Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 766 Riga 2010 (august 10. No 41 71. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" apakšaktivitāt "Appendix 3.2.2.1.1. Information systems and electronic services development" project application selection to the second round were issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.2. Priority Areas and the availability of "reach" UR3.2.2.pas "ICT based infrastructure and services" activity "public 3.2.2.1. Government electronic services and information system development". apakšaktivitāt "information 3.2.2.1.1 system and the development of electronic services "(apakšaktivitāt) project application selection, second round;
1.2. the European regional development fund, the project assessment criteria application (hereinafter referred to as the project application evaluation criteria);
1.3. the requirements of the European regional development fund project applicant (hereinafter referred to as project applicant);
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination.
2. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt is the effective use of information and communication technologies to improve the efficiency of the public administration, promoting public service elektronizācij, development, availability and quality, and to reduce the administrative burden on citizens and economic operators, to increase the opportunities for citizens to get involved in public affairs, to develop information systems, providing a technical base for the development of electronic services and improving the circulation of information. Apakšaktivitāt is focused on information and communication technology infrastructure, including information systems and services, the development of a number of sectors, such as health care, employment and social protection, cultural industry, providing both access to information resources and the conservation of these resources. Apakšaktivitāt's goal is also to develop and improve information system for all or more of public administration institutions, ensuring the coherence of information systems and integration, and develop services involving several public authorities and are used in a number of information systems.
3. Apakšaktivitāt implement the project application to the limited selection.
4. Apakšaktivitāt in the second round of the selection available in the framework of the European regional development fund is LVL 33 057 598.
5. The European Regional Development Fund funding intensity is up to 100 percent of the project's total eligible costs.
6. implementation of Apakšaktivitāt is provided by the responsible authority and the liaison body. The responsible authority's regional development and Municipal Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority), the authority is the Central Finance and Contracting Agency (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body).
7. Cooperation authority has functional authority.
8. the purpose of the group is Apakšaktivitāt any regulatory authority, authorized public administration tasks, and other information systems and electronic services users.
9. the responsible authority: 9.1. provide apakšaktivitāt related information and publicity measures at the level of the apakšaktivitāt according to the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements;
9.2. ensure implementation of apakšaktivitāt, monitoring and control activities implementation and application of the evaluation criteria of the project development, analyse problems and provide the implementation of the activity the managing authority and the European Union's structural funds and the Cohesion Fund Monitoring Committee proposals for the improvement of the implementation of the activity;
9.3. provides, not to be exceeded the available implementation apakšaktivitāt European regional development fund, and monitors the available European regional development fund, including a learning Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 listed in the implementation of the principle of the apakšaktivitāt level;
9.4. the assessment by the Commission in drafting the Statute, application assessment methodology of the project, the project submission form for the evaluation of the methodology and the application of the methodology for completing the project;
9.5. sending of the call for project submissions for a limited range of projects;
9.6. create project submission Evaluation Commission;
9.7. ensuring the project application selection and evaluation;
9.8. Decides on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition, as well as monitor conditions;
9.9. institutions of cooperation developed a standard agreement for the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement);
9.10. the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system collects data on the project submissions under the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
9.11. evaluate collaborative institutions prepared information on the draft amendment and give an opinion on the amendment of the project;
9.12. before closing the checks for payment at the place of implementation of the project, ensuring the technical content and functionality testing.
10. cooperation authority: 10.1 ensure the introduction of the project-related information and publicity measures, consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements;
10.2. draft agreement in the development of the responsible authority and concluded an agreement with the beneficiary;
10.3. assess the agreement amendments aligning it with the responsible authority, if the changes are related to the project objectives, the rules referred to in point 9.3 of the enforcement principle, the activities of the project, project costs, project results and the monitoring indicators to be achieved, and decide on amendments to the agreement;
10.4. the beneficiary of the financing look prepared for submission of requests for payment schedule;
10.5. the inspection reports submitted by the beneficiaries of payment requests, approve the amount of the eligible expenditure shall prepare payment orders and declarations of expenditure;
10.6. the review and approval of submitted project progress reports;
10.7. monitoring of projects used the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and the data it collects on projects consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
10.8. ensure that these rules are not exceeded, paragraph 4, of apakšaktivitāt available for the implementation of the European regional development fund, and monitors the available European regional development fund, including a learning Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project;
10.9. providing project monitoring and control, including checks in the project locations, subject to the regulations, which determines the order in which the managing authority, certifying authority, liaison body or authority responsible for the controls to be carried out for the European Union structural funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of the project;
10.10. the test and submit to the procurement monitoring Bureau funding procurement plan drawn up by the beneficiary;
10.11. the preparation of the information to the authority responsible for the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt of the available funding.
11. Regional development and local government Ministry is developing information system concept development methodologies and publish it on the website of the Ministry.
12. the project applicant will plan and prepare project submission under the Cabinet of Ministers approved information system operations concept for the theme of the project referred to in annex 1 of these rules.
13. the project, the applicant shall publish the rules referred to in point 12 of the Cabinet of Ministers approved the concept of information system project applicant description of the Web site.
II. Project activities and the cost of Apakšaktivitāt within the 14 eligible activities are: 14.1. information systems, integration and development;
14.2. electronic service creation and development;
14.3. information resource digitization;
14.4. the structural funds of the European Union information and communication activities.

15. The project is not eligible activities other than those referred to in point 14 of these regulations, does not contribute this provision referred to in paragraph 2 of the apakšaktivitāt goal and does not match the information in the Cabinet of Ministers approved the concept of a system.
16. eligible direct costs of the project are: 16.1. preparation of project documentation costs: 16.1.1. supporting the preparation of the documentation of the project costs: 16.1.1.1. information system operational concept description Prep costs;
16.1.1.2. project financial analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis development costs;
16.1.2. information systems acquisition technical specification development costs;
16.1.3. the information system software requirements specification development costs;
16.1.4. technical infrastructure and standard software acquisition or lease purchase technical specifications development costs;
16.2. project-related systems software development and introduction of quality control costs;
16.3. the information system development costs: 16.3.1. information systems software development costs, including the costs related to data exchange interfaces to external systems, including information systems and public information system savietotāj the interoperability costs;
16.3.2. software design documentation development costs;
16.3.3. software user and administrator manual development costs;
16.3.4. the portal and Web site design and development costs, which provides e-services;
16.3.5. user authentication, payment processing, electronic service of process management in software development costs, if the project (upgradeable) e-services interfaces do not form for the single public service portal (URwww.latvija.lv);
16.3.6. develop information systems testing costs: 16.3.6.1. information systems testing documentation development costs;
16.3.6.2. information systems testing costs to provide software development and introduction of quality control;
16.3.6.3. create the information system security audit costs;
16.4. the information system costs until it launched a productive operation: 16.4.1. import and data migration exercise costs;
16.4.2. information resource digitization costs;
16.4.3. the costs of interpretation services portal design and development;
16.4.4. administrator training costs;
16.4.5. system configuration information;
16.4.6. technical infrastructure rental costs of information systems development days according to the project activities;
16.5. the technical infrastructure and standard software acquisition cost: 16.5.1. server technical and installation of the necessary infrastructure acquisition costs;
16.5.2. an array of equipment data acquisition costs;
16.5.3. to cover the cost of the acquisition;
16.5.4. card personalization equipment costs;
16.5.5. technical infrastructure and to cover the cost of installation and configuration;
16.6. the value added tax payments that are directly tied to a project if the beneficiary cannot recover in the laws on value added tax.
17. The provisions referred to in paragraph 16.1.1. costs shall not exceed 10 per cent of the total eligible direct project costs.
18. This provision 16.1. the costs referred to in total do not exceed 20 percent of the total eligible direct project costs.
19. the project eligible indirect costs are: 19.1. the project activities directly related to the publicity costs, consistent with the laws of European Union funds publicity and visual identity claims, not exceeding five percent of the total eligible direct project costs;
19.2. the unexpected expenditure, up to a maximum of three percent of the total eligible direct project costs, except for this provision 10.3. costs referred to in point. Contingencies the beneficiary may use this provision set out in paragraph 16 of the costs, with the exception of this rule 10.3. costs referred to in point, if these contingencies previously coordinated with the cooperation of the authority in accordance with the agreement.
20. Costs are eligible if they: 20.1. made pursuant to legislation in the area of public procurement requirements;  
20.2. is made based on the conclusion of the service, or enterprise agreements;
20.3. is actually carried out, figuring the beneficiary's book-keeping, identifiable, separate from the rest of the cost of the test, as well as its certifying the excuse documents (original or relevant laws and the documents in a fixed order certified copies);
20.4. the provisions of paragraph 14 of the implementation of the activities referred to in this rule referred to in paragraph 2, the objective and are intended for application in the approved project;
20.5. match safe financial management principle: 20.5.1. the principle of economy, to which the beneficiary uses her actions, to be available at a particular time, in appropriate quantity and the lowest price;
20.5.2. utility principle to achieve the best relationship between resources employed and results;
20.5.3. the principle of effectiveness in achieving specific objectives and expected results;
20.6. is made after 14 august 2008.
21. If a service agreement for this rule 16. costs referred to in paragraph 1, shall be concluded more than a year before the conclusion of the agreement, the beneficiary shall submit proof of the cooperation body in the applicable service contract includes the cost of compliance with the existing market situation and cost effectiveness.
22. not included in the project costs not mentioned in this provision in paragraph 16 and 19 and made on the basis of the conclusion of the contract of employment.
III. requirements for project applicants and project submission 23. Project applicant is of direct public administration, under the authority and supervision of the existing institutions and planning regions.
24. the project, the applicant is entitled to submit the application to a project in cooperation with other direct public administration institutions, existing institutions subordinated to it, as well as with the planning regions and local authorities (hereinafter referred to as cooperation partner), concluding the agreement on cooperation.
25. the project applicant be eligible for European regional development fund, if: 25.1. the responsible authority it has invited to submit a project application;
25.2. the project included in the project application to the topic meets the planned project list (annex 1) and does not exceed the provisions mentioned in annex 1 of the project topic for maximum total project eligible costs.
26. Make a cost effectiveness analysis, the applicant chooses the project cost efficiency best solution, provided that the total project benefits and savings are greater than the project investment and operating costs throughout the project life cycle. A financial analysis of the project, the applicant determined the project funding deficit rate under the guidance of the responsible authority.
27. the project applicant project application form prepared and presented in accordance with Annex 2 of these rules.
28. the project application form accompanied by: 28.1. cost-effectiveness analysis or, if the project is for revenue and project meets the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55 the requirements-financial analysis, prepared according to the guidelines laid down by the responsible authority Guide;
28.2. The Cabinet of Ministers approved the concept of a system of information;
28.3. partner Declaration (annex 3).
29. The minimum eligible costs of the project amount is within the 105 421 apakšaktivitāt lats, the maximum eligible cost of the project is LVL 3 514 020.
30. the maximum project duration is three years, but not longer than until 30 June 2015.
31. the project, corresponding to the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55 the requirements and which sets out the funding gap rate, may require public funds from the national budget of the "unallocated funding instrument of the policy of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures" do not apply to the financing of expenditure that result when the investment costs in the current value is less than the current value of the net revenue. About the national budget allocations in each specific case decided by the Cabinet of Ministers.
IV. Project application selection

32. within 10 working days after the Cabinet approved the information system concept, organized the project application selection by sending a call for project submissions that the project referred to in paragraph 23 the applicants under this rule 1. the conditions laid down in the annex. Deadline for submission of projects is not less than 40 working days from the date of dispatch of the invitation.
33. the project to the responsible authority, the applicant shall submit the application and the provisions referred to in paragraph 28 of the document in two copies (original and one copy) with the indication "original" or "copy": 33.1. paper form – personally or by sending by mail, in addition to submitting that rule 28. documents listed electronically not rewritable media. Documents are presented according to the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document and inserts the sealed container (envelope or box). If the application is sent by post, by the time the project is the date when the project application has been given to the post office. In the event of a dispute, the project applicant proves the fact that the consignment is placed in the mail. Where the application is filed personally, the presentation of time is the moment when a representative of the authority responsible has made the mark to the project application for the project;
33.2. the electronic form of the document, according to the laws and regulations governing the circulation of electronic documents. The application of the project time is the time when the project submissions sent by email or through the authorities held a special online form. In the event of a dispute, the applicant demonstrates the fact that the application sent to the project submission deadline. If the responsible authority submits that the application is received, so this claim justified.
34. The Evaluation Commission composed of three voting for regional development and local government representatives of the Ministry.
35. the responsible authority shall be invited to participate in the evaluation work of the Commission and the managing authority of one representative and one representative of the liaison bodies as observers without voting rights.
36. the President of the Commission is the head of the responsible authority, or responsible authorities driving official nominated.
37. the Evaluation Commission Started work, the members of the Commission and observers, to sign a declaration that they do not exist in such circumstances violates the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, the law limits the European Union's structural and cohesion funds to the person involved, and not the circumstances that it could be argued that they are interested in a specific project in the project submitted by the applicant for the approval of the application.
38. the Commission received project submissions valued under the provisions referred to in annex 4 draft application evaluation criteria.
39. the project submission's compliance with these rules referred to in annex 4 of the administrative and eligibility criteria is assessed by the "Yes" (match), "partial match" (provided) or "no" (not match). Project compliance with this provision of the application, 4. the quality criteria referred to in annex scored, giving a certain number of points.
40. Where the application under the rules referred to in annex 4 of the draft application evaluation criteria, does not meet any of the administrative, or refine the eligibility criteria or not receiving the minimum number of points corresponding to one of the quality criteria, evaluation of the application, the project could not continue.
41. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project if: 25.5. the project submission complies with all the rules referred to in annex 4, the administrative and eligibility criteria;
41.2. application of the project has won at least 25 points, judging according to this provision, 4. the quality criteria referred to in annex.
42. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for the approval of the project, if it complies with all the rules referred to in annex 4, refine, not administrative and eligibility criteria and won at least 25 points under this provision of the annex 4 the quality criteria referred to in the application, but the project does not need to specify the corresponding to one of the rules referred to in annex 4, refine, administrative or compliance criteria.
43. The rules referred to in paragraph 42 of the condition can include the requirement to provide additional explanation about the project application or requirement to clarify the application of the project to ensure the conformity of the application of the draft provisions referred to in the annex to be administrative or compliance criteria.
44. where these rules 42 and 43 of the conditions referred to in any other affected by this rule 4. criteria referred to in the annex of the conformity assessment, the responsible authority decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition accompanied by appropriate instructions. 42. These terms and conditions referred to in paragraph 43 of the execution cannot affect the assessment of the application of the project after the rules referred to in annex 4. quality evaluation criteria.
45. If adopted, this provision in paragraph 42 that decision, the conditions contained in the project shall ensure, when you submit information to the responsible authorities within the time limits of no more than 30 working days from the date of the decision.
46. the responsible authority shall ensure that the provisions of the decision referred to in paragraph 42 of the conditions covered and 15 working days after the conditions of receiving the dossier sent to the applicant an opinion on draft conditions.
47. If this provision in the decision referred to in paragraph 42 of the conditions are not met or are not met this provision, the term referred to in paragraph 45, the application is rejected.
48. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the project, if the rejection of the application: the application does not project 29.9 meets one of the rules referred to in annex 4, refine, not administrative and eligibility criteria;
48.2. the project application to the standings has not acquired at least 25 points under the rules referred to in annex 4 of the quality criteria.
49. the responsible authority shall ensure that information on the approved design submissions were published on the website of the institution.
50. Where the applicant does not submit the project submission this provision within the period referred to in paragraph 32 or has filed a submission deadline for the project, but it has been rejected under this provision in paragraph 47 or 48, the responsible authority shall have the right to invite the applicant to submit a draft project submissions.
V. implementation and monitoring of the project 51. cooperation authority agreement with the beneficiary of the financing switch according to the regulations on the procedures for European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds.
52. the project the applicant within five working days after the provision of the decision referred to in paragraph 41 of the receipt or the provisions referred to in paragraph 46 of the receipt of the opinion of the submitting institution for cooperation for the submission of the request for payment schedule.
53. The beneficiary within five working days after the conclusion of the agreement or before the commencement of the implementation of the project, if the project starts to implement before the conclusion of the agreement, shall be submitted to the liaison body of the procurement plan, prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds.
54. The beneficiary shall ensure the first tender tender not later than three months after the conclusion of the agreement, where the project started after the conclusion of the agreement. If, within that period, the first tender is not announced, the liaison body shall decide whether the need to break the agreement.
55. The beneficiary shall submit a request for payment of the cooperation body, costs copies of supporting documents and a report of the project agreements and deadlines in order.
56. in assessing the cooperation institution beneficiary documentation, has the right to invite independent experts in the field of public procurement regulatory laws in order to check the conformity of the expenditure requirements of these provisions and reasonableness.
57. The beneficiary shall ensure that the eligible expenditure, repayment of which is from the European regional development fund, as well as the implementation of the project-related assets, liabilities and cash flow accounting records are identifiable, separate and verifiable.
58. where the project takes place in cooperation with the provisions of paragraph 24 the authorities listed in the project the applicant concluded cooperation agreements with them not later than three months from the conclusion of the agreement. If the contract is not concluded within that period, the authority may decide on the termination of the agreement.

59. If during the implementation of the project is the need to clarify this provision, paragraph 12, the Cabinet of Ministers approved the concept of a system description, and specified in the information system concept the beneficiary of approval of the cooperation agreement shall be submitted to the authority.
60. The beneficiary shall ensure that any project developed software will be available to all national regulatory authorities with the right to freely copy, use, modify and improve public administration.
61. the developer shall transfer funds to the recipient of the software source code and copyright, developed or developed within the project.
62. the responsible authority, the authority and the beneficiary shall keep all the project-related original documents and document the original derivatives made pursuant to regulations on the development and design of a document and the accuracy of which certified until 2021 December 31, as well as the European Commission and the authorities of the Republic of Latvia access to this documentation.
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky, regional development and local Government Minister d. Staķ 1. Annex Cabinet 2010 august 10 Regulation No 766 3.2.2.1.1. apakšaktivitāt "information systems and electronic services development" within the list of planned projects and their total eligible costs no PO box
The theme of the project, the Ministry responsible for the implementation of a project in the project total eligible costs 1. electronic customs data-processing systems design, development and maintenance, the Ministry of Finance of the State Revenue Service 3,073,369.00 2. Business register information system of the Ministry of Justice companies register in the electronic shopping 3 2,736,000.00 system e-tendering and e-auction functionality development regional development and the Ministry of local government agency "the State regional development agency" 2,475,000.00 4. accommodation of a single natural and legal persons for communication with Government and local authorities, regional development and local government Ministry of State Agency "State regional development agency" 2,970,000.00 5. Geographic information system data interchange format creation of spatial and spatial planning purposes in accordance with the inspire directive for regional development and Ministry of local government agency "the State regional development agency" 805,500.00 6. Centralized application (question) the national regulatory authority or a municipality, through the site www.latvija.lv regional development and the Ministry of local government agency "the State regional development agency" 738,000.00 7. Official publication electronic documents in a single and the universal standard development and implementation project for the Ministry of Justice Ministry of Justice 141,156.00 8. Multilingual machine translation hull and infrastructure of the e-services of the Ministry of Culture State Agency "Culture information systems" passport system 9 882,000.00 and single migration information system (VM) development of electronic identification cards and electronic residence permit (card) of the Ministry of the Interior to issue citizenship and Migration Affairs Board 2,529,000.00 10. Natural and legal persons and public authorities to Exchange data with the Member States of the European Union registry network (single AccessPoint) regional development and the Ministry of local government agency "the State regional development agency" international cargo 1,260,000.00 11. logistics and port information system of the Ministry of Transport Ministry of transportation 1,864,350.00 12. electronic health records and integration platform information system – phase 2. Industry statistics information system development, support the provision of medical treatment decisions related to joint monitoring of the sector information system – phase 2 Ministry of health health economics Centre 2,260,260.00 13. Electronic booking, visit the healthcare workflow, elektronizēšan, electronic prescription information system functionality additions, data exchange elektronizācij to work with insurance companies, the Ministry of health Health Economics Centre 14.728,964.00 school Portal-3. turn to the Ministry of education and Science Ministry of education and science 1,873,138.50 15. Health care provider information system , its promotion, the other institutions, the development of information systems for the Ministry of health health economics Centre 2,828,700.00 16. Uniform national authorities financial and management accounting system and its linking with the single national human resources management system in the Ministry of finance, Ministry of finance 2,582,280.00 17. State social insurance agency's e-service system development – round 2 Ministry of welfare State social insurance agency 18. unemployment 1,179,000.00 accounting and information system of registered vacancies (the magician) and e-service development and implementation of the Ministry of welfare State employment agency
19. the report of 1,080,000.00 automatic exchange system development of the Ministry of Finance Treasury 519,300.00 20. Welfare industry centralized network infrastructure Ministry of welfare State employment agency industry Prosperity 225,000.00 21. single filing system by the Ministry of Welfare State employment agency 306,580.50 regional development and local Government Minister d. Staķ of regional development and local government Ministry submitted the annex 2 Cabinet 2010 august 10 Regulation No 766 of regional development and local Government Minister d. Staķ annex 3 Ministerial Office 2010 august 10 Regulation No 766 proof partners Project is implemented in cooperation with the (name of Office) responsible officer of (name), (position) To certify that the project at the date of application (dd/mm/yyyy) 1.
 
committed to participate in the (name of Office) project "_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _" implementation, ensuring the implementation of such project activities: 1) ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ 2) ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ ___ 3) ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ 2. partner has the appropriate legal status.
3. There is no known reason why this project could not be implemented or could be delayed its implementation, and confirm that the obligations set out in the project may make regulations for the relevant activities of the European Union within the implementation.
4. Realize that the project may not approve for co-financing from the European regional development fund, where the application is filled in fully and quality, as well as the relevant legislation of the European Union the implementation of the planned activities for the European Regional Development Fund (the current year/planning period) at the date of approval of the project has been used up.
5. Aware that, if the certificate contains incorrect information, administrative and financial penalties may be launched against this proof of the said legal person – the cooperation partners.
Signature: date: dd/mm/yyyy * note stamp location. The document properties in the "signature", "date" and "stamp" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
Regional development and local Government Minister d. Staķ 4. Annex Cabinet 2010 august 10 Regulation No 766 application evaluation criteria PROJECT performance program number and name: 3. Infrastructure and services priority number and name: 3.2.
 Regional accessibility and promotion of measures to reach the number and name: 3.2.2.
 ICT infrastructure and services activity number and name: 3.2.2.1.
 Public administration electronic service and information system development Apakšaktivitāt number and name: 3.2.2.1.1.
 Information systems and electronic services development Project application selection way limited project application selection (2nd round) the body responsible for regional development and local Government Affairs i. administrative criteria Scoring System-Yes/No (N) rejected 1 or made more precise (P) 2 Project 1 the applicant is invited to submit a project application N application of the project 2 presented within the time limit set in the invitation N 3. project proposal is prepared for Latvian language N 4. project application is drawn up into N 5. Project application is signed by the person or institution authorized paraksttiesīg person P 6. project application is fully completed and drawn up according to the project application form for project submission 7 P financial calculation is carried out in the project application, P 8 of the financial statement is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed P

II. eligibility criteria scoring system – Yes/No (N) rejected 1 or made more precise (P) 2 Project applicant eligibility criteria Project applicant has 9 direct public administration, under its authority or institution, under the supervision or planning region N 10. project application indicates the applicant's projects partners have direct public administration institution under its authority or institution, under the supervision of the planning region or municipality (if applicable) N eligibility criteria of the project the project includes 11 application actions comply with Cabinet rules on apakšaktivitāt project application selection, second round implementation of the project, a specific topic and project the applicant complies with the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the application of the apakšaktivitāt project in the second round of the selection of a specific implementation of the responsible body for the implementation of the project topic P 12. project content is relevant to the information system concept that is consistent with the above, regional development and local government ministries P. 13 the applicant is instructed by the project, as required by the plan to attract funding for the implementation of the project the project the applicant 14 P by as plans to provide project management for project submission 15 P for the specified project duration does not exceed three calendar years from the agreement on the implementation of the project, and the project is expected to be completed until 2015 June 30 P 16. project application based on the needs of the target groups of the project application, P 17 describes how it will deal with at least one of the following problems P 17.1.
 inadequate information systems development, interoperability and integration, 17.2.
 not enough elektronizēt in the public administration services-17.3.
 inadequate electronic service delivery technical base-17.4.
 too high administrative burden for citizens and economic operators-18. the project application contains a detailed explanation of the operations P 19. the application of the project project activities during project implementation is planned sequentially, the effective use of project implementation period, P 20. project application is objectively verifiable results P 21. project displayed in the application identified the problem, objectives, activities and results direct linking and selected problem in the best and most cost effective solution for P 22. project applicant intends to implement publicity and information measures, consistent with the laws of the European Union funds publicity and visual identity assurance requirements P 23. submission of the project total eligible costs do not go beyond the subject of the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the apakšaktivitāt project application selection to the implementation of the second round down the amount of P 24. Project submissions included in eligible costs comply with the regulations of the Cabinet of apakšaktivitāt project application selection, implementation of the second round of the eligible costs laid down and meet the requirements laid down in the rules of P 25. submission of draft budget estimate shall be drawn up in accordance with planned activities P 26. Projected costs are proportionate and reasonable in relation to the anticipated results P 27. the eligible cost of the project to the benefit of the unit does not exceed the terms of the Cabinet of Ministers on the application of apakšaktivitāt in project selection, the second round of implementation referred to in paragraph 26 the cost of P 28. Project has indicated that the applicant intends to use the results of the project and ensure the maintenance of the results of the project for at least five years after the end of project implementation P 29. Project in the electronic service/perfected the current service request number onsite year is at least 10 000 times , and describes how the project will be provided within two years of the project implementation to ensure that at least 15% of the requests are made electronically (if applicable) P 30.
When a project is created in the information system or savietotāj are extended an existing information system savietotāj or equivalent system functions, about the necessity of the Cabinet of Ministers approved (if applicable) P 31. Project to be created or perfected e-service description is complete, describing its purpose, elektronizācij and the role of the bodies involved (if applicable) P 32. the resulting Draft information systems and e-services comply with the regulations laid down in the data security requirements, the project has carried out 33 P. financial analysis If the project is for revenue and project meets the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55 P requirements III. Criteria of quality Evaluation System-point scale can score-59.
If you received less than 25 points, the project application rejected 34.
 Significance of project 34.1.
 planned project activities that encourage the sharing of e-government infrastructure development 21.3 8.
 planned project activities for the development of the industry (including more) e-government infrastructure, providing the industry's resource economy 6 21.3. planned activities the project provides for public service elektronizācij by reducing the existing administrative burden for citizens and economic operators 21.4 4.
 planned project activities for the development of the industry (one-stop) e-government infrastructure, providing the industry's resource economy 2 the planned project activities associated with the implementation of European Union directives and international agreements commitments 1 Criteria determining the score for each section, some by aggregating 35. Project to create (upgradeable) e-service or the operation of the system data exchange is 21.8.
 using an existing everything (national information system savietotāj) 35.2. bilateral, 6 but data exchange interfaces are described in ALL 4 35.3.
 bilateral 22.0 2.
 one system within 1 of the criteria assessed by determining the score for each data exchange link separately. Total amount divided by the number of links to Exchange data for 36.
 Project schedule (if applicable) 36.1. savietotāj information system creation or improvement of national information 8 36.2. creating or improving the system 6 36.3.
 other information system or improvement of 4 Criteria in determining the number of points for each project created/improved information system/information system savietotāj. The total amount is divided by the information system/information system savietotāj the number 37.
 Within the framework of the project (upgradeable) to the citizens or economic operators focused electronic service elektronizācij degree (if applicable) maximum: 37.1 10 point.
 5. grade: proactive interaction 37.2.
 4. degree-business process-service full treatment, including decision making, payment information, sorting, 37.3.
 3. grade-a two-way interaction – client identification form and the electronic submission of information instead of paper documents 37.4.
 2. grade-interaction-form and document templates download 37.5.
 1. degree-information-information on services is available on the internet, the criteria assessed each project e-services to be created individually using the formula P = (PEP/MaxEP) x 10, where P-points;
PEP-elektronizācij degree offered (if the project is intended to create a grade 1 electronic service, its value treated as zero (0);
MaxEP-the maximum possible degree of elektronizācij the e-services;
10-the maximum number of points to be acquired.
The criteria assessed by determining the score for each to be created/e-service improvement alone. The total amount is divided by the number of service 38.
 Within the framework of the project (upgradeable) electronic service interfaces for deploying form (if applicable) 38.1.
 joint public service directory (www.latvija.lv) 3, 38.2.
 authorities here on the internet 2 23.8.
 other electronic media 1 as possible different e-service deployment, the criteria assessed by the indicator, which received the highest rating of 39.
 The project will be created (upgradeable) information system interface for deploying form (if applicable) 24.3.
 national integrated information system in 6 savietotāj 24.4.
 in another information system savietotāj 4 in 39.3.
 authorities here on the internet 2 as possible different interfaces form of accommodation, the criteria assessed by the indicator, which received the highest assessment project results in 40 24.9.

create electronic service user share the two-year period following the implementation of the project in relation to current service to the number of users who use the services of the onsite services when citizens 40.1.1.
 more than 50.00% 5 40.1.2.
 from 40.01% 50.00% 4 40.1.3.
 from 40.00% 3% – 30.01 40.1.4.
 from 30.00% 20.00%-2 40.1.5.
 less than 1 in 20.00 40.2. electronic service user share the two-year period following the implementation of the project in relation to current service to the number of users who use the services of the onsite when services are economic operators 40.2.1.
 more than 50.00% 5 40.2.2.
 from 40.01% 50.00% 4 40.2.3.
 from 40.00% 3% – 30.01 40.2.4.
 from 30.00% 20.00%-2 40.2.5.
 less than 25.0% 1. created 20.00 electronic services or information systems of public administrations offenders share a two-year period after the implementation of the project in relation to the current number of public administrations when you create services or information systems for public administrations 40.3.1.
 more than 50.00% 5 40.3.2.
 from 40.01% 50.00% 4 40.3.3.
 from 40.00% 3% – 30.01 40.3.4.
 from 30.00% 20.00%-2 40.3.5.
 less than 1 20.00 criteria assessed by determining the score for each project you create/e-service improvement target group separately. The total amount is divided by the number of e-services. When you create a service/advanced several target groups, service scored after scorecard, which received the highest rating of 41.
 Project risk assessment 41.1.
 project implementation duration 41.1.1.
 ... 1.5 years 41.1.2. < 3
 ≤ 1.5 ... 2.5 years 41.1.3. < 2
 ≤ 2.5 ... ≤ 3 years 1 41.2.
 the project estimated the number of procurement procedure that the contract price exceeds LVL 20 000 (excluding VAT) 41.2.1.
 ........ ≤ 3 3 41.2.2.
 4 ≤ ... 41.2.3. < 7 2
 ....... ≥ 7 1 scoring both indicators amount. The maximum number of points is the criteria 6 42.
 The project provides for specific actions in the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities, providing electronic service options for persons with functional disabilities 42.1.
 the project provides for three and more specific actions for equal opportunities 42.2 2.
 the project provides for 1-2 specific actions for equal opportunities 1 26.3.
 the project does not foresee specific actions for equal opportunities 0 notes.
1 if you receive a negative rating, the application is rejected.
2 If you received a negative assessment, decide on approval of the draft on condition (project shall ensure compliance with the criteria laid down in the decision).
Regional development and local Government Minister d.-Staķ