Key Benefits:
2 May 2007 (State 1 Er June 2015)
The Federal Department of the Interior,
Having regard to the order of 16 March 2007 on the allocation of organs for transplantation (Organ allocation order) 1 ,
Stops:
For the purposes of this order:
1 New content according to the c. I of the DFI O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2012 ( RO 2012 3139 ).
An organ may be assigned to a newborn or to a young child whose blood group is not compatible if the legal representative gives his or her consent.
1 The wait time is calculated from the date on which the wait list is entered. It is determined in days.
1bis If the registration on the waiting list was not made in due time for reasons beyond the control of the patient, the waiting time is calculated from the day on which the conditions of registration are met. The competent transplant centre shall communicate the date to the national authority. 1
2 If the use of a patient against a non-listing decision on the waiting list is accepted, the waiting time is calculated from the day on which the transplant centre issued the non-registration decision.
3 If the use of a patient against a decision to remove the waiting list by the transplant centre is accepted, the waiting time shall include the length of time since its cancellation.
4 If a patient is required to undergo a new transplant, the waiting time is calculated from the day on which the patient is re-listed on the waiting list.
4bis If a patient is required to undergo a new transplant within 90 days of a kidney transplant, the entire length of time that the patient waited for a kidney transplant is taken into account. 2
5 The length of time the patient is temporarily unable to be transplanted into the calculation of waiting time.
6 The waiting time taken into account for the assignment of a heart is up to two years.
7 For patients in medical emergency, only the time they waited for a transplant in this situation is taken into account.
8 For patients without medical emergency, the whole time they waited for a transplant is taken into account.
9 The waiting time abroad shall be counted from the date of entry on the list established in the country concerned, if the patient produces a written attestation from the competent body of that country certifying the duration of the waiting period. 3
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of the DFI of 3 Nov 2010, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2010 ( RO 2010 5073 ). See also disp. And trans. Of this mod. At the end of the text.
2 Introduced by ch. I of the O of the DFI of 17. 2008, effective since October 15. 2008 ( RO 2008 4469 ).
3 Introduced by ch. I of the O of the DFI of 17. 2008, effective since October 15. 2008 ( RO 2008 4469 ).
1 The patient is considered to be at risk of immediate death:
2 The medical emergency is 14 days. It is extended every 14 days when confirmed by the competent transplant centre.
Where there is no medical emergency, the following order of priority applies:
1 When the priority is the same for several patients, the heart is assigned:
2 When there is medical emergency for several patients within the meaning of s. 4, para. 1, the heart is assigned to the patient for whom the medical emergency is the largest. When the medical emergency is the same for several patients, the heart is assigned according to the order of priority defined in para. 1.
1 In particular, the patient is considered to be at risk of immediate death for which an invasive, invasive, intensive care unit ventilation is required.
2 The medical emergency lasted 28 days. It is extended every 28 days when confirmed by the competent transplant centre.
1 When there is no medical emergency, the optimum quality lung is assigned:
2 The correct quality lung is attributed to:
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of the DFI of 17. 2008, effective since October 15. 2008 ( RO 2008 4469 ).
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of DFI of 1 Er Jul. 2011, effective from 1 Er August 2011 ( RO 2011 3377 ).
3 Introduced by c. I of the O of the DFI of 17. 2008, effective since October 15. 2008 ( RO 2008 4469 ).
4 New content according to the c. I of the O of DFI of 1 Er Jul. 2011, effective from 1 Er August 2011 ( RO 2011 3377 ).
5 New content according to the c. I of the O of the DFI of 17. 2008, effective since October 15. 2008 ( RO 2008 4469 ).
1 When the priority is the same for several patients, the lung is assigned:
2 When there is medical emergency for several patients within the meaning of s. 7, para. 1, the lung is assigned to the patient for whom the medical emergency is the largest. When the medical emergency is the same for several patients, the lung is assigned according to the order of priority defined in para. 1.
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of DFI of 1 Er Jul. 2011, effective from 1 Er August 2011 ( RO 2011 3377 ).
1 In particular, the patient is considered to be at risk of immediate death:
2 The medical emergency lasts for a maximum of six days. It is extended every two days when confirmed by the competent transplant centre.
3 If a body cannot be attributed to a patient whose blood group is identical to that of the donor or compatible with the donor's group, the liver may be assigned to a patient whose blood group is not compatible, if the patient gives his or her Consent.
1 If the patient is not exposed to immediate risk of death within the meaning of s. 10, para. 1, and if the donor is under 18 years of age, the liver is allocated:
2 If the donor is blood group 0, the liver, within the priorities defined in para. 1, is assigned:
3 If the donor is of a different blood group than group 0, the liver, within the priorities defined in para. 1, is assigned to the patient who received the most points according to the system set out in Appendix 1.
1 New content according to the c. I of the DFI O of 12 May 2015, in force since 1 Er June 2015 ( RO 2015 1429 ).
1 If the patient is not exposed to immediate risk of death within the meaning of s. 10, para. 1, and the donor is between 18 and 49 years of age, the liver is first attributed to the patient with a body weight of less than 25 kilograms.
2 If the donor is blood group 0, the liver, within the priorities defined in para. 1, is allocated according to the priorities defined in Art. 11, para. 2.
3 If the donor is of a different blood group than group 0, the liver, within the priorities defined in para. 1, is assigned to the patient who received the most points according to the system set out in Appendix 1.
1 Introduced by ch. I of the DFI O of 12 May 2015, in force since 1 Er June 2015 ( RO 2015 1429 ).
If the patient is not exposed to immediate risk of death within the meaning of s. 10, para. 1, and the donor is 50 years of age or older, the liver is assigned:
1 Introduced by ch. I of the DFI O of 12 May 2015, in force since 1 Er June 2015 ( RO 2015 1429 ).
When the priority is the same for several patients, the liver is assigned:
In particular, it is considered to be at risk of immediate death for the patient who cannot or can no longer be dialysed.
1 If there is no medical emergency within the meaning of s. 13 and that the donor is 60 years of age or younger, the kidney is assigned in the second priority:
2 If the donor is over 60 years of age, the kidney is allocated:
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of the DFI of 17. 2008, effective since October 15. 2008 ( RO 2008 4469 ).
1 The kidney is assigned the third priority to the patient:
2 The National Allocations Service only allows donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies:
3 The authorised number of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies must be calculated in such a way that each patient can benefit from an organ supply of at least 2 % of the potential donors in his case. The calculation shall be carried out on the basis of all available donor data.
4 The allowable number of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies is calculated upon listing on the waiting list. It must be recalculated at the beginning of each calendar year, or when new data regarding a patient's HLA antibody are available.
1 New content according to the c. I of the DFI O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2012 ( RO 2012 3139 ).
If the donor has obtained a negative test for the Epstein-Barr virus, the kidney is assigned the fourth priority to the patient who also obtained a negative test for the Epstein-Barr virus.
1 New content according to the c. I of the DFI O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2012 ( RO 2012 3139 ).
The kidney is assigned the fifth highest priority to the patient who obtains the most points according to the system defined in Appendix 2.
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of the DFI of 17. 2008 ( RO 2008 4469 ). New content according to the c. I of the DFI O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2012 (RO 2012 3139).
When the priority is the same for several patients, the kidney is assigned:
A pancreas for islet islet transplantation is attributed to:
A patient who requires only one kidney is a priority in relation to the patient for whom the transplantation of pancreatic or pancreatic islets and a kidney is indicated:
1 New content according to the c. I of the DFI O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2012 ( RO 2012 3139 ).
1 When the priority is the same for several patients, the pancreas or pancreatic islets are allocated:
2 The compatibility of the tissue characteristics shall be evaluated on the basis of the point system defined in Annex 2 A . 1
3 Blood group compatibility is provided if:
1 New content according to the c. I of the DFI O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2012 ( RO 2012 3139 ).
In particular, it is considered to be at risk of immediate death for the patient who cannot or can no longer be fed parenterally.
1 When there is a medical emergency for several patients, the small intestine is allocated:
2 When several patients do not have a medical emergency, the small intestine is allocated:
1 Art. 3, para. 1 Bis , also applies to patients on the waiting list at the time this amendment enters into force.
2 In the point system according to Annex 2, up to the entry into force of this amendment, a point is assigned per month waiting prior to the start of dialysis for patients on the waiting list or whose registration has not been Conducted in a timely manner within the meaning of s. 3, para. 1 Bis .
(art. 11 to 11 B )
Points |
Refresh After |
Scan results not going back more than |
≥25 |
7 days |
48 h |
24 to 19 |
1 month |
7 days |
18 to 11 |
3 months |
14 days |
≤10 |
12 months |
30 days |
1 New content according to the c. II al. 1 of the DFI O of 12 May 2015, in force since 1 Er June 2015 ( RO 2015 1429 ).
(art. 15 A And 18)
Criteria |
Points |
|
For each HLA-DR-level compatibility |
12 |
|
For each compatibility at the HLA-B locus |
4 |
|
For each compatibility at the HLA-A locus |
4 |
|
Wait times (per month) upon registration on the waiting list and before dialysis begins |
0.75 |
|
Wait times (per month) upon entry on the waiting list and after dialysis begins |
1.5 |
|
1 For each patient, calculate the percentage of all donors registered in the National Service Data Bank against which it has preformed anti-HLA antibodies (calculation of the percentage of reactive antibodies On the panel).
2 For each patient, a number of points should be calculated according to the following formula, based on the percentage of reactive antibodies on the panel:
Number of points = 84 × x 2 (x = percentage of reactive antibody on panel).
1 New content according to the c. II al. 1 of the DFI O of 23 May 2012 ( RO 2012 3139 ). Update as per c. II al. 2 of the DFI O of 12 May 2015, in force since 1 Er June 2015 (RO 2015 1429).
(art. 19, para. 2)
Criteria |
Points |
|
For each HLA-DR-level compatibility |
6 |
|
For each compatibility at the HLA-B locus |
4 |
|
For each compatibility at the HLA-A locus |
1 |
|
1 Introduced by ch. II al. 2 of the DFI O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2012 ( RO 2012 3139 ).
(art. 21, para. 2, let. (b)
Criteria |
Points |
|
Hemopathy: |
||
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
Infections: |
||
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
Central venous access: |
||
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
Hail Intestine: |
||
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|