Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 850 in Riga in 2008 (October 14. Nr. 74 8. §) rules on "operational programme human resources and employment" 1.5.1.3.2. apakšaktivitāt "Appendix a public service quality improvement at national, regional and local level" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme "human resources and employment ' priorities 1.5 of Appendix" administrative capacity "UR1.5.1.pas based on" better regulation "policy activity" public 1.5.1.3. can institutions exercising operational quality and efficiency "1.5.1.3.2. apakšaktivitāt" quality public services at national , regional and local levels "(hereinafter referred to as apakšaktivitāt);
1.2. the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competences between the two institutions, cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination.
2. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt is to ensure effective and appropriate to the needs of the public service, in particular through support to institutions that provide tax and financial planning, management and accounting, providing services in business, employment and social policies, both at national and regional level.
3. the purpose of the group is Apakšaktivitāt direct regulatory authorities, institutions, the courts, having delegated public tasks individually, in the planning region, County and local government authorities.
4. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt achieved in implementing this provision, paragraph 21, and in this rule referred to in paragraph 46.1.8. below the monitoring indicators.
5. Apakšaktivitāt implement open project application selection.
6. during the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt discovered the project application selection occurs at least three times. First open the project application selection available funding is $590 355. First open the project application selection issued in 2008.
7. Apakšaktivitāt implement these provisions from the date of entry into force to 31 December 2013.
II. The responsible authority and the liaison body With the implementation of the 8 apakšaktivitāt sais wound responsible authorities implemented the obligations and rights of the State Chancellery of the structural funds of the European Union Department (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority).
9. With the implementation of the commitments of the wound apakšaktivitāt cooperation bodies implement the obligations and rights of society integration Fund secretariat (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body).
10. Cooperation authority has functional authority.
11. Apakšaktivitāt within the responsible authority: 11.1. participates in the project agreement for the project of the European Social Fund (hereinafter referred to as the agreement);
11.2. the implementation of supervised apakšaktivitāt, ensure that there will be exceeded this rule 15, paragraph apakšaktivitāt for the implementation of the European Social Fund financing, and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle apakšaktivitāt level, implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 93. Article 1 and referred to in paragraph 2;
11.3. gives proposals to the managing authority and the rules referred to in paragraph 73 of the measure "better regulation policy ' to the Monitoring Committee for the implementation of the development of the apakšaktivitāt;
11.4. use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system for monitoring the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt;
11.5. requests from authorities and funding requested information necessary for the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt monitoring and control.
12. within the framework of cooperation of the Apakšaktivitāt authority: an open invitation projects 12.1. the application of these rules in the selection procedures specified in paragraph 28;
12.2. a project on the application of open selection project submission Evaluation Commission;
12.3. the development of the project application form filling methodology and project application assessment methodology;
12.4. provide project information project to the applicant at the time of application;
5. assess the project submissions and decides on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition;
12.6. the accumulated data for project submissions and projects according to the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use;
12.7. the development agreement and the conclusion of agreements with project funding recipients, as well as provide information about the recipient of the funding arrangement;
12.8. the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
12.9. gives budgeting laws regulating certain information in the national budget funds for the preparation of the request;
12.10. ensure project implementation monitoring and control, including checks at the place of implementation of projects and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle on the project level, implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 above;
12.11. check the progress reports submitted by the beneficiaries and payment requests, approve the amount of the eligible expenditure and payment orders, prepare and submit payment authority, prepare expense claims and send them for verification to the managing authority;
12.12. Approves the amendments to the project;
12.13. the preparation of the information to the authority responsible for the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt of the learning available funding;
12.14. inform the public and ensure the implementation of publicity.
III. conditions for the provision of aid 13. applicant and Project partner can be of national regulatory authorities, institutions, the courts, having delegated public tasks, planning regions, county authorities and their institutions. The project, the applicant can only be the Government that built up in implementing the administrative territorial reform.
14. One project applicant during the implementation of each of the apakšaktivitāt announced in the public the project application selection may submit one project submission.
15. Apakšaktivitāt within the framework of the European Social Fund financing is 85 percent. National funding is 15 percent of the total eligible costs of the project amount. The total funding for the planned apakšaktivitāt 1 967 851 lats, including European Social Fund funding 1 672 673 dollars, and national funding 295 178 lats.
16. The State budget financing of the planning region projects supported under the State budget grant awarding criteria to municipalities and regions in planning the European Union's structural and cohesion funds for the implementation of projects co-financed.
17. the estimated total Apakšaktivitāt funding allocation between beneficiary groups, 50 percent of the planning regions, county municipalities and their institutions and 50 percent of national administrations, courts and institutions, having delegated public tasks. If the advertised open project application selection within one group of beneficiaries submitted and approved projects are not learned all the funding, the remaining funds will be redirected to the other beneficiary groups to support the project.
18. The minimum total eligible cost amount per project in the apakšaktivitāt is 5 000 lats. The maximum total amount of the eligible cost per project in the apakšaktivitāt is 30 000 lats.
19. Project implementation time is between six and 12 months.
20. within the framework of funded Apakšaktivitāt project, which aims to promote the effective and community needs with the appropriate public administration services, improving their quality.
21. The project funded the following: 21.1. project administration;
21.2. the service quality evaluation measures;
21.3. service quality measure development and implementation;
21.4. the methodology for the evaluation of quality of services in the design, development and adaptation;
21.5. the exchange of experiences;
21.6. training;
21.7. information and publicity measures for the implementation of a project.
22. the cost of the project is divided into the following four headings: 22.1 costs administration costs, applying the Cabinet set a constant rate;
22.2. in technical and material equipment costs project-specific implementation of the activities (cost position may provide inventory costs, if the unit does not exceed 150 lats and its life expectancy is less than a year);
22.3. the other cost: 22.3.1. consultants, experts and specialists ' fees;

22.3.2. State social security payments and other social guarantees, which is compulsory in accordance with external laws and regulations;
22.3.3. teaching and methodological material development, translation, printing and distribution;
22.3.4. in organizing seminars and training and implementation costs;
22.3.5. transport costs – fuel, rental, purchase, the service, the use of public transport;
22.3.6. domestic and foreign mission expenses in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations;
22.3.7. space, materials, technical and equipment rentals;
22.3.8. space, materials, technical and equipment maintenance costs;
22.3.9. Office supply costs;
22.3.10. information and publicity costs according to the regulations governing the structural funds of the European Union;
22.4. contingencies, an amount not exceeding five percent of 22.2. these provisions and 22.3. eligible costs referred to in point totals. They consumed in this provision and the bottom paragraph 22.2 22.3. to cover the costs referred to in.
23. This rule 22.2 22.3 22.4., and the bottom point, such costs are eligible costs of the project. 22.1. This provision States the cost incidence or incidence is determined in paragraph 82 of these rules.
24. The value added tax payments to the project you can plan as eligible costs, if the beneficiary of the value added tax amount not recoverable as input according to the legislation on taxes and fees.
25. in addition to the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999 of the second subparagraph of article 11 of the terms of are considered ineligible costs the following: 25.1. all types of bonuses, stimulus materials and cash prizes;
25.2. the leave benefits to employees;
25.3. the allowance to the employee's family member or dependent in the event of death;
25.4. other material incentives that pay is defined regulatory laws;
25.5. the health, life and accident insurance;
15.9. the costs associated with application development project;
25.7. representation, sales and marketing expenses.
26. the application of the project provided for the eligible costs must be actual, reasonable, appropriate to the specificities of the project, and this provision in paragraph 22 and 24.
27. in the course of project implementation costs considered eligible if they: 27.1. incurred in the period determined by the agreement;
27.2. the project required, designed for in the approved project submission, and carried out under appropriate financial management, economy and efficiency;
27.3. made and listed the beneficiaries or partners of accounting records and separated from the rest of costs;
27.4. can be identified, check and confirm with the relevant payment documents (the originals).
IV. Project the application of 28. cooperation authority after consulting with the responsible authority shall open the project application selection, place the following information in the newspaper "Gazette" and cooperation bodies homepage on the internet (URwww.lsif.lv): 28.1. deadline for submission of projects;
28.2. the project application selection available funding;
28.3. the address of the Web site, which can be found in the following: 28.3.1. procedure for the submission of project applications to send it by mail, in person or submit an electronic document;
28.3.2. a project for the preparation of the application, materials used (these provisions and consumables project submission form to fill out).
29. If, after the announced open project application selection are not agreements of all the funding available in this selection, dividing it between the two groups of beneficiaries, the remaining part of the funding to the next open the project application selection.
30. the project application submitted to the authority until the announcement of cooperation indicated in the submission deadline. The submission period is not less than one month from the date of notification of the selection. Project application be rejected if it is received after the specified deadline.
31. the project application consists of the completed project submission form (annex 1) and its attachments: 31.1. project administration and implementation of the staff involved in the description of the life course (CV);
31.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable);
31.3. the mandate of supporting documents (if applicable);
19.5. the project applicant questionnaire-application of value added tax, provided for in the laws and procedures and checks the information provided on the application of value added tax to the European Union within the framework of the projects co-financed by the structural funds and take a decision on the inclusion of value added tax to the project-related costs.
32. the application of the project completed in Latvian language and text.
33. the project application can be submitted to the institution of cooperation: 33.1. paper form in five copies (one original and four copies). Project application dealt with in accordance with the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document;
33.2. electronically. Project application dealt with in accordance with the legislation on electronic document processing using XML file format.
34. the paper submitted the original application for the project shall be accompanied by an electronic version (electronic media). To the media indicate the following information: 34.1. apakšaktivitāt number;
21.3. the project name of the applicant;
21.3. the name of the project.
35. If the project application submitted in paper form, all documents (original and four copies in electronic version) inserts a sealed envelope. On the envelope is: 21.8. indication of "restricted access information";
35.2. the cooperation of the name and address of the authority;
35.3. the project the name and address of the applicant;
35.4. apakšaktivitāt number and name;
22.1. the name of the project.
36. the project application submitted with a cover letter requesting the project. The covering letter indicates the name of the applicant, the project, the activity number, name, and the name of the project.
37. cooperation authority registers the project submitted the application filing date, the registration number and the project applicant or five working days by post proof of receipt of the application for the project.
38. the project application can be submitted personally, send by mail or electronically, subject to the following conditions: 38.1. paragraph 28 of these rules in the project application in the advertisement submission of end date is the last day when the liaison body shall accept and register the project applications submitted in person or electronically;
38.2. If the project application submitted electronically, on the application of the time considered to be the moment when it established cooperation bodies in electronic mail information system;
38.3. If the application is submitted electronically, the applicant shall ensure that the submission of the project to get cooperation authority no later than the rule referred to in paragraph 28, the announcement of the project specified in the submission of the application;
38.4. in the event of a dispute, the applicant must demonstrate that the project is sent to the application before the application deadline for the submission of projects, but to the liaison body of the inspection is to be conducted in connection with the receipt of the application and project cooperation in the establishment and registration of results must inform the applicant of the project;
38.5. where the application is submitted electronically, it must be signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp before the submission of the project application.
V. submission of the project evaluation and decision-making within the 39. Apakšaktivitāt application project provides the evaluation cooperation bodies create a project application selection Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission), which operates under the authority of the cooperation developed and approved the Charter. If any of these provisions in the institution referred to in paragraph 40 has submitted the application to the bottom of the project activities, the representative of the Commission in the framework of its authorities submitted an application in the evaluation of the project do not participate.
40. the Commission consists of representatives with voting rights included: 24.9. responsible authorities;
40.2. the liaison bodies;
40.3. The Latvian employers ' Confederation;
25.1. the State Chancellery;
25.2. The regional development and Municipal Affairs Ministry;
327. the special task Minister for electronic Government Affairs Secretariat;
40.7. the special task Minister for society integration Affairs Secretariat.
41. the Commission observer status may include a representative of the managing authority.
42. The members of the Commission in the absence of his replacement by another delegated representative. Such delegation shall be made in writing to the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Statute.
43. The Commission is within the apakšaktivitāt project application submitted for evaluation may invite experts.
44. in order to determine the technical conformity of the application of the project, project submissions valued under the following administrative evaluation criteria: 44.1. a project application is filled in text (if applicable);

44.2. the project application is filled in the Latvian language;
44.3. the project application is completely filled;
27.6. these regulations has been submitted to the project application, the number of copies (one original and four corresponding certified copies (if applicable));
27.7. the project application, the original is cauršūt (caurauklot) (if applicable);
27.7. the project proposal is prepared according to these provisions a specific project submission form;
27.8. the project application is signed by the applicant's institution of the project officer or authorized person;
27.8. the project application is accompanied by all these rules, certain attachments: 44.8.1. project administration and implementation of the staff involved in the description of the life course (CV);
44.8.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable);
44.8.3. a mandate of supporting documents (if applicable);
27.9. the project financial statement is made in the national currency;
44.10. eligible expenditure of the project correspond to those laid down in these rules eligible costs;
44.11. the requested total eligible cost not less than 5 000 la them and does not exceed 30 000 lats;
44.12. project estimated eligible costs do not exceed the limits of the costs referred to in this provision in paragraph 22.1 and 22.4.;
44.13. project implementation period is less than six months and not more than 12 months.
45. In order to assess the conformity of the project application conditions of apakšaktivitāt project submissions valued according to the following criteria for the evaluation of conformity: 45.1. the project submission complies with the specific objective of providing effective public needs and public administration services, in particular through support to institutions that provide tax and financial planning, management and accounting, providing services in business, employment and social policies, both at national and at regional and local level;
45.2. the applicant and the project partner or partner (if applicable) is a national direct regulatory authority, Court of Justice, the institution who delegated certain public tasks in the planning region, County, municipality, County, municipal authority. Project applicants may be only those municipalities that formed through administrative territorial reform.
46. in order to determine the importance of the application of the project identified in the problem-solving, the ability of the applicant of the project implementation, as well as selected priority projects in assisted submissions, project submissions valued according to the following quality criteria: 46.1. application of the justification of the project evaluation criteria: 46.1.1. extent to which the project will be able to solve 1. operational programme "human resources and employment" the problems related to improving the quality of public services in public administration;
46.1.2. to what extent the project will address 5.1.3.2. apakšaktivitāt ' quality public services at national, regional and local level "target group needs;
46.1.3. the number of recipients of services and the frequency of your use of the services;
46.1.4. the project's contribution to the implementation of the horizontal priorities: 46.1.4.1. or project is the direct or indirect positive impact on balanced development of the territory in a horizontal priority;
46.1.4.2. or project is the direct or indirect positive effect on the horizontal priority of equal opportunities;
46.1.4.3. or project is the direct or indirect positive effect on the horizontal priority of the information society;
46.1.5. how logical is a common project structure (project section of cross compliance and the additionality);
46.1.6. evaluation of project activities (activity statement, the need for activities and compliance with the project's objectives and expected results, schedules, assessments);
46.1.7. project sustainability assessment (results of the project in financial, institutional and political sustainability);
46.1.8. or project submission outcome indicators or planned results indicators contribute to the achievement of such monitoring indicator: 46.1.8.1. the outcome indicator: support public institutions exercising can count-98 (the base value in 2004:0 score in 2009 – 48);
46.1.8.2. table of results: the public administration increase by 25 percent, which introduced the quality management system,-91 (the base value in 2006-73 institutions index \ in 2009-80);
46.1.9. does the project planned a publicity and information activities to ensure the project's publicity and are appropriate to the activities planned in the project;
46.2. the project implementation capacity evaluation criteria: 46.2.1. project administration experience of staff involved in project management;
46.2.2. project applicants and staff involved in the implementation of the project's technical and professional capacity (project staff experience and knowledge of 5.1.3.2. apakšaktivitāt ' quality public services at national, regional and local levels "in the field);
46.2.3. project implementing logistical planning;
46.2.4. project submissions for project roles and responsibilities are relevant (clearly defined functions and responsibilities between the bodies involved and the staff involved in the administration of the project, roles and responsibilities are divided according to the competency and experience);
46.2.5. project submissions for project management and supervisory mechanism is adequate (management, control, monitoring and evaluation of quality control mechanisms);
46.2.6. project implementation involved the choice of partners is based (specified in the planned cooperation model; the role of the partners defined according to its competence and experience);
46.3. the project budget submission evaluation criteria: 46.3.1. project application for costs is reasonable and necessary to the project's objectives and results and the implementation of activities;
46.3.2. project budget costs corresponds to average market prices;
46.3.3. the cost of the project is commensurate with the expected results of the project;
46.4. specific quality criteria: 46.4.1. project applicant is a public administrative institutions that provide services to the administration of tax and financial planning, management, and development planning, as well as business, employment and social policies at national, regional and local level;
46.4.2. project quality public services is viewed in context with other management processes;
46.4.3. project implementation is clearly visible in the body of the employee;
46.4.4. a municipality or local authority outside Riga (applies when the applicant is planning the project region and county municipalities and their institutions).
47. After the submission of the project application project ranking is assessed according to the following criteria: financing the project submission, or 29.3. meet all the administrative and eligibility evaluation criteria, as well as have at least 67 points for the assessment of compliance with the quality criteria;
47.2. in the call in an open project or application in the selection of available funds are sufficient to finance the project submission.
48. the project application, compliance with this provision, 44, 45 and 47 above criteria scored with "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet).
49. the submission of the project compliance with this provision, 46.1.1 46.1.2., 46.1.3., 46.1.5., 46.1.6., 46.1.7., 46.1.8., 46.1.9., 28.7. and 46.3. in this criterion is assessed by a score from one to five, according to the following ratings: 1-very weak, 2-poor, 3-satisfactory, or neutral, 4-good, 5 – very good. Assessment of compliance with these rules and 46.1.2. subparagraph 46.1.1 criteria referred to in points are multiplied by a factor of 2. If project implementation partner or partners are not involved, compliance with this provision in subparagraph 46.2.6. this criterion gets 3 points.
50. the project submission's compliance with this provision 46.1.4. criteria referred to in point scored with 0, 3 or 5 points: 50.1. compliance with this provision. 46.1.4.2.46.1.4.1 and the criteria referred to in point rating: 50.1.1. project does not affect this area – 0 points;
50.1.2. project has an immediate positive impact-3 points;
50.1.3. project has a direct positive impact – 5 points.
50.2. compliance with this provision. 46.1.4.3 criterion referred evaluation is as follows: the project does not foresee 50.2.1. activities for the development of the information society – 0 points;
50.2.2. projects for target groups of the apakšaktivitāt training on information communication technology options – 3 points;
50.2.3. project intended to develop or improve information systems or improve electronic service quality or availability – 5 points.
51. the project application, compliance with this rule 46.4. the criteria referred to in point scored with 0 points or 1 point (0-the condition is not met, 1-condition is fulfilled): 51.1. the compliance assessment of 46.4.1 these provisions and referred to 46.4.2. criteria points will be multiplied:

51.1.1. by a factor of 7, if the applicant is a planning region, County, or municipal authority;
51.1.2. by a factor of 9, if the applicant is a national direct regulatory authority, court or institution who delegated certain public tasks;
assessment of compliance with 51.2. This provision 46.4.3. criterion referred to in points are multiplied by the factor 6:51.2.1. If applicant is a planning region, County, or municipal authority;
51.2.2. by a factor of 8, where the applicant is a national direct regulatory authority, court or institution who delegated certain public tasks;
51.3. the assessment of compliance with the rules referred to in point 46.4.4. criterion points are multiplied by a factor of 6.52. project application is considered to be appropriate: 52.1. application of the justification of the project evaluation criteria (this rule 46.1.), if the total number of points shall not be less than 39 pun kt;
52.2. the project implementation capacity evaluation criteria (that rule 46.2), if the total number of points shall not be less than 18 knot kt;
52.3. project budget submission evaluation criteria (this rule 46.3. the bottom) if the total number of points shall not be less than 10 points.
53. If the project is found, the application does not match at least one of these rules 44, 45 and 47 of the criteria referred to in paragraph or not received a sufficient number of points in accordance with this provision, the Commission 52 stopped a project application and recommends to reject the application for the project.
54. After the submission of a project evaluation quality criteria the project application is assigned a certain number of points overall.
55. project submissions are ranked in order of priority after score obtained, specifying in the application the project requested funding. If multiple project submissions are received the same number of points, priority shall be given to those submissions that receive the highest rating for compliance with this provision, and 46.1.2 46.4 46.1.1. criteria referred to in point.
56. the project application to the Commission for approval or approval of moves provided (except if it is found in at least one of the terms referred to in paragraph 53).
57. the project application to the Commission for approval with conditions driven, if you need clarification on any of these terms and 46.1.6 46.3. criteria referred to in paragraph 61 of these regulations.
58. The liaison body shall take a decision on the application of project: 58.1 approval for financing from the European Social Fund, the Commission has recommended the application of the project to confirm or approve with conditions;
58.2. project financing for the rejection of the application of the European Social Fund, the Commission has recommended the rejection of the application for the project.
59. cooperation authority within five working days after the decision on it shall inform the applicant of the project.
60. the decision on the application for the approval of the project authority of cooperation accompanied by conditions under which will be closed.
61. the decision on approval of the application, the project on condition the liaison body specifies the application in the project details. These updates can include: 61.1. planning of project activities under this provision clarifying 46.1.6. criteria referred to in the bottom of the steps in the evaluation (time schedule changes, up to the time of the planned project, the Division of activities on or off);
61.2. project budget clarification according this rule 46.3. criteria referred to in the instructions in the evaluation (reduction or exclusion, compliance arithmetical), in so far as it does not affect this rule 22.1 and 22.4. restrictions referred to.
62. the decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions contained in the project shall ensure cooperation bodies deadline (not exceeding 30 working days) and information about the conditions in the decision to submit the institution to assess the cooperation.
63. cooperation authority within 10 working days evaluate this rule the information referred to in paragraph 62, drawing up an opinion on the compliance with the conditions and decisions: 39.2. If the opinion is positive, two working days, inform the applicant of the project on the conditions under which the agreement will be closed;
39.3. If the opinion is negative because the applicant has not provided a draft decision contained in the conditions or not they complied with that rule 62, the time limit referred to in the project's application shall be deemed to have been rejected. If the decision is contested, the opinion of Justice assessed simultaneously with the decision taken by the evaluation of the rule of law.
64. If the application is rejected, the liaison body Act this provision in paragraph 59 and 65.
65. the decision on rejection of the application of the project liaison body shall include details of the project and the reasons for rejection of the application, the project applicant project application four copies.
66. These provisions 44, 45, 46 and 47 above, the project application to the evaluation criteria set out in these provisions and in the application of the system of evaluation of projects compiled project submission evaluation criteria (annex 2). These evaluation criteria are approved by the Monitoring Committee.
Vi. conditions for implementing the project 67. Following the adoption of the decision on the application for the approval of the project authority for cooperation concluded with the beneficiary of the financing agreement, which stipulates the obligations of the Contracting Parties and rights as well as the procedure and conditions (including the financing conditions and payment arrangements), which must be followed to ensure the implementation of the project.
68. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation of the project according to the approved project submission and provide reports on the implementation of the cooperation body of the progress and financial implementation in accordance with the agreement.
69. The beneficiary is projected implementation of activities initiated after agreement.
70. the implementation of the project is opened in a separate account in the State Treasury, which is being carried out and which are received by all the project-related payments, if the beneficiary receives the advance and interim payments.
71. the amendments to the project carried out according to the procedures laid down in the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds.
72. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project related loading snapshot homepage on the internet (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months.
VII. follow-up of 73 Apakšaktivitāt. Apakšaktivitāt does the monitoring of the activities of the "better regulation policy Oversight Committee (hereinafter referred to as the measure of the Monitoring Committee).
74. the Monitoring Committee of the measure are the following: 74.1. consider responsible authorities, cooperation agencies and the beneficiaries of the information provided on the implementation of apakšaktivitāt;
74.2. responsible authorities to consider proposals for the necessary amendments to the European Union's structural funds programming documents and decide on their progress to the Monitoring Committee;
46.2. to give proposals on measures of "better regulation policy of the development of the monitoring process.
75. The event, the Monitoring Committee has the following rights: 75.1. to request and receive from the responsible authorities, cooperation authorities and funding requested information related to the implementation of apakšaktivitāt;
75.2. the measures for the meetings of the Monitoring Committee in an advisory capacity to call on industry professionals and experts.
76. actions Monitoring Committee chaired by the Director of the State Chancellery. Secretariat functions carried out by the responsible authority.
77. the Activities of the Monitoring Committee shall operate in accordance with the regulations. Charter of the open vote, approved by the majority of participating in at least two thirds of the actions of members with the Monitoring Committee.
78. the Measures the Supervisory Committee meets no less than quarterly.
79. The event, the Monitoring Committee with voting rights included representatives of ministries and authorities involved in better regulation policy planning and implementation, the State Chancellery, responsible authorities, as well as representatives of the social partners.
80. the Activities of the meetings of the Monitoring Committee in an advisory capacity can participate in cooperation with the authorities, the managing authority and the certifying authority representatives and the representatives of non-governmental organisations involved in better regulation policy planning and implementation.
81. measures of personnel of the Monitoring Committee, on the basis of the institutions and bodies, the mandates approved by the Prime Minister.
VIII. Closing questions 82. This rule 22.1. administrative costs referred to incidence or imputability and determined in accordance with the Cabinet decision on the administrative costs at constant rate.

83. the implementation of the projects that have been initiated before the Cabinet of Ministers adopted a decision on the administrative costs at constant rate, fixed administrative costs rate applies from the day of conclusion of the agreement, subject to the provisions of paragraph 18 of the limit on the maximum amount of the projects.
84. cooperation authority, through an agreement with the beneficiary, these rules determine the conditions referred to in paragraph 83 of the order.
Prime Minister i. Godmanis Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok Editorial Note: rules shall enter into force on 25 October 2008.
Annex 1 Annex 1 PDF 250kb Cabinet on October 14 2008. Regulation No 850 of the Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok annex 2 Cabinet on October 14 2008. Regulations No 850 Project submission evaluation criteria of the operational programme number and name 1. human resources and employment priority number and title 5. Administrative capacity measures the number and name 5.1. Better regulation policy number and name of the activity 5.1.3. Public institutions exercising power quality and efficiency of the number and Apakšaktivitāt the name 5.1.3.2. quality public services at national, regional and local level, the project application selection type open project application selection responsible authority public registry 1. quality criteria (point scale from 1 to 5:1 "-very weak," 2 "," 3 "– weak, satisfactory/neutral," 4 "," 5 "– well – very well) the scale the scale of Points 1.1. justification for the application of the project evaluation kritēr state maximum-65 points 1. Extent to which the project will be able to solve 1. operational programme" human resources and employment ' these problems related to improving the quality of public services in public administration 5 x 2 2. to what extent the project will address 5.1.3.2. apakšaktivitāt ' quality public services at national, regional and local level "target group needs 5 x 2 3. the number of recipients of services and the frequency of your use of the services. the project contribution 5 4 horizontal priorities: 4.1 or project is direct or indirect positive impact on balanced development of the territory in a horizontal priority : 4.1.1. project has direct positive impact 5 project is not 4.1.2 direct positive impact 3 4.1.3 project does not affect this area 0 4.2 or project is direct or indirect positive impact on equal opportunities horizontal priority: 4.2.1 project has a direct positive impact 5 4.2.2. project has indirect positive impact 3 4.2.3. project does not affect this area 0 4.3 or project is direct or indirect positive impact on the information society in the horizontal priority 4.3.1. the project will: develop or enhance information systems or improve electronic service quality or availability for the project 5 4.3.2 activities/apakšaktivitāt target groups of the training on the use of information communications technology opportunities in the project 3 4.3.3. activities in the development of the information society 5. how logical 0 is the total project construction (project section of cross compliance and the additionality) 5 6. evaluation of project activities (activity statement, the need for activities and compliance with the project's objectives and expected results of the assessment, schedules) 5 P 7. project sustainability assessment (results of the project in financial, institutional and political sustainability) or project submission 5 8. planned outcome indicators result indicators or facilitating such surveillance indicators: outcome indicator 5 8.1-supported institutions exercising public power of 98 (the base value in 2004:0 score in 2009 – 48) 8.2 table of results-the public administration increase 25% , which introduced the quality management system,-91 (the base value in 2006-73 institutions, score in 2009:80) 9 or project planned publicity and information activities to ensure the project's publicity and is appropriate for a project planned activities 5 evaluation of compliance If these rules 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8 and 9 the criteria received less than 39 points, the submissions rejected 1.2. Project implementation capacity evaluation criteria the maximum 30 points 10. project administration experience of staff involved in the project management of the project by the applicant 5 11. and staff involved in the implementation of the project of technical/professional capacity (project staff experience and knowledge of 5.1.3.2. apakšaktivitāt ' quality public services at national, regional and local level "scope) 5 12. Project implementation logistics security planning application for the project 5 13. the functions and responsibilities of the project distribution is appropriate (clearly defined functions and responsibilities between the bodies involved and the staff involved in the administration of the project, roles and responsibilities are divided according to the competency and experience) 5 14. project submissions for project control and monitoring mechanism is appropriate ( management, control, monitoring and evaluation of quality control mechanisms) 5 15. Project implementation involved the choice of partners is based (specified in the planned cooperation model; the role of the partners defined according to its competence and experience) 5 If the project partners are not involved, the criteria of the rating is 15, 3 points if the assessment of compliance with 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 to get less than 18 criteria points application of the project rejected the submission of the project 1.3 budget evaluation criteria the maximum 15 points in 16 project application for costs is reasonable and necessary to the project's objectives and results and the implementation of activities 5 P 17. project budget costs corresponding to average market prices 5 P 18. The cost of the project is commensurate with the expected results of the project 5 P If assessment of compliance with these rules. 17 and 18, the criteria received less than 10 points, the application is rejected for the project 1.1., 1.2. and 1.3. criteria for the assessment of the percentage share is 80% of the overall project rating 1.4. Specific quality criteria project 0/1 application-specific quality criteria evaluated to 0, if the criterion is not met, and 1 if the criteria is met. -Specific quality criteria are multiplied by a factor of 6 and 7, if the applicant is a planning region, municipality or local authority, but with 8 and 9 If the applicant is a national direct regulatory authority/Court/authority, who delegated certain tasks of the national maximum-26 points 19. Project applicant is a public administrative institutions that provide services to the administration of tax and financial planning, management, and development planning and business employment and social policy at national, regional and local level (1 x 7) 1 (1 x 9) 2-20. Project quality public services is viewed in context with other management processes (1 x 7) 3 (1 x 9) 4 21. Project implementation is a clear involvement of employees in the institutions (1 x 6) 5 (1 x 8) 6-22. Municipality/municipal authority outside Riga (apply If the applicant is a planning region and county municipalities and their institutions) 1 x 6 1.4. criteria of assessment of part of the share is 20% of the overall project rating 2. eligibility criteria Yes/No 23. the project submission complies with the specific objective of providing effective public needs and public administration services, in particular through support to institutions that provide tax and financial planning, management and accounting services business , employment and social policies both at national and at regional and local level Yes/No N 24. applicant and Project partner or partner (if applicable) is a national direct regulatory authority, Court of Justice, the institution who delegated certain public tasks in the planning region, County, municipality, County, local iestāde7 N Yes/No if you received a negative assessment of compliance with the criterion of 23 or 24, the application of the project rejected 3. evaluation criteria Yes/No 25. project application is filled in text (if applicable) Yes/No N 26. project the application is filled in Latvian language Yes/No N 27. project application is fully completed (yes/no) N

28. it is submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers on October 14 2008. Regulation No 850 of the '' rules for the operational programme "human resources and employment" 1.5.1.3.2. apakšaktivitāt "Appendix a public service quality improvement at national, regional and local level" '' project application specified number of copies (one original and four corresponding certified copies (if applicable)) Yes/No N 29. submission of the project the original is cauršūt (caurauklot) (if applicable) Yes/No N 30. project application has been drawn up under the Cabinet of Ministers on October 14 2008. Regulation No 850 of the '' rules for the operational programme "human resources and employment ' 1.5.1.3.2. Appendix apakšaktivitāt "quality public services at national, regional and local level" '' specific project submission form to Yes/No N 31. project application is signed by the applicant's institution of the project officer/authorized person Yes/No N 32. project application is accompanied by all the Cabinet of Ministers of 14 October 2008 a Regulation No 850 '' rules on "operational programme human resources and employment" at the bottom of the 1.5.1.3.2. Appendix activity "quality public services at national , regional and local level "'' certain attachments: 32.1. project administration and implementation of the CV of staff involved in the Yes/No N 32.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable) Yes/No N 32.3. a mandate of supporting documents (if applicable) Yes/No N 33. project financial statement is made in the national currency (yes/no) N 34. eligible expenditure of the project comply with the Cabinet of Ministers on October 14 2008. Regulation No 850 of the '' rules for the operational programme" human resources and employment "at the bottom of the 1.5.1.3.2. Appendix activity" quality public services at national , regional and local level "'' the eligible costs laid down Yes/No N. 35 requested total eligible cost not less than 5 000 lats and not more than 30 000 lats Yes/No N 36. Project estimated eligible costs exceed the cost restrictions Yes/No N 37. Project implementation period is shorter than six months and not more than 12 months Yes/No N if you received a negative assessment of compliance with 25. , 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 or 37. criteria for project submissions rejected 4. criteria for the award of funding to Yes/No 38. the project submission complies with all administrative and compliance evaluation criteria, as well as it has received at least 67 points in the evaluation of compliance with quality criteria Yes/No N 39. Project submission open project in the call is sufficient application of available funding selection Yes/No N If obtain negative assessment of compliance with the criterion 38 or 39. application of the project rejected the designation.
1. P-non-exhaustive criteria provided.
2. N – if you received a negative rating, the application is rejected.
The notes.
1 rating applies when the applicant is planning the project region, County or municipal authorities.
2 assessment apply if the applicant is a national project of direct regulatory authority/Court/authority, who delegated certain public tasks.
3 rating applies when the applicant is planning the project region, County or municipal authorities.
4 Rating if the applicant is a national project of direct regulatory authority/Court/authority, who delegated certain public tasks.
5 Rating if the applicant is a project in the planning region, County or municipal authorities.
6 rating apply if the applicant is a national project of direct regulatory authority/Court/authority, who delegated certain public tasks.
7 Project applicants may be only those municipalities that formed through administrative territorial reform.
Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok