Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 792 Riga 2011 October 11 (Mon. No 58 38. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and Services 3.2.2.2. Appendix" activity "public internet access point development" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' 3.2. priorities and the availability of the territory "reach" UR3.2.2.pas "ICT based infrastructure and Services 3.2.2.2." activity "public internet access points in development" (hereinafter activity);
1.2. the European Regional Development Fund (hereinafter draft) submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project and the project application to the applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination.
2. The purpose of the activity is to increase access to the internet for the widest possible groups in society, providing access to public administrations and companies offered electronic services and information, to promote the social inclusion of citizens in the social, economic and cultural processes and improve their quality of life.
3. the activity exercised limited project application selection.
4. Activity, total funding available is 3 000 000 lats, including the European regional development fund and the funding of 2 550 000 lats municipal budget funding for 450 000 lats.
5. activities within the European regional development fund shall not exceed 85 per cent of the total eligible project costs, but the local financial budget shall not be less than 15 percent of the project's total eligible costs.
6. the implementation of the activity provided by the responsible authority and the liaison body. The responsible authority is the protection of the environment and regional development Ministry (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority), the authority is the National Agency for regional development (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body).
7. the responsible authority shall: 7.1 ensure the monitoring of the activity associated with the information and publicity measures, consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements;
7.2. ensure the implementation of the activity, monitoring and control activities implementation and application of the evaluation criteria of the project development, analyse problems and provide the implementation of the activity the managing authority and the European Union's structural funds and the Cohesion Fund Monitoring Committee proposals for the improvement of the implementation of the activity;
7.3. ensure, in order not to exceed the available for the implementation of the activity of the European regional development fund financing, and monitors the available European regional development fund, including a learning Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the enforcement of this principle in the activity level;
7.4. establish evaluation Commission Regulation, project evaluation and project application application fill methodology;
7.5. create project submission Evaluation Commission;
7.6. ensure the project application selection and evaluation;
7.7. a decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition, as well as monitor conditions;
7.8. the liaison bodies developed a standard agreement for the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement);
7.9. evaluate collaborative institutions prepared information on the amendment to the agreement and provide an opinion on the amendment to the agreement.
8. cooperation authority: 8.1 provides activities related to the implementation of information and publicity measures, consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements;
8.2. the development agreement project, the responsible authority and switch arrangement with the European regional development fund, the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary);
8.3. the beneficiary's payment request prepared a schedule for the submission;
8.4. checked the beneficiary's payment claims submitted, the eligible expenditure of the approved amounts, prepare payment orders and declarations of expenditure;
8.5. assess project progress report and its relevance for implementation of the project;
8.6. assess the agreement amendments aligning it with the responsible authority, if the changes are related to the project objectives, this rule 7.3. principle referred to the execution of project activities, project costs, project results and the monitoring indicators to be achieved, and decide on amendments to the agreement;
8.7. the project monitoring the use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and the data it collects on projects consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
5.5. ensuring not to exceed the provisions laid down in paragraph 4, the activities available for the implementation of the European regional development fund, and monitors the available European regional development fund, including a learning Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project;
8.9. ensure project monitoring and control, including random checks carried out at project locations;
8.10. verify and submit to the procurement monitoring Bureau funding procurement plan drawn up by the beneficiary;
8.11. provide information to the authority responsible for the preparation of activities for the implementation of the available funding.
9. The Liaison Office has functional authority.
II. Project activities and costs eligible project 10:10.1. new public internet access points;
10.2. existing public internet access points in major expansion of functionality.
11. The project is not eligible activities other than those referred to in point 10 of these regulations and these rules not conducive to prescribed in paragraph 2, the objective of the activity.
12. The project's eligible direct costs are: 12.1. preparation of the documentation supporting the project, cost effectiveness analysis izmaksas, not exceeding five percent of the total eligible direct project costs;
12.2. public internet access point creation and development costs: 12.2.1. installing a new internet connection or an existing internet connection capacity;
12.2.2. wireless internet access zone creation or expansion;
12.2.3. computer and Office techniques;
12.2.4. computer network and computer network communications equipment;
12.2.5. software;
12.2.6. public internet access points for use of the preparation.
13. the project eligible indirect costs are: 13.1. project activities directly related to the minimum European Union information and publicity costs, not to exceed one percent of the total eligible direct project costs;
13.2. the unexpected expenditure, up to a maximum of three percent of the total eligible direct project costs.
14. Value added tax payments that are directly tied to a project if the beneficiary cannot recover in the laws on value added tax established, are eligible costs within the apakšaktivitāt.
15. the costs are eligible if they: 15.1. make pursuant to laws and regulations in the area of public procurement;
15.2. the provisions of paragraph 10 for the implementation of the activities referred to in paragraph 2 of these regulations and in the achievement of safe and meet the financial management, socio-economic benefit and cost effectiveness;
15.3. is made based on the conclusion of the contract of purchase or the company.
16. The project does not include the cost of which is not certain of these rules 12, 13 and 14.
17. These rules 12, 13 and 14 above costs apply from this rule into force.
18. the total eligible costs of the project amount is not more than 3 000 000 lats.
III. Requirements to the applicant and the project partner Project applicant is 19 the State regional development agency.
20. the applicant may submit a draft project submissions in cooperation with local authorities (hereinafter referred to as partners), a co-operation agreement in which the partner undertakes to: 20.1. to provide a space for the activities envisaged in the draft process;

20.2. to provide staff with appropriate knowledge and skills of public internet access points in the provision of services, t.sk. advice on working with minimal software, visitor computer connecting to the wireless network and public administration electronic services;
20.3. the activities provided for in the project progress and success in the work of the staff to provide an infrastructure and the necessary equipment is not purchased within the framework of the project;
20.4. from local government funds to maintain the infrastructure created under the project, purchased the equipment and services provided;
20.5. to submit to the State regional development agency in a statement that it has sufficient and stable financial resources for the implementation of the project;
20.6. to ensure that the project and the authority acquired the assets transferred would be used for the purpose of the project during project implementation and for at least five years after the final payment to the beneficiary;
20.7. monthly in prepare statements on a public internet access point activities during project implementation, as well as five years after the implementation of the project;
12.9. to provide information on the implementation of the project and to provide the European Commission and the European Union fund management representatives of the bodies involved in the approach to the implementation of all projects related to the original document, as well as the implementation of the project site.
21. the cooperation partners can apply for public internet access points, ensuring that each town of the Republic (with the exception of Riga), municipality or district territorial unit (city, County) to be created or improved in no more than one public internet access points.
22. Project funding eligible cost breakdown by region not exceeding: 22.1. Riga planning region, except in the city of Riga-577 320 lats;
22.2. the Kurzeme region-607 801 lats;
22.3. Zemgale planning region – 632 241 lats;
22.4. Vidzeme planning region – 578 186 pounds;
22.5. the planning of Latgale region – 604 452 lats.
23. the applicant carried out the project cost effectiveness analysis.
24. the cost effectiveness analysis, the applicant chooses the project cost efficiency best solution, ensuring that the project's total estimated eligible costs per unit the benefit of public internet access points-not more than 5 500 lats.
25. You public internet access point provides the following services: 25.1. wireless internet access around the clock at least 50 meters radius of public internet access points;
25.2. access to computers with a certain minimum (document, table and image editing, document digitization and processing of digitized documents, e-signature) and an internet connection;
25.3. a chance to digitise documents in A4 and A3 sizes;
25.4. the ability to print color and black and white documents in A4 and A3 sizes;
25.5. the opportunity to connect visitors-owned media, make those antivirus check and run with them.
26. the cooperation partners can apply for public internet access points, if the existing public internet access point does not support any of the rules referred to in paragraph 25.
27. the project applicant project application form, including the project submission form attachments, prepared and presented in accordance with this provision, 1. the requirements set out in the annex.
28. the project application form accompanied by: 28.1. cost-effectiveness analysis;
28.2. the cooperation partner's certificate (annex 2).
IV. Project application selection 29. the responsible authority shall send to the applicant, the project calls for project submissions, determining the project submission deadline, which is not shorter than 90 working days from the date of dispatch of the invitation.
30. the applicant shall provide the project responsible body project submissions and that rule 28. documents listed in one of the following ways: 30.1. the paper form in two copies (original and copy) with the indication "original" or "copy". Documents shall be submitted personally or sent by mail, adding following rule 28. electronic documents listed are not rewritable media. Documents are presented according to the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document and inserts the sealed container (envelope or box). If the application is sent by post, by the time the project is the date when the project application has been given to the post office. In the event of a dispute, the applicant demonstrates the fact, when the post passed the post. Where the application is filed personally, the presentation of time is the moment when a representative of the authority responsible has made the mark to the project application for the project;
30.2. the electronic form of the document, according to the laws and regulations on the circulation of electronic documents. The application of the project time is the time when the project submissions sent by email or through the authorities held a special online form. In the event of a dispute, the applicant demonstrates the fact that the application sent to the project submission deadline. If the responsible authority submits that the application is received, so this claim justified.
31. the project submission evaluation panelists include three environmental protection and regional development Ministry representatives and two representatives of the liaison bodies.
32. the responsible authority shall be invited to participate in the project application for the evaluation of the work of the Commission and one representative of the Managing Authority observer status without voting rights.
33. the project submission Evaluation Commission received project submissions valued under the provisions referred to in annex 3 of the draft application evaluation criteria.
34. the project submission's compliance with these rules referred to in annex 3 the administrative and eligibility criteria is assessed by the "Yes" (match), "partial match" (provided) or "no" (not match). Project compliance with this provision of the application, 3. the quality criteria referred to in annex scored, giving a certain number of points.
35. If the project application, subject to this provision as referred to in annex 3 of the draft application evaluation criteria, does not meet any of the administrative or the eligibility criteria identified as not to be, or not receiving the minimum number of points corresponding to one of the quality criteria, evaluation of the application, the project could not continue.
36. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project if: 36.1. the project submission complies with all the rules referred to in annex 3 of the administrative and eligibility criteria;
36.2. the project in the application of this provision are fulfilled 3. quality criteria referred to in the annex to the minimum requirements.
37. the head of the authority responsible for the application of the project, if approved, subject to the submission of the project need to clarify, according to one of the provisions listed in annex 3 of the administration or eligibility criteria that allows the updating of the project application.
38. This provision, paragraph 37 of the condition can include the requirement to provide additional explanation about the project application or requirement to clarify the application of the project to ensure the conformity of the application of the draft provisions referred to in annex 3 administrative or eligibility criteria that allows the updating of the project application.
39. If this rule 37 and 38. compliance with the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 affect any other provisions of this annex the conformity of this criterion in the assessment, the responsible authority decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition accompanied by appropriate instructions.
40. The rules referred to in paragraph 37 of decision conditions contained in a period not exceeding 20 working days from the date of the decision.
41. the responsible authority shall ensure that the provisions referred to in paragraph 37 of the decision contained in the conditions and seven working days after the conditions of receiving the dossier sent to the applicant an opinion on draft conditions.
42. If the rules referred to in paragraph 37 of the decision contained in the conditions are not met or are not met this provision, the term referred to in paragraph 40, the application is rejected.
43. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the project, if the rejection of the application: the application does not project 43.1 corresponds to any of the rules referred to in annex 3 the administrative and eligibility criteria that do not allow updating of the application of the project;
43.2. the project submission does not comply with the provisions of annex 3 of the quality criteria referred to in the minimum requirements.
44. the responsible authority shall ensure that rules 36, 37, 41 and 42 of the decision referred to in paragraph transmission project to the applicant within five working days after the decision.
45. the responsible authority shall ensure that information on the approved project submission is posted on the protection of the environment and regional development Ministry's Web site.
V. implementation and monitoring of the project's liaison body 46. agreement with the beneficiary of the financing switch according to the regulations on the procedures for European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds.

47. The beneficiary within five working days after the conclusion of the agreement shall be submitted to the liaison body of the procurement plan, prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds.
48. the project the applicant within 10 working days after this provision in paragraph 36 of that decision or the rules referred to in paragraph 41 of the opinion of the submitting institution for cooperation for the submission of requests for payment schedule.
49. If the payment schedule for the submission of the request is required to make changes, the beneficiary shall submit five working days the cooperation institution updated payment schedule for the submission of the request.
50. The beneficiary shall ensure the first invitation to tender for procurement not later than three months after the conclusion of the agreement.
51. The beneficiaries of cooperation institution shall submit the payment request with copies of supporting documents, the expenditure and the progress reports for the project agreement to conditions within the time limits and procedures.
52. in assessing the cooperation institution, interim or final payment request, have the right to invite independent experts in the field of public procurement regulatory laws in order to verify the payment request specified eligible costs in compliance and reasonableness.
53. The project no longer than until 30 June 2015.
54. The beneficiary shall ensure that the eligible expenditure, which shall be repaid from the European regional development fund co-financing and national public co-financing, as well as cash flow, assets and liabilities accounting records are identifiable, separate and verifiable.
55. the changes that affect the project goals and objectives to monitoring indicators, the liaison body aligned with the responsible authority.
56. If the project is implemented in cooperation with point 20 of these regulations the authorities listed in the project the applicant concluded cooperation agreements with them within three months of the conclusion of the agreement. If the contract is not concluded within that period, the authority may decide on the termination of the agreement.
57. The beneficiary and partners to ensure that the project is implemented and extended in public internet access points for at least five years after the implementation of the project will not be charged the fee for the provision of the internet access services.
58. The beneficiary and the partners in the project in acquire all fixed installations and equipment, in which the investment is made, shall be insured against loss or damage that may result from natural disasters, illegal actions of third parties or due to accident, at least five years after the implementation of the project.
59. in order to provide public internet access points of sustainability and quality of the action, the beneficiary of the project by purchasing a centralized and unified public internet access point management services and partners shall bear the cost of this service from their own funds for at least five years after the implementation of the project.
60. the responsible authority, the authority and the beneficiary shall keep all the project-related original documents until 2021 December 31, as well as the European Commission and the authorities of the Republic of Latvia access to this documentation.
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky environmental protection and regional development Minister in the Welfare Minister i. Jurševsk of environmental protection and regional development Ministry submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 11 October 2011 regulations No 773 of environmental protection and regional development Minister in the Welfare Minister i. Jurševsk annex 2 to the Cabinet of Ministers of 11 October 2011 regulations no 792 proof partners Project is implemented in cooperation with the (name of Office) of (name of responsible officer first name, last name), (position) To certify that the project at the date of application (dd/mm/yyyy) 1.
 
undertake to participate in (name of Office) project "_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _" implementation, ensuring that the project and the authority acquired the assets transferred: 1.1 will be admitted to the institution's accounting records;
1.2. will be maintained and insured against loss or damage resulting from natural disasters, illegal actions of third parties or due to accident, at least five years after the final payment to the beneficiary;
1.3. not be forfeited or disposed of at least five years after the final payment to the beneficiary;
1.4. will be used for the purpose of the project during project implementation and for at least five years after the final payment to the beneficiary.
2. the cooperation partner has sufficient and stable financial resources for the implementation of the project.
3. the cooperation partner during project implementation, as well as five years after the end of the implementation of the project shall undertake: ensure space 3.1. Action for the progress in the project;
3.2. to provide staff with appropriate knowledge and skills of public internet access points in the provision of services, t.sk. advice on working with minimal software, visitor computer connecting to the wireless network and public administration electronic services;
3.3. the activities provided for in the project progress and success in the work of the staff to provide an infrastructure and the necessary equipment is not purchased within the framework of the project;
3.4. from local government funds to maintain the infrastructure created under the project, purchased the equipment and services provided;
3.5. once a month to prepare statements on a public internet access point;
3.6. to provide information on the implementation of the project and to provide the European Commission and the European Union fund management representatives of the bodies involved in the approach to the implementation of all projects related to the original document, as well as the implementation of the project site.
4. I am aware that if proof of such requirements will not be met, to the above legal persons – partners – can be applied to administrative and financial penalties.
Signature date (dd/mm/yyyy) stamp location note. Document properties in the "signature", "date" and "stamp" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
The protection of the environment and Minister for regional development, Welfare Minister i. Jurševsk annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 11 October 2011 regulations no 792 application evaluation criteria Project performance program name and number 3.
Infrastructure and services priority name and number 3.2.
Regional accessibility and reach of promotion name and number of the measure 3.2.2.
ICT infrastructure and services activity name and number 3.2.2.2.
Public internet access point development project selection way limited project application selection responsible authority for environmental protection and regional development Ministry administrative criteria scoring system – yes/no Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 1. project proposal is prepared in paper form and submitted personally or sent by mail in a sealed container (envelope or box) or in the electronic form of the document prepared and filed electronically, signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp of the N 2. a project proposal is submitted to the authorities of cooperation within the time limit set in the invitation N 3. project the applicant is hereby invited to submit a project application to the N 4. project application has been submitted in one original N 5. project application submitted is cauršūt (caurauklot), where the application is submitted in paper form P 6. All project submissions page is numbered P 7. project application has been drawn up according to the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity for the specified project submission form, and all of the forms are filled in the section 8 project application P drawn into P 9. project application form is accompanied by all the Cabinet regulations on the implementation of the activities provided and according to the accompanying document drawn up in application of the project 10 P is not addressed in the correction, deletion, addition, deletion, or aizkrāsojum, where the application is submitted in paper form P eligibility criteria scoring system – yes/no eligibility criteria of the project precizējams2 project Noraidāms1 or 11. application corresponds to the purpose of the activity: to increase access to the internet for the widest possible groups in society, providing access to public administrations and companies offered electronic services and information to promote social inclusion of citizens in the social, economic and cultural processes and improve their quality of life N application includes 12 project activities comply with the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity of the eligible actions provided P 13. as a result of the implementation of the project will ensure citizens access to public administration electronic services N 14.

The project's eligible costs included in the submissions comply with the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity of the eligible costs laid down P 15. submission of the project financial statement is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed P 16. Project in the application of the European regional development fund co-financing shall not exceed the applicable percentage specified in the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity P 17. Contingencies do not exceed the terms of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity specified percentage (if applicable) P 18. submission of project results and the planned values are accurately defined , and will contribute to the activities of the measurable objective P 19. Project application is justified, as it will ensure the implementation and monitoring of the project P 20. Project application, as it will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in the project for at least five years after completion of the project in the project application, P. 21 total eligible cost is less than the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity the minimum total eligible cost amount P 22. Project total eligible costs in the application should not exceed the terms of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity planning region quotas about P 23. applicant Project plans to implement publicity and information measures, consistent with the laws of European Union funds publicity and visual identity assurance requirements P 24. Project has been cost effectiveness analysis in accordance with the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity N 25. eligible costs of the project amount to one unit the benefit does not exceed the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity of the fixed maximum amounts of the costs to the benefit of one unit P 26. Project applicant is committed to providing financing from its own resources If the cost of the project will increase the eligibility of the applicant for the project P criteria Scoring System-Yes/No Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 27.
The project the applicant complies with the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of specific activities for the project N quality criteria the applicant ranking system-point scales 28 project application specific actions designed to implement the Criteria should be: get at least 1 paragraph 28.1 percent and more from 91. scheduling regional authorities under 3.75 to 90.99 from 28.2 percent of the planning region under self-government 2.60 to 28.3 percent of the planning region 74.99 constituent municipalities 1. not satisfied at least 17.6 17.6. the requirements set out in 0 apakškritērij 29. Implementation of the project will result in created and developed public internet access points: the criteria to receive at least 1 point 29.1. the newly created internet access points share a project exceed 70 per cent of all projects planned in the internet access points, 2. the newly created 29.2 internet access point, the proportion of the project is from 50 to 70 percent of all projects planned in the internet access points 1. have not been executed at least 3 29.2. the requirements set out in 0 apakškritērij 30. submission of the project project implementation reflect the degree of readiness : to receive at least Criteria 1 paragraph 30.1. procurement is advertised on the projected purchase of fixed assets 3 30.2. has been prepared and approved procurement documentation for the acquisition of fixed assets provided for in draft 2. procurement is up 30.3 documentation for project acquisition of fixed assets provided for in 1. are not fulfilled at least 30.4 30.3. the requirements set out in apakškritērij 0 31. project intended to implement: the criteria to receive at least 1 paragraph 31.1. to 12 months 3 31.2. from 13 to 18 months 2 31.3. from 19 to 24 months 1 are not fulfilled at least 19.5. 31.3. the requirements set out in 0 apakškritērij criteria of HORIZONTAL priorities Project provides 32. specific activities for the provision of equal opportunities, including ensuring the availability of services to persons with functional disabilities: Criteria to receive at least 1 paragraph 32.1. project for four and more specific actions to ensure equal opportunities for project 2 32.2. from one to three specific activities to ensure equal opportunities 1 project is not designed to 32.3. specific actions to ensure equal opportunities 0 explanation the ratings total 13 If fewer than 5 points application is rejected, the project notes.
1 if you receive a negative rating, the application is rejected.
2 If you received a negative assessment, decide on approval of the draft provided that a project shall ensure compliance with the criteria laid down in that decision.
The protection of the environment and Minister for regional development, Welfare Minister Jurševsk of I.