Advanced Search

The European Economic Area Financial Instrument And The Norwegian Government In Bilateral Financial Instrument Priorities "health" The Second Solo Project Open Competition Rules

Original Language Title: Eiropas Ekonomikas zonas finanšu instrumenta un Norvēģijas valdības divpusējā finanšu instrumenta prioritātes "Veselība" otrā individuālo projektu atklāta konkursa nolikums

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 43 in Riga in 2008 (January 22. 5. § 29) European economic area financial instrument and the Norwegian Government in bilateral financial instrument priorities "health" the second solo project tender Issued in accordance with the rules of the European economic area financial instrument and the Norwegian Government, the bilateral management of the financial instrument of the law article 18 (3) i. General questions 1. the European economic area financial instrument and the Norwegian Government in bilateral financial instruments (hereinafter – financial instruments) priorities "health" of the individual project (hereinafter draft) submissions open competition (hereinafter referred to as the open competition) regulations that includes also individual projects the application evaluation criteria.
2. the priorities for "health" purpose is public health, promoting healthy lifestyles and promoting disease prevention, improving health care quality, efficiency and accessibility, as well as promoting public awareness of, and involvement in health promotion activities.
3. Prioritize "health" are: 3.1 subpriority mortality and reducing the spread of infectious diseases;
3.2. lifestyle related disease reduction and limitation;
3.3. improving mental health care;
3.4. health authorities technical and vocational ability.
4. the project is financed from the project the applicant (hereinafter referred to as project applicant) and co-financed by means of financial instruments. Total financial instruments available for the co-financing of individual projects in the open competition, is EUR 1 562 298 equivalent in local currency.
5. financial instruments Of individual project co-financing requested shall not be less than EUR 250 000 equivalent in dollars and must not exceed the provisions mentioned in paragraph 4, the overall open competition for the available financial instruments for co-financing.
6. the "health" of priority within the available financial instruments: 6. co-financing does not exceed 60% of the project total eligible costs (except this rule 6.2. and 6.3. cases referred to). If the activity qualifies as State aid under the business support the Control Act, article 5 of the financial instruments for co-financing shall not exceed the relevant aid intensity laid down in a specific type of support;
6.2 does not exceed 85%, if not less than 15% of the project total eligible costs are financed from the State or a local government budget, but financial instruments will cover the rest of the co-financing of the eligible costs of the project. If the activity qualifies as State aid under the business support the Control Act, article 5 of the financial instruments for co-financing shall not exceed the relevant aid intensity laid down in a specific type of support;
6.3. This provision is greater than 6.1 and 6.2. co-financing referred to, but not exceeding 90% of the project total eligible costs of the project, the applicant, which prepared an individual project submissions to support associations, foundations, religious organizations or trade union activity is logged for both the co-financing of financial instruments at the same time. In this case, the applicant shall bear the remaining project cost of the project. If the activity qualifies as State aid under the business support the Control Act, article 5 of the financial instruments for co-financing shall not exceed the relevant aid intensity laid down for a particular type of aid.
7. If in the course of the implementation of the project total eligible costs for the project exceeds the maximum approved amount of the eligible cost, the difference shall be borne by the applicant of the project.
8. the managing authority shall ensure that the submission of the project for the preparation of the necessary legislation in the Republic of Latvia and the financial instrument for the guidelines, rules and procedures for the publication of financial instruments with Latvian homepage on the internet (URwww.eeagrants.lv).
9. the managing authority shall issue an open tender by placing an advert in the newspaper "Gazette", two of the largest amount of the subscription after the Latvian daily newspapers and financial instruments with Latvian homepage on the internet (URwww.eeagrants.lv), as well as the Ministry of health (hereinafter referred to as intermediate) inserts the contest announcement in its homepage on the internet (URwww.vm.gov.lv).
 
 
II. co-financing financial instrument conditions 10. applicant may develop Projects project application and to implement the project on your own or with a partner, or partners. The applicant and the project partner can be direct or in direct administrative authority derived public person as well as in the Republic of Latvia registered legal person. Partner can also be in another European economic area country registered legal person or State or local government authority, or an international organization that works in another European economic area country.
11. A partner in a project can be either a direct partner, which is directly going to the shroud and the financial implementation of the project on the neris, participating in project financing. The applicant and the project partners define the relationship between a written agreement of the parties ' responsibilities in the implementation of the project, the amount of investment and the individual in the course of the implementation of the project and the materials used, the benefits of ownership.
12. In order to qualify for a financial instrument, co-financed the project the applicant complies with the provisions of annex 1 of these requirements and confirm it with the signature (annex 1).
13. If it is found that the project applicant knowingly or recklessly made false statements, the managing authority and the intermediate body shall have the right to suspend the application of the project further upstream.
14. the project activities implemented in Latvia, as well as the European economic area countries, if so you get priority objectives. Activities related to investments in construction, reconstruction of buildings, renovation or restoration work, real estate acquisition and installation of equipment, implemented in Latvia.
15. One project applicant may submit an unlimited number of project submissions, if it justifies that can fulfill this provision 12. the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 and to ensure that a single project activity would not be included in other projects.
16. the project the applicant all the project activities implemented in the framework of the project and all of the payments envisaged up to 30 April 2011.
17. project financial calculations are carried out for the European Union single currency. The project applicant is responsible for the correctness of the financial calculation arithmetic. The costs associated with the development of project submissions are not considered as eligible costs.
 
 
III. Project preparation and submission of the application, the application of the project 18. prepare English, completing the individual project application form (annex 2) electronic version in MS Excel format (available in Latvian financial instrument homepage on the internet (www.eeagrants.lv) and (URwww.eeagrants.org) International website). The project applicant is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information provided and the accuracy.
19. the project applications shall be accompanied by the following documents in English (indicates the project submission form in paragraph 11): 19.1. a detailed project budget (annex 3);
19.2. the project applicant and signed by the partners of the partnership project (annex 4) for each of the partners in the project that is specified in the application form, if the 4.4.2 project partnership;
19.3. the project the applicant signed a co-financing Declaration (annex 5) to the project the applicant institution form;
19.4. the documents which, in addition to the provisions of paragraphs 20 and 21 of these documents and justifies the added project submission form, the information referred to in.
20. the project application, the following documents shall be annexed to the Latvian language: 20.1. brief description of the project (not more than 3200 characters), which contains the individual project goal, main activities and results to be achieved;
20.2. the draft statement by the applicant on the project the applicant institution form;
20.3. the project applicant, certified project requesting a copy of the registration certificate, if the applicant is a national or local education authority, public institution, Association, Foundation, a religious organization, a trade union or a corporation;
20.4. the project applicant, certified project applicant a copy of the statutes of the institution, if the applicant is a public institution, Association, Foundation, a religious organization, a trade union or a corporation;
20.5. not earlier than one month before the date of submission of the application to a project in the State revenue service issued a certificate stating that the applicant does not have tax debt, or the written consent of the project, in which he authorizes IB to receive this certificate, indicating the national internal revenue service regional Department's address, in which the applicant is established in the project as a tax payer;

20.6. not earlier than one month before the date of submission of the application to a project in the business register issued a statement indicating the persons with the right to be represented by the applicant, the project or the project applicant is issued a token (or its certified copy) to the person who has signed the project application form or any other documents attached to it and that is not a registered right to represent the project applicant, if the applicant is Association, Foundation or Corporation;
20.7. not earlier than one month before the date of submission of the draft issued on religious affairs board certified, indicating the person with signature rights, if the applicant is a religious organization. If the applicant does not add this statement, the IB shall be entitled to require the religious affairs administration;
12.9. the institution or person the certificate of approval of the project qualify for credit or other financial resources (if such is provided to attract), the certificate shall state the funding to be allocated to the applicant together with the project's features cover the first year of implementation of the project planned spending. If the credit or other financial resources shall be provided by the institution or person who is not a credit institution, State or local government, or a State or local government authority, in addition to such bodies or persons shall submit the annual accounts for the preceding year or any other document attesting to the availability of funds in the amount specified in the certificate;
20.9. local participation in project decision, stating the total cost of the project (including the municipal investment projects) and pre-financing of an amount to the applicant together with the project's features cover the first year of implementation of the project planned project costs, if the applicant is a municipality;
20.10. the project applicant applicant's certified project annual report for 2006 and 2007 operational copy of the balance sheet or, if not, report for the period of the project the applicant institution's founding date, if the applicant is an association, Foundation, a religious organization, a trade union or a corporation;
20.11. the project management involved in life (CV) and the work task and the required qualifications;
20.12. the project applicant, certified by one of the following ownership or rent copies of supporting documents, if the applicant owned, leased or owned property intended for delivery, installation, construction, reconstruction, renovation or restoration work: 20.12.1. Land Registry Department issued a copy of the shore (land registry certificate) for the land on which the construction of, or intended for buildings for reconstruction, renovation or restoration work;
20.12.2. long-term land or a building lease, which secured the land for a period starting from the beginning of the implementation of the project to completion, and the subsequent 10 years, if the applicant is a society, Foundation, a religious organization, a trade union or a corporation;
20.12.3. long-term land or a building lease, which secured the land for the time from the initiation of the implementation of the project to completion, and the subsequent three years, and a proof of the applicant of the project that the property will remain in use by the applicant of the project at least 10 years after the completion of the project, if the project applicant is a State or municipal authority.
21. If the project partnership, the project applicant for each of the partners in the project that is specified in the application form, the project of 4.4.2. the application shall be accompanied by the following documents: 21.1. Latvian language if the project involves a partnership with the Republic of Latvia registered partner, or partners, established or operating in the territory of the Republic of Latvia: 21.1.1. partners, certified partners for a copy of the certificate of registration, if the partner is a State or municipal authority as a scientific authority of the State, society, Foundation, a religious organization, a trade union or a corporation;
21.1.2. not earlier than one month before the date of submission of the draft of the State revenue service issued a certificate attesting that the partner is not a tax debt, or the written consent of the partners, in which he authorizes IB to receive the said certified statement specifying the national internal revenue service regional authorities the Department address where the partner is registered as a taxable person if it participates in the financing of individual projects;
21.1.3. the cooperation partner certified partner's annual report for 2006 and 2007 operational copy of the balance sheet or, if not, report for the period from the founding partners, if the partner is a society, Foundation, a religious organization, a trade union or a corporation, and it participates in the financing of the project;
21.1.4. certified partners of one of such ownership or rent copies of supporting documents, if the cooperation partner property, rental or owned property intended for delivery, installation, construction, reconstruction, renovation or restoration work: 21.1.4.1. of land registry departments issued a copy of the shore (land registry certificate) for the land on which the construction of, or intended for buildings for reconstruction, renovation or restoration work;
21.1.4.2. long-term land or a building lease, which secured the land for the time from the initiation of the implementation of the project to completion, and the subsequent 10 years, if the partner is a society, Foundation, a religious organization, a trade union or a corporation;
21.1.4.3. or building long-term land lease, which secured the land for the time from the initiation of the implementation of the project to completion, and the subsequent three years, and a proof of the partners that the property will remain cooperation partners use at least the next 10 years after completion of the project implementation, if the cooperation partner is a State or municipal authority;
21.2. the following documents, together with a certified translation partner of Latvian or English if the project involves partnerships with partners who are registered or work in another European economic area country: 21.2.1. partner's registration certificate or its equivalent copy except if the partner is a State or municipal authority;
21.2.2. not earlier than one month before the date of submission of the draft issued by the competent institution a certificate attesting that the partner is not a tax debt, if the partner participates in the financing of the project. Where national legislation following the issuance of the certificate does not provide the partners submitted a declaration that it has no tax arrears;
21.2.3. not earlier than one month before the date of submission of the application for the project issued by the national competent authorities certificate, which certifies that the partner has not been declared incapable of maksātn (including not in the process of reorganisation and not being wound up) if the partner participates in the financing of the project. Where national legislation following the issuance of the certificate does not provide the partners submitted a statement that it has not been declared insolvent (including not in the process of reorganisation and winding-up proceedings is located).
22. These rules 20 and 21. documents referred to the project submission form not refers in paragraph 11.
23. the project application is added to the table of contents that lists all attachments, attachment number and page number in each Annex.
24. submission of project documents are arranged in the following order: 24.1. project application form;
24.2. the project table of contents of the application;
24.3. the project application attachments: 24.3.1. This provision of the documents referred to in point 19 in the order listed;
24.3.2. This provision of the documents referred to in paragraph 20 in the order listed;
24.3.3. paragraph 21 of these provisions of the acts referred to in the order specified for each cooperation partner.
25. the project is added to the original submission of the project application form (annex 2) and 19 of these rules and in paragraph 20.1. document referred to in the electronic version of the CD (CD), which indicate the following information in Latvian and in English: 25.1. priority "health";
25.2. the full name of the applicant in the project;
25.3. the name of the project.
26. The provisions referred to in paragraph 25 of document electronic version of the filename indicates the number and name of the annex in English or its abbreviation.
27. the project application submitted in triplicate: original and two copies, to the project submission form indicating the "original" and "copy", in one or more sealed and stamped envelopes or boxes. If the envelopes or boxes, it is more sanumur. Each project application copies (original and copies) is designed according to the registry of the Republic of Latvia law requirements, pages are numbered, it is cauršūt (caurauklot), stamped and signed, the signature is decrypted, and also indicated the page number and date of caurauklošan.

28. By submitting the application, the project on the envelope or box specifies the following information: 28.1. distribution – the Ministry of health, Brivibas 72, Riga, LV-1011;
28.2. the priority to "health";
28.3. the full project name and address of the applicant;
28.4. the name of the project;
28.5. "not to be opened before the start of the assessment".
29. the tender shall be three months from the date of the invitation to tender for the public. Project applications shall be submitted no earlier than 30 days after the notification of open competition. Tender announcement shall specify the period for the submission of the project application.
30. the project applicant or his authorized representative shall submit the application to the IB project in person or sent by post to the IB.
31. the intermediate body shall examine project submissions that are received or passed between niekinstitūcij postal authority to tender the period referred to in (postmark).
32. By fax or electronically received project submissions do not consider and project the applicant shall be informed thereof in writing. If the application is received after the time limit laid down in the invitation to tender, it does not open, and intermediate project, the applicant shall be informed in writing of the time and place when project submissions do not look can get back.
33. questions on the application of the project preparation and sends its public tender to a e-mail address (vm@vm.gov.lv) or by mail.
34. If intermediate not later than 15 working days before the public tender announcement deadline specified in receive interested parties written a letter asking for the preparation and submission of the project open tender intermediate within five working days after receipt of the letter, prepare a written response and sends it to the person concerned by electronic means or by mail to the specified address. If the question is received electronically, the intermediate answer the interested party shall be made by electronic means.
35. in order to reply to the questions should be available to all interested parties, the IB publishes homepage on the internet (URwww.vm.gov.lv), without issue.
 
 
IV. evaluation of the application and Draft decision 36. Intermediate open competition in the development project for the evaluation of the application of the Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission) rules. Charter establishes the Evaluation Commission and operational procedures.
37. project submissions are evaluated in two stages: 37.1. project submissions and evaluation according to open administrative evaluation criteria (annex 6);
37.2. the project submission and evaluation of the quality evaluation criteria (annex 7) and the specific evaluation criteria (annex 8).
38. the Intermediate registers the project applications and grants them identification numbers. Intermediate project provides application testing administrative evaluation criteria. The purpose of the administrative assessment is to verify that the project submission complies with the requirements and has quality and directional-specific evaluation criteria.
39. Where the application does not comply with the administrative evaluation criteria for its evaluation of administrative writing requires the applicant to clarify the draft project submissions or submit additional information by sending a request by post and on both the project specified in the applicant's fax number.
40. Where the applicant within five working days after you send the request submitted intermediate required more information in person or sent by mail (postmark), the individual project submissions under the administrative evaluation criteria assessed.
41. If after evaluation of the application of the administrative project does not meet at least one criterion of the administrative assessment or where the applicant within five working days after you send the request of IB need not submit the additional information, the IB shall take a decision on the application of the non-compliance of the draft administrative evaluation criteria and its rejection. Intermediate 10 working days, inform the applicant of the draft decisions, including relevant administrative evaluation criteria or criteria not met.
42. If the application fulfils the administrative evaluation criteria, the IB shall take a decision on the conformity of the application of the draft administrative evaluation criteria and guidance for further evaluation and 10 working days, inform the applicant of the project.
43. project submissions that meet the administrative evaluation criteria for its evaluation, supports the quality evaluation criteria and the specific evaluation criteria.
44. the overall assessment of the project quality assessment criteria is 65 percent share of the specific evaluation criteria and the percentage is 35 percent. The total number of points earned for the project is calculated using the following formula: KK SKI – – – – – – – – x + 65 x 100 100-35, where the CCI assessment criteria of the quality overall rating;
SKI-specific evaluation criteria overall rating.
45. evaluation the Commission arranged by specific criteria of quality and prized project applications in order of priority according to the process of evaluating the resulting assessment, prepare a draft list of the application and submit it to the intermediate.
46. further progress in the application of the project and the adoption of the decision on the refusal to send the project application to the Office or the financial instruments a financial instrument, it was sent to the Office, to the European economic area, the Committee of the financial instrument or the Norwegian Foreign Ministry adopted a final decision on the approval or rejection of a project conducted in accordance with the financial instruments in the Republic of Latvia regulating the statutory procedures.
 
Prime Minister i. Godmanis Health Minister i. Morris Editorial Note: rules shall enter into force on 16 February 2008.
 
1. the annex to Cabinet of 22 January 2008 of Regulation No 43 of the individual project, the applicant's receipt of the Health Minister i. Morris presented the Ministry of health adopted annex 2 Cabinet of 22 January 2008 in Regulation No 43 of the Draft application form Health Minister i. Morris submitted to the Ministry of health adopted annex 3 Cabinet of 22 January 2008, regulations No 43 detailed budget Health Minister i. Morris submitted to the Ministry of health adopted in annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 22 January 2008 in Regulation No 43 of the partnership Health Minister I. The Ministry of health submitted to the Morris version of annex 5 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 22 January 2008 the Regulation No 43 of the co-financing statement Health Minister i. Morris annex 6 Cabinet-January 22, 2008. Regulations No 43 administrative evaluation criteria no PO box
Criteria Yes No 1.
1.1 individual APPLICATION design.
Filed in application, individual project original and two copies of 1.2.
Individual project submissions is added in point 19 of these rules the following documents in English, they are mentioned in the submission form, and in paragraph 11 the names match the project submission form in paragraph 11 of the specified names 1.3.
Individual project submissions has been added to the rules laid down in paragraph 20 of the annex, as well as set out in paragraph 21 of the document, if the individual project partnership, and they are presented according to these regulations, paragraph 20 and 21 with the requirements set out in 1.4.
Individual project submission copy matches the original individual project submissions, and compliance is certified with the signature of the responsible officer a copy of 1.5.
Filed in individual project submissions in electronic form CD (CD), and it is according to this rule 25 and 26 the requirements set out in paragraph 1.6.
Individual project electronic version has individual project submission form, form the annex referred to in paragraph 11 in English and a brief description of the individual projects Latvian Edition 1.7.
Individual project submission form electronic version is MS Excel format 1.8.
Individual project submission form and the attached annex in electronic version matches the original 1.9.
Individual project submission form all fields are filled into English according to paragraph 18 of these regulations to the requirements of individual project submissions 1.10 original and copies together with the call for proposals referred to in the annexes is cauršūt (caurauklot) 1.11.
The individual financial statements of the project has been carried out in the European Union's single currency 1.12.
No individual project budget arithmetic errors and individual project submission form 4.2 and 5 under is not a field that was stained red to 1.13.
Detailed individual project budget is submitted to detailed budget form and reconciled with individual project submissions 2. Individual project eligibility 2.1.

Individual project application form as a main priority in the sector is marked "health and child care" ("Health and childcare") 2.2.
From the financial instruments required co-financing of at least EUR 250 000 2.3.
From the financial instruments required co-financing does not exceed EUR 1 562 298 2.4.
Of financial instruments for co-financing shall not exceed the requested this provision set out in point 6 the proportion of individual project eligible costs 2.5.
From the financial instruments required an advance of up to 10% of the individual project total cost of 2.6.
Individual project management costs are planned up to 10% of the individual project total cost 2.7.
Individual project activities planned to implement in Latvia, as well as the European economic area countries 2.8.
Individual project activities associated with investments in the construction, reconstruction, renovation of buildings or works of restoration, real estate acquisition and installation, planned to implement in Latvia 2.9.
It is envisaged that the implementation of the individual projects will be completed and payments are made to the 2011 30 April 3.
Individual Project applicant 3.1.
Individual project applicant is a direct or in direct authority, other State authority derived public person as well as in the Republic of Latvia registered legal person 3.2.
The applicant is not an individual project's tax debt of 3.3.
Individual project submissions and submission of individual draft declaration is signed by the individual requesting the project responsible person 4.
The cooperation partner (completed for each cooperation partner) 4.1.
Partner is direct or in direct authority, other State authority derived public person as well as in the Republic of Latvia registered legal person or a European economic area country registered legal person, or a State or local government authority, or an international organisation, operating in the European economic area country 4.2.
Partner is not a tax debt (to be completed only for partners that participate in the financing of individual projects) 4.3.
Partner has not been declared insolvent, including not in rehabilitation process and is not in liquidation (completed only about 21.2. these provisions referred to partners who participate in the financing of individual projects) Health Minister i. Morris annex 7 Cabinet of 22 January 2008 in Regulation No 43 of the quality evaluation criteria form BC
Criteria for assessment under the assessment's contribution (%)
1. compliance with the individual projects 1.1.
Individual project is focused on the application of the provisions laid down in paragraph 2, the objective 1 5 30 1.2.
Individual project submission complies with these rules laid down in paragraph 3 for 1-5 subpriority 1.3.
Individual project submissions will comply with national, regional and local strategic planning documents 1-5 2.
Individual project justification 1.3.
Individual project is defined and justified in the application problem and the chosen target group needs 1-5 20 2.2.
Individual project submissions shows that reaching a goal, the problem will be solved and the needs of the target audience will be satisfied within 1-5 2.3.
Individual project activities are clearly defined, proportionate with the planned implementation timetable and ensure high-quality results 1-5 of 2.4.
Individual application of the project takes account of the possible risk of the individual project and prerequisites 1-5 2.5.
Individual project submissions are clearly shown on a reciprocal linking between the individual project identified problem, defined objectives and planned activities 1-5 2.6.
Expected results and indicators are clearly defined and measurable 1-5 2.7.
The results of the individual projects is the multiplikatīv effect (on individual project results and possibilities of use of the results of the planned to inform the other institutions and the target group) 1 5 2.8.
The results of the individual projects are sustainable (individual project implementer has the necessary structures and personālresurs, as well as financial resources, to continue to provide support to a selected target group after the conclusion of individual projects) 1 5 3.
Individual project implementation resources 3.1.
Individual project submissions is reflected in the individual project implementation mechanisms (including available and the required material and technical base), as well as preparation for the implementation of the individual project level 1 5 20 3.2.
Individual project in the application reflect the specific knowledge and experience in the matters to be addressed individual projects or similar type of activity management 1-5 3.3.
Individual project submissions are clearly specified, as the individual will be monitoring the implementation of the project in 1-5 3.4.
Individual project planned publicity and information dissemination activities are sufficient and proper 1-5 4.
Individual project budgets, cost justification and effectiveness 4.1.
Individual project expenditure entered in the budget are reasonable and appropriate market prices 1 5 30 4.2.
Leverage utility (value for money) objective 1 5 4.3.
The individual items of the eligible cost of the project comply with the European Free Trade Association countries established financial instruments developed by the Office and to the European economic area and of the Committee of the financial instrument of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway on the implementation of approved eligible costs laid down by the guidelines requirements 1-5 notes.
1. for each individual project evaluation item allocate a certain number of points from 1 to 5 according to the following ratings: 1 – very weak (the criteria is not running), 2-poor (criterion is not described, the criterion is met in an indirect way), 3-mediocre (includes a description of the implementation of the criteria, but the criteria are not fully met), 4 to the right (the criterion is met directly, but does not include problems), 5 criterion very well (is executed directly and it is described in detail).
2. the total of the individual projects score is calculated as follows: no PO box
Criterion the maximum score in the rating Section of the estimate of the proportion (%)
Overall rating: (A) (C) (D) = B x A B C D 1.
The individual project's compliance with 15 30 2.
Individual project justification 40 20 3.
Individual project implementation resources 20 20 4.
Individual project budgets, cost justification and effectiveness 15 30 total 100 Health Minister Morris i. Annex 8 Cabinet January 22, 2008. Regulations no specific evaluation criteria 43 form BC
Criterion the maximum score in the rating Section of the estimate of the proportion (%)
Overall rating: (A) (C) (D) = B x A B C D 1.
Individual project submissions and compliance with the horizontal priorities: sustainable development (environmental, economic and social), gender equality and good governance practice 5 10 2.
The project contributes to the individual: 5 40 2.1.
the State-funded health service quality, efficiency and accessibility improvements (applied and evaluated these rules referred to in point 3.4 subpriority) 2.2.
public health (for example, and evaluate this rule 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of the referred subpriority) 3.
Individual project contribution to raising public awareness on the topic 5 10 4.
Individual project promotes the complex approach to problem solving in the audience, including the various health sector institutions and professional cooperation at local, regional, national and/or international level 5 20 5.
Individual project promotes healthcare workers and health professionals to the improvement of qualification in European Union and European economic area countries experience 5 10 6.
Individual project novelty 5 10 total 100 note.
Each individual project evaluation criteria to allocate a certain number of points from 0 to 5 in accordance with the following ratings: 0-not applicable, 1 – very weak (a criterion is not described, the criterion is met in an indirect way), 2-poor (includes a description of the implementation of the criteria, but the criteria is fulfilled in an indirect way), 3-mediocre (includes a description of the implementation of the criteria, but the criteria are not fully met), 4 to the right (the criterion is met directly but does not include problems), 5 – very good (the criterion is met directly, and it is described in detail).
Health Minister Morris I.