The Saeima has adopted and the President promulgated the following laws: law on administrative procedures (A) General provisions Chapter 1 basic rules of administrative procedure, article 1. The terms used in the law (1) the authority shall have legal personality (the institution, body or official), with laws which granted certain public mandate in the area of public administration.
(2) the higher authority is a legal entity (institution, Department or officer) who, in accordance with the regulations, the authority may order the administrative act or actual action of issue or cancel the administrative acts issued by the authority.
(3) an administrative act is an act issued by the authority in the field of public law relating to individual persons or particular persons, by establishing, amending or terminating a specific finding of legal relations. The Authority's decision or other action of private law, as well as internal decisions that affect only the authority, give it institutions or particular persons, are not subject to administrative action, other than decisions about the institution or its particular legal status of a subject of the creation, change, termination, and other disciplinary punishment decisions if they significantly restrict authority employees or particular subjects of human rights. Administrative act is also the President of the Parliament, the Cabinet and the local Government Council (the Council's) political decisions (political statements, declarations, appeals officers election URu.tml.), as well as criminal justice decisions and court rulings.
(4) the members of the administrative procedure is the body governed by public law, which side of the call, as well as the relevant authority of the person or entity to which a specific administrative procedure or other persons of their rights or legal interests for certain procedural rights or obligations.
(5) the provisions of the law are legal Act (in part) and the General principles of law.
(6) the external normative act is the Constitution, laws, Cabinet of Ministers regulations and local regulations, as well as international treaties.
(7) the internal normative act is the law that public bodies managed by aiming to identify their own or give up body self internal operational procedures or explain what external legislative procedures in your area (instruction, tips, rules, etc.).
(8) the rules of international law is binding on Latvia on international treaties, customary international law and general international law principles.
2. article. The basic objective of the law this law aims are: 1 to provide a democratic, legal) State fundamental principles, in particular respect for human rights, in specific public legal relations between the State, on the one hand, and, on the other hand;
2) expose the independent, impartial and competent judicial control executive actions that relate to specific public legal relations between the State and individuals;
3) to ensure the provision of legal, accurate and effective application of the public-law relationships.
3. article. The operation of the law (1) this law shall apply to the administrative procedure, in so far as the authority of other laws in special legal provisions do not cover other procedures.
(2) the administrative procedure in the Court under this Act.
4. article. The principle of the administrative procedure (1) the administrative process applies the following principles: 1) principle of respect for the rights of the person (article 5);
2 the principle of equality) (article 6);
3) rule of law (article 7);
4) of the rules of law in the application of the reasonable principle (article 8);
5 the principle of the prohibition of arbitrariness) (article 9);
6) the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations (article 10);
7 principle of law reservation) (article 11);
8) the principle of the Democratic machine (article 12);
9) the principle of proportionality (article 13);
10) of the Act, the principle of priority (article 14).
(2) the administrative procedure shall also apply in the first paragraph of this article, not those principles, which were discovered, derived and developed institutions and judicial practice, as well as science.
(3) an administrative act and actual action authority (Chapter 7) must comply with the first paragraph of this article the principles of the administrative procedure.
5. article. The principle of respect for the rights of persons in the administrative procedure, in particular the decision on the merits, the authorities and courts of law applicable within the foster of the rights and legal interests.
6. article. The principle of equality in the same factual and legal circumstances of the case, the authorities and courts adopt the same decisions regardless of the administrative process of gender, age, race, colour, language, religion, political or other views, social origin, nationality, education, social and property status, occupation, and other circumstances.
7. article. The principle of rule of law institutions and judicial action must comply with the law. Authorities and courts of law operating within the scope of their powers and its powers may be used only in accordance with the mandate of the point and the target.
8. article. Reasonable application of legal rules, the principle of authority and the Court, in applying the rules, use the rules for the interpretation of the basic measures (grammatical, historical, systemic and teleoloģisk method), to achieve a fairer and more efficient results (article 17).
9. article. The principle of the prohibition of arbitrariness of administrative and judicial decisions may be based on the facts that are necessary for the adoption of the decision, and resulting in the objective and rational legal considerations.
10. article. The principle of legitimate expectations can rely that authority is legal and consistent. Authorities in the prevention of error that the person is not at fault, may not result in adverse consequences for the person.
11. article. Principle of law reservation Person adverse administrative or factual issue to take action the authority may on constitutional, law, as well as to the rules of international law. Cabinet of Ministers regulations or local regulations may give rise to the following administrative act or actual action only if the Constitution, the law or the rules of international law directly or indirectly included in the mandate, the Cabinet of Ministers issued the rules, or the local authorities when issuing binding provisions, they shall provide the following administrative acts or actual action. If the Constitution, the law or the rules of international law is mandated by the Cabinet, the Cabinet of Ministers while the rules may empower the municipalities.
12. article. The democratic principle of the machine body and the Court, in applying the rules, consider whether a person adverse administrative act or actual action is necessary in a democratic society to protect the rights, democratic public facility, public safety, well-being or morals.
13. article. The principle of proportionality that society Benefits obtained with the restrictions imposed on the recipient has to be greater than his rights or legal interests of the restriction (article 66). Essential personal rights or legal interests are justified only with significant public benefit.
14. article. The principle of the primacy of the law in the Person of a favourable administrative act, which regulates the legal relations of the democratic society and the State in question is essential for the equipment (freedom of expression and thoughts, conscience and religious belief, freedom of Assembly and freedom of Association, as well as the political system), the authority may issue to the constitutional or statutory basis.
15. article. External laws, general principles of law and international law (1) the authority and the Court of Justice in the administrative procedure applicable external laws and regulations, the rules of international law, as well as the General principles of law, including the principles of the administrative procedure (article 4).
(2) the authority and the Court observes the following external regulations legal force hierarchy: 1) Constitution;
2) of the Act and article 81 of the Constitution of the order of the Cabinet of Ministers issued regulations;
3) Cabinet of Ministers regulations;
4) compulsory local authority regulations.
(3) the rules of international law, regardless of their source, according to their location apply foreign law in the hierarchy of legal force. If a contradiction is established between the rules of international law and of the same legal force in Latvian legislation, the rules of international law.
(4) the General principles of law apply, if the matter is not regulated by external regulatory act, as well as to interpret legislation (article 17).
(5) where a contradiction is established between the legal force of law, the law that has the highest legal force.
(6) where the conflict between equal legal force to the General and special provisions, General provisions shall apply in so far as it does not prejudice the special rules.
(7) where the conflict between equal legal force of external legislation, the latest external legislation. Decisive is the outer date of adoption of the legislation.
(8) in deciding which of the same legal force of law, is preferable, should also take account of the importance of the common objective, which consists in the context of these provisions, and preferred it to the rules that govern a democratic society and national equipment essential question.

(9) If the authority should apply the law, but it reasonably doubts whether the provision meets the highest legal force, the authority for the provision of these rules of law apply, but his doubt immediately motivated in a written report, inform the higher authority and the Ministry of Justice.
(10) the authority and the Court may refuse to decide the matter on the basis that this issue is not regulated by law or other foreign legislation (institutional and judicial legal prohibition of obstruction). They may refuse to apply the law, on the grounds that the provision does not provide a mechanism for the application that is incomplete or not represented by other legislation which regulate the nearest law enforcement. This does not apply only to cases where there is no established or not, that this provision should apply to or otherwise be involved in its application.
16. article. The application of internal law (1) the internal normative act is binding on the public authorities that this Act has been issued, as well as subordinate bodies. Natural and legal persons of the internal regulatory act is not binding.
(2) if the authority finds contradiction between the internal laws, as their acts, issued by the higher authority.
(3) if the authority finds conflict between internal law included the same legal force of the General provisions and special provisions, General provisions shall apply, in so far as it does not prejudice the special rules.
(4) if the authority finds contradiction between equal legal force internal laws, as the latest act. Decisive is the date of adoption of the legislation.
(5) if the authority must apply internal measure, but it reasonably doubts whether it meets the highest legal force for the internal legislative act, the authority applies, but his doubt immediately motivated in a written report, inform the higher authority and the institution that issued these regulations, as well as the Ministry of Justice.
(6) if the authority must apply internal measure, but it reasonably doubts whether it complies with the Act, regulations, external to the General principles of law, including the principles of the administrative procedure (article 4), as well as international law, the authority of the internal regulations shall not apply and motivated in writing without delay report, inform the higher authority and the institution that issued these regulations, as well as the Ministry of Justice. The institution which has issued the regulations, can make a written order to apply it. The order is to be carried out, then, if it also contains the legal basis on which the authorities doubt must be rejected and the inner measure complies with the Act, regulations, external to the General principles of law, including the principles of the administrative procedure, as well as international law.
Article 17. Interpretation of the rules of law and analogy (1) authorities and courts in interpreting the law (translating), use the following methods: 1) the interpretation of the literal interpretation of the (philological) method, which is to clarify the meaning of the provisions of the law from the linguistic point of view;
2 the historical method of interpretation), that is, to find out the meaning of the provisions of the law, having regard to the circumstances on the basis of which it created;
3) systemic method of interpretation, that is, to find out the rules make sense in the context of other provisions of law;
4) teleoloģisk (meaning and purpose) interpretation of the method, which is to clarify the meaning of the provisions of the law on the basis of appropriate and equitable objectives with the corresponding legal provisions.
(2) if the authority or the Court finds legal system failures, it can prevent this by using the analogy of a method, that is, systematically analysing the legal framework of similar cases and the results of this analysis of established principles of law applying in the particular case. The analogy may not justify such administrative measure, which restricts the distribution of human rights.
(3) if the interpretation of the law by various methods may come at both the results that correspond to the legal system, and the result that is contrary to any law, the interpretation of the method used, the results of which will correspond to a specific case law.
(4) if the interpretation of the law by various methods may arrive at different results, all of which comply with the legal system, use the method of interpretation with which the case can be more efficient and more equitable.
(5) If the Constitutional Court rules concerned is interpreted by the judgment, and the Court applies this interpretation.
(6) If a higher authority in the internal regulatory acts interpreted the law, the authority applies this interpretation. Authority referred to in article 16 of this law, the fifth and sixth part, remains intact.
18. article. Administrative expenses (1) the administrative procedure to the person the institution is free of charge, if the law does not provide otherwise.
(2) On application to the Court to pay duty in this chapter 13 of the law and order.
(3) the Cabinet will determine in which order and about the administrative procedure in the courts of the country in remuneration of budgetary costs of witnesses, interpreters and experts.
(4) the complicated administrative cases by the authorities or court decision an individual representative paid from the State budget. The amount of remuneration and the cost of the procedure determined by the Cabinet of Ministers.
Chapter 2 administrative procedural legal capacity article 19. Legal capacity (1) administrative procedural legal capacity has the capacity to be endowed with administrative procedural rights and obligations.
(2) the administrative procedural capacity is the ability to implement the administrative procedural law and execute administrative procedural obligations.
20. article. Administrative procedural legal capacity of the person (1) an administrative procedural legal capacity shall be equal to the private law natural and legal persons.
(2) the administrative procedural legal capacity also recognised associations of persons in matters of their legal capacity (legal personality).
21. article. Administrative procedural capacity of the person (1) an administrative procedural capacity is a legal person and the natural person having legal age.
(2) the natural person's procedural law, which has not reached the age of 15 or recognized as incapacitated, that person's legal representative.
(3) the natural person's procedural law, which has reached the age of 15 to 18 years, implement the person's legal representative. In such cases the agency or the Court will also be invited to participate in the minors concerned.
(4) in the cases specified in the law, minor is entitled to independently exercise their procedural rights and perform the obligations. If the law is a minor who has reached the age of 15, granted the right to independently apply to the authority, it has the right to administrative act or actual action authority independently subject to judicial review. In this case, at the discretion of the Court or the authority may invite that person's legal representative, to provide it with assistance in case he's handling.
(5) in the case of a legal person led the legal representative or a person expressly authorized to do so.
22. article. Public law administrative procedural legal capacity (1) administrative procedural legal capacity in full has: 1) to the Republic of Latvia;
2) a municipality;
3) with the law or to the legally established for autonomous public bodies. Public law is considered autonomous, if it completely or largely financed from its own budget and its activities, rights and obligations are governed by law.
(2) other public-sector administrative procedural legal capacity have in matters relating to areas in which they operate, in accordance with the law of its own independent budget.
23. article. Public law procedural capacity of the administrative public bodies acting on behalf of the authority of the public body has determined to issue the administrative act or take actual action. This public law also determines the appropriate authorities of the administrative procedural capacity.
3. Chapter members on administrative procedures and Court article 24. The members of the administrative procedure administrative process are: 1) the applicant (article 25);
2) authority records is an administrative thing;
3) the addressee (article 27);
4) third person (article 28);
5) entity that has the right to be a person of rights and legal interests of the advocate (article 29);
6) applicant (article 31);
7) the defendant (article 34);
8) (35-40).
25. article. Applicant the applicant is the person who turns to set up the institution, established by or end the specific public legal relations. The applicant is also considered to be a person whose rights or legal interests to defend this law, initiated by the article 29 of the bodies referred to in the application.
26. article. Participation in the judicial procedure (1) application to the authority may submit several applicants (līdziesniedzēj).
(2) each līdziesniedzēj will process independently.

(3) Līdziesniedzēj can ask things of bringing one of your own environment or a common representative.
(4) the Authority's procedural actions and decisions, including administrative provisions, establish, amend, or terminate the legal relationship is found with each līdziesniedzēj separately. Each līdziesniedzēj its own procedural law, in particular the right to challenge and appeal against procedural acts and administrative acts, can be used independently from the rest of the līdziesniedzēj.
27. article. The recipient the recipient is a person, in respect of which the administrative act was issued or made (will be) the actual Act.
28. article. Third person (1) for a third party in the administrative procedure may be the person whose rights or legal interests of the relevant administrative act may limit or which may affect the judgment of the case.
(2) a third party in the administrative process, the granting of the status of the members of the authorities or court decision after the application of the person. The third party may also be invited to participate in the proceedings by the administrative or judicial process.
(3) to a third party in the administrative process relating to procedural capacity and capacity. It is the applicant or the applicant's procedural rights under the exceptions laid down in this law.
(4) the decision on the admission of a third party institution this person, the recipient or potential recipient can be challenged within seven days after the decision is communicated to the person concerned or otherwise become known to the highest authority, but if higher authorities is not whether it is a Cabinet Minister, to appeal to the Court. Higher authority within seven days of the appeal court. The Court decision may not be appealed.
(5) a third party or an admission in court in accordance with article 146 of the Act.
29. article. Entity that has the right to be on a person's rights and legal interests stand (1) in the cases provided for in the law, public law and private law to a legal person has the right to submit to the Authority an application or an application to the Court to defend the rights and legal interests.
(2) in the first paragraph, the holder of the right may be familiar with the case materials, to take rejection, give explanations, submit evidence, participate in the verification of evidence, to submit requests, to challenge and appeal against administrative acts or actual action, as well as do other law provided for the applicant or the applicant procedural actions.
(3) the first paragraph of this article in the right-holder's abandonment of the application or the application it submitted under the first paragraph of this article, does not deprive the person whose rights or legal interests for defending the application or the application has been filed, a right to require the authority or court case is heard on the merits.
(4) If the administrative procedure under the first paragraph of this article of the entity and the person whose rights or legal interests for defending the application or the application has been filed, have different views about the process or on the merits, the determinant is a personal opinion. On the application of the person concerned authority shall take a decision on the termination of the proceedings or the Court shall terminate the proceedings.
30. article. Institutions participating in the process of going to the opinion (1) the authority or court in the cases specified in the law, call on the institutions to participate in the process, to the extent of their competence to give an opinion in the case.
(2) the first paragraph of this article to the body have the right to get acquainted with the materials of the case, to participate in reviewing the evidence, to submit requests and give an opinion.
31. article. The applicant (1) the applicant is the person who go to court to take control over administrative acts issued by the institution or institutions of the rule of law and the actual merits of the action or the people publicly identified in a legal obligation or right. The applicant shall be considered to be the person whose rights or legal interests to defend this law, proposed by the article 29 of the legal entity referred to in the application.
(2) in the application, except in the cases provided by law, may be brought by the person whose rights or legal interests are affected or may be affected.
32. article. Participation in the judicial procedure (1) application to the Court may be lodged by several applicants (līdzpieteicēj).
(2) each līdzpieteicēj will process independently.
(3) Līdzpieteicēj can ask things of bringing one of your own environment or a common representative.
(4) a court ruling shall be adopted for each līdzpieteicēj separately. Each līdzpieteicēj its own procedural law can be used independently from the rest of the līdzpieteicēj.
33. article. Administrative procedural rights of participants taking over (1) if any of the members of the administrative procedure in case leaves (an individual's death, termination of legal person, etc.), the authority or the Court may replace the administrative process to his successor.
(2) procedural rights transfer possible at any stage of the proceedings.
(3) the transferee all transactions that are executed in the process up to the moment of his accession, is as mandatory as it was a person whose right to take over.
34. article. (1) the defendant, the defendant in the Court is the Republic of Latvia, the municipality or other this law referred to in article 22 public bodies.
(2) the defendant upon the side of the body from which the applicant requires a corresponding action, or another institution, as determined by the regulations in the Act.
35. article. The right to representation in the administrative procedure administrative process can participate in the process with the help of the representative or agent. A delegate can be any legal capacity of the natural or legal person with restrictions specified in this law, in article 36 and 37.
36. article. Persons who may not be representatives of the administrative process (1) as a representative cannot be a person: 1) which has not reached the age of majority in accordance with the procedure laid down in the law are recognised as incapacitated;
2) for which a judgment has been deprived of his right to keep other people's things;
3) which is the same case provided legal assistance to another Member of this administrative procedure (except for 26 and 32 cases provided in article).
(2) if any of the first paragraph of this article, the authority or court proceedings of such persons not admitted.
37. article. The people who represent the Authority (1) the authority of the administrative procedure cannot be represented or institutions to operate the procedural side can not a person: 1) which particular case arising or likely to arise a conflict of interest;
2) for which there is reasonable doubt of objectivity;
3) subject to the other limitations provided for in the law.
(2) a member of the administrative procedure, on the basis of their request, may request in writing the authority or court to change the person participating in the Affairs of the authority. The decision of the authority in connection with such a request shall be taken within seven days. If the request is rejected, at the request of the applicant the decision on rejection in writing to be served. Seven days after the decision is communicated to the person concerned or otherwise become known, it can be a challenge in a higher authority, but if higher authorities is not whether it is a Cabinet Minister, to appeal to the Court. Higher authority within seven days of the appeal court. The Court decision may not be appealed.
38. article. Representation of design (1) natural persons representation presented with notarized powers. An individual may authorize its representative also serves or in court. This mandate, the Authority expressed in writing and signed by the principal, but hearing the hearing authority writable the minutes of the hearing.
(2) the legal representative of the person or body in the present with a written authority or is certified by the documents from which it is clear the officer without special authorisation to represent the legal person or authority. As regards the institutions authorised representative no. 39 of this law and article 147 provisions on special authorisation.
(3) the authority of the designated staff (officials) are not subject to this law, the provisions of article 40 of the abandonment of representation, as well as 39. and article 147 provisions on special authorisation.
(4) a parent, adoptive parent, guardian and guardian show authority or court documents proving their rights.
(5) If a member of the same administrative procedure for participating in the case, he has the right to invite legal assistance Attorney. The lawyer's authority in this case attest to the warrant.
39. article. The extent of the powers of the representative (1) a mandate to lead the case gives the agent represented in behalf meet all procedural actions, except for the activities carried out, the law requires special authorisation.
(2) is binding on the Represented all the procedural acts performed by the delegate in the mandate given to him.
40. article. Representation of the revocation or refusal of representation (1) the Organisation may at any time revoke the mandate of the representative, informing him of it in writing or orally. The authority of this statement expressed in writing, but the court record in the minutes of the hearing.
(2) the agent shall be entitled to withdraw from the case, bringing about the time represented and written notification to the authority or court.
Chapter 4 procedural time limits article 41. The determination of the procedural time limits

Procedural actions enforcement of the statutory time limits. If a procedural time limit is specified in the law, determined by the authority, the Court or the judge. Authority, the Court or the judge's deadline duration must be such that the procedural action could meet.
Article 42. At the beginning of the procedure (1) a procedural time period calculated in years, months or days begins to run on the day following the date or the event that determines its start.
(2) the Procedural time limit calculated in hours, which begin the next hour after the event that determines its start.
43. article. The expiry of the procedural (1) period, in which the number of months, the last day of the last month is the relevant date. If the deadline is not the last month of that date, the last day of the period is the last day of that month.
(2) If the last day of the period falls on a Saturday, a Sunday or a statutory holiday, the last day of the period is the next working day.
(3) a term specified to expire on a certain date, this date.
(4) a procedural act for which the deadline expires, you can run on the last day of the period up to twenty-four. If the document is served to a communications authority (Post Office) on the last day of the period up to twenty-four, it is considered passed. If this operation must be executed by the authority or court, the time limit shall be considered to have expired at the hour when the relevant institution or court finishes.
44. article. The procedural consequences of having failed to observe the time limit the right to perform procedural actions lapses with the law, authority, the Court or a judge within the time limit set for the expiry review. Documents submitted after the expiry of the procedural, not appearance.
Article 45. A procedural time-limit suspension suspension proceedings or recipient adverse administrative enforcement of the law, for the purposes of the term shall be suspended. For the purposes of the period when the stops occurred, the fact that there is a basis for suspension of the period. For the purposes of procedural time limits will continue from the date of the renewed proceedings or administrative act.
Article 46. The procedural time limit (1) procedural delay can restore authority, court or judge at the request of the members of the administrative procedure, if the reason for the lateness of the acquittal.
(2) restoring the amount due, the authority or permission to execute at the same time, the Court delayed procedural action.
47. article. Procedural extension of authority, the Court or the judge may extend the time limit at the request of the members of the administrative procedure.
48. article. Procedural time limits and restoration of the extension procedure (1) the request for the extension of a procedural deadline or the overdue renewal of the authority or the Court, which delayed the action needed to meet. The authority shall decide the matter within seven days. The Court shall decide the matter in advance of the hearing, the time and place of the hearing by announcing administrative members. This person is not an obstacle of absence the matter for decision to the Court.
(2) The Court or the judge's refusal to extend or renew a deadline for an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
49. article. The authority determined term consequences (1) on the authority of this Act or other legislation laid down that it must follow any procedural action, subject to the provisions of this chapter for procedural purposes at the beginning of the period (article 42), on the expiry of the procedural (article 43) and the provisions of this article.
(2) If the authority does not comply with this Act or other legislation, in which the time limits laid down in the administrative process it must follow the procedural action of any member of the administrative procedure, the administrative process can refer to a higher authority, but if higher authorities is not whether it is a Cabinet of Ministers, the Court. Higher authority or court seven days shall adopt a decision asking the authority to execute the respective procedural action, setting a specific time limit.
(3) where the authority of this article above referred to in the second subparagraph, the authorities or judicial decision within a time-limit is not complied with, the relevant procedural action, if it actually and legally possible, be deemed to be met. If it actually or legally impossible, a member of the administrative procedure, for which the deadline is right under this law, the provisions of Chapter 8, and to seek reimbursement deadline of itself be considered as a moral damage to this law, within the meaning of article 92.
(4) if the law or other normative act shall state the period within which the authority in the course of the administrative procedure must follow the procedural action that the applicant or the possible administrative act unfavourable to the recipient, after the expiry of the procedural act can no longer execute.
50. article. The deadline for judicial consequences (1) the Court shall perform procedural acts pursuant to this statutory procedural for the purposes of the beginning of the period (article 42), the procedural expiry (article 43) and the provisions of this article.
(2) if the Court does not comply with this statutory procedural actions enforcement period, the administrative process can refer to the President of the Court with a complaint. The President of the Court may ask the judge to execute the respective procedural action, setting a specific time limit.
(3) a complaint about the judge's action may be a ground for refusal of a judge.
(4) if the judge does not comply with the time limit set by the President of the Court of relevant procedural actions, administrative proceedings may seek reimbursement in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
(B) part of the ADMINISTRATĪVI process in the authority section 5 jurisdiction, cooperation and openness of information in article 51. The administrative jurisdiction of the administrative authority the matter within the limits of its competence, conferred by the legislation.
52. article. Change of jurisdiction (1) If, during the administrative procedure changes a body which has jurisdiction over, or it is established that the authority dealing with the case, this case is not the jurisdiction, the matter shall be referred to the authority, which has jurisdiction over.
(2) If the administrative process change territorial jurisdiction, the case with the two institutions and the written consent of the applicant, may be left for consideration at the previous institution.
53. article. Cooperation during the administrative procedure (1) after the authority, which has jurisdiction over, another institution independent of the departments provide the necessary information at its disposal, or other assistance. Assistance is provided free of charge, except in the cases provided for in the laws.
(2) the first paragraph of this article, the aid may be refused in writing stating that: 1) it is not possible for factual reasons;
2) it is not possible for legal reasons, especially if the information requested may not provide in accordance with the laws and regulations on the protection of the information;
3) it can provide other authority with less resource consumption;
4) assistance for resource consumption exceeds the relevant authorities the need for this assistance.
(3) the authority may ask the institutions subordinated to the order of higher authority shall assess the validity of the refusal. If the body is not whether it is a Cabinet of Ministers, the question shall be determined by the Cabinet of Ministers authorised institution.
54. article. Provision of information (1) If a person from natural or legal persons received a request for information in connection with any administrative proceeding, the authority shall provide the relevant information in its possession, except where this information is in accordance with the law are considered to be limited by the availability of information.
(2) If the information requested in part contain information that cannot be disclosed under the Act, the person shall issue the information, if it after the removal of confidential parts is not lost or changed its thrust.
(3) information about an individual's private life, except for the provisions in certain cases, can provide with that person's consent. If, in accordance with the provisions of law may request this information and get the other person, information may be provided when it proves the validity of their interests.
(4) a Person is entitled to acquaint themselves with the information held about yourself, request a corrigendum, as well as the deletion of the information, the collection or storage of which rules do not provide for or obtained illegally.
Chapter 6 administrative process towards authority article 55. The administrative prosecution authority administrative authority proposes: 1) to the application;
2) on the initiative of the authorities;
3) to higher authorities or other institutions of the order message.
Article 56. Initiation of proceedings on the basis of the application (1) an application may be made orally or in writing. The application shall indicate the applicant's name, domicile (legal person – name, address, registration number), the claim; It must be signed by the applicant. Hearing the application authority immediately expressed in writing, and signed by the applicant.

(2) If the application is filed after jurisdiction, the body may not accept this submission. On the applicant a written statement issued immediately, stating the authority, which also have jurisdiction. Institution at which the applicant in turn, may also accept and deliver the application to the authority, which has jurisdiction over. If this application is sent by mail, the institution concerned within seven days of being sent by jurisdiction and shall notify the applicant.
(3) jurisdiction of disputes settled in the common agenda of subordination higher institution or a specific Cabinet authority.
(4) the authority, which has jurisdiction over the person, accepting the application, even if it considers that the application is not properly completed or not justified.
(5) the authority shall provide the applicant as necessary information or other assistance in the successful settlement of the issue according to the interests of the applicant.
57. article. After the prosecution authorities initiative authority that has jurisdiction over, suggests the Administration if it becomes aware of the facts on which they are based, in accordance with the law must be issued or may be issued the administrative act, as well as if the authority has reason to believe that such facts could be.
58. article. Initiation to higher authorities or other institutions of the order message (1) if the case is not authority with jurisdiction, which have become known to the relevant facts, but the lower body, the higher authority shall order the authority to propose lower administrative affairs.
(2) if the case jurisdiction to another institution, the institution that became known the facts, report on it to the authority, which has jurisdiction over. The authority, which has jurisdiction over, deciding on administrative proceedings.
Article 59. Lookup (1) of the administrative prosecution authority to obtain information, in accordance with the regulations is required for the adoption of the relevant decision.
(2) the generation of information the authority may use all legal methods, also get information from the members of the administrative procedure from the other institutions, as well as with witnesses, experts, inspections, documents and other evidence. If the authority is not required in the administrative process, but other authority authority gets it, even rather than requests from members of the administrative procedure.
(3) if the information contains details of an individual's private life (ID number, nationality, citizenship, residence, marital status, health status, criminal record, income, property, religious or political opinions, or other information), the authority shall explain to the person on the legislative basis and for what the authority wants to get these messages, as well as whether the person under external regulations are obligatory or its provision is voluntary.
60. article. Restrictions on obtaining information (1) the authority may collect or require the information that is provided for in the Act or regulations concerned directly to the need to consider the matter. Other information may be added to the case only if it cannot be separated from the decision required information.
(2) the authority may collect and use the information in the administrative procedure, obtained by unlawful methods.
61. article. The right to access to the file during the administrative procedure the participant has the right to get acquainted with the case and express their views at any stage of the proceedings. This right does not cover the information, which, in accordance with article 54 of this law cannot be disclosed. Submitted in writing to the authority views add to the case.
62. article. Administrative hearings process (1) deciding on the issue of the administrative act that could be detrimental to the recipient or a third person, identify and evaluate the authority of the recipient or a third party opinion and arguments in the case.
(2) personal perspective and argument which is not required when: 1) of the Act is the administrative issue urgent and any delays directly threaten the national security, public order, a person's life, health or property;
2) case is objectively unimportant;
the substance of the case 3) shows that the clearance of personal point of view is not possible or is not adequate.
(3) If the administrative act is issued in writing and personal views and arguments are cleared, the administrative act description Specifies the reasons.
Article 63. Decision on termination of the administrative act was issued or (1) After the necessary fact finding and administrative process of the hearing authority shall without delay examine the circumstances of the case and makes a decision: 1) for termination due to lack of facts;
2) on termination of due to the fact that the administrative act, the issue is not useful, if applicable, the law grants the authority issuing them right of option (article 65 of the second or fourth part);
3 the administrative issue), if the applicable law provides that an administrative act is to be issued (article 65 of the first or third paragraph), or to grant authority to issue it a right of option (article 65 of the second or fourth part).
(2) the decision on the termination of and motivation for the authority shall notify the applicant, as well as other members of the administrative procedure, if they have been invited to express their views. This decision as an administrative act may be challenged and appeal to the General procedure.
64. article. Administrative act, the period of issue of administrative proceedings (1) If on the application of the proposed framework, the authority shall take a decision on the issue of administrative act or the termination of the period of one month from the date of submission of the application, if the regulatory act does not specify a shorter period.
(2) If objective reasons one month deadline cannot be met, the authority may be renewed for a period not exceeding four months from the date of submission of the application, notify the applicant. If you need long-term findings of fact, the time limit for the receipt of the decision of the State Secretary at the Ministry or the head of the municipal administration, but, if the authority is not in the cabinet departments — authorities by a reasoned decision of the Manager can be extended to a year, by giving the applicant. The decision for extension may be challenged and appealed. The Court decision may not be appealed.
(3) in cases of urgency, the applicant may apply to the authority with the motivated submission, asked to issue an administrative act in the short term. The authority immediately of such application examined and adopted the written decision. In the case of a refusal decision shall immediately be notified to the applicant. This decision may be challenged and appealed. The Court decision may not be appealed.
Article 65. Considerations when deciding on administrative legislation and determination of its content (1) If the applicable law provides that certain content to be issued the administrative act (obligatory administrative act), the authority shall issue such an administrative act.
(2) If the applicable law allows the authority to decide whether the administrative act to issue or not to issue, but the issuing of certain cases its contents (issue check the administrative act), the authority shall consider the issue. If the authority finds that the administrative act is issued, it shall issue the administrative act of the contents provided for in the applicable legislation. If the authority finds that the administrative act, the issue is not appropriate, it closes the case.
(3) If the applicable law provides that an administrative act is not determined to be picked, but the specific contents (content check administrative act), the authority issued pursuant to this Act, the applicable rules of law laid down in the framework, and in this framework, relying on efficiency considerations shall be determined by the administrative act.
(4) If the applicable law allows the authority to decide whether the administrative act to issue or not to issue, but the issuing of particular case its content (free administrative act), the authority shall first consider picking efficiency. If the authority finds that the administrative act is issued, it is issued pursuant to this Act, the applicable rules of law laid down in the framework, and in this framework, relying on efficiency considerations shall be determined by the administrative act. If the authority finds that the administrative act, the issue is not appropriate, it closes the case.
66. article. Utility considerations content (1) considering the issue of the administrative act or the utility of content (article 65), the authority shall decide on the administrative law: 1) the need to achieve the legitimate objective of (legitimate);
2 Administrative Act) about the suitability of the objective;
3 the administrative needs), that is, whether this goal is impossible to achieve with the resources that are less restricted by administrative rights or legal interests;
4 the administrative compliance) compared the impairment of the person and the public interest benefits and taking into account that a person's fundamental rights may justify the limitation of a significant public benefit only.
(2) restriction of human rights, if the recipient the rights to essentially takes away, in any case not proportionate.
Article 67. Administrative form and ingredients (1) the administrative act issued in writing, with the exception of this law article 69 of these cases.
(2) the administrative acts issued in writing, contain the following ingredients: 1) the name and address of the authority;

2) distribution (natural person: name, surname, place of residence or other information which helps to identify the person, a legal person, the name, address, registration number);
3) if administrative proceedings instituted on the basis of the application, the claims of the applicant;-
4) administrative process views and arguments, if any, have been made;
5) fact finding;
6 justification of administrative act), especially including efficiency observations (65 and 66);
7) a separate listing of suitable legislation (including legislation, part of a point or a point);
8) the recipient impose legal obligation (certain or specific action to ban) or assigned, approved or disapproved;
9) indication, where and what time period this administrative act may be challenged or appealed.
(3) the Administrative findings of fact part indicates that the evidence substantiated conclusions and arguments on the basis of which the evidence was rejected.
(4) the authority of the laws based on the Constitution, laws, Cabinet of Ministers regulations or municipal rules, binding rules of international law, as well as the General principles of law. The justification shall specify the external legislation, part of a point or section.
(5) the Administrative Authority may use the justification arguments expressed in published court judgments and legal literature, as well as other specialised literature.
(6) the authority may not justify administrative action with the internal regulations. If the authority has applied internal law, the administrative act, indicating the grounds cited in the internal legislation of the Publisher, release date, name, and the application of the law. This reference is informative in nature.
(7) if the authority needs the applicant's claim and the other members of the administrative procedure is not expressed different views, the second paragraph of this article 4, 6, and 9. the information referred to in paragraph 1 are not required.
68. article. Administrative provisions Act (1) If the applicable legislation provides for the operation of the administrative act limiting conditions, time limits, conditions, tasks, reservations (including the cancellation of a reservation), the administrative act separately.
(2) where the applicable legislation does not provide for restrictive conditions, the authority may include an administrative act if: 1) the authority may itself decide on the issue of the administrative act or failure (article 65, second and fourth);
2) without following the appropriate administrative action can not be performed.
(3) the conditions should be consistent with the administrative act and comply with the contents of the administrative law sense and purpose.
Article 69. In the form of administrative non-compliance (1) the administrative acts may be issued orally or otherwise, are not subject to this law, the provisions of article 67, if one of the following conditions: 1 the issuance of administrative acts) is urgent, and delay any direct threat to the national security, public order, a person's life, health or property;
2 it provides the applicable regulations) in the Act;
3) case is objectively unimportant;
4 issue of the administrative act) writing is not possible or is not adequate.
(2) if the administrative act was issued otherwise than in writing, or if it is issued in writing, but does not meet the article 67 of this law, the addressee has the right within one month of the request, to the authority in writing in it according to the requirements of article 67. Administrative authority shall be issued in writing within two weeks after the receipt of the request.
(3) if the administrative act until the request has lapsed, the authority to issue: 1) if the recipient does not need his or another person's rights or legal interests;
2) for requesting reimbursement under this law, the provisions of Chapter 8;
3) in order to prevent similar cases from happening again.
70. article. The administrative act and the validity of the notification (1) if the external regulatory act or the same administrative act provides otherwise, an administrative act shall enter into force at the moment when it is notified to the recipient. The way in which administrative action shall notify the recipient in writing, orally, or otherwise, does not affect its entry into force.
(2) If the administrative act of writing sent by post, it is considered that the administrative act of the recipient notified on the seventh day of service at the post office. If sending by mail recipient adverse administrative action, it presented as registered post. In case of doubt, the authority must demonstrate when post released mail. If the recipient claims that he post the administrative act has not received, he should justify this claim, citing credible reasons.
(3) the administrative act is in force until it is repealed, executed or can no longer be executed due to the actual or legal change of circumstances.
71. article. Notification of the administrative act, other members of the administrative procedure (1) the administrative acts shall be notified to the third party.
(2) if the recipient and the applicant are one and the same person, the administrative provisions of the Member States shall communicate to the applicant.
(3) the administrative acts shall be notified to the authority if it corrected the clerical or mathematical error in the calculation of this Act 67. the second paragraph of article 7, 8 or 9 components referred to in paragraph.
72. article. Clerical and mathematical calculation correct errors (1) the authority may at any time act in the text can correct obvious clerical or mathematical error in the calculation, if it does not change the substance of the decision.
(2) the recipient has the right to require that the first paragraph of this article corrects the error.
(3) the refusal of the authorities to repair the first paragraph of this article the recipient of an error within seven days can be a challenge in a higher authority or, failing this, or it is a Cabinet of Ministers — to appeal to the Court. The Court decision may not be appealed.
73. article. The explanation of the administrative the recipient has the right to require the authority to the administrative obligations imposed on explaining orally or by the recipient's request, also in writing. This does not affect the validity of administrative acts and terms.
74. article. Invalid administrative act (1) the administrative act does not apply if: 1) objectively understood by which it was issued;
2) it is published by the authority which issued the administrative act in question is not a jurisdiction (except 52. referred to in the second subparagraph of article case);
3) issued in writing to the recipient adverse administrative act is not the appropriate legal rules enumerated;
4) it requested from the recipient's breach of the provisions of the law or conduct that actually or legally not possible.
(2) the recipient shall notify the Authority forthwith his doubts about the validity of administrative acts. If the authority is of the opinion that no reasonable doubt of the recipient (and the administrative act is debatable), it shall notify the recipient in seven days, the extension of the statutory time limit for opposition.
75. article. Final administrative act (1) the administrative act is in force, but it can be a challenge if: 1) it can clearly infer the legal obligations imposed on the recipient (a specific action or a specific prohibition of possession) or assigned, approved or disapproved;
2) administrative procedure has not been complied with this law or other rules of law which shall be determined by the Administrative Procedure Act (procedural error);
3 after your content) it is contrary to the law, even if the authority has not correctly applied the legislation (also relied on incorrect facts), has not adhered to the legal provisions valid hierarchy or the utility erred in its observations (textual errors).
(2) If the administrative act contested is not disputed, it remains in effect until it is repealed, executed or can no longer be executed due to the actual or legal change of circumstances.
76. article. The right to challenge the administrative provisions (1) the administrative act may be challenged by the applicant, recipient, third party, article 29 of this law that the holder of the right, as well as the person whose rights or legal interests of the administrative act limiting the administrative process which has not been invited as a third party.
(2) the administrative act may be challenged in higher authority subordinated to the order. Law or the Cabinet of Ministers regulations may require other body in which the administrative act may be challenged. If you do not have one or it is a Cabinet of Ministers, administrative action may appeal to the Court immediately.
(3) the administrative act contested is the initial administrative matters continued. Subject to the provisions of this law, except for the opposition procedure.
(4) If the administrative act article 79 of this law in not contested within the time limit set, it becomes irrefutable. The request to restore the deadline decided by the same authority which shall examine the application on the administrative law challenge.
77. article. Administrative provisions for appeal of the application for the administrative act contested shall be made in writing or orally to the body which issued the administrative act. If the application made orally, it shall be expressed in writing and signed by the applicant. This application seven days transmit the higher authority for consideration.
78. article. Application for administrative dispute Act (1) the application of the administrative act contested: 1) indicates that administrative disputes;
2) to what extent administrative disputes;
3).

(2) in the application of administrative law in the draft can also specify the administrative act contested themes.
Article 79. The administrative dispute Act (1) the administrative act may be challenged within one month from the date of its entry into force, but if the administrative act issued in writing does not indicate where and in what period it can be a challenge — within one year from the date of its entry into force.
(2) a Person whose rights or legal interests of the relevant administrative act limiting the administrative process which has not been invited as a third party can challenge an administrative act within one month from the date on which it became aware of it, but not later than one year from the date of its entry into force.
80. article. The administrative act contested suspension (1) an application for the administrative act contested suspended its activities from the time the application is received.
(2) if the higher authority of the administrative leave, restoring the administrative action of the Act with the date when the administrative act have expired and it does not appeal the judgment under appeal.
81. article. Decision on the contested administrative act (1) the higher the authority hearing the case again by nature, in whole or in part, subject to the applicant's objections.
(2) the higher authority in its decision of may: 1) leave of the administrative acts;
2) annul the administrative act;
3) cancel any administrative acts;
4) issue in terms of content or administrative act;
5) to determine whether the administrative act, which already lost power (article 82), was legal or illegal.
(3) the decision on the contested administrative act (administrative act) may not be the recipients ' interests will not be more favourable than the contested administrative act, except where noted law violations that are not taken into account when issuing the contested administrative act.
(4) if the application of the administrative dispute Act mentioned in the grounds of contestation, the highest authority in the justification of the decision to be the arguments concerning the justification of the applicant.
(5) the contested administrative act acquires its final presentation in such a way that it makes a decision on the contested administrative act. In this way it is feasible and can be appealed in court.
Article 82. Unenforceable provisions of administrative challenge (1) administrative acts may be challenged if it already has been fulfilled or otherwise lapsed, in the following cases: 1) the decision on the administrative act contested in the rule of law requires a person's rights;
2) for requesting reimbursement under this law, Chapter 8;
3) in order to prevent similar cases from happening again.
(2) if the administrative act shall cease to be in force during the process of contesting it, but the applicant justified the need for the continuation of this process, the process continues until a decision is taken on the contested administrative act.
83. article. The undisputed administrative cancellation (1) the authority, pursuant to this law, 85. the provisions of article 86 and, on his own initiative or at the request of the recipient can cancel both legal and illegal administrative act, not challenged.
(2) repealed by laws, a new administrative act.
84. article. Administrative act, the Administrative Justice Act is legal if it complies with the law, but unlawful — if you do not comply with the law.
85. article. Legal administrative act repeal (1) recipient adverse legal administrative act may cancel at any time, except in accordance with the provisions of the same content administrative act should be issued immediately.
(2) the recipient of a favourable legal administrative act may be waived, if at least one of the following conditions: 1) allows law administrative law and administrative provisions it contains;
2 the administrative acts issued) with some other condition, and this condition is not met at all, not properly met or not met in good time;
3) changed things factual or legal circumstances, where there is an administrative act at the time of issue of such a body could not issue the administrative act. In this case, the administrative action can be canceled within three months from the date on which the authority learned of the cancellation of the opportunity, but not later than one year from the date of its entry into force;
4) changed things factual or legal circumstances, where there is an administrative act at the time of issue of such a body could not issue administrative acts and administrative acts, will stay in force affecting the vital interests of the public.
(3) if the administrative act shall be repealed in accordance with the second paragraph of article 3 or 4, the public body shall, in accordance with Chapter 8 of this Act to pay the recipient the loss or personal injury that he incurred due to the cancellation of administrative acts.
86. article. The unlawful administrative act repeal (1) a recipient of unlawful adverse administrative action you can cancel at any time.
(2) the recipient of a favourable administrative act unlawful can be reversed, if at least one of the following conditions: 1) the recipient has not yet used its right that this administrative act confirms or grants;
2) law allows administrative legislation and administrative provisions it contains, except that the illegality of the administrative act, the cause is directly the illegality;
3 administrative law) will stay in force affecting the vital interests of the public. If the recipient of this administrative act is received money or other benefits, the administrative act shall cease to be in force by the date of cancellation. The relevant public bodies in accordance with Chapter 8 of this Act to pay the recipient the loss or personal injury that he incurred due to the cancellation of administrative acts;
4) recipient administrative act issue reached by knowingly making false declarations, bribery, coercion, threats or other unlawful activity. In this case, the authority shall consider the illegality of the activities of the recipient and repealed administrative act with its date of issue. The recipient is obliged to pay the public body to which the institution belongs, what he gained from this institution, on the basis of the administrative act.
(3) the abolition of the administrative acts in accordance with the second paragraph of article 1 and paragraph 3 is allowed within three months from the date on which the authority learned of the cancellation of the opportunity, but not later than one year from the date of its entry into force.
87. article. The initiation of the administrative procedure on the basis of a new application (1) if the administrative act has become the undisputed, the same case administrative process can start again on the basis of the application of the recipient, if at least one of the following conditions: 1) is changed to the actual circumstances of the case, which was the basis for the decision;
legal background 2) things have changed for the good of the recipient;
3) European Court of human rights or other international or supranational Court has given a ruling in this case, from which it follows that the administrative procedure be initiated. In such a case the authority, acting resume case, based on the Court ruling found facts and their legal assessment.
(2) if the administrative act has become the undisputed, the same case administrative process can start from scratch to a third-party application, if you have the following set of conditions: 1) this person about good things have changed the actual or legal background, which was the basis for the decision;
2) distribution is not yet used by the right, that the relevant administrative provisions, assigned or approved.
(3) the application for the initiation of the administrative procedure may be submitted again: 1) while the administrative act is in force;
2) within six months from the date when the administrative process has learned about the facts, giving him the right to do so.
(4) an application for the initiation of the administrative procedure in the same case, the authority, which has jurisdiction over newly proposed administrative procedure.
88. article. The initiation of the administrative procedure of the new initiative by the authorities (1) If the administrative act entered into force, and become the undisputed, the authority may, on its own initiative, to initiate the administrative procedure in the same case, if it became known or new evidence is available, which may be more favourable to the recipient based on the administrative act to issue than administrative law in force.
(2) the authority is obliged to initiate the administrative procedure in the same case, if necessary, to perform in the present case, the adoption of a constitutional court decision that suitable provision invalidated according greater legal force rules.
(3) the authority has the responsibility to initiate the administrative procedure in the same case, if necessary, to comply with the present case, the European Court of human rights or other international or supranational Court ruling. In such a case the authority, acting resume case, based on the Court ruling found facts and their legal assessment.

(4) the administrative process in the same case can start a body which has jurisdiction over newly proposed administrative procedure, regardless of which authority issued the administrative act concerned the initial administrative process.
Chapter 7 authority actual action of article 89. The actual action of the authority of the actual action is the action by public authorities in the area of the law in any other way, rather than issuing administrative acts, if this action arising or likely to arise the rights or legal interests of the rightholder. The actual action is also the Authority's inaction, if an institution in accordance with the provisions of law were obliged to perform, as well as certificate authorities.
Article 90. Notice of the actual action of the authority when the authority your actual action was intended or it had to be made before actual action, the Authority notified of actual action, location, and time, to the person concerned. Such a statement may be an individual or the public.
91. article. Application for actual action authority (1) a Person who finds that the rights or legal interests of the institutions fact action or is likely to injure a touch can turn to the authority with the application for authority to motivate change in relation to the intention of the actual action.
(2) the authority the application shall be considered and examined before the actual action or its completion. Its decision authority shall notify the General order.
(3) If a person is not satisfied with the Authority's decision, it can appeal to the Authority's actual action in court.
8. reimbursement of chapter article 92. The right to reimbursement, anyone is entitled to seek reimbursement for property damage or personal injury, including non-material damage caused to him by the administrative act or actual action authority.
93. article. Jurisdiction in matters of compensation (1) Submit a higher authority the application for an administrative challenge to the Act, may seek reimbursement.
(2) if the higher authorities have not, it is the Cabinet or under the regulations may be appealed to the administrative law court without opposition in a higher authority the application for Administrative Appeals Act may also be required at the same time. Reimbursement may be required, including an actual action of the authority.
(3) If a reimbursement is not required at the administrative law challenge or appeal or appeal against the actual action, the application for reimbursement may be submitted to the body that caused the loss or damage. The authority may request reimbursement if you have completed the appropriate administrative proceedings on the merits (the entry into force of the higher authorities issued the administrative act, and it is not appealed, or entry into force of the judgment of the Court of Justice). Application for reimbursement to apply this law provisions on administrative law.
94. article. Reimbursement obligation (1) to require Reimbursement from the Republic of Latvia: 1) if the authority is financed from the State budget;
2) if the authority is financed from the municipal budget;
3) autonomous public bodies (first paragraph of article 22 (3)), of which the budget funded by the relevant authority;
4) if the authority has its own independent budget, which does not fit into any of the 1-3 above the budget of public law bodies, and it has caused the loss or damage, personal in the field in which it operates within its budget.
(2) if the authority is financed by several (including various) budget, reimbursement required of it under the first paragraph of this article of the public bodies, from which the budgetary authority receives more funding. If two or more public-sector funding, reimbursement requests from public bodies by the applicant or of the applicant's choice.
(3) where the authority is the private law of compensation required of it under the first paragraph of this article of the public body to which the institution belongs to private entities with the public may be favored.
Article 95. Clearance indemnifying (1) If a reimbursement is not correctly specified the law referred to in article 94 of the public law, application for reimbursement to the institution. Authority finds itself the relevant public bodies.
(2) if the public body in the event of a dispute about it, from which this law referred to in article 94 public law prasām of compensation, the application for compensation, the applicant may apply to the courts, where the month of the relevant public bodies are not agreed upon. The Court itself finds a body governed by public law, from which the prasām compensation.
(3) a decision adopted in accordance with the first and second subparagraphs, shall notify the applicant (the applicant).
Article 96. It is the duty of the applicant the applicant is obliged to cooperate in their knowledge and practical capabilities make the body text of the conditions necessary to establish the liability of a body governed by public law and damage the foundations of the loss or damage. If the applicant is not justified in this obligation to be fulfilled, later, challenging the decision of the Supreme Court or an appeal it, he to the circumstances cannot be invoked.
Article 97. The application of the principles of civil law remedies for fixing the amount of the reimbursement amount Determined shall apply by analogy the principles of civil law, if the law does not establish a specific procedure for the calculation of the reimbursement.
9. Chapter reference of their rights article 98. The right to inquire about their rights (1) a Person is entitled to receive inquiries about their rights in a given legal situation (hereinafter the inquiry).
(2) the application shall be submitted to the authority for reference, as is the settlement of the issue on the merits.
(3) the application of reference include: 1) a description of the facts;
2) from the facts of a particular question arising, the answer to which depends on their legal rating;
3 explanation of why such) reference required;
4 the applicant's discretion): legal considerations.
(4) if the answer to the question depends on considerations of cost-effectiveness (65 and 66), then right click the directory refers to the authority of the clearance limit freedom of action. In its reply, the authority may specify the General considerations as that discretion to be used. These considerations do not apply article 101 of this law, the second and third part in certain legal consequences.
(5) where this chapter provides otherwise, the reference count on this law, the provisions relating to administrative action, in so far as they are applicable, subject to the inquiry.
Article 99. Reference preparation (1) preparing the reference, if required, the authority may request additional information from the applicant.
(2) when preparing the inquiries, the authority may request the higher authorities, the Ministry of Justice, as well as other institutions.
(3) prior to the notification of the recipient reference authority a copy of the reference period shall be transmitted to the higher authority. After the reference authority for communication of send a copy thereof to the Ministry of Justice, as well as other institutions, which by this reference may be interested, or who had been involved in its preparation.
100. article. Inquiries inquiries form shall be issued in writing. It contains the following components: 1) the name of the authority;
2) reference distribution (natural person: name, surname, place of residence or other information which helps to identify the person, a legal person, the name, address, registration number);
3) the applicant, if it is not identical with the reference distribution;
4) a description of the facts submitted and an explanation of why the recipient of such a reference reference is necessary;
answer to question 5);
6) answers legal grounds;
7) a separate listing of suitable legislation (including legislation, part of it, or point).
101. article. Reference legal consequences and challenge (1) reference reference not bound to the recipient. Reference the authority determined the legal consequences of the second and third parts.
(2) if the reference distribution has acted in accordance with the reference, then issued to authorities later issued the administrative act that relate to the matter on which the reference given, may not be less favourable to the recipient even if the Authority later finds that the reference was not correct.
(3) if the question to which reference later in the administrative case, is one of several issues that must be assessed to the authority, this assessment may not be less favourable to the recipient, except where otherwise things overall outcome would be less favourable to the recipient or it would be unlawful.
(4) the Reference may be challenged in a higher authority. If higher authorities is not whether it is a Cabinet of Ministers, the reference is not contested. It may not be appealed in court.
(5) in the second and third subparagraphs to specific legal consequences do not stand if the reference is not issued in writing or by knowingly making false declarations, bribery, coercion, threat or other punishable criminal or administrative activities.
(C) part of the administrative procedure in court proceedings section RIRM General provisions Chapter 10 basic rules of article 102. The law governing administrative litigation case (1) proceedings in the administrative case is determined by this law.

(2) Proceedings in the administrative case is going after them during the administrative procedure law, which applies in the case of certain procedural action or judgment execution time.
Article 103. Administrative Court (1) the Administrative Court is the judicial control over the administrative acts issued by the institution or institutions of the rule of law and the actual merits of the action, as well as legal persons in public law duties or clearance.
(2) the Court of Justice in the administrative procedure in carrying out their duties, even (ex officio) objectively ascertain the circumstances of the case and give them a legal appraisal of the proceedings within a reasonable time.
(3) the Court of Justice clarified the administrative procedure: 1) or administrative act, and the actual act of the authority complies with the provisions of this law and other legal provisions;
2) or rules of law and public law, administrative procedure the Treaty gives Member certain rights or obligations;
3) conditions which are relevant in the case.
Article 104. The hierarchy of legal rules check (1) examination of the administrative act or actual action in the rule of law and clarifying personal public legal obligations or rights, the Court of Justice in case of doubt, check that suitable provision meets the highest legal force rules.
(2) if the Court finds that the provision does not meet the highest legal force of law, so this provision does not apply. The Court in the decision or judgment, the reasons for its opinion.
Article 105. Proceedings of the administrative proceedings (1) the merits of the Court of first instance examined, but after the administrative process complaints about the court verdict, appeal court of second instance.
(2) judgment of the Court of second instance on administrative procedures of the Member may appeal to the appeal in cassation.
Article 106. Administrative court proceedings (1) the Court shall propose to the administrative affairs after the applicant's application.
(2) the Court shall propose to the administrative affairs after this law, article 29 of the legal entity referred to in the application.
Article 107. Investigations in the administrative case (1) the Court shall determine the circumstances of the proceedings in oral or written process.
(2) the proceedings of the hearing process, clarify the circumstances of the hearing.
(3) the proceedings of the written procedure, the circumstances of the case clarified, on the basis of the evidence in the case.
(4) the limits of the claim To determine the true circumstances of the case and the legal and a fair trial, the Court shall give the members of the administrative procedure instructions and recommendations, as well as to collect evidence on its own initiative (in the unbiased principle).
Article 108. The administrative transparency of the proceedings (1) the administrative court appearance.
(2) a reasoned court decision administrative affairs can be dealt with in a closed hearing to prevent disclosing during the administrative procedure the Member's private life, as well as to protect the State, professional, commercial or adoption secret.
(3) in a closed hearing, the participating members of the administrative procedure, but, if necessary, expert and interpreter.
(4) in a closed court hearing the case, subject to the relevant provisions of the proceedings.
(5) a court ruling declaring publicly. The case, which dealt with a closed hearing, publicly declare the introductory part of the judgments and the operative part.
(6) the mass media employees with leave of the Court, you can write (using sound or image recording and transmission techniques) in the course of the hearing. The Court may impose such a prohibition of publication of the entry to certain procedural actions enforcement or judgment.
109. article. Administrative matters alone and collegiate (1) the Court of first instance administrative matter judge sitting alone. If a case is particularly complex, the President of the Court of first instance may determine things collegiate. In this case the three under consideration by the Court of first instance judges.
(2) the appeal and cassation instance in administrative cases are heard on a collegial basis.
110. article. (1) the language of the proceeding is the national language.
(2) documents in foreign languages during the administrative procedure are to be submitted, added to those officially approved translation of the national language.
(3) the Court may allow the individual procedural acts in another language, if requested by any of the members of the administrative procedure and the other participants agree. The minutes of the hearing and the judgment of the national language.
(4) a member of the administrative procedure, except for the legal representative of the person does not understand the language of the proceedings, the Court shall ensure the right to get acquainted with the materials of the case and participate in procedural steps with the interpreter.
(5) the Court may at its discretion provide interpreters in the legal person.
111. article. Restrictions the judge justice (1) the Court in which the case is heard on the merits, nor the constant judges.
(2) If the process of hearing some of the judges replaced by another judge, the trial began.
(3) none of the presiding judges are not entitled to participate in the other trial, before the hearing is declared closed.
(4) the provisions of this article shall not apply to the writing process.
112. article. Administrative adjudication of directness (1) of first instance and the appellate court itself examine the evidence in the case.
(2) the court adjudicating the case, based on evidence that the examination itself.
Article 113. Oral proceedings (1) the hearing process in administrative adjudication of the Court of session.
(2) on the Court and invite the person called evidence and explanations given orally.
(3) the earlier questioning witnesses Recorded evidence, written evidence and other documents read out at the hearing, except where the present administrative process, members agree that this evidence is not required reading.
114. article. Writing process (1) the Court may as to without a court hearing, if the documents are sufficient and agreed to in writing to members of the administrative procedure.
(2) in the hearing of the written procedure shall be established for the delivery of the judgment.
(3) If the administrative process has agreed in writing to the hearing process, it is considered that he consented to the writing process for future judicial instances. Written approval process does not prevent the administrative process at the next court to request the trial hearing process.
11. the composition of the Court, Chapter 115. The question the court deciding questions that arise when considering the use of collegial composition, the judges decide by a majority vote. None of the judges are not entitled to refrain from voting.
116. article. Ban the judge to participate in further proceedings (1) the judge who participated in the proceedings before the Court of first instance may not participate in the hearing of the appeal or cassation instance court, as well as to participate in the new case before the Court of first instance, if the ruling made him participating, has been canceled.
(2) the judge who participated in the hearing of the appeal or cassation instance may not participate in this new case before the Court of first instance or appellate court.
(3) the judge who participated in the proceedings, the appellate court may not participate in the proceedings before the Court, except in the case of the Senate Administrative Department of the joint.
Article 117. The judge reset or rejection (1) a judge shall not be entitled to participate in the proceedings, if he: 1) in the previous examination of this case participated in the process as a member of the administrative procedure, a witness, expert, interpreter or Secretary of the hearing;
2 kinship relations) is up to the third degree of relationship or affinity up to the second degree with one of the members of the administrative procedure;
kinship relations, 3) is up to the third degree of relationship or affinity up to the second degree with one of the judges, which is composed of the court hearing the case;
4) personally, directly or indirectly, has an interest in the outcome of the case or there are other circumstances that cause reasonable doubt as to his impartiality.
(2) where there is the first part of this article or this law, the circumstances referred to in article 116, the judge himself away until the beginning of the hearing.
(3) If the first part of the above conditions the judge found, in the course of the proceedings, he himself away, indicating that the reset themes. In this case, the court proceedings are suspended.
(4) the members of the administrative procedure on the basis referred to in this article may apply to the judge or the rejection of the entire composition of the Court.
118. article. Rejection of application (1) the members of the administrative procedure can declare a rejection of the judge or the entire composition of the Court in writing or orally. For the record the minutes of the hearing.
(2) rejection must be motivated and made before things start to consider its merits. Later you can sign up for a rejection, if the person who filed it, rejection, became known in the course of the proceedings.
119. article. Rejection applied for arbitration proceedings

(1) If you apply for rejection, the Court heard another administrative process views and listens to the judge that the rejection log.
(2) the decision on the refusal by the Court of Justice applied adopt separate procedural document.
(3) in the case of a judge sitting alone, the appearance of the rejection adopted applied the same judge.
(4) in case that a collegial basis, decisions about rejection applied shall be taken in the following order: 1) if rejection logged one judge, shall adopt the General composition of the Court. If votes divide like the judge is rejected;
2) if rejection logged more judges or the entire composition of the Court, the same court shall be adopted by the full with the majority.
120. article. Effect of rejection (1) where the judge or the Court rejected all of the composition, the case is heard by another judge or another court.
(2) If a court consisting of the establishment of the Court is not possible, the case to another district (municipal) Court or to another district court.
(3) If the judge made the rejection during the proceedings, applied in the case of refusal to satisfy the action started again.
12. chapter under the administrative jurisdiction of the case and article 121. Exposure (1) the Administrative Appeal and the actual action as administrative court.
(2) in the cases specified in this law, the Court also natural and legal persons who do not have applications to the administrative legal nature.
(3) the question of the responsibility of the case settled in court or judge. If the Court or the judge admits that proceedings are not subject to a court decision shall indicate the authority competent for the investigation of this case.
122. article. Jurisdiction (1) the administrative first instance district (City) Court.
(2) the administrative case, the physical and the legal person shall be submitted to the Court by the authority addresses whose action is under appeal, if the law does not stipulate otherwise.
123. article. Proceedings adopted the transfer of the case to another court (1) in the case that the Court accepted its jurisdiction in proceedings under the regulations, the Court in substance, although the course of the proceedings would be changed in its jurisdiction.
(2) the Court may transfer the case to another court if: 1) the proceedings before the Court of Justice finds that it adopted in violation of the rules of jurisdiction;
2) after one or more judges of the judge reset or rejecting the replacement in the same court;
3) admit that this thing faster, more complete and more comprehensive review other court, especially the larger part of the location of evidence.
(3) the decision to refer the matter to another court an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
(4) in the case referred to another court on the basis of a court decision, when expired, but the appeal of this decision, if the decision is appealed, the rejection of the complaint by next.
(5) in the Case that was sent from one court to another court for consideration by the Court, adopted, this thing sent.
13. Department duty article 124. (1) a State fee for the application for the initiation of the Court pays a State fee of ten dollars.
(2) the appeal shall be paid State fee of five dollars.
(3) an appeal in cassation and the adjacent State of complaints does not pay the fees.
125. article. Refund of State fees (1) the State fee refunded wholly or partly in the following cases: 1 the fee paid more) than that determined by the law;
2) judge refuses to accept the application;
3) is terminated proceedings on the ground that the case is not subject to this law;
4 leave without examination) the application on the ground that the applicant will not have noticed certain things extrajudicial procedures that the application presented by a competent person, and then, if the application is left without examination at the request of the applicant, before the start of the hearing on the merits, but the writing process — before a meeting of the Court judgment.
(2) the State fee refunded, if the application for the refund lodged with the Court within one year from the date when the amount paid to the State budget.
(3) a State fee shall be reimbursed from the State budget to the Court or the judge's decision.
Article 126. Government fees reimbursement (1) If the application is satisfied in full or in part, the Court ordered the defendant in favour of the applicant, she paid the State fee.
(2) if the applicant from a State duty payment was released and the application is satisfied in full or in part, the national toll from the defendant is sentenced.
(3) if the applicant from a State duty payment was released, application rejected, duty is not taken from the applicant.
Article 127. Government fees and deposit refund duty paid and released Cabinet.
128. article. Exceptions from the General rules on stamp duty (1) of the State duty payment is exempt of this law referred to in article 29, the holder of the right.
(2) If the Act referred to in article 29, the holder of the right shall waive application made in person, but that person require a hearing on the merits, the State fee shall be paid in the General rules.
(3) the Court or a judge, taking an individual's assets, can reduce the size of State fees.
129. article. Appeals against decisions of State fees in matters concerning the decision relating to the duty of an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
14. Chapter court notices and calls 130. article. Calling and call on the Court (1) the members of the administrative procedure calls on the Court to subpoena.
(2) witnesses, experts and interpreters are summoned to the Court by summons.
(3) the summons and the summons announces the time.
131. article. Writ of summons subpoena must specify: 1) or the presentation of the invited persons name, surname and place of residence or other specified address this person (legal person – name, legal address or other such legal persons given the address of authorised representative);
2) the name and address of the Court;
3) arrival time and place;
4) those things that a person calls or calls;
5) why the person invited or provoked;
6) that the person who receives the summons in connection with the presentation of the person invited or absence, have an obligation to put last;
7) absence.
132. article. A court summons was (1) a subpoena usually delivered by mail or Messenger to the called person invited or specified address.
(2) the administrative procedure a member with the consent of the judge can get a subpoena delivered to another in this case, the person invited or summoned.
(3) If the called person invited or stated another way of communication, or event is particularly urgent, the person can invite or summon to the Court of session, with other kinds of communication.
(4) if the person is not reachable, the above address the subpoena delivered to persons invited or summoned or legal residence address.
(5) the person Invited or summoned who lives abroad or having their registered office abroad, the subpoena sent by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the international treaty.
133. article. Subpoenas (1) summons the person invited or summoned person shall be issued against the signature. The subpoenas part shall also sign the subpoenas received time.
(2) if the subpoenas do not face its supplier to the person at the above address, the subpoena issued to adult family members living together with the person invited or summoned. In this case, the recipient of a summons in a part of the record they sign your name, and the relationship with the person invited or summoned. The subpoenas, the beneficiary shall be obliged to immediately pass the summons to the summoned person invited or.
(3) the authority or entity addressed subpoena issued to the employee concerned.
(4) if the Court invited or called person is away, subpoenas supplier subpoenas shall be part of the signature on the check, as well as where they drove off the person invited or called, and its expected time of return.
(5) the subpoenas part of the signature returned to the Court.
134. article. Consequences of refusal to accept subpoena (1) on the trial of the person invited or called party is obliged to accept a subpoena.
(2) if the Court or the person invited in the called party refuses to accept the summons, the supplier shall mark on the subpoenas part of signature, and returns it to the Court.
(3) refusal to accept the summons shall not be an impediment to the proceedings.
Article 135. The obligation of the person to be achieved (1) the Court or the presentation of the person invited must be achievable.
(2) where a writ of summons was delivered in accordance with the procedure laid down in this chapter, it is considered that the person invited or summoned has been notified about the time and location, with the exception of article 133 of this law in the fourth paragraph down.
(3) where a writ of summons to the called or invited person delivered 132 of this law in the fourth paragraph of article in the order, it is considered that the person invited or summoned has been notified about the time and place of the seventh day after the summons in the mail.
Chapter 15 the Protocol article 136. The obligation to write Protocol (1) in any court writes the trial protocol.

(2) in the cases provided for in this Act Protocol article also on the procedural steps that are executed outside the hearing.
137. article. (1) the content of the minutes the minutes of the hearing: 1) hearing date (year, month, date) and location;
2 the name of the Court), hearing the case, the composition of the Court and the hearing Secretary;
3) hearing disclosure period;
4) things;
5) details of the administrative process, witnesses, experts and interpreters coming;
6) news that the members of the administrative procedure are explained in their procedural rights and obligations;
7) news that the interpreters, witnesses and experts warned about criminal liability under the criminal code;
8) members of the administrative procedure explanations, witness statements, experts ' hearing on their opinions, news on plastic and written evidence;
9) administrative process applications and requests;
10) court orders and decisions that have been adopted for certain procedural documents;
11) article 30 of this law that the opinion of the institution short content;
12 the Court debate short) content;
13) news on leaving Court for the judgment or decision;
14) details of a court judgment or a separate procedural document accepted the Court decision read;
News of the judgment) 15 (decision) the content, agenda and time limit of appeal advocacy;
16) news about when the members of the administrative procedure may be familiar with the trial protocol and the full text of the judgment (of the decision);
17) hearing closing time;
18) hearing at the time of signature of the Protocol.
(2) the minutes of the proceedings of the Court signed by the Chairman and the hearing Secretary.
(3) outside the hearing some procedural action executed Protocol must conform to the requirements of this article.
(4) if the case is covered in the written procedure, the Protocol specifies the first part of this article, 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of that news.
Article 138. Protocol writing (1) the Protocol of the hearing Secretary.
(2) the minutes shall be signed no later than the third day after the completion of the hearing or separate procedural actions enforcement, but complex cases — no later than the fifth day.
(3) Pierakstījum and edits in the minutes before the sitting of the Court in the reservation, the President and the Secretary's signature. All the blank lines and other free Protocol barred. The Protocol may not be deleted or paint text.
139. article. Notes on the Protocol (1) members of the administrative procedure may be familiar with the Protocol and within three days from the date of its signature, to submit written comments on the Protocol, indicating the shortcomings and incorrectness.
(2) the comments submitted by the Court sitting President within five days. If he agrees with the comments, then confirm their accuracy and add those to the minutes of the hearing.
(3) where the Court is sitting, the President does not agree with the submission of the present note, the hearing at the same court, which heard the case, within fifteen days from the submission of notes. If the case dealt with and the three judges of the same court cannot be achieved, the matter in court, which is made up of at least two of those judges who participated in the proceedings.
(4) the administrative proceedings shall notify the members of the Court's time and place. This person is not a barrier to matter of absence for treatment.
(5) After notes a court takes a decision about their accuracy or rejection.
16. Chapter procedural penalties article 140. Types of procedural sanction in the cases specified in this law, the Court may impose the following sanctions: 1 procedural) warning;
2) expulsion from the courtroom;
3) forced the money;
4) forced the arrival on the Court.
141. article. Warning the Person interfering with the arrangements at the time of the hearing, the hearing Chairman, expressed alarm. About the mark of the minutes of the hearing.
142. article. Expulsion from the courtroom where the administrative process, a witness, expert or interpreter interferes with the procedure repeatedly, with her court decision can be expelled from the courtroom. Other persons present, impeding the arrangements can be expelled by order of the President of the hearing without prior notice.
143. article. Forced money (1) the Court shall impose a coercive fine in this statutory.
(2) a copy of the Court decision on the imposition of coercive promptly to the person who forced the money.
(3) the obligated Person forced money, ten days after the receipt of a copy of the decision may request that the Court impose a coercive fine, release it from the forced payment of money or reduce its amount. The look of the application hearing, before announcing the sitting person forced money on. This person's absence is not an obstacle to the consideration of the application. The Court decision may not be appealed.
(4) an official of the forced money it pays from their personal funds.
144. article. The forced arrival of (1) the Court may decide on the forced arrival of witnesses to the Court.
(2) The decisions of the Court specified in the police authority.
17. Chapter administrative rights and responsibilities article 145 in court. The applicant and the respondent's procedural rights (1) the applicant and the defendant is entitled to: 1) familiarize yourself with the materials of the case to draw from those statements, transcripts and make copies (copies);
2) to participate in the hearing;
3) to sign up for rejection;
4) submit evidence;
5 to participate in reviewing the evidence);
6) log requests;
7) give the Court oral and written explanations;
8) make their arguments and observations;
9) to object to any other Member of the administrative procedure requests, arguments and considerations;
10) appeal to the judgment of the Court of Justice and the decision;
11) receive case the judgment and a copy of the decision, as well as use other procedural rights, which they have been assigned by this law.
(2) the applicant shall also have the right: 1) completely or partially withdraw from the claims contained in the application;
2) to the beginning of the hearing to amend the application in writing or subject as well as the amount of the claim.
(3) the defendant shall also have the right to raise objections against the claim contained in the application, declare it fully or in part.
146. article. Third parties rights and obligations (1) the third person being admitted or invited to participate in the proceedings in accordance with the decision of the Court of Justice.
(2) the decision of the Court, which rejected a request for a member or a third party during the case, an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
(3) a third party with an independent claim has the rights and obligations of the applicant.
(4) a third party who does not apply for a stand alone claims, the applicant and the respondent have procedural rights and obligations, with the exception of the right to amend the application or object, abandon the claim, admit a claim, as well as require the judgment of the Court of Justice.
(5) the application of third parties and third parties to be joined in the application for leave to intervene on the side of the applicant or the defendant indicates why a third person admitted to participate in the case.
147. article. Representation and powers of the representative design (1) representation in court are presented according to this law, the provisions of article 38. To the extent of the powers of the representative subject to article 39 of this law.
(2) representative in particular powers to be granted the right to apply, in whole or in part, to opt out of the claim contained in the application, modify the subject matter of the application, declare the claim in whole or in part, to appeal to a court ruling, or appeal in cassation, submit execution izpilddokument, get fined and the money or to terminate the enforcement proceedings.
148. article. Member of the administrative procedure (1) the members of the administrative procedure must: 1) arrive at the invitation of the Court;
2) time to announce the reasons for which it is unable to attend the hearing;
3) execute other procedural obligations imposed on it under this Act.
(2) a participant in the administrative process, your rights and obligations must be used to perform in good faith.
The second section evidence 18. Chapter General rules of evidence article 149. The evidence in the administrative case is evidence of facts that justify the administrative process for claims and objections, as well as news on other facts which are relevant in the event of the case.
150. article. The burden of proof (1) the authority must prove the circumstances to which it refers to as its objection grounds.
(2) the authority may rely only on the grounds referred to in the administrative act.
(3) the applicant shall, wherever practicable, to participate in the collection of evidence.
(4) If the administrative process of the evidence is not sufficient, the Court shall collect it on his own initiative.
151. article. Relevance of evidence the Court only accepts the evidence that counts.
152. article. Admissibility of evidence (1) the Court shall only allow the showing of statutory funds.
(2) the fact that under the law can be proven only with certain means of proof, does not initiate or by any other means of proof.
Article 153. The basis for exemption from proof of (1) if the Court recognizes the fact of common knowledge, it is not required to prove.

(2) the fact that established by a judgment which has the force of res judicata in the operative part, it does not need to prove the Administrative Affairs.
(3) the fact that established a judgment which has the force of res judicata in its theme, not to prove the Administrative Affairs, involving the same parties.
(4) the fact that the law regarded as established, there is no need to prove the case.
154. article. Evaluation of evidence (1) the Court shall assess the evidence on its own internal beliefs, based on a comprehensive, complete and objective test evidence, as well as on the basis of legal consciousness, based on the laws of logic, knowledge and righteousness.
(2) no evidence is not predetermined, related to the Court.
(3) a court judgment shall indicate why this one evidence given priority in comparison with other evidence and found one fact about the show, but the other — on the unproven.
19. provision of evidence chapter 155. article. Provision of evidence admissibility (1) If a person has reasonable grounds for believing that evidence may be required at a later date may be impossible or difficult, it may ask the Court to provide this evidence.
(2) application for the securing of evidence may be submitted to the court proceedings and the hearing.
(3) evidence for court proceedings to ensure the district (City) Court in whose territory the activities provide a source of evidence. Evidence after the initiation of the Court provides that proceedings in the Court in the case.
156. article. The application of the provision of evidence in the application for securing of evidence: 1) the applicant's name and address (legal person – name, registration number and registered office), which referred to the need to provide evidence and its possible participants;
2) evidence which is necessary;
3) facts which demonstrate the evidence required;
4) the reasons why the applicant requires to provide the evidence.
157. article. The order in which the application is under consideration for the provision of evidence before the Court in the proceedings (1) an application to secure evidence in court hearing within ten days from the date of arrival.
(2) at the hearing the applicant and invite potential members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle to the application of absence for treatment.
(3) evidence to ensure no possible administrative procedure can only invite members in cases of urgency or where it is not possible to determine who will be members of the administrative procedure.
(4) a witness questioning, as well as on-the-spot inspection and inspection shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of this law.
(5) the minutes of the hearing and the material collected by providing evidence, kept until it requires the court hearing the case.
(6) the decision of the Court to reject the application of an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
158. article. The order in which the application is under consideration for the provision of evidence by the prosecution in court (1) an application to secure evidence in court hearing.
(2) the applicant and other participants in the administrative procedure, shall notify the time and place of the hearing. This person is not an obstacle to the application of absence for treatment.
159. article. The task of the Court (1) If the court hearing the case, it is not possible to collect evidence located in another city or district, it asks the Court to execute certain procedural steps.
(2) the decision on the Court's task set out briefly the nature of the case and indicate the conditions that have to be clarified, and the evidence to be collected to the Court who performs the task. This decision required the Court to which it is addressed, and the Court shall execute the request within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the task.
160. article. Tasks of the court procedure (1) the tasks of the Court at the hearing in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act. Administrative proceedings shall notify the members of the time and place of the hearing. This person is not an obstacle of absence to complete a task.
(2) the records and other things material, collected by executing the task, within three days, send to the court hearing the case.
20. Chapter means of proof, article 161. Notes (1) the members of the administrative procedure that contains an explanation of facts that justify his claims or objections, evidence recognised, if it confirms other tested and evaluated the evidence.
(2) if the administrative process recognizes the fact that the other members of the administrative procedure to justify their claims or objections, the Court may admit the following fact about the show if it has no doubt that no false recognition, violence, threat or affected by the law, or to hide the truth.
(3) If no other means of proof, or they do not secure enough, the applicant — natural person under oath can approve their comments. For knowingly making false declarations to the Court of justice the applicant may be held criminally liable under the criminal code. Applicant affidavit can be put only in person, and the representation is not permitted.
(4) the oath as evidence is not admissible with regard to the conditions established by a judgment which has the force of res judicata, as well as common fact approval or rebuttal.
162. article. Witness statements (1) the witness is a person who the Court called on the Court to witness the facts relating to the case.
(2) a member of the administrative procedure, asking the interrogated witnesses, identify any significant conditions in case a witness can be approved.
(3) neither the witnesses summoned to the Court has no right to withdraw from the testimony of the naming, with the exception of this law and article 163.164. in specific cases.
(4) a witness may be questioned only about the case to clarify the facts.
(5) may not be the evidence of the witness testimony, based on messages that are from unknown sources, or to another person on the basis of, if that person is not questioning.
163. article. Persons who may not be a witness On the stand can not to summon and question a: 1) the clergy — the circumstances which become known to him, hearing the confession;
2) person of its trade or profession have no right to disclose the information entrusted to it, — with the news;
3) minors: of the circumstances demonstrating against his parents, grandparents, brothers and sisters;
4) person to your physical or mental deficiencies could not correctly perceive the circumstances which are relevant;
5) children up to the age of seven.
164. article. Persons who refuse to testify from the witness can refuse: 1) of the administrative procedure the Member's relative straight line and side line in first or second grade, spouse and first brother-in-law, as well as administrative member family member;
2) administrative procedure of the assignee, trustee or custodian, as well as the person who is in the custody of one of the members of the administrative procedure or in custody;
3) person in another case brought by one of the members of the administrative procedure;
4) person whose testimony may take action against the person.
165. article. (1) the duty of witness witness called person must appear in court and be given a true testimony of the known circumstances.
(2) the witness must answer to the Court and the administrative process issues.
(3) If a witness of sickness, age, disability or for other justifiable reasons may not appear in court, the Court may question a witness to his location.
166. article. (1) a witness responsibility For intentionally false testimony and waiver to testify for reasons which the Court held to be justified, the witness can be held criminally liable under the criminal code.
(2) If a witness fails to appear without valid reason after his call, the Court may impose coercive money up to a hundred lats or decide on the forced arrival.
167. article. Written evidence is written evidence of facts which are relevant to this case, and with letters, numbers and other signs, or technical writing means written documents in other articles, as well as the respective records systems (audio, VCR tapes, computer diskettes, compact discs, digital video disc).
168. article. Written submission of evidence (1) the members of the administrative procedure, who submitted written evidence or ask their request, identify any important circumstances in case this evidence can confirm.
(2) the written proof is provided in the original or in authenticated copies. A copy can also judge. If the facts which are relevant to the case, a written document or another part of the article, you can submit to the Court a certified extract from it.
(3) the original document should be presented, if the law or international treaty provides that certain facts can be proven only with original documents.
(4) If the written evidence submitted to the Court a copy of or an extract from it, the Court of administrative proceedings participants reasoned request or on its own initiative, may require the original, if it is necessary to clarify the circumstances of the case.
Article 169. Written proof of claim procedure

(1) the Court, on its own initiative, or a member of the administrative procedure the reasoned request may require written proof from the authorities and the people.
(2) members of the administrative procedure that the Court require written evidence, description of this evidence and to motivate, why he thinks that it is to him that the person or institution concerned.
(3) the authority or person to whom it is not possible for the Court to submit the required written evidence or present them to the Court, within the time limit set in writing notify the Court thereof, stating the reasons.
(4) If the administrative process refuses to submit to the Court written evidence requested, not denying that it is to him, the Court may admit the facts which demonstrate the approval of the other members of the administrative procedure to respond to the written evidence.
170. article. In the case of written evidence check in After a court judgment enters into force, the authority or person who submitted written evidence of the originals, by its reasoned written request, the Court shall return the proof of funds. If this evidence is a reference to a court ruling, the case leaves judges certified the written transcripts of evidence.
171. article. Written proof of their view at the place of storage If written evidence in court is impossible or difficult their number, size, or other reason, the Court may require the certified extracts from the written evidence or make written evidence and research the storage location.
Article 172. Real evidence is real evidence of corporeal things, which, with its characteristics, the nature or existence of the facts it may be helpful to have a role in the case.
173. article. The procedure for requesting evidence (1) the Court, on its own initiative, or a member of the administrative procedure the reasoned request may require trace evidence from institutions and individuals.
(2) a member of the administrative process that submitted into evidence or ask their request, identify any case essential conditions this evidence can confirm.
(3) the members of the administrative procedure that the Court require evidence, proof and describe this motivates why he feels that it is to him that the person or institution concerned.
(4) the authority or person to whom it is not possible for the Court to submit the required evidence or exhibits also present them within the time limit fixed by the Court, shall notify the Court thereof, stating the reasons.
174. article. Viewing the evidence storage site If submitted into evidence in court is impossible or difficult their number, size, or other reason, the Court may make the viewing of evidence and research for the storage location.
175. article. Evidence storage (1) trace evidence or keep, adds court evidence Vault.
(2) items that cannot be delivered to the Court, keep it. It is a description and, if necessary, photograph or shoot. Descriptions and images added to the case.
(3) the perishables exhibits evidence review court, immediately notifying the members of the administrative procedure. After viewing the exhibits, evidence shall be returned to the authority or the person from whom they were received.
176. article. Check the evidence (1) exhibits evidence after judgment entry into force give to the authority or the person from whom they were received or transferred to the person whose right to those things the Court acknowledged.
(2) the trace evidence in accordance with the law or a court decision may not be given away to members of the administrative procedure or the person from whom they received, the Court shall refer the relevant national institution.
(3) in some cases, new evidence may give up before the entry into force of the judgment, if not detrimental to the proceedings.
177. article. Responsibility for writing and not submit evidence if the Court has not been notified that it is not possible to submit the required written evidence or exhibits, or they have not been submitted for reasons which the Court held to be justified, the Court can impose on the person concerned forced money up to twenty-five lats. Forced cash payment does not release the person from the obligation to submit the evidence requested of the Court.
178. article. (1) expertise expertise in case the Court shall determine the cases in which case significant fact finding requires special knowledge in science, engineering, the arts, or in another sector. If necessary, the Court shall determine the number of inspection.
(2) the expertise of the inspection in question authorities or other experts proficient. The experts shall be appointed by the Court, taking into account the views of the members of the administrative procedure. If necessary, you can designate one or more experts.
(3) a member of the administrative procedure have the right to submit questions to the Court for which, in his opinion, the expert opinion must be given. Questions that require the expert opinion shall be determined by the Court. The Court motivated the administrative procedure of the participants asked questions rejection.
(4) the Court of Justice decision on expertise discovery indicates that the questions need expert opinion and who asked to do the inspection.
(5) the Inspection shall be carried out in court or out of court, if the Court is impossible or difficult.
Article 179. The obligations and rights experts (1) the person designated an expert to appear at the Court's call.
(2) If the expert is called to appear at the hearing for reasons which the Court held to be justified, he can be punished with forced money to fifty lats.
(3) the Expert shall have the right to get acquainted with the materials of the case, to ask questions of the participants in the administrative proceeding and the witnesses, as well as request the Court of Justice izprasī of additional material.
(4) the expert gives an objective opinion on your behalf and is personally responsible for it.
(5) expert opinion can deviate from the naming, if he issued the materials studied are not sufficient or if the questions go beyond his scope of expertise. In such cases, the expert shall notify the Court in writing that it is not possible to give an opinion.
(6) the waiver, without justification from the performance of his duties, or for knowingly false expert opinion may be held criminally liable under the criminal code.
180. article. Reset or reject expert (1) an expert may not participate in the proceedings, if he's in the previous examination of this case participated in the process as a judge, as well as other article 117 of this Act in the cases.
(2) an expert may not participate in the proceedings, even if he: 1) after the service of the State or otherwise are or have been dependent on administrative process;
2) one of the members of the administrative procedure in the present case until the court proceedings has been linked with expert professional duties;
3) he is not clear that the matter concerned.
(3) If this article exists in the first and second conditions referred to, it is the duty of the experts themselves to reset to the beginning of the hearing.
(4) a member of the administrative procedure have the right to lodge an expert rejection.
(5) the rejection of expert logs on and the Court decides this law and article 118.119.
181. article. Expert opinion (1) expert opinion must be substantiated and justified.
(2) the expert opinion shall be expressed in writing and submitted to the Court. Expert opinion must contain an accurate description of the studies conducted, their results and the conclusions reached in reasoned responses to the questions of the Court. If, in carrying out the inspection the expert finds the circumstances which are relevant to the case and for which they have not asked for questions, he may in its opinion be given on these conditions.
(3) If the designated number of experts they consulted among themselves. If the experts come to the common opinion, signed by all experts. If the experts do not match, every expert writes a separate opinion.
182. article. Expert opinion evaluation (1) expert opinion the Court assessed by this law, the provisions of article 154.
(2) if the expert opinion is not clear enough or is incomplete, the Court may impose additional expertise, asking they be made the same expert.
(3) If the expert opinion is based or motivated, as well as if in the opinion of several experts, has conflicting, the Court may determine the repeated expertise, asking them to be made for another expert or more experts.
183. article. Association of personal opinion (amicus curiae) (1) the Association of persons which is to be considered as a recognised representative of the interests of a sector and from which you can expect expert advice, you can ask the Court for permission in writing to present their views on the facts or law in the sector in question.
(2) if the Court finds that the person can help the Association's opinion for the Court to take an objective decision in the case, it shall determine the matters on which the Association of persons may submit their views. Questions should be connected with the case. Association of persons may not be given the actual or legal assessment of the relevant administrative proceedings.

(3) if the Court considers that the views received, meet the requirements of the second subparagraph, it shall forward that opinion to all the members of the administrative procedure and shall fix a time limit within which the parties can express their views on it. Administrative process received the views of the court transcripts of the rest of the members of the administrative procedure.
The third section of the PROCEEDINGS before the Court of first instance the application of Chapter 21 article 184. The subject of the application, the application can be made on: 1) the issuance, administrative deregulation (abolition in all or part, the amendment also) or validity (annulment, annulment of lost, also repealed administrative act of recognition as valid);
2) authorities actual action;
3) from the legislative public directly consequential to a specific legal relationship, the existence or not of their contents, where applicable legal interests is impossible to realize with the 1 and the application referred to in paragraph 2.
185. article. The administrative act appealed against the suspension of (1) the filing in Court of administrative law, recognition of the abolition of the unenforceable or invalid administrative act be suspended from the date of application.
(2) the first part of this article shall not apply to the following cases: 1) administrative act imposes the obligation to pay the tax, fee or other charge State or municipal budget;
2) provided for in other laws;
3) authority, on the basis of execution of the urgency of the case in question, in particular the administrative act has determined that it is enforceable immediately;
4), border police, the National Guard, the fire service and other officials authorised by law the provisions issued in order to immediately prevent direct danger to national security, public order, people's life, health and property.
(3) the second paragraph of this article, in the cases listed in the applicant may request the Court of Justice, motivating his request, the administrative act to stop the action. Request to the Court within seven days.
(4) if the applicant's request, in accordance with the third paragraph of this article, is satisfied in full or in part, the authority within seven days of an ancillary complaint may be submitted. District Court next examined the complaint within seven days.
(5) if the Court rejects an application for the annulment of administrative recognition of the unenforceable or invalid administrative act, action returns to the day when the judgment enters into force.
186. article. The form and content of application (1) an application shall be made in writing.
(2) the application shall state: 1) the name of the Court to which application is made;
2) applicant and his representative, if the application is submitted by a representative, the name and address of the residence or other, in which the person can be reached. If the applicant or his representative is a legal person, its name, registration number, if any, and the legal address;
3) name and address;
4) application and evidence that it has in his possession;
5) claim;
6) the claim, if it includes a claim for damages;
7) list of documents annexed to the application, if any have been added;
8) the place and time of composition.
(3) the application may contain: 1), the defendant institution, which it represents, and its address;
2) the claim, if the application contains claims to pay personal injury;
3) other information which may be important for consideration.
(4) the signature of the applicant or his representative. If the application is submitted on behalf of the applicant, the representative, the application shall be accompanied by appropriate he privileges or other document certifying the authorisation of the representative to submit the application.
187. article. Documents to be attached to the application (1) Applications shall be accompanied by documents confirming: 1) State duty payment;
2) things of extrajudicial order, if any, specified in the Act;
3) circumstances on which the claim is based.
(2) the application and accompanying documents submitted to the Court with such copies as there are defendants and third parties.
(3) the judge depending on the circumstances and character of the applicant, be exempted from the obligation of natural persons to submit an application and the documents accompanying the shipment of transcripts to the defendant and the third party.
188. article. Application deadline (1) an application for the issue of the administrative act, or the validity of the cancellation may be submitted within one month from the date of entry into force of the administrative act of higher authority (decision on the contested administrative act).
(2) if the higher authorities is not whether it is the Cabinet of Ministers, the application may be submitted within one month from the entry into force of the administrative act.
(3) If the administrative act does not specify which and the period within which they can appeal, the application of this article in the first and in the cases referred to in the second subparagraph may be submitted within one year of the entry into force of the administrative act.
(4) an application for the institution's actual action when a time limit is not determined by other laws or the Cabinet of Ministers regulations, may be submitted within one year from the date of the applicant becoming aware of the specific actual action authority.
(5) where the authority or a higher authority has notified the applicant of its decision in connection with the application, the application for judicial review may be submitted within one year from the date of submission of the person referring the matter to the institution or higher authority.
189. article. Application to court (1) an application shall be submitted to the Court pursuant to rules on jurisdiction.
(2) an application may be submitted to the applicant or his authorised person. The application can also be sent by mail or through the law certain means of communication.
(3) if the application is lodged by the authorised representative, the mandate must be certified in accordance with the procedure laid down in the law.
190. article. Deciding on the date of receipt of the application for a court judge within three days, shall decide on: 1) and the initiation of adoption;
2) refusal to accept a application;
3) leaving without guidance.
191. article. The non-acceptance of the basis of the application (1) the judge shall refuse the application, if: 1) case is not pending on the agenda of the administrative process;
2) of the same or another court proceedings is a matter between the same participants, the administrative procedure concerning the same subject and on the same basis;
3) between the same participants, the administrative procedure concerning the same subject and on the same basis is the entry into force of a court judgment or court ruling to end legal proceedings in respect of the applicant's abandonment of the claim;
4) case disagrees with this Court;
5 the applicant will not have noticed this) case law category of things the previous extrajudicial procedures;
6) application submitted by a competent person;
7 on behalf of the applicant) application submitted by a person who is authorized in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law;
8) application submitted by a person who is not entitled to make an application.
(2) an application For refusal to accept a judge adopt a reasoned decision. Decision, together with the issue of applications submitted by the applicant.
(3) the decision to reject the application of an ancillary complaint may be submitted. Deadlines for the submission of an ancillary complaint shall run from the date on which the applicant received a copy of that decision.
(4) the judge's refusal to accept the application of the first paragraph of this article 4.-7. Basic is not an obstacle to the application of the same to the Court when will eliminate existing disadvantages.
192. article. Without leaving the application guidance (1) the judge leave application without guidance, if: 1) the application does not meet this law, the requirements of article 185;
2) is attached to the application, all this Law 187. the first paragraph of article 1 and of the documents referred to in paragraph 2.
(2) on the application without leaving the judge adopted the guidance motivated the decision communicated to the applicant, and shall fix a time limit for the correction of deficiencies. This period may not be less than twenty days from the date of dispatch of the decision. On an ancillary complaint may be submitted. The appeal period shall run from the date when the applicant received a copy of the decision.
(3) if the applicant within the period fixed, the application shall be deemed to have been filed on the day it was first submitted to the Court.
(4) if the applicant established term deficiencies are not remedied, the application shall be deemed not to have been filed and be returned to the applicant.
(5) the applicant is not an obstacle to return it to a court action, pursuant to this law the general application procedures.
193. article. Claims and administrative consolidation (1) the applicant may be combined in one multiple application related claims.
(2) if the court proceeding is more homogeneously things involving the same participants in the administrative procedure, or things one applicant applications against several defendants or more applications of the applicant against the same defendant, the Court may consolidate the proceedings in this case alone, where this combination contributes to administrative cases faster and better.
194. article. Claims and administrative division (1) the Court or the judge may ask the applicant to release one or more of the claims in a separate application pools, if individual examination of claims for appropriate.
(2) the court hearing the case, may by decision to release one or more of the claims in a separate case the joint, if they are to be considered in the same proceedings become difficult or impossible.
22. the Department is the interlocutory

195. article. Interim basis (1) If there is reason to believe that the execution of the Court's decision in the case could be difficult or impossible, the Court shall, upon application by the applicant can take a reasoned decision on the application for interim relief. The application for interim measures indicated by the President of the feature.
(2) interim measures can be applied at any stage of the case.
196. article. Interim means interim measures can include: 1) Court's decision that until the judgment of the Court of Justice to replace the requested administrative act or actual action authority;
2) judicial decision imposing an obligation to the authority concerned within a time-limit draw certain activities or prohibiting a specific action.
197. article. In the matter of the application for interim relief applications for interim relief appearance at the hearing, which shall be notified to the members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle to the application of absence for treatment.
198. article. The President of the Court by means of changing the administrative process can replace the application for interim measures laid down by the President of another feature. The application shall be examined at the hearing, which shall be notified to the members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle to the application of absence for treatment.
199. article. The decision on the implementation of the interim decision on interim measures shall be implemented immediately in the order set out in the enforcement of the Court judgment.
200. article. The interim withdrawal (1) the President may cancel the same court after administrative process.
(2) an application for the cancellation of the interim hearing, decide by giving participants in the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle to the application of absence for treatment.
(3) application for cancellation of the application for interim relief may also decide the course of the proceedings.
201. article. Interim termination if the application for interim measures, the abolition of the rejected interim measures remains up to the date of entry into force of the judgment.
202. article. The decision on interlocutory appeals (1) interlocutory decision in the matter of an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
(2) where a decision on interim measures taken without the presence of the members of the administrative procedure, the time limit for submission of an ancillary complaint of the date when he received a copy of that decision.
(3) next to the complaint about the decision on interim measures does not suspend the execution.
(4) an ancillary complaint submitted for decision, which canceled or changed the interim President, suspends the execution of the decision.
23. Chapter administrative preparation for the hearing of the case, article 203. Send the application to the defendant and the defendant's explanation (1) the acceptance of the application for the examination of the application and the documents accompanying the transcripts sent to the defendant immediately and invite him to provide a written explanation to the Court. Explanation the judge shall set a time period which may not be longer than fourteen days from the date of dispatch of the copy.
(2) the defendant explanation indicates opposition to the application and be accompanied by proof that it approves of. The applicant's claim, the defendant may also recognise all or in part.
(3) an explanation submitted to the Court with such copies as much as is in the case of the applicant and the third party.
(4) an explanation of the failure is not an obstacle to consideration.
204. article. The judge's actions in preparing the trials (1) preparing the trials, the judge shall perform the following procedural steps: 1 decide question of) third parties joined in the case;
2) decide the issue of provision of evidence;
3) decide the issue of the Court's task of sending other courts;
4 decide issues of law) article 30 of the bodies referred to in the evidence;
5) decide the issue of calling witnesses to the hearing;
6) decide the issue of the determination of expertise;
7) require written and exhibits evidence of this law and article 169.173 set in order;
8) decide the question whether the present case is not the writing process;
9) determines the defendant or decide the question of its replacement, if the defendant is not specified or specified incorrectly;
10) carry out other necessary procedural actions.
(2) if necessary, the judge may ask to appear at the administrative actors and their representatives, to asking him about the merits of the objections to the application, explain their procedural rights and obligations, find out their views on the possibility of referral of the writing process, as well as decide other things preparation issues.
(3) the judge may ask the administrative process participants in writing to answer questions about the factual circumstances and legal nature, as well as their views on the izprasī the opportunity to proceed to the writing process.
205. article. Send a copy of the explanation After receiving the explanation of the defendant the Court shall immediately forward a copy to the applicant and the third party.
206. article. Determination of the hearing (1) when the explanatory or on its deadline for submission expired the judge adopts a decision which determines the date of the hearing, the time and the Court invited and called person.
(2) the first paragraph of this article shall not apply in cases which present a written process.
24. Chapter hearing 207. article. Limitations the presence of courtroom courtroom getting into an number of persons determined by the Court under the existing courtroom space. Relatives of the applicant or his other invited Parties and mass media employees have the advantage of right to be present at the hearing.
208. article. The hearing procedure (1) the members of the administrative procedure, witnesses, experts and interpreters and other persons present at the hearing to follow the procedure laid down in this law, and must unconditionally obey the instructions of the President of the court hearing and court decisions.
(2) the Court's courtroom at parties must behave so as not to interfere with the course of the hearing.
(3) the Court enters the courtroom and leaving the courtroom of the Court of the persons present stands up.
(4) the members of the administrative procedure, witnesses, experts and interpreters provide explanations and evidence for the Court, standing up.
(5) judgment of the Court of Justice in the courtroom listening room, standing up.
(6) depart from this article in third, fourth and fifth part can only with the permission of the Chairman of the hearing.
209. article. Enforcement hearing (1) a Person who interferes with the procedure at the time of the hearing, the Court expressed a warning.
(2) If a person who is not a participant in the process, repeatedly interfering with the order, the Court is expelled from the courtroom. On the dignity of the Court, this person may also be called to account in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
(3) If a member of the administrative procedure, a witness, expert or interpreter repeatedly disturb the order, the Court may impose forced those people money to fifty lats or be expelled from the courtroom.
(4) If the applicant is deported, defendant or third party is in accord with the new at the same meeting, the Chairman of the hearing, that person was presented with the procedural steps that met its absence.
210. article. In the course of the hearing the court filing, you can write down or otherwise record, without compromising its performance. Use hearing a sound or image recording and transmission techniques may be only with the permission of the Court. Before deciding this question the court listens to the views of members of the administrative procedure.
25. the Department's administrative trial article 211. Hearing vacate (1) at the hearing, chaired by the President of the court hearing, the judge to whom the case was transferred for treatment.
(2) the President of the Court directs the proceedings so as to ensure that all administrative proceedings participants an equal opportunity to participate in the investigation of the circumstances of the case and objective hearing.
212. article. The trial launch of the trial court in defined time enters the courtroom, the Court found, reported, a case will be heard, calling the Court composition and interpretation, if it participates in the case.
213. article. Invited and called the arrival of persons (1) hearing the Secretary shall report to the Court in which the case and summoned the people invited to come, or is notified of the sitting of the Court who has not come, and any information received about the reasons of absence.
(2) the Court shall verify the identity of the tourist arrivals, as well as the powers of officials and representatives.
214. article. Member of the administrative procedure, a witness, expert or interpreter in the absence of the effect of (1) If on the hearing did not appear any of the members of the administrative procedure, a witness, expert or interpreter, the Court starts a hearing, unless in accordance with this law or article 268.269. There is no reason to postpone it.
(2) If a member of the administrative procedure, which did not appear at the hearing, is in court for their declared cause of absence, the Court can impose this person forced money to fifty lats.
(3) if any of the members of the administrative procedure does not appear before the Court for reasons which the Court considers is not justified, the Court can impose this person forced money up to a hundred lats.

(4) witnesses and experts who are not present at the hearing, the law applicable. 179.166 and procedural penalties laid down in article 9.
215. article. The participation of an interpreter at the hearing (1) the Court shall explain the interpreter for his obligation to translate their personal explanations, questions, and requests for applications that do not understand the language in which the proceedings take place, but these people, other members of the administrative procedure, questions, explanations, applications, requests, read the contents of documents, court orders and court rulings.
(2) the Court shall warn the interpreter that the waiver be translated or the translation of the intentionally wrong they may be held criminally liable under the criminal code.
(3) the interpreter can declare a rejection when it is clear that he does not provide adequate translation.
216. article. Removal of witnesses from the courtroom to Witness the beginning of their questioning is expelled from the courtroom. Sitting President to court questioning the witness not communicate with not questioning witnesses.
217. article. Explanation of rights and obligations of the members of the administrative procedure (1) the Court shall explain the administrative procedure by the actors of their procedural rights and obligations.
(2) the court proceedings in the course of explaining the administrative procedural actions enforcement participants or the consequences of failure.
218. article. The rejection decision (1) the Court shall determine whether the members of the administrative procedure is rejections to the judge, expert or interpreter.
(2) log on to the rejection of the law court decides, in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 119.
219. article. Explanation of rights and obligations of the expert the Court explained to the expert his rights and obligations and warns that the waiver of the naming or opinion about intentionally false expert opinion going can be held criminally liable under the criminal code.
220. article. The administrative process for the proposed decision to the Court of the request, whether the members of the administrative process is a request related to the hearing, and decide it by the rest of the members of the administrative procedure the perspective of hearing.
221. article. The beginning of the proceedings on the merits (1) the substance of the matter starts with the President of the hearing report on the circumstances of the case.
(2) after the Court examined whether the applicant maintained the claim contained in the application and whether the defendant admits.
222. article. Waiver of claims and claim recognition (1) orally at the hearing expressed refusal of the claim record the minutes of the hearing and signed by the applicant. Waiver of claims submitted in writing for the Court, added to the case.
(2) the recognition of the claim at the hearing, the record of the minutes of the hearing and signed by the respondent. The recognition of the claim submitted to the Court in writing, accompanied by the case.
(3) to refuse to admit the claim and the claim can be completed before the substance of the matter.
(4) The applicant's abandonment of the claim, the Court adopted a decision terminating the proceedings at the same time.
223. article. The administrative process explanation (1) members of the administrative procedure gives explanations at the hearing in the following order: the applicant, the third party with an independent claim, the defendant.
(2) if the case involves a third party who does not have an independent claim, it gives clarification by the applicant or respondent, depending on which side the person concerned is participating in the case.
(3) the holder of the right, who cut the application to court to defend the rights and legitimate interests, provided explanations at the hearing first.
(4) the representatives of the members of the administrative procedure to give explanations of their chosen word.
(5) the members of the administrative procedure the explanatory notes specify the conditions on which they based the claims or objections. If the applicant and the respondent has admitted a legal fact, it records the minutes of the hearing and signed by the applicant, the respondent, respectively, or both during the administrative procedure.
(6) if the members of the administrative procedure to evidence and the Court finds that they required, the Court may ask them to submit.
(7) the administrative procedure members are eligible to submit their comments in writing to the Court.
(8) the members of the administrative procedure written explanations read the court order specified in this article, pursuant to this law, the provisions of article 113.
224. article. The applicant's affidavit (1) If no other evidence or they are not safe enough, the applicant — natural person may, upon the invitation of the Court confirm under oath his explanation, which contains the particulars of the facts on which he based the claims or objections.
(2) Before giving the applicant an explanatory sign a receipt for the following content: "I, (name), with the oath I certify that to the best of my knowledge will say the truth and the only truth and nothing noklusēš. I have explained that the deliberate deception of the Court for me can be held criminally liable under the criminal code. "
(3) a Declaration on applicant's signature is added to the case.
225. article. Questions of order (1) with the permission of the Court in administrative proceedings participants can ask each other questions. Court rejects questions that do not apply to the case.
(2) the Court may put questions to the members of the administrative procedure in any hearing.
226. article. Proof of inspection arrangements in the determination of the Court on its own initiative or at the request of the members of the administrative procedure can determine other evidence check sequence than that laid down in this law.
227. article. Witness the warning (1) before the Court of witness questioning clarified his identity, explaining the refuse from self-incrimination and warn that the intentionally false testimony or for unreasonable waiver of hearing, they may be held criminally liable.
(2) Before questioning a witness sign the following declaration: "the contents of I, (name), will testify in court about what I know of a case in which I am called as a witness. I have explained that the intentionally false testimony or unjustified refusal to testify for me can be held criminally liable under the criminal code. "
(3) a Declaration on the occasion of the signature of the witness case.
(4) a witness who is not reached 14 years of age, the Court explains his duty to truly suggest, tell him this case known, but does not warn you of this witness for the consequences due to the unjustified refusal to testify or for knowingly false testimony.
228. article. (1) a witness questioning every witness questioned separately.
(2) Witnesses give their evidence and answer questions orally.
(3) the Court shall establish the witness's relationship with members of the administrative procedure and invites her to tell the Court everything that witness personally known case, avoiding the news, which he cannot provide sources as well as from its own assumptions and conclusions; The Court stopped the witness explained where he talks about the circumstances that do not apply to the case.
(4) with the permission of the Court in administrative proceedings participants can ask questions to the witness. The first question asks the administrative process by which, at the request of the witness called, and then other members of the administrative procedure. After the trial the witness invited by the initiative of the first questions the applicant, then the other members of the administrative procedure. Court rejects questions that do not apply to the case.
(5) the Court may ask the witness questions at any point in his questioning.
(6) if necessary, the Court may question a witness a second time in the same or the next session, as well as to make the witness konfrontēšan.
(7) If the circumstances which call for witnesses, it is established, the Court with the consent of members of the administrative procedure may not question a witness, accept arrivals on their decision.
229. article. Witness the right to use the written notes during the hearing a witness may use notes when writing his testimony related to a calculation or other data which are difficult to remember. These comments display Court and administrative proceedings, and the decision of the Court may add a thing.
230. article. Minor (1) a witness interrogation of witness questioning minors at the discretion of the Court to be a legal representative, the technician on the rights of the child, a psychologist or a teacher's presence. These people can also ask questions of the witnesses for minors.
(2) if it is necessary to establish the fact, the minor witness interrogation after the Court decision can be expelled from the courtroom any administrative proceedings and Court members in the Chamber of the people present. After the administrative process of the return of the Court Chamber, he presented the testimony of the minor witness and give him a chance to ask this witness questions.
231. article. Witness testimony of the witness testimony of the reading obtained evidence assurance or court order or task in the previous hearing, read the hearing pursuant to this law, the provisions of article 113.
232. article. Questioning the witness duty

Questioning the witnesses must remain in the Chamber of the Court until the end of the hearing. He can leave the court room before the end of the hearing the Court, in accordance with the decision taken at the administrative hearing process point of view.
233. article. Expert opinion and expert questioning (1) expert opinion read at the hearing, pursuant to this law, the provisions of article 113.
(2) the Court of Justice and the administrative process participants can ask the expert questions in the same order and order as witnesses.
(3) article 182 of this Act in the cases referred to, the Court may impose additional or repeated expertise.
234. article. Written examination (1) evidence in case the existing written evidence or it is read the minutes of the review hearing, pursuant to article 113 of this law, the provisions of the administrative procedure or the players, but if necessary, experts and witnesses.
(2) the issue of a written evidence to the Court to decide the case after it rolled out administrative process with the contents of the evidence and listened to their views.
(3) personal correspondence may be read in open court only with the consent of the persons within which it was sarakstīšan. If such consent is not a relevant person or dead, above evidence reads and checks in a closed hearing.
235. article. Written evidence of the opposition (1) administrative proceedings may challenge the truthfulness of written evidence.
(2) the written evidence of the truthfulness To may not object to the person who signed it. This person can challenge such evidence if the signature given the violence, threat or false.
(3) the applicant contested the written evidence gives the same hearing an explanation of whether he wants to use this written evidence or ask them to exclude from evidence.
(4) If a member of the administrative procedure wants to use the contested evidence, Court, compared it with other evidence in the case, shall decide on the admissibility of its use.
(5) land registry, notarial and other law provisions stating the truth can not be questioned. It can be a challenge to travel alone.
236. article. Application for written evidence of counterfeiting (1) administrative proceedings may submit a reasoned application for written evidence of counterfeiting.
(2) the Person who submitted this evidence, can ask the Court to exclude it from the evidence.
(3) an application for written evidence of counterfeiting, the Court may determine the expertise or request other evidence.
(4) if the Court finds that the evidence is false, writing it off it from the evidence and the fact shall be notified to the public prosecutor's Office of the counterfeits.
(5) if the Court finds that the administrative process is deliberately not unreasonably proposed a dispute about writing the fake evidence, it may be that a member of the administrative procedure to impose a coercive fine of up to a hundred lats.
237. article. Items of evidence (1) overview of the evidence at the hearing and presented to the members of the administrative procedure, but, if necessary, experts and witnesses.
(2) the administrative process of evidence can provide explanations and express their views and requests.
(3) items of proof viewing Protocol drawn up providing evidence or judicial task order, reads the Court, pursuant to this law, the provisions of article 113.
238. article. Proof of inspection and verification on the spot (1) If written evidence or exhibits can not be delivered to the Court, the Court shall take a decision on the review and check their location.
(2) for the review of evidence on the ground, the Court shall notify the participants in the administrative procedure. This person does not have prevented the arrival inspection.
(3) To review the evidence in the Court of the location can call the experts and witnesses.
(4) in view of the progress recorded in the minutes of the hearing, which shall be accompanied by the inspection and audit compiled evidence of plans, drawings and pictures.
239. article. The opinion of the institution (1) after hearing the evidence the court listens to check its article 30 of this law, in the opinion of the said institutions that participate in the process in accordance with the law.
(2) the judge and the administrative process participants can ask questions to the representative of that institution because of the opinion.
240. article. The essence of the trial completion (1) after examination of the evidence, the Court applied the administrative process views on the possibility of completing the proceedings on the merits.
(2) if there is no need to check the additional evidence, the Court shall ascertain whether the applicant maintained the claim contained in the application.
(3) if the applicant does not waive a claim, the Court shall declare the proceedings on the merits for the finish and go to the Court debate.
241. article. Judicial debate (1) Court debate first speaks of the applicant or his representative, then the defendant or his representative. The holder of the right, who turned to the courts to defend the rights and legal interests, the Court debate first.
(2) If a case involving third party with an independent claim, the person or the representative of the applicant and the defendant after the speech.
(3) a third party who has no independent claim or its representative speaks after the applicant or respondent, depending on which side the third party case.
(4) the members of the Court debate is not entitled to rely on in their speeches and evidence that were not tested in court.
(5) a court suspends debate participant if he is talking about conditions that do not apply to the case.
242. article. Replicas (1), after the administrative process, participants talked about the debate, they have a right to reply to each one.
(2) the last right on cue is the defendant or his representative.
(3) the Court may limit the duration of the replica.
243. article. Notice of judgment (1) if the Court debate and reply, if any, the Court will go to make judgment by giving the courts the courtroom audience and the delivery of the judgment in time and space.
(2) if the Court finds that this hearing is not likely to make the judgment that operative part, it shall set the next hearing for the next ten days, which it will announce the verdict.
244. article. Resumption of the hearing (1) if the Court during deliberations of the Court considers it necessary to ascertain new facts which are relevant in a case, or in addition to verify existing or new evidence, it shall resume the proceedings on the merits.
(2) in such case, the hearing will continue in accordance with the procedure laid down in this chapter.
245. article. Administrative proceedings in the case of the written procedure is covered in the written procedure, the Court shall determine the delivery of the judgment. Judgment of the Court of Justice make to documents in the case, subject to the statutory procedure for judgment.
26. Chapter judgment 246. article. General provisions (1) the Court of Justice, which by nature, adjudicates the case to make a judgment and declare on behalf of the people of Latvia.
(2) make a judgment and declare the following.
(3) the Judgment must be legal and justified.
(4) there should be no direct or indirect interference in the judgment or judicial influence.
247. article. The rule of law and the validity of the judgment (1) Make a judgment, based on the material and procedural legal norms.
(2) a court judgment shall be based on the circumstances established by the evidence in the case or that, in accordance with article 153 of this Act need not be demonstrated.
(3) a court judgment shall be based solely on the conditions on which the members of the administrative procedure were able orally or in writing, to express their views.
248. article. Order of judgment (1) If a judgment rendered, the collegiate court sitting President expressed his views last.
(2) the Court shall make a judgment, all resolutions adopted by a majority. Judgment signed by all judges.
(3) in the case of a judge sitting alone, the appearance of the judgment signed this judge.
(4) after the signing of the amendment or change is not allowed.
249. article. Compliance with the limits of the claim the Court make judgment on the subject-matter of the application indicated by the applicant shall not exceed the boundaries of the claim.
250. article. Check the amount and limits of an opposition (1) the Court shall make a judgment, examine whether: 1 the administrative acts issued), respecting the procedural and formal preconditions;
2) administrative act shall meet the provisions of substantive law;
3 administrative law grounds) to justify the obligation to the recipient or assigned, approved or rejected.
(2) the Court of Justice, when assessing the lawfulness of the administrative act, the judgment shall take into account only the circumstances on which the authority has referred to the justification of the administration.
(3) the Court shall make a judgment on the Authority's actual action, examine whether the actual action has been carried out under the procedural and formal preconditions, and that it complies with the provisions of substantive law.
251. article. Form and content of the judgment (1) a judgment shall be made in writing.
(2) a judgment consists of introductory paragraph, descriptive parts, theme part and the operative part.

(3) the introductory terms indicates that the judgment was delivered on behalf of the people of Latvia, as well as of the time of judgment, the Court has given the name of the judgment, the Court's composition, the administrative process and the subject of the application. If the case dealt with the writing process, the introductory part shall state this fact.
(4) the applicant shall indicate in the descriptive part of the claims and objections of the defendant, as well as the administrative process provided an explanation of the nature of the participants. If the case dealt with the writing process, indicate in the descriptive part of the administrative process.
(5) the theme part: 1) in the case of established facts, evidence, which justified the Court's conclusions and arguments with which rejected one or other evidence;
2) rules on which the Court relied;
3) the circumstances of the case found the legal assessment;
4) references to published court judgments and legal literature, as well as other special literature, which the Court used its reasoning;
5) Court's conclusions on the merits of the application.
(6) in the operative part of the judgment indicates on the application in whole or in part, for the satisfaction, or rejecting, in whole or in part and the substance of the judgment. In addition, the point having to pay stamp duty, this law, 253, 254 and 255.. time limits referred to in article, as well as the time limit for appeals against the judgment and order.
252. article. The short judgment (1) in exceptional cases, the Court may draw up abbreviated forms of judgment, which consists of an introductory part and the operative part.
(2) in this case, the full Court judgments shall be drawn up within ten days, indicating the date of its signature.
253. article. Judgment on the administrative cancellation or invalidation (1) If an application for the administrative act of revocation or invalidity of the Court considers reasonable, the relevant administrative act is repealed in whole or in part thereof or recognize it as void. The Administrative Court in the event of the cancellation of the Act lays down that day administrative act shall be deemed to be repealed.
(2) if necessary, especially if the administrative act before the cancellation or annulment void launched its execution, the Court judgment shall specify the manner in which the authority should be initiated enforcement consequences avoided, and instructs the body for this purpose, a specific term to perform specific actions.
(3) in the cases provided for in the law, the Court may amend the administrative provisions and to identify specific content.
(4) if the Court accepts the applicant's right to compensation, it asks the applicant to pay the judgment, the reimbursement and fix it.
254. article. The judgment of the administrative act favourable to issue (1) If an application for the issue of an administrative act, the Court considers reasonable, it instructs the institution to issue the administrative act in question.
(2) a court judgment shall be determined by the administrative act, content and period of issue, if the authority is no longer need to make efficiency considerations. Authority no longer be made for reasons of efficiency, if it is: 1) the compulsory administrative act (article 65, paragraph 1);
2) content check the administrative act (65, the third part of the article), but the Court has already made all the necessary precautions and come to the conclusion that the right can only be one specific content administrative act.
(3) where the authority has yet to be made to the efficiency of the Court's comments, the judgment States that the authority should issue a given period the administrative act. Issue the administrative act, the authority is necessarily the judgment established facts and their legal assessment.
(4) in the second paragraph of this article to the specified case, the judgment of the administrative act until replaced by the authority issue.
255. article. Judgment on the Authority's actual action (1) If the Court considers that the application of the reasonable demands of the institutions fact action, it makes a judgment on the Authority's obligation to execute specific actions and determine the due date.
(2) If the Court considers reasonable application that requires to ban authority to carry out the specific actual action, the Court shall make a judgment, which prohibits the authority to carry out the specific actual action.
256. article. Judgment on public-law relationship, the existence or not of the content of the finding if the subject is a specific public legal relations of existence, non-existence or content of the statement of the Court in which the judgment rendered is determined that the specific public legal relations exist or do not exist, or is set to the content (of the resulting rights and obligations).
257. article. Judgment in favour of the applicant or more against several defendants (1) Judgment in favour of the more applicants indicates which part of the judgment relating to each of them.
(2) a judgment against several defendants indicated that part of the judgment is to be executed for each of them or that their liability shall be joint and several.
258. article. The judgment (1) a judgment declaring the hearing, sitting President reads it. With the consent of members of the administrative procedure, the Court can only read the introductory paragraph of the judgment and the operative part. In this case, the copy of the judgment of the Court of the administrative procedure be served to participants immediately after the judgment.
(2) declaring a shortened judgment, the Court shall notify the date of the full judgment will be drawn up.
(3) following the judgment the Court explains its content, modalities and deadlines for appeals.
259. article. In a written judgment in the process of examining cases (1) case, which dealt with the writing process, was sentenced by the Court for the hearing and notify the members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle of absence of judgment.
(2) the judgment shall be given in accordance with this law, article 258, first and third part.
260. article. Clerical and mathematical calculation error correction (1) the Court, on its own initiative, or a member of the administrative procedure, the application can correct the ruling clerical or mathematical error in the calculation. Question about error correction for hearing, notice to the members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle of absence to examine the question of error correction.
(2) clerical or mathematical error in the calculation of judgment corrected by decision of the Court.
(3) the decision of the Court to make a judgment error correction during the administrative procedure may submit a complaint to the next.
261. article. Papildspriedum (1) the Court which delivered the judgment in the case, may, on its own initiative or on application by an administrative process to make papildspriedum if: 1) no judgment on any of the claims, which were filed in evidence and, if the case pending hearing process, the members of the administrative procedure have given explanations;
2) Court is not specified by the action to be taken, the Authority fined the amount of stuff that needs to be released, or Government fees refund applicant or the State.
(2) Papildspriedum the judgment may propose law judgment within the time limit.
(3) the examination of this question of the time and place of the Court shall notify the participants in the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle of absence to decide the question of papildspriedum of the judgment.
(4) the decision of the Court to refuse the papildspriedum alone an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
262. article. Explanation of the judgment (1) a court which delivered the judgment may by members of the administrative procedure, the application of the decision explain, without amending its content.
(2) a judgment clarifying permissible, if it has not yet been performed and it is not expired.
(3) the question for advocacy in court hearing, notice to the members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle of absence to consider the judgment of advocacy.
(4) the decision of the Court judgment on the issue of clarifying an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
263. article. The entry into force of the judgment (1) a court judgment shall enter into force after the expiry of the order in appeal for redress and complaint has not been submitted.
(2) where a judgment appealed, not a part of the judgment it shall enter into force on the expiry of the appeal against it.
(3) a member of the administrative procedure, as well as his successor after the entry into force of the judgment do not have the right to submit the application to the Court on the same subject on the same basis as well as another process to challenge Court between facts.
(4) a judgment has entered into force, have the force of law, it is mandatory and enforceable, it may be withdrawn only in cases stipulated by law and order.
(5) at the request of the applicant, the Court issued him a copy of the judgment to the inscription on its entry into force.
264. article. The execution of the judgment of the enforcement of judgments after its entry into force, except where the Court has determined that the judgment is enforceable immediately.
265. article. Immediately enforceable judgments (1) at the request of the applicant, the Court judgment may stipulate that it is enforceable immediately in full or in part.
(2) the execution of the judgment immediately permissible if special circumstances enforcement delay can cause considerable harm to the applicant or enforcement may become impossible.
266. article. The Division of enforcement, enforcement or modification of the agenda

(1) the Court which has given judgment in the case, after the administrative process of the application, subject to the specific circumstances, you can divide enforcement of time limits, as well as to amend the enforcement type and order.
(2) the application shall be examined at the hearing, notice to the members of the administrative procedure. The absence of that person to be an obstacle for the examination of the application.
(3) the decision of the Court to divide enforcement of time limits, as well as on the enforcement type and order modification of an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
267. article. Send a copy of the judgment (1) a copy of the judgment of the administrative process to the participant, who has not participated in the hearing, sent three days after it is rendered, but if judgment is rendered in a shortened, three days after the full judgment.
(2) if the Member has participated in the hearing and the Court has given a shortened judgment, after his written request was forwarded to him a full copy of the judgment within three days after it was placed.
27. Chapter administrative suspension of proceedings article 268. Obligation of the Court to postpone the hearing, the Court postponed a hearing if: 1) the defendant has not received a copy of the application and therefore asked to postpone a hearing;
2) need, to call on the members of the administrative procedure, the person whose rights or legal interests may be affected by the judgment of the Court of Justice;
3) does not appear at the hearing, one of the members of the administrative procedure, and he has not been notified of the hearing date and location.
269. article. The right of the Court to defer proceedings the Court may postpone a hearing if it finds that: 1) it is not possible to review the case because no one had arrived during the administrative procedure, a witness, expert or interpreter;
2) still need to collect evidence.
270. article. The decision on the suspension of the proceedings (1) the decision on the suspension of the trial record in the minutes of the hearing.
(2) the decision on suspension of proceedings indicates procedural actions that must be met by the next court hearing, as well as the time of the next hearing.
(3) the next hearing date and time of the Court declares against the signature of the persons who come to the Court of session. Absent from the new invited or summoned to court.
(4) the decision on the suspension of the proceedings is not subject to further appeal, except where the decision is fixed for the next hearing.
271. article. Witness questioning, delaying the proceedings (1) if the court hearing is present all the members of the administrative procedure, the Court, delaying the proceedings, may question a witness arrivals.
(2) Nopratināto witnesses, if necessary, may call up for the next hearing.
272. article. Resumption of proceedings (1) the Court shall resume the proceedings, after suspension, previously made procedural acts are not repeated.
(2) at the request of the members of the administrative procedure, the Court read the minutes of the previous sitting.
Chapter 28 a stay of proceedings in the administrative case of article 273. Obligation of the Court to stay the proceedings, the Court shall suspend the proceedings if: 1) natural person died or ceased to exist in a legal person who is the applicant or a third party with an independent claim, and if the disputed legal relationship allows transfer of rights;
2) applicant or third party lost capacity;
3) case is not possible until another matter pending before the courts or the authority.
274. article. The right of the Court to stay the proceedings, the Court may stay the proceedings if: 1) it determines the inspection;
2) applicant or third party, illness, age, disability or other relevant reasons could not participate in the proceedings.
275. article. The period of stay of proceedings the proceedings shall be suspended: 1) this law article 273 of the cases provided for in paragraph 1, to the successor or legal representative of the determination of the appointment;
2) this law article 273 (2) in the cases provided for in the appointment of the representative until legal;
3) this law article 273 3. in the cases provided for in paragraph 1, until the entry into force of a judgment or decision of the case;
4) 274. this law provided for in paragraph 1 of article case — until you received the expert's opinion;
5) this law 274. paragraph 2 in the case provided for in the Court — until the period set by the representation of the design.
276. article. The decision on the suspension of the proceedings (1) the suspension of the proceedings the Court shall adopt a reasoned decision a separate procedural document.
(2) the decision shall specify the conditions to which the time of onset or termination proceedings stopped, if the period to which the proceedings are suspended.
(3) the decision of the Court to stay the proceedings of an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
277. article. Renewal of proceedings the Court restores the proceedings on its own initiative or on the application of a participant in the administrative process.
29. Chapter without leaving the application. Article 278. Court leave application without court leave application without examination, if the applicant is not 1) statutory notice things the previous extrajudicial procedures;
2) application submitted by a competent person;
3 the name of the applicant) an application submitted by a person who is authorized in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law;
4) of the same or another court hearing in administrative proceedings between the same participants in the administrative procedure concerning the same subject and on the same basis.
279. article. The right of the Court to leave the application without hearing the Court may leave application without examination: 1) at the request of the applicant;
2) if the applicant for which notification of the hearing time and space without arriving at the hearing without justification and is not asked to review the case in his absence.
Article 280. Decision on the application for abandonment without examination (1) On application without leaving a court shall adopt a reasoned decision a separate procedural document.
(2) the decision of the Court to leave the application without an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
281. article. The consequences of abandonment application without examination if the application is left without examination, the applicant may submit a new application to the Court under the procedure laid down in the law.
Chapter 30 such termination in the administrative case 282. article. The termination of the proceedings, the Court shall terminate the proceedings based on the case if: 1) case is not pending on the agenda of the administrative process;
2) application submitted by a person who is not entitled to file the application;
3) the entry into force of a judgment given in proceedings between the same participants in the administrative procedure concerning the same subject and on the same basis;
4 the applicant waives the application);
5 the contested legal relationship) does not allow transfer of rights after the death of the natural person who is the applicant;
6) stopped to exist in a legal person who is the applicant, and not its successor.
283. article. The decision on the termination of the proceedings (1) the termination of the proceedings, the Court shall adopt a reasoned decision a separate procedural document.
(2) the decision of the Court to terminate the proceedings an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
284. article. Consequences of termination of proceedings if the proceedings are terminated, the Court again against the same defendant on the same subject and on the same basis.
Chapter 31 court decision article 285. Decision making (1) a court ruling by which the case is heard on the merits, in the form of a decision.
(2) the decision to draw up a separate procedural document, in the form of a resolution or record the minutes of the hearing.
(3) the judge's procedural action that is executed outside the hearing, adopt a decision that draws up a separate procedural document or resolution.
(4) the decision may be presented in the form of a resolution, if it is not appealable.
286. article. The content of the decision (1) the decision of the Court: 1) decision, place and time;
2 the name and composition of the Court);
3) of the administrative procedure and the subject matter of the application of the participants;
4) issues on which a decision;
5 themes of the decision);
6 the Court or judge's ruling);
7) procedure for appeals against decisions and deadlines.
(2) in exceptional cases, the Court may draw up the decision without its themes (short for decision). The full decision of the Court shall draw up, not later than the next day.
287. article. (1) notification of the decision the decision of the Court shall notify the participants in the administrative procedure.
(2) the decision taken a separate procedural document, within three days, forward to the administrative process to the participant, if he has not participated in the hearing, as well as those to which it relates.
(3) the decision taken outside the hearing, a member of the administrative procedure within three days of sending the notification.
288. article. Next to the decision of the Court (1) If, in proceedings, found circumstances, possibly indicating a breach of a rule of law, as well as in other cases, the Court can accept the next decision. Next decision sends to the institution concerned.
(2) the Court may determine the next decision a particular task execution time, as well as that institution and the period within which to reply. Official who fails to comply with a decision or during the next does not respond, the Court may impose a coercive fine of up to a hundred lats.
(3) if the Court, considering the case, discovered signs of the crime, the next decision is sent to the Prosecutor's Office.
The fourth section of the proceedings in the Court of appeal 32. Chapter appeals submission

289. article. Right of appeal of the judgment of the Court of first instance and administrative process of the papildspriedum member can lodge an appeal.
290. article. Appeals procedure (1) the district (City) Court judgment which has entered into force may appeal to the appeal procedure in the District Court.
(2) the District Court addressed to the appeal submitted to the Court that delivered the judgment.
(3) if the appeal is submitted directly to a specified period, the period is not in the District Court considered overdue.
291. article. Deadline for submission of an appeal (1) the appeal can be filed within twenty days from the date of the judgment.
(2) if the Court's full judgment determines otherwise, the time limits for appeals from these days. If the full judgment shall be made after the deadline, the time limit for appeals from the full judgment.
(3) the appeal that was submitted after the deadline, refuses to accept and return to the applicant.
292. article. The content of the appeal (1) the appeal shall state: 1 the name of the Court), which addressed the complaint;
2) the complainant, as well as his authorized representative, if the appeal is submitted by a representative, the name and residence or other address where the person is reachable (legal person – name, registration number and registered office);
3 the defendant representative bodies) and its location;
4) judgment for which the complaint;
5) extent to which the judgment appealed from;
6) as to the accuracy of judgment does not disclose;
7) or log on request for evidence gathering (on which circumstances and why this evidence was not submitted to the Court of first instance);
8) the complainant's claim;
9) or accept the referral of a written process, if the district (City) Court case heard in the hearing process;
10) list of documents annexed to the complaint;
11) compose a complaint.
(2) the appeal shall be signed by the applicant or his authorized representative.
(3) an appeal made by a person who is not authorized, it refuses to accept and return to the applicant.
293. article. A copy of an appeal (1) the appeal shall be accompanied by its transcripts according to the number of participants in the administrative process and the document certifying payment of the State fees. If the appeal shall be accompanied by other documents to be submitted under their transcripts of the administrative procedure, the number of participants. This provision does not apply to documents for which the original or copies are already members of the administrative procedure.
(2) the Court, depending on the circumstances of the case and may release the complainant — physical person from the obligation to submit the appeal and copies of accompanying documents for distribution to the rest of the members of the administrative procedure.
294. article. The appeal of the limit of (1) the appeal shall not alter the subject matter of the application or framework, to include new claims that are not logged in the Court of first instance.
(2) on the new claim shall not be considered to: 1) clarification of the claim;
2) manifest error correcting application;
3) claim to pay the value of property in connection with the seizure, loss of or changes in its composition;
4) claim the total amount limits, amend the amount of ingredients;
5) claims to recognize the right of amendment to restore the injured claim rights in the course of the case changed in the circumstances.
295. article. Joining the appeal (1) and Līdzpieteicēj a third party participating in the process, the administrative side of the parties who submitted the appeal, filed the complaint can join.
(2) for joining the complaint shall notify in writing to the District Court not later than ten days before the hearing.
(3) On an application for joining the appeal for national duty without pay.
296. article. Leaving the appellant without guidance (1) the Court of first instance, the judge shall decide on the appeal leaving without guidance, if: 1) the applicant's appeal was not signed by or does not comply with this law, the requirements of article 292;
2) appeal is not accompanied by all required copies;
3) on an appeal the State fee has not been paid.
(2) the decision shall set a time limit for the applicant to deficiencies. On an ancillary complaint may be submitted. Deadlines for the submission of an ancillary complaint shall run from the date on which the person receives a copy of the decision.
(3) If within the period of time to resolve, the appeal shall be deemed to have been filed on the day on which it was first submitted to the Court. Otherwise, the complaint shall be deemed not to have been filed and shall be returned to the applicant.
(4) the appellant is not an obstacle to the return of the applicant to submit them again in court, subject to the provisions of this law on the appeal.
297. article. Appeals against a refusal of the decision to refuse to accept the appeal an ancillary complaint may be submitted. Deadlines for the submission of an ancillary complaint shall run from the date on which the person receives a copy of the decision.
298. article. Action after the adoption of an appeal (1) following the adoption of the appeal court within three days, notify the other participants of the administrative procedure and send them a complaint and accompanying documents, transcripts, indicating the time limit for the submission of written pleadings.
(2) After the expiry of the period for submission of the case with the complaint and accompanying documents within three days, send to the District Court.
299. article. The administrative process of written explanations (1) members of the administrative procedure the written explanation of the appeal with a copy of the explanation for the number of participants in the administrative procedure shall be submitted to the District Court within thirty days from the date of the sent a copy of the appeal.
(2) an explanation of the transcripts sent to the rest of the members of the administrative procedure.
300. article. The cross-appeal (1) On an appeal the administrative process may submit to the cross-appeal.
(2) the cross-appeal must comply with this law 289.292, 293 and 294,. the provisions of article, and pay a State fee of five dollars.
(3) the complaint shall be submitted to the cross-appeal the appellate court within the time limit provided for in Article 299 of the Act.
(4) After receipt of the complaint in the District Court of the cross-appeal was sent to the participants in the cross-appeal of the administrative procedure complaints certified.
33. the administrative proceedings Division of the Supreme Court of appeal article 301. Initiation of appeal (1) verified that the appeal procedure, the judge-rapporteur, after receiving the explanation or after the deadline for submission expired, shall decide on the appeal and the proceedings determined by the hearing date and time.
(2) it was found that the appeal was sent to the Court of appeal, in breach of the procedure for the appeal, the judge rapporteur shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) waiver to institute appeal proceedings, if a violation of the appeal period prescribed for or if the appeal presented by the person not authorised; in this case, the complaint together with the case sent to the Court of first instance, the complaint shall be returned to the applicant;
2 the transmission of the case), the Court of first instance statutory actions — if, by appeal, this law have not been complied with article 292 first or second part, or not paid the State fee.
(3) If the second paragraph of article 1 the conditions set out in paragraph finds at the hearing, the Court shall take a decision on the appeal, leaving without examination.
302. article. The boundaries of case on appeal (1) the appellate court examines the merits because the appeal and cross-appeal from the complainant of an amount as requested in these complaints.
(2) the appellate court shall take into consideration only the claims which are to be dealt with in the Court of first instance.
(3) the new claims are not considered this law case referred to in article 294.
(4) the appellate court examines the merits, other than this law, 303 cases referred to in article.
303. article. In exceptional cases, when the judgment of the Court of first instance shall be annulled and the case sent to the new Court of first instance (1) the appellate court regardless of the motives of a decision annulled the judgment of the Court of first instance and send the case to a new Court of first instance in the following cases: 1), the Court examined the case illegal;
2) the Court of Justice has been in breach of the procedural rules, which state that the administrative process must be communicated to the members of the Court's time and place, or examined the use of the written procedure, although the members of the administrative procedure a written consent;
3), the proceedings for infringement of the procedural rules for the language of the proceedings;
4) judgment of the Court of Justice determines the rights and obligations of persons who are not invited in as members of the administrative procedure;
5) in case no full Court judgment or trial protocol.

(2) the Court of appeal, upheld the appeal of the judgment of the Court of Justice, by which the proceedings are terminated in or left without examination, cancel the judgment of the Court of first instance in this part and in this part of the case sent to the Court of first instance.
304. article. Procedure for hearing appeals court (1) the appellate court case on a collegial basis by three judges.
(2) members of the administrative procedure calls and other persons summoned to the Court in accordance with this law, the provisions of Chapter 14.
(3) the hearing shall take place in accordance with this law, chapter 24 and 25 of the rules, noting that the first explanations provided by the appellant, but if the complainant, both the applicant and the respondent, the applicant.
305. article. Examination of evidence the appellate court (1) the appellate court the evidence examined and judged by this law, 18, 19 and 20 of the rules of the chapter.
(2) if necessary, the Court shall ask the participants in the administrative proceeding to submit additional evidence or understanding them.
(3) the fact that the Court of first instance found, and it is not disputed, the appeal court may not examine.
306. article. Appeal (cross-appeal) withdrawal of the complaint (1) appeal (cross-appeal) the complainant can withdraw it until you have completed the proceedings on the merits.
(2) If the appeal is withdrawn, the Court shall decide on the termination of the proceedings on appeal, except where the appeal (of the cross-appeal) the complaint submitted by another participant in the administrative process.
(3) if the appeal proceedings are terminated due to withdrawal of the appeal, the State fee shall not be refunded.
34. Chapter appeal court's decision in article 307. Judgment of the Court of appeal (1) Judgment of the Court of appeal make this law, 246-257. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article, except as provided for in this article.
(2) the introductory part of the Judgments in this law refers to in the third subparagraph of Article 251, under certain conditions, as well as mention of the appellant and the judgment complained of.
(3) the descriptive part of a judgment shall indicate the article 251 of this law in the fourth paragraph, under certain conditions, include the content of the judgment at first instance and on appeal (cross-appeal) complaints, as well as a short retelling of the opposition.
(4) the grounds of the Judgment indicates the article 251 of this Act in the fifth subparagraph, under certain conditions, as well as motivate treatment judgment of the Court of first instance.
308. The appeal of the judgment of the Court (1) the appellate court shall pass judgement in this law and in article 258.259.
(2) a copy of the judgment of the administrative procedure participants sent in this article 267 of the law.
309. article. The appellate court judgments (1) the appellate court judgment enters into force after expiry of the appeal in cassation and appeal in cassation has been lodged.
(2) If an appeal in cassation is filed, the appeal instance court judgment shall enter into force simultaneously with the: 1) Senate action the hearing decision if refused to propose the cassation proceedings;
2) Senate judgment, if the appellate court's judgment is not canceled.
(3) The appellate court to apply the law, the provisions of article 263.
310. article. Clerical and mathematical calculation to correct errors in the appeal court's judgment (1) appeals to the Court under article 260 of the Act in accordance with the procedure laid down in the judgment can correct clerical and mathematical calculation errors.
(2) the decision of the Court to commit error correction of judgment in administrative proceedings may submit a complaint to the next.
311. article. The appeal court in papildspriedum (1) the appellate court may, on the application of the administrative process or on its own initiative to make papildspriedum if: 1) no judgment on any of the claims, which were submitted in evidence and, if the case pending hearing process, the members of the administrative procedure have given explanations;
2) Court sentenced is not specified by the amount of stuff that needs to be released, the action to be performed, or to reimbursement of State fees to the applicant or to the State.
(2) the question of the papildspriedum of the judgment may be initiated within thirty days from the date of the judgment.
(3) the Court shall make Papildspriedum, after bringing the matter before the hearing, notice to the members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle of absence to decide the question of papildspriedum of the judgment.
(4) the Papildspriedum shall enter into force the law 309. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
(5) the decision of the Court to refuse the papildspriedum alone an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
312. article. The judgment of the appellate court's explanation of (1) the Court of appeal of this law, in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 262 may explain its verdict.
(2) The decision of the Court of Justice judgment in matters of advocacy an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
313. article. The appellate court decision enforcement (1) the appellate court judgments executed after its entry into force, except where the Court has determined that the judgment is enforceable immediately.
(2) at the request of the members of the administrative procedure for the appeal court's 265 and 266 of this Act. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article decide on enforcement, the Enforcement Division immediately deadlines or performance type and order modification.
(3) the decision of the Court to divide enforcement of time limits, as well as on the enforcement type and order modification of an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
314. article. A stay of proceedings in the administrative proceedings, leaving the application without examination, termination of proceedings, administrative proceedings in the appeal court suspended the proceedings, the application for leave and judicial review without cease in accordance with this law, 28, 29 and 30 chapters.
The fifth section of the Court of first instance and the appeal court's decision to appeal a court decision 35 Chapter 315 appeal. article. The right to appeal against the decision (1) the Court of first instance and the appeal court decision in administrative proceedings may appeal against the judgment of the Court of Justice, separate from the next complaint: 1) in the cases specified in this law;
2) if the Court decision prevents things going forward.
(2) on the other courts of first instance and appellate court decisions can be expressed in the opposition appeal or cassation complaint.
316. article. Deadline for submission of an ancillary complaint (1) an ancillary complaint may be submitted within ten days from the date of the Court decision, except in the cases provided for in this Act.
(2) an ancillary complaint submitted after that deadline expired, refuses to accept and return to the applicant.
317. article. Next to the lodging of the complaint procedure (1) next to the complaint shall be submitted to the Court that the decision adopted. Next complaint: 1) to the relevant District Court, of the decision of the Court of first instance;
2) Senate of appellate court decisions.
(2) for the next complaint of State fee shall not be paid.
(3) If an ancillary complaint submitted directly to a given period, it should be for the court appearance, maturity is not considered late.
318. article. Next to the content of the complaint (1) next to the complaint shall state: 1 the name of the Court), which addressed the complaint;
2) the complainant, as well as his authorized representative, if the complaint shall be submitted to the representative, the name and residence or other address where the person is reachable (legal person – name, registration number and registered office);
3 the defendant representative bodies) and its location;
4) the decisions of the complaint;
5) extent to which the decision being appealed;
6) gets the irregularity of the decision;
7) the complainant's request;
8) list of documents annexed to the complaint;
9) compose a complaint.
(2) next to the signature of the applicant, the complaint or by his authorized representative.
319. article. Next to a copy of the complaint (1) next to the complaint adds its transcripts and copies of accompanying documents, according to the number of participants in the administrative process.
(2) the Court, depending on the circumstances of the case and may release the complainant — physical person from the obligation to submit next to the complaint and accompanying documents, transcripts sent the rest of the members of the administrative procedure.
320. article. Next to the complainant without the guidance of abandonment (1) on the next complaint, which is not signed by the applicant or which is not accompanied by all required transcripts, or which does not comply with this law, the requirements of article 318, the judge shall decide on the continuation of an ancillary complaint without guidance and set a time limit for the correction of deficiencies. On an ancillary complaint may be submitted. Deadlines for the submission of an ancillary complaint shall run from the date on which the applicant received a copy of the decision.
(2) if the applicant in the decision deadline in the instructions next to the complaint shall be deemed to have been filed on the day on which it was first submitted to the Court. Otherwise, the next appeal is deemed not to have been filed and shall be returned to the applicant.
(3) next to the complaint the applicant is not an obstacle to the return of its repeated filing of court, subject to the provisions of this law on the next complaint.
321. article. The court action after the adoption of an ancillary complaint

(1) following the adoption of an ancillary complaint judge the complaint and accompanying documents, copies within three days, send to the members of the administrative procedure.
(2) the expiry of the time limit for appeal within three days of the case, together with the ancillary complaint shall forward to it the Court that the complaint is addressed.
322. article. Next to the complaints handling policy next to examine the complaint in the order in which a statutory matter to the appellate court.
323. article. The District Court and the District Court jurisdiction of the Senate and the Senate the next complaint, have the right to: 1) leave the decision unchanged, but the complaint is dismissed.
2) annul the decision wholly or in part and refer the matter for a new hearing to the Court that the decision taken;
3) annul the decision wholly or in part and with his decision to decide the matter on the merits;
4) to amend the decision.
324. article. On the next appeal decision adopted (1) on the next appeal to the decision may not be appealed, and it shall enter into force from the moment of its adoption.
(2) the decision of the regional court, which rejected the appeal on the next decision, by which the proceedings are terminated, on the basis of this law, article 282 1 and 2, or refusing to accept the application, on the basis of this law, article 191, first paragraph, point 1 and 8, can be appealed to the Senate within ten days from the date of its adoption.
The sixth section of the cassation instance COURT TIERSVEDĪB in chapter 36 of the Cassation article 325. The right to submit a cassation complaint to the appeal court judgment and papildspriedum of the administrative procedure may be appealed in cassation if the court violated the substantive or procedural rules of law or the case exceeded the limits of its competence.
326. article. The substantive law the breach of substantive rules to be recognized as a violation, if the Court has not imposed: 1) the substantive law, which should have been applied;
2) applied the substantive law that should not have been applied;
3) misinterpreted the rules of substantive law.
327. article. Infringement of procedural provisions (1) the provisions of procedural law shall be considered a violation, if the Court of Justice: 1) has not imposed rules the procedural rights which should have been applied;
2) applied the provisions of procedural law, which should not have been applied;
3) misinterpreted the provisions of procedural law.
(2) procedural rules violations may be grounds for appeals against the judgement in cassation, if this violation has led or could lead to wrong judgment of the case.
(3) the infringement of procedural rules that could lead to wrong judgment of the case, considered that: 1), the Court examined the case illegal;
2) the Court of Justice has been in breach of the procedural rules, which state that the administrative process must be communicated to the members of the Court's time and place, or examined the use of the written procedure, although the members of the administrative procedure a written consent;
3), the proceedings for infringement of the procedural rules for the language of the proceedings;
4) judgment of the Court of Justice determines the rights and obligations of persons who are not invited in as members of the administrative procedure;
5) in case no full Court judgment or trial protocol.
328. article. The content of the appeals (1) an appeal in cassation shall specify: 1) the name of the Court addressed a complaint;
2) the complainant, as well as his authorized representative, if the appeal in cassation is submitted by a representative, the name and residence or other address where the person is reachable (legal person – name, registration number and registered office);
3) judgment, for which a complaint;
4) to what extent the judgment appealed from;
5) any material or procedural norms of law by the Court of Justice violated and gets this;
6) to the request made to the Senate;
7) or agrees in writing to the hearing process, if the appellate court case heard in the oral procedure;
8) compose a complaint.
(2) an appeal in cassation shall be signed by the applicant, its or his authorised representative. If an appeal in cassation shall be representative of the applicant, he adds the power of the complaint or other document from which derives the right to lodge a complaint of the representative.
(3) an appeal in cassation, submitted by a person who is not authorized, it refuses to accept and return to the applicant.
329. article. The deadline for appeals (1) an appeal in cassation may be lodged within thirty days of the date of the judgment.
(2) if the Court's full judgment determined otherwise, the term of appeal from these days. If the full judgment shall be made after the deadline, the time limit for appeals from the full judgment.
(3) the complaint submitted after this deadline, refuses to accept and return to the applicant.
330. article. The judge's decision on appeals against the judge's decision to refuse to accept an appeal in cassation an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
331. article. Cassation procedure (1) appeals shall be submitted to the Court that delivered the judgment.
(2) If an appeal in cassation shall be submitted directly to a specified period, the deadline for the Senate is not considered late.
332. article. Appeals transcript (1) an appeal in cassation a copy to add to its administrative procedure according to the number of participants.
(2) the appellate court judge depending on the circumstances of the case and may relieve the complainant — physical person from the obligation to submit a cassation complaint to send other transcripts of administrative proceedings participants.
333. article. Cassation complaint leaving without guidance (1) If an appeal in cassation is submitted that the applicant has not signed or that are not accompanied by all required transcripts as well as it does not meet this Law 328 of the first paragraph of article 1 through 4 or 6, the appellate court shall decide on the appeal in cassation leaving without guidance. The decision shall specify the period for the correction of deficiencies. On an ancillary complaint may be submitted. Deadlines for the submission of an ancillary complaint shall run from the date on which the applicant received a copy of the decision.
(2) if the Court of Cassation, the complainant's deficiencies in a specified period, the complaint is to be considered as a remedy to be filed on the day on which it was first submitted.
(3) if the Court of Cassation, the complainant is not a specified period deficiencies distracted, the complaint shall be deemed not to have been filed and shall be returned to the applicant.
(4) an appeal in cassation in return is not an obstacle to the applicant for submission to court them again, subject to the provisions of this law of Cassation.
(5) If the first part of this article shows the deficiencies found in the Senate, the cassation complaint is returned to the Court of appeal in the first, second and third part of the action.
334. article. The appellate court after cassation complaints (1) the appellate court shall send to the members of the administrative procedure the cassation complaint transcripts and declare them within thirty days from the date of dispatch of the written copy is entitled to submit to the Senate an explanation in relation to the appeal in cassation.
(2) the expiry of the time limit for appeal against the judgment of the appellate Administrative Court together with an appeal in cassation within three days, send to the Senate.
335. article. Cassation for accession (1) and Līdzpieteicēj a third party participating in the process, the administrative side of the parties who submitted the cassation complaint, filed the complaint can join.
(2) for joining the complaint shall notify in writing to the Senate no later than ten days before the hearing.
336. article. Withdrawal of the appeal in cassation (1) the Person who submitted the complaint of Cassation, can it be withdrawn before the hearing.
(2) If an appeal in cassation, appeal proceedings are terminated a reference.
337. article. Counter-complaints lodged (1) a member of the administrative procedure within 30 days of the appeal in cassation for the date of dispatch of the copy may be submitted to the Senate his counter-complaints.
(2) submitting counter-complaints, follow this law, 325.326.327, 328 and,. 332. article.
(3) If an appeal in cassation has been withdrawn, the look of self-sustainable counter-complaints.
37. The administrative proceedings Division of the Supreme Court of Cassation article 338. Action meeting (1) the appearance of action the hearing to decide whether it satisfies this law 325-329. Article and the cassation proceedings are being or.
(2) Conduct the hearing in the administrative proceedings before the Senate Administrative Department in accordance with the procedure laid down by the President of the Chamber of senators, which is made up of three Senators.
(3) If a panel of Senators unanimously recognizes that the cassation complaint does not meet the requirements of the law, this College with their hearing decision refuses to propose the cassation proceedings.
(4) If the senator's views are not the same, or all the Senators feel that the thing to be in the Court of Cassation, the senator the College with its decision to propose to the Court of cassation proceedings and shall refer the matter to the appeal in cassation.
(5) the decision of the Chamber of Senators of the rain may refer to the appeal in cassation the Senate Administrative Department of the joint session.
(6) if the Court of cassation proceedings, propose the following the request of the members of the administrative procedure to conduct the hearing, may suspend the enforcement of the judgment.
339. article. Determination of the hearing in the Senate

(1) the composition of the Court and the rapporteur to a predefined order determines the Senate Administrative Department of the President. The hearing date and time determined by the rapporteur.
(2) about the time and place notified to the members of the administrative procedure.
(3) the Court of cassation instance proceedings before the three Senators, but in the cases stipulated by law, the Senate Administrative Department of the joint session.
340. article. At the beginning of the proceedings (1) the Chairman opened the meeting and notify the hearing, a case in the Senate.
(2) the Secretary shall report to the Court in which the case and summoned the people invited to come, or is notified of the sitting of the Court who has not come, and any information received about her absences.
341. article. Explanation of rights and obligations of the members of the administrative procedure (1) the President of the hearing shall notify the composition of the Court, as well as the name of the interpreter, if he participates in the hearing, and explain the administrative procedure for the members of their right to take rejection, as well as other procedural rights and obligations.
(2) the basis of rejection and rejection of the arbitration proceedings shall be determined by this law, 117-119. article.
342. article. The consequences, if the hearing does not appear in the administrative process of the administrative procedure in the absence of the Member, if properly notified of the cassation instance court sitting time and space do not preclude consideration.
343. article. The administrative process for deciding the application, the participant's application of the administrative procedure relating to the hearing, decides after hearing other members ' views on administrative procedures for the hearing.
344. article. Report on the substance of the matter in the Senate start with the rapporteur's report on the case.
345. article. The administrative process explanation (1) following the reports of the rapporteur the court listens to the administrative process of clarification. The Senate can determine in advance how long will want explanations, but the members of the administrative procedure, the length of time granted must be equal.
(2) the first talk in the administrative process that submitted the cassation complaint. If the judgment appealed to both the applicant and the respondent, the first talks the applicant.
(3) a Senator can ask the members of the administrative procedure.
(4) each Member of the administrative procedure have the right to reply.
346. article. (1) the judgment By members of the administrative procedure explanations go to make a judgment by the Court.
(2) If, in proceedings of three Senators, the Court does not come to a common view or all Senators believe that the case pending before the Senate Administrative Department of the joint session, the Court shall take a decision on the referral to the Senate Administrative Department of the joint session.
(3) the joint judgment in going with a majority of senators. Judgment signed by all judges.
(4) after consulting the Court returns to the courtroom, and the President of the Court sentenced by reading the introductory part and the operative part.
(5) the Senate shall notify the administrative process, when participants can consult the full text of the judgment.
38. the Department of Cassation instance court ruling 347. article. The boundaries of the proceedings (1) the Court of Cassation in the case, the test case judgment in the rule of law in the judgment in the part relating to the members of the administrative procedure that the judgment appealed against, or appeals to join, and arguments referred to in the appeal in cassation.
(2) if the Court finds a violation of the rules of the law which led to all the things wrong in the judgment, it may set aside the judgment in full, although only part of the appeal.
348. article. Judgment of the Court of cassation instance Court examined the case, you can make one of the following decisions: 1) leave of the judgment, but the appeal is dismissed.
2) set aside the judgment in full or in part and refer the case back for a new hearing of the appeal or the Court of first instance;
3) set aside the judgment in full or in part and to terminate the proceedings or leave application without examination if the appellate court has not adhered to this law or in article 278.282.
349. article. Judgment of the Court of cassation instance content (1) judgment of the Court of Cassation instance consists of the introductory, descriptive parts, theme part and the operative part.
(2) the introductory part shall specify: 1) name and composition of the Court;
2 the time of judgment);
3) of the administrative procedure and the subject matter of the application of the participants;
4) administrative process that submitted the cassation complaint (counter-complaints) or joined it;
5) or written examination process.
(3) the descriptive part of the point: 1) a brief statement of the facts of the case;
2) judgment of the Court of Appeal's nature;
3) appeals of themes;
4) themes or explanation counter-complaints character;
5) on administrative agreement of the participants, if the case dealt with the writing process.
(4) the theme part: 1) dismissing the appeal in cassation, the arguments which the complaint rejected;
2) allowing the appeal in cassation, the arguments concerning the appeal court in the law allowed violations of rules of the law incorrect application or competence.
(5) in the operative part indicates the Senate ruling in accordance with this law, the relevant paragraph of article 348.
350. article. The interpretation of rules of law 53 (1) of the rules of law interpretation (translation), expressed in the judgment of the Court of cassation instance is mandatory for the Court where the case is heard.
(2) the Court of Cassation does not indicate in its judgment, a judgment to make a case.
351. article. Judgment of the Court of cassation instance of cassation instance court judgment is not appealable and shall enter into force at the time of delivery.
352. article. Clerical and mathematical calculation error correction (1) the Senate or on its own initiative, a member of the administrative procedure, the application can correct the ruling clerical or mathematical error in the calculation. Question about error correction for hearing, notice to the members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle of absence to examine the question of error correction.
(2) clerical or mathematical error in the calculation of judgment corrected by decision of the Court.
The seventh section things NEW examination AFTER judgment or decision to the entry into force of chapter 39 new consideration of the case due to newly discovered circumstances 353. article. Newly discovered circumstances Of newly discovered circumstances shall: 1) essential circumstances that existed at the time of the hearing, but was not known to the Court;
2) by a judgment which has the force of res judicata in criminal proceedings found intentionally false witness statements, knowingly false expert opinion, knowingly false translation, false written or real evidence which was given in an unlawful or unfounded judgment;
3) a judgment which has the force of res judicata in criminal activities that detected because its made unlawful judgment or decision;
4) judgment of the Court or the Authority's decision, which was the basis for the Court in this case given the administrative judgment or make appropriate decisions;
the judgment in case 5) law annulment according greater legal force rules;
6) European Court of human rights or other international or supranational Court ruling in the case, from which it follows that the administrative process must be started again. In this case, the decision of the Court resumed case must be based on the European Court of human rights or other international or supranational Court ruling found the facts and their legal assessment.
354. article. (1) filing of case due to newly discovered circumstances may initiate administrative proceedings, submitting an application: 1) of the district (City) Court ruling — the abolition of the District Court;
2 the District Court judgment or) decision: the Senate.
(2) an application may be submitted within three months from the date when the circumstances are established on the basis of the case for a new trial.
(3) an application may be made if a judgment or decision entered into force more than three years.
355. article. The submission deadline for the calculation of the submission deadline shall be calculated: 1) as a result of this law, Article 353 contains the conditions — from the opening day of the conditions;
2) this law 353. Article 2 and 3 in the case specified in paragraph from the date of entry into force of the judgment in criminal cases;
3) this law 353. paragraph 4 in the case specified in the date of entry into force of a court ruling that cancelled the verdict of the administrative proceedings, civil or criminal, or from the date of the cancelled authority's decision is based on a judgment or a decision please cancel due to newly discovered circumstances;
4) this law 353. Article 5 in the case specified in paragraph from the date of entry into force of the judgment of the Constitutional Court, which in an appropriate provision shall cease to apply as appropriate the higher legal force and the norms adopted in the case in connection with administrative proceedings of the constitutional complaint;

5) this law, Article 353 contains the case-from the date of entry into force of the European Court of human rights or other international or supranational Court ruling, from which it follows that the administrative procedure in the present case should be initiated.
356. article. The examination of the application (1) applications due to newly discovered circumstances appearance at the hearing.
(2) For the hearing and notify the site and a copy of the application sent to the members of the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle to the application of absence for treatment.
357. article. Court decision (1) the Court, having reviewed the application, checks whether the conditions to which the applicant refers, identifiable as newly discovered circumstances in accordance with this law 353. article.
(2) if the Court finds newly discovered circumstances, it annulled the contested decision in whole or in part and shall refer the case to a new Court of first instance.
(3) if the Court finds that the circumstances indicated in the application are not newly discovered, it shall reject the application. Such decision may be submitted to the next.
(D) the administrative ACTS and court order enforcement ACT of the eighth SECTION of the administrative execution of the administrative act, chapter 40 of the General provisions implementing article 358. The administrative procedure for implementing the provisions of (1) the administrative execution of the recipient voluntarily.
(2) voluntary pre administrative forced execution acts carried out in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act, if the Act on which the administrative act was issued, does not determine the order of the other.
(3) if the recipient is not favourable administrative act must meet the same authority, executed after the expiry of the opposition period (appeal) and that is not disputed (appealed) or the entry into force of a court judgment by which the recipient's application rejected. This provision shall not apply in cases where the law allows the execution of the administrative act immediately.
(4) at the same time with the notification of the administrative act of the recipient authority may take the measures set out in the law, the administrative enforcement of the law.
359. article. Enforcement authority (1) the administrative forced execution of enforcement authority: 1) the authority which issued the administrative act;
2) another institution;
3) a bailiff;
4) police.
(2) the Competent enforcement authority determined by law.
(3) If the execution of the administrative act under the law agrees with bailiff, enforcement of the law of civil procedure apply.
(4) if the competent enforcement authority, it is the body that has issued the administrative act.
360. article. Enforcement conditions (1) the administrative execution shall, if the circumstances are as follows: 1) administrative act is in force (art. 70);
2) administrative act has become the undisputed (76);
3) until the beginning of the administrative enforcement Act is not executed voluntarily.
(2) an administrative act may be executed forcibly with the entry into force, without waiting for the moment when it became the undisputed and until the beginning of the enforcement is not yet fulfilled voluntarily, if: 1) forced execution with the entry into force provided for in another statute;
2 administrative) authority the Act specifically provides that it is an executable with the entry into force, giving urgency to the fact that any delay to directly threaten the national security, public order, a person's life, health or property;
3) administrative act issued in accordance with article 69 of this law, the provisions of the first subparagraph.
(3) the police, the border guard, the National Guard, the fire service and other authorized officials in the law, administrative act issued to immediately remove the direct threat to national security, public order, a person's life, health and property, are enforceable forcibly with their entry into force.
(4) the administrative act is not enforceable if since its entry into force more than three years. Calculating the Statute of limitations, the time of the report, to which the administrative act, action was suspended.
361. article. Warning of enforcement (1) The enforcement of the first alert destination.
(2) a warning issued in writing to the administrative enforcement Act issued in writing. You can specify the administrative act.
(3) this Act applies to the alert referred to in article 70 of the administrative act entered into force.
(4) the written warning shall include: 1) indicates that the administrative provisions it applies;
2) the invitation recipient execute administrative act voluntarily;
3 indication of administrative law) enforcement, if it is not executed voluntarily;
4) indicates that the date you can start enforcement;
5) enforcement authority;
6) indication of the applicable enforcement;
7) indicates that the enforcement is carried out on the recipient's account;
8) alarm output place, date and signature of the official.
(5) the Written notice within seven days can be a challenge in a higher body if this warning is not contained in the fourth paragraph of this article, these components or administrative act has already been executed voluntarily. If higher authorities is not whether it is a Cabinet of Ministers, the alert can be appealed in court. Higher authority within seven days of the appeal court. The Court decision may not be appealed.
(6) where an administrative act in accordance with article 69 of this law issued or could be issued orally or otherwise, also a warning may be issued orally or otherwise. It may not include all of the fourth part of this article in specific components, however, the warning must be such that the recipient can understand that this is a warning for the administrative enforcement of the Act.
(7) enforcement is carried out in accordance with the conditions of the alert. If the authority wants to change the conditions of enforcement, in particular the applicable enforcement features, it issues a new alert.
(8) Warning do not need this Law 360. the third paragraph of article in those cases. The warning may be issued when it is appropriate, however, it is not necessary to comply with this article and the provisions of article 362 (informal warning), and it is final.
362. article. The restrictions forced the due date (1) the beginning of enforcement provides: 1) not earlier than on the date when the administrative act has become the undisputed (76);
2) calculation to the beginning of enforcement is not enough at a time when the opposition is warning.
(2) If an alarm can be expressed orally, or otherwise warning is not necessary at all, however it is expressed, the due date is determined depending on the particular circumstances. In this case, the enforcement may be initiated immediately after the warning.
363. article. Enforcement of the unlawful consequences (1) a Person against whom a compulsory execution, may lodge a complaint if enforcement activities that focus on the administrative enforcement Act does not comply with the provisions of this chapter.
(2) the complaint may be submitted within seven days from the date on which the person became aware of the enforcement action. The complaint shall be submitted to the higher authority, but if higher authorities is not whether it is a Cabinet of Ministers, the Court. Higher authority within seven days of the appeal court. The Court decision may not be appealed.
(3) the higher authority or the Court which adopted complaints, enforcement authority may order up to a decision to suspend the activity in question or to cancel.
(4) If the person's unlawful administrative act execution resulting from the damage, it is entitled to compensation in accordance with this law, the provisions of Chapter 8.
364. article. The administrative enforcement Act (1) the administrative enforcement Act imposes costs.
(2) drawn up by the administrative authority of the law enforcement costs may be appealed to the Court of the location of the authority. The Court's decision an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
365. article. Enforcement order of the Cabinet of Ministers issued the rules, which govern the enforcement of administrative order.
41. the chapter On payment of money directed the administrative coercive performance 366. article. To the cash payment directed the administrative enforcement conditions (1) the administrative act that obliges the recipient obligation to pay certain amount of money to run an executory order basis, applying the rules of the civil law for the recovery of a sum of money.
(2) an administrative act, which imposes the obligation to the recipient to pay a certain sum of money, forcibly executed when it issued in writing, pursuant to this law, the provisions of article 67, and if the recipient in accordance with this law, article 362 361. and is expressed in the written warning. Exceptions laid down in this law, article 360 of the second and third subparagraphs, and article 361 of the sixth and eighth, not applicable.
367. article. (1) an executory order executory order issued by the enforcement authority. It is the power of execution.
(2) executory order include: 1) the name of the authority which issued the executory order;
2) recipient's name, surname, personal code and residence (legal person – name, registration number and registered office);
3) indicate that the administrative act is enforceable;
4) recovered and other related conditions;
5) the indication of an alert expression;
6) date when the executable administrative act entered into force;
7) date when the alert entered into force;

8) date when the administrative act has become the undisputed, or indication that the administrative act in accordance with this law, article 360 of the second paragraph of point 1 if executable with the entry into force of, before it became the undisputed;
9) indicates that the administrative act is not executed voluntarily;
10) issue an executory order place, date and signature of the official.
(3) the enforcement authority by recipient or the authority may, by decision, explain, without amending its executory order content.
42. the chapter on a specific activity or activities in the administrative legislation of the ban brought a forced execution article 368. To a specific activity or activities in the administrative legislation of the ban directed the enforcement funds (1) the administrative act that imposes the obligation of the recipient to execute a specific action (also: issue a specific case) or prohibit certain activities to execute, execute forcibly with aizvietotājizpild, forced the money or direct force.
(2) the enforcement authority, based on external regulations and taking into account efficiency considerations (article 66), choose the enforcement funds, change them until reaching a result.
369. article. Against the recipient aizvietotājizpild (1) if the administrative act imposes the obligation on the recipient to execute a specific action that actually and legally that you can also run the enforcement authority, other body or person may perform administrative acts with the help of aizvietotājizpild. In this case, the enforcement authority executing this action itself or instructs executed by another institution or a natural or legal person.
(2) Aizvietotājizpild the cost of the addressee.
(3) when selecting the type of aizvietotājizpild and its particular shape, authority based on external and internal legislation, taking into account efficiency considerations (article 66), choose the most efficient and at the same time the recipient's interests at least touch on the way and the particular form that generates the least costs.
370. article. Recipient of the forced money (1) if the administrative act imposes the obligation on the recipient to execute a specific action or to refrain from certain activities and he does not fulfil this obligation, the recipient can put forced money.
(2) forced money can be imposed repeatedly until you stop the run or the recipient. Repeatedly forced the money may be imposed no earlier than seven days after the last time, if the recipient of this seven-day period has not fulfilled or still hasn't stopped the operation concerned.
(3) the minimum compulsory money is five lats, but the maximum-thousand dollars. In determining the amount of money forced enforcement authority comply with the principle of proportionality (article 13), particularly given the financial situation of the recipient.
(4) forced an executory order is imposed on the enforcement authority. Executory order include: 1) the name of the Executive, which issued an executory order for forced money;
2) indicated that the administrative act enforceable;
3) indication of the expression of warning;
4) date when the executable administrative act entered into force;
5) date when the alert entered into force;
6) date when the administrative act has become the undisputed, or indication that the administrative act in accordance with this law, the second part of article 360 of the executable with the entry into force of, before it became the undisputed;
7) indicates that the administrative act has so far not executed voluntarily;
8) forced a sum of money;
9) indicate that forced money payable;
10) forced money on executory order picking a place, date and signature of the official.
(5) to the executory order for forced money applies this law referred to in article 70 of the administrative act entered into force.
(6) an executory order for forced money can be a challenge or appeal, if it is not contained in the fourth paragraph of this article, these components, administrative act already executed voluntarily or forced the monetary amount is disproportionate. Executory order for seven days may be challenged in a higher authority, but if higher authorities is not whether it is a Cabinet Minister, to appeal to the Court. Higher authority within seven days of the appeal court. The Court decision may not be appealed.
(7) an executory order for forced execution of money forced under the same terms and conditions as to the payment of money are focused on administrative enforcement of the Act (article 366 and 367.).
371. article. The direct use of force presupposes (1) if the administrative act imposes the obligation on the recipient to execute a specific action or to refrain from certain activities and he does not fulfil this obligation, it can be executed using direct force.
(2) the direct effect of enforcement authority itself may apply or ask the police to do so. Law enforcement authority in the cases specified in it can ask the other institution. In this case, the police or relevant authority within their competence, working as palīgizpildiestād, subject to the Executive order.
372. article. The direct use of force in the form of (1) the direct use of force includes: 1) physical use of force;
2) special means (handcuffs, service dog, etc.);
3) weapons (especially firearms).
(2) an enforcement authority may apply physical force the normative limits laid down in the Act.
(3) the enforcement authority and the palīgizpildiestād can be applied to special funds only if it under other legislation are granted rights, and only the normative limits laid down in the Act.
(4) an enforcement authority may apply palīgizpildiestād and weapons only if it under another law granted rights, and only within the limits set by the law.
373. article. Efficiency considerations for the direct use of force (1) choosing the type and strength of its particular shape, the authority shall be based on relevant considerations of efficiency (article 66) and choose the most effective way and the particular form that potentially the least threatening another person and the public interest and at the same time the least hurt the interests of the person against whom the direct force is applied, especially in the least-threatening the life, health and property.
(2) the possible losses that may occur to the person against whom the direct force is applied, as well as any other person, may not be clearly disproportionate to the public benefit of the administrative enforcement of the Act.
(3) the direct use of force that endangers the life of the person directly, against whom the enforcement is directed is permissible only in order to save another person's life.
374. article. The right to compensation in connection with the enforcement of the Act where the administrative enforcement process closely by a person other than the person against whom the enforcement is directed, that person is entitled to compensation in accordance with this law, the provisions of Chapter 8, whether or not the forced execution had a legal or illegal.
The ninth SECTION of the execution of judgments of the Court ruling 43 chapter of the General provisions implementing article 375. Authority to execute the court order (1) the institutions are obliged to properly and promptly to execute against it, facing the administrative case accepted the judgment of the Court of Justice or other decision (ruling).
(2) for the enforcement authority shall notify the applicant and the Court.
(3) if the authority does not comply with a court ruling voluntarily, is directed against the authority of enforcement in accordance with the provisions of this law.
376. article. The Court in connection with the execution of judicial decisions (1) After the entry into force of the ruling, but if it is enforceable immediately — immediately after its adoption in the judgment of the Court, or a copy of the decision is sent to the authority.
(2) at the request of the applicant, the Court issued him with a copy of the judgment on its entry into force, or a copy of the judgment, which States that it is enforceable immediately.
(3) the administrative complaint process, which arises in connection with the execution of the Court's judgment, the Court of session. The Court shall notify the participants in the administrative procedure. This person is not an obstacle to the absence of complaints.
377. article. Court order enforcement authority (1) the enforcement authority, which shall carry out the Court ruling forced execution shall be determined by the Cabinet of Ministers.
(2) if the competent enforcement authority, enforcement is carried out by the Ministry, which fed into the body that has issued the administrative act.
(3) where the authority which issued the administrative act is not subordinate to any Ministry and Cabinet or is specified by the other law enforcement authority, enforcement is carried out by a bailiff.
(4) if the Court ruling forced execution agrees with the bailiff, forced execution of the law of civil procedure apply.
378. article. Court order enforcement of the conditions for the execution of the court order, if: 1) to the beginning of the enforcement of a court order is not executed voluntarily;
2) since the Court ruling entered into force not more than three years.
379. article. Warning about a court ruling forced execution (1) Authority written notice of enforcement.
(2) the Notice shall include: 1) indicates that the Court ruling it applies;
2) invitation to the authority to execute the judgment voluntarily;
3) indicate which date you can begin enforcement;
4) indication of the applicable enforcement;
5) alarm output place, date and signature of the official.
(3) the beginning of enforcement shall determine in the light of the Court ruling, the authority laid down the specific actions.
380. article. The Court ruling means the enforcement

(1) a court order for the authority to force can be executed with aizvietotājizpild and forced cash assistance.
(2) the enforcement authority, based on considerations of cost-effectiveness, select enforcement feature changes it until reaching a result.
381. article. Against the Authority directed aizvietotājizpild (1) If the Court ruling imposing authority responsibility for implementing the specific action that actually and legally that you can also run the enforcement authority or other institution, the Court ruling can be enforced with the help of aizvietotājizpild. In this case, the enforcement authority executing this action itself or instructs it to execute another institution.
(2) selecting aizvietotājizpild, enforcement authority shall designate the most effective way and the particular form that generates the least costs.
382. article. Officials in forcibly imposed on money (1) If the Court ruling imposing authority the obligation to execute a specific action or to refrain from certain actions and the authority does not fulfil this obligation, the head of the authority or other officer may impose a coercive fine.
(2) forced money can be imposed repeatedly until the head of the institution or other officer executing or stopped the activities concerned. Repeatedly forced the money may be imposed no earlier than after seven days.
(3) the minimum compulsory cash is a hundred dollars, but the maximum-thousand dollars. In determining the amount of money forced enforcement authority comply with the principle of proportionality (article 13).
(4) forced an executory order is imposed on the enforcement authority. Executory order include: 1) the name of the authority which issued the executory order for forced money;
2) indicated that the Court ruling enforceable;
3) indication of the expression of warning;
4) date when the executing Court ruling entered into force;
5) date when the alert notified body;
6) indicate that the Court ruling has so far not executed voluntarily;
7) forced a sum of money;
8) indicate which forced money payable;
9) compulsory money executory order picking a place, date and signature of the official.
(5) to the executory order for forced money subject to this law, as laid down in article 70 of the administrative act entered into force.
(6) an executory order for forced money seven days may be appealed to the Court after Executive location, if it is not contained in the fourth paragraph of this article the said constituents, court order already executed voluntarily or forced the monetary amount is disproportionate. The Court decision may not be appealed.
383. article. Court order enforcement costs enforcement bodies composed of a ruling enforcement costs may be appealed to the Court of the location of the authority. The Court's decision an ancillary complaint may be submitted.
44. Chapter a separate Court ruling forced enforcement 384. article. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the individual effects (1) effect of judgment on the annulment of administrative nullity of void or unenforceable ban to take actual action or public-law relationship of finding occurs at the moment when the verdict comes into effect.
(2) the authority may not act contrary to the judgment of the Court of Justice.
(3) If a person believes that the authority acts contrary to the Court's judgment, it may refer the complaint to a higher authority. If higher authorities is not whether it is a Cabinet of Ministers, a person may apply to the courts. The higher authority's decision can be appealed in court. The Court decision may not be appealed.
385. article. For payment of money drawn from a court ruling forced execution regarding the authority of the Executive's approach to the budget funds is governed by a special law.
Transitional provision for the entry into force of this law shall lay down the procedure by a special law.
The law shall enter into force on July 1, 2003.
The law adopted by the Parliament of 25 October 2001.
State v. President Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga in Riga, 2001 14 November Editorial Note: the law shall enter into force on July 1, 2003.