.,, (4) The Governor does control the implementation of deconcentration and the duties of the host which includes implementation of programs and activities, as well as the type of shopping.
.,, (5) the Regent/Mayor exercises control of the master ' s duties covering the execution of programs and activities, as well as the type of shopping.
.,, (6) The order of the execution of development plans in the form of activities other than deconsentation and the duties of the extermination performed by the SKPD Chief as referred to in paragraph (1) are executed in accordance with the laws.
Section 3
Implementation of the development plan is intended to ensure the objectives and objectives of the construction work in the plan are conducted through monitoring and surveillance activities.
The Second Part
Monitoring The Execution Of Development Plans
Section 4
.,, (1) The Ministry of the Ministry does monitoring the implementation of Renja-KL which includes the execution of programs and activities in accordance with its duties and authority.
.,, (2) The Governor conducts monitoring of the execution of deconcentration and the duties of the host which includes the execution of programs and activities in accordance with its duties and authority.
.,, (3) the Regent/Mayor performs monitoring the execution of the master's duties which includes the execution of programs and activities according to its duties and authority.
.,, (4) The Head of SKPD Province conducts a monitoring implementation of the deconcentration covering the execution of the program and activities according to the task and its authority.
.,, (5) the Head of SKPD Regency/City performs monitoring the execution of the master's duties which includes the execution of programs and activities in accordance with its duties and authority.
.,, (6) Monitoring of program execution and activities as referred to in paragraph (1) to paragraph (4) is conducted against the development of fund absorption realization, the realization of achieving the output of the output (output), and the constraints encountered.
.,, (7) the monitoring results as referred to in paragraph (1), paragraph (4), and paragraph (5) are compiled in the form of a quarterly report.
Section 5
.,, (1) Head of SKPD Regency/City compiling a quarterly report in order to perform the duties of the master of the host.
.,, (2) The report as referred to in paragraph (1) delivered the slowest 5 (five) business days after the corresponding quarterly terminates to the Regent/Mayor via Head of Bappeda Regency/City, and the Head of the Ministry/Institutates associated with Busan to the Head of the SKPD Province whose duty and authority is the same.
Section 6
.,, (1) Head of Bappeda Regency/City compiling a Regency/City quarterly report by using the quarterly report SKPD Regency/City as referred to in Article 5 of the paragraph (2).
.,, (2) The report as referred to in paragraph (1) is delivered to the Governor through Head of Bappeda Province at least 10 (ten) working days after the corresponding quarterly expires.
Section 7
.,, (1) The Head of SKPD Province is compiling a quarterly report in order to exercise deconcentration duties.
.,, (2) The report as referred to in paragraph (1) delivered the slowest 5 (five) business days after the corresponding quarterly ends to the Governor through the Head of Bappeda Province, and the Minister/Head of the associated Institution.
Section 8
.,, (1) Head of Bappeda Province compiling the Provincial quarterly report by using the provincial SKPD quarterly report as referred to in Section 7 of the paragraph (2) and the district/City quarterly report as referred to in Article 6 of the paragraph (2).
.,, (2) The report as referred to in paragraph (1) delivered the slowest 14 (fourteen) business days after the relevant quarterly ends to:
., a., a. Minister;
B. Finance Minister; and
C. Minister of the Interior.
Section 9
.,, (1) the Head of the Work Unit in the Ministry/Institute environment compose and deliver the quarterly report to the Chief of the Organization Unit at least 5 (five) of the working days after the corresponding quarterly expires;
.,, (2) the Head of the Organization Unit in the Ministry environment/Instituting and delivering the quarterly reports based on the quarterly report as referred to in paragraph (1) to the Minister/Head of the Institution at least 10 (ten) business days after The relevant quarter is over.
., (3) The leadership of the Ministry/Institute of Instituts compiling a quarterly report of the Ministry/Institute by using the quarterly report as referred to in paragraph (2), the quarterly report SKPD District/City in order to perform the duties of the host as referred to in Section 5 of the paragraph (2), and the quarterly report SKPD Province in order to perform the deconcentration duties as referred to in Article 7 of the paragraph (2).
., (4) The report as referred to in paragraph (1) delivered the slowest 14 (fourteen) business days after the corresponding quarterly ends to:
., a., a. Minister;
B. Finance Minister; and
C. Ministry of Personnel Minister of Personnel.
Section 10
The Minister maintains and analyzes the quarterly monitoring report of the Ministry/Institute as referred to in Article 9 of the paragraph (4), and the quarterly report Bappeda Province as referred to in Article 8 of the paragraph (2) to assess the progress of the implementation plan and identify issues that require a follow-up.
The Third Part
Supervision Of The Implementation Of The Development Plan
Section 11
Layout of the supervision of the implementation plan conducted by the Chief Ministry/SKPD as referred to in Article 3 is exercised in accordance with the laws.
BAB III
EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Kesatu section
Common
Section 12
., (1) The evaluation is conducted against the execution of Renja-KL and RKP to assess the performance success of a program/activities based on performance indicators and goals listed in Renstra-KL and the National RPJM.
., (2) The evaluation is conducted against the implementation of the National RPJM and the Renstra-gram.
., 25. The first quarter-final reporting period is March 31, the end of the second quarter is June 30, the third quarter ending is 30 September, and the fourth quarter ending is 31 December.
BAB II
PLAN EXECUTION CONTROL
DEVELOPMENT
The Kesatu section
Common
Section 2
.,, (1) The leadership of the Ministry/Lemhow/SKPD does the implementation of the implementation of the development plan in accordance with the duties and authority of each.
.,, (2) The control of the program and activities are the tasks and functions attached to each Ministry/Lemhow/SKPD.
.,, (3) The Ministry/Agency leadership performs implementation of the Renja-KL implementation which includes the implementation of programs and activities, as well as the type of shopping.
KL to assess the efficiency, effectiveness, benefit, impact, and sustainability of a program.
.,, (3) The evaluation as referred to in paragraph (1) is performed on the basis of the resource used as well as:
., a., a. indicator and output performance objectives for activities; and/or
B. The Program is not available for use with the Program.
.,, (4) Evaluation of the execution of a medium-term development plan is performed at least 1 (one) times and executed the slowest 1 (one) year before the end of the plan period.
., (5) The evaluation as referred to in paragraph (4) is exercised on the basis of the resource used as well as:
., a., a. indicator and output performance objectives for the underlying activities; and/or
B. The Program is not available for use with the Program.
(6) Evaluation is carried out systematically, objectively, and transparent.
The Second Part
Evaluation of Renja-KL and RKP Implementation
Section 13
.,, (1) The Chairman of the Ministry/Institute conducted the evaluation of the implementation of Renja-KL the previous period.
.,, (2) The evaluation as referred to in paragraph (1) is performed against the achievement of the resource used, indicators and performance goals of the output (output) for each activity.
.,, (3) The evaluation results as referred to in paragraph (2) are used to assess the achievement of the indicator and target outcome (outcome).
., (4) The leadership of the Ministry/Institution delivers a report of results evaluation of the implementation of Renja-KL to the Minister the slowest 2 (two) months after the budget year ends.
Section 14
.,, (1) the Minister did conduct an evaluation of the RKP implementation of the prior period based on the report of the Renja-KL implementation evaluation results as referred to in paragraph (1).
.,, (2) the Minister uses the RKP evaluation results as referred to in paragraph (1) for the drafting of the RKP design for a period of 2 (two) the following year.
The Third Part
Evaluation of the Implementation of Renstra-KL and the National RPJM
Section 15
(1) The Ministry/Agency leadership conduct evaluation of the Renstra-KL implementation.
., (2) The evaluation as referred to in paragraph (1) is conducted against the execution of the programs in Renstra-KL.
.,, (3) The evaluation results as referred to in paragraph (1) are delivered to the Minister at the slowest 4 (four) months before the National RPJM expires.
.,, (4) The Minister performing a National RPJM evaluation using the Renstra-KL evaluation results as referred to in paragraph (1) and the evaluation results of the RPJM National RKP period running.
.,, (5) The evaluation of the National RPJM implementation is conducted to assess the achievement of implementation of national development strategies, general policies, programs and subject activities, as well as the macro economic framework as specified in the National RPJM document Walk.
Section 16
Based on the results of the evaluation as referred to in Article 15 of the paragraph (1) the Ministry/Agency leadership may submit a proposal for change of the program to the Minister.
BAB IV
CONTROL INFORMATION AND
EVALUATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Section 17
The Ministry/Institute provides the Controlling and Evaluation information for the implementation of the plan required by the development perpetrators regarding the development of the development plan in accordance with the laws.
BAB V
OTHER LAIN-CONDITIONS
Section 18
The ministries/agencies conducting activities in the province/city in addition to the task of deconcentration/master duties are required to deliver the quarterly report busan to the Head of the Regions via Head of Bappeda where the activity is located.
Section 19
The form and contents of the quarterly report are compiled using the forms listed in this Government Regulation Attachment, which is an inseparable part of Government Regulation.
BAB V
CLOSING PROVISIONS
Section 20
All laws governing the Code of Control and Evaluation of the Existing Implementation Plan are stated to remain in effect, as long as not contradictory and/or are not yet set under this Government Regulation.
Section 21
This Government Regulation shall come into effect on the date of the promulctest.
In order for everyone to know it, order the invitational of this Government Regulation with its ordination in the State Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia.
.,, Set in Jakarta
On November 29, 2006
PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA,
-DR. H. SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO
Promulgated in Jakarta
On November 29, 2006
MINISTER OF LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA,
HAMID AWALUDIN
ADDITIONAL
STATE SHEET RI
| No. 4663 | (Explanation Of 2006 State Sheet Number 96) |
EXPLANATION
Above
GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
Number 39 YEAR 2006
ABOUT
ORDER CONTROL AND EVALUATION
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
I. UMUM
., 1. Background Change Social, economic and political conditions demands the need for a comprehensive development planning system and leads to the embodiment of transparency, accountability, democratization, decentralization, and The participation of the community, which can ultimately guarantee the use and allocation of increased development funds, becomes more efficient and effective and sustainable. One effort to systematically respond to these demands was the Act No. 25 of 2004 on the National Development Planning System (SPPN).
.,
.,, In a new system, the development planning step consists of 4 (four) stages, namely: (1) plan construction; (2) plan assignment; (3) plan execution control; and (4) the evaluation of the execution of the plan. Planning, execution, control and evaluation of plan execution are parts of the management function, which are intertwined and cannot be separated from one another. The four are mutually complementary and each gives feedback and input to the other. Planning has been well-crafted, it is of no meaning if it cannot be implemented. Any execution plan will not go smoothly if it is not based on good planning. In line with that, in order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the resource allocation, as well as improve the transparency and accountability of the management of development programs, the need for control and evaluation efforts to the execution of the plan development.
.,, the very fundamental change of social, economic and political conditions demands the need for a comprehensive development planning system and leads to the embodiment of transparency, accountability, democratization, decentralization, and participation The public, in the end, can guarantee the use and allocation of the limited source of development funds to be morties are completed;
D. whether the program will continue, how its funding plans are.
Sustainability criteria include criteria: technical, managerial, social, and financial.
., a., a. technical, whether the technology and methods developed in the implementation of the program have been appropriate. Whether the raw materials and necessary equipment can be held and maintained by themselves by the beneficiaries (beneficiaries);
., b. managerial: who is responsible for managing the finished program results implemented;
., c. social: whether program benefits will continue to be accepted society once the program is completed;
D. financial: how to close operating costs and maintenance if the implementation of the program is terminated.
Verse (3)
., clear enough.
Verse (4)
., clear enough.
Verse (5)
., clear enough.
Verse (6)
.,, referred to as "systematic" is the process of implementation of the evaluation implemented in accordance with the order so that results and recommendations can be accounted for;
The intended "objective" is the result of an evaluation not affected by the acting interests and/or the program;
What is "transparent" is the planning process, execution and accountability of the evaluation results should be known by the stakeholders (stakeholders).
Article 13
.,, pretty clear.
Section 14
.,, pretty clear.
Article 15
.,, pretty clear.
Section 16
.,, pretty clear.
Section 17
., the "development offender" is an individual person, a group of people including indigenous legal society or a legal entity that is interested in the activities and outcomes of good development as a charge, offender, beneficiary, or Risk-taking.
Article 18
.,, who delivered a gust to the Chief of the County is the disclaimer of such activities.
Section 19
.,, pretty clear.
Section 20
.,, pretty clear.
Section 21
.,, pretty clear.
Attachment ...
ation of the development plan. Therefore, in transparent and accountable planning, it must be accompanied by the drafting of the plan execution performance indicator, which at least includes; (i) input indicators, (ii) output indicators, and (iii) results/benefits indicators.
