Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 362 in Riga 2010 April 13 (Mon. No. 19 33) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 10 June 2008. Regulations No 426 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "apakšaktivitāt" Appendix 3.2.1.3.1. Road safety in built-up areas outside Riga "" issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law paragraph 10 of article 18 to make a Cabinet of 10 June 2008. Regulations No 426 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "apakšaktivitāt" Appendix 3.2.1.3.1. Road safety in built-up areas outside Riga "(Latvia's journal , 2008, no. 102) the following amendments: 1. To replace paragraph 6:1.1. "" with the number "12 739 12 739 935 934";
1.2. the number "10 828 945" with the number "10 828 944."
2. Replace paragraph 9, the words "minimum" with the words "laid down the minimum".
3. Express section 16.1.6. by the following: "16.1.6. Decides on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of a conditional and shall inform the applicant of the project;".
4. To supplement the provisions of the following paragraph in the 16.1.8: "accumulating data on project 16.1.8. submissions under the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and use until a decision on the application for the approval of projects, the approval or rejection of the conditions;".
5. Replace 16.2.6. in subparagraph the word "leading" with the word "certification".
6. To express the following paragraph 16.2.10: ' information accumulation 16.2.10. for projects for which an agreement has been concluded, and the transfer of such information to the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system; ".
7. Make the following subparagraphs 16.2.12.: "16.2.12. every six months according to the competency report on financial resources learning and progress made in implementing the activities, outputs and performance indicators, as well as in the course of implementing projects, problems identified and once a year, a report on the implementation of the horizontal priorities in the framework of the activity and submit them to the responsible authority;".
8. To supplement the provisions of the following paragraph in the 16.2.14: "amending agreement on 16.2.14. project implementation, if necessary, in agreement with the amendments to the competent authority."
9. Supplement with 11.7. and 18.10. subparagraph as follows: "following the underground communications. 11.7 and public transport infrastructure rebuilding, if its directly related to traffic safety project and the construction process in the public service for the provision of the necessary infrastructure at risk of deterioration: 18.9.1. public service infrastructure (water, sewage, heating, public transport) conversion;
18.9.2. gas, electricity and telephony communications infrastructure conversion without changing their specifications;
18.10. the installation of the parking lot, if it is directly related to the achievement of the objective of the apakšaktivitāt and the following conditions are fulfilled: 18.10.1. vehicle parking at the State and local authorities and public service items, which provides State and local functions, if the installation is technically justified;
18.10.2. vehicle parking is located at the edge of the carriageway and intended for transient use up to two hours;
18.10.3. investment is not made of any particular commercial interest. "
10. Delete the 19.2 and 19.3.
11. Make a point 20 as follows: "20. the eligible costs of the project are to: 20.1. project preparation costs (excluding project submission form fill) to 10 percent of the eligible costs of the project: 20.1.1. construction development costs no more than five percent of the project's eligible costs: 20.1.1.1. technical feasibility;
20.1.1.2. inženierizpēt, the required transport infrastructure (geological, hydrological and topographic trying);
20.1.1.3. Design (sketch design, construction and procurement procedures document preparation);
20.1.1.4. document preparation costs according to the laws and regulations on environmental impact assessment;
20.1.2. būvekspertīz;
20.1.3. road safety audits;
20.2. the cost of the works;
20.3. autoruzraudzīb costs;
20.4. building costs;
20.5. publicity measures, in so far as it provides for the European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management regulatory acts;
20.6. the value added tax, which is directly related to the project, if a project applicant cannot recover it according to the laws and tax policy;
20.7. land acquisition costs up to 10 percent of a project's eligible costs if they are necessary for the purposes of the project;
12.9. expenditure for contingencies that rule 20.2, 20.3, 20.4., 20.6 and 20.7... States attributable to cover not more than five percent of the 20.2, 20.3, 20.4.., and 20.7 20.6. in eligible costs laid down. "
12. Delete 21.5. section.
13. Make the following point 13.6.: 13.6. implementation of the project-related rewards and administrative costs of the project; ".
14. To supplement the provisions of this paragraph 21.10: "21.10. alteration of underground communications, if the crew capacity after the transfer or conversion is increased."
15. To complement the chapter IV with 22.1 points as follows: "the application of the project may include 22.1 only 20 of these regulations, paragraph costs."
16. Delete 27.4. and 27.5. section.
17. Delete 28.2. section.
18. Replace paragraph 28.3, the number "30" with the number "90".
19. Delete the 28.4. section.
20. Make the following paragraph in 28.5: "Council decision, 28.5. which shows that the Government is ready to implement the project and invest in the relevant funding;".
21. Deleted 28.6 and 28.7...
22. the express section 28.14. the following wording: "28.14. a document showing that the object in which to make investments, is in the property of the applicant or of the project the project the applicant has entered into or reached a deal with the owner of the land under the construction of article 3 of the law;".
23. To supplement the rules with no 28.21. and section 28.22. the following wording: "No 28.21. If the project is intended for the provision referred to in paragraph 18.9.1. investments: 28.21.1. certified civil engineer examination of the opinion, which found that the project planned investments in certain areas, it is not possible to avoid this provision 18.9.1. infrastructure referred to transmission or damage;
28.21.2. contract for public service that meets the business supports the control law 21.1 the requirements set out in article;
28.22. If the project is for this provision 18.9.2. investments referred to in point-certified civil engineer examination of the opinion, which found that the project planned investments in certain areas, it is not possible to avoid this provision 18.9.2. referred to transmission or damage to infrastructure. "
24. Make a paragraph 29 by the following: "29. Apakšaktivitāt within the responsible authority may hold multiple project application selection round. The next application round project is organised, if not in the previous round teaches all apakšaktivitāt within the funds available. "
25. Delete paragraph 31.
26. Express 29.3. subparagraph by the following: "47.2. panelists include representatives of the Ministry of transport and, if necessary, the specialists of the sector concerned;".
27. Make 52 as follows: "52. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions under the administrative and eligibility criteria, evaluation form under" assessment "indicating compliance of the application for the project evaluation criteria (" Yes "," no "match-match," P "– be)."
28. the express 54, 55 and 56 points by the following: "project 54. application assessed according to the following criteria: administrative 54.1. the project application is filed within the time limit set in these rules;
54.2. the project is drawn up into the application;
54.3. project submission prepared for the Latvian language;
54.4. the original of the application is the project cauršūt (caurauklot) (does not apply to projects submitted by electronic applications in the form of the document);
54.5. one project has been submitted to the original application and one copy (not applicable to the project application submitted in the form of electronic documents);
54.6. project application is added to the project submission in electronic version (can not add attachments) (does not apply to projects submitted by electronic applications in the form of the document);
54.7. project submission complies with the regulations laid down in the document preparation and design requirements;
54.8. a copy of the application the project comply with the project's original application (does not apply to projects submitted by electronic applications in the form of the document);
project submission is 54.9. prepared under the apakšaktivitāt project application form;

project submission is 54.10. fully completed, is added to the annex set out in these provisions and the accompanying documents;
54.11. application of the project financing plan and budget summary has no arithmetic errors and properly completed;
54.12. requested by the European regional development fund co-financing and national budget allocation to local authorities have calculated the arithmetic correctly, the European regional development fund co-financing amount complies with these rules, restrictions, and the European regional development fund co-financing rate shall not exceed the maximum amount;
project submission not 54.13. not specified corrections, erasures, aizkrāsojum, deletion or addition (does not apply to projects submitted by electronic applications in the form of the document);
project submissions are 54.14. signed the project paraksttiesīg the person of the applicant or the authorized person;
application of project financial 54.15 calculation is made in local currency;
54.16 in the application project cost position and complies with those rules and their cost.
55. project submissions valued according to the following eligibility criteria: 55.1. project eligibility criteria of the applicant: the applicant is 55.1.1. project (with the exception of the Riga City municipality);
55.1.2. project requested by the applicant of the European regional development fund co-financing does not exceed the maximum laid down in these provisions and is not less than the minimum amount;
55.1.3. the project the applicant does not have tax debt and the State social insurance compulsory contribution to the debt;
55.1.4. project applicant has sufficient and stable financial resources to ensure that all cash flows during project implementation;
55.1.5. the project applicant is committed to providing financing from its own resources if the project costs are increasing;
55.1.6. project application describes the project management, implementation and monitoring of the scheme;
55.1.7. project application describes all the activities planned in the project for the implementation of the required resources;
55.1.8. project management team have the appropriate experience and project management capacity, professional and technical knowledge. The project management group includes at least the following specialists: 55.1.8.1. one project leader, which has at least three years of experience in the management of transport infrastructure projects;
55.1.8.2. one accountant, financier, who has at least three years experience in financial accounting;
55.1.9. project applicant has tried to obtain confidential information in your possession or affect the Evaluation Commission or the authority of the European Union structural funds project submission, or other funds of the European Union-funded projects in the evaluation of the application;
55.2. project eligibility criteria: 55.2.1. project meets apakšaktivitāt's aim to improve road safety in built-up areas, eliminating '' black points '' or traffic safety in the dangerous location-not just those that have a large number of fatalities and accidents, but also potentially dangerous location, through the various transport infrastructure and traffic improvement measures to the organization with the means as possible achieve the level of road safety improvements (e.g., intersection and rebuilding energy-efficient street lighting , traffic lights, pedestrian lanes and crosswalk installation);
55.2.2. infrastructure object in which to make an investment, the project is located the property of the applicant or the applicant has entered into or reached a deal with the owner of the land according to article 3 of the law on construction;
55.2.3. project budget includes expenditure corresponds to the average projected market prices during the whole implementation and are required to achieve the project's results and the implementation of the planned activities;
55.2.4. project planned in the application monitoring indicators are clearly defined and measurable;
55.2.5. the results of the project will ensure sustainability for at least five years after completion of the project;
55.2.6. project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements the minimum requirements laid down;
55.2.7. the project is not and is not financed or co-financed was from other sources of Finance of the European Union or the State and local budgets, as well as project planned activities do not overlap with the activities that are co-financed with other activities of the European Union funds and the other financial instruments;
55.2.8. the project will be completed within two years after the conclusion of the agreement, but not later than 31 august 2015.
56. the project submissions valued according to the following quality criteria: 56.1. entry-level road safety assessment in a particular place. If you need significant improvements in road safety, the application of the project will be awarded five points if road safety is not required – 0 point. The proportion of the common criteria evaluation is 15 percent. Traffic safety level shall be evaluated, on the basis of the Commission of experts of the Ministry of transport, which takes account of the following aspects: 56.1.1. road traffic accidents, the number of victims, the wounded number, the number of accidents in which no casualties, road accidents cost;
56.1.2. road traffic accident reason analysis, comparison with other analogous meanings and load the streets;
56.1.3. traffic intensity and composition (existing and prospective), pedestrians and cyclists;
56.1.4. traffic congestion delays or risks;
56.1.5. the current shortcomings of traffic organization;
56.1.6. position of the infrastructure;
56.1.7. other specific traffic safety representative sizes;
56.2. improvement in road safety, if the project will be implemented. If, after the implementation of the project significantly improves road safety project application will be awarded five points if traffic doesn't improve security, 0 point. The proportion of the common criteria evaluation is 20 percent. The improvement in road safety is assessed on the basis of the Commission of experts of the Ministry of transport, which takes account of the following aspects: 56.2.1. impact on the number and severity of accidents;
56.2.2. transport system maintenance cost reduction benefits of users;
56.2.3. innovations for traffic organization in the solution (new elements, different traffic patterns, except for maintenance and rehabilitation);
56.2.4. other specific traffic safety representative indicators;
56.3. requested by the European regional development fund co-financing. The proportion of the common criteria rating is 25 percent: 56.3.1. the Republic city municipalities and county municipalities with a total population of 15 000 or more (according to the Central Statistical administration data for 2009): up to 200 000 lats 56.3.1.1.-five points;
56.3.1.2.200 001 300 000 lats – four points;
56.3.1.3.300 001 400 000 lats – three points;
56.3.1.4.400 001-500 000 lats – two points;
56.3.1.5.001-500 600 000 lats-one point;
56.3.1.6. more than 600 000 lats – 0 points;
56.3.2. county municipalities with a total population of less than 15 000 (according to the Central Statistical administration data for 2009): 56.3.2.1. to 100 000 lats – five points;
56.3.2.2.001 100-150 000 lats – four points;
56.3.2.3.001-150 200 000 lats – three points;
56.3.2.4.200 001-250 000 lats – two points;
56.3.2.5.001-250 300 000 lats-one point;
56.3.2.6. more than 300 000 lats – 0 points;
56.4. national funding. The proportion of the common criteria evaluation is 10 percent: more than 35 56.4.1. percent, five points;
56.4.2.31-35 percent, four points;
56.4.3.26-30 per cent-three points;
56.4.4.21-25 percent-two points;
56.4.5.16-20 percent, one point.
56.4.6.15 percent – 0 points;
56.5. the degree of readiness of the project. The proportion of the common criteria evaluation is 10 percent: 56.5.1. developed a full range of construction for all types of work anticipated as well as prepare the purchase documentation – five points;
56.5.2. developed a full range of projects all the expected work, four points;
56.5.3. the technical-economic analysis, as well as developed the sketch project-two points;
56.5.4. developed the sketch project and technical project for only one type of work (for example, with the electricity-related jobs)-one point;
56.5.5. has none of the above documents – 0 points;
56.6. the project site (County and city authorities of the Republic) territorial development index project application selection round of the day. The proportion of the common criteria evaluation is five percent: 56.6.1-2.000 or below – 2 points;
56.6.2.-to-1.000-1.999 of 1.5 points;
56.6.3. from: 0-1 point to 0.999;
from 0.001 to 1-56.6.4.0.5 points;
1.001 or higher-56.6.5.0;
56.7. road or intersection capacity increase or reduce the delay. The proportion of the common criteria evaluation is 10 percent: 56.7.1. Yes – two points;
56.7.2. no – 0 points;

54.1. environmental accessibility for people with functional disabilities. The proportion of the common criteria evaluation is five percent: 56.8.1. developing projects, will be taken into account in the construction of the regulatory laws and requirements regarding accessibility for people with functional disabilities, and the project includes specific additional measures for promoting environmental accessibility for people with functional disabilities (such as terrain surface, contrasting colour at the level of the Exchange, traffic lights, guardrails, equipped with sound signal)-one point;
56.8.2. developing projects, will be taken into account in the construction of the regulatory legislation, but the project is not intended for specific measures for the promotion of accessibility for people with functional disabilities – 0 points. "
29. Supplement with 56.1 points as follows: "the project submissions valued 56.1 according to the following criteria: financing if the project submission complies with these rules, 54.3 54.1 54.2.,.,.,., 54.4, 54.15 54.13 54.14., 55.1.2., 55.1.1., 55.1.3., 55.1.9., 55.2.1 55.1.5.,.,., 55.2.4., 55.2.5 55.2.3., 55.2.7. and 55.2.8. assessment criteria referred to in this provision as well as 56.2 56.3 56.1.,.,.,.,., 56.6 56.4 56.5 56.7 54.1., and the assessment criteria referred to in subparagraph has received a total of at least 165 points then, listing of project submissions in descending order, starting with the most points earned, submission of the draft selection round application for the project has enough funding. "
30. Make 57 as follows: "57. If the application requires clarification this provision accordingly, 54.5 54.7 54.8 54.6.,.,.,.,., 54.9 54.11, 54.12 54.10..,.,., 55.1.6 54.16 55.1.4., 55.1.7., 55.1.8., 55.2.6., and 55.2.2. the requirements referred to in subparagraph, the competent authority shall take a decision on project approval with conditions. If you received a negative assessment of compliance with the other criteria, the submission is rejected. "
31. The deletion of paragraph 58.
32. To make 60 and 61 points. the following wording: "60. If multiple project submissions received the same number of points, with priority given to the application of the project in which the project is to be implemented in the territory of the municipalities with the lowest development index to open the project application selection round of the day.
61. The competent authorities shall adopt the administrative head of the decision on the application of the project approval, approval with conditions or disapproval. "
33. To supplement the rules with 65.1 and 65.2, 65.3, 65.4 points as follows: "If the project applicant, 65.1 which project the application approved, does not provide the conditions contained in the decision or does not comply with the prescribed time limit, the application is rejected and the project funding is not granted. Selection round of the available funding, the surplus can be assigned to the next application of the project that received the highest number of points, but rejected because of insufficient funding.
removing the above decisions 65.2 of the rejection of the application for the project as a result of insufficient funding, the responsible authority shall take into account the remaining funding.
If canceled before 65.3 the decision rejecting the application for the project as a result of insufficient funding, but the project submission does not comply with this rule, 54.5 54.7 54.8 54.6.,.,.,.,., 54.9 54.11, 54.12 54.10..,.,., 55.1.6 54.16 55.1.4., 55.1.7., 55.1.8., 55.2.6., and 55.2.2. the requirements referred to in subparagraph, the competent authority shall take a decision on the application for the approval of this project provided.
65.4 65.3 points of these regulations in accordance with the procedure laid down in the decision taken on project approval submissions, provided the conditions contained in the project, the applicant provided within five working days of receipt of the decision. "
34. To supplement the 66 behind the number "65" with name and number "and" 65.4.
35. A supplement 68 behind number "65" with name and number "and" 65.4.
36. Delete paragraph 70.
37. To replace the words "in paragraph 71 of the territory" with the words "populated place".
38. To supplement the rules with 84 as follows: ' 84. If a breach of the regulations on control of business support, liaison body reduces the funding for the project to the extent that the infringement. "
39. To complement the chapter X rules with the following wording: "X. concluding issues 85.79. These rules apply to the first point of the project application selection within the approved project submission.
86. This rule 20.7, as well as paragraph 65.1 and 65.2, 65.3, 65.4 points not applicable project submissions, filed the first application round project. "
40. Make a new version of the annex (annex).
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky traffic Minister k. Gerhards traffic Ministry annex in the submitted version of the Cabinet of Ministers of 13 April 2010 Regulation No. 362 of the "Cabinet of 10 June 2008. Regulations No 426 traffic Minister k. Gerhard