Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 478 in Riga on July 3, 2012 (pr. No 37 11. §) rules for the European integration of third-country nationals Fund 2011 program implementation activities Issued in accordance with the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" within the established fund management law article 14, paragraph 3 (I). General questions 1. determines: 1.1. European third country nationals Integration Fund (hereinafter Fund) programme 2011 following the activity of the project tender procedures: 1.1.1. ' ' (a) ' 1 ' activity "education or adaptation programme development and implementation with the aim of ensuring high-quality third-country the integration of citizens, t.sk. programs for special groups of third-country nationals ' (hereinafter referred to as the ' ' a ' ' 1 activity); 1.1.2. ' ' b ' ' 1 activity "to improve access of third-country nationals in the public and private services and products, as well as to promote a more favourable attitude towards migration in the host society" (hereinafter referred to as the ' ' b ' ' 1 activity); 1.1.3.2. activity "the administrative capacity of the national agencies that provide services to third-country nationals (hereinafter referred to as 2. activity); 1.1.4.3. activity "experience and good practices of integration policies" (hereinafter referred to as 3. activity); 1.2. the requirements of the project of the Foundation the applicant (hereinafter referred to as project applicant); 1.3. the Fund's project application (hereinafter referred to as the project application) preparation and submission of the project application procedure selection procedure, as well as the evaluation criteria; 1.4. the grant award procedure; 1.5. the technical assistance activities. 2. The beneficiary payments fund projects on expenditure incurred up to June 30, 2013, can be performed during the period from the date of the decision on the application of the project approval or approved on the conditions referred to in the decision of approval of the project application, to grant the contract to the final report of the project submission deadline, but not later than July 31, 2013. Beneficiary payments ' ' b ' ' 1 activity on expenditure incurred up to June 30, 2013, can perform during the period from the date of entry into force of the provisions to grant the contract for the project's final report due date, but not later than July 31, 2013. 3. To Fund activities relating to the implementation of the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" within the established fund management rules set out in article 7 of the managing authority and the right to exercise the Ministry of culture (hereinafter referred to as the managing authority). 4. To Fund activities relating to the implementation of the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" within the Fund management established in article 9 of the law certain audit the Authority's duties and rights shall be exercised by the Ministry of Finance (audit authority). 5. To Fund activities relating to the implementation of the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" Fund created as part of the management of the law set out in article 10 certification authority obligations and rights implemented the Central Finance and contracts (hereinafter referred to as the certificate authority). 6. the Fund's target group: 6.1. Fund's main target group are the nationals of the Member States of the European Union, as well as stateless persons (hereinafter referred to as third-country nationals) who arrived in Latvia in the last five years and legally resident in the territory of Latvia; 6.2. the Fund's target group can be included in a third-country nationals who have obtained authorisation for entry to the Republic of Latvia prior to entry to ensure the integration of those services, and third-country nationals who legally reside in the Republic of Latvia for more than five years; 6.3. the Fund's target group are not included in the nationals of third countries who submitted an application for asylum in respect of which a final decision has not yet been adopted, which is the status of refugee or alternative or eligible for refugee status or asylum in accordance with the law, as well as seasonal work performers. II. Requirements for the project for the applicant 7. General requirements the project applicant: 7.1 this by a decision of the Court of Justice has not been declared bankrupt (including not in the rehabilitation process, or the process of legal protection), its economic activity is not terminated or in accordance with the commercial information that is not in the process of liquidation (if applicable); 7.2. it provided false information to the managing authority in relation to the implementation of projects co-financed by the Fund; 7.3. the interest a person is not made a criminal offence in the Republic of Latvia or the European Union's financial interests, and it does not have adequate means of coercive influence (if applicable); 7.4. it has received financing or does not provide for funding for the same eligible costs of other activities in the framework of local, regional, national or European Union funds; 7.5. If it has been the beneficiary of another Fund annual program, it has seen the conditions of funding consistent with the laws governing 74. Annual departments ' national budget execution process transferable funds "80.00.00 in" unallocated funding instrument of the policy of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures "planned redistribution of funds of European Union policy instruments and other foreign financial assistance co-financed projects and the implementation of measures and the General Programme" solidarity and management of migration flows "created as part of the Fund management and control arrangements (if applicable); 7.6. this one fund within the framework of the activity has provided one project submission; 7.7. If it's been a project applicant in another Fund annual program, it's up to the application of the project to date has been inadequate pay expenses incurred by the managing authority; 7.8. it is not in the process of with the proceedings against the leading authority on another year of the Fund in the context of project submission, evaluation, and other claims of the Fund in the context of the annual programme. 8. the project applicant is responsible for the preparation of the submission of the project, project management, implementation, and project objectives and results.
9. Implementation of the open project selection, project submissions in the application may provide project implementation in cooperation with partners. Partners must meet the same requirements as the project applicant.
10. the implementation of limited application, selection is not allowed for the project to attract partners. III. submission of the project selection procedure for organizing 11. the managing authority shall hold a more limited application selection or open the project application selection, taking into account the requirements of these regulations that apply to each specific activity. 12. the project application selection in managing authority may organise each activity individually, multiple activities or all activities at the same time. 13. the application of the selection of projects is the following: 13.1. the managing authority shall issue: 13.1.1. open project application selection by placing an advert in the newspaper "Gazette"; 13.1.2. limited application, selection by sending an invitation to the specific project, applicant referred to in this provision a given activity; 13.2. the project the applicant shall prepare and submit a project application, which consists of the completed project submission form and you want to add additional documents; 13.3. the managing authority shall ensure that the submission of the draft assessment and shall take a decision on the application for the approval of projects, the approval or rejection of the condition; 13.4. If the application is approved, the managing authority shall ensure that an assessment of the fulfilment of the conditions mentioned in the decision on the application for the approval of the project; 13.5. the managing authority shall conclude with an approved principal applicant of the project grant agreement. 14. the Announcement of the open project application selection or in the invitation to tender if the limited application of selection of projects, the managing authority shall include the following information: the name of the activity of the Fund, 14.1 and objectives; 14.2. the Fund's activities within available funding; 14.3. the project to the application procedure and deadline; 14.4. an indication of the managing authority home page on the internet that provides information about the project for the preparation of the application, the materials used, the submission of the project evaluation criteria, the European Union and national funding arrangements and questions. IV. Project application preparation and submission procedures 15. Project applicant project application submitted to the managing body of the rules referred to in point 14 announcement or invitation within the time limit specified. 16. the project application consists of the completed project submission form (annex 1) and the following additional documents: 16.1. project budget form (annex 2); 16.2. a detailed written justification, if the subcontract for the project exceeds 40% of the direct eligible costs (if applicable); 16.3. the project applicant project administration and implementation of the people involved in the original description of dzīvesgait (CV) (if applicable); 16.4. the project partners participate in the certificate of approval of the project (annex 3); 16.5. the project partners in the implementation of the project administration and those involved in the original description of dzīvesgait (CV) (if applicable); 16.6. the statement of the credit institution granting the project applicant or its partners or their account balance, if the project foresees the use of additional financial resources, which is not a fund or the national budget funding for the implementation of the project following its approval of the project will be linked to the applicant or its partner funding. These certificates shall be submitted for an amount that is not less than the planned project, additional financial resources. The project at the date of application to the credit certificate may not be older than 30 calendar days; 10.4. a mandate of supporting documents (if applicable); 16.8. the project applicant cover letter indicating the name of the applicant, the project activity number and name, as well as the name of the project. 17. the application of the project prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations on the development and presentation of the document. 18. the project applicant project application can be submitted by the lead institution: 18.1 in paper form, by personally leading the institution or by sending by registered mail; 18.2. an electronic document. 19. If the project application submitted in paper form, it shall be submitted in one copy together with an electronic copy of the identical electronic media with relevant references. A copy of the application to a project in the form of a submitted paper, numbered caurauklot, with table of contents, on the back of the last page of the thread ends are glued, stamped with the seal of the applicant and the project on the labels provide information on the number of pages in the document, proof of the correctness of the content of the document, the document author's name, signature, date and place of preparation of the document. The draft mandate of the applicant (if applicable) and submit the cover letter individually, not cauraukloj. 20. If the project application submitted to an electronic document, it developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format, a signature with a secure electronic signature, add time stamp and are presented according to the law on electronic document design. 21. If the project application submitted personally or sent by registered mail, place it in a sealed envelope or box that has the following information: 21.1. indication of "restricted access information"; 21.2. the managing authority the name and address; 21.3. the project the name and address of the applicant; 21.4. "European integration of third-country nationals Fund project submission"; 21.5. annual program activity number and name; 21.6. the application of the project name. 22. the application shall be accompanied, where the electronic document, sent to the managing authority electronic mail address, e-mail notification, under "subject" indicates that rule 21.1, 21.4 21.5 21.6., and the information referred to in point. 23. the managing authority shall, on receiving the project application, register it in the document record management system. If the application is received in paper form, the leading authority on the envelope or box indicates the time of receipt of the application for the project and the identification number. V. Project application procedures for the evaluation of projects Submitted 24 applications of valuation provide managing authorities created the project submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission). Commission meetings as observers without the right to vote can participate in a certification body. 25. If the project announced the selection of the application, the Commission begins work by project submission deadline for submission. 26. If a limited project announced the selection of the application, the Commission may initiate the evaluation of the application of the project before the project specified in the invitation for the submission of application to the end of the statutory period, if the project applicant, having sent an invitation, if you submitted the application for the project. 27. the project application to the opening meeting, the Commission finds that the application is submitted the project announcement, or within the time limit set in the invitation: 27.1. project submissions submitted advertisement or invitation, within the time limit laid down in the grant project identification number, for which the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project; 27.2. project submissions filed after announcement or invitation, the deadline set in the open and not looking, and the managing authority shall send the draft back to the applicant with the reason for the examination. 28. the Commission project submissions valued under these rules laid down by the Administration and the specific activity of the quality evaluation criteria laid down. Open the project application selection within the project submissions submitted under these rules laid down in the specific project submission evaluation criteria evaluate the Fund's Management Committee. 29. If there is no information in the project application in order to assess compliance of the application for the project to one or more project submission evaluation criteria, as well as if this information is not legible or not submitted to the Latvian language, believes that the project submission does not meet the relevant criteria, or criteria given lower ratings. 30. first, the Commission shall assess the project submissions according to refine, not administrative evaluation criteria (annex 4). If the application does not comply with something not to be an administrative evaluation criteria, the Commission suspended the application of the evaluation of the project and recommends that the managing authority to reject it. 31. If the application complies with all of the project not to be administrative evaluation criteria, the Commission shall evaluate the application of the project in accordance with the refine administrative evaluation criteria (annex 4), specific evaluation criteria (annex 5) and quality evaluation criteria (6, 7, 8 or 9.). 32. The overall assessment in accordance with the quality evaluation criteria shall be obtained by aggregating the score awarded to the members of the Commission and the amount divided by the number of members of the Commission, which is valued in the project application. If the application does not correspond to something one has to be the quality evaluation criteria or did not acquire a minimum number of points in accordance with the quality evaluation criteria, the Commission suspended the application of the evaluation of the project and recommends that the managing authority to reject it. 33. The limited application of the selection of projects: 33.1. the Commission acknowledges the project application for the appropriate valuation and moves on to be administrative evaluation criteria if: the application project 33.1.1 the quality evaluation criteria won at least 55% of the maximum possible number of points; 33.1.2. design application has obtained the minimum required number of points in accordance with the quality evaluation criteria; 33.1.3. the Commission determined that need clarification in some quality criteria, which, in accordance with these terms is defined as a reservation; 33.1.4. activities are sufficient funding of the project for the implementation of the application; 33.2. the project submissions that do not conform to this rule 33.1. the conditions referred to in the Commission considers inappropriate, not further evaluated and recommends the managing authority to dismiss them; 33.3. the Commission assesses the application of the project according to refine, administrative and evaluation criteria: approval; driven 33.3.1. 33.3.2. move for approval provided that clarifications are required in the criteria which, in accordance with these terms is defined as a reservation; 33.4. the Commission secretariat shall prepare and submit to the managing body of the evaluation report, which included information on project submissions received, the evaluation and also for approval, approval with conditions and rejected the proposed project applications and their reasons for rejection. 34. Open the project application selection: 34.1. the Commission acknowledges the project submissions on the appropriate assessment and management of the Fund by the Committee of specific evaluation criteria, if it obtained the minimum required number of points in accordance with specific quality criteria; 21.3. the Commission shall submit project applications in evaluation of the Management Committee of the Fund, in accordance with specific evaluation criteria (annex 5); 21.3. for project submissions that targeted rejection, the Commission shall prepare a summary of the information management Committee of the Fund; 21.4. each project application under the specific evaluation criteria evaluated by two members of the Management Committee of the Fund; 34.5. the total rating in accordance with specific evaluation criteria shall be obtained by aggregating the members of the Management Committee of the Fund, the number of points awarded and the amount of the fund divided by the number of members of the Management Committee, which is valued in the project application; 21.5. the Fund's Management Committee shall prepare and submit to the Commission a draft submission reviews according to the specific project submission evaluation criteria; 21.6. the Commission of these provisions by 21.5. information referred to in the application of the draft assessment of the total number of points earned in accordance with quality and specific evaluation criteria and sorts them in order of priority according to the resulting points; 21.6. the project application is considered appropriate and geared to refine administrative evaluation after evaluation criteria, if all the following conditions are implemented: 34.8.1. project application to the quality evaluation criteria and the specific evaluation criteria won at least 55% of the maximum possible number of points; 34.8.2. design application has obtained the minimum required number of points in accordance with specific evaluation criteria; 34.8.3. after the project submission ranking in order of priority, taking into account that the project approval submissions, which got the highest number of points, there is sufficient funding for the implementation of the project application; 21.7. the Commission assesses the application of the project according to refine, administrative and evaluation criteria: 34.9.1. move for approval; 34.9.2. move for approval provided that clarifications are required in the criteria which, in accordance with these terms is defined as a reservation; 34.10. the Commission, on the basis of the Fund's Management Committee and the Commission's assessment shall be submitted to the managing body of the evaluation report, which includes information about received submissions, project evaluation, as well as for approval, approval with conditions and rejected the proposed project applications and their reasons for rejection. 35. the managing authority shall, on the basis of the Commission's evaluation report, shall take a decision on the application of the project: 21.8. those rules are 33.3.1. approval and 34.9.1. in the cases referred to in (a); 35.2. approval, provided these terms and 34.9.2 in 33.3.2. in those cases; 35.3. rejection, if the implementation for at least one of the following conditions: application to project 35.3.1 does not meet even one criterion of the administrative assessment that under these rules to be defined as; 35.3.2. open application in the selection of projects project application to the quality evaluation criteria and the specific evaluation criteria and the limited application of the selection of projects, the quality evaluation criteria – not at least 55% of the obtained the maximum possible number of points; 35.3.3. design application has acquired the minimum required number of points in accordance with a specific quality or specific evaluation, the evaluation criteria (if applicable); 35.3.4. after the project submission ranking in order of priority, taking into account that the project approval submissions, which got the highest number of points is not sufficient funds for the implementation of the project application. 36. the managing authority within 10 working days after this provision in paragraph 35 of the decision sent to the applicant of the project. 37. the conditions referred to in the decision of approval of the application, the project on condition that the applicant provides a project managing authority within the time limit provided for in the decision. 38. the Commission within 10 working days after receipt of the information on the fulfilment of the conditions mentioned in the decision on the application for the approval of the project, assess their compliance with the conditions laid down in the decision. 39. Open project application in the selection of the managing authority within five working days after the Commission evaluated the conditions referred to in the decision of approval of the project application, this information is sent to the Steering Committee for examination, or the conditions are fulfilled in accordance with specific evaluation criteria. 40. following the evaluation of conditions managing authority shall draw up an opinion. Where the conditions referred to in the decision of approval of the project application, are met, the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project grant agreement. 41. Where the conditions referred to in the decision of approval of a project application with the condition are not met or are not met within the time limit laid down in that decision, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected and the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project. 42. If it is established that the applicant knowingly provided false information in any application evaluation stage of the project, the Commission shall suspend the submission of further evaluation of the project and recommends that the managing authority to reject it, as well as to inform the applicant of the project. Vi. the Grant contract for 43 months after the decision on the application of the project approval or opinion on the conditions referred to in the decision of approval of the application, the project on condition that the managing authority by the beneficiary grant agreement concluded, which defines the obligations of the Contracting Parties and rights as well as the Fund's project implementation procedures and conditions (including the financing conditions and payment arrangements). 44. the managing authority shall terminate the project application selection without closing the grant agreement if all projects submitted submissions are rejected or for objective reasons (force majeure, not available financial means or other special circumstances that preclude the Fund project). 45. Following the adoption of the decision on the application of the project approval or opinion on the conditions referred to in the decision of approval of the project application, but before the grant beneficiary of conclusion of the contract or the managing authority shall specify in the application of the project included information that lost the topicality, without changing the substance of the project submission. 46. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation of the project according to the approved project submission and provide a report to the managing authority on the progress of the implementation and financial implementation in accordance with the grant agreement. 47. If the beneficiary does not reach the monitoring indicators of the project, but the reach project goals, leading authority in proportion to reduced funding for the project in question, except in the case where the beneficiary has reached at least 85% of the monitoring indicator and prove that has taken all the measures necessary to achieve the project monitoring indicators. 48. the funding recipient project open separate accounts for the Treasury, from which is made and which is received by all the project-related payments. 49. the amendments shall be made in accordance with the project grant agreement arrangements. Must not alter the purpose or project monitoring indicators, as well as issues that affect the valuation criteria laid down such information which by these rules in relation to that activity are listed as not to be. 50. If during the implementation of the project requires amendments to the project, the beneficiary shall submit to the institution the managing grant agreements of the draft amendments and the reasons for them. If the managing authority, the evaluation of the submitted draft amendments to the agreement grants the compatibility of the rules referred to in paragraph 49 of the requirements, as well as their impact on the achievement of the project objectives, establishes the need to amend the grant contract, it prepares the grant agreement draft amendments and send it to the project funding recipient. 51. The beneficiary shall ensure the target group for the information and publicity measures in accordance with the grant agreement. 52. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project-related information and documentation storage until 2022 31 December. VII. ' (a) ' ' 1 ' activity "education or adaptation programme development and implementation with the aim of ensuring high-quality integration of third country nationals, t.sk. programs for special groups of third-country nationals ' implementation and project submission evaluation criteria 53. ' ' a ' ' 1 the purpose of the activity is qualitative adaptation of third-country nationals programs (language courses, kultūrorientācij courses, support measures for vulnerable groups of third-country nationals) and organizing to ensure full access to services and participation in the host society, as well as the availability of measures to promote integration of the vulnerable groups of third-country nationals-women as children, the elderly, people with disabilities or persons with low education level. 54. ' ' (a) ' 1. ' activity monitoring can leverage the following indicators: 54.1. language and integration courses trained and involved 300 nationals of third countries; 54.2. courses trained and naturalization exam prepared to sort 100 third-country nationals. Information days organised in five regions of Latvia, provided media and publications homepage on the internet; 54.3. creating two platform for dialogue with third country nationals involvement of volunteers; 54.4. create three support mechanisms for third country nationals vulnerable groups such as child minding services, support groups, specific measures aimed at information and services more accessible; 54.5. third-country nationals ' children and young people involved in educational and interactive events that promote the involvement of third-country nationals in public activities, including volunteering, and non-formal education programmes, to promote the preservation of culture and tradition; 54.6. create support mechanisms for third-country National preschool age children and their parents. 55. ' ' a ' ' 1 activity within the project, the following measures: 55.1. Latvian language and integration course design and implementation to enable immigrants to get basic knowledge of Latvian language, history, social and economic characteristics, cultural life, the public administration system, and other areas of fundamental rights; 55.2. courses and informational activities to third-country nationals prepare naturalization process; 55.3. associations and foundations, municipalities and universities are involved in the integration of third-country nationals in the process improvement, including practical support to the Latvian culture and language learning, involving the local population as volunteers and special emphasis on civil participation of immigrants and advocacy; 55.4. creating support mechanisms and the provision of services for vulnerable group of third-country nationals, as well as children's educational and interactive event organizing, promoting their involvement; 55.5. support mechanism for the creation of third-country nationals in preschool age children. 56. ' ' a ' ' 1 activity implemented as an open project application selection. 57. ' (a) ' ' 1 ' activity the project applicant and their partners can be public authorities, municipalities, local authorities, derived public persons, associations and foundations, international organizations, universities. 58. ' ' (a) ' 1 ' activities within available funding is 743,525.21 lats, consisting of Foundation funding and the State budget 557,643.91 lat funding 185,881.30 dollars. In addition to the Fund and the State budget to finance the project application can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant. 59. ' (a) ' ' 1 ' activity available funding one project application to cover the eligible costs are no less than 14 056 lats and not more than 120 000 lats. 60. within the framework of the project can be implemented only in the Latvian language and integration courses and programs that are developed before the submission of the application for the project. The course or program updates costs must not exceed 20% of the development costs. The course or program is considered updated when changes to the content of more than 10% but not more than 50% of its volume. The course or program in which the changes to the content shall not exceed 10%, shall be deemed to be not updated. The course or program where changes exceed 50%, considered to be developed from scratch. 61. where the submission of the project within the planned to implement the Latvian language and integration courses and programs that are developed above, the project applicant 16.8 of these regulations in the project referred to in the covering letter indicates additional information about Latvian language and integration course or program development costs, as well as the contents. 62. ' ' (a) ' 1 ' activities within the Latvian language and integration courses or programs, the minimum volume is 120 hours. 63. ' ' a ' ' 1 activity funds used within one project's direct target group member must not exceed 800. 64. the project submissions 1. ' ' ' a ' activity is valued in accordance with the provisions referred to in annex 4 of the administrative assessment criteria referred to in annex 5, specific evaluation criteria and referred to in annex 6, the quality evaluation criteria. VIII. ' b ' ' 1 ' activities "to improve access of third-country nationals in the public and private services and products, as well as to promote a more favourable attitude towards migration in the host society and project submission evaluation criteria 1 (b) ' ' 65 ' ' the purpose of the activity is sustainable organizational, research and monitoring structures (national integration Center) to facilitate the integration of third-country nationals into society of Latvia to improve the access of third-country nationals in the public and private services and goods, as well as information for the public, to promote positive attitudes towards third-country nationals in the host society. 66. ' ' b ' ' 1 activity you can leverage the following monitoring indicators: 66.1.300 third-country nationals available advice social, legal, educational, employment and other matters; 66.2. resolve the crisis situation of third-country nationals; 66.3. implement two measures, information and prepared two informational materials about national integration Center; 66.4. third-country nationals have access to the national integration Center home page on the internet, Russian, Latvian and English languages, as well as ensure its associations with other important sources of information; 41.3. organised at least one monitoring and counseling sessions in two regional integration support points; 66.6. provided at least 10 tutorials in different areas of service providers and professionals from at least 10 local authorities to work with third-country nationals; 66.7. ensure a free informational phone activity for third-country nationals; 41.5. at least 50 third-country nationals provided for national integration Center support relating to the improvement of professional qualifications or qualifications for new acquisitions, as well as implement other active labour market policy measures; 66.9. provide support for at least 100 third-country nationals for the recognition of professional qualifications; 66.10. implement three educational and informative measures intended for a wide circle of the population and increased awareness of the issues of immigrant integration, as well as promote immigrant integration into Latvian culture and public life; 66.11. implement three measures to promote media involvement in the integration of third-country nationals issues and more tolerant society. 67. ' ' b ' ' 1 activity is implemented as a more limited application. 68. ' ' b ' ' 1 activity project, the applicant can be a national institution that is the leading national body for social integration policy planning and coordination. 69. ' ' b ' ' 1 activity within the project, the following measures: 69.1. different specialists – lawyers, psychologists, social workers, the provision of advice and assistance to third country nationals in crisis situations; EB 69.2. informational and cultural events, to integrate and promote the participation of third-country nationals in the public and political life, as well as improved relations between third-country nationals and the rest of the community, including public authorities, the social partners and the majority of the public, the publication of information material, home page on the internet (Latvian, Russian and English); 69.3. provision of social services with the representatives of third-country nationals and help regional integration support points with third-country nationals; 69.4. provision of advice to other service providers and professionals in different areas, working with third-country nationals; 69.5. free phone for nationals of third countries operating activities; 72.2. support access of third-country nationals to the labour market (improvement of professional qualifications, the new qualification, language courses and other active labour market policy measures); support for the 69.7. third-country nationals for the recognition of professional qualifications (for example, legal advice); 69.8. educational and informative measures intended for a wide circle of the population and increased awareness of the issues of immigrant integration, as well as promote immigrant integration into Latvian culture and public life; 43.4. actions to promote media involvement in the integration of third-country nationals issues and more tolerant society. 70. ' ' b ' ' 1 activities within available funding is $486,650.52, consisting of the funding of the Fund and the State budget $364,987.89 finance 121,662.63 lats. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant. 71. ' b ' ' 1 ' activity available funding one project to cover the eligible cost is not less than 14 056 lats and up to 486,650.52 lats.
72. the project submissions 1. ' ' ' ' b activity valued in accordance with the provisions referred to in annex 4 of the administrative assessment criteria referred to in annex 7 and quality evaluation criteria. IX. activities 2 "strengthening the administrative capacity of State agencies that provide services to third-country nationals" implementation and project submission evaluation criteria 73.2. the purpose of the activity is to strengthen the capacity to coordinate, implement, monitor and evaluate the integration of third-country nationals in the various measures of public administration and service delivery levels, as well as to strengthen the management of participating professionals in diversity and intercultural dialogue skills. 74.2. activity monitoring can leverage the following indicators: 74.1. established an intercultural learning and diversity management system (package including program development and approval); 74.2. advanced at least 100 by third-country nationals working professional knowledge and quality of service on the admission of third-country nationals, integration, naturalisation and repatriation issues as well as intercultural communication; 46.2. organized at least three roundtable discussions on diversity management issues, involving municipal employees and specialists in different areas; 74.4. improved admission procedures the methodology. 75.2. activity in the framework of the project, the following measures: 75.1. measures which will establish and implement intercultural training system (package, including program development, approval and staff training); 75.2. the competence and training of specialists for the admission of third-country nationals, integration, naturalisation and repatriation issues as well as intercultural communication; 75.3. admission procedures for the improvement of the methodology. 76.2. activity is implemented as an open project application selection. 77.2. application requesting the project activity can be public authorities, municipalities, local authorities, derived public persons, associations and foundations, international organizations and universities. 78. in the context of the activity 2 available funding dollars, comprising 103,032.15 Fund is LVL 77274.11 and the State budget financing 25758.04 lats. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant. 79.2. activity available funding one project application to cover the eligible costs are no less than 14 056 lats and not more than 103,032.15. 80. project submissions 2. activity valued in accordance with the provisions referred to in annex 4 of the administrative assessment criteria referred to in annex 5, specific evaluation criteria referred to in annex 8, and the quality evaluation criteria. 3. activity x. "the experience and good practices of integration policies" implementation and project evaluation criteria applications 81.3. the purpose of the activity is to obtain the other Member States of the European Union the best experience and practice to establish an effective integration of third-country nationals in the framework and analyze the opportunity to experience gained in Latvia. 82.3. activity reached such a monitoring indicator-improved at least 20 specialist knowledge who work with third-country nationals and have gained experience on the integration of third-country nationals policy in other Member States. 83. the activity is implemented as a more limited application. 84.3. activity project, the applicant may be a public institution, which is the leading national body for social integration policy planning and coordination. 85.3. activity in the project within the allowed actions that promote the exchange of information and best practices and cooperation with the Member States in relation to third-country nationals integration policies and the development and implementation of measures. 86.3. activities within available funding is $14113.99, consisting of $10585.49 Fund and the State budget funding for 3528.50. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant. 87.3. activity minimum available funding one project application to cover the eligible costs are $14 056. 88. project submissions 3. activity valued in accordance with the provisions referred to in annex 4 of the administrative evaluation criteria and referred to in annex 9 quality evaluation criteria. XI. conditions for the implementation of projects through the open project 89. application selection, partner relations with the leading body representing the project applicant, and the obligations of the managing authority is the only project applicant. Partners under the partnership agreement may be put together not more than 30% of project activities and receive up to 30% of the funding for the implementation of the project. 90. within the framework of the Fund attributable to the direct and indirect costs according to the provisions of the costs of the Fund (annex 10). 91. when implementing the project, the direct eligible costs of the project are less than the estimated cost of the application, the managing authority shall take a decision on the project's indirect eligible costs in proportion to the reduction of indirect eligible costs exceed this provision ratio referred to in annex 10 of the projects carried out under the direct eligible costs. 92. when implementing the project, it is noted that subcontracting will exceed 40% of the direct eligible costs, the beneficiary before subcontracting shall inform the managing authority by giving the reasons for the excess. The managing authority shall grant, in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Treaty, overrun the grounds look, in assessing whether the activities that are intended to be implemented through appropriate subcontracts, the beneficiary or its partners may implement more effective and better, or subcontracting is necessary for specific activities and for the implementation of this provision is violated or not 89. the requirements referred to in point. If the managing authority agrees with the increasing proportion of subcontracting basis, it shall issue a written consent for subcontracting. If the managing authority disagrees with the reasons for the increase in the proportion of subcontractors, the subcontractor does not harmonise the closure, send a written letter to the recipient of the funding. If the beneficiary has entered into subcontracts, but failed to overrun the grounds leading body, the managing authority the amount of the excess is considered to be not relevant to your expenses. 93. The value added tax payments to fund the project plan as the eligible costs, if the beneficiary of the value added tax cannot be recovered under the laws and regulations in the field of taxation. 94. The funding recipient, conclude agreements on the implementation of project activities, must ensure transparency, free competition and the optimal use of the resources of the Fund and of the principle of public procurement laws and regulatory requirements.
95. The beneficiaries of the contracts for the implementation of project activities shall comply with appropriate publicity to ensure transparency, non-discrimination and equal treatment. Contracts with a value of up to 50 000 LVL 3 514, may be closed if the beneficiary has requested and reviewed at least three quotes. Contracts with a value of 50 000 lats or more, shall be in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procurement procedure and the application of a Subscriber-funded projects.
96. Remuneration does not exceed the project application to the project applicant or partner typically work a fee for similar work and have no more than six pounds an hour (not including the State of the employer social security contributions), excluding overtime pay. Payment for overtime work shall be carried out in accordance with the labour law governing laws and regulations. 97. The beneficiary persons prohibited to participate in decision making about the nature of economic agreements and contracts (excluding employment contracts) to persons that are beneficiaries or partners, members, officers, their spouses, parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren, brothers, sisters, half-brothers or half-sisters, adoptive or adopted, or with economic operators, associations and foundations whose members, shareholders or members of the Board are persons mentioned in this paragraph. 98. The beneficiary may enter into contracts for the performance of duties provided for in the project the implementation of the project with the cooperation partners, officers, members or volunteers, all with one person contracts total not exceeding the provision shown in the 95-3514 dollars (without value added tax), and the contract amount is taken into account in calculating the cooperation partners in the amount of funds transferred under this rule 89. XII. implementation of technical assistance activities for the 99. Technical assistance activities implemented by the management of such funds, participating in the control and supervision of public administration authorities (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authorities): 99.1. managing authority; 99.2. audit authority; 99.3. certification authority. 100. The technical assistance activities for the maximum available funding for the Foundation's annual programs Fund. For technical assistance funding distribution between the managing authority, the audit authority and certification authority agreed the Fund Management Committee. 101. implementation of technical assistance activities related expenses of 100% of the financing of the Fund. 102. in order to ensure that the audit authority and the certifying authority for technical assistance activities, as well as proper audit and certification authority function separation, the managing authority with the audit authority and certification authority concluded an agreement on the audit authority and the certifying authority for technical assistance the procedures for the exercise of the activity. 103. in order to ensure the managing authorities for the implementation of technical assistance activities, the managing authority shall issue internal regulations, which shall be determined by the managing authority for technical assistance and monitoring of project implementation modalities, as well as the amendments to the order of the managing authorities of the technical assistance project. 104. the managing authority of the rules referred to in paragraph 102 of the agreement and these rules switch referred to in paragraph 103 of the internal regulatory acts issued for the implementation of all programmes. 105. the amendment of the technical assistance projects carried out by the responsible authorities of the proposal by amending the rules referred to in paragraph 102 or by order of the arrangements for managing the technical assistance project. The responsible authorities received a proposal to amend the technical assistance project, the managing authority shall assess compliance with the proposed amendments of the regulations, the cost of the foundation year programme and other Fund regulatory legislation and prepare the grant contract amendment or the draft amendments to the order or send a letter, which informed that amendments do not comply with the rules, the costs of the Fund annual programs, and other Fund regulatory legislation and not eligible.
Prime Minister v. Minister of culture dombrovsky, the obligation of the Minister of justice the artist s jaunzeme-grende Ministry of culture submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478, Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende Ministry of culture presented in annex 2 to the Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478, Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende annex 3 Cabinet 2012 July 3 Regulation No 478 partners certify the receipt that: 1. the third country nationals Integration Fund (hereinafter Fund) in the implementation of the project will not be tolerated discrimination based on gender, race, ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, sexual orientation or age, and will be provided equal opportunities for different groups in society; 2. prior to the application of the project's leading body I am familiar with the contents of the application for the project and their role in the implementation of the project; 3. authorized the applicant to conclude a draft grant agreement with the managing authority and represent all partners with the introduction of the project-related activities; 4. at least eight years after the completion of the project will keep all project implementation documentation and information and, if necessary, the uzrādīš, as well as agree with the Republic of Latvia or the representatives of the institutions of the European Union controls and audits before approving a project, the project during implementation and after completion of the project; 5. within the framework of the project or the stalls were deserted sold real estate before the implementation of a project are not bought with the financial support of the European Union; 6. If the partner has been a project applicant in another Fund annual program, it's up to the application of the project to date has been inadequate for reimbursing expenses if it is requested by the managing authority; 7. the project planned activities in the application is not and will not be funded from other foreign financial resources. Partner institution (name) (signature) (date) the Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende annex 4 Cabinet 2012 July 3 Regulation No 478 European integration of third-country nationals Fund 2011 program activity the project application to the administrative evaluation criteria no PO box Criteria may/may not (P), (N) to clarify the application of the project of the Fund 1. The project application has been submitted for the tender advertisement or invitation to tender within the time limit set in the N 2. The project applicant or the authorized person has submitted draft submissions personally or sent by mail in a sealed package, or an electronic document signed with a secure electronic signature and add a time stamp N 3. The project is fully completed application, including all attached to Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478 ' ' rules for the European integration of third-country nationals to fund program activities 2011 implementation ' ' (hereinafter referred to as the rules) the said annex P 4. The project application has been designed according to the requirements of rules P 5. The project the project attached to the application of the electronic version of the application, and it fully corresponds to the original submission of the project (if applicable) P 6. The project application is drawn up into N 7. Project submission is prepared in Latvian language N 8. The applicant and its project partners meet the requirements of the rules N 9. The project application is signed by the officer in accordance with regulations N 10. If the applicant has been a project applicant in another Fund annual program, it's up to the application project is not repaid according to the time taken for expenses if the managing authority has requested N 11. The applicant and its project partners do not have tax debt N 12. The applicant and its project partners are not declared insolvent, including not in rehabilitation process and is not in liquidation (public administrations, local authorities and public-law legal entities under this criterion does not evaluate) N 13. One of the Fund's activity within the project, the applicant has submitted one application for the project N 14. Project expenditure does not exceed one project specific activities within and beyond the funding available per project specific activities within the minimum funding available N 15. The project budget is balanced, including the total cost corresponding to total P to 16. The project application of financial calculations, including the Fund and the State budget, the amount of funding, have been drawn up in dollars and is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed P 17. The project's eligible costs specified in the application to meet the costs referred to in the provisions of P 18. The project specified in the application to the subcontracting aspect ratio does not exceed the proportion referred to in the provisions or the project attached to the application, detailed written justification provide sufficient explanation of the subcontracting aspect ratio exceeded P 19. The project submission complies with the aspect ratio, how much funding and implementation part can put partners P 20. The project specified in the application to the indirect cost ratio does not exceed the proportion referred to in the provisions of P 21. Project calendar plan reasonable and sufficient time to implement the project P 22. Project payments resulting from the project is expected to take the period from the date when the approved opinion on compliance with the conditions referred to in the decision of approval of the project application, to grant the contract to the final report of the project submission deadline, but not later than July 31, 2013 N 23. The project is in compliance with the Foundation's application to the territorial limits of operation P 24. Project submission (or individual measures contained therein) is not filed or approved for funding from other sources, except in the case of the managing authority before the submission of the project application selection it already rejected N 25. The project planned in the contract list corresponds to the project's activities, the Fund's project budget estimate and a detailed cost estimate and is properly designed, the chosen procurement procedures comply with the laws and regulations in the procurement, Minister of culture, P for the Minister of Justice's responsibilities in the artist s jaunzeme-grende annex 5 cabinet 2012 July 3 Regulation No 478 European integration of third-country nationals to fund program activities 2011 project application specific evaluation criteria no PO box Criterion points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project of the Fund 1. The application of the contribution of the project to address policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/N 1.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals 0 in 1.2. the project application to the address defined in the area of integration of society challenges the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 1.3. the project application to the address defined in the area of integration of society challenges the integration of third-country nationals and making a significant contribution problem solving 5 2. Project results and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/2.1. the project submission does not describe how the applicant plans to project to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 2.2. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the project the applicant's logistical, personnel and financial security of the project results for further use 3 2.3. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in the further use of the 5 total 0-10 Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende annex 6 Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no. 478 of third-country nationals integration fund program 2011 ' ' a ' 1 ' ' ' educational activities or the development of the adaptation and implementation of programmes with the aim of to ensure the quality of the integration of third country nationals, t.sk. programs for special group of third-country nationals in the ' ' project submission quality evaluation criteria (open the project application selection) no PO box Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 1. Application of the project in General and project specific objective: 1.1 0-5 2/N. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined, but meets the objective of activity 2 1.3. a clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application of project implementation: 0 – 5 1/N 2.1. do not give investment activity monitoring indicator achievement 0 2.2. contribute to the monitoring of the activity of one pointer towards 1 2.3. contribute to the monitoring of the activity of the two indicators in achieving 2 2.4. contribute to the monitoring of the activity of the three achievement scores 3 2.5. contribute to the four activity monitoring indicator 4 towards 2.6. contribute to the monitoring of the activity of the five indicators in achieving 5 3. The measures provided for in the project application: P 0-5 2/3.1. does not comply with the Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478 ' ' rules for the European integration of third-country nationals to fund program activities 2011 implementation ' ' (hereinafter referred to as the rules) the envisaged measures allowed 0 3.2. comply with the rules laid down in the arrangements, but not allowed and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and planned results 2 3.3. meet the laid down steps and is authorized and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and planned results 5 4. Project application: 0-5 2/P 4.1. not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3. justify the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target, background and characteristics are expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the information on the project's merits 5 5. Project submission problem: 0-5 2/P 5.1. not defined and justified 0 5.2. is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3. is defined completely, but is only general reasoning 3 5.4. is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information 5 6. The project application of reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the project funds: 0-5-0/P 6.1. not specified 0 6.2. is specified, but no clear 2 6.3. 5 7 is clearly indicated. Application of the project in the project monitoring indicators: 0-5 2/P 7.1. do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2. provides an example of the results of the project and the achievement of the improvements (benefits) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. Selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: P 0-5 1/8. is not sufficient for the implementation of the project because the requirements are not associated with the specified obligations or requirements is not defined, or the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 8.2. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. It is part of the project, sufficient requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certifies the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and meet the responsibilities, as well as for the description of the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. The project requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. not enough, and it will not be provided within the framework of the project budget 0 9.2. not enough, but it will ensure the project budget 2 9.3. is provided in part, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully 5 10. Application of the project planned project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1. not defined 0 10.2. is defined, however, the project monitoring description does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3. are clearly defined, provide for effective control of the implementation of the project and the beneficiary of the Fund control measures taken and costs 3 11. Project publicity measures: 0-3/0 P 11.1. not defined 0 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow circle of persons 1 11.3. is defined in the wide range of information on the Fund's design and reach a wide circle of persons 3 12. The budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. the costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 12.2. the cost is reasonable, comply with the nature of the project and of the Foundation purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is reasonable and adequate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the Fund's project-specific and objective 7 13. Application methods of the project target groups: 0-5 3/13.1 P. not defined 0 13.2. reads, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and the efficiency of the target group to reach 13.3 3. is clear and explicit and create complete clarity about the compliance of selected methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. Application of project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1. does not describe the risks associated with the implementation of the project, and is not designed for risk prevention or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partially described in the risks associated with the implementation of project activities, and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. describe all risks associated with the implementation of the project, and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 5 no PO box Application of the project quality criteria that determine the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to specify the project's application 15. Application of the project planned in the number of direct beneficiaries in all the measures provided for in the Fund as a whole: P 0-5 2/9.4. up to 50 (including) people 0 15.2. 51-99 (inclusive) people 1 15.3. 100-149 (including) people 2 15.4. 150-200 (including) people 3 15.5. 201-300 (including) people 4 15.6. more about 301 people 5 16. Application of the project's contribution to the creation of support mechanisms for third country nationals mazaizsargātaj the groups (women, children, the elderly, people with disabilities or persons with low education level): 0-5-0/P 16.1. not created support mechanism 0 16.2. create one or two support mechanisms 2 16.3. create three to four different support mechanisms 5 total 0 78 Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende annex 7 Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no. 478 of third-country nationals integration fund program 2011 ' ' b ' 1 ' ' ' activity to improve the access of third-country nationals in the public and private services and products, as well as to promote a more favourable attitude towards migration host society ' ' quality of project submission evaluation criteria (limited project application selection) no PO box Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 1. Application of the project in General and project specific objective: 1.1 0-5 2/N. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined, but meets the objective of activity 2 1.3. a clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application of project implementation: 0 – 5 1/N 2.1. do not give investment activity monitoring indicator achievement 0 2.2. contribute one to two activities achieve 1 monitoring indicator 2.3. contribute three to four activity monitoring indicator achievement 2 2.4. contribute to the activities of five to six achievement indicators of monitoring 3 2.5. contribute seven to eight activities to the achievement of 4 monitoring indicator 2.6. all activities contribute to the achievement of the monitoring indicator 5 3. The measures provided for in the project application: P 0-5 2/3.1. does not comply with the Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478 ' ' rules for the European integration of third-country nationals to fund program activities 2011 implementation ' ' (hereinafter referred to as the rules) the envisaged measures allowed 0 3.2. comply with the rules laid down in the arrangements, but not allowed and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and planned results 2 3.3. meet the laid down steps and is authorized and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and planned results 5 4. Project application: 0-5 2/P 4.1. not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3. justify the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target, background and characteristics are expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the information on the project's merits 5 5. Project submission problem: 0-5 2/P 5.1. not defined and justified 0 5.2. is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3. is defined completely, but is only general reasoning 3 5.4. is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information 5 6. The project application of reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the project funds: 0-5-0/P 6.1. not specified 0 6.2. is specified, but no clear 2 6.3. 5 7 is clearly indicated. Application of the project in the project monitoring indicators: 0-5 2/P 7.1. do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2. provides an example of the results of the project and the achievement of the improvements (benefits) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. Selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: P 0-5 1/8. is not sufficient for the implementation of the project because the requirements are not associated with the specified obligations or requirements is not defined, or the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 8.2. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. It is part of the project, sufficient requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certifies the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and meet the responsibilities, as well as for the description of the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. The project requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. not enough, and it will not be provided within the framework of the project budget 0 9.2. not enough, but it will ensure the project budget 2 9.3. is provided in part, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully 5 10. Application of the project planned project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1. not defined 0 10.2. is defined, however, the project monitoring description does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3. is clearly defined and ensure effective control of the implementation of the project and the beneficiary of the Fund control measures taken and costs 3 11. Project publicity measures: 0-3/0 P 11.1. not defined 0 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow circle of persons 1 11.3. is defined in the wide range of information about the project and the Foundation reach a wide circle of persons 3 12. The budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. the costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 12.2. the cost is reasonable, comply with the nature of the project and of the Foundation purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is reasonable and adequate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the Fund's project-specific and objective 7 13. Application methods of the project target groups: 0-5 3/13.1 P. not defined 0 13.2. reads, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and the efficiency of the target group to reach 13.3 3. is clear and explicit and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. Application of project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1. does not describe the risks associated with the implementation of the project, and is not designed for risk prevention or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partially described in the risks associated with the implementation of project activities, and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. describe all risks associated with the implementation of the project, and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plans 5 15. The application of the contribution of the project to address policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/N 15.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals 0 15.2. the project application to the address defined in the area of integration of society challenges the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 15.3. the project application to the address defined in the area of integration of society challenges the integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems 5 16. Project results and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/16.1. the project submission does not describe how the applicant plans to project to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 16.2. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the project the applicant's logistical, personnel and financial security of the project results for further use 3 16.3. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in no further use in 5 BC Application of the project quality criteria that determine the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 17. Application of the project planned in the number of direct beneficiaries in all the measures provided for in application of the project as a whole: 0-5 0/P 17.1. up to 50 (including) people 0 17.2. 51-99 (inclusive) people 1 17.3. 100-149 (including) people 2 17.4. 150-200 (including) people 3 17.5. 201-300 (including) people 4 10.9. more about 301 people 5 18. Application of the project continue the 2010 program activity 1.2 ' ' to improve the access of third-country nationals in the public and private services and products, as well as to help them to integrate into Latvian society by providing mediation services and the necessary consultations in the framework of the project implemented ' ': 0-5 5/N 18.1. the project provides for a continuing program of 2010 1.2. activities implemented in the framework of project activities 0 18.2. the project intends to continue the 2010 program 1.2. activities implemented in the framework of the project 5 total 0-88, Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende Annex 8 Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no. 478 of third-country nationals integration fund 2011 program activity 2 "strengthening the administrative capacity of State agencies that provide services to third-country nationals" project submission quality evaluation criteria (open the project application selection) no PO box Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 1. Application of the project in General and project specific objective: 1.1 0-5 2/N. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined, but meets the objective of activity 2 1.3. a clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application of project implementation: 0 – 5 1/N 2.1. do not give investment activity monitoring indicator achievement 0 2.2. contribute to the monitoring of the activity of one pointer towards 1 2.3. contribute to the monitoring of the activity of the two indicators in achieving 3 2.4. contribute to the monitoring of the activity of the three achievement scores 5 3. The measures provided for in the project application: P 0-5 2/3.1. does not comply with the Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478 ' ' rules for the European integration of third-country nationals to fund program activities 2011 implementation ' ' (hereinafter referred to as the rules) the envisaged measures allowed 0 3.2. comply with the rules laid down in the arrangements, but not allowed and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and planned results 2 3.3. meet the laid down steps and is authorized and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and planned results 5 4. Project application: 0-5 2/P 4.1. not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3. justify the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target, background and characteristics are expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the information on the project's merits 5 5. Project submission problem: 0-5 2/P 5.1. not defined and justified 0 5.2. is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3. is defined completely, but is only general reasoning 3 5.4. is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information 5 6. The project application of reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the project funds: 0-5-0/P 6.1. not specified 0 6.2. is specified, but no clear 2 6.3. 5 7 is clearly indicated. Application of the project in the project monitoring indicators: 0-5 2/P 7.1. do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2. provides an example of the results of the project and the achievement of the improvements (benefits) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. Selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: P 0-5 1/8. is not sufficient for the implementation of the project because the requirements are not related to the duties listed or not defined, or selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 8.2. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. It is part of the project, sufficient requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certifies the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and meet the responsibilities, as well as for the description of the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. The project requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. not enough, and it will not be provided within the framework of the project budget 0 9.2. not enough, but it will ensure the project budget 2 9.3. is provided in part, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully 5 10. Application of the project planned project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1. not defined 0 10.2. is defined, however, the project monitoring description does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3. is clearly defined and ensure effective control of the implementation of the project and the beneficiary of the Fund control measures taken and costs 3 11. Project publicity measures: 0-3/0 P 11.1. not defined 0 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow circle of persons 1 11.3. is defined in the wide range of information on the Fund's design and reach a wide circle of persons 3 12. The budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. the costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 12.2. the cost is reasonable, comply with the nature of the project and of the Foundation purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is reasonable and adequate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the Fund's project-specific and objective 7 13. Application methods of the project target groups: 0-5 3/13.1 P. not defined 0 13.2. reads, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and the efficiency of the target group to reach 13.3 3. is clear and explicit and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. Application of project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1. does not describe the risks associated with the implementation of the project, and is not designed for risk prevention or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partially described in the risks associated with the implementation of project activities, and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. describe all risks associated with the implementation of the project, and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 5 no PO box Application of the project quality criteria that determine the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to specify the project's application 15. Application of project investment in the implementation of activities that ensure the administrative capacity of the national agencies that provide services to third-country nationals: P 0-5 2/9.4. planned to implement one of the 15.3. activities referred to in point 0 15.2. planned to implement two of the 15.3. activities referred to in point 2 15.3. planned and implemented intercultural training system; to improve the knowledge and the quality of services and repatriation of naturalization for professionals who work with third-country nationals in different areas of integration; develop admission procedures methodology 5 total 0 – 73, Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende 9. attachment Cabinet 2012 July 3 Regulation No 478 European integration of third-country nationals Fund 2011 program activity 3 "experience and good practices of integration policies" project submission quality evaluation criteria (limited project application selection) no PO box Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 1. Application of the project in General and project specific objective: 1.1 0-5 2/N. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined, but meets the objective of activity 2 1.3. a clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application of project implementation: 0-3 3/N 2.1. do not give investment activity monitoring indicator achievement 0 2.2. contribute to the monitoring of the activity indicators in achieving 3 3. The measures provided for in the project application: P 0-5 2/3.1. does not comply with the Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478 ' ' rules for the European integration of third-country nationals to fund program activities 2011 implementation ' ' (hereinafter referred to as the rules) the envisaged measures allowed 0 3.2. comply with the rules laid down in the arrangements, but not allowed and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and planned results 2 3.3. meet the laid down steps and is authorized and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and planned results 5 4. Project application: 0-5 2/P 4.1. not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3. justify the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target, background and characteristics are expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the information on the project's merits 5 5. Project submission problem: 0-5 2/P 5.1. not defined and justified 0 5.2. is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3. is defined completely, but is only general reasoning 3 5.4. is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information 5 6. The project application of reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the project funds: 0-5-0/P 6.1. not specified 0 6.2. is specified, but no clear 2 6.3. 5 7 is clearly indicated. Application of the project in the project monitoring indicators: 0-5 2/P 7.1. do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2. provides an example of the results of the project and the achievement of the improvements (benefits) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. Selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in the staff competence, experience and professional skills: P 0-5 1/8. is not sufficient for the implementation of the project because the requirements are not associated with the specified obligations or requirements is not defined, or the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 8.2. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. It is part of the project, sufficient requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certifies the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and meet the responsibilities, as well as for the description of the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. The project requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. not enough, and it will not be provided within the framework of the project budget 0 9.2. not enough, but it will ensure the project budget 2 9.3. is provided in part, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully 5 10. Application of the project planned project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1. not defined 0 10.2. is defined, however, the project monitoring description does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3. is clearly defined and ensure effective control of the implementation of the project and the beneficiary of the Fund control measures taken and costs 3 11. Project publicity measures: 0-3/0 P 11.1. not defined 0 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow circle of persons 1 11.3. is defined in the wide range of information on the Fund's design and reach a wide circle of persons 3 12. The budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. the costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 12.2. the cost is reasonable, comply with the nature of the project and of the Foundation purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is reasonable and adequate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the Fund's project-specific and objective 7 13. Application methods of the project target groups: 0-5 3/13.1 P. not defined 0 13.2. reads, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and the efficiency of the target group to reach 13.3 3. is clear and explicit and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. Application of project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1. does not describe the risks associated with the implementation of the project, and is not designed for risk prevention or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partially described in the risks associated with the implementation of project activities, and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. describe all risks associated with the implementation of the project, and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plans 5 15. The application of the contribution of the project to address policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/N 15.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals 0 15.2. the project application to the address defined in the area of integration of society challenges the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 15.3. the project application to the address defined in the area of integration of society challenges the integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems 5 16. Project results and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/16.1. the project submission does not describe how the applicant plans to project to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 16.2. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the project the applicant's logistical, personnel and financial security of the project results for further use 3 16.3. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in the following 5 17. Application of project investment experiences of professionals, which provides for the development and implementation of measures for the integration of third-country nationals policy: 0-7 0/P 17.1. It is not intended to involve professionals 0 17.2. intended to involve five to 10 Professional 2 17.3. involving 11 to 20 specialist 5 17.4. involving more than 20 specialist 7 total 0-83, Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende annex 10 of the Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478 Fund cost provisions i. General provisions 1. Guiding principles 1.1. Project costs are eligible if they: 1.1.1. meet the objectives of the Fund; 1.1.2. within the framework of the measures have been set out in the Cabinet on July 3, 2012 rules no 478 ' ' rules for the European integration of third-country nationals to fund program activities 2011 implementation ' ' (hereinafter referred to as the rules) with respect to a particular activity; 1.1.3. the need to fund the measures contained in the draft; 1.1.4. are reasonable and in accordance with the principles of sound financial management, in particular in relation to value for money and cost-effectiveness; 1.1.5. incurred in the beneficiary or his partners, which operates in the Republic of Latvia, except for international public sector organisations set up by intergovernmental agreements, and specialised agencies set up by such organisations, as well as the International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Federation, dealing with the same objectives set by the regulations. The rules on the eligibility of expenditure and the recipient of the funding is applied with the appropriate changes, also the cooperation partner; 1.1.6. related to the Fund's target group; 1.1.7. incurred in accordance with the grant agreement. 1.2. the Fund supported projects cannot be financed from other sources of funding of the European Union. The Fund supported projects can be funded from the State budget, as well as other public and private funds. 2. Project budget 2.1. Project budget must be balanced – the total cost must be equal to the total amount of income. 2.2. Project costs broken down: 2.2.1. direct eligible project costs that are directly associated with the project; 2.2.2. indirect eligible project costs that are not directly related to the specific project; 2.2.3. the expenditure of the project including the project direct and indirect eligible costs, income of the project the European Union financing, the State budget funding, funding of the beneficiary, partner funding, third party funding and project revenue incurred; 2.2.4. ' revenue ' ' ' the meaning of the rules means income, which the compliance referred to in paragraph 4 in the period of the project derive from the sales, rental, service or registration fees, and other similar income. 3. income and profit-making condition 3.1. Fund supports non-profit projects. If the income of the project, including the project revenue, resulting from the completion of the project exceeds the actual project undertaken in the relevant expenditure, the reduction of the Fund's investment in the project. All project income source shall be recorded in the beneficiary's accounts, and they must be identifiable and verifiable. 3.2. the Fund's and the State budget funding contribution from the national budget, in application of the principle of non-profit, calculated on the total eligible costs minus the third-party beneficiary of investment, investment, investment partners and the project generated revenue. 4. Eligibility period 4.1. Payments made shall be (the exception is the depreciation write-downs) and relevant costs arise after 1 January of the year referred to in the financing decision that approved annual programme. Eligibility period is up to N1 + 2 June 30, which means that the project expenses must be incurred before that date. Payments can also be made by N1 + 2 June 30, but before the submission of the final report the managing body. Note the. N1-Fund annual program started the year. 5. Expenditure accounts 5.1. expenditure corresponds to the direct beneficiaries of the payments made. They are a financial transaction except depreciation write-downs. 5.2. expenditure shall be justified by official invoices. If this is not possible, the expenditure is justified by accounting documents or supporting documents of equivalent probative value. 5.3. Costs are identifiable and verifiable. They are: the beneficiary specified in 5.3.1 accounting documents; 5.3.2. in accordance with the Republic of Latvia accounting standards and accounting regulatory laws, as well as according to the beneficiary's accounting practices; 5.3.3. declared in accordance with the applicable requirements for tax and social regulations governing legislation. 5.4. reference data storage and processing complies with the laws and regulations in the field of data protection. 5.5. The beneficiary shall ensure a separate analytical accounting, computerized financial transactions incurred in connection with the Fund's project implementation activities. 5.6. The beneficiary shall ensure the project charges made after the conclusion of the contract only grants from the project account. If the beneficiary plans to make payments within the framework of the project from another account before the payment required agreement of the managing authority. 5.7. The beneficiary and its partners provide information storage on the project's technical and financial progress that is necessary for the provision of relevant news. Information accumulates the beneficiary and its partners records and accounting records, including electronic media. 5.8. Where appropriate, the beneficiaries are obliged to keep records of the certified copy of the affiliate income and expenditure to the appropriate project. 6. the territorial scope 6.1. expenditure shall be eligible for funding recipients and their partners who operate and are registered in the Republic of Latvia, with the exception of the international intergovernmental organization dealing with the rules defined objectives. 6.2. the expenditure of the Fund meets this annex I, Chapter 1.1.5. the beneficiaries defined in point. 6.3. Expenses incurred in the territory of the Member States of the European Union (excluding expenditure on the measures that the country of origin of persons who are not citizens of the European Union, are performed before removal and give them the opportunity to learn integration requires knowledge and skills, such as vocational training, the dissemination of information material, versatile patterns of civil courses and language teaching). 6.4. the project partners, registered and operating in third countries, can participate in the project without the cost, thus the following partners expenses not attributable. This does not apply to international intergovernmental organizations. II. Direct eligible costs 7. Direct eligible costs are costs directly related to project implementation, and they include the project budget calculation. 8. Staff costs 8.1. project staff costs are all costs incurred on a contract basis. Project staff costs have actually paid salaries plus social security charges and other statutory costs, staff costs of the project fits the recipient's remuneration scheme, but not exceeding the rate laid down in these provisions. 8.2. the staff costs of the project description submission form and the project budget form, specifying the position, number and names, if they are known. If the names of those not yet known or is unable to detect it, the project provided indications of the professional and technical qualifications, which will put relevant given the project's functions or tasks. 8.3. Project staff costs awarded, such as salaries, social insurance contributions, are eligible, provided that they do not exceed the beneficiary's remuneration scheme of the average rate. Where appropriate, you can specify the employer's contributions paid, excluding bonuses, incentive payments or profit-sharing schemes. The fees, taxes or charges (salaries applicable in particular direct taxes and social security payments) related to projects financed by the Fund shall be considered eligible only if they are actually incurred direct beneficiaries. 8.4. with regard to international organizations, the relevant personnel costs may include legislation, the obligations and rights provided for in relation to remuneration. 8.5. the structure of the national staff salary costs is appropriate, insofar as they are related to the cost of activities which the relevant public body would not carry out if the project concerned would not be. Such personnel moves or designated for the purposes of the project by writing directly on the receiver. 8.6. the project involved in the overall management of staff costs may not exceed 20% of the total eligible costs. 9. Travel and subsistence costs 9.1. Travel and subsistence costs are eligible direct costs: 9.1.1. only for staff involved in project activities and that the mission is necessary for the implementation of the project; 9.1.2. specifically justified cases, other persons participating in the activities of the project and that the mission is necessary for the implementation of the project; 9.1.3. in respect of persons who participate in the project's activities, if the beneficiary can present the attendance list. 9.2. Mission expenses is attributable, on the basis of actual costs. Expense reimbursement rate is determined on the basis of the cheapest or the most cost effective way of public transport flights are permitted only if the trip is longer than 800 km (return) or destination of geographic characteristics justifies the choice of the route. Tickets keep. If you use a personal car, refundable expenses shall be calculated on the basis of the cost of public transport or distance rates, calculated in accordance with the official rules of the Republic of Latvia or the beneficiary's use of terms. 9.3. Maintenance costs are attributed on the basis of daily allowances or real costs. If your organization has its own daily rates (subsistence money), they shall apply subject to the Republic of Latvia, the prescribed maximum limit in accordance with national law and practice. The residence includes a local cash transport (including trips by taxi), accommodation, meals, local telephone and other additional costs. 10. Equipment costs 10.1. Cost of acquisition of equipment is eligible only if it is essential for the implementation of the project. 10.2. The equipment has a project necessary technical features, and it complies with the applicable norms and standards. 10.3. The cost of purchase of equipment are applied on the basis of the fixed assets depreciation write-downs, rent or lease cost. 10.4. The choice between leasing, rental or purchase based on the cheapest option (the beneficiary must keep the documents that justify the selected option is the least expensive). If rental or lease is not possible, the short-term nature of the project or the rapid fall in the value of the equipment, the purchase is allowed and depreciation write-downs expenditure may be considered eligible, based on the regulations on depreciation write-downs. 10.5. The expenditure on rental or lease may be eligible for funding under the lease or rental period in relation to the objectives of the project. 10.6. expenditure on purchases: If the equipment is purchased before the 10.6.1. the implementation of the project or its implementation, is only applicable depreciation write-downs it spending part, which corresponds to the period of use of the equipment and the actual usage for the project's needs; 10.6.2. costs relating to equipment purchased prior to the commencement of the project, but used for project purposes, are eligible on the basis of depreciation write-downs. These costs are not eligible where the equipment was purchased through European Union funding; 10.6.3. acquisition cost of the equipment corresponds to the average market price. Depreciation is calculated in accordance with the funding to the recipient of the applicable tax and accounting rules; 10.6.4. the depreciation write-down is calculated for the full months including the month of acquisition of equipment; 10.6.5. individual items worth less than 14 056, the entire purchase amount is the eligible costs, if the equipment is purchased before the last three months of the project. Individual items that cost more, are 14 056 lats or relevant, just based on depreciation. 11. Real estate 11.1 real estate property has a project necessary technical features, and it complies with the applicable norms and standards. 11.2. The financing of real estate rental may receive, understand if there is a link between the rental and the objectives of the project and the following conditions are met: 11.2.1. real property not purchased through European Union funding; 11.2.2. real property can only be used for the purposes of the project. Otherwise, the deal is only part of the cost is in proportion to the project used the premises. 12. Auxiliary materials and General Services 12.1. Consumables, supplies and other general costs are eligible if they are identifiable and directly necessary for the implementation of the project. 12.2. Office supplies delivery costs, as well as all kinds of detailed administrative consumables delivery costs, representation costs and the costs of General Services, which is not separated from the total cost of the authority and not directly necessary for the implementation of the project (such as office supplies, phone, internet, mail, Office cleaning, utilities, insurance, staff training and recruitment costs), there is no direct eligible costs. They include indirect eligible costs according to chapter III of this annex. 13. Subcontracting agreements 13.1. Subcontracts-company agreements, service contracts, autorlīgum and other contracts with the performers, which the artist is fed directly to the beneficiaries, and makes a profit. Subcontractor means a third party who is neither a direct recipient of the funding of the project, not a project partner, and provides assistance in specific work and services, the implementation of which is not possible with direct funding to the recipient or partner. 13.2. the funding recipient is capable of implementing the measures of the project, the beneficiary cannot therefore enter into subcontracting agreements for the implementation of a project. Subcontracting contracts is limited, and may not exceed 40% of the direct eligible costs. Subcontracting costs within the meaning of these rules can be, for example, the cost of translation services, printing of handouts, training courses (costs include, for example, equipment rental), catering services, website development. 13.3. The Fund may not get such subcontracting agreements: 13.3.1. the project general management of subcontracting tasks such as project manager, Coordinator, Assistant, accountant; 13.3.2. subcontracting contracts, which increases the cost of the project, but does not cause disproportionate additional value; 13.3.3. subcontracts with intermediaries or consultants, paying down a percentage of the total cost of the project, unless the beneficiary of the Fund such payments are not supported by the work performed or the actual value of the services; 13.3.4. for all subcontracts for the beneficiary requests and subcontractor undertake auditing and control authorities provide all the necessary information on subcontracting activities carried out in the framework. 14. the costs directly resulting from the conditions relating to the financing of the European Union, 14.1 costs necessary to comply with European Union funding requirements (such as costs related to publicity, transparency, evaluation of projects, independent audit, bank guarantees, translation costs) are the direct eligible costs. 15. Expert services 15.1 the fee for legal consultation, notary services or technical and financial experts ' fees are direct eligible costs. The cost of this expert within the meaning of the provisions is the single, specific costs with high added value in bringing in certified experts. 16. special expenditure relating to third-country nationals covered by the scope of the Fund the purchase by 16.1. beneficiary assistance made in relation to third-country nationals covered by the scope of the Fund in accordance with the definition provided in the master document, and a direct beneficiary of the reimbursement payments to these persons is an appropriate expenditure, subject to the following special conditions: 16.1.1. direct beneficiary rules down time stores all the necessary information and evidence that third country nationals who have received the aid, subject to the scope of application of the Fund in accordance with the definition provided in the Basic Act; 16.1.2. the direct recipient of the rules down time keep evidence of third-country nationals assistance (such as invoices, receipts, and/or approved payment orders). 16.2. If necessary, to persons covered by the scope of the Fund, visit measures (e.g. training), may provide a small cash bonuses as extra assistance provided that the total amount in one project does not exceed 17 570 dollars and its distribution to each person in the relevant event, course or other activities. Direct receiver stores the list of persons, which fixed the time and date of the payment, and provide appropriate measures to avoid double funding and misuse of funds. III. Indirect eligible costs 17. action appropriate indirect costs are those costs which, in the light of this annex referred to in paragraph 1, the conditions of conformity does not constitute specific costs directly linked to project activities. 18. By way of derogation from paragraph 1.1.5., and (5) implementing the indirect costs can be fixed flat-rate financing, which may not exceed 7% of the direct costs. Indirect eligible costs may include communication (e.g., telephone, internet), postal costs, cleaning, utility payments, insurance, office supply costs. 19. the beneficiaries that their activity gets funding from the budget of the European Union, indirect eligible costs are not eligible. IV. non-eligible costs ineligible costs 20:20.1. value added tax, unless the beneficiary can show that he is unable to recover it; 20.2. mediation services, which do not comply with this annex 1.1 point 1.1.4. section; 20.3. return on capital, debt and debt service charges, debit interest, foreign exchange commissions and losses due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, savings loss or contingent liabilities, interest payments in the future, undoubtedly shows, penalties, fines, financial penalties, litigation costs and excessive or unjustified expenditure; 20.4. the representation costs relating only to the project. Apply reasonable representation costs for measures justified by the type of project, for example, the cost of the closing event of the project or project coordination group meetings; 20.5. the costs declared by the beneficiary and which relate to another project or work programme, which receives European Union funding; 20.6. land acquisition, real estate acquisition, construction and renovation; 20.7. contributions in kind. Minister of culture, Minister of Justice ad interim of s jaunzeme-grende