Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 1166 2010 in Riga on December 21 (Mon. No 74 40) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers on 30 September 2008. Regulations No. 817 "provisions for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' addition of activity historically 3.4.1.4." remediated "" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law paragraph 10 of article 18 to make a Cabinet of 30 September 2008. Regulations No. 817 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix 3.4.1.4. activity" remediated "" (Latvian journal , 2008, no. 164; 2010, no. 121) the following amendments: 1. Delete paragraph 9.6.;
2. Make the following point 14: "14. project total budget comprises also financial contingency reserve, which can be up to five percent of this rule 9.5. and in paragraph 9.7 eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project uses this rule 9.5 and 9.7. referred to cover eligible costs before financial reserves through the use of appropriate amendments to the terms of the arrangement. "
3. Replace the figure "in paragraph 19.2." with the number "2011.".
4. Make the following introductory paragraph 20: "20. the responsible authority shall send the invitation to the project selection round of applicants to submit applications within the project (call forward no more than three times). Application of the project to the responsible authority within two months of the invitation is sent, the project applicants. If the project application selection round invited potential project applicant does not submit the application within the time limit or the decision to reject the application of the project, the responsible authority shall call for project submissions retries, within two years, but not earlier than six months after the project submission deadline for submission deadline or after the decision rejecting the application for the project. If the project application selection round, repeatedly invited potential project applicant does not submit the application within the time limit or the decision to reject the application of the project, the responsible authority shall send the third time call for project submissions until 31 December 2011. The competent authority may extend the application of the project for a period of time up to two months, in writing informing potential project applicants of project submission deadline extension: ".
5. Replace 34.1 in numbers and the word "26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31." with the figures and word "27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32.".
6. Replace paragraph 34.2. numbers and the word "8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 34, 35, 36 and 37" with numbers and the word "8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 35, 36, 37 and 38.".
7. Replace the paragraph numbers and 21.3. the word "14, 16, 22, 23, 24, 32, 33 and 38." with the figures and word "14, 16, 22, 23, 24, 26, 33, 34 and 39.".
8. Replace the figure "in 21.4 39." with the number "40".
9. Replace the figure "in paragraph 37.2.38." with the number "39".
10. Replace 37.3. in subparagraph numbers and the word "32 and 33." with the figures and word "33 and 34".
11. Supplement with 23.5. subparagraph by the following: "23.5. ensure tax payment under this provision of the annex referred to in paragraph 26 of the criterion."
12. Replace the figure "in paragraph 38.2.38." with the number "39".
13. Replace the paragraph numbers and 38.3. the word "32 and 33." with the figures and word "33 and 34".
14. To supplement the provisions of this paragraph 24.2: "24.2. ensure tax payment under this provision of the annex referred to in paragraph 26 of the criterion."
15. Make annex 4 by the following: "4. in the annex to Cabinet of 30 September the Regulation No. 817 European regional development fund project application form of Evaluation Criteria rating 1 p.k.. quality criteria for rating points 1. planned activities the project ready to start: obtain at least 1 paragraph 1.1., the project is ready to start (a list of the works to be carried out is not prepared or not prepared qualitatively) 0 1.2. project readiness is low to start (is ready and reasonable list of works to be purchase documentation not prepared) 1 1.3. project is ready for the launch of the medium (and has been prepared for based list of works to prepare the purchase documentation projects development) 2 1.4. project has high readiness for initiation (developed the technical design of the works, prepared for the technical specifications of the procurement) 3 2. Project risk assessment, including assessing the potential cost growth: obtain at least 2 points 2.1. the project is not carried out in the application of risk assessment in the application of the project 0 2.2 risk evaluation performed does not completely , the action plan identified risks are not developed or not developed completely 1 2.3. application is made in the project quality risk assessment action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete submission of project 2.4 2 has made a qualitative risk assessment, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 3. project in the application is analyzed the possible alternatives to the project and the project economic analysis : must be at least 2 3.1. alternative analysis has not been carried out and the project economic analysis 0 3.2. analysis carried out only one parameter (the only alternative analysis or economic analysis only) 1 3.3. analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the selection of the proposed alternative 2 alternative is made 3.4 analysis and project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives as well as the selected alternative is the lowest cost 3 4. sustainability assessment of investments – investments in future (maintenance costs) that would be needed to make the territory historically contaminated sites remediation, meet environmental requirements by project implementation: you must obtain at least 1 paragraph 4.1. future evaluation not done 0 4.2 subsequent costs 15 percent or more of the ways of the project's eligible expenditure 1 4.3. further cost ways less than 15 percent of the eligible costs of the project amount 3 4.4. does not require an analysis of the effects 5 5. If the project is not implemented: obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1. impact analysis is performed following evaluation 5.2 0 was made incomplete 1 5.3. quality is carried out only after the evaluation, the information is not provided for the following financial assessment has been carried out on 2 5.4. long-term assessment of possible effects, which are justified by the competent authorities or organisations findings and studies that provide information about the financial implications of the evaluation criteria 1.1 on 3 horizontal priorities rating points 6. Project intended to focus on sustainable development technology : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 6.1. the project is not described in the application's choice of technology 0 6.2. selected technology limits the contamination but did not eliminate the pollution source 1 6.3. selected technology eliminates the pollution source, but does not provide a range of pollution clean-up of selected technology 2 6.4. eliminates the pollution source, in whole or in part, provides the range of pollution clean-up of Contaminated sites remediation 3 7. is significant to the region's further development (of the balanced development of the territory) : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 7.1. submission of a project is not described in the bailout's impact on development of the region 0 7.2. minimized the threat of environmental pollution and public health: a territory is not intended to include in the economic chain 1 7.3. rehabilitation of the territory of the economic activities in the territory of the bailout 2 7.4 provides its unlimited use of 3 2. eligibility criteria 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No. 8. The concentration of pollutants in the polluted area historically exceeded environmental quality regulations for limit values N 9. that the project will reduce the spread of the pollution and its effects on groundwater, river basin or the Baltic Sea water quality N 10. project intended to implement the historically contaminated sites established the Latvian environment, geology and Meteorology Centre of contaminated and potentially contaminated sites and in the registry under the registry data recognized as contaminated sites N 11. project intended to implement the historically contaminated site that can not apply the "polluter pays" principle as a body responsible for the creation of pollution, the country no longer exists, nor is there a direct successor to the obligations and responsibilities of the project application to the N 12. complies with the regulations on the implementation of the activity specified in the activity purpose N 13. the project submission complies with the regulations on the implementation of the requirements of the activity activity eligible activities N 14. Project submissions included in eligible costs comply with the laws and regulations on the implementation of the requirements of the activity activity eligible costs 15 P.

Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 15.1. given the technical characteristics of the activities to be specified in the result of 15.2 and outcome indicators, and they meet the purpose of the activity provided 15.3. actions for the positioning of the project area provided 15.4. what economic benefits 15.5. actions provided qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits. provide activities to 15.6 qualitative and quantitative contribution to the European Union and the Republic of Latvia laws implementing the essential requirements in the field of prevention of pollution 15.7. describes the polluter-pays principle grounds of non-compliance with the project 16. Schedule meet the planned activities P 17. information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results: N 17.1. have the appropriate institutional structure is appropriate for a planned 17.2. pēcsanācij monitoring costs 17.3. is or will be available for staff to ensure the monitoring of the pēcsanācij application Project contains 18 works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed goals N 19. Project financial analysis carried out in accordance with the laws and regulations on the implementation of the activity Required in N 20. European regional development fund co-financing aid intensity does not exceed 70 per cent of the eligible costs of the project N 21. Project budget includes cost: N 21.1. proportionate and reasonable, clearly stated assumptions cost calculations are directly necessary 21.2. project 22. project cash flow forecast is based: P 22.1. displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 22.2. meet the planned timetable 22.3. meet the financial plan of the project the project submission 23. reflected in the introduction of the planned project organisation chart and planned human resources provides legislation for the European Union to the projects financed by the Fund management certain functions of the beneficiaries: P 23.1. project management (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) 23.2. financial management of the project (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) 23.3. technical management of the project (for example, reconciliation in design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) project planned 24. publicity and information dissemination activities of the Commission of 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, article 8 P 2.2 Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No 25. Project applicant to, owned, held or controlled is the site whose territory the historically contaminated sites N 26. Project the applicant does not have tax debt on the application of the first working day of the month P 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 27. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the time specified in the invitation N 28. Project applicant is invited to submit a project application N application of the project prepared 29 according to activity submission form for N 30. Project submission prepared for the Latvian language N 31. submission of the project drawn up into N 32. project submissions from the applicant institution project signed by the authorized person submitted 33 N. one project application, the original and one copy, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted in paper form) P (NA) 34. project original and a copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot, the attached document pages numbered (if the application is submitted in paper form) P (NA) 35. project application and attachments are presented according to the circulation of electronic documents regulatory laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 36. project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N ( 37. the project na) application and the attachments designed for DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 38. project application form completed in all its sections N 39. the project attached to the application for all specified attachments: 24.3. contaminated areas P use plan summary project the graphical material of 39.2., showing the location of project activities project area environmental monitoring national 39.3. in the opinion of the Office of the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure for application
 
 
24.5. municipal proof that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed to 24.5. pēcsanācij monitoring of the institution responsible for the receipt of monitoring carried out in accordance with the legislation on the reorganisation process management (financial and human resources support) 24.6. construction estimate 24.7. the project cash flow forecast 4. Funding criteria Yes/No 40. project planned in the application of the European regional development fund co-financing does not exceed regulations on the implementation of the activities set out in annex 1 to the maximum of the European regional development fund co-financing for the project N legend.
N – If a negative rating, the application is rejected.
P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in that decision).
NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed for this criterion. "
The Prime Minister, regional development and local Government Minister v. dombrovsky Environment Ministers – in place of Welfare Minister Jurševsk of I.