Amendments To The Cabinet Of Ministers Of 26 June 2007 No. 419 The Provisions Of "the Order In Which The European Union's Structural And Cohesion Funds In The Participating Institutions Provide The Planning Document Preparation And Implementation Of Th...

Original Language Title: Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2007.gada 26.jūnija noteikumos Nr.419 "Kārtība, kādā Eiropas Savienības struktūrfondu un Kohēzijas fonda vadībā iesaistītās institūcijas nodrošina plānošanas dokumentu sagatavošanu un šo fondu ieviešanu"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now

Read the untranslated law here: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/175674

Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 332, Riga, 13 May 2008 (pr. No 30 27) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 26 June 2007 No. 419 "the terms of the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds" issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 7, article 14, first subparagraph, and article 18, paragraph 1, to make the Cabinet of 26 June 2007 No. 419 the provisions "order in which European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds "(Latvian journal, 2007, 104 no) the following amendments: 1. Replace the words in paragraph 2.2.3." housing agency "with the words" building, energy and housing State Agency ". 2. Make paragraph 5 by the following: "5. the European Union will fund the project (except for large projects) the costs incurred can be considered eligible, after the entry into force of the procedure for implementing the action programmes referred to in the appendix to activity (hereinafter referred to as the procedures for the exercise of the activity). The procedures for the exercise of the activity determines the European Union fund project in the application information to be provided in accordance with these rules 1, 2 and 3 of the annex. The procedures for the exercise of the activity before the entry into force, but not earlier than the 2006 24 October for eligible costs can be considered to be associated with the Foundation of the European Union project supporting the application and preparation of documentation for submission to the responsible body or institution, to be able to take a decision on the application of the project approval, if such costs shall comply with the procedures for the exercise of the activity requirements, as well as a large project costs If they comply with the procedures for the exercise of the activity requirements. " 3. Supplement to chapter I, paragraph 5.1 by the following: "the responsible authority 5.1 or the liaison body, examining the relevance of administrative costs, in addition to the request from the beneficiary information and make sure the appropriate method to meet the Council of 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund (hereinafter referred to as Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006), the requirements of article 52 or the Council, July 5, 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999 Article 11 paragraph 3 of point "b" requirements for the administrative expenses ratio calculating. " 4. Make paragraph 9 by the following: "9. the managing authority, in cooperation with the Foundation of the European Union in the management of the institutions involved in the development and approval of the Cabinet of Ministers action programme complements, but the responsible authority – action programme complements amendments." 5. Delete paragraph 10. 6. Replace paragraph 30, the words "big project" with the words "European Union fund project". 7. To supplement the provisions of Chapter VIII, as follows: "VIII. Project cost effectiveness 42. If the legislation the maximum amount of public funding of projects exceeding five million euros, for the implementation of the activity, taking into account the specificities of the sector of the economy and expected the project complexity and the extent of the financial activity, shall include at least one project submission evaluation criteria, which is the ability to assess the cost effectiveness of the project. 43. If the procedures for the exercise of the activity in the project, the maximum amount of public funding exceeds five million euros, the European Union funds the project applicant, drawing up the European regional development fund and the cohesion fund the infrastructure project, the application performs the evaluation of the effectiveness of the project costs, calculating the cost per unit of the benefit, if the procedures for the exercise of the activity is not otherwise specified. 44. financial analysis of 2006 of the Council July 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (hereinafter referred to as Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006), laid down in article 55 projects, generating revenue and that the total cost is greater than 200 000 euros. 45. the European Union co-financing by the Fund for the project, from which derive revenue, calculated by the method of financing the deficit, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, article 55 (2), if the procedures for the exercise of the activity is not otherwise specified. 46. the procedures for the exercise of the activity in determining the requirements and instructions of project cost analysis of the effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis, use these rules laid down in annex 5 macro-economic assumptions and projections. " 8. Annex 1:8.1 Supplement 1.4. point table with the following lines: "..
I-28 Municipalities.

. .
.
I-29 in the planning region.

. .
.
I-30 General partnership.

. .
.
I-31 limited partnership.

. .
.
I-32 derived public person (except for the municipalities and regions in planning).

. .
.
I-33 derived public person established a public agency "


8.2. Add to subparagraph 7.1. table with a note (below the table) as follows: "Note. State budget allocations to local authorities in the amount calculated in accordance with the legislation on the State budget grant award procedures local authorities the European Union structural funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of projects co-financed, if the procedures for the exercise of the activity is not otherwise specified. "; 8.3. section 8:8.3.1. replace the words "• this project is not being funded and has been co-financed from other/European Union financial sources as well as State and local budget resources" with the words "project is not and has not been financed or co-financed from other Union financial sources as well as State and local budgets, and the project planned activities do not overlap with activities financed from other funds of the European Union activities and of other financial instruments"; 8.3.2. to replace the words ' declare that the false information given on the proof of the necessary administrative and financial penalties may be started against both me, and also to the above legal entities-project applicant. "with the words" aware that the false information given on the proof of the necessary administrative and financial penalties may be started against me, and against the said legal person – the project. " 9. Annex 2:9.1. Add to subparagraph 1.1.6. a table with the following lines: "..
I-28 Municipalities.

. .
.
I-29 in the planning region.

. .
.
I-30 General partnership.

. .
.
I-31 limited partnership.

. .
.
I-32 derived public person (except for the municipalities and regions in planning).

. .
.
I-33 derived public person established a public agency "9.2 7.3 shall be expressed by the following:" 7.3. cost efficiency analysis key findings (if applicable) ([number]):. "

9.3. section 8:9.3.1. to replace the words "• this project is not being funded and has been co-financed from other/European Union financial sources as well as State and local budget resources" with the words "project is not and has not been financed or co-financed from other Union financial sources as well as State and local budgets, and the project planned activities do not overlap with activities financed from other funds of the European Union activities and of other financial instruments"; 9.3.2. to replace the words ' declare that the false information given on the proof of the necessary administrative and financial penalties may be started against both me, and also to the above legal entities-project applicant. "with the words" aware that the false information given on the proof of the necessary administrative and financial penalties may be started against me, and against the said legal person – the project applicant. "; 9.4. Replace annex 2, "financial plan" in the column "eligible costs" of Public figures and signs "4 = 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + 13" with numbers and signs "4 = 6 + 8 + 10 + 12 + 14"; 9.5. Replace annex 2, "financial plan", the words "such as capital funds or the European investment bank funding" with the word "notes". 1. For example, the national capital fund or the European investment bank funding. 2. national budget allocations to local authorities in the amount calculated in accordance with the legislation on the State budget grant award procedures local authorities the European Union structural funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of projects co-financed, if the procedures for the exercise of the activity is not otherwise specified. " 10. Annex 3:10.1. Add to subparagraph 1.1.6. a table with the following lines: "..
I-28 Municipalities.

. .
.
I-29 in the planning region.

. .
.
I-30 General partnership.

. .
.
I-31 limited partnership.

. .
.
I-32 derived public person (except for the municipalities and regions in planning).

. .
.
I-33 derived public person established a public agency "10.2. make 7.3. subparagraph by the following:" 7.3. Cost-effectiveness analysis or cost-benefit analysis key findings (if applicable) ([number]):.


7.3.1. Main elements and parameters used for financial analysis (projects, generating revenue, according to the Commission, on 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 Annex XXI. 1.2. under the specified table); 7.3.2. Main results of the financial analysis (projects, generating revenue, according to the Commission, on 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 Annex XXI. table specified in section 1.3). "; 10.3. section 8: replace the words "10.3.1. • this project is not being funded and has been co-financed from other/European Union financial sources as well as State and local budget resources" with the words "project is not and has not been financed or co-financed from other Union financial sources as well as State and local budgets, and the project planned activities do not overlap with activities financed from other funds of the European Union activities and of other financial instruments within ''; 10.3.2. to replace the words ' declare that the false information given on the proof of the necessary administrative and financial penalties may be started against both me, and also to the above legal entities-project applicant. "with the words" aware that the false information given on the proof of the necessary administrative and financial penalties may be started against me, and against the said legal person – the project applicant. "; 10.4. Replace annex 2, "financial plan" in the column "eligible costs" of Public figures and signs "4 = 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + 13" with numbers and signs "4 = 6 + 8 + 10 + 12 + 14"; 10.5. Replace annex 2, "financial plan", the words "such as capital funds or the European investment bank funding" with the word "notes". 1. For example, the national capital fund or the European investment bank funding. 2. national budget allocations to local authorities in the amount calculated in accordance with the legislation on the State budget grant award procedures local authorities the European Union structural funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of projects co-financed, if the procedures for the exercise of the activity is not otherwise specified. " 11. To supplement the provisions of annex 5 with the following: "5. the annex to Cabinet of Ministers of 26 June 2007, regulations no 419 Macroeconomic assumptions and projections in Latvia, cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of European Union funds projects 1. Macro-economic assumptions and projections of changes in the price index 1.1. A cost-benefit analysis uses the following macroeconomic assumptions price index changes (by year):.
average 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007-2013 2014-2033 average consumer price inflation (percentage) 12.5 7.2 4.9 3.8 2.5 2.5 6.2 2.5 gross domestic product deflator (percent) total 11.7 8.1 6.0 4.5 3.9 3.2 7.1 2.5 fixed capital formation deflator (percent) 9.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.5 7.4 2.5 1.2. Consumer price index reflects the change in the consumer price basket of products and services contained in the price dynamics. Consumer price inflation is suitable for personal income and private consumption index. Consumer price index inflation is suitable for projects where a large proportion of the cost of wages. Cost-benefit analysis on the use mikrolīmen calculations for pay. 1.3. The gross domestic product deflator reflects average price changes in all sectors of the economy together. This indicator is often used for other macro-economic indicators index and in many cases the calculations you can choose consumer price inflation rates or gross domestic product deflator. The gross domestic product deflator is suitable for mixed cost projects in different sectors, as well as it has the proper pointer to the expected discounted financial flows out of business. Cost-benefit analysis on the use mikrolīmen calculations for services. 1.4. total fixed capital formation deflator reflects the country the incidence of capital investment. This rate is applied to the indexing of investment projects. The total fixed capital formation deflator is suitable for projects where a large proportion of the cost of investment in fixed capital investments (construction and the creation of the means of production). Cost-benefit analysis on the use mikrolīmen calculations for fixed capital formation (construction and capital goods). 2. Macroeconomic forecasts, gross domestic product and employment costs-benefit analysis makes use of the following medium-term and long-term macroeconomic forecasts (by year): 2009-2013 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-2014-2033 of … ….
the average increase in the average increase in GDP growth, comparable prices (percentage) 7.5 7.0 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.0 6.6 2.7 GDP growth per capita in comparable prices (percentage) growth of employment 8.1 7.6 7.4 7.3 7.1 6.6 7.2 3.2 (percentage) 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 – 0.8 wage growth, comparable prices (percentage) 4.9 6.1 6.7 6.9 6.4 5.9 6.4 3.6 3. Discount rates 3.1. If the calculations do not apply inflation, cost-benefit analysis makes use of the following real discount rates: real social discount rate 5.5% in real financial discount rate 5% 3.2. If the calculation is applied to the inflation, the cost-benefit analysis using nominal discount rates. "
Prime Minister i. Godmanis Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok