Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 518 in Riga on 24 July 2012 (pr. No 41 48) of the economic characteristics of the plant variety evaluation rules Issued under the seeds and the varieties of life law 11.1 of the first paragraph of article 3 i. General questions 1. determine the economic characteristics of the plant variety evaluation (evaluation of the variety below), order and pricing. 2. pursuant to this provision the breed 1. criteria referred to in annex shall be assessed to determine: the adequacy of the variety 2.1 conventional agriculture; 2.2. the suitability of the variety of organic farming. 3. evaluation of the variety is growing, the use of the variety and the quality of the product obtained in comparison with standartšķirn. Standartšķirn by the national plant variety Board proposal establishes the national plant protection service (hereinafter service). 4. Standartšķirn check of the requirements are the following: 4.1 variety is entered in the catalogue of varieties of plants (hereinafter referred to as the directory); 4.2. the variety used in the production; 4.3 the variety has provided seeds. 5. If the catalog does not include any of the varieties of crop variety being evaluated is compared with the crop variety which has better indicators. 6. Where varieties are more than 15 varieties of standartšķirn media. Judging the breed, its performance is compared with the average of standartšķirn. 7. If the crop is not set, the standartšķirn evaluate the breed physical indicators according to the rules referred to in annex 1. 8. evaluation of the variety award: 8.1. catalogue of the variety: 8.1.1. summer cereal, fodder plants, annuals of oilseeds (except in the form of winter crops), textile, potatoes and beet varieties-two years; 8.1.2. winter crops of cereals and oilseeds (form field) – two years if conditions for wintering has been under ziemcietīb. If the national plant variety Board until June 1 of the current year of assessment of a variety of ziemcietīb two years of assessment results, admit that the conditions were not wintering under the ziemcietīb evaluation, the evaluation of the variety at the national plant variety Board proposal to continue a third year; 8.1.3. Red clover varieties – three years. Red clover to perform media tests twice — first and second year. In the first year of the pilot back in clover records and observations are made in the year of the vehicle, as well as first and second year of use. In the second year of the pilot back in clover records and observations are made in the year of the vehicle and the first year of use; 8.1.4. perennial fodder plant varieties (except the Red clover) – four years in two test cycles. Perennial fodder plant seed varieties planted twice – first and second year. Records and observations are made in the year of the vehicle, as well as first and second year of use; 8.2. for other purposes (e.g., to determine the suitability of the variety for the production of similar agro climatic conditions of Latvia or post-registration variety trials) is not limited. 9. If the rules referred to in paragraph 13 above, the applicant has made a variety of other purposes under this provision 1. criteria referred to in the annex and in accordance with the procedure laid down in these provisions and submit an application for entry in the catalogue of the variety to be assessed, the results obtained in the evaluation of the variety used in accordance with the laws and regulations on plant varieties. 10. where the variety is evaluated for inclusion in the directory, then breaks the economic characteristics of the variety during the assessment not longer than one year of evaluation. 11. evaluation of the variety provided by the Latvian University of Agriculture. 12. the assessment of the necessary Variety: 12.1. field test data; 12.2. data quality indicators. II. The application for the evaluation of varieties 13. Application on the economic characteristics of the plant variety evaluation (hereinafter referred to as the application) in accordance with the provisions of annex 2 of the Latvian University of Agriculture may submit one of the following Parties (hereinafter the applicant): 13.1. breeder; 13.2. the breeder's rights owner – natural or legal persons who have acquired the right of the breeder; 13.3. Sustainer of the variety: the natural or legal person who provides for the maintenance of the variety; 13.4. the breeder, the breeder of the variety of the right holder or the authorized representative (authorized representative). 14. the application submitted to the Latvian University of agriculture: for 14.1. summer cereal, forage plants, oil plants, except in the form of winter crops, textile, potatoes and beet varieties, up to March 1; 14.2. for winter rape and winter Rep – up to 10 July; 14.3. the winter crops of cereals, up to august 1. 15. The Latvian Agricultural University received a submission for the evaluation of the varieties registered the application log. If the application is filled in in accordance with the provisions of annex 2, and supplied all the necessary information, within two weeks the applicant notifies the variety applied for entry in a field trial. The applicant may inform the forwarding this information to his designated electronic mail address. 16. If the application is not completed in accordance with the provisions of annex 2, the Latvian Agricultural University applied for a variety of field trial varieties not included in the plan and asked the applicant within 20 working days to submit an updated application. This information can be communicated to the applicant, sending them to their designated electronic mail address. 17. If the application for summer crops, forage plants, oil plants, except in the form of winter crops, fibre plants, potatoes and beet varieties evaluation is filed after March 20, for the winter or winter rape rape varieties evaluation – after august 1, but for the winter crops, cereal varieties evaluation – august 20, evaluation of the variety is carried out next year. III. assessment of the variety order 18. Latvian University of agriculture according to annex 3, this provision provides the location of field trials evaluation of the variety. 19. After the submission of registration of Latvian Agricultural University provides a variety of evaluation in the following order: 19.1. conclude with agreement on applicant assessment of the variety: 19.1.1 species; 19.1.2. variety; 19.1.3. breed field trial sites; 19.1.4. the necessary seed; 19.1.5. seed supply arrangements and time; 19.1.6. results of the evaluation of the submission procedures and deadlines; 19.1.7. payment arrangements for the evaluation of the variety; 19.2. the breed include varieties of field trial plan, specifying the species, the breed, when started to breed, a breed field trial sites, breed evaluation years, applicant, the breeders, the country in which the variety was created. 20. the evaluation of plant varieties, these rules specify pricing, annex 4. 21. the potato seed quality for certified seed of the first generation (C1), but the rest of the crop seed quality-basic seed category quality requirements laid down in the law on solely and seed. Seed supply according to the law on the quarantine of the crop requirements. 22. the potato varieties are divided into four groups-agrīnum early, medium, medium-late early and late. After the submission of the applicant, the information on the variety of evaluation in the relevant agrīnum. Each group has its own agrīnum standartšķirn. IV. Requirements for the conduct of field trials 23. Trial carried out under the pilot scheme, which is no less than four iterations. Diagrams indicate the order of varieties. Variety introduce deploys randomized. 24. Test conditions discovery requirements are the following: 24.1. the only differences principle ensures that: in the trial all varieties 24.1.1. equal circumstances; 24.1.2. in the particular field trials may be different, but the seeded varieties only dīgstoš the number of seeds, fertilizer, priekšaug, soil treatment and care of plantations of volumes and harvesting technology used is uniform; 24.1.3. varieties with different vegetation period length harvesting period vary; 24.2. precision provides all work accurate under conditions of good agricultural practice and the requirements of these regulations; 24.3. the distance from trial fields to forests, groves, highways, watercourses, buildings and structures, individual trees, bike paths, and novadgrāvj the edges of the field does not influence the test results. 15.2. the field trial evaluations and measurements in one trial, one of the signs carried by the same specialist. 25. The trial shall be carried out in the field that meets the following requirements: 25.1. field in the history of at least four years have tracked data on crops, seeds, fertilizer izsētaj, plant protection products and crops; 25.2. the presence of perennial weeds in the field must not affect the test results. 25.3. plants lightly used phosphorus and potassium content in soil based on the reaction from the soil and grain size distribution is set to high or medium; 25.4. before the trial placement area field for at least one year is mounted in the buffer volume, in which the trial is carried out;
25.5. test varieties for suitability in organic farming, carried out in the field that certified under the legislation on the organic agriculture supervision and control. 26. the production process requirements are the following: 26.1. the relevant crop species again in the same field may grow at an interval of not less than four years, but the species of cereals, with an interval of three years; 26.2. each species select priekšaug in accordance with good farming practice; 26.3. any work carried out in the field trials judged in crops growing conditions of good agricultural practice, with a particular focus on job timely, uniform and high-quality execution of it; 26.4. trial or pursuant to the recommended planting for precision rules in accordance with the provisions of annex 5. 27. Fertilizer requirements are as follows: 27.1. calculation of necessary common fertilizer dose, take note: 27.1.1. soil agroķīmisk the results of research that is not older than those time limits referred to in the law on the protection of water and soil from pollution caused by agricultural activity with nitrates; 27.1.2. nutrient removal; 27.1.3. priekšaug; 27.1.4. other fertilizer and fertilizer time affecting factors; 27.2. organic plant nutrients with crop rotation using one or more of the following techniques: 27.2.1. grown legumes; 27.2.2. grow green manure plants; 27.2.3. grow green manure plants as intercultural; 27.2.4. soil plant residue, straw, perennial grasses, potato plants or other plant debris; 27.2.5. use compost, manure or other organic mass; 27.2.6. perform additional processing of the soil, which contributes to the intense activity of micro-organisms (such as repeated inversion of the soil, which increases the plants available potassium and phosphorus); 27.2.7. If necessary, apply fertilisers, which allowed the Commission's September 5, 2008, Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules on organic production, labelling and control rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products, annex I. 28. The trial field deployment requirements are the following: 28.1. fields placed perpendicular to the direction of tillage; 28.2. in one pilot in the accounting field and field dimensions are the same. Field accounting area is not less than the provisions referred to in annex 6; 28.3. repetitions (the pilot part of the area, which includes all the varieties) deployed in one to four columns without splitting the repetitions, between which is a bar which allows you to harvest each variety separately. 29. Volume and plantation maintenance requirements are the following: 29.1. care on each trial all varieties of the species concerned carried out under the same limits; 29.2. care use only those plant protection products are authorised in accordance with the legislation on plant protection; 29.3. ensure the maintenance of order and pagriezienjosl variants and repeat the marking. At a square placed labels and ensure its preservation throughout the vegetation period. The label says the number or code of the variety, the name of the variety and the repetition. V. field observations and experiments made it count 30. each crop observations, inventory and assessment data processing supports the Latvian University of Agriculture. 31. in the period of vegetation phenological crop varieties carried out observations, noting the dates when the plants have reached the development stage. The phase is considered the moment when 10 to 15 percent of the plant has reached the development stage. For the full phase shall be deemed to be the moment when 75 percent of the plant's corresponding phase. 32. the phenological assessments are marked such growth (plant development) phase: 32.1. cereals – full of seedlings phase, vārpošan or skarošan in the beginning, full of flowering phase (rye) and full of ripening phase; 32.2. buckwheat seedlings – full phase, the phase of the inflorescence emergence beginning and full of ripening phase; 32.3. peas, field beans, vetches and lupins (except perennial Lupin) – full of seedlings to flowering phase start phase and harvesting ready; 20.1. full of oil, the seedlings start of flowering phase, a phase of maturity and harvesting; 32.5. textile – full of seedlings to flowering phase, beginning in the early phase, dzeltengatavīb (only the fibre flax) and full flowering phase (hemp fibre only); 32.6. Green fodder plants (oil, mustard and California Bluebell rutk) – full of seedlings to flowering phase and phase; 32.7. maize (green fodder) – full of seedlings to flowering phase start phase, piengatavīb and vaskagatavīb; 20.4.-full of seedlings grasses phase and vārpošan/skarošan in the beginning; 32.9. Fabaceae (also the perennial Lupin) – full of seedlings phase and the beginning of flowering; 32.10. potatoes-full of seedlings to flowering phase, the beginning and the end of the vegetation period (early varieties only). 33. Field experiments of variety valued these rules 1. criteria referred to in the annex, as well as records and measurements (except for the quality analysis) in accordance with the rules referred to in annex 7.
34. If a disease or pest occurrence is found on one or more varieties, accounting log Specifies the date as well as the development phase of the variety and the use of plant protection products for the entire trial. 35. If the evaluation of the variety of plants partially or completely in the trial died, draw up legislation. The Act specifies the reasons for the destruction and the size of the area, which reduces the area of accounting. The Act creates a Commission to compose a three people. Variety assessment reimbursement agenda fixed by mutual agreement between the Latvian Agricultural University and the applicant.
36. to separate the trial fields accounting for observations of the area unfit, draw up legislation. Reducing the trial field accounting area, comply with the following conditions: 36.1. If the trial plants died up to 50 percent from the field in the accounting area, take into account the actual accounting; 36.2. If the pilot plant are killed, more than 50 percent from the field in the accounting area, field observations of invalid; 36.3. If the pilot plant are killed, more than 50 percent of the repetitions, repetitions of the accounting area of observations invalid; 36.4. If the pilot plant are killed, more than 50 percent of the pilot area of accounting, the trial transcript. 37. If the observations and records of some of characteristics for the variety to be drastically different from the breed representative, submitted in accordance with the provisions of annex 2, and the results are analysed. These differences may not be the reason for the annulment of the results. Should not be recognised as invalid field observations, on the basis of the difference in productivity by repetition, if not find out specifically the reasons for the differences. 38. Harvest harvested when the breed reached its harvesting maturity. 39. Before the harvest of the crop is harvested, the first bar and the area of isolation while observations invalid, if any. The square area of accounting specified, taking into account the accounting area. Vi. Quality analysis to assess 40 varieties of compliance with these rules referred to in annex 1. the criteria for the evaluation of varieties, a Latvian Agricultural University provides quality analysis in accordance with the provisions of annex 7 of the methods referred to in any of the provisions referred to in paragraph 41 of the laboratory. 41. The rules referred to in annex 1. varieties of quality analysis can be performed in one of the following laboratories: laboratory accredited 41.1. the society with limited liability "the standardization, accreditation and Metrology Centre" Latvian National Accreditation Bureau according to the standard LVS EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 "the competence of testing and calibration laboratories-General requirements" fodder, food, fibers and malt testing; 41.2. the other Member States of the European Union, European economic area and European Free Trade Association Member States recognized the institution of laboratories; 41.3. laboratory, which has at least three years of experience conducting qualitative analyses. VII. evaluation of varieties, collection and reporting of results 42. Latvian University of Agriculture collects a variety of field trials of the evaluation findings, quality results, analyse their data, the mathematical processing, as well as evaluate varieties according to the varieties of balls, evaluation criteria, taking into account the characteristics of the varieties of economic assessment methods (7 and 8). 43. The Latvian Agricultural University until May 1 of the current year shall be notified to the service and service within five working days, send to the national plant variety Board plant variety rights expert group (hereinafter expert group) winter crops of cereals and oilseeds (form field) within two years of the results of the evaluation of ziemcietīb for each trial site. 44. Two weeks after that rule 43, paragraph results of the expert group to assess, in the light of the conditions, or wintering has been under evaluation, ziemcietīb and make proposals to the national plant variety Board on the assessment of certain varieties, the continuation of the third year. 45. The national plant variety Board within two weeks after receipt of the proposal of the Group of experts to examine and make proposals to the Latvian Agricultural University on the assessment of certain varieties, the continuation of the third year. 46. If the Latvian University of agriculture, pursuant to the national plant variety rights proposal, the Council shall decide on the continuation of the assessment of certain varieties of the third year, up to 15 June of the current year to inform the applicant of the decision taken. 47. The Latvian Agricultural University shall notify the applicant: 29.3. This provision in annex 1 all field trial data on the species concerned two weeks after data collection, but not later than 15 October of the current year; 47.2. cereals, fodder plants annuals (excluding annuals the airen) and canola varieties full evaluation results to current year 1 November; 47.3. the other varieties of the species full evaluation results-1 for the year to December. 48. If the applicant has doubts about the accuracy of the results of the evaluation of the variety, the applicant within two weeks after notification of the results of the evaluation with a reasonable objection may apply to the Latvian University of Agriculture, to review those results. 49. The Latvian Agricultural University, in agreement with the staff of the deliverable document shall be submitted to the technical service for inclusion in the design of plant varieties for the evaluation of economic characteristics all breed database evaluation results for each trial site, up to the current year's 15 November for cereals, oilseed rape and the annual fodder plant (excluding annuals the airen) and up to 15 for the year through December, on other species. Service all breed evaluation results shall be published on its website until the current year through December 31. VIII. Closing questions 50. Be declared unenforceable in the Cabinet as at 30 June 2008, Regulation No 469 "plant variety evaluation of economic characteristics" (Latvian journal, 2008, nr. 100).
51. the evaluation of varieties, which started under the Cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 469 of the provisions "of the economic characteristics of the plant variety evaluation rules ' requirements and that the 2012 evaluation takes place in the second year, the quality of the analyses carried out using first checks the methods used in the year. 52. the evaluation of varieties, which started under the Cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 469 of the provisions "of the economic characteristics of the plant variety evaluation rules ' requirements and which are judged in 2012, the first year (also in the fall of 2011 the winter crops in the farm), the quality of the analysis carried out in accordance with the provisions referred to in chapter VI of the rules of procedure. 53. the winter crops, varieties of species assessment launched under the Cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 469 of the provisions "of the economic characteristics of the plant variety evaluation rules ' requirements and which in 2013 is ranked for the third year, quality analysis checks, using the same method by which the assessment was launched, but in the autumn of 2012, the media this provision of the variety listed in annex 3. 54. the application of economic valuation of properties in 2013 that service received after august 1, 2012, the service shall provide to the Latvian University of agriculture. 55. the provisions applicable to the 1 august 2012. Informative reference to European Union Directive provisions included in the law arising from the Commission of 6 October 2003 Directive 2003/90/EC laying down measures for the implementation of Council Directive 2002/53/EC in article 7 concerning mandatory signs and the mandatory nature of certain agricultural plant species in the test conditions. Prime Minister-Minister of welfare of the farming Minister Viņķel I L. Annex 1 of the rapidity of the Cabinet on July 24, 2012 rules no 518 varieties evaluation criteria and conventional organic 1. Cereal varieties of economic characteristics evaluation criteria 1.1. Wheat variety evaluation criteria: 1.1.1. ziemcietīb (only winter wheat); 1.1.2. the plant length, cm; 1.1.3. resistance to veldr **; 1.1.4. to standartmitrum grain yield (t ha-1); 1.1.5. the grain yield,%, compared with the standard; 1.1.6. the length of the vegetation period days. Qualitative analysis: 1.1.7. storage volume, g l-1; 1.1.8. protein content,%; 1.1.9. gluten content,%; 1.1.10. sedimentation (Zeleny index), cm3; 1.1.11. falling number, sec.; 1.1.12.1000 grain mass, g; 1.1.13. starch content,%. 1.2. Rye varieties evaluation criteria: 1.2.1. ziemcietīb; 1.2.2. resistance to veldr **; 1.2.3. to standartmitrum grain yield (t ha-1); 1.2.4. the grain yield,%, compared with the standard; 1.2.5. the plant length, cm; 1.2.6. the length of the vegetation period days. Qualitative analysis: 1.2.7. standard mass per storage volume, g l-1; 1.2.8. protein content,%; 1.2.9. the falling number, sec.; 1.2.10.1000 grain mass, g; 1.2.11. starch content,%. 1.3. Triticale varieties evaluation criteria: 1.3.1. ziemcietīb; 1.3.2. resistance to veldr **; 1.3.3. to standartmitrum grain yield (t ha-1); 1.3.4. the grain yield,%, compared with the standard; 1.3.5. the plant length, cm; 1.3.6. the length of the vegetation period days. Qualitative analysis: 1.3.7. storage volume, g l-1; 1.3.8. the protein content,%; 1.3.9. falling number, sec.; 1.3.10.1000 grain mass, g; 1.3.11. the starch content,%. 1.4. The barley variety evaluation criteria: 1.4.1. ziemcietīb (only winter barley); 1.4.2. resistance to veldr **; 1.4.3. at the standartmitrum grain yield (t ha-1); 1.4.4 grain yield,%, compared with the standard; 1.4.5. the plant length cm; 1.4.6. the length of the vegetation period days. Qualitative analysis: 1.4.7. storage volume, g l-1; 1.4.8. protein content,%; 1.4.9.1000 grain mass, g; 1.4.10. starch content,%. 1.5. assessment criteria of the OAT varieties: 1.5.1 to standartmitrum grain yield (t ha-1); 1.5.2. the grain yield,%, compared with the standard; 1.5.3. resistance to veldr **; 1.5.4. the plant length, cm; 1.5.5. the length of the vegetation period days. Qualitative analysis: 1.5.6. storage volume, g l-1; 1.5.7., plēkšņainīb%; 1.5.8. the protein content,%; 1.5.9. the fat content,%; 1.5.10.1000 grain mass, g. 1.6. Buckwheat varieties evaluation criteria: 1.6.1. grain harvest at (his nuts), standartmitrum (t ha-1); 1.6.2. the grain yield,%, compared with the standard; 1.6.3. veldr resistance; 1.6.4. the plant length, cm; 1.6.5. the length of the vegetation period days. Qualitative analysis: 1.6.6. storage volume, g l-1; 1.6.7., plēkšņainīb%; 1.6.8. the protein content,%; 1.6.9. the mass of his nuts, 1000 g; 1.6.10. the starch content,%. 2. fodder plant economic characteristics evaluation criteria 2.1. Pea varieties evaluation criteria: 2.1.1. seed at standartmitrum (t ha-1); 2.1.2. seed yield,%, compared with the standard; 2.1.3. veldr resistance; 2.1.4. the plant length, cm; 2.1.5. the length of the vegetation period days. 2.1.6. The qualitative analysis: protein content,%; 2.1.7. the taste; 2.1.8. readiness factor; 2.1.9. the mass of 1000 seeds, g. 2.2. Field bean variety evaluation criteria: seed at 2.2.1 standartmitrum (t ha-1); 2.2.2. seed yield,%, compared with the standard; 2.2.3. veldr resistance; 2.2.4. the plant length cm; 2.2.5. the length of the vegetation period days. 2.2.6. The qualitative analysis: protein content,%; 2.2.7. the mass of 1000 seeds, g. 2.3 vetch varieties evaluation criteria: 2.3.1. seed at standartmitrum (t ha-1); 2.3.2. seed yield,%, compared with the standard; 2.3.3. ziemcietīb (only winter vetch); 2.3.4. the plant length, cm; 2.3.5. the length of the vegetation period days. 2.3.6. The qualitative analysis: protein content,%; 2.3.7. the mass of 1000 seeds, g. 2.4. Lupin varieties (excluding perennial Lupin) evaluation criteria: 2.4.1. seed at standartmitrum (t ha-1); 2.4.2. seed yield,%, compared with the standard; 2.4.3. veldr resistance; 2.4.4. the plant length, cm; 2.4.5. the length of the vegetation period days. 2.4.6. The qualitative analysis: protein content,%; 2.4.7. the mass of 1000 seeds, g. 2.5. varieties of Grasses evaluation criteria: 2.5.1. ziemcietīb (except the one the airen); 2.5.2. the Green mass yield (t ha-1); 2.5.3. the number of days till the first mowing results (up to flowering); 2.5.4. the plant length, cm; 2.5.5. veldr strength; 2.5.6., dry matter yield t/ha; 2.5.7. dry matter yield,%, compared with the standard. Qualitative analysis: 2.5.8. the content of dry matter,%; 2.5.9. the crude protein content in dry matter,%. 2.6. Legumes (including perennial Lupine) varieties of evaluation criteria: 2.6.1. ziemcietīb; 2.6.2. the Green mass yield (t ha-1); 2.6.3. number of days till the first mowing results (up to flowering); 2.6.4. the plant length, cm; 2.6.5. veldr strength; 2.6.6. the yield of dry matter, t/ha; 2.6.7. dry matter yield,%, compared with the standard. Qualitative analysis: 2.6.8. dry matter content,%; 2.6.9. crude protein content in dry matter,%. 2.7. Green fodder plants (oil, mustard and California Bluebell rutk) varieties of evaluation criteria: 2.7.1. Green mass yield (t ha-1); 2.7.2. the plant length, cm; 2.7.3. veldr strength **; 2.7.4. dry matter yield t/ha; 2.7.5. dry matter yield,%, compared with the standard. Qualitative analysis: item 2.7.6. the content of dry matter,%; 2.7.7. the crude protein content in dry matter,%. 2.8. the varieties of maize (green fodder) evaluation criteria: 2.8.1. Green mass yield (t ha-1); 2.8.2. the plant length, cm; 2.8.3. veldr strength **; 2.8.4. COB number; 2.8.5. dry matter yield (t ha-1); 2.8.6. dry matter yield,%, compared with the standard. Qualitative analysis: 2.8.7. dry matter content,%; 2.8.8. crude protein content in dry matter,%; 2.8.9. neutral fraction of the wood washed (NDF); 2.8.10. acid washed in the fibre fraction (ADF). 3. Oil and fibre plants, economic characteristics, evaluation criteria 3.1. varieties of Swede rape and turnip rape evaluation criteria: 3.1.1. seed yield (t ha-1); 3.1.2. seed yield,%, compared with the standard; 3.1.3. ziemcietīb (only winter rape and winter Rep); 3.1.4. veldr resistance; 3.1.5. the plant length, cm; 3.1.6. the length of the vegetation period in days (*); 3.1.7. the oil yield,%, compared with the standard. Qualitative analysis: 3.1.8.1000 seed weight (g); 3.1.9. the protein content,%; 3.1.10. the standard mass per storage volume (g l-1); 3.1.11. the oil content,% *. 3.2. Long flax varieties evaluation criteria: 3.2.1. straw yield (t ha-1); 3.2.2 straw yield,%, compared with the standard; 3.2.3. veldr resistance; 3.2.4. the length of the vegetation period (up to dzeltengatavīb); 3.2.5. the plant length, cm. Qualitative analysis: 3.2.6. fibre length, cm 3.2.7. bast content,%; 3.2.8. the fibre content,% *. 3.3. the oil flax variety evaluation criteria: 3.3.1. seed (t ha-1); 3.3.2. seed yield,%, compared with the standard; 3.3.3. veldr resistance; 3.3.4. the length of the vegetation period (up to the attainment of maturity of the seed); 3.3.5. the plant length, cm; 3.3.6. the oil yield,%, compared with the standard. 3.3.7. The qualitative analysis: oil content,%. 3.4. the varieties of hemp grown for fibre evaluation criteria: 3.4.1 the stem yield (t ha-1); 3.4.2. the stem yield,%, compared with the standard; 3.4.3. the length of the vegetation period (up to full flowering phase); 3.4.4. the plant length, cm. Qualitative analysis: 3.4.5. bast content,%; 3.4.6. fibre content,%. 3.5. the varieties of hemp grown for Oil evaluation criteria: 3.5.1 seed yield (t ha-1); 3.5.2 seed yield,%, compared with the standard; 3.5.3. resistance to veldr; 3.5.4. the length of the vegetation period (up to the attainment of maturity of the seed); 3.5.5. the plant length, cm; 3.5.6. oil yield,%, compared with the standard. Qualitative analysis: 3.5.7. the oil content,%. 4. the economic characteristics of potato varieties for assessment criteria 4.1. potato varieties evaluation criteria early varieties: 4.1.1 tuber yield of 45 days after the sadīgšan (t ha-1); 4.1.2. the production of 45 days after the sadīgšan; 4.1.3. the tuber yield,%, compared with the standard of 45 days after the sadīgšan; 4.1.4. tuber yield t/ha, 55 days after sadīgšan (t ha-1); 4.1.5. the output, t/ha, 55 days after sadīgšan (t ha-1); 4.1.6. the tuber yield,%, compared with 55 days after the sadīgšan; 4.1.7. the total (t ha-1); 4.1.8. the total,%, compared with the standard; 4.1.9. the production of goods in total (t ha-1); 4.1.10. the production of goods in total,%, compared with the standard; 4.1.11. the length of the vegetation period (from sadīgšan to stem the destruction). 4.1.12. The qualitative analysis: the starch content,%; 4.1.13. the average mass of tubers, g; 4.1.14. taste properties. Resistance to disease: 4.1.15. stem infection with 4.1.15.1. stem rot: (Phytophtor-infestan),%; 4.1.15.2. page early blight (Alternari-Solana),%; 4.1.16. tuber infection with 4.1.16.1. stem rot: (Phytophtor-infestan),%; 4.1.16.2. wet rot (Pseudomonas fluorescent),%; 4.1.16.3. dry rot (Fusarium Solana)%. 4.2. potato varieties evaluation criteria and vēlīnaj medium varieties: 4.2.1 total (t ha-1); 4.2.2. the total,%, compared with the standard; 4.2.3. the production of goods in total (t ha-1); 4.2.4. the production of goods in total,%, compared with the standard; 4.2.5. the length of the vegetation period (from sadīgšan to stem the destruction). 4.2.6. The qualitative analysis: the starch content,%; 4.2.7. starch yield,%, compared with the standard *; 4.2.8. the average mass of tubers, g; 4.2.9. the content of dry matter,%; 4.2.10. taste properties. Resistance to disease: stem infection with 4.2.11 involving.: 4.2.11.1. stem rot (Phytophtor-infestan),%; 4.2.11.2. page early blight (Alternari-Solana),%; 4.2.12. tuber infection with 4.2.12.1. stem rot: (Phytophtor-infestan),%; 4.2.12.2. wet rot (Pseudomonas fluorescent),%; 4.2.12.3. dry rot (Fusarium Solana)%. 5. Fodder beet and sugar beet varieties of economic assessment criteria 5.1. Fodder beet and sugar beet varieties evaluation criteria: 5.1.1 root yield (t ha-1); 5.1.2. the root yield,%, compared with the standard; 5.1.3.,% izziedēšan; 5.1.4. the rooting in the soil, iegremdējum%; 5.1.5. the dry matter yield,%, compared with the standard. 5.1.6. The qualitative analysis: the content of dry matter,% *. 5.2. varieties of Beet evaluation criteria: 5.2.1 root yield (t ha-1); 5.2.2. the root yield,%, compared with the standard; 5.2.3., izziedēšan%; 5.2.4. the rooting in the soil, iegremdējum%; 5.2.5. the sugar yield,%, compared with the standard. 5.2.6. The qualitative analysis: sugar content,%. The notes. 1. the criteria shall determine the information, but shall not be taken into account when assessing the economic characteristics of varieties in accordance with the provisions of Annex 8. 2. The criteria taken into account in assessing the suitability of the variety only in organic farming. Agricultural Minister l. Rapidity annex 2 to the Cabinet on July 24, 2012 rules no 518 plant variety evaluation of economic characteristics of the information to be included in the submissions 1. Breed name or provisional designation (designation assigned by the breeder).
2. Plant species extended Latin name, indicating the genus, species, subspecies, variety. 3. the name of the plant species in the Latvian language. 4. information on the applicant: a legal person – name, legal address, registration number in the register of companies or commercial register, contact information; a natural person – given name, surname, personal code, residence address, contact information. 5. Applicant: the breeder, the breeder's right, the maintainer of the variety (varieties for which no breeder), the breeder, the breeder of the variety of the right holder or the authorized representative. 6. information about the breeder if the applicant is not the breeder: name or first and last name, nationality, address, contact information. 7. information about the maintainer of the variety, if the applicant is not the maintainer of the variety: the name or first and last name, nationality, address, contact information. 8. Country in which the variety was created. 9. Information on whether the variety has been genetically modified. 10. information on breed characteristic (such as cereals, winter crops or summer shape, ear of barley – number of kanš potatoes-harvest maturity (agrīnum), forage grasses-use (feed or grass), flax oil or fibre, tag or variety is a hybrid (and hybrid type)), be taken into account in a variety of experimental tumors. 11. information about how variety is logged for evaluation of economic characteristics: 11.1 conventional agriculture; 11.2. organic farming; 11.3. both conventional and organic farming. 12. "all the information I would like to receive electronically" (a claim if the applicant uses all with the variety of information wants to get to the specified e-mail address). 13. the date, signature and stamp. Note the. Document properties "date", "signature" and "stamp" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design. Agricultural Minister l. Rapidity of annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 rules no 518 places the economic characteristics of the plant variety evaluation trials for No field. PO box Species trial places conventional agriculture organic farming sites number of sites number of sites sites 1. Winter wheat 3 LL Faculty of agriculture teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" of the Viduslatgal vocational high school, education programmes site "*" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 2. Winter rye 3 National Institute of crop breeding Stand 2 State Bench cereal breeding Institute of the Viduslatgal vocational high school, education programmes site "*" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" State crop breeding priekuļi Institute 3. Winter triticale 3 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" 2 National Institute of crop breeding Stand in the national crop breeding Institute Priekuļi LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" of the Viduslatgal vocational high school, education programmes site "*" 4. Winter barley 2 National Institute of cereal breeding Stand 2 National Institute of crop breeding Bench LL agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" of LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" 5. Summer wheat 3 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" 2 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" Viduslatgal vocational high school, the educational programmes of the "*" 6. Summer barley 3 LL agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" of the Viduslatgal vocational high school, education programmes site "*" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 7. Oats 2 National Institute of cereal breeding Stand 2 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 8. Peas, field beans 2 National Institute of cereal breeding Stand 2 National Institute of crop breeding Bench LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 9. Winter rape 3 National Institute of crop breeding Stand 2 National Institute of crop breeding Bench LL agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 10. Summer rape, 3 LL, Faculty of agriculture teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 National Institute of crop breeding Bench LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" Viduslatgal vocational high school, the educational programmes of the "*" 11. 2 the national potato crop breeding Institute Priekuļi 2 National Institute of cereal breeding Bench LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 12. Maize, oilseed radish, mustard, California Bluebell 2 LUA agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" National Institute of crop breeding priekuļi LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" 13. Grasses 2 National Institute of cereal breeding Stand 2 National Institute of crop breeding Bench LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 14. Alsike clover and other legumes 2 Faculty of Agriculture of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 National Institute of crop breeding Bench LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 15. The red and white clover 2 LUA agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 National Institute of crop breeding Bench LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 16. Lucerne 2 National Institute of crop breeding Stand 2 National Institute of crop breeding Bench LL agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" of LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" 17. 2 Viduslatgal of buckwheat vocational high school, education programmes site "*" 2 National Institute of cereal breeding Bench LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 18. Fodder beet and sugar beet 2 LL Faculty of agriculture teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 19. Long fibre flax, flax oil 2 Viduslatgal vocational high school, the educational programmes "*" 2 National Institute of cereal breeding Bench LL agency "agricultural Scientific Institute" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" 20. Cannabis 2 Viduslatgal vocational high school, the educational programmes "*" 2 National Institute of cereal breeding Bench LL agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" LUA "Agency for agricultural Scientific Institute" Rate of Agriculture Minister l. Appendix 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 rules no 518 plant variety evaluation of economic characteristics, pricing No. PO box One variety of a species assessment in one place of trials for one year ($) total field trials ** qualitative analyses and administrative expenses 1. Winter wheat 175 130 45 2. Summer wheat 175 130 45 3. Winter barley 170 130 40 4. Summer barley 170 130 40 5. Rye 175 130 45 6. Oats 175 130 45 7. Triticale 175 130 45 8. Buckwheat 180 130 50 9. Peas 175 130 45 10. Other legumes (beans, vetch, Lupine) 175 130 45 11. Winter rape and turnip rape 175 130 45 12. Summer rape and turnip rape 175 130 45 13. Grasses 173 130 43 14. Legumes (including perennial Lupin) 173 130 43 15. Corn 180 130 50 16. Black radish, mustard oil, California Bluebell 175 130 45 17. Potatoes 180 130 50 18. Long fibre flax and hemp grown for fibre 180 130 50 19. Oil and oil flax hemp 175 130 45 20. Fodder beet and sugar beet 170 130 40 notes. 1. Value added tax does not apply, in accordance with the law "on value added tax" in article 2 of the twenty-second part. 2. Field trials also include the cost of maintenance of the standartšķirn. Agricultural Minister l. Rapidity of annex 5 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 rules no 518 recommended seeding rules no PO box The number of germinable seeds of crops to the m2 1. 1.1. Cereals Winter wheat 400 – 550 1.2. Summer wheat 550 – 650 1.3. Winter rye 400 – 550 1.4. Winter rye (hybrids) 200-250 1.5. Winter triticale 400 – 550 1.6. Summer Triticale 500 – 550 1.7. Oats 500 – 600 1.8. Winter barley 350-400 1.9. Summer barley 400-450 1.10. 250-300 2 buckwheat. Fodder plants 2.1. Alopecurus pratensis 1300 – 1500 2.2. Cocksfoot 1400 – 1600 2.3. 600-800 high tall oatgrass 2.4. Meadow Fescue 1000 – 1200 2.5. Tall Fescue 1100 – 1400 2.6. The 1200-1400 Miežabrāl 2.7. Bezakot grass 700 – 900 2.8. Timothy 2500-2900 2.9. Perennial ryegrass 1000-1300 2.10. Hybrid ryegrass 1000-1300 2.11. Auzeņairen 1000-1300 2.12. Italian ryegrass, annual 1000-1200 in 2.13. White bent 6000 – 6200 2.14. Creeping bent 5000-7000 2.15. Brown top 5000-7000 2.16. Red fescue, 1500-1800, 2.17. Sheep Fescue 2200 – 2700 2.18. Meadow grass 3700-4000 2.19. Swamp meadowgrass 4500-5000 2.20. The usual 4500-5000 meadowgrass 2.21. Red clover 500 – 700 2.22. Alsike clover 1300 – 1500 2.23. White clover 1200-1400 2.24. Lucerne 800 – 1100 2.25. Hybrid alfalfa in the 600-900 2.26. East 300-500 2.27 Galega. The vanagnadziņ 700-900 horned 2.28. Sainfoin 300 – 400 2.29. Perennial Lupin 300 – 350 2.30. Peas 100-120-150 2.31. Winter vetch, Vicia summer 120 to 150 2.32. Field beans 50-60 2.33. Lupine (except perennial Lupin) 100 – 130 2.34. California Bluebell 100 – 150 2.35. Mustard (green fodder) 80-120 2.36. Oil radish 80-120 2.37. Corn (green fodder) 8-10 3. Oil and fibre plants 3.1. Winter, winter turnip rape (hybrids) 60-80 3.2. Winter, winter turnip rape (līnijšķirn) 80-100 3.3. Summer, summer turnip rape (hybrids) 60 – 80 – 100 3.4. Summer, summer turnip rape (līnijšķirn) 80-100-120 3.5. Long line at 1800-2000 3.6. Oil line 600 – 700 3.7. Hemp grown for fibre 550-600 3.8. Cannabis oil 200 300 4. Potatoes 50 000-60 000 (55 000) PCs. HA-1 5. Chard 5.1. Fodder beet 7-7.5, 5.2. Sugar beet farming Minister 7 – 7,5 L. Annex 6 Speed Cabinet 24 July 2012 rules no 518 square accounting area no PO box Crop field accounting area (at least) 1. Cereals, oilseeds and fibre plants 10 m2 2. Fodder plants 10 m2 3. Potatoes 25 m2 4. Early potatoes crop growth dynamic discovery for 2 x 5 m2 5. Beets 10 m2 of Agriculture Minister l. Rapidity of annex 7 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 rules no 518 characteristics of varieties of economic assessment methods I. 1. Ziemcietīb Ziemcietīb appreciate visually comparing spring volume status (by vegetation renewal) with the volume position prior to hibernation (1., table 2). Volume status assessment table 1 no PO box Assessment of the condition of the Volume 1 balls. 9 very good stocking level normal (izretošan visually perceptible, is also not a place with live plants), plant health 2. 8   3. 7 good stocking level of not less than 75% of normal, healthy plants 4. 6   5. 5 medium, stocking level of not less than 50% of normal, plants with few signs of disease 6. 4   7. 3 bad stocking level is not less than 25% of the normal, the plants ill 8. 2 very bad stocking level of less than 25% 9. 1 plants completely died 2. If the volume's assessment of the situation in the spring is the same as the autumn, ziemcietīb evaluates to 9 balls, but if lower, also valued the ziemcietīb below (table 2). Evaluation of Ziemcietīb table 2 Volume condition in autumn (Ballroom) 1-2 1 9 3 1 8 9 4 1 7 8 9 5 1 6 7 8 9 6 1 5 6 7 8 9 7 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb (Ballroom) Volume position spring (prom) 3. If the volume is not uniform, the square is subdivided into several equal parts, and each part is assessed separately. Reviews counted and divided by the square of the number of shares, gaining an average square. II. veldr resistance 4. Resistance against the veldr in two stages. As soon as the veldr appears, note the crop development stage and degree of veldrēšan. The final evaluation shall be carried out before the harvest. If veldrēšan is not smooth, it is assessed separately by the square parts and calculates the average. Degree of Veldrēšan is determined by visually evaluating the deviation from the vertical position of the straw balls in accordance with table 3: assessment of resistance to veldr table 3 no PO box Volume status assessment balls 1. Veldr no stalks in vertical position 9 2.   8 3. Veldr is a small, all the straw hanging up to 30 ° inclination, or 3/4 of the straw hanging up to 45 ° inclination, or 1/2 of the straw hanging up to 60 ° inclination, or 1/4 of the straw hanging up to 90 ° inclined 7 4.   6 5. Veldr medium, all the stalks up to 45 ° inclination, leaning, or 3/4 of the straw hanging up to 60 ° inclination, or 1/2 of the straw hanging up to 90 ° inclination in 5 6.   4 7. Veldr is strong, all the straw hanging up to 60 ° inclination, or 3/4 of the straw hanging up to 90 ° inclined 3 8.   2 9. Veldr is very strong, all the straw hanging and 90 tilt 1 III. Plant length 5. Cereals plant measured in dzeltengatavīb during the development phase, which do not duplicate each other. The square in two places in equal distances from the square ends of the size the length of the plant from the soil to the prejudice of the last vārpiņ/top (not including the rachis). Measurements shall be carried out with mērkok, in which the section marked in centimeters. Then calculate the average length of plants of each variety. 6. Buckwheat plant measured in duplicate, not adjacent when they reached technical maturity (70-75% of his nuts ripen). The square in two places in equal distances from the square ends of the size the length of the plant from the soil to the top end of the inflorescence. Measurements shall be carried out with mērkok, in which the section marked in centimeters. Then calculate the average length of plants of each variety. 7. the length of the Pulses of plant flowering phase-hull in the early stage of development, which do not duplicate each other. The square in two places in equal distances from the square ends of the size the length of the plant from the soil to the stem end. Measurements shall be carried out with mērkok, in which the section marked in centimeters. Then calculate the average length of plants of each variety. 8. Oil plants, textile and green fodder plants (maize, oil rutk, California Bluebell) length of the flowering plants in full phase, which do not duplicate each other. The square in two places in equal distances from the square ends of the size of the plant from the soil up to the length of the stalk or stem end. Crops, with a length of more than 1.50 m, work out two people. Then calculate the average length of each plant variety, rounded up to the nearest whole centimeter. 9. the perennial and annual grassland species (including the perennial Lupin) of the length of the plant before the first mowing results in duplicate of, which is not in the next. The square in two places in equal distances from the square ends of the size of the plant from the soil up to the length of the stalk or stem end. Then calculate the average length of each plant variety, rounded up to the nearest whole centimeter. IV. Cereals, pulses and oilseeds harvest and records 10. Harvest vintage ready for harvesting: 10.1 German cereals when it has reached its harvesting maturity (grain is hard, and you can not print with a thumb nail); 10.2. buckwheat German when they are ready (the harvest ripened his nuts about 85-90%); 10.3. peas, summer and winter vetches all pods are dry and Brown, dry seed; 10.4. fodder beans and lupins around the pods dry and black, hard seeds; 10.5. rape, turnip rape, mustard, oil dollar is yellowish green, the leaves wilt and fall, all the seeds dark and hard. Pāksteņ started the Grove; 10.6. the oil flax pods (not less than half of the plant), nobrūnējuš and apžuvuš. If the bolls seed shake, they grab; 10.7. oil hemp seeds have become grayish, and parted the nuts surrounding leaves. 11. first harvested the crop, isolation and exclusion of bars. Twisted plants from the insulating saveldrējušo tracks. Specifies the field of the area of accounting, adjusting their size in relation to exclusions, if any. 12. Harvesting begins with the early varieties. First harvested all the repetitions in a row one variety, then according to the variety, the time of ripening all the repetitions to each subsequent variety. After each field harvesting combine several minutes kept idling, to prevent the accumulation of grain or seed Harvester junctions. If the readiness of varieties all varieties are equal, the first of all the varieties harvested in one iteration and then the next. 13. the yield from each square (repeat) after churning in a separate bag that makes a single label, the other affixed to the bag. Harvest the fields or warehouses weighing to the nearest 0.01 kg. The weighing of each bag (repeat) iegrābum and prepare for each variety one pooled sample in accordance with the standard LVS EN ISO 24333 + AC: 2011 "cereals and cereal products. Sampling (ISO 24333:2009) ". 14. the joint sample mass must be such that after drying and separation of impurities should not be less than 1 kg (peas, beans and lupins-2 kg, oil plants-0.5 kg). The combined sample in a special packaging that does not allow moisture of the sample changes. As soon as possible (to seed does not begin to perish) specimen attached to determine the purity of the standard EN-271:2000 "cereals. Methods of analysis. Determination of impurities in the cereal grain ". While the net fraction of moisture of the seed with proven ekspresiekārt or in accordance with the standard LVS 272:2000 "cereals. Methods of analysis. Grain moisture detection ". 15. t ha-1 the yield calculated at 100% purity and standartmitrum with two decimal places, using the following formula: X = A × (100 − B) × E where (100 − D) × 10 c X-grain (seed) mass at standartmitrum (t ha-1); A-square crop grain (seed) mass (weight) (kg); (B)- grain (seed) humidity (%) at the time of weighing the harvest; C-squares in the accounting area (m2); D-standartmitrum, cereals and legumes (14%, rape-8% to-9% Rep, linseed, mustard-12%-9%-12%), cannabis; E-purity (%). 16. the joint sample immediately dried up to humidity no more than standartmitrum, and cleanse impurities from the waste. From dried and purified in the combined sample, prepare the average sample (s) for the determination of qualitative indicators (peas, beans and lupins-2 kg, 1 kg of cereals, oil plants-0.5 kg). V. fibre plants and harvest records 17. After long line squares from paved for plucking stem, taking a handful of equally around a square, draw up a paraugkūl of each variety, diameter 15-17 cm. 18. Long flax stalks tied bundles and bend over 8-10 stato outcropping. No later than in 10-12 days izkuļ seeds. Weigh individual stalks and seeds. Determine the moisture content and recalculate stem yield at standartmitrum (t ha-1). 19. the Stem yield t ha-1 calculation at standartmitrum with two decimal places, using the following formula: X = A × (100 − B) × E where (100 − D) × 10 c X-stem yields at standartmitrum (t ha-1); A-stem weight box (kg); B – stalks for humidity (%) at the time of weighing the harvest; C-squares in the accounting area (m2); D-standartmitrum,% (-19%) of flax stalks; E-purity (%). 20. Paraugkūl dry until moisture not greater than standartmitrum, and cleanse impurities from the waste. Dried and purified from paraugkūļ that contains only the risk, prepare a sample average (1,5-1,6 kg) for the determination of qualitative analyses. Vi. Potato harvesting and records 21. Early potato varieties of crop growth dynamic experimental harvest German: 21.1.  45 days after at least one full of seedlings to variety – the first deadline; 21.2.55 days after at least one full of seedlings to variety – the second deadline. 22. The harvest of early pamatvākum and medium early potato varieties, when 75% variety launched plant started yellowing stem and death. 23. Average vēlīnaj and vēlīnaj Potato tubers of varieties matures accelerated (if necessary) for at least 10 to 12 days before the harvest, when the Greens mowed or destroyed by chemical means. 24. first stop harvesting sites, and isolation. 25. The potato yield is graded into three fractions: oversized small tubers, medium size tubers and large tubers. Non-standard small tubers early varieties are less than 28 x 28 mm. Non-standard small tubers and potato vēlīnaj medium varieties are less than 35 x 35 mm, oblong shaped tubers – less than 30 x 30 mm. large tubers are larger than 80 x 80 mm and oblong shaped tubers are larger than 75 x 75 mm. Rotting tubers is collected separately, weigh to the nearest 0.1 kg and the total number counted and not standard produce. Weigh each of the three fractions and calculate the proportion of each fraction of the tuber yield in% of the total. Mechanically damaged tubers, which corresponds to the size of food use, depending on the size of the average or big added heel faction. The total number of varieties yield and medium or large tuber yield is calculated using the following formula: R = S + N x 10 L x 10, L = S Rs where R-number variety in total yield (t ha-1); RS – the average number of varieties or the large tuber yield (t ha-1); S-laid variety in medium or large tuber mass (kg); N – number of non-standard varieties of tubers mass (kg); L-square area (m2). 26. tubers of Potatoes (medium-sized and large tubers) average weight is determined as follows: first, calculate the product of the proportional relationship between tuber medium and large heel faction. Then select 100 tubers according to calculated the ratio, it is washed, weighed and calculated the average tuber weight of goods in grams, weight divided by the number of tubers. 27. determination of potato quality analysis you select 3 kg greasy disease intact and mechanically damaged tubers of samples sent to the laboratory. VII. the multi-annual and annual grassland (also a perennial Lupine) and harvest records in the year of Sowing, 28 appļauj, the multiannual lawns is not produced. For annual grasses and annual to multiannual medium grasses for the first and second year of first use of the skarošan or vārpošan mowing results carried out in phases beginning, Fabaceae, flowering early. Atal grasses collected no later than 35 days. Clover and alfalfa in the lawn at the beginning of flowering Atal. Cutting height is not less than 5 cm. 29. first harvested the crop, isolation and exclusion of bars. Specifies the field of the area of accounting, adjusting their size in relation to exclusions, if any. 30. Harvesting begins with the early varieties. First harvested all the repetitions in a row one variety, then according to the variety, the time of ripening all the repetitions to each subsequent variety. If the readiness of varieties all varieties are equal, the first of all the varieties harvested in one iteration and then the next. 31. a square green gained mass weighed (accurate to 0.1 kg), while the average of the sample take a 1.5-2 kg (with calculation, the sample can be drawn up with a mass of 1 kg quality analyses) and the variety of dry matter for the determination of crude protein. 32. the average weigh to the nearest 0.01 kg and graded in the variety and number of contaminated (such as other plants, stubble residues). Qualitative analyses of samples taken from the first mowing results. 33. the Number of varieties of green mass is calculated using the following formula: R = P x M x L R x 1000, where K-number variety green mass (t ha-1); P-number variety, the average mass of sample (after sorting) (kg); (K) the mass of the average before sorting (kg); M-from the square grass harvested mass (kg); L-square area (m2). 34. the Number of the production of the variety to the average of the samples immediately grind 2-3 cm long pieces and take samples of it – 1 kg of quality analysis. 35. For the determination of the moisture content of the sample, weigh out the two 50 g each to an accuracy of 0.01 g. Oven at 100-105 ° c to constant mass. Weigh to the nearest 0.01 g, last two weights weight difference should not exceed 0.02 g. Moisture content of each sample is calculated using the following formula: M = (a − b) × 100 where a M-humidity (%), a-green case (g); (b) in the case of dry mass – (g). 36. the moisture content of each variety is calculated as the average of the two samples. 37. the Qualitative analyses, prepare the remaining portion of the sample. 20-30 minutes it heated in the 80-90 ° c to stop the action of the enzyme and micro-organism. After heating, continue drying at a temperature no higher than 60-65 ° c, until constant weight. The dry place the cloth bag and add labels – one place inside the bag, the other affixed to the outside. 38. For each variety of dry matter produced by iterations is calculated using the following formula: X = A x (100-M), which is 100 X-dry yield (t ha-1); A – green mass yield (t ha-1); M-green mass harvest of humidity (%) at the time of weighing. VIII. Green fodder plants (oil rutk, mustard, California Bluebell, and corn) and harvest records 39. Oil turnips and California Bluebell feed harvested at the beginning of flowering, green manure, the end of flowering. Corn harvested as late as possible, but before fall frosts. 40. Green fodder plants (oil, mustard and California Bluebell rutk) harvesting, green estimates, sample preparation quality analysis, determination of the moisture content and dry matter yield calculation carried out in accordance with the perennial grasses and annuals for the methodology. 41. the number of maize Cob down five normal developed stalks. Adds advanced cobs. The average number of cob each variety. 42. in each field Maize separately lists the cob mass (bracts) and straw sheet mass. Cobs, stalks and leaves chopped and prepared the average sample that immediately deliver qualitative laboratory analysis. IX. The grain/plēkšņainīb detection of his nuts 43. To determine the plēkšņainīb of oats: 43.1. analysis uses the joint clean grain fraction of the sample, weigh the sample in duplicate ~ 5 g. grain flakes separated by preparējam the needle; 43.2. atplēkšņoto bare grain is weighed to the nearest 0.01 g; 43.3. grain plēkšņainīb is calculated using the following formula: a = 100 × (P-K), where P (a)-grain plēkšņainīb (); K-atplēkšņot in the grain mass of sample (g); P-sample (g). 44. in order to determine the plēkšņainīb of buckwheat: 44.1. analysis uses the net aggregate sample, weigh a fraction of his nuts in duplicate sample ~ 2.5 g of mortar squeezing his nuts. to a degree that allows you to separate the kernels from the skins; 44.2. separated WISPs weighed to the nearest 0.01 g; 44.3. the plēkšņainīb of his nuts is calculated using the following formula:
a = K × 100 where P a − (plēkšņainīb%) of his nuts; K-scale mass (g) of the sample; P-sample (g). 45. the Plēkšņainīb shall be calculated as the arithmetic mean of the two results of repetition. Allowable difference between two parallel determinations carried out on the scale of the quantity of oats and buckwheat grain for his nuts must not exceed 1%. If the difference is greater, the analysis must be repeated. X. potato disease records 46. Disease registration is carried out in calendar of phytopathological accounting time limits (table 4). Phytopathological records schedule table 4 diseases of potato plants no PO box The accounting period accounting disease indicator 1. Stem rot (Phytophthora infestan) – disease appeared for the first time. Second time-10 days after the first. Three times-10 days after the second stage of infection, accounting for 2. Stem early blight (a Sort of Solanum Alternari.) Vegetation period, when the symptoms of disease Infection rate,% potato tuber diseases 1. Stem rot (Phytophtor-infestan) yields removing infected tubers, 2. Wet rot (Pseudomonas fluorescent, Xanthomonas spp. Clostridium spp.) Harvest removing infected tubers, 3. Dry rot (Fusarium spp., and Phoma foveat) yields removing infected tubers,% 47. potato plants diseases determined by visually observing the degree of damage percentage, the damaged page surface divided by the entire field of plant leaf surface. 48. The potato tuber diseases determined by analyzing a sample of 100 tubers, determining the degree of damage to tubers percentage, number of defective tubers divided by total number of tubers in the sample. If one tuber finds more illness, lists all. XI. Izziedēšan. 49 Izziedēšan of the beet is calculated using the following formula: Izziedēšan (%) = flowering plants field, PCs.  x 100% number of square roots, PCs.
XII. Pea cooking factor 50. Pea cooking coefficient shall be determined as follows: 50.1. weigh 50 g of each variety of seed (seed of varieties all laid the moisture content no higher than standartmitrum) and boiled in water without salt. Each variety of seed boil separately; 50.2. each sample shall be carried out after the first 70 minutes since the start of boiling. It repeats every 10-15 minutes to complete the development, determined by organoleptic, easily pushing with the scoop on separate seeds. For a complete willingness to consider a situation in which most of the seeds are soft; 50.3. cooked samples (separately) on the sieve drain, pretending to saucers, cool and weigh to the nearest 0.1 g. Cooking coefficient is expressed as the ratio of the mass of boiled seeds to dry the seed mass. It is calculated using the following formula: X = V, where X-factor of cooking; V – the mass of cooked seeds; S-dry seed weight. XIII. Taste rating 51. Taste peas and potatoes is determined by organoleptic 9 ball scale under table 5. table 5 no PO box Taste evaluation balls 1. Very delicious 9 2. Delicious 7 3. Average delicious 5 4. Not delicious 3 5. Very tasty sauce 1 52. Peas in water for not less than 10 hours. Each variety of seed boil separately in water that is at least twice the mass of common seed. When the 75-80% of the seed is izvārījuš (degree of readiness determines the organoleptic), add common salt (NaCl) to a calculation to seed continue to boil 1% salt solution to 95% degree of ripeness. Degust the warm. 53. The potato varieties taste tasting all varieties valued in the evaluation sites all varieties of agrīnum groups. Early varieties tasting is carried out individually for each sample. Tasting the varieties evaluated no fewer than five taster. Each variety of potatoes peeled tubers Cook separate pot salt solution, 2% (20 g salt per 1 l water). Do not use apzaļot tasting tubers. When the potatoes are soft, the water is discarded and the little flame dry. Degust the warm (variety served with encrypted numbers). XIV. Qualitative analysis 54. Wheat: 54.1. protein, starch, sedimentation (Zeleny index), gluten-free and standard used in determining grain Infratec 1241 and program analysers, WH 280710 T4; 54.2. the fall of the number determined in accordance with the standard EN EN ISO 3093:2011 "wheat and rye grains and flours, grains of durum wheat and semolina. The determination of incidence Hagberg-Perten methods (ISO 3093:2009) "; 54.3.1000 grain mass shall be determined according to the ISTA methodology. 55. Rye and Triticale: 55.1. protein, starch and the determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain analyser used and programmes 310705 Infratec 1241 RY T; 55.2. fall of the number determined in accordance with the standard EN EN ISO 3093:2011 "wheat and rye grains and flours, grains of durum wheat and semolina. The determination of incidence Hagberg-Perten methods (ISO 3093:2009) "; 55.3.1000 grain mass shall be determined according to the ISTA methodology. 56. the barley: 56.1. protein, starch and the determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain analyser used and programmes 040609 Infratec 1241 BA T3; 56.2.1000 grain mass shall be determined according to the ISTA methodology. 57. Oats: 57.1. protein, fat and the determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain analyser used Infratec 1241 and OA programs 070308 EN; 1000 grain mass 57.2. determined in accordance with the ISTA methodology. 58. Buckwheat: 58.1. standard mass per storage volume is determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 7971-4: "Cereal in 2011. The standard "mass per hectolitre". Part 3. Usual method (ISO 7971-3:2009) "; 58.2. protein content shall be determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 20483: cereals and legumes "2011. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. The Kjeldahl method "; 58.3. starch content shall be determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 3255:2001 "natural starches. Determination of starch content. Ewers polarimetric method "; 58.4. the mass of his nuts down the 1000 according to ISTA methodology. 59. Rape: 59.1. oils and the determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain analyser used and PRODUCE Infratec 1241 program 050904 T3; 59.2. the mass of 1000 seeds is determined according to the ISTA methodology; 59.3. protein content shall be determined according to the standard LVS 277:2000 "cereals. Methods of analysis. Determination of crude protein grain and grain products ". 60. The oil flax and hemp oil content of oil shall be determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 646:2009 "oil seeds. Determination of oil content (reference method) (ISO 646:2009) ". 61. Peas: 61.1. protein and determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain used Infratec 1241 and program Analyzer FP or FP 090107 310804 PTM; 61.2.1000 seed weight determined in accordance with the ISTA methodology. 62. Potatoes: 62.1. starch content shall be determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 3255:2001 "natural starches. Determination of starch content. Ewers polarimetric method "; 62.2. dry matter content is calculated by using the conversion table, on the basis of the quantity of starch. 63. the Perennial grasses and annuals crude protein content in the dry matter is determined for the first mowing results to a standard LVS EN ISO 5983-2:2009 "in animal feed. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. Part 2: mineralisation and steam distillation method (ISO 5983-2:2009) ". 64. Green fodder plants (oil rutk, mustard, California Bluebell, and maize) the crude protein content in the dry matter, determined in accordance with the standard LVS EN ISO 5983-2:2009 "in animal feed. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. Part 2: mineralisation and steam distillation method (ISO 5983-2:2009) ". 65. Maize: 65.1. neutral fraction of the wood washed (NDF) is determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 16472:2006 "in animal feed. With amilāz handle neutral detergent insoluble fiber content (aNDF) "; 65.2. acid washed wood fraction (ADF) defines the standard LVS EN ISO 13906:2008 "feed. The aqueous acid detergent fiber (ADF) and the aqueous acid detergent lignin (ADL) content discovery (ISO 13906:2008) ". 66. If a determination of the quality characteristics of Latvia approved methodological standards, it is determined by generally accepted international methods. Agricultural Minister l. Rapidity of Annex 8 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 rules no 518 evaluation criteria of the varieties of cereal varieties I economic characteristics evaluation criteria 1. varieties of cereals for the harvest of the factors making up the ratings after the 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb very poor poor average good very good resistance against veldr * very poor poor average good very good grain harvest ,% (compared with the standard) ** very bad < 66 66-75 76-85 86 bad-95 96-105 of 106 average-115 116-125 of 126-good 135 very good > 135 2. Wheat varieties of grain quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 g l-1 of the standard, very low < 688 688-709 710-719 720 low − medium 730-750 751 770-771-785 of 786 high 770-799 very high > 799 Protein content,% very low < 9.0 – 9.0 9,6-10,4-low 9.7 10.3 11.3 11.2 medium-11.9 12.0-13.0 13.1 14.0 14.1 – high-very high 16.0 > 16.0 gluten content,% very low < 15.0 15,0 − − 19,0 18,1 18,0 19,1-low 22 medium high-22.1-23,0 23,1 25.0 25.1-29,0 very high > 29.0 sedimentation (Zeleny index), low 15 15 − CC 20 medium < 21-25 26-35 36-45 46 high-very high ≥ 55 56 falling number, sec. very low < 180 180-200 201-220 low > 400 medium-high 221-331 400 250 301-330 very high 1000 grain mass 251-300 of winter wheat, g very low < 27 27-30 31-34 35-low 38-39 42 43 medium-high 47 46-50 51-54 very high > 54 1000 grain mass summer wheat, g very low < 20 20-24 25-29 under 28-32-36 37-33 medium 41-45 46-high 42 50 very high > 50% starch content, very low < 65.0 65,0-65,6 low 65.7-66.4-67,0 66,3 medium 67,1-67,8-68,4 high several 67,7-69,1 69.2-70.0 very high > 70 3. Rye grain varieties of quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 g l-1 of the standard, very low < 600 600-620 621-640 641-low 660 661-680 681-medium 700 701-720 721-high 730 very high > 730 protein content,% very low < 8.0 8.0-9.0-9.9 8.9 low 10.0-11.0-12.0 10.9 average 11.9-13.0 13.9 14.0 12.9 high − − 15.0 very high > 15.0 falling number, sec. very low low 80-90 220-220 91-201 109 medium 110-119 171-200 120-139 is high to very high 140-170 g 1000 grain mass, the tetraploid rye very low < 30 30-33 34-37 38-low average of 42-41 45 46-50 51-54 55-high 60 very high > 60 the diploid rye very low < 25 25-28 29-31 32-low 34 35 37 38-medium-high 41-40 43 44-46 high > starch content, 46% very low < 60.0-60.9 60.0 low 61.0-61,9-62,0 62,9 medium 63,0 − 63,9 64,0-high eur 65.0 64.9-65,9 66.0 very high > Triticale grain varieties 66 4. quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 g l-1 of the standard, very low-low 650 650 660 < 661-670 671-680 medium 681-690-691-700 701-730 731-high 750 very high protein content, 750 >% very low < 8.0 8.0-9.0-9.9 8.9 low 10.0-11.0-12.0 10.9 average 11.9-13.0 13.9 14.0 12.9 high − − 15.0 very high > 15.0 falling number, sec. very low low 80-90 220-220 91-201 109 medium 110-119 171-200 120-139 is high to very high 140-170 g 1000 grain mass, very low < 31 31-33 34-36 37-low 39 medium 40-43 44-46 high 47-50 51-54 very high > starch content, 54% very low < 61.0 61.0-62,0 low 62.1-63,0 63,1-64,0 medium 64,1 − 65,0 eur 65,1-66.0 66.1-67,0 67,1 is high – very high 68,0 > 68 5. Barley varieties of grain quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 g l-1 of the standard, very low < 550 550-570-571-590 591 low-600 601-620 621-mid-650 651-681-high 680 700 very high > 700 a protein content% very low low 8.1, 9,0 < 8.1 9.1 – 10.0 10.1-12 .0 medium-13.0-14,0 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 15.0-high-very high > 17.0 17,0 1000 grain mass, g very low < 34,1-34.1 36.0 38.0 38.1 the 36,1-low − medium 40,1 − 40.0-45.0 42,0 42,1 45,1-48.0 48.1 high-very high 50.0 > 50.0% starch content, very low < 55.0 55.0 56.6-low 58.3 58.4-60,1 56.7-medium-61,9 62,0 60,2 − − 65.4 63.6 63.7 65,3 high-very high 67,0 > 67.0 6. Oatmeal varieties of grain quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 g l-1 of the standard, very low < 430 430-440 441-450 451-low average of 461-460 470 480 490-491-high 500 very high > Plēkšņainīb, 500% very high 33.0-35.0 high 35.0 > 30,0-32 9-24,0 26,0 29,9 medium-low 25.9 20.0-22.0-23,9 21.9 18.0-19.9 low Protein content < 18.0% very low < 8.0 8.0-9.0-10.0 10.1 9.1-low 11.0 average 11.1 12,1 12.0-13,0-high 13.1-15.1 16.0 15.0 – very high > 16.0% fat content, very low < 3.5 3,5-3,7-3,9 3,6 low 3.8-4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3-medium-high 4.5-4.6 4.7 4.4-5.0 very high > 1000 grain mass of 5.0 g very low < 18 18-19 20-22 23-low 25 26-30 31 medium-35 36-40 41-high 45 very high > 45 7. Buckwheat varieties of his nuts the quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 g l-1 of the standard, very low-500 501-520 low < 521-540 541-560 561-580 581-medium high 601-600 620 620-650 very high > Plēkšņainīb, 650% very high 24.1 25.0 high – 25.0 > 23.1-24,0-22.1 21.1-22,0 23,0 medium – low-20,1 21.0 20.0 18.0 19.0 19.1 – very low Protein content < 18.0% very low < 10.0 10,0-11,0 11.1-12.0 12.1-low 13.0 13.1 14.0 14.1-medium-high 15.1 15.0-17.0 16.0 16.1-very high > 17.0 1000 mass, his nuts (g) very low < 20.0 20.1-low 22.1 22.0 21.0 21.1--23,0-24,0-23.1 average 24.1 25.0 25.1-27.0 27.1 high – very high 30.0 > 30.0% starch content, very low < 52.0 53,0 53.1 52.0-low-54.0 54.1 56.0 55.0 medium – 55,1-56.1 – – 57,1 58,0 58,1 57,0 high – very high 60.0 > 60 II. Fodder plant varieties of the economic characteristics of the assessment criteria 1. varieties of Legumes crop factor in forming the rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb,% very poor poor average good very good Veldr strength very low low medium high very high seed yield,% (compared with the standard) in the tīrsēj very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 2. Pea varieties of quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 the protein content of the seed % very low < 17.0 17,1 18,1 18,0 19,1-low 19.0 20.0 average – 20.1 21.1 21.0-22.0-high-22.1 23,0 23,1 – 25,0 very high > 25.0 taste very bad poor average good very good pea cooking factor very bad < 2.3 2.2 2.2 bad average good very good 2.5 > 1000 seed weight 2.6 g very small < 100 101 – 140 – 180 181 141 small-220-260 261-221 average 300-340 341-301 big 370 very large > 370 3. varieties of field beans of the quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 of seed protein content,% very low-low 22.1 22.0 23,0 < 23.1-24,0-25.0 25.1 24.1 medium-high 27.0 27.1-29,0 29.1-31,0 31,1-32.0 very au the 32.0 1000 seed gst > mass (g) very small < 100 101 – 140 – 180 181 141 small-220-260 261-221 average 300-340 341-301 big 370 very large > 370 4. Vetch varieties of quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 the protein content of the seed 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9% very low < 22.0 23,0 23.1 22.1 – low – 25.0 25.1-27.0 average 29.1 27.1-29,0-31,1-33.0 33.1 31,0 high – very high 35.0 > 35.0 1000 seed weight (g) summer vetches very small < 40 41-45 46-50 51 small-55 56-60 61-medium 65 large 66-70 71-75 very large > 75 winter vetches very small < 16 16-20 21-25 26 small-30 31-35 36-medium large 40 41-45 46-50 very large > 50 5. Lupin (except perennial Lupin) varieties of quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 the protein content of the seed, the 32.0% very low-low 32.1 < 34.0-36.0 38.0 34,1 36,1 – medium 38.1-40,0 40,1 – 42,0 high 5-44,0 44.1-48 .0 very high 1000 seed weight 48.0 >, g yellow lupin very small < 80 80-100 101-120 121-small 140 141-160 161-medium 180 181-200 201-high 220 extremely large > 220 blue Lupin very small < 100 101-120 121-140 141-small 160 161-180 181-medium-large 201-220 221 200 – 240 very large > 240 white Lupin very small < 200 201-250 251-300 301-small-350 351-400 401-the average 450 451-500 501-large 550 very large > 550 6. economic characteristics of Grasses rating after 9 ball scale criteria of very low 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb, plants totally dead low, around 25% of the pārziemojuš plant, pārziemojuš average around 50% of plant high, around 75% of plant pārziemojuš very high pārziemojuš, all the plants dry matter yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 crude protein content in dry matter,% very low < 4.0 4,0-6,0-8,0 8.1 6.1 low – medium – 12.0 12.1 10.1 10.0-15.0 15.1 – 18,1 18,0 is high – very high 20.0 > 20.0 7. Fabaceae (also a perennial Lupine) assessment of economic characteristics after the 9 ball scale criteria of very low 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb, plants totally dead low, around 25% of the pārziemojuš plant, pārziemojuš average around 50% of plant high, around 75% of plant pārziemojuš very high pārziemojuš, all the plants dry matter yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 crude protein content in dry matter,% very low < 10.0 10,0 – 14.0 14.1-17.0 17.1 low-20.0-22.0 22.1 average 20.1-25.0 25.1-27.0 27.1 is high – very high 30.0 > 30.0 8. rutk oil, mustard and California Bluebell economic characteristics of varieties rated at 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 dry weight yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 crude protein content in dry matter,% oil of very low rutk 8.0 8,0 9,0 low < – 9.1 – 11.0 11.1 – medium – 15.0 13.0 13.1 15.1-high 18.9 19.0 17.0 17.1 – – 20.0 very high > 20.0 mustard very low < 9.0 9.0-10.0-11.0 11.1 10.1-low 13.0 13.1 14.0 14.1-medium-high 15.1 15.0 16.0 16.1 – 18.0 – very high > 18.0 California Bluebell to very low < 5.0 5,0-7,0 7,1-8.0 8.1 low – medium – 11.0 11.1 10.1 10.0-13.0 13.1 14.0 14.1 high – very high – 15,0 > 15.0 Moreover organic valued Veldr strength very low low medium high very high crude protein content in dry matter,% oil rutk very low < 1.28 1.28-1.44 1.45-1.76 1.77-low 2.08 medium-2,41-2.40 2.72 2,09 high 2.73-3.04 3.05-3.20 very high > 3.20 mustard 1.44 1,44 very low-low 1.60 < 1.61-1.76 1.77 – medium – 2.24 2.25 2,09 2.08 – 2,40 high 2,41-2,56 + 2.57-2.88 very high to very low California Bluebell 2.88 > < 0.80 0.80 – 1.12 1.13-1.28 1.29 low – medium – 1.76 1.78 1.61 1.60-2.08 high-2.25-2.40 2,09 2.24 very high > 2.40 9. Corn (green fodder) the economic characteristics of varieties rated at 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 dry weight yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 crude protein content in dry matter,% (N x 6.25) very low < 4.0 4,0-5,0-6,0 5,1 low 6.1 – 7.0 7.1-8.0 8.1 to medium-high 9.1 10.0 9.0-10.1-11.0 very high > 11.0 neutral fraction of the wood washed (NDF),% dry matter very high > high medium 42.0 50.0 46.0 low 38.0   very low < 34.0 acid washed in the wood fraction (ADF),% dry matter very high > 32.0 high medium low 30.0 28.0 low 24.0 26.0 Moreover, organic farming < valued Veldr strength very low low medium high very high III. Oil and fibre plants, economic characteristics, evaluation criteria 1. Winter and summer of Swede rape and turnip rape crop, harvest and the factors that make up quality rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb very poor poor average good very good resistance to veldr very low low medium high very high Seed yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 protein content in seed% very low < 17.0 17,0-17,9-18.7 17.3 low 18.8-20.6 19.6-19.7 20.5 medium-high 21.4 21.5-22.3 22.4-23,0 very high > 23.0 2. Long varieties of flax yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 straw yield,% (compared with the standard) very low-low 66 66 75 < 76-85 86-95 96-105 106 average-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 plant length, cm < 70 70 72 73-76-75-78 79-81 82-84 85-87 88-90 > 90 cm of length, Hand < 60 61 64 65-68-69-72-76-80 81 73 77-84 85-88 > 88 bast content% < 20 21-22 23-24-25-26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 – 34 – > 35 3. Oil flax varieties yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 seed,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil content,% < 38.0 38.0 – – – 40.9 40.0 39.9 38,9 39,0 41.0 43.0 41.9 42,0-42,9-43,9 – 45,0 45.0-44,0 > 4. varieties of hemp grown for fibre yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 the stem yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > fibre content, 135% < 30 31 32 33 34 35 – – – 37-38 39 36-40 41-42 43-44 > 45 cm in length, Plant < 200 200-230 231-260 261-290 291-310 311-340 341-370 371-400 > 400 5. cannabis varieties of oil yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 seed,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil content,% < 38.0 38.0 – – – 40.9 40.0 39.9 38,9 39,0 41.0 43.0 41.9 42.0 – – – 42.9 43,9 44,0 – 45,0 > 45.0 IV. economic characteristics of potato varieties for assessment criteria the potato yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 item tuber yield,%, compared with 45 days after sadīgšan (scored early varieties) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 product yield of tubers,%, compared with 55 days after the sadīgšan of the standards (scored early varieties) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > Total of 135 ,%, compared with the standard very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 product yield of tubers,%, compared with the very low standard < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 starch content,% (weighted average and vēlīnaj varieties) < 10.0 10,0-12.0 12.1-14.1-15.1 15.0 14.0-18.0 17.0 19.1 19.0 18.1 17.1 – – – 20.0 > 20.0 stem stem rot resistance, infection rate,%, the third time the 81-100 records 66-80 51-65 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 stem resistance to early blight, 66-80% 81-100 51-65 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 dry rot , infected tubers,% 61-70 51 70-> 60 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 wet rot infected tubers,% 61-70 51 70-> 60 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 stem rot, infected tubers,% 61-70 51 70-> 60 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 v. fodder beet varieties of economic characteristics evaluation criteria 1. Fodder beet harvest and quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 root yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > dry matter yield, 135% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > Izziedēšan, 135% very large 1.6 – 2,0 2.0 > averaged 1.1-1.5 0.5-1.0 low very low < 0.5 2. Sugar beet harvest and quality score rating after 9 ball scale criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 root yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 sugar content,% 14-15 15-16 above the 18 sugar yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > Izziedēšan, 135% very large > 2.0 1,6-2.0 medium-large 1.1-1.5 0.5-1.0 low very low 0.5 notes. < 1. the criteria taken into account in assessing the suitability of the variety only in organic farming. 2. Assessing the variety, the number of double-a ball. Agricultural Minister l. Rapidity of