The Saeima has adopted and the President promulgated the following laws: the law of criminal procedure (A). General provisions Chapter 1. Basic rules of criminal procedure article 1. The purpose of the law of criminal procedure criminal law aims to establish a criminal offence of the criminal-investigation, prosecution and adjudication of criminal matters — arrangements that ensure the effective application of the rules of criminal law and criminal law for a fair settlement of unwarranted interference in a person's life.
2. article. The sources of law of criminal procedure (1) the criminal proceedings is determined by the Constitution of Latvia, international law and this law.
(2) the application of the European Union (community) legislation takes account of the European Court of Justice, but the law of the Republic of Latvia in respect of the application by the Constitutional Court in a judgment delivered by the interpretation of a provision.
(3) other national rules of criminal procedure may be applied only to international cooperation to foreign based reasoned request, provided this is not contrary to fundamental principles of criminal procedure of Latvia.
3. article. Criminal law the criminal law Chamber establishes a common procedure in all criminal proceedings in that jurisdiction on criminal offences make it authorised persons.
4. article. The criminal law during the criminal proceedings in order to determine the law of criminal procedure, in force on the procedural actions at the time.
5. article. The application of the law between the folksy cooperation international cooperation can apply to the foreign request specified in foreign incentive provisions, in addition to checking its validity.
Chapter 2. Fundamental principles of criminal procedure article 6. Indispensability of the criminal proceedings in the official authorised to take criminal proceedings, in any case, when becoming aware of the reason for the initiation of criminal proceedings and the Foundation is obliged to initiate criminal proceedings and lead them to the criminal law criminal law for a fair settlement.
7. article. Public and private prosecution (1) where this Act provides otherwise, criminal proceedings shall be carried out in the public interest, regardless of the will of the person who suffered the damage. This is the public prosecution in criminal proceedings criminal proceedings, in which the prosecution function implemented on behalf of the State Prosecutor.
(2) of the criminal law, article 130 90 (with a domestic violence related cases), 131, 132, 136, 145, 159 and article 160 in the first subparagraph of article 168, 169, 180, 197, article 200 and 260 in the first subparagraph of article intended offence criminal proceedings initiated by the public prosecutor, if the application is received from the person wronged.
(3) in article 130 of The criminal law (with the exception of family violence related cases), 156, 157 and 158.. in article offence is made private accusation criminal procedure in which the prosecution function implemented by the victim.
8. article. The principle of equality in the Criminal Procedure Act lays down a single procedure for all persons involved in criminal proceedings, irrespective of that person's origin, social and property status, occupation, nationality, racial and national affiliation, attitude toward religion, sex, education, language, place of residence and other circumstances.
9. article. The obligation (1) criminal proceedings Instituted in criminal proceedings is the responsibility of any person to execute the criminal officials authorised to perform the procedural requirements and to comply with the statutory procedure.
(2) the procedural requirements for contesting the validity of the rule of law and is carried out in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act, but shall not be exempt from this requirement.
(3) for a derogation from the first subparagraph, in particular the obligation of fulfilling only those individuals who have a certain immunity in criminal proceedings.
10. article. Criminal proceedings in the criminal procedural immunity immunity may fully or partly exempt a person from participation in criminal proceedings, and from testimony and documents and provide the subject matter issue, prohibits or restricts the rights, apply to this person coercive measures, as well as enter and make enquiries in the possession of the premises.
11. article. The language used in the criminal proceedings (1) the criminal proceedings take place in the language of the country.
(2) a Person having the right to defence, the victim and his representative, the witness, specialist, expert, Auditor, as well as other persons whose driver had involved the criminal proceedings if they do not know the State language, a procedural act in the time is right to use the language that that person knows, and not use the interpreter, whose participation in the process of the driver supports.
(3) a person involved in criminal proceedings, which does not understand the national language, in the cases provided for in the law, the procedural documents, ensure translation into understandable language for the person.
(4) the driver can make the process a separate procedural action in another language by adding procedural document translation into the national language.
12. article. Human rights instruments (1) criminal proceedings shall be carried out in accordance with internationally recognised human rights and preventing unwarranted imposition of the duties of criminal proceedings or disproportionate interference in a person's life.
(2) human rights may be limited only in cases where the required public security considerations, and only in accordance with the procedure laid down in this act according to the nature of the crime and danger.
(3) apply to custodial safety feature, not available to the public in violation of the site's privacy, correspondence and communications secret may only with the consent of a judge of the investigation.
(4) the driver of the process, in particular the notified Prosecutor and investigating judge's obligation is to protect the person's privacy and business secrets of secrets. News for may obtain and use only when it is necessary to clarify the circumstances alleged.
(5) a natural person shall have the right to have criminal proceedings do not include details of the person's own or its betrothed, spouse, parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren, brothers and sisters (close relatives) private life, business and resources, if it is not necessary for the fair settlement of criminal law.
13. article. The prohibition of torture and humiliation (1) in any criminal proceedings must not humiliate, blackmail, torture, or threatened with torture or violence, or the use of violence.
(2) if the person resists certain procedural actions, impede its progress or refusing duly to fulfil their duties, including procedural can be applied to specific procedural action by law enforcement for coercive measures.
(3) in order to overcome the person's natural resistance, procedural actions or, at whom she calls, national police officers in exceptional cases may apply physical force not needed without causing pain to that person and not humiliate them.
14. article. The right to the completion of the criminal proceedings within a reasonable time (1) everyone has the right to the completion of the criminal proceedings within a reasonable time, that is, without unjustified delay.
(2) the driver of the process selects the appropriate to the circumstances the simplest type of criminal proceedings and prevent unjustified interference in personal life and expenditure.
(3) in criminal proceedings in which the fit of a security feature, the term reasonable provision has the advantage in comparison with other criminal proceedings.
(4) criminal proceedings against minors in the provision of reasonable maturity is an advantage in comparison with similar criminal proceedings against a minor person.
(5) the reasonable deadline may be grounds for termination of this process in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
15. article. Right to a hearing in court, everyone has the right to a hearing in a fair, impartial and independent court.
16. article. The right to impartial criminal proceedings (1) the officials carrying out criminal proceedings, interpreters and professionals should abandon participation in criminal proceedings, if they have a personal interest in the outcome or the circumstances that the parties involved in the process rightly gives reason to believe that such interest might be.
(2) the Person who implemented the defense, the victim, the victim's representative and an official who is authorised to make the criminal process, but there is no driver, has the right to sign up for rejection if the first paragraph of this article.
(3) the driver of the process or statutory officials, on their own initiative or on the basis of rejection must be stopped in the first part of that person's participation in the process, if they are not themselves atstatījuš.
Article 17. Procedural separation function of human rights limit the control function of the pre-trial investigation and prosecution, defence and justice functions in criminal proceedings are separate.
18. article. Equivalence of procedural powers, this law provides that persons involved in criminal proceedings has powers (rights and obligations), which provides them with the statutory tasks and to guarantee equal rights.
19. article. The presumption of innocence

(1) No person is considered innocent as long as the guilt of the crime is not found in the law.
(2) a Person having the right of defence, there is no need to prove their own innocence.
(3) all reasonable doubt as to guilt, which cannot be avoided should be evaluated for the good of the person who has the right to defence.
20. article. The rights of the defence (1) every person for which the assumption or assertion that it committed a criminal offence has the right to a defence, that is, the right to know what the offence was committed or the suspect or accused, and choose your defense position.
(2) the right of defence of person can be implemented or even inviting the champion of his choice a person under this Act may be the Defender.
(3) in the cases specified in the law, the participation of a counsel is mandatory.
(4) if the person is your financial situation can not invite national champion, gives it a defence and decide on the Defender's salary from public funds, with total or partial relief from the person.
21. article. The right to (1) a Person who has the right of defence, may cooperate with the criminal conduct of the authorised officer to facilitate the application of the criminal law relations.
(2) the cooperation can take: 1) the simplest form of the process;
2) promotion of progress;
3) another person commit a criminal offence detection.
(3) cooperation possible from the initiation of criminal proceedings and the execution of the penalty.
22. article. The right to compensation for the damage caused to the Person with a criminal offence to cause harm, taking into account the moral injury, physical suffering and property damage, are guaranteed procedural options the moral and material claiming and receiving.
23. article. Justice in criminal justice from the Court, the proceedings of the Court, and considering the accusation against a person, an innocent person was acquitted or recognizing the person guilty of the crime and establishing national institutions and individuals necessarily enforceable criminal for relief, which, if necessary, feasible.
24. article. Protection of personal and property risk (1) a Person who is threatened due to its obligation in the criminal proceedings is entitled to require that the driver carries out the process, the measures provided for in this law and its effects.
(2) the driver of the process, get the information referred to in the first subparagraph, depending on individual circumstances, decide on the need to take one or more of the following measures: 1) launch another criminal investigation of hazards;
2) to select an appropriate security measure in the interest of the person that happened;
3) propose special procedural protection determination in a person who is a threat;
4) ask law enforcement authorities to make a person or property.
(3) If the second subparagraph in those measures could not prevent a real person's life in danger, the driver terminates the process the use of evidence, which is the reason for the threats.
25. article. Double punishment not permissible (ne bis in idem) (1) a Person for the same criminal offence and punishment the Court can only once.
(2) Recurrent costs is not: 1) criminal proceedings again any instance where the previous court ruling canceled law appeal before its entry into force;
2 new criminal trials) to the newly discovered circumstances underlying the cases stipulated by law and order.
(3) in the cases provided for in the law, the criminal judgment which has the force of res judicata may be relitigated convicted person to remedy the situation.
(4) the punishment within the meaning of this article is criminal law provides for punishment, forced or mandatory obligations, ruling that the criminal proceedings are completed.
(5) If the person, fine, finds that it is for the same offence in administrative punishment, this administrative penalty should be repealed and be taken into account in determining the criminal penalties.
(6) a Person may not be tried and punished in Latvia, if convicted for the same offence or of a foreign country with which the eligible for Latvia is the agreement on the reciprocal recognition of kriminālspriedum or a contract on the ne bis in idem principle. If the person convicted in another foreign country, in the event of litigation in favour of fines already served part of the sentence.
(7) the Ne bis in idem principle is not violated if punishing legal persons are also sanctioned individual who has committed a criminal offence in the interest of the legal person, acting either individually or as a legal person concerned collegiate institutions, based on the Member's right of representation of the legal person, to act on its behalf or make decisions on behalf of the legal person, or exercising control within the legal person, or as a legal person.
The first section. Persons involved in criminal proceedings, Chapter 3. Officials who carry out criminal proceedings article 26. Powers to carry out criminal proceedings (1) the powers of the criminal proceedings on behalf of the State is the only statutory officials, which they were granted in the context of the position or of Heads of orders.
(2) the mandate of the criminal proceedings in question are: 1) the driver of the process;
2) investigation team;
3 the Central Prosecutor);
4 to carry out criminal procedure empowered to) officer executing the process Guide, the investigation team or the Court's task to carry out procedural acts (hereinafter the procedural task performer);
5) examiner's body expert;
6) expert who do not work in the examiner's Office, where the driver of the process asked him to perform the inspection;
7) Auditor on behalf of the promoters of the process;
8) the Chief Coroner;
9) post higher public prosecutor;
10) the investigating judge;
11) prosecution.
(3) the rejection of the complaint process, and organizational issues in the Registrar's powers are the judge, the Prosecutor, as well as judicial, prosecution and investigation authorities and the heads of the departments.
(4) the European Union (community) to officials of the institutions are empowered to take criminal proceedings in the European Union (community) legislation the cases.
27. article. Process Guide (1) official of the proceedings is the process or the Court, which currently heads the criminal proceedings. Process Guide: 1) organized criminal conduct and recordkeeping;
2) take decisions concerning the progress of the criminal proceedings;
3) or even involving other officials in the exercise of State powers in the relevant criminal proceedings stage or stage;
4) require that any person executing the criminal justice obligations and comply with the procedure;
5) allows persons involved in criminal proceedings to exercise the rights laid down in the law.
(2) process drivers are: 1) — the coroner in the investigation;
2) — the Prosecutor criminal prosecution;
3) preparing the trials, as well as from the moment when the ruling declared that the complete proceedings in the District Court until a transfer to the next judicial instance or the execution of the ruling, the judge who directs the proceedings;
4) hearing: composition of the Court.
(3) the pre-trial criminal investigation can create a group whose leader is the driver of the process.
28. article. Coroner coroner's investigation officer who heads the investigating authorities order authorized to make investigations in criminal proceedings.
29. article. The coroner's duties as driver of the process and the right to (1) a coroner is obliged: 1) initiate criminal proceedings, once found and defined by the law;
2) make inquiries to find out if the crime happened, who did it, or to a person for the criminal to be responsible, to find out the person and get the evidence that provides the basis for the prosecution of persons criminally liable;
3) to take all the measures provided for in the law damages;
4) choose the type of criminal procedure, which provide for a fair settlement of the criminal law as unwarranted interference in personal life and reasonable expenses;
5) meet his immediate superior, the Prosecutor, the central post higher prosecutor's investigation of the judge's instructions or statements.
(2) the coroner shall have the right to: 1) in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law to accept any procedural decision and take any procedural action or ask its pursuit investigation team or the procedural task performers;
2) suggest the Central Prosecutor to decide the question of initiating a criminal prosecution;
3) appeal to his immediate superior authority, instructions which are subject to an administrative investigator's boss, or the Central Prosecutor;
4) appeal to the public prosecutor in the Central decisions and instructions in the higher public prosecutor's Office;
5) appeal to a higher post in the Prosecutor's instructions for the next post in the higher public prosecutor;
6) appeal to the judge's decision in the investigation to the President of the Court.
30. article. Investigation team

(1) investigation team is authorized to carry out criminal investigation officer or the Prosecutor, with the immediate superior or investigator post higher prosecutor's order included investigative group.
(2) during the Group process and the task force has set the right to carry out investigations and to adopt procedural decisions.
(3) do not stop execution, the investigation team may guide the process of appeal to the supervisory tasks of the public prosecutor.
(4) the Chief Coroner and the public prosecutor's instructions in the central investigation team appealed, as well as the rejection process sought by the promoters.
(5) the Tasks and instructions to be made in writing to the appeal.
31. article. The Chief Coroner (1) the Chief Coroner's investigation authority or the Manager or his Deputy in accordance with the Division of responsibilities or individual orders to control the criminal proceedings in question asked out in the course of the investigation.
(2) the Chief Coroner is obliged: 1) to ensure that their officials subject to the timely launch of criminal proceedings;
2) organize a procedural task performers;
3) assign procedural powers in its required the Executive Circle, in order to ensure the conduct of criminal proceedings and without unwarranted purposefully putting off;
4) give instructions about the direction of the investigation and inquiry operations, if the driver does not support the process of targeted investigations and unwarranted interference in the person allows life or hesitation.
(3) the Chief coroner shall have the right to: 1) become familiar with him exposed officials in criminal proceedings;
2) process major organisational accept decisions, that is, to lay down the criteria for the allocation of criminal procedure, criminal proceedings for another process to pass the driver, create a group to take over the investigation of the criminal proceedings;
3) participate in procedural steps performed by the driver of the process or investigation team;
4) make investigations, previously informing the driver of the process;
5) cancel your command of the existing officers wrongly and unlawful decisions.
32. article. Procedural task performer (1) procedural task performer is the investigation officer or the Prosecutor who requested the process engaged to perform one or more actions of the investigation, not including their investigative group.
(2) procedural task performer responsible for the actions of the investigation asked execution, and his duty is to inform the driver of the process on all the facts which may be relevant to the criminal legal and fair.
33. article. Examiner's expert authority (1) the examiner's expert authority is empowered to take criminal proceedings if he has won the right to carry out certain types of expertise, and received the process task force.
(2) an expert driver of the process task: 1) do demonstrate the expertise, if the necessary information to carry out research using the expertise, equipment and substances;
2) event, or other places, the body area, viewing of the subject;
3) treating persons;
4) remove samples for comparative research;
5) participates in the activities of other investigations;
6) uses expertise in criminal and other cases of foot placement and removal.
(3) the Expert shall have the right to: 1) familiarize themselves with the materials of criminal cases;
2) request from promoters of the inspection process requires additional information and materials;
3) refuse to make the expertise (opinion), if the submission is not enough or asked questions beyond his competence;
4) get their reimbursement of incurred in coming after the process of driver's call.
(4) the Expert shall have the right to take the decision only and provide answers to the questions asked. If the expert finds that the use of expertise, you can get important information to the criminal proceedings for which the question is asked, he shall inform in writing the process Guide.
(5) the expert carried out their duties: 1) after the process of transforming a given instructions that the investigation activities in the fixed Protocol, involving expert;
2) in accordance with the procedural decision on expertise.
34. article. Invited expert (1) process can call up promoters and with the decision to ask the inspection to make a person who is not the expert examiner's authority, but whose knowledge and practical experience is sufficient expertise.
(2) the External expert is this law, article 33, third and fourth parts of the law.
35. article. (1) an auditor auditor's powers to carry out criminal proceedings if he has the appropriate qualifications, in accordance with the procedure laid down in the law, won a certificate for conducting the audit and received the decision requested the proceedings or investigations in the Protocol fixed the specific task.
(2) the Auditor on behalf of the promoters of the process: 1) inventory;
2) document viewing and removal;
3) view of the goods production and raw materials required to perform the audit;
4) provides economic and financial activities of the auditor's report, the description if it is given without the audit;
5) poll they witness or participate in the questioning;
6) carry out audits to the driver in the agreed amount of the process;
7) presented stakeholders with the materials;
8) gives the auditor's assessment of stakeholders ' objections.
36. article. The public prosecutor in criminal proceedings (1) according to the stage of criminal proceedings the public prosecutor shall exercise supervision of the investigation, prosecution and maintenance of the public prosecution function.
(2) in the cases specified in the law, the Prosecutor shall decide the question of criminal proceedings and investigations.
37. article. The investigation of the Central Pro cursor (1) the Prosecutor, who according to the Prosecutor's Office in the distribution of obligations or order given in criminal proceedings, the investigation is to be made is the central supervision of the Prosecutor.
(2) the Central Prosecutor during the investigation are obliged: 1) give instructions about the type of selection process, the direction of the investigation, and investigation activities, if the driver does not support the process of targeted investigations and unwarranted interference in the person allows life or hesitation;
2) request to the Chief Coroner change process Guide, makes changes in the investigation, if the instructions given are not met or is vitiated by procedural violations that threaten the progress of criminal proceedings;
3) to participate in a hearing where the investigating judge shall decide on the authorisation of coercive measures and special investigative activities;
4) participate in the procedural steps aimed at cooperation with a person who has the right of defence, as well as simpler process;
5) to handle complaints about the process, the force investigation team, the Chief Coroner and bailiff of procedural tasks and decisions;
6) decide that the rejection of the process applied for driver, group member, the Chief Coroner, expert, Auditor, or the interpreter;
7) immediately take over the conduct of criminal proceedings when the investigation yielded enough evidence for criminal law for fair settlement.
(3) the investigation of the Central Prosecutor have the right to: 1) decide on the initiation of criminal proceedings and the transfer of the investigation authority;
2) request of instructions given;
3) to perform procedural actions, informing the process advance Guide;
4) at any time to get acquainted with materials of criminal proceedings;
5) to cancel the process of investigation proceedings and decisions of the members of the Group;
6 submit suggestion post) higher prosecutor for another coroner to the immediate superior in certain criminal proceedings or transfer to another criminal investigation authority.
38. article. The Prosecutor as a driver for (1) the Supervisory prosecutors obtained the status of the promoters of the process from when he takes over the conduct of criminal proceedings and decide on the initiation of a prosecution: 1) after the investigation process the request of the promoters;
2) after post higher prosecutor's instructions;
3) on its own initiative.
(2) post higher prosecutor can impose the duties of other promoters of the process for the Prosecutor.
(3) in exceptional cases, the Attorney General of the Criminal Department of the Prosecutor or the Court may determine the area's Chief Prosecutor for investigations of promoters of the process stage.
39. article. Prosecutor: driver of the process, responsibilities and rights (1) the Prosecutor as a driver must: 1) avoiding unjustified delays and, within the time limit laid down in the law to initiate prosecution;
2) waive the prosecution and criminal proceedings be terminated if there is a law of the conditions;
3) determine the Criminal Court and the archive to the file as a whole;
4) provide the person to whom the rights of the defence, the Court of Justice in criminal matters be material or copies of transcripts (copies) and set the final deadline for submitting applications;
5) issue of a victim of statutory copies of materials and determine the final date for lodging applications;

6) to decide on the applications submitted;
7) to submit to the Court an agreement closed with the accused on the recognition of guilt and punishment;
8) to take a decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings and to submit to the Court the Criminal Court;
9 to end criminal proceedings if) established a statutory basis;
10) submit criminal trials in a special process.
(2) the Prosecutor in a criminal has the right to: 1) terminate criminal prosecution and to identify additional investigation;
2) in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law to accept any procedural decision and take any procedural action or ask its pursuit investigation team or the procedural task performers;
3) to issue a statement on the Prosecutor's sentencing and to end criminal proceedings if the accused voluntarily executed a penalty;
4) prepare draft agreement;
5) to submit proposals on the recognition of established facts prove without evidence examination in court.
(3) If a court decision is required for the Court of Justice of the European communities for a preliminary ruling on the European Union (community) legislation the interpretation or validity of, the public prosecutor may propose to Attorney General sends a confusing question to the Court of Justice of the European communities.
40. article. Investigating judge investigating judge is the judge of that district (City) Court President for a certain period in the cases stipulated by law and order instructed to control the respect for human rights in criminal proceedings.
Article 41. Investigation of the judge's duties and rights (1) the investigation and prosecution of the investigating judge is obliged: 1) in the cases provided for by law to decide on the application of coercive measures;
2) decide on the suspect and the accused's application for their safety features, amendment or withdrawal of the suit by the investigating judge's decision;
3) in the cases provided for by law to handle complaints about process guide the safety feature;
4 in the cases provided for by law) to decide on the proposal of the promoters of the process to carry out special investigations;
5) decide on complaints regarding private life secrecy justified infringement of the questioning;
6) decide on complaints regarding the violation of the secrecy of the unwarranted criminal proceedings, which are protected by law;
7) decide who shall exercise the rights of the defence, or the victim's application for archive file to be submitted to the Court to the criminal proceedings;
8) decide on the person who has the right to defence, application for special investigations, which are not added to the criminal (source document), adding the Criminal Court candidate;
9) decide on the refusal to apply for a post in the higher public prosecutor and ask one level's Procuratorate set another post higher prosecutor;
10) to decide who has the right to a defence request to be exempted from the payment of the lawyer.
(2) the Court of first instance up to the start of the hearing the investigating judge is obliged to rule on: 1) the accused's application with respect to security amendment or withdrawal of funds;
2) prosecution proposal relating to the designation of a security or amendment.
(3) the investigating judge is not allowed to replace the process Guide and the Supervisory prosecutors in pre-trial criminal proceedings, giving guidance on the direction of the investigation and inquiry operations.
(4) the investigation and prosecution of the investigating judge has the right to: 1) to familiarize yourself with all of the material in the criminal proceedings, in which the driver of the process, the person or the application, sign up for rejection;
2) request from the process, additional information was requested and to lay down the time periods within which criminal proceedings are carried out special investigations or applied with a custodial security feature;
3 the procedural sanctions) applies for failure to perform or order in pre-trial criminal proceedings for non-compliance;
4) propose that the officials authorised to carry out criminal procedure, human rights would be punished for defamation, which allowed criminal proceedings as a result of the implementation of the powers.
(5) the investigating judge can also contain other specified in this law, rights and obligations.
Article 42. The public prosecution (1) the public prosecution in the Court of first instance maintains that the Prosecutor who betrayed the Criminal Court. Post higher prosecutor can ask the Prosecutor to another Prosecutor.
(2) the public prosecution in the Court of appeal maintained the same Prosecutor as possible that it maintained before the Court of first instance. Post higher prosecutor national prosecutor maintenance may assign another Prosecutor.
(3) the Court of cassation instance the Prosecutor expressed views on the legitimacy of the Court's judgment and reasonableness.
43. article. The State prosecution powers (1) Prosecutor, maintaining any charges in court, has the responsibility and right to: 1) with the consent of the public prosecutor in the post above to withdraw from the charge of maintenance if there is reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt;
2) to sign up for the rejection, where there is a statutory basis;
3) to comment on each of the Court a statement of the issues;
4) push the prosecution evidence and to participate in the examination of other evidence;
5) require the submission of additional evidence of breaks or new incriminations;
6) log requests;
7) speak in court debates;
8) look at the minutes of the hearing, the full text of the ruling and submitted complaints of persons;
9) appeal to the courts, where there are grounds to do so.
(2) the first paragraph of this article contains the powers of the Prosecutor in all criminal proceedings, regardless of the nature of the proceedings certain categories of cases.
44. article. The private prosecution (1) the private prosecution cases in court, the prosecution maintained the victim or his representative.
(2) the private prosecution to court is a statutory public prosecution powers.
Article 45. Post the highest prosecutor in criminal proceedings (1) post in the top Prosecutor in the procedure prescribed by law, as the central control of the Prosecutor in the investigation, prosecution and proceedings driver trial the prosecution shall exercise their powers.
(2) post higher prosecutor's duties: 1) District (the city of) Prosecutor, if the statutory functions of the public prosecutor in the public prosecutor's Office of the Prosecutor in question;
2) Court Prosecutor, if this area statutory function of the public prosecutor of the public prosecutor's Office concerned the public prosecutor or Chief of the district level, but also on its own initiative if these functions take the district (municipal) Prosecutor's Office or the public prosecutor's Office Prosecutor likened status;
the General Prosecutor's Office Chief, 3) if the statutory functions of the Public Prosecutor General Prosecutor's Office of the Chief of the section do or a public prosecutor, General Prosecutor's Office of the Department of the public prosecutor or the Court's Chief Prosecutor, as well as the County, on its own initiative;
4 the Attorney General if) the statutory functions of the Prosecutor General's Department Chief carried out;
5) any prosecutor, if their particular criminal proceedings authorized by the Attorney General or the Chief Prosecutor.
(3) Post higher prosecutor his procedural power to all stages of the process.
Article 46. Post higher duties and rights of prosecutors (1) post in the higher public prosecutor is obliged: 1) decide on complaints regarding the supervisory Prosecutor and prosecutors — the process of decisions and actions of the promoters;
2) decide on the Central Prosecutor and prosecutors — the process of renunciation of participation in the proceedings of criminal proceedings or for the refusal applied to them;
3) decide on the Central Prosecutor's suggestion to change the coroner's immediate superior or investigative authority;
4) to change the Central Prosecutor or Prosecutor — process Guide, if not fully ensure the monitoring and the prosecution;
5) create the IP group when the amount of work that threatens the completion of criminal proceedings within a reasonable time;
6) to change the State prosecution, if not fully ensured prosecution maintenance;
7) decide whether a waiver of indictment is justified and legitimate.
(2) post a higher public prosecutor have the right to: 1) to familiarize yourself with all of the material in the criminal proceedings, in which he performs post higher prosecutor's functions;
2 the Supervisory prosecutors detect), if it is necessary to derogate from the previously approved distribution principles of criminal proceedings;
3) ask the Prosecutor to fulfil the supervisory Prosecutor or Prosecutor — process guide function or take them yourself;
4) request to the investigating authorities, who heads administrative subject's chief investigator in the criminal proceedings, in particular in the process of other chiefs;
5 ask the investigation in criminal proceedings) perform other investigative authority;
6) give instructions to the Supervisory Board or the Pro-Procurator ror process driver for the type of selection process, the progress of the investigation and inquiry activities;
7) cancel the process Guide, investigation team, a position below the Prosecutor's decisions;
8) instruct the State prosecution on the evidence examination tactics and further proof of the source application;
9) decide the State prosecution's suggestion to waive indictment in court, their residence approving or asking for another subordinate Prosecutor to maintain public prosecution, or to assume the same.

47. article. The judge as a guide in the preparation of the hearing of criminal cases (1) the judge preparing the case for the hearing: 1) the jurisdiction of this Court;
2) decide the issue of the likelihood of hearing;
3) determine the hearing time, place and manner of the hearing;
4 ask the Court Office make) preparatory activities.
(2) the preparation of the judge assessed the evidence and the legal qualification of the offence and criminal-law decisions for the President.
48. article. The Court as a guide (1) examining criminal cases, the Court has the power to force the process of criminal procedural and enforcement, as well as the exclusive right to judge of the Court.
(2) for the performance of its functions the Court: 1) require that any person executing the criminal justice obligations and comply with the procedure at the hearing;
2) apply procedural penalties;
3) without interfering with the prosecution and defence in the implementation of the residence, taking part in the examination of evidence;
4) decide the applications received, requests and rejection;
5) appearance and adjudicate the case and declare the ruling;
6) measures shall be taken to be prosecuted officials who carried out the criminal and his powers exercised in bad faith.
(3) the Court participates in international cooperation in the criminal field in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act.
49. article. The judge as a driver after the trial and nolēmumapieņemšan judge at the hearing and the adoption of the ruling until this ruling for release or send the next instance: 1) supports the trial protocol and the availability of the day all the law;
2) ask to send criminal complaints, together with the data of the next instance court;
3) convened by the Court to decide the hearing Protocol not attached to surround himself with objections;
4) adopted a decision on court ruling releasing and asking to take the necessary steps to comply with this decision;
5) convened to decide the composition of the Court in the enforcement of judicial decisions.
Chapter 4. Circumstances which prevent the conduct of criminal proceedings, article 50. Conflict of interest not permissible in criminal proceedings (1) the criminal proceedings to be recorded in the register of the person shall assume the powers of the criminal proceedings, if this person is faced with a conflict of interests, that is to say, if its personal interests both directly and indirectly, does not coincide with the objectives of criminal procedure or the circumstances involved in the criminal proceedings the person rightly gives reason to allow such interest.
(2) Conflict of interest situation does not affect the victim as a private prosecution.
(3) the first subparagraph of this article, the persons referred to in the conduct of criminal proceedings to give up once discovered a conflict of interest.
(4) Persons who carry out criminal procedure, is obliged to bring the existing conflict of interest persons banned from carrying out criminal proceedings, acting within their competence or applying for rejection.
51. article. Conflict of interest the undisputed kon conditions without any further fact-finding is recognized the existence of a conflict of interest if the person to be registered in the register of criminal procedure: 1) is a kinship relations to the third degree, the affinity to the second degree or in marriage with the person who has the right to defence, or with the victim;
2), the spouse, children or parents receive income from the person who has the right to defence, or of the victim;
3) is linked to the joint holding of the person who has the right to defence, or with the victim;
4) located in the explicit personal conflict with the person who has the right to defence, or with the victim;
5) in this process is the witness, the victim or the person who has the right to defence, or has made the defense or representation of the victim.
52. article. The circumstances of a conflict of interest for individual persons involved in criminal proceedings (1) pre-trial proceedings shall not be involved in persons who are bound by marriage, a common household or first degree kinship, if this person's particular process are: 1) the Prosecutor and the supervisory process, the driver for the investigation;
2) post higher prosecutor and promoters of the process or the Central Prosecutor;
3) the investigating judge and the promoters or the supervisory process, or post a higher prosecutor.
(2) the issue of the first paragraph of this article, the termination of the conflict of interest in accepting a person has the right to decide the rejection.
(3) the investigating judge shall not be a person in the criminal process has been the central force or Prosecutor.
(4) in proceedings before the Court may not participate in a judge who has participated in this criminal procedure: 1) in any capacity;
2) up to the third degree kinship, affinity up to the second degree, married with another judge involved in the hearing, prosecution or criminal prosecutors who betrayed the proceedings, or with the judge, Prosecutor or prosecutors linked the holding of a joint.
53. article. The expert and the basis for the rejection of the Expert auditor and Auditor's refusal is based, in addition to this law, in article 50 and 51 of these circumstances may also have insufficient training for carrying out the duty.
54. article. Self reset of criminal proceedings (1) the notice on the self reset of the criminal conduct of a conflict of interest situation submitted: 1) investigation team, expert, auditor-driver of the process;
2) driver of the process in the investigation and the coroner's boss — the Central Prosecutor;
3 the supervisory Prosecutor) process in a criminal prosecution and national promoters prosecution — the higher public prosecutor's Office;
4) post higher prosecutor — next higher public prosecutor's Office;
5) investigating judge-President of the Court;
6) initiation of proceedings to the judge, the President of the Court;
7, those of the criminal judge), — the Court's composition.
(2) an officer who has received the notice, provide the person attracted substitutions or withdrawal also recognise unjustified and asking to continue criminal proceedings.
55. article. Rejection of application (1) a Person who exercises a defence, the victim or the person authorised to carry out the process, if it is aware of the conditions that prevent a person to perform a specific criminal proceedings, submit that person's rejection of article 54 of this law referred to persons who have the right to decide on the refusal.
(2) the pre-trial in criminal proceedings and proceedings in the Court to start hearing the rejection log in writing, but orally at the hearing, the minutes record it.
(3) the same reasoning can not apply for rejection.
(4) the rejection may not be applied to motivate action given the person in criminal proceedings. Action appeal in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
Article 56. The adoption of the decision on rejection (1) applied for rejection checking theme initiated immediately. The decision shall be taken, if it is confirmed the reasons for refusal or rejection of the belief that the Foundation does not exist.
(2) in all cases of persons who applied for rejection, accepting the explanation.
(3) in exceptional cases, a person can be suspended from duties until a decision is taken.
57. article. The decision on rejection or refusal to reject appeals (1) outside the hearing decision of rejection or refusal to reject 10 days: 1) may be appealed to the driver of the process in the investigation decision — the Central Prosecutor;
2 the Central Prosecutor's decision): the higher public prosecutor's Office;
3) post in the higher public prosecutor's decision of the investigating judge;
4 investigation of the judge's decision), the President of the Court;
5 the decision of the President of the Court of Justice), the Supreme Court Senate.
(2) at the hearing, the decision may not be appealed separately.
(3) the first paragraph of this article persons shall be final and not appealable.
58. article. Prevention of conflicts of interest does not effect (1) If a conflict of interest is not removed intentionally, especially if the circumstances themselves exclude persons participating in criminal proceedings, the person called to the statutory liability.
(2) the first paragraph of this article of detection is the basis of the decision taken by the party concerned to deregulation and obtain proof of the acceptability of doubting.
Chapter 5. The people who are implementing the defense of article 59. The implementation of the basic defence (1) implementation of defence is carrying out criminal proceedings authorized officers in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act in writing to the conjecture or statement that the person has committed a criminal offence.
(2) depending on the evidence obtained, assumptions are broken down as follows: 1) there is a real chance that the person committed the criminal offence (against the person may initiate criminal proceedings);
2) separate facts give grounds to believe that a criminal offence committed by this person (the person can hold);
3) set of evidence gives a basis for the assumption that the most likely target for a criminal offence committed by this person (a person may be suspect);
4) set provides the basis of evidence the Prosecutor — a process the driver believing that this person committed a particular criminal offence (a person can sue);

5) Prosecutor: driver of the process does not doubt that with evidence manages to convince the Court that there is reasonable doubt as to the fact that this person made a specific criminal offence.
(3) the presumption obtains claim form if: 1) a person who has the right to defence, the law States that the Prosecutor's assumption is correct, and the two argue that the person committed a particular criminal offence;
2) evaluating the evidence, the Court finds that a person has committed a particular criminal offence.
(4) the legal entity for the implementation of the defence is in accordance with the procedure laid down in this law, the Prosecutor's assumption that the natural person has committed a criminal offence directly to the interests of the legal person.
(5) the right to defend itself shall end with a joint statement or court order of the entry into force, unless there are special circumstances defined by law, which entitles them to question.
60. article. Persons who exercise Their defence (1) implementation of procedural defence of the person who has the right of defence, that is, a person: 1) which made this law, article 59 of the assumption or assertion;
2) against whom proceedings medical coercive measures;
3) against which criminal proceedings are terminated on a reabilitējoš basis;
4) against which criminal proceedings are terminated because of the existence of circumstances which preclude criminal liability if the person denies the same provided for in the criminal code.
(2) to the person entitled to procedural defence rights of defence also implemented: 1) defender;
2) representative.
(3) the legal person for which the interests of a natural person darbojušo expressed in this law, the presumption referred to in article 59 or their own assertion, procedural rights of defence implemented with assistance of the representative.
61. article. The person against whom criminal proceedings initiated (1) If criminal proceedings when there is a real possibility that a certain person committed the criminal offence, criminal proceedings initiated against that person.
(2) from the time of the first paragraph of this article, the person is engaged in carrying out procedural actions or the disclosure of the information is provided for the initiation of criminal proceedings against them, that person acquires the procedural rights of the defence.
(3) the Person against whom criminal proceedings initiated, has the same rights as the suspect, except the right to receive a copy of the procedural documents. Against that person may not apply security features, except for the obligation to report the receipt of the consignment address.
(4) of the second subparagraph of this article contains the moment has the right to the completion of the criminal proceedings within a reasonable time.
(5) a Person against whom criminal proceedings initiated, without the prior consent of the procedural acts may be the time to take pictures, shoot or otherwise with the technical means to record the purpose of use of the materials in the media.
62. article. (1) hold hold is a person who lawfully detained temporarily because certain facts give grounds to believe that it committed a criminal offence.
(2) hold 48 hours, should be recognised as a suspect or released without any procedural constraints.
(3) if the hold is released, but the criminal proceedings against him are not terminated, they shall have the same rights as the person against whom criminal proceedings initiated.
Article 63. (1) the right to hold detained has the right to: 1) immediately invite champion and conclude an agreement with him. Detained for this purpose, it is entitled to receive from the process of transforming a list of lawyers and information about legal assistance coordinating bodies, as well as free use of the telephone to invite counsel;
2) require that detention shall notify his close relative, a teaching institution or employer;
3) get a hold of a copy of the Protocol and written information about detainee rights and obligations;
4) meet with the advocates of privacy call safe conditions without special permits and the promoters of the process without time limits;
5) orally or in writing to express their attitude with respect to the validity of the detention;
6) to testify or refuse to give testimony;
7) to sign up for the rejection of the driver, as well as the process of the investigation group, which carried out the investigation with detainees;
8) to submit complaints about the actions of officials;
9) log requests for their immediate investigative actions, which may be evidence of validity for approval not suspected;
10) for legal assistance from the defence of proceedings at the time of ordering.
(2) Without the consent of the detainee may not be made public in the media during the procedural action with a photo, video or other technical means fixed his image, unless it is necessary for the detection of the offence.
(3) Hold the alien has the right to be informed of his country's diplomatic or consular representation.
64. article. The obligations (1) the duty to give truthful identifying information about themselves.
(2) the duty to allow him to undergo the examination of the experts, and deliver samples to the comparative research or let they are acquired.
(3) detained followed the procedure laid procedural steps.
Article 65. The suspect if the evidence as a whole gives a basis for the process of assumption that the promoters regarding the criminal offence most likely done this particular person, he adopted a written decision that the person must be regarded as suspect.
66. article. The suspect's rights from the time the person notified that it recognized as suspects, that person has the right to: 1) to receive a copy of the decision to which that person is recognized as a suspect, and written information about the suspect's rights and obligations;
2) immediately invite champion and conclude an agreement with him. Detainees or persons apcietinātaj for this purpose, it is entitled to receive from promoters in the court process in the list of lawyers practising in the area and information about legal assistance coordinating bodies, as well as free use of the telephone to invite counsel;
3) to sign up for the request for payment of the assistance of counsel from public funds;
4 in the cases provided for in the Act) require the lawyer's participation in the defence of the individual procedural operations, if not yet an agreement on defense with a particular lawyer or that the defender could not appear;
5) detention facilities, to meet with the advocates of privacy call safe conditions without special permits and the promoters of the process without time limits;
6) familiar with the criminal register not later than three days after the submission of the application;
7) to sign up for the rejection of your recorded in the register;
8) submit applications for investigative activities, and participation in them;
9) participate in investigation activities, which are performed by that person or its defenders, unless such participation does not interfere with the operation or investigation do not touch another person's rights;
10) to receive a reasoned decision, if the suspect refused participation in investigation activities conducted by or at the request of his counsel;
11) look at the decision on the determination of expertise before it is released, if the inspection relates to this person and ask additional questions to ask the expert to give an opinion, except where specific expertise in other investigative activities;
12) law for complaints about the conduct of the criminal proceedings authorized officials;
13) in the cases specified by law, within the time limits and in order to appeal the procedural decisions;
14) orally or in writing to express their attitude towards their suspicions;
15) to testify or refuse to give testimony;
16) request to the criminal-law measures for adjustment to be made with its consent, as well as to compensate for the moral, physical and material damage;
17) make it up with the victim;
18) apply for the termination of the criminal proceedings, if this is a violation of the statutory deadline for completion of the pre-trial process;
19) at judge to participate in the investigation process and the proposal of its promoters and defenders of the handling of complaints, unless the law requires different handling policy;
20) express a desire to cooperate with officials conducting criminal proceedings.
(2) Without the suspect's consent must not be public media coverage of proceedings in time with photo, video or other technical means fixed his image, unless it is necessary for the detection of the offence.
(3) the provision is judged as not obstructing the settle the case and avoid pre-trial investigation process.
Article 67. The suspect's responsibilities (1) from the time the person notified that it recognized as suspects, that person is obliged: 1) on time to attend the conduct of authorised officials the process in the specified location, where a call is made in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law;
2 do not be discouraged and not) interfere with the progress of the criminal proceedings;
3) comply with safety rules and the law means these constraints;

4) allow that it is subject to examination by the expert, and deliver samples to the comparative research or allow them to be obtained;
5) follow the procedures agreed at the time of proceedings;
6) point to the fact that the time of the crime, it is found in another site (hereinafter referred to as the alibi), provided for in the criminal code or the circumstance that eliminates criminal penalties.
(2) the provisions of the security or legitimate claims of officials, failure to limit violation or failure of the agenda is the basis to decide the question of tighter security, the imposition of additional restrictions or procedural penalties.
68. article. The suspect status of expiry (1) a Person loses the suspect status if: 1) criminal proceedings are terminated as a whole or a particular person;
2) is lifted, with which this person was recognized as suspects;
3) it is called a criminally and launched its prosecution.
(2) the fact that the decision is repealed, that person was found on the suspects, not repeating the person's recognition as a suspect, if further evidence is obtained, which gives sufficient basis for supposing that most likely a criminal offence committed by the person directly, however it retains the right to the completion of the criminal proceedings within a reasonable time and the total time in which it is located the suspect status, procedural may not exceed the statutory time.
(3) a Person against whom had prosecuted, can not be declared a suspect in the same crime.
Article 69. The accused (1) the accused is the person who requested the decision with the process referred to as criminally liable for committing a criminal offence and the prosecution initiated against is terminated, which is not justified or found guilty of a judgment which has the force of res judicata.
(2) the same person in one criminal case cannot be accused and suspect.
70. article. The accused's rights before court proceedings (1) the accused in pre-trial criminal proceedings shall have the same rights as a suspect, as well as the right to: 1) after the completion of the investigation, get all the criminal cases for the Court copies of materials, if they have not been issued previously;
2) — the Prosecutor submitted the process within a reasonable period of time to get acquainted with materials of criminal cases received and submit final applications;
3) to make an application to the judge, asking for an investigation to present him with a special investigative activities which are not connected to criminal proceedings (source documents);
4) agree or disagree with the termination of the criminal proceedings, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility, or the Prosecutor's statement about it;
5) agree with the process for the Prosecutor in criminal proceedings — the completion of the agreement process;
6) agree with process guide — prosecutors about the possibility of criminal charges in court, the accused in the impugned jurisdiction without proof;
7) to withdraw complaints of defenders.
(2) depending on the type of the selected process certain rights in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law can be restricted or special way.
(3) testimony of the provision is judged as not obstructing the settle the case and avoid pre-trial investigation process.
71. article. The accused's right to the Court of first instance the Court of first instance, the accused has the right to: 1) early to know things the place and time of the hearing;
2) invite or request to ensure the defending champion's participation in the hearing;
3) to participate in criminal proceedings for the same and use language that he could, if necessary, free of charge, using an interpreter;
4) to sign up for the rejection of the Court's composition, the individual judge, public prosecutor and expert;
5) request to replace the stand, if there are legal obstacles to his participation;
6) to agree to the establishment of evidence at the hearing;
7) to express their views on the issues discussed in each, if it refers to the person or to his representative data;
8) to participate in each direct evidence and the examination orally if the evidence relates to the person or to his representative of data;
9) to sign up for the Court motivated the request to use the 7 and 8 of this article, the rights referred to in paragraph, even if the subject matter or evidence not directly relevant to his person or representative of the data;
10) log requests;
11) give evidence;
12) speak in court do not participate in the debate if the Defender;
13) to say the last word;
14) to receive a copy of the court order and to get acquainted with the minutes of the hearing;
15) to appeal court ruling in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
72. article. The accused's right to appeal court (1) the accused's right to appeal court has accused: 1) who filed the appeal;
2 for which the prosecution appeal) protest or complaint has been lodged by the public prosecutor or the victim;
3) which interests are directly affected by the appeal in part on other charges against the accused;
4) if the judge — process Guide for it.
(2) the appeal court hearing, the accused has the same rights as the first instance court, the sisters as well as the right to: 1) to receive the appeal or protest, a copy of which is on the basis of his participation in the appeal court;
2) receive information about the handling of complaints;
3) to submit objections or explanation of the appeal or protest;
4) keep and base your complaint or withdraw your complaint or defenders.
(3) the accused shall have the right, starting with the day of the Court, to get the Court of Appeal ruling and submit a copy of an appeal in cassation.
73. article. The defendant's right of appeal to the Supreme Court (1) defendant's right of appeal to the Court is the defendant: 1) who submitted the cassation complaint;
2) on which the accusation or complaint of Cassation protest submitted by the public prosecutor or the victim;
3) which interests are directly affected by the part of the other accused in the indictment;
4) if the judge — process Guide for it.
(2) the Court of cassation instance court until the start of the trial the accused has the right to: 1) to receive their appeal in cassation or protest, which is based on his participation in the Cassation Court;
2) receive information about the handling of complaints and procedures;
3) to submit objections or explanation of the appeal in cassation or protest;
4) invite champion.
(3) if the case is heard in oral proceedings at the hearing, the accused has the right to maintain or withdraw its complaint and counsel or to comment on other complaints that were based on the recognition of the status of the accused before the Court.
(4) If the Court of cassation complaint is dealt with in the written proceedings, the accused has the right to: 1) to receive their appeal in cassation or protest, which is based on his participation in the Cassation Court;
2) to sign up for the rejection of the Court's composition or a single judge;
3) to submit written representations on the other individual complaints;
4) log the request for the complainant a reasoned examination of the oral hearing, the proceedings in his presence.
74. article. Accused the accused in all criminal responsibilities stages have the same obligations as the suspect.
75. article. Rights of a person who committed a criminal offence in a State of insanity (1) the Person who committed a criminal offence in a State of insanity, but in accordance with the opinion of the judicial psychiatric expertise can participate in criminal proceedings of medical coercive means, have the same rights as the accused, except the right to waive the defence and the right to speak in court debates.
(2) the first paragraph of this article is the right person to help pay for the defenders of public funds.
(3) If, in accordance with the opinion of the judicial psychiatric examination of a person may not participate in the criminal proceedings, all its rights of defence implemented a defender and also within the statutory agent, guide the process allowed to participate in the process.
76. article. Rights of the individual, for which the criminal offence is statute-barred (1) if the person acknowledges his guilt of the crime, it has the right to request termination of the criminal proceedings due to the limitation of criminal liability.
(2) If a person does not admit his guilt of the crime, it has the right to lodge a complaint against the Prosecutor's decision on termination of the criminal proceedings due to the limitation of criminal proceedings at the Court with jurisdiction for the criminal proceedings at first instance.
(3) the hearing of the complaint the complainant shall have the same rights as the accused in the Court of first instance, except for the right to the last word and the right to appeal against the Court ruling.
77. article. Rights of the individual, which argues for a rehabilitation of the deceased person

(1) if the driver of the process is terminated by a decision of the criminal proceedings on a reabilitējoš basis, essentially recognizing the person convicted of the crime, and the person is dead, then that person's legal representatives, close relatives or persons who are in possession of the facts, which show about the dead innocence, may occur in criminal proceedings to ensure the rehabilitation of the deceased.
(2) in the first paragraph, such persons have the right to request the continuation of criminal proceedings, asking that the requirements of the application defense attorney and his mandate frame.
(3) the Person who requested the continuation of the proceedings, the pre-trial proceedings and the Court have the same rights as the accused, except the right to the last word in court.
(4) the pre-trial proceedings and in court by a lawyer who shall implement the requirements referred to in the application, the defence, have the same rights as a defender in the process of medical coercive measure, when the defendant is unable to participate in the process.
78. article. The right of any person against whom criminal proceedings are terminated due to circumstances which preclude criminal liability (1) If criminal proceedings are terminated due to the fact that a person has committed a criminal offence, without prejudice to the limits of necessary self-defence, making the interception, when in extreme need State or justified professional risk, but the person does not admit of a criminal offence, it shall be entitled to lodge a complaint against the Prosecutor's decision of district (City) Court.
(2) the complaint during such person shall have the same rights as the person who contests his guilt in a criminal offence in respect of which the offence is statute-barred.
Article 79. Defender (1) Defender is a practising lawyer in criminal proceedings, in particular, that it phases or individual procedural action in implementing the defence of a person who has the right to a defence.
(2) The advocate of the criminal proceedings may be: 1) a sworn advocate;
2) sworn advocate Assistant;
3) of a Member State of the European Union national who acquired the qualification of a lawyer in one of the Member States of the European Union;
4) foreign lawyer (except the part referred to in paragraph 3), in accordance with the Republic of Latvia a binding international treaty on legal aid.
(3) the advocate may not without the consent of the person to be defended to withdraw from defending that he must be carried out in accordance with the agreement.
(4) the Defender participating in case of the agreement or the date of adoption of the task, if the person acquired defended the rights of the defence in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act.
(5) an attorney as counsel the right to participate in criminal proceedings confirm order.
(6) the advocate must not assume the defense of another person, or to provide it with the legal aid if it is contrary to the interests of the person to be defended, the agreement concluded with the past.
(7) the advocate must not conclude agreement on one of several persons in criminal proceedings, the prosecution if the person between the interests of the defence, there is conflict.
80. article. Defenders of the invitations (1) agreement with the defender of the switch to the right of defence, in the interest of or or the other person.
(2) in cases when the Defender's participation is mandatory, or at the request of the interested party to the agreement may conclude body entrusted with the provision of legal aid.
(3) process drivers not switch agreement on defense and can not invite certain lawyers for defending, but provides interested parties with the necessary information and gives it the ability to use communication features to invite counsel.
(4) in cases when the Defender's participation is mandatory, but interested party agreed with the champion, process guide informs the institution entrusted with the provision of legal aid, it must ensure that the Defender.
(5) If no agreement with champion, law in urgent cases, the promoters of the process invites a lawyer providing defence in certain procedural action.
81. article. Advocate a separate procedural action (1) the lawyer by a particular assignment are invited to ensure the defense of the individual procedural action, if not yet an agreement on participation in criminal proceedings or counsel the Defender, who had his own early announced, could not have come to such a procedural act offence: 1) give evidence in connection with detention;
2) recognition of the suspect and the suspect's first questioning;
3) with the imposition of binding the matter to send an investigative judge.
(2) the lawyer provides the process of inviting driver legislation.
(3) the conduct of the Defence of the individual procedural action does not impose an obligation to take on a defence lawyer throughout the criminal proceedings or the stage.
Article 82. Defenders of rights and responsibilities, ensuring the defense of the individual procedural action (1) ensuring a detainee, the suspect or the accused in a separate procedural defence in action, Defender with procedural action to have the same rights and obligations as would advocate if he will participate in the entire process.
(2) the advocate both before and after procedural actions may meet with the person to be defended, to prepare for the operation and discuss the results.
(3) the Defender's right after the completion of the transaction and regardless of the weight of the person using the rights defender complaints about officials and request submission, if it stems directly from the activities carried out and meet with the person defended agreed the Defense position.
(4) the advocate detained, the suspect or the accused, using their professional knowledge and experience, providing legal information and advice needed to select the appropriate advocacy positions and implement it.
83. article. Mandatory participation in defenders (1) the participation of a Counsel is mandatory in criminal proceedings: 1) if the rights of defence is a minor or legally incompetent person, or restricted person belongs;
2) of medical coercive measures;
3) if it is continued due to the application of the dead person's rehabilitation;
4) if the rights of defence is a person with a physical or mental deficiency even could not fully exercise their procedural rights;
5) if the rights of defence are illiterate, or person with such a low level of education that it cannot make full use of their procedural rights.
(2) the participation of a defence counsel is obligatory in criminal proceedings that take place in the agenda of the agreement process from the time of the launch of discussions with the accused on the conclusion of the agreement.
84. article. Payment for the defenders (1) paid for the Defender's assistance under the agreement to ensure the person who invited counsel and signed the agreement.
(2) if the agreement is concluded, the institution entrusted with the provision of legal aid, and payment shall be determined by the Cabinet of Ministers.
(3) the fee for the provision of advocacy a separate procedural action lawyer in Cabinet and in the amount prescribed for the provision of legal aid authority responsible of the following objectives for national funds.
(4) the Defender has the right to demand payment.
85. article. The right to exemption from payment of the defenders (1) the right to exemption from payment of the assistance of counsel, which in this case is covered from public funds are: 1) the person whose financial condition preclude payment of the assistance of counsel to provide from its own resources;
2) person in criminal proceedings, when the Defender's participation is mandatory, are not eager to defend.
(2) the decision on the payment of the assistance of counsel from the public accepts the investigating judge during the pre-trial proceedings or court hearing.
86. article. Defenders of the rights and obligations (1) the Defender has all the rights which the person defended him in the process, as well as the right to: 1) require legislation in accordance with the procedure laid down for the protection of the person and to receive the necessary information;
2) participate in the process of questioning the person defended type and stage, in the appropriate order, to participate in other activities, the investigation of which request logged by a person who has the right to a defence, or counsel, as well as participate in investigative activities, in which the person would be entitled to be defended to participate, but do not do;
3) criminal proceedings article 83 of this Act referred to in the first subparagraph in cases of compulsory defence, look at all the documents from the prosecution service (initiation of prosecutions) and receive a copy of this material;
After the completion of the investigation of 4) to get acquainted with materials of criminal proceedings and with the technical means to copy the required materials;
5) speak in court debates;
6) to submit to the Supreme Court in the application for the renewal of a criminal due to newly discovered circumstances.
(2) the advocate does not replace, but defended the action on its behalf. Only the person defended itself represent themselves to procedural steps that are expressed in its subjective opinion, and namely: 1) treatment expression against the suspect or indicted;

2) testimony;
3) last name.
(3) the Defender has the right, without special permission of the promoters of the process to meet with the detained or arrested person defended privacy safe conditions without appointments and duration limits, if necessary by interpreters. Such appointments may be authorised officials of Visual control conditions, but out of earshot.
(4) if there are specific of facts showing that the defender of their rights is used to retard any procedural act, or knowingly violate their rights, investigating judge at the request of the promoters of the process or the Court may limit the duration of the appointment or provide that appointments take place under conditions which exclude written materials or other objects, putting the person defended. Such a decision shall be notified to the Latvian Council of sworn advocates.
(5) it is the duty of Counsel to use their professional knowledge and experience, as well as any defense in law means and methods to find out what is exculpatory and attenuating circumstances for the person who has the right to defence and to provide the necessary legal assistance.
(6) an appeal the Prosecutor's ruling on the completion of the process, the Defender shall inform the person defended.
(7) the Defender without consent of the person to be defended is not entitled to disclose information which he made known in the context of the conduct of the defence.
87. article. Conditions that preclude the lawyer to participate in criminal proceedings (1) the lawyer must not assume the defense or the provision of legal aid and must inform the person defended the need to undo the agreement, if it is already closed, if: 1) in the present case, he has provided or provide legal aid to a person whose interests are in conflict with the interests of the person requesting legal assistance in the same case;
2) this person's interests conflict with the interests of another person with whom the agreement closed earlier, another administrative procedure in civil or criminal proceedings;
3 defended the interests of the person) is contrary to the lawyer or the interests of the persons with whom he has an affinity for up to the third degree, up to the second degree of affinity or by which they are bound by marriage or common household;
4) lawyer earlier in the process was that the officials authorised to take criminal proceedings;
5 the criminal register in particular) are recorded in the official with whom the lawyer is kinship relations to the third degree, up to the second degree of affinity or by which they are bound by marriage or common household;
6) lawyer in this process is a witness or victim.
(2) if the lawyer continues to operate in the conflict of interest situation, person involved in criminal proceedings, may make the rejection, which the lawyer decides to force the process.
88. article. Abandonment of the defenders (1) a Person who has the right to a defence, is entitled to withdraw from the defenders. Such a waiver may only be made by the person's own initiative. Waiver of counsel is not a barrier to participation in the criminal proceedings the public prosecutor and other persons.
(2) if the person has the right to waive the defence, defence, it tracked in procedural acts. The person with signature must clearly demonstrate that the surrender of the defenders took place voluntarily and at his own initiative. If the person has the right to a defence, had made the request for participation, the defenders out of the defenders can take place only in the presence of counsel.
(3) waiver of counsel is not binding if the driver of the process of defence refuses this law, article 83 of the person referred to in the first subparagraph.
Article 89. The minor (1) in order to fully ensure the minor's rights and interests, the right to defence, the criminal proceedings may take part.
(2) The representative can be: 1) one of the legal representatives (mother, father, guardian, trustee);
2) one of the grandparents, adult brother or sister of the minor if the minor lived with one of them and the family for the care of minors;
3) child protection institutions of the representative;
4) the non-governmental organisations representative, who carries out the function of protection of the rights of the child.
(3) permission to participate in criminal proceedings, representative or replaced by the promoters of the decision process, which can also be written in the form of a resolution. In deciding this question, the driver of the process followed in the second paragraph of this article, the specific order and individual ability and desire to truly protect the minor's interests.
(4) the delegate permission to participate in criminal proceedings from the time the minor acquired the rights of the defence and a decision on his participation of the representative.
(5) a decision must be adopted immediately, but not later than within three working days. If this time it is not possible to choose from the second paragraph of this article, 1. and 2. the persons referred to in paragraph 1, are called child protection institutions.
(6) representative of the termination of its participation in criminal proceedings, when it reaches the age of majority.
Article 90. Minor's representative in the implementation of the defence law (1) if the rights of defence is a minor party, its representative is entitled to: 1) know what is represented in the procedural status and rights;
2 the status of the represented) get a determinative decision and a copy of the information on their own and in law represented;
3) look at the criminal register and sign up for rejection it recorded officials;
4) to submit complaints about actions and decisions of officials, to sign up for the request in the same order as the organisation itself;
5) to get the Court to submit copies of materials of the criminal case, if the minor is in custody;
6) to submit closing applications;
7) receive information about the criminal trial of the time and place of any court;
8) to attend the closed meetings of the Court;
9) acquainted with the Court ruling in the same order as the Defender;
10 the Court of Appeal ruling) in the same order and the same volume as represented;
11) invite counsel for the realisation of the rights of the defence.
(2) With the consent of the promoters of the process agent may participate in procedural steps that take part in it.
91. article. In criminal proceedings, a representative of medical coercive means (1) To fully ensure the rights and interests of the person who committed a criminal offence in a State of insanity, can participate in the criminal proceedings.
(2) The representative can be: 1) patron;
2) spouse;
3) mother, father or guardian;
4) one of the grandparents, guardians, brother or sister, son or daughter, or another close relative, if a person living with him and he takes care of it;
5) representative from the medical authorities, where the person in treatment;
6) family courts (pagastties).
(3) permission to participate in criminal proceedings, representative or replaced by the promoters of the decision process, which can also be written in the form of a resolution. In deciding this question, the driver of the process followed in the second paragraph of this article, the specific order and individual ability and desire to truly protect the incapacitated person's interests.
(4) criminal proceedings can also participate in the representative of a person who committed a criminal offence, but has started the process of medical coercive means of detection, because a person ill with psychiatric disorders after committing the crime.
(5) permission to participate in criminal proceedings, a delegate from the moment the process is initiated medical coercive measures and a decision on the participation of the representative.
(6) representative of the termination of its participation in criminal proceedings, if the process will continue in the General order.
92. article. The right of the representative process of medical coercive means (1) a representative of a person who committed a criminal offence in a State of insanity, is right: 1) to receive information about their rights and in the represented;
2) familiarize themselves with the criminal register and sign up for rejection it recorded officials;
3) to submit complaints about actions and decisions of officials, to sign up for the request in the same order as the Defender;
4) to get the Court to submit copies of materials of criminal cases;
5) to submit closing applications;
6) receive information on criminal proceedings of the time and place of any court;
7) to participate in the closed hearings;
8) acquainted with the Court ruling and appeal to them in the same order as the Defender.
(2) the first paragraph of this article, the rights are also representative of a person who was fallen ill with psychiatric disorders after committing the crime.
93. article. The representative of the legal person in the process of forced application of means of coercion (1) in order to ensure the legal rights and interests in the process of forced application of the means to influence the legal entity due to its interest to reach a natural person of a criminal offence, criminal proceedings shall be open to the participation of a representative of the legal person.
(2) a legal person representative can refer to:

1) natural person in accordance with the mandate laid down in legal documents regulating activity of the person;
2) natural person for that purpose issued by the powers.
(3) the representative of the legal person may not be a person who is a witness in the criminal proceedings in question or the victim or which by itself or its close relatives personal interests are in conflict with the legal persons represented interests.
(4) the delegate permission to participate in criminal proceedings or he is replaced by a decision of the promoters of the process, which can also be written in the form of a resolution.
94. article. The representative of the legal person's rights in the process of forced application of means of coercion (1) the legal personal representative shall have the same rights and obligations as the accused pleading.
(2) the legal personal representative of national full realisation may invite the solicitor. Pay a lawyer provides legal entity.
Chapter 6. The victim and his representation of article 95. Persons who may be a victim (1) victim may be a natural or legal person to whom the harm caused by criminal offences, namely the moral injury, physical suffering or economic loss.
(2) The victim in criminal proceedings may not be the person to whom the moral injury suffered as a specific group or part of the company's representative.
(3) if the person is dead as a result of a crime, the victim may be the surviving spouse of a deceased, ascending or descending relatives, adoptive, first grade collaterals.
Article 96. Recognition of the victim (1) Person on the victim admits driver of the process or investigation team with their decision, you can write also in the form of a resolution.
(2) the driver of the process in a timely manner, inform that person of its right to be recognised as victims in criminal proceedings.
(3) the Person for the victim may recognize only with the same or its representative the written consent.
Article 97. Victim rights general principles (1) the victim, taking into account the moral damage caused him injury, physical suffering and economic loss, the amount of this damage is applied and used his procedural rights the moral and material compensation.
(2) all this law 98., 99, 100 and 101. the rights referred to in article the victim can only be exercised in criminal proceedings, which directly relate to criminal offences, with which he has harmed.
(3) in all stages of criminal proceedings and in all its forms, the victim has the right to participate in criminal proceedings, using language that he could, if necessary, free of charge, through an interpreter.
(4) the victim: an individual may exercise his rights himself or through a representative.
(5) the victim — legal persons the right to exercise its representative.
(6) the victim or his representative law enforcement may invite this law, article 79 a person referred to in the second subparagraph of the provision of legal aid.
(7) the victim exercised their rights on a voluntary basis and the extent of its choice. Non-use does not impede the proceedings.
(8) the victim in all stages of the process and in all the ways you can make it up with the person who has caused him damage. In the cases provided for by the law is the Foundation of the settlement the termination of the criminal proceedings.
(9) without the consent of the victim cannot be disclosed in the media during the procedural action with a photo, video or other technical means fixed his image, unless it is necessary for the detection of the offence.
98. article. The victim's right to pre-trial criminal procedure pre-trial criminal procedure victim have the right to: 1) not later than within three working days after submission of application to become acquainted with the criminal register and sign up for a rejection of the recorded officials;
2) against self-incrimination and close relatives;
3) to submit applications for investigative activities;
4) look at the decision on the determination of expertise before it released and submit an application for an amendment thereto, if the inspection is carried out by his own application;
5) log requests;
6) law for complaints about the conduct of the criminal proceedings authorized officials;
7) in the cases specified by law, within the time limits and in order to appeal pre-trial procedural decisions in criminal proceedings;
After the completion of investigation 8) get them addicted criminal court copies of materials that directly relate to criminal offences that harmed him;
9) — the Prosecutor submitted the process within a reasonable period of time to get acquainted with materials of criminal cases and submit final applications;
10) log the request the investigating judge to present him with a special investigative activities which are not connected to criminal proceedings (source documents).
(2) survey and questioning the victim also has all the rights and obligations of witnesses.
Article 99. Victim's rights before the Court of first instance the Court of first instance, the victim has the right to: 1 learn timely hearing) space and time;
2) to sign up for the rejection of the Court's composition, the individual judge, public prosecutor and expert;
3) own to participate in criminal proceedings;
4) to express their views on the question of each;
5) to participate in each court and the evidence to be tested directly in the test conducted orally;
6) log requests;
7) speak in court debates;
8) acquainted with the Court ruling and the hearing Protocol;
9) appeal to the Court of Justice in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
100. article. The victim's right to appeal to court (2) if the judgment of the Court of first instance in the judgment under appeal in part on the criminal offence with which the victim has suffered harm, guide the process sends the victim received a copy of the appeal, but the appeal court announces complaint handling time, place and agenda.
(2) at the hearing, the victim has the same rights as the Court of first instance, as well as the right to maintain and justify your complaint or to reverse it.
(3) the victim is entitled to inspect the minutes of the hearing, the Court determined the day to receive the appeal court's ruling and to submit a cassation complaint.
101. article. Victim's rights before the Court of Cassation (1) If the appellate court ruling appealed part of the criminal offence with which the victim harmed, process guide appellate court sends the victim received a copy of an appeal in cassation, the Court of Cassation but Announces complaint handling time, place and agenda.
(2) If the Court of cassation complaint is dealt with in the written proceedings, the victim has the right to: 1) sign up for a rejection of the composition of the Court or an individual judge;
2) to submit written representations on the other individual complaints;
3) sign up for a request by the complainant a reasoned examination of oral proceedings in open court of his presence.
(3) in proceedings for the ongoing process of orally at the hearing, the victim has the right to sign up for rejection, maintain or withdraw its complaint and comment on other complaints that were based on his membership of the Court of Cassation.
Article 102. The victim in the case of private prosecution (1) the Person caused damage in article 130 of the Criminal Code (with the exception of family violence related cases), 156, 157 and 158.. article establishes the criminal offence, the complaint in district (municipal) Court of their place of residence and are recognized as victims by the judge's decision on the initiation of criminal proceedings.
(2) the victim's responsibility to private prosecution case is to prove the allegations in the complaint. To this end, the victim reported the judge a request for the person to court and calling for the materials required to request, if it requires public officials.
(3) Those of the case in court, the victim is 99 of this law, in article 100 and 101 in certain rights.
Article 103. The victim's obligations (1) the victim is obliged to attend the conduct of criminal proceedings notified officials at the specified time and place, and to participate in the investigation.
(2) the victim is not obliged to exercise their procedural rights and can not invite him or expose forced the arrival, if he is not invited because of the need to participate in the investigation.
Article 104. Persons who may be the victim — natural persons representative (1) a victim — a minor physical person can represent any age and legal capacity of natural persons on the basis of the authority of the victim.
(2) if the injury created a minor person, injured: 1) represented the mother, father or guardian;
2) one of the grandparents, adult brother or sister of the minor if the minor lived with one of them and the relatives for care of minors;
3) child protection institutions of the representative;
4) the non-governmental organisations representative, who carries out the function of protection of the rights of the child.
(3) If the person caused damage that incapacitate the victim represented the patron or any of the second part of this article.
(4) the second and third subparagraphs in these cases all the victim's rights fully owned by his agent and victim they can not be implemented independently, except for the minor the right to give evidence and to make their voices heard.

(5) where it is difficult or otherwise ensure the minor's rights and interests, or that referred to in the second subparagraph of article shall submit a reasoned request to the agents, processes the driver decides attorneys as the minor victim's representatives inviting. In such cases, the work of a lawyer paid by the Cabinet in the order of the following objectives for national funds.
(6) in exceptional cases process driver decides about the victim — the poor person's age — invite a lawyer representative, if otherwise not possible to ensure the rights and interests protection.
(7) the minor or incapacitated in victim's agent permission to participate in the criminal proceedings with the promoters decision process, you can write also in the form of a resolution.
(8) in deciding the question of permission to participate in criminal proceedings for the minor or incapacitated in victim's representative, guide the process followed in the second paragraph of this article, the specific order and individual ability and desire to really protect the interests of the victim.
Article 105. The victim: a representation of the legal person in criminal proceedings (1) legal persons recognized as victims, may represent natural persons: 1) in accordance with the mandate set out in law;
2) in accordance with the mandate that certain legal documents regulating activity of the person;
3) issued for the purpose of the powers.
(2) criminal proceedings in authorization to participate in the representative after his mandate and checking with the driver of the process of decision, which may be written in the form of a resolution.
Article 106. Persons who may not be representative of the victim (1) a representative of the victim cannot be official, which recorded the criminal register.
(2) a representative of the victim may not be a person who has a direct or indirect interest in the matter in favour of the injury caused to the person.
Article 107. Representatives of the victim's rights (1) if the person exercised their rights through a representative, the representative is all the victim's rights.
(2) fifteen years of the age of the minor victim's representative used right along with your organisation.
Article 108. Provision of legal assistance to the victim (1), the victim or his representative their rights to full realization can invite lawyers to provide legal aid.
(2) the first paragraph of this article, the lawyer is not participating as a representative of the victim.
(3) the legal aid provider shall have the right to participate in all procedural steps that take place with the participation of the victim, and after the victim's request, the total or partial use of his right.
Chapter 7. Other persons involved in criminal proceedings, article 109. Witness (1) the witness is a person who lawfully may be invited (to testify) about a criminal case proven conditions and related facts and palīgfakt.
(2) the pre-trial criminal procedure witness News provides a survey or interrogation. Hearing witness News provides only the questioning.
(3) the driver of the process as witness may invite officials that pre-trial process is or was authorized to carry out the process, with the exception of the judge and the Prosecutor in the investigation, if it keeps the public prosecution in criminal proceedings.
110. article. Rights of witnesses (1) a witness has the right to know what he called to testify in criminal proceedings, a person shall provide information and what is the procedural status of such officials.
(2) a witness before the polls and interrogation is entitled from the procedural acts the performers to receive information about their rights, duties and responsibilities, a news blip types, as well as the right to give testimony in his well known language, if necessary, through interpreter services.
(3) a witness has the right to: 1) make notes and additions in the documented testimonies or in writing to request the opportunity to write a manuscript evidence in a language that he can;
2) against self-incrimination and close relatives;
3) to complain about the survey or the progress of pre-trial interrogation during criminal proceedings;
4) make a complaint to the investigating judge for the unwarranted disclosure of private life secret evidence or ask the Court to withdraw the issues of private life secret and require the request to record the minutes of the hearing, if it is rejected;
5) legal aid lawyer for the invite.
(4) Without the consent of the witness may not be made public in the media during the procedural action with a photo, video or other technical means fixed his image, unless it is necessary for the detection of the offence.
111. article. Duties of witnesses (1) a witness, in response to the questions asked, the only real news and shows about everything that he knows its binding with the criminal offence. The right not to testify to those persons to whom such procedural immunity established Constitution, this law, and Latvia in binding international agreements.
(2) the witness must appear before conducting the criminal proceedings, officials at the specified time and place, and to participate in the activities of the investigation if the invitations.
(3) a witness may not be divulged and the interrogation of the survey content, if it does not give consent are especially warned.
112. article. Lawyer in criminal proceedings (1) everyone has the right to criminal legal aid lawyer be invited. Lawyer pay provides the same person, except in the cases referred to in this law.
(2) a lawyer who provides legal assistance in the criminal proceedings, the person is entitled to receive the promoters of the process information about the nature of the criminal proceedings, as well as with the person to participate in the activities of the investigation that is going on with this person's participation, to provide it with legal assistance, explanations, submit requests and submit evidence.
Article 113. Specialist (1) Professional is a person who, after conducting the criminal proceedings, the officers provide assistance call, using their own expertise or job skills in a particular area.
(2) an official who invited experts, shall inform him of the procedural activities he is called upon to provide assistance, of his rights and obligations, as well as responsibility for intentionally providing false information.
(3) the officer must: 1) attend criminal proceedings requesting officials indicated at the time and place and participate in the activities of the investigation, if the invitation;
2) provide help for using your knowledge and skills, but without making a practical research of inquiry, traces of the crime, the fact and circumstances, as well as the understanding of inquiry processes and results are maintained;
3) draw the enquiries agent attention to circumstances that are important for detecting and understanding the circumstances;
4) not to disclose the content and operation of the investigation results, if the disclosure is not specifically warned.
(4) the Expert shall have the right in the document in which you record the investigations, make notes in connection with his actions or explanation provided.
114. article. Personal Assistant to the promoters of the process: (1) procedural actions, not the actions of the investigation and is not associated with decision-making, but their execution, process Guide task can take the judge's Assistant, the Assistant Prosecutor, trial Secretary, or the employee of the registry of the relevant authority.
(2) the investigation authorities, Prosecutor's Office, judicial and penitentiary interpreters provides the right to use the language they know. Process guide may instruct the interpreter's obligation is made to another person who knows the language.
(3) official, who called the interpreter, the interpreter shall inform him of the rights and obligations, as well as the responsibility for false interpretation or translation. On rights and obligations are not required to inform the translator that the translation is a professional job and who, taking up the post, their responsibility is proven.
115. article. Conditions that limit the participation of persons in criminal proceedings (1) officer, the hearing Secretary and interpreter to inform the driver of the process of the circumstances that can make the basis of their procedural actions questioning of objectivity. Process guide decides to participate in criminal proceedings of their inviting or suspension from the criminal.
(2) professional and freelance basis for dismissal can also be sufficient training to do their jobs.
Chapter 8. 116. the criminal procedural immunity article. The Foundation of criminal procedural immunities (1) the criminal proceedings in the immunity plea is Constitution, this law, other laws and international treaties set out personal information or place a special legal status, guaranteeing the right of a person to completely or partially refusing the obligations or criminal proceedings limits the right to carry out certain investigative measures.
(2) a Person's immunity to criminal proceedings resulting from this: 1) Penal immunity laid down in the Constitution or international treaties;
2) trade or profession;
the status of the current criminal procedure 3);
4) affinity.
(3) a Person shall be entitled to immunity from criminal proceedings, if the requested information is protected by law: 1) State secrets;

2) professional secrecy;
3) trade secrets;
4) private life secret.
(4) the international agreements specified the location of the special legal status of the right to limit the officer to get into this place and do the investigation there.
Article 117. The type of immunity in criminal proceedings (1) the criminal procedural immunity given to the person the benefits of different levels of performance of the obligation in the criminal proceedings, namely: 1) totally relieve the person from the obligation to participate in criminal proceedings;
2) lays down special provisions for the prosecution of persons criminally liable;
3) prohibit or limit the application of coercive measures or lays down special provisions relating to it;
4) prohibit or limit personal communications and correspondence;
5) released a person from giving testimony in any part or in full;
6) lays down special provisions for the removal of the document.
(2) the special legal status of premises: 1) completely excluded from entering and investigation work in premises;
2) lays down special arrangements for the receipt of the permission entry and investigations regarding the premises;
3) restrict the periods to those premises and izņemamo objects.
118. article. Diplomatic immunity (1) diplomatic immunity exempts foreign diplomats, they assimilated persons and their family members from criminal liability under the criminal law and of all duties in the criminal proceedings.
(2) in the diplomatic bag shall not detain and arrest.
(3) a Person entitled to diplomatic immunities, attest to the certificate issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in which the Republic of Latvia in accordance with the international treaties concluded on its personal privileges and immunities.
(4) A person who is certified by the diplomatic immunity of diplomatic passports issued by foreign or other identifying documents, identifiable by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
(5) the diplomatic mission premises, residence of the head of mission, diplomatic missions, documents and archives official correspondence shall be inviolable irrespective of their location.
(6) the Person enjoying diplomatic immunity, can be held criminally liable and shall impose obligations only with kriminālprocesuālo sending State consent expressed in writing.
(7) the request to allow foreign diplomats to the Attorney General of the criminal prosecution shall be submitted to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for further diplomatic channels for decision.
119. article. Consular immunity (1) consular immunity has international agreements provided for foreign consular officials.
(2) a consular courier shall not detain and arrest.
(3) a Person's right to consular immunities confirms a certificate issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in which the Republic of Latvia in accordance with the international treaties concluded on its personal privileges and immunities.
(4) without the consular authorities or the diplomatic mission of the sending State driver's consent may enter the premises of the consular section is used only for consular authorities work.
(5) the consular posts, archives, documents and official correspondence shall be inviolable irrespective of their location.
(6) the sending State may waive the immunity of any criminal proceedings. Such refusal must be expressed in writing.
120. article. Laws guaranteed national criminal procedural immunity of officials (1) the President and a member of the Parliament's Constitution in criminal proceedings certain immunity, that is, the officials can be held criminally liable only with the consent of the Saeima.
(2) criminal proceedings may be initiated against a judge only the Attorney-General. A judge may be held criminally liable or arrest only with parliamentary consent. The decision on the judge's arrest, forced the arrival of detention or exposure to shaking adopt specific authorized a Supreme Court judge. If the judge is caught committing a crime, for compulsory detention or of the arrival of the exposure to shaking is not necessary, but within 24 hours, inform the particular official judge of the Supreme Court and the Attorney General.
(3) a lay judge with justice-related duties during arrest or can be held criminally liable only with the consent of the local government, which elected him. A decision on the arrest of a lay judge, forced the arrival of detention or exposure to shaking adopt specific authorized a Supreme Court judge. If the lay judge is caught committing a crime, for compulsory detention or of the arrival of the exposure to shaking is not necessary, but within 24 hours, inform the particular official judge of the Supreme Court and the municipality.
(4) the Prosecutor may detain, conceivably, be subject to search, arrest, or be held criminally liable in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law, shall forthwith by notice to the Attorney General.
(5) the national safety authorities and the corruption prevention and combating Bureau officials may detain, conceivably, be subject to a search, the search or inspection of the premises of the living or professional, personal or professional, as well as be held criminally liable only with the consent of the Attorney General. If the official is caught committing a criminal offence, such consent is not required, but 24 hours is required to inform the Attorney General and the national security authority or Office Manager.
(6) in order to be able to prosecute criminally a person's immunity, the Prosecutor criminal sanction shall be provided to the competent body of the proposal.
(7) the Proposal shall indicate the circumstances of the crime shall, as far as the criminal proceedings.
121. article. Criminal proceedings to protect professional secrecy (1) is not a controlled rights not to testify and not personal records to be removed: 1) to the confessional priest findings;
2) defender and Attorney who provided legal assistance in any form, on the news, which he defended in person entrusted in confidence;
3) interpreter, which called for the rights of the defence lawyer and the written notice by the process, indicating the necessary driver of translator: name, surname, personal code, place of practice or the declared place of residence.
(2) only by a Supreme Court Panel of three judges of the Senate authorisation may be: 1) questioning the judge and remove his personal records of the consultations room secrecy;
2) questioning him, remove documents and request information on the workers who make a direct criminal detective, intelligence or counter-espionage abroad, as well as for employees and people who process the promoters or the investigating authorities carry out special investigations task activities.
(3) the permission of a judge of the investigation requires: 1) secret and top secret state documents containing secret viewing and removal;
2) open for viewing, wills and probate this removal to persons approved for the interrogation.
(4) the medical establishment news about the patient only after promoters of the process provides a written request.
122. article. Lawyer's immunity (1) not allowed: 1) the interrogation as a witness for lawyers, which became known to him, providing legal assistance in any form;
2) control, take a look at or remove documents that the lawyer up, or correspondence that he received or sent, providing legal aid, as well as to search, locate and remove the following correspondence and documents;
3) control the lawyer's provision of legal assistance in the use of information systems and communication features, remove information from them and interfere in their activities.
(2) For the provision of legal aid is not a recognised champion or advocate illegal action in the best interests of the client, providing legal assistance in any form, as well as the client's illegal act.
The second section of evidence and investigation activities in Chapter 9. Burden of proof and evidence article 123. The burden of proof is proof, persons involved in the criminal activity that gets the objects as evidence of the existence or absence of facts in support of using evidence.
124. article. (1) the subject matter of proof, the showing of all the subject matter of the course of criminal proceedings a proven set of circumstances and related facts and palīgfakt.
(2) in criminal proceedings in the criminal detection of presence or absence, as well as other criminal law and this law in the circumstances which are relevant to the specific criminal law for a fair settlement.
(3) the facts in criminal proceedings not Related provable but are related and provides the basis to draw on proven conditions.
(4) With palīgfakt is justified by some other evidence of credibility or reliability, and the likelihood or probability of not to use it in the proof.
(5) the allocation of the items contained in the circumstances be considered proven, if in the course of the showing off of any reasonable doubt as to the presence or absence of.
125. article. Legal presumption of fact

(1) no additional procedural steps for the following circumstances to be regarded as proven, unless the course of criminal proceedings are not proven otherwise: 1) generally known facts;
2) by a judgment which has the force of res judicata in criminal proceedings found other facts;
3) fixed in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law for administrative infringement, if the person is unaware of it;
4) the fact that the person knows or should have known their own laws and obligations;
5) the fact that the person knows or should have known their professional obligations;
6) modern science, engineering, the arts or crafts in general the accuracy of methods of research.
(2) Is deemed to show that a person has breached the legal owner of the copyright, related rights or rights to a trade mark unless it can reliably explain or justify this acquisition or origin.
Article 126. Bodies of evidence and burden of proof (1) On the allocation of subjects considered in criminal proceedings, all persons involved with this law required or granted rights to perform the demonstration.
(2) the burden of proof in criminal proceedings is the pre-trial process, but the court proceedings — prosecution.
(3) If a person involved in criminal proceedings is of the opinion that any of this law, article 125 of the presumed facts are true, the obligation to state this fact on evidence of non-conformity to reality is the person involved in it that it claims.
(4) The circumstances which preclude criminal liability, as well as to alibi should indicate the person to whom the rights of the defence in connection with the investigation of the offence, unless such information has already been obtained in the investigation. If a person in the following circumstances or alibi does not indicate that the charge has no obligation to prove it, it is not for the Court to give judgment in the assessment, but the person is denied the opportunity to receive reimbursement for losses incurred, unfounded holding it suspects, if the termination of criminal proceedings or persons that acquittal was related to the investigations.
Article 127. Evidence (1) evidence in criminal proceedings is any procedure laid down by law for certain procedural and secured in the form of facts, that persons involved in the criminal proceedings within their competence in the subject matter of the evidence used in the conditions of the existence or absence of support.
(2) persons involved in criminal proceedings as evidence can only be used for reliable, relevant and permissible of facts.
(3) operational activities, information on the facts, the news that fixed by technical means, may be used as evidence only if they can be verified in the procedural law.
128. article. The reliability of evidence (1) Proof of credibility is what message the degree of accuracy of detection.
(2) how credible is the evidence of facts, assess, looking at all the facts obtained during the course of criminal proceedings or of facts and mutual respect in General.
(3) none of the evidence not previously determined a higher degree of reliability than other evidence.
129. article. Relevance of evidence proof are applicable to the particular criminal proceedings if the facts directly or indirectly confirms the alleged circumstances of the criminal proceedings the presence or absence of other evidence or credibility, reliability, feasibility of use or impossibility.
130. article. Admissibility of evidence (1) information during criminal proceedings concerning the facts is allowed to use as evidence, if they have been obtained and securely in this procedural law.
(2) proof Of an unacceptable and will not be used for any news concerning the facts obtained: 1) using violence, threat, blackmail, deceit or duress;
2) procedural activities carried out by the person under this Act was not entitled to make;
3) allowing particular specified in this Act which preclude the use of the evidence in question;
4) violating fundamental principles of criminal procedure.
(3) the particulars of the facts obtained, allowing other procedural irregularities, considered limited permitted and can be used in evidence only if allow procedural violation is not relevant or can be removed, they could not influence the accuracy of the resulting message or if their credibility is confirmed for the rest of the process.
(4) the conflict of interest situation for evidence is admissible only if the prosecution can prove that the conflict of interest is not affected by the criminal objective.
131. article. (1) as evidence in criminal proceedings may be news about the fact that in his testimony during the interrogation or survey provided the person in law invited to provide information on the criminal procedure (evidence) verifiable conditions and related facts and palīgfakt.
(2) the witness is also a pre-trial investigation authority or the Court addressed to the person's own written and signed statement on specific facts or circumstances.
(3) If the person in the cases specified in this law had the right to refuse to give testimony and the person was aware of it, but this evidence was provided, however, that testimony as evidence to be assessed.
132. article. The expert or auditor's opinion (1) as evidence in criminal proceedings may be the expert or auditor's opinion on the facts and circumstances, that the criminal proceedings in question provide, in writing, the sight go expert or auditor.
(2) the expert or auditor shall give explanations concerning the opinion or information about facts or circumstances is the expert or auditor's testimony.
133. article. The opinion of the competent institution (1) as evidence in criminal proceedings may be a control or monitoring function of the institution conducting the written opinion on what facts and circumstances of the event, the control or monitoring according to the laws and established competence (authorization) make this institution.
(2) The opinion of the competent authorities in criminal proceedings also considered physical inventory or audit Act, drawn up by the competent persons authorised by the Commission.
(3) the opinion of the competent bodies of the institution also be provided with a statement of the facts and circumstances that are at the disposal of that institution because of its competence and activities.
134. article. Evidence (1) things For evidence in criminal proceedings may be any of the things that was used as a tool of the crime or criminal offence kept the feet, or in any other way the contents of facts and is used in the proof.
(2) If the thing to be used in the demonstration due to the content of the information contained therein, it's considered rather than on evidence, but on the document.
Article 135. Document (1) as evidence in criminal proceedings can be a document, if the evidence can only be used in connection with the content of the information contained therein.
(2) a document may contain particulars of the facts in writing or in another form. On the documents of proof means in criminal proceedings also considered computerised media, sound and image fixing technical means to record where the content of the information recorded can be used as evidence.
136. article. Electronic evidence as evidence in criminal proceedings may be of facts in the form of electronic information that is processed, stored or transmitted by a automated data processing devices or systems.
137. article. Investigation activities information as evidence in criminal proceedings may be news about the facts that strengthen investigation activities or other protocols in the statutory forms.
Chapter 10. Enquiries article 138. Enquiries (1) investigative actions are procedural actions that focus on news or if the checking given in criminal proceedings.
(2) the authorized officer to carry out criminal proceedings is entitled to draw his mandate only in this investigation provided for in the law.
139. article. Investigation of the performance of the activities of the General provisions (1) the previously planned investigations are usually operated from 8.00 until 20.00 o'clock time. where investigative action is urgent because it can lead to significant evidence of loss and threaten the achievement of the objective of criminal procedure, this shall be done without delay.
(2) at the beginning of its investigation activities the operator shall inform the relevant parties involved in the process of its rights and obligations, as well as notify you of liability for breach of their duties. Are not required to inform and warn the person that procedural obligations are also its professional duties.
(3) a person who participates in the investigation work, prohibited the use of violence, threats, lies, as well as other illegal and moral norms inappropriate actions or activities that endanger the life or health of the person or injures personal dignity. Investigative activities related to the indecent exposure of the human body, banned from making and participate in the opposite sex person, except for treatment.

(4) it is prohibited to disclose details of private life of the person who is participating in the investigation, as well as the messages that contain trade secret or trade secret, except when it is necessary in the proof.
(5) the investigation of the operation can be performed by using technical means in article 140 of this law.
(6) the investigation of the nature of the activities in the course of the hearing of this law determines the eighth to eleventh title.
140. article. Procedural actions through technical means (1) the driver of the process, a procedural act may be performed using technical means (s, videoconferencing), if required by the interests of the criminal proceedings.
(2) in the course of the proceedings, using the technical means must be provided to different rooms or buildings existing process Guide and people that participate in procedural, could hear the teleconference, as well as hear and see: the videoconference.
(3) the opening of proceedings, the process notifies the driver: 1) for procedural acts the venue, date and time;
2) driver of the process, the first and last names;
3) second procedural actions in place of the existing process guide authorized posts, name and last name;
4) about the content of the procedural actions and the exercise of using technical means.
(4) at the invitation of persons participating in the operation called a procedural, your first name, last name, and the procedural status.
(5) the identity of the persons participating in the operation, the procedural but not force the process in one room, verifying and certifying the person authorised by the promoters of the process. Its job is to ensure the progress of the proceedings in its location.
(6) the driver of the process shall inform persons participating in the activities of their procedural rights and obligations, in the cases provided for in the law, warns of responsibility for non-fulfilment of his duties, and launched a procedural action.
(7) the process of transforming an authorised person shall draw up a certificate stating the procedural acts the venue, date and time, your posts, your name and surname, procedural actions of each in this venue the persons present in the first name, last name, ID number and address, as well as the warning if the law provides liability for breach of their duties. Warn the person about it subscribe. The acknowledgement shall also indicate the breaks in the course of proceedings and procedural actions end time. Proof of signature in all procedural acts in the present location, and it is sent to the process for adding driver procedural actions Protocol.
(8) the pre-trial process in investigation activities carried out through technical means, shall be this law, the procedure laid down in article 143, but other procedural actions — in article 142 of this law. During a procedural hearing that are performed by using technical means, shall record the minutes of the hearing.
141. article. Investigations of fixation (1) investigative activities be recorded normally.
(2) the action taken and the investigation results can capture sound and image recording.
(3) in the cases specified in this law in the investigation of the action taken and the results can be fixed just opinion, report or statement.
142. article. Investigation operations Protocol (1) investigations Protocol written by or in the course of the activities of the investigation immediately after the completion of the investigation the offender or his actions in task-other person present.
(2) the investigation activities of the Protocol pursuant to article 326. this law article.
(3) If a person involved in the investigation address, for security reasons, it is not appropriate to disclose, in the Protocol shall be replaced by the address and telephone number, through which it is possible to communicate with the person concerned.
(4) the investigation activities the operator introduces the people who participated in the investigation, with the Protocol and all sign it. If the person refuses to sign, it is entry in the Protocol.
(5) every person before signing is entitled to request to the Protocol are made amendments, additions or record itself.
143. article. Sound and image recording (1) investigations investigator investigations progress can capture sound and image recordings on it before the start of the investigation by giving persons participating in the investigation.
(2) the record shall record all transactions in the course of the investigation. Not partial entry. If during the course of the investigation it is necessary to break the record in the proceeding before the break and after the break — to resume the investigation.
(3) the sound and images fixed in the recording information is considered accurate and complete compared to the fixed information in writing.
(4) writing activities of the investigation Protocol, observe this law article 142, but of course the activities of the investigation and the facts found in the Protocol only essential facts.-min
(5) the investigation activities in sound and image recording is stored together with the criminal case.
144. article. Scientific and technical means (1) the activities of the investigation investigation activities can use scientific and technical means.
(2) scientific and technological use of investigation activities is prohibited if it threatens the health and lives of the persons participating in the investigation of the transaction.
145. article. The interrogation interrogation is the investigation activity, the content of which is capturing information from pratinām.
146. article. Attend for questioning (1) a Person for questioning calls by summons or otherwise informing you that a case and give testimony, what will the procedural situation of the person, as well as the consequences of absence.
(2) the Arrested person for questioning calls through the intermediary of the Office with which it is held. The questioning also can arrest this institution.
(3) minors for questioning about the IE calls with his legal representatives, training institutions or family courts (pagastties). If there are circumstances that reasonably prevent or impede the use of the following invite, juvenile calls without using the above.
(4) a Person who has a certain special protection, for questioning calls with its body, which provides for special protection of the person.
147. article. Interrogation procedure (1) the Interrogation begins with pratinām-person identity and languages to be used in establishing the interrogation. To find out whether the pratinām understand the language in which the proceedings take place, and in which language he can testify.
(2) investigations investigator explained to him the pratinām this law rights and obligations.
(3) evidence of pratinām is a part of the personal data: name, surname and personal code.
(4) If a witness is associated with numbers, dates, and other information that is difficult to remember, the pratinām has the right to use their own documents and records, as well as to read them. Notes can be added in the Pratinām file.
(5) in the course of the Interrogation the pratinām can produce the accompanying objects, documents, sound recordings, and images, as well as read him documents or play records on the mark. The materials are presented only after the pratinām in testimony recorded in the matter.
(6) Pratinām read previous testimony admissible if: 1) is the major inconsistencies between the previous and this testimony;
2 the pratinām refuses to testify);
3) case in court questioning the person's absence.
(7) If a person specified in a special procedural protection, the interrogation followed this law, the provisions of article 308.
148. article. Interrogation duration (1) minor interrogation duration without this consent in one day may not exceed eight hours, including break.
(2) the minor interrogation shall be made in accordance with this law and article 152.153.
Article 149. The testimony provided by the recording of interrogations recorded interrogation Protocol, it is write in the first person. At the request of the person pratinām his testimony of the CIRS, it can write directly.
150. article. Detained, suspected and accused of detainee interrogations, the suspect and the accused at the beginning of the first interrogation: 1) find out the person's biographical information, place and date of birth, citizenship, education, marital status, place of work or training, occupation or post, place of residence, criminal record;
2) explains the procedural situation of the person and shall issue a copy of the document so that this procedural situation;
3) issued a statement from the person the law that defines the procedural rights and obligations given in criminal proceedings, if this person does not already been issued;
4) explains the person its rights not to testify and warn you that everything that will be said, can be used against that person.
151. article. Interrogation of the witness and the victim (1) prior to interrogation the witness and the victim, explain their rights and obligations and warned about responsibility for refusal to testify or knowingly false testimonies coming.
(2) Witnesses and victims may be questioning him about all the conditions that have or may have a role in the case, the suspect or the accused or other persons involved in criminal proceedings.

152. article. The minor interrogation characteristics (1) duration of the minor's interrogation without his consent in one day must not exceed six hours, including break.
(2) a minor who has not reached 14 years of age, or, at the discretion of the investigator of the investigation activities, any teacher's questioning of minors or the presence of a specialist, which trained psychologists to work with children in criminal proceedings (hereinafter referred to as a psychologist). One of the minor's legal representatives, close relative minor or trustee shall have the right to participate in the interrogation, even if he is not the person against whom criminal proceedings are initiated, the on hold, the suspect or the accused and if the objection to the minor. The person with the enquiries agent authorization may ask questions to pratinām.
(3) minors who have not reached 14 years of age, are not warned about responsibility for refusal to testify and intentionally false statements go.
(4) If a psychologist tells the driver that the 14gad process is not achieved or the psyche of the person of the minor's psyche that is identified as a victim of the violence caused by the person from whom the victim is materially or otherwise dependent, or sexual exploitation, can be detrimental to the repeated interrogation, be it directly only with the permission of the judge of the investigation, but the Court, with a decision of the Court of Justice.
Article 153. Minor's interrogation by a psychologist (1) If the psychologist believes that 14 years not reached the persons psyche or the minor's psyche that is identified as a victim of the violence caused by the person from whom the victim is materially or otherwise dependent, or sexual exploitation, can be harmful to direct questioning, this can be done by technical means and psychologist. If the investigator or the Prosecutor does not agree, direct interrogation shall be made only with the permission of the judge of the investigation, but the Court, with a decision of the Court of Justice.
(2) the driver of the process and the other his personal guest in another room where technical features ensure that you can hear and see pratinām and psychologist. The Pratinām together with the psychologists in the room, which is suitable for a call with the juvenile and ensure that the technical process of the promoters asked questions only heard psychologist.
(3) If pratinām is not reached 14 years of age, psychologist, subject to the specific circumstances in the minors, explain the need for activities and the importance of the information provided, find out personal data, ask the minor psyche in an appropriate form guide process issues, if necessary, to inform you about the break in the action and the resumption of the investigation.
(4) If the person pratinām has reached 14 years of age, process guide with the psychologist shall inform minors through the actions of the investigation to find out the nature of his personal data, explain their rights and obligations, as well as warn him about responsibility for non-fulfilment of his duties, ask the minor psyche in an appropriate form in the process of transforming asked questions; If necessary, inform on the break in the action and the resumption of the investigation.
(5) in the course of the Interrogation is recorded in accordance with this law, 141-143 article. Pratinām minor in the Protocol does not sign.
154. article. Specify the source of information obligations (1) the Court may instruct the media journalist or editor to indicate the source of the information published.
(2) The coroner or the Prosecutor's suggestion, decided by the investigating judge, heard the proposal applicant, media journalist or editor and familiar with the material.
(3) the decision on the information source of the investigating judge shall adopt, subject to the rights of the person and the public interest and proportionality.
(4) the judge's decision may be appealed by the applicant, the proposed media journalist or editor, and it is this Act, chapter 24.
155. article. Poll (1) If that testimony is not fixed in detail, does not jeopardise the achievement of the objective of the criminal proceedings, the subject-matter of proof, the particulars of the facts provided can also get a the survey.
(2) in carrying out the survey, investigation operations analyst meets with the witness personally, explaining his rights and obligations, as well as find this witness known relevant information for the investigation or the absence of such information.
(3) at the time of the survey evidence can be fixed in the Protocol or to make notes and use the sound or picture fiksējošo technical features.
(4) If at the time of the survey evidence is not recorded in the minutes, on the progress of the survey and the results of inquiry investigator writes a message stating: 1) place, date of the survey, its launch and completion time;
2) surveys, offender name and surname;
3) interviewed the person name and address;
4) provided evidence of each person; If several people have the same evidence, this information will be mentioned once;
5) used scientific and technical means.
(5) the report may reflect the more evidence.
156. article. Expert and Auditor's interrogation (1) Process the driver may invite experts or auditors to provide testimony to: 1) see the expert or auditor's opinion related to the important questions that do not require additional studies;
2) specify the details of inspection or study audit that is used in a method or, in the opinion of the used terms;
3) for information on other facts and circumstances, not an opinion, but is related to the expert or auditor's participation in pre-trial proceedings;
4) see expert or auditor's qualifications.
(2) Expert and auditor shall be made, under cross-examination the witness's cross-examination rules.
157. article. Konfrontēšan (1) Konfrontēšan is of two or more persons at the same time questioning earlier interrogation by, if that person is a significant controversy in previous testimony.
(2) the questioning of any earlier can confront the person regardless of what that person's procedural status.
158. article. Procedure Konfrontēšan (1) Konfrontēšan takes place pursuant to the provisions of the CIRS, except specified in this article.
(2) Konfrontēšan start with the question of whether the konfrontējam knows each other and what is their relationship.
(3) in the course of konfrontējam Konfrontēšan in turn asking questions about the circumstances, which are contrary to their previous testimony, and this contradiction.
(4) the activities of the investigation Konfrontējam reviewer permission you can ask each other questions. Investigation operations the operator is entitled to reject questions that are not relevant or not relevant. All the asked questions and the answers are recorded in the minutes.
(5) Konfrontējam previous testimony can be read only after the fixed statement, which he made at the time of the confrontation.
(6) the signature of each konfrontējam your testimony.
(7) If a person participating in the konfrontēšan that certain special procedural protection, konfrontēšan shall be carried out pursuant to this law, the provisions laid down in the fourth section.
159. article. (1) inspection inspection is investigation, which investigation actions directly perceive the reviewer finds and records the object characteristics, if there is a possibility that this object is associated with the criminal offence.
(2) to find the traces of the crime and identify other important circumstances, make the scene, off-road areas, facilities, vehicle, object, document, body, animal or other object, Visual inspection.
160. article. View the General provisions (1) investigations investigator may be invited to participate in any examination of the persons involved in the criminal proceedings in question.
(2) in order to ensure the maintenance of interest, you can organize it security.
(3) If in the course of the inspection you need reporting search, recognition or other investigative activities, the completion of the investigation, subject to the relevant rules of business.
(4) If other investigative activity is found in the object, it reviews can be done at the same inquiry in action, view the results in the form of inquiry.
(5) More space or area area can simultaneously view a number of officials empowered to carry out the criminal proceedings. Each of them in the course of the inspection is recorded separately, indicating the specific view object and view the results.
161. article. The expert or auditor's participation in the inspection (1) if the inspection, the expert, finds and removes traces of the criminal offence or the objects for which it is necessary to make further inspections, inspections Protocol specifies the location, characteristics, removal, as well as the fact that the sole responsibility of the person they passed. In such cases, the case of withdrawn feet and viewing is done in the course of inspection.
(2) the driver of the process can ask the expert to take a look at everything completely, if the object is under consideration as a whole is subject to further inspection.
(3) if the inspection process, the Auditors participate in the guide may instruct him to audit or inventory required for document viewing and removal. View only the Protocol indicates the documents, the location, removal of facts and the responsibility of the Auditor, which passed to the audit or to perform a physical inventory documents removed. Document viewing is done in the course of an audit or inventory.
162. article. Viewing site

(1) viewing a site's specific location and the object of the inspection, if it is performed after receipt of the information on criminal offences committed and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the site has occurred or continued to be a criminal offence.
(2) If the scene view made incomplete and are experiencing confusion or further questions, you can perform additional site inspection. If the scene view allowed significant irregularities of procedural order, you can make the scene again. Event place additional or repeat examination carried out pursuant to this law, the provisions of article 163.
(3) in the Event the site in the course of the investigation, the investigator may remove the action items with traces of the crime, and documents. Articles and documents for which circulation is prohibited by law, to be removed regardless of their connection with the criminal proceedings. The subject matter and the removal of documents is viewing the scene.
163. article. Off-road areas, room, vehicle or object inspection (1) if the off-road area, room, vehicle or object is associated with the criminal offence committed, you can make these areas, premises, vehicle or object.
(2) not available to the public in the territory or premises and the premises in these areas or items, as well as vehicle or computer viewing can be done only with these territories, premises, vehicle or a computer user's consent or a judge's decision to the investigation.
(3) natural and legal persons property, possession or use of an existing area of the territory, space or view this person as possible, or in the presence of their representatives.
(4) subject to the inspection of the scene of the emergency, the entry on site does not require the consent of a person.
164. article. Inspection body (1) If the external inspection of the corpse is not asked to perform a forensic expert, it shall be carried out with the participation of health professionals.
(2) the corpse cremation is allowed only after the inspection, tiesmedicīnisk if you have received the consent of the Prosecutor, the pre-trial proceedings or during the proceedings, the Court's decision.
165. article. The body ekshumācij the body dug up from burial sites, to make it look, show their recognition withdrawn samples for comparison or expertise (the body ekshumācij), may, with the deceased's close relatives consent or with the judge's decision, the investigation pre-trial process, or by a decision of the Court of Justice, at the time of the hearing.
166. article. Ekshumācij procedure (1) the body of ekshumācij previously coordinated with the competent health institutions, and the process of making the task force medical examiner, funeral site in the presence of a representative of the administration.
(2) shall be recorded in the Ekshumācij and taking pictures or videos of them made.
(3) the body after burial ekshumācij again takes place with the permission of the officials, after which the ekshumācij made the decision.
167. article. Viewing of the animal by animal inspection, if necessary, also recorded its reaction to the team or to the naming of its own name.
168. article. Watching (1) where there are reasonable grounds to believe that a person's body are the traces of the crime, in particular features which have some significance for the case, or even a person in a special physiological condition, as well as to determine its physical development, can make the person look.
(2) if the process guide instructs watching do to another person, he shall act on the matter, indicating a person and for what purpose and to whom the question asked to perform this action.
Article 169. Viewing arrangements (1) shall be made, subject to the Inclusion of inspection, with the exception of specified in this article.
(2) If viewing is associated with the body of the person considered indecent exposure, but the investigations the perpetrator has the opposite sex person, this action of inquiry investigator asking to do a medical professional. Protocol written by investigator investigations, attending medical professional who has done watching.
170. article. Forced to look at (1) if the person does not consent to viewing, do it.
(2) the person forced to watching that particular criminal proceedings are not held, the suspect or the accused, can be done only on the basis of the investigation, the judge's decision.
(3) If the offence is dealing with an urgent and procrastination can lead to evidence of loss or compromise the achievement of the objective of criminal procedure, it can be done with the consent of the Prosecutor, not later than the next business day after watching the notifying the investigating judge and the presentation of the activities of the investigation report and materials, based on the investigations of the need and urgency. The judge examined the validity of the rule of law and enter. If investigations were not substantiated or committed unlawful, the judge shall decide on the admissibility of the evidence obtained.
171. article. Experimental investigation of the investigation investigation activities of the experiment is that the content is a special attempt to find out if certain circumstances and certain way of accomplishing what could an event or activity, as well as to obtain new or check earlier information about conditions that have or may have a role in the case.
Article 172. The investigation procedure of the experiment (1) during the experiment, if necessary, after the enquiries call offender participates in the persons who made the transactions included in the experiment.
(2) the investigation shall be carried out under the conditions of the experiment, which should correspond to those which took place in the event or activity. To turn off the random, the results of the transactions included in the experiment can be done repeatedly.
173. article. On-the-spot check, the testimony of the witness on-the-spot check investigations whose contents are repeated personal interrogation of the earlier testimonies provide facts and verification of this fact on the site, as well as a comparison of the results obtained, in order to obtain new or check earlier information about the circumstances of the case.
174. article. Arrangements for the on-the-spot check the testimony of (1) the testimony of the on-the-spot check is carried out with the participation of the persons questioned in the past.
(2) testimony of the on-the-spot verification person sequential show for one of the earlier testimony of the fact, and this is followed by fact checking and viewing the site.
(3) if there is conflict between the evidence found and the specific facts, the actions of the investigation investigator calls pratinām parties explain their reasons.
175. article. Display resolution (1) presentation of recognition is of inquiry whose contents are a demonstration of the object the victim, witness, the suspect or the accused in order to establish its identity with the object which this person is known or previously caught in circumstances related to the event.
(2) the display resolution can live person (after its external appearance, dynamic signs or voice), body, subject matter, document, or other object.
176. article. Questioning before reporting recognition before the presentation of the recognition of the object the person examined the conditions under which it will pick a recognizable object, and the object's characteristics and the characteristics by which this person would recognize it. Pratinām could not describe in detail the nature and characteristics of the object can not be a reason for refusing to make the reporting of recognition.
177. article. Arrangements for the reporting of recognition (1) Recognizable objects presented together with at least another two objects. All objects must be homogeneous, without drastic differences.
(2) the circumstances in which disclosure occurs recognition should be as similar to those in which the Recognizer object recognized caught due to the event, but a recognizable object must be located in such a State as possible and form as a first-time perception.
(3) the display objects, their location or their presentation order must be such that the recognizer could not previously know recognizable object location, and so he could fully perceive its characteristics and signs by which this object can be recognized. Recognition in the party itself must choose between the other uzrādāmaj persons.
(4) the reportable objects as photograph taken or made a sound and image recording.
(5) If it is not possible to produce the same recognizable object, you can display the display produced by the photo, video or other scientific and technical means and fixed its features and characteristics by which this object can be recognized.
(6) in the fifth subparagraph of this article, that rule is also where the recognisable object is rare and difficult to find two more mutually consistent objects.
(7) if the recognizer points to one of the objects presented as recognizable, invite potentially more recognizers to explain the characteristics and the characteristics he would recognize. The recognized Parties invited to give his full name.
(8) in cases where the specific recognizer special procedural protection and necessary for his safety, recognition shall be carried out pursuant to this law, the provisions of title IV.
(9) in the eighth part of this article is to be followed also apply in cases where the ethical or psychological reasons need to recognize the person does not see the recognizer.

178. article. The presentation of a recognition of the body (1) resolution presented one body, if necessary, appropriate handling after it.
(2) the body clothes separately the recognition of this law, in article 177.
Article 179. (1) a search is a search of inquiry whose contents are space, off-road vehicle areas and individuals forced to crawl to find and remove the search object, if there are sufficient grounds to believe that the target is in a search of the site.
(2) a search shall be carried out in order to find the relevant criminal proceedings, objects, documents, cadavers, or search.
180. article. The decision for the search of (1) a search shall be carried out by the investigating judge or the Court's decision. The investigating judge shall decide, on the basis of the process of transforming application and accompanying materials.
(2) the decision for the shake, which, where, at what business and any objects and documents will search for and remove.
(3) in cases of urgency, when putting off because your articles or documents may be destroyed, hidden or damaged or search a person may escape, process Guide, you can search with the consent of the Prosecutor.
(4) the decision on the shaking is not necessary, making the people can search, as well as article 182 of this Act, part of the fifth case.
(5) On the third part of this article contains the driver for the search process no later than the next business day after it is made, notify the investigating judge, the presentation of the material, based on the investigations of the need and urgency, as well as the actions of the investigation Protocol. The judge examined the legality and reasonableness of a search. If the unlawful actions of the investigation, the investigating judge the resulting evidence declared inadmissible in criminal proceedings and decide on the action to remove objects.
181. article. In search of the persons present (1) search of the presence of the person shall, where the search is taking place, or that person's age in the presence of family members. If the presence of the person concerned or that person can not avoid participation in a search, the search shall be carried out subject to the search object's possessor, niekotāj to the establishment or local authorities in the presence of a representative.
(2) a legal person on the premises in question in search of a legal person in its presence and in the presence of the person, in connection with which the acts or omissions of a search of the premises of the legal person shall, if there is no objective obstacles the person be delivered to the premises of the legal person. If the presence of the representative or agent is not possible avoid participation in a search, the search shall be carried out by local authorities in the presence of a representative.
(3) a search shall be made, in the presence of the suspect or accused person, except where this is not possible for objective reasons.
(4) in order to recognize the search objects, you can also call up a search victim or witness.
(5) a Person who is in search of the site, explains their right to be present at all investigation activities during the operations of the operator and to comment on them.
182. article. The order in which the search is to be made (1) investigations investigator with the investigative activity at persons have the right to go into a decision on a search of specified premises or area area to find the decision of these objects, documents, or search a person's body. If necessary, you can organize a search site for safekeeping.
(2) when starting a search, investigation activities the operator introduces the person to which the search takes place, with a decision on a search. This person on the sign decision. Then the enquiries performer invited to voluntarily issue a search object.
(3) if the person to whom the search is taking place, refuse to open in place of the existing search space or storage, the enquiries agent is entitled to open them without causing unnecessary damage.
(4) a search instead of persons may be prohibited to leave this place, to move and to talk between themselves until the end of the investigation. If your actions or those of the number people interfere with search, they can move to other premises.
(5) the premises or area may be shaking the territory also included the search of vehicles and persons. If necessary, the search can be done in a room or area of the territory stay beginning and end.
(6) the search time takes the decision referred to in articles and documents, as well as other objects and documents that may play a role in the case. If you find things that storage is prohibited, they shall be removed, giving the reasons for such action in the Protocol.
(7) If a search victim or witness present recognizes one of the found items, it indicates the Protocol.
(8) all search and found in the removed items remaining at parties, description of the Protocol and, if possible, packaging and apzīmogojam.
(9) if the driver of the process engaged in the search, the expert or auditor shall present to remove the search time, found objects and draw the necessary expertise or audit, the search protocol specifies the objects, their location, the identifying signs of withdrawal and inspection authority or an auditor that responsibility passed to remove objects.
(10) the search site after completion of a search as possible, savedam the previous order.
183. article. People search (1) If there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that a criminal major items or documents in a man's clothes in his trunk, to present in his body or body open sockets, you can do a search of the person.
(2) a Person may only make a search of a same sex officer, if necessary, call upon the treatment of persons regardless of sex.
184. article. Search for diplomatic and consular premises (1) search of diplomatic and consular representations of spaces and spaces used by foreign parliaments and Governments in official delegations and missions, can only be done after this mission, the delegation or the head of Mission's request or with his consent.
(2) a search of the premises in which the lives of foreign diplomatic missions and staff of other institutions as well as foreign and Government official of the Parliament delegation and mission members, in accordance with international agreements binding enjoys diplomatic immunity, and their family members, as well as their employees, members and their families, the search can be done only at their request or with their consent.
(3) the consent referred to in this article the process requires promoters with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia.
(4) in making a search of diplomatic and consular missions, representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs presence is mandatory.
185. article. The search service of the copy of Protocol of shaking a copy of the minutes shall be issued to the person, to which the investigations carried out, or other article 181 of this Act referred to in the first and second subparagraph.
186. article. Withdrawals are withdrawals of inquiry whose contents are significant to the case of objects or documents, if the disqualification of inquiry which is known to the operator or to a specific thing or document and it is not necessary to search for or they are in public places.
187. article. The decision on the removal of (1) the removal by force of the decision process.
(2) the decision on the removal of specified that, where, at what business and any items or documents other than.
188. article. Removal order (1) jams, initiating the investigation activities the operator introduces the person to which the removal, with a decision on removal. This person on the sign decision. Then the enquiries invited persons investigator shall immediately issue a movable object.
(2) the withdrawn items or documents describing the withdrawal in the minutes.
(3) a copy of the Protocol for removal after completion of the investigations, issue the person to which the withdrawals made.
(4) If a person refuses to issue a removable object or if the specified location in the document or remove is not found, but there is reason to believe that it is located elsewhere, you can this law 180. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article decide on search and search to find it.
189. article. Articles and documents are submitted at the initiative of the person (1) a Person is entitled to submit a driver of the process objects and documents, and this person's opinion, can play a role in criminal proceedings.
(2) the fact of filing shall be recorded, indicating the item or document the identifying signs, as well as the applicant's explanations for the object or collection.
(3) If a person submitting articles or documents which investigative activities, it is recorded that during the investigation activities.
(4) If it is established that the document submitted to the front tip or is irrelevant in criminal proceedings, it returned to the applicant.
190. article. The object requested by the promoters of the process and documents

(1) the driver of the process, without making this law provided for in article 186, is entitled to request in writing from the natural or legal persons for criminal proceedings meaningful objects and documents.
(2) if the natural and legal persons do not submit process guide the requested objects and documents his time limit expires, the driver of the process in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act shall be withdrawn or shaking.
(3) the legal entity managers after the request of the promoters are obliged within their competence to make the documentary audit resorisk a counting, or service check and on time to submit the documents together with the relevant annexes fulfilled the request.
(4) the pre-trial process to request from credit documents that contain information about a person's private life, can only judge of investigation.
191. article. Electronic information system storing data in (1) the driver of the process with his decision, you can ask the electronic information system owner or the lawful possessor (that is, the person who provides the person contacting the information system or within the service process or store data) immediately provide it owned or controlled a particular investigation needs the maintenance of data integrity in unaltered state and are not available to other users of the system.
(2) data retention can be detected for up to 30 days, but this period, if necessary, for a period of up to another 30 days may be extended by the investigating judge.
192. article. The electronic information system of the data stored in the Discovery Process, the driver based on the investigation of the judge's decision or with the consent of the data subject may request that the electronic information system owner or lawful possessor discloses the data saved in the system.
193. article. Inspection inspection is investigation, carried out by one or more experts on behalf of the promoters of the process and the content of which is submitted to the expertise of the research object in order to clarify the major criminal facts and circumstances on which the expert opinion is given.
194. article. Basis for determining inspection expertise determines where the major issues of criminal procedure establishing the need to conduct a study which used a special knowledge in a scientific, technical, artistic or craft industry.
195. article. Mandatory inspection inspection is required, to determine: 1) cause of death or bodily injury severity and character;
2) pregnancy or the fact of its artificial interruption;
3) signs that point to a sexual offence;
4 the person's age, if) it has a role in criminal proceedings, but not the document;
5) the suspect or accused or of the mental state of the person's mental state, for which proceedings are medical coercive means for determining if a driver of the process have reasonable doubts as to the dismissals of the persons concerned;
6 person capacity) adequately perceive and memorize important facts in the case and to testify for them, as well as its ability to independently exercise their rights and legitimate interests in criminal proceedings, if reasonable doubt arises about it;
7) cash and securities authenticity;
8) of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors;
9) the dead person's identity, where the body of ekshumācij;
10) weapon, ammunition or explosive substances.
196. article. Additional inspection (1) additional expertise to determine if the driver of the process agree to expert opinion, but there are ambiguities or loopholes or have additional questions.
(2) an additional inspection may be done to the same expert.
197. article. Repeated inspection (1) specifies that if the inspection process, challenging the driver for the expert opinion on the merits of its reasonableness, not fundamental flaws or prevent the methodical nature of the errors, and then, if the lack of expert qualifications or competence or if not allowed examination of the significant procedural violations.
(2) expertise instructs another to do an expert or experts to the Commission, or the Commission, the same research and initial inspection findings. Expert who did the initial inspection, may be present in the repeated expertise, without participating in the trials.
198. article. The Commission of experts for the purpose of (1) the Commission of inspection Experts are usually established to: 1) expertise, if they result in the expected loss of object or studied fundamental changes, which excluded the possibility of repeated trials;
2 personally identifiable inspection);
3) expertise on treatment person's error, taking the treatment.
(2) the inspection authority the Manager can ask any expertise to make an expert Commission.
(3) Commission of experts who do not work in one examiner's authority, creates a process to guide your decision.
(4) the opinion of the Commission's inspection signed by all its members, but if they disagree, each of the experts give their opinion.
199. article. Complex inspection (1) Complex inspection determines if criminal proceedings are major issues for clearance of one object or several objects under different sectoral experts.
(2) the experts who carried out the inspection, the complex provides a common opinion.
(3) a separate opinion can provide expert who disagrees with the common opinion.
200. article. The decision on the determination of expertise (1) the decision on the determination of expertise adopted process guide or investigation team.
(2) the decision on the determination of expertise: 1) the reasons for the determination and expertise;
2) conditions that refer to the object to be studied;
3) examiner's authority or the expert's name, which asked to draw expertise;
4) expert task and raised to be addressed;
5) expert release material.
(3) the inspection of living people, the decision indicates his personal data.
(4) if the investigation operations process carried out on behalf of the promoters or participate in it examiner's authority expert who takes further study exposed objects, process driver can ask the object for the same inspection make this same expert or examiner's authority by sensing the challenge and be addressed the enquiries. If necessary, the driver for the inspection process can ask additional questions and to submit additional materials.
201. article. The examiner's expertise (1) by its inspection authority in committing of the examiner's decision on the determination of izpētāmo objects and the required file submitted to these authorities.
(2) if the decision does not indicate a specific expert, who suggested making expertise, or if the inspection process Guide task carried out in the examiner's Office where the expert participated in the investigation or action, the expert examiner determines the leader of the authority and notify the driver of the process.
(3) the examiner's authority is not entitled to give the driver an expert binding instructions, which can affect the results of research and opinion, as well as coordination with the without the process of transforming themselves to research izprasī the necessary additional materials, except medical records.
202. article. Expertise: expert outside perpetrator (1) by its expertise in expert, who did not work in the examiner's Office, the process of peer review and designated driver: 1) make sure that his personality and competence;
2) whether no barriers, which he cannot do this expertise;
3) issued a decision on the inspection, the expert determination, the precise object and all necessary materials;
4) explains to him the rights and obligations of experts;
5) warned about responsibility for the refusal to draw expertise and intentionally false opinion going;
6) if necessary, explain the inspection findings procedure.
(2) that the experts are familiar with the decision, he confirms with his signature. There are marked expert statements and applications that process the driver can reject the decision.
(3) the driver of the process provides all the expertise of the expert service of the object, if necessary by providing expertise in a subject.
(4) the process an expert task force at the same time obliges the employer experts not to make obstacles for the inspection.
203. article. Expert opinion (1) Expert opinion in writing giving, as evidenced by his signature.
(2) expert opinion: 1) your first and last name;
2) position;
3) about his qualifications;
4) decision or a task with which a particular inspection;
5 the date of inspection);
6) the persons present;
7) things used materials and studied the object sākumdat;
8) used to research methodology and the results obtained;
9) reasoned answers to questions or reasons why the answer is not possible;
10) other conditions important for criminal proceedings which the expert learned on its own initiative.
(3) if any of the issues the expert cannot give specific and firm response, accepted the findings of fact in the statement. If it can be scientifically justified, the expert noted that eventuality confidence level.
(4) the expert opinion shall be accompanied by pictures and other objects or materials.
204. article. The use of coercive measures by expertise

(1) in order to ensure that the detainee, the suspect or the accused in Court of psychiatric or psychological examination or with his body research related expertise, where necessary, coercive measures may be used.
(2) forced witness, victim or persons against whom criminal proceedings initiated, the judicial psychiatric or psychological expertise or his body of related research expertise can only be done with the investigation, the judge's decision and only in such a case, if a criminal case circumstances without demonstrable expertise is not ascertainable.
205. article. Statement of expert opinion naming it cannot If before the trial commences, the expert makes sure that will not be able to answer questions in the decision because he does not have the relevant expertise, appropriate research methodologies or research facilities are insufficient or of poor quality, or other important reasons, he writes about it motivated statement, which puts the driver in the process.
206. article. Comparative research necessary to ensure samples expert the opportunity to reply to the questions asked, the driver can take the process or ask an expert to take a comparative research of the required samples which reflect the research expertise in object properties and characteristics.
207. article. Persons are sampled comparative study (1) comparative studies, samples can be taken from a detainee, the suspect, the accused or the person against whom criminal proceedings take place on medical coercive means.
(2) in order to determine whether the marks on objects (objects) or any major criminal circumstances are due to the other person as a result of the transaction, samples can be taken from these persons, examine them accordingly as victims or witnesses.
208. article. The order in which considerable comparative research samples needed (1) Comparative research necessary samples can be requested or expert of the process on his behalf.
(2) If the comparative research of the required samples from people with its consent, it shall, pursuant to this law, the provisions of article 142.
(3) comparative study of sampling required, if it is not extracted from the person's, done as a separate investigation. You can do other activities over the course of the investigation, in the form of the required steps in the Protocol.
209. article. The comparative research of the required sampling compulsions (1) Comparative research samples needed to force can only be taken with the decision of the judge of the investigation.
(2) in cases of urgency, when the putting off of the comparative exploration of the required samples can be destroyed or damaged, it can guide the process to take forcibly with the consent of the Prosecutor. Not later than on the working day following the transaction process of investigation proceedings shall notify the investigating judge, the presentation of the material, which is based on its need and urgency, as well as the actions of the investigation Protocol. The judge examined the actions of the investigation justice and reasonableness.
11. chapter. Special investigations article 210. Special investigative activities (1) in this section the special investigative actions, if the criminal proceedings for alleged investigations of facts necessary to obtain without telling the parties involved in criminal proceedings and those who could provide this information.
(2) special investigative actions, on the basis of the judge's decision, of investigations carried out or requested process institutions and persons on his behalf. If following the realization of the need to use operational tools and techniques, ask it to make only specially authorised by law to public bodies (referred to in this chapter, a specialized national authority).
(3) special investigations may be carried out only in the investigation of serious or particularly serious crimes.
211. article. Special investigations as a result of the information gathered (1) special investigation activity recorded only in connection with a serious or especially serious crime information which: 1) requires criminal proceedings alleged investigations;
2) indicated on another criminal offence or the circumstances of the offence;
3) need immediate significant threat to public safety.
(2) the driver of the process, she was involved, as well as the Prosecutor and the investigating judge supervising the special investigative activities, to take the necessary measures to prevent any inappropriate collection and use of this article are laid down in the first subparagraph.
212. article. Special permission for the conduct of the investigation (1) special investigations carried out on the basis of the investigation, the judge's decision.
(2) the decision of the investigation judge is not necessary if the special investigative activity agrees with all the publicly unavailable location during this operation working or living person.
(3) for the purposes of this chapter shall not be available to the public are the places where you can go or stay without the owner, possessor or user consent.
(4) in cases of urgency Directors may initiate the proceedings of special enquiries, receiving the consent of the Prosecutor and not later than the next business day — the investigative judge's decision.
213. article. Decision on special investigative activities (1) the investigating judge decision on special investigative activities shall be adopted after the consideration of the process of transforming motivated suggestion and criminal material.
(2) the decision shall specify the activities of the special investigation, authorities or persons who asked for this operation, its objectives and duration, as well as any other conditions which have a role in ensuring the action to be taken.
(3) not publicly accessible location to special investigation duration may not exceed 30 days. This time limit may be extended by the investigating judge, if there is reason to.
214. article. The authorization order violation consequences (1) if the driver of the process will not have noticed this section authorisation set out in the agenda, the special investigative actions, the evidence obtained is not used for the identification process.
(2) If the activities of the special investigation launched this Law 212. the fourth paragraph of article properly, the investigating judge shall decide on the initiation of the investigations, as well as the need for the continuation, if it is not completed. If the of inquiry was not justified or was unlawful, the judge shall decide on the admissibility of the evidence obtained and the action of objects removed.
215. article. Special types of investigative activities (1) in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the following special investigations to: 1) correspondence, legal control;
2 communication control);
3) the electronic information system of the data control;
4) data transmitted content control;
5 place or person) audiokontrol;
6) of videokontrol;
7) observation and tracking of the person;
8) object;
9 special investigative experiment);
comparative research of 10) required the taking of the sample in a special way;
11) control of criminal activity.
(2) for the purpose of this article is the first part in the investigation activities or deploy it to provide the necessary technical means, may be the secret to get into places not available to the public, if this is allowed by the investigating judge with your decision.
216. article. The fixing of special investigations (1) a driver of the process, even making special investigative actions, write Protocol.
(2) If the activities of the special investigation carried out by a specialised State institution, its representative writes a report and with the result of this action the materials submitted to the process for driver.
(3) If the special investigations task force in the process by another party, it shall report in writing to the driver of the process and submit his findings as a result of this action.
(4) special investigations investigator do everything possible to get the investigation of facts of interest fixed by technical means.
(5) on news that points to another criminal offence or the circumstances of the offence, process guide informs the authority with jurisdiction for the investigation of the offence.
(6) for messages that need immediate significant public safety risk, drivers of the process or a specialised authority shall immediately notify the public security authorities.
217. article. Correspondence control (1) the postal authorities or individuals who provide delivery of shipments, the responsibility passed to the control of the consignment without the sender and recipients of messages based on the investigation, the judge's decision, if there is reason to believe that the mailing contains or may contain details of the circumstances of demonstrable facts, and if these activities required obtaining is impossible or difficult.

(2) the postal authorities or individuals who provide the service of transporting the consignments, inform officials in the decision on the subject to their inspection being in their possession. The officer immediately, but not later than 48 hours from the date of receipt of the information, examine the contents of the consignment, and shall decide on the withdrawal of this shipment or further transmission with or without content copy, photographic or otherwise, however. In all cases, the officer writes a consignment inspection protocol in the presence of a representative of the bearer.
(3) the consignment shall be removed only if there is reason to believe that the process of proof, it will be significantly more original than copy or Visual fixation.
(4) where a consignment is removed or remove the post shall be referred to the recipient or sender with a significant delay, shall inform him of the reasons for the delay of the consignment and the control framework as far as possible without compromising the interests of the criminal proceedings.
(5) post losses or other bearer incurred as a result of the removal of the consignment, pay the State cabinet.
218. article. Communications control (1) phone and other communications equipment control without the other party or the originator and recipient of the message based on the investigation, the judge's decision, if there is reason to believe that the conversations or released information may contain details of the circumstances of demonstrable facts, and if these activities required obtaining is not possible.
(2) Telephone and other means of communication with the user control, the sender or receiver of information written consent shall be carried out, if there is reason to believe that the person or the family may be facing a criminal offence or that the person is or may be involved in committing the crime.
219. article. The electronic information system of existing data controls (1) information systems (its), the accumulated data, environmental data, search and access to it, as well as acquisition (hereinafter information systems data control) without this system or data owner, possessor or holder's knowledge of criminal proceedings shall be based on the judge's decision, of investigations if there is reason to believe that a particular information system information may contain details of the circumstances of demonstrable facts.
(2) If there is reason to believe that the search data (information) are stored in the territory of Latvia in the other system that can be accessed by hackers using the IP system referred to in the judge's decision, the new decision is not required.
(3) during the start-up process, the driver may require that a person who is familiar with the functioning of the system or to data processing, storage or transmission related duties (hereinafter referred to as the responsible employee of the system), provide the necessary information, as well as warn the person about the secrecy of the investigation.
(4) the process of making the task force information systems data control system is the responsibility of the responsible employee to take or otherwise provide to the system (part of the storage environment), make copies of your data, keep relevant data stored unchanged, to ensure system integrity of existing information resources, to make the data available to the not controlled other users or prohibit other activities with them.
220. article. Data transmitted content interception, data collection and recording, which transferred to the information system on the territory of Latvia, using existing communication equipment (hereinafter referred to as the control of data transferred) without the system owner, possessor or holder's particulars shall be based on the judge's decision, of investigations if there is reason to believe that the data transmission from the information obtained may contain details of the circumstances of demonstrable facts.
221. article. The site audiokontrol or videokontrol is not publicly available audiokontrol or videokontrol without the site owner, possessor and visitor messages based on the investigation, the judge's decision, if there is reason to believe that the ongoing negotiations in this location, other sounds or developments may contain details of the circumstances of demonstrable facts. Not publicly available audiokontrol or videokontrol shall be carried out only if these activities required obtaining is not possible.
222. article. Personal audiokontrol (1) audiokontrol of the Person without these personal messages undertaken on the basis of the investigation, the judge's decision, if there is reason to believe that personal conversations or other sounds may contain details of the circumstances of demonstrable facts, and if these activities required obtaining is not possible.
(2) a Person's audiokontrol with the person's written consent, on the basis of the decision of the promoters, the process takes, if there is reason to believe that, against that person or the family may be facing a criminal offence or that the person is or may be involved in committing the crime.
223. article. Personal observation and tracking (1) personal observation and tracking, without news of the investigation carried out on the basis of the judge's decision, if there is reason to believe that a person's behavior or contacts with others may contain details of the circumstances of demonstrable facts.
(2) the decision of the investigation judge indicates whether you are entitled to continue with observation of contact persons been someone monitoring and tracking for up to 48 hours.
224. article. The subject or location of the subject of the observation or surveillance shall be carried out on the basis of the investigation, the judge's decision, if there is reason to believe that observation can provide details of the circumstances of demonstrable facts.
225. article. Special investigative experiment (1) special investigative experiment shall be carried out on the basis of the investigation, the judge's decision, if there is reason to believe that: 1) in the past has done criminal acts and is going to do or has launched the same criminal activities;
2) specific criminal offence in the criminal proceedings may be terminated;
3) the results of the experiment, you can get news on provable facts within the circumstances, and without these steps if necessary obtaining is impossible or difficult.
(2) special investigative experiment raises a person's daily activity-specific situations or circumstances that contribute to criminal intent, and keeps the unveiling a personal action in these circumstances.
(3) a Person is prohibited to provoke action, as well as the impact of violence, threat, blackmail or to use its state of helplessness.
(4) if the special investigative experiment ends with personal criminal activities open to filing articles of the Protocol in the presence of the person being tested.
226. article. The reference sample in a special way of getting (1) If the interests of the process requires the person to discover the existence of suspicions about its relation with the committing of the crime, comparative research samples, based on the judge's decision, the investigation may be obtained, without informing the person concerned.
(2) the samples that you can get and which is the role of evidence in criminal procedure, remove the detected, when lost the need to keep the fact secret research.
227. article. Crime control (1) If a single criminal offence or related offences, but the individual stage, to be stopped immediately, you will lose the chance to prevent another criminal offence or to clarify, all the parties involved, especially the organisers, and subscribers, or any criminal activity goals based on the judge's decision, the investigation can take control of criminal activity.
(2) the crime of interruption of delay for control purposes is not allowed, if it is not possible to completely prevent: 1) of human life and health hazards;
2) many people in life-threatening substances;
3) dangerous criminals escape;
4) or irreversible ecological disaster economic loss.
(3) If criminal activities for the purposes of control, make other special investigative actions, the authorization must be received in the General order.
(4) the operator shall submit the process control driver reports according to specific activities of the investigation process, but not uncommon as laid down in decision.
228. article. The special investigative measures actions for (1) special investigative activity at the official and people can use a specially prepared messages and documents previously specially created organizations or businesses, subject and substance, imitation, a specially prepared technical means, as well as mimic the participation in a criminal offence or participation of supporters.
(2) imitating a criminal activity, not endanger the lives and health of people, to cause any damage, if it is not absolutely necessary for heavier and more dangerous crime detection.
(3) the first paragraph of this article, the use of the provision outside the special investigative procedure requires the person responsible for the general framework.
229. article. The results of the activities of the special investigation, proof of use

(1) the activities of the special investigation protocols, sound and image recordings, photos, other fixed by technical means, the withdrawn items and documents or copies of the evidence used in the same way as other investigative activities.
(2) If a person is used in the proof of the secretly fixed expressions or actions, that person is required to be examined. When a person presents facts, without knowing it, that person shall be informed of the activities of the secret so far as it concerns the right of the persons concerned.
(3) If the special investigations was carried out without the authorisation provisions, information may not be used in evidence.
230. article. The results of the activities of the special investigation of the use for other purposes (1) evidence obtained as a result of the special investigation, used only in criminal proceedings, in which the activities in question were carried out. In case of facts that point to another criminal offence or demonstrable conditions in another criminal case, they can be used as evidence in the case concerned only with the Prosecutor or the investigating judge's consent, which supervises the special investigations in criminal proceedings in which the operation is conducted. This restriction does not apply to the use of evidence supporting other criminal proceedings.
(2) the judge or the Prosecutor's investigation, the decision is not required if the special investigation as a result of use of information the public safety threat of immediate essential.
231. article. Introduction to materials that are not attached to the criminal proceedings (1) reports of special investigative activities, as well as with the technical features fixed material, for which the driver of the process said that they have no interest in criminal proceedings, the evidence does not add to criminal matters and keep the body that completes the pre-trial process.
(2) the criminal proceedings to which the person involved has the right to get acquainted with materials of criminal cases after the completion of pre-trial investigation, may submit an application to the Prosecutor or the investigating judge, asking it not to introduce the materials added.
(3) the Prosecutor or the investigating judge shall evaluate the application, taking into account the potential importance of the material in the criminal proceedings and the removal of human rights restrictions, and may deny the possibility to get acquainted with the unbound materials, if this can severely compromise a criminal involved in the person's life, health or interests protected by law or if it touches only third-person private life secret.
(4) a person involved in criminal proceedings, which the public prosecutor or investigating judge presented with criminal proceedings do not add material can lodge a request to process these materials add a driver for a criminal case. Request decide in the same order as the other of the completion of the investigation, login requests.
(5) On the hearing of the request applied during check out the attached to special criminal investigation activities in materials decided by the same court, reviewing the request and materials of criminal proceedings, if necessary by requesting clarification from the applicant and the Prosecutor.
232. article. With those special investigative activities for which there is no evidence in criminal proceedings (1) the meaning of the action with the reports, audio, and video recordings, photographs, and other materials that are fixed, using the technical means, to remove objects and documents, copies thereof, if the driver of the process said that they have no interest in criminal proceedings of evidence, the public prosecutor or the investigating judge supervising the special investigations in criminal proceedings, acting so as to reduce possible human rights violation.
(2) the withdrawn documents and objects, if possible, be returned to their owners, informing them about the activities of the special investigation, insofar as it affects that person.
(3) reports, copies of the material fixed by using technical means, destroyed, that they have no evidence of interest in criminal proceedings.
(4) the criminal proceedings which do not clarify to the criminal liability of the person called the treatment of the materials referred to in this article may decide no sooner than six months after the special investigation actions completed.
(5) should the criminal proceedings for actions with the following materials may decide appeals of the decision date of expiry.
(6) the criminal proceedings that were sent for review to the Court, for the treatment of this material shall be decided by the Court ruling takes effect.
233. article. Measures for the protection of information in criminal proceedings (1) details of special investigative activities in fact to its completion is a confidential investigation, for which the disclosure officer or person involved in the exercise, are responsible in accordance with the law. Champion, which shall have the right to acquaint himself with all the materials of the criminal prosecution of the moment, with those documents, relating to special investigations, this investigation was presented not to complete the operation.
(2) the driver of the process uses all the means provided for by law, to limit the special investigation resulting from the activities of the communications that have a role in criminal proceedings, the evidence if it invades personal privacy or other concerns with the law protect the limited availability information.
(3) the activities of the special investigation materials to manufacture a copy only allowed in the cases provided for by law, be made to mark the operation of the Protocol.
234. article. Criminal proceedings do not add materials of information protection measures (1) special investigations of methods, techniques and tools, as well as the resulting messages that have no meaning in criminal proceedings of evidence on which this transaction was made or which other criminal proceedings is not allowed or does not require immediate fundamental of public safety threats, is a State secret, and of the investigation or the person responsible for the disclosure in accordance with the procedure laid down in the criminal code.
(2) the process guide warns people engaging in special investigative activities, for in the first subparagraph for liability. If the special investigative activities is the person's professional duty, warning by the employer.
(3) the public prosecutor or investigating judge warns of responsibility for persons with criminal proceedings are introduced the unbound material.
(4) in deciding on the action to the criminal proceedings do not add materials, the Prosecutor and the investigating judge shall verify the alert all people and that the necessary measures are taken to prevent unwarranted dissemination of information, and going tasks failures.
12. chapter. With the emergence of evidence and documents article 235. Evidence or documents in the case (1) obtained in the course of the investigation activities and documents of the case, if there is reason to believe that the future of those criminal proceedings could be evidence of a role in the process of transforming the existing criminal records into evidence and documents list.
(2) things and documents obtained in the course of investigative actions, but which, as later in the process, there is no evidence found in the matter of criminal proceedings, against signature immediately return it to the owner or the lawful possessor, or decide on another legal action, noting it into evidence and documents list.
(3) the national archives stored on a permanent document in original investigations are removed only over technical documents or handwriting expertise to bear, but in other cases, the file copies thereof certified to be added.
236. article. Evidence and a list of documents into evidence and document the process in the list of driver points: 1) into evidence or document name;
2) date it obtained, and investigation activities, in which it was obtained;
3) the place of storage;
4) date and the final disposal of the evidence and documents.
237. article. Evidence storage (1) items of evidence which cannot be stored with the rest of the material, stored in criminal matters specifically provided for this purpose. If this condition is not fulfilled, they may be stored in the Cabinet established authorities or in another place the Cabinet in the order, if it is granted to the final issue of preservation for decision on further action in that particular case.
(2) If these things are necessary for the owner or lawful possessor legal objectives, they can give him permanently or temporarily, provided that this does not prejudice future criminal proceedings.
(3) money, securities, precious metals and juvelieriz strādājum, jewels, poisonous, narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, precursors, nuclear and other strategic materials as well as weapons, ammunition and explosives, if these things are real, evidence shall be deposited in the Cabinet established special institutions.

(4) transfer the materials to another process of criminal proceedings, exhibits evidence can be left in the possession of the first process report into evidence storage within the site.
238. article. Document storage (1) the original of the document after the necessary investigation carried out operations with them, promptly returned back to their owner or the lawful possessor, but add it to the file copy.
(2) if the document is an original return it to the owner or the lawful possessor may harm future criminal proceedings or has a reasonable suspicion that they are after check-in could be used for illegal purposes, the document owner or the lawful possessor transfers a copy of the document, but the original documents adds to the file and store along with all its storage case.
239. article. Evidence and document storage time limits (1) the trace evidence and documents shall be kept until the judgment of the Court of Justice shall enter into force or the date until which may appeal against a decision on termination of the criminal proceedings.
(2) If the right to withdraw the case is civil dispute subject on the agenda, items of evidence and documents are stored, until the entry into force of the judgment of the Court of Justice in civil matters or limitation occurs.
(3) trace evidence that long-term storage is not possible and you can not give the owner or lawful possessor, or prolonged storage of which cause injury to the country, with the driver decision process for disposal or destruction shall pass to the Cabinet.
(4) in the third paragraph of this article, the process of transforming the specified decision may appeal against the pre-trial investigation the investigating judge in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act.
240. article. Ultimate action with real evidence and documents (1) a judgment or decision on termination of the criminal proceedings indicates what to do with items of evidence and documents, namely: 1) the objects, documents and values returned to their owners or rightful possessor;
2) a suspect or accused related criminal tools confiscated;
3) values obtained in criminal cases and documents confiscated;
4) circulation prohibited transfer of the case to the relevant authorities or destroyed;
5) things that have no value, at the request of the interested parties shall be issued or destroyed.
(2) if the evidence of things must be returned to its owner or legal possessor, but doing this is not possible, pay the owner with the same species and the same quality items or pay its value, what exists at the time of reimbursement.
The third section procedural coercive measures and sanctions in chapter 13. The application of coercive measures, the General provisions of article 241. The application of procedural coercive measures based on (1) the application of procedural coercive measures is based on the reactions of the criminal purpose in a given process or individual procedural acts for the performance of their duties of procedural failure or improper performance.
(2) a security measure as the coercive procedural feature applied to the suspect or accused, if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person concerned will continue criminal activity, avoid investigation and Court.
(3) the Court shall make a judgment that can be applied to the accused, the security tool if there is reason to believe that he would avoid execution of the judgment.
242. article. Procedural coercive means (1) providing criminal procedure rights may be limited by the following procedural coercive measures: 1) detention;
2) into the medical institution for the purpose of inspection;
3) forced the arrival.
(2) security features are Also procedural coercive measures. It can only be applied to the suspect and the accused.
243. article. Security features (1) has the following safety features: 1) mailing address of receipt of notification;
2 prohibition to approach a certain) person or place;
3) occupation prohibition;
4) the prohibition to leave the country;
5) set in a place of residence;
6) personal surety;
7) security;
8) transfer of police supervision;
9) house arrest;
10) detention.
(2) the minors as a security feature can also be applied: 1) transfer of parental or guardian supervision;
2 insert the social adjustment) educational institution.
(3) the soldier as a security measure may also be applied to the transfer of the unit commander (boss).
(4) the first paragraph of this article 1.-4. the security referred to in point features can also be applied in addition to any other security feature.
244. article. Procedural choice of coercive measures (1) the driver of the process chooses the procedural coercive means as possible, touching the person's fundamental rights and is proportionate.
(2) when selecting a security feature, process guide takes into account the nature of the crime and safety, the suspect or accused, his marital status, health and other conditions.
(3) procedural coercive means may not be applied to minors victim.
245. article. Decision on the application of procedural coercive measures (1) the coercive Procedural feature, except for the detention, the driver of the process or the investigating judge with a motivated written decision indicating: 1) the person to whom the compulsory applicable feature;
2 the application of coercive measures);
3) forced type;
4) application deadlines;
5) body or person commissioned to execute the decision;
6) procedures for appeals against decisions.
(2) the decision on the imposition of additional points, in connection with a criminal offence the suspect or the accused applies security feature.
(3) the decision on detention, house arrest, minor adjustments in the social insertion of educational institution or person placing the medical institution of the expertise of the pre-trial process, adopt an investigating judge.
246. article. The application of procedural coercive measures (1) entering the procedural application of coercive measures, the person shall inform the person to whom the compulsory feature is applied, the decision taken, as well as explaining the essence of coercive measures, the content of the appeal procedures and coercive measures of the consequences.
(2) a Person who exercises the rights of the defence is entitled to check out procedural documents that fixed of facts used to justify the application of procedural coercive measures. If such a presentation to the pre-trial investigation or threaten a third party or to the public interest, an important driver of the process it may defer the decision until the relevant hazard prevention.
247. article. Another person informed of procedural coercive measures (1) if the application of procedural coercive tool is linked with the deprivation of liberty of the person, on application of the person concerned and the location of the driver of the process immediately, subject to the person's will and instructions, inform the family or other close relatives and jobs or training places.
(2) The first paragraph of this article in the application of coercive measures in the process of transforming the minor shall immediately inform his parents or other close relatives, the minor or guardian if the person is in custody.
(3) the first paragraph of this article in the application of coercive measures of a foreign national subject to the promoters of the process, the parties concerned will inform the representative of that country to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia.
248. article. In the minors, dependent or defence of property (1) If the person applying to the custodial detention of procedural, without supervision and care remain minor in custody or guardianship or in person, process Guide allows that person to control the communications through contact with close relatives or any other person for the provision of supervision and care. If that chance is not, shall inform the promoters of the process, child protection or social institutions or family courts (pagastties).
(2) If the person applying to the custodial detention of procedural, without supervision remains the property, process Guide allows that person to control the communications through contact with close relatives or any other person for the provision of property management. If the person is not, in the process transforming a cabinet order property puts responsible storage or management of another person, but in exceptional cases the property may ask the municipality after property locations, providing the necessary financing from the State budget.
(3) the measures taken to the driver in writing of the process, inform the person that applied compulsory feature.
249. article. Procedural coercive measures for the amendment or withdrawal (1) If the application of procedural coercive measures are lost or changed in the core of its application, conditions of application, changed behaviour or other circumstances have been cleared, said the choice of coercive measures, process guide takes the decision on the amendment or withdrawal.

(2) If a person violates the provisions of the appropriate security measures, process guide is entitled to choose and apply a different more restrictive security feature.
(3) the decision on the coercive means of modification or cancellation shall be communicated without delay to the authority or official who supports it, and the person to whom the compulsory feature applied.
(4) if the result of the inquiry before the security feature is canceled, the more restrictive a security measure may be applied only if there are new circumstances.
14. chapter. The deprivation of liberty is not related to article 250 of coercive measures. The forced arrival (1) in order to ensure that the suspect, accused, witness and victim participation in the procedural activities if he, without justification, fails to appear after driver's call, the process can be applied to the forced arrival.
(2) the suspect and the accused forced the arrival of may also be applied without prior invitation, if his place of residence is unknown or if he was hiding from investigation and Court.
(3) pregnant women or sick persons in the acute, if this fact is confirmed by a doctor, the forced arrival may only be applied where the procedural action is not likely to make a person's location, and only to the investigative judge or court decision.
251. article. The arrival of the order forced (1) applies with the arrival of coercive process driver's decision, indicating that that officer when and for what purpose to be brought, which police authorities asked the forced arrival.
(2) find a person must apply to the forced arrival of police officers against the signature of the present decision shall be delivered to the person concerned at the decision of the officials and mark the time when the decision is made.
(3) If the forced arrival cannot be applied or if the atvedam is not found, the police officer noted that the decision in the process of transferring the driver.
252. article. Mailing address for receipt of notification of receipt of the Shipment (1) address communication is the suspected or accused in writing notice of postal or electronic address to which officials conducting the criminal proceedings, sent mailings, the suspect or the accused undertakes to receive within 24 hours and without delay to come at the invitation of the promoters of the process or execute other such kriminālprocesuālo.
(2) if the consignment is properly sent to the reported address, considered that after the first paragraph of this article expiration of it has been received by the addressee.
253. article. Prohibition to approach a certain person or location (1) Prohibition to approach a certain person is with the promoters decision process for restrictions on the suspect or the accused person concerned be closer than the distance referred to in the decision, to avoid physical or Visual contact with it and not to use any means of communication or information transmission techniques for communicating with that person.
(2) the prohibition to approach a certain place is with the promoters decision process for restrictions on the suspect or the accused to attend the place or find it closer than the distance referred to in the decision.
(3) On the first and second subparagraph does not constitute an infringement of the prohibition on approaching a particular person or place, if it takes place within the exercise of criminal process Guide.
254. article. Occupation ban (1) occupation prohibition is the process of transforming decision limited the suspect or the accused temporarily to take a certain type of activity (activities) or to perform a specific job (work).
(2) the decision on the prohibition of the occupation for the execution of persons sent to the employer or other institution.
(3) in the first subparagraph, that decision is mandatory for any official and enforceable within three working days from the date of arrival. For the execution of the decision of the review officer shall notify the driver of the process.
255. article. The prohibition to leave the country, the prohibition to leave the country is the process of transforming decision limited to the suspect or accused to leave Latvian territory without the permission of the driver process.
256. article. Residence residence residence set in a specific place of residence is the suspect or the accused in writing not to leave more than 24 hours specified life or temporary residence without the permission of the promoters of the process, as well as to attend without delay after the invitation of promoters or other kriminālprocesuālo.
257. article. Security (1) the security is the process of transforming decision determined the amount of money that passed the process guide in certain credit institutions deposit (storage) to ensure that the suspect or the accused coming after the invitation of promoters and other statutory procedural obligations.
(2) the amount of the security shall be determined pursuant to the procedure guide the nature of the crime and with their injury, personal assets, as well as the penalties provided for in the law and the Mayor.
(3) security money to deposit in person that this security measure is applied, as well as any other person or entity. Where a security is lodged with the other person, the driver of the process shall inform it of the specific nature of the criminal proceedings, which suited this security feature, and explain the consequences will be, if it will not be respected.
(4) on the lodging of securities submitted its sensor driver of the process document, which is added to a criminal.
(5) If a suspect or accused does not comply with the procedural obligations or commits a new intentional criminal offence, the security force of the process in favour of the decision to the State budget, but other security features of the repeal or amendment of the employer where returned.
258. article. Personal guarantee (1) personal surety is a written commitment, that natural person's head that the suspect or the accused will arrive after the invitation of promoters and execute other procedural obligations.
(2) the personal guarantor must be not less than two.
(3) when a surety, process guide informs the guarantor on the nature of the criminal proceedings in question, which applied this security feature, and explain the consequences will be if the provisions of the security features will not be met.
(4) If the provisions of this security breach, the investigation judge or court decision imposing compulsory guarantor money 10 to 30 in the Republic of Latvia the minimum monthly salary.
259. article. The soldier's unit commander transfers (boss) (1), under the supervision of the Commander of the unit putting Soldiers (boss) is under the supervision of the unit commander (boss) in accordance with the written commitment of the promoters decision process for the application of safeguards to ensure that the suspect or the accused soldier will arrive after the invitation of promoters and execute other procedural obligations.
(2) the transfer of the unit commander, a soldier (Chief) applicable only to the supervision of the unit commander (boss) consent, and he may at any time withdraw the soldiers monitoring.
(3) is received from the unit commander (boss) of the written commitment on troops, under the supervision of the sampling process shall inform him of the driver for the specific nature of the criminal proceedings, which suited this security feature, as well as his responsibility.
(4) if the suspect or the accused fails to comply with its obligations, the unit commander (boss), which he was, under the supervision of the investigating judge or the Court may impose a coercive fine of up to 10 in the Republic of Latvia the minimum monthly salary.
260. article. The transfer of minors by parents or guardians in monitoring (1) the transfer of minors by parents or guardians of persons under the supervision of one or more of this person written undertaking in accordance with the decision of the promoters of the process for the application of safeguards to ensure that a minor suspect or accused will arrive after the invitation of promoters and execute other procedural obligations.
(2) a transfer under the supervision of the parents or guardian apply only to the person and the minor's consent.
(3) the transfer of minors by parents or guardians in monitoring, process Guide to inform them of the specific nature of the criminal proceedings, which suited this security feature, and explain the consequences will be if the provisions of the security features will not be met.
(4) the parents or guardians may at any time withdraw the minor oversight, if they fail to ensure the proper behavior of the minors.
(5) If a minor suspect or accused does not meet its obligations, procedural persons who he was, under the supervision of the investigating judge or the Court may impose a coercive fine of up to 10 in the Republic of Latvia the minimum monthly salary.
261. article. Transfer of police custody

(1) the transfer of police custody is the suspected or accused and restriction of freedom of action, provided that the person in question without the permission of the promoters of the process may change permanent or temporary place of residence, visit the site or in the decision to meet with the authority, the persons referred to in the decision and that it set overnight hours must be in their own home, as well as more frequently than three times a week you must log in to the police at the place of their residence. The limit of determination, having regard to the suspect or accused or learning conditions.
(2) the decision on the imposition of the execution of police sent to the area, which the person concerned is resident.
(3) the police monitored the institution must immediately inform the process is recorded and to the driver for his supervision of the sampling.
(4) to check the movement of persons and freedom of action in respect of restrictions, police officers have the right to enter its permanent or temporary residence (apartment, House).
262. article. The decision on the appeal against the imposition of (1) pre-trial proceedings may be appealed to the driver of the process decided upon: 1 the prohibition to approach a certain) person or place;
2) occupation prohibition;
3) prohibition to leave the country;
4) the amount of the security;
5) transfer to police custody, but only for those specified in the decision and the action of movement restrictions.
(2) If a person suitable for a security feature, it can be justified that the provisions of this security feature, it is not enforceable, this person, as well as its counsel or agent shall within seven days after the decision on the imposition of the date of receipt of the copy of the decision to submit the complaint to the investigating judge.
(3) the investigating judge shall examine the complaint process in writing within three working days. If necessary, the judge requested the file and process the promoters or the complainant's explanations.
(4) the investigating judge may, by decision, dismiss the complaint or ask the driver of the process within three working days to amend the appropriate security measure or its rules.
(5) the investigation of the judge's decision a copy of the driver, the person who applied for the security feature and the complainant. The decision is not appealable.
15. chapter. The deprivation of liberty of forced features related article 263. Detention detention is a person's deprivation of liberty for a period of up to 48 hours without a judge's decision, of investigations if there are conditions of detention.
264. article. Conditions of detention (1) a Person may be detained only if the assumption is the basis for the criminal offence for which you can apply to a custodial penalty, and if there is any of the following conditions: 1) a person directly in surprise committing the crime, immediately after, or haunted by the criminal offence was committed;
2) to a person as the perpetrator of the crime indicates the victim or another person, which had seen the event directly or otherwise acquired such information;
3) at a person's own or its use in existing premises or other facilities found obvious traces of the crime;
4) of the crime site found this person's left foot;
5) announced the search for a person in connection with a criminal offence.
(2) if the conditions of detention, but on the criminal offence may not be applied with a custodial penalty, the person can be detained if there are credible grounds to believe that they will not be able to provide the arrival after the invitation of promoters, because: 1) the person refuses to provide information about your identity and the identity is established;
2 a person with no fixed abode) and jobs;
3) person has no permanent place of residence in Latvia, and it may try to leave the country.
(3) If there are reasonable grounds for believing that serious or especially serious crime, also can stop the person who strolls and stalking the crime or its surroundings and which does not have a fixed residence and workplace, if one has a basic assumption about its relation with the crimes committed.
(4) one in criminal proceedings a person shall be detained only one time.
265. article. The detention order (1) suspending the person on its own initiative or on behalf of the promoters of the process, the State police officer or employee of the investigating authorities, or the Prosecutor shall immediately notify that person of which it is seized, and warned that it has the right to remain silent, that anything he said, can be used against them.
(2) If there is reason to believe that the gun can have or that he can destroy, remove or hide to his existing evidence, the officer making the arrest, pursuant to this law, the second paragraph of article 183 of the rules, you can do the search, the attachable giving personal detention Protocol.
(3) If there is an obvious link with the person committed a criminal offence for which you can apply to a custodial penalty, and this person is committing an offence or fleeing from it or if the person opened the search for such a criminal offence, it can detain anyone and immediately to the nearest police officer.
266. article. Procedural design of detention (1) After the arrival of the detainee detention facilities where officials did hold, immediately writes the detention Protocol. The Protocol specifies: 1) which, when and where did the detention;
2) for committing a criminal offence occurred on hold;
3) why and who put on hold;
4) what condition is held, what is she looks like and what are their complaints about health;
5) what is his clothes;
6) or personal searches have been carried out and which is found;
7) which documents, items, money and other values next to the detained persons;
8) bated in explanation.
(2) the present Protocol, he explains the rights of the detained, and he signed the Protocol.
(3) the investigating authority detention Protocol without delay, and the driver, but the process holds a copy of the minutes within 24 hours send the public prosecutor.
(4) the detention Protocol shall mark on future actions, the release or security measure.
267. article. Execution of detention (1) this law shall apply to Seized 271. Article referred to in the second subparagraph the limits of the law, and it is not necessary for the investigation judge or court decision.
(2) the procedure for the holding of the special law.
268. article. The period of detention (1) process the driver immediately, but not later than 48 hours must be taken to hold the inquiry judge to decide the issue of the application of the security measures associated with the deprivation of liberty or detained must apply other security feature, or he must be released.
(2) the period of Detention shall be calculated from the actual date of detention. During the detention of a period.
269. article. Detainee release (1) held to be released immediately, if: 1) not confirmed suspicions that he has committed a criminal offence;
2) has not been established that the detention and conditions;
3) need not be applied with the detained custodial safety feature;
4) over the period of detention prescribed by law;
5) investigating judge not applied with a custodial safety feature.
(2) releasing detainees, he holds a copy of the minutes shall be issued, indicating the release and date.
270. article. Pirmsapcietinājum hold (1) an investigator or Prosecutor may detain a suspect or accused for a period of up to 12 hours for delivery to the judges at the investigation, to decide the issue of remand if: 1) simultaneously with the decision on prosecution of criminal liability is made in the suggestion for application of pre-trial detention;
2) person violated the above security features applied rules and need to apply for custody.
(2) a Person who is detained in accordance with the procedure laid down in this article, to be delivered within the period indicated in the investigation and the detention of judges during the investigation may be carried out with the participation with the exception of the interrogation of the first paragraph of this article referred to in paragraph 2.
271. article. (1) Detention detention is imprisonment, under the decision of the judge of the investigation or the Court ruling in the cases provided for in the law can be applied to a suspect or accused before the final ruling of the entry into force of the relevant criminal proceedings, if the arrest is based.
(2) the application of pre-trial detention is the basis for limiting rights and allows you to: 1) hold the investigation of persons in prison or specially outfitted police premises;
2) move the person guarding the monitoring process needed to proceedings at the time and place;
3) limit the appointment of the person arrested and the communication, except for the meeting with counsel;
4) control of the person arrested, correspondence and conversation;
5) determine the internal order and mode of holding;

6) limit in the individual assets in use.
(3) Limit the extent of the limits established by law for each arrest the investigating judge or by the Court, in assessing the individual investigator or the Prosecutor's proposals, having heard the views of the arrest, as well as taking into account the nature of the crime and the reason for the arrest.
(4) the procedure for holding in custody is determined by a special law.
272. article. (1) the basis for arrest custody can only be applied if the criminal proceedings for the specific details of the facts creates reasonable suspicion that the person has committed a criminal offence for which the law provides a custodial sentence, and another security measure can not ensure that a person does not commit a new criminal offence, will not interfere with the investigation or avoid investigation, trial or enforcement of the judgment.
(2) a Person who is suspected or accused of a particularly serious crime, detention may also apply if: 1) the crime was directed against the juvenile or the person who was or is a material or otherwise depending on the suspect or the accused, or the person's age, illness or other reasons, are not able to protect their interests;
2) person is a criminal organized group;
3) found one of this law, article 264 of the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 or 2 above;
4) person has no permanent place of residence in Latvia.
273. article. The basics of application of pre-trial detention for minors, pregnant women and women who have recently given birth (1) minors, pregnant women and postnatal period up to one year, but if the woman is breastfeeding, feeding during the fall, the whole of this law, the provisions referred to in article 272, with the exceptions laid down in this article.
(2) If the first paragraph of this article, the person is suspected or accused of a crime of negligence or criminal offence, detention does not apply.
(3) If the first paragraph of this article, the person is suspected or accused of the less serious intentional crime, detention may be applied only if the person concerned has violated other safety features, the rules or the crime committed, when the suspect or accused of serious or particularly serious crime.
274. article. The application of pre-trial detention in the pre-trial process (1) On the application of pre-trial detention process decided by the investigating judge, in considering the proposal of the promoters of the process, hearing the views of the person concerned, as well as examining the file and assessing the reasons for the arrest and plea.
(2) the process of examining the proposal of the drivers participating in the process, transforming a person whose arrest is doomed, they advocate and representative.
(3) if the driver of the process can prove that the person concerned avoids and hides from the investigation, the matter can be decided they are absent. The provision of legal aid in the participation of a counsel is invited.
(4) the investigating judge closed the hearing, which will be recorded in the minutes, shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) refuse the application of pre-trial detention;
2) refuse the application of pre-trial detention, but apply under house arrest;
3) refuse the application of pre-trial detention, but apply the social adjustment inserting educational institution;
4) to apply detention;
5) apply custody and determine a person's search.
(5) the decision of the investigating judge, justify detention or other security features with application to the file-based considerations.
(6) if the investigating judge did not agree with the proposal of the promoters of the process and refused the application of detention he denials in the decision also specifies the reasons.
(7) after the investigation judge at the service of the decision of the Court the Parties shall issue a motivated SafeSeaNet isoperational a copy of the decision.
275. article. Custody by security (1) if the investigating judge finds that there are 272 of this Act specified in article Foundation for the application of detention, but also the circumstances showing that it is possible to apply a security, and at the request of the person who implemented the defense, the judge may determine the term of pre-trial detention for one month, at the same time that the detention may be revoked if the person is at this time the judges pay security.
(2) If, within one month of the security charge and the investigating judge shall submit proof of payment, the judge shall decide on the security features. On the basis of this decision shall immediately be released from custody.
(3) If a security is not paid, the question of the extension of custody is decided this law, in article 274.
276. article. Remand after committing the Criminal Court after the Criminal Court for the transfer of custody, on its own initiative or at the request of the Prosecutor, the court seised of the matter, pursuant to this law 272. – – Article 275.
277. article. Custody time limits (1) a Person may be kept in custody only as long as is necessary for the normal development of the process, but no longer, as in the decision on the recognition of the person as a suspect or criminal prosecution of the criminal offence specified in this law allows.
(2) the total period of detention to be charged for the time spent by a person in detention, detention in custody in pirmsapcietinājum, or another of a coercive means in the place of execution, but does not count the time spent in detention of the person in another country in connection with the transfer of criminal proceedings if the person's extradition.
(3) the term of detention in the pre-trial process in favour of the time referred to in the second paragraph to the referral to the court registry.
(4) the Person suspected or accused of committing a criminal offence, the term of detention must not exceed three months, of which the pre-trial process allowed to hold people in custody for a period not exceeding two months.
(5) a Person suspected or accused of the less serious crime, the term of detention must not exceed nine months, of which the pre-trial process allowed to hold persons in pre-trial detention for a period not exceeding four months.
(6) a Person who is suspected or accused of committing a serious crime, detention shall not exceed 12 months, of which the pre-trial process allowed to hold the person in custody for a period not exceeding six months. The investigating judge in the pre-trial process and higher trial court during each term may be extended for a further three months, if the driver has not made a process unwarranted delay or if the person who implemented the defense, have deliberately been very reluctant in progress, or if the process faster completion was not possible for the special complexity.
(7) a Person suspected or accused of a particularly serious crime, detention shall not exceed 24, from which the pre-trial process allowed to hold people in custody for not more than 15mēneš. The investigating judge in the pre-trial process and higher trial court during each term may be extended for a further three months, if the driver has not made a process unwarranted delay or if the person who implemented the defense, have deliberately been very reluctant in progress, or if the process faster completion was not possible for the special complexity. Higher level court, this time limit may be extended for a further three months, if the driver has not made a process unwarranted delay and with another security measure can guarantee the safety of the public.
(8) If a person during criminal proceedings, which suited of a security feature, made a new criminal offence for which the law provides for deprivation of liberty, as a security measure can apply to custody. In such cases, the period of pre-trial detention is defined as a new criminal offence.
278. article. The term of detention for minors (1) minors in custody shall not exceed half of the maximum possible age limit provided for in this law, in article 277.
(2) the minors that suspected or accused of committing a serious crime, the term of detention must not be extended.
(3) the minors that suspected or accused of particularly serious crime, the time limit of detention may be extended only to the higher court for three months, if the offence results in death if it committed using firearms or explosives.
279. article. Custody time limits (1) suspects the suspect until the prosecution of criminally be held in custody for a period not exceeding one half of the pre-trial detention period allowed in the process.
(2) the Prosecutor may allow the central investigation authority to exceed the first paragraph of this article, the term but for not more than half of this law, article 277. residual term of detention in the pre-trial process.
Article 280. The repeated suggestion for the application of detention if the investigating judge is not applied, the process of pre-trial detention can suggest driver for that matter, if the person: 1) built and issued a new indictment on more serious criminal offence;

2) person violated appropriate security features;
3) evidence of attempts illegally to affect liecinoš parties;
4) person is destroyed or tried to destroy traces of the crime;
5) investigation dossier creates reasonable suspicion that the person has committed another criminal offence or intentionally going to avoid pre-trial investigation or the Court.
281. article. Control over the application of pre-trial detention (1) applying or extending the period of detention, the investigating judge or the court deadline should be set so that the light of the actual circumstances of the case, is required. If the deadline has not been sufficient, the driver can initiate the process to apply for custody continue (to extend the detention time limit) but not exceeding 277 and 278 of this Act to the deadlines set out in article.
(2) the person Arrested, its representative or counsel may at any time submit to the investigating judge or the court application for custody application need further evaluation. The application shall be considered and a decision adopted under article 274 of the Act.
(3) an application for custody of the need for further evaluation of the application may be rejected without examination hearing process, if since the last application of detention if the tests are passed less than a week and Ché race application is not supported by the facts, the news of which the investigating judge or the Court was not aware of when deciding on the application of pre-trial detention or during examination of the application.
(4) If, within two months after the detention of the arrested person's application, its representative or counsel has not submitted an application for custody of the need for further evaluation of the application, then the following evaluation of the investigative judge or court.
(5) decisions provided for in this article may be appealed against this law, in article 286.
282. article. House arrest (1) house arrest is deprivation of liberty, under the decision of the judge of the investigation or the Court ruling can be applied to a suspect or accused before the final ruling of the entry into force of the relevant criminal proceedings, if there are grounds for the application of pre-trial detention, but the person special circumstances is not desirable or not possible to hold in custody.
(2) under house arrest a person can hold its place of residence if the person concerned agrees to set the minor living in person.
(3) house arrest applied, its application to complaints about the appearance and control over its application to perform the same procedure as for custody.
(4) house arrest at a party may apply this law 271. under the second subparagraph of article.
(5) if necessary, under house arrest suspects can protect, control over its compliance with the limit set to ask the police, as well as expose the control to this person cohabiting person correspondence and communication features.
(6) house arrest in custody time limits applicable to, and at the time considered the time spent in custody, including one house arrest days per day of detention.
283. article. Into a medical institution for the purpose of expertise (1) a suspect or accused, as well as those in respect of which the launched process medical coercive means of detection, you can forcibly insert the medical institution where its expertise to major issues to solve in a psychiatric tiesmedicīnisk or judicial expertise needed to do the studies only in the hospital's medical conditions.
(2) a Person may be placed in a medical institution for the purpose of expertise based on the investigation, the judge or court decision only if it is accepted also the decision on the determination of the relevant expertise.
(3) the insertion of medical institution in order to apply expertise, complaints about their appearance and control over its application shall be carried out in the same order as on the detention. Personal participation in a with procedural coercive means of deciding the issues involved is optional if under doctor (expert) opinion it would not be permissible or recommended personal health reasons and if the relevant procedural participating persons.
(4) medical institution inserted person may apply this law 271. under the second subparagraph of article.
284. article. Period of medical institution of expertise (1) forcibly inserted person may be placed in medical institution of expertise needed, but no more than the relevant category of criminal offences the maximum period of detention in the pre-trial process.
(2) the period of medical institution forced inspection of dwelling during the pre-trial detention, even if the person as a safety feature has not been selected for detention.
285. article. The minor social adjustment insert (1) placing the minor social adjustment of educational institution is a person's deprivation of liberty, under the decision of the judge of the investigation or the Court ruling can be applied before the final ruling of the entry into force of the relevant criminal proceedings, if the suspect or accused minors are not required to hold in custody, however, is not sufficient assurance that, when you're free, the minor will execute their obligations and procedural not commit new criminal offences.
(2) Insert the social adjustment of education takes place in the same order, with the same conditions, at the same time, with the same appeal as custody and control arrangements. Social adjustment of educational institution including time spent as the time spent in detention, the number one authority on days spent one day of detention.
286. article. Of a coercive means against the application of (1) pre-trial proceedings the person applied with a custodial detention other than detention, its representative or counsel, as well as the public prosecutor within seven days after receiving the application of coercive measures or adapt it to, a copy of the decision, you can file a complaint about the judge's decision in the investigation. The judge of its decision together with the submitted complaint not later than the next working day shall send the District Court.
(2) if the proposal for the application of coercive measures submitted by the coroner, but investigating judge denied the application, the complaint about the judge's decision to the investigation, the coroner may be made only with the consent of the public prosecutor in the Central.
(3) If the custodial person forcibly feature applied by the Criminal Court of the transfer and the next hearing is scheduled for the next 14 days, this person, its representative or counsel within three working days, you can complain to one level higher court.
(4) If a related feature suitable for forced them away, this person has the right to appeal the decision within seven days from the moment when it became aware of the application of coercive measures.
287. article. Complaints handling policy (1) the complaint concerning the application of coercive measures involving the deprivation of liberty, or the waiver to apply a higher level of appearance the judge closed the hearing within seven days of the decision and the date of receipt of the complaint.
(2) the complaint shall be heard by the person to whom the compulsory feature applied, its representative or counsel and, if necessary, request the material. If the compulsory feature has ruled the Court, also in the process of being listened to promoters.
(3) the judge shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) complaint dismissed and in maintaining the appealed decision;
2) complaint to satisfy the appeal, set aside the decision and accordingly apply the necessary compulsory means or reject its application.
(4) the judge in his decision, motivated by its adoption by specifying the reasons set out in this law, and basic or not. A copy of the decision that SafeSeaNet isoperational send the investigative judge, drivers of the process, the person who applied for a compulsory feature meant to be, and the person who had made the complaint.
(5) the decision may not be appealed.
Chapter 16. 288. The procedural sanctions article. The concept of procedural sanctions sanctions are Procedural coercive measures, process guide or investigating judge may apply to a person who does not comply with the statutory procedural duties, interfere with the performance of procedural acts or showing disrespect for the Court.
289. article. The basis of application of procedural penalties (1) involved in criminal proceedings or any other person may apply to the procedural penalties for: 1) statutory and process certain procedural obligations of the promoters of default;
2) procedural actions obstructing progress;
3) repeated absences at the invitation of the promoters of the process without a valid reason;
4) notification of inability to attend at the invitation of the promoters of the process, if that option was;
5 criminal proceedings), the person concerned to fulfil the obligations of a procedural.

(2) the application of the procedural sanctions shall not release the person from the procedural obligation fulfillment, and does not exclude the possibility of applying the statutory procedural coercive measures.
(3) If the first paragraph of this article is the person an administrative irregularity or offence, that person may be called to administrative responsibility or criminally.
290. article. Procedural penalties (1) the Person who breached the statutory order may apply such procedural penalties: 1) warning;
2) forced the money;
3) expulsion from the courtroom.
(2) the lawyer and the Prosecutor can apply only a warning, but in other cases, for their infringement shall inform the relevant Council of sworn advocates or the General Prosecutor's Office.
291. article. Warning (1) a Person who interferes with the procedure laid down in the criminal proceedings or nailed treats its procedural obligations, the process can make the driver alert.
(2) the Notice may be expressed orally or in writing.
292. article. Forced money Person who interferes with the procedure laid down in the criminal proceedings or ignores the process requirements, promoters may impose forced money to one in the Republic of Latvia of the minimum monthly salary around if this law provides otherwise.
293. article. Forced money application (1) an investigator or Prosecutor, which found procedural order or procedural obligation jamming violations, writes about the Protocol and with the documents certifying the fact of the infringement, shall immediately forward it to the investigating judge for a decision on the application of forced money.
(2) the investigating judge upon receipt of a Protocol on the same day the decision and immediately send a copy thereof to the person to whom a compulsory, as well as appropriate money to process the driver if forced money does not apply.
(3) if the violation is detected in the hearing, the President of the court hearing the substance of the infringement in the formula, and it is recorded in the minutes of the hearing, notify the decision on the application of the procedural sanctions operative part and explains the person sanctioned its right in a court on the same day to receive a copy of all decisions, as well as the right to 10 days to appeal against that decision.
294. article. The decision on forced money appeals (1) an investigation of the judge's decision on the application of forced money person trading after the date of receipt of the copy of the decision can be appealed to the district (municipal) to the President of the Court, but the Court decision — the same court that imposed forced money. The complaint may request to cancel the decision in General, release the person from being forced to pay money or to reduce its amount.
(2) the complaint 10 days for review before notifying the person forced money on. This person's absence is not an obstacle for the inquiry.
(3) the decision is not appealable.
295. article. Forced execution of money (1) if the person is not a compulsory application of money lodge or lodging of a complaint, the duty is rejected within 10 days of notification of the decision or reject the complaint voluntarily pay the money.
(2) voluntary in the event of failure to comply with the decision to send the enforcement to the sworn bailiff.
(3) the officer forced the money must pay from their personal funds.
296. article. Expulsion from the courtroom (1) a Person who interferes with the procedure at the hearing and does not comply with the judge's order, the President of the Court may be expelled from the courtroom. About the mark of the minutes of the hearing.
(2) the accused and the victim may be expelled from the courtroom by a court decision, when he repeatedly substantially interfere with the procedure. The accused in the case of the expulsion hearing can continue if the Court decides that the accused's participation in the hearing is not necessarily required, and only for as long as there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused could continue to disrupt the order of the Court.
(3) any person, other than the accused, lawyers and prosecutors, with expulsion from the courtroom forced the money can be applied.
297. article. Expulsion from the courtroom (1) if the consequences from the courtroom to the accused or the victim refused permission to continue to participate in the hearing, the hearing Chairman, presents the person with the procedural steps that are performed during the izraidījum.
(2) If from the courtroom expelled the accused who has no defence, he must be able to participate in the debate between the parties. In all cases, they must be given the opportunity to say the last word.
298. article. Expulsion from the courtroom of the Court of appeal (1) the decision on expulsion from the courtroom accused, his counsel and the representative, the victim and his/her representative within one business day, if the expulsion can be appealed before the Court of the place has gone to take a final decision.
(2) the Court of complaints received, together with an extract from the minutes of the Court shall immediately forward to the higher court. As long as no complaint is pending, the Court cannot declare a final ruling in the criminal proceedings.
(3) a complaint in superior court judge within three working days of the hearing, announced in advance by the person who was expelled from the courtroom. This person has the right to participate in the inquiry, but its absence is not an obstacle for the inquiry.
(4) the decision is not appealable.
(5) If the higher court considers the complaint to be justified, the investigation must be renewed by making it possible for the accused or the victim to exercise his procedural rights.
The fourth section special procedural protection chapter 17. Special procedural protection in Article 299. Special procedural protection content protection is the special pleading of victims, witnesses and other persons who have given evidence in criminal proceedings of shows or for serious or especially serious crime, as well as minor, indicating a criminal law 161, 162 and 174 crimes provided for in article, and the person whose risks can affect that person (hereinafter in this chapter, the person at risk), life, health and other legitimate interests.
300. article. Special procedural protection reasons and basis for (1) a Person's life, health and property of real danger, a real danger, expressed or news that driver of the process gives a sufficient basis to believe that the threat can be real due to the person's testimony is provided by special procedural protection.
(2) persons at risk, its representatives or advocates the application and process writing guide is a basic proposal of special procedural protection.
301. article. Arrangements are pending submission of special procedural protection (1) the written submissions about the need to establish a special process of procedural protection shall be submitted to the promoter.
(2) the driver of the process: 1) there is a person, whether the special procedural protection reasons;
2 the applicant) identity of the person and other circumstances;
3) decide on special procedural protection need of determination or rejection of the submission received.
(3) if the driver of the process as necessary to establish the special procedural protection, he shall submit its proposal to the Attorney General for a decision on the special procedural protection.
(4) during the hearing of the application for the affected person special procedural protection determination submitted to the Court that this application check or ask to do the Prosecutor.
302. article. The process of suggestion for promoters of special procedural protection determination process for the proposed special promoters of procedural protection setting: 1) endangered persons name, surname, personal code (if it is not, year of birth, and date), citizenship, place of residence and work, education, family status, dependants, news about criminal convictions;
2 content and applications) the date of receipt;
3) application, check results and materials that confirm the need to establish a special procedural protection;
4) conclusion on the need to establish a special procedural protection, citing a proposal concerning certain necessary protection measures.
303. article. Personal recognition of special procedural protection (1) the Attorney General, familiar with the application process and the proposal of the promoters, as well as criminal matters, if necessary, considered a threat, its representative or counsel, shall decide on the special procedural protection determination or decision, refused to identify the person special procedural protection.
(2) if the person's application for the need to establish a special procedural protection it submitted to the Court, the decision on the determination of such protection shall be taken by the Court. Such a decision may be adopted by the Court of Justice on their own initiative, if the process of the hearing there was a need for special procedural protection to the person and that person would.
(3) if necessary to hide the identity of the person, the Attorney General decision indicates that a person's identity are to be replaced by pseudonyms.

(4) if the decision provides personal identity concealment, process guide all criminal proceedings before the scrambled documents that are recorded in the person's identity, transcribed by changing only the personal identity data, as provided for in the decision. Original documents shall be removed from the criminal case and stored together with the decision on the special procedural protection setting, and may be consulted only in the criminal proceedings in this process and in particular the Attorney General authorized a Prosecutor.
304. article. The decision on the special procedural protection determination or refusal to determine (1) the decision on the special procedural protection is adopted as the determination immediately, but not later than 10 days.
(2) the decision shall specify the institutions and officials, who asked for the execution of the decision, you can specify the protection measures applicable.
(3) the first paragraph of this article, the decision does not add the criminal, but it adds a reference for such a decision.
(4) the decision on refusal to admit a person of special procedural protection, indicates the withdrawal of motivation.
305. article. The decision on the implementation of special procedural protection (1) the process of adoption of the decision: 1 Guide) introduces a protected person under the decision taken;
2) explains the right to appeal against the decision;
3) explains the protected person's rights and obligations;
4) shall inform the protected person the personal identity data replaced with pseudonyms, for its use of pleadings and that responsibility, acting under the pseudonym, is the same as running under their own identity data. The person on the sign and provide his pseudonym signature model.
(2) if the special procedural protection is provided only with this law, article 308 and 309 criminal proceedings referred to in the instruments, the execution of the process guide in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act.
(3) if the special procedural protection also provides special measures referred to in the law, the process of sending promoters for performance of special protection authority and it is carried out in a special law.
(4) the transfer of criminal proceedings from one process to another, a process in which promoters in criminal proceedings, introduces the new process guide with the decision and the materials of special procedural protection.
(5) the decision of the special procedural protection, personal application, the test materials, process driver's suggestion and other materials relating to the special procedural protection setting and implementation, are not added to the criminal proceedings, but are stored under a secret document containing the terms of storage.
306. article. Defence and other rights and obligations of persons defender and other persons participating in criminal proceedings and which, because of their procedural obligations are known for special procedural protection, do not have the right to disclose the details of special procedural protection of protected persons and the measures.
307. article. The persons to be protected the rights and duties of the Person recognized as the special procedural protection is a special statutory protection of personal rights and responsibilities.
308. Nature of proceedings duration of pre-trial process (1) a Person who has a certain special procedural protection to the questioning of the invites with special protection authority.
(2) documents in the form of procedural acts in which the protected person to whom personal identity data replaced with the pseudonym, process guide their identity instead of data indicates only the pseudonym. If you need to specify the address of the mailing receipt indicates special protection authority address.
(3) in carrying out procedural actions involving more than one person and is required to prevent the special procedural protection to identify opportunities to uses such technical means, which do not allow you to identify this person. The protected person has the right not to answer questions, if the answers can make it possible to establish its identity.
(4) the consent of the Attorney General With criminal proceedings against the accused that certain special procedural protection, you can extract the individual records.
(5) on the hearing list of the invited person personal identity data replaced with pseudonyms, recording only the pseudonym and special protection authority address.
309. article. The nature of the proceedings (1) the criminal proceedings in which the person recognized as the special procedural protection, look for a closed hearing.
(2) if necessary, the protected person may participate in the hearing through technical means, being itself outside the courtroom, pursuant to this law, in article 140.
(3) the Person in criminal proceedings a person's identity are replaced with the pseudonym is the right not to testify in court, if there is reason to believe that the threat its security. This person a waiver to testify in court is not called to criminal liability. In this case, the evidence that the person to whom the personal identity data replaced with the pseudonym, provided the pre-trial proceedings, the hearing is not read and cannot be used as evidence in the case.
(4) if the person in criminal proceedings a person's identity are replaced with the pseudonym, give evidence in court, using the technical means to prevent its identification capability to cause Visual or auditory disturbance, providing the opportunity for the Court to see and hear this person without those disabilities. The protected person has the right not to answer questions, if the answers can make it possible to establish its identity.
(5) if necessary, the Court may question a witness whose identity is hidden, in a separate room, providing a testimony given in audibility in the courtroom, as well as the opportunity to ask questions to the witnesses and to hear the answers.
(6) If the hearing is open to the identity of the person to whom the criminal proceedings they were replaced with the pseudonym, the Attorney General for his decision to ask the special protection authority to carry out the specific statutory protection measures for this person.
310. article. Special procedural protection (1) termination of the Person's special procedural protection is terminated by the Attorney General or the decision of the Court in any criminal proceedings, for the moment, if: 1) lost the reason for protection;
2) person waived the protection;
3) person with his actions made it impossible for protection.
(2) If a person refuses to be protected from the protection, it shall submit a written application for it process that this application driver for decision shall be referred to in the first subparagraph.
(3) the decision on the special procedural protection of stored together with other materials relating to the special procedural protection.
311. article. The protected person does not use the testimony If the measures cannot guarantee the security of the protected person, at the request of the promoters of the process the Attorney General or the Court which determined the protection, shall take a decision not to use this person's testimony as evidence in criminal proceedings.
The fifth section of the procedural time limits and documents, chapter 18. Procedural time limits article 312. The procedural time limit period is a procedural law in accordance with the procedure laid down in the period (or moment) where (or when) the parties involved in criminal proceedings are obliged or entitled to take certain actions or to refrain from so doing.
313. article. At the beginning of the procedure (1) where a procedural deadline determined by the performance of a procedural actions before or after the other proceedings or in connection with this law determined the occurrence of, or simultaneously with other procedural act, then it is associated with the specific event and is not covered by this law, the time limits provided for in article 314 of the calculation.
(2) the hours, days, or months is the beginning of a certain procedure is specified in this Act, but if it is not specified, the beginning of the period considered when creating the criminal sanction, which term is defined.
(3) the criminal proceedings for the moment of creation to be considered as the time when the person has learned or pursuant to the law on the duly made the announcement, it had to learn about the specific procedural rights or obligations.
314. article. Calculation of procedural time limits (1) the calculation of the hours or days that the time-limits laid down, no account shall be taken of the hour or the day on which the period runs. The beginning of the calculation considers the next hours or days. The deadline expires, the sources of the period in question, the last full hour, if the time limit specified in the source, or the last 24-hour period, if the specified days.
(2) months deadline expires last month, but on that date, if that date is not in the month, the last date of the month.
(3) If the deadline falls on a working day, not on the last day of the period shall be considered to be the first next working day.
(4) if the time limit refers to the person's disqualification or limitation, for its beginning is considered the actual limitation of disqualification or moment, but on the expiry of a period, law or decision deadline actual expiration time (hours or days).

315. article. Procedural time during operation (1) are complied with, if the procedural action taken until the expiry of the document by the end of the statutory period, put the person is entitled or authorized to receive, or the document by the end of the statutory period passed mail and transfer fact duly authenticated.
(2) is met if the person detained or the medical institution concerned has deposited its instrument of detention or hospital's administration by the end of the statutory period.
(3) the right of realization of the operative term without due cause delays cause this exhaustion.
(4) the procedural obligations operative term delays release of obligation, and the procedural obligation enforceable in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
316. article. Procedural extension (1) Extensible is only procedural time limits in respect of which this Act has a specific disclaimer on their extension.
(2) where this Act provides otherwise, the question of the extension of the State no later than five days before the expiry of the basis of the application of the person concerned and the materials presented, filed not later than seven days before the deadline. In the cases specified in the law, and then, if circumstances so require and the person for whom the question is meant to be, an application for the extension of the appearance in the presence of the interested parties.
(3) in considering the application for extension shall take a decision on the extension of or refusal to extend the deadline.
(4) the decision on the extension of or refusal to extend the deadline to be reasons why you are or are not extended. This decision shall indicate the time period is extended to some, or time, by which it is prolonged.
(5) extending deadlines, follow this law, in article 314. procedural time calculation.
317. article. Late renewal of procedural time limits (1) where the person concerned valid reason missed the deadlines for the realisation of rights, have the right to submit an application for the renewal of this term. The application shall indicate the reasons why and the overdue documents certifying the justification of having failed to observe the time limit.
(2) the interested parties to the application for the renewal of the period of delay in the process of transforming the look of the next two business days. If the question of deciding is not possible without further explanation from the applicant or other persons, as well as if the applicant requests that the application for the renewal of the period of the applicant's appearance and the presence of other persons invited to attend.
(3) in considering an application for the renewal of the time limit, the driver of the process may take a decision on the renewal of the period of delay or waiver to restore the missed deadline.
(4) the decision on the renewal of the period of delay or waiver to restore missed deadlines should be motivated, and it must immediately notify the applicant.
(5) the driver of the process, received an application for the renewal of the period of delay, in accordance with the applicant's request or on his own initiative to issue a decision on the renewal of the period of delay may suspend the enforcement of a ruling that the time limit for appeals is asked to renew.
(6) applications for renewal of the period of delay due to the competence of the judge of the investigation decision making during the pre-trial investigation judge appearance.
19. chapter. Ruling in article 318. Decision of the pre-trial process (1) in pre-trial proceedings, and accepts, in writing, promoters formalise motivated decisions about: 1) the initiation of criminal proceedings and the way forward;
2) invalidation of the suspect;
3) invalidation of the person injured;
4) personal prosecution criminally;
5 the application of coercive measures);
6) completion of the pre-trial process.
(2) the driver of the process of adopting a reasoned decision in other cases set out in this Act, but, where necessary, a decision may be taken on any important issues in the process.
(3) officials conducting criminal proceedings, but there is no process drivers, adopt reasoned decisions in matters within their competence.
319. article. The Court ruling (1) judgments of the Court's judgment and decisions.
(2) judgment of the Court is a judicial decision on the accused's guilt or innocence, or not penalty, as well as the acquittal or release from punishment.
(3) the Court shall decide on the issues to decide, in preparing the criminal matter to the Court, in the course of the hearing and passing judgment.
(4) judgment of the Court of Justice, but also in the cases specified by law the decisions expressed in writing.
320. article. The ruling body (1) presented a written ruling consists of an introduction, descriptive, themes and the operative part.
(2) the introduction of a ruling stating the place and time of acceptance, the authority and their officials, which adjudicates, and legal issues, for which the ruling was made.
(3) the descriptive part of the point in the process of ascertaining the nature of the underlying ruling.
(4) the theme part indicates a reference to the law, under which the ruling was made, and the grounds for its conclusions. The theme for the award must be a part of, if this is provided for in this Act.
(5) in the operative part indicates the conclusion on the matter, and the adopted modalities and deadlines for appeals.
(6) in the cases provided for in this law, the process of transforming a written decision may consist only of enter and operative part (hereinafter referred to as the decision in the form of the resolution).
321. article. Introduction to the ruling (1) a Person involved in criminal proceedings and where the rights and interests of affected accepted the ruling, they advocate and representative, as well as the person to whom the application, the application or request, the basic ruling adopted, presented the ruling before its launch, if execution is carried out with the participation of the person concerned.
(2) in the cases specified in the law, presentation of the pre-trial process in the decision taken by the investigation concerned only the completion of the transaction or the completion of the pre-trial process.
322. article. Date of entry into force of the judgment (1) all decisions enter into force immediately after their adoption, unless the law is not laid down for the entry into force of the other arrangements.
(2) a court judgment shall enter into force in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act.
(3) the entry into force of the order is mandatory, and enforceable in all.
20. chapter. 323. Article suggestions. Suggestion process Guide article proposal, if the purpose of criminal proceedings is to take actions that are not within the competence of the promoters of this process or require the decision of a competent person.
324. article. (1) the examination of the proposal the proposal looks official, that the criminal proceedings shall be empowered to take itself or with the decision to allow another to take the action recommended in the proposal.
(2) if the law provides otherwise, the proposal will be reviewed within seven days, if necessary, call upon the suggestion of the applicant. The decision taken or actions taken by the applicant communicated not later than within three days.
Chapter 21. Protocols Article 325. Procedural action Protocol (1) pre-trial investigations in course of action, but in the cases specified by law, in the course of other proceedings recorded in this Act Protocol.
(2) proceedings in procedural actions shall record the minutes of the hearing.
326. article. The content of the Protocol (1) procedural actions specified in the Protocol: 1) venue and date;
2) time when the operation started and finished.
3) procedural actions reviewer's position, name and last name;
4) — proceedings of the members name, surname, personal code, but a lawyer: name, surname, place of practice and procedural status;
5) progress and findings, if any;
6) used scientific and technical means;
7) Registrar's Office, name and surname.
(2) the protocol adds objects and documents obtained in the course of the proceedings.
(3) the minutes of the court hearing is determined by the contents of this law article 484.
327. article. Introduction to procedural actions (1) procedural actions the operator introduces the people who participated in the activity in question, these proceedings contain the Protocol and its annexes, reading, showing or playing them. Person made corrections and additions to be recorded in the minutes.
(2) the Protocol in General and each page separately sign the procedural actions, and taker whom all the people who participated in the transaction. If the person refuses to sign, it noted in the minutes, indicating the reasons for the refusal and motives.
22. chapter. Summons 328. article. Summons summons is a document by which a process guide invites the person to the investigation authority, Prosecutor's Office or court to participate in criminal proceedings (hereinafter referred to as the invited person).
329. article. The contents of summons writ specifies: 1) invited natural persons name, surname and place of residence or other address designated by that person;
2) invited the entities name, legal address or other such legal persons indicate the address of the authorised representative;
3) investigation authority, Prosecutor's Office or the name and address of the Court;
4) arrival time and place;
5) inviting someone for a reason;

6) the obligation of the person received a summons put it they invited person is absent;
7) absence.
330. article. Summons (1) the summons shall be issued no later than three days before the time of arrival. Where the procedural action is not planned and is not urgent, the summons may be issued just before arrival.
(2) a summons is usually delivered by mail or Messenger (Messenger) to the address of the person invited.
(3) If the person indicated by other invited modes of communication, or event is particularly urgent, you can invite people by using other forms of communication.
(4) If the person invited is not reachable, the above address the summons delivered to the residence or registered office.
(5) the Invited person residing abroad or whose registered office is abroad, the summons sent to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia or international agreement.
331. article. The issue of a summons (1) the summons shall be issued personally invited to the person against signature. The summons part of the signature indicates they receive time.
(2) If a summons is not the supplier of the invited person you encounter at the above address, he summons issued for another adult family member who lives together with the invited person. In this case, the recipient of a summons in a part of the record they sign your name, as well as specify which relations he has with the invited person. The summons is the responsibility of the recipient to pass the summons to the person invited.
(3) the Invited persons absent summons summons signed by the supplier shall be made part of the mark, as well as points where they drove off the person invited, and its expected time of return.
(4) a legal person shall be issued a summons addressed to the employee concerned.
(5) the summons part of the signature process returned to the driver.
332. article. Invited persons obliged to accept summons (1) the person Invited is obliged to accept the summons.
(2) If asked by the person refuses to accept the summons, the supplier shall mark on the signature portion of the writ and returns it to process a driver.
333. article. Invited persons bound to be reachable (1) the Person designated in the specific criminal procedural acts for whom your address, there is bound to be achievable in this address.
(2) If a subpoena delivered in accordance with the procedure laid down in this chapter, it is considered that the invited person is notified of the progress of the criminal proceedings in time and space, with the exception of this law, article 330 of the fourth part.
(3) If a subpoena delivered to the invited person in this law, article 330 of the procedure laid down in the fourth paragraph, considered that the invited person is notified of the progress of the time and place of the seventh day after the summons in the mail.
23. chapter. 334. Article applications. Term of consideration of (1) the application shall be considered and a decision thereon immediately after receipt of the application, unless this Act provides otherwise.
(2) if the decision on the application is not possible to accept now, it must be made within three working days following receipt of the application.
335. article. Application to Registrar (1) the application is upheld, if it contributes to significant facts in criminal proceedings, the person involved in the process and other rights and legitimate interests.
(2) if the application is satisfied, the written decision may not design, but the satisfaction of the application in writing to the applicant and ensure its implementation.
(3) the complete or partial rejection process guide takes a reasoned decision that three working days shall notify the applicant, sending or giving him a copy of its decision.
(4) the process of the promoters decision rejecting the application may be appealed in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act.
24. chapter. Complaints 336. article. The right to lodge a complaint (1) conducting the criminal proceedings against officials or ruling may be submitted in person to the proceedings, as well as the person whose rights or legal interests are affected by a particular action or ruling.
(2) the Prosecutor, the complaint is called the Prosecutor's protest.
(3) the process of transforming the decision is appealable, except in the cases provided by law.
337. article. Complaints (1) the complaint shall be submitted to the national body or the driver of the process that is responsible for the process and in accordance with the law shall be entitled to examine complaints and make those decisions.
(2) the complaint shall be submitted to: 1) on the investigation team, the procedural task performers, expert or auditor — the process of driver behaviour;
2) about the conduct of investigators or decisions — the Central Prosecutor;
the Prosecutor's action 3) or decisions — post a higher public prosecutor;
4) for investigative action or decision of a judge, the President of the Court;
5) about the judges, the President of the Court;
6) about the Court ruling, the higher court.
(3) if the person is a lodge in the second paragraph of article 1, paragraph 3 of the persons referred to in the action or decision and does not agree with the complaint, the investigating prosecutor in higher positions, the decision, it can appeal against this decision to the next highest prosecutor Office, where the decision of the pre-trial investigation is final.
(4) the Person who received the complaint about my actions or decision, it must be handed over immediately to the second part of that official. If a person considers the complaint justified, it stops at the disposal of the appeal or appeal against the decision and recognize its results invalid.
(5) can be written and oral complaints. Log a complaint orally shall be recorded in minutes signed by the complainant and the person to whom the complaint is made orally. Log on to decide a complaint orally in the same order that's defined in a written complaint for decision. The complaint can be annexes relating to its content.
(6) a Person who does not understand the language, the criminal proceedings has the right to lodge a complaint in the language that it knows.
338. article. Hold or the person sending the complaint to the arrest detention or detention after the Administration detained or arrested in the complaint it shall immediately be surrendered to officials that this complaint is addressed.
339. article. The deadline for the submission of complaints (1) complaints of official actions and decisions in pre-trial investigation may be submitted throughout the pre-trial process.
(2) an investigator or a Prosecutor's decision to initiate criminal proceedings for abandonment or termination of criminal proceedings, the decision can be appealed within 10 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the decision.
(3) complaints about the rulings of the Court may be lodged within 10 days from the date of availability of the award.
(4) If the complaint is overdue for good reason, it may be renewed at the request of the applicant, the institution or the officer who has the right to examine the complaint.
340. article. Withdrawal of the complaint (1) the Person who made the complaint is entitled to withdraw.
(2) the complaint submitted to the Court can be reversed until the Court go to discuss the ruling.
(3) the complaint submitted by the accused or the victim's interest may be withdrawn only with their consent.
341. article. Ruling of suspension due to the submission of complaints in the cases specified in this law, the complaint shall suspend the execution of the judgment under appeal. In other cases, the decision may suspend the officer hearing the complaint, if that Officer considers it appropriate.
342. article. (1) the inquiry received complaint process guide within three working days from the date of receipt of the complaint or the appearance by jurisdiction.
(2) it is prohibited to ask the inquiry to the same person whose action or of the judgment under appeal, as well as the Executive who approved the appeal against the ruling.
(3) the officer hearing the complaint, may take into account not only the themes of complaint. If necessary, it can check the entire appeal ruling or even all the merits and legality of the criminal proceedings.
(4) the officer shall examine the complaint is obliged within their competence to take immediate measures to restore the violated rights of persons and legal interests.
(5) If a complaint is not overdue and restored, is not considered the complaint and shall notify the applicant.
(6) the Court shall consider the complaint in a closed hearing, the presence of the complainant and his counsel or representative. At the hearing, the person may participate in the action or decision appealed or its representative. Their absence is not an obstacle for the inquiry.
(7) the appeal and cassation complaint and protest in a tenth of this law in accordance with the procedure laid down in title and timeless.
343. article. The time limit for the examination of complaints (1) the complaint, except the appeal and cassation complaint and protest, the 10 days of its receipt.
(2) where a complaint inspection required to obtain additional materials or take other measures, admissible complaints within 30 days of the hearing, on notice to the complainant.
344. article. (1) decision of the complaint the complaint may meet or decline.
(2) Satisfy the complaint, you can: 1) totally or partially cancel or amend the decision appealed against;
2) completely or partially terminate criminal proceedings;
3 send a new criminal) investigations;
4) recognize the results of the action on the judgment void.

(3) the investigating judge and the Court, allowing the appeal, accepted the second paragraph of article 1 and the ruling provided for in paragraph 4.
(4) refusal to satisfy the complaint to be substantiated.
(5) the officer or the Court which decides the complaint, can not cancel earlier accepted the ruling, if it can cause deterioration of the person who submitted the complaint or of which it submitted.
345. article. Communication on the matter of complaints (1) the Person who made the complaint, notify the complainant of the decision and further appeals and order.
(2) if the action or appeal the ruling to a person unlawfully harmed, it explains the right to claim compensation or the prevention and the procedures for the exercise of this right.
(3) the complaints and the responses to it, as well as a copy of the complaint examination materials added to criminal matters.
25. chapter. Complaints about the Attorney General's decision to 346. article. The Attorney General's appeal against the decision of the Attorney General complaint about the decision taken in accordance with this law, 303. Article 310 and 410, you can submit a person whose rights or legitimate interests to the decision violated, within 10 days from the date on which it became aware of the decision and its contents.
347. article. The complaint and the determination of the proceedings (1) the complaint on the Attorney General's decision to the Supreme Court Senate.
(2) received a complaint, Senate Chairman of the Department concerned determines the composition of the Court and ask for one of the judges to examine the complaint.
(3) the judge designated for the examination of complaints, requests from the Attorney General's criminal or other materials, which were the basis for the decision, and determine the duration of the examination of the complaint.
(4) if necessary, the judge may izprasī the documents and other materials, as well as summon persons concerned to provide an explanation.
(5) the judge shall notify the Attorney General and the complainant of the complaint and hearing about their own and their representatives the right to participate in the hearing. The complainant, on remand, after his request is to ensure participation in the inquiry.
348. article. (1) the inquiry complaining about the Attorney General's decision to review the Supreme Court Senate of three judges, with the participation of the Attorney General and the complainant or their representatives. This absence of persons without valid reason, if those timely notified of the time and place of the examination, the examination of the complaint is not an obstacle.
(2) the Court, having heard the appellant and the Attorney General or their representatives, go to discuss and adopt a decision read by court.
(3) the Court may take one of the following decisions: 1) leave the decision of the Attorney General;
2) amend the Attorney General's decision;
3 to cancel the decision of the Attorney General).
(4) the Court's decision is final and not appealable.
349. article. The Court's examination of the complaint after the decision of the Criminal Court and other izprasīto materials within three working days, together with the decision to send to the Attorney General.
The sixth section Property questions in chapter 26 of the criminal proceedings. The crime caused damages article 350. Compensation for the damage caused to the victim (1) compensation is fixed in money terms, what a person with a criminal offence is caused by injury, pay the victim as satisfaction for moral injury, physical suffering and financial loss.
(2) the compensation is for the President of the criminal element that the accused pay or on a voluntary basis to the Court ruling.
(3) If a victim believes that compensation is not reimbursed for all injury caused, he shall be entitled to claim reimbursement of the civil procedure law. In determining the amount of remuneration to be taken into account in criminal proceedings compensation.
(4) requiring consideration in the civil order, the victim is exempt from State fees.
(5) the Court ruling in the criminal proceedings is binding on a person's guilt in the civil judgment.
351. article. Application for compensation (1) the victim has the right to submit an application for compensation of damages at any stage of the criminal proceedings until the Court of the initiation of the investigation. The application should be based on the amount of compensation requested.
(2) an application may be submitted orally, in writing or Express. Hearing the application process will be recorded in the proceedings.
(3) during the pre-trial investigation of the applications submitted and the amount of compensation requested by the Prosecutor's document on the completion of the pre-trial process.
(4) criminally called party identification is not an obstacle to making the application for compensation.
(5) the victim is entitled to withdraw his application for compensation at any stage of the criminal proceedings until the Court go to make the judgment. Waiver of compensation the victim can not justify accusations of supporting the repeal, amendment or judgment.
352. article. The amount of compensation (1) the amount of compensation is determined by the Court, in considering an application by the victim, and taking into account: 1) of the property;
2) the gravity of the criminal offence and the nature of the offence;
3) caused physical suffering, permanent disability and loss of functional capacity;
4) the moral depth of name-calling and public access;
5) psychic trauma.
(2) if the injury created a legal person, the amount of compensation is also affected by difficulties in the business.
(3) direct damages assessed in the prices used for the determination of the amount of the charge.
(4) the wrongdoer may voluntarily agree to the compensation of the victim about whether they can detect it by mutual agreement. Such an agreement is expressed in writing, or at the request of both parties of the procedural acts the record Protocol.
353. article. Persons who may impose a countervailing duty of payment (1) the obligation to pay compensation, the Court may impose: 1) for which the minor defendant found guilty of the crime;
2 to the minors) found guilty of the crime, — subsidiary with parents or persons who replace them;
3) legal person, if its case guilty of committing the crime recognized the natural person who committed the offence, acting individually or as a legal person concerned collegiate member of the institution, on the basis of the right of representation of the legal person, to act on its behalf or make decisions on behalf of the legal person, or īstenodam control within the legal person, or as a legal person.
(2) in other cases, the refund shall be fixed, but the damages happen. civil law
(3) the procedure of the victims fund, and the recoverable damage from this Fund, the quantum of damages determined by a special law.
354. article. The victims fund fees (1) a conviction, the Prosecutor's statement on the fine and the Prosecutor's decision on the termination of criminal proceedings, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility is the basis for a person found guilty of committing the crime, pay the fee to the victims fund.
(2) the fees shall be: 1) for this criminal offence — 10 lats;
2) of less-serious crimes 15 lat;
3) committed serious crimes-20 lats;
4) about this very serious crime — 25 lats.
(3) If a person is found guilty at the same time more for committing criminal offences, the fee to be paid according to the offence more serious.
27. chapter. Action to get the stuff, article 355. For a property crime (1) Property is to be recognized as a crime if the person acquired the property or possession of it has come as a result of a crime.
(2) if not proven otherwise, on getting treasure, also considered the financial resources owned by a person: 1) are organized criminal group or support it;
2) itself engaged in terrorist activities or maintain permanent relations with persons involved in terrorist activities;
3) itself engaged in trafficking or maintain permanent relations with persons involved in trafficking;
4) itself engaged in criminal activities with narcotic or psychotropic substances or maintain permanent relations with persons involved in such activities.
(3) for the purposes of this article the standing relations with another person that will send the specific criminal activities, means that a person lives with another person or controlled, or affect its behavior.
356. article. Recognition of property on for (1) the assets of a criminal can recognize which has the force of res judicata ruling or decision on the Prosecutor's completion of the criminal proceedings.
(2) during the pre-trial criminal procedure criminal property obtained can be recognised: 1) to the district (municipal) Court decision in Chapter 59 of this law in the order, if the property owner or the lawful possessor is unknown and the process of driver is not sufficient evidence that casts doubt on the criminal origin of the assets (property and criminal offences);

2) with process of decision, if promoters before the Court during the investigation at the suspect, the accused or a third party is found, and the withdrawn property in respect of which the owner or lawful possessor was previously made a loss of property and its location, eliminating reasonable doubt, proved her right.
357. article. Criminal check for belongings (1) Property returned by the home owner or the lawful possessor of the decision by the driver of the process after the property store for the attainment of the objectives of criminal procedure is no longer necessary.
(2) property that circulation prohibited by law and that consequently, the person in possession is illegal, but this does not give the possessor of the decision of the Court of Justice shall transfer to the institution of the State or the legal person entitled to get and use.
358. article. Criminal confiscation of property obtained by crime (1) get lost, if they further storage to achieve the objectives of the criminal proceedings is not required and if it is not to be returned to the owner or the lawful possessor of the decision of the court seized, but the resulting financial resources including the State budget.
(2) if the seized property is obtained, destroyed or hidden, and it is not possible to confiscate, forfeiture or recovery may be subject to other property, financial resources, also forfeited property value.
(3) If the accused is not a property that could be subject to the second subparagraph, the confiscation of property may be confiscated: 1) that the accused person by the Commission of a criminal offence without obligation to replace sheets appropriate remuneration is the third person;
2) the accused person if one spouse, at least three years before the commencement of a criminal offence is not established separation of property of the spouses;
3) another person's property if the accused persons have a common (shared) Syme vanity.
(4) the State budget include: 1) features, the Cabinet of Ministers, in accordance with the procedure laid down in realizing the things that affiliation has not been ascertained or of which the owner is not a legal right to it, or that the owner or lawful possessor has abandoned them;
2) features that the person obtained from the property sales, knowing its criminal origin;
3) from criminal property obtained in consequence of the use of the fruit;
4) financial resources confiscated;
5) a financial or other material benefit, of the values adopted by the public official as a bribe.
359. article. From criminal property sales means if the victim has requested damages in the criminal proceedings in question has this law 358. the fourth paragraph of this article, it will first use the refund requested and paid.
360. article. The rights of third parties (1) if the property gain found at a third party, it returned after the home owner or the lawful possessor.
(2) if the owner of the property shall be returned to the lawful possessor, or third party, which was a good faith acquirer of the property or a good faith mortgage, workers have the right to civil procedure in order to submit a claim for damages, including compensation for damages against the accused or convicted person.
Chapter 28. The question of the provision of article 361 of the solution. The seizure of goods (1) in order to ensure the solution of questions in criminal proceedings, as well as the possible confiscation of property, criminal proceedings shall be affixed to the arrest, the suspect detained or accused, also inherit property, they come from other people, or their personal belongings, which are responsible for the material the suspect or the accused. Arrests also may be imposed for a criminal or criminal proceedings related to the assets held by the other parties.
(2) seizure of property may be imposed and in proceedings for the application of coercive measures of a legal person and of medical coercive means of detection, if it is necessary to provide the solution to the question of criminal proceedings or possible pecuniary, or confiscation of property.
(3) seizure of property in the pre-trial process imposed by the promoters of the process, a decision confirmed by the investigating judge, but the time of the hearing decision.
(4) in cases of urgency, when the putting off of the property may be forfeited, destroyed or concealed, process guide can seize property with the consent of the Prosecutor. On the arrest of the driver of the process no later than the next working day shall notify the investigating judge, the presentation of the report and other materials in support of arrest need and urgency. If the investigating judge does not approve the process guide the decision on seizure of property, property seizure to remove.
(5) the decision on seizure of property, must be provided, for what purposes and who owned property is arrested, but if there is some question about the challenges, the necessary amount of the security.
(6) process can ask the promoters of the arrest the police enforcement, as well as notify the sequestration of the public register in which the registered rights to this property so that it could record a prohibition to alienate this property and saddled with other cases or the law of obligations.
(7) where, in respect of the property, before it arrested, is a registered mortgage pledge action with the mortgaged property may take place only after reconciliation with process Guide. If such a property by a decision of the Court of Justice is recognized as criminal, sequestration has priority over the mortgage.
(8) not allowed to seize essential items used by the person whose property is arrested, the family members and their dependants. The following list of subjects determined by the annex 1 of this law.
362. article. Protocol on seizure of property (1) on the seizure of the property record.
(2) the Protocol shall be: 1) every thing that arrested, indicating its name, brand, weight, degree of wear, as well as other individual characteristics;
2 If the arrest is imposed on the whole property),-that the arrest is not imposed;
3) application for property ownership by a third party is sought.
(3) imposing arrest property, its owner, holder, user or notified to the holder on the handle it or use it, but, if necessary, removed and put in storage.
(4) if the property is removed, the Protocol specifies that directly removes that and having deposited.
(5) if the seizure was made at the time of the attempt to hide things, to destroy it or damage, it shall be recorded in minutes.
363. article. A copy of the Protocol of seizure of property (1) a copy of the minutes of seizure of property shall be issued against the signature of the person to which the description of the property, or one of the minors family members but, if not present, the local government representative whose administrative territory the property arrested.
(2) where a lien imposed on property located in the territory of a legal person, a copy of the minutes of seizure issued against the signature of the property of the legal person's representative.
364. article. The arrest exposed property value determination (1) property to which the lien is imposed, are valued at the actual value, taking into account depreciation. If necessary, the value of the property, call the professionals.
(2) cash and securities are recorded at their nominal value.
(3) if the lien should be only part of the property for a certain amount of property owner or user has the right to specify the things that, in his opinion, should be subject to arrest.
365. article. Arrested property storage (1) property to which the lien is imposed, can leave the store owner or user, his family members or any other natural or legal person, which explains the statutory responsibility for the maintenance of that property. The person's signature on it.
(2) property to which the lien is imposed, may not leave the possession of the suspect or the accused.
(3) if the lien is imposed things whose circulation is prohibited by law, as well as money, currency and securities issued by banks for credit, bills of Exchange, shares and other instruments of money, articles of precious metals and jewels, as well as precious metals and precious stones, the storage location and order determined by the Cabinet of Ministers.
(4) cash deposits and securities held in banks or other credit institutions, are not removed, but after receiving the decision on seizure of property with the costs of operations are terminated.
366. article. Abolition of sequestration (1) process the driver shall take a decision on sequestration and shall immediately notify the person whose property had been arrested or had surrendered possession of arrested property. The decision on the cancellation of arrest must be accepted if: 1) the Court acquittal verdict;
2) Court has decided that the property to be recognized as a criminal get;
3 terminate criminal proceedings) process with decision reabilitējoš;
4) in criminal proceedings is not charged or compensation to the victim recanted;
5) criminal offences in the criminal law, retrain article, which does not provide for confiscation of property;
6) lost any reason to question the solutions.
(2) the driver of the process, you can save the attachment to the goods part which may require procedural expenses.

(3) the removal process arrest driver after the entry into force of the judgment shall also provide without delay the relevant public register, in which the rights to this property.
29. chapter. Procedural and reimbursement of expenses article 367. Procedural costs (1) procedural expenses are: 1) the amounts paid to witnesses, victims, experts, auditors, specialists, interpreters and other process going the tītaj parties, to cover the travel expenses related to arrival of procedural actions and return to the place of residence, and the fee for accommodation as well as daily allowance;
2) amount paid to witnesses and victims as the average wages for the period during which they were due to participate in a procedural did not make their work, or by the investigating authorities, the public prosecutor's Office or the Ministry of Justice have rewarded their employers for paid average earnings;
3) pay experts, auditors, interpreters and professionals on the job, except when they are participating in the process of executing their duties;
4) pay a lawyer when the expenditure on legal aid covered from public funds;
5) amounts spent into evidence storage and transfer.
6) amounts spent for the purpose of inspection;
7) other expenses incurred in criminal proceedings.
(2) in the first subparagraph, these procedural expenses shall be borne by the funds from the State cabinet and set the agenda.
368. article. Procedural costs drive (1) procedural expenses to the Court decision propelled from convicts except in this article, the third, fourth and fifth cases referred to.
(2) If the Court convicted several persons, the Court shall determine the extent of each convicted procedural expenses recovered. The Court shall take into account the nature of the crime, convicted in the level of responsibility and resources.
(3) where a judgment of a person is justified, procedural expenses from public funds. If the accused is justified in part, she can recover from the procedural expenses related to the accusation that a person found guilty and convicted.
(4) the procedural expenses from public funds if the person, from which they recovered, qualifies. The Court may exempt the convicted of procedural expenses driven wholly or partially in other situations, where recovery can significantly affect the economic situation of the persons who are convicted of dependants.
(5) the procedural expenses related to the participation of the lawyer in criminal proceedings after posting, if the driver of the process in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law a person is freed from paying for legal assistance, as well as pay for the interpreter's work covered from public funds.
(6) the procedural expenses related to investigations or hearings be postponed if they are delayed due to the law in the absence of the persons called without valid reason, you can recover from these parties of civil law.
(7) the procedure laid down in this article is a collection of procedural expenses shall also determine if criminal proceedings are terminated, the Prosecutor, when drawing up the statement, or as a punishment for the criminal proceedings terminated conditionally exempting from criminal responsibility or on the basis of other accused not reabilitējoš conditions.
(B) pre-trial proceedings in criminal matters and criminal procedure Chapter 30. The initiation of criminal proceedings and termination article 369. Grounds for initiating criminal proceedings (1) the initiation of criminal proceedings by reason of the submission of the report of the investigation, the Prosecutor's Office or court authority (hereinafter referred to as the criminal conduct of responsible authority), which indicates a possible criminal offence was committed, or the obtaining of the criminal conduct of a responsible authority.
(2) the first paragraph of this article may submit messages: 1) as a result of a crime victim, as the application;
2) and central authorities inspecting their operations — control order legislation;
3) treatment of persons or institutions, as a report on injuries, illnesses or deaths where the cause may be a criminal offence;
4) child protection institutions and non-governmental organizations — as the application of the minor impairment of the cause which could be a criminal offence;
5) any natural or legal person, as information about possible criminal offences, of which itself is not directly affected;
6) any person for the criminal offence committed themselves, as a submission.
(3) the grounds for initiating criminal proceedings may not be anonymous information or information that the applicant refuses to disclose the source of information.
(4) On the progress of the criminal proceedings, the authorities referred to in the first paragraph in the news can get their resorisk or criminal justice activities in the following cases: 1) directly finding the criminal offences at the time of ordering and it stopped;
2) just finding the crime evident consequences;
3) criminal proceedings for another criminal offence;
4) performing other statutory functions: inspection, operational activities, etc.
370. article. The basis for the initiation of criminal proceedings (1) criminal proceedings may be initiated if there is a real possibility that there has been a criminal offence.
(2) criminal proceedings may be initiated even if the message contains information about possible criminal offence has occurred, and it is possible to test only with the means and methods of criminal procedure.
371. article. Investigation authorities, Prosecutor's offices and the jurisdiction of the criminal proceedings (1) the Chief coroner or the coroner has a duty to initiate criminal proceedings within their competence, in connection with any act referred to in article 369 of the public prosecution in the case.
(2) the Prosecutor initiates criminal proceedings within their competence, in connection with any act referred to in article 369 of the public prosecution in the case.
(3) the decision of the Prosecutor to criminal proceedings in the case of the public prosecutions and related materials transmitted without delay to the investigation authority, with the exception of article 38 of this law, as provided for in the third subparagraph.
(4) the judge or the Court of criminal proceedings initiated private prosecution cases.
(5) in other cases, the judge or the Court, the application materials or the data received in the hearing, without resorting to the investigation authority or, in the cases stipulated by law, the Prosecutor's Office.
372. article. The procedures for initiation of criminal proceedings (1) the criminal proceedings initiated by an authorized officer of a procedural decision, stating: 1) it started the reason and basis;
a brief description of the offence, 2), in so far as it is known at the time of initiation;
3) person against which launched the process, if known;
4) authority or specific person tasked to steer the process.
(2) the decision may also be written in the form of a resolution. Such decision shall specify the task to initiate criminal proceedings and the authority or the person asked to drive the process.
(3) in case the decision of urgent resolutions, you can lock the first emergency actions the investigation Protocol.
(4) the decision on the criminal proceedings may not be appealed.
(5) information on the initiation of criminal proceedings within 24 hours of it being sent to the authority of the public prosecutor's Office, which is responsible for the supervision of the investigation, as well as the person who had submitted the details of the criminal offence, with the exception of treatment of the person or authority.
(6) the authority of the public prosecutor's Office that SafeSeaNet isoperational following the receipt of the information, notify the driver of the process in the Prosecutor's supervisory data.
(7) the criminal proceedings initiated messages and detected offences recorded in the accounts in a single Cabinet.
373. article. A refusal to initiate proceedings (1) If a procedural authorised officer finds that there are no grounds for criminal proceedings, the decision in the form of a resolution written on application and notify the person who submitted the details of possible criminal offence, except for the treatment of persons or institutions.
(2) the fact that the message does not contain sufficient information for the initial qualification of the offence cannot be the basis for the process does not start up.
(3) if the information contains information on violations of the law, where the opening is not required to apply the means and methods of criminal proceedings, they shall send the competent inspection authority.
(4) the decision on refusal to commence criminal proceedings of this Act 369. the second paragraph of article 1, 2, and 4. the persons referred to in paragraph 1 within 10 working days of notification of the appeal to a higher prosecutor, but a private prosecution cases — a higher level court.
374. article. The criminal records Of criminal proceedings in all the time with this process-related documents stored in a single place in criminal cases. These documents may only be removed from it on the basis of the decision and in accordance with the provisions of this law.
375. article. Introduction to criminal case materials (1) during the course of criminal proceedings criminal investigation of existing material is secret, and may be familiar with those officials who carry out criminal proceedings, as well as persons to whom the officials relevant materials produced in accordance with the procedure laid down in this law.

(2) After the completion of the criminal proceedings and the final ruling comes into force with the criminal may be familiar, the public prosecutor's Office and Court investigations staff, persons whose rights were violated given in criminal proceedings, as well as persons who perform scientific operations. All final decisions in criminal matters, by providing prescriptive information protection is available to the public.
(3) information on persons involved in criminal proceedings (other than the person who has the right to defence) a residence and a telephone or other communications equipment number (address) in a separate inquiry, the criminal, and with it you can just take the officials carrying out the criminal.
376. article. Criminal register (1) the criminal record is inserted in each criminal case registration page that starts with a record of criminal proceedings and ending with a record of the entry into force of the final ruling.
(2) in the course of criminal proceedings, the registry entry: 1) the most important procedural decisions;
2) officials carried out a specific criminal proceedings;
3) criminal legal qualifications;
4) progress of criminal proceedings;
5) procedural deadline dates;
6) service of a document.
(3) the replacement process.
(4) any person involved in criminal proceedings has the right to consult immediately with a criminal record.
377. article. No discriminatory conditions of criminal proceedings criminal proceedings may not be initiated, but started the process should be terminated if: 1) has happened a criminal offence;
2 no offence) criminal offence composition;
3) barred;
4) accepted Amnesty Act, which prevents the imposition of penalties for relevant criminal offences;
5) the person who called or called to criminal liability, is dead, except as necessary to process the dead rehabilitated;
6) entered into force of judgment or process guide decision on termination of the criminal proceedings on the same charge against the person who formerly called criminally liable for the same criminal offence;
7) it is facing an alien or stateless person as the State border crossing that illegal for this criminal offence forcibly expelled from the Republic of Latvia;
8) than the application in the criminal proceedings that may be initiated only on the person's application;
9) occurred the victim and the suspect or the accused in a criminal court, which may be initiated only on the basis of the application of the injured party, except in criminal proceedings for the criminal law as provided for in article 130 of the criminal offence, if it is related to domestic violence;
10) found in the circumstances referred to in the criminal code, which excludes criminal liability.
378. article. Suspension and reinstatement of criminal proceedings (1) the criminal proceedings suspends the process, if you have made any procedural actions that may without the suspect or accused, and if: 1) the suspect or the accused was ill with the disease, which over a period of time is an obstacle for conducting a procedural action with that person's attendance, and is certified by the medical authorities issued no opinion;
2) a suspect or accused of hiding and not known his whereabouts;
3) the suspect or accused is unknown, but he is outside the territory of Latvia;
4) to the person who called the criminally, are criminal proceedings and immunity have been received for authorisation to the competent authorities to initiate prosecution;
5 other this law) is definitely appropriate.
(2) If criminal proceedings with several suspects or defendants in criminal proceedings shall be suspended for one or more of them, in the case of the other suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings may continue, while considering the question of the Criminal Division in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act.
(3) the criminal proceedings, if the suspension of criminal proceedings of the lost cause.
(4) The suspension of criminal proceedings, as well as on the renewal process of the promoters shall mark the criminal register.
379. article. Termination of criminal proceedings, releasing a person from criminal liability (1) the driver of the process may terminate criminal proceedings if: 1) committed a criminal offence that is criminal signs, but that is not the damage caused to the criminal penalties imposed;
2) a person who has committed a criminal offence or a less serious crime is izlīgus with the victim or his representative;
3) criminal offences committed a minor and is found in the criminal offence was committed, and the particular circumstances of minors get news that relaxes its responsibility.
(2) an investigator with the consent of the public prosecutor in the central or the Prosecutor may terminate the criminal proceedings and materials for minors to send educational nature, the application of coercive measures.
(3) the Prosecutor may terminate the criminal proceedings conditional relief from criminal responsibility.
(4) to terminate criminal proceedings on the basis of the compromise may not be if the news that a settlement has been reached as a result of threats or violence or other unlawful means.
(5) to terminate criminal proceedings, release the person from criminal responsibility, should not oppose it if the person who committed a criminal offence, or its representative.
380. article. The person does not reabilitējoš conditions a Person is rehabilitated, if criminal proceedings are terminated by a decision provided for in this law, the first paragraph of article 377 of 3, 4 and 5, article 379 of the first and second subparagraphs, the first subparagraph of article 410, 415, 419, article 605. in the first paragraph, the third subparagraph of article 661, as well as in the case of a judgment of conviction.
381. article. The implementation of the settlement (1) in the event of the compromise of the victim and the criminal offence committed person can contribute to national reconciliation of the probation service's trained mediator.
(2) the driver of the process, finding that in criminal proceedings the Court is possible and appropriate to involve the mediator, of being able to inform the national probation service.
(3) the Settlement indicates that it closed voluntarily, the parties understand its consequences and what are its conditions. Add the criminal settlement.
(4) at the hearing, the settlement may declare orally and record it in the minutes of the hearing.
(5) settlement signed by both parties, the victim and a person who committed a criminal offence, proceedings or proceedings the national probation service's trained intermediary presence, showing the signatures of the parties. The parties may submit the process driver also notarized settlement.
382. article. The procedures for carrying out procedural actions (1) criminal proceedings a report of the process and choices take procedural steps to ensure the achievement of the objective of criminal procedure as quickly as possible and more economical.
(2) If necessary and if required by the interests of criminal procedural act may be performed using technical means (s, videoconferencing) 140 of this law in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
383. article. Lost renewal of criminal proceedings (1) If a criminal case is lost, the public prosecutor or the Court shall decide on the renewal and, if necessary, it shall be made available before the investigating authority.
(2) Criminal material restored, either by making copies of relevant documents, if its possible to get, and carrying out the necessary procedural actions.
The seventh section of the pre-trial criminal procedure chapter 31. The pre-trial criminal procedure General provisions article 384. The pre-trial criminal procedure pre-trial criminal content, inquiry and prosecution should: 1) or a criminal offence has occurred;
2) person who called to criminal liability;
3) or the termination of the criminal proceedings is justified, complete or progress on the Court.
385. article. The pre-trial criminal procedure (1) the criminal proceedings over the driver chooses one of the pre-trial process types: 1) push to end criminal proceedings, a degree of relief from criminal responsibility;
2) to direct to the appropriate criminal proceedings, the Prosecutor's statement about it;
3) to push the urgency procedure in criminal proceedings;
4) push the criminal process in short order;
5) push the criminal process for the application of the agreement;
6) to carry out the investigation and prosecution of the General order.
(2) the designated driver of the process in the process type in the registry of criminal record when the further process differs from the general policy. If the process is in General, you do not have to specify it in the registry.
386. article. The pre-trial investigation authority pre-trial investigation within their competence: 1) national police;
2) security police;
3) financial police;
4) military police;
5) prison administration;
6) corruption prevention and combating Bureau;
7) Customs authorities;
the State border guard of 8);
9 tālbraucieno in the sea) masters of vessels;
10) in the foreign territory of the Latvian national armed forces Commander of the unit.
387. article. Institutional jurisdiction (1) the national police officials authorized to investigate any criminal offence, except in the second to the tenth part in certain cases.
(2) security police officials authorized to investigate criminal offences committed in the field of State security or public safety, or other criminal offences within their competence and, when asked to make investigations the Attorney General.

(3) the financial police notified officials investigating criminal offences in the area of revenue and the State revenue service officials and workers.
(4) military police notified officials investigate military service and military units or their location in committed criminal offences, as well as criminal offences committed by soldiers, militia, military units of the civilian workers in connection with the performance of their duties.
(5) the prison administration officials authorized to investigate criminal offences committed by detainees or inmates as well as prison administration staff in the prisons.
(6) the corruption prevention and combating Bureau authorized officials investigating criminal offences relating to political organizations (parties) associations for infringement of the provisions of the financing, as well as criminal offences the State institution service, if they are associated with corruption.
(7) the Customs authorities officials investigating a smuggling case.
(8) the State border guard officials authorised to investigate criminal offences related to the illegal border crossing, the illegal movement of persons across the State border or illegal stay in the country, as well as the national border guard officers committed criminal offences.
(9) the Tālbraucieno sea captains worked on ships of the Republic of Latvia to commit criminal offences.
(10) the foreign territory in the Latvian national armed forces Commander of the unit investigates criminal offences committed by soldiers or this unit in this unit's location (place of stay closed area), unless these offences does not investigate the foreign investigation authorities.
(11) certain criminal offences institutional jurisdiction of the Attorney General.
(12) If a particular criminal investigation has jurisdiction over one of the investigating authority, the investigating authority first launched criminal proceedings.
(13) If an investigative body receives information about an ongoing or a serious or very serious crime investigation which does not fall within its competence, but evidence for fixation of the offender for detention or necessary to carry out urgent investigative measures, it shall inform the criminal proceedings on the competent investigation authority concerned, take immediate action and the transfer of the investigation launched after the criminal jurisdiction.
(14) the investigation authorities of disputes on jurisdiction settle criminal offences the Attorney General.
388. article. The pre-trial criminal procedure territorial jurisdiction (1) pre-trial criminal proceedings take place in district (City) where the criminal offence was committed, or, if it is not possible to determine where it was detected or found, except in the cases provided for in this article.
(2) in order to ensure faster and more economical, the pre-trial criminal procedure can start and also do this where a criminal offence discovered or joined its consequences, as well as the place where the suspect, accused, victim or witness.
(3) the Prolonged or continue an offence where pre-trial criminal proceedings take place in district (City) where the offence is completed or terminated.
(4) if the offences are committed in several areas, the pre-trial criminal proceedings take place in district (City), where they are committed or of which the most harshest criminal offence, or the last of the prosecution of criminal offences.
(5) the investigation authority or a public prosecutor, who received the news of another district (the town of) crime, receive materials by jurisdiction without delay. If you need urgent action, the investigating authority initiate criminal proceedings, take immediate action and the transfer of the investigation launched after the criminal jurisdiction.
(6) the Attorney General or Chief within their competence, any criminal can be removed from one investigation or prosecution authorities and with the resolution in the form of a written order, put it in the other investigation or prosecution authority or from one of the public prosecutor or investigator shall transfer the Prosecutor or investigator, regardless of the crime.
(7) the dispute over territorial jurisdiction in pre-trial criminal proceedings within their competence settle Court Chief Prosecutor, District Criminal Department Chief or the Attorney General.
389. article. The period of pre-trial process (1) from the time of the pre-trial process is involved in the person who has the right to defence, or the person having the right to dispose of their property is limited by the procedural steps in the pre-trial process must be completed or cancelled all restrictions: 1) for the criminal offence — within six months;
2) for less serious crime — nine months;
3) for serious crimes — twelve months;
4) for a very serious crime — eighteen months.
(2) criminal proceedings for serious or very serious crime investigating judge in the first paragraph of this article, set the pre-trial process may be extended for a further six months but not more than three months in one extension, if the driver is not the process or the process delay made a faster completion was not possible for the special complexity.
390. article. The pre-trial criminal procedure (1) a merger of One of the records you can merge several criminal proceedings if: 1) committing criminal offences with great reliability refers to the association between them;
2) findings suggest that criminal offences committed by the same person;
3 contact the merger) a suspect, accused, their representative or counsel.
(2) records must be combined in criminal proceedings for the same or a related person, offences committed by having signs of organised crime.
(3) the decision on criminal proceedings into single records by promoters of the initiative process, adopt the district (municipal) Court or County Prosecutor, to combine criminal records.
391. article. The pre-trial criminal procedure split (1) criminal proceedings should be the driver Process releases separate records if: 1) the pre-trial process become aware of the other person committed a criminal offence, and it is not related to the criminal proceedings;
2) is not permitted in the pre-trial process in the identity of the person who committed the criminal offence.
(2) the Prosecutor may distribute separate records of criminal proceedings: 1) that the accused committed a criminal offence, but hiding and his whereabouts is unknown, or the accused's location is unknown, but he is outside the territory of Latvia and may not participate in the process;
2) juvenile defendants who committed criminal offences with minors;
3) accused take another possible criminal offence for which became known to the prosecution;
4) determine the person to whom the special procedural protection.
(3) the criminal proceedings the public prosecutor can be broken, even if a very large amount or in many episodes create obstacles for the preliminary criminal proceedings within a reasonable time.
(4) Of the Criminal Division of the driver of the process decides that at the same time be considered as well as the decision to initiate the course of new criminal proceedings. Date of adoption of the decision is the new date for the initiation of criminal proceedings.
(5) the decision of the Criminal Division of the process Guide: 1) of the Criminal Division and the new reason and the initiation of criminal proceedings;
2) personal data on the suspect or the accused (if known), in respect of which criminal proceedings are separated;
3 the nature of the accusation;)
4) qualification of the crime, if known;
5) security feature, the application date and time.
(6) the decision of the Criminal Division of the things added to the original or a copy of the material and their list.
(7) For the Criminal Division of the driver of the process shall notify the person who has the right to defence.
392. article. The pre-trial criminal procedure and termination of criminal prosecution (1) pre-trial criminal proceedings and prosecution process closes, if the promoters cleared the law referred to in article 377 of the circumstances.
(2) If a particular suspect or the accused's guilt of the crime to prove in the pre-trial process has failed and is not possible to collect further evidence, process Guide to decide on the termination of the criminal proceedings against that person, but the investigation continues.
(3) if there are several defendants, but the prosecution is terminated for one or some of them, in this part of the criminal proceedings are terminated and the Prosecutor takes a decision about it.
(4) If criminal proceedings are terminated in part, in respect of one or some of the defendants, the Prosecutor, if necessary, decide on the question of the Criminal Division.
(5) the decisions of the public prosecutor shall inform the accused and their victims, which caused damage to a specific criminal offence, and make the relevant entries in the register of criminal proceedings.

393. article. Termination of criminal proceedings and prosecution in the restoration (1) an authorised person procedural end criminal proceedings or against the person end the prosecution can restore, repeal the decision of termination, if found that its adoption did not have a legitimate basis, or if the open new conditions that were not known to the driver of the process at the time of adoption of the decision, and which is relevant to the decision making.
(2) the pre-trial criminal proceedings and prosecution can be restored, if not to the limitation of criminal liability.
394. article. Tasks in pre-trial criminal proceedings (1) the coroner and the public prosecutor may ask the individual procedural steps or tasks to carry out another investigation authority or the authorized officer to carry out criminal proceedings.
(2) the task makes writing, indicating the issues that must be clarified, making the investigation or other action. The task is added to the decision on the basis of which the investigation is to be carried out in the specified action, as determined by the law. If a task is given the same authority for investigation, it may be expressed orally.
(3) the task must be completed no later than 10 days from the date of arrival. If the task is not possible within that time limit, the bailiff shall notify the employer of a task, specifying the reason for the delay and the possible deadline.
395. article. The investigation group (1) If in criminal proceedings must take major work or it is particularly complex, the Prosecutor or the investigating authority supervisor shall take a decision on the criminal investigation group, indicating the specific person who will participate in the investigation and prosecution, and appointing the head of the investigation team of the criminal proceedings. This decision is not appealable.
(2) the decision taken is the entry in the criminal record.
(3) the investigation team leader organizes the work of the Group and take all the decisions for the progress of the criminal proceedings and the application of the security features, and the extension of the period of application.
396. article. The prohibition to disclose before trial in criminal proceedings (1) information acquired by News person involved in criminal proceedings, using their own procedural rights or the performance of their duties, the lawyer disclosed only with the permission of the promoters and the process she prescribed.
(2) the obligation not to disclose the resultant pre-trial process messages does not apply to the exchange of information between the suspect or the accused and his counsel.
32. chapter. 397. The investigation article. Initiation (1) after a decision on criminal proceedings, the process guide makes this statutory procedural steps until you see the person who called to criminal liability, and collected enough evidence in criminal proceedings the public prosecutor of the prosecution.
(2) If a person who committed a criminal offence is not established, the investigation shall be carried out until there was a limitation of criminal proceedings or other circumstances is cleared, which, in accordance with the provisions of this law do not allow criminal proceedings.
398. article. Criminal investigation of the role of the qualification (1) criminal proceedings regarding the action of the opening, you can qualify for membership only to the Group of criminal offences.
(2) When sufficient evidence is obtained, the offence for which the inquiry was opened after a specific classified criminal law and criminal procedure of article in the register shall mention.
(3) a Person may be declared suspects, as well as it security feature to apply only from the time of the offence may qualify by a particular criminal law article.
399. article. On the tālbraucieno of the pre-trial process for existing marine vessels or foreign territory in the Latvian national armed forces unit (1) on the tālbraucieno Investigation of sea vessels out of the vessel, but the foreign territory of the Latvian national armed forces unit — this unit commander in order prescribed by law and timeless until the criminal proceedings of material can be transferred to the Republic of Latvia to the competent investigation authority or the Prosecutor's Office.
(2) If the need arises to apply procedural coercive measures or make enquiries to be carried out only on the basis of the investigation, the judge's decision, the master of the vessel or the unit commander may initiate and receive such decisions through technical means of communication.
400. article. Suspension of criminal proceedings (1) If criminal proceedings in the investigation of the criminal offence or the less serious crime committed person failed to find out the time limit of two months from the date of initiation of criminal proceedings, investigators with the consent of the Supervisory prosecutors to decide the question of the suspension of criminal proceedings.
(2) Before the first suspension of criminal proceedings referred to mandatory enforceable measures of procedural and investigative minimum amount according to the classification of criminal offences prescribed by the Attorney General.
(3) if the supervisory Prosecutor establishes that the criminal proceedings in compliance with all the requirements of a particular Attorney General criminal investigation, criminal proceedings stop the process until it can be established, the guilty person or advocate criminal liability limitation. After the suspension of criminal proceedings, investigation activities may be carried out only when it is restored.
(4) the decision on the suspension of criminal proceedings criminal proceedings in the register of marks and news about crime in the Ministry of the Interior.
401. article. The completion of the investigation (1) the coroner completes investigations: 1) written by proposing the initiation of prosecutions in criminal matters and the transfer of materials the Prosecutor;
2) transfer of criminal prosecution of materials the Prosecutor to start after his initiative;
3) when the decision on the termination of the criminal proceedings.
(2) the coroner shall state: Proposal 1) criminal offence;
2) criminal qualification;
3) criminally called persons name, surname, personal code and residence;
4) evidence.
(3) If criminal proceedings are terminated due to circumstances which, found in criminal investigations or criminal proceedings to terminate provides the basis, relieving a person from criminal liability, process guide shall immediately notify the supervisory Prosecutor and stakeholders, explaining their rights to get acquainted with the materials of the criminal proceedings.
Chapter 33. Prosecution article 402. The basis for the prosecution of the person criminally public prosecution process prosecution process the public person criminally liable if called the investigation collected evidence points to this person's guilt in the offence under investigation, and the Prosecutor is convinced that the evidence confirms this.
403. article. The prosecution started criminal prosecution (1) Prosecutor: driver of the process may be initiated: 1) If you receive a proposal for the prosecution investigators launch;
2) on its own initiative, except in criminal proceedings from the coroner's records.
(2) the Prosecutor initiates criminal prosecution when deciding on prosecution of persons criminally liable, within 10 days after receipt of the materials of the criminal investigation authorities.
(3) the Prosecutor, does not see a basis for a prosecution of the person criminally liable, do one of the following: 1) criminal investigation authority shall return the continuation of the investigation, indicate in writing on the need to take certain procedural steps;
2) shall decide on the termination of the criminal proceedings against the person concerned and sent to the criminal investigation authority of the convicted person;
3) shall decide on the termination of criminal proceedings, finding this law specified in article 379.
(4) On the adoption of a criminal procedure records the Prosecutor made a check of criminal records.
404. article. Procedural immunity for initiating the Process of prosecution proceedings, if this law is not otherwise specified, see the Foundation be held criminally liable person with legal immunity in criminal proceedings, shall apply to the competent institution with the suggestion to allow the prosecution of that person. Proposal added to the draft decision on the prosecution of the person criminally liable (criminal charges), in addition to 405 of this Act specified in article cite evidence to support the allegations.
405. article. Decision on the prosecution of the person criminally liable (Prosecutor) (1) the decision on prosecution of persons criminally liable (the Prosecutor) Prosecutor: 1) criminally called persons name, surname, personal code, place of residence and jobs announced;
2) each of the impugned Criminal factual circumstances that establish the legal qualifications;
3) criminal legal qualifications;
4) persons who suffered as a result of a crime;
5) other persons who are criminally liable for the participation of known or membership in the same criminal offence.
(2) if the offences are committed within the communion, ideally under the first paragraph of this article shall indicate the total of all such communion in the prosecution of criminal offences.
(3) the decision on the prosecution of the person criminally liable may not be appealed.
406. article. The prosecution service

(1) after a decision on prosecution of persons criminally liable, the Prosecutor immediately: 1) shall issue a copy of the indictment, the accused made sure of his identity, and explain the nature of the accusation;
2) issued by the accused in writing information on the rights of the accused;
3) provides the possibility to call on counsel for the accused, if it is not already a guest;
4), whether the accused is a defender, or have reason to ask the assistance of counsel on public expense, or the participation of a defence counsel is mandatory.
5) whether the accused's request, whether he wishes to give evidence, or he has a proposal for the agreement on the application of the process.
(2) that the defendant has received a copy of the indictment and written information about their rights, signing up to the decision on the prosecution of criminal liability, and specify a date.
(3) If the accused refuses to sign the record of the decision, the Prosecutor, indicating the date on which the accused was issued a copy of the indictment and written information about their rights.
(4) if the issue of a copy of the indictment to the accused is present at the time the defender and representative, they subscribe to the decision on the prosecution of the person criminally liable.
(5) If the accused for good reason can not attend to the Prosecutor, a copy of the indictment and written information about the accused's right to a public prosecutor may, by mutual agreement, put the accused to his defence counsel, or vanity, among the representatives with the assistance of the courier or sent by mail to his receipt of the notified shipment address.
(6) If the accused's location is unknown, but he avoided to come after the Prosecutor's invitation, a copy of the indictment the accused be released on his arrival or a forced to be sent by mail to his receipt of the notified shipment address.
(7) If the accused opened the search, the copy of the indictment and written information on the rights of the accused to be released immediately after the receipt of the written notification of the detention or arrest of the accused.
(8) the accused who does not understand the language in which the written complaint, provide a translation of the charge against him, in plain language.
(9) If the accused hiding in another country and has opened his search, the copy of the indictment is issued with an official extradition request for notification.
407. article. Interrogation of the accused the Prosecutor accused questioning can immediately after the issue of a copy of the indictment to him or, if the accused asked for time to prepare his defence, mutually agreed in a reasonable period of time.
408. article. The amendment of the indictment (1) If, after the Public Prosecutor issued a decision on the accused in his prosecution of criminal liability, additional evidence and as a result it is necessary to amend decision, Prosecutor writes a new decision on the prosecution of the person criminally liable and its copy shall be issued by the accused.
(2) if the indictment has not been confirmed on any of the criminal offences for which a person is criminally liable, prosecutors called the decision terminating the prosecution in this part of the decision and immediately send a copy of the person against whom the criminal prosecution ended.
409. article. In search of the accused (1) stopping the criminal proceedings in accordance with this law, the first paragraph of article 33 paragraph 2, the Prosecutor shall immediately take a decision on the accused. If necessary, the public prosecutor may decide on the imposition of the accused or an amendment thereto.
(2) a copy of the decision of the accused, as well as search the decision on the imposition or amendment of the prosecutor sends a fulfillment of the national police.
410. article. Termination of criminal proceedings against the person who significantly helped reveal a serious or very serious crime (1) the Attorney General may, by decision, terminate the criminal proceedings against the person who significantly helped reveal a serious or very serious crime that are heavier or more dangerous than the person's own committed a criminal offence.
(2) the provisions of this article shall not apply to the person who is called a criminally liable for very serious criminal offence.
411. article. The completion of the pre-trial criminal proceedings the public prosecutor the pre-trial criminal procedure forms can be completed: 1) deciding on the transfer of criminal proceedings and the transfer of the Court to the Court after jurisdiction in criminal cases;
2) when deciding on the transfer of criminal proceedings the court order of immediacy;
3) when deciding on the transfer of criminal proceedings the Court shortened the process order;
4) closing agreement with the accused and the transfer of the Criminal Court;
5) application of the accused on the statement;
termination of criminal proceedings, 6) conditional relief from criminal responsibility;
7) in deciding on the termination of criminal proceedings;
8) the decision of the Criminal Court and the transfer of medical or educational nature coercive.
412. article. The completion of the pre-trial criminal procedure, transfer of the case to the Court (1) Prosecutor, said evidence sufficient to sustain the charge in court, the Criminal Court shall be drawn up and the archive to the file list.
(2) a candidate for the Court in the criminal proceedings the Prosecutor include materials pertaining to a specific criminal offence and will be used in court as evidence, but not proof, of the materials included in the archive file.
(3) upon completion of process, the Prosecutor, the accused or his counsel: 1) issued by the Criminal Court for copies of materials, if they have not already been issued;
2) issued by the materials in the archive list.
3) depending on the quantity of the material and the pre-trial investigation deadlines lays down the final date for lodging applications;
4) that the defendant's closing in the submission of applications should be submitted to the Prosecutor information on whether he requires the examination of case collegiate court or even the defenders of the hearing, who, after the Defense's view, would be called to the hearing and whether the accused agrees to the possibility that criminal charges or independent of the Court without proof.
(4) If the accused, but also in cases of compulsory defence his defender and agent, agrees to the possibility that criminal charges or independent of the Court without proof of the checks, the Prosecutor on the article of the Protocol, showing whether the accused consented to the establishment of evidence throughout the indictment or any particular part thereof, as well as explaining the accused such consent and consequences of a procedural nature.
(5) the victim upon the application of the Prosecutor shall issue a copy of the case file relating to an offence where a person recognised as a victim in criminal proceedings, and shall set a reasonable final deadline for submitting applications.
(6) Tiesmedicīnisk, judicial psychiatric and judicial psychological examination a copy of the opinion was not issued, but provides the opportunity to become acquainted with them. From the above findings can copy this Act 203. the second paragraph of article 1.-5 and 9-10. the information specified in points.
(7) when you receive copies of materials of criminal proceedings, the accused has the right to use an interpreter free of charge.
(8) the final application the Prosecutor must be considered within three working days from the date of the application and shall communicate its decision to the applicant.
(9) in the case of process meet promoters make appropriate procedural actions. After these steps the accused or his counsel shall be issued in addition to the materials obtained and determine how long they are able to become acquainted with them.
(10) after the closing of the application submission period expiration or closing meeting or rejecting the application the Prosecutor shall decide on the transfer of Criminal Court.
413. article. Decision on transfer of Criminal Court (1) the decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings the public prosecutor to the Court: 1) the particulars of the accused person;
2) for committing the crime the person is accused and the case transferred to the Court of Justice;
3) qualifications of the crime;
4 of the crime) the time, place and type.
5 the testimony of the accused person);
6 the evidence used in court);
7) appropriate security measure and its expiry date;
8) victims and the amount of the refund;
9 for the attachment of property);
10) accused of aggravating and attenuating circumstances;
11) number of pages of criminal proceedings.
(2) the decision shall be accompanied by evidence and document list and the list of persons who, after the prosecution and the defense, called to the hearing. The person called to the court addresses only the list forwarded to the Court.
(3) the decision together with the Criminal Prosecutor shall immediately forward to the Court.
(4) for making the decision and Criminal Court Prosecutor of dispatch shall inform the accused and the victims or their representatives, sending them a copy of the decision and information about their rights and responsibilities, as well as the Court, which court criminal case sent. The accused who does not understand the language of the country in which the written decision, the Prosecutor shall ensure translation of his writing in plain language.
(5) the decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings the Court is not appealable.
414. article. The decision on the termination of criminal proceedings

(1) If the pre-trial process is found in circumstances that do not allow criminal proceedings or may be based on the person's release from criminal responsibility, or if there is no proven accusations and it is not possible to collect further evidence, process guide takes the decision on the termination of criminal proceedings or of part of it.
(2) the descriptive part of the decision shall specify: 1) the basis for the initiation of criminal proceedings;
2) details of the suspect or accused person;
3) when and at what criminal offence brought and issued the indictment or the person is suspected;
4) appropriate security measure;
5) or before this decision was taken against any of the defendants or suspects criminal proceedings were terminated in any part of it.
(3) the decision shall state the grounds of the criminal part of the grounds for termination and base.
(4) in the operative part of the decision shall specify: 1) decision on the termination of criminal proceedings, or any part of it;
2) security features;
3 abolition of the property seizure);
4) action to remove objects and values;
5) appeals against decisions.
(5) a copy of the decision shall be issued or the person against whom criminal proceedings had been launched or who was the suspect, the accused, the victim or his representative, as well as the person or authority on which the application was launched criminal proceedings.
(6) If criminal proceedings are terminated, but a criminal case materials contain particulars of the facts, due to which the person would be subject to disciplinary means or influencing administrative penalty, the driver sends the process required materials to the competent institution or official.
34. chapter. The characteristics of the pre-trial process, terminating criminal proceedings conditional relief from criminal responsibility, article 415. Termination of criminal proceedings, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility (1) if the Prosecutor, having regard to the nature of the crime and injury data, raksturojošo, and other circumstances of the case, is the belief that the accused do not commit criminal offences, the public prosecutor can terminate criminal proceedings conditional relief from criminal responsibility.
(2) in order to obtain personal data representative of the public prosecutor may request the national probation service's evaluation report.
(3) termination of the criminal proceedings, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility, permissible only if: 1 the person accused of a criminal offence) or a less serious crime;
2 the person has not penalized) for an intentional criminal offence;
3) against a person in the last five years, criminal proceedings are terminated, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility;
4) such termination of the process agree to post higher prosecutor and made their mark on the criminal register.
(4) the termination of the criminal proceedings may only be made with the accused's voluntary and explicit consent.
(5) termination of criminal proceedings, conditional relief from criminal responsibility, the Prosecutor determined trial period from three to eighteen months.
(6) termination of criminal proceedings, a degree of relief from criminal responsibility, the public prosecutor may impose on the accused the obligation: 1) apologize to the victim;
2) deadline to prevent injury;
3) not to change the place of residence without the consent of the State Probation Service;
4) periodically register the national probation service and to participate in probation programmes;
5) refrain from a certain action or occupation;
6) treatment of alcohol, drugs, psychotropic substances, toxic or other dependencies.
416. article. Decision on termination of the criminal proceedings, relatively free from criminal responsibility in the decision, the termination of the criminal proceedings conditional relief from criminal responsibility, the Prosecutor shall specify: 1) for committing a criminal offence the accused person;
2 the termination of criminal proceedings);
3) probation;
4 the accused person) obligations imposed;
5) body tasked to monitor the behaviour of the person concerned;
6) appropriate security features.
417. article. Presentation of the decision and the materials of the criminal proceedings (1) the Person in respect of whom criminal proceedings are terminated, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility, shall issue a copy of the decision, explain the consequences of the termination of the criminal proceedings is the following. The person with signature certifies that agrees with the qualifications of the crime and voluntarily undertake to fulfil the obligations referred to in the decision.
(2) the Prosecutor shall transmit the decision to the victim, the termination of the criminal proceedings conditional relief from criminal responsibility, and communicate about their rights to get acquainted with the materials of the criminal case and the appeal against the decision.
(3) the decision shall enter into force if, within 10 days from the date of receipt of the notification the victim has not appealed or his complaint rejected.
418. article. The consequences of the termination of the criminal proceedings, the conditional relief from criminal liability (1) the decision on the termination of criminal proceedings in full shall apply after the expiry of the trial period and the performance of obligations.
(2) If a person performs duties and checks assigned to not make a new intentional criminal offence, criminal proceedings shall be deemed to have terminated it, and for the same offence against the person can not be restored, except specifically provided in this Act.
(3) the criminal proceedings for the same offence in respect of the person against whom it was terminated, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility, can be restored only in the following cases: 1) a person has failed to comply with the obligations placed upon it;
2) during the test person committed a new criminal offence of intentional;
3) Prosecutor made the decision of a conflict of interest situation;
4) person with illegal activity affected liecinoš persons to give false testimony or otherwise tampered with evidence;
5) open new conditions that the Prosecutor was not known at the time of adoption of the decision, which confirms that the person actually committing a serious or particularly serious crime that this ignorance of circumstances results in incorrect categorisation as a criminal offence or a less serious crime.
(4) If a decision after the conditions come into force fully and the criminal is not restored in the second part, in the cases provided for in this Act does not create a criminal offence atkārtotīb. Information on termination of the criminal proceedings, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility, saves the Interior Ministry's information center.
419. article. Supervision over criminal proceedings conditional relief from criminal liability (1) the Prosecutor who took the decision on the termination of criminal proceedings, the conditional relief from criminal responsibility, after checking, on the basis of personal behavior, control the information provided by the institution, shall make a decision in about conditions and the entry into force of the decision in full.
(2) If found this law 418 article conditions referred to in the third subparagraph, the public prosecutor, restore the decision repealed the criminal and moves it to the General procedure.
35. chapter. Pre-trial criminal characteristics, the application of the Prosecutor's statement on the fine article 420. The Prosecutor's statement, the admissibility of the application of sanctions (1) If a person has committed a criminal offence or a less serious crime and the Prosecutor, having regard to the nature of the crime and damage, person representative data, and other circumstances of the case, is the belief that this person should not be applied with a custodial penalty, but it cannot be left unpunished, he may terminate criminal proceedings by drawing up a statement of the punishment.
(2) in order to obtain personal data representative of the public prosecutor may request the national probation service's evaluation report.
(3) if one person committed a number of criminal offences, a statement of the punishment may only be imposed on all its criminal acts.
(4) If one of the criminal offences of the accused person, statement, more sanctions may be applied to the person to whom such application is possible under this law.
(5) the Prosecutor shall draw up a statement of the sentence if the accused admits his guilt, is compensated for injury caused to the victim and the termination of criminal proceedings, agree to the application of his punishment.
421. article. The Prosecutor's statement as punishment (1) if the Prosecutor has determined that the criminal proceedings may be terminated, in determining the penalty for the person, he shall draw up the Prosecutor's statement about the penalty, including the decision on termination of the criminal proceedings and in the operative part indicates the fine and the deadline.
(2) the Prosecutor in his statement on sentencing the accused person may apply fines or forced labour, but no more than half of the maximum fine provided for in the criminal code or the duration of the work.
(3) the Prosecutor may apply to the additional penalty of disqualification also, but not more than half of the maximum additional penalty in criminal law provided for the duration of this.
422. article. Presentation of the materials of criminal proceedings (1) the Person against whom criminal proceedings are terminated with the Prosecutor's statement, issued this statement about the punishment and criminal copies of materials, explaining the consequences of the termination of the criminal proceedings. The signature of the person that agrees with the criminal qualification and undertake to comply with the set statement. The accused to express their agreement immediately or within five working days from the date of receipt of the copy.

(2) the driver of the process sends a victim statement on penalty copy and notifies you about his right to get acquainted with materials of criminal proceedings and the appeal against the decision within 10 days after the date of receipt of the notification.
423. article. The Prosecutor's statement on the effects of (1) If a person willingly given period following the Prosecutor's statement, set fines, criminal proceedings against them is terminated. The person shall be punished, if not for a period of one year from the date of its execution without making a new criminal offence.
(2) If a person has consented to a statement about the punishment, but it fails on the execution of the responsible authority in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act proposes the question about the replacement of the fine provided for in the law.
36. chapter. Pre-trial criminal characteristics, the arrangements for applying the immediacy 424. article. Immediacy in the application of the admissibility of the launching process of the inquiry, the promoters can apply the urgency procedure if: 1) identify the person who committed a criminal offence, as it surprised a criminal offence at the time or immediately after it;
2 the person has committed a criminal offence), a serious or less serious crime;
3) investigation conferred the order of immediacy to the extent possible to complete within three working days.
425. article. The progress of the investigation procedures in the immediacy of (1) the driver of the process after it launched the investigation procedure in immediacy: 1) find out the circumstances of the crime;
2) identify crime victims;
3) inquire with the crime damages nature and amount;
4) if necessary, make the event site or other investigative activities;
5) identify witnesses of the event;
6) witnesses and possible perpetrators of the survey;
7) all recorded in one protocol found;
8) shall take a decision on the recognition of the person as suspect;
9) if necessary, the suspect detained or apply security to him;
10) find other circumstances having a role in the matter.
(2) within three working days of the initiation of the process of transforming things a cover letter submit materials of the Central Prosecutor and made their mark on the criminal register.
426. article. The Prosecutor's actions before the Court of Justice in criminal proceedings the immediacy of the order (1) the Prosecutor within two working days after the receipt of the material to decide on the continuation of the proceedings the immediacy.
(2) if the public prosecutor does not agree with the process, since the immediacy finds conditions that do not allow it, or believes that not collected sufficient evidence to suspect guilt could be proved in court, he shall return the materials to the continuation of criminal proceedings the investigating authority in General.
(3) if the Prosecutor agrees with the immediacy of the process in order, he shall decide on the transfer of Criminal Court.
427. article. Decision on transfer of Criminal Court routines in the immediacy (1) the decision on the transfer of Criminal Court routines in the immediacy of the Prosecutor: 1), on which the offence occurs in criminal proceedings (name, surname, personal code, place of residence and jobs announced);
2) for committing the crime the person is indicted and transferred to the Court of Justice;
3) qualifications of the crime;
4 the evidence used in court);
5) accused of aggravating and attenuating circumstances;
6 security feature applied);
7) victims and the amount of the refund;
8) trial of time and place.
(2) at the time of the hearing the Prosecutor determines, in coordination with the Court, but the time to trial may not be less than three and not more than 10darb days from the date of the accused a copy of the decision is issued.
(3) the decision shall be accompanied by evidence and document list and the list of persons who, after the prosecution and the defense, called to the hearing. While the prosecutor sends the invitation to the hearing all izsaucamaj parties.
(4) the decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings to the Court at the same time be considered as well as the decision on the prosecution of the person criminally liable.
(5) a copy of the decision together with a copy of the case file shall be issued without delay to the accused. A copy of the decision will be a victim.
(6) a copy of the decision of the Prosecutor and criminal decisions taken in the materials are sent to the Court.
(7) the decision of the Criminal Court of the immediacy of the transfer order is not appealable.
37. chapter. Pre-trial criminal process particularities of short article 428. The admissibility of the application process shortened process guide can make the short investigation process, if: 1) is the person who committed a criminal offence;
2) can complete the investigation within 10 days.
429. article. The abbreviated process investigation order (1) the driver of the process after the initiation of the investigation: 1) find out the circumstances of the crime;
2) identify crime victims;
3) inquire with the crime damages nature and amount;
4) made the necessary investigative actions;
5) decide on the recognition of the person as suspect;
6) if necessary, the suspect detained or apply security to him;
7) find other circumstances having a role in the matter.
(2) within ten days from the date of initiation of the proceedings shall provide the Prosecutor submitted the materials of the case with the proposal for the commencement of a prosecution.
(3) the suggestion process guide provides a brief description of the offence under investigation, their skills and indicate possible perpetrators.
430. article. The Prosecutor's actions before the short process (1) if the public prosecutor does not consent to process the short order because the process finds conditions that do not allow it, or believes that not collected sufficient evidence to suspect could bring charges and prove it in court, he shall return the materials to the continuation of criminal proceedings the investigating authority in General.
(2) If the Prosecutor agrees to process abbreviated process in order, he shall decide on the transfer of Criminal Court.
(3) the public prosecutor's decision should be taken and criminal proceedings should be sent to the Court during the trading.
431. article. Decision on transfer of Criminal Court routines in the short process (1) the decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings the Court shortened the process order of the Prosecutor: 1), on which the offence occurs in criminal proceedings (first name, surname and personal code);
2) for committing the crime the person is indicted and transferred to the Court of Justice;
3) qualifications of the crime;
4 the evidence used in court);
5 security feature applied);
6 for the attachment of property);
7) accused of aggravating and attenuating circumstances;
8) particulars of the accused person.
(2) the decision shall be accompanied by evidence and document list and the list of persons who, after the prosecution and the defense, called to the hearing.
(3) the decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings to the Court at the same time be considered as well as the decision on the prosecution of the person criminally liable and is not appealable.
432. article. Introduction to file abbreviated procedure (1) the decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings the Court shortened the process order copy, together with copies of the documents issued to the accused. A copy of the decision will be a victim.
(2) within three working days of receipt of the copy of the decision to the accused and the victim may submit final applications.
(3) after the closing date for the submission of applications and the application made of the Prosecutor and the Registrar's decision of the Criminal Court of the materials are sent.
38. chapter. The application of the agreement in the pre-trial criminal procedure article 433. The basis for the application of the agreement (1) on its own public prosecutor, the accused and his defence initiatives may conclude an agreement on the recognition of guilt and punishment, if you see the circumstances relating to the subject of proof, and the accused agree to him the impugned offence, qualifications for the assessment of damages and application of the process.
(2) the agreement in the process cannot be applied unless there are several accused in criminal proceedings and the agreement on the recognition of guilt and punishment may not be applied to all defendants.
434. article. Negotiations on the conclusion of the agreement (1) if the public prosecutor, to travel or to continue the prosecution recognised as possible in the process of concluding agreements, he performs the following steps: 1) explains the accused and the accused minor's representative the opportunity to realign criminal relations by concluding the agreement, the rights of the accused, conclude agreements and its consequences;
2) inform victims of their rights to express their views on the possible application of the process arrangement.
(2) received the accused and representatives of the accused minors consent to conclude the agreement, the Prosecutor shall prepare the draft agreement and started negotiations with the defendant, his counsel and the accused minor representative on the agreement.
(3) If the accused and the accused minor's representative agrees to the indictment and issued to get up, the qualifications of the crime and injury assessment, begin negotiations for the type and the amount of the fine, which the Prosecutor will ask the Court to order the.

435. article. The agreement of the accused the right to process the accused agreed process has the right to: 1) agree or disagree with the conclusion of the agreement;
2) to sign up for rejection;
3) put his proposal on the type and the amount of the fine;
4) receive copies of materials of the criminal case after the conclusion of the agreement;
5) know of someone committing a criminal offence, he will be charged in court and a penalty and the Mayor will ask the Prosecutor of the court order;
6 participate in the consideration of the arrangement) courts;
7) provide explanations of the agreement;
8) to withdraw from agreements made by the time the Court go to the Conference room to make the ruling;
9) appeal to the ruling;
10) familiarize yourself with the minutes of the hearing;
11) to receive legal aid counsel.
436. article. Victim's rights agreement process (1) If criminal proceedings are continuing as the agreement process, process guide — the Prosecutor issued a memorandum to the victim.
(2) a victim has the right to: 1) sign up for rejection;
2) timely receive information about when and where the Court will examine the agreement;
3 in the consideration of the arrangement) to participate in a court;
4) to express their objections to the approval of the arrangement;
5) to submit the agreed process, procedure, or criminal law norm violations;
6) to participate in the proceedings before the Court of cassation instance court in article 101 of this law.
437. article. Protocol to the agreement (1) the Protocol of Agreement: 1) venue and date;
2) procedural actions reviewer's position, name and last name;
3 the accused, the accused) – – representatives of the minor's given name, surname, personal code, but, if not, — birth year and date, as well as the champion's name and place of practice;
4) of the crime site, time and a brief description of it;
5) criminal qualification;
6) with criminal damages and agreement on it;
7) accused the mitigating and aggravating circumstances;
8) particulars of the accused person;
9) fine, a public prosecutor will request the Court to order the.
(2) If the accused committed several criminal offences, the Prosecutor indicated the punishment he will request an order for each of the offences and the final penalty. This provision also to be followed in cases where the accused is determined by a number of fine judgments.
(3) the Agreement signed by the accused, the accused's counsel – – minor's representative, and the Prosecutor, and a copy thereof issued to the accused or his representative.
438. article. The Criminal Court to send (1) a prosecutor after the conclusion of the agreement in criminal matters agreement together with the Protocol sent to the Court by suggesting it to approve the conclusion of the agreement.
(2) the Court Prosecutor: Proposal 1) informed on conclusion of the agreement;
2) informed the accused of the applied safety feature;
3 min) evidence that confirms the criminal offence and the guilt of the accused;
4) indicates the crime damages and agreement on it;
5) inform the pre-trial process;
6 min trace evidence) their location and means used in the compensation and the possible confiscation of property;
7 the Court approve the conclusion) agreement and order the penalty provided for therein.
(3) the Prosecutor shall notify the accused, his counsel, victims and their representatives as to which court the case sent.
(4) after sending all requests to the Court and complaints should be sent directly to the Court.
39. chapter. Pre-trial criminal characteristics, application of compulsory means of influencing legal person article 439. Criminal procedure (1) where in the course of criminal procedure is established that natural person, acting either individually or as a legal person concerned collegiate member of the institution, on the basis of the right of representation of the legal person, to act on its behalf or make decisions on behalf of the legal person or the implementation of the control within the legal person, or as a legal person, is made a criminal offence in the interest of the legal person, the driver of the process can take a reasoned decision on the that starts the process of forced application of legal means of influence.
(2) the process of forced features influence the application of the legal person being criminal proceedings, during which the suspect is recognized or criminally is referred to under the first paragraph of this article of the natural person.
(3) launching a process of forced application of the means of influencing the process notifies the driver of the entity concerned, by sending a copy of the decision and shall be informed of the rights and obligations of the representative.
440. article. In pre-trial criminal proceedings applied to the pre-trial process in conditions of forced application of legal means of influencing the person find out: 1) of the crime;
2) natural persons legal entities the status of institutions;
3) legal persons actual action;
4) legal persons the nature of the activities carried out and the resulting consequences;
5) legal persons, the measures taken to avoid committing a criminal offence;
6) legal persons size, occupation, and financial position.
441. article. The pre-trial criminal procedure completion upon completion of pre-trial proceedings and deciding on the transfer of criminal proceedings, the public prosecutor to the Court in addition to the General requirements specified in pre-trial process should in this Act referred to in article 440 of the conditions and basis of forced application of legal means of influence.
Proceedings of the eighth section of the General provisions chapter 40. The criminal jurisdiction of the Court of Justice Article 442. Instance proceedings in criminal matters (1), district (City) Court hears all criminal cases as Court of first instance, except for the District Court jurisdiction.
(2) the District Court as the Court of first instance has jurisdiction in criminal proceedings for crimes against humanity, peace, criminal cases of war crimes, genocide, crimes against the State and for such serious and particularly serious crimes provided for in the criminal law and in article 117.118, article 153 in the second and third subparagraphs, and article 154, 176 in the fourth paragraph of article, the third paragraph of article 177, the third paragraph of article 179, 183 in the second paragraph of article 184. Article, article 190, 190.1 of the fourth paragraph of article in the second and third part 192, 224 and 225. Article, third paragraph article 251 article 252, third paragraph, article 257 article 253.1, second paragraph, in the second paragraph of article 258, 268. Article 320 article 321 of the third part, the second part of the article, in the second paragraph of article 322, 323, in the second paragraph of article 348.349, all in article and criminal cases, which made special liecinoš person procedural protection measures as well as all criminal offences against morals and dzimumneaizskaramīb, if they are committed by the juvenile or the juvenile.
(3) the District Court as the Court of first instance may consider things also for other criminal offences which it considers necessary for the proceedings to take your case to the legal complexity or for security reasons.
(4) the appeal of order under appeal of district (City) Court ruling district court appearance as an appeal court, but the District Court as the Court of first instance, the Supreme Court's Criminal Chamber of the Court of appeal.
(5) the appeal in cassation appeal any court ruling the Supreme Court examined the Senate as a Court of Cassation.
443. article. Criminal jurisdiction at the place of the crime (1) Criminal Court whose activity a criminal offence committed in the area.
(2) If the place of the crime cannot be identified, criminal jurisdiction is the Court in whose district the finished the pre-trial process.
(3) the Prolonged or continue an offence in criminal cases the Court has jurisdiction, which actions the District criminal offence finished or terminated.
(4) in order to ensure that the criminal proceedings as soon as possible, in some cases, it may consider: 1) after the detection of the criminal offence;
2) after the occurrence of the consequences of the crime;
3 the accused or witness) at most locations.
444. article. Action with another court of criminal jurisdiction (1) if the Court of Justice to the Court of the initiation of the investigation, finds that a criminal has jurisdiction to another court, the criminal shall be surrendered to the Court after jurisdiction concerned.
(2) If the criminal jurisdiction of another court court the Court finds, in the course of the investigation it continues its process.
445. article. The Court of criminal jurisdiction of another court (1) the Court of justice until the beginning of the investigation, the Court may propose to the criminal jurisdiction to pass it to another court if: 1) transfer of criminal proceedings, its faster;
2) two or more single-level courts have criminal cases for one and the same person committed criminal offences.
(2) the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 in the case referred to in the court proceedings is criminal for easier transfer of criminal offence, the criminal court proceedings are criminal for more serious criminal offences.

(3) the question of the transfer of criminal cases from one court to another court decides one level of Justice. The decision shall be taken in the form of a resolution.
446. article. Jurisdiction dispute not permissible (1), a transfer from one court to another court in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act, this Court must accept.
(2) jurisdiction in disputes between the courts is not permitted.
41. chapter. The composition of the Court, article 447. Criminal cases solely and collegiate (1) the Court of first instance criminal proceedings are dealt with by a sole judge, except in the second and third subparagraphs above.
(2) the Court of first instance judge and two lay assessors in the collegiate-looking for: 1 criminal) the very serious crime;
2) serious crime, if the public prosecutor, the accused or his counsel in writing requires criminal collegiate.
(3) the Court of first instance, the judge can impose things collegiate examination even if a criminal case is particularly complex.
(4) the appeal and cassation in criminal court on a collegial basis.
448. article. The question the Court Registrar (1) the questions that arise when considering the case of collegiate, the Court decides by majority vote.
(2) a judge, lay judge and deciding issues related to criminal proceedings, have the same rights.
(3) none of the composition of the Court is not entitled to refrain from voting.
42. chapter. The criminal trial, the General provisions of article 449. The criminal trial of the directness and mutiskum (1), the Court of first instance examined the evidence directly.
(2) the hearing of persons giving evidence orally.
(3) the written evidence and other documents at the hearing read or play, except when the person implementing the defence, the Prosecutor and the victim or his representative agrees that this proof read or play is not necessary.
(4) if the request is reasonable, the Court shall decide on the evidence.
(5) verification of evidence during the hearing of the case would not take place only in the cases stipulated by law and order.
450. article. The criminal trial of openness (1) the criminal hearing in open court.
(2) a criminal matter in a closed hearing, if necessary to protect the public or secret adoptions.
(3) a reasoned decision the Court may determine the closed hearing: 1) the criminal proceedings of an offence committed by the age of sixteen years is not reached;
2) in criminal matters on criminal offences against morals and dzimumneaizskaramīb;
3) to prevent disclosing criminal involved in the life of intīmo conditions;
4) in order to protect trade secret or trade secrets;
5) to ensure the protection of persons involved in criminal proceedings.
(4) in a closed hearing, the persons involved in the criminal proceedings participate.
(5) a court ruling declaring publicly. In criminal matters, which are tried in closed hearing, publicly declare the introductory part of the judgments and the operative part, but then closed the hearing — a theme and descriptive part.
451. article. The right to get acquainted with the materials of the case the accused, his counsel, the Prosecutor, the victim and his/her representative may be acquainted with materials of criminal case for extra added as it is received, the Court will draw from those statements, transcripts and ask to make the required copies of the materials of the case, except for the cases provided by law, but there is an objective need to be acquainted with all the materials of the criminal case and ask to make the required copies of the file.
452. article. Court composition consistency (1) hearing the criminal proceedings take place in constant judges.
(2) If in the course of the hearing of criminal cases from judges replaced by another judge, criminal trial started again.
453. article. Reserve judge and reserve lay judge (1) criminal proceedings, which requires a longer time, you can participate in both the reserve and the reserve lay judge in the hearing of the Court Chamber. About the mark of the minutes of the hearing.
(2) If the criminal trial process a judge or lay judge shall be replaced by a reserve judge or lay judge, trial continues. Trial in this case, the Court will complete the new composition.
454. article. The President of the court hearing (1) a court session shall be chaired by one of the judges, who take part in criminal proceedings (hereinafter referred to as the Chairman of the hearing).
(2) the President of the court hearing the trial run to ensure the person implementing the defence, the Prosecutor and the victim an equal opportunity to participate in the investigation of the circumstances of the case.
455. article. Procedural rights in proceedings (1) the accused at the hearing, his representative and defender of the victim and his or her representative, and the Prosecutor, shall have the same rights to take rejection, lodge requests, submit evidence, participate in the examination of evidence, submit to the Court written explanations, participate in court debates, as well as other questions arising in criminal proceedings in the course of proceedings.
(2) the Court may, on its own initiative, to obtain evidence and examine the hearing only if the accused defence exercised by himself, but the Court should have reasonable doubts as to his possible guilt dismissals or accusation.
456. article. The participation of a Prosecutor in the hearing (1) the participation of a Prosecutor of the public prosecutor in criminal proceedings is mandatory.
(2) the Prosecutor maintained in State Court charges, based on evidence, it shall express its views on the matter during the hearing found conditions, participate in court debates. One of the public prosecution in criminal proceedings can also maintain several prosecutors.
(3) the Prosecutor may apply for and maintain an application for compensation in the public interest.
457. article. Consequences of the absence of the public prosecutor (1) If a prosecutor fails to appear at the hearing, the criminal trial postponed.
(2) If a Prosecutor's absences are not known for their absence of reported post higher prosecutor.
458. article. Replacement of the criminal proceedings the public prosecutor (1) If the Prosecutor's further participation in the hearing is not possible, they can be replaced.
(2) in the case of a change of the public prosecutor the Court continue trial.
(3) the Prosecutor who argues, the Court gives the criminal time to prepare for the criminal trial.
(4) the Prosecutor who joined the criminal proceedings, the Court may ask repeatedly to listen to a witness and victim testimony or expert opinion, as well as to carry out other procedural actions.
459. article. The Prosecutor's obligation to waive indictment (1) If criminal proceedings in the course of proceedings the Prosecutor acknowledges that the whole or part of the indictment has not been confirmed, his duty is to refuse all or part of the indictment to the Court for the higher public prosecutor confirmed the refusal of motivation.
(2) the Prosecutor may withdraw from the indictment to the Court left to the Conference room for the judgment.
460. article. Waiver of indictment (1) If a prosecutor waives indictment, according to this law, the first subparagraph of article 459 of the established procedure, the Court declares the hearing breaks. If, within three working days of the appointment of the Prosecutor to the Supreme Court sitting resumption will not replace the prosecution and renewed accusations of maintenance, the Court shall decide on the termination of criminal proceedings in connection with the Prosecutor's denial of accusations.
(2) in criminal proceedings in which the decision on the termination of the public prosecutor in connection with the abandonment of the prosecution process, restore allowed if new circumstances are discovered.
(3) waiver of the indictment the Prosecutor is not an obstacle to claiming compensation in the civil procedure law.
461. article. The duty of the Prosecutor to amend the indictment (1) If criminal proceedings in the course of proceedings the Prosecutor acknowledges that brought in the indictment is issued and amenable to easier or harder, his duty is to amend the indictment, motivating them.
(2) the Prosecutor may amend the indictment to easier, if not change the crime circumstances, until the Court go to make a judgment, but in other cases, to the judicial investigation is complete.
462. article. Amendment of the indictment in the course of proceedings (1) if the Prosecutor amends charges to more, not when the criminal offence of the actual circumstances, the new charge is recorded in the minutes of the hearing.
(2) if the Prosecutor amends charges to easier due to the actual crime of changes in circumstances or on heavier, if not change the factual circumstances of the crime, the new charges can record the minutes of the hearing. After the trial, the accused or his counsel's request, the new indictment the Prosecutor shall be made in writing. If you need time to amend the indictment at the request of the Prosecutor, the Court declares the hearing breaks.
(3) If the Court of first instance Prosecutor acknowledges that the accusation is amenable to a heavier, because hearing is found in other factual circumstances of the crime, the Court Prosecutor's request, declaring the break required in the conduct of the investigation and the new accusations. The break may not be longer than one month.
(4) the accused or his counsel, the victim or his representative's request, the Court declares the hearing break, giving time to get acquainted with the new mount.

463. article. The accused's participation in criminal proceedings (1) the accused's participation in criminal proceedings is mandatory.
(2) If the accused did not appear at the hearing, the criminal trial postponed.
(3) If the accused did not appear at the hearing without good reason or not of an absence, a court may decide on his arrival to court forcibly on the security features of the modification or application.
464. article. Criminal trials without the accused's participation in criminal proceedings for the criminal offence for which a fine may be imposed or forced labor, the Court can try without the participation of the accused, if the accused has submitted a request to the Court for a criminal trial without his participation and participate in the hearing his counsel.
465. article. The criminal trial in the absence of the accused (in absentia) (1) the Criminal Court can try the accused's absence, if the accused is in a foreign country and she: 1) location is unknown;
2) appearance can not be ensured.
(2) a judicial decision taken by those in default, the entry into force of the General order. However, the accused may appeal against the ruling of the appeal procedure within 30 days from the day when he learned he had to learn on the Court accepted the ruling.
466. article. The participation of a counsel in the hearing (1) the participation of a Counsel in criminal proceedings is mandatory in the cases provided for in this Act and by the person involved in the call.
(2) the person defending the rights of defence, expressed their views on the course of the hearing established conditions and participate in court debates. One of the defence in criminal proceedings can also implement several defenders.
467. article. Consequences of the absence of the defenders (1) if the defendant did not appear at the hearing and it is not possible to replace him, the criminal trial postponed.
(2) if the Defender's absence the reason is unknown, the court notifies the Latvian Council of sworn advocates.
468. article. Replacement of criminal defence counsel during the proceedings (1) If, in the future, participate in the defence of criminal proceedings within a reasonable time is not possible, the Defender can replace.
(2) in the case of a change of Counsel the Court continue trial.
(3) the barrister who argues, the Court gives the criminal time to prepare a defence.
(4) the defender who joined the criminal proceedings, the Court may ask repeatedly to listen to a witness and victim testimony or expert opinion, as well as to carry out other procedural actions.
469. article. Victim participation in the criminal proceedings (1) the criminal hearing by participating in the victim or his representative.
(2) if the victim did not appear at the hearing, the criminal hearing without his presence, except when the Court recognizes that the participation of the victim in criminal proceedings is compulsory or victim good reason had asked to postpone the hearing.
470. article. The absence of the witness or expert in the effects of (1) If on the hearing did not appear or expert witnesses, the Court starts trial, unless in accordance with this Act is not a reason to postpone it.
(2) the witness or expert, who did not appear at the hearing without good reason, this statutory procedural penalties.
471. article. Order of Court (1) the Court enters the court room and leaving the courtroom of the Court of the persons present stands up.
(2) judgment of the Court of the persons present in the courtroom listening, standing up.
(3) the persons present at the hearing of the Act so as not to interfere with the course of the hearing.
(4) the persons present at the hearing of the Court without reservation, abide by the instructions of the Chairman of the hearing, court decisions and Court kārtībniek.
(5) a Person who interferes with the order of the courtroom, the Court may apply the procedural sanctions, or it can be held statutory responsibility for the dignity of the Court.
(6) the order of the Court Chamber provides Court kārtībniek that the court order of the President is compulsory.
472. article. The right to be in the courtroom of the Court (1) the Court Chamber, the number of persons present determined by the Court under the judicial Chamber, the number of existing sites.
(2) the accused and the victim's close relatives or other persons invited to have her benefits entitled to be present in criminal trials.
(3) the trial Chamber does not let a person who is younger than 14 years, unless it is a person involved in criminal proceedings.
473. article. Court decisions (1) the hearing of the case in question the Court settle when making decisions.
(2) the Court shall consult the room adopted the following decisions: 1) on the termination of the proceedings;
2) safety feature;
3) about rejection;
4) for inspection.
(3) the second paragraph of this article, the decisions of the Court shall prepare a separate document. The decision to sign the entire composition of the Court.
(4) other decisions are at the discretion of the Court may accept both the consultation room and the consultation on the site of the Chamber of the Court. This decision shall be entered in the minutes of the hearing.
(5) during the hearing accepted the decision of the Court shall notify immediately.
(6) a decision on the intentionally false statements, findings of opinion or interpretation, or on the Lam to give false testimony, opinion or make findings or translations on unfounded refusal to give evidence, or to make a translation of the opinion finding the Court concurrently with the judgment. The decision to send the investigation authority.
(7) during the hearing decisions can only be appealed together with the final judgment of the Court of Appeal agreed, if otherwise provided by law.
474. article. Clerical and mathematical calculation error correction (1) the Court, on its own initiative or on the application of the person involved can fix in the ruling clerical or mathematical error in the calculation. Question about error correction for the writing process.
(2) clerical or mathematical calculation error corrected by means of a decision notified to the parties involved in the process.
(3) the persons involved in the process of ruling the Court made errors in the correction of an ancillary complaint may be submitted or next to the protest.
43. chapter. Combining criminal proceedings, breaking, suspension, suspension or termination of the 475. article. Combining criminal proceedings (1) if the Court is one of two or more criminal than any one person committed criminal offences, criminal proceedings for these offences combined, except when combining criminal proceedings significantly complicated criminal proceedings.
(2) criminal proceedings may be combined up to the beginning of the investigation the Court with a judge or a court decision.
(3) the criminal proceedings, the merging of ti material for easier add criminal offences on the more serious criminal offences.
476. article. Criminal Division (1), the Court in the interests of the accused or the victim of the criminal proceedings in which the accused multiple people or one person for several criminal offences can be broken if the Division does not harm the criminal objective.
(2) Of the Criminal Division of the Court takes a decision, which at the same time be considered as well as the decision to initiate the course of new criminal proceedings. Date of adoption of the decision is the new date for the initiation of criminal proceedings.
(3) the decision shall specify the basis of Division of criminal procedure, the accused person, the nature of the indictment, the criminal law article, part of it, the point after which brought the prosecution, security tool, the application date and time and other circumstances, as well as indicate the process after its breakdown.
(4) If criminal materials released need to find out a criminal offence committed by the person, the Court shall send them to the investigating authority or the Prosecutor's Office.
(5) If the Criminal Division is due to one or more of the accused from the Court of Justice, avoiding at the same time with the decision of the Criminal Division of the Court on the hearing of criminal matters in criminal proceedings the suspension of release.
(6) a decision on the Division of the process sends the public prosecutor, the accused and the victim.
477. article. Suspension of proceedings (1) If it is not possible to adjudicate criminal cases due to the fact that the hearing is not a call to come in person, the Court shall take a decision on the postponement of the hearing to a specified period of time.
(2) the proceedings, the Court did not come to the arrival of the person hearing or procedural enforcement sanctions.
(3) the Court shall resume the proceedings, after suspension, can not repeat the previously made procedural actions.
478. article. Suspension of criminal proceedings for the interpretation of the provisions of the law (1) if the Court finds that the rule of law, adequate for the particular criminal, does not meet the highest legal force law (Act), it shall submit an application for the initiation of the Constitutional Court, while stopping the criminal proceedings until the entry into force of the Constitutional Court ruling.
(2) If the case requires the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European communities for a preliminary ruling on the European Union (community) rules interpretation and validity of Court of the Court of Justice of the European Communities does not clear the question in the form of a reasoned decision, while stopping the criminal proceedings until the preliminary ruling.

(3) the suspension of the proceedings for the interpretation of the provisions of the law because of the uncertainty, the Court decides on the necessary coercive measures or sequestration, but without prejudice to the procedural time limit laid down in the law.
479. article. Suspension of criminal proceedings, the accused's disease (1) If the accused is ill with psychiatric disorders or other serious diseases and can not attend the court hearing the criminal proceedings shall be suspended until such time as the accused going.
(2) of this article, in the case referred to in the first paragraph, the Court may order the accused expertise.
(3) If the accused has recovered, restore the trial judge, the decision to write the resolution.
(4) if the psychiatric disorders recognized as incurable and eliminates criminal penalties, criminal proceedings stop, and continue the process of medical coercive means.
480. article. Suspension of criminal proceedings due to the accused's flight from the Court (1) If the accused, the Court avoided the Court takes a decision on the accused and on the search suspension until criminal proceedings when the accused is found.
(2) the decision on the execution of the search of the accused by the Court specified in the police authority.
(3) After finding the accused judge renewed trial, the decision by writing in the form of a resolution.
481. article. Termination of criminal proceedings at the hearing, the Court shall terminate the criminal proceedings (1) in the following cases: 1 if during the hearing) it establishes in article 377 of the Act specified the conditions which prevent the criminal proceedings;
2) if the Prosecutor has refused from the indictment;
3) to continue the process of medical coercive means.
(2) a court may terminate criminal proceedings, release the person from criminal responsibility, article 379 of the Act in the cases.
(3) the decision on the termination of criminal proceedings, decide on appropriate security measures, and possible compensation for confiscation of property security measures, other procedural coercive measures, as well as items of evidence.
44. chapter. In the course of fixing the hearing article 482. The minutes of the hearing (1) the hearing Protocol is a procedural document that records the progress of the proceedings and court decisions.
(2) if any of the persons participating in the hearing, is opposed to the sitting President's action, these objections entered in the minutes of the hearing.
(3) in the cases provided for in this Act Protocol article also on the procedural steps that are made outside the courtroom.
(4) the Protocol of the Court can be added to the debate of members submitted a written speech.
483. article. In the course of fixing the hearing by technical means (1) the hearing during the course of the hearing in full record using sound or image recordings, or other technical means, and shall mark the minutes of the hearing.
(2) the first paragraph of this article of the technical features of the materials added to criminal matters and keep up to date when the Act impugned in the accused more severe criminal offence limitation period.
484. article. In the course of the hearing the recording the minutes of the hearing (1) the minutes of the hearing of the trial, but the signature of the Secretary of the hearing the Chairman and the Secretary.
(2) launching the proceedings, minutes of the hearing: 1) at the hearing, the time and place (at the beginning and end of the meeting);
2 the composition, of the Court) the hearing officer, as well as an interpreter, if he participates in the hearing;
3) first and last name of the accused, a criminal offence under criminal charges;
4) prosecutors, defenders of the first and last names if they participate in the hearing;
5), his representative in the victim's name, if they participate in the hearing;
6) applied for a court request, if any apply, and as regards the decisions of the Court.
(3) after the initiation of parturition in the Protocol: 1) also condemned the treatment of charges;
2) tourist arrivals, expert witnesses and other persons involved in the process name and surname;
3) court orders and decisions that have been adopted for certain procedural documents;
4) news about the evidence or documents.
(4) If in the course of the hearing is not fixed by sound and image recordings or other technical means, the minutes of the hearing record, the victim, the accused also witnesses, experts and other persons involved in the process of clarification.
(5) outside the courtroom carried a certain procedural action Protocol must conform to the requirements of this article.
(6) fixes the Protocol a reservation before the signature of the Secretary of the court hearing. All the blank lines and other free places in the aizsvītr Protocol.
(7) the content of the Protocol can not be deleted, paint or otherwise fix by applying mechanical exposure.
(8) the hearing shall be drawn up within three working days following the date of the judgment of the Court. After this period, the public prosecutor in the exercise of the defense, and the victim may be familiar with the Protocol and within three working days to submit comments on it or to ask you to send a copy of the minutes.
485. article. Another person the right to record the progress of the Court, other persons who are not employees of the Court, the hearing may be sound and image recording, not interfering with the judicial process, if allowed by the Court of Justice and with the consent of the accused, his counsel, the Prosecutor, the victim and a witness.
The ninth section of the proceedings before the Court of first instance, chapter 45. Preparation of the hearing of criminal cases 486. article. The court action after receipt of (1) criminal matters By a criminal court of receipt check that: 1) this Court has jurisdiction in criminal cases;
2) attached to the criminal offence;
3) issued to the defendant a copy of the indictment;
4) the accused was provided with the opportunity to get acquainted with the materials of the case and the rights of the defence.
(2) If it is established that the criminal jurisdiction of another court, the judge sent the criminal jurisdiction.
(3) If it is established that this was not observed in the first paragraph of article 2, 3 and 4 above, the judge sent the Criminal Prosecutor of higher failures.
487. article. Preparation of the hearing of the case for the urgency procedure (1) receive a criminal court that passed to the immediacy of the order, the Court, in addition to this law specified in article 486, check whether the Prosecutor's decision on transfer of criminal court proceedings in specified time and location is matched by the Court.
(2) this law 488.489. paragraph and want to happen only in cases where the need to amend the criminal trial of time and place.
488. article. Criminal proceedings (1) the judge not later than within three working days following receipt of your criminal proceedings shall take a decision on the criminal trial of time and place. The decision to write the resolution.
(2) the court hearing the criminal proceedings are initiated as soon as possible.
(3) If the accused adequate security feature associated with imprisonment, criminal proceedings initiated no later than four weeks after its receipt.
(4) If a minor defendant suitable security feature associated with imprisonment, criminal trial starting no later than three weeks after its receipt.
(5) if the objective circumstances, it is not possible to comply with the third and fourth periods referred to in part, by a reasoned decision of the judge can postpone the commencement of the hearing of criminal cases of the time.
489. article. Notification of hearing izsaucamaj persons, the Prosecutor and the Defender (1) After hearing the judge fixing the order immediately to the Court Office to invite to the presentation of the Court of session and announce the hearing the Prosecutor and defender.
(2) If criminal proceedings for a longer period of time, the judge may order a witness or expert be called to another, rather than the beginning of the hearing.
490. article. During the hearing of criminal cases amendment to criminal trials if it becomes known to the accused or the victim good reason not be able to attend the hearing, or there are other reasons why the hearing within that time may not take place, the judge determines another criminal trial.
491. article. State questions, preparing the criminal court hearing the judge preparing the criminal proceedings in the Court, decide the following questions: 1) for inviting counsel;
2) for inviting an interpreter;
3) for consideration of whether alone or collegiate;
4) on the hearing of an open or a closed hearing;
5) or the thing off with or without verification of evidence at the hearing;
6) for refund or possible confiscation of property, if the application;
7) other issues, for which the accused, defence, the public prosecutor, the victim or the victim's representative;
8) evaluation report on the application of the national probation service.
492. article. With respect to compensation, or possible confiscation of property in execution of a decision relating to compensation or contingent assets confiscation provision shall issue to the applicant the decision adopted and enforced in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
46. chapter. 493. Article proceedings. Opening of the sitting of the Court

The Court of session found the hearing Chairman, announcing that the case will be heard, and naming the Court composition.
494. article. The called person arrival examination (1) the Chairman of the hearing, announced that in this case the called person come, or is notified of the sitting of the Court who has not come, and any information received about the reasons of absence.
(2) If the accused has refused from participation in the process, the defenders he signed the minutes of the hearing.
495. article. Witness the expulsion from the courtroom to Witness his interrogation beginning may not be in the court room.
496. article. Log on to the Registrar (1) the Prosecutor, the victim, the accused and his counsel may submit to the Court the request.
(2) the Court shall decide the request for another log on the first part of the persons referred to in point of the hearing.
(3) rejected requests from the person in the course of the hearing, you can sign up again.
497. article. Charges maintenance judicial investigation begins with the indictment, the Prosecutor setting out briefly the nature of the charges.
498. article. The accused's treatment charges (1) After hearing the indictment hearing Chairman whether the accused understands, of the crime of which the accused, and that he admits his guilt.
(2) the accused's treatment of charges recorded in the minutes of the hearing and the accused shall sign it.
499. article. The offence of evidence (1) the Court may decide on the basis of evidence in relation to all or part of its own (episode) only on the condition that: 1) the accused admit their guilt throughout his indictment or the salient part thereof;
2) Court after inspection of the file there is no doubt as to the accused's guilt;
3) accused, but in cases of compulsory defence also his defender and agent, agrees such tests do not.
(2) before deciding the matter on the evidence, the Court shall inquire of the Prosecutor, the person, in the exercise of the defense, the victim and his representative on how well they explain examinations of evidence was not a procedural nature and consequences.
(3) after a decision on the evidence, the Court shall examine the accused person of the raksturojošo and go to the Court debate.
(4) after the Court debate, the Court heard the defendant's last name, make and pass judgement. Following the judgment of the appellate order may only be made part of the court sentence or penalty in connection with the permit process violations.
500. article. Proof of inspection procedure (1) the evidence adduced, the Court, upon hearing the testimony of the victim to initiate and the prosecutors witness statements, as well as examine other evidence submitted by the Prosecutor.
(2) After examination of the evidence provided by the Prosecutor, the court listens to the accused or his defence witnesses listed and check the other evidence submitted by him.
(3) the Court of justice by the Prosecutor, the victim, the accused and his defence counsel's request, may provide for other proof testing procedures.
501. article. Reading the testimony of any person, or play a particular criminal procedure provided earlier testimony can be read or play the Court if: 1) are important differences among the testimonies and those given in court;
2) provider has forgotten what the circumstances of the case;
3) provider is not present at the hearing, the reason that exclude appear in court;
4) provider avoids the appearance or refuses to testify;
5) the Court agrees with the statement that the psychologist this law, article 152, fourth paragraph, the following people can be heard at the hearing or questioning by the psychologist.
502. article. Questions of order (1) with the permission of the Court, the accused, his counsel, the Prosecutor, the victim and his or her representative may ask questions of the persons giving evidence in court. Court rejects questions that do not apply to the case.
(2) the victim, as well as other persons invited the Prosecutor's first question asks the Prosecutor.
(3) the accused or his counsel to persons invited the first questions the accused and his counsel, other defendants and their supporters.
(4) the Court may ask questions at any moment of the hearing.
503. article. The accused's testimony (1) By this law, the evidence referred to in article 500 of the inspection, the President of the Court asks whether he wants the accused to give evidence.
(2) If the accused has expressed consent to give evidence, the first questions put to him his defender and other defenders of the accused.
(3) the accused may submit to the Court their testimony in writing. Written testimony read except this law 449. in the third subparagraph of article specific case.
504. article. A judicial inquiry is completed after the completion of the examination of evidence, if not further requests, the Court makes a judicial investigation into the finish and go to the Court debate.
505. article. Judicial debate (1) Court debate first speech says the Prosecutor, then the victim or his representative and the accused or his counsel.
(2) if the Court debate more victims or their representatives, the defendants or their guardians, comes to the order determined by the Court after the hearing of persons perspective.
(3) the Court is not limited to the duration of the debate.
(4) the Court may submit to the members of the debate to court their speech in writing, and adds it to the case.
506. article. Court debates contents (1) the Prosecutor, the indictment speaks of court debate motivates his views about the accused's guilt or innocence and expressed views on the accused and the applicable penalty for fever.
(2) the victim of the Court debate diet claim for damages and can speak out about the applicable penalty for the accused.
(3) the accused or his counsel Court debate say defense.
(4) the members of the Court debate their conclusions can motivate a judicial investigation only examined evidence. If you need to check the new evidence, the debate may ask the Court to reopen a judicial inquiry.
(5) in Cases where the hearing did not take place, the Court's examination of evidence in the debate members expressed only on applicable penalties, the type and the amount.
(6) the President of the Court may suspend a member of the Court debate speech, where he talks about the conditions, having no connection with the case.
507. article. Right to reply (1) after the Court debate each member thereof is entitled to one replica of the speech content.
(2) the right to the last replica is a defender. If the Defender does not participate in the hearing, right to the last replica is accused.
508. article. The accused's last word (1) after the completion of the debate of the court hearing the Chairman shall invite the accused to say the last word.
(2) the accused may waive the last name.
(3) the defendant last name duration is not limited. The Chairman of the hearing may terminate accused the last word when he talks about the conditions, having no connection with the case.
(4) the last word has not been allowed to ask the defendant questions.
509. article. The reopening of the courts (1) If the members of the Court debate in their speeches or the accused last name of new conditions, which is of importance in the case, or reference the Court untested evidence relating to the case, the Court, after the debate, the participant's request or on its own initiative, take a decision on the resumption of the investigation and of the Court shall be the Court of inquiry.
(2) after the completion of the investigation the Court resumed Court rediscovered the Court debate and gives the last word to the accused.
510. article. The Court left room for discussions to make judgments (1) after the defendant last name Court go to the consultation room to make a judgment, and the Court shall notify the Chairman of the hearing, the present judgment in determining time and location.
(2) If a difficult case, the Court recognizes that this hearing is not likely to make a judgment, it determines the next hearing in the next 14 days, which it will announce the verdict.
47. chapter. Judgment 511. article. The judgment of the General provisions (1) the Court of Justice, which by nature, adjudicates the case to make a judgment and declare on behalf of the State.
(2) the judgment shall be legal and justified.
512. article. The rule of law and the validity of the judgment (1) a court making a judgment based on the substantive and procedural law.
(2) a court judgment shall be based on evidence, which tested at the hearing or in accordance with this law, the provisions of article 125 no need to check.
513. article. The deliberations of the Court secret (1) discussing the judicial discussion going on in the room. During the consultations in this room is only in the composition of the Court, which is hearing the case.
(2) a court may suspend, for a rest, as well as weekends and holidays.
(3) break the judges be prohibited from gathering news about the ongoing case, expressing the views expressed during the consultations, as well as the adopted ruling content.
514. article. The deliberations of the Court State questions (1) consultations during the consultation room of the Court shall decide the following questions: 1) or the accused, the impugned criminal offence;
This offence is 2) or criminal offence, and criminal law article, part of it, in this point;
3) or the accused is guilty of this crime;

4) or the accused punished for this crime;
5) or have conditions that enhance or soften the accused's responsibility;
6) what kind of principal and the Mayor must be ordered the accused, and that he had to endure;
7 piespriežam of either the accused or) and;
8) or the person who recognized the limited falling, you have to define the criminal law provided for in article 68 medical coercive measures;
9) or to be saved, must amend or apply a safety feature for the accused;
10) or upheld the claim for damages owing to the good and to what extent it damages;
11) how to handle evidence and other things during the process izņemtaj things and property subject to Lien;
12) of the proceeds of the seizure or recovery;
13) recovered from legal costs.
(2) If the accused passed the Court of several criminal offences, the Court in the first part of this article, these issues decide for each crime separately.
(3) if the Criminal Court passed a number of defendants, the Court in the first part of this article, these issues decide for each defendant separately.
515. article. The deliberations of the court order (1) the Judicial Council headed by the President of the court hearing.
(2) the President of the court hearing each question asked in the form, so you could give an affirmative or negative response.
(3) decide on each individual question, the judges vote. The President of the Court expressed their opinions and votes last.
516. article. Separate opinion of judge (1) the President of the Court or a judge of the Court, which remained at the individual thoughts, they are expressed in writing.
(2) Individual thoughts adds to the case in a closed envelope, and may be consulted only in the higher court of appeal this Court's ruling in the case. Declaring the judgment, not the individual thoughts.
517. article. A judicial inquiry after court resumes deliberations (1) if the consultations during the Court considers it necessary to clarify some facts which are relevant in the case, the Court does not make a judgment, shall take a decision on the resumption of judicial investigations.
(2) After the completion of the investigation of the Court the Court rediscovered the Court debate, listen to the accused and the last word go to consult for the judgment.
518. article. Types of judgment judgment of acquittal or conviction may be.
519. article. Justification based on the judgment of the Court make for good judgment if: 1 the accused committed the offence) is not a criminal offence in the composition;
2) participation in a criminal offence, the accused is not proven.
520. article. The basis of the judgment of conviction (1) the Court shall make a judgment of conviction, if in the course of the hearing the accused's guilt in a criminal offence is proven.
(2) a judgment of Conviction may not make if the accused has been proven guilty only by evidence of persons whose identity is not being disclosed to special procedural protection interest, and other evidence in the case is not.
521. article. The judgment of conviction, the sentence the Court can make a judgment, conviction without ordering a fine, if this law 379 of the first paragraph of article 1 and referred to in paragraph 3.
522. article. Empowering nature of coercive measures for the minor (1) if the Court finds that the accused committed a minor crime, but subject to this offence was committed to the specific circumstances and guilty people get news that soften his liability, the Court may release him from under penalties and apply statutory empowering nature of coercive measures.
(2) when applying the empowering nature of the detention, the Court shall take into account the nature of the crime and the accused person, raksturojošo data, as well as aggravating and attenuating circumstances.
523. article. Writing the judgment (1) After this law referred to in article 514 of the court deciding questions written by the judgment, which consists of introductory paragraph, descriptive parts, theme part and the operative part. The judgment of the national language.
(2) the judgment shall be signed by all judges who participated in the hearing. The judge, who left at the separate opinion, also signed the judgment.
(3) the text of the judgment, amendments to clauses before signing it.
524. article. The introductory part of the judgments in the introductory part of the judgment: 1) judgment was given on behalf of the State;
2 the date of delivery of the judgment);
3 the name of the Court), who delivered the judgment;
4) Court;
5) Prosecutor, advocate;
6) the accused's name, surname, personal code, but, if not, the date and place of birth;
7) criminal law, part of the article and the point after which the person accused.
525. article. Good judgment is a descriptive part and a part of the theme (1) Supporting the descriptive part of a judgment shall state the substance of the indictment.
(2) Supporting the grounds of the judgment indicates: 1) Court found event conditions;
2 the basis for the acquittal of the accused) and evidence that confirms this;
3) themes, why the Court rejected evidence that warranted prosecution.
526. article. Justification the operative part of the judgment (1) Supporting the operative part of the judgment indicates the decision of the Court: 1) that the accused (mentioning his name) was declared innocent on the charges brought against him (mentioning the criminal law article, part of it, the point in which the criminal offence) and acquitted;
2) on the abolition of the security features;
confiscation of property 3) and security instruments of the compensation, if any, was applied;
4) attorneys pay;
5) for the transmission of all or part of a pre-trial investigation, if a criminal offence has occurred, but the Court did not find it surrendered the accused person's guilt.
(2) if the Court makes a judgment of acquittal, it left without examination application for damages as a result of the offence. Leaving the application without examination do not preclude damages requirements for lifting of the civil law.
527. article. The descriptive part of a judgment of conviction and theme part (1) descriptive part of a judgment of a conviction shall prove the criminal and legal description of qualifications, stating the time, place, type of offence, the accused's guilt, the themes, and the consequences of the offence.
(2) the grounds of the judgment of Conviction shall specify: 1) the evidence on which the conclusions of the Court justified;
2) themes, why the Court rejected other evidence;
3) accused of aggravating and attenuating circumstances;
4) themes, why not share the indictment recognised as unproven, if accepted by the Court;
5) amendment of the indictment if the accusation, the Court amended;
6) on the given theme the imposition of penalties;
7) with a declaration of enforceability of a decision issues, if necessary.
(3) if the Court, on the basis of the decision taken, the evidence has not been carried out, the Court judgment, the test indicates that the accused's guilt is proven. In such cases, the analysis of the evidence and their list is not necessary.
528. article. The operative part of the judgment of conviction (1) criminal conviction in the operative part of the judgment indicates the decision of the Court: 1) that the accused (mentioning his name) found guilty of an offence (Criminal Code article citing, in part, the point in which the criminal offence);
2) under penalties of defendant type and the amount of each crime and the final penalty to be served;
3 the accused's release from criminal sanctions), if he is released from it;
4) empowering nature of application of coercive measures, if released from criminal minor;
5) the accused applied with a custodial term of the security features of the transfer penalty period;
6) probation conditional sentencing;
7) safety feature;
8 accused of condoning) accusations, if accepted by the Court;
9) damages;
10) compensation or confiscation of property, if it is not done in the past;
11) the proceeds of the seizure or recovery;
12) lawyer's pay is driven from the accused or for his release;
13) fee to the victims fund;
14 release of the accused from custody), house arrest or social adjustments of educational establishments in the Chamber of the Court, if he set with non-custodial penalties.
(2) application of conditional sentencing, the Court shall decide on probation, about what obligations relatively convicted the chargeable and entrusted the supervision of conditionally sentenced.
(3) conditionally sentenced a person who committed a criminal offence, as the alcohol, narcotic, psychotropic or toxic substances, the Court with the accused's consent can be placed on the obligation to seek treatment for his alcohol, narcotic, psychotropic or toxic substance addiction, asking the police authority concerned and the body of treatment to control the implementation of this obligation.
529. article. Good or the operative part of the judgment of conviction further questions in the operative part of the judgment, in addition, indicate the Court's decision on: 1) action with real evidence and documents;
2) procedural reimbursement;
3) judgment procedures and time limits;
4 in preparation) full time, if delivered in a short judgment.
530. article. The short judgment

(1) the Court may prepare the abbreviated forms of judgment, which consists of introductory paragraph, descriptive part and the operative part.
(2) if the Court has prepared a short judgment, the judgment of the Court in full shall be prepared within 14 days, stating the date of availability.
531. article. (1) the delivery of the judgment of the Court declaring the verdict, the President of the hearing by reading the abbreviated or full judgment.
(2) If the full judgment is prepared, a copy of the judgment shall be immediately issued to the accused, the victim, as well as defender and Prosecutor in their application.
532. article. The release of the accused in the courtroom after the verdict is rendered, the Court immediately released from custody, house arrest or social adjustments in educational institutions: 1) eligible;
2) accused that are not defined in the criminal penalties;
3) the accused, who relieved of criminal penalties;
4) accused that sentenced to custodial penalties and that at the time of delivery of the judgment in detention, house arrest or social correction institution reaches or exceeds the time specified in the judgment of deprivation of liberty;
5) that the accused sentenced to a custodial penalty conditionally;
6) accused that the sentence not involving the deprivation of liberty.
533. article. The Court's decision (1) next to the Court with the final ruling may take next to a decision of the competent body or officials point to a criminal law violation detected, their causes and contributing factors and require to correct it.
(2) the Court, on the basis of criminal proceedings, may take a decision on the next expression of appreciation to the person who has provided significant assistance in the detection and crime prevention, as well as on other grounds, if it necessary.
(3) a body or official, which is next to the decision of the Court not later than one month shall take the necessary measures and notify the results to the Court.
(4) next to the Court decision shall enter into force simultaneously with the judgment.
534. article. The accused and the protection of children if the Court, making a conviction, the accused applied with a custodial security measure and therefore without supervision and care remain minor in custody or guardianship of, or charged with, a different person, or without supervision remains the property of the accused, the Court shall ensure that the law referred to in article 248(4) of the safeguard measures.
535. article. Issue of a copy of the judgment to the accused (1) availability of the judgment day is the day when the judgment is receivable clerk of court, while in detention, house arrest or educational institution of social correction of person — a day when that person the opportunity to become acquainted with the judgment it in plain language.
(2) If the accused is in detention, house arrest or social correction institution not later than the working day following the judgment in the preparation of the full Court shall send a copy to the accused.
(3) if the judgment was given in a language that the accused does not understand the Court to him or, if the accused is in detention, the prison provides the opportunity to get acquainted with the verdict through an interpreter.
48. chapter. The nature of the proceedings, the victim and the accused in the case of settlement 536. article. Statement of the victim and the offender in the settlement (1) the victim and the accused to the Court left to the Conference room in the cases provided for in the criminal law may declare the settlement.
(2) If a settlement shall be made in writing, it adds to the case. The settlement must be specified that it closed voluntarily and the victim understands the consequences of the settlement.
(3) If a written settlement submitted to the accused without the presence of the victim and the victim is a natural person, any settlement must be notarized.
(4) if the victim and the accused on the settlement reported orally at the hearing, the settlement shall record the minutes of the hearing and signed by the victim and the accused.
(5) Before a settlement is signed, or at the written receipt of court settlement will ensure that it entered into voluntarily and that the victim understands the consequences of the settlement.
537. article. Check the file in case of settlement (1) If a court settlement filed or signed the minutes of the hearing after it launched a judicial investigation, and the Court there is no doubt about the guilt of the accused, the investigation shall be terminated and go off the Court debate.
(2) if the victim and the accused shall notify the Court of the settlement during the debate, the Court stopped the debate and give the accused the last word.
(3) if the victim and the accused on the settlement after the Court declares the debate, the Court gives the Court of Justice on behalf of the debate participants point of view point.
538. article. The effects of the settlement if the victim and the accused Announces settlement to leave the court room, court deliberations, without checking the file, may take a decision on the release of the accused from criminal responsibility and the termination of criminal proceedings.
49. chapter. The nature of the proceedings in respect of pre-trial proceedings closed agreement article 539. Preparation of criminal matter to the Court an agreement process (1) the agreed agenda of the process submitted to the Criminal Court judge of receipt in addition to this law, laid down in article 486 checks whether the pre-trial process in the agreement has been concluded in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act and the provisions of the criminal law is not allowed. Finding of infringement, the judge sent the case to the public prosecutor to prevent the infringement.
(2) criminal collusion must commence within 21 days from the date on which it is received by the judge in the proceedings.
540. article. The composition of the Court the criminal process examined the arrangement by a sole judge.
541. article. Judicial investigation (1) judicial investigation begins by presenting the agreement, read by the Prosecutor.
(2) the court hearing of the agreement, whether the accused understands, of the crime of which he is accused of, or recognized guilty, or signed the agreement knowingly and willingly, understand its consequences and agrees that it will respect the agreement concluded.
(3) the Court of Justice offers the accused and his representative the opportunity to comment on the circumstances of the conclusion of the agreement.
(4) the Court shall inquire of the defenders and the Prosecutor's attitude to the agreement.
(5) the Court shall hear the other persons invited to the present case.
(6) the Court at the end of the investigation the Court calls on the members of the hearing to express requests and decide on their satisfaction or rejection.
(7) at the request of the Registrar of the Court applied to go consult room to make judgment, announcing the hearing bystanders.
542. article. Court ruling agreed the process (1) the consultation room Court accepts one of the following decisions: 1) the decision on the termination of the proceedings if it is established that the conditions do not allow for criminal proceedings;
2) decision on the transmission of the case to Prosecutor misconduct;
3) conviction judgment.
(2) a court judgment subject to further appeal in cassation only.
543. article. Judgment of the Court of Justice in the process of the agreement (1) where the Court has no doubt about the accused's guilt, so make a criminal conviction.
(2) the grounds of the Judgment, the Court set out the nature of the agreements made by the Prosecutor, the accused and his advocate expressed at the hearing, and shall assess the validity of the agreements made.
(3) in the operative part of the judgment indicates the Court's decision on: 1) that the accused (mentioning his name) found guilty of an offence (Criminal Code article, mention it and the point where the criminal offence in question);
2) that the Court approve the agreement and ordered it closed for the type and the amount of the fine;
3) release of court accused the Chamber of the House of detention, arrest or social adjustments of educational institutions, if the accused by non-custodial penalty;
4) the accused applied with a custodial term of the security features of the transfer penalty period;
5) during the term of conditional sentencing in the case;
6) safety feature;
7) damages;
8) damages or confiscation of property, if it is not done in the past;
9) action with real evidence and documents;
10) procedural reimbursement;
11) lawyer's pay is driven from the accused or for his release from payment;
12) fee to the victims fund;
13) judgment to appeal in cassation and its duration.
50. chapter. The nature of the proceedings, conclude an agreement hearing process 544. article. Right to conclude an agreement in the process of hearing (1) the Prosecutor and the accused is entitled to the initiation of the investigation the Court agree on the completion of the criminal proceedings, the conclusion of the agreement on the recognition of guilt and punishment.
(2) the conclusion of the agreement in the process of formation allowed if: 1 a criminal offence the accused's impugned), less serious crime or serious crime;
2) the accused consents to the impugned criminal and legal skills;
3) the accused admits his guilt he impugned criminal offence was committed in full.
545. article. The court action after receipt of the application the Court, Prosecutor or accused receive, or his defenders or representatives of an oral or written application for the desire to conclude an agreement: 1) the admissibility of the relevant agreement;
2) explains the effect of the defendant;

3), whether the Prosecutor or the accused, respectively, and his representative agrees with the conclusion of the agreement;
4) identify the victim or his representative's views on the application of the agreement;
5) determine the hearing agreed alignment of the breaks and for submission to the Court.
546. article. Criminal trial process (1) the agreement if the agreement is concluded, the Court after the adjournment in the same composition, continuing trial in Chapter 49 of this law.
(2) where the Prosecutor and the accused following the adjournment of the Court declares that the agreement has been concluded, the Court will continue hearing the General order.
51. The nature of the proceedings the proceedings for the compulsory application of legal means to influence party 547. article. The Criminal Court in considering the matter, criminal, which proposed to apply coercive influence means a legal person, the Court must decide the following issues: 1) or a criminal offence has occurred;
2) or the offence committed by a natural person in the interest of the legal person;
3) or a legal person, that is, one of the leaders of the legal person or the owners, was aware of this criminal offence;
4) or has cleared this law referred to in article 415;
5) a coercive influence feature.
548. article. (1) the Court ruling held that natural persons a criminal offence is committed in the interest of the legal person, legal person, moreover, knew about it and did nothing criminal or its consequences, the Court of Justice shall decide on the coercive influence also means the application of a legal entity.
(2) that is proven in the first paragraph of this article, the Court facts in criminal proceedings for the compulsory application of the means to influence the legal person terminates.
The tenth section of the proceedings in the Court of appeal and cassation instance court 52. chapter. Preparation of the case to the appeal court in 549. article. Appeal against the order of the Board of appeal of the order is a written protest or appeal the complaint on the appraisal of the Court of first instance with a view to its abolition in full or part thereof as a matter of fact, it for legal reasons.
550. article. Appeals and protest time limits (1) the appeal or protest shall be submitted not later than 10 days after the date of becoming available on the full Court ruling.
(2) after the deadline submitted the appeal or protest of a decision by the judge may be written in the form of a resolution, "accept, unless the applicant has not asked for the renewal of the term. The decision taken by the Court of Justice shall notify the applicant, but submitted a complaint or protest adds to the case.
(3) the judge's decision, with which the appeal or protest refused to accept may be appealed against within 10 days of the appeal court, whose decision is final.
551. article. Appeals and protest the content (1) an appeal or protest shall indicate: 1) Court ruling, for which a complaint or protest;
2) to what extent the ruling appealed from or noprotest;
3) gets the ruling was correct;
4) evidence, which must verify the appellate court;
5) or be introduced any new evidence that the circumstances and why this evidence was not submitted or examined by the Court of first instance;
6) at the applicant's request;
7) complaint or protest the attached document list.
(2) an appeal or protest shall be signed by the applicant.
(3) an appeal or protest shall indicate the persons name, address that complaint or protest, the applicant asked the appellate court to question him, as well as whether the appeal court will need a champion, and that it must appoint to the Court.
(4) the victim and his/her representative appeal cannot ask for more than what they asked for a hearing before the Court of first instance.
(5) the Prosecutor is obliged to submit the protest as illegal or unjust Court ruling. However, the Prosecutor who participated in the Court of first instance, may submit a protest only for those judgments in which the Court did not take into consideration his views in the hearing or committed irregularities, which he could not prevent the course of litigation. These restrictions do not apply to post a higher prosecutor.
552. article. Appeals and protest submission procedure (1) the appeal or protest addressed to the one level — the Court of appeal.
(2) an appeal or protest shall be submitted to the Court which made the ruling.
553. article. Appeals and protests without the guidance of abandonment (1) If an appeal or protest shall not comply with this law, the requirements of article 551, the judge shall decide on the appeal or protest the abandonment without guidance, indicating the lack of complaint or protest, and determines the applicant 10 days to remedy the shortage.
(2) if the applicant is not remedied within the time limit set, the judge shall decide on the appeal or protest the abandonment without examination.
554. article. Appeals and protest the consequences of filing (1) an appeal or protest shall suspend the submission of the entry into force of the judgment for all defendants in the case.
(2) the appeal or protest submission on supporting the judgment of the Court of Justice does not suspend the entry into force of the judgment on the part of the accused's release from custody, house arrest or social adjustments of educational establishments.
(3) the appeal or protest, submitted only in connection with damages in the case of the Registrar, not suspend enforcement of the part of the accused's criminal liability.
555. article. Appeals or protests, objections and explanations (1) After the appeal or protest the deadline for submission of the Court which delivered the judgment sends the case to the appeal court, but the people whose interests and rights infringes upon appeal or protest, – – appeals submitted or a copy of the protest, as well as inform them of things sent to the appeal court.
(2) persons whose interests and rights infringes upon appeal or protest, is entitled, until the date on which the case will be viewed in the appellate court, the court premises to become acquainted with the case, extracts, make copies of materials of the case, to submit their written opposition to the appeal or protest and the explanations for them. Objections to the appeal or protest and explanations of those added to the case.
(3) the Person who submitted the appeal or protest, not later than 10 days after the expiry of the term for appeal shall be entitled to submit complaints to the Court of appeal or protest additions, but they must not alter the nature of the original request.
556. article. The appeal or protest revocation (1) the Person who submitted the appeal complaint or protest, until the appellate court go discuss the making of the judgment shall be entitled to withdraw their complaint or protest.
(2) no limit may be revoked: 1) the complainant – – their appeal;
2 the accused minor) – – your champion and his former representative appeal;
3) underage victim – his reps and my former legal representative appeal;
4) Prosecutor – protest their appeal and post higher prosecutor – – post lower the appeal of the Prosecutor's protest.
(3) only with the written consent of the accused can withdraw: 1) his Defender – – their appeal;
2) his agent or former agent – – their appeal.
(4) only with the written consent of the victim of his representative may withdraw its appeal.
(5) the recall is not binding on the Court of Justice, if the appeal: 1) reference the minor or the person to whom they are physical or mental deficiencies required provide protection or minors or any such person's advocate or representative;
2) appellate court finds an obvious criminal law or a breach of the law, which the contested decision be annulled or swivel to reduce the amount of the charge, sentence or end break the case.
(6) After the appeal or protest the cancellation of receipt of court may take a decision on the appeal.
(7) If the appeal or protest the withdrawal complies with the requirements of this Act and submit to things to send to the Court of appeal, the Court of first instance does not send the case to the appellate court, but adds a cancellation file. If a cancellation is filed in the appellate court, the appellate court judge or the Court shall decide on the appeal. The decision taken by the Court of Justice shall notify the person who had submitted the appeal or protest.
557. article. Minor's representative appeal proceedings (1) the minor's or the victim's representative accused the appeal if it is not to be considered withdrawn, even if the hearing represented the moment already come of age.
(2) if the accused or the victim's former representative to the complaint filed by the represented in adulthood, it left without examination.

558. article. Conditions that have to be clarified before accepting a case for review (1) Decide the question of accepting a case for review, the judge give them clear, or there are no circumstances which preclude the possibility of appeal to review the case.
(2) If, on receipt of the file in the Court of appeal, the judge noted that the Court of first instance has not complied with the requirements provided for in this law, in article 551 550. and he shall take a decision on the return of the case to the Court of first instance for the deficiencies and shall notify in writing to the persons whose interests and rights in your submission infringes upon the appeal or protest.
559. article. Accepting a case for review (1) if there are no circumstances which preclude the referral of an appeal procedure, the judge shall take a decision on its review.
(2) the decision shall specify: 1) in the case of a time and place;
2) of a person invited to the Court of session;
3) as decided on requests and any supporting materials izprasām applied in the context of the request.
(3) about the time and place notified to the persons whose interests and rights in your submission infringes upon the appeal or protest, and the Court of first instance.
53. chapter. Hearing the appeal procedure in Article 560. Persons participating in the proceedings in the appeal hearing (1) The appellate court shall invite the Prosecutor (with the exception of private prosecution cases), which the appeals court decision, the person in respect of which the appeal or the judgment of the Court of noprotestēt, their defenders and representatives.
(2) other persons may be invited to the hearing if the request expressed in the appeal or protest and if that person is not questioning, proceedings before the Court of first instance. The Court may, on its own initiative, invite persons questioning the Court of first instance, if reasonable doubts as to the completeness or the testimony given on the possible guilt of the accused in the indictment of a criminal offence.
(3) if the person who submitted the complaint of high inflation or ape protests, does not appear before the Court without justification, they leave without complaint or protest.
(4) If the accused in his appeal is contested his guilt of the crime or offence in the actual circumstances, is dead, his complaint is to be considered.
561. article. The proceedings of the appellate court (1) in case the appellate court's consideration in the order laid down by the Criminal Court of first instance, except in this chapter.
(2) judicial investigation begins with the judge's report on the judgment of the Court of first instance and the appeal or protest of requests made in it. After the judge asks the person who submitted the appeal complaint or protest, or it keeps your complaint or protest and to what extent.
562. article. The amount and the frame in which the case is pending before the Court of appeal (1) a judicial inquiry and Court debate appellate court takes the complaint or protest the claim and within which should not be exceeded unless the appellate court is in any doubt about the Court of first instance found the accused, members or accomplices of guilt or of aggravating circumstances.
(2) the appellate court may apply the law on more serious offences than acknowledged by the Court of first instance, only if requested by the Prosecutor in his protest or the victim in its complaint in the case of private prosecution if the victim in his public accusations in the complaint case, supported by the Prosecutor. In this case, however, may not apply the law on harsher than that of offences for which the person was accused by a criminal court, except when the Prosecutor of the Court of first instance hearing turned to more serious charges.
(3) the determination of the penalty Heavier accused admissible when for this reason filed by the Prosecutor or the victim's complaint to the protest.
(4) the eligible person's recognition of the guilty and the punishment it permitted where this reason filed by the Prosecutor or the victim's complaint to protest the private prosecution proceedings, or the victim's complaint to the public prosecutor in the case, supported by the Prosecutor.
563. article. The appellate court ruling (1) the results of the proceedings in the appeal court shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) leave an amended judgment of the Court of first instance;
2) annulled the judgment of the Court of first instance and make a new judgment;
3) cancel the judgment of the Court of first instance in any part of it and make a new judgment in this part;
4) cancel the judgment of the Court of first instance and terminating the criminal proceedings in the cases provided for in this Act;
5) cancel the judgment of the Court of first instance, in whole or in any part thereof and send a new criminal cases to the Court of first instance.
(2) the first subparagraph of article 1 (4) and (5) in the cases provided for in the appeal court's decision.
564. article. The appellate court ruling contain (1) the appellate court ruling consists of introductory paragraph, descriptive parts, theme part and the operative part.
(2) in the introductory part of the Judgments given the time and place, name and composition of the Court, the Prosecutor and the person who submitted the appeal complaint or protest, the judgment under appeal or noprotestēt.
(3) the descriptive part of the Ruling to be appealed or the nature of the judgment in noprotestēt, the appeal or protest in the requests.
(4) the grounds of the Judgment given in the appeal court's opinion on the appeal or protest the validity conditions, what appellate court found, evidence confirming the appeal court's opinion, the rationale for why the appellate court rejected any evidence and the law, after which it runs.
(5) If the appellate court finds such conditions an offence different from the judgment of the Court of first instance of the conditions listed, it provides a new criminal offence.
(6) If the appellate court left to the judgment of the Court of first instance without the amendment, could not repeat the judgment of the Court of first instance referred to the evidence and opinions.
(7) in the operative part of the judgment to be one of this law, the ruling provided for in Article 563.
(8) if the Court of appeal make a new judgment on the merits, the descriptive part, theme and operative part must conform to the requirements set out in this law, the judgment of the Court of first instance.
565. article. The appellate jurisdiction of the new judgment (1) an appeal or protest the result of the examination of the appeal court may: 1) justify the accused of any criminal offences or part of them, of which the Court of first instance judgment of conviction, sentence or fixing the easier without changing the set fines;
2) recognize the accused guilty of the crime is easier than that recognized by the Court of first instance, in determining penalties or lighter without changing the set fines;
3) to exclude from the charge to individual episodes of the crime, identifying easier without changing the fixed penalty or penalties;
4) annul the judgment of the Court of first instance in the part of the sentence and determine the accused easier;
5) annul the judgment of the Court of first instance in the part of the compensation of damages, compensation and confiscation of property security, items of evidence, procedural expenses and security tool and make a new judgment in this part.
(2) the finding of incorrect application of the criminal law, the Court of Appeal applied the first part of this article, the requirements for other defendants who have been convicted for the same criminal offence, regardless of whether it is submitted to the appeal or protest.
(3) on the basis of the Prosecutor's protest or complaint by the victim in a case of private prosecution, or the victim's complaint to the public prosecutor in the case, supported by the public prosecutor, the appellate court may: 1) admit the accused guilty of the more serious criminal offence than those recognised by the Court of first instance, determined by a more severe penalty or without changing it;
2) cancel the acquittal judgment of the Court of first instance and make a judgment of conviction;
3) admit the accused guilty of a separate offence committed in that event, the Court of first instance excluded from prosecution by establishing heavier penalties or without changing it;
4) annul the judgment of the Court of first instance in the part of the fine, determined by a more severe penalty.
(4) on the basis of a victim's complaint to the public prosecutor in the case, the appellate court may annul the judgment of the Court of first instance in the part of the fine, determined by a more severe penalty.
566. article. The appellate jurisdiction of the sending of the new criminal cases to the Court of first instance If the appellate court finds that the infringement of the law, which certainly caused the cancellation of the judgment, it shall take a decision on the judgment of the Court of first instance for annulment in whole or in any part thereof and the transmission of the case to a new Court of first instance in another.
567. article. Termination of appeal proceedings, if the appellate court finds this law 550. Article, it shall adopt a decision on the appeal.

568. article. The appellate court ruling declaring (1) the appellate court makes ruling the introductory paragraph and operative part.
(2) the Court shall set the time when you will be available for the full Court ruling.
54. chapter. The hearing in the Cassation 569. article. Appeal in cassation (1) an Appeal in cassation is Cassation protest or writing complaints to the Senate of the Supreme Court on the appellate court ruling the Justice who has not yet entered into force, for the purpose of achieving its cancellation in whole or any part of it or to amend it for legal reasons.
(2) in the first subparagraph for purposes of procedure and appeal not valid, having been convicted by a Court of first instance, adopted the agreement process.
(3) the Court of Cassation in the case of new evidence not examined.
570. article. Appeals and protest time limits (1) an appeal in cassation or protest shall be submitted not later than 10 days after the date of the Court judgment or decision has become available.
(2) after the deadline the cassation complaint or protest to the decision of the judge, written by a resolution, refused accept unless the applicant has not asked for the renewal of the term. The decision taken by the Court of Justice shall notify the applicant, but submitted a complaint or protest adds to the case.
(3) the judge's decision, with which an appeal in cassation or protest refused to accept may be appealed against within 10 days of the Senate of the Supreme Court, whose decision is final.
(4) the first part of this article in accordance with the procedures specified in the complaint or protest suspended enforcement of the judgment or decision enters into force.
571. article. Persons who have the right to submit a cassation complaint or a protest (1) an appeal in cassation may be lodged with the accused, his counsel, the victim, his spokesman and legal representative.
(2) the accused may submit a complaint about his impairment of, but the victim may make a complaint to the part that touched his rights and interests.
(3) the Prosecutor may file a cassation protest.
572. article. Appeals and protest the content of an appeal in cassation and the protest must include the justification of the claim by reference to the criminal law or infringement of this law, as well as motivated request on the view of hearing in the hearing process, if a complaint or protest the applicant so wishes.
573. article. Reasons for decision review in cassation of Justice Ruling in cassation only if a cassation complaint or a protest expressed in the claim based on a breach of criminal law or material violation of this law.
574. article. Violation of the criminal law criminal law offences are: 1) the general part of the criminal law incorrect application of article;
2) criminal law article, its parts or incorrect application of paragraph, qualify the criminal offence;
3) fine or a determination of the accused Mayor, not specified in the relevant article of the criminal law, its parts, or points penalties.
575. article. Criminal law essential violation of the law of criminal procedure (1) significant irregularities, which certainly caused the cancellation of the ruling of the Court is as follows: 1), the Court examined the case illegal;
2) are not complied with conditions that exclude the participation of judges in criminal proceedings;
3) case dealt with the accused or persons involved in the process, if the accused is absent, and the participation of the person under this Act is mandatory;
4) violated the accused's right to use a language which he understands, and use the interpreter;
5) the accused is given the name defense or are not given the opportunity to say the last word;
6) case, the minutes of the hearing if it is mandatory;
7) making a judgment, a violation of the Court's deliberations secret.
(2) Of this law, a serious irregularity can recognize a person's removal from the courtroom, where superior court of appeal, held that the expulsion was unjust, it is significantly restricted the accused or the victim's procedural law and thus resulted in the illegal ruling.
(3) Of this law, a serious irregularity may recognize other infringements of this law, which led to the illegal ruling.
576. article. Appeals and protest procedures for filing an appeal in cassation or protest shall be submitted to the Court which adopted the ruling.
577. article. Appeals and protest the consequences of referral (1) an appeal in cassation or protest shall suspend the submission of the entry into force of the judgment for all defendants in the case.
(2) an appeal in cassation or protest submission on supporting the judgment of the Court of Justice does not suspend the entry into force of the judgement in the part of the security feature – – custody, house arrest or insertion of social correction education – – cancellation.
(3) the expiry of the time limit for appeal against the ruling, the Court which made the ruling, the case with the cassation complaint or protest to the Senate of the Supreme Court.
578. article. Notice of an appeal in cassation or protest lodged (1) for submitting the appeal in cassation or protest to the Court which made the ruling, notify the Prosecutor and those persons whose interests and rights to this complaint or protest invades, and at the same time sent to the public prosecutor and those persons complaints or protests.
(2) in the first paragraph, that person shall within 10 days after the complaint or of receipt of the copy of the protest may submit written representations or explanations that are to be sent to the Senate of the Supreme Court.
579. article. An appeal in cassation or protest in supplementing or amending (1) the Court of Cassation, the complainant may file a complaint with additions and amendments. Cassation protest applicant or post higher prosecutor can lodge a protest additions and amendments.
(2) the Protest, as well as the victim's complaint or the amendments to the appendices to that appeal in cassation submitted after expiry of the time limit for appeal, may not require the accused to the deterioration of the situation, provided that such requirements are not in the original protest or complaint.
(3) in Addition to and shall be made not later than 10 days after the expiry of the time limit for appeal. The Senate of the Supreme Court shall immediately send a copy thereof to the other this law 578 in the first subparagraph of article.
580. article. The cassation complaint or cassation protest withdrawal and protests can be held at this law, in article 556.
581. article. Minor over the Cassation hearing representatives (1) the accused minors or cassation complaint of the representative of the victim, if not withdrawn, even if the hearing represented the moment already come of age.
(2) if the accused or the victim's former representative to the complaint filed by the represented in adulthood, it left without examination.
582. article. The composition of the Court of Cassation, judgments and decisions in cassation examined the Supreme Court Senate of three judges, one of which is the sitting President.
583. article. Determination of the proceedings (1) the judge who asked referē (hereinafter also-rapporteur), familiar with the case and with the resolution of the appeal in cassation or protest, the action detects the writing process or court hearing.
(2) in the case of written procedure, if possible to take a decision in the case. If you need additional explanations from the persons who have the right to participate in the process, or, at the discretion of the Supreme Court Senate cases concerned may have a special meaning in interpretation of the law, determines the proceedings at the hearing.
(3) the Person who submitted the complaint or protest, as well as those whose interests touch complaint or protest, declare whether the case will be heard in the process of writing or at the hearing, indicating where and when it will be viewed.
(4) If proceedings are set out in the written procedure, the third subparagraph shall notify the persons referred to in the Court's composition and explain the law within seven days to sign up for rejection.
(5) the proceedings before the Court, the accused on remand should be able to participate in the proceedings if he has asked for this law 578. in the second subparagraph of article within the time limit specified.
584. article. The boundaries of the proceedings before the Court of Cassation (1) the Court of Justice ruling of checks in the cassation complaint or a protest and the requirements.
(2) the Court of Cassation may exceed the cassation complaint or protest the amount of claims and the frame where it finds this law, article 574 and 575 in irregularities and they are not listed in the complaint or protest.
585. article. Hearing the written procedure (1) the written procedure in the case after the appearance of existing materials, subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of cassation instance.
(2) if necessary, the Court shall request the submission of the Prosecutor's opinion.
(3) the circumstances of the report to the rapporteur.
(4) an appeal in cassation or protest shall decide, when adopting a decision.
(5) the written procedure may also make a decision on the referral to the Court.
(6) an appeal in cassation or protest The decision taken with a copy to the complainant and the Prosecutor. The rest of this law, the third paragraph of article 583 persons referred to notify the examination results.
586. article. Proceedings before the Court at the hearing, the hearing process

(1) hearing found the hearing and will notify the President, a case will be heard, find out who had come to the hearing and decides the issue of opportunity. The accused or his counsel, as well as representatives of the victim or his absence, when they announced the cassation instance court sitting time and space do not preclude consideration.
(2) the President of the sitting shall notify the composition, of the court interpreter, Attorney and lawyer's name and find out whether there are rejections. If so, the Court shall decide on them.
(3) the hearing shall begin with the rapporteur's report, in which he sets out the circumstances of the case relating to the subject matter of the complaint or protest, the substance of the ruling, which filed an appeal in cassation or protest, the reasons which applied to cancel or modify the ruling.
(4) the rapporteur's report, the President shall invite the complainant, his counsel or representative to provide explanations in support of the complaint. If the case is heard in connection with the protests, the first to name the Prosecutor in support of the protest.
(5) where the complainant, his Defender or representative has not arrived, the grounds for complaint reported to the rapporteur.
(6) the Court may hear other persons notified of the hearing and that the rights and interests of the cassation complaint or a protest touch.
(7) After hearing the explanation of the Prosecutor shall give their views on them. Then again, the Court heard the accused or his counsel and consultation room decision.
587. article. Cassation instance court of cassation instance court shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) leave of the ruling, but the appeal in cassation or protest is dismissed.
2) cancel all or part of the judgment and refer the case back for a new hearing;
3) cancel all or part of the judgment and terminate the criminal proceedings;
4) to amend the judgment;
5 to terminate the cassation proceedings).
588. article. Cassation instance court the content of the decision (1) the decision of the Court of Cassation must specify: 1) decision-making time and place;
2 the name and composition of the Court), the public prosecutor and other persons participating in the proceedings;
3) the person who submitted the complaint or cassation protest;
4) appeal ruling of the operative part;
5) an appeal in cassation or protest in the nature and grounds of the claim, as well as the nature of the objection and the Prosecutor's opinion.
6) appeal court's decision on the complaint or protest.
(2) the decision must be motivated. If an appeal in cassation or protest is rejected, the decision must indicate why the complaint or protest the arguments considered unfounded.
(3) in the event of the cancellation of the Court ruling, the Court specifies the Act and its requirements of the article violated, and how is it manifested.
(4) If a hearing process in court, the operative part of the decision discussed in the signature room all court composition. The President or a judge of the Court composition makes them immediately in the Chamber of the Court.
(5) the Court of Cassation's decision may not be appealed. This decision shall enter into force at the time of delivery.
589. article. The Court of Cassation 53 instructions (1) of the Act of translation, expressed in the cassation instance court decision required the Court that this case is heard again.
(2) the Court of Cassation does not indicate in its decision, a decision should be taken in the proceedings.
590. article. Cassation instance court decision releasing (1) motivated the cassation instance court decision not later than five working days after the signature of the Court composition and all together with the case shall: 1), the Court of first instance, if adopted this law, art. 587, 3, 4 or 5 of that decision;
2) Court ruling cancelled, if the Court of Cassation decided on sending a new hearing of the case.
(2) the decision on the basis of which the accused lifted of a security feature, the executable immediately. In this case the cassation instance court shall send the decision to execute the statement.
591. article. Proceedings after judgment or decision (1) the case in which the decision adopted, sent to the new Court, which adopted it. Their appearance in the General order, but in another court.
(2) the penalty enhancement or law enforcement for more serious criminal offence, proceedings, admissible only if the judgment cancelled a fine pulp, or due to the fact that after the Prosecutor's protests or complaints by the victim was required to apply the law on more serious crime.
(3) the ruling, taken from the new look of the case can be appealed and may submit representations in General.
The eleventh section of characteristics of criminal proceedings in the cases of certain categories 55. chapter. Criminal proceedings by establishing medical coercive measures 592. article. Medical coercive means, the basis for determining (1) the criminal law as provided for in article 68 medical coercive means used by the Court to the person who committed the criminal offence in a State of insanity, or after committing the crime, or the judgment of the fallen ill with psychiatric disorders who robbed her ability to understand their actions or their drive, if that person after the offence and his mental state is dangerous to the public.
(2) If the first paragraph of this article after the crime, the person's character and his mental state is not dangerous to the public, but suffering from psychiatric disorders, the process may terminate criminal proceedings, shall be forwarded to the person concerned close relatives or other care that take care of the patient and the medical supervision at his home.
593. article. Order of the pre-trial process (1) a criminal offence committed by the person, being in a State of insanity, as well as on persons committed criminal offences for which psychiatric disorders occurred after the offence was committed, the pre-trial process is mandatory and is subject to the statutory general arrangements as well as the provisions of this chapter.
(2) If the General agenda launched in the course of criminal proceedings has shown this law referred to in Article 592 basis or have received judicial psychiatric expertise opinion on that basis, the existence of the process submitted 10 days adopt a reasoned decision on the continuation of the process of medical coercive measures and repealing decision on prosecution of criminal liability. If necessary, a criminal case materials about a particular person isolated in the records.
594. article. Persons participating in the activities of the investigation the pre-trial process (1) launching a process of medical coercive means of detection, process guide shall notify the person concerned or his representative by sending a copy of the decision, as well as inform such person and the representative about their rights and responsibilities.
(2) If a person started the process of medical coercive means and in accordance with the opinion of the expert, the person concerned may not take part in the investigation activities in the pre-trial process, process guide informs the person's counsel and shall take a decision on the participation of the representative in the criminal proceedings.
595. article. The conditions applied to the pre-trial process (1) in pre-trial process medical coercive measures to clarify: 1) the determination of the crime;
2) or an offence committed by the person being tested;
3) or the person committing the crime during my illness with psychiatric disorders who could not understand their actions or their drive, or with any of these psychiatric conditions developed after committing the crime;
4) conditions that do not allow the imposition of penalties if a person with psychiatric disorders developed by committing the crime;
5) verifiable person raksturojošo;
6) as a result of a crime and the nature of the injury caused.
(2) the Court may order a medical coercive measures if cleared the first part contains the conditions.
596. article. Judicial expertise (1) psychiatric process driver determines the judicial psychiatric expertise to the suspect or the accused, if the criminal is news that the person who developed with psychiatric disorders, committed a criminal offence, being in a State of insanity, or fallen ill after committing the crime, or the news that he committed a criminal offence in a State of limited dismissals.
(2) in determining the judicial psychiatric expertise, you need to clear this 595 of the law the first paragraph of article 3, 4 and 5 above and ask an expert specific questions.
(3) the mainstream medical establishment of coercive measures for psychiatric expertise is required.
597. article. Suspension of the pre-trial process due to the insertion of personal medical institution

(1) If a person with psychiatric conditions developed after committing the crime, and expert opinion, cannot participate in the pre-trial process and it needs treatment, driver of the process submitted to the Court on insert the person's suggestion of a medical institution. The Court shall take a decision on the persons placing medical institution or rejected the suggestion. Received the following a court decision, the process of pre-trial proceedings suspend the process.
(2) received from the hospital's opinion that the person is cured and the investigation to continue, the promoters and the process continues in the pre-trial process.
(3) If, in accordance with the expert opinion of a person is not curable, and it is necessary to provide one of the proposed criminal law medical coercive means, process guide completes the process of medical coercive means.
598. article. Defenders and representatives participation in the process (1) Advocates the participation process medical determinations of coercive measures is mandatory.
(2) a Person participating in the process of medical coercive measures is required, if the same person may not take part in the process.
(3) the advocate and representative process from the time the person is found sick with mental disabilities, unless they have not participated in the process previously for other reasons.
(4) If during the course of criminal proceedings a person is cured and recognized as overhead, the Court decides on the further participation of the representative in the process, but the Defender continued participation in the process.
599. article. The abolition of the security features (1) launching a process of medical coercive means for determining the person designated security feature should be repealed.
(2) if the person due to the disease is dangerous to the public, the process of pre-trial investigation judge at the request of the promoters of the process may decide this person into a psychiatric hospital until the Court takes a decision on medical coercive means.
600. article. The completion of the pre-trial process (1) in pre-trial proceedings, a medical coercive means for determining the Prosecutor completed to decide criminal cases sent to court medical coercive means of detection, which may not be appealed.
(2) If there are several defendants in the criminal case, but a decision on the transmission of the case to the Court medical coercive means for determining the Prosecutor accepts one or more of them for the rest of the accused the Prosecutor General in the pre-trial process completes.
(3) If the second part of this article in criminal proceedings can be completed in respect of all defendants at the same time, the case sent to the Court for consideration in one process.
601. article. Decision on the transmission of criminal proceedings the Court decision on the transmission of criminal proceedings the Court medical detection of coercive measures in addition to the General requirements specified in pre-trial process should this law 595 first paragraph of article 3 and paragraph 4 of the above conditions and basis of medical coercive means.
602. article. Preparation of the hearing judge, decide the question as to which the persons invited to the hearing, shall order the hearing to deliver also the person against whom the proceedings are medical coercive means of detection, if it allows the person's disease.
603. article. Criminal proceedings at the hearing (1) the criminal on medical coercive means of determining the appearance of a closed hearing, the participation of the Prosecutor, Defender, personal representative and expert-psychiatrist, but this law 602 cases set out in article – also to the person against whom the proceedings.
(2) judicial investigation begins with the fact that the public prosecutor read out the decision on sending a criminal court medical coercive measures for the detection of the descriptive part.
(3) the Court examined evidence and listen to expert opinion on a person's mental state, to decide the question of whether this person has committed a criminal offence and whether it be medical coercive means.
(4) the appellate court expert shall be invited at its discretion.
604. article. Criminal matter in court by criminal about the medical determination of coercive measures, the Court must decide the following issues: 1) or a criminal offence has occurred;
2) or the offence committed by the person against whom the proceedings;
3) or a person of a criminal offence committed in dismissals or insanity of the State, and whether it has a psychic disorder at the time of adoption of the decision;
4) or a person with psychiatric conditions developed after committing the crime, and that this not temporary and, therefore, the proceedings should be suspended;
5) or the person is dangerous to the public;
6) what medical coercive means it identifiable.
605. article. The Court decision of criminal case (1) Recognizing that a person has committed a criminal offence, being in a State of insanity, or that the person has fallen ill with psychiatric disorders after committing the crime and therefore not aware of his actions or control them, in accordance with article 13 of the criminal code, the Court shall take a decision on the person's release from criminal responsibility or punishment and detects one of criminal law envisaged in article 68 medical coercive means.
(2) If a person after the offence and his mental state is not dangerous to the public, the Court can put it close to a relative or other person in charge of carrying out nursing and medical supervision of its residence.
(3) is satisfied that the person is charged, the Court shall refer the decision of the Criminal Prosecutor in the pre-trial process is finished.
(4) it is accepted that the participation of the person of an offence is not proven or established conditions that does not allow at all criminal proceedings, the Court shall decide on the termination of criminal proceedings and notify the medical institution in which the person in treatment.
(5) it is recognised that the test person has not committed a crime, but it is done by another person, the Court of criminal proceedings against the person to be tested shall be terminated and sent to the Prosecutor for criminal cases before the Court in the process.
(6) in the operative part of the decision, the Court determines the action with real evidence and documents, compensation for damage, the movers with possessions, which arrested, procedural costs drive and explains the decision of the Court of appeals procedures and deadlines.
606. article. Appeals against decisions of the Court (1) the decision of the Court is appealable order in General.
(2) If a court decision is appealed only in connection with the determination of the compensation of damage in case it does not suspend the execution of the decision in part on the forced medical measure.
607. article. Medical coercive means of repeal or amendment of the basis (1) If you need to apply for a lost Court medical coercive means, due to the fact that a person with this feature set, recovered or otherwise changed its state of health, the hospital's Manager, in which the treatment of the person concerned, on the basis of the doctor's opinion, the Commission proposes that the Court should decide on the specific medical coercive means the cancellation or amendment.
(2) a request to cancel or amend the specific medical coercive means may submit to the Court a person who certainly medical coercive means, as well as the person's legal representative, spouse or other close relatives. In such cases, the Court of the medical authorities must request the opinion on the State of health of the person about whom the request is submitted.
(3) a proposal for a specific medical coercive means the cancellation or amendment may be submitted to the Court the Prosecutor, also suggested adding the medical opinion and other documents necessary for the issue matter.
(4) the Court of Justice, which decided on compulsory medical measure, or the Court of first instance, which controls the execution of the decision, on its own initiative review the question of its abolition or amendment, if a year of medical coercive means or determination of the question of its abolition or modification of the last examination is not filed a request or suggestion to withdraw or amend the specific medical coercive means.
608. article. Medical coercive means of repeal or amendment procedure (1) the issue of medical coercive means of cancellation or modification shall decide within 14 days of the Court which decided on the discovery, or the Court in whose area the medical establishment is located, which shall carry out the forced treatment.
(2) the hearing shall participate in the Prosecutor, Defender and legal representative of the person. The Court invited the hospital's representative, the person who proposed the issue and, if necessary, the person to whom the specified medical coercive means.
(3) if the Court is in doubt as to the opinion of the doctor, it can identify the judicial psychiatric expertise, in addition to request medical or other documents, as well as to perform other actions.

(4) After examination of the circumstances, the Court heard the opinion of the public prosecutor and the defence.
(5) For medical coercive means of cancellation or modification or refusal to do so, the Court takes the decision. The decision is subject to appeal in cassation only.
(6) the question repeated action no earlier than three months from the date when the Court rejected the request for a medical coercive means of repeal or amendment.
609. article. Restoration effects of criminal proceedings (1) If a person who had fallen ill with psychiatric disorders after committing the crime, recognized as a whole, the Court of law 608. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article decide on medical coercive measures and send the case to the public prosecutor the pre-trial process is complete.
(2) the medical institution will be treated as the time spent in detention, the time spent.
56. chapter. Criminal proceedings in cases of rehabilitation of the dead article 610. The reason for the continuation of the criminal proceedings in the rehabilitation of the deceased (1) if the driver of the process with his decision has terminated the criminal proceedings due to the death or has terminated the criminal proceedings to another does not reabilitējoš Basic, essentially recognizing the person convicted of the crime, and that person then is dead, its statutory representatives, close relatives or other persons who are in possession of the facts, which show about the dead innocence one year after the adoption of this decision may submit an application for the continuation of the criminal proceedings in the rehabilitation of the dead.
(2) an application for the continuation of the criminal proceedings in the rehabilitation of the deceased person may apply also in the case when is dead the suspect or the accused in criminal proceedings, but the process has not yet ended.
611. article. The decision on the continuation of the criminal proceedings in the rehabilitation of the deceased (1) appearance of the personal driver of the process of application for the continuation of the criminal proceedings in which the deceased rehabilitation of facts provided, which shows the person's innocence of the crime, they verify the material in the context of criminal proceedings if the existing information and 10 days after the receipt of the application takes one of the following decisions: 1) annul the decision on the termination of criminal proceedings and criminal proceedings to continue rehabilitation of the deceased;
2) rejection of the application.
(2) the driver of the process immediately a copy of the decision shall be forwarded to the applicant that the application is rejected, the decision may be appealed to the law in this chapter 24.
612. article. Pre-trial criminal nature of continuation (1) after a decision on the continuation of criminal rehabilitation, died in the pre-trial process is pursuant to this statutory general arrangements as well as the provisions of this chapter.
(2) the driver of the process shall decide on its involvement in the process, the person who submitted the application for continuation of criminal rehabilitation, and the dead shall inform that person about his/her rights.
(3) the driver of the process in the pre-trial process will make the necessary procedural steps to check the particulars provided on the application.
613. article. The completion of the pre-trial process in the rehabilitation of the deceased (1) pre-trial proceedings to investigators with the deceased in the rehabilitation the Central Prosecutor's consent or the Prosecutor can be completed with the decision on the termination of criminal proceedings: 1) on a reabilitējoš basis;
2) with justification, which reabilit the dead, while considering the issue of that person before the restricted restoration, if possible;
3) justification of the reabilitējoš against the deceased, while considering the issue of that person before the restricted renewal, if it is possible, but the criminal investigation of the material transfer of the convicted person.
(2) a copy of the decision process for the driver to immediately send to the applicant, informing him of the right to consult the file and 10 days to appeal the decision in court.
614. article. Proceedings of the deceased rehabilitation (1) judge, received the applicant's complaint about the termination of the pre-trial process: 1) request from promoters of criminal pre-trial process materials;
2) determines the place of the hearing and time;
3) invited to the hearing required people.
(2) criminal rehabilitation appearance of the deceased for the hearing, with the participation of the Prosecutor, the applicant and the Defender, if any.
(3) at the hearing, hear the applicant or complainant counsel Prosecutor's report on the substance of the case and examine the evidence submitted.
615. article. (1) decision of criminal proceedings by the Criminal Court for rehabilitation of the deceased, to decide, or a criminal offence or the offence committed and the person on that process.
(2) accepted that participation in the dead of an offence is not proven or established conditions that does not allow at all criminal proceedings, the Court shall decide on the termination of criminal proceedings, the participation of the persons concerned.
(3) is satisfied that an offence has been committed and is committing the person for which the proceedings, the Court shall decide on the termination of criminal proceedings, without the participation of the persons concerned.
(4) held that the deceased did not commit a criminal offence, but it made the other person, the Court shall terminate the criminal proceedings against the dead and sent to the Prosecutor's Office in criminal proceedings criminal cases.
616. article. The procedures for appeals against decisions of the Court (1) the decision of the Court is appealable order in General.
(2) the Person who requested the continuation of the process, have the same rights to appeal to the Court of first instance and the appeal court's decision as the accused.
57. chapter. The nature of the proceedings, by complaints about the grounds for the termination of criminal proceedings, article 617. The core of the complaint the Person against whom criminal proceedings have been terminated, its representative and defender may complain about the driver of the process or the Prosecutor's decision to terminate criminal proceedings, if it is terminated due to: 1) criminal liability limitation, but the person does not admit his guilt in the offence;
2), but the personal act of amnesty did not admit his guilt in the offence;
3) that a person has committed the offences under conditions which preclude criminal liability, that is to say, without prejudice to the limits of necessary self-defence, making the interception, when in extreme need State or justified professional risk, but the person concerned contests the actual circumstances.
618. article. The lodging of the complaint procedure and the time limits (1) the complaint about the process or the Prosecutor requested a decision on termination of the criminal proceedings and the reference of this Act Chapter 24 General established procedures, except in this article.
(2) the decision may be appealed within one month from the date of receipt of the copy of the decision.
(3) the complaint shall be submitted to the promoter of the process that it, along with the materials presented to the Court which would have jurisdiction in the criminal proceedings.
(4) If a decision on termination of the criminal proceedings is accepted for one person, but to the other parties the same criminal proceedings will continue against the decision taken and added to the Criminal Court at the criminal trial. The process of such action shall inform the promoters of the complainant.
619. article. Complaints handling policy (1) the judge complaining about the reasons for the termination of criminal proceedings in court hearing one month after it is received.
(2) if the complainant without justification, fails to appear at the hearing, she submitted the inquiry is terminated.
(3) the judge hearing the Court heard the complainant, appealed the decision makers and other persons invited to the Court, the test results obtained in criminal proceedings and proceedings related to the complaint the evidence and decide.
620. article. Complaints in the Court decision (1) decide the complaint pursuant to this law 344. article.
(2) the judge's decision is not appealable.
58. chapter. Criminal proceedings in cases of private prosecution 621. article. The initiation of criminal proceedings in cases of private prosecution (1) criminal proceedings in the case of private prosecution may be initiated only when the person to whom the harm caused, made a complaint to the Court about a particular person of this law article 7 referred to in the third subparagraph of the crime.
(2) upon receipt of a complaint the judge no later than the next business day, or check the victim's complaint to the correct article and part of the criminal code, after which the criminal proceedings initiated private prosecution cases, and whether or not the criminal penalties, limitation, and shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) for the initiation of criminal proceedings;
2 waiver to initiate criminal proceedings);
3 shipment of the material after the) jurisdiction.
(3) the judge's decision on the criminal proceedings may not be appealed.
622. article. The court action after the initiation of criminal proceedings (1) the decision on the initiation of criminal proceedings, the judge shall determine the criminal proceedings and the location and order of the Court Office: 1) send the person against whom the indictment, a copy of the complaint;
2) to inform the accused of his rights and obligations, including the right to consult with the Court to add materials; complaint
3) inform victims about the time and place;
4) called a hearing for the accused and, if necessary, witnesses, experts and other persons.

(2) in the case of private prosecution in the pre-trial process occurs.
(3) If the accused not later than the beginning of the proceedings in the Court of appeal for the victim, the two may be combined in one indictment in the case and do the same process. In this case, each of the victims is also accused, and each is both the victim and the accused's rights and obligations.
623. article. The private prosecution case preparation for trial a private prosecution case preparation for the hearing, the hearing takes place in the law in General.
624. article. The private prosecution proceedings procedure (1) the private prosecution cases, the trials going on in this law the General order, pursuant to this article.
(2) the private prosecution cases, the preliminary hearing judge explains in part the victim of his right to keep or to make it up with the accused.
(3) Court at the beginning of the investigation the victim reads his complaint. Then the judge asking the accused whether he understood the charges and whether he himself admit guilty.
(4) if the settlement takes place before leaving the Conference room to make judgments, criminal proceedings are terminated.
625. article. The criminal case of private prosecution termination hearing (1) the criminal proceedings in cases of private prosecution terminated in the stage of the hearing, if it is established in the following circumstances: 1) no victim complaints;
2) the victim or his representative, without justification, not come to the Court of session;
3) the victim and the accused reconciled.
(2) the private prosecution cases are also subject to other criminal proceedings provided for in this Act for the termination of rules.
59. chapter. Process on getting the stuff, 626. article. The reason for starting the process of criminal property obtained driver has the right to process before the Court in the criminal proceedings the question of timely resolution and process in the interest of economy, with the consent of the supervisory Prosecutor, to release from criminal material on get the stuff, and starting the process if the following conditions occur: 1) set of evidence gives grounds to believe that everything that has been removed or arrested have criminal (criminal offence related) origin;
2) objective reasons of criminal referrals to the Court in the near future (in a reasonable time period) is not possible and this can cause significant ineligible expenses.
627. article. The decision to begin the process of obtaining the property crime (1) process, the promoters of this law 626. the conditions referred to in article, decides to launch a process on getting the stuff, and put a criminal a criminal get Court for decision to the property.
(2) decision process Guide: 1) what materials of criminal cases under investigation for an offence is revealed in the case of criminal property;
2) who are associated with a particular property;
3) what action to get the stuff, he says.
(3) the decision and the accompanying materials are sent to the district (municipal) Court.
628. article. With property information related to the process of transforming this Act 627 decision referred to in article shall immediately send a copy of the suspect or accused and the person to whom the property was removed or it was arrested, if such persons in criminal proceedings is concerned, or any other person who is entitled to the property, while pointing to the right: 1) in person or by counsel or a representative to participate in the process of criminal property;
2) orally or in writing to the Court to make their treatment decisions;
3) to submit applications to the Court.
629. article. Court proceedings for a criminal to obtain property (1) judge, received the decision about the process on getting the goods: 1) set the hearing date and place;
2) invites the required people to court.
(2) the hearing must take place within 10 days after receipt of the decision of the promoters of the process.
(3) the hearing shall participate in the process of transforming that made his decision, the Prosecutor, if the decision is accepted by the coroner as well as 628 this law referred to in article and to court the invitees.
(4) at the hearing, the hearing process Guide, prosecutors, other invitees and check the evidence submitted.
630. article. Court decision on getting things (1) examining the material on get lost, the Court must decide: 1) or something that is related to the criminal offence;
2) or known property owner or lawful possessor;
3) or a person has a legal right to property;
4) action to gather belongings.
(2) if the Court finds that the property with a criminal offence is not proven, it shall take the decision to end the process of criminal property and specify future action in this decision to the relevant property.
631. article. The decision of the Court of criminal appeals of property the Court decision is appealable to the appeal court in General.
Twelfth section of the entry into force of the decision and rulings related to the matter of Chapter 60. The judgment and the decision to release 632. article. The entry into force of the judgment (1) judgment of the Court of first instance enters into force when it expired to appeal or appeal in cassation and the judgment is not appealed.
(2) the appeal court judgment shall enter into force when it expired for the appeal in cassation and the judgment is not appealed. If an appeal in cassation or protest is filed, the judgment shall enter into force on the day of the cassation instance court has examined the case, if it is not lifted by the judgment.
(3) if there are several defendants and where a judgment appealed something, or in respect of one of them, the judgment does not take effect in respect of all defendants.
(4) criminal conviction in a court decision on the security feature and the damages or property confiscation provision shall enter into force immediately after the judgment.
633. article. The Court decision comes into force (1) the decision of the Court of first instance enters into force and is executed when it expired and the appeal decision is not appealed.
(2) the decision of the Court of appeal shall enter into force when it expired for appeal in cassation and the decision was not appealed.
(3) the Court's decision on the termination of the immediately enforceable in the part relating to the release of the accused of safeguards relating to deprivation of liberty.
(4) the decision of the Court of Cassation shall enter into force on the date of delivery and shall be final.
634. article. Judgment and decision procedures (1) the judgment and the decision shall be referred to the Court for the execution, which has given the judgment or decision, in the first instance not later than within three working days following the date of its entry into force or the receipt of the appeal or cassation instance court.
(2) the Court shall send the order for enforcement of the judgment and a copy of the judgment to the authority which, in accordance with the law on the execution of penalties imposed on the obligation to execute the judgment. If the case viewed the appeal or appeal in cassation, together with the order for enforcement of the judgment of the Court of appeal and also sent the Court a copy of the ruling.
(3) judgment, exonerating the accused from the judgment and emancipating judgment on conditional sentencing is executed immediately after the judgment on the part of the accused's release from the security features relating to deprivation of liberty.
(4) to comply with a judgment in part on fines, confiscation of property and other property in nature drives, court injunction sent the bailiff at the residence or been convicted after his property location or issue the victim at his request.
(5) the authority executing the judgment, shall immediately notify the Court that delivered the judgment on it.
(6) the judgment and the full implementation of the decision is controlled by the Court of first instance.
635. article. The order in which an enforceable decision on the medical application of coercive measures (1) the decision on the medical application of coercive measures be enforced immediately after its entry into force.
(2) If, since the date of entry into force of the decision on the criminal law article 68, first paragraph, point 1 of the intended medical coercive measures, six months have passed and the execution of the decision at this time is not initiated, the relevant parties without the prior consent of the treatment is delayed until the new doctor received an opinion from the Commission.
(3) If, since the date of entry into force of the decision on the criminal law 68 of the first paragraph of article 2 and paragraph 3 proposed medical coercive measures, six months have passed and the execution of the decision this time, been initiated, the person concerned may be placed in a hospital, but without the prior consent of the treatment is delayed until the new doctor received an opinion from the Commission.
(4) a Person can start the treatment, if doctors, the Commission gives its opinion that the person is not recovered, the health situation has not significantly changed, and may require specific treatment in compulsory.

(5) if the Commission recognises the doctor, that person is recovered or the health situation has changed to the extent that does not require a forced treatment or referred to in the third subparagraph in the case of forced treatment can be performed in ambulatory, a question about a specific medical coercive means the cancellation or amendment being considered this law 607. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
636. article. The order in which executable statement on (1) the Prosecutor's statement on the entry into force, if it is not appealed or the complaint dismissed.
(2) the public prosecutor's Office sent to the Prosecutor's statement on the fine copy of the authority in accordance with the law on the enforcement of penalties required to execute it. Statement on the fine, confiscation of property and other property in nature drives the public prosecutor's Office sent to the bailiff at the place of residence of the person or at the property location.
(3) the authority, which runs the set fines for its execution shall immediately notify the public prosecutor's Office, which the Prosecutor had issued the statement.
(4) statement on the execution of the fine control of the public prosecutor's Office.
637. article. Notice the sentenced relatives for enforcement after the entry into force of the judgment, with which the convicted sentenced to deprivation of liberty, or arrest, penitentiary administration enables you to immediately inform his close relatives or other persons at his choice of penal places.
638. article. The postponement of the execution of the judgment (1) If a sentence of imprisonment or arrest, the Court may postpone the enforcement of the judgment in the following cases: 1) if convicted of serious disease illness that impedes the sentence — while he recovered;
2) if convicted is pregnant at the time of execution of the judgment, for a period not longer than one year;
3 If the juvenile is convicted) children, for a period until the child reaches three years of age;
4) if immediate parole can lead to very serious consequences for the convicted or his family due to fire or other natural calamity, the only working family member, serious illness or death, and in other exceptional cases, to the Court of a particular time, but no longer than three months.
(2) enforcement must not defer to persons convicted of serious or very serious crime.
(3) payment of a fine may defer or split time for a period of up to one year, if the convicted is difficult to pay the fine immediately.
639. article. Convicted right during the execution of the judgment (1) at the time of the execution of the convicted have the right to their own with the release of the judgment related to the legal protection of the interests of the Court, namely, the right to: 1) invite champion;
2) to submit an application for release from parole due to illness or disability;
3) to submit an application for a conditional early release from punishment and for other enforcement related matters;
4) participate in the meetings of the Court and give evidence;
5) submitting materials that are ready to examine the question of the enforcement of the judgment;
6) to submit complaints about the judge's decision.
(2) in considering issues related to the enforcement of the judgment in relation to convicts who have not reached 18 years of age, as well as those convicted who are physically or mentally deficient, the participation of a counsel is mandatory.
61. chapter. Judgment and decision execution time issues in the article 640. Release from parole due to illness (1) if the convict penitentiary penal time ill with psychiatric disorders and therefore can not be in the penitentiary institution and he needed treatment, the judge, on the basis of the opinion of the expert, can be released from the sentence of convicted, in determining his treatment.
(2) If the first paragraph of this article after the crime, the person's character and his mental state is not dangerous to the public, the judge may by close relatives or other care that will take care of the patient, and the medical supervision at his home.
(3) If at the time of sentence with psychiatric disorders that become ill convict a specified penalty not involving the deprivation of liberty, the judge can decide on his release from the subsequent sentence.
(4) if the convict penitentiary penal time ill with severe disease, psychiatric disorders, the judge, taking into account the nature of the crime, convicted in personality and other circumstances, can make a decision about his release from the subsequent sentence.
(5) releasing convicted of subsequent parole due to illness, the judge may exempt him not only from the principal, but also from the additional penalty, giving the decision about it.
641. article. Conditionally sentenced the obligation or conditional sentencing repeal (1) If a convict with a relatively good behavior proves that has changed, or has been declared disabled, district (City) Court judge after his application to the institution of the place of residence of the tasked to control conditional behavior, sentenced to probation for convicted conditionally obligations imposed may be waived wholly or partly.
(2) if the conditional convict without justification, fails to fulfil his duties of the Court or commits an administrative offence repeatedly, the judge at his place of residence, the application of the authority tasked to monitor the behavior of convicted conditionally, can decide on the penalties laid down in the judgment enforcement is conditional on the convicted or the extension of him for one year.
(3) application to the court hearing, without requiring a criminal, convicted conditionally and in the presence of representatives of the authorities, which control his behavior.
(4) if the judge dismissed the application for annulment of the duties, which were imposed on the convicted conditionally for a trial period, it can be re-submitted after six months.
642. article. Reduced penalties in exceptional cases if the convict helped reveal a serious or very serious crime that are heavier or more dangerous than his own, the Criminal Court judge, with which he has been convicted by a judgment, on the Attorney General's submission that the convicted can reduce penalties under the criminal law provisions of article 60.
643. article. Conditional early release from punishment (1) in accordance with article 61 of the criminal law, convicted conditionally released before the term of deprivation of liberty, or arrest of a district (City) Court judge after the sentence if it has a place in the penitentiary institutions of the Administrative Commission of the submission.
(2) application to the court hearing, without requiring a criminal. Participating Prosecutor, as well as custodial institutions representative of the Administrative Commission and the convict.
(3) if the judge rejects the application, it can be re-submitted after six months.
(4) releasing relatively early from the penalty, the judge on a penalty time can been convicted to impose obligations laid down in article 55 of the criminal code.
(5) If before the expiry of the conditional release, without justification, fails to fulfil his duties of the Court or commits an administrative offence repeatedly, the judge may decide not to report the execution of the punishment part of its application, the authority tasked to control the behavior of the convicted.
644. article. Police control replacement or cancellation (1) If a person who applied to police control, abuse violates its rules, district (City) Court judge sentenced the police authorities of the place of residence of the basic criminal law application of article 45 of the cases can be replaced without penalty served time with deprivation of liberty for the same period.
(2) in accordance with article 45 of the Criminal Code of the district (City) Court judge sentenced the residence of police control can reduce or cancel it if a custodial authority of the Administrative Commission or the police authorities reasoned submission.
(3) the application of this law, examine 651. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
645. article. Fine to arrest or deprivation of liberty (1) If a fine cannot be recovered, the judge replaced with arrest or deprivation of liberty under article 41 of the criminal law of the fourth part.
(2) If payment of the fine, when convict instead endure imprisonment or arrest, he immediately released.
(3) If, at the time of the convict's fine place serving imprisonment or arrest, pays part of the fine, the judge reduced the imprisonment or seizure duration according to the part of the fine paid.
646. article. Forced labour replacing with arrest if the person sentenced to forced labor, abuse avoid parole, the judge replaced with arrest under criminal law article 40 provisions of the third paragraph.
Article 647. Execution by the empowering nature of application of coercive measures (1) If a minor who has been released from under penalties and appropriate educative nature coercive means to fulfil the obligations imposed by the Court, the penalty imposed on him is run.
(2) the issue of the execution of penalties to decide district (City) Court in the place of residence of minors in accordance with the procedure laid down in this law.
648. article. Medical institution of the time spent during the penalty If convicted, suffer imprisonment or arrest, was placed in the medical institution, in the time spent clearing penalty.

649. article. The verdict, if there are other outstanding judgments if a convict has more outstanding judgments, and the enforcement authority or the Prosecutor's application to the Court that delivered the judgment, or the last of the same level of court at the place of enforcement in accordance with article 50 of the criminal law the fifth part or article 51 of the decision on the final determination of the penalty after this judgment togetherness.
650. article. The Court, which decides with enforcement issues (1) the issues relating to penalties laid down in the judgment, as well as doubts and ambiguities arising from the execution of the judgment, and the enforcement authority or the Prosecutor's application to the Court to decide, which delivered the judgment.
(2) If a judgment is executed outside the judicial district where the judgment, delivered by an enforcement authority or the Prosecutor's application to these questions decides the the same level of the judge whose sentence the convicted in the district.
651. article. With the enforcement of the decision process issues (1) enforcement issues decide the judge at the hearing, the Prosecutor and the convicted for participation that are provided in article 71 of this law rights.
(2) If the judge examines the question of the release of the convicted sentence of disease or disability, as well as the question of the treatment of exempted transfers under the auspices of institutions, to participate in the hearing the opinion of the doctor did a representative of the Commission.
(3) If the judge examines the issues related to the execution of the judgment, the Court of session are invited a representative of the institution manages or controls the execution of conditionally sentenced.
(4) If on the hearing without justification, not the people who sent or requested submissions, hearing postponed.
(5) the judge found the hearing and notifies, something is covered, then checks whether the hearing invited guests arrived, decide the issue of judges, the Prosecutor, trial Secretary, interpreter of rejection.
(6) the hearing shall begin with the application or request made by the applicant of the reading. The Court then heard the Prosecutor's and other people's views. The last talk in the convict and his Defender. Then the judge discussed the room takes a decision.
(7) All court decisions taken by the enforcement of the related matters can be appealed within 10 days. Higher court examines a complaint in accordance with the procedure laid down in this article, and its decision is final.
652. article. The Prosecutor's statement in a specific execution issues agenda (1) deciding issues relating to the Prosecutor's statement on a specific execution of penalties, as well as doubt and confusion arising from the execution of this penalty, in accordance with the procedure laid down in this chapter shall decide its prosecutorial authority Chief that the Prosecutor had issued a statement about the penalty.
(2) the Attorney General's decision is appealable.
653. article. Criminal procedure (1) remove the issue of removing the appearance of judicial district (City) Court judge after the sentencing of the place of residence of the person suffered, if this person is received, its legal representative or counsel request.
(2) the request shall notify the Prosecutor of the Court. In the absence of the public prosecutor to the Court of session is not a barrier to matter for the criminal.
(3) hearing required to participate to the person in respect of whom the request is addressed for the criminal. This person has the right to a defence.
(4) the question of the criminal process begins with a request to consider reading. After the judge heard the views of invitees and the deliberations room decision.
(5) If a request for the removal of the criminal record is rejected, again it may be submitted not earlier than six months after the date of the decision on the rejection of such a request.
(6) the decision of the Court on the issue of criminal removal can only be appealed on this article provides procedural non-compliance.
654. article. Penitentiary administrative appeals against decisions of the Commission (1) the decisions on the execution mode softening or hardening of convicts accepting penitentiary of the Administrative Commission.
(2) in the first subparagraph, these decisions can be appealed to the convict, his legal representative and the Defender, but the Prosecutor can lodge a protest about them.
(3) such complaints and protest in a district (City) Court judge after the custodial authorities the location of this law 651. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
The thirteenth section of the ruling in force a new investigation 62. chapter. The reconstruction of criminal proceedings due to newly discovered circumstances 655. article. Foundation for the recovery of criminal proceedings due to newly discovered circumstances to renew criminal proceedings (1) where is the entry into force of a judgment or decision may be due to newly discovered circumstances.
(2) the following shall be considered As newly discovered circumstances: 1) by a judgment which has the force of res judicata of the victim or witness acknowledged knowingly false testimony knowingly false expert opinion, translation, into evidence, investigation and court actions or decisions of the forgery, as well as other evidence of fraud, which were based on unlawful judicial decision making;
2) by a judgment which has the force of res judicata, the judges recognized the Prosecutor or investigator criminal malice that had been based on unlawful judicial decision making;
3) other circumstances, which, assuming the ruling, were not known to the Court and which by themselves or in conjunction with the previously established conditions indicate that the convict is not guilty or made easier or more serious crime than that for which he was convicted or acquitted, or indicating the fault of the person in respect of which the proceedings have been terminated;
4) Constitutional Court opinion on the rules of law or its interpretation of the Constitution of the non-compliance, on the basis of which the entry into force of the court order;
5 international court institutions) opinion that the Latvian Court ruling which has entered into force, does not comply with binding international legislation.
(3) if it is not possible to build judgment so that barred amnesty law issued by individual persons or spared dead accused, the second paragraph of article 1 and 2 of this newfound presence of circumstances finds the investigation carried out by the procedure laid down in this chapter.
656. article. The deadline for the renewal of criminal proceedings due to newly discovered circumstances (1) good judgment or the decision on the termination of criminal proceedings before the new law only allowed for the criminal liability of the limitation period and no later than one year from the date of the detection of newly discovered.
(2) If criminal proceedings have been completed with conviction, then, upon the circumstances that indicate that the person concerned committed a criminal offence heavier than that on which the person convicted, the criminal can be restored to the criminal offence heavier in a certain limitation.
(3) Conviction of a new hearing due to newly discovered circumstances in favor of the convicted is not limited by time.
(4) the convicted person's death is not an obstacle to the restoration of the criminal case rehabilitated to this person.
(5) on the newly discovered circumstances shall be considered the date of the finding: 1) this law 655. the second paragraph of article 1 and paragraph 2-in the cases provided for in the day of the entry into force of the judgment;
2. this Act 655) of the second paragraph of article 3 in the cases provided for in paragraph – – the date when the Prosecutor took the decision on the renewal of the process due to newly discovered circumstances.
657. article. The reconstruction of criminal proceedings due to newly discovered circumstances (1) the right to renew criminal proceedings due to newly discovered circumstances is the Prosecutor.
(2) the reason for the recovery of criminal proceedings is a criminal case, the representatives of the persons involved in the application, as well as information obtained by other criminal investigations or in the course of proceedings, if this law 655. laid down in the second subparagraph of article.
(3) the application for the newly discovered circumstances the Prosecutor after the initial appearance of the criminal proceedings.
(4) The renewal of a criminal due to newly discovered circumstances the Prosecutor decides, in the context of an investigation driven by newly discovered circumstances, subject to the provisions of this law on criminal proceedings before the Court, and shall notify the applicant.
(5) if the Prosecutor refuses to renew criminal proceedings due to newly discovered circumstances, he shall adopt a reasoned decision and notify the applicant, sending him a copy of the decision and explaining the right to appeal against that decision.
658. article. The Prosecutor's action after the completion of the investigation of the incidence (1) if the public prosecutor after the completion of the investigation of the incidence of acknowledges that cancel is the basis for the ruling, he writes an opinion on the basis of the newly discovered evidence obtained in the investigation.
(2) opinion, together with the criminal and investigative materials, jaunatklāto, investigating the circumstances, the Prosecutor shall send to the Court in accordance with this law, the provisions of article 659.
(3) if the public prosecutor after the newfound non Foundation investigation of conditions ruling the abolition of the newly discovered circumstances, he shall act on the matter.

(4) a copy of the decision on the new conditions the completion of the investigation, the Prosecutor shall transmit to the applicant, while explaining to him the right to appeal.
659. article. The court hearing the case due to newly discovered circumstances the Prosecutor's opinion, and the submission of: 1 appearance) on the case in which the ruling adopted by the Court of first instance or appeal court, one level higher than the trial court adopted the ruling;
2) about the case in which the decision was adopted by the Supreme Court Senate, — five senators, of the Supreme Court who has not participated in the criminal proceedings, the President of the Court or his Deputy.
660. article. The order in which the court hearing the case due to newly discovered circumstances (1) received the materials with the Prosecutor's opinion on the newly discovered circumstances, the judge shall determine the date of criminal proceedings, and it is notified to the interested parties, while explaining their rights to participate in the hearing.
(2) the Prosecutor's participation in the hearing is mandatory.
(3) the absence of the parties, if they are notified in a timely manner about the time and place, there is no obstacle to the proceedings.
(4) the Convicted, imprisoned, after his request to be participation in a hearing.
(5) of this law, the proceedings referred to in article 659 courts takes this law 561 in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
661. article. Court procedures, if renewed criminal proceedings due to the new open conditions (1) the criminal proceedings in connection with the renewal, newly discovered circumstances before a judicial inquiry, trial, appeals court ruling takes the General order.
(2) when considering criminal cases in which the judgment has been canceled due to newly discovered circumstances, the Court is not bound in the specified penalty cancelled.
63. chapter. The ruling in force a new investigation because of material or procedural norms of law breach critical article 662. The ruling, which can be heard from again (1), having been convicted by a Court of law can be dealt with if it is not viewed in cassation, by this law, a person referred to in article 79 of the application or the protest.
(2) the appraisal can be dealt from the new ruling in criminal proceedings in which the applicable law for persons of special rehabilitation.
663. article. Persons who have the right to submit an application or representations (1) an application for judicial review of the ruling from the new eligible convicted and on behalf of the person or on behalf of a person against whom a judicial decision in the criminal proceedings terminated may bring a lawyer.
(2) the Attorney General and the Chief of the Criminal Department of the Prosecutor may submit a protest on his own initiative or at the first paragraph of this article, at the request of the parties.
664. article. The right to withdraw the application or representations (1) an application or protest shall entitle the applicant to withdraw until the beginning of the hearing.
(2) the Chief of the Criminal Department of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Attorney General may also be withdrawn in protest.
665. the article. The filing of the application or the protest grounds (1) an application or protest can be submitted, if: 1) the ruling passed by the illegal court composition or proceedings of the izspriedus the lower level court;
2) service investigation found that one of the judges ruling is not signed because the law has not participated in the decision making;
3. this Act 574) or 575 infringements referred to in article led to the convicted person's illegal status deterioration.
666. article. The application and the protest form (1) application or a protest shall be made in writing.
(2) in the application or protest shall indicate and motivates the base of appeals against judgments referred to in this law, in article 303.
667. article. The application or the submission of the application, the protest or the protest time limit for submission.
668. Request verification of criminal proceedings (1) the Supreme Court President and the senator may be izprasī the Criminal Court to decide any question concerning the application or the Prosecutor's protest.
(2) the Attorney General and the Chief of the Criminal Department of the General Prosecutor's Office can be any criminal izprasī Court to decide the issue of the examination of the application or of the filing of the protest.
(3) this Act 663. in the first paragraph, such persons and their interests, the lawyer representing to prepare the application, have the right to get acquainted with the materials of criminal cases in the institution in which the criminal is, and get the necessary copies of materials of the case.
669. article. Suspension of execution If the Supreme Court Senate passed consideration of application or protest, it may defer or suspend judgment or decision until the new trial.
670. article. Ruling of the new judicial review applications and protests on judgments and decisions which have entered into force, a review of the Supreme Court Senate 582. this law – – 586. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
671. article. Ruling new examination (1) the Court, when examining an application or protest, examine the judgment or decision contested.
(2) the Court may examine the judgment and the decision in full and for all convicts, where there are grounds for annulment of the ruling on the infringement of the law, which led to wrong judgment of the case.
672. article. The decision, taken by the application or the results of the examination of the protest (1) the application and results of the examination of a protest can take one of the decisions specified in this law, 587.
(2) the decision must comply with the content of this law 588. the requirements set out in article.
(C) part. International cooperation in the field of criminal law Chapter 64. Cooperation General provisions Article 673. International cooperation (1) international cooperation in the criminal field (hereinafter also – – criminal cooperation) foreign State requests and ensures Latvia: 1) in a prosecution, extradition proceedings or enforcement of the judgment, or medical coercive measures;
2 the transfer of criminal proceedings);
3 transfer the convicted person) a custodial sentence;
4) procedural actions;
5) recognition and enforcement;
6) other international treaties in the cases provided for.
(2) in cooperation with the criminal law between tautiskaj courts and international courts and tribunals established (hereinafter – the International Court of Justice) requires parties to international courts, procedural assistance to them and the International Court ruling.
674. article. Criminal law the legal basis of cooperation (1) the criminal law cooperation in the regulation of this law, as laid down in article 2 of the law of criminal procedure.
(2) other public criminal proceedings, the procedure may be applied if the need arises based on penal cooperation request and if it does not conflict with the fundamental principles of criminal procedure of Latvia.
(3) Latvia may ask foreign using criminal rogatory, to apply the procedure prescribed in the penal proceedings in Latvia or its individual principles.
675. article. Criminal law cooperation (1) the competent authorities of the penal cooperation requests sent and received by the competent authorities, specified in the laws governing international cooperation in the criminal field.
(2) the criminal law of Latvia in cooperation, the competent authority may agree with the foreign competent authority on the Court, the prosecution and investigation authorities for direct communication.
(3) If no agreement for foreign cooperation in criminal law, the right to submit a request to the foreign State through criminal law cooperation or get a foreign request is penal cooperation the Minister of Justice and Attorney General in this part of the law of responsibility.
(4) in the third subparagraph, officers may require or issue a statement that the foreign State penal cooperation will be reciprocal, it is observed that the future partner will provide assistance, subject to the same principles.
676. article. Evidence of cooperation in the framework of criminal law, evidence obtained as a result of penal cooperation under provided for criminal proceedings in a foreign country, comparable to the procedure with the procedure laid down in this law for evidence.
677. article. The lawyer's participation in (1) through cooperation, criminal lawyer is invited to provide legal aid to a person or in this part of the Act to carry out in the cases provided for in the defence.
(2) a lawyer may provide legal assistance from the moment the person is detained or arrested, or other part of this Act in the cases provided for.
(3) providing legal assistance, the lawyer shall have the right to: 1) meet with the person under conditions which ensure the confidentiality of the negotiations;
2) submit evidence and requests to sign up.
(4) the participation of a Lawyer is mandatory in article 83 of this Act in the cases.
(5) the investigating judge or the Court, in assessing the financial situation of the person, the person may fully or partially exempt from the payment of legal aid. If a person is exempt from the payment of legal aid attorneys pay covered from public funds regulations. Also the Latvian Council of sworn advocates, the Council may exempt a person from payment of legal assistance and cover the lawyer's pay from their own budgets.

(6) in the process of penal cooperation defender have the same rights as criminal proceedings in progress in Latvia.
678. article. At the request of the penal cooperation form and content (1) criminal law cooperation request shall be submitted in writing if the international agreement or otherwise provided by law.
(2) the Request shall indicate: 1) name of the applicant institution;
2 the subject matter and nature of the request);
3) a description of the crime and legal qualifications;
4) information, which can help to identify a person.
(3) a request shall also indicate other information necessary for its execution.
679. article. At the request of the penal cooperation (1) the request for written penal cooperation and submit to the national language.
(2) in the cases provided for in the request shall be accompanied by a translation into the language of the countries chosen for the communication language.
(3) if the international treaty does not define the communication language of the foreign State, the application can submit without adding a translation.
(4) if the cooperation with foreign criminal law are not governed by an international treaty, the request shall be accompanied by a translation into the language of the country concerned.
(5) the competent authority may agree with the foreign competent authority for any other language.
680. article. In Latvia the expenditure covers expenditure resulting from criminal law cooperation in its territory and because of the transit of a person to Latvia through the territory of a third country, unless this part of the law or other normative act or mutual agreement states otherwise.
681. article. Personal transit (1) If criminal cooperation is clouded by personal commitments from foreign to Latvia through the territory of a third country, the competent authority shall, if necessary, submit a request for transit.
(2) If a person is moved by air and no landing is scheduled on the territory of a third country, the competent authority did not submit a request for transit, but between the folksy in the cases provided for in the third country only inform.
(3) the competent authority of Latvia at the request of foreign countries may allow the criminal law cooperation with related parties in transit through the territory of Latvia. A request for transit may be refused if requested for Latvian citizens or non-citizens-– law "on the status of citizens of the former USSR, which do not have Latvian citizenship of another country or" entity (hereinafter – the Latvian citizen) transit.
(4) a request for transit writes like a particular type of penal cooperation.
Fourteenth issue of section 65 of chapter. Extradition to Latvia 682. article. The person picking the conditions in (1) a Person may request extradition, if there is reason to believe that a foreign country is located: 1) a person who is suspected or accused of committing a criminal offence, punishable by the criminal law of Latvia which and for which the intended deprivation of liberty with a maximum limit of not less than one year, if the international agreement does not provide for another term;
2) person convicted in Latvia by deprivation of liberty or arrest for a period of not less than four months.
(2) a Person may ask for the extradition of several criminal offences, even if on one issue may not be applied because it does not meet the condition of possible or sentenced to fines.
(3) a Person's extradition request may not be made if the gravity of the offence and the character is not commensurate with the costs issue.
683. article. The person's extradition request submission procedure (1) where this Act identified 682. referred to in the first subparagraph the terms, the process of turning the General Prosecutor's Office to promoter the written proposal to request the extradition of a foreign State.
(2) the proposal shall indicate this Law 678. the information referred to in the article, and then add this law referred to in article 684 attachments.
(3) the suggestion of appearance within 10 days after receipt of the General Prosecutor's Office and the results will inform the driver of the process. The examination time limit may be extended by the Attorney General, and informs the driver in the process.
(4) if there are grounds to request extradition, the General Prosecutor's Office prepares and sends a request to the foreign State.
(5) the Prosecutor may file a foreign State a request for extradition of a person on their own initiative.
684. article. The person's extradition request (1) the request for extradition of the Person in accordance with this law, article 678. Article and then add: 1) decision on security features — — application of detention or, having been convicted by a judgment of conviction or a certified copy of it;
2) decision on the recognition of the person as a suspect or criminal prosecution, or a certified copy of the decision in question;
3 the text of article of the law), after which the person is suspected or known criminal prosecution or convicted, as well as the text of the article of the law governing limitation periods and the classification of criminal offences;
4) the order for enforcement of the judgment or a certified copy of it;
5) information, which can help to identify a person;
6) other documents if required foreign.
(2) the documents accompanying the request for extradition of transcripts, copies and extracts to be produced and to which the Cabinet of Ministers.
685. article. Personal notification of the international search and order (1) If found this Law 682. referred to in the first subparagraph the terms and there is reason to believe that a person has left the territory of Latvia, but its location is not known, the General Prosecutor's Office asked the driver of the process to decide on the person for the purpose of international search to request its request for extradition, adding this Law 684. the documents mentioned in the article.
(2) if there are grounds to request extradition, the General Prosecutor's Office shall take a decision on the promulgation of the international search of the person, shall transmit it to the enforcement process and inform the driver.
686. article. Request for temporary custody (1) Before issuing request, the Prosecutor can ask the foreign person be issued temporary custody.
(2) the request for temporary custody of the article under this Law 678. article. It also provides the decision on security features — — the application of detention or conviction, having been convicted by a judgment, as well as inform you about Latvia's intention to submit a request for extradition of the person.
(3) if the person's temporary custody request, send the extradition request as soon as possible, taking into account the agreements stipulated between the folksy temporary custody time limits.
687. article. Foreign persons issued by the takeover (1) a foreign takeover of the person issued the Ministry of the Interior carried out the competent authority within the time limits in international treaties. On the arrival of the person shall notify the Attorney General's Office of Latvia within 24 hours.
(2) if the person is issued during the pre-trial proceedings, the public prosecutor or post a higher prosecutor 72 hours this person after its arrival in Latvia should issue a complaint, but if the indictment was issued, – – the right to lodge to explain rejection and requests to submit complaints.
(3) if the person is issued at the time of the hearing, the Prosecutor General's Office that issued the person taken in Latvia, within three days, notify the driver of the process.
(4) If the transfer of the person issued with a transit, the Ministry of the Interior, the competent authority of the Prosecutor General's Office with a request in turn receive permission issued by the third country for transit of the person.
688. article. Extradition from a foreign country for a period of (1) If a foreign person be left and that Latvia can lead to criminal penalties, 19(4) or hinder criminal investigations, the Prosecutor may request that the foreign grant of this person at the time.
(2) the request for the extradition of the person at the time of the article just like the extradition request.
689. article. Foreign person issued by mi kr nālatbildīb and execution frame (1) a Person may be held criminally liable and the trial only for the criminal offence for which it was issued.
(2) these conditions do not apply in cases where: 1) received approval of the issuing State and the costs of prosecution for other offences before picking;
2) offence was committed after the person passed for Latvia;
3) person after release 45 days have not left Latvia, although such a possibility it was;
4) person after picking has left Latvia and at the back.
(3) a Person may be issued to a third country only with the consent of the issuing State.
(4) the second subparagraph of this article, provided for in paragraph 1 shall ask the consent in the same way as the issue.
(5) If the person the final penalty determined by a criminal offence or more togetherness judgment, but it was issued only on some of them, the Court which determined the final penalty of the sixteenth section of this law in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Penal part of the executable.
690. article. Foreign custody spent the term of custody time limits (1) the person issued from the Latvian State border crossing.
(2) the amount of time that the person at the request of Latvia, spent in detention abroad, including the finance term.
691. article. Extradition to Latvia from a Member State of the European Union (1) extradition to Latvia from a Member State of the European Union is based on Latvian courts make a decision on the European arrest warrant (EAW decision).

(2) the custody decision is a Member State of the European Union the judicial authorities of the judgment given by the Member State to the other person or pursuit of criminal prosecution or a custodial penalty enforcement.
692. article. The EAW procedure of adoption of the decision (1) if found in this law, the conditions mentioned in article 68, the driver approached the process in district (municipal) courts with a written proposal to the custody decision.
(2) the proposal shall indicate this Law 678. and the information referred to in article 684 shall be accompanied by the documents mentioned in the article.
(3) the Court shall examine the proposal within 10 days of the decision taken and inform the driver of the process.
(4) If the pre-trial investigation has found grounds for arrest, the decision of the investigating judge shall adopt the European decisions and their custody along with attached documents sent to the Prosecutor General's Office.
(5) the hearing stage of criminal proceedings the European Court custody decision adopted in criminal proceedings, which is located.
693. article. The European decision of the European custody custody decision shall specify: 1) for information on the requested person's identity and nationality;
2) ruling on the basis of which the subject of the European custody decision;
3 the type of offence), the legal qualifications and the applicable legal provisions;
4) conditions of the offence;
5) the effects of the offence;
6) ordered the punishment, if the penalty is final, or the limit of the penalty for the offence may apply;
7) new evidence or documents that need to be removed and put;
8) Court decision makers name, address, telephone and fax number and e-mail address.
694. article. The European custody decision execution (1) If the location of the requested person is known, the European Prosecutor's custody decision sent the European Union concerned to the competent authority of the Member State, adding the translation in the language of the Member State.
(2) if the detention decision is taken in the prosecution of the person until the Member State will decide on the issue or the failure of the person, the Attorney General's Office after the promoters may the Member State competent authorities to ask: 1), questioning of persons interrogated by participating in the process of the driver;
2) surrender of at the time of the transfer agreement on the back.
(3) If the location of the requested person is known, the announcement of the European custody decision put international cooperation information systems.
(4) the Ministry of the Interior, the competent authority shall take over the person within 10 days from the date of the decision on extradition or agree with the person in the competent Member State, emitting the judicial authorities of another party taking over. Personal delivery in Latvia within 24 hours, inform the Prosecutor General's Office. The transfer of the person going on this law, 687. the second, third and fourth paragraph.
695. article. With persons of a Member State of the European Union's takeover-related conditions (1) taking over the person from a Member State of the European Union, must follow this law and 690.689. the conditions referred to in article.
(2) in addition to the first paragraph of this article the parties issued can be held criminally liable and to court other criminal offences for which it was issued, as well as to issue to another Member State in the following cases: 1) personal offence is not punishable by deprivation of liberty or freedom of the restrictive order;
2) a person may be liable to a penalty not involving the deprivation of liberty;
3 after its acquisition) a person in Latvia has accepted this agreement has been accepted by the Prosecutor in the presence of a lawyer, writing about the Protocol.
66. chapter. Extradition of foreign State article 696. Extradition based on (1) the Person is in the territory of Latvia, the issue of prosecution, trial or enforcement of the judgment, if the foreign request to extradite that person for the offence under the laws of Latvia and foreign are criminal.
(2) a Person may be issued for prosecution or proceedings for an offence for which offence for a custodial sentence, with a maximum limit of not less than one year or a more severe punishment.
(3) a Person may be issued for the execution of the judgment, a State which delivered the judgment and tried in person with the penalty associated with deprivation of liberty for a period of not less than four months.
(4) If extradition is requested for several criminal offences, but on one issue could not be applied because it does not meet the conditions for a possible penalty imposed in respect thereof, or a person may also be issued for this criminal offence.
697. article. The reasons for the refusal of extradition (1) extradition may be refused if: 1) a criminal offence in whole or in part in the territory of Latvia;
2) person in Latvia are suspected, accused or convicted for the same criminal offence;
3) Latvia has decided not to initiate or terminate criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence;
4) extradition requests due to political or military criminal offences;
5) asked to issue a foreign person in default sentenced to the penalty of execution and has not received sufficient guarantees that the person will be issued, the right to require a new trial;
6) issue of foreign contact, which has no extradition treaty, Latvia.
(2) extradition is not permissible if: 1) the person is a citizen of Latvia;
2) person's extradition request is related to the aim to launch this person prosecuted or punished the persons race, religion, nationality or political opinion, or where there are reasonable grounds to believe that a person's rights may be violated for these reasons;
3) in respect of the person for the same criminal offence in Latvia Court judgment enters into force;
4) in accordance with Latvian law for the same criminal offence a person cannot be held criminally liable, Doom or execute it due to the limitation of penalties, Amnesty, or other legitimate basis;
5) person in the procedure prescribed by law been spared for the same criminal offence;
6) foreign gives sufficient guarantees that the person will be sentenced to the death penalty and not execute them;
the person abroad can 7) threaten to torture.
(3) the international treaty may provide other reasons for the refusal of extradition.
698. article. The person and the right to be picked (1) the person to be picked is a person whose extradition is sought or which is the issue of the arrest or detention.
(2) a person is entitled to be issued: 1) know what they ask and what issues;
2) process to use it to understand language;
3) provide explanations in connection with the issues;
4) sign up requests, including requests for simplified extradition;
5) look at all test materials;
6) invite lawyers in legal aid.
699. article. The purpose of the issue of the detention of the person (1) an investigator or Prosecutor may detain a person for up to 72 hours for the purpose of extradition, if there are reasonable grounds for believing that it is in the territory of another State, committed a criminal offence for which the extradition provided for, or if the foreign issued its search and made a provisional arrest or extradition request.
(2) for the person's detention for the purpose of issuing an investigator or Prosecutor, indicating a record in the name of, and other necessary personal data, reason for detention, as well as to where, when and which the person arrested. The detention Protocol and create a signature in person to be picked.
(3) shall inform the persons to be Deliberate about its rights, and it will be checked in the detention Protocol.
(4) The person detained immediately, but not later than within 24 hours, inform the Prosecutor General's Office, sending a person's detention. The Prosecutor shall inform that State of the person issuing the search.
(5) If a person 72 hours from the moment of detention does not apply to temporary detention or extradition, the person should be detained or any other applicable security feature.
700. article. The basis of application of temporary custody (1) at the request of foreign countries for temporary custody until the extradition request received, the person may apply to be issued temporary custody.
(2) If the request for temporary custody of the foreign decision on custody of the person or the entry into force in respect of the person, as well as the fact that a foreign State will submit a request for extradition and for any criminal offence, extradition will be sought, details of the person to be picked, and if you do not know the circumstances that exclude the possibility of extradition, the Prosecutor submitted to the investigating judge, which in the territory of the person detained or the General Prosecutor's Office is located , the proposal for the temporary custody application and supporting materials.
701. article. Application of temporary custody (1) On the application of the temporary custody hearing, the judge, the Prosecutor and the participation of the person to be picked.
(2) a judge, a Prosecutor, listened to the people and to be a lawyer, if he participates in, adopt a reasoned decision that may not be appealed.
(3) temporary custody to 40 days from the date of detention if an international agreement provides otherwise.
(4) a Person from the temporary detention may be released if prosecutors 18 days of detention did not receive foreign requests for extradition or that person notice substantiated such request the reasons for the delay.

(5) a Person from the temporary custody will be released if prosecutors: 1) within 40 days of the request for extradition is received;
2) 40 days is not suitable for picking detention;
3) have become aware of circumstances which preclude the possibility of extradition.
(6) the release of the Person does not reopen it for issuing arrest and, if the request for extradition is received later.
702. article. Extradition custody (1) Extradition custody applies, after receiving the request for extradition with: 1) the foreign decision on that person's custody or, having been convicted by a final judgment in relation to that person;
2 a description of the crime) or the decision on the prosecution of the person criminally liable;
3 the text of article of the law), after which the person called criminally or sentenced, as well as the text of the article of the law that regulates the Statute of limitations;
4) information on persons to be issued.
(2) If you do not know the circumstances that exclude the possibility of issuing checks offender suggestion for picking their custody and supporting material submitted to the investigating judge, which in the territory of the person detained or the General Prosecutor's Office is located.
(3) a proposal for the issuance of the looks of the detention in the same order as a request for temporary custody.
(4) If the person to be arrested or served in Latvia it ordered a penalty for another criminal offence committed, the term of detention for extradition from the person's release.
(5) the person in custody be picked period may not exceed one year, and must not be longer than the term of the punishment imposed in a foreign country, if it is less than one year of detention or remand.
703. article. Information on the foreign custody For issuing pre-trial detention or release the person from the Prosecutor General's Office informs the requesting State.
704. article. Extradition request examination (1) the Chief Public Prosecutor, received a foreign request for extradition, started checking it. The Prosecutor whether there is this law, 696 persons laid down in article output based and this law provided for in article 697 of the person issuing the reasons for the refusal.
(2) If the request does not contain sufficient information to decide the issue of extradition, the Prosecutor General's Office requires a foreign State required additional information and may fix a deadline for the submission of information.
(3) the test must be completed within 20 days from the issue of the date of receipt of the request. If the inspection requires additional information, the period shall run from the date of receipt. The test time limit may be extended by the Attorney General.
(4) the person to be picked by the public prosecutor with a request for extradition from the 48 hours of receipt and give the person concerned an opportunity to comment.
(5) a Prosecutor during the test you can do all the investigation provided for in criminal procedure.
705. article. Inspection completion (1) the Prosecutor, after assessing the person's extradition and based the admissibility, adopt a reasoned decision on: 1) the issue of the admissibility of persons;
2) refusal to issue a person.
(2) If a decision on the admissibility of extradition of the person, that person shall be issued a copy of the decision.
(3) the decision on the admissibility of extradition issued in person can appeal to the Supreme Court within 10 days from the date of arrival. If the decision is not appealed, it enters into force.
(4) the decision on refusal to issue the person a the Prosecutor shall notify the person concerned and the foreign State. The Prosecutor shall immediately release the person from the temporary detention or extradition.
706. The issue of the admissibility of complaints (1) the issue of the admissibility of the complaint about the appearance of three Supreme Court judges.
(2) the judge who asked to request from the General Prosecutor's Office referē checks the material and determine the duration of the examination of the complaint.
(3) the Chief Public Prosecutor, the complainant and his solicitor notify the complainant at the hearing and the right to participate in the hearing. If necessary, the Court will understand the other necessary materials and calls a personal explanation.
(4) a complainant provides the opportunity to participate in the inquiry.
(5) If the person to be a lawyer is absent without justification, for the provision of legal aid in other pieaicinām, if a person wishes to obtain legal aid.
707. article. (1) the decision of the Court of Justice having heard the complainant, his lawyer and the Prosecutor, the Court go discuss and adopt one of the following decisions: 1) leave the decision of the public prosecutor;
2) cancel the decision of the public prosecutor and to recognize the issue of unacceptable;
3) put the extradition request additional verification.
(2) the decision of the Court is not appealable.
(3) the Court's decision and the materials are sent to the General Prosecutor's Office.
(4) if the Court considers the issue of unacceptable, the person concerned shall be released immediately from custody.
708. article. A decision on the extradition of a foreign State (1) the decision on the parties which have entered the admissibility of extradition, together with the General Prosecutor's Office checks materials sent to the Ministry of Justice.
(2) the decision on extradition to a foreign country after the Justice Minister's proposal adopts the Cabinet.
(3) the Cabinet of Ministers may refuse extradition if there is only one of the following circumstances: 1) extradition may be harmful to national sovereignty;
2) offence considered political or military;
3) has sufficient grounds to believe that the issue is related to the aim of persecuting its people based on race, religion, ethnicity, sex or political views.
(4) the decision taken by the Ministry of Justice shall inform the person to be picked, the foreign and the General Prosecutor's Office.
(5) a decision on the extradition of the person runs the Interior Ministry.
(6) on receipt of the decision on the refusal to extradite a person, the Prosecutor shall immediately release the person from custody.
709. article. At the request of several countries (1) where the Attorney General's Office has received several requests for extradition in respect of one and the same person, this request for inspection integrates process, unless there is a decision on the extradition of persons: 1);
2) refusal to issue the person;
3 the issue of admissibility of persons).
(2) where a decision on extradition has been taken, later of the received request is satisfied. It shall notify the requesting State.
(3) if other foreign arrival, at the request of the entry into force of the decision on the admissibility of extradition, the decision is presented to the Cabinet later received the test completion.
(4) if the requested extradition of several foreign States, Cabinet of Ministers, on a proposal by the Minister of Justice, taking into account the nature of the offence, its site and receipt of the request, the order determines which country a person is to be issued.
710. article. The transfer of the person to be picked (1) shall inform the Foreign Ministry of the Interior on the transfer of the person to be a time and place, as well as the period in which the person to be found in detention.
(2) the Ministry of the Interior agreed with foreign than another due date if independent from the national will of the reason transfer cannot occur before the specified date.
(3) if the foreign party be taken over within 30 days from the issue date, the Prosecutor, that person shall be released from custody.
711. article. Transfer of persons suspension or transfer on time (1) If in Latvia should be completed to the person to be initiated or criminal proceedings must be met including the penalty imposed, once a decision on the extradition of the person, the Attorney General or the Minister of Justice pursuant to this part of the law may postpone the surrender of the requested person in a foreign country.
(2) where a transfer delay can lead to criminal penalties, 19(4) or hinder criminal investigations abroad and such transfer does not interfere with the judicial proceedings in Latvia, the Minister of Justice may transfer a person to a foreign State for a time, setting back the transfer time.
712. article. If the re-extradition of the person issued abroad to avoid prosecution or fines, and has returned to Latvia after it can issue a foreign request, based on the decision taken on the issue.
713. article. Simplified extradition (1) a Person may be issued to a foreign State, if the simplified procedure: 1) received a written consent of the person to be the issue of simplified procedures;
2) picked is not a Latvian citizen;
3) Latvia against is not a person to be initiated criminal proceedings to be completed or you do not need to follow it with the penalty imposed.
(2) the person to be your consent for the release of the simplified procedure confirms the presence of a lawyer, public prosecutor before a decision on the admissibility of extradition.
(3) the consent of the Prosecutor clears only the first paragraph of this article and shall promptly issue a related materials to the Attorney General.
(4) the Attorney General shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) on personal issues;
2) waiver of personal issue;
3) for non-application of simplified extradition.
(5) the Attorney General's decision is not appealable.
(6) On the issue or refusal of a person to be issued to inform the issuing and foreign persons and shall refer the decision to the Ministry of the Interior.
714. article. The person issuing Member State of the European Union (1) a Person who is in the territory of Latvia may be issued to the initiation and prosecution, trial or enforcement of the judgment to the Member State of the European Union, for that person to a foreign country adopted the European custody decision and is this law referred to in article 696 picking.

(2) if the person is issued on this law, the offences referred to in annex 2 and if it made the European custody decision adopted in the country is for a custodial sentence, with a maximum limit of not less than three years, the test of whether the offence is a crime in accordance with Latvian law, also not out.
(3) If a foreign country European custody decision adopted for the Latvian citizen, then that person is taking issue with the condition that the person, after the sentencing is passed back to the Latvia under a custodial sentence. Under penalties of execution takes place this law 782. — 801. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
(4) extradition may be refused if: 1) is this law 697 of the first paragraph of article 1 – – 3 reasons referred to in paragraph;
2) in accordance with Latvian law for the same criminal offence a person cannot be held criminally liable, Doom or run it fine due to the Statute of limitations;
3) offence committed outside the custody decision adopted in the national territory and that, in accordance with Latvian law is not a criminal.
(5) the extradition is not permissible if: 1) in accordance with the law for the offence the person cannot be held criminally liable, tried or punished in connection with the Amnesty;
2) person for the same criminal offence is convicted and the sentence served or in one of the Member States of the European Union or the penalty can no longer be accepted;
3) in accordance with Latvian law has reached the age at which criminal liability arises;
4) citizens of Latvia are required the issuance of a European Union Member State under penalties of execution.
715. article. With the extradition of a Member State of the European Union related conditions (1) the person shall Be this law, the rights referred to in article 698 of the right to agree or disagree to issue, as well as the right to be called to criminal liability only for those convicted and criminal offences for which it is issued, except for this law, in the second paragraph of article 695 as provided in.
(2) the person to be your consent to the issuance and denial of the right to be called to criminal liability only for those convicted and criminal offences for which it is issued, confirms the presence of a lawyer, the Prosecutor and on it is written in the Protocol.
(3) If the person to be picked is a Latvian citizen, has the right to waive rights, guaranteeing that the Latvian citizen after the sentencing Member State of the European Union returned to Latvia in the sentence imposed.
(4) in relation to a person's immunity to criminal proceedings, the European custody decision deadline shall begin from the moment when the person in law lost the immunity.
(5) Latvia accepts to fulfill the decisions of the European custody Latvian or English.
716. article. Test for extradition to a Member State of the European Union (1), the General Prosecutor's Office received the European custody decision, organised by checking it.
(2) the Prosecutor shall take this law 704 in accordance with the procedure laid down in article, whether there is a personal issue and there is no reason for the refusal of extradition set out in this law, 714. article.
(3) If at the General Prosecutor's Office received the extradition request from third countries and European custody decision from the Member States of the European Union in respect of one and the same person, this decision check integrates process, unless there is a decision on the extradition of the person or persons to issue a waiver. A look at the received requests for extradition and decide the question as to which country the advantage given the gravity of the crime, it was the place, time and order of receipt of the request.
717. article. Member State of the European Union be issued to persons in detention and arrest (1) personal detention for purposes of extradition takes place in article 699 of this law in the order if the person assumes the European custody decision or international search system contains a statement of the existence of such a decision.
(2) If you do not know the circumstances that exclude the admissibility of extradition of the person, the perpetrator of the inspection proposal for the application of detention for extradition and European arrest decision shall be submitted to the district (City) Court in whose area the person detained or the General Prosecutor's Office is located.
(3) the issue of pre-trial detention apply this law 701 under the procedures laid down in article to 80 days from the date of the person's detention. The Court in exceptional cases this period may be extended once for 30 days. The General Prosecutor's Office informs the European custody decision adopted by the competent authority of the country of execution of the decision the reasons for delay.
718. Temporary activities until a decision is taken If a Member State of the European Union the European custody decision adopted, to ensure the prosecution of individuals before a decision on the issue or the failure of the person, by the competent judicial authorities, at the request of the Prosecutor General's Office the person questioned, by participating in the person chosen by the competent judicial authorities, or the temporary transfer of the person agrees, setting back the time of the transfer.
719. article. Foreign persons issued by the issuing Member State of the European Union (1) a person issued may be transferred to another Member State of the European Union when the country, issuing the person consented to the next issue.
(2) if the custody decision is received in respect of the person that Latvia issued by another State, not the consent of the person giving the issue, the General Prosecutor's Office for further recourse to the person by the State to receive the consent of the parties to further the issue of the Member State of the European Union.
720. article. A decision on extradition to a Member State of the European Union (1), the General Prosecutor's Office within 10 days from the date of application of the security features of a decision on the issue or the failure of the person to a foreign State. A decision on the extradition of a person may not be appealed, if the person has agreed to extradition.
(2) If the person does not consent to be picked for the issue, the decision of the General Prosecutor's Office on the extradition may be appealed to the Supreme Court within 10 days from the date of arrival.
(3) a complaint about the decision of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Supreme Court shall examine this law and in article 706.707 in the order and sent to the General Prosecutor's Office of the decision within 20 days from the date of receipt of the complaint.
721. article. The decision on the extradition of the person to the Member State of the European Union discharge (1) the decision on the parties which have entered the extradition the Prosecutor shall immediately forward to the Ministry of the Interior.
(2) the decision of the extradition is carried out pursuant to this law, in article 710 in the first and second subparagraphs, the conditions laid down.
(3) the decision on the extradition of the person of the Prosecutor may defer extradition of the person concerned to the Member State of the European Union Latvia started to complete criminal proceedings or a sentence in the Penal and the serious humanitarian reasons, if there is reason to believe that the issue of a specific situation would manifestly endanger the life or health of the person. The decision to postpone the extradition the Prosecutor shall inform the Member States of the European Union, the competent judicial authorities and the other parties agreed to the transfer.
(4) if the person is not taken within 10 days of the date of the decision or from the date of its issuance, which agreed to a European Union Member State competent authorities, the person must be released from custody.
(5) If a decision on the issue, not the person of the Prosecutor shall inform the Court of the Member State's competent authorities.
722. article. The subject matter of transfer to the Member State of the European Union (1) the Chief Public Prosecutor at the request of a Member State of the European Union or on its own initiative pulls out and surrendered to a Member State subjects: 1) necessary as real evidence;
2 the person issuing) which acquired as a result of the offence.
(2) items required as real evidence, transfer, even if the European custody decision cannot be performed issuing the death or escape of the person.
(3) if the items required in Latvia started to complete criminal proceedings, they may postpone the transfer time. Transferring objects, the Prosecutor may request that they be returned.
The fifteenth section of the transfer of criminal proceedings chapter 67. Foreign country taking over criminal proceedings initiated in Latvia article 723. The transfer of criminal proceedings and the conditions for the taking over of criminal proceedings is the continuation of criminal proceedings abroad launched in Latvia by a foreign request or with the consent, if required by procedural interests and the offence is punishable under the criminal law of Latvia.
724. article. The transfer of criminal proceedings by the competent authority (1) pre-trial investigation stage requests for transfer of criminal proceedings for consideration and determination of the General Prosecutor's Office.
(2) the stage of Hearing requests for the transfer of criminal proceedings and decide the appearance of the Ministry of Justice.
725. article. The basis of the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) the transfer of criminal proceedings is: 1) filed a request for the foreign criminal proceedings (hereinafter also – the criminal takeover request) and consent to take over of Latvia;
2) Latvia filed a request for the transfer of criminal proceedings (criminal proceedings request the transfer) and the consent of the foreign State to pass.

(2) If the offence in respect of which the transfer of criminal proceedings is sought (hereinafter chapter 67 and 68 – – offences), Latvia is not a criminal, but is punishable under other law, it shall immediately inform the applicant without taking over the criminal proceedings. Consent is the basis for the continuation of the process of law in Latvia.
726. article. At the request of the transfer of criminal proceedings, the reasons for rejection (1) transfer of criminal proceedings is not allowed if: 1) the offence in respect of which the transfer of criminal proceedings is requested, is not considered a crime under the Criminal Code of Latvia;
2) timed criminally barred, as well as the last ones six months for which the limitation period is extended when an offence falls within the jurisdiction of the Latvian penal solely in accordance with the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings;
3) there is no evidence that provides the basis for any suspect or accuse the offence;
4) for the same offence in Latvia adopted a final judgment;
5 a request for criminal proceedings) the takeover of the entry into force of a conviction, made a country with which no agreement on Latvia of criminal proceedings was given in the judgment of the Court of Justice mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, and this country has a chance to execute the ordered soda.
(2) the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings may not be fulfilled if: 1) it is not sufficiently justified;
2) a person who is suspected or accused of committing an offence, in Latvia without regularly;
3) has reason to believe that the offence is political or purely military or request submitted to the person persecuted its race, religion, ethnicity, sex or political opinion;
4) offence by the territory of the requesting State;
5) taking over of criminal procedure would conflict with Latvia's international commitments to development of other countries;
6) process does not comply with the principles of the legal system of Latvia;
7 no agreement with Latvia) the requesting country for the criminal.
727. article. The criminal proceedings at the request of the transposition deadline (1) a request for the transfer of criminal proceedings decide 10 days, but if the material is especially large, – – 30 days.
(2) in special cases, if the required documents, the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings decide this article within the time limits provided for in the first subparagraph after receipt of the translation.
(3) if the Registrar requires additional information requested by the competent authority of the requesting State. After the receipt of the additional information the question shall be determined by the first part of this article within the time limits provided for.
(4) if the proceedings for any offence in Latvia will be initiated only after the victim's complaints, but it is not added to the materials received, the competent authority shall immediately inform the victim and the decision shall be taken by the victim's consent or refusal. If within 30 days of the victim has not provided an answer, the process is terminated.
728. article. At the request of the Registrar, the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) examined the foreign request, necessary documents and additional information, if requested, the competent authority shall take one of the following decisions: 1) for the acquisition and transfer of criminal proceedings;
2) on the request of the transfer of criminal proceedings, rejection.
(2) the first paragraph of this article of the decision together with the translation of the competent authority shall immediately forward the request to the requesting State.
729. article. Latvia's request for the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) If simultaneously with the ongoing criminal proceedings in Latvia also in another country takes place in criminal proceedings for the same offence, the competent authorities of the foreign State may submit a request for the service of Latvia, criminal proceedings if it complies with the interests of Justice and contribute to the progress of the criminal proceedings.
(2) the Request is not submitted, if there are reasons for excluding criminal proceedings.
730. article. The procedure of the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) If a person in another State are brought in the indictment, the person concerned shall be transferred to the Court or convicted, the competent authority shall be referred to the public prosecutor for the continuation of criminal proceedings by the person's life or place of residence in Latvia.
(2) the Prosecutors 10 days to decide whether there is sufficient evidence for prosecution of the person criminally liable under the criminal law of Latvia, and the road passes the criminal proceedings or for the continuation of the investigation of the stage.
(3) If a person in another country is not built in, criminal prosecution shall continue from the stage of the investigation.
(4) the criminal proceedings take place in General.
731. article. The withdrawal of the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) the directors shall submit the process motivated the criminal takeover proposal for the withdrawal of the same competent authority that decided on the transfer of criminal proceedings, if the reasons that exclude sees the criminal takeover.
(2) the competent authority 10 days to decide on the continuation of the criminal proceedings in Latvia or the criminal takeover.
(3) the competent authority, reference to the consent to the transfer of criminal proceedings, shall inform the promoters of the process and asking him to cancel all appropriate coercive measures, as well as decide the action with real evidence.
(4) On the transfer of criminal proceedings, withdrawal of the competent authority shall immediately inform the requesting State and shall forward to it a criminal case materials.
(5) If the transfer of criminal proceedings in connection with the withdrawal of the criminal political or military nature or expressed because the person persecuted its race, religion, ethnicity, sex or political opinion, evidence obtained in Latvia may not pass to the requesting State. In other cases, the evidence does not transfer, if the actions of the investigation could not be carried out at the request of the foreign assistance in criminal proceedings.
732. article. Temporary custody before the receipt of the request of the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) if the foreign State announces its intention to submit a request for the transfer of criminal proceedings and request the temporary custody before receiving it, the competent authority shall apply to the judges of the investigation with the arrest of the person proposed to be decided the issue of the transfer of criminal proceedings, if all the following conditions are satisfied: 1) the request shows that the requesting State has issued a decision on the application of pre-trial detention;
2) criminal law of Latvia for the corresponding offence under the custodial sentence;
3) has reason to believe that the suspect or the accused will avoid participating in criminal proceedings or hide evidence.
(2) the first part of this article in the order arrested person is exempt if: 1) 18 days of detention or temporary remand days have not received the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings;
2) within 15 days from the date of receipt of the request is not received the documents that you want to add;
3) 40 days of detention or temporary detention, the date of application of the decision is taken on the security features of application of pre-trial detention-taken in the criminal proceedings;
4) decision to reject the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings;
5) criminal takeover withdrawn;
6) become aware of circumstances which preclude persons in detention to keep.
733. article. Temporary custody by the criminal takeover of the receipt of the request (1) If a request for transfer of criminal proceedings and the accompanying materials give grounds to believe that the person is suspected or accused of committing an offence, avoid investigation or court or interfere with ascertaining the truth in a case, the competent authority shall ask the investigative judge to impose temporary custody.
(2) a Person arrested under this article, the proportion of temporary custody, if: 1) request to take over criminal proceedings is not decided within 40 days of detention or temporary custody date of application;
2) 40 days of detention or temporary detention, the date of application of the decision is taken on the security features of application of pre-trial detention-taken in the criminal proceedings;
3) decision to reject the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings;
4) taking over of criminal proceedings been withdrawn;
5) become aware of circumstances which preclude persons in detention to keep.
734. article. Hold, to decide the issue of temporary custody (1) if the competent authority considers it necessary to impose temporary custody, it can make the task of the police to detain a person for up to the next day's noon arrival at the judge's investigation.
(2) for the person's detention, police officer writes a protocol indicating the exact time and place of detention, as well as reflect the person detained rights advocacy. The minutes shall be signed by the interceptor and held, as well as a lawyer, if he participates in.
(3) If the first part of this article within the time specified in the detained person is not suitable for temporary custody, that person is exempted.
735. article. The application of the temporary custody order (1) the proposal for the temporary custody and supporting material submitted to the competent authority the investigating judge by their location or the investigating judge that the person detained in the territory.
(2) On the application of the temporary custody hearing, the judge shall decide which competent authority representative, the Prosecutor and the person apcietinām.

(3) the judge, considered a representative of the competent authority, the Prosecutor, the person and the lawyer apcietinām, if he participates in, adopt a reasoned decision.
(4) The temporary custody application and release from it, the competent authority shall inform the applicant accordingly.
736. article. Crime suspect and the accused the right to (1) If a person in another country are suspected or accused of committing offences, staying in Latvia and the offence is criminal jurisdiction only because the foreign takeover of criminal proceedings, ask the competent authority before a decision is presented to the person concerned by the request and enquire whether it wishes to participate in criminal proceedings in the requesting State. Personal views may be taken into account when deciding on the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings, but it is not binding.
(2) of the criminal takeover person acquires the same rights that the suspect or the accused is in Latvia.
737. article. The application of other coercive measures to the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) of the criminal takeover of receipt of the request, the competent authority may apply any of the coercive procedural feature, it may also be used without a foreign request is received, the offence would be under the jurisdiction of Latvia.
(2) any removal of coercive measures, if the decision is taken on the request of the transfer of criminal proceedings or taking over the rejection is withdrawn.
738. article. The time spent in the custody of (1) the period of temporary custody from the moment of detention.
(2) the time spent by a person in custody in another State occurred during criminal proceedings, are not counted in the term of detention in Latvia, but is counted in the penalty period.
(3) if the person is in the custody of the criminal takeover during the period of detention, many of the Latvian State border crossing.
(4) All time spent by a person in Latvia, temporary custody in favour of the security features.
739. article. Criminal liability and penalties for the criminal proceedings limits (1) the accused inkriminējam of only those actions that are criminal under the laws of both countries.
(2) the penalty imposed must not be greater than the law of the requesting State, the penalty provided for the offence is within the jurisdiction of Latvia only at the request of the transfer of criminal proceedings.
740. article. The obligation to inform the requesting State (1) the process of criminal proceedings taken in the final decision shall inform the competent authority which ruled on the criminal takeover request. This body, taking over the process, you can ask the driver to inform them of the process for the other decisions adopted, where the need arises from Latvia's international obligations.
(2) the competent authority shall inform the requesting State of the final decisions adopted, as well as other procedural steps, if provided for in the contract or mutual agreement.
68. chapter. In Latvia, the transfer of criminal proceedings initiated 741. article. The transfer of criminal proceedings and the conditions (1) the transfer of criminal proceedings is the continuation of the suspension in Latvia and abroad, where there are grounds for holding a person suspected of committing an offence or suspects, but the unsuccessful criminal proceedings and their secular pursuit in Latvia is difficult or not possible, while putting foreign State to contribute.
(2) the transfer of criminal proceedings, in which the entry into force of a conviction, only if the judgment cannot be executed in Latvia, but foreign, in which the convicted person does not accept the execution of the judgment of another State.
742. article. Competent authorities (1) the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings in the pre-trial process in the foreign country shall be submitted during the Attorney General's Office.
(2) the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings or after the entry into force of the judgment of the foreign State shall submit to the Ministry of Justice.
743. article. The criminal referral basis basis in Latvia launched criminal proceedings in a foreign State to surrender are: 1) the Latvian filed the criminal takeover of the request and consent of the foreign State to take over;
2) foreign transfer of criminal proceedings submitted the request and consent of Latvia put Latvia to continue its ongoing criminal proceedings in a foreign country.
744. article. The reasons for the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) the driver of the process to consider the question of the transfer of criminal proceedings if there is this law 741. the conditions referred to in article and: 1) a suspect, accused or convicted is a foreign citizen and permanent resident or staying in their country of nationality;
2) a suspect, accused or convicted is in a foreign country, and his extradition is not possible or is refused;
3) a foreign State against the same person and the same criminal offence, as well as other offences is made in the criminal proceedings;
4) important evidence or liecinoš the majority of the persons located in a foreign country;
5) it is not possible to ensure the presence of the accused in criminal proceedings in Latvia;
6) in Latvia is not or will not be able to execute the sentence.
(2) established by the criminal procedure and the reasons for the transfer conditions, process Guide to the competent authority a proposal to send a request for the transfer of criminal proceedings.
745. article. The request for the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings, in addition to this law should be specified in article 678 motivates that there are criminal proceedings and transfer conditions and the transfer complies with the interests of the criminal proceedings.
(2) a request to be added to all the existing criminal procedural documents or copies of them and their criminal law article text with translation, the responsibility for the decision on the recognition of the person as a suspect or criminal prosecution of the criminal offence specified, if required by the contract or the agreement of the competent authorities.
(3) if the foreign State filed a request for temporary custody, the criminal takeover request must be submitted as soon as possible, but no later than the 15th day after the person's arrest.
(4) If the request for the transfer of criminal proceedings filed without the added materials, they shall as soon as possible, but if a person suitable for temporary custody, not later than the twelfth day of the submission of the request.
746. article. Application of the transfer of criminal proceedings (1) the competent authority shall inform the competent authority of a foreign State for each procedural action taken after the criminal takeover request submission, and send a copy of the relevant procedural documents.
(2) the Latvian authorities do not carry out procedural acts in criminal proceedings, if passed: 1) received notice of the foreign takeover of criminal proceedings;
2) given its consent in Latvia Latvia going transfer of criminal proceedings in a foreign State.
(3) process in Latvia can be restored, if notification is received: 1) on the withdrawal of the takeover;
2) that process of an offence abroad.
747. article. Detention (1) If there is reason to believe that the person will try to avoid criminal proceedings in the requested State, the competent authority shall forward the request for temporary custody until the criminal takeover request submission.
(2) If a person in Latvia is suitable security feature — detention, criminal takeover request is not grounds for annulment. In such a case, the requested State to answer driver continues to process the necessary procedural actions.
(3) If criminal proceedings after the transfer is renewed, the period of detention only the time spent by a person in custody in Latvia but all offences associated with this time of detention including the finance term.
748. article. Criminal proceedings against Latvia national transfer of criminal proceedings in connection with the offence or suspected offence has accused the Latvian citizen is allowed to pass, if: 1 the person concerned) are outside Latvia and its issuance refused or persistently deferred;
2) Latvia has a contract with a foreign country on the transfer of criminal proceedings;
3) foreign, which is not a Treaty on the transfer of criminal proceedings, provided a sufficient guarantee that will follow this law, article 739. criminal liability and penalties.
Sixteenth section sentenced to penal transfer chapter 69. Foreign takeover of a convicted person in Latvia penal 749. article. Basis for the transfer of persons in penal (1) grounds for a foreign country convicted person sentenced to a custodial penalty, the sentence in Latvia are: 1) the request of the competent authorities of Latvia to put convicted person (hereinafter also – request for the transfer of persons) and foreign competent authority approval;
2) foreign competent authority, on request, to take over the convicted person and the competent authorities of Latvia acceptance.
(2) the competent authority shall take the actions provided for in this chapter, if the convicted person has been received or the request of the representative of the competent authority of the foreign information or request or on their own initiative.
750. article. Competent authority competent authority which receives a request for the consent of the convicted person in the foreign takeover of Latvia in the sentence and sent it, is the Prosecutor General's Office.
751. article. The conditions for the transfer of a person to (1) sentence convicted persons in a foreign country can take over a sentence in Latvia, if:

1) the sentenced person is a citizen of Latvia or its permanent place of residence is in Latvia;
2) criminal proceedings have been completed with the final ruling;
3) at the time of receipt of the request, the person convicted at least six months remaining until the end of the sentence;
4) the acts to which the fixed penalty is considered criminal by the Latvian Criminal law;
5) the consent of the sentenced person.
(2) the convicted person's consent is not required, if there is reason to believe that, taking into account the person's age or physical or mental condition, taking over for sentence is required, and it agrees with the representative of the convicted person.
(3) in exceptional cases a person can take to the sentence even if the sentence is less than the specified in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3.
752. article. At the request of the person taking over (1) the competent authority shall, after receipt of the convicted person, or representative of a foreign request to take over that person sentence in Latvia, initiated the request received.
(2) if the file does not contain sufficient information to decide the question of the transfer of a convicted person, may request the competent authority of the foreign State for more information.
753. article. Completion of the examination (1) the competent authority shall examine the request within 10 days after it is requested, or the receipt of the additional information and accepts one of the following decisions: 1) submit a request for transfer of the convicted person's sentence in Latvia;
2) refuse to submit the request for the transfer of the convicted person;
to satisfy the foreign request 3) and take over the person convicted penal in Latvia;
4) reject the foreign request.
(2) the examination time limit may be extended by the Attorney General, and informs the driver in the process.
(3) the decision shall immediately notify the person who submitted a request for the transfer of the convicted person, the sentence and the foreign State in which the person was convicted.
(4) the decision may not be appealed.
754. article. A request for surrender of the request for surrender of a sentence in the article according to this Law 678. the requirements set out in article and then add: 1) document or a statement that the relevant person is a citizen of Latvia or the place of residence is in Latvia, where such a document was not mutually filed;
the Latvian Criminal Law 2) article text, under which the offence for which the punishment prescribed for the person, be deemed criminal in Latvia.
755. article. In Latvia, the izciešam part of the fine measurement (1) the decision of a foreign country, in particular the continuation of the sentence and the fine izciešam in Latvia part within 10 days after receiving the proposal, the competent authorities shall adopt the same level after the convicted person, the Court or the competent authorities of the location and in the same composition, what level of court and the composition of the offence when the criminal review of it happened in Latvia.
(2) the Court shall examine the proposal in Chapter 61 of this law. The sentenced person can invite lawyers in legal aid.
(3) the decision of the Court of Justice provides: 1) continuation of the sentence and the fine izciešam;
2 in custody and imprisoned) spent time in the transfer;
3) custodial authorities a way entering the execution, and it is determined by the same criteria as in this case, if the punishment for the offence would be established in Latvia took place in criminal proceedings;
either the executable part 4), if the Latvian Criminal law provides for such additional penalty.
(4) the decision of the Court is not appealable.
756. article. Continuing with sentence (1) the foreign court in the particular sentence continues without penalty and measure the amendment.
(2) If the penalty established by a foreign court and the Mayor does not correspond to the Latvian Criminal law the punishment for the same offence, the Court amended the penalty for the same criminal offence under Latvian Criminal law, subject to the following conditions: 1) fine and the mayor shall not exceed in the Latvian Criminal law, the maximum penalty for the same offence;
2) fine and the Mayor should conform to the judgment;
3) laid down in the Criminal Code of Latvia the minimum limit of the penalty doesn't matter.
(3) If a foreign person in the mental disorders or mental retardation is not penalized by the criminal, but it is applied to other custodial measures, court rules on medical coercive means such person.
757. article. The transfer of the convicted person (1) receive the consent of the foreign State to pass sentence of persons convicted in Latvia, competent authority instructs the Ministry of the Interior, in coordination with the foreign, to take over and put the person in the execution.
(2) If the issue of the continuation of the fine not decided before the arrival of the convicted person in Latvia, after the takeover of the prison investigation put to decide the question of izciešam soda.
758. article. The legal effect of a person's taking over of sentence (1) the execution takes place in the same order as in the criminal proceedings held in Latvia are sentenced to execution.
(2) a person convicted in Latvia, as adopted applies a pardon and amnesty provisions and conditions for early release, as well as the respective foreign decisions on punishment reduction, amnesty or pardon.
(3) the right to review the judgment is only the State in which the judgment was given.
(4) the execution of suspended and the person shall be released if the State in which the person was convicted, shall inform Latvia about the abolition of the judgment of conviction, except in this part of the law in cases where the information received with the request for temporary custody.
(5) the competent authority shall organise the foreign notification relating to decisions or facts that affect the subsequent sentence. If the explicit information on the execution of the penalty of immediate termination or expiry date, it passes the execution body. In other cases, it referred to the Court, which decides with enforcement issues.
759. article. Legally valid application of the foreign judgment in criminal procedure of Latvia with the judgment of the person at the request of a foreign passed sentence in Latvia, the penalty is enforced in the manner provided for in the criminal law of Latvia's penalty after several judgments.
760. article. Foreign country convicted persons fled the takeover (1) If a citizen of Latvia has been convicted in a foreign country, absconded from parole and arrived in Latvia and this is requested by the foreign take over and ensure her parole in Latvia, the convicted person's consent is not required.
(2) prior to the receipt of the request or of the decision, the competent authority may submit a proposal to the investigating judge in the first paragraph, that person to apply temporary custody if: 1) to the foreign request or decision in this case has received foreign demand to apply temporary custody;
2) foreign demand has information about the sentenced person referred to those facts, in determining the penalty, the penalty, and the Mayor, as well as penal launch time.
(3) to ensure the person's appearance in court, the competent authority may ask the police to detain that person and delivered to the Court.
(4) a Person released from temporary custody if: 1) foreign 18 days from the date of the apprehension of the person has not submitted a request to take over the person and provide it in a sentence imposed in Latvia;
2) request to take over foreign convicted persons are motivated to reject.
(5) referred to in this article shall, at the request of a foreign person to take over and provide it in a sentence imposed in Latvia may be rejected only if there are no one of this law, 751. the conditions referred to in the article.
761. article. Foreign country convicted persons subject to expulsion of the takeover, the competent authority may agree to the foreign country convicted person to take penal in Latvia without the person's consent, if: 1) in a judgment or administrative decision is contained in the order for the expulsion of the convicted person or the deportation of foreign persons this after release from prison;
2) added to the foreign request for the convicted person's views on their transfer and expulsion or deportation order;
3) have other conditions that allow the transfer of the person.
762. article. The expulsion of the person subject to the legal consequences of the transfer (1) a Person who has taken penal in Latvia without its consent in accordance with this law, the provisions of article 761, may not be held criminally liable, the trial or put a sentence for other offences committed before that person's takeover, except for offences for which accepted the judgment enforceable.
(2) the first subparagraph of this article shall not apply where: 1) received sentences piesprieduš foreign prosecution, the costs of the permit or the carrying out of a sentence;
2) person after release 45 days left of Latvia;
3) person has left Latvia and returned to it again.
763. article. Information on parole (1) the competent authority shall inform the foreign, in which the person was convicted: 1) on completion of the sentence;
2) the convicted person escapes from prison;
3) If this is requested by foreign special report.
(2) the authority responsible for the enforcement of penalties, shall immediately inform the competent authority of the first paragraph of this article.

70. chapter. In Latvia, the transfer of the convicted person to a foreign State Penal 764. article. The basis for the transfer of the convicted person's sentence (1) basis in Latvia by deprivation of liberty for transfer of convicted person to a foreign country is the sentence: 1) the foreign competent authority, on request, to transfer the sentenced person and the competent authorities of Latvia agreement;
2) the Latvian authorities request to take over the person convicted and the foreign competent authority approval.
(2) the competent authority shall take the actions provided for in this chapter, if the convicted person has been received or the request of the representative of the competent authority of the foreign information or request or on its own in the authority.
765. article. The competent authority a request for transfer of the convicted person in the Latvia penal for a foreign country and agree to receive and transmit to the Attorney General's Office.
766. article. Conditions for the surrender of the sentence (1) the transfer of the convicted person to a foreign State sentence is permissible if: 1) the sentenced person is a national of the State in which the sentence is to be served;
2) judgment of the Court of Justice has entered into force;
3) at the time of receipt of the request, the person convicted at least six months remaining until the end of the sentence;
4) the acts to which the fixed penalty is considered criminal by the law of the foreign State;
5) the sentenced person expressed a wish to get it passed, or the expression of consent.
(2) the Latvian and foreign competent authority may agree to the transfer of the convicted person without that person's consent, if there is reason to believe that, in view of its age or physical or mental condition, the transfer is necessary for the sentence and it agrees with the representative of the convicted person.
(3) the competent authority may be transferred abroad to sentence a convicted person who does not have this foreign national if there is reason to believe that the foreign country is the person's residence and surrender of the will promote fairness and social rehabilitation of the person.
(4) the competent authority may refer the person to a foreign State to its mental disorders or mental retardation is defined in specialized treatment in a psychiatric hospital with security or treatment the appropriate custodial sites, equivalent treatment measures.
(5) in exceptional cases a person may put the sentence even if the sentence is less than the specified in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3.
767. article. Information for the convicted person imprisonment institutions administration 10 days after it received the judge's order releasing judgment, shall inform the foreign citizen convicted in Latvia or a person whose permanent residence is in Latvia, about the person's right to express a desire to be transferred to a penal of their nationality or country of residence. The convicted explains the legal consequences of the transfer.
768. article. Request for the transfer of persons in penal (1) the sentenced person your request for transfer to a foreign State sentence shall be submitted in writing to the competent authority.
(2) the competent authority shall immediately inform, in writing, a person convicted of a foreign State and the dispatch of the notice for the hearing of the request results.
769. article. Consent of the convicted person (1) if the convicted person has been received or the foreign representative a request for surrender of the person and this request in writing to the convicted person is not connected to a desire to get it passed, or consent of the competent authority within 10 days of the convicted person was presented with this request, it explains the legal consequences of the transfer and call them to express their attitude to the received request.
(2) a consent or waiver, and writing in the sentenced person is evidenced by his signature.
(3) If a foreign made the request, the competent authority shall ensure that the possibility of a foreign representative, for which both countries have agreed to examine the conditions in which the sentenced person has given consent.
770. article. Foreign information (1) if the convicted person has been received the request or consent of the members submitted this request for the surrender of a person to a foreign country, the sentence, the competent authority for the request immediately, but not later than within 10 days notify the foreign.
(2) the foreign State Information indicates: 1) the convicted person's first name, last name, place and date of birth;
2) the address of the convicted person in a foreign country, if the address is;
3) an offence for which a specific punishment;
4) type and the amount of the fine, as well as the time when initiated penal.
(3) at the same time with the competent authority the information can be sent to a foreign State a request to take over the party for this sentence in a foreign country, if the original material is not found facts that prevent the surrender of the person. In this case, the request shall indicate that it is in effect, provided that the following facts are not well established in a foreign country.
771. article. A request for the surrender of the assay (1) after receiving a request to transfer a sentenced person to a foreign country, the sentence, the competent authority shall verify that there are conditions for surrender.
(2) if the file does not contain sufficient information to decide the question of the transfer of the foreign State, the competent authority may request additional documents: 1) or a statement that the sentenced person is a national of this State or this country has its habitual residence;
2 the text of the law), under which the offence for which the person is convicted, is considered criminal in this country.
(3) if necessary, the competent authority before the completion of the inspection can be requested to notify the foreign that the procedure for the determination of the penalty — or change — the continuation will be applied.
772. article. Completion of inspection, the competent authority shall examine the request within 10 days after it is requested, or the receipt of the additional information and accepts one of the following decisions: 1) submit a request for transfer of a person to a foreign State Penal;
2) to accept the surrender of the person;
3) to reject the request for the surrender of the person.
773. article. Please ensure the sentence escaped person (1) the competent authority of a foreign State may submit a request to provide penal abroad that this citizen convicted in Latvia and fled from parole on his country of citizenship. The consent of the convicted person is not necessary.
(2) Before submitting the request, the competent authority may request the competent authority of the foreign State applies temporary custody, the person giving the convicted person, an offence for which a specified penalty, penalty applied and measured, as well as the time when initiated penal.
774. article. Request to take over the sentence of the person subject to expulsion (1) competent authority without the consent of the foreign State may submit a request to take over that person sentence, if the judgment as either a certain expulsion from Latvia or have another person bound by the decision of which that person is not allowed to stay in Latvia after parole.
(2) the request shall be accompanied by a copy of the judgment or the decision on expulsion of convicted person and its views on the transfer.
775. article. The transfer of the convicted person If Latvia has agreed to transfer the sentenced person or the foreign has agreed to take over it, ask the competent authority of the Home Affairs Ministry to coordinate with the foreign transfer of this person and put it in the foreign State concerned.
776. article. Surrender of the legal implications (1) with the convicted person moving across the State border of the Republic of Latvia in Latvia penal has stopped. Execution may not be renewed, if the foreign country has announced that the sentence was completed.
(2) the execution renewed, if the foreign State that: 1) a person has escaped from the penitentiary authorities;
2) execution is completed and the person returned to Latvia.
(3) the competent authority shall immediately inform the foreign for the pardon, amnesty or abolition or amendment of the judgment.
The seventeenth section kriminālspriedum of another country the recognition and enforcement of Chapter 71. Sentenced to penal enforcement abroad in Latvia 777. article. Foreign country ordered the execution of penalties and the conditions (1) sentenced to penal enforcement abroad in Latvia is fine and this merits the unchallenged rule of the recognition and enforcement of the same order as if the punishment would be determined in the course of criminal proceedings in Latvia.
(2) the penalty imposed abroad eligibility and recognition of the rule of law does not preclude its alignment with the Latvian Criminal law provides for sanctions for the same offence.
(3) execution of the punishment imposed in a foreign country, if: 1) Latvia has foreign contract for the second execution of the penalty imposed in the State;
2 foreign) submitted a request for it under penalties;
3) punishment in a foreign country specified in the judgment which has the force of res judicata in criminal proceedings completed;
4 convicted persons on) the same offence could be punished under the criminal law of Latvia;
5) the carrying out of a sentence is not barred, not a foreign country, not in Latvia;
6) at the time the judgment was not timed criminally barred in accordance with the Latvian Criminal law;
7) foreign country there is at least one of this law, the penalty referred to in article 804 fulfillment request submission.
778. article. The competent authority of a foreign request for the execution of the sentence in Latvia receives and decides the Ministry of Justice.
779. article. Foreign country sentenced to penal enforcement abroad ordered the Foundation of the fine execution of the Foundation is:

1) these foreign competent authorities a written request accompanied by the entry into force of a court ruling in the criminal proceedings and the completed document on release or certified copies thereof;
2) the decision of the competent authority on the request of a foreign adoption and referral to the court action is executed in Latvia;
3) Latvian Court ruling on the action to be executed in Latvia;
4) Latvia Court issued an order for the release of the judgment in Latvia.
780. article. Sentenced to penal enforcement abroad, at the request of the foreign State the grounds for refusal of enforcement of the penalty imposed may be refused if the request: 1) has reason to believe that a certain person a fine race, religion, ethnicity, gender, or political views, or if the offence is considered political or purely military;
2) execution would conflict with Latvia's international obligations to another State;
3) execution would conflict with the fundamental principles of the legal system of Latvia;
4) in Latvia are or have completed by final ruling criminal proceedings for the same offence for which the punishment imposed in a foreign country;
5) execution in Latvia;
6) competent authority of Latvia believes that the foreign judgment is able to execute itself;
7) an offence not committed in a foreign country, which ordered the executable.
781. article. Sentenced to penal enforcement abroad at the request of arbitration proceedings (1) sentenced to penal enforcement abroad request the competent authority shall examine within a period of 10 days.
(2) the competent authority shall establish whether there is a foreign country sentenced to penal enforcement framework conditions and whether the reasons for rejecting a request for a review, and accept or reject it.
(3) if the competent authority believes that the information provided is not sufficient, it shall request additional information or documents and their submission. The first part of this article, determine the period of consideration from the moment of receipt of materials requested.
(4) if the ruling applies to two or more offences, not all of which are those for which the possible execution in Latvia, the competent authority to specify which part of the fine relates to offences that meet these requirements.
(5) the decision taken by the competent authority shall immediately notify the requesting State.
(6) If the application was accepted for review, the Ministry of Justice, together with the annexes to the court action executed in Latvia.
782. article. In Latvia, the action is executed (1) Latvia executable fine after it sentenced a foreign request for the execution of the penalty laid down in the same level of Court sentenced the place of residence or place of stay and the same composition, what level of court and the composition of the offence when the criminal review of it happened in Latvia.
(2) the foreign court ruling found actual conditions and personal guilt is binding on the Court of Latvia.
(3) the penalties laid down in Latvia must not aggravate the situation of the sentenced, but it should meet the prescribed punishment in a foreign country.
(4) the question of Latvia the penalty enforceable court appearance in Chapter 61 of this law. Convict may invite the solicitor receiving legal aid.
(5) if the person subject of the moment detained in a foreign country, the Justice Ministry of Justice requested the transfer or the participation of Latvia in a fine setting process through technical means.
(6) the Court's decision to convict and prosecutors 10 days may be appealed to the Supreme Court in cassation to the Senate.
(7) the complaint in the same manner as a cassation complaint or a protest lodged with the criminal proceedings in progress in Latvia, and to the extent permitted by international agreements binding for Latvia and this chapter.
783. article. Of a fine run in Latvia (1) deprivation of liberty, or arrest, the Court determines if a foreign country sentenced to custodial penalties and the Latvian Criminal law for the same offence under the custodial penalty.
(2) the duration of Penalties should comply as far as possible the duration of the penalty specified in a foreign country, but it must not exceed the Latvian Criminal law for the same offence provided for imprisonment or arrest the maximum limit.
(3) the Latvian Criminal law deprivation of liberty laid down in or arrest the minimum limit is irrelevant when deciding the question of Latvia executable.
(4) All the time, when the convict was put on hold, and the time he spent in detention and execution sites in connection with the offence for which the penalty established abroad, will be charged at the time of sentence.
(5) the custodial authorities a way entering the execution are determined by the same criteria as in the case if the penalty for the offence would be established in Latvia took place in criminal proceedings.
(6) with a custodial sentence of a foreign country may not be replaced by a fine.
(7) custodial sentences in Latvia can be determined conditionally, if the Court is convinced that the convict, not fine, do not further endured new criminal offences. In this case, the same conditions apply as if the person is convicted in criminal proceedings in Latvia conditionally.
784. article. In Latvia the executable the fines (1) Latvia executable fine court determines if a foreign country fined and Latvian Criminal law for the same offence as the principal provides fine or more severe punishment, or the fine intended as additional penalty.
(2) a foreign State the amount of the fine imposed by Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect on the date of the judgment a criminal conviction.
(3) Latvia executable fine may not exceed the maximum provided for in the criminal law of Latvia the fine limits on such offences, except where such offence in Latvia for more severe penalties. In this case the executable in Latvia, the fine may not exceed the fine set out in the criminal code's maximum limit at the time of adoption of the decision.
(4) in Latvia in payment of the fine, the Court may postpone the deadlines or broken for a period of not more than one year from the date the decision enters into force.
(5) a foreign country specified in the payment deadlines or Division is binding on the courts of Latvia, however, the Court may in addition impose performance incentives, up to the fourth paragraph of this article.
(6) If Latvia executable fine it is not possible to recover, you can replace it with the penalty associated with deprivation of liberty, if it allows the foreign law which has given judgment. In this case, the replacement of the fine takes place in Latvia. The replacement of the fine is not permissible, if foreign, submitting a request for enforcement of a fine, specifically atrunājus.
785. article. In Latvia the executable property confiscation (1) confiscation of property to be executed in Latvia, determining if such foreign country and sentenced for the same offence as a principal or an additional penalty for the Latvian Criminal law or criminal proceedings in progress in Latvia effects would be forfeited to another basis provided for in law.
(2) If a foreign judgment provides for the confiscation of property, but the Latvian Criminal law does not provide for confiscation of property as a penalty or additional penalty, confiscation shall apply only to the extent that the foreign judgment found that the thing is forfeited crime tool or obtained in a criminal way.
(3) a request for the confiscation of all or part of the return of foreign State shall decide in each case the competent authority.
786. article. In Latvia the executable restriction (1) determination of Latvia all foreign executable specified disqualifications or disqualification penalties corresponding to those laid down in the Criminal Code of Latvia this additional penalty imposition criteria.
(2) the determination of disqualification for a period of one year to five years, if the foreign judgment in less time.
(3) the Court shall determine the executable in Latvia the penalty may not be applied if the disqualification does not see its usefulness in your own country.
(4) in Latvia may determine the rights, even if the punishment is carried out in a foreign country.
787. article. In Latvia, the execution in a specific foreign country under penalties enforcement procedures (1) Latvia set for execution in a foreign country under penalties of execution takes place in the same order as in the criminal proceedings held in Latvia are sentenced to execution.
(2) To the person who served a sentence abroad in Latvia the penalty applies in Latvia adopted amnesty and pardon and early release conditions.
(3) the execution of suspended and foreign country under penalties of withdrawing the request for enforcement of a foreign decision on annulment of the judgment in a criminal conviction.
(4) a foreign decision on penalty reduction, amnesty or pardon act extradition is binding for Latvia.
(5) the foreign notification of this article, the third and fourth part legal facts receives and organizes the performance of the competent authority. If the foreign decision contains sexually explicit information on the execution of the penalty of immediate termination or expiry date, it passes the execution authority, but in other cases, the consideration of the Court that decides with enforcement issues.

(6) a Person served with a custodial penalty immediately released as soon as the information on the abolition of the judgment of conviction, if not received at foreign request for temporary custody application in the cases provided for in this section.
788. article. Foreign country convicted persons in detention (1) the competent authority may ask the police to detain for up to 48 hours the person convicted abroad for the offence for which the arrest should be permitted in Latvia in the ongoing process, if: 1) foreign announces its intention to ask this abroad sentenced to custodial sentences and asked to arrest persons in connection with the avoidance of punishment;
2) competent authority sees a possibility that convict, for which foreign deposits with a custodial penalty enforcement request to avoid participation in the hearing of the action to be executed in Latvia;
3) the competent authority is of the opinion that the convict, being in default of freedom, illegal impact on liecinoš or vilto evidence.
(2) a Detained person must be released if the first paragraph of this article within the time it is not suitable for temporary custody.
789. article. Foreign country convicted person temporary custody (1) If a person arrested in this article of law 788 cases and in the order, the Ministry of Justice submitted a proposal to the investigating judge to apply temporary custody.
(2) the competent authorities judge examines the proposal in the same order as the suggestion of the application of temporary custody case when criminal proceedings are transferred to Latvia.
(3) temporary custody may apply to the Court for hearing a request to meet with the foreign custodial penalty, if there is reason to believe that the convict will avoid a trial.
(4) a Person released from temporary custody if: 1) foreign 18 days from the date of detention has not submitted a request for enforcement of a fine along with the required attachments;
2) competent authority stated that the request for review not be accepted;
3), the Court found that the penalty execution in Latvia;
4 determining) the Court in Latvia executable has not imposed a fine as a security measure of detention;
5) found the circumstances which exclude persons holding in custody.
790. article. The application of the security features by setting the executable in Latvia the penalty, the Court decision until the entry into force and the order for the execution of extradition may apply any security measure in the same order as in the ongoing criminal proceedings in Latvia.
791. article. The order for the execution of Latvia (1) if the decision of the Court of a foreign State for enforcement of a penalty imposed in Latvia, within the time limit laid down in the law is not appealed, the judge of the same Court issued the order of execution.
(2) if the decision of the appeal court and the Supreme Court, the Senate left it in force, referējuš judge orders for execution.
792. article. Foreign country default (in absentia) sentenced to penal enforcement request arbitration proceedings (1) where a judgment given in default, the foreign competent authority, received a foreign request for its execution in Latvia the convicted statement indicates that: 1) the request for the execution of punishment made the foreign with which Latvia has the contract for the second in the country in default sentenced to the penalty of execution;
2) has the right to 30dien from the date of receipt of the notification to submit a complaint with a claim for default case heard in the presence of the foreign State or in Latvia;
3) fine will be aligned and executed the General order, if 30 days will not be required in the proceedings in the presence of the convicted or the complaint will be rejected or no action due to the absence of the convicted.
(2) in the first subparagraph for submitting the complaint to the convict to the competent authority of Latvia. If the complaint does not specify the State of the proceedings, their appearance in Latvia.
(3) a copy of the Statement with a reference to its issuance of the convicted Justice Department immediately sends the request to the requesting State.
793. article. Submission of a foreign country (1) If convicted within the period prescribed in the law complaint, asking him to reconsider the case in the presence of a State which imposed the fine, the competent authority request limits.
(2) If the accused without justification does not come to a foreign country at the invitation of the Court, issued no later than 21 days before the date of commencement of the review, the complaint is recognized as not submitted and the competent authority following receipt of a request for appearance in the same order as if the thing to be considered in the presence of the convicted.
(3) if the examination results in a conviction, judgment, the competent authority shall send the pending request of the requesting State.
(4) if the default of the sentenced person in Latvia is located in temporary custody after a foreign request, this person is referred to the complaints referred to the foreign State to its presence. In this case, the question of the person holding custody further decides that the State imposed a fine.
(5) If a foreign country convicted in absentia, which submitted the complaint to the State which imposed the fine, arrested in connection with another criminal proceedings or serving punishment for other offences, the competent authority shall inform the requesting country and the time when sentenced may refer the complaint to a foreign State for participation in the proceedings.
(6) if the foreign law permits, the convict can participate in a inquiry by using technical means. Participation, through technical means, does not affect the sentenced procedural rights in proceedings abroad. If convicted, the legal aid lawyer, invited a foreign lawyer shall have the right to meet with their confidential conditions in Latvia and, together with the customer to participate in the consideration of the complaint by using technical means.
(7) a foreign lawyer shall not affect the convicted in inviting the right to legal aid in Latvia.
794. article. The submission of Latvia (1), if the default of convict requires consideration of the complaint of the Latvian courts, the competent authority shall immediately inform the foreign country and shall forward the complaint, as well as the foreign request, together with the annexes to the Court which would be competent to review the case if the criminal proceedings take place in Latvia.
(2) from the time when the complaint is received by the Court, the criminal proceedings will continue in Latvia and convict the accused obtained status and all the rights of the accused, including the right to invite a lawyer for defending in this law.
795. article. Complaints handling policy in Latvia (1) summons the accused will be served not later than 21 days before the date of examination of the complaint, if he did not make any explicit consent in the shorter term.
(2) If the sentenced person without justification, fails to appear, the Court shall be exempt from the hearing and the issue of a foreign country in default sentenced to the penalty of execution in Latvia are considered in the same order as on the presence of a sentence.
(3) if the foreign law permits, the complaint proceedings in procedural acts with persons abroad can be performed by using technical means.
(4) the results of the examination, the Court shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) the decision rejecting his complaint and action is executed without a trial on the merits;
2) adopted a decision on default of a foreign court's ruling and on the continuation of the criminal proceedings in Latvia from the prosecution stage.
796. article. Foreign material (1) the Court which agrees to a foreign country was given in consideration of the complaint of the convicted person, the competent authorities shall ask the necessary foreign-hand with crime trial related materials.
(2) evidence obtained in a foreign country specified in the procedural order, measured as derived in Latvia.
797. article. Foreign country specific out-of-court penalties (ordonnance penale), Latvia (1) enforcement of international agreements in the cases provided for foreign country out-of-Court set fines in Latvia in the same order as the result of a hearing ordered soda.
(2) on receiving a request for out-of-court penalties laid down in the execution of Latvia, the competent authority shall issue to the person a foreign country specific penalty statement indicates that: 1) the request for the execution of punishment made the foreign with which Latvia has the contract for the second in the country in certain out-of-court penalties enforcement;
2) within 30 days, submit a complaint to the competent authority of Latvia, a person may request a court hearing on a foreign country or in Latvia;
3) fine will be aligned and executed the General order, if 30 days will not be required in the proceedings in the Court in the presence of the person or the complaint will be rejected or no action due to the person's absence.
(3) the complaint concerning the out-of-court penalties laid down in legal proceedings has the same effects and the subsequent arbitration proceedings as a complaint, if the punishment imposed in absentia.
798. article. Criminal liability and limitation period for execution

(1) a foreign country ordered the penalty to be executed in Latvia restricts in the Latvian Criminal law and criminal proceedings and execution of limitation and foreign laws intended the limitation.
(2) the circumstances which affect the flow of time abroad to the same extent it affects in Latvia.
799. article. Double-judged not permissible in Latvia does not fulfil a sentence of a foreign State if the person suffered the same offence in Latvia or in a third country, a sentence been convicted without the penalty of a fine, released under amnesty or pardon or is eligible for the same offence.
800. article. Foreign judgment in Latvia in compliance with criminal proceedings (1) the punishment of criminal proceedings in progress in Latvia, the person in respect of which the requested foreign State for enforcement of a punishment in Latvia, in Latvia, the executable is added to the penalty for the punishment imposed in a foreign country in the order for the determination of the penalty after several convictions for criminal law.
(2) an offence in criminal law by the Latvian penal offence, for which Latvia is executed in a foreign country, the penalty imposed shall have the same meaning as an offence in the criminal proceedings in progress in Latvia.
801. article. The postponement of the execution of the penalty ordered fines abroad in Latvia may postpone the execution under the same circumstances and under the same procedures as a fine imposed in Latvia.
72. chapter. In Latvia the penalty awarded against the enforcement of a foreign country 802. article. Sentenced to penal enforcement in Latvia and the conditions (1) sentenced to penal enforcement in Latvia's foreign country is fine and this merits recognition and enforcement of the rule of law in the same order as if the punishment would be imposed in the country occurred in criminal proceedings.
(2) the conditions for the submission of the request for the foreign State in Latvia are sentenced to the penalty of execution is as follows: 1) Latvia has foreign contract for the second execution of the penalty imposed in the State;
2) the offence for which the sentence is also under foreign criminal law;
3) convict would be a criminal act if the criminal proceedings take place in a foreign country;
4) judgment which established punishment, Latvia entered into force;
Latvia submitted a foreign State 5) penalty enforcement request along a judgment which has the force of res judicata and the order for release.
803. article. The competent authority in Latvia are sentenced to the penalty of execution request to the foreign State shall submit to the Ministry of Justice.
804. article. In Latvia the penalty awarded against the execution of the reasons Latvia may request a foreign country to meet in Latvia a sentence if there is 802. this law referred to in the second subparagraph of article and one or more of the following reasons: 1) the sentenced person is not in Latvia, but resides or normally reside abroad;
2) penalty enforcement of foreign country promote the social rehabilitation of the convicted person;
3) the sentenced person serving abroad with the custodial sentences and convicted in Latvia by deprivation of liberty or arrest, which could be executed immediately after the sentence imposed abroad;
4) is the foreign nationality of the convicted person, and it has expressed its willingness to promote the social rehabilitation of the person;
5) Latvia would not be able to execute the punishment, even using the extradition.
805. article. In Latvia the penalty awarded against the request for enforcement (1) sentenced in Latvia the penalty in addition to the request for enforcement of this law should be specified in article 678 motivates that there are conditions and reasons for the execution of a foreign country.
(2) the request shall be accompanied by: 1), the Court ruling the original or a certified copy;
2) order for releasing the original or a certified copy;
3 the impugned Criminal Code of Latvia) article text.
(3) at the request of a foreign criminal or submit it the certified copy of the document.
(4) If a punishment for a certain number of offences or after several judgments, but not all offences under penalties of execution allows a foreign country, the competent authority will propose to the Court to determine the sentence to be served for the offence for which the penalty enforcement abroad is possible. The Court determined the fine thirteenth section of this Act.
806. article. In Latvia the penalty awarded against the consequences of execution (1) After the execution of the fine imposed in Latvia, the foreign State of the Latvian authorities do not do anything with the execution of related activities.
(2) in the first subparagraph of this article, the restrictions do not apply to the case where the person before the appropriate security feature — and sentenced to detention, imprisonment. In this case, you can start a custodial sentence.
(3) As the additional penalty of disqualification in Latvia can be executed regardless of the submission of the request for enforcement of a foreign country as punishment.
807. article. In Latvia the convicted person in custody (1) If there is a reasonable suspicion that the convicted abroad could avoid a custodial sentence, Latvia may request the competent authority of a foreign State to arrest convicted to Latvia under penalties enforcement request submission and consideration.
(2) if the person is arrested abroad to the first part of this article the request specified in the execution of the penalty, a request must be submitted as soon as possible, but no later than the 15th day after the person's arrest.
(3) the person arrested in Latvia, a candidate for the foreign State participation in the process of determining the fine to be executed. If the foreign court finds that in sentenced in Latvia for execution in this country is not possible, Latvia takes over arrested persons and general order shall decide on its holding in custody or release.
(4) if the foreign law permits, the arrested person in Latvia the penalty may participate in the process through technical means.
(5) if the judgment is cancelled in Latvia, which executes foreign custodial sentence, and the case passed to the new trial, the competent authority shall immediately inform the foreign and may submit a request for temporary custody application in the cases provided for in this section.
808. article. Latvian law execution time in a foreign country (1) Court ruling which established punishment by execution of a foreign country, you can review only by the Court.
(2) If a court order is repealed, the competent authority shall immediately inform the competent authority of a foreign State. This information supersedes earlier submitted the request for execution.
(3) If the revision of the judicial decision amended by part of the penalty, or the conditions of implementation, the competent authority shall submit to the enhancement request for execution.
(4) the amnesty laws adopted in Latvia also apply to persons who have been sentenced to punishment in Latvia, but is executed in a foreign country, therefore, the competent authority shall immediately forward to the foreign countries that have submitted requests for enforcement of fines, but not from the information on completion.
(5) the convicted person punishment is executed in a foreign country, can pardon the law in Latvia. On the adoption of the pardon, the competent authority shall immediately inform the competent authority of a foreign State.
809. article. Execution of the rights (1) Latvia recover execution rights when: 1) request withdrawn before foreign notified its intention to execute the penalty;
2) foreign announced the rejection of the request;
3) foreign clearly does not exercise its right of execution, although the announced intention to execute it;
4) results in a foreign delay execution it is no longer possible.
(2) if the execution of the request is cancelled due to the cancellation, ruling the criminal proceedings take place in Latvia in the General order.
(3) regardless of the place of execution of all penalties carried out in Latvia and abroad, is counted in the part of the fine served
(4) the execution in Latvia is possible if foreign announced the execution completion or becoming aware that a person is eligible for the same offence, the penalty, the convicted suffered no penalty, another went under amnesty spared or foreign country with whom Latvia has an agreement on mutual enforcement of judgments.
810. article. Limitation periods (1) the competent authority shall inform the foreign on the Latvian Criminal law the limitation provided for by the Member and all factors that affect the limitation period.
(2) the foreign statutory limitation period is not an obstacle to the execution of the punishment in Latvia after the enforcement of the rights.
The eighteenth section of procedural Assistance activities in chapter 73. Foreign State aid procedural activities 811. article. The basis for the foreign State aid procedural actions in carrying out procedural assistance Foundation is: 1) request for foreign assistance in the performance of procedural acts (hereinafter in this chapter, the foreign request);
2), the competent authorities of Latvia, decision on admissibility of carrying out procedural actions.
812. article. The competent authorities, at the request of the foreign proceedings (1) the pre-trial stage of the proceedings the foreign request for consideration and determination of the General Prosecutor's Office, but until the initiation of prosecution, the Ministry of internal affairs.
(2) the stage of the hearing, at the request of foreign review and decide on the Ministry of Justice.
(3) If the States or their competent authorities have agreed on direct communication, requests for consideration and determination of the institution concerned.
81. article. At the request of a foreign enforcement procedure (1) a request for Foreign assistance in carrying out procedural actions enforcement of this law.

(2) request can be executed in a different order, if requested by the foreign State and if it is not contrary to fundamental principles of criminal procedure of Latvia.
(3) at the request of a foreign competent authority may permit the foreign representative to participate in procedural acts or personally to make the execution of the request in its presence.
814. article. At the request of a foreign Registrar (1) the request for foreign assistance in carrying out procedural actions decide immediately, but not later than 10 days after receiving it. If the Registrar requires additional information, it requests from the requesting State.
(2) examining the foreign request, the competent authority shall take one of the following decisions: 1) on request, the feasibility of determining the authority executing the request, terms and other conditions;
2) waiver request to run or part thereof, by reason of the refusal.
(3) the decision taken by the competent authority shall immediately notify the requesting State, if the request is refused or any part thereof, or if the requested foreign State.
815. article. At the request of a foreign enforcement (1) the request by executing the Foreign investigation authority, Prosecutor or the Court on behalf of the competent authority.
(2) at the request of a Foreign enforcement authority upon the instructions of the competent authority shall inform in due course the foreign procedural actions on place and time. The results of the implementation of the request of the competent authority of the materials sent to the foreign State.
(3) If a procedural action is not carried out, or partially performed, at the request of the foreign State shall notify the reasons for the failure.
(4) if the foreign request, you get facts that further examination is needed to take other urgent procedural acts, the performer in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act shall be entitled to do so by notifying the sponsor of the request.
(5) at the request of a Foreign artist, finding the request during the execution of articles and documents whose circulation is prohibited by law and which are not specified in the request for withdrawal, removes them, about writing a separate protocol.
816. article. At the request of a foreign enforcement reasons for refusing the request of a Foreign enforcement may be refused if: 1) request related to a political offence;
2) request may harm Latvia's national sovereignty, security, public order or other essential interests;
3) not sufficient information and submitted additional information to get.
817. article. Procedural actions through technical means (1) at the request of a foreign or executing authority, upon request, with the consent of the foreign proposal procedural act may be performed using technical means.
(2) procedural action, through technical means, made the request of the requesting State in its procedural competent officer. If necessary, the performance of such procedural actions in Latvia or abroad participate in the interpreter.
(3) Request the executive authorities representative identity of the parties involved and ensure procedural actions in progress in Latvia and its compliance with the fundamental principles of criminal procedure of Latvia.
(4) If, through a procedural action is a violation of the fundamental principles of criminal procedure of Latvia, the representative of the executing authority shall immediately take the measures necessary to continue this activity in accordance with the aforementioned principles.
(5) the Person who was invited to give evidence, have the right not to give testimony, even if it stems from the law of the requesting State.
818. article. The application of coercive measures Latvia may refuse the application of coercive measures of an offence that is not punishable under criminal law in Latvia, if: 1) to the applicant country it does not have a Treaty on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters;
2) such contract is, but foreign it committed to apply coercive measures only in their own country criminal offences.
819. article. Special investigative activities by the special investigative activities at the request of a foreign made only if it would be permitted in Latvia in criminal proceedings for the same offence.
820. article. Temporary transfer of persons (1) at the request of a foreign person, where detained in Latvia, on remand or serving with custodial sentences, for a certain period of time can put a foreign State to give evidence or konfrontēšan provided that this person immediately after the completion of the proceedings but no later than the last day of the period of the transfer will be passed back to Latvia.
(2) a surrender may be refused if: 1) bated, arrested or sentenced person consents;
2 the person's presence is) required in criminal proceedings that take place in Latvia;
3) persons move, exclude the possibility of criminal proceedings in Latvia to complete within a reasonable time;
4 there are other important reasons).
(3) that a person at the request of a foreign custody spent abroad, including safety features and served in the penalty period.
821. article. The person's temporary acceptance (1) if the foreign State requests that the person in detention or serving the custodial sentences in a foreign country, the procedural actions during the found in Latvia, the competent authority may allow that person to take procedural action.
(2) a Person in Latvia by a foreign request, delivered to the custody of the law there 702. Article 1 of the first paragraph of the document referred to in paragraph basis. The execution of the request it shall immediately be transmitted back to the foreign country, but not later than the last day of the transfer.
822. article. Temporary transfer of the person, or the enforcement competent authority instructs the Ministry of the Interior to coordinate with foreign and make personal referrals or at the time of adoption.
823. article. Personal immunity (1) against a person who has arrived in Latvia with the consent of the foreign request of Latvia, shall not initiate or continue criminal proceedings for any offence committed prior to the arrival.
(2) in the first subparagraph within a certain immunity to the person expires after 15 days from when it was able to leave the territory of Latvia, as well as in the case when the person left the territory of Latvia and returned voluntarily.
824. article. The subject of transfer, the request of a foreign State by foreign it can pass objects that are required as proof of things. If necessary, the competent authority guarantees that the object will be returned.
825. article. The foreign procedural documents procedure At the request of the competent foreign authority shall organise the issue of foreign procedural documents in Latvia. On the issue of a written Protocol according to this law, the requirements of article 326.
74. chapter. Foreign State request for performing procedural acts article 826. Application procedure (1) If criminal proceedings need to take procedural action abroad, process guide refers to the competent authority with a written proposal to ask foreign to take procedural action. The suggestion of this law shall be added to the first subparagraph of article 147 provides the request and other documents.
(2) the suggestion of appearance within 10 days and shall inform the applicant of the results.
(3) if the proposal is recognised by the competent authority a request sent to the foreign State.
827. article. Request for procedural acts performed abroad (1) the request for the performance of procedural acts in a foreign country in accordance with this law, article 678. Article and then add documents that would be necessary if the procedural action to be carried out in Latvia in accordance with this Act.
(2) a foreign State may be asked to: 1) allow the officer of Latvia to participate in procedural acts;
2) announce the procedural actions place and time;
3) take procedural action, through technical means.
828. article. A request for a temporary transfer of the person (1) the competent authority process guide written may ask to the person who arrested abroad, detained or serving with custodial sentences, for a certain period of time passes the procedural action.
(2) the competent authority process may ask the promoter foreign to adopt temporarily a person in detention or serving custodial sentences related to Latvia, where its presence is necessary for the performance of procedural acts in a foreign country.
829. article. To Latvia invited persons immunity (1) Against a person who arrived in Latvia after the invitation of the Latvian authorities to perform a procedural act shall not initiate or continue criminal proceedings for a criminal offence committed prior to the arrival.
(2) in the first subparagraph within a certain immunity to the person expires after 15 days from when it was able to leave Latvia and, if the person has left Latvia and then voluntarily returned.
Nineteenth title separate international questions 75. chapter. The joint investigation group 830. article. The joint investigation team and the building conditions (1) joint investigation team is Latvian and foreign one or several foreign conduct of pre-trial proceedings authorized by officials who work together in one country, ongoing criminal proceedings.
(2) joint investigation team creates specific criminal conduct, the participating countries by common accord on its head, composition and activities of the period.

(3) joint investigation team established to prevent the unwarranted delay of the process related to the need to carry out investigations in several countries, in particular in cases where several countries initiated criminal proceedings for the same offence or a significant amount of investigation to be performed outside the territory of the State where the criminal proceedings.
831. article. The competent authority on behalf of Latvia agreement on creation of the joint investigation team of the Attorney General or a signature — the conclusion of a specific agreement, by his authorised representative.
832. article. The joint investigation team based in Latvia of the joint investigation team based in Latvia is this law 831. the officials referred to in article signed an agreement on the participation of Latvia such groups.
833. article. The joint investigation team leader and his powers (1) joint investigation team leader (hereinafter in this chapter — the Manager) is a representative of the State where the criminal proceedings.
(2) the appointment of the Supervisor is an integral part of the agreement. You can change the head only with the consent of all the Member States.
(3) If a Manager is the representative of Latvia, she has the following powers: 1) put all procedural rights they would have if the process takes place only in Latvia;
2) ask the Group attached to independently perform procedural actions in Latvia;
3) ask the Group attached to take a certain amount of investigation in the country whose representative he is;
4) decide to what extent present each United Group members with the information available to the group.
(4) Member States may establish a different agreement the authority of the supervisor.
834. article. Foreign Member attached to the joint investigation group (1) criminal proceedings in progress in Latvia attached to the joint investigation team is representative of another Member in the group.
(2) the joint investigation team may also include transnational organization, if such a right would be in one of the Member States.
(3) the Attached participant can independently perform in Latvia, the driver asked the procedural actions.
(4) the procedural actions in the country, represented by the attached participant, he carried out his mandate and to the extent specified by the Manager.
(5) If a third country need legal aid in the criminal section of the attached participant requests for judicial assistance submitted in their country.
835. article. The Latvian member of the joint investigation team (1) joint investigation team Latvia attached to the procedural powers in the Member State in which the criminal proceedings shall be laid down in an agreement on the establishment of the group.
(2) attached to the Latvian group member in the ongoing criminal proceedings in a foreign country has the right to independently perform procedural actions in Latvia its procedural powers and within the scope of the driver.
(3) joint investigation team can be put at the disposal of the driver all the information needed for criminal proceedings, available in Latvia for him due to his post.
(4) If criminal proceedings take place in Latvia, the joint investigation team may be more representative of Latvia. Their term of Office and the relationship with the Manager is the same as when criminal proceedings are carried out only in Latvia formed investigation teams.
836. article. Court procedures in criminal proceedings in Latvia (1) If a Manager is the representative of Latvia, criminal proceedings take place in Latvia in the procedural order.
(2) participants in proceedings Attached to their country out there within the procedural order, unless the driver is asked to apply the procedure laid down in Latvia and the foreign legal system so permits.
(3) all made in Latvia procedural actions appealable to the Latvian law.
(4) control and supervision of the investigating authorities and the Prosecutor made the leader the General order, if the agreement specifies otherwise.
837. article. The transfer of criminal proceedings in another country (1) If this Act Chapter 68. conditions and reasons of criminal proceedings in Latvia to the surrender to another Member State, the competent representatives of countries agree on the appointment of the head of the other.
(2) if the Member States fail to agree on change of driver or transfer of criminal procedure exist for third country, joint investigation teams stopped and further followed this law, chapter 43.
(3) If a Member State does not agree with the process of the third country, the submission must be returned upon request.
838. article. The issue the issue is taking place in the General procedure, regardless of whether the person is in the issuing Member State or in a third country.
76. chapter. In cooperation with the International Criminal Court, Article 839. A criminal law framework of cooperation (1) in cooperation with the Criminal courts between the tautiskaj is only for those offences that are the competence of these courts.
(2) the Latvian laws or international regulations for personal immunity or special procedural rules which may be associated with the person under investigation mandate, cannot be an obstacle to the realization of the International Court of Justice jurisdiction over that person.
840. article. The competent authority shall, in cooperation with the International Criminal Court (1) cooperation with international courts, the competent authority is the Ministry of Justice.
(2) if necessary, the international criminal police organisation (Interpol).
841. article. Basis for surrender of the International Court of Justice (1) a Person against whom the International Court of justice brought charges or judicial, prosecution and trial may be transferred at the request of the Court.
(2) a Person who is a citizen of Latvia, prosecution and litigation in the International Court of Justice may be transferred only if the International Court of Justice has received proof that the person in the event of conviction, the custodial sentence will serve in Latvia.
(3) the legal basis for surrender of the International Court of Justice is the basic document of the Treaty establishing the International Court of Justice and the provisions of this law.
842. article. Surrender of the reasons for the refusal to surrender of the International Court of Justice is not permissible in cases where there is one of this law, 697. the first paragraph of article 6, paragraph 2 and 3 and the second paragraph 3., 4. and 5. the reasons mentioned in paragraph 1.
843. article. Surrender of the Registrar, at the request of the inspection and enforcement (1) the request for the surrender of persons to the International Court of Justice checks the person detained, arrested, and all matters related to decide and execute this law, in article 698-711.
(2) request the International Court of Justice on the transfer of persons is a priority in comparison with other country submitted a request for extradition. If the International Court of Justice decision has not even determined that a particular case is the only international court with jurisdiction, the order of the competing request, the competent authority shall determine, pursuant to this law, the provisions of article 709.
844. article. Assistance to the International Court of Justice in the conduct of proceedings (1) the competent authority shall, upon the request of the International Court of Justice organized investigations and prosecutions and provide it with the necessary assistance in the conduct of proceedings. The request may include the cooperation of victims and the protection of liecinoš measures and measures for the purposes of confiscation, especially the interests of the victims.
(2) a request for the execution of this law — 813 815, 817-820.., 824 and 825. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article.
(3) a request may be refused if it relates to the issue of documents or evidence the discovery that affects national security, unless the request could not be performed by the special conditions or later.
(4) authorised officers of the International Court of Justice has the right to carry out the necessary procedural actions in the territory of Latvia, independently or in cooperation with the competent international organisations and competent authorities of Latvia. If the proceedings do not involve any coercive measures, the application of an authorized officer of the International Court of Justice after consultation with the competent authority, they may be carried out without the presence of representatives of the competent authority.
845. article. Economic nature of the International Court of Justice ruling enforcement (1) the competent authority shall take the measures provided for in this Act, to ensure that you run the decision of the International Court of Justice for consideration of victims, including restitution, compensation and rehabilitation.
(2) the International Court of Justice in certain fine or seizure of property is carried out by the Latvian legislation procedure, without prejudice to a third party for a good faith (bona fide).
(3) the competent authority shall take the measures provided for in this law, to recover the proceeds, property or assets, which by the decision of the International Court of Justice is to be forfeited. Property or proceeds obtained shall be the International Court of Justice.
846. article. The conviction of the International Court of Justice judgment (1) if the International Court of Justice determined that the custodial penalties sentenced person accomplished in Latvia, the competent authority shall immediately inform the International Court on the feasibility of the fine or of the circumstances that could significantly affect the execution of Latvia.

(2) the execution takes place in the same order as in the criminal proceedings held in Latvia are sentenced to execution. A convicted person shall have the right to unimpeded and confidential contact with the International Court, but the International Court of Justice has the right to carry out supervision of the execution of the fine.
(3) the International Court of Justice specified punishment may be reduced or changed only by this Court.
(4) execution time, the competent authority at least 45 days in advance, inform the International Court on the previously established conditions and on any conditions that may significantly affect the prison rules or time.
(5) If, after a person has no penal law, or have not been given permission to stay in Latvia, it is transported to another country for which that person must accept or agree to accept it, subject to the person's choice.
(6) the convicted person's prosecution, punishment or extradition to another State for the offence for which it made before the arrival of Islam, the sentence can only happen with the consent of the International Court of Justice, unless the person at the Penal voluntary stay in Latvia for more than 30 days or has left and then returned to Latvia.
847. article. Confidentiality of information (1) to request the International Court of Justice on cooperation and attached documents to keep them secret, except where disclosure is required for the execution of the request.
(2) the competent authority, providing legal aid, may request the International Court to take measures to prevent the disclosure of information that would harm national security interests to protect Latvian officials or other limited access protected information.
(3) other State confidential information, the competent authority may provide the International Court of Justice only if it agreed to the State providing the information.
Transitional provisions 1 to this law into force in accordance with the Latvian Criminal Code of procedural actions and their resulting materials retain their legal status.
2. Procedural actions, so this law into force in accordance with the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code, are also finished in that order in the code.
3. Criminal matters brought before the entry into force of the law, the pre-trial process time limit shall run from the date of entry into force of the law.
4. Security features that apply to persons of this law into force and in respect of which the code of criminal procedure of Latvia did not detect any procedural time, this time limit shall run from the date of entry into force of the law.
5. with regard to the security features that apply to a person before the date of entry into force of the law, in force in certain criminal procedural decision of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code or the relevant time limit prescribed in the rules.
6. If this law does not impose a before the proper security feature, driver of the process within one month after the date of entry into force of the law must decide on this security feature of its revocation or amendment.
7. If a person is found to be suspect of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 70, the driver of the process within 10 days after the date of entry into force of the law to decide on the recognition of the person as suspect under this Act.
8. In criminal matters, which until this date of entry into force of the law is applied to civil claims, further considered the applications for compensation. If these matters are not also at the same time brought the victim or civil defendants not simultaneously also accused, civil suit pending in the law of civil procedure and on the process of transforming one month after the entry into force of this law shall notify the following persons of the day.
9. Regulations used the term "cognitive authority" and "cognition" to the perpetrators of these acts to fine-tune further the progressive versions of sense as the term "investigative body", and "investigator".
10. This law 353. the third part of the article, article 354 and 528. paragraph 13 of article shall enter into force simultaneously with the law on the victims fund.
11. To 2006 January 1 this law 415 of the sixth paragraph of article 3 and 4 of this function the State Probation Service site provides national police.
12. This law 483. the first part of the article is in force in the courts, which have the required technical support.
13-2006 April 1 special authorization of investigative activities shall be issued: 1) the President of the Supreme Court specifically authorized the Supreme Court judge — the control of correspondence, communication facilities, sites, or places of personal audiokontrol, videokontrol;
2 the Attorney General specifically authorized) Prosecutor: personal observation and tracking, object observation, the special investigative experiment, comparative research necessary for the taking of the sample in a special way, the control of criminal activity.
The law shall enter into force on 1 October 2005.
The law adopted by the Parliament in December 2005 on April 21.
State v. President Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga in Riga 11 May 2005 editorial Note: the law shall enter into force by 1 October 2005.
The law of criminal procedure Annex 1 Manta, which supersedes the attachment for arrest is not subject to such a person owned property: 1. the home equipment, household items and clothing required for the defendant, his family and the people who are dependants.
2. the food needed for the accused and his family in subsistence.
3. The money total not exceeding the Government determine within one month of the accused and the subsistence minimum for each family member.
4. Fuel needed for family cooking and living space heating.
5. Techniques and tools required for the accused business or professional activities to continue, except when the company was declared bankrupt by a court or the accused in criminal proceedings deprived of the right to communicate to the occupation.
6. Persons whose occupation is agriculture, — one cow, heifer, goat, sheep, pig, poultry and Flock, feed the animal feeding to young cattle fodder harvesting or piling on pasture, as well as seeds and planting material.
 
The law of criminal procedure Annex 2 to the Offence for which the person is issued by a Member State of the European Union, without checking whether they are in accordance with the Latvian Criminal law: 1) the membership of a criminal organisation;
2) terrorism;
3) trafficking in human beings;
4) sexual exploitation of children and child pornography;
5) illegal trade in narcotic and psychotropic substances;
6) illegal trade in arms, munitions and explosives;
7) corruption;
8) fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Community on 26 July 1995 the European Convention for the protection of the financial interests of the community;
9) criminal money laundering;
10) counterfeiting currency;
11) computer crime;
12) environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal and plant species and varieties;
13) assistance for illegal entry and residence in the country;
14) murder, grievous bodily harm;
15) illegal trade in human organs and tissues;
16) kidnapping, illegal imprisonment in Europe needs and the taking of hostages;
racism and xenophobia 17);
18) organised or armed robbery;
19) illegal trade in cultural goods, including antiques and works of art;
20) fraud;
21) racket and extortion;
22) product counterfeiting and pirated production;
23) administrative document counterfeiting and trade;
24) means of payment counterfeiting;
25) illegal trade with hormones and other growth promoters;
26) illicit trafficking in nuclear materials or radioactive materials;
27) trade in stolen vehicles;
28) rape;
29) arson;
30) crimes that are within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court;
31) the seizure of the ship or aircraft;
32) sabotage.