Establishment Of A Commission Of Parliamentary Inquiry To Processing, Provision And Dissemination Of Telephone Call Record Protected By The Obligation Of Confidentiality

Original Language Title: Constituição de uma Comissão Eventual de Inquérito Parlamentar ao processamento, disponibilização e divulgação de registo de chamadas telefónicas protegidos pela obrigação de confidencialidade

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now

Read the untranslated law here: http://app.parlamento.pt/webutils/docs/doc.pdf?path=6148523063446f764c3246795a5868774d546f334e7a67774c336470626d6c7561574e7059585270646d467a4c316776644756346447397a4c326c75635445745743356b62324d3d&fich=inq1-X.doc&Inline=false

INVESTIGATION PARLIAMENTARY no RITE ‰ ° 1/X ‡ ƒ is the CONSTITUTION of a COMMISSION ƒ the EV Group INVESTIGATION PARLIAMENTARY RITE ‰ no ° 1/X ‡ ƒ is the CONSTITUTION of a COMMITTEE of INVESTIGATION, if ƒ ‰, PROCESSING PARLIAMENTARY DISPONIBILIZAà RITE ‡ is ƒ and ‡ is ƒ the DISSEMINATION of RECORDS of TELEPHONE CALLS “ ONLY PROTECTED by ‡ is ƒ the OBLIGATION of CONFIDENTIALITY the 13 January 2006 It was disclosed by the newspaper â œ Horasâ € 24 €  a list of 208 phones whose 80000 calls between December 2001 and May 2002 would have been reported by EN in à ¢ scope of a lawsuit and include the floppy disks set out in your € œ â € 9⠝ Envelope. Between these phones included the President of the Republic, the President of the Assembly of the Republic, the Prime Minister and several other cabinet members, the Presidents of the Supreme Court of Justice, the Supreme Administrative Court and the Supreme Military Court of Justice provider, a former President of the Republic, responsible for the secret services , of Presidents of the Chamber of Deputies and of many other personalities. None of these personalities were to be surveyed or investigated in the framework of that process ¢. The President of the Republic made on the same day a communication to paà s considering the subject of greater gravity, having declared that â € œ the rights, freedoms and guarantees of the Portuguese are an essential pillar of democracy, it has to be preserved, no breaks or remedies of µ esâ € , adding that â € œ violation µ is the private life , whether through telephone eavesdropping ³ only illegal, whether through telephone calls records ³ only or in other ways also to be intolerà of intromissà on the private reserve of the Portuguese, cannot pass in claroâ €  and informing still have required â € œ averiguaà µ s is [that] are finalised the curtissimo € prazo⠝. These records of telephone calls ³ nicas are protected by the duty of confidentiality imposed by the contract of lease of PT (in nea article 6° c, Decree Law 31/2003 of 17 February) and the Law of protection of personal data (numbers 1 and 3 of article 47° of the law 67/98 of 26 October). The violation of this Act constitutes a crime and, to the extent that this can be prescribed, is exclusively referred to the scope Poland tico the requirement of discharge of responsibility, what are ³ Parliament can obtain through a Commission survey. In fact, Parliament has a duty to monitor and ensure the exercà heat and freedoms to monitor compliance with the institutional duties that ensure. In this case, these freedoms have been violated and the responsibility for such a violation should be clarified. Therefore, the Parliamentary Group of the left bloc proposed µ and Assembly of the Republic the following deliberaÃ: 1 â € ” the Assembly of the Republic approves the Constitution of a Committee of any survey parliamentary disponibilizaÃ, processing and disclosure of records of telephone calls ³ only protected by the obligation of confidentiality; 2 â € ” This Committee has, in particular, by the subject determine:) as is established and updated by the customer's account Status, who has access to that information and how it is that your confidentiality is protected; b) where µ s condition was requested to provide the information about the registration of telephone calls ³ only; c) what is and how does the mechanism of supervision on EN on the processing of information relating to records of confidential phone calls or especà accounts stay; d) who were responsible for the selection, processing and disponibilizaà of constant information of these floppies; and) what was the procedure for investigation established to treat later this information; f) if some of the procedures throughout this process violated the law and the guarantees of the subscribers of these phones.

Assembly of the Republic, October 2006 4. The Members and the members of BE,