Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 520 Riga, 9 June 2009 (pr. No 39 16) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 December 2007 the provisions of the "rules on no 836 operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' activity" 3.5.1.1. Appendix for water infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2000 "issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do cabinet 4 December 2007 rules no. 836" rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" in the early stage of the extra activity of water management "3.5.1.1. infrastructure development with the people of merācij agli equivalent more than 2000 "(Latvian journal, 2007, no. 205; 2008, 47, 80 no) the following amendments: 1. Replace paragraph 3 in the number and the word" dollars "to number 294 824 600 and the word" 294 826 278 lats. "
2. Express 8 and 9 point as follows: "8. the incidence of the cost of the project start and end dates define the civil contract or letter of agreement for the implementation of the cohesion fund projects (except for large projects). Within the activity are only supported in the eligible costs directly related to the Cohesion Fund project activities and are proportionate and reasonable.
9. subject to the conditions contained in the Council on 11 July 2006, the traditional structure of Reg (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Development Fund launched Reģi, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation lu (EC) No 1260/1999, as well as the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1084/2006 establishing a Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1164/94, the following costs apply : 9.1. costs associated with the project under the cohesion fund application and supporting the preparation of the dossier for submission to the responsible authority to be able to take a decision on the approval of the project application: 9.1.1. technical feasibility, the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, but not more than 2% of the Cohesion Fund project application planned total eligible costs;
9.1.2. the development projects and related costs of būvekspertīz, but not more than 4% of the Cohesion Fund project application planned total eligible costs;
9.2. autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5% of the eligible costs of the works;
9.3. building costs, but not more than 3% of the eligible costs of the works;
9.4. the cost of the works;
9.5. the contract of supply, including the acquisition of technological equipment, costs of assembling and tuning, except that rule 7.3. costs referred to. "
3. Supplement with 10.1 points as follows: "10.1 with a total eligible costs these rules understand this rule 9 the conditions listed in the appropriate amount of the costs which is set before the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down the Riga vispā provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55 application for instance."
4. Make the following paragraph 11: "11. Non-eligible costs are as follows: 11.1. technical feasibility, the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation, related development costs that exceed 2% of the Cohesion Fund project application planned total eligible costs;
11.2. the development of the construction and related costs of būvekspertīz in excess of 4% of the Cohesion Fund project application planned total eligible costs;
11.3. the autoruzraudzīb costs in excess of 0.5% of the eligible costs of the works;
11.4. building costs in excess of 3% of the eligible costs of the works;
11.5. sewage sludge accumulated in the recycling and waste management costs;
11.6. Powerline construction costs;
7.3. acquisition of equipment costs, relating to the construction and maintenance of the network. "
5. Supplement with 11.1 and 11.2 of chapter II paragraph by the following: "11.1 the cohesion fund projects total budget represents the financial reserve, which can be up to 5% of the project total eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project uses the rules referred to in paragraph 9 to cover eligible costs. Before the financial use of the reserve of the amendments to the civil law contract or letter of agreement for the project under the cohesion fund the infrastructure really.
11.2 the cohesion fund the project submission does not include the following costs: 11.2 1. real estate purchase costs (of existing buildings and the land on which they built);
11.2 2. inappropriate operation of the dismantling costs of the objects (remove the slogan unless this object location infrastructure project is economically and technically justified);
11.2 3. the implementation of the project specifically purchased or produced, the continued use of the equipment should the acquisition cost (including the acquisition cost of the equipment, which are used in the construction process);
11.2 4. administrative or project management, to be used for prolonged use of the equipment costs (including computer equipment and transport costs);
11.2 5. of second-hand equipment purchase expenses;
11.2 6. fees for accounting and audit services;
11.2 7. expenses, which does not provide the immediate purchase of equipment (including līzin gu);
11.2.8 of legal, technical and financial advice provided for the cohesion fund the project during its implementation;
11.2 9. infrastructure operating expenses;
11.2 10. Cohesion Fund project management the remuneration of the staff and administrative expenditure of the project, the beneficiary's current maintenance costs, as well as publicity costs, if the pub lisk services exceeds the minimum requirements set by the laws and regulations of European Union funds to finance the project publicity and visual identity requirements provide the citation;
11.2 current and loan 11. acquisition cost of funds, payment for the loan review, design, reservation and service charges for financial transactions, interest on arrears, penalties and expenses of litigation of the issue. "
6. To express the 19 and 20 in the following: "19. Cohesion Fund project application selection issued in three project application selection rounds according to the respective selection round for the Cohesion Fund co-financing available: 19.1. the first application round project for the Cohesion Fund co-financing available is 162132740 lats;
19.2. the second project application selection round for the Cohesion Fund co-financing available is $114883844;
19.3. the third project application selection round the cohesion fund available for co-financing of at least 17809694 lats;
19.4. If the first and second application round of projects available for the Cohesion Fund co-financing is not granted or used, it redirects a third application round project financing (annex 2).
20. service provider water management activities within the Cohesion Fund co-financing attitudes in accordance with the provisions of annex 1 can get once, but invite water management service provider selection round to submit under the cohesion fund the project cold gum can three times. The responsible authority call for cohesion fund project application for water service providers, local authorities, local government authorities and agencies, as well as corporations that provide water services in annex 2 of these provisions in those areas of the project, sent: 20.1. water management service providers annex 2 of these provisions 1. project group-territories during the month after the entry into force of these regulations. If the water management invited the provider does not submit to the cohesion fund the project submission deadline or a decision is taken on its rejection, the responsible authority shall send the invitation to the next year;
20.2. water management service providers annex 2 of these provisions 2. project group-territories in 2009 after refining the list according to this provision, paragraph 66. If the water management services services invited provider does not submit to the cohesion fund the project submission deadline or a decision is taken on its rejection, the responsible authority shall send the invitation to the next year;
20.3. water management service providers annex 2 of these provisions 3. project group-territories in 2010 after updating the list according to this provision, paragraph 66. If the water management services services invited provider does not submit to the cohesion fund the project submission deadline or a decision is taken on its rejection, the responsible authority shall send the invitation to the next year. "
7. To complement the chapter IV with 23.1 points as follows: "23.1 calls for cohesion fund project application for water service providers this provision 2 Group 3 to annex the territories of the project not being sent after 15 December 2011."
8. Express the 28 and 29 of the following paragraph:

"28. The cohesion fund the project applicant project application under this rule shall be annex 4, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43. or. 44, 45, 46 and 47. criteria referred to in paragraph 1.
29. The cohesion fund the project applicant project application form in the annex to this regulation is added to annex 4, paragraph 49 referred to in the documents. "
9. Amend paragraph 30.
10. Express 31 the following: "31. the responsible authority shall establish a restricted project application selection the cohesion fund the project application for the evaluation of the Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission) and approved its Statute. The Evaluation Commission is made up of responsible authorities, Ministry of the environment and local government representatives of the Union of Latvia, as well as representatives of associations and foundations whose operational objective related to environmental issues behind the sardzīb. Representatives of the managing authority, the Commission shall take part in the evaluation observer. "
11. Make the following paragraph 33:33. Cohesion Fund "project submissions valued under vajiem, compliance, in the administrat quality and funding criteria (to Act): 33.1. compliance with the administrative, compliance and funding criteria assessed with" Yes "or" no "(" Yes "," no "– meets does not meet). If the project application to the Cohesion Fund or the administrative eligibility criteria are not specific to the Atti cinām cohesion fund project applicant project application to the Cohesion Fund in relation to this criterion is not evaluated;
33.2. compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points: 33.2.1. The cohesion fund the project by providing the assessment pursuant to this agreement not to annex 4, Kuma 1., 2., 3., 4. and 5. criteria referred to in each paragraph shall receive at least one point.
33.2.2. The cohesion fund the project by providing a rating according to this agreement the provisions of annex 4, 5, 7 and 8 the criteria referred to in paragraph may receive additional points. "
12. Supplement with 33.1 point as follows: "the Commission assessed Valuation 33.1 cohesion fund project submissions in the following order: 1. first 33.1 valued project application, compliance with this provision 4. Add Kuma 36, 37, 39 and 40, paragraph. administrative criteria. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue;
2. If the project application 33.1 pursuant to this rule 33.1. subparagraph 1 of the criteria evaluated with "Yes", the application is assessed according to these notes to annex 4, Kuma 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 38, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47 and 48 of the criteria referred to in paragraph. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue;
3. If the project application 33.1 pursuant to this rule 33.1. subparagraph 2 of the criteria evaluated with "Yes", the application of these provisions adequately valued in annex 4, 22, 23, 25, 33, 34, 35, 42, 43 and 49 min in the selected criteria and quality criteria in accordance with the provisions of the bottom point. 33.2. If the application does not meet the quality of the threshing fall under this provision, draft 33.2.1. submissions are rejected and not scoring there pin;
4. If the project application 33.1 meets quality criteria in accordance with the provisions of section 33.2.1., project submissions valued under this note to annex 4, Kuma 50 in this criterion. "
13. Express 34 as follows: "34. If two or more applications of the cohesion fund projects have got the same amount of points, the project application priority list ranked in the following order: 34.1. Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 1 criterion;
21.3. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 2 this criterion;
21.3. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 7 this criterion;
21.4. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 6 of the criterion. "
14. To supplement the rules by 21.8 points as follows: "the head of the responsible authority 35.1 shall take a decision on the application of the cohesion fund the project-approval if: 1. it meets this 21.8 rules referred to in annex tratīv the administra, compliance and quality criteria;
2. it meets this 35.1 the provisions of annex 4, paragraph 50 of award criteria for the funding. "
15. Express 37 and 38 as follows: "37. Decision on the application of the Cohesion Fund project approval may include conditions that the cohesion fund the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, so that it can enter into a contract or one third of the Board with the implementation of the project: 37.1. specify information about the cohesion fund the project applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 3);
23.1. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, annex 4, paragraph 49 of this criterion;
37.3. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, annex 4, 42 and 43 of this criterion;
23.2. to clarify changes in the total amount of eligible costs and eligible costs according to the provisions of paragraph 9 and 11.1;
37.5. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and not eligible under this provision, paragraph 11;
23.4. to clarify the cohesion fund the project time schedule according to the rules of annex 4, paragraph 25 of this criterion;
37.7. specify cash flow forecast according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 33 of this criterion;
23.5. clarify the planned implementation of the project under the Cohesion Fund and planned human resources function of the beneficiaries of the corresponding annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 34 of the criterion;
23.5. refine the planned publicity and information dissemination efforts according to the rules of annex 4, paragraph 35 of this criterion.
38. the head of the authority responsible for major projects, shall take a decision on the application of the cohesion fund projects in compliance with the draft application evaluation criteria and the application of the cohesion fund projects not specified or incorrect information to be included in the project application to the Cohesion Fund, to prepare it according to that rule 36. Decision on the application of the project in compliance with the large project application evaluation criteria may include such conditions that the cohesion fund the project applicant must meet the time limit specified in the decision: 38.1. specify information about the cohesion fund the project applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 3);
23.7. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, annex 4, paragraph 49 of this criterion;
23.8. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, annex 4, 42 and 43 of this criterion;
23.9. to clarify changes in the total amount of eligible costs and extend the costs according to the sister, this provision and paragraph 11.1; 9.
38.5. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and not eligible under this provision, paragraph 11;
24.0. refine the cohesion fund the project time schedule according to the rules of annex 4, paragraph 25 of this criterion;
36.6. specify cash flow forecast according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 33 of this criterion;
24.1. clarify the planned implementation of the project under the Cohesion Fund and planned human resources function of the beneficiaries of the corresponding annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 34 of the criterion;
24.2. to clarify the planned publicity and information dissemination efforts according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 35 this criterion. "
16. Express 24.4 and 39.3 point as follows: "If the decision contained in 24.4 condition is not met or not met within the time limit laid down in the decision approving the project submission, or this provision, paragraph 35 of the responsible authority opinion is negative, the project application to the Cohesion Fund shall be deemed to have been rejected.
opinion which is 39.3 found that the applicant has not fulfilled the conditions contained in the decision, the responsible authority within two working days, send to the project applicant. "
17. Make 46 as follows: "46. If the beneficiary does not comply with the regulatory provisions of the procurement provisions in the light of the requirements laid down, the costs arising from the conclusion of the purchase contract, are considered non-eligible costs of the project. "
18. To express 60 as follows: "60. If, after the conclusion of the contract or civil law agreements on the implementation of the Cohesion Fund, the cohesion fund the project necessary to amend, the beneficiary shall submit a proposal to the responsible authority completed form for amendment of the project (annex 5). The amendments Pro can be provided in the project agreement or civil consensus document in a certain Cohesion Fund co-financing. "
19. Make the following section 61.1.: "61.1. Cohesion Fund financing plan for the project, if it is related to the amendment of non-eligible costs and changes not exceeding 20% of their amount, as well as if it is related to the amendments to the procurement plan;".

20. Make 66 as follows: "2.66. These provisions referred to in annexes 1, 2, and 3. the project group shall be specified in the list to the 2010 October 1."
21. Make the new version of annex 1 (annex 1).
22. Put the new version 2 of the annex (annex 2).
23. Make the new version of annex 3 (annex 3).
24. Make new annex (annex 4).
The Prime Minister, the children, family and integration Affairs v. dombrovsky Environment Ministers – in place of the Minister of agriculture j. Dūklav Editorial Note: the entry into force of the provisions to the 17 June 2009.
 
Submitted to the Ministry of the environment annex 1 the Cabinet 9 June 2009. Regulations No 520 "annex 1: Cabinet of Ministers of 4 December 2007 the Regulation No. 836 instructions the cohesion fund the project cost-benefit analysis 1. Cohesion Fund projects to develop such cost-benefit analysis: section 1.1. financial analysis;
1.2. risk analysis;
1.3. analysis of alternatives;
1.4. the economic analysis.
2. Financial analysis is carried out using the current macroeconomic indicators, which the responsible authority shall publish on its website (URwww.vidm.gov.lv).
3. financial analysis includes the following sections: 3.1 funding rates calculated in accordance with the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55;
3.2. the tariff calculation. Payments for water services shall not be less than two percent of the average household monthly income or the calculations, which show recipient under financial capacity, which does not allow to raise tariffs to the following levels;
3.3. operating costs and benefit analysis. Analysis prepares cash flow forecasts in the form of a 30-year period. At the beginning of the reporting period (0) is the year when all the site are taken into service;
3.4. fixed asset depreciation. The lifetime of the asset is determined based on the analysis of the alternatives.
4. Operating expenses and benefits analysis include the following: 4.1. income for water services;
4.2. expenditure associated with water management services.
5. Operating costs and benefit analysis does not include the depreciation of fixed assets, payments for loans and related interest. It includes the calculation of the profit or loss and adds the operating expenses and benefits analysis for the same period.
6. Operating costs and benefit analysis shall include at least the following sections: 6.1. cost of investment and existing assets;
6.2. economic activity changes in revenue and expenditure, current prices, t.sk. the applicant projects revenue from water management services for the past three years;
6.3. financial sources;
6.4. credit, their analysis of a period of three years;
6.5. technical analysis of operation, service, consumer groups. Scope of services and the predicted changes in consumption;
6.6. the solvency of the population and the accounts receivable analysis;
6.7. the tariff. The current tariff, the tariff separately for water and sewer services, and tariff plan reporting period.
4.2. operating cash flow, which is positive in all years.
7. Cost-benefit analysis. The responsible authority shall develop guidelines to applicants the project cost-benefit analysis.
8. Economic analysis aims to demonstrate that the project's economic net present value greater than zero (ENPV > 0). "
The Minister of the environment-Agriculture Minister in place of j. Dūklav of the Ministry of the environment submitted to the annex 2 Cabinet 9 June 2009. Regulations No 520 "annex 2 Cabinet 4 December 2007 the Regulation No. 836 project list 2007-2008 period, the project list (1. project group list) No.
The name of the project, the maximum co-financing from the Cohesion Fund in dollars 1.
Aizkraukles water management development II round 1 823 486 2.
Water services development in Aizpute 2 338 017 3.
Water service development, water management services This development Consortium of river basin authorities, (II) round 3 859 136 4.
Ādaži aquaculture development project 5 087 277 5.
The development of the consortium of water management River basin authorities, round II, baldone 3 274 728 6.
The development of the consortium of water management River basin authorities, 3., Pigeons in the city 6 306 882 7.
The prize for the development of water management project II round 2 808 873 8.
Water services development in Brocēno 1 118 269 9.
The development of the consortium of 19 water management River basin authorities, 2., 4 300 932 10 of Carnikava.
Cēsis aquaculture development project III round 5 671 589 11.
Water services development in Dundaga 1 592 115 12.
Waste water treatment plants, drinking water treatment plants and ūdensgūtn built, water and sewerage network and expansion of 3 042 829 13 Ērgļo.
14 Courland region urban aquaculture development project – grobiņa 2 050 230 14.
Water management development II gulbenes round 5 728 754 15.
Ikšķile aquaculture development (I) round 6 601 518 16.
The development of water Located in 1 610 774 17.
Water management development I jaunpiebalga round 2 092 479 18.
Water management development of jekabpils round 8 966 375 19 II.
Water services development in Kandava 2 016 118 20.
Water services development in Kārsava 2 755 494 21.
The development of the consortium of water management River basin authorities, II., Aizkraukle district of Koknese parish 2 332 494 22.
The development of water management Consortium of municipalities of round II (Krāslava town) 10 961 125 23.
The development of water management in the municipality of 6 130 285 24 Ma.
Water management services in 2 502 664 25 fuller.
Water service development Līgatn 1 104 274 26 in.
Water services development in 872 809 27 Lubāna.
The development of water management in Ludza 4 673 949 28.
The development of water management in Madona Round 9 144 816 29 II.
Water services development in Mālpils 1 077 790 30.
Water management development in Malta 1 081 594 31.
Water management development services in Mazsalaca 3 724 211 32.
Water management development, OGRE II round 7 081 217 33.
Water management services in the Meadow, 2 246 051 34.
Water supply and sewerage network and construction of reconstruction of priekule municipality 2 433 492 35.
Water services in Riga 14 491 924 36.
Water services development in 766 887 37 Roy.
Vietnam's development of water management water management development Consortium of river basin authorities, 2. round 4 465 531 38.
Water management services 3 537 808 39 on the Sweet.
The development of Saulkrasto water, water management development Consortium of river basin authorities, 3. Round 3 916 252 40.
Skrīveri parish for water services development 3 378 852 41.
Water management development in 14 municipalities in the region of Courland, Skrunda-1 085 425 42.
Stands the city of water development project 1 106 782 43.
Water services development in Talsi 4 948 497 44.
Water management development in 14 municipalities in the region of Kurzeme-Ugāl-973 695 45.
Water services development in Ulbroka 3 979 928 46.
The terrain, water supply network, organising reconstruction and construction of municipal vaiņode 893 784 47.
The development of the consortium of 19 water management River basin authorities, 2., Vangaž to 3 814 908 48.
Varakļāni water development I turn 3 859 489 49.
The development of water management in 1 249 989 50 Viļaka.
The development of viļāni municipality water, round 1 547 831 51 3.
Water service development costs 1 458 095 Zilupe total: 183 888 323 2009-2011 period project (2. project group list) No.
The name of the project, the maximum co-financing from the Cohesion Fund in dollars 1.
Water services development in Alūksne 1 103 402 2.
Water services development in the Auc 1 233 421 3.
Water services development in Babīte 3 523 156 4.
Water services development in Bauska 2 958 102 5.
Water services development Dagda 1 159 626 6.
Water services development in Dobele 3 352 375 7.
Water services development in Iecava 2 312 927 8.
Water services development in Īslīc 2 002 991 9.
Water services development in Jaunjelgava 772 381 10.
Water services development in Jelgava 12 552 079 11.
Water services development in Jurmala 16 164 492 12.
Water services development in Kalnciems 1 104 807 13.
Water services development in Kekava 2 705 795 14.
Water services development in 1 988 935 15 Lielvārd.
Water services development 3 to 6 296 421 16.
Water services development in the livani 2 185 720 17.

Water services development in 4 408 689 18 Mārup.
Water services development in Ozolnieki village 1 734 520 19.
Water service development preilji 2 114 737 20.
Water service development of 1 054 908 21 Priekuļo.
Water management services in Rezekne 7 738 574 22.
Water management services in salacgrīva 1 771 066 23.
Water services development in Sigulda 2 318 550 24.
Water services development in smiltene 1 216 553 25.
Water management services in 10 389 551 26 Tukums.
Water management services wearing 3 886 506 27.
Water services development in Valmiera 7 738 574 28.
Water service development of 1 254 505 29 Vecumnieko.
Water services development in Ventspils 7 028 040 30.
Water services development in the Viesīt together 114 883 844 812 441 2010 – 2013 period project (3. project group list) No.
Residential area 1.
Cesvaine 2.
Daugavpils 3.
Jaunolain 4.
Ķegums 5.
Liepaja 6.
Olaine 7.
Salaspils "in place of the Minister for the environment, Minister of agriculture j. Dūklav 3. Annex 282kb, Ministry of the environment submitted a PDF version of the annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 9 June 2009. Regulations No 520" annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 December 2007 the Regulation No. 836-instead of the Environment Ministers of Agriculture Minister Mr Dūklav, Ministry of the environment, submitted in annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 9 June 2009. Regulations No 520 "annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 December 2007 the Regulation No. 836 Project submission evaluation form.
Assessment criteria 1. Quality criteria for rating points 1.
Project readiness stage: obtain at least 1 point 1.1.
the applicant has not prepared a draft technical specifications of the works contract procurement tender in accordance with the governing law of purchase and is not designed, developed and provided for by the legislation of the order accepted the technical project on at least one project planned for works contracts 0 1.2.
prepare the technical specification of the joint construction and purchase of advertising design in accordance with procurement laws regulating 1 1.3.
developed and provided for by the legislation of the order accepted the technical project on at least one project for the planned procurement of 2 1.4 works.
developed and provided for by the legislation of the order accepted technical project all planned construction project procurement 3 2.
The effectiveness of the implementation of the project for a direct improvement of infrastructure: water management must obtain at least 1 paragraph 2.1.
autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount greater than 3.5 percent of project submission planned total eligible costs 0 2.2.
autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the amount of eligible costs from 3 to 3.5 percent of project submission planned total eligible costs 1 2.3.
autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the amount of eligible costs from 2.5 to 3 percent (not including) from the project submission planned total eligible costs 2 2.4.
autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount is less than 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs 3 3.
The risk assessment of the implementation of the project, including the estimated potential cost increase: at least 1 must be obtained in point 3.1.
the project is not carried out in the application of risk assessment 0 3.2.
project risk assessment in the application was made, the plan of measures to prevent the risk identified is not developed or not developed completely 1 3.3.
the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, the risk identified in the plan of measures for the elimination or reduction of incompletely developed 2 3.4.
the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risk 3 4.
The project is carried out in the application the alternatives (financial, technological, technical solution) analysis and economic analysis of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 4.1.
alternative analysis has not been carried out and the project economic analysis 0 4.2.
the analysis performed for only one of the parameters (only the analysis of alternatives or only economic analysis) 1 4.3.
analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives 2 4.4.
analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives, and selected the alternative with the lowest cost 3 5.
The cost of return indicators (population, which as a result of the implementation of the project will improve water quality and provide access to the original total cost: note. The average project application selection round costs of return indicators calculation for project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria-project cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions.

Criterion gives additional points 5.1.
project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 20 percent 1 5.2.
project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference between 10 and 20 percent 2 5.3.
project cost estimate of return is equal to the average of the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, it exceeds 10 percent or 10 percent less than their 5.4 3.
project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference between 10 and 20 percent 4 5.5.
project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 20 percent 5 6.
Long-term investment rating system of water management by project implementation: must obtain at least 1 paragraph 6.1.
not done an assessment on the planned long-term investments 0 6.2.
long-term investments are planned for the period that is shorter than 5 years 1 3.9.
long-term investments are planned for the period from 5 to 10 years 2 6.4.
long-term investments are planned for the period exceeding 10 years 3 1.1. criteria for the assessment of horizontal priorities points 7.
Project applicant's financial contribution to the project (macroeconomic stability): the criterion gives extra points to 7.1.
less than 5 percent of the project's eligible costs 1 7.2.
from 5 to 10 percent of the eligible costs of the project 2 7.3.
more than 10 percent of the eligible costs of the project 3 8.
The project area development index (of the balanced development of the territory): the criterion gives additional points 8.1.
area development index greater than + 0.33 1 8.2.
area development index from-to + 0.74 0.33 2 8.3.
area development index less than 0.75-3 2. Eligibility 2.1. Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No/NA 9.
The applicant shall provide the project community services Cabinet December 4, 2007 No. 836 of the provisions of the "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' activity" 3.5.1.1. Appendix for water infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2000 "included in annex 2 of the project area N 10.
The contract has been concluded with the municipality, if the public service is provided in water management Corporation. Contractual: N 10.1.
in particular, the water management be provided public services 10.2.
the requirement of public water services provider for the necessary technical equipment maintenance and renewal, to provide these services under each specific service requirements of 10.3.
contract period of 10.4.
water management the public service area 10.5.
water management the public service provider granted exclusive or special rights 10.6.
get rewards (compensation) payments, investment in public water management infrastructure, the provision of services and conditions for compensation (compensation) payment calculation, control and review, as well as compensation (compensation) payment and repayment spread over 11.
The decision has been taken on the water management of the public service, where public water management service provides the municipality or its authority. Management decision: N 11.1.
in particular water management are provided for public services in 11.2.
water management the public service area 11.3.
water management public service tariffs


12. Conclusion of the agreement on water management of government public service, where public service provides local government agency. Management contract: N 12.1.
local government agency charged with functions of water management in the public service, including in particular public services are provided for water management in 12.2.
water management of the public service of the territory of 12.3.
water management public service tariffs, 13.
The project applicant is not tax debt to the application for the first working day of the month N 14.
Project applicant has stated that the infrastructure needed for the public service of water belongs to the project applicant.
Note the. Does not apply to the project the applicant that submits an application to the first draft of the project application selection round to N 15.
A corporation is not in liquidation or insolvency proceedings.

N 16.
Project assessment of the financial situation of the applicant certifies the operating financial stability after the offender project N 17.
Project applicant has stated that it has the right to carry out the works concerned, which within the framework of the project for the construction works N 2.2. Cohesion Fund projects match the horizontal priority – sustainable development Yes/No 18.
The project will ensure the reduction of the pollution of the environment or the regulations according to the quality of the provision of drinking water to the population N 19.
The project will improve water management infrastructure efficiency N 2.3. project eligibility criteria Yes/No 20.
The project submission complies with the purpose of the activity, water supply and waste water collection and purification of water quality improvement and expansion of services, ensuring high-quality living environment, reducing environmental pollution and eutrophication of water bodies, water resources and promoting the rational use of energy: N 21.
Application of the project meets at least one of the activities eligible activities: N 21.1.
quality of drinking water supply and water resource protection 21.2.
with the communal waste water discharged to the environment pollution reduction of 21.3.
water management services that comply with the regulations laid down by the water's quality of service indicators, ensuring access 22.
The project submission complies with activities eligible costs: P 22.1.
technical feasibility, the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, but not more than 2 per cent of the project under the cohesion fund the application scheduled for total eligible costs when such costs for 22.2.
development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than 4 percent of the Cohesion Fund project application planned total eligible costs when such costs for 22.3.
autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works, if such costs for 22.4.
building costs, but not more than 3 per cent of the eligible costs of the works, if such costs for 22.5.
the cost of the works and 22.6.
supply contract costs, including costs of technological equipment, Assembly and tuning, if such costs are provided for 23.
The project submission complies with activities not eligible costs P 24.
Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 15.0.
given the technical characteristics of the activities to 24.2.
Specifies the result and outcome indicators and fulfil the purpose of the activity 24.3.
provides a location for operations within the territory of 15.2 project implementation.
Provides steps for economic benefits, 24.5.
actions to provide qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits of 24.6.
actions to provide qualitative and quantitative contribution of the EU and the Republic of Latvia on the implementation of the requirements of environmental protection and water management in the area of 24.7.
describe the principle of the "polluter pays", the project 25.
Time schedule of the project comply with the planned project activities P 26.
The information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results: N 26.1.
have the appropriate institutional structure of 26.2.
are appropriate to the planned project results in operating the infrastructure built and maintenance cost 26.3.
It is planned according to the tariff policy that will provide the required operating and development costs (in the case of a loan-repayment of the loan also) 26.4.
is or will be available for staff to ensure the implementation of the project according to the fixed assets resulting from the operation of the 27.
The project specified in the application for works and supply of equipment (for example, network, infrastructure, equipment supplied) meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed project objectives N 28.
Project cost-benefit analysis carried out by applying: N 28.1.
the real social discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 28.2.
the real financial discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 28.3.
the appropriate conversion factor scores 28.4.
According to the medium-term and long-term forecasts 29.
Project financial analysis confirms the financial stability of the project N 30.
The requested funding from the Cohesion Fund aid intensity justified by cost-benefit analysis N 31.
The requested State budget financing of aid intensity laid down in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 December 2007 the Regulation No. 836 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix" for water activity 3.5.1.1. infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2,000 "and reasoned with project cost-benefit analysis N 32.
The project budget includes cost: N 32.1.
include all project costs required for the positions of 32.2.
is under construction for the 32.3.
are reasonable and justified, specifying clear assumptions for calculation of costs 32.4.
It is directly necessary for the implementation of the project of 32.5.
meet the projected market prices 33.
Project cash flow forecast: P 33.1.
displays both the demand and the cost of funding the performance forecast 33.2.
meet the planned time schedule, 33.3.
meet the project's financial plan 34.
The project planned in the application project implementation and human resources ensure planned legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries: P 34.1.
Project administrative (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) control of 21.3.
financial (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) for the management of 21.3.
technical (for example, reconciliation in design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) management 35.
The project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the cohesion fund the project publicity and information dissemination measures requirements P 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 36.
The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 37.
The project applicant is invited to submit a project application N 38.
Project submission has been prepared according to the activity of N 39 the submission form.
Project submission prepared for the Latvian language N 40.
Project submission prepared into N 41.
Project submission signed by the authorised person N 42.
Filed one project submission of an original and three copies, as well as the electronic version of that annex contains only the cost benefit analysis (where the application is filed in paper form) P 43.
Both the project the original and the copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot, of the attached document pages numbered (if the application is filed in paper form) P 44.
The project application was made under the electronic movement of documents regulatory laws and requirements (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 45.
Project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 46.
Project submission developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document), 47 N.
The project application has been developed and presented in the annex pursuant to the electronic circulation of documents regulatory requirements in laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) 48 N.
Project application form completed in all its sections N 49.
The project attached to the application for all specified attachments: 30.5 P.
aquaculture development project feasibility study (including additional documentation that explain or articulates the technical-economic justification, if required) 30.6.

the project's cartographic material is appropriate, which provide information about the location of project activities in the project area and their impact on the natural attractions in the surrounding area 30.6.
construction estimate 30.7.
the municipality where the planned works, proof that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed to 30.8.
Environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of 30.8.
Water management structures construction project evaluation Commission feasibility studies preparatory to acceptance in accordance with the water management build the laws governing 49.7.
Board's decision, management contracts or contract between the municipality and the Corporation (depending on the legal status of the applicant in the project) on water management of the public service of the copy of 49.8.
the license for the provision of a copy of the public service, if the services are provided to a corporation 31.0.
a copy of the credit agreement concluded or lending institution issued a copy of a document certifying that the credit will be granted without guarantees, if credit is provided without guarantee of a municipality 49.10.
municipal financing decision, if the project foresees municipal co-financing of 49.11.
the municipal decision on the guarantee or loan, if the project foresees municipal guarantee or loan 49.12.
municipal decision that applicant under the project of the municipality prepared a project application and incorporates the work and the amount of financing 49.13.
project cash flow forecast 4. Criteria for the award of funding to Yes/No 50.
The project planned in the application of the Cohesion Fund co-financing shall not exceed the Cabinet December 4, 2007 No. 836 of the provisions of the "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' activity" 3.5.1.1. Appendix for water infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2000 "in annex 2 the maximum cohesion fund co-financing of specific water management infrastructure project and the project submissions, listing priority order (starting with the most points got a submission of the project), the project application selection round application is sufficient funding for the project N legend : N-if the assessment is negative, the project application is rejected, the P-a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission deadline of the decision), NA (not applicable), if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed for this criterion. "
The Minister of the environment-Agriculture Minister in place of j. Dūklav in