Amendments To The Latvian Code Of Administrative Offences

Original Language Title: Grozījumi Latvijas Administratīvo pārkāpumu kodeksā

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now

Read the untranslated law here: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/249651


The Saeima has adopted and the President promulgated the following laws: the amendments to the Latvian Code of administrative offences in the Latvian Code of administrative offences the following amendments: 1. Express article 21, first paragraph as follows: "If the news about administrative offences is sufficient to establish that the infringement is minor, the institution (official), which due to the hearing is entitled not to open infringement proceedings in administrative or terminate the proceedings initiated and the release party of administrative responsibility , limited to an oral reprimand. " 2. Express article 37 as follows: "article 37. The administrative responsibility of the administrative offence proceedings limitation proceedings may be initiated no later than six months from the date of the infringement, but if the violation is ongoing, the cessation of the infringement from the day. Refusal to commence criminal proceedings or terminate criminal proceedings, but are detectable signs of irregularities in the administrative proceedings, administrative proceedings, the violation may be initiated not later than one month from the date of the decision to initiate criminal proceedings or abandonment of its termination. Management of the administrative case of the infringement of article 166.6 this code [if the irregularities committed political party (organisation) or political (Organization) Association], "c" for the twelfth chapter and 204.2 article administrative violations can start one month from when the infringement was recorded daily, but not later than two years from the date of the offence. " 3. To make the first part of article 39 in the following wording: "If administrative misconduct caused economic damage natural or legal person, the examination of the Administrative Affairs of the infringement, the Court has the right to decide on at the same time the obligation of property." 4. To make the sanctions in this article 155.8: "fines imposed on natural persons up to five hundred lats, but the entities — up to five thousand lats, confiscating the infringement of copyright and related rights objects and their media." 5. Article 158.2 and 158.3 be expressed as follows: "article 158.2. Administered by the public service without a licence or a registration or licence conditions or general authorisation regulations for controlled public service without a public service licence or registration, or for public service license terms or general authorisation provisions — expressed a warning or fine imposed on natural persons from fifty to five hundred lats, officials from one hundred to five hundred lats, but the entities — from two hundred to ten thousand lats. Article 158.3. Failure to provide information, providing false information to the public service Commission, its legal regulation the default decision and legislation administered sector for infringements of the administered the public service or the user's failure to provide information the public service Commission, its the deadline, as well as providing false information to the Commission, the public service Commission the legal decision of default or other not mentioned in this code the law administered sector violations compliance with which is supervised by the public service Commission, regulating, warning or impose expressed fine natural persons from fifty to five hundred lats, officials from one hundred to five hundred lats, but the entities — from two hundred to ten thousand lats. " 6. Replace the words "in article but 158.4 entities — from five hundred to ten thousand lats" with the words "but entities — from two hundred to ten thousand lats. 7. Turn off the article number and the word 236.4 "156.3 and". 8. Express article following 238.1:238.1 "article. The commencement of proceedings for administrative offences cases Receive messages that indicate possible administrative infringement, article 247 of this code, the persons within three working days, shall take a decision on the administrative records of the breach or a waiver of the administrative offence proceedings begin (238.2 this code and 239), or transfer of materials by jurisdiction. The decision on the administrative records of the initiation of the infringement can be assumed by the administrative infringements in the form of Protocol or the resolution in the form of the document, which contains news or facts about possible administrative offences. The refusal to initiate administrative offence proceedings shall notify the persons whose legal interests are affected by this decision. The decision shall be communicated to the notification law. The refusal to initiate administrative offence proceedings a person whose legal interests are violated, has the right to appeal to a higher authority within 10 working days from the date of notification of the decision. Higher authority decision on complaint submitted shall be taken within 10 working days from the date of receipt of the complaint. Higher authority within the meaning of this code is the highest officer of the authority which is competent for the administrative offence proceedings. If there is no higher authority, the complaint shall be submitted to the district (municipal) Court of the person whose legal interests are violated, the place of residence or registered office. Higher authority decision on cancelling an administrative infringement proceedings initiated the person whose legal interests are violated, has the right to appeal to the district (municipal) Court of their place of residence or registered office within 10 working days from the date of notification of the decision. District (municipal) Court complaint about the refusal to initiate administrative offence proceedings and the process of writing the appearance a month from the date of receipt of the complaint, shall take a decision on the satisfaction or rejection. District (City) Court is not appealable. The decision shall be communicated to the person whose legal interests are violated, and the authority with jurisdiction for administrative infringement proceedings. Residence within the meaning of this code is the declared place of residence of the person, but if a person does not have a declared place of residence, — the specified address. " 9. To supplement the code with 238.2 article as follows: "article 238.2. A refusal to initiate proceedings in cases of administrative offences

Institutions (officials) empowered to consider cases on administrative infringement, examined the application and other materials about the administrative breach, may refuse to initiate proceedings in this case, the administrative infringement if the offence be minor. " 10. Express 239. point 7 of article as follows: "7) if have passed 37 of this code the time limits provided for in article;".
11.242.243. Expressing and article as follows: "article 242. The Prosecutor's rights in infringement proceedings in the administrative Prosecutor, checking information on violations of the law, is entitled to: 1) propose a recordkeeping for administrative offences; 2) familiarize themselves with the file; 3) to participate in the proceedings; 4) submit a protest on the decision in the case and a decision taken on administrative infringement cases; 5) take other's statutory activities. 243. article. Evidence and proof evidence of irregularities in the administrative case is any procedure provided for in this code for the specific procedural form and strengthen of facts, which are administrative infringement proceedings the parties involved in matters within their competence, are used to prove the existence or the administrative infringement and determine other circumstances, which is of importance in deciding the proper case. Authority of the burden of proof in administrative offence proceedings is the institution (official) called a person at the Administrative Court of the responsibility, but the authorities. If the administrative records of the infringement is not proven otherwise, without further procedural steps for proven constitute such circumstances: 1) generally known facts; 2) by a judgment which has the force of res judicata or the Prosecutor's statement on the facts established in the criminal proceedings; 3) judgment which has the force of res judicata for prosecution of the person of the administrative responsibility established facts; 4) the fact that the person knows or should have known their own laws and obligations; 5) the fact that the person knows or should have known their professional obligations; 6) modern science, engineering, the arts or crafts in general the accuracy of methods of research. Unless the administrative records of the infringement is not proven otherwise, without further procedural steps be considered as evidence of facts that administrative irregularities at the time of capture of the administrative offence report delineated the officer. Administrative offence records involved can be used only as evidence of reliable, relevant and permissible of facts. The fact that under the law can be proven only with certain means of proof, does not initiate or by any other means of proof. To determine the administrative responsibility of the person known as mental state if there is a reasonable doubt as to that person's dismissals, determined expertise. Minor bodily injury in the event of causing bodily injury and for the determination of the nature of gravity forensic expert opinion is required. The reliability of evidence is heard, the degree of accuracy of detection. How reliable is the proof of facts, assessed by looking at all of the administrative record-keeping violation results obtained in fact or set of facts and mutual respect. None of the evidence not previously determined a higher degree of reliability in relation to the other evidence. The evidence is relevant to the particular administrative infringement cases, if the facts are confirmed, directly or indirectly, in violation of administrative demonstrable records of presence or absence, as well as the reliability of other evidence or credibility, or the impossibility of use. News about a person's private life, the sensitive parts of the business and assets to get acceptable only if this is necessary to prove the existence or the administrative infringement and determine other circumstances, which is of importance for the correct decision of the case. Administrative records for the violation of facts, as well as news that fixed by technical means, it is acceptable to use as evidence, if they have been obtained and are enshrined in procedural prescribed in this code. News or facts, which officials of the competent authority in the exercise of this authority, acquired the activities of statutory regulatory powers, are allowed as evidence in the administrative record keeping violations, if this news or facts you can check the administrative record-keeping violation. About unacceptable and will not be used in the proof of the details of the facts obtained: 1) using violence, threat, blackmail, deceit or duress; 2) procedural activities, carried out by a person in accordance with this code or other laws were not entitled to do. Of facts obtained, allowing other procedural irregularities, considered limited permitted and can be used in evidence only if allow procedural violation is not relevant or can be removed, they could not influence the accuracy of the resulting message or if their reliability confirms the other administrative records for the infringement. Conflict of interest situation for evidence is admissible only if the institution (official) can prove that the conflict of interest is not affected by the administrative offence proceedings lens. Administrative infringement proceedings evidence obtained in violation of the administrative record. In this code and in other laws in the cases of administrative violations in the institution (official), which does not represent a violation of administrative Protocol, information on facts recorded opinions, view the protocols and other documents obtained by the administrative violations in the course of the proceedings. " 12. To supplement the code with 243.1 article as follows: "article 243.1. Features include the showing of proof means: 1) to the administrative responsibility of the persons referred to in the explanatory notes; 2 person trail;) 3) expert opinion; 4 opinion of the competent institution);
5) document that contains news about the facts, in writing or in another form; 6) electronic evidence; 7 procedural steps in writing) or the other way, of facts attached; 8) real evidence. "

13. off 245. article name and text, the word "preliminary". 14. To complement the eighteenth chapter of the code and article 245.1 245.2, with the following: "article 245.1. The procedural time limit in the case of the infringement of procedural actions enforcement of time limits laid down in this code. If a procedural time limit is stipulated in this code, it shall be determined by the authority, the Court or judge. Authority, the Court or the judge's deadline duration must be such that the procedural action could meet. A procedural time period calculated in years, months or days begins to run on the day following the date or the event that determines its start. A procedural time period calculated in hours, begin on the hour after the event that determines its start. Administrative detention time from the moment of actual detention. Period, in which the number of months, the last day of the last month is the relevant date. If the deadline is not the last month of that date, the last day of the period is the last day of that month. If the last day of the period falls on a Saturday, a Sunday or a statutory holiday, the last day of the period is the next working day. A term specified to expire on a certain date, this date. If the term refers to the person's disqualification or limitation, for its beginning is considered the actual limitation of disqualification or moment, but on the expiry of a period, or in this code the time limit laid down in the decision of the actual expiration time (hours or days). A procedural act for which expires, you can run on the last day of the term till 24.00. If the document is served to a communications authority (Post Office) on the last day of the time limit until 24.00 o'clock, it is considered passed. If this operation must be executed by the authority or court, the time limit shall be considered to have expired at the hour when the relevant institution or court finishes. Article 245.2. The procedural consequences of having failed to observe the time limit the right to perform procedural actions lapses with this code, the authorities, the Court or a judge within the time limit set for the expiry review. Documents submitted after the expiry of the procedural, not appearance. Delayed procedural time can restore authority, the Court or the judge of administrative irregularity at the request of the parties, if the reasons for justifying the delay. Restoring the amount due, the authority, the Court or judge at the permission to execute the missed a procedural action. Decision on overdue renewal of procedural time limits, the authority, the Court or judge shall adopt within seven days. " 15. Add to article 248 of the first part of the sentence the following wording: "If, by drawing up administrative offence report, the institution has a known place of the proceedings, and the time, notification or summons about space and time not sending and information about the place and time specified in the administrative offence report." 16. off article 248.1 ' declared (or specified) ". 17. in article 249 of the expression by the following: ' article 249. Transmission protocol the Protocol sent to the authority empowered to deal with administrative affairs of the infringement. A copy of the minutes shall be issued or sent to the person who called to administrative responsibility. If the person called to administrative responsibility, is a minor, also sends a copy of the minutes to its legal representative declared place of residence or address. Protocol to be sent not later than within three working days from the date of its composition. If the Protocol drawn up on the Latvian vessel outside the internal waters, it will be sent no later than seven working days from the date of the composition. " 18. off Article 251. 19. in article 252: make the first paragraph by the following: "this code directly in the cases provided for, to stop violations of administrative when used in other means of influence to determine offending party to draw up a Protocol on administrative violation, if it cannot be done on the site and drawing up of the Protocol is mandatory, and to comply with administrative offences cases decisions are allowed personal administrative hold, people watching and viewing property as well as the property and document removal. "; to complement the second paragraph after the word "persons" with the word "watching"; to turn off the second paragraph, the words "and other laws". 20. Article 254: turn in paragraph 4, the words "as well as the local authorised persons"; 5. turn off the point. 21. the express Article 255 and 256. by the following: ' Article 255. Administrative detention time limits for administrative detention the person is suspected of having committed an infringement in administrative, may be no more than four hours. Providing this code 252. the objectives set out in article, the necessary procedural actions with the detainee carried out immediately. The person who had the alcoholic beverages, drugs, or other intoxicating substances, administrative detention time from the person atskurbšan. 256. article. People watching and viewing the personal belongings and effects of viewing viewing can be done then notified the State police and municipal police officers, State border guard officials, officials of the State revenue service, the national environmental and natural conservation administration officials. People watching can be done with a person of the same sex to be considered official. Property viewing is done in the presence of the person whose ownership or possession of the property is located. In cases of urgency, these things can be viewed without the owner (possessor). For people watching and viewing of the property a separate protocol shall be drawn up or make a record of the Protocol on administrative detention. "
22. in article 256.1: off in the third paragraph, the words "or entry shall be made in the Protocol on administrative violation"; turn off the fourth part; to make a fifth by the following: "officer, who shall have the right to draw up a Protocol on administrative violation concerned, not available to the public in the territory or premises and their current property and vehicle inspection can be done with the owner (possessor, bearer's) consent or district (City) Court judges decision, adopted on the basis of the application and accompanying officials." 23. the express 260, 261 and 262.. article as follows: "article 260. Administrative liability called personal obligations and rights

The person who called to administrative responsibility, has the following responsibilities: 1) arrive at a specific time to perform the authorized officials of the process in the specified location; 2 do not be discouraged and do not impair) an administrative offence case; 3) follow the procedures of the procedural steps. The person who called to administrative responsibility, have the right as personally, so with the assistance of counsel (legal person, with the representative) to familiarize yourself with all things material, draw from those statements, transcripts and make copies, to participate in the proceedings, provide explanations, make requests, as well as to appeal the decision in the case. If the person called to administrative responsibility, does not understand the language in which the proceedings, this person is guaranteed the right to use it in understandable language, as well as the use of interpreting services in accordance with the procedure laid down in this code. 261. article. The victim Suffered administrative infringement cases can be a natural or legal person to whom the harm caused by administrative offences, namely the moral injury, physical suffering or economic loss. On administrative infringement cases victims can be the person to whom the moral injury suffered as a specific group or part of the company's representative. At the express request of the person in the person of the victim recognised institutions (officials) empowered to deal with administrative affairs of the infringement. The decision on recognition of a person as a victim can also design resolutions. The decision on the refusal to admit a person as a victim in the case of the infringement of the administrative authority (Officer) accepts, in writing, within 10 working days by notifying the person concerned. The refusal to admit a person as a victim in the case of administrative violation, the person has the right to appeal within the time and in the same order provided for in article 238.1 of this code relating to the refusal to initiate infringement proceedings in administrative appeals. The complaint is dealt with in the written procedure within 10 working days of its receipt. District (City) Court is not appealable. The victim has the right to be acquainted with all things material, draw from those statements, transcripts and make copies to submit requests and applications, to sign up for the injury or property loss claims and use his procedural rights the moral and material compensation are apt to participate in the proceedings and the appeal against administrative decisions in infringement cases. The victim has the right to testify, as well as to ask people questions to himself in plain language. The victim's right against self-incrimination, and betrothed, spouses, parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren, brothers and sisters, as well as to others with whom the individual is living, and to which it is a common (non-shared) facilities. The victim of their rights is implemented on a voluntary basis and the extent of its choice. The law does not impede the use of administrative offence proceedings. 262. article. Defender of the Natural person who is called to administrative responsibility, has the right to defence. The rights of the defence can be implemented or even inviting the champion of his choice and capacity of other adult person. Underage person upon the legislative counsel. Natural persons with powers of defenders present notarized powers. If the physical person's Patronus is a sworn advocate, this authority to certify with the written mandate without notarial attestation. An individual may authorize their counsel also orally or in court. At the hearing, the authority orally writable the minutes of the hearing. " 24. To supplement the code with article 262.1 as follows: "article 262.1. The legal representative of a person who is called to administrative responsibility, as well as the victim – legal person represented by its authorized representatives. Representation of the legal person shall be made with the written mandate or be evidenced by documents from which it is clear the officer without special authorisation to represent the legal person. The victim — the minor physical person can represent any age and legal capacity of natural persons, on the basis of a mandate that the victim presented as notarized power of Attorney, or legal representative of the victim without special authorisation. The victim may also authorize your representative or orally in court. At the hearing, the authority orally writable the minutes of the hearing. The victim — a minor natural person representing the legal representative without special authorisation. If the minor physical person's legal representative called to administrative responsibility, the person's representation of the family courts implemented. " 25. in article 264, the following expression: "264. article. Witness the Witness is a person who lawfully may be invited (to testify) about the facts that determine the administrative offence case. By its institutions (officials) the invitation, which records the case, the witness must appear at a specified time and to give truthful evidence, notify all the case known to him and to answer questions. The witness have the right not to testify when he was called to administrative responsibility of the persons fiance, spouse, parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, brother, sister, and does not indicate a person with which the natural person living together and with which it has a common (shared) facilities. " 26. Express 268 and 269, article 268.1 as follows: "article 268. In the case of the infringement of the administrative preparation for examination to the Authority (Officer), preparing the administrative offence proceedings, check: 1) or the proceedings are within its competence. If this case is not within its competence, the case is transferred by jurisdiction; 2) or persons participating in the proceedings, the proceedings have been notified of the place and time. In the case of persons participating in the proceedings, is not notified of the hearing, the time and place notified in this code in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 268.1; 3) or requested the necessary supporting materials. If the required material is not required, request them; 4 administrative liability called) at the person, the victim, his representatives and defenders of the requests and decide their next moves. Article 268.1. Statement of administrative offence proceedings

The person who called to administrative responsibility, and victim notification of infringement proceedings in administrative and summons at the time or not later than 10 days before the hearing sent registered post by mail to the person concerned and the victim's place of residence or registered office. If the person called to administrative responsibility, is a minor, the statement of the administrative offence proceedings and time or registered post summons by mail send its legal representative to his place of residence or address. Other administrative offence proceedings about the time and place notified to the notification law. 269. article. Administrative offence proceedings for breach of administrative space case is heard by the infringement. There are objective reasons, the person called to administrative responsibility, may ask the institution (official), which is competent to hear the case, to examine the place of residence of the person concerned or of the registered office or at the administrative place of infringement. In relation to this request the decision may not be appealed. " 27. Article 270: make the second paragraph as follows: "If the objective reasons in the first paragraph of this article, the time limit cannot be met, the institution (official), competent to hear administrative cases of infringement, may extend this period, but not longer than 30 days, notice to the parties. The trial period does not include the time to which the hearing postponed, based on a request by the Chairperson at the administrative liability called person or victim. If the case requires inspection, administrative infringements proceedings are suspended due to the expert opinion of the moment. " replace the third paragraph, the word "eighty" with the word "hundred". 28. Turn 270.1, 270.2 and 270.3 article. 29. the express article 271 the following: ' article 271. Procedures for the administrative offence case is pending at the Office of the administrative offence proceedings started, announcing the composition of the institution or peer naming the official name and job title, which is hearing the case, stating that the case will be heard, and naming the person who is called to administrative responsibility, as well as verifying the person's identity and its representatives or defenders. Collegiate bodies sitting President or officer handling the case, explained to the persons participating in the case, the procedural rights and obligations, notify the administrative violations of the Protocol, examine the contents of the request of the person and supplement called to administrative responsibility, or that person's representative or counsel requests the victim or his representative requests and make decisions for them, as well as hear the explanations. Then check the rest of the evidence in the case, heard by the victims, witnesses and expert opinion. If the case involves the Prosecutor, hear his opinion. Collegiate bodies shall be adopted by the members of this institution, participating in the hearing, a simple majority. Without the presence of the parties may examine only if it is known that they have notified in good time about the place and time. If you have received a request to postpone the proceedings, institution (official), hearing the case, may recognize a request and postpone the trial. Without the presence of the person called to administrative responsibility, the case may also be considered in cases where there was a responsibility for this code, in article 57.3 149.10 149.31 article eighth proposed stopping or parking regulations, and cases where the road traffic offence fixed by technical means (photographic equipment or video equipment) without stopping the vehicle. In cases where the administrative liability called the foreign owner, bareboat charterer or operator may examine the case without their presence, the agents are inviting the master. If the administrative responsibility is called the minor or the victim is a minor, the case is heard in a closed session. If the person called to administrative responsibility, is a minor, the institution (official) administrative infringement cases can be dealt with only if about the time and place notified minor legal representative of this code in the third subparagraph of article 268.1. " 30. off and article 271.1 271.2. 31. Article 273 of the turn. 32. the express article 274 the following: ' article 274. Decision of the administrative offence proceedings

Examined the administrative infringement cases, the institution (official) takes a decision in this case. The decision shall specify: 1) the name of the institution (official name, surname, position), which adopted the decision; 2 collegiate body composition), if has a collegial institution; 3 the number of the decision); 4) hearing date; 5) identification of the person called to administrative responsibility, and the person's representative or counsel; 6) actual and legal circumstances findings (specify the evidence on which the conclusions are based, and the arguments on which the evidence was rejected); 7) case identified conditions that mitigates or reinforces the responsibility for administrative offences; 8) for administrative violations of the Protocol, except where an administrative offence drawn up Protocol; 9) legislation providing for liability for administrative offences concerned (including the legislative article, part of it, a point or a point); 10) in case the decision taken; 11) indication of where and what time period this decision may be appealed; 12) on the basis of expenditure supporting documents indicate the concentration of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances affect the determination of the examinations and of the expenditure relating to the obligation of reimbursement, if the person is found guilty of the administrative offence; 13) further action with izņemtaj things, documents, as well as to guarantee the money. Administrative infringement cases, which are heard and that decisions are taken immediately after the detection of the infringement, the second part of this article contains the messages include the administrative violation report. If the administrative offences committed by a minor, the institution (official) can decide on administrative infringement cases of local transmission of the Administrative Commission to decide the issue of empowering nature of application of coercive measures for minors. In this case, the institution (official) shall take a decision on the recognition of the person guilty of the administrative offence, without the imposition of administrative penalties. To decide the question of empowering nature of the coercive measures, the minor administrative infringement cases sent to the municipal Administrative Commission after the minor's place of residence. Decision of the administrative offence case signature officer who reviewed the case, but the collegiate bodies of the decision — its President. " 33. Make 275. the third paragraph of article as follows: "the decision on the termination of the proceedings be taken: 1) if expressed in oral reprimand in accordance with article 21 of the code; 2) if found signs of the crime. In this case, the material shall be transferred to the investigating authority empowered to launch criminal proceedings; 3) when this code is provided for in article 239 of the circumstances. " 34. Article 276. Express as follows: "Article 276. In case of violation the administrative decision taken by the administrative notification of infringement proceedings may declare the decision taken immediately after the hearing. The person who was called to administrative responsibility, and the victim within three working days after the decision is issued against the signature or send registered post by mail to the person concerned and the victim's place of residence or registered office. If the decision taken in respect of minors, the decision to send registered post by post, the minor legal representative. " 35.277 and 278 off article. 36. To supplement the code with the twenty-second chapter 278.1 by the following: article "article 278.1 The unlawful decision and error correction in case of violation of the administrative institutions adopted (officials) the decision of the higher authority may revoke either on its own initiative if it is unlawful. You cannot cancel the decision, when it is executed. The highest authority of the decision shall be notified to the administrative offence proceedings and the public prosecutor. Institution (official), which acted as the administrative infringement case, on its own initiative or at the administrative offence proceedings, a request may correct clerical or mathematical decision calculation errors, if it does not change the substance of the decision. " 37. Make twenty-third chapter follows: "twenty-third chapter administrative infringement cases in appeals against decisions adopted by the Supreme authority of article 279. Institutions (officials) appeals against decisions of the Supreme authority of the Person who called to administrative responsibility, as well as the victim in the case of the infringement adopted administrative bodies (officials) may appeal to a higher authority. If the higher authority, the decision may not be appealed to the district (municipal) Court. The City Council of the Republic or the District Council Chairman, Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive of the decision, the municipal Administrative Commission decision and national armed forces naval coast guard service may appeal to the district (municipal) Court. The complaint shall be submitted to the institution (official), which acted as the administrative infringement cases. Institution (official) to file the complaint within seven days after the sending jurisdiction. Article 280. The content of the complaint, the complaint shall state: 1) its institutions (officials) to whom addressed the complaint; 2) the complainant's name and place of residence, but a legal person, the name, registration number and registered office. If the complaint is lodged by the legal person's authorized representative, his name and place of residence or other address, in which he can be achieved; 3), the decisions of the complaint; 4) to what extent the decision being appealed and the decision was not what accuracy; 5) the complainant's claim; 6 the documents annexed to the complaint); 7) compose a complaint. The complaint is signed by the applicant or the legal person's authorized representative. 281. article. Time limit in the case of the infringement of the administrative decision can be appealed to the Supreme Administrative Authority the complainant in infringement cases can be filed within 10 working days of notification of the decision from the full day. 282. article. The deadline for renewal appeals

Delayed procedural time can restore body empowered to consider the case, at the reasoned request of the complainant, if it accepts the reasons for supporting the decree nisi. Refusal to renew procedural time can be appealed to the district (municipal) Court within 10 working days from the date of notification of the decision after the complainant's place of residence or registered office. District (municipal) Court of appeal review and decision process in writing within one month from the complaint and the date of receipt of the materials. The decision shall be communicated to the complainant and the authority whose decision is under appeal. The decision is not appealable. 283. article. Leaving the complaint without guidance If no respect in this article 280 of the code requirements, higher authority shall take a decision on the complaint without guidance and leaving failures set a time limit of not less than 10 working days from the date of notification of the decision. The decision is not appealable. If the complainant does not prevent a determined period, the complaint shall be deemed not to have been filed and shall be returned to the applicant by the decision. The decision to consider the complaint of the complainant not to have been filed within 10 working days from the date of notification, it can appeal to the district (municipal) Court of their place of residence or registered office. District (municipal) Court of appeal review and decision process in writing within one month from the complaint and the date of receipt of the materials. The decision shall be communicated to the complainant and the authority whose decision is under appeal. The decision is not appealable. 284. article. The protest was lodged on the administrative case of the breach of the decisions of the administrative offence case decisions prosecutors may submit representations within a period of one year from the date of the decision. Protest this code indicates the information specified in Article 280. 285. article. The decision of suspension due to a complaint or protest lodged the complaint shall suspend the decision on the imposition of the administrative penalty execution to the inquiry, with the exception of decisions on 25 and 29 of this code in the article (if the decision related to the driving disqualification) for the application of the penalty, as well as cases where a fine is imposed, levied an administrative infringement. The Prosecutor submitted a protest to the enforcement of the decision to stop the protests. Filing a complaint or protest shall not suspend the decision on the imposition of the administrative penalty execution cases about administrative violations in maritime transport and protection of the environment by a foreign ship owner, bareboat charterer or an operator or a foreign crew member. 286. article. Complaints and protests the Supreme authority of the examination of the complaint or protest on infringement proceedings in the administrative decisions taken by the higher authority shall consider the written procedure within 30 days following receipt of a complaint or protest, but in cases of traffic offences, after the receipt of all materials of the case. Higher authority when examining a complaint or protest on administrative decisions in infringement cases, check the legality of the decision taken and reasonableness. 287. article. Complaint or protest the decision of the presiding authority examined the complaint or protest on the administrative decision infringement cases, adopt one of the following decisions: 1) leave the decision unchanged, but rejects a complaint or protest; 2) repealing decision and terminated; 3) amended penalties provided for under the legislative act on liability for administrative offences. The first part of this article, paragraph 3 in those cases the authority may take a decision less favourable to the person, if the case is being heard by the public prosecutor or the victim of the protests. If it is established that the decision adopted by the institution which is empowered to decide a given case, such decision shall be cancelled and the matter shall be referred for examination to the competent authority. The decision taken on the complaint or protest the administrative offence case, within three working days by post, by registered post sent to the administrative responsibility of the called person and the victim. The results of the examination of the protest was communicated to the public prosecutor. If the decision taken in respect of minors, this decision within three working days, send to the registered post by post, the minor legal representative. " 38. To supplement the code with the twenty-third "a", "b" the twenty-third and twenty-third chapter of the "c" as follows: "twenty-third" a "Division of administrative offences cases in district (municipal) courts Article 288. Administrative infringement case of appeals against decisions taken by the district (municipal) Court Higher authorities decide the person called to administrative responsibility, as well as the victim may appeal to the district (municipal) Court of the declared place of residence, legal person, its registered office in Latvia. If the person does not have a declared place of residence or address of a legal person is not in Latvia, the decision may be appealed to the district (municipal) Court of the administrative offence. Prosecutor protests submitted after the administrative offence. Complaint and the Prosecutor's protest is submitted to the body whose decision is under appeal. The authority within seven days from the date of receipt of the complaint the complaint with the documents sent to the district (municipal) Court after jurisdiction. If the number of submitted complaints, and they agree to the various courts, the authority the case to one of the piekritīgaj courts, your choice of motivating. After the administrative infringement proceedings reasoned request of district (municipal) Court or judge until the beginning of the proceedings the jurisdiction of administrative violations it can use to transfer to another court. The decision is not appealable. 289. article. The date until which the administrative infringement case can appeal the decision in court, the highest authority in the administrative decision infringement cases in district (City) courts may be appealed against within 10 working days from the date of notification of the decision. If you have missed the deadline for the submission of pleadings in court, the complainant may request the renewal of procedural deadlines. District (municipal) Court judge in decision writing process for renewal of procedural term shall be adopted within seven days from the date of receipt of the request. On the judge's decision to refuse to renew the term of submission of an ancillary complaint may be submitted. 289.1 article. The complaint and the Prosecutor's protest the administrative infringement case

The complaint about the decision in infringement proceedings and the administrative Prosecutor's protest shall indicate: 1 the name of the Court), which addressed the complaint; 2) the complainant's name and place of residence, but a legal person — its name, registration number and registered office. If the complaint is lodged by the legal person's authorized representative, his name and place of residence or other address, in which he can be achieved; 3), the decisions of the complaint; 4) to what extent the decision being appealed and the decision was not what accuracy; 5) the complainant's claim; 6) requests; 7) compose a complaint. The complaint shall be accompanied by: 1) representation of the supporting documents; 2) evidence forming the basis of the complaint. The complaint is signed by the applicant or the legal person's authorized representative. 289.2 article. Authority administrative infringement proceedings in the Court of the administrative authority the infringement proceedings have the right to participate in the hearing and in reviewing the evidence, lodge requests the Court to give oral and written explanations, to appeal a court judgment and decision. 289.3 article. District (municipal) Court judges after complaints and the receipt of the materials of the case After complaints and cases of receipt of materials in district (municipal) Court judge shall check that: 1) administrative infringement cases this Court has jurisdiction; 2) complainant has complied this code 279. Appeals against decisions provided for in article. If the administrative violation have jurisdiction to another district (City) Court judge within seven days after receipt of the administrative offence proceedings, in his records of the file with the cover letter sent to the district (municipal) Court with jurisdiction for the proceedings. Judge not later than seven working days after the receipt of the administrative offence case in its records a decision on legal proceedings, leaving the complainant without guidance or refusal to initiate legal proceedings. Deciding on legal proceedings, the judge shall determine at the time of the proceedings and the decision taken shall be notified to the administrative offence proceedings. 289.4 article. Complaints to the Court without the guidance of abandonment If this code are not fulfilled the requirements of article 289.1, the judge shall decide on the continuation of the complainant without the guidance and failures set a time limit of not less than 10 working days from the date of notification of the decision. The decision is not appealable. If the complainant corrects flaws in a given period, the judge shall decide on the initiation of the proceedings and shall set the hearing. The decision shall be communicated to the administrative offence proceedings. Otherwise, the complaint shall be deemed not to have been filed and shall be returned to the applicant. The decision to consider the complaint of the complainant does not submit an ancillary complaint may be submitted. 289.5 article. Refusal to institute infringement proceedings in the administrative judge takes a decision on refusal to propose administrative infringement proceedings, if: 1) the complainant has missed procedural time administrative infringement proceedings in the appeal decision, and is not asked to renew procedural time delay or judge has denied a request for restoration of the term; 2) has submitted a complaint to the person who is not entitled to make a complaint, or a person who is authorized in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law; 3) the complainant has not adhered to this code, laid down in article 279(2) of the appeals procedure. The decision shall be communicated to the complainant and the authority whose decision is under appeal. A refusal to propose administrative infringement of an ancillary complaint may be submitted. 289.6 article. The proceedings in district (City) Court in district (City) Court administrative infringement case in open court hearing process. At the request of the person who referred to the Administrative Court, the Administrative Affairs of the infringement can be viewed in the writing process. Those in the writing process, the nature of the written procedure, the Court, in a manner comply with the same principles and process participants provides the same rights that the hearing process. The Court shall set the closed hearing, where necessary, adoption of State secrets secret and the limited availability of information protection, as well as cases in which the prosecution called person or the victim is a minor. About the time and place of the proceedings shall be notified no later than two weeks before the hearing. In proceedings of the written procedure, the judge shall fix a date by which the judgment will be available in the clerk of court, as well as at least two weeks ' deadline until which the administrative infringement cases members can submit comments, sign up for a challenge, ask to review the case at the hearing, as well as to submit other hearing-related applications or requests. The Court examined evidence directly. The Court is not entitled, on its own initiative, to obtain evidence and to examine them at the hearing. The Administrative Court of Justice infringement cases, decide the following questions: 1) or administrative violation has occurred; 2) or the person called to administrative responsibility, is to blame for the administrative offence; 3) If a person is punishable for this administrative offence; 4) or there are circumstances which strengthen or soften the liability; 5) any administrative penalty applicable to the person; 6) or eligible for compensation, which for good and to what extent it will be recovered; 7) dealing with items of evidence and other administrative irregularities izņemtaj during the proceedings, effects and application of the guarantee money. 289.7 article. The Court sitting

District (municipal) Court administrative judge hears violation alone. The opening of the proceedings, the judge called his name and job title, check the identity of tourist arrivals, as well as the powers of representatives and defenders, explain the persons participating in the case, the procedural rights and obligations, find out whether there are rejections, notify the administrative offence proceedings, complaints or protests, the contents of the request of the person examined and supplement called to administrative responsibility, or that person's representative or the defence requests , the victim or his representative requests and additions and make decisions for them, as well as hear the explanations. If the witness or expert fails to appear without valid reason after his call, the Court may impose a coercive fine of up to 50 lats. The person within 30 days after the decision on the imposition of a compulsory notification submitted to the Court forced payment of money supporting documents. The obligated person forced money, 10 days after the date of notification of the decision, you can ask the Court that imposed the emergency money, release that person from being forced to pay money or to reduce its amount. The Court examined the application of the written process. The decision is not appealable. If the person who submitted the complaint or protest, repeatedly fails to appear at the hearing without justification, they leave without complaint or protest. After hearing the explanation of the judge checks the other evidence in the case, questioned victims, witnesses and heard the opinion of an expert. The judge warned in the course of the victim, witness, expert and interpreter of the criminal penalties under the criminal law of waiver to testify or knowingly false testimonies coming. Administrative hearing infringement proceedings has the right to sign up for rejection and requests, to participate in the examination of evidence and Court debates, to make replicas, as well as to participate in the consideration of other issues resulting from the administrative infringement proceedings. If the administrative offence proceedings shall participate in representative, Defender and Prosecutor, they have the right to reply to the debate. A representative and defender of the speaking after opinion has given prosecutors. Written evidence and other documents at the hearing read or play, if any of the administrative offence proceedings requires it. The Court or the judge may determine that the procedural actions are made at the hearing by videoconference if the parties, witnesses or experts for the hearing in a different location (not the trial venue). Video conferencing case procedural actions at the hearing are made using image recording in real time. 289.8 article. The judge reset or reject the judge shall not be entitled to participate in the proceedings, if he: 1) is this person involved in or participated in the previous examination of this case; 2 kinship relations) is up to the third degree, affinity up to the second degree of relationship or marriage with one of the parties involved in the case; 3) personally directly or indirectly interested in the result of the case or there are other circumstances that cause reasonable doubt as to his impartiality. If there is the first part of this article in the circumstances specified by the judge himself away. If the judge himself is not a atstatīj, a person who participates in the proceedings on the grounds referred to in this article may apply to the judge, indicating the rejection of the judge's reasons for the reset. 289.9 article. Rejection of the application and consideration of the procedures before the rejection made a Reasoned case begin to consider on the merits. You can sign up for the rejection later when it became known in the course of the proceedings. You can sign up for rejection in writing or orally. For the record the minutes of the hearing. If you are logged on to rejection, court heard another person involved in the proceedings. A decision on the proposed rejection of the Court adopted a separate procedural document. The decision on the refusal applied for adopting the same judge. 289.10 article. The minutes of the court hearing in each article the hearing Protocol or provide an audio recording of the hearing. The minutes of the hearing: 1) trial venue and time (year, month, date); 2 the name of the Court), hearing the case, the composition of the Court and the hearing Secretary; 3) hearing disclosure period; 4) things; 5) news about administrative infringement proceedings to arrive; 6) news that the administrative offence proceedings, explain their procedural rights and obligations; 7) news that the interpreters, witnesses, victims and experts have warned about criminal liability under the criminal code; 8) for administrative infringement proceedings in explanations, witness and victim testimony, experts ' hearing on their opinions, news on plastic and written evidence; 9) proceedings, administrative irregularities, representatives and defenders of applications and requests; 10) court orders and decisions that have been adopted for certain procedural documents. 289.11 article. Suspension of proceedings and the suspension of the proceedings If it is not possible to try the case because the hearing has not come to any person, the Court shall decide on the suspension of the proceedings for a specified period. Decision on the postponement of the trial record in the minutes of the hearing. The Court shall suspend the proceedings if: 1) case is not possible until another matter pending before the courts or the authority. The proceedings shall be suspended until the entry into force of the decision or judgment in the case; 2) it adopts a decision to submit an application to the Constitutional Court rules in conformity with the Constitution or the rules of international law (Act) or the Constitutional Court is proposed by the applicant in the context of the case constitutional complaint. Proceedings pending the Constitutional Court ruling came into force;
3) it takes a decision to ask the Court of Justice of the European Union the issue of European Union law or the validity of the interpretation. The proceedings shall be suspended until the Court of Justice of the European Union preliminary ruling came into force. 289.12 article. District (municipal) Court ruling in the case of administrative violation

District (municipal) Court independently of the complainant's motives with a decision repealing the decision and sent the case for a new review body jurisdiction in the following cases: 1) has the authority, with the appropriate administrative rights infringement cases to examine; 2) examination of the case violated rules that require administrative infringement cases to inform members about the place and time; 3), the proceedings for infringement of legal provisions on the language of the proceedings; 4) decision determining the rights and obligations of persons who are not participants in the administrative offence; 5) in case the decision is not full. District (municipal) courts of appeal or protest the administrative infringement cases, make one of the following decisions: 1) leave the decision unchanged, but rejects a complaint or protest; 2) repealing decision and terminated; 3) repeals decision and make a judgment, by which the person is found guilty of an administrative infringement and fines; 4) amend the penalties provided for under the legislative act on liability for administrative offences. The second part of this article 3 and 4 of the cases referred to in paragraph district (City) Court can take a person less favourable judgment, if the case is being heard by the public prosecutor or the victim of the protests. 289.13 article. District (municipal) Court ruling declaring the dial and order after the Court debate and reply, if any, the Court go make ruling by notifying the Court Chamber and the present, a time when the ruling will be drawn up and available in the clerk of court. The Court ruling shall be made not later than 10 days. The Court ruling after dialing it, within three working days, forward to the administrative offence proceedings. The award consists of the introductory, descriptive parts, theme part and the operative part. If the judge, in considering the complaint, admit that the reasons contained in the decision is correct and fully sufficient, he accepted the ruling on the grounds of, you can specify that the added motivation of a ruling authority. In this case, a more detailed presentation of the argument is not needed. District (municipal) Court can declare the ruling immediately after the hearing, announcing a shortened form of the ruling, which consists of the introductory part and the operative part. Abbreviated form of declaring the ruling, district (City) Court declares the date will be drawn up in the full ruling. In this case, the full ruling of district (City) Court shall draw up a 10-day period, with the full ruling dial date. Ruling given the written procedure, after compilation, within three working days, forward to the administrative offence proceedings. If within that period the ruling is issued a copy of the administrative offence proceedings, a copy of the ruling, this member no longer sent. In this code, in the second paragraph of article 289.12 these rulings may be appealed to the appeals procedure. 289.14 article. Error correction of court rulings in district (City) Court, which accepted the ruling of the administrative offence case, on its own initiative or administrative offence proceedings, a request may be corrected in the ruling clerical or mathematical error in the calculation, if it does not change the substance of the ruling. Typos or mathematical calculation errors shall be corrected by the Court ruling. Question about error correction in the written judgment decide the process within one month from the date of receipt of the request, notice to the administrative offence proceedings. A refusal to correct the first paragraph of this article in violation of administrative error rain Member who asked to fix the errors, an ancillary complaint may be submitted. 289.15 article. The procedures are accepted and appealed the Court decision, with which the administrative offence within the case decide procedural issues deciding procedural issues, the decision to draw up a separate procedural document, in the form of a resolution or record the minutes of the hearing. The decision can be in the form of a resolution or to record the minutes of the hearing, if it is not appealable. The decision, made a separate procedural document, the Court or the judge shall specify: 1) decision, place and time; 2 the name and composition of the Court); 3) persons participating in the case, and the subject of the application; 4) issues on which a decision; 5 themes of the decision); 6 the Court or judge's ruling); 7) procedure for appeals against decisions and deadlines. Decision shall be given immediately after the procedural issue. Exceptionally, the Court or judge may draw up the decision, without specifying its themes (short for decision). The full decision of the Court or judge shall be drawn up within three working days.
In the cases provided for in this code for the Court or the judge's decision an ancillary complaint may be submitted. On the other court or judge's rulings can be expressed in opposition to the appeal. Next to the complaint shall be submitted to the district (municipal) Court which adopted the decision. Next to the action may be brought within 10 days from the date of notification of the decision, except in the cases provided for in this code. If the Court or judge shall adopt the decision of the appeal of short period shall run from the date of the decision, the full composition. An ancillary complaint submitted after the expiration of the district (City) Court judge refuses to accept and be returned to the applicant. The decision, which refused to accept the next appeal, an ancillary complaint may be submitted. The appeal of the decision period shall run from the date of receipt of the decision. District (municipal) Court to file the complaint within seven days shall forward to it a District Court with jurisdiction for the administrative offence proceedings. District Court next to the complaint the sole judge in the written procedure within one month from the complaint and the date of receipt of the materials. At the judge's discretion may be reviewed ancillary complaint hearing process. The decision shall be communicated to the complainant and the authority whose decision is under appeal. The decision is not appealable. If the judge, in considering the next complaint, acknowledges that the decision of the Court of first instance the justification is incorrect and completely sufficient, he next to the appeal decision in part, you can specify the theme that joins the Court of first instance or the motivation of the judge's ruling. In this case, a more detailed presentation of the argument is not needed. 289.16 article. 213. This code of administrative offences provided for in article hearing procedures

213. This code of administrative offences provided for in article things review the hearing process pursuant to the requirements laid down in this chapter. Following the receipt of materials in district (municipal) Court judge examines whether the administrative infringement cases this Court has jurisdiction. If the administrative violation have jurisdiction to another district (City) Court, the judge immediately after receiving the administrative infringement cases in his records of the case material with a cover letter send it a district (City) Court with jurisdiction for the proceedings. District (municipal) Court judge hearing the case in 30 days from the date of initiation. Things about this code 149.15 article administrative violations, related to the alcoholic, narcotic or other intoxicating substance use, district (City) Court judge shall examine, within 15 days after the receipt of all materials of the case. District (municipal) Court judge judgment the administrative infringement cases can be appealed to the appeals procedure. Twenty-third chapter of the "b" administrative infringement proceedings in the Court of appeal 289.17 article. District (municipal) Court of appeals ruling adopted by the appeal court of the appeal procedure in the district (City) Court ruling can be appealed to the District Court. The Prosecutor can appeal the protest. District (municipal) Court or judge's ruling is appealable if it directly in the code. The appeal or protest shall be drawn up in accordance with the requirements of article 289.1 of the code. The appeal shall be accompanied by copies of the relevant administrative proceedings. The appeal or protest shall be filed at the district (City) Court of Appeal ruling. 289.18 article. Expiration district (City) Court ruling can be appealed to the Court of appeal in district (City) Court rulings in administrative offence proceedings can be appealed against within 10 working days from the date of notification of the decision. If a procedural time limit is missed or appeal the complaint, the complainant may request the renewal of procedural deadlines. The district (City) Court refusal to renew or extend the term of the procedural appeal or an ancillary complaint may be lodged next to the complaint. 289.19 article. District (municipal) court action after receipt of the appeal in district (municipal) Court judge shall decide on the appeal without the guidance of leaving if the appeal does not meet the requirements of article 289.1 of the code. District (municipal) Court judge leaving the decision on the complaint without guidance of the appellant for the deficiencies set a time limit of not less than 10 working days from the date of the administrative proceedings for infringement, announced the decision on complaint leaving without guidance. The decision is not appealable. If within the period of time to resolve, the appeal shall be deemed to have been filed on the date of the district (City) Court is seised first. Otherwise, the complaint shall be deemed not to have been filed and shall be returned to the complainant. The decision to consider the appeal not to have been filed on administrative infringement of the parties who submitted the complaint of an ancillary complaint may be submitted. If you missed the deadline for lodging an appeal and the appellant has not sought to renew procedural time delay, district (City) Court judge refused to accept the decision and notify the applicant, but adds the complaint submitted to the case. If the appeal complies with the requirements of article 289.1 of the code, district (City) Court judge seven days to file the complaint sent to the District Court by jurisdiction. 289.20 article. The appellate court action after complaints and the receipt of the materials of the case, the District Court found that the appeal procedure, within seven days of the decision on the appeal of the legal proceedings and determine the date when the complaint will be heard writing process. Found that the appeal sent to the Court of appeal, in violation of the procedure for lodging a complaint, the judge accepts one of the following decisions: 1) waiver to institute appeal proceedings if the complaint is lodged on the ruling, which under law may not be appealed. In this case, the complaint together with the case sent to the Court of first instance that the complaint is returned to the applicant;
2 the transmission of the case), the Court of first instance statutory actions when submitting the appeal, no respect of this code or of article 289.1 of the fifth subparagraph of article 289.19. If the second part of this article 1 the conditions set out in paragraph finds the complaint on the merits, the Court shall decide on the appeal. 289.21 article. Procedure for hearing appeals in the Court

District Court of appeal on a collegial basis by three judges. The appeal is heard writing process. For the hearing and notify the parties sends them a copy of the complaint, giving the right to two weeks time to sign up for the rejection of the Court or an individual judge to submit views on the complaints and be informed of the date of the complaint will be dealt with in the written procedure, and the date when the judgment will be available in the clerk of court. The Court may, on its own initiative, take a decision on the appeal of the judicial review hearing, notice to the administrative infringement proceedings no later than two weeks before the hearing. A decision on the proposed rejection shall be taken in the following order: 1) if rejection logged one judge, shall adopt the General composition of the Court. If votes split like the judge is rejected; 2) if rejection logged more judges or the entire composition of the Court, shall adopt the same composition of the Court by a majority. The Court of appeal followed the twenty-third day of this code "a" of the proceedings specified in chapter order. In addition to the twenty-third day of this code "a" Division in the Court of appeal, notwithstanding the complainant's motives abolished district (City) Court ruling and sent the case for a new consideration, if not the trial protocol, or hearing the audio recording. The appellant may withdraw the complaint, pending the completion of the proceedings on the merits. Where the complaint is withdrawn, the judge shall decide on the appeal. Where the complaint is withdrawn, the hearing shall be decided by the Court. If the person who submitted the appeal repeatedly fails to appear at the hearing without justification, they leave without complaint. 289.22 article. The appellate court's decision in the appeal court rulings make the administrative infringement proceedings under this code, the twenty-third "a" Division. The appellate ruling in the case of administrative violation is not appealable and shall enter into force on the date of its composition. The full Court ruling shall be made not later than 10 days from the date of the trial court. Twenty-third chapter "c" administrative infringement cases in the context of the renewal with the newly discovered circumstances 289.23 article. Newly discovered circumstances Of newly discovered circumstances shall: 1) circumstances which, assuming the ruling, there have been no known court or authority which itself, or together with the previously established conditions indicates that the administrative punishment is not committed administrative offences; 2) by a judgment which has the force of res judicata in criminal proceedings found intentionally false witness statements, knowingly false expert opinion, knowingly false translation, false written or items of evidence which had been unlawful on the basis of a court ruling or decision of the authority; 3) a judgment which has the force of res judicata in criminal cases, the authorities found, court or Prosecutor, which was given in the judgment or decision is unlawful; 4) judgment of the Court or the Authority's decision, which was grounds for administrative violations in this case given the decision or judgment; 5) European Court of human rights or other international or supranational Court ruling follows from that judgment that the entry into force of the administrative offence proceedings, does not comply with binding international regulations; 6) judgment of the case law applied to annulment the appropriate higher legal force. 289.24 article. If the application is for a ruling in the case of administrative violation, administrative punishment, the person can ask to be brought due to newly discovered circumstances by submitting an application: 1) for annulment of the decisions of the authority: District (municipal) courts; 2) of the district (City) courts and regional courts, the ruling of the District Court for annulment —. Application can be submitted within three months from the date when the circumstances are established on the basis of the case for a new review, or the entry into force of a court ruling. Applications may be made if the date of entry into force of the judgment since more than three years. This condition does not apply to cases where the newly discovered circumstances is the European Court of human rights or other international or supranational Court ruling. 289.25 article. The submission deadline for the calculation of the submission deadline shall be calculated: 1) in the context of this code in paragraph 1 of article 289.23 specified conditions — from the opening day of the conditions; 2 this code 289.23 article) 2 and 3 in the case specified in paragraph from the date of entry into force of the judgment in criminal cases; This code 3) article 289.23 contains the case, from the date of entry into force of a court ruling that cancelled the verdict of the administrative proceedings, civil or criminal, or from the date of the cancelled authority's decision is based on a judgment or a decision please cancel due to newly discovered circumstances; 4) this code article 289.23 contains the case-from the date of entry into force of the European Court of human rights or other international or supranational Court ruling, from which it follows that the administrative infringement proceedings should be instituted; This code 289.23 5) article in the case specified in paragraph from the date of entry into force of the judgment of the Constitutional Court, which in an appropriate provision shall cease to apply as a non higher legal force rules. 289.26 article. The application review On application by newly discovered circumstances shall the adoption Court judge. Acceptance of the application for the examination of the decline, if not complied with this code and article 289.24 289.25. Following the decision of the Court on an ancillary complaint may be submitted to the County within 10 working days from the date of notification of the decision. The District Court judge's decision on the refusal to accept the application of an ancillary complaint may be submitted to the President of the District Court. Application due to newly discovered circumstances examine the writing process. Repeatedly submitted applications for the same conditions left without examination. 289.27 article. The Court ruling

The Court examined the application checks whether the conditions to which the applicant refers, identifiable as newly discovered circumstances in accordance with this code, 289.23 article. If the Court finds newly discovered circumstances, it repealed the contested decision fully and make a new ruling on administrative infringement cases. If the Court finds that the circumstances indicated in the application are not newly discovered, it shall reject the application. Following the decision of the Court on an ancillary complaint may be submitted to the County within 10 days from the date of notification of the decision. If the decision is accepted by the District Court, next to the complaint may be submitted to the President of the District Court. " 39. Article 291: off fifth; express the sixth follows: "If the appellate Court reviewed the appeal or protest of the district (City) Court judge accepted the ruling of the administrative offence proceedings, make a judgment, it is released to the district (municipal) courts and all matters relating to the execution of the decision decide district (City) Court judge the writing process. If the person who called to administrative responsibility, hiding or its location is not known, district (City) Court judge in written procedure shall adopt a decision on the promulgation of the person. " 40. Replace the second paragraph of article 292, the words "police authority" with the words "State police". 41. Replace 294. in the first paragraph, the word "authorities" with the words "institutions (officials)." 42. in article 295 paragraph 1: turn off; to supplement the article with a paragraph 4 as follows: "4) if the legal person for which it eliminated and excluded from the register of enterprises registers."
43. To supplement the twenty-fourth chapter of the code with article 297.1 as follows: "article 297.1. With the decision and the case of the termination of administrative offences consequences If is repealed decision and terminated in the case of administrative violation, then recovered the amounts repaid, withdrawn and confiscated items be returned, as well as repealing other restrictions related to the earlier decision. If someone objects to check in is not possible, shall be reimbursed the value. The withdrawn and confiscated items will not be returned unless it is permitted by other legislation. "
44. Add to article 300 of the second part as follows: "the decision on the imposition of the fine may take five years from the date when the decision filed involuntary execution. If the decision to suspend, in accordance with the provisions of the law of civil procedure regarding the suspension of the limitation period for filing time is suspended until compliance recordkeeping. " 45. Make 302. article as follows: "article 301. The decision on the imposition of the fine in the completion of the execution of the fine, the Court shall notify the institution or the officer that issued the execution. " 46. To make 304. article as follows: "304. article. Institutions that implement decisions on confiscation of the decision on administrative violation or offence subject of seizure of the execution of the tool body (Officer), which adopted the decision on the imposition of the administrative penalty, except in cases of administrative offences in which the decision on administrative penalty in accordance with article 213 of the code of conduct adopted by the Court. In this case, the decision on the administrative violation or made the subject of the seizure of the execution of the tool body (Officer) for the administrative offence is entitled to draw up a protocol of administrative irregularities. " 307. Article 47. off. 311. Article 48. off. 49. Article 317 of the express as follows: "article 317. The decision on the administrative arrest of deadlines, the decision on the execution of administrative arrest after it expires to appeal and the appeal decision is not appealed, or the entry into force of the appellate court ruling. If the appeal court ruling announces in abbreviated form and draw up a full ruling later, administrative arrests executed after the date of notification of the judgment in abbreviated form. The decision on administrative arrest shall be implemented within two years of the decision on administrative arrest released. " 50. Replace article 5, first paragraph, the words "detention" with the words "temporary places of detention" and the words "police authority" — with the words "State police". 319. Article 51. off. 52. To replace 320. in the first paragraph, the words "in the code of civil procedure" with the words "civil law". 53. Make 321. article as follows: "321. article. Part of the decision on the property loss compensation to forced execution if the decision about the property loss compensation does not meet this code 320. in the third subparagraph, it shall be sent within the time limit set for the execution of the bailiff of the civil law. " 54. To supplement the transitional provisions in paragraph 13 with the following sentence: "After June 30, 2012 the administrative ruling of the District Court of appeal in the District Court." 55. Add to the informative reference to directives of the European Union with 23, 24 and 25 as follows: "23) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009. directive 2009/16/EC on port State control; 24) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009. directive 2009/18/EC establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending directives 1999/35/EC of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2002/59/EC; 25) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009. directive 2009/20/EC on the insurance of shipowners for maritime claims. " The law shall enter into force on July 1, 2012.
The Parliament adopted the law of 14 June 2012.
The President a. Smith in 2012 on June 27.