The Provisions On "operational Programme Human Resources And Employment ' Addition Activity" Public Administration Planning And Management Of Human Resources Information Technology System Development And Implementation "

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas “Cilvēkresursi un nodarbinātība” papildinājuma aktivitāti “Publiskās pārvaldes cilvēkresursu plānošanas un vadības informācijas tehnoloģiju sistēmas izstrāde un ieviešana”

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now

Read the untranslated law here: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/175879

Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 347 in Riga, 19 May 2008 (pr. 5. § 31) the provisions on "operational programme human resources and employment ' addition activity" public administration human resources planning and management system development "Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme" human resources and employment ' priorities 1.5 of Appendix "administrative capacity" UR1.5.2.pas "based on human resources capacity building" 1.5.2.1. activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development" (hereinafter activity);
1.2. the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination.
2. The purpose of the activity is to ensure the implementation of the national approach competences administration human resources management processes, as well as the planning and management of human resources information technology system development and deployment.
3. activities at the national regulatory authorities and other government-funded bodies.
4. the purpose of the activity reaches, in implementing this provision, paragraph 20, and following these rules referred to in paragraph 46.1.7. surveillance indicators.
5. Activity implemented limited project application selection.
6. activities in the period of the limited application of the selection of projects takes not more than two periods, subject to this provision in paragraph 29 above.
7. Activities implemented from the date of entry into force of the provisions to 30 June 2015.
II. The responsible authority and the liaison body 8. activities relating to the implementation of the responsible authorities implement the obligations and rights of the State Chancellery of the structural funds of the European Union Department (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority).
9. activities relating to the implementation of the cooperation obligations and rights of the Authority implementing the society integration Fund secretariat (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body).
10. Cooperation authority has functional authority.
11. activities within the responsible authority: 11.1. participating in the agreement on the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement) project;
11.2. in monitoring the implementation of the activity, ensure that these rules are not exceeded, paragraph 15 of the activities available for the implementation of the European Social Fund financing, and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle of activity level, the implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 93. Article 1 and referred to in paragraph 2;
11.3. gives proposals to the managing authority and the provisions of the measures referred to in paragraph 70 of the "human capacity building" to the Monitoring Committee for the implementation of development activities;
11.4. use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system for monitoring the implementation of the activity;
11.5. the cooperation requested from the institutions and the European Social Fund, the beneficiary (hereinafter called beneficiaries) information necessary for the monitoring and control.
12. activities within liaison body: 12.1. send a limited range of applicant projects call for project applications (hereinafter referred to as the notice);
12.2. a limited application of the selection of projects project application Evaluation Commission;
12.3. the project development application assessment methodology and application form filling project methodology;
12.4. provide information to the project applicant project application preparation;
12.5. assess the project submissions and acceptance of the Board's decision on the application of the project approval, approval with conditions or disapproval;
12.6. the accumulated data for project submissions and projects in the legislation of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and the use of the prescribed order;
12.7. the development agreement and the conclusion of agreements with project funding recipients, as well as provide information about the recipient of the funding arrangement;
12.8. the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
12.9. gives budgeting laws regulating certain information in the national budget funds for the preparation of the request;
12.10. ensure project implementation monitoring and control, including checks at the place of implementation of projects and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle on the project level, implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 above;
12.11. check the progress reports submitted by the beneficiaries and payment requests, approve the amount of the eligible expenditure, prepare payment orders and submit them to the payment authority, prepare expense claims and send them for verification to the managing authority;
12.12. the amendments to the project;
12.13. the preparation of the information to the authority responsible for the implementation of activities under the European Social Fund available funding;
12.14. provide information to the public and provide publicity for the project implementation.
III. conditions for the provision of aid 13. Project applicants can have a direct administrative authority responsible for the administration of human resources policy, planning and implementation.
14. the implementation of the project may involve cooperation partners – direct administration and administrations directly.
15. the project is financed from the European Social Fund and the State budget. Activities within the European Social Fund financing is 85 percent of the total eligible costs of the project amount, but 15 percent of the national budget funding. The total funding available in activity 6 174 333 lats, including European Social Fund funding 5 248 183 lats, and the State budget financing 926 150 lats.
16. activities within the available amount of the combination of European regional development funding areas as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, article 34 (2) and the following limitations constitute 54 660 pounds or one percent of the activities planned for the implementation of the European Social Fund financing.
17. The minimum total eligible cost amount per project in this activity are 900 000 lats. The maximum total amount of the eligible cost per project in this activity is 5 500 000 lats. Holders each project does not exceed one percent of the total eligible costs.
18. The implementation of the project will not exceed this provision the term referred to in paragraph 7.
19. activities financed under projects that provide for the introduction of a national approach competences administration human resources management processes, as well as the planning and management of human resources information technology system development and deployment.
20. The project supported the following: 20.1. project administration;
20.2. training;
20.3. the public administration human resources development plan, competencies model, recommendations and methodological materials;
20.4. designing of a database;
20.5. the database maintenance;
20.6. database user support measures;
20.7. the exchange of experiences;
12.9. studies on aspects of human resources management;
20.9. seminars and conferences;
20.10. information and publicity.
21. One project activity within the applicant can submit more than one project submission does not exceed this rules 15, 16 and 17 of these constraints.
22. application of the project eligible costs are distributed under five headings: costs 22.1. project administration costs, an amount not exceeding five percent of 22.2. these provisions, 22.3 and 22.5 in. down the cost totals. Project Administration arrange the company or service contract;
22.2. the logistical means and equipment costs. They may be subject to inventory the cost of implementation of specific activities of the project, if the unit does not exceed 150 lats and its lifetime is less than a year;
22.3. other eligible costs: 22.3.1. consultants, experts and specialists ' fees;
22.3.2. State social security payments and other social guarantees, which is compulsory in accordance with external laws and regulations;
22.3.3. in development of requirements specification;
22.3.4. measures in support of users (manual, training);
22.3.5. costs associated with the study of human resources management;
22.3.6. seminars, conferences and the Organization and implementation of training-related costs;

22.3.7. transport costs – fuel, rental, purchase, the service, the use of public transport;
22.3.8. mission expenses in Latvia and abroad in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations;
22.3.9. space, material and technical resources and equipment rental costs;
22.3.10. space, materials, technical and equipment maintenance costs;
22.3.11. information and publicity costs according to the regulations governing the structural funds of the European Union;
22.3.12. with the implementation of project activities of the associated costs;
22.4. contingencies, an amount not exceeding five percent of 22.2. these provisions, 22.3 and 22.5. the costs referred to in point totals. They use this rule 22.2 and 22.3.. the costs referred to in point;
22.5. holders (amounting to a maximum of 16 of these rules and restrictions referred to in paragraph 17) software development and the acquisition of licenses.
23. The value added tax payments to the projects you can plan as eligible costs, if the beneficiary of the value added tax amount not recoverable as input tax in accordance with the laws governing.
24. in addition to the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999 of the second subparagraph of article 11 conditions of ineligible costs the following: 24.1. all types of bonuses, material incentives after annual evaluation and prize money;
24.2. the leave benefits to employees;
24.3. the allowance to the employee's family member or dependent death (employees);
24.4. other material incentives that pay is defined regulatory laws;
15.2. the health, life and accident insurance;
24.6. the costs associated with the development of project submissions.
25. the application provided for in the project eligible costs must be actual, reasonable, appropriate to the specificities of the project, the objective and the provisions of paragraph 22 and 23. The use of a permitted combination of human resources planning and management information technology instrument development.
26. in the course of project implementation costs considered eligible, if: 26.1. incurred in the period determined in agreement with the beneficiary;
26.2. the project required, designed for in the approved project submission and made a subject of appropriate financial management – economy and efficiency – principles;
26.3. made and listed the beneficiaries or partners of accounting records and separated from the rest of costs;
16.4. can identify and check and if they certify the supporting documents for the payment of the original.
IV. the application of the project 27. Cooperation authority, after consulting the authority, on the basis of this provision, paragraph 13, of the provisions of the invitation sent to the project applicant.
28. The invitation shall: 28.1. project application submission deadline;
28.2. the activity of the financing available;
28.3. the application of the project;
28.4. the address of the Web site that contains the following information: 28.4.1. the project to the application procedure for sending it by mail, in person or submit an electronic document;
28.4.2. project preparation of application materials to be used (these provisions and consumables project submission form to fill out).
29. the limited application of the second selection authority shall organise cooperation only if received this rule 55.2. the decision referred to in point or 60.2. referred to in opinion.
30. the project application submitted to the authority of the cooperation specified in the call deadline. Period not less than one month from the date of dispatch of the invitation. Project application be rejected if it is received after the specified deadline.
31. the project application consists of the completed project submission form (annex 1) and its attachments: 31.1. project administration and implementation of the staff involved in the description of the life course (CV);
31.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable);
31.3. the mandate of supporting documents (if applicable);
19.5. the project applicant questionnaire-application of value added tax, provided for in the laws and procedures and checks the information provided on the application of value added tax to the European Union within the framework of the projects co-financed by the structural funds and take a decision on the inclusion of value added tax to the project-related costs.
32. the application of the project completed in Latvian language text.
33. the project of cooperation between the authorities submitted the application in one of the following ways: 33.1. paper form in five copies (one original and four sets of jas). Project application dealt with in accordance with the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document;
33.2. the electronic document. Project application dealt with in accordance with the legislation on electronic document design (uses XML file formats).
34. the paper submitted the original application of the project the project is added to the electronic version of the application (electronic media). To the media indicate the following information: 34.1. activity number and name;
21.3. the project name of the applicant;
21.3. the name of the project.
35. when submitting a project application in paper form, all documents (original and four copies in electronic version) inserts a sealed envelope. On the envelope indicates the following: 21.8. "restricted access information";
35.2. the cooperation of the name and address of the authority;
35.3. the project the name and address of the applicant;
35.4. the activity number and name;
22.1. the name of the project.
36. the project application submitted with a cover letter requesting the project. The covering letter indicates the name of the applicant, the project activity number and name and the name of the project. Project application can be submitted personally, electronic form or document sent by mail.
37. cooperation authority registers the project application submitted on the day of receiving it, assign it a registration number and the project applicant project application, at the time of the issue or five working days by post proof of receipt of the application for the project.
38. paragraph 28 of these rules with the invitation specified in the project application submission period end date is the last day when the liaison body shall accept and register the project submissions: 38.1. If the project application submitted personally or sent by mail, on receipt of the application time is considered when it received and registered cooperation;
38.2. the application shall be accompanied, where the electronic document in the form of the submission of the project received time is considered when it established cooperation bodies in electronic mail information system. The project application must be signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp before the project submission deadline for submission;
38.3. If the project application submitted electronic document form or sent by post, the project applicant must ensure that the application of the draft to be sent to the times and received the cooperation of the authority no later than 28 of these rules with the invitation specified in the project application deadlines;
38.4. in the event of a dispute, the applicant must demonstrate that the project application has been sent before receipt of the application the project expires, but the cooperation should be based on the authority that the application is received or are received after the project submission deadline.
V. submission of the project evaluation and decision-making activities within 39. submit application to the evaluation of the projects provide cooperation authorities created a limited selection of the project proposals Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission). The Commission operates under the authority of the cooperation developed and approved the Charter.
40. the Commission with voting rights included in the cooperation bodies, the Ministry of finance, the Minister of special duties Electronic Government Affairs Secretariat, Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of culture.
41. the Commission observer status may include authority and a representative of the managing authority.
42. in the absence of the members of the Commission they are replaced by another authorized representative. Such authorisation shall be made in writing to the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Statute.
43. the Commission's activities within the project application submitted for evaluation may invite experts.
44. in order to determine the technical conformity of the application of the project, the project assessed the cold output according to the following administrative evaluation criteria: 44.1. a project application is filled in text (if applicable);
44.2. the project application is filled in the Latvian language;
44.3. the project application is completely filled;
27.6. these regulations has been submitted to the project application, the number of copies (one original and four copies, and they are under represented (if applicable));
27.7. the project application, the original is cauršūt (caurauklot) (if applicable);
27.7. the project proposal is prepared according to these provisions a specific project submission form;

27.8. the project application is signed by the applicant's institution of the project officer or authorized person;
27.8. the project application is accompanied by all these rules, certain attachments: 44.8.1. project administration and implementation of the staff involved in the description of the life course (CV);
44.8.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable);
44.8.3. a mandate of supporting documents (if applicable);
27.9. the project financial statement is made in the national currency;
44.10. eligible expenditure of the project correspond to those laid down in these rules eligible costs;
44.11. the requested total eligible cost not less than 900 000 lats and not more than 5 500 000 lats;
44.12. project estimated eligible costs exceed the cost limit;
44.13. project implementation term is not longer than 30 June 2015.
45. in order to determine the applicant's project and the project's compliance with the activity of the application conditions defined, project submissions valued according to the following criteria for the evaluation of conformity: 45.1. the project applicant is a government body responsible for public administration human resources policy planning and implementation;
45.2. the project applicant is invited to submit a project application;
45.3. the project submission complies with the stated purpose is to ensure the implementation of the national approach competences administration human resources management processes, as well as the planning and management of human resources information technology system development and deployment.
46. in order to determine the importance of the application of the project identified in the problem solving and ability of the applicant to the project implementation, as well as select priority projects assisted submissions that the application of the project would gain more support, project submissions valued according to the following quality evaluation criteria: 46.1. application of the justification of the project evaluation criteria: 46.1.1. extent to which the project will be able to solve 1. operational programme "human resources and employment ' of the public administration human resources policy;
46.1.2. to what extent the project will address 1.5.2.1. activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development" target group needs;
46.1.3. or project is the direct or indirect positive effect on the horizontal priority of the information society;
46.1.4. how logical is a common project structure (project section of cross compliance and the additionality);
46.1.5. evaluation of project activities (activity statement, the need for activities and compliance with the project's objectives and expected results, schedules, assessments);
46.1.6. project sustainability assessment (results of the project in financial, institutional and political sustainability);
46.1.7. or project submission outcome indicators or planned results indicators contribute to the achievement of such monitoring indicator: 46.1.7.1. the outcome indicators: the Government and the State budget-funded institutions, participating in joint planning and management of human resources information technology systems,-7 per cent (base value in 2004, 0 percent score in 2009 – 1 percent);
46.1.7.2. the result indicators: the Government and the State budget funded institution, which introduced the single human resources planning and management information systems, 100 percent (the base value in 2004 to 20 percent, a score of 2009 – 20 per cent);
46.1.8. does the project planned a publicity and information activities to ensure the project's publicity and meet project planned activities;
46.2. the project implementation capacity evaluation criteria: 46.2.1. project administration experience of staff involved in project management;
46.2.2. project applicants and staff involved in the implementation of the project's technical or professional capacity (project staff experience and knowledge 1.5.2.1. activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development activities);
46.2.3. project implementation logistics support planning;
46.2.4. project submissions for project roles and responsibilities are relevant (clearly defined functions and responsibilities between the bodies involved and the staff involved in the administration of the project, roles and responsibilities are divided according to the competency and experience);
46.2.5. project submissions for project management and supervisory mechanism is adequate (management, control, monitoring and evaluation of quality control mechanisms);
46.2.6. project implementation involved the choice of partners is based (specified in the planned cooperation model; the role of the partners defined according to its competence and experience);
46.3. the project budget submission evaluation criteria: 46.3.1. project application for costs is reasonable and necessary to the project's objectives and results and the implementation of activities;
46.3.2. project budget costs corresponds to average market prices;
46.3.3. the cost of the project is commensurate with the expected results of the project;
46.4. specific quality criteria: 46.4.1. project applicant has a leading role in the development of Government policy development, coordination, monitoring of implementation;
46.4.2. project applicant has the leading role of the public administration human resources policy development, coordination, supervision of implementation.
47. the project submission's compliance with this provision in paragraph 44 and 45 criteria assessed with "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet).
48. Compliance with quality criteria, which share the common assessment represent 80 percent of the quality criteria maximum points, scored as follows: 48.1. the project application, compliance with this provision, and 46.1.46.2.46.3 points below quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points from 1 to 5 (1-very weak, 2-poor, 3-satisfactory, or neutral, 4-good, 5 very good), except that rule 46.1.3. the criteria of subparagraph;
According to this rule 48.2.46.1.1., and 46.1.2 46.2.2. subparagraph obtained points multiplied by the coefficient "2";
compliance with this rule 48.3.46.1.3. bottom of the criteria assessed by the granting of certain number of points (0-project activities in the development of the information society, 3 – the project activity, or at the bottom of the activity of target groups for training on information communication technology or intended to increase opportunities for the target group to participate in policy-making and policy implementation, the use of information communication technology solutions, 5-project is intended to develop or improve information systems or improve electronic service quality or availability);
30.1. If the project is not involved in the cooperation partners, compliance with this provision. 46.2.6) (criterion assessed by 3 points.
49. Compliance with quality criteria in the assessment of common make up 20 percent of the quality criteria the maximum possible number of points, scored the following: 49.1. the project application compliance with this rule 46.4. the criterion of subparagraph assessed by giving a certain number of points (0-the condition is not met, 1-condition is satisfied);
30.6. According to this provision the bottom point 46.4.1. points earned are multiplied by the factor in the Division of "12." According to this provision subparagraph obtained 46.4.2. points are multiplied by the factor of "13".
50. the project application to the completeness of the corresponding application project: 50.1 justification evaluation criteria (this rule 46.1.), if the total number of points shall not be less than 30 points;
50.2. project implementation capacity evaluation criteria (that rule 46.2), if the total number of points shall not be less than 21 points;
50.3. the project budget submission evaluation criteria (this rule 46.3. the bottom) if the total evaluation score not less than 10 points.
51. If the project is found, the application does not match at least one of these rules 44 and 45 of the criteria or the total number of points does not satisfy this provision in paragraph 50 above, the Commission stopped the project evaluation of the application and submission of the project suggests a decline.
52. After the submission of the draft criteria for the evaluation of the quality of the project grant application determine the total number of points.
53. the project application to the Commission for approval or approval of moves provided (except if it is found in at least one of the terms referred to in paragraph 51).
54. the project application to the Commission for approval with conditions driven if necessary clarifications 46.1.5. these rules and criteria referred to in paragraph 46.3. According to paragraph 58 of these rules.
55. The liaison body shall take a decision on the application of project: 55.1 approval for financing from the European Social Fund, the Commission recommended the application of the project to confirm or approve with conditions;
55.2. project financing for the rejection of the application of the European Social Fund, the Commission recommended the rejection of the application for the project.

56. cooperation authority within five working days after the decision on it shall inform the applicant of the project.
57. the decision on the application for the approval of the project authority of cooperation accompanied by information on the conditions under which the agreement will be closed. If the applicant fails within the time limit set in the authority to conclude an agreement of cooperation, the financing of the activity transferred to other European Social Fund activity.
58. the decision on approval of the application, the project on condition the liaison body specifies the project application in the clarification, which may include: 58.1. planning of project activities under this provision clarifying 46.1.5. criteria referred to in the bottom of the steps in the evaluation (time schedule changes, up to the time of the planned project, the Division of activities on or off);
58.2. project budget clarification according this rule 46.3. criteria referred to in the instructions in the evaluation (reduction or exclusion, compliance arithmetical), in so far as it does not affect this rule 22.1., 22.4., and 22.5. restrictions referred to;
58.3. the other legal actions were reasonable, to ensure the application of the project of technical compliance.
59. the decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions contained in the project shall ensure cooperation bodies deadline (not exceeding 30 working days) and information about the conditions in the decision to the liaison body shall be submitted for assessment.
60. cooperation authority within 10 working days evaluate this rule the information referred to in paragraph 59, drawing up an opinion on the compliance with the conditions and decisions: 60.1. If the opinion is positive, two working days, inform the applicant of the project agreement;
60.2. If the opinion is negative because the applicant has not provided a draft decision contained in the conditions or not it provided the rule 59 within the time limit set in point, believes that the project application has been rejected.
61. Where the application is rejected, the liaison body, this provision of the Act and paragraph 56.62.
62. In the decision on rejection of the application of the project liaison body shall include details of the project and the reasons for rejection of the application, the project applicant project application four copies.
63. This rule 44, 45 and 46 projects set out in the evaluation criteria and the application of these provisions in certain project evaluation system of the application compiled application evaluation criteria of the project as a whole (annex 2), approved by the Monitoring Committee.
Vi. Project implementation conditions 64. Following the adoption of the decision on the application for the approval of the project authority for cooperation with the beneficiary of the financing arrangement, which stipulates the obligations of the Contracting Parties and rights as well as the procedure and conditions (including the financing conditions and payment arrangements), which must be followed to ensure the implementation of the project.
65. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation of the project according to the approved project submission and report on the implementation of the cooperation body of the progress and financial implementation in accordance with the agreement.
66. The beneficiaries of the activities provided for in the project implementation started only after agreement.
67. the implementation of National Projects to open a separate account from which performs and receives all payments related to the implementation of the project.
68. the amendments to the project carried out according to the procedures laid down in the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds.
69. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project related loading snapshot homepage on the internet (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months.
VII. monitoring the implementation of the activity 70. monitoring the implementation of the activity functions taken "human capacity building" Monitoring Committee (hereinafter referred to as the measure of the Monitoring Committee).
71. the Monitoring Committee of the event has the following tasks: 71.1. consider responsible authorities, cooperation agencies and the beneficiaries of the information provided on the implementation of the activity;
71.2. the authorities responsible to examine proposals for the necessary amendments to the European Union's structural funds programming documents and decide on their progress to the Monitoring Committee;
71.3. to give proposals on measures the "human capacity building" the streamlining of the monitoring process.
72. The event, the Monitoring Committee has the following rights: 72.1. to request and receive from the responsible authorities, cooperation authorities and funding requested information related to the implementation of the activity;
72.2. the measures for the meetings of the Monitoring Committee in an advisory capacity to call on industry professionals and experts.
73. the measures Monitoring Committee chaired by the Director of the State Chancellery. Secretariat functions carried out by the responsible authority.
74. The event monitoring Committee operates in accordance with the regulations. Charter of the open vote, approved by the majority of participating in at least two-thirds of the voting members of the Monitoring Committee.
75. the measure of the Monitoring Committee meets no less than quarterly.
76. The event, the Monitoring Committee with voting rights included representatives of ministries and authorities involved in human resource planning and implementation of policies, as well as the national Office, the responsible authorities and representatives of the social partners.
77. the Activities of the meetings of the Monitoring Committee in an advisory capacity can participate in the managing authority, certifying authority, liaison body and the representatives of non-governmental organisations involved in human resource planning and implementation of the policy.
78. the establishment of the Monitoring Committee of the event, on the basis of the institutions and bodies, the mandates approved by the Prime Minister.
Prime Minister i. Godmanis Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok Editorial Note: the entry into force of the provisions by 28 May 2008.
 
 
1. the annex to Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 347 Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok annex 2 Cabinet 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 347 project submission evaluation criteria of the operational programme number and name 1.
Human resources and employment priority number and name 1.5.
Administrative capacity measures the number and name 1.5.2.
Human resources capacity building activity number and name 1.5.2.1.
public administration human resources planning and management system development Project application selection way limited the project application selection responsible authority public registry 1. Quality criteria point scale from 1 to 5 (1-very weak, 2-poor, 3-satisfactory/neutral, 4-good, 5 very good) system for rating scale Point 1.1. justification for the application of the project evaluation criteria – 50 points placed in Madame 1.
The extent to which the project will be able to solve 1. operational programme "human resources and employment ' of the public administration human resources policy 5 x 2 2.
To what extent the project will address 1.5.2.1. activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development" target group needs 5 x 2 3.
Or project is the direct or indirect positive impact on the information society in the horizontal priority – Projects designed to develop or improve information systems or improve the quality of the electronic services or availability (5 points)-the project activities/apakšaktivitāt target groups of the training on the use of information communication technology or intended to increase opportunities for the target group to participate in policy-making and policy implementation, the use of information communication technology solutions (3 points)-project activities in the development of the information society (0 points) 5 4.
How logical is a common project structure (project section of cross compliance and the additionality) 5 5.
Evaluation of project activities (activity statement, the need for activities and compliance with the project's objectives and expected results, schedules, assessment) 5 P 6.
Evaluation of the sustainability of the project (project results in financial, institutional and political sustainability) 5 7.
Or in the application of the project outcome indicators or planned results indicators contribute to the achievement of such monitoring indicator: indicator of Outcome – public administration and funded from the national budget, the proportion of institutions participating in joint planning and management of human resources in the IT system – 7% (the base value in 2004 – 0%, 1%) in 2009.
The table of results – Government and funded from the national budget, in which the proportion of institutions participating in the common human resources planning and management, the number of IT systems – 100% (baseline 2004-20%,-20%) in 2009.
5 8.

Does the project planned a publicity and information activities to ensure the project's publicity and are appropriate to the activities planned in the project if the assessment of compliance with 5 1-8. the criterion received less than 30 points, the submissions rejected 1.2. Project implementation capacity assessment criteria in place-35 points Maxim 9.
Project administration experience of staff involved in the project management 5 10.
The project applicant and project staff involved in technical/professional capacity (project staff experience and knowledge 1.5.2.1. activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development activities) 5 x 2 11.
Project logistics security design 5 12.
Project submissions for project roles and responsibilities are relevant (clearly defined functions and responsibilities between the bodies involved and the staff involved in the administration of the project, roles and responsibilities are divided according to the competency and experience) 5 13.
Project application of the project management and supervisory mechanism is adequate (management, control, monitoring and evaluation of quality control mechanisms) 5 14.
The project involved the choice of partners is based (specified in the planned cooperation model; the role of the partners defined according to its competence and experience) 5 If the project partners are not involved, the criteria of the rating is 14 "3" If the assessment of compliance with criterion 9-14 received fewer than 21 points, the submissions rejected submission of draft budget 1.3 evaluation criteria in place-15 points Maxim 15.
The project's application for costs is reasonable and necessary to the project's objectives and results and the implementation of activities 5 P 16.
The project's budgeted costs corresponding to average market prices 5 P 17.
The cost of the project is commensurate with the expected results of the project 5 P If the evaluation of compliance with 15.-17. the criterion received less than 10 points, the application is rejected for the project 1.1., 1.2. and 1.3. criteria for the assessment of the percentage share is 80% of the overall project rating 1.4. Specific quality criteria "0/1" project submission quality evaluation criteria assessed with "0", if the criterion is not met, and a "1" If the criteria is met. Quality evaluation criteria shall be multiplied by the factor of "12", 13 "" Madame placing – 25 points to 18.
The project applicant is the leading role in the development of Government policy development, coordination, monitoring of the implementation of the 1 x 12 19.
Project applicant has the leading role of the public administration human resources policy development, coordination, supervision of implementation 1 x 13 1.4. part of the criteria for rating is 20% of the overall project rating 2. eligibility criteria Yes/No 20.
The project applicant is a government institution that is responsible for the administration of human resources policy, planning and implementation of Yes/No N 21.
The project applicant is invited to submit a project application to the Yes/No N 22.
The project submission complies with the stated purpose is to ensure the implementation of the national approach competences administration human resources management processes, as well as human resources planning and management in the development and implementation of the system Yes/No N if 20-22. criteria of assessment is negative, the project submission rejected 3. Administrative criteria Yes/No 23.
The project application is filled in text (if applicable) Yes/No N 24.
The project application is filled in Latvian language Yes/No N 25.
The project application is fully completed (yes/no) N 26.
Is submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 347 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment ' addition activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development" ' set the project application, the number of copies (original and four copies, they are under represented (if applicable)) Yes/No N 27.
The original application is the project cauršūt (caurauklot) (if applicable) Yes/No N 28.
The project application has been drawn up under the Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 347 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment ' addition activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development" project specific "submission form for Yes/No N 29.
The project application to the project the applicant has signed the officer/authorized person Yes/No N 30.
The project application is accompanied by all the Cabinet 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 347 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment ' addition activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development" "attachments: Yes/No N 30.1.
Project administration and implementation the CVS of staff involved in the Yes/No N 30.2.
Proof of the cooperation partnership (if applicable) Yes/No N 30.3.
Mandate of supporting documents (if applicable) Yes/No N 31.
Project financial statement is made in the national currency (yes/no) N 32.
The eligible expenditure of the project comply with the Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 347 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment ' addition activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development" "specified eligible costs N Yes/No 33.
Total eligible costs requested no less than 900 000 lats and not more than 5 500 000 lats Yes/No N 34.
The project estimated eligible costs exceed the cost restrictions Yes/No N 35.
Project implementation term is not longer than 30 June 2015 for the Yes/No N When 23.-35. criteria of assessment is negative, the project submission rejected notes.
1. P-non-exhaustive criteria is provided.
2. N-negative rating in case the application is rejected for the project.
Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok