Advanced Search

The Provisions On "operational Programme Infrastructure And Services" 3.4.1.2.2. Apakšaktivitāt "appendix Of Anthropogenic Load Reduction, Educational And Informational Infrastructure In Natura 2000 Areas"

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas “Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi” papildinājuma 3.4.1.2.2.apakšaktivitāti “Antropogēno slodzi samazinošās, izglītojošās un informatīvās infrastruktūras izveide Natura 2000 teritorijās”

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 790 in 2008. on 22 September (pr. No 67 35 §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" 3.4.1.2.2. apakšaktivitāt "Appendix of anthropogenic load reduction, educational and informational infrastructure in Natura 2000 sites" issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.4. Qualitative environmental priorities "life and economic activity" contributes "UR3.4.1.pas environment" 3.4.1.2.2. apakšaktivitāt "anthropogenic load decreasing , educational and informational infrastructure in Natura 2000 sites ' (hereinafter referred to as the activity);
1.2. the European Regional Development Fund (hereinafter the project) submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. requirements for project applicants;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements;
1.5. the responsible bodies and authorities functional cooperation between the monitoring form. 2. The purpose of the activity is to maintain the quality of the natural environment of Latvia, according to European Union directives, international obligations of State and local needs, prevent existing and future threats to natural values, while ensuring the most effective use of resources and the conservation of natural values. 3. activities at the protected natural areas and visitors. 4. activities implemented in the framework of projects co-financed by the European regional development fund. Activity within the available public funds consist of the European regional development fund co-financing 7 730 844 lats and national funding, provided by the beneficiary. National contribution form the State budget, local government and the Corporation, and the minimum is 1 364 266 lats. 5. Activity implemented an open project selection application form. 6. activities in the implementation of the responsible authority is the Ministry of the environment. The responsible authority has the following functions: 6.1. ensure the project application selection, evaluating the project submissions by the European Regional Development Fund for funding;
6.2. to provide information on the project applicant project application preparation;
6.3. during the two months following the entry into force of the Ministry of the environment publish a home page on the internet (www.vidm.gov.lv) procurement guidelines and procurement documents;
6.4. to participate in the civil law contract or agreement on the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the civil law contract or agreement);
6.5. According to competence and in accordance with the agreement between the responsible authorities and the liaison authority of di to garner information on the projects and put them on the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
6.6. to plan a presentation about the activities and the implementation of public information, including activities within the projects approved;
6.7. to ensure that the activity is not exceeded the available for the implementation of the European regional development fund, and to monitor the available European regional development fund, including a learning Council on 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level by controlling the project financial plan. 7. the cooperation body is the Central Finance and contracting agency. The cooperation body is the functional authority. Cooperation institution has the following functions: 7.1 develop and conclude civil contracts or agreement with the European regional development fund, the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary);
7.2. to examine the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau and responsible authority;
7.3. ensure the European regional development fund and the State budget of co-financing funding planning and use of funds in accordance with the agreement or the civil contract concluded with beneficiaries;
7.4. to consider and approve the financing requested progress reports submitted and verified payment requests, approve the payment requests included attributable expenditure amounts, prepare payment orders and submit them to the paying authority;
7.5. to prepare the statement of expenditure and to present its leading body;
7.6. prepare the European regional development fund and the payment forecasts to submit its payment authority and the managing body;
7.7. to provide information on the authority responsible for the implementation of the activities available in the European regional development fund co-financing;
7.8. According to competence and in accordance with the agreement between the competent institution and liaison body to accumulate information on the projects and put them on the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
7.9. to plan and implement information and publicity measures on the project level, including providing information to the European regional development fund, the beneficiary of the civil contract or agreement conditions and project locations to monitor the provision of publicity measures, laid down in the Commission of 8 December 2006, in Regulation No 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund. After the civil contract or agreement concluded to publish your website on the internet (www.cfla.gov.lv) for information on projects;
7.10. to ensure the monitoring and control of the activity, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation No 1083/2006 and article 93, paragraph 2, of the implementation of the principle of the project, as well as to assess the risks and prepare a draft annual plan of inspections in the project locations, testing project locations, if necessary, in collaboration with the authority;
7.11. assess civil contract or agreement amendments, to take a decision on the approval or rejection of amendments and match them with the responsible authority, if the amendment includes changes: project monitoring indicators 7.11.1.;
7.11.2. project activities, providing for the inclusion of new activities or the activities of the project changes in financial terms exceeded 20 percent of the total cost of the project;
7.11.3. the project will cost more than 20 percent of the total cost of the project. II. Project activities eligible, eligible and non-eligible costs of the activity within the 8 supported infrastructure in Natura 2000 areas, which developed a conservation plan to reduce anthropogenic load to ensure the conservation of biological diversity: the path of the new route 8.1 up-path, including the footbridge, stairs, walkways, installation;
8.2. landscaped resort;
8.3. informative signs, indications, thematic information stands up and landing in nature;
8.4. installation of the visitors parking lot for vehicles;
8.5. view the construction of the Tower;
8.6. the informative stand and deployment outside of the project included in the Natura 2000 sites for the Natura 2000 areas create the infrastructure. 9. in the framework of the activity does not support: 9.1. Natura 2000 area landmark (poles with the designation of the territory's symbol) and prohibition signs, "enter" and "Caurbrauk" construction and installation;
9.2. the informative stand creation and deployment, which includes basic information on Natura 2000 areas;
9.3. the information centres. 10. eligible costs directly linked to project activities. Subject to the conditions contained in the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 and July 5, 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund and of Regulation (EC) no 1183/1999 repeal, apply the following: 10.1 the new trail route project development , the related escalation costs but no more than two percent of the total project eligible costs, which are stated in the decision on the approval and application of the project civil contract or arrangement;
10.2. the development of the construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than four per cent of the project total eligible costs, which are stated in the decision on the approval and application of the project civil contract or arrangement;
10.3. the cost of the works;
10.4. autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works;

10.5. building costs, but not more than two per cent of the eligible costs of the works;
10.6. the supply contract costs;
10.7. Billboard, indications and signs manufacture, transport and installation costs. 11. the total budget of the project comprises also financial reserve, which can be up to five percent of the project's total eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project uses this rule laid down in paragraph 10 to cover eligible costs before financial reserves through the use of appropriate amendments to the civil law contract or arrangement. 12. the costs cannot be considered eligible, if the project at the date of application of the shipbuilding is accepted and the goods have been signed and acceptance. Ineligible costs the following: 12.1 the new trail route in project development, the related escalation costs that exceed two percent of the total eligible project costs, which are stated in the decision on the approval and application of the project civil contract or arrangement;
12.2. the development of the construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, exceeding the four percent of project total eligible costs, which are stated in the decision on the approval and application of the project civil contract or arrangement;
12.3. autoruzraudzīb costs in excess of 0.5% of the eligible costs of the works;
12.4. building costs that exceed two percent of the eligible costs of the works;
12.5. the national authorities – project management personnel involved in project management fees and administrative expenses up to five percent of the project's total eligible costs. 13. non-eligible costs of the project must not be larger than 20 remain stable over those of the total eligible costs. 14. the project cost does not include: 14.1. real estate purchase expenses;
14.2. the implementation of the project particularly the purchase or production of durable equipment acquisition cost (including equipment used in the construction process);
14.3. administrative or project management objectives of durable equipment, used computer equipment and vehicles;
14.4. fees for accounting and audit services;
14.5. the fee for the legal, technical and financial advice provided on the project during its implementation;
14.6. the infrastructure operating expenses;
14.7. recipient of funding current maintenance costs;
14.8. the revolving loan funds and the cost of the acquisition, paid for the review of the design of the loan, reservation and service charges for financial transactions, interest on arrears, penalties and expenses of litigation;
14.9. project management the remuneration of the staff and administrative expenditure of the project, if the project applicant is municipality/Municipal Association or Corporation. III. Requirements to the project the applicant 15. applicant may be a Project the municipality, the Municipal Association (cooperation), a public body or a corporation, with its specially protected natural areas protection and management that affect the project. Local associations may establish its authorities in the territory for Natura 2000 sites infrastructure activity objectives. 16. the project for the implementation of the project, the applicant does not constitute a partnership. 17. On the European regional development fund shall not be eligible: If the project applicant 17.1. – municipal-administrative territory is a Natura 2000 site, which provided for the creation of infrastructure;
17.2. If the local Government Association does not include all the municipalities in whose territory for Natura 2000 site infrastructure;
17.3. If the applicant for the project to the application project, the first date of the month has tax arrears;
17.4. If a corporation in liquidation or insolvency proceedings. IV. Project application selection 18. Project application selection issued three project application selection rounds: 18.1. the first application round project for the European regional development fund co-financing are 3 313 220 pounds;
18.2. the second project application selection round for the European regional development fund co-financing are 2 208 812 lats;
18.3. the third project application selection round for the European regional development fund co-financing of at least LVL 2 208 812;
18.4. If the first and second application round of projects available for the European regional development fund co-financing is not granted or used, it directs the project application to the third round of financing. 19. the first application round project is launched for the three-year period, the other two selection rounds, a two-year period. 20. the responsible authority a notice announcing submission of application: 20.1. the first application round project – not earlier than one month and not later than two months after the entry into force of these regulations;
20.2. the second project application selection round – up to 1 March 2010;
20.3. the third project application selection round-up to March 1, 2012. 21. The notice of project application submission indicates the project application selection round of the funding available, the start and end of the time limit. The responsible authority shall issue notice: 21.1. newspaper "Gazette";
21.2. the Ministry of the environment website on the internet (URwww.vidm.gov.lv). 22. the project application to the responsible body shall be filed within three months after submission of open project selection round of the tender. V. submission of the project application conditions and project evaluation criteria 23. maximum intensity of aid from the European regional development fund does not exceed 85 percent of the total eligible costs. 24. The minimum eligible costs activity within one project has 35 140 lats, maximum – 351 402 lats. 25. the project application, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Latvian language into the responsible body within a time limit which it shall specify one of the following forms: 25.1. in paper form by filling in the project application form (annex 1). The project application must be signed by the applicant's institution of the project manager or his authorised person. Project applicant in paper form shall submit one original and the draft caurauklot one caurauklot it copies (without attachments), as well as submit the electronic version of the application. The attached document page number;
25.2. electronically signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on electronic document design: 25.2.1. it must be designed to DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format;
25.2.2. in addition to the deliverable documents must be prepared in response to the Community legislation on electronic document design. 26. the project applications shall be accompanied by the following documents: 26.1. the planning of architecture;
26.2. the regional environmental authorities or environmental management that the project activities meet the protection of Natura 2000 sites;
26.3. environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure;
26.4. the project's cartographic material, which is represented by a project activity related to the placement of objects in the project area;
26.5. local government certification that the project complies with the existing local authorities planning or detailed;
16.5. a copy of the credit agreement concluded or lending institution issued a copy of the document certifying that the credit will be granted without guarantees, if credit is provided without guarantee of a municipality;
16.6. the financing decision of the municipality if the municipality provides for co-financing of the project, including eligible and ineligible costs;
16.7. the municipal decision on the guarantee or loan, if the project guarantee or borrowing of municipalities;
26.9. local decision that local authority funding under the project receiving the application and it includes work and amount of funding;
26.10. legislation provided documentation showing authorization of the municipality to implement or co-sponsor a project if the municipality is in the process of financial stabilisation (draft statement by the applicant that the total level of commitment during the implementation of the project from the project the applicant not more than 20 percent of the budget);
26.11. the project cash flow forecast, reflecting the project's funding movement during project implementation;
26.12. the indicative project procurement plan according to the law, planning documents of the European Union in the field of the structural funds and the Cohesion Fund. 27. project submissions valued at administrative, compliance, quality and funding criteria (annex 2). 28. Administrative criteria are the following: 28.1. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified time limits;
28.2. the project application is filed pursuant to the provisions referred to in paragraph 25 of the design requirements;
28.3. the project application is fully completed (annex 1);
28.4. the project attached to the application for all these rules referred to in annex 26. 29. eligibility criteria are as follows:

29.1. is the land owner's consent to deploy infrastructure;
29.2. for each Natura 2000 site, for the application of the project, has developed a conservation plan and intended actions comply with environmental protection plan;
29.3. the project submission complies with the purpose of the activity (this provision);
29.4. the project submission complies with activities eligible activities (paragraph 8 of these regulations;)
29.5. the project submission complies with activities eligible costs (paragraph 10 of these regulations;)
18.4. the project submission complies with activities not eligible costs (paragraph 12 of these rules);
18.5. the project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken;
29.8. the time schedule of the project comply with the planned activities;
29.9. project information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results;
29.10. application fiziskie project indicators meet the project schedule;
29.11. the requested State budget financing of aid intensity laid down in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Latvia in the proposed national budget funding modalities;
29.12. project budget includes costs are justified;
29.13. project cash flow forecast is justified;
29.14. the indicative project procurement plan is based;
No 29.15. project in the application reflect the planned project implementation structure diagram and planned human resources supports legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries;
29.16. project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the European Regional Development Fund funded project publicity and information measures. 30. the eligibility criteria are the following: 30.1. If applicant is a municipality, in the administrative territory of the applicant of the project located in Natura 2000 sites, for infrastructure;
30.2. local government association includes all municipalities in whose territory for Natura 2000 site infrastructure;
30.3. the project is within the competence of the applicant to the specially protected natural areas protection and management that affect the project;
18.9. the project applicant is not tax debt to the application for the first working day of the month;
5. the project the applicant has stated that the infrastructure created through the project, the project will be the property of the applicant in accordance with the conditions of the activity;
30.6. the project has stated that the applicant will provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project;
19.1. the Corporation is not in liquidation or insolvency proceedings. 31. quality criteria are the following: 19.3 planned activity in the project launch readiness (scores from zero to three points, must obtain at least two points);
31.2. the project risk assessment, including assessing the potential cost increase (number of points – from zero to three points, must obtain at least two points);
31.3. to create sustainable infrastructure use (number of points – from zero to three points, must obtain at least one;)
19.5. the cost estimate of the returns – infrastructure planned lifetime (in years) relative to the initial total cost (in dollars) (the number of points-three points for criterion gives extra points). The average application round project calculation project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria. The average cost of return indicators is the cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions;
31.5. the applicant's project co-financing of the eligible costs (number of points – from zero to five points);
19.6. Natura 2000 sites in or anthropogenic load on the Natura 2000 sites in accordance with the nature protection management (score from zero to ten points);
19.7. anthropogenic load declining infrastructure (the number of points to four points);
19.8. the project area development index on the date of submission of the application for the project (the number of points to three points);
19.8. the project of the specific activities provided for the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving access to information for persons with functional impairments (score three points, the benchmark gives extra points). 32. Funding criteria are the following: 32.1. the project submission complies with the administrative, compliance and quality criteria, as well as quality criteria for overall rating of at least 15 points;
32.2. the listing of this rule 32.1. below the criteria referred to in paragraph with "Yes" the estimated project submissions in the priority order (starting with the most points got a submission of the project), the project application selection round application sufficient funding of the project. Vi. submission of Project evaluation and decision making arrangements 33. Responsible authorities the driver creates an open project select project application submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission assessment) and approved its Statute. The Evaluation Commission is composed of the responsible authority, the Ministry of environment, local government and the Latvian Union of environmental non-governmental organization representatives, as well as managing authorities and cooperation agencies representatives observer status. The observer shall draw up an opinion on the evaluation of the work of the Commission and submitted to the responsible authorities the driver in terms in which the evaluation the Commission shall prepare a draft opinion on the results of the evaluation of the application. 34. the responsible authority: 34.1. in the month following the entry into force of these regulations are developed and approved a project application selection project application assessment methodology and application form filling project methodology;
21.3. in the month following the entry into force of these provisions on its homepage on the internet (www.vidm.gov.lv) revealed the project application selection project application form (annex 1), project submission evaluation form (annex 2), the project application and assessment methodology for the implementation of the project the necessary methodological materials;
3. register the project submissions, grants them an identification number and within two weeks the project applicant, be sent electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) or by post, proof of receipt of the application for the project. 35. the project compliance with administrative applications, eligibility and funding criteria assessed with "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). Application of project compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. If the administrative application or eligibility criteria is not applicable to a specific project, applicant project application in respect of this criterion. 36. On the draft application compliance with this provision and 31.9.) (19.5. criteria referred to in the application for the project receives additional points. 37. If the application is submitted to the responsible body within the time limit (22 of these rules) or in the Latvian language is made, the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project. 38. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 38.1. first assessed the compliance of the application of the draft rules 28, 29 and 30 of the criteria referred to in paragraph. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue. If the application of these criteria the project evaluated with "Yes", the application of these provisions are valued at 31. criteria referred to in paragraph 1, by giving a certain number of points;
38.2. If the application complies with the provisions referred to in paragraph 31, the criteria and the criteria overall rating of at least 15 points, project submissions valued at this provision in paragraph 32 of this criterion and include project application priority list;
38.3. If the application does not comply with the provisions referred to in paragraph 32 the criteria and criteria overall rating is at least 15 points, the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue;
23.9. the project application for the establishment of a list of priority project submissions valued at that rule 32.2. criteria referred to in point. 39. If two or more project applications have received the same amount of points, they ranked the project application priority list in the following order: 24.3. project application with the highest rating for this rule 19.3. bottom of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
24.4. the project application with the highest rating for this rule 31.6. the bottom of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
39.3. the project application with the highest rating of 19.7. these provisions referred to below, the criteria;

24.5. the project application with the highest rating for this rule 31.5. criteria referred to in paragraph below. 40. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for the approval of the project, if it complies with this provision 28., 29., 30, 31 and 32 and the criteria referred to in paragraph 31 of these regulations, the criteria referred to in the overall rating of at least 15 points. 41. The decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions that the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, so that it could conclude civil contracts or agreements for the implementation of a project: 25.5. to clarify the details of the project the applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 1);
41.2. to clarify the documents submitted pursuant to paragraph 26 of these rules;
41.3. to clarify the changes in total amount and eligible costs the eligible costs under this provision, paragraph 11;
25.7. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and not eligible under this provision, paragraph 13;
25.8. to clarify the project time schedule according to the activities planned under this rule 29.8. section;
25.8. to clarify the project cash flow forecast according to 29.13. these provisions;
25.9. to clarify the indicative procurement plan of the project according to this provision, 29.14.;
to specify the project's application 26.0. incorporates a planned project organisation chart and planned human resources security under this provision no 29.15.;
41.9. specify information about the project publicity measures under this provision. 29.16. 42. This provision in the decision referred to in paragraph 41 of the conditions of implementation of the project the applicant authority in the prescribed time limit, which may not exceed two months from the date of receipt of the decision. The time-limits laid down in this decision cannot be extended. 43.20 working days following this provision, paragraph 42 of the expiration of the evaluation the Commission shall evaluate fulfilment of the decision on the application of the project approval with conditions, and the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on the conditions contained in the decision. 44. If the applicant for the project conditions laid down in the decision is not complied with within the time limit set or the provisions referred to in paragraph 43 of the opinion is negative, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. In the opinion of Justice controlled just like the decision, which contains the conditions for the control of this opinion is drawn up. The project specified in the application for funding, if the decision contains the conditions are not met, the next project diverted the application selection round. 45. the decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection provided the determining authority within five working days after the decision has been forwarded to the project the applicant by mail or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature). VII. Project implementation rules 46. The beneficiary all the project activities implemented within two years of the civil contract or agreement. 47. The beneficiary not less frequently than once every three months on its homepage on the internet (if any) the current information on the process of implementation of the project. 48. the civil contract or cooperative agreement funding authority is transferred to the recipient of an advance payment of 20% from the European regional development fund and the State budget funding. 49. The beneficiary shall ensure that all project for the procurement procedure. 50. Civil in the agreement or arrangement shall be amended: 50.1. If the actual eligible costs are not against the original project did not set out the eligible costs varies by less than 20 percent;
50.2. If the physical indicators of the project shall not exceed five percent of the approved amount of the projects monetised during project implementation;
50.3. If changes in the project's procurement plan does not change the total amount of the purchase. 51. The beneficiary shall ensure the preparation and submission of the report the cooperation institution under civil contracts or agreements. VIII. follow-up activities for the implementation of the project 52. Beneficiary is directly responsible for project implementation and maintenance of results for at least five years after the implementation of the project. 53. The beneficiary for five years after the implementation of the project once a year in accordance with the provisions of annex 3 provides information on the responsible authority: 53.1. the results achieved under the project in compliance with the objectives set out in the application;
33.1. the project achieved the outcome and results of the project;
53.3. the status of the owner of the asset;
53.4. public information activities about the project results and benefits to society. 54. For the first time this provision set out in annex 3 shall be submitted within one year of project implementation, and every year in the civil law contract or agreement. 55. the responsible authority shall ensure that the storage and analysis of information on the objectives of the activity for at least five years after the implementation of all projects in the framework of the activity, if the civil agreement or arrangement has not established longer period. Prime Minister i. Godmanis Environment Minister r. vējonis Environment Ministry submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 22 September 2008. Regulations No 790 Environment Minister r. vējonis annex 2 Cabinet of 22 September 2008. Regulations No 790 of the European regional development fund project application form of Evaluation Criteria rating 1 p.k.. quality criteria for rating points 1. planned activities the project ready to start: must be at least 2 points 1.1., the project is ready to start (a list of the works to be carried out is not prepared or not prepared qualitatively) 0 1.2. project has low readiness to start (is prepared and based on the list of the works to be carried out, the purchase documentation not prepared) 1 1.3. project is ready for the launch of the medium (and has been prepared for based list of works to prepare the purchase documentation projects development) 2 1.4. project has high readiness for initiation (developed the technical design of the works, prepared for the technical specifications of the procurement) 3 2. Project risk assessment, including assessing the potential cost growth: obtain at least 2 points 2.1. project submission does not assess the potential risks of the project submission 2.2 0 possible risks evaluated incompletely , the action plan identified risks are not developed or not developed completely 1 2.3. project risk assessment in the application of qualitative, action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete submission of the project 2 2.4. potential risks assessed qualitatively, designed substantiated the risk identified in the plan of measures for the elimination or reduction of 3 3. Create a sustainable use of the infrastructure assessment: the need to have at least 1 paragraph 3.1. planned life not rated 0 3.2. infrastructure be planned lifetime is less than 5 years 1 3.3. infrastructure be planned lifetime of 5 to 10 years (including) 2 3.4 infrastructure be planned lifetime exceeds 10 years. the cost estimate 3 4 return of contents (infrastructure planned lifetime (in years) relative to the initial total cost (in dollars)). The average project application selection round of the score, which is calculated in project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria (cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions): 4.1 less than the estimated project cost of return indicators, and so the difference is 10 per cent (inclusive) and more 1 4.2. equal to the average estimated cost of return indicators, by 10 percent to exceed or are less than 10 per cent higher than 2 4.3 average calculated return of project costs assessment index, and so the difference is 10 per cent (inclusive) and more 3 criteria 1.1 horizontal priorities Project is not approved, if the total number of points collected is less than 10 points Project the applicant 5. co-financing of the eligible costs: less than 15 percent of the 5.1 0 5.2. from 15 to 25 percent (including) 3 5.3. more than 25 percent 5 6. Natura 2000 sites in or anthropogenic load on the Natura 2000 sites in accordance with the nature protection management (sustainable development) : mazapmeklēt-6.1 an area of anthropogenic load mitigation and information infrastructure is not required, or on average visited the area where the infrastructure is not required on average 6.2 0 visited the area, the infrastructure does not need level 2 6.3 intensively visited the area, the infrastructure does not require level 4 6.4 average visit territory, infrastructure, urgently need to be improved to preserve the existing natural values 6 6.5 intensively visited areas, infrastructure should be improved, in order to preserve the natural values in 8 6.6 intensely frequented area infrastructure, urgently, to create, to preserve the natural values in 10 7.

Anthropogenic load declining infrastructure (sustainable development):* * note. Ratings are to be summarized, complex projects receive a higher rating.


7.1. for erosion reduction (fencing, hillsides anchorages, including ladders) area 1 7.2. for reducing pollution in the eitrof (waste, lavatories, resting place fitting) 1 7.3. for visitors flow management, to maintain the natural values and routed visitors to less sensitive areas (indications, trails, footbridges, enclosure) 1 7.4 for areas accessible, terminal area parking, road parking lot project 1 8. area development index on the date of submission of the application for the project (the balanced development of the territory) : the average area 8.1 development index greater than + 1.9 1 8.2. average area development index from-to + 1.9 0.91 (inclusive). the average territory 2 8.3 development index less than-3 9 project of 0.91. specific activities the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving access to information for persons with functional disabilities (equal opportunities): criterion gives additional points 9.1. does not foresee specific project activity information to ensure access for persons with functional disabilities 0 9.2. project specific activities intended to ensure access to information for persons with functional disabilities 3 2. Eligibility criteria 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No 10 is the landowner agreement to deploy infrastructure N 11. for each Natura 2000 site, for the application of the project, has developed a conservation plan and intended actions comply with conservation plan (sustainable development) project application 12. N corresponds to activities: 12.1. objective of maintaining the quality of the natural environment in Latvia, according to European Union directives, international obligations of State and local needs; to prevent existing and future threats to natural values, while ensuring the most effective use of resources to conservation of natural values and restoring N 12.2. eligible activities-path, landscaped recreation site, various informative and thematic information stands up and away, parking lot (visitor transport) and view-tower construction, which requires the Natura 2000 area of anthropogenic load reduction; informative stand placement for Natura 2000 areas create the infrastructure outside the project included in the Natura 2000 areas 12.3. eligible costs N P 12.4 non eligible costs P 13. Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 13.1. given the technical characteristics of the activities to be specified in the result of 13.2 and outcome indicators, and they meet the purpose of the activity 13.3. actions for providing disposition project area 13.4. the action to be taken to provide economic benefits to the operation provided 13.5 qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits provided to 13.6 qualitative actions and quantitative contribution to the European Union and the Republic of Latvia on the implementation of the essential requirements of law 14. timetable of the project comply with the planned activities of the project application, P 15. provides information to demonstrate that the project applicant will ensure the sustainability of the project results: N 15.1. have the appropriate institutional structure is appropriate for a planned 15.2. results of the project built in the maintenance costs of the infrastructure 15.3. is or will be available for staff to maintain the project the infrastructure resulting from the project submission 16 physical indicators meet the project schedule N 17. Requested the State budget financing aid intensity set According to the laws of the Republic of Latvia in the proposed national budget funding arrangements for N 18. Project budget includes costs are justified: N 18.1. includes all necessary for the implementation of the project cost positions match those of the works 18.2, developed in accordance with the public procurement regulatory framework the statutory procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price to be proportionate and justified 18.3., clearly stated assumptions are directly necessary 18.4 project 18.5. certain taking into account the expected market price at the time of project implementation on the basis of the data of the Central Statistical Bureau on the project at the date of application or the applicant's market research 19. project cash flow forecast is based: P 19.1. displays both funding request and the cost forecast of 19.2. meet the planned time schedule meets the procurement plan 19.3 and 19.4 for the specifics of the contract. financial plan correspond to 19.5 complies with the European regional development fund project payment conditions 20. indicative procurement plan project is based : P 20.1. cover all project activities and services and their cost 20.2. distribution of employment contracts are reasonable and consistent with the scope and specifics of the implementation contract 20.3 time schedule is justified, comply with the requirements of the legislation in the field of public procurement on the procurement method 20.4. contract deadlines, including the procurement procedure shall comply with the laws, regulations and project schedule project submission 21. reflected in the introduction of the planned project organisation chart and planned human resources provides the funding legislation, the requested functions : P 21.1. the project administrative (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) control project financial 21.2. (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) for the management of the project technical 21.3. (such as the reconciliation of design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) control project planned 22. publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the European Regional Development Fund funded project publicity and information dissemination measures P 2.2. Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No/NA 23.
If the applicant is a municipality, in the administrative territory of the applicant of the project located in Natura 2000 sites, the infrastructure for the creation of the Association in the municipality N 24 (cooperation Association, the authority of the municipality established a co-operation agreement) includes all municipalities in whose territory for Natura 2000 sites infrastructure N 25. the competence of the applicant to the project is its specially protected natural areas protection and management of the project by the N 26. Project the applicant does not have tax debt on the application of the first working day of the month N 27. Project applicant has stated that the infrastructure created through the project, the project will be the property of the applicant after the implementation of the project in accordance with the conditions of the activity N 28. project has stated that the applicant will provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project N 29. A corporation is not in liquidation or insolvency process N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 30. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 31. project application submitted for such application design requirements : P 31.1. the application is drawn up according to the activity application form submission prepared for 31.2. Latvian language 31.3. application is made in the text (where the application is submitted electronically) 19.5. submission signed by the authorised person 31.5. filed one of the original draft and one copy, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted electronically) 19.6. both the original and the copy of the project submitted to the caurauklot, the attached document pages numbered (if the application is submitted electronically) 19.7. a project proposal is presented under the electronic circulation of documents regulatory legislation (if project application filed electronically): 31.7.1. signed with a secure electronic signature 31.7.2. developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format 31.7.3. additional documents to be submitted is designed and presented according to the circulation of electronic documents the laws and regulatory requirements 32. project application is completely filled in application of the project N 33. added to all specified attachments: P the planning architecture task 33.1.33.2. regional environmental management or conservation management opinion that project activities under Natura 2000 sites meet the protection objectives. environmental monitoring 33.3 National Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of cartographic material project 20.8, showing the location of project activities the project area 33.5. authorities proof that the project complies with the existing municipal territory planning or detailed to 20.9.

a copy of the credit agreement concluded or lending institution issued a copy of a document certifying that the credit will be granted without guarantees, if credit is provided without guarantee of a municipality the municipal decision on 20.9. financing if the project foresees municipal co-financing, including eligible and ineligible costs. the municipal decision on 21.0 guarantee or loan, if the project foresees municipal guarantee or borrowing is 21.1. local decision that the Government match funding recipient project submission prepared and incorporates the work and the amount of funding determined 33.10. legal documentation confirming permission to implement the project, the municipality if the municipality is in the process of financial stabilisation 33.11. the project cash flow forecast 33.12. the indicative project procurement plan 4. Criteria for the award of funding to Yes/No 34. the project submission complies with the administrative, compliance and quality criteria, as well as quality criteria for overall rating is at least a 15-point List of 34 35. N. criteria referred to in paragraph with "Yes" the estimated project submissions in the priority order (starting with the most points winning the project application) the project application selection round application is sufficient funding for the project N legend: N-if the assessment is negative, the project application is rejected; P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in the decision); NA (not applicable) if the criterion does not apply to the specific project, applicant project is not assessed in relation to these criteria.
Minister for the environment r. vējonis annex 3 Cabinet of 22 September 2008. Regulations No 790 Minister of environment r. vējonis