Amendments To The Cabinet Of Ministers Of 1 December 2015 Regulations No. 686 "the Order In Which The Candidates Nominated By The Board And Council Members Of The Corporation In Which The Posts Of The State As A Member (Shareholder) Has The Right To No...

Original Language Title: Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2015. gada 1. decembra noteikumos Nr. 686 "Kārtība, kādā nominē kandidātus valdes un padomes locekļu amatiem kapitālsabiedrībās, kurās valstij kā dalībniekam (akcionāram) ir tiesības izvirzīt valdes vai padomes locekļus, un val

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now

Read the untranslated law here: https://www.vestnesis.lv/op/2016/199.1


Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No 647 in 2016 (27 September. No 48 49) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 1 December 2015 regulations No. 686 "the order in which the candidates nominated by the Board and Council members of the Corporation in which the posts of the State as a member (shareholder) has the right to nominate board members, and Board members of corporations in the country, which has been created by the Council" Issued in accordance with the Public person part of the capital and Corporation management article 31 of law tenth do cabinet 2015 December 1 Regulation No 686 "order that the candidates nominated by the Board and Council members of the Corporation in which the posts of the State as a member (shareholder) has the right to nominate board members, and Board members of corporations in the country, which has been created by the Council "(Latvian journal, 2015, nr. 249.) the following amendments: 1. To supplement paragraph 5 the second sentence after the words" take into account "with the words" public shareholders or Council (if created) as well. " 2. Make point 7 by the following: "7. Nominations for the Commission in defining these rules 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.5. criteria referred to in assessing the compliance of the candidate and those for members of the Executive Board candidates follow that rule referred to in annex 1, minimum requirements, but on the Council members candidates – this provision listed in annex 2 minimum requirements. Nominations Commission provides that defined criteria are reasonable. " 3. Express 10.1. subparagraph by the following: "10.1. being prepared for Board members the necessary competences and professional experience requirements description, as well as information prepared by the nominations Commission of the current situation of the Corporation, its strategy, goals and challenges;". 4. a add to 10.2. subparagraph after the word "description" with the words "and subject to the regulations of the Commission approved the nominations". 5. Express 10.4. subparagraph by the following: "10.4. prior to the members (shareholders) meeting or meetings of the Council, which elected a member of the Board of directors or Council, nominations Commission is given sufficient time to develop rules that are defined in the detailed selection criteria, candidate evaluation criteria and candidates for the conformity assessment procedures and methods, as well as to evaluate the Board of directors or Council members candidates." 6. Add to paragraph 11 behind the words "including" with the words "no more than three". 7. Supplement 15.1. subparagraph after the word "applicant" with the words "selection and". 8. Add to paragraph 15.2., after the word "procedures" with the words "and potential candidate awareness." 9. Supplement 16 to the second sentence as follows: "If the nominations Commission Member finds that cannot provide proof of compliance with the requirements relating to any of the candidates, then it indicates the acknowledgement and away from the candidate himself evaluation." 10. Add to paragraph 19 of the fourth and fifth sentence by the following: "If the nominations Commission has information to suggest that the candidate's reputation is impeccable, the nominations Commission is obliged to examine it and decide on candidates progress further evaluation process. Candidates can be excluded from further evaluation process only with the unanimous agreement of all nominations of members of the Commission decision. " 11. Make the following paragraph 23:23 "To inform the public about the candidates and the selection process of candidates, and the results of the evaluation process, public shareholders or the Board of the Corporation (if any): 23.1. simultaneously with the provisions referred to in point 10.2 public tender shall be published in the login tīmekļvietn the institution of post announcement, nominations for the Commission and, if necessary, other additional information; 23.2. within three working days after the members (shareholders) meeting or Council of the Corporation (if any) the decision of the Board of election members shall be published in the institution's tīmekļvietn the information on the candidate assessment process (criteria for the evaluation of candidates and the candidate evaluation methods, estimated the number of nominees) and members (shareholders) meeting or Council of the Corporation (if any) accepted the decision. Information about the members (shareholders) meeting or Council of the Corporation (if any) decision indicates post elected officials name, job title, and other messages that indicate the public shareholders or Board (if any) deemed necessary. " 12. the title of Chapter VI to express the following: "VI. Closing questions". 13. To supplement the rules with 26 and 27 the following: "26. the Board of the Corporation, which the company (shareholders) meeting is approved until the date of entry into force of amendments to annex 2 of these provisions of point 3.1.1 the expression of the new version (for the criteria, at least three years experience in a medium or large Corporation Board or Council Member, preferably quoted or international company-discovery), deletion of subparagraph 3.1.2 and Appendix 2 augmented with paragraph 3.1.4. , continue to perform the functions of the Council until their term expires. 27. the nominations Commission, set up to the date of entry into force of amendments in paragraph 11 of these rules on not more than three public shareholders or the Corporation Council (if one exists) aim to inclusion of representatives of the Commission, this nomination requirement of public shareholders or the Corporation Council (if one exists) aim the maximum number of representatives is not applicable. " 14. Make 2 point 3.1.1 of annex by the following: "3.1.1. minimum of three years experience in a medium or large Corporation Board or Council Member, preferably quoted or multinational organization;". 15. in annex 2 section 3.1.2. 16. Make 2.3.1.3. subparagraph by the following: "3.1.3. at least three years of experience in the executive position in which the institution responsible for policy development;". 17. To supplement the annex to 3.1.4. subparagraph by the following: "3.1.4. at least 10 years of internationally recognized research or consulting experience with business related field leading academic staff (Associate Professor, Professor, principal investigator)". 18. To complement annex 3, after the word "prevention" with the words "and individuals" of data protection. 19. Make 3. point 2 of the annex by the following: "do not represent a specific 2) candidate _____ _____ _____ interests, not a particular candidate's current or former direct supervisor or direct subordinate (in the last 24 months);". 20. To complement annex 3 paragraph 6 by the following: "6) have warned that a false declaration in the certificate, as well as nominations for the work of the Commission for the disclosure of information and other measures for the protection of this information breaches get called (-a) to disciplinary action, administrative or criminal liability." 21. Annex 4 be expressed as follows: "annex 4 Cabinet 2015 December 1 Regulation No. 686 of candidates scoring model form of the svars1 Apakškritērij Apakškritērij criterion for the applicant's first name, last name and the weight of the assessment assessment multiple 1. Language skills 1.1.       1.2.2 Izglītība2 2.1. Weight does not experience 3 3.1.       3.2.4. Competence 4.1.       4.2.       4.3.       4.4. Other significant responsibilities 5.1.       5.2. Candidate's total novērtējums3 nominations Commission member (name) (signature) (date) the assessment of the possible number of points according to novērtējumam4 brilliant 10 very good 8-9 good 7 6 satisfactory average 4-5 weak 0-3

The notes. 1. Apakškritērij weight is determined individually for each post. Each apakškritērij assigned a weight to ensuring that the sum of the weights of all apakškritērij is always equal to 100.2. weight and give ratings points, but finds the conformity of a person's education Cabinet 2015 December 1 of Regulation No 686 "the order in which the candidates nominated by the Board and Council members of the Corporation in which the posts of the State as a member (shareholder) has the right to nominate board members, and Board members of public corporations in the that the Council "is established in point 4.1. If the applicant does not meet the education requirements, the candidate is rejected. 3. the calculation, each apakškritērij assessment apakškritērij multiplied by the weight and then summing all the multiples. 4. the nominations Commission member according to their rating points assigned to each candidate for each of the apakškritērij, which provided for the evaluation with the points. " Prime Minister Māris kučinskis financial Minister, traffic Minister Uldis Augul States