Rescue of the Secretary of Security and Justice of June 24, 2013, nor 398136, to establish forms for covering data and moderate for the findings of the Representative Responsibilities.

The Minister of Security and Justice,

Pay attention. Article 30, fifth member of the law enforcement integrity reviews by public control.;

Decision:

Article 1

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

In this arrangement, it is understood under:

• A. Law Bibob: Law enforcement integrity reviews by the public board.;

• B. authorities: A driver's corpses or a right person with a government stake that's authorized for the government. Bill Bibob. Adjust;

• C. Involved: A involved as intended. Article One, first member, part e, of the law Bibob.;

• D. Question form: A form as intended. 2;

• E. Question list: A questionnaire as intended. == sync, corrected by elderman ==;

• F. Bibob matter: A case as intended. Article 2, under a to and with eIn which case, Bill Bibob. It's applied.

Article 2

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

The forms for transmitting data and modest intent. Article 30, first and third member of the Bill Bibob._

• A. For disposal of subsidies, match. == sync, corrected by elderman == to this arrangement:

• B. For disposal, the release of permits on the ground. _Consistently. == sync, corrected by elderman == to this arrangement:

• C. for other disposal, match. == sync, corrected by elderman == to this arrangement.

• D. For government assignments as intended. Article One, first member, under J, from the law of Bibob.Consistently. == sync, corrected by elderman == to this arrangement:

• E. For real estate transactions as intended. Article One, first member, under o, of the law of Bibob.Consistently. == sync, corrected by elderman == to this arrangement.

Article 3

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

The form for the findings of the own investigation, meant in. Article 30, fourth member of the law, Bibob._ == sync, corrected by elderman == to this arrangement.

Article 4

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

It's authorized to authorize the authorities based on the questioning form for a Bibob event to put together a questionnaire and instead of using the question form for acquitting and modest, Article 30, first and third member of the Bill Bibob.!

Article 5

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

In assembling a questionnaire for a Bibob event, the authorities have to rule out a selection of questions and participate in the questioning form for that Bibob case.

Article 6

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

Indeed. 5 It's the authorized agency to assemble a questionnaire allowed to reform questions from the question form as far as:

• A. The authorized authorisation this necessarily eight to improve communication with the involved;

• B. The authorized authorities with that of the involved no longer requires data or modest than on the ground of the questioning form of the involved would be required;

• C.P.'s stretch of questions in the questionnaire doesn't get contentiously different from the questions from the question form.

Article 7

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

Until November 1st of 2013, it is authorized to use questionnaires that deviate the decisions in this arrangement.

Article 8

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

This arrangement is performing at the time where the Evaluation and expansion law Bibob. In action.

Article 9

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

This arrangement is brought in as... Get Bibob forms.

This arrangement will be placed in the state code.

The Desk

Minister

Of Security and Justice,

I.W.

Attention 1.

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

Bibob application with regard to subsidiaries.

Found on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

Containment.

Instruction.		3
One.	Identification.	4
Two.	One person's case.	11
	Eventually speaking.	11
	Management functions.	12
	Finance.	12
	Lines.	14
	Criminal and legal act.	15.
3.	Of course.	16
	Identification partner.	16
	Eventually speaking.	17
	Management functions.	17
	Finance.	18
	Lines.	20
	Criminal and legal act.	20
4.	Eventually,	22
	Identification ultimately holds	22
	Eventually speaking.	22
	Management functions.	23
	Finance.	24
	Lines.	25
	Criminal and legal act.	26
5.	Eventually in charge.	28
	Identification ultimately in charge.	28
	Eventually speaking.	28
	Management functions.	28
	Criminal and legal act.	29
Six.	Specific questions subsidies.	31
	Location of activity.	31
	== sync, corrected by elderman ==	31
7.	Declaration and signing.	33
Authority.		33

Instruction.

This application is on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman == Secureed by the Secretary of Security and Justice. Based on this form, a board organ can be reviewed on the ground. Bill Bibob. feed.

This Bibob application involves (indistinct conversations) subsidies.

Consequences flawed in.

This Bibob application must fill you completely, correctly and truth-married and hand in with the right admissions. If you don't do this or if you refuse to provide data, that could have the following consequences:

• ♪ A subsidial application can be left out of treatment.

• ♪ A grant grant can be revoked.

Besides, it's deliberately acquired of incorrect information. == sync, corrected by elderman ==! This could also lead to decline and/or retreat of the subsidia disposal.

Reference.

It can prevent this form from being asked for information you've given before. In those cases, you can refer to the answer:

• ..the answer of other questions from this form. Then why don't you give me the next one to, like, "Supervision Question 4."

• ..the evidence you provide at the answer of the questions. Then, for example, give the next one to, "See the merchandise of January 1st 2013."

• _ Then give the next one, for example, "Should be the grant application of January 1st 2013."

As far as you answer the questions from this form with these references completely, you don't have to fill in anything else. Well, consider that the actual situation may have changed in regard to what has been reported/vasted before.

Information transferred into previous procedures.

It may prevent you from in another procedure at the substance boards or given documents or records, which are now requisitioned. If these documents and data haven't changed and the board's organs are still available, it won't be necessary to give them back. Contact the board of directors to determine which information you do and no longer have to give.

Your answer doesn't fit the form.

It can prevent your answer from fitting into the answering room at the question of the question. In that case, you can mention the requested data on an admission you're adding to this form.

Authority used terms.

In the questions, we speak repeatedly about *** These are terms from the Bill Bibob. (Sighs) Article One, first member, under eternal_ This could be justice. Furthermore, it's repeatedly about [Chuckles] This means we described the up here involved.

In the back of this question form, you'll find a quiz lighting. In which we explain the meaning of some other terms. Read this chapter properly.

1.

1A: Why did you apply a subsidy or what do you receive a subsidia?

Activity:

Location:

1B: Is spoken of a subsidy application by a natural person and/or one man's case?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Burger Service Number (BSN)

Address:

Phone number:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the time that one man's case didn't exist.

If you're referring to as you intended, you're the one who's involved in the involved. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions:

_ One man's case-- private person and

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions subsidies.

You can skip the next questions:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

..the questions 3A to 3M under 03. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪

..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1C: Is spoken of a subsidy application due to a partnership under firm, a commanding partnership.

• No. Continue asking for question 1F and 1G.

• ! Yeah, and all the associates are natural. Answer question 1D. Sla questions 1E, 1F and 1G over.

• _ Answer question 1E and 1G.

1D: What vortex, resume or size concerns the subsidie application?

Name partnership/ size:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next natural people as partners:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Liver with regard to this fox, resume or size, the next in:

• _

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions:

_ == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions subsidies.

You can skip the next questions:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

_ One-man case-- private personnel.

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪

..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1: What vortex, resume or size concerns the subsidie application?

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next partners:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next ultimate superiors:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This partnership/mateship has the next ultimate claims:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Liver with regard to the first-named partnership/meating in the next:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.! As far as these natural people are, they're also ultimately speaking and ultimately leading. The other ultimately have confessions and ultimate supervisors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions:

Question 1G:

_ == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

_ Eventually speaking,

_ Eventually in charge. ♪

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions subsidies.

You can skip the next questions:

Question 1F;

_ One man's case-- private person.

1F: Is spoken of a subsidy application for an overwhelming court form than a private person/a case, nuts, résumé or size?

Remark: From your answer to the obvious questions, this should be the case. If still spoke of a private person/a man's case, vow, résumé, or size, you probably made a mistake. Then change your answer to one of the previous questions.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This subsidial receiver/ applicant has the next driver:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This subsidial receiver/-interviewer has the next ultimate leads:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least this concerns the natural people who were named up here as a driver. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This subsidie receiver/-interviewer has the next shareholders:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This subsidie receiver/-appropriate has the next ultimate saying:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least this concerns the natural people who were called up here as a shareholder. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a copy of the shareholder registry.

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give balances and profits and loss bills for the time that the first-named party didn't exist.

The first-named party is the one that was meant to be in the first place. Bill Bibob.! The natural people who are shareholder are ultimately speaking. The natural persons who are a driver are eventually supervised. Any other ultimately ultimately have words and ultimate superiors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions:

Question 1G:

_ Eventually speaking,

_ Eventually in charge. ♪

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions subsidies.

You can skip the next questions:

_ One man's case-- private person and

..the questions 3A to 3M under 03. Vennoot, of course.

1G: By your answer to the obvious questions, you may have indicated that there are shareholders and/or other ultimate claims. Are there any other natural people who could be entitled to the involved?

Remark: In lighting in the back of this form, when someone as ultimately beneficiary is noticed.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

One-man case-- private person.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 2A to and with 2L only if that was reported in question 1B.

Eventually speaking.

2A: Have you been saying in the last five years, ultimately speaking, of any other right persons and enterprises?

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If your ultimate saying isn't even real anymore;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

2B: Have you been commanding officers for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 2A.

Finance.

2C: Did you at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is understood under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2D: Are you currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about your debts to the Belts.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2E: Did you enjoy the last year and the year before that?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2F: If you've reported this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did you foresee your livelihood?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! I used my own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided for my livelihood, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

2G: Do you have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

2H: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that received right persons and enterprises from the questions 2A and 2B.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

2I: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B for the past five years, a settlement entered with the State's Attorney's Attorney or otherwise referred to as suspected?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

2J: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal penance?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2K: In the last five years, is a license of yours and/or the right persons and businesses called 2A and 2B, denied or withdrawn?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

2L: Is it up to you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a burden of boarding and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 3A to and by 3M only if it was reported to the questions 1D or 1E. Fill a natural person who's associated with one copy of these questions.

Identification partner.

3A: On what partner does the next answer to the questions 3B to and 3M involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

3B: Has this partner been ultimately saying that the last five years have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Commercial Revenue has been recorded, you'll have a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You also have to report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• ..the consolidated profit and loss bills over the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate claim of this partner is no longer act;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

3C: Has this associate been in circumstance for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 3B.

Finance.

3D: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3E: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts were held?

Remark: You also need to provide information on debt to the Belasting Service.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3F: Has this partner enjoyed the last year and the year before?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3G: If you've reported that this partner this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did this partner in this period have foreseeable?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This associate used his own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

3H: Does this associate have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

3I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 3B and 3C.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

3J: Are these associates called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a settlement agreement with the criminals and the firms that are called to the requests 3B and 3C?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

3K: Have these associates, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C in the last five years, have a legal and/or fiscapable boal?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3L: In the last five years, is a license of this partner, the substance partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C, denied or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3M: Is on this partner, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a burden of board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 4A to and by 4M only if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F. Fill one of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately holds

4A: To what ultimate saying has the next answer to the questions 4B/m 4 M involvement?

• ! To a natural person,

Last name:
First names:
Birthedatum:

• ! To a right person,

Name:
Traffic number:

Eventually speaking.

4B: Has this ultimate factory been saying in the last five years also ultimately have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate saying of this ultimate ultimate saying isn't real anymore, and...

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

4C: Has this ultimate claim to have been in charge over the last five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 4B.

Finance.

4D: Does this finally have saying currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4E: Does this finally have saying right now, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about debts to the Residency.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4F: Did this finally have saying this year, last year, and the year before that, have enjoyed revenue?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4G: If you've reported that this ends up saying this year, over the past year, and/or the year didn't have any revenues, how did he/she have in this period?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This ultimate saying has used its own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

4H: Does this finally have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

4I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 4B and 4C.

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

4J: Are these ultimately speaking, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in the questions 4B and 4C, over the past five years, a settlement with the defendant.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

4K: Have these ultimately claiming, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a legal and fifty bodily?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines become among other fines of the Arbey Inspection and the Belt Services Understood.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4L: In the last five years, is a license of (a) this end of ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in 4B and 4C, or assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

4M: Is it to (a) this ultimately claiming, (B) the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a burden of control and compulsiveness?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 5A to and by 5G alone: ..if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F: ♪ As far as you're concerned with this ultimate supervisor, not all the questions 4A to and with 4M under Section4. Eventually, there's been a lot of people who answered.

Fill in one of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately in charge.

5A: To what ultimate supervisor, the next answer to the questions 5B/m 5G involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

5B: Is this ultimate supervisor in the last five years finally saying he's been saying, "of right persons and enterprises"?

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

Management functions.

5C: Has this ultimate supervisor over the last five years been circumstantial?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 5B.

Criminal and legal act.

5D: Have these ultimately supervised and/or the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C for the past five years, a settlement entered with the D.A.'s office or otherwise assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

5E: Did these ultimate supervisor and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal righteous fine?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

5F: In the last five years, is a license of this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C, refused or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've reported archives, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

5G: Is this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a burden under board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

6.

Location of activity.

6A: Are the activities for which the subsidy is granted/is bound to a specific location?

• No. Continue asking for question 6E. Skip questions 6B, 6C and 6D.

• Yes.

6B: Is the premises or grounds where the subsidize/subsidized activities occur, rented or is there another usage agreement?

• No. Continue asking 6D. Skip 6C.

• Yes, hired/paid. Turn on the submissive.

• ! Another user agreement. Turn on the submissive.

The landlord/pater/the one who lets it use is:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

Sort of a match:

Rentsom/pay per month: $100.

If you arched, rented/gepacht, or if any other user agreement has answered, then deliver the next one.

• _

6C: Is there a rearrange or a delay of the payment of this rent/pathy or use fee?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

For the period,

Total amount of delay or backwards: $100.

6D: Is the premises or ground where the subsidiatory enterprise is/is founded, partly owned by the subsidie applicator/ receiver?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Years of purchase:

Application:

Wise of funding:

Percentage property:

Named co-owners:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

6E: Are we subsidizing the subsidized activities co-financing with their own ability?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Betrayal: $100.

This ability is obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6F: Are we subsidizing the subsidized activities co-financed with other odd ability, then the subsidia?

Remark: Under strange ability, other subsidies and contributions are also understood by other parties.

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The funds are/become:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6G: Has subsidized subsidiates subsidized activities filed a subsidial application to other board organs that hasn't been decided yet?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Management:

Subsidiaries:

Management:

Subsidiaries:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• The subsidial application.

6H: Will for the subsidizing/subsidized activities be applied to any other subsidies?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Management:

Subsidiaries:

Management:

Subsidiaries:

7.

The signs declare that:

• ..they have answered the questions of this form completely and to truth: ♪

• ..the documents that are as administered to the answering of this form are consistent with the actuality and being right.

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

If you sign this form as authorized of the involved, then deliver the next one:

• ..a written evidence of power.

Authority.

In the preliminary questions, we use some specific terms. Underneath this, an explanation of their meaning.

Catched.

In Article One, first member, under e, of the law Bibob. It's determined that the following (rights)persons UNITED UNITIVATIONS ACCCCOSIALLY

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..gaved for government assignments;

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

• _

So the involved is always the party that formally involves a government relationship. Because involved can also be legal persons, it's not necessarily about the natural people who do acts that way, for example, fill in this form or have any interest.

Let me get this straight. At a subsidy application, the subsidial receiver/ applicant is the one involved.

Possessions.

Under siege seats.

• ..contant money.

• ..and savings.

• ♪ In investment funds, bonds, profit evidence and options.

• _

• _

• ..In real estate, including the own place.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• To rights on stirring business.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

The next thing you know, it's not marked as a serving serpent.

• ♪ Other stirring cases for your own use or use within the family, for example, an incurable residence.

• $500 in cash.

Remark: fruit use and pleasure rights.

Also denounced rights and rights of fertility from the top-notch possessions are marked as a property.

Of course.

A natural person is an individual. This is of interest because the answer to the prejudicial questions may also be from right-persons, for example, decided partnerships or a collaboration of several natural individuals.

Undertaking.

Speaking of serving underhavious enterprise, it's about the enterprise that involves the license application. In principle, this is the enterprise that drives the involved.

You and yours.

As a matter of booze or boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo!

Eventually beneficiary.

For a review on the ground Bill Bibob. It's important to know. To whom the proceeds of an enterprise or other benefits end up eventually. By the way, the natural people who end up saying are also the beneficiary. It's about the owners of a one-man case, the associates of a vow or the (indirectly) shareholders of a decided partnership. They're finally entitled to the profits of the enterprise.

In some cases, other natural people are more than the ones with the circumstantial saying they're finally beneficiary. It'll be among other things, depending on the power-resisting decisions:

• ..a natural persons who are direct or circumstantial certificate holder.

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• ..to have the right of fruit on the despicable stock.

• _ Remark: It could be a number of natural people. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

Eventually in charge.

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of leading and circumstantial. For a review on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who's finally in charge. If there's any mention of a chain of commanding entrepreneurs, this is the natural person/persons that are at the end of that chain.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible leaders. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimate supervisor is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a void, resume or size, the ultimate superiors are usually:

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a nameless partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ At a foundation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a union, internal security or co-operation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural persons that are direct or circumstantial.

Remark: Commissioners.

In several of the above-rescribed lawforms, Commissioners can play a "indirect" role. If that's the case, they're usually supervisors, too.

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign lawsuits, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that is similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are director of an English limited company or business manager of a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

Eventually,

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of saying and having circumstance. For an assessment on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who ended up saying the word. If spoken is from a chain of phrase-related. Persons, it's about the natural person/persons that are at the end of that chain.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible ultimate saying. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimately saying is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a nut, résumé, or size, the ultimately say,

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholders of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholder.

• ♪ At a nameless partnership, at least this nV itself is considered to be the ultimate saying in the frame of this question form. Besides, the natural persons who are -- are as far as they're known or can be direct or circumstantial shareholder are ultimately speaking. Remark: It could be a number of natural people who aren't all familiar. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

• ♪ At a foundation in the frame of this questioning form, the foundation itself is marked as the ultimately speaking.

• ♪ In a union, amongst beneficiary or co-operation, the ultimate sayings are usually the natural people who are vote-justed members. Remark: It could be a number of natural people who aren't all familiar. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

Remark: Certificates, property and fruit use in business stock.

Up here, repeatedly, indirectly, shareholders have been ultimately assigned saying. If word is of stock, in common falls, depending on the power-besting decisions, the next natural persons as ultimately pointed out:

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• _

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign law forms, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that's similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are shareholders of an English limited company or a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

Bible 2.

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

Bibob application regarding permits ex-wife == sync, corrected by elderman ==

Found on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

Containment.

Instruction.		37
One.	Identification.	38
Two.	One-man case-- private person.	45.
	Eventually speaking.	45.
	Management functions.	46
	Finance.	46
	Lines.	48
	Criminal and legal act.	49
3.	Of course.	50
	Identification partner.	50
	Eventually speaking.	50
	Management functions.	51
	Finance.	52
	Lines.	53
	Criminal and legal act.	54
4.	Eventually,	55
	Identification ultimately holds	56
	Eventually speaking.	56
	Management functions.	57
	Finance.	57
	Lines.	59
	Criminal and legal act.	60
5.	Eventually in charge.	6
	Identification ultimately in charge.	6
	Eventually speaking.	6
	Management functions.	62
	Criminal and legal act.	6
Six.	Specific questions build permits.	64
	Executive construction.	64
	Building location.	65
	== sync, corrected by elderman ==	66
7.	Declaration and signing.	66
Authority.		67

Instruction.

This application is on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman == Secureed by the Secretary of Security and Justice. Based on this form, board organs can be reviewed on the ground. Bill Bibob. (Let's do it.

This Bibob application is about (indistinct conversations) == sync, corrected by elderman ==!

Consequences flawed in.

This Bibob application must fill you completely, correctly and truth-married and hand in with the right admissions. If you don't do this or if you refuse to provide data, that could have the following consequences:

• ♪ A license application can be left out of treatment.

• ♪ A granted license can be revoked.

Besides, it's deliberately acquired of incorrect information. == sync, corrected by elderman ==! This could also lead to decline and/or retreat of the license.

Reference.

It can prevent this form from being asked for information you've given before. In those cases, you can refer to the answer:

• ..the answer of other questions from this form. Then why don't you give me the next one to, like, "Supervision Question 4."

• ..the evidence you provide at the answer of the questions. Then, for example, give the next one to, "See the merchandise of January 1st 2013."

• _ Then, for example, give the next one to, "See the license application of January 1st 2013."

As far as you can answer the questions from this form with these references completely, you don't have to fill in anything else. Well, consider that the actual situation may have changed in regard to what was reported before or recorded.

Information transferred into previous procedures.

It can prevent you from in another procedure at the substance boards or documents, which are now requisitioned. If these documents and data haven't changed and the board's organs are still available about that, it won't be necessary to retract the data that's re-enacted. Contact the board of directors to determine which information you do and no longer have to give.

Your answer doesn't fit the form.

It can prevent your answer from fitting into the answering room at the question of the question. In that case, you can mention the requested data on an admission you're adding to this form.

Authority used terms.

In the questions, the words /de /de are often involved, or ultimately involved. These are terms from the Bill Bibob. (Sighs) Article One, first member, under eternal) It's about the license holder. This could be justice. Furthermore, repeatedly from [Chuckles] Which means we described the up here involved.

Behind this questioning form, a chapter of UNITSAP is recorded. In which we explain the meaning of some other terms. Read this light.

1.

1A: What did you ask for a permit?

Type license:

Location:

1B: Is there a license application from a natural person and/or a man's case?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Burger Service Number (BSN)

Address:

Phone number:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the time that one man's case didn't exist.

If you're referred to as a matter of fact, you're the one who's involved in the case. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions:

_ One man's case-- private person and

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions construction permits.

You can skip the next questions:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

..the questions 3A to 3M under 03. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪

..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1C: Is spoken of a license application, from/through a company under firm, a commander partnership.

• No. Continue asking for question 1F and 1G.

• ! Yeah, and all the associates are natural. Answer question 1D. Sla questions 1E, 1F and 1G over.

• _ Answer question 1E and 1G.

1D: What vow, resume or size concerns the license application?

Name partnership/ size:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next natural people as partners:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Liver with regard to this fox, resume or size, the next in:

• _

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions:

_ == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions construction permits.

You can skip the next questions:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

_ One-man case-- private personnel.

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪

..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1: What vow, resume or size concerns the license application?

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next partners:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next ultimate superiors:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This partnership/mateship has the next ultimate claims:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Liver with regard to the first-named partnership/meating in the next:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.! As far as these natural people are, they're also ultimately speaking and ultimately leading. The other ultimately have confessions and ultimate supervisors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions:

Question 1G:

_ == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

_ Eventually speaking,

_ Eventually in charge. ♪

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions construction permits.

You can skip the next questions:

Question 1F;

_ One man's case-- private person.

1F: Is spoken of a license application, from/through another lawsuit than a private person/a man's case, vow, resume or size?

Remark: From your answer to the obvious questions, this should be the case. If still spoke of a private person/a man's case, vow, résumé, or size, you probably made a mistake. Then change your answer to one of the previous questions.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This licencekeeper/aper has the next driver:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This license holder/-interviewer has the next ultimate leads:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least this concerns the natural people who were named up here as a driver. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This license holder/-appropriate has the next shareholders:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This licencekeeper/equivalent has the next ultimately say,

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least this concerns the natural people who were called up here as a shareholder. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a copy of the shareholder registry.

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give balances and profits and loss bills for the time that the first-named party didn't exist.

The first-named party is the one that was meant to be in the first place. Bill Bibob.! The natural people who are shareholder are ultimately speaking. The natural persons who are a driver are eventually supervised. Any other ultimately ultimately have words and ultimate superiors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions:

Question 1G:

_ Eventually speaking,

_ Eventually in charge. ♪

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions construction permits.

You can skip the next questions:

_ One man's case-- private person and

..the questions 3A to 3M under 03. Vennoot, of course.

1G: By your answer to the obvious questions, you may have indicated that there are shareholders and/or other ultimate claims. Are there any other natural persons who could be ultimately beneficiary of the involved?

Remark: In lighting in the back of this form, when someone as ultimately beneficiary is noticed.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

One-man case-- private person.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 2A to and with 2L only if that was reported in question 1B.

Eventually speaking.

2A: Have you been saying in the last five years, ultimately speaking, of any other right persons and enterprises?

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

• ..the profits and loss account for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• ..the consolidated profit and loss account for the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If your ultimate saying isn't even real anymore;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

2B: Have you been commanding officers for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 2A.

Finance.

2C: Did you at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is understood under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2D: Are you currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about your debts to the Belts.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2E: Did you enjoy the last year and the year before that?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2F: If you've reported this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did you foresee your livelihood?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! I used my own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided for my livelihood, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

2G: Do you have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

2H: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You need to get into this. All of you. Received loans that are listed in the answer. All of you. Presuming questions, even if this one is added to admissions. It's also about the loans that received right persons and enterprises from the questions 2A and 2B.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

2I: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B for the past five years, a settlement entered with the State's Attorney's Attorney or otherwise referred to as suspected?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

2J: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal penance?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2K: In the last five years, is a license of yours and/or the right persons and businesses called 2A and 2B, denied or withdrawn?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

2L: Is it up to you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a burden of boarding and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 3A to and by 3M only if it was reported to the questions 1D or 1E. Fill a natural person who's associated with one copy of these questions.

Identification partner.

3A: On what partner does the next answer to the questions 3B to and 3M involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

3B: Has this partner been ultimately saying that the last five years have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Commercial Revenue has been recorded, you'll have a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You also have to report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss account for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• ..the consolidated profit and loss account for the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate claim of this partner is no longer act;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

3C: Has this associate been in circumstance for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 3B.

Finance.

3D: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3E: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts were held?

Remark: You also need to provide information on debt to the Belasting Service.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3F: Has this partner enjoyed the last year and the year before?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3G: If you've reported that this partner this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did this partner in this period have foreseeable?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This associate used his own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

3H: Does this associate have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

3I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 3B and 3C.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement.

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

3J: Are these associates called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a settlement agreement with the criminals and the firms that are called to the requests 3B and 3C?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

3K: Have these associates, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C in the last five years, have a legal and/or fiscapable boal?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3L: In the last five years, is a license of this partner, the substance partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C, denied or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3M: Is on this partner, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a burden of board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 4A to and by 4M only if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F. Fill one of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately holds

4A: To what ultimate saying does the next answer to the questions 4B/m involvement?

• ! To a natural person,

Last name:
First names:
Birthedatum:

• ! To a right person,

Name:
Traffic number:

Eventually speaking.

4B: Has this ultimate factory been saying in the last five years also ultimately have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate saying of this ultimate ultimate saying isn't real anymore, and...

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

4C: Has this ultimate claim to have been in charge over the last five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 4B.

Finance.

4D: Does this finally have saying currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4E: Does this finally have saying right now, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about debts to the Residency.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4F: Did this finally have saying this year, last year, and the year before that, have enjoyed revenue?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4G: If you've reported that this ends up saying this year, over the past year, and/or the year didn't have any revenues, how did he/she have in this period?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This ultimate saying has used its own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

4H: Does this finally have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

4I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 4B and 4C.

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

4J: Are these ultimately speaking, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in the questions 4B and 4C, over the past five years, a settlement with the defendant.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

4K: Have these ultimately claiming, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a legal and fifty bodily?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines become among other fines of the Arbey Inspection and the Belt Services Understood.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4L: In the last five years, is a license of (a) this end of ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in 4B and 4C, or assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

4M: Is it to (a) this ultimately claiming, (B) the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a burden of control and compulsiveness?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 5A to and by 5G alone: ..if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F: ♪ As far as you're concerned with this ultimate supervisor, not all the questions 4A to and with 4M under Section4. Eventually, there's been a lot of people who answered.

Fill one copy of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately in charge.

5A: To what ultimate supervisor, the next answer to the questions 5B/m 5G involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

5B: Is this ultimate supervisor in the last five years finally saying he's been saying, "of right persons and enterprises"?

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

Management functions.

5C: Has this ultimate supervisor over the last five years been circumstantial?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 5B.

Criminal and legal act.

5D: Have these ultimately supervised and/or the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C for the past five years, a settlement entered with the D.A.'s office or otherwise assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

5E: Did these ultimate supervisor and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal righteous fine?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

5F: In the last five years, is a license of this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C, refused or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've reported archives, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

5G: Is this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a burden under board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

6.

Executive construction.

6A: Is the license application/keeper also the employer of construction?

• Yes.

• No. The employer is/his:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

If you've answered your question, deliver the next one:

• _

6B: Does the license application/keeper perform the construction all by himself?

• Yes.

• No. This is done by:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

Building location.

6C: Is the premises or property where the license is permitted, and it's owned by the license applicant/keeper?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Years of purchase:

Application:

Wise of funding:

6D: Is the premises or the premises where the license is permitted, rented/paid or is there another usage agreement?

• No.

• Yes, hired/paid. Turn on the submissive.

• ! Another user agreement. Turn on the submissive.

The landlord/pater/the one who lets it use is:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

Sort of a match:

Rentsom/pay per month: $100.

If you arched, rented/gepacht, or if any other user agreement has answered, then deliver the next one.

• _

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

6E: What are the (expected) building costs?

Building costs. $100.

Give the next one:

• ..a budget of construction costs.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

6F: Is the construction of which the license is permitted, by you, financed with your own ability?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Betrayal: $100.

This ability is / is obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6G: Is the construction of which the license perceives, by you.

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The funds are/become:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

7.

The signs declare that:

• ..they have answered the questions of this form completely and to truth: ♪

• ..the documents that are as administered to the answering of this form are consistent with the actuality and being right.

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

If you sign this form as authorized of the involved, then deliver the next one:

• ..a written evidence of power.

Authority.

In the preliminary questions, we use some specific terms. Underneath this, an explanation of their meaning.

Catched.

In Article One, first member, under e, of the law Bibob. It's determined that the following (rights)persons UNITED UNITIVATIONS ACCCCOSIALLY

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..gaved for government assignments;

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

• _

So the involved is always the party that formally involves a government relationship. Because involved can also be legal persons, it's not necessarily about the natural people who do acts that way, for example, fill in this form or have any interest.

Let me get this straight. At a construction license request, the license-keeper/equivalent is the one who was involved.

Possessions.

Under siege seats.

• ..contant money.

• ..and savings.

• ♪ In investment funds, bonds, profit evidence and options.

• _

• _

• ..In real estate, including the own place.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• To rights on stirring business.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

The next thing you know, it's not marked as a serving serpent.

• ♪ Other stirring cases for your own use or use within the family, for example, an incurable residence.

• $500 in cash.

Remark: fruit use and pleasure rights.

Also denounced rights and rights of fertility from the top-notch possessions are marked as a property.

Of course.

A natural person is an individual. This is of interest because the answer to the prejudicial questions may also be from right-persons, for example, decided partnerships or a collaboration of several natural individuals.

Undertaking.

Speaking of serving underhavious enterprise, it's about the enterprise that involves the license application. In principle, this is the enterprise that drives the involved.

You and yours.

As a matter of booze or boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo!

Eventually beneficiary.

For a review on the ground Bill Bibob. It's important to know. To whom the proceeds of an enterprise or other benefits end up eventually. By the way, the natural people who end up saying are also the beneficiary. It's about the owners of a one-man case, the associates of a vow or the (indirectly) shareholders of a decided partnership. They're finally entitled to the profits of the enterprise.

In some cases, other natural people are more than the ones with the circumstance say the ultimate beneficiary. It'll be among other things, depending on the power-resisting decisions:

• ..a natural persons who are direct or circumstantial certificate holder.

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• ..to have the right of fruit on the despicable stock.

• _ Remark: It could be a number of natural people. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

Eventually in charge.

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of leading and circumstantial. For a review on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who's finally in charge. If talking is from a chain of commanding officers' right-persons, it's about the natural person/persons that are at the end of those chains.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible leaders. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimate supervisor is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a void, resume or size, the ultimate superiors are usually:

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a nameless partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ At a foundation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a union, internal security or co-operation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural persons that are direct or circumstantial.

Remark: Commissioners.

In several of the above-rescribed lawforms, Commissioners can play a "indirect" role. If that's the case, they're usually supervisors, too.

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign lawsuits, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that is similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are director of an English limited company or business manager of a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

Eventually,

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of saying and having circumstance. For an assessment on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who ended up saying the word. If spoken is from a chain of phrase-related. Persons, it's about the natural person/persons that are at the end of that chain.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible ultimate saying. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimately saying is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a nut, résumé, or size, the ultimately say,

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholders of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholder.

• ♪ At a nameless partnership, at least this nV itself is considered to be the ultimate saying in the frame of this question form. Besides, the natural persons who are -- are as far as they're known or can be direct or circumstantial shareholder are ultimately speaking. Remark: It could be a number of natural people who aren't all familiar. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

• ♪ At a foundation in the frame of this questioning form, the foundation itself is marked as the ultimately speaking.

• ♪ In a union, amongst beneficiary or co-operation, the ultimate sayings are usually the natural people who are vote-justed members. Remark: It could be a number of natural people. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

Remark: Certificates, property and fruit use in business stock.

Up here, repeatedly, indirectly, shareholders have been ultimately assigned saying. If word is of stock, in common falls, depending on the power-besting decisions, the next natural persons as ultimately pointed out:

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• _

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign law forms, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that's similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are shareholders of an English limited company or a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

Bibob applications with regard to disposal, non-secret subsidiaries or permit expenses. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

Found on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

Containment.

Instruction.		71
One.	Identification.	72
Two.	One-man case-- private person.	79
	Eventually speaking.	79
	Management functions.	80
	Finance.	80
	Lines.	82
	Criminal and legal act.	83
	Arbedshistory.	84
3.	Of course.	85
	Identification partner.	85
	Eventually speaking.	85
	Management functions.	85
	Finance.	86
	Lines.	88
	Criminal and legal act.	88
	Arbedshistory.	90
4.	Eventually,	90
	Identification ultimately holds	90
	Eventually speaking.	91
	Management functions.	91
	Finance.	92
	Lines.	94
	Criminal and legal act.	94
	Arbedshistory.	96
5.	Eventually in charge.	96
	Identification ultimately in charge.	96
	Eventually speaking.	96
	Management functions.	97
	Criminal and legal act.	97
Six.	Specifically questions other permits.	99
	== sync, corrected by elderman ==	99
	Vesting location and inventory.	100.
7.	Declaration and signing and signing.	102.
Authority.		103

Instruction.

This application is on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman == Secureed by the Secretary of Security and Justice. Based on this form, board organs can be reviewed on the ground. Bill Bibob. feed.

permits, revelations, acknowledgements and admissions.

This Bibob application is about the requisitions of ) permits, receipts, acknowledgements, acknowledgements and admissions under the work of the job. Bill Bibob. Falling, except for subsidies and environmental licenses build ex-wives. == sync, corrected by elderman ==! Underneath this, we use the word "Excellency." Also, as a matter of fact, there's another available.

Consequences flawed in.

This Bibob application must fill you completely, correctly and truth-married and hand in with the right admissions. If you don't do this or if you refuse to provide data, that could have the following consequences:

• ♪ A license application can be left out of treatment.

• ♪ A granted license can be revoked.

Besides, it's deliberately acquired of incorrect information. == sync, corrected by elderman ==! This could also lead to decline and/or retreat of the license.

Reference.

It can prevent this form from being asked for information you've given before. In those cases, you can refer to the answer:

• ..the answer of other questions from this form. Then why don't you give me the next one to, like, "Supervision Question 4."

• ..the evidence you provide at the answer of the questions. Then, for example, give the next one to, "See the merchandise of January 1st 2013."

• _ Then, for example, give the next one to, "See the license application of January 1st 2013."

If you answer the questions from this form with these references completely, you don't have to fill in anything else. Well, consider that the actual situation may have changed in regard to what was reported before or recorded.

Information transferred into previous procedures.

It may prevent you from re-enacting in another procedure at the substance boards or provided documents or records that are now requested. If these documents and data haven't changed and the driver's organs still have data, there's no need to retract those data. You should talk to the board.

Your answer doesn't fit the form.

It can prevent your answer from fitting into the answering room at the question of the question. In that case, you should mention the requested data on an admission you're adding to this form.

Authority used terms.

In the questions, the words /de /de are often involved, or ultimately involved. These are terms from the Bill Bibob. (Sighs) Article One, first member, under eternal) It's about the license holder. This could be justice. Furthermore, repeatedly from [Chuckles] Which means we described the up here involved.

Behind this questioning form, a chapter of UNITSAP is recorded. In which we explain the meaning of some other terms. Read this light.

1.

1A: What did you ask for a permit?

Type license:

Location:

1B: Is there a license application from a natural person and/or a man's case?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Burger Service Number (BSN)

Address:

Phone number:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the time that one man's case didn't exist.

If you're referred to as a matter of fact, you're the one who's involved in the case. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions: == sync, corrected by elderman == One man's case-- private person and == sync, corrected by elderman == Specifically requesting any other permits.

You can skip the next questions: == sync, corrected by elderman == ..the questions 3A to 3N under 3rd. == sync, corrected by elderman == == sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪ ..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1C: Is spoken of a license application, from/through a company under firm, a commander partnership.

• No. Continue asking for question 1F and 1G.

• ! Yeah, and all the associates are natural. Answer question 1D. Sla questions 1E, 1F and 1G over.

• _ Answer question 1E and 1G.

1D: What vow, resume or size concerns the license application?

Name partnership/ size:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next natural people as partners:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Liver with regard to this fox, resume or size, the next in:

• _

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions: _ == sync, corrected by elderman == == sync, corrected by elderman == Specifically requesting any other permits.

You can skip the next questions: == sync, corrected by elderman == == sync, corrected by elderman == One-man case-- private personnel. == sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪ ..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1: What vow, resume or size concerns the license application?

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next partners:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next ultimate superiors:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This partnership/mateship has the next ultimate claims:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Liver with regard to the first-named partnership/meating in the next:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a current outlet from a foreign trade record of all the associates and eventually claimed to be as far as they are foreign rights.

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trade record of the Dutch Chamber of Building is recorded, you don't have to provide these data. Then refer to the trafficker.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trade record of the Dutch Chamber of Building is recorded, you don't have to provide these data. Then refer to the trafficker.

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.! As far as these natural people are, they're also ultimately speaking and ultimately leading. The other ultimately have confessions and ultimate supervisors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions: Question 1G: _ == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪ _ Eventually speaking, _ Eventually in charge. ♪ == sync, corrected by elderman == Specifically requesting any other permits.

You can skip the next questions: Question 1F; == sync, corrected by elderman == One man's case-- private person.

1F: Is spoken of a license application, from/through another lawsuit than a private person/a man's case, vow, resume or size?

Remark: From your answer to the obvious questions, this should be the case. If still spoke of a private person/a man's case, vow, résumé, or size, you probably made a mistake. Then change your answer to one of the previous questions.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This licencekeeper/aper has the next driver:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This license holder/-interviewer has the next ultimate leads:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least this concerns the natural people who were named up here as a driver. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This license holder/-appropriate has the next shareholders:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This licencekeeper/equivalent has the next ultimately say,

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least this concerns the natural people who were called up here as a shareholder. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a copy of the shareholder registry.

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give balances and profits and loss bills for the time that the first-named party didn't exist.

The first-named party is the one that was meant to be in the first place. Bill Bibob.! The natural people who are shareholder are ultimately speaking. The natural persons who are a driver are eventually supervised. Any other ultimately ultimately have words and ultimate superiors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions: Question 1G: _ Eventually speaking, _ Eventually in charge. ♪ == sync, corrected by elderman == Specifically requesting any other permits.

You can skip the next questions: == sync, corrected by elderman == One man's case-- private person and ..the questions 3A to 3N under 3rd. Vennoot, of course.

1G: By your answer to the obvious questions, you may have indicated that there are shareholders and/or other ultimate claims. Are there any other natural people who could be entitled to the involved?

Remark: In lighting in the back of this form, when someone as ultimately beneficiary is noticed.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

One-man case-- private person.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 2A to and with 2M only if that was reported in question 1B.

Eventually speaking.

2A: Have you been saying in the last five years, ultimately speaking, of any other right persons and enterprises?

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If your ultimate saying isn't even real anymore;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

2B: Have you been commanding officers for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 2A.

Finance.

2C: Did you at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is understood under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2D: Are you currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about your debts to the Belts.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2E: Did you enjoy the last year and the year before that?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2F: If you've reported this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did you foresee your livelihood?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! I used my own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided for my livelihood, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

2G: Do you have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

2H: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that received right persons and enterprises from the questions 2A and 2B.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

2I: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B for the past five years, a settlement entered with the State's Attorney's Attorney or otherwise referred to as suspected?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

2J: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal penance?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2K: In the last five years, is a license of yours and/or the right persons and businesses called 2A and 2B, denied or withdrawn?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

2L: Is it up to you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a burden of boarding and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

Arbedshistory.

2M: Have you been working as an employee before, not as an entrepreneur?

• No.

• Yes. Admit the subject:

Name employer:

Period:

3.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 3A to and with 3N only if it was reported to the questions 1D or 1E. Fill a natural person who's associated with one copy of these questions.

Identification partner.

3A: On what partner does the next answer to the questions 3B to and 3N involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

3B: Has this partner been ultimately saying that the last five years have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Commercial Revenue has been recorded, you'll have a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You also have to report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate claim of this partner is no longer act;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

3C: Has this associate been in circumstance for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 3B.

Finance.

3D: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3E: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts were held?

Remark: You also need to provide information on debt to the Belasting Service.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3F: Has this partner enjoyed the last year and the year before?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3G: If you've reported that this partner this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did this partner in this period have foreseeable?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This associate used his own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

3H: Does this associate have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

3I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 3B and 3C.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

3J: Are these associates called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a settlement agreement with the criminals and the firms that are called to the requests 3B and 3C?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

3K: Have these associates, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C in the last five years, have a legal and/or fiscapable boal?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3L: In the last five years, is a license of this partner, the substance partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C, denied or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3M: Is on this partner, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a burden of board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

Arbedshistory.

3N: Has this associate been working as an employee not as an entrepreneur?

• No.

• Yes. Admit the subject:

Name employer:

Period:

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 4A to and by 4N only if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F. Fill one of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately holds

4A: To what ultimate saying has the next answer to the questions 4B/4N involvement?

• ! To a natural person,

Last name:
First names:
Birthedatum:

• ! To a right person,

Name:
Traffic number:

Eventually speaking.

4B: Has this ultimate factory been saying in the last five years also ultimately have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate saying of this ultimate ultimate saying isn't real anymore, and...

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

4C: Has this ultimate claim to have been in charge over the last five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 4B.

Finance.

4D: Does this finally have saying currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4E: Does this finally have saying right now, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about debts to the Residency.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4F: Did this finally have saying this year, last year, and the year before that, have enjoyed revenue?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4G: If you've reported that this ends up saying this year, over the past year, and/or the year didn't have any revenues, how did he/she have in this period?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This ultimate saying has used its own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

4H: Does this finally have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

4I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 4B and 4C.

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

4J: Are these ultimately speaking, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in the questions 4B and 4C, over the past five years, a settlement with the defendant.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

4K: Have these ultimately claiming, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a legal and fifty bodily?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines become among other fines of the Arbey Inspection and the Belt Services Understood.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4L: In the last five years, is a license of (a) this end of ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in 4B and 4C, or assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

4M: Is it to (a) this ultimately claiming, (B) the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a burden of control and compulsiveness?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

Arbedshistory.

4N: Has this ultimately claimed earlier as an employee, not as an entrepreneur, been working at the location where the license applies?

Remark: Also give quiz to if this one ends up saying he's a right person.

• No.

• Yes. Admit the subject:

Name employer:

Period:

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 5A to and by 5G alone: ..if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F: ♪ For as far as you're concerned with this ultimate supervisor, not all the questions 4A to and with 4N under Section4. Eventually, there's been a lot of people who answered.

Fill in one of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately in charge.

5A: To what ultimate supervisor, the next answer to the questions 5B/m 5G involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

5B: Is this ultimate supervisor in the last five years finally saying he's been saying, "of right persons and enterprises"?

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

Management functions.

5C: Has this ultimate supervisor over the last five years been circumstantial?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 5B.

Criminal and legal act.

5D: Have these ultimately supervised and/or the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C for the past five years, a settlement entered with the D.A.'s office or otherwise assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

5E: Did these ultimate supervisor and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal righteous fine?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

5F: In the last five years, is a license of this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C, refused or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've reported archives, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

5G: Is this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a burden under board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

6.

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

6A: Does the license include a new enterprise?

• No. The involved has been pushing this enterprise for longer.

• No. The involved takes over this enterprise.

• Yes. There's been a new enterprise.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

If you've reported that is a takeover, then deliver the next one:

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

If you've reported that the person involved has been floating this venture longer than the next:

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

The balances and profits and loss bills, of course, don't have to be given for the time that this firm didn't exist.

6B: Is/is being funded by the substance of your own ability?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Betrayal: $100.

This ability is / is obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6C: Is/is being funded by the suburban enterprise?

Remark: Debts to the Belasting Services and loans within a congregation are also marked as funding with odd ability.

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The funds are/become:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6D: Are there any toy machines placed in the submarine?

• No.

• ! Yeah, these are placed by:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• ..the exploitation agreement.

• _

Vesting location and inventory.

6E: Is the license application tied to a specific location?

• No. Speak 6F to 6K.

• Yes, because...

Address:

6F: Is the premises or grounds where the license is applying, rented/paid or is there another usage agreement?

• No. Skip 6G over.

• Yes, hired/paid. Turn on the submissive.

• ! Another user agreement. Turn on the submissive.

The landlord/pater/the one who lets it use is:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

Sort of a match:

Rentsom/pay per month: $100.

If you arched, rented/gepaught, or established any other usage agreement, then deliver the next one.

• _

6G: Is there any residue or delay at the payment of this rent/pathy or use fee?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

For the period,

Total amount of delay or backwards: $100.

6H: Is/is the premises or property where the license application is presented to, uh, part of the license application?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Years of purchase:

Application:

Wise of funding:

Percentage property:

Named co-owners:

6I: Is the inventory of the suburban enterprise being removed or rented?

• No. Skip 6J.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Treatment fee:

Payment period.

The rental/padder is:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• ..a list you're reporting from which the hired/paid inventory exists.

6J: Is there a rearrange or delay at the payment of this rent/pathy?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

For the period,

Total amount of delay or backwards: $100.

6K: Is/ become the inventory of the substance enterprise ( part) property of the license application/keeper?

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Application:

Wise of funding:

7.

The signs declare that:

• ..they have answered the questions of this form completely and to truth: ♪

• ..the documents that are as administered to the answering of this form are consistent with the actuality and being right.

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

If you sign this form as authorized of the involved, then deliver the next one:

• ..a written evidence of power.

Authority.

In the obvious questions, some specific terms are used. Under here is an explanation of their meaning.

Catched.

In Article One, first member, under e, of the law Bibob. It says that the next (rights)persons [Chuckles]

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..gaved for government assignments;

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

• _

So the involved is always the party that formally involves a government relationship. Because involved can also be right persons, it's not always about the natural persons who do acts like that.

Let me get this straight. At a license-approvement request, the license holder/-interviewer is the one involved.

Possessions.

Under siege seats.

• ..contant money.

• ..and savings.

• ♪ In investment funds, bonds, profit evidence and options.

• _

• _

• ..In real estate, including the own place.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• To rights on stirring business.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

The next thing you know, it's not marked as a serving serpent.

• ♪ Other stirring cases for your own use or use within the family, for example, an incurable residence.

• $500 in cash.

Remark: fruit use and pleasure rights.

Also denounced rights and rights of fertility from the top-notch possessions are marked as a property.

Of course.

A natural person is an individual. This is of interest because the answer to the prejudicial questions may also be from right-persons, for example, decided partnerships or a collaboration of several natural individuals.

Undertaking.

_ In principle, this is the enterprise that drives the involved.

You and yours.

If there were any signs of archives involved, we're talking about described up here.

Eventually beneficiary.

For a review on the ground Bill Bibob. It's important to know. To whom the proceeds of an enterprise or other benefits end up eventually. By the way, the natural people who eventually have the saying are also the beneficiary, as the owners of a one-man case, the associates of a vow or the indirectly shareholders of a decision. They're finally entitled to the profits of the enterprise.

In some cases, other natural people are more than the ones with the circumstantial saying they're finally beneficiary. Depending on the power-making decisions, it's about, like,

• ..a natural persons who are direct or circumstantial certificate holder.

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• ..to have the right of fruit on the despicable stock.

• _ Remark: This could affect a number of natural people. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

Eventually in charge.

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of leading and circumstantial. For a review on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who's finally in charge. If talking is from a chain of commanding officers' right-persons, it's about the natural person/persons standing at the end of those chains.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible leaders. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimate supervisor is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a void, resume or size, the ultimate superiors are usually:

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a nameless partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ At a foundation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a union, internal security or co-operation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural persons that are direct or circumstantial.

Remark: Commissioners.

In several of the above-rescribed lawforms, Commissioners can play a "indirect" role. If that's the case, they're usually supervisors, too.

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign lawsuits, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that is similar to one of the above described functions. This is about natural people who are director of an English limited or company manager of a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

Eventually,

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of saying and having circumstance. For an assessment on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who ended up saying the word. If spoken is from a chain of claims to have been entitled, human beings, it's about the natural person/persons standing at the end of that chain.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible ultimate saying. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimately saying is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a nut, résumé, or size, the ultimately say,

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholders of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholder.

• ♪ At a nameless partnership in this questioning form, at least this nV itself is marked as the ultimately speaking. Besides, the natural persons who are -- are as far as they're known or can be direct or circumstantial shareholder are ultimately speaking. Remark: This could be a number of natural people who aren't all familiar. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

• ♪ At a foundation in the frame of this questioning form, the foundation itself is marked as the ultimately speaking.

• ♪ In a union, amongst beneficiary or co-operation, the ultimate sayings are usually the natural people who are vote-justed members. Remark: This could affect a number of natural people. Consult with the board of directors on who to give you information.

Remark: Certificates, property and fruit use in business stock.

Up here, repeatedly, indirectly, shareholders have been ultimately assigned saying. As a matter of fact, in common cases, the next natural persons can be detected as ultimately speaking,

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• _

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign law forms, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that's similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are shareholders of an English limited company or a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

Bible 4.

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

Bibob application with regard to government assignments, as intended. Article One, first member, under I, from the law of Bibob.

Found on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

Containment.

Instruction.		106
One.	Identification.	107
Two.	One-man case-- private person.	114
	Eventually speaking.	114
	Management functions.	1x15
	Finance.	11
	Lines.	117
	Criminal and legal act.	1x18
3.	Of course.	119
	Identification partner.	120
	Eventually speaking.	120
	Management functions.	120
	Finance.	121
	Lines.	123
	Criminal and legal act.	123
4.	Eventually,	125
	Identification ultimately holds	125
	Eventually speaking.	125
	Management functions.	126
	Finance.	127
	Lines.	128
	Criminal and legal act.	129
5.	Eventually in charge.	131
	Identification ultimately in charge.	131
	Eventually speaking.	131
	Management functions.	131
	Criminal and legal act.	132.
Six.	Specifically asking government assignments.	134
	Exclusive European recommendation lines.	134
	Financial and economic steering.	135
7.	Declaration and signing.	136
Authority.		136

Instruction.

This application is on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman == Secureed by the Secretary of Security and Justice. Based on this form, judges with a government stake can conduct a review on the grounds of the Bibob. This Bibob application is about government assignments as intended. Article One, first member, under I, from the law of Bibob.!

Who's this form for?

This questioning form is meant for involved like that. Article One, first member, under e, of the law Bibob. It's called. It's about:

• ..gaved for government assignments;

• _ ♪

• ..the subcontractors of government assignments.

Infiltrate. Guilts, entrepreneurs to whom a government assignment is or will be entrusted, and subcontractors have to fill out a separate copy of this question form.

If the gifted, the entrepreneur to who is a government assignment or will be entrusted or the subcontractor is a companionship under the firm. For vortex, C.C.S.S.S.S.S., only one form needs to be filled.

Relationship with your own statement.

Important: If the involved, to whom the questionnaire is reached, a gifted or subcontractor for government assignments, some questions in this form are already answered in their own statement. Involved. == sync, corrected by elderman == Then it won't be allowed to let the administrative service ask these questions again in the frame of the house. Bill Bibob. Put it. Questions that can be included in their own statement are 2I, 2J, 3J, 3K, 3M, 4J, 4M, 4M, 5D, 5E, and the questions in chapter 6. These questions serve to be removed from the questionnaire. If the questionnaire, after gunning for the assignment, serves for an examination with the eye on a decision at the point of the decomposition of a government assignment, any questions can be asked out of the question form.

Reference.

It can prevent us from asking for information you've already given. You can refer to those cases:

• ..the answer of other questions from this form. Then why don't you give me the next one to, like, "Supervision Question 4."

• ..the evidence you give to the answer of the questions. Then, for example, give the next one to, "Supie the balance of January 1, 2013."

• _ Then why don't you give the next one to, like, "See the year's bill, 2012."

As far as you can answer the questions from this form with these references completely, you don't have to fill in anything else. Well, consider that the actual situation may have changed in regard to what has been reported/vasted before.

Information transferred into previous procedures.

It may prevent you from in another procedure at the subcutaneous right person with a government stake already given documents or data that are now requested. If these documents and data haven't changed and the right person with a government stake is still available, there's no need to give that information again. Consult with the right person with a government stake, which information you do and no longer have to give.

Your answer doesn't fit the form.

It can prevent your answer from fitting into the answering room at the question of the question. In that case, you can mention the requested data on an admission you're adding to this form.

Authority used terms.

In the questions, we speak repeatedly about *** Those are terms from the Bill Bibob.! With this, we engage, entrepreneurs to who is a government assignment or will be entrusted and undertakers. If the gifted, the entrepreneur of whom a government assignment is or will be entrusted, or the subcontractor is a vof, CV or size, all associates are involved.

Other than that, we speak repeatedly from *** This is what we're talking about.

In the back of this question form, we'll be laying under "Toelight" significance of some other terms. Read this chapter properly.

1.

1A: In connection with what government assignment do you fill this form?

Reference number:

Description:

1B: Is the involved a natural person and/or a man's case?

Remark: In the guidance and in the back of this form, who is in the frame of this form.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Burger Service Number (BSN)

Address:

Phone number:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the time that one man's case didn't exist.

You have to answer the following questions:

_ One man's case-- private person and

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions government assignment.

You can skip the next questions:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

..the questions 3A to 3M under 03. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪

..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1C: Handling the involvement involving the substance government assignment as partners of a firm's company's partnership.

Remark: If the gifted, the entrepreneur to who is a government assignment or will be entrusted or the subcontractor is a companionship under the firm.

• No. Continue asking for question 1F and 1G.

• ! Yeah, and all the associates are natural. Answer question 1D. Sla questions 1E, 1F and 1G over.

• _ Answer question 1E and 1G.

1D: What vortex, resume or size concerns this government assignment?

Name partnership/ size:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next natural people as partners:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Liver with regard to this fox, resume or size, the next in:

• _

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions:

_ == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

_ Specific questions government assignment.

You can skip the next questions:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

_ One-man case-- private personnel.

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪

..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1: What vortex, resume or size concerns this government assignment?

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next partners:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next ultimate superiors:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This partnership/mateship has the next ultimate claims:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Liver with regard to the first-named partnership/meating in the next:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.! As far as these natural people are, they're also ultimately speaking and ultimately leading. The other ultimately have confessions and ultimate supervisors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions:

Question 1G:

_ == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

_ Eventually speaking,

_ Eventually in charge. ♪

_ Specific questions government assignment.

You can skip the next questions:

Question 1F;

_ One man's case-- private person.

1F: Is the involvement a different lawsuit than a private person/a man's case, vomit, resume or size?

Remark: From your answer to the obvious questions, this should be the case. If still spoke of a private person/a man's case, vow, résumé, or size, you probably made a mistake. Then change your answer to one of the previous questions.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This one has the next driver:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This one involved has the next ultimate leads:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least this concerns the natural people who were named up here as a driver. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This one has the next shareholders:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This one involved has the next ultimate saying:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least this concerns the natural people who were called up here as a shareholder. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• ..the balance of lighting by the end of the last three years of the involved.

• ..a copy of the shareholder's register of the involved.

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give balances and profits and loss bills for the time that the first-named party didn't exist.

You've reported who's involved. The natural people who are shareholder are ultimately speaking. The natural persons who are a driver are eventually supervised. Any other ultimately ultimately have words and ultimate superiors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions:

Question 1G:

_ Eventually speaking,

_ Eventually in charge. ♪

== sync, corrected by elderman == Specific questions government assignment.

You can skip the next questions:

_ One man's case-- private person and

..the questions 3A to 3M under 03. Vennoot, of course.

1G: By your answer to the obvious questions, you may have indicated that there are shareholders and/or other ultimate claims. Are there any other natural persons who could be ultimately beneficiary of the involved?

Remark: In lighting in the back of this form, when someone as ultimately beneficiary is noticed.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

One-man case-- private person.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 2A to and with 2L only if that was reported in question 1B.

Eventually speaking.

2A: Have you been saying in the last five years, ultimately speaking, of any other right persons and enterprises?

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If your ultimate saying isn't even real anymore;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

2B: Have you been commanding officers for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 2A.

Finance.

2C: Did you at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is understood under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2D: Are you currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about your debts to the Belts.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2E: Did you enjoy the last year and the year before that?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2F: If you've reported this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did you foresee your livelihood?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! I used my own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided for my livelihood, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

2G: Do you have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

2H: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that received right persons and enterprises from the questions 2A and 2B.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

2I: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B for the past five years, a settlement entered with the State's Attorney's Attorney or otherwise referred to as suspected?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

2J: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal penance?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2K: In the last five years, is a license of yours and/or the right persons and businesses called 2A and 2B, denied or withdrawn?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

2L: Is it up to you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a burden of boarding and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 3A to and by 3M only if it was reported to the questions 1D or 1E. Fill a natural person who's associated with one copy of these questions.

Identification partner.

3A: On what partner does the next answer to the questions 3B to and 3 M involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

3B: Has this partner been ultimately saying that the last five years have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Commercial Revenue has been recorded, you'll have a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You also have to report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate claim of this partner is no longer act;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

3C: Has this associate been in circumstance for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 3B.

Finance.

3D: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3E: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts were held?

Remark: You also need to provide information on debt to the Belasting Service.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3F: Has this partner enjoyed the last year and the year before?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3G: If you've reported that this partner this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did this partner in this period have foreseeable?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This associate used his own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

3H: Does this associate have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

3I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 3B and 3C.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

3J: Are these associates called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a settlement agreement with the criminals and the firms that are called to the requests 3B and 3C?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

3K: Have these associates, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C in the last five years, have a legal and/or fiscapable boal?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3L: In the last five years, is a license of this partner, the substance partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C, denied or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3M: Is on this partner, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a burden of board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 4A to and by 4M only if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F. Fill one of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately holds

4A: To what ultimate saying has the next answer to the questions 4B/m 4 M involvement?

• ! To a natural person,

Last name:
First names:
Birthedatum:

• ! To a right person,

Name:
Traffic number:

Eventually speaking.

4B: Has this ultimate factory been saying in the last five years also ultimately have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate saying of this ultimate ultimate saying isn't real anymore, and...

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

4C: Has this ultimate claim to have been in charge over the last five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 4B.

Finance.

4D: Does this finally have saying currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4E: Does this finally have saying right now, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about debts to the Residency.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4F: Did this finally have saying this year, last year, and the year before that, have enjoyed revenue?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4G: If you've reported that this ends up saying this year, over the past year, and/or the year didn't have any revenues, how did he/she have in this period?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This ultimate saying has used its own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

4H: Does this finally have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

4I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 4B and 4C.

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

4J: Are these ultimately speaking, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in the questions 4B and 4C, over the past five years, a settlement with the defendant.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

4K: Have these ultimately claiming, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a legal and fifty bodily?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines become among other fines of the Arbey Inspection and the Belt Services Understood.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4L: In the last five years, is a license of (a) this end of ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in 4B and 4C, or assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

4M: Is it to (a) this ultimately claiming, (B) the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a burden of control and compulsiveness?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 5A to and by 5G alone: ..if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F: ♪ As far as you're concerned with this ultimate supervisor, not all the questions 4A to and with 4M under Section4. Eventually, there's been a lot of people who answered.

Fill one copy of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately in charge.

5A: To what ultimate supervisor, the next answer to the questions 5B/m 5G involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

5B: Is this ultimate supervisor in the last five years finally saying he's been saying, "of right persons and enterprises"?

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

Management functions.

5C: Has this ultimate supervisor over the last five years been circumstantial?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 5B.

Criminal and legal act.

5D: Have these ultimately supervised and/or the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C for the past five years, a settlement entered with the D.A.'s office or otherwise assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

5E: Did these ultimate supervisor and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal righteous fine?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

5F: In the last five years, is a license of this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C, refused or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've reported archives, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

5G: Is this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a burden under board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

6.

Infiltrate. Fill one copy of the questions 6A to and with 6H. (Out your any answer to questions 1D and 1E appears to be possible that there are several involved.)

Exclusive European recommendation lines.

6A: Wrongs this involved in bankruptcy, revenue, surséance of payment or agreement, did this involved have stopped his employment or is he in some sort of state-of-the-art involving a national arrangement?

No.
Yeah, 'cause	_
	_
	== sync, corrected by elderman ==
	Agreed.
	_
	Otherwise.

If you've reported Several others, then deliver the next in:

• ..a description of the state that's involved.

6B: Is the bankruptcy of this engagement applied or against this involved is a procedure of relief, surséance of payment or agreement or any other kind of procedure that has been made in the national legal settlement for?

No.
Yes, because...	_
	_
	== sync, corrected by elderman ==
	Agreed.
	Otherwise.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one in:

• ..a description of the procedure that was applied.

6C: Is this one involved in a court-appointed decision that has a power of indictment, convicted of a crime that brings the appeal of the individual involved in the drive, as is intended in article 45 members, first c, part of the Deliberate order?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Year/ years:

Landing:

Surprise:

Recorded sentence/mate rule:

Any lights:

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Surprise:

Recorded sentence/mate rule:

Any lights:

6D: Did this involved in the exercise of his profession commit a serious error, as is intended in Article 45, first member, part of the Declaring Protective Acts for government assignments?

Remark: Exercising the appeal is more than just delivering a virtuous work/product. It's also about execution of the work, the service or the product that matched the contractor's terms of expenses, expensive and organization of the project. The edge conditions and the relationship with the employer are a creature of work, the service or the product.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Year/ years:

Landing:

Surprise:

Recorded sentence/mate rule:

Any lights:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Surprise:

Recorded sentence/mate rule:

Any lights:

6E: Did these involved in his obligations satisfy the payment of social insurance contributions match the legal resources of the country where he's been established or from the land of the service?

• No.

• Yes.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ This statement cannot be over three months.

6F: Did these involved in his obligations satisfy the payment of his taxes match the legal reservations of the country of the attending service?

• No.

• Yes.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ This statement cannot be over three months.

6G: Has this involved made himself guilty in serious degrees of false statements in transmitting the intel that match the criteria for quality selection can be required or not removed these intel?

• No.

• Yes.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

Financial and economic steering.

6H: It's important to get a clear picture of the financial and economic bearing of this one involved. You are requested to mention the requested data by the end of the last year. If there's any major changes in the history of the book year, does that include the one involved?

Give the next one:

• ..appropriate bank statements.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• ..if the assignment involves working: The circuits of the work.

• ..if the assignment is about services: The roundings of the services.

• If the assignment is about deliveries: The supplier's convertible ratings considering his products.

7.

The signs declare that:

• ..they have answered the questions of this form completely and to truth: ♪

• ..the documents that are as administered to the answering of this form are consistent with the actuality and being right.

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

If you sign this form as authorized of the involved, then deliver the next one:

• ..a written evidence of power.

Authority.

In the preliminary questions, we've used some specific terms. Under here, an explanation of their meaning.

Catched.

In Article One, first member, under e, of the law Bibob. It's determined that the following (rights)persons UNITED UNITIVATIONS ACCCCOSIALLY

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..gaved for government assignments;

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

• _

So the involved is always the party that formally involves a government relationship. As involved can also be legal subjects, it's not necessarily about the natural people who do actions, for example, fill in this form or have interest in the relationship.

Let me get this straight. On a government assignment, the gifted, the entrepreneurs are subject to who is a government assignment or will be entrusted and the subcontractors are the ones involved. If the gifted, the entrepreneur to whom a government assignment is or will be entrusted or undertaker a firm's companionship, a commander's partnership is either involved or his partnership.

Possessions.

Under siege seats.

• ..contant money.

• ..and savings.

• ♪ In investment funds, bonds, profit evidence and options.

• _

• _

• ..In real estate, including the own place.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• To rights on stirring business.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

The next thing you know, it's not marked as a serving serpent.

• ♪ Other stirring cases for your own use or use within the family, for example, an incurable residence.

• $500 in cash.

Remark: fruit use and pleasure rights.

Also denounced rights and rights of fertility from the top-notch possessions are marked as a property.

Of course.

A natural person is an individual. This is of interest because the answer to the prejudicial questions may also be from right-persons, for example, decided partnerships or a collaboration of several natural individuals.

Undertaking.

As spoken to as a matter of underhavige submarine, this is basically the enterprise driven by the people involved.

Right person with a government strike.

In Article One, first member, under one of the laws of Bibob. The next archersons with a government status are called

• ..the state;

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• # waters;

• to public bodies as intended. Article 8, first member of the law community arrangements.;

• _

• to public bodies for appeal and company;

• to public bodies as intended. == sync, corrected by elderman ==; ♪

• _

In the frame of a government assignment, these right persons performed as a recommended service or the contraction with which after a recommendation is closed.

You and yours.

If we're from archives or archives involved, we're talking about described up here.

Eventually beneficiary.

For a review on the ground Bill Bibob. It's important to know. To whom the proceeds of an enterprise or other benefits end up eventually. By the way, the natural people who end up saying are also the beneficiary. It's about the owners of a one-man case, the associates of a vow or the (indirectly) shareholders of a decided partnership. They're finally entitled to the profits of the enterprise.

In some cases, other natural people are more than the ones with the circumstantial saying they're finally beneficiary. It'll be among other things, depending on the power-resisting decisions:

• ..a natural persons who are direct or circumstantial certificate holder.

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• ..to have the right of fruit on the despicable stock.

• _ Remark: It could be a number of natural people. Consult with the right person with a government stake on who to give you information.

Eventually in charge.

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of leading and circumstantial. For a review on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who's finally in charge. If talking is from a chain of commanding officers' right-persons, it's about the natural person/persons that are at the end of those chains.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible leaders. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimate supervisor is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a void, resume or size, the ultimate superiors are usually:

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a nameless partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ At a foundation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a union, internal security or co-operation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural persons that are direct or circumstantial.

Remark: Commissioners.

In several of the above-rescribed lawforms, Commissioners can play a "indirect" role. If that's the case, they're usually supervisors, too.

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign lawsuits, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that is similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are director of an English limited company or business manager of a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

Eventually,

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of saying and having circumstance. For an assessment on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who ended up saying the word. If spoken is from a chain of phrase-related. Persons, it's about the natural person/persons that are at the end of that chain.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible ultimate saying. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimately saying is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a void, resume or size, the ultimate superiors are usually:

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholder.

• ♪ At a nameless partnership, at least this nV itself is considered to be the ultimate saying in the frame of this question form. Besides, the natural persons who are -- are as far as they're known or can be direct or circumstantial shareholder are ultimately speaking. Remark: It could be a number of natural people who aren't all familiar. Consult with the right person with a government stake on who to give you information.

• ♪ At a foundation in the frame of this questioning form, the foundation itself is marked as the ultimately speaking.

• ♪ In a union, amongst beneficiary or co-operation, the ultimate sayings are usually the natural people who are vote-justed members. Remark: It could be a number of natural people. Consult with the right person with a government stake on who to give you information.

Remark: Certificates, property and fruit use in business stock.

Up here, repeatedly, indirectly, shareholders have been ultimately assigned saying. If word is of stock, in common falls, depending on the power-besting decisions, the next natural persons as ultimately pointed out:

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• _

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign law forms, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that's similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are shareholders of an English limited company or a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

Bibob application with regard to properties, as intended. Article One, first member, under o, of the law of Bibob.

Found on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

Containment.

Instruction.		140
One.	Identification.	141
Two.	One-man case-- private person.	1
	Eventually speaking.	1
	Management functions.	149
	Finance.	149
	Lines.	151
	Criminal and legal act.	152.
3.	Of course.	15
	Identification partner.	15
	Eventually speaking.	154
	Management functions.	154
	Finance.	155
	Lines.	15
	Criminal and legal act.	15
4.	Eventually,	15
	Identification ultimately holds	15
	Eventually speaking.	15
	Management functions.	160
	Finance.	161
	Lines.	162
	Criminal and legal act.	163
5.	Eventually in charge.	165
	Identification ultimately in charge.	165
	Eventually speaking.	165
	Management functions.	165
	Criminal and legal act.	166
Six.	Specific questions properly transactions.	1
6.1.	Type transaction.	1
6.2.	Particular real estate -- establishment/currently legal.	1
6.3.	Particular real estate - rent/parent/use	16
6.4.	Public real estate-- refuge/currently entitled transaction.	170
6.5.	Public real estate -- retaliation/cross code.	172
6.6.	Public real estate-- rent/parent/use.	173
6.7.	Public real estate-- rent/parent/use.	174
6.8.	Joint participation.	175.
7.	Declaration and signing.	177
Authority.		178

Instruction.

This application is on the ground. == sync, corrected by elderman == Secureed by the Secretary of Security and Justice. Based on this form, judges with a government stake can conduct a review on the grounds of the Bibob. This Bibob application is about real estate transactions as intended. Article One, first member, under o, of the law of Bibob.!

Consequences flawed in.

This Bibob application must fill you completely, correctly and truth-married and hand in with the right admissions. If you don't do this or if you refuse to give information, that could have the following consequences:

• == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

• _

Besides, it's deliberately acquired of incorrect information. == sync, corrected by elderman ==! This could also lead to the absence, decomposing or suspending a real-estate transaction.

Reference.

It can prevent this form from being asked for information you've already given. In those cases, you can refer to the answer:

• ..the answer of other questions from this form. Then why don't you give me the next one to, like, "Supervision Question 4."

• ..the evidence you provide at the answer of the questions. Then, for example, give the next one to, "See the merchandise of January 1st 2013."

• _ Then, for example, give the next to, "See the lease of January 1st 2013."

As far as you can answer the questions from this form with these references completely, you don't have to fill in anything else. Well, consider that the actual situation may have changed in regard to what has been reported/vasted before.

Information transferred into previous procedures.

It may prevent you from in another procedure at the subcutaneous right person with a government stake already given documents or data that are now requested. If these documents and data haven't changed and the right person with a government stake that still has information, there's no need to give it back. Consult with the right person with a government stake, which information you do and no longer have to give.

Your answer doesn't fit the form.

It can prevent your answer from fitting into the answering room at the question of the question. You can report the requested information on an admission you're adding to this form.

Authority used terms.

In the questions, we speak repeatedly about *** These are terms from the Bill Bibob. (Sighs) Article One, first member, under eternal) This is what the intended contraction is supposed to be, so the entrepreneur with who is a real estate transaction or will be dealt with. This could be justice. Furthermore, repeatedly from [Chuckles] This means we described the up here involved.

In the back of this question form, we'll be laying under "Toelight" significance of some other terms. Read this chapter properly.

1.

1A: On what real estate deal does the real estate deal involve?

Kadastrale announcement:

Location:

1B: Is there a real-estate transaction with a natural person and/or a man's case?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the time that one man's case didn't exist.

If you're referred to as a matter of fact, you're the one who's involved in the case. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions:

_ One man's case-- private person and

_ Specifically, real-estate questions, as far as you're concerned about asking for 6.1A.

You can skip the next questions:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

..the questions 3A to 3M under 03. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪

..the questions 5A to 5G under £5. Eventually leading.

1C: Is spoken of a real-estate transaction with a corporate partnership under firm, a commander partnership.

• No. Continue asking for question 1F and 1G.

• ! Yeah, and all the associates are natural. Answer question 1D. Sla questions 1E, 1F and 1G over.

• _ Answer question 1E and 1G.

1D: What vortex, resume or size is the real estate transaction?

Name partnership/ size:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next natural people as partners:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Liver with regard to this fox, resume or size, the next in:

• _

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.!

You have to answer the following questions:

_ Vennoot

Of course, someone. ♪

_ Specifically, real-estate questions, as far as you're concerned about asking for 6.1A.

You can skip the next questions:

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

_ One-man case-- private personnel.

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually speaking, ♪

== sync, corrected by elderman == Eventually leading.

1: What vortex, resume or size is the real estate transaction?

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next partners:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This partnership/ size has the next ultimate superiors:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This partnership/mateship has the next ultimate claims:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least it's about the natural people who were called up here as a partner. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Liver with regard to the first-named partnership/meating in the next:

• _

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give these balances and profits and loss bills for the period that this partnership/measure didn't exist yet.

The associates are the involved as intended in the company. Bill Bibob.! As far as these natural people are, they're also ultimately speaking and ultimately leading. The other ultimately have confessions and ultimate supervisors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions:

Question 1G:

_ == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

_ Eventually speaking,

_ Eventually in charge. ♪

_ Specifically, real-estate questions, as far as you're concerned about asking for 6.1A.

You can skip the next questions:

Question 1F;

_ One man's case-- private person.

1F: Is there any record of a real estate transaction with another lawsuit than a private person/a man's case, vof, resume or size?

Remark: From your answer to the obvious questions, this should be the case. If still spoke of a private person/a man's case, vow, résumé, or size, you probably made a mistake. Then change your answer to one of the previous questions.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Name:

All trade names:

Right shape:

Traffic number:

Address:

Phone number:

This intended contraction has the next driver:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This intended contraction has the next ultimate supervisors:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as the ultimate supervisor is noticed. At least this concerns the natural people who were named up here as a driver. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:
Phone number:

This intended contraction has the next shareholders:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

This intended contraction has the next ultimately said:

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted. At least this concerns the natural people who were called up here as a shareholder. Their data doesn't need to be re-interviewed.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		All trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Phone number:		Phone number:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a copy of the shareholder registry.

• _

• _

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

You don't have to give balances and profits and loss bills for the time that the first-named party didn't exist.

The intended contraction. Bill Bibob.! The natural people who are shareholder are ultimately speaking. The natural persons who are a driver are eventually supervised. Any other ultimately ultimately have words and ultimate superiors have reported you.

You have to answer the following questions:

Question 1G:

_ Eventually speaking,

_ Eventually in charge. ♪

_ Specifically, real-estate questions, as far as you're concerned about asking for 6.1A.

You can skip the next questions:

_ One man's case-- private person and

..the questions 3A to 3M under 03. Vennoot, of course.

1G: By your answer to the obvious questions, you may have indicated that there are shareholders and/or other ultimate claims. Are there any other natural persons who could be ultimately beneficiary of the involved?

Remark: In lighting in the back of this form, when someone as ultimately approved.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

One-man case-- private person.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 2A to and with 2L only if that was reported in question 1B.

Eventually speaking.

2A: Have you been saying in the last five years, ultimately speaking, of any other right persons and enterprises?

Remark: In the back of this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If your ultimate saying isn't even real anymore;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

2B: Have you been commanding officers for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 2A.

Finance.

2C: Did you at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is understood under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2D: Are you currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about your debts to the Belts.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2E: Did you enjoy the last year and the year before that?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2F: If you've reported this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did you foresee your livelihood?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! I used my own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided for my livelihood, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Burger Service Number (BSN)
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

2G: Do you have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

2H: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that received right persons and enterprises from the questions 2A and 2B.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

2I: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B for the past five years, a settlement entered with the State's Attorney's Attorney or otherwise referred to as suspected?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

2J: Have you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal penance?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

2K: In the last five years, is a license of yours and/or the right persons and businesses called 2A and 2B, denied or withdrawn?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

2L: Is it up to you and/or the right persons and enterprises called 2A and 2B in the last five years, a burden of boarding and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3.

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 3A to and by 3M only if it was reported to the questions 1D or 1E. Fill a natural person who's associated with one copy of these questions.

Identification partner.

3A: On what partner does the next answer to the questions 3B to and 3M involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

3B: Has this partner been ultimately saying that the last five years have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Commercial Revenue has been recorded, you'll have a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You also have to report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate claim of this partner is no longer act;

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

3C: Has this associate been in circumstance for the past five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times. You can join this admission with the organogram you're consulting on the answer of question 3B.

Finance.

3D: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year before that possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3E: Did this partner at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts were held?

Remark: You also need to provide information on debt to the Belasting Service.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3F: Has this partner enjoyed the last year and the year before?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3G: If you've reported that this partner this year, the last year, and/or the year before that, how did this partner in this period have foreseeable?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This associate used his own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

3H: Does this associate have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

3I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 3B and 3C.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

3J: Are these associates called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a settlement agreement with the criminals and the firms that are called to the requests 3B and 3C?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

3K: Have these associates, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C in the last five years, have a legal and/or fiscapable boal?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

3L: In the last five years, is a license of this partner, the substance partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises called 3B and 3C, denied or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

3M: Is on this partner, the subhavious partnership and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 3B and 3C over the last five years, a burden of board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 4A to and by 4M only if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F. Fill one of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately holds

4A: To what ultimate saying has the next answer to the questions 4B/m 4 M involvement?

• ! To a natural person,

Last name:
First names:
Birthedatum:

• ! To a right person,

Name:
Traffic number:

Eventually speaking.

4B: Has this ultimate factory been saying in the last five years also ultimately have been saying, "from other right persons and enterprises"?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered your question, liver to the upper rights and enterprises, the next in:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable times.

• ..the profits and loss accounts for the last three years.

• ..the balances with lighting at the end of the last three years.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..the consolidated balances with lighting per the end of the last three years, as far as they've been set up.

The lengths of these balances and profits and losses may remain retarded:

• One. If the ultimate saying of this ultimate ultimate saying isn't real anymore, and...

• Two. For the time that the despicable right-persons and enterprises didn't exist yet.

Management functions.

4C: Has this ultimate claim to have been in charge over the last five years?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 4B.

Finance.

4D: Does this finally have saying currently, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's possessions?

Remark: In the back of this form, which is under possession.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

Possession:

Now value:

The end of last year:

Worth year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4E: Does this finally have saying right now, at the end of last year and at the end of the year's debts?

Remark: You also need to give information about debts to the Residency.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

Schuldeiser:

Now treaty:

Betrayal end last year:

Bedtime year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4F: Did this finally have saying this year, last year, and the year before that, have enjoyed revenue?

Remark: With revenues under other payments, benefits, profit benefits, and revenues are meant to be rented out.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

Bron revenue:

Type income:

Betrayal this year:

Betrayal last year:

Behavior year before that:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4G: If you've reported that this ends up saying this year, over the past year, and/or the year didn't have any revenues, how did he/she have in this period?

Remark: By answering this question, you can give multiple answers.

• ! This ultimate saying has used its own ability.

• ! Someone else has provided life support, because...

Last name:
First names:
Date of birth and place:
Address:

• ! In another way,

Through:

4H: Does this finally have a fiscal partner?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Last name:

First names:

Date of birth and place:

Address:

Lines.

4I: In the answer of the preliminary questions, they may be received loans. Is that the case?

Remark: You have to go into this at all receiving loans that are mentioned in the answer of all prejudicial questions, including this one. It's also about the loans that have received right persons and enterprises from the questions 4B and 4C.

• No.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

Treason charge:

Debt:

Rental eccentration:

Type certainty.

Betrayal security:

Date agreement:

Date deduction:

Full (statuary) name debt demander:

Trade names debt demander:

Birthedatum and place debt demander:

Trade register number debt demander:

Addresser!

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

• _

Criminal and legal act.

4J: Are these ultimately speaking, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in the questions 4B and 4C, over the past five years, a settlement with the defendant.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

4K: Have these ultimately claiming, ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a legal and fifty bodily?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines become among other fines of the Arbey Inspection and the Belt Services Understood.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

4L: In the last five years, is a license of (a) this end of ultimately speaking, the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises that are called in 4B and 4C, or assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

4M: Is it to (a) this ultimately claiming, (B) the involved and/or, the right persons and enterprises called in the questions 4B and 4C over the last five years, a burden of control and compulsiveness?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Got it.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

_

Infiltrate. Fill the questions 5A to and by 5G alone: ..if that was reported to the questions 1E or 1F: ♪ As far as you're concerned with this ultimate supervisor, not all the questions 4A to and with 4M under Section4. Eventually, there's been a lot of people who answered.

Fill one copy of these questions eventually.

Identification ultimately in charge.

5A: To what ultimate supervisor, the next answer to the questions 5B/m 5G involvement?

Full name:

Birthedatum:

Eventually speaking.

5B: Is this ultimate supervisor in the last five years finally saying he's been saying, "of right persons and enterprises"?

Remark: In lighting behind this form, when someone as ultimately has been spotted.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Roll:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _ As far as the evidence in the trafficking register of the Dutch Chamber of Building has been recorded, you can suffice with a reference to the trade register.

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods.

Management functions.

5C: Has this ultimate supervisor over the last five years been circumstantial?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

Function:

Period:

Statute name:

All trade names:

Traffic number:

Address:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• == sync, corrected by elderman == You should also report the despicable periods. You can join this admission with the organogram that you consult with the answer to question 5B.

Criminal and legal act.

5D: Have these ultimately supervised and/or the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C for the past five years, a settlement entered with the D.A.'s office or otherwise assigned?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

Suspect:

Year/ years:

Landing:

Punishable facts:

Any lights:

5E: Did these ultimate supervisor and/or the right persons and enterprises that are called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a legal and/or fiscal righteous fine?

Remark: Under control and fiscal righteous fines are under other fines of the Arbey inspection and the Belts Service understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

Property.

Year/ years:

Management:

Property facts:

Any lights:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

5F: In the last five years, is a license of this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C, refused or revoked?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

Involved.

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Name enterprise:

If you've reported archives, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

5G: Is this ultimate supervisor and/or of the right persons and enterprises called 5B and 5C in the last five years, a burden under board and/or compulsion?

Remark: Amongst controlled subdues the closure of a property or inheritance on the ground. Article 13b of Opium Law. Understand.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

Involved.

Surprise:

Year/ years:

Management:

Location:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• [Chuckles] The defining decisions.

6.

6.1. Type transaction.

A: What's the transaction to?

• ! A government striker is going to acquire a real estate case of mine.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.3 to 6.8.

• ! A government striker has acquired a real estate case of mine.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.3 to 6.8.

• ! A government striker is going to get a business right from me.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.3 to 6.8.

• ! A government stake managed to change a business right from me.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.3 to 6.8.

• ! A government stakeman rents/paid/uses a real estate case of mine.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.2 and 6.4 to 6.8.

• ! A government striker is going to hire a real estate case of me/patients.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.2 and 6.4 to 6.8.

• ! I'm going to acquire a real estate case of a government stake.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Hit the questions under 6.2, 6.3 and 6.5 to 6.8.

• ! I've acquired a real estate case of a government stake.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.2 to 6.4 and 6.6 to 6.8.

• ! I'm going to get a new legal right from a government stake.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Hit the questions under 6.2, 6.3 and 6.5 to 6.8.

• ! I've got a [Chuckles] corporate right of a government stake.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.2 to 6.4 and 6.6 to 6.8.

• ! I'm gonna hire a real estate case of a government stake, stitches, or forces, use a code.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.2 to 6.5, 6.7 and 6.8.

• ! I'm rent/pathetic/use a real estate case of a government stake.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.2 to 6.6 and 6.8.

• ! I'm going to join a government stake with a government stake to a judge, a commander partnership or a firm companion who has the property or a business right to a disregarded case or dismissed.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.2 to 6.7.

• ! I'm gonna take a judge with a government stake in a court of law, a commander partnership or a firm that discharges property or a business law or a business law enforcement to a disgraced case or dislocated.

  == sync, corrected by elderman == Skip the questions under 6.2 to 6.7.

6.2. Particular real estate -- establishment/currently legal.

6.2A: Is/was/was/ becomes the real-estate business that allows the transaction to be your property?

• No. Skip the questions 6.2B and 6.2C.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Years of purchase:

Application:

6.2B. Is/was/was the real-estate case that allows the transaction to be funded by you.

• No.

• Yes, because...

Betrayal: $100.

This ability is/was/was obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6.2C. Is/was/was/becomes the real-estate case that allows the transaction to be funded by you.

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The funds.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6.3. Particular real estate - rent/parent/use

6.3A. Is/become the real estate case where the transaction is, uh, your property?

• No. Skip the questions 6.3B. and 6.3C.

• Yes. Turn on the submissive.

Years of purchase:

Application:

6.3B. Is/is being the real estate case where the transaction is, uh, financed with its own ability?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Betrayal: $100.

This ability is/will be obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6.3C. Is/is being the real estate case where the transaction is, uh, financed with odd ability?

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The funds are/shells are:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6.3D. Is/was the real estate case where the transaction allows you to be retained from another contractor or is spoken of another user agreement?

• No.

• Yes, hired/paid. Turn on the submissive.

• ! Another user agreement. Turn on the submissive.

The landlord/pater/the one who lets it use is/become:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

Sort of a match:

Rentsom/pay per month: $100.

If you arched, rented/gepacht, or if any other user agreement has answered, then deliver the next one.

• _

6.4. Public real estate-- refuge/currently entitled transaction.

6.4A. For what activities will you use the real-estate business that allows the transaction?

• ! I'm not using the real estate case.

• ! The real estate case will be rented/paid/ter use available to another party, because...

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

• ! I'll use the real estate case for (andering) corporate activities, because...

Type corporate activity:

• ! I'll use the real estate case for other activities, because...

Type activities:

If you've reported that it's rent-paid to use by another party, then deliver the next one.

• _

6.4B. Do you have to pay for aggravating or acquiring this property/this business fee?

• No. Skip the questions 6.4C. and 6.4D.

• Yeah, 'cause $100.

6.4C. If you have to pay a fee, will you finance these payments with your own ability?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Betrayal: $100.

This ability is / is obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6.4D. If you have to pay a fee, will you finance these payments with odd ability?

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The funds are:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6.5. Public real estate -- retaliation/cross code.

6.5A: What activities do you use the real-estate case that allows the transaction?

• ! I'm not using the real estate case.

• ! The real estate case is rented/paid/ter use available to another party,

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

• ! I'm using the real estate case for (ander) corporate activities,

Type corporate activity:

• ! I use the real estate case for other activities, because...

Type activities:

If you've reported that it's rent-paid to use by another party, then deliver the next one.

• _

6.5B. Did you have to pay this business fee?

• No. Skip the questions 6.5C. and 6.5D.

• Yes, because...

Total fee: $100.

Reeds paid: $100.

Still paying: $100.

6.5C. As far as you've already paid a fee, did you fund these payments by any means necessary?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Betrayal: $100.

This ability is obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6.5D. As far as you've already paid a fee, you funded these payments, then, with odd ability?

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The financier.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6.6. Public real estate-- rent/parent/use.

6.6A: What activities are you going to use the real-estate business that allows the transaction?

• ! I'm not gonna use the real estate case.

• ! The real estate case will be rented/paid/ter use available to another party, because...

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

• ! I'll use the real estate case for (andering) corporate activities, because...

Type corporate activity:

• ! I'll use the real estate case for other activities, because...

Type activities:

If you've reported that it's rent-paid to use by another party, then deliver the next one.

• _

6.6B. Do you have to pay a fee for hiring/paid/use of this real estate case?

• No. Skip questions 6.6C and 6.6D.

• _

6.6C: If you have to pay a fee, will you fund these payments with your own ability?

• No.

• Yes, because...

This ability is/will be obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6.6D. If you have to pay a fee, will you fund these payments with odd ability?

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The funds are:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6.7. Public real estate-- rent/parent/use.

6.7A: What activities do you use the real-estate case that allows the transaction?

• ! I'm not using the real estate case.

• ! The real estate case is rented/paid/ter use available to another party,

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:

• ! I'm using the real estate case for (ander) corporate activities,

Type corporate activity:

• ! I use the real estate case for other activities, because...

Type activities:

If you've reported that it's rent-paid to use by another party, then deliver the next one.

• _

6.7B. Did you have to pay a fee for rent/patient/use of this real estate case?

• No. Skip the questions 6.7C and 6.7D.

• Yes, because...

Total fee: $100.

Reeds paid: $100.

Still paying: $100.

6.7C. As far as you've already paid a fee, you funded these payments, then, with your own ability?

• No.

• Yes, because...

This ability is obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6.7D. As far as you've already paid a fee, did you fund these payments than any of them with odd ability?

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

The financier.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6.8. Joint participation.

6.8A: Did you have your own ability to enter the capital and/or strange ability of loans in the right person or partnership?

• No. Skip the questions 6.8B and 6.8C.

• Yes.

6.8B. Did you fund this input?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Own ability: $100.

This ability is obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6.8C: Did you fund this input?

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

Totally strange ability: $100.

The funds are:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

6.8D. Will you bring in the right person or partnership?

• No. Skip the questions 8E and 8F.

• Yes.

6.8E: Will you fund this input?

• No.

• Yes, because...

Own ability: $100.

This ability is/will be obtained by:

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

6.8F: Will you fund this entry?

• No.

• Give that to the next of kin.

Totally strange ability: $100.

The funds are:

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

Last name:		Name of right person:
First names:		Trade names:
Date of birth and place:		Right shape:
Burger Service Number (BSN)		Traffic number:
Address:		Address:
Treason funding:	$100.	Treason funding:	$100.

If you've answered the question, deliver the next one:

• _

• _

7.

The signs declare that:

• ..they have answered the questions of this form completely and to truth: ♪

• ..the documents that are as administered to the answering of this form are consistent with the actuality and being right.

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

Name involved:

Name signer:

Addresser:

How do you...

Date of signing:

Place of signing:

Signature:

If you sign this form as authorized of the involved, then deliver the next one:

• ..a written evidence of power.

Authority.

In the preliminary questions, we use some specific terms. Underneath this, an explanation of their meaning.

(Sighs) contraction.

The intended contraction is the one that was described under this.

Catched.

In Article One, first member, under e, of the law Bibob. It's determined that the following (rights)persons UNITED UNITIVATIONS ACCCCOSIALLY

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..gaved for government assignments;

• _

• == sync, corrected by elderman == ♪

• _

So the involved is always the party that formally involves a government relationship. As involved can also be legal subjects, it's not necessarily about the natural people who do actions, for example, fill in this form or have interest in the relationship.

Let me get this straight. In a real estate transaction, the engagement is the engagement of who is a real estate transaction or will be dealt with.

Possessions.

Under siege seats.

• ..contant money.

• ..and savings.

• ♪ In investment funds, bonds, profit evidence and options.

• _

• _

• ..In real estate, including the own place.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• _

• To rights on stirring business.

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

The next thing you know, it's not marked as a serving serpent.

• ♪ Other stirring cases for your own use or use within the family, for example, an incurable residence.

• $500 in cash.

Remark: fruit use and pleasure rights.

Also denounced rights and rights of fertility from the top-notch possessions are marked as a property.

Of course.

A natural person is an individual. This is of interest because the answer to the prejudicial questions may also be from right-persons, for example, decided partnerships or a collaboration of several natural individuals.

Undertaking.

Speaking of serving underhavige undertaking, it's about the enterprise with which a real estate transaction is or will be entered. In principle, this is the enterprise that drives the involved.

Right person with a government strike.

The term "Appealing Person" with a government status rate is acquitted from the outcome. Bill Bibob. (Sighs) Article One, first member, under a) It's about:

• ..the state;

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• # waters;

• to public bodies as intended. Article 8, first member of the law community arrangements.;

• _

• to public bodies for appeal and company;

• to public bodies as intended. == sync, corrected by elderman ==; ♪

• _

You and yours.

As a matter of booze or boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-boo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo!

Eventually beneficiary.

For a review on the ground Bill Bibob. It's important to know. To whom the proceeds of an enterprise or other benefits end up eventually. By the way, the natural people who end up saying are also the beneficiary. It's about the owners of a one-man case, the associates of a vow or the (indirectly) shareholders of a decided partnership. They're finally entitled to the profits of the enterprise.

In some cases, other natural people are more than the ones with the circumstantial saying they're finally beneficiary. It'll be among other things, depending on the power-resisting decisions:

• ..a natural persons who are direct or circumstantial certificate holder.

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• ..to have the right of fruit on the despicable stock.

• _ Remark: It could be a number of natural people. Consult with the right person with a government stake on who to give you information.

Eventually in charge.

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of leading and circumstantial. For a review on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who's finally in charge. If there's a chain of commanding officers' right-persons, it's about the natural person/persons that are at the end of that chain.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible leaders. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimate supervisor is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a void, resume or size, the ultimate superiors are usually:

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a nameless partnership, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ At a foundation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial drivers.

• ♪ In a union, internal security or co-operation, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural persons that are direct or circumstantial.

Remark: Commissioners.

In several of the above-rescribed lawforms, Commissioners can play a "indirect" role. If that's the case, they're usually supervisors, too.

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign lawsuits, the ultimate superiors are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that is similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are director of an English limited company or business manager of a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

Eventually,

The Desk Bill Bibob. Speaks of saying and having circumstance. For an assessment on the ground of the Bibob, it's important to know who ended up saying the word. If spoken is from a chain of phrase-related. Persons, it's about the natural person/persons that are at the end of that chain.

Given the variation in property and state structures, it's not possible to give an exhaustive resound of all possible ultimate saying. Under here, examples with regard to the most common cases:

• ♪ In a one-man case, the ultimately saying is the natural person who owns this one-man case and for whose account this is being driven.

• ♪ In a nut, résumé, or size, the ultimately say,

  • 1) the natural people who are partner;

  • 2) the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholders of right persons who act as partners.

• ♪ In a private partnership, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who are direct or circumstantial shareholder.

• ♪ At a nameless partnership, at least this nV itself is considered to be the ultimate saying in the frame of this question form. Besides, the natural persons who are -- are as far as they're known or can be direct or circumstantial shareholder are ultimately speaking. Remark: It could be a number of natural people who aren't all familiar. Consult with the right person with a government stake on who to give you information.

• ♪ At a foundation in the frame of this questioning form, the foundation itself is marked as the ultimately speaking.

• ♪ In a union, amongst beneficiary or co-operation, the ultimate sayings are usually the natural people who are vote-justed members. Remark: It could be a number of natural people. Consult with the right person with a government stake on who to give you information.

Remark: Certificates, property and fruit use in business stock.

Up here, repeatedly, indirectly, shareholders have been ultimately assigned saying. If word is of stock, in common falls, depending on the power-besting decisions, the next natural persons as ultimately pointed out:

• == sync, corrected by elderman ==

• ..a natural persons who are directly or circumstantial on the despicable stock.

• _

Remark: foreign rights.

In foreign law forms, the ultimate claims are usually the natural people who fulfill a function that's similar to one of the above described functions. It's about natural people who are shareholders of an English limited company or a Belgian decided partnership with limited liability.

Attention 6.

No other versions. Saved. Relationships. (Extern link) Permanent link.

Formulier finding his own research.

Found on the ground. Article 30, fifth member of the Bill Bibob.

Initiating

This form is on the ground. Article 30, fifth member of the Bill Bibob. Secureed by the Secretary of Security and Justice. This form is intended for the findings of their own research of directors and right persons with a government stake in the frame of the government. Bill Bibob. Containment and then to the Bibob Bureau.

Infiltrate.

This form is exclusively intended for driver organs and right personnel with a government strike. It just needs to be filled in when there's a consultation application on the ground. Bill Bibob.!

It can prevent an answer from fitting into the answering room. In that case, you'll have to mention the requested data in an admission you're adding to this form and referring to that admission.

It can prevent the requested information from being described in additional documents. If that's the case, that's enough to refer to those documents.

Admit to parts 4 and 5 each time from which source the data's been reported.

Do you have any questions?

If you have any questions about this form, you can call in office hours with Bibob at 970 370 4600. For more information, you can also look at wwrightis.

One.

This form concerns the next one:

(Statutaire) name: ...

Any trade names: ...

2.

This form involves one:

• ! license. As in...

  • ! Article 2.1, first member of the law general decisions.'Cause...

    ...

  • ! Article 3 Drank and Horecawet

  • == sync, corrected by elderman == Article 1.1 of the law transporting goods. ♪ Article 7.1, first member of the law transporting goods.

  • ! Article 4 of law enforcement 2,000

  • ! Article 6 Opium law. (opium engagements)

  • Anders, because...

• ! Meaning license. Which is required on the ground of a suspension for a facility or a company, for one:

  • _

  • Coffee shop.

  • == sync, corrected by elderman ==

  • == sync, corrected by elderman ==

  • Otherwise,

• ! Subsidia. In case: ...

• ! Other disposal.'Cause... ...

• ! Government assignment. In case:

  • == sync, corrected by elderman ==

  • == sync, corrected by elderman ==

  • _

  CPV code: ...

• ! Real good transaction. In case: ...

This license, subsidia, other disposal, assignment or transaction is:

• _

• Not yet granted, taken, envyed or entered.

The enterprise is:

• Open and/or in company.

• Not open and/or in business.

3.

Did you get a message from the district attorney as intended. == sync, corrected by elderman ==?

• No.

• Yes. == sync, corrected by elderman ==

Have you had any advice from an RIEC?

• No.

• _

Give this to what's going on, the reason for this advice application is.

Other remarks and relevant cases.

Are the non-existents involved?

• No.

• Yes. Then give us what parties in which files prevent, so the Bureau can ask for this file in a later stage.

In addition to what facts and conditions you continue remarkable and relevant in the substance file. In other words, what are the findings of your own investigation?

Research questions.

It can prevent your own investigation from imposing insufficient clarity on specific applications of the application. Bill Bibob. Relevance points. Under this, you can report the research questions you consider for the advice of interest.

Nader identification involved.

Put down the names of the entrepreneurs and enterprises that could play a role in the substance file.

Natural persons.

Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:
Last name:
First names:
Born:
Gender:
Nationalities:
Address:
BSN:
Roll:

Right persons and enterprises.

Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:
Name:
KVK number:
Vesting address:
Right shape:
Roll:

7.

Consult a review of the additional admissions, including:

• _

• ..a filled Bibob application with the additional receipt.

• ..a copy of the file. Under here, the pieces with regard to:

  • The history of the company, institution, transaction etc;

  • The regular procedure;

  • "The own investigation into the cadder Bill Bibob.!