Read the untranslated law here: http://app.parlamento.pt/webutils/docs/doc.pdf?path=6148523063446f764c3246795a5868774d546f334e7a67774c336470626d6c7561574e7059585270646d467a4c316776644756346447397a4c3342716244457a4e6931594c6d527659773d3d&fich=pjl136-X.doc&Inline=false
DRAFT LAW N° 136/X Â Revokes Decree nâº 35,106, 6 of the draft law Â° 136/X Revokes Decree nâº 35,106, of 6 November 1945 (regulating the long occupation and assignment of houses intended for family read poor) Decree-Law nº 310/88, of September 5, came to determine the form of construction of homes for sale by city pios pursuant to Decree nâº 34,486 , 6 April 1945. It is recalled that through this degree if authorized the Government to promote the construction, within five years, and by using the administrative bodies and dio © Mercy ³ rdias, of 5,000 houses for the accommodation of family read in population centers of the Mainland and Islands.
Expressly repealed by article 22Â° of Decree-Law nº 310/88, this velhoâ â diploma of 1945 was regulated by Decree nº your 35,106, of November 6, â inserts multiple wrapping µ s on is long occupation and assignment of houses intended for family pobresâ lias.
This last diploma, is not expressly repealed by any legislation, unlike what happened with the Decree-Law Nr 34,486, µ and your article has 12âº that the occupants of the building of houses by city pios pursuant to Decree nâº 34,486, can be displaced where there is not the need to occupy the House or if become unworthy of â right of long occupation that was concedidoâ .
2 Moreover, paragraph 1 of the same article lists then a set of µ s situation especially applicable to residents and that, at least, are of doubtful constitutionality.
Moreover, as if unit measures what is indignoâ â and determining the possible eviction, as it establishes the body of the article?
Regardless of the discussion jurÃ tip about whether certificate revocation expressed a certain degree (Decree nâº 34,486, in this case) implies automatically the certificate revocation of all legislation, in particular regulation that it is affects, we consider that this regulation being applied does not expressly repealed, and containing her few pious princÃ violators of fundamental rights of citizens , Is the certificate revocation expressed this diploma the best option to clarify once this situation.
Stipulates the 65Â° article of the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic â all have the right, for you and your family, to a housing of dimension adequadaâ , leaving it to the State to ensure that right. In addition, the princÃ peep out of equality between the citizens enshrined in article 13Â° of CRP provides that all citizens have the same social dignity and are equal before the law.
â no one may be privileged, benefited, harmed, deprived of any right or exempt from any duty in reason of ascendÃ, sex, race, language, territory by ³ River of origin, religion, convictions of µ s Poland practices or ideological ³ gicas, statement, economic situation ³ mica or socialâ condition .
This is an princÃ pio constitutional system structuring Portuguese, actually is inherent in a rule of law. 3 the prohibition of arbÃ trio is an external limit freedom of conformaÃ or of the decision of the public powers, following the princÃ pio of equality as pio princÃ negative control (see Vital Moreira, Garcia Canotilho, Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, Annotated).
For your part, the right to housing is embodied the right to not be arbitrarily deprived of housing and the right to get it, with the requirement of the measures and provide for appropriate State is µ s your lifetime achievement. It is a right analogous to the rights, freedoms and guarantees and a social right constitutionally provided.
Being, the µ g/s, the intention of the parliamentary group of the PCP promote express certificate revocation of the Decree nº 35,106, of 6 November 1945, it should make clear what is our central concern to avoid creating a possible legal vacuum with regard to â wrapping µ s on is long occupation and assignment of casasâ of social housing that that Decree was intended to regulate.
Thus, revoked the Decree nº 35,106, 6 November, the µ s objective conditions that will be able to determine the long occupation and the desocupaÃ of fires and, consequently, the establishment and the resolution of their contracts, established under Decree nâº 34,486, of 8 April 1945, regulated by Decree nº 35,106 , of 6 November, be governed by the existing legislative framework that regulates the urban leases.
The utilization of 35,106 Decree of 6 November 1945, that started to have an application frequently and heavily contested in the City port from pio years of 2002 and 2003, motivated initiative 1 4 of the parliamentary group of the CFP, in June 2003, during the legislative session 2âª the 9th parliamentary term, where already expected the certificate revocation of that legislation in 1945. This was actually is a legislative initiative in which the PCP was pioneering at the time, having been the first party to take a concrete piece of legislation aimed at eliminating the municipal actuaÃ supported by a legal framework clearly unconstitutional and that allows eviction or administrative evictions executed summarily by mere indication and standalone order is rquica.
Once the 9th parliamentary term was interrupted by the decision of the President of the Republic to dissolve the Assembly of the Republic and of mark µ s legislative election anticipated, this initiative of the parliamentary group of the PCP (draft Law 328/IX) expired, not having come to be discussed.
However, and since the X Term, the situation has not been changed. In the City's port has pursued the pious use of 35,106 Decree of 6 November 1945, in other city the PaÃ 's principles continue to be also recurrently used some of that legislation which, unquestionably, conflict with the right of citizens is impugnaÃ of administrative acts and not allow the courts to enjoy in a timely manner and useful, the existence, or not, reason enough for the resolution of lease agreements.
In these terms, the Members of the parliamentary group of the CFP feature the following Bill: 5 Article 1
Is revoked the Decree nº 35,106, of 6 November 1945, â inserts multiple wrapping µ s on is long occupation and assignment of houses intended for family pobresâ lias.
Article 2nd the resolution of contracts established under Decree nâº 34,486, of 8 April 1945, governed by the stipulated in the legislation of the urban rent Regime.
Assembly of the Republic, July 11 2005 Members
Search Translated Laws of Portugal