Capital overview :
Section the Environmental Protection Convention of 19 February 1974 between Norway, Denmark, Finland and Sweden are given the power of law here in the realm.
Part Article Section 2.This law takes effect from the time the King decides.
Part Article
The Environmental Convention of 19. February 1974, between Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.
Governments in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, which consider it very important to cherish and improve the environment, have been agreed on the following :
Art 1.With environmental harmful business means in this convention emissions of solid or liquid waste, gas, or other fabric from ground, building or facilities in vassdrag, sea or in the sea and use of soil, ocean, building or facilities otherwise as entails or may cause disruption of the surroundings through water pollution or other impact on water conditions, sand, air pollution, noise, temperature change, ionising radiation, light or other equivalent.
The Convention does not come to the Applicability of the extent of environmental harmful business regulated through particular agreement between two or more contravening states.
Part Article Art 2.By decision whether an environmental malware shall be permitted, they shall disruptions such a business involves or may be subject to any other counterpoint state equal to disruption in the state where the permit is to be granted.
Part Article Art 3.The one that has been hit or may be struck by disruption from environmental harmful business in other counteractivity can travel case by the person court or administrative authority in the state of whether or not the business should be permitted, hereunder lawsuits of preventive measures against injuries, and can be overtested the court's or the government's decision in the same extent and on the same terms as court subjects in the state where the business is driven.
The provisions of the first clause are given the equivalent of the inquiry when it comes to lawsuits for damages due to environmental harmful business. The question of damages must not be judged by rules that are more unfavorable for the scathing than the enterprise landscape's replacement rules.
Part Article Art 4.Each state shall designate a special authority (regulatory authority) with the task of holding public environmental protection interests in the country in communications with disruptions from environmental harmful business in other contravening state.
In order to have such interests, the regulatory authority can prosecute or be heard by the person court or administrative authority in other contravalence of environmental harmful business should be permitted, if the authority or other representative of Public environmental protection interests in the person state can travel case or be heard in such cases, as well as few overtrial courts or the administrative government's decision in accordance with the process of the process of the state of such matters.
Part Article Art 5.Finds the court or administrative authority to determine the question of permission for environmental harmful business (the consession authority) that the business involves or may be subject to disruption of meaning in a different counter-era state, shall The context of the session, if it uses the announcement or cancellation in cases of this species, as soon as possible sending a copy of the case documents to the regulatory authority in the other state and give the authority the authority to make a statement. The direction of time and place of meeting or experience shall in the event be given the regulatory authority in good time. The parole authority is also to be kept informed of the case of the issue in the extent that it may have interest in the authority of the authority.
Part Article Art 6.After the request of the regulatory authority, in the extent that it is consistent with the case management rules of the person state, impose the applicant to provide the further details, drawings and technical descriptions that The consession authorities believe are necessary to judge the effects of the other state.
Part Article Art 7.Regulatory authority shall make known, in the extent it considers it necessary for consideration of public interests or individual interests, subdirections from the context of the context of the context of local newspaper or otherwise appropriate and shall for Incidentally, it is making the investigation into the effects of its own countries as it finds necessary.
Part Article The Art 8.Cost of the Regulatory Authority business is paid by the home state.
Part Article Art 9.If the regulatory authority in a specific case has informed the court or administrative authority in the state permit shall be granted, that the regulatory authority on the issue shall be conducted by other authority, the convention regulations come. about the regulatory authority of the Applicability of this authority as far as they fit.
Part Article Art 10.Where it is deemed necessary for the decor of environmental malware damage effects in other countries, the regulatory authority in that country is due to the request from the context of the consession of the establishment of the enterprise-led experience on the site. By such experience, the consession of the context has the authority or plain-savvy as the authority points access to be present.
Whether necessary to further regulations on such experience as discussed in the first clause are being worked out in intercounsel between the affected countries.
Part Article Art 11.If the question of permission for environmental harmful business, which entails or may cause disruption of significant importance in other counteractivity, is the subject of decision by the government or by the State Council or Ministry of State (ministerial) in the enterprise diet, the question is to be dreamed between the states if the government of the first-mentioned state requires it.
Part Article Art 12.In case as mentioned in Article 11, the government of each of the states may require a commission to make a statement in the case. If one does not agree on anything else, the Commission shall consist of one of the parties in communities designated chairman from the other countertop state as well as three members from each of the affected states. Once such a commission has been created, the case cannot be decided until it has made a statement.
Each of the states should reward those members who are designated by the person state. Allowance or other payment to the chairman and other costs in connection with the Commission's business that is not obvious is to consider only the one state expenditures shall be paid with equal parts of the affected states.
Part Article The Art 13.Convention also comes to the Applicability of business in the state of the state of the state's continental oclassile areas.
Part Article Art 14.This Convention takes effect six months after the day of the state of controversy, the Swedish Foreign Ministry has announced that the constitutional measures required to set the Convention in effect have been implemented. The Swedish Foreign Ministry shall inform the rest of the other counterlaws about the reception of these discourse.
Part Article Art 15.Case that at this convention has been initiated by the court or administrative authority and as the leading concerns of the Convention shall be processed and judged according to prior current regulations.
Part Article Art 16.wish contracaste state to resign the Convention shall be written in writing of the Swedish government, which without a stay shall inform the rest of the other counterlaws about the resignation and about the date of the reception herding.
The signing will take effect twelve months after the date that the underdirection has been received by the Swedish government, or at a later time that is indicated in the resignation.
The Convention is to be deposited in the Swedish Foreign Ministry and confirmed copies shall of the Swedish Foreign Ministry be sent each of the contravening state governments.
To the confirmation of the respective of the respective States of the United States, the respective of the United States has signed this convention.
The finishing in Stockholm 19 February 1974 in one specimen on the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish languages, all of which have the same validity.
Part Article
