, of the Minister of Education and Training, the practice of evaluation of the training results of students, students of higher education institutions and secondary school professionals.

Third. Chief of the Office, the Chief of Student Affairs, students, the chiefs of the relevant units of the Ministry of Education and Training, the Director of the University, the Academy, the Rector of the universities are responsible for this private practice.

KT. MINISTER.
CAPTAIN.


(signed)


Nguyen Thi

STATUTE

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT TRAINING RESULTS TRAINED IN THE MAIN LEVEL OF PRIMARY SCHOOL
(The Board is attached to the Digital Information 16 /2015/TT-BGDT August 12, 2015 by the Minister of Education and Training)

Chapter I

GENERAL REGULATION

What? 1. The tuning range and subject apply

1. This statute rules the evaluation of the exercise results of learntrained learnmen (later known as learnmen), including: Assessment of the results of training and framing; classification and evaluation process; organization of evaluation and usage. It ' s a result; the organization does.

2. This statute applies to learnmen who are trained in the undergraduate degree in universities, academia, universities (later known as educational institutions).

What? 2. The principle of evaluating the results of learning results

1. Make the process seriously and the assessment criteria are regulated at this statute; ensure objectiation, public, fair, accurate.

2. Make sure that the element of equality, democracy, respect the right to master is judged.

3. Coordination of synchrony, tight parts, relevant units in the school engaged in evaluating the results of the training of learnmen.

What? 3. The assessment and the scale

1. Consider, evaluate the academic results of the learnness of consciousness, the attitude of learnmen according to the level of points achieved on the sides:

a) the consciousness of learning;

b) The sense of internal conduct, statute, regulation in the school;

c) The sense of participation in political, social, cultural, cultural, sporting, anti-crime, and social and social activities;

d) Public consciousness in community relations;

Consciousness and participation in class cadres, unions, other organizations in the institution of higher education or learnmen achieve special achievement in learning, training.

2. The training point is rated by a scale of 100.

Chapter II

RATING CRITERIA AND POINT FRAMES

What? 4. Evaluation of Learning Participation

1. The criteria for determining the rating point:

a) consciousness and attitude in learning;

b) The attitude and attitude to participate in academic clubs, academic activities, extracts activities, scientific research activities; and more.

c) The mind and attitude to the exams, the competition;

d) The spirit exceeded, striving to rise in learning;

The results of the study.

2. The rating bracket from 0 to 20 points.

What? 5. Assessment of the sense of internal acceptance, statute, regulation in the basis of higher education.

1. The criteria for determining the rating point:

a) The intention to accept the direction texts of the industry, of the upper-level directing body made in the basis of higher education;

b) The sense of acceptance of the intranet, statute and other regulations is applied in the basis of higher education.

2. The rating bracket from 0 to 25 points.

What? 6. Evaluation of consciousness engaging in political, social, cultural, cultural, sporting, anti-crime prevention and social and social and social and social and political activities.

1. The criteria for determining the rating point:

a) Consciousness and effectiveness engage in political, social, cultural, cultural, cultural, cultural, and cultural activities.

b) The sense of participation in the activities of interest, volunteering, social work;

c) Participate in the propaganda, anti-crime prevention and social crimes.

2. The rating bracket from 0 to 20 points.

What? 7. Evaluation of civic consciousness in community relations.

1. The criteria for determining the rating point:

a) The idea of acceptance and participation in the propaganda of the leaders of the Party, the policy, the law of the State in the community;

b) The sense of participation in social activities has a documented achievement, a positive expression, and a commendation;

c) There is a spirit of sharing, helping the loved one, who has the difficulty, the affliction.

2. The rating bracket from 0 to 25 points.

What? 8. Evaluation of consciousness and results when engaging in class cadre work, unions, organizations in the basis of higher education or learnmen achieve special achievement in learning, training, and training.

1. The criteria for determining the rating point:

a) consciousness, spirit, attitude, prestige, and work effectiveness of learnmen are assigned to the task of class management, Party organizations, Youth League, Student Union and other organizations in the basis of higher education;

b) organizational skills, class management, management of party organizations, Youth Corps, Student Society and other organizations in the basis of higher education;

c) Support and actively participate in the joint activities of the class, collective, faculty and educational institutions of higher education;

d) The learers achieved special achievements in learning, training.

2. The rating bracket from 0 to 10 points.

Chapter III

CLASSIFICATION OF EVALUATION AND EVALUATION RESULTS

What? 9. Classification results

1. The training results are divided into categories: excellent, good, medium, weak and poor.

2. Classification results of training results:

a) From 90 to 100 points: outstanding type;

b) From 80 to below 90 points: good type;

c) From 65 to below 80 points: kind of type;

d) From 50 to under 65 points: medium type;

From 35 to below 50 points: the weak type;

e) Under 35 points: poor type.

What? 10. Classification for evaluation

1. During the time the learer was disciplined in charge, when evaluating the results of training was not well-crossed.

2. During the time the learer was disciplined the warning level, when assessing the results of training was not beyond the average type.

3. The person who learned to suspend school suspension was not evaluated for training during the suspension.

4. The learnmen who are disciplined are not allowed to evaluate the results of their training.

5. The learer completed the curriculum and graduated slowly compared to the regulation of the course, which continues to be evaluated results in training during the completion of the addition of curriculum and graduation, depending on the cause to scale the assessment level. The price of training at the next time.

6. Disability, handicapped, orphaned both parents or father or mother, family circumstances are particularly difficult to have confirmation of the locality by regulation for training activities that are not likely to participate or meet the common requirement that is preferable. An incentive, an incentive, an incentive, a partner to evaluate the outcome of training through the effort and progress of learnmen depending on the subject matter and circumstances.

7. The temporary school student who is preserved in training results will be evaluated results in training when continuing to return to the prescribed study.

8. The learmaster of the two training programs will be evaluated results of training at the first program management unit and take comments from the second program management unit as a base, base for further evaluation. When the first program is completed, the second program manager will continue to be evaluated for the training of learnmen.

9. The school-educated learman ' s consent to the Dean of the two institutions of higher education is preserved the training results of the old university education facility when studying at the new university education facility and continues to be evaluated results of training in the next semester. Come.

What? 11. Process assessment process

1. The person who learned based on his training results, self-evaluated according to the level of detail provided by the institution of higher education.

2. The class meeting with the chair teacher/academic advisor to participate, conduct the review and pass the level of self-assessment of each person on the basis of the results confirming the results and must be over half the consent of the class unit collective and must be compiled. It's a bonus.

The dean/mentor teacher confirmed the results of the class meeting and transferred the results to the Board of Evaluating The academic results (later called the Faculty Board).

3. The committee review the department of meeting, united, the Chief Information Officer passed and the results report to the Council evaluating the results of school learnmen (the latter being called the School Board).

4. Board of the Board of Meeting, Uniform the Rector review and the decision to recognize the results.

5. The evaluation results, the taxing of the learnmen must be published publicly and inform the learman before 20 days prior to the formal decision-making.

Chapter IV

ASSESSMENT ORGANIZATION AND USE ASSESSMENT RESULTS

What? 12. The Council assessed the results of training

1. The university education establishment decided to set up the Council to evaluate the academic results and end the operation when the Board of the Board decided to recognize the results of the official learman.

2. Level Council

a) The authority to establish

The school board chaired by the Dean or the Vice-Chancellor was appointed by the Chancellor to sign the decision to establish the school board.

b) The Council of the School Board consists of:

-Chairman of the Council: The Rector or the Vice Chancellor is authorized by the provoking.

-Permanent Council: Head of the School for the Doctrine of the Doctrine.

-Commissioners: Representative of the Faculty of faculties, departments (departments) involved, the youth delegation and the school student assembly.

c) The mission of the school board:

-Consultant to help the Principal review, recognise the training results of each student, student and bear the direct direction of the Rector.

-Based on existing regulations, on the basis of the Dean's recommendation, conduct review, evaluate the results of each faculty's training, recommend the provoking recognition.

3. Board of Science

a) The authority to establish

The Dean of the Faculty of Science, or the Deputy Chief of the Faculty of the Faculty of the Faculty of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Faculty of Contracting

b) Member of the Board of Science:

-Chairman of the Council: Dean of the Faculty or Deputy Chief of the Department of the authorized department.

-Commissioners: Assistant to the management of the management of learnmen; teacher dean/advisor to study; representatives of the Youth League; the General Assembly or the Student Union, the class staff.

c) The mission of the Board of Science:

-There is a mission to help Dean, to assess, to be accurate, to be fair, to publicly and to democrat the practice of every one of the scientists in the department.

-Based on the existing rules, on the basis of the chair teacher/mentor of each class unit, conduct the review, evaluate the training results of each class, the Chief Minister of Public Affairs.

What? 13. Time of assessment

1. The evaluation of training results by learnmen is periodically conducted by semester, academic year and the entire course.

2. The training point of the semester is the total score of the five detailed evaluation events of the school.

3. The training point of the school year is the average plus of the training points of the school year.

4. The training point in the course of the course is the average plus of the training point of the course of the course.

What? 14. Use the results

1. The evaluation results forged each semester, the school year of the learman is saved in the school ' s school management record, used in the scholarship of scholarships, reward-discipline, school discipline, stop studying, dormitory boarding, trial resolution. adds, in terms of cost-free, service and living in the dormitory and other priorities depending on the regulation of the university education facility.

2. The evaluation of the evaluation of the school's entire course is saved in the school's management profile of the university education facility, as a base for a graduate exam, a thesis or graduation course.

3. The evaluation results for all-course training are recorded in the learning results table and saved in the school ' s profile when graduating from the school.

4. The learnmen have excellent training results that are given the basis of higher education considering the expression, commendation.

5. People who learn to be trained poorly, poorly for the next two students to stop at least one semester in the next semester and if they are to be placed in a training class, the second consecutive semester will be forced to learn.

What? 15. Rights of complaint

The learer has the right to complain to the rooms, functional boards, or the Principal if the assessment of the results of the exercise is not correct. Upon receiving a complaint, the institution of higher education is responsible for addressing, responding to the provisions of the law of the complaint.

Chapter V.

THE ORGANIZATION.

What? 16. Organization to execute

1. The rector of higher education institutions issued a guide text detailing the implementation of this Regulation; annually, inspection, evaluation, and revision of the timely addition to the conditions, the scope of the school, the field, and the local area.

2. The implementation of the implementation of the institution of higher education institutions must clearly specify the responsibility, powers, functions of the assessment council, the responsibility of the departments, departments, departments, classes, the dean/the student dean/academic advisor and the responsibility of the learmaster in the house. the school; it is evident, details of the content, criteria, scale and form of evaluation, the appropriate assessment subject by each year, in accordance with the specific characteristics and conditions of the school, in accordance with the rules of evaluation under the regulatory framework of the Regulation. Hey.

3. End of the academic year, the institution of higher education assessment, summking and reporting of the work implementing this Regulation on the Ministry of Education and Training and the Direct Management Agency.