Key Benefits:
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA STATE NEWS
No. 1075, 2016 MA. Work discipline, Judge. Enforcement.
THE SUPREME COURT REGULATION
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
NUMBER 7 IN 2016
ABOUT
ENFORCEMENT OF THE JUDGE ' S WORK DISCIPLINE ON THE SUPREME COURT AND
THE JUDICIAL BODY THAT IS BELOW
WITH GRACE GOD ALMIGHTY
CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA,
DRAWS: A. that with the Government Regulation
No. 94 of 2012 on Financial Rights and
The Court of Judges Under the Supreme Court
and the Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2013 on
Financial Rights and Judge Ad Hoc facility as well as
Government of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation No. 55
of 2014 on Financial Rights and Facilities Judges
The Supreme and Justice of the Constitution, need to be followed with
an increase in the employment discipline of judges in the environment
the Supreme Court and the Judicial Agency under it;
b. that to improve the work discipline of Judges
as referred to in the letter a above,
Supreme Court Chief Justice Number
069 /KMA/SK/V/2009 about the First Change of
The Supreme Court Decision Number
071 /KMA/SK/V/2008 on Enforcement Provisions
Working Discipline in the Implementation Of Allowance
Special Performance of Judges and Civil Servants on
Supreme Court and Judicial Agency at
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -2-
Bawlah, no longer can be applied to
affirmation of the Judge's work discipline;
c. that based on considerations in the letter a and
the letter b, need to establish the Supreme Court Regulation
Republic of Indonesia on the Enforcement of Discipline Discipline
Judges on the Supreme Court and Judicial Agency who
Are under the Supreme Court;
Given: 1. Law No. 3 Year 2009 on
Second Amendment to the Law No. 14 Year
1985 about the Supreme Court (State Sheet
Republic of Indonesia 2009 No. 3, Supplement
sheet of State of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4958);
2. Law No. 48 of 2009 on
Power of Justice (Republican Gazette
Indonesia Year 2009 Number 157 Additional Sheet
State of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5076);
3. Law No. 49 Year 2009 on
Second Amendment to the Number 2 Year Act
1986 about the General Judicial (State Gazette
Republic of Indonesia 2009 number 158, additional
sheet of State of the Republic of Indonesia Indonesia No. 5077);
4. Law No. 50 Year 2009 on
Second Amendment to Law No. 7 Year
1989 on Religious Justice (State Sheet
Republic of Indonesia 2009 No. 89, Supplement
sheet of State of the Republic of Indonesia Indonesia No. 5078);
5. Law No. 51 of 2009 on
Second Amendment to Act Number 5 of the Year
1986 about the State of State Tata Enterprises (Sheets
State Of The Republic Of Indonesia In 2009 Number 160,
Additional Sheet Of State Republic of Indonesia Number
5079);
6. Invite Invite Number 25 Year 2014 on Law
Military Discipline (State Sheet Of The Republic Of Indonesia
In 2014 Number 257, Additional Sheet Of State
Republic Indonesia Number 5591);
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -3-
7. Law No. 31 Year 1997 On The Judicial
Military (sheet Of State Of The Republic Of Indonesia In 1997
Number 84, Additional Gazette Republic Of State
Indonesia Number 3713);
8. Government Regulation No. 26 of 1977 on
The Health Testing of Civil Servers and Power-
Other forces working on the Republic of the Republic
Indonesia (State Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Year
1977 Number 36,
Indonesia Number 3105);
9. Government Regulation No. 94 of 2012 on
The Financial Rights and the Facility for Judges in
under the Supreme Court (Republican Gazette
Indonesia Year 2012 Number 213);
10. Government Regulation No. 19 of 2013 on
Fourth Amendment to Government Regulation Number
32 Years 1979 on Dismissal Of Civil Servants
Civilian (state Gazette Indonesia Year 2013
Number 51);
11. 2013 Presidential Decree Number 5 Year 2013 on Rights
Finance and Judge Ad Hoc Facilities (state Sheet
Republic Of Indonesia 2013 No. 13);
DECIDED:
SET: THE SUPREME COURT REGULATION ON ENFORCEMENT
THE JUDGE ' S WORK DISCIPLINE ON THE SUPREME COURT AND
THE JUDICIAL BODY THAT IS UNDER IT.
BAB I
provisions of UMUM
Article 1
In this Court of Justice Ordinance referred to:
1. The Judge's Work Discipline is the Judge's compliance with
obeying the obligation and avoiding a ban that
is specified in the laws
and/or the statutory regulations of the working hours.
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -4-
2. Sanctions are punishment handed down to Judge
for violating the disciplinary provisions.
3. Judges are Supreme Court Justices, Judge Ad Hoc and Judge
Yusticial on the Supreme Court as well as Judge, Judge Ad
Hoc, Justicial Judge and Non-Palu Judge on the body-
judicial body under it.
4. Judge Ad Hoc is the Judge who has the expertise and
experience in a particular field to examine,
prosecute and severing cases raised for
a specific term and its appointment is set
in Law.
5. Judge Yusticial was the first judge of the degree and
Judge of appeal assigned to the Court
the Great or on the Court of Appeal.
6. Non-Palu judges are judges who are currently serving
sanctions are not allowed to examine and prosecute
cases in a certain time period.
7. The Chief Justice is the Chairman, the Vice-
Chairman and the Young Chairman/Supreme Court Chamber.
8. The Leader of the Court is Chairman/Head, Vice Chairman/
Deputy Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals and Ketua/
Head, Vice Chairman/Vice Chief Justice
First that is under the Supreme Court.
BAB II
JUDGE ' S WORK DISCIPLINE
Article 2
The judge is obliged to comply with the provisions of the work discipline
in accordance with the provisions applicable to his work unit.
Article 3
Supreme Court Leader, Supreme Court Panitera,
The judge occupies the Structural Office, the Leadership
The Court of Appeal and the Level Court Leader
First other than mandatory compliance with provisions as
referred to in Section 2 is also responsible for
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -5-
adhered to and replying to the provisions of Article 2 by the Judge
in the work unit he has led.
Article 4
(1) The working day begins Monday through Friday.
(2) Work hours and break hours for the Judge are set:
a. Working hours as follows:
1. day Monday s/d Thursday from 08.00 s/d
at 4:30 pm local time; and
2. It's Friday from 8:00 a.m.
local time;
b. hours of rest as follows:
1. day Monday s/d Thursday from 12.00 s/d
at 13:00 local time; and
2. day Friday from 11.30 s/d at 13.00
local time;
c. workhours as defined above
adjusted for execution needs
trial and work to be done at
outside the office and beyond the provisions of the work hours between
other local checks, itinerers, or
other tasks/policies.
(3) The attendance list and the work return list are set as
following:
a. list of attendance and the return list is implemented via
engine (finger scan/card machine) and manual;
b. list of attendance and the return list for the Chief Justice
is manually executed;
c. The attendance list and the return list are manually set
as follows:
1. list of attendance and return lists performed
each day by writing the names, hours coming
and coming home, and signing on
the present list is listed in Appendix I which
is an inseparable part of
This Court Regulation;
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -6-
2. after entering the working hours, below the number
last the list of the Judges attendance was bused the line
down with the red ink and signed
by the registration of the attendance list. Judge
that came late continuing the filling
the list was present below the red ink line
that was; and
3. list home on weekdays issued 15
(fifteen) minutes prior to the time return hour
local. If there is a service interest out
the office before the return hour, it can not
fill the list home by submitting
the written permission letter from the immediate supervisor,
listed in Annex II which is
section inseparable from Regulation
This court;
d. in any environment at the level of eselon II in
Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and
First-Level Court, designated a
officer of the present list and the return list both
manual and machine;
E. The officer in the d item at the end of the month
brand the present list and the return list and
upload the list of attendance and the list home through
the national data communication application every week;
f. officials responsible for
implementation of the list of attendance and the return list as
following:
1. for the Vice Chairman is the Chairman
Supreme Court;
2. for the Young Master/Coaching Room and
Oversight is the Vice Chairman of Non
Judicial;
3. for the Young Chairman/The Perkara Room is
Vice Chairman of the Judicial Field;
4. for the Chief Justice is the Young Chairman/Room
masing-masing;
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -7-
5. in the Supreme Court environment for
The Paniteraan, Directorate General and Agency
is the Panitera or the ruling Judge
the stuructural post; and
6. in the Court of Appeals environment and
The First Level Court is
Chairman/Chief or Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief
Court of Appeal and Chairman/Head
or Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief Justice
First Level;
g. Supreme Court and Chief Justice
The Supreme Court Oversight Board is responsible
answer monitoring the implementation compliance of the list
present and the list home by the court of the degree
first and the level of appeal through application
national data communication.
(4) The work hours as referred to in paragraph (2) can
be adjusted to the local government policy
local, provided not to reduce the amount
working hours should be.
(5) For uniformity, the working hours mentioned in
paragraph (2) in Above is specified by the Chief Justice
Appeals under the coordination of the Chairman of the High Court.
(6) The number of effective working hours in 5 (five) business days in
1 (one) week is cumulative as much as 37.5 (three
tens seven comma 5 commas and may not be used
for other activities outside of care.
Article 5
(1) The Judge who is about to leave the office before the hour
home is required to receive a written permission from the Chairman/Head
or the designated officer by using
form listed in Annex II which is
an inseparable part of this Court Regulation.
(2) For Justice Yusticial on the Supreme Court, permission
as referred to in paragraph (1) is provided by
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -8-
Panitera/Judge occupying structural office,
or designated official.
(3) If the event is referred to in paragraph (1)
due to the use of service requirements
The command/disposition of the leadership, the duty/dispositions
the leadership applies as a written permission.
(4) Permission as specified in paragraph (1) and paragraph (2)
given in writing are listed in Annex II
which is an inseparable part of the Regulation
This court.
(5) Request permission as referred to in paragraph (1) and
paragraph (2) and the granting of permissions as referred to
paragraph (4) may be delivered directly or
sent via fax or message
electronic.
Section 6
(1) Chairperson/Head of the Court of Appeals to
leave office for outside interest
the mandatory diners inform the Director
General of the Judicial Agency is related.
(2) Vice Chairman/Vice Chief Court of Appeals,
The Court of Appeals Court is required to request permission
to the Chairman/Chief Court of Appeals.
(3) The Chairman/Head of the First Level Court to
leave office for outside interests
diners are required to notify Chairman/Head
Court of Appeal.
(4) Vice Chairman/Deputy First Court Chief Justice
and First Level Court Judge who is about to
leave office for interest outside
mandatory diners request permission to the Chairman/Head
First Level Court.
(5) Permission as specified in paragraph (2) and paragraph (4)
given in writing is listed in Annex II
which is an inseparable part of Rule
This court.
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -9-
(6) Notice as referred to in paragraph (1) and
paragraph (3) may be delivered directly or
sent via fax or message (s)
electronics.
(7) Leaving office for sufficient service interest
relayed notice.
Article 7
(1) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will
leave office outside the kedinasan before the hour
returning home got permission from the Chief Justice
the Great.
(2) Young Chairman/Perkara Chamber is about to leave
the office before the hour home outside the mandatory kedinasan
gets permission from the Deputy Chief Justice of the Field
Judicial.
(3) Young chairman/Coaching Room or Oversight that
is about to leave the office outside of sanity before
the return hour is required to receive permission from the Vice Chairman
Supreme Court of Non-Judicial Fields.
(4) the Supreme Court Justice. wish to leave the office before
the return hour is required to get a written permission from the Chairman
Young/Chamber or the designated official with
using the form set forth in Annex II
which is an inseparable part from the Regulation
This court.
(5) If the thing is referred to in the In verse (1)
up to paragraph (4) due to the need
service under the command/disposition of the leadership, the letter
The job/disposition of the leadership applies as permissions
written.
(6) Request permissions and permissions as
referred to in paragraph (1) up to paragraph (5) may
be submitted directly or delivered via
fax or email.
Section 8
(1) non-entry judges outside of the mandatory diners
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -10-
gets the written permission of the Chairman/Chief or official
designated by using the form listed
in Annex III which is the part not
separable from the Court Rules this.
(2) For the Justicial Judge on the Supreme Court, the permission
as referred to in paragraph (1) is provided by
Panitera/Judge who occupies a structural position,
or a designated official.
(3) If it is as referred to in paragraph (1)
due to the purpose of service based
The command/disposition of the leadership, then the assignment/disposition letter
The leader applies as a written permission.
(4) Permission as referred to in paragraph (1) and paragraph (2)
can only be provided for at least 2 (two) days
Work.
(5) Permission as specified in paragraph (1) and paragraph (2)
provided in writing.
(6) the request for the permission as referred to in paragraph (1) and
paragraph (2) and the grant of permission as referred to
paragraph (5) may be Delivered directly or
sent via fax or message/message
electronics.
Section 9
(1) Chairperson/Head of the Court of Appeal that is not
admission to work outside of the kedinasan on a mandatory job day
requesting permission to the Director General of the Judicial Agency
is related.
(2) Vice Chairperson/Vice Chief Court of Appeals,
Judge Court of Appeals, Ketua/Head
First-Level Tribunal that does not work on
a working day outside of the mandatory kedinasan requests permission to
Chairperson/Head of the Court of Appeal.
(3) Vice Chairman/Vice Chief Court First Class
and First Level Court Judge who is not
entered work outside the kedinasan on a mandatory job day
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -11-
requesting permission to the Chair/Head of the Court Level
First.
(4) Permission as specified in paragraph (1) to the paragraph
(3) may only be provided for at least 2 (two) days
work.
(5) Permission as specified in paragraph (1) to the paragraph
(3) provided by the Director General of the Judicial Agency
regarding or Chairperson/Chief Justice is provided
written set forth in Appendix III which is the
an inseparable part of this Court Regulation.
(6) The request for permission as referred to in paragraph (1)
up to paragraph (3) and granting of permissions as
referred to in paragraph (5) may be submitted
directly or sent via fax or
electronic mail/message.
Article 10
(1) Vice Chief Justice who does not work in
outside of the work day is required
written to the Chief Justice with
giving the reason.
(2) Chairman Youth/Perkara Chamber that does not work in
outside of the work day is required
written to the Vice Chairman of the Judicial Field with
giving the reason.
(3) The Young Master/Coaching Room or Supervision that
does not enter work outside of care on weekdays
is required to request permission. written to the Vice Chairman
Non-Judicial Fields by giving a reason.
(4) The non-incoming Supreme Court Justice
on the day of the mandatory work requesting permission in writing to
Young Chairman/Chamber each by giving
the reason.
(5) If the event is referred to in paragraph (1) to
with (4) due to the use of the service
under the command/disposition of the leadership, the letter
the assignment/disposition of such leadership applies as permission
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -12-
written.
(6) Permission as referred to in paragraph (1) to
with paragraph (4) may only be provided for the longest
2 (two) business days.
(7) Permission as paragraph (1) to the paragraph
(4) and the grant of permission as referred to in paragraph
(6) is given in writing according to which
set forth in Appendix III which is the section
inseparable from this Court Regulation.
(8) Request for the permission as contemplatically referred to in this section.
(8) Request for permission on paragraph (1)
up to the paragraph (4) may be submitted
directly or submitted via facsimile or
electronic mail.
Article 11
(1) Judge who is about to travel abroad either service
nor is personally required to request permission in writing
to the Chief Justice.
(2) Judges who are about to travel abroad for
meet the religious obligations sufficient to get permission
from the work unit leadership.
(3) The judges who travel abroad in order
the duties of kedinasan are required to report the results to
Supreme Court Chief Justice.
(4) The Chief Justice can delegated
authority on paragraph (1) to the designated officer.
Article 12
(1) The Chairman/Head of the First Level Court
traveling abroad, city or area more than 1
(one) day, mandatory Subject to its duties and duties
in writing to the Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief or
appoints the Chief/Chief Duty Officer, in which case
there is a vacancy in the post of Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief.
(2) The Chairman/Chief Justice Level of Appeal that
is traveling abroad, city, or area more than 1
(one) day, required to bestow its duties and authority
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -13-
in writing to the Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief or
appointing Acting Chairman/Head, in case
there is a vacancy in the post of Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief.
(3) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is required defile its duties and
its authority in writing to any of
the Deputy Chief Justice or Acting Officer
appointed before traveling abroad, city or
area more than 1 (one) days.
BAB III
COACHING
Article 13
(1) Judge who did not enter the job due to ill reason more
of 2 (two) days but not more than 14 (fourteen)
days, required to apply for a sick leave request that
submitted in writing to authorized officials
provides a leave of absence by attaching mail to the authorized personnel. Description
doctor.
(2) Judge who suffered ill over 14 (fourteen)
days in a row and cannot run
duty, required to submit a sick leave request
written to the official who provided leave
by attaching a Test Team
Health appointed by the Minister of Health/home
sick caring, at least 7 (seven) days
counts since day fourteen of his illness.
(3) Annotated letter as referred to in paragraph (2)
at least stated about need to be given
leave, length of leave and other annoyation that is viewed
needs.
(4) Sick Cuti as referred to in paragraph (2) given
for the longest time 6 (six) months.
(5) The term of the sick leave referred to
the paragraph (4) can be added for at least 3 (three) months
If viewed need based on the captions
The Minister for Health Testing Team appointed by the Minister
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -14-
Health/hospital taking care.
(6) The pain of the pain as referred to in paragraph (1), paragraph (2),
paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), provided in writing is listed
in Annex IV which is section not
separated from this Court Regulation.
(7) The unhealed judge of his illness in the term
time as referred to in paragraph (5), should be tested
back his health by the Health Test Team which
appointed by the Minister of Health.
(8) If based on the results of the test health
as referred to in paragraph (7) the Judge
is concerned not to be able to work again as
Judge, he is honored from his post.
Article 14
(1) In the case of the Judge experiencing pain as
referred to in Article 13 of the paragraph (2) not too
checking his health after passing from the term
specified time, the direct supervisor of the Judge
ordered that concerned for
checking health as set in
Article 13 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3).
(2) The command referred to paragraph (1) is performed
in writing by the Chairman/Chief, or the Vice
Speaker/Vice Chief of the Court and is delivered to
The judge is concerned.
(3) Judge who received the order to check
the health of his superiors as intended in
paragraph (1), compulsory health check
no later than 7 (seven) days since receiving
a health check order from the Chairman/Head or
Vice Chairman/Vice Chief Justice.
(4) If after passing time as specified
on the paragraph (3) the Judge is concerned not
checking for health and submitting a request
sick leave, to the Judge concerned given
The First Warning.
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -15-
(5) If after 7 (7) days since
received the First Warning Judge who
is concerned not to be health checked and
filed for a sick leave request, to The judge
is concerned given the Second Warning.
(6) If in the middle of time 7 (seven) days after
given the Second Commemoration, the Judge is concerned
not also conducting a health check, against
in question is a work discipline check.
Article 15
(1) Judges who do not comply with the entry provisions
and/or the working hours as referred to in Article
4 as many as 3 (three) times in 1 (one) month running,
called by the Acting Officer to be heard
interest in the reason not to comply
the entry provisions and/or hours of work.
(2) The Administrative Court/Court Level
Appeal may report to the Chairman of the Court
Level Appeals/Head of the Oversight Board if
Knowing the Chair of the Pertama/ Level Court/
The Court of Appeals disobeying
the entry provisions and/or hours of work as
referred to Article (4).
(3) Chairperson of the Court of Appeal/Head of the Agency
The mandatory supervision follows up on the report as
referred to a paragraph (2).
(4) The report as referred to in paragraph (2)
is delivered to the Head of the Oversight Board via
electronic mail/e-mail: kepala@badanpengawasan.net
or the Court of Justice surveillance information system
Agung RI.
(5) If in request request as
referred to paragraph (1), the Judge in question is not
may provide a valid and/or rational reason
so that he does not comply with the entry provisions
and/or working hours, to the Judge in question
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -16-
is given the First Warning.
(6) If within 3 (three) months after
is given the First Warning the Judge
is concerned to repeat the deed again as
referred to in paragraph (1), to the Judge
concerned given the Second Warning
(7) The First and Second Warning as
referred to in paragraph (5) and paragraph (6) is stated
written.
(8) If in the middle of 3 (three) months after
given the Second Warning, the Judge is concerned
reprising the act as referred to
paragraph (1), against the Judge in question
Check.
(9) The authority as referred to in paragraph (1)
against the Justicial Judge of the Supreme Court
is run by Panitera/Judge who has
structural position or other Officer which
is appointed.
BAB IV
REPORTING
Article 16
(1) Chairman/Head of the mandatory First Level Court
report to the Chairman/Chief Court Level
Appeal with busan to the Head of the Agency
Court Oversight Supreme, in the case of a Judge in
the court that he led does not comply with the provisions
regarding the working hours and/or not checking
the health and submitting a leave request
as defined in this Court Regulation.
(2) The report referred to in paragraph (1) as not-
may not contain:
a. name, pangkat/department of the Judge/position of Judge that
reported; and
b. the accumulation description does not comply with the provisions
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -17-
regarding the working hours and/or the length of not entering
work due to illness from the Judge in question,
without filing a sick leave request, as well as the form
coaching that has been provided including if
already given the first warning and/or
the second warning.
(3) The report as referred to in paragraph (1)
delivered to the Head of the Oversight Board
The Supreme Court is most slowly dated 5 (five) months
next.
Article 17
(1) Chairman/Head of the Court of mandatory Appeals
report to the Chief Oversight Board
Supreme Court, in case of the Judge in the court which
was in it or the Chair of First Level Court in
legal territories that do not comply with the provisions
regarding the working hours or not checking the health
and submitting a leave request as
specified in this Court Regulation.
(2) the report as Referred to in paragraph (1) as not-
it contains:
a. name, pangkat/department of the Judge/position of Judge that
reported; and
b. the accumulation description does not comply with the provisions
regarding the working hours and/or the length of the entry
work due to the illness of the Judge in question
without filing a sick leave request, as well as the form
the coaching that has been is provided including if already
given the First and/or Warning
Second Warning.
(3) The report as referred to in paragraph (1)
is delivered to the Court Oversight
the slowest of the date 5 (five) the following month.
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -18-
Article 18
(1) Panitera/Judge occupying structural office or
Officials appointed to the Supreme Court, mandatory
report to the Chief Oversight Board
Supreme Court, in Judge Yusticial stuff in the unit
The work he led did not comply with the provisions
regarding the working hours or not checking the health
and applying for a leave request as
specified in this Court Regulation.
(2) The Chief Oversight Board is required to report to
Young Chairman/Room Oversight, in the case of the Judge
Yusticial in the work unit he led did not comply
provisions regarding the working hours or not checking
health and submitting a leave request
as determined in Regulation This Court.
(3) The head of the Oversight Board is required to report to
The Young Chairman/The Oversight Chamber, in which case
The Judge who occupied the structural/leadership position/Leadership
The Main High and/or Madya disobeying
provisions regarding working hours or not checking
health and submitting the request for leave
as defined in this Court Regulation.
(4) The report as referred to in paragraph (1) as not-
should not contain:
a. name, pangkat/department of the Judge/position of Judge that
reported; and
b. the accumulation description does not comply with the provisions
regarding the working hours and/or the length of the entry
work due to the illness of the Judge in question
without filing a sick leave request, as well as the form
the coaching that has been Provided, including if
already given the First Warning and/or
Second Warning.
Article 19
(1) The Young Chairman/Oversight Chamber is required to report
to the Vice Chairman of the Judicial District in the case of the Judge
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -19-
Great, the Chief Oversight Board does not comply
provisions regarding the working hours or not checking
health and submitting a leave request
as defined in the Court Rules This.
(2) Vice Chairman of the Judicial Field and Non-Judicial Fields
is required to report to the Chief Justice in
the Young Chairman/Chamber of the Supreme Court is not
complies with the provisions regarding the working hours or not
Check on health and submit a request
leave as specified in the Regulations
This court.
(3) The Chief Justice organates a Meeting
The Chief Justice for setting a follow
up on the Deputy Chief Justice
complies with the provisions regarding the working hours or not
checking health and submitting a request
leave as specified in the Regulation
This court.
(4) Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief Justice
organizes the Chief Justice Meeting Supreme
with half support plus one element
Supreme Court Leader to establish a follow up
further up to the Chief Justice who does not comply
provisions regarding the working hours or not checking
health and submitting a leave request
as defined in the Court Rules This.
(5) The Supreme Court Chief Meeting discussed and
take the deemed necessary if the Chairman
The Supreme Court does not comply with the provisions regarding
hours of work or not to check health and
submitting a leave request as specified
in this Court Regulation.
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -20-
BAB V
THE FORMATION AND ARRANGEMENT OF TEAM EXAMINERS
Article 20
(1) Examination as referred to in Section 14 and
Section 15 is performed by the established examiner team
and consists of:
a. Chairman/Head of the First Level Court
sets 3 (three) team persons who are
chaired by the Chairman/Chief, or Vice Chairman/Vice
Head and two (two) judges,
with assisted by 1 (one) person court staff
first level as secretary, for
checking Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief and
Judge/Judge Ad Hoc in charge of
First Level Court;
b. Chairman/Head of the Court of Appeals
Establits 3 (three) team-person examiners that
chaired by the Chairman/Chief or Vice Chairman/Vice
Head and consists of 2 (two) persons Judges
High, assisted by 1 (one) staff
court appeals level as secretary,
to check the Vice Chairman/Deputy Chief, Judge
High, Judge Ad Hoc, Justicial Judge and Judge
Non Palu in charge of the Court Level
Appeal as well as the First
Chair/Head of the Courts
in its legal region;
c. Head of the Supreme Court Oversight Board
establishes 3 (three) of the examiner's team which
is the Supervising High Judge who is a
of which acts as chairman, and is assisted
by 1 (one) of the Agency's staff. Supervision as
team secretary to check for High Judge and
Judge Yusticial assigned to the Supreme Court
Great and First Level Judges at 4 (four)
The Judicial Agency Environment in terms of:
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -21-
1. The judge has moved out of duty outside the region
previous Court of Appeals Law
before; or
2. The leadership of the Judge in question is not
making any oppressors to the Judge
;
d. Viceroy/Supreme Court Surveillance Board
establishes 3 (three) team-member examiners that
chaired by a Chief Justice and
consists of 2 (two) High Court Supervisers
and assisted by 1 (one) the Judge person Yusticial
The Oversight Board as the team secretary for
checking the sitting Judge
structural eselon 2;
e. The Chief Justice set three (three) persons
a team of examiners chaired by the Chairman
Young/Room Supervision and consists of 2
(two) the Chief Justice, with assisted by
Head of the Oversight Board/The Regional Inspector
The Oversight Board as a team secretary for
inspeting the Supreme Court Justice, the Supreme Court of the Court
the Great, or the Judge who occupied the post
structural eselon 1 and the Chair/Head of the Court
The Appeal Level;
f. The Chief Justice set out a team of examiners
consisting of 3 (three) Young Chairmen/Rooms
one of whom was appointed as
chairman, with assisted by the Head of the Agency
Oversight as team secretary to check
The Young Chair/Supreme Court Chamber;
g. The Chief Justice forms the examiner's team
chaired by the Chairman/one of the Vice Chairman
and consists of 2 (two) Chairman's members
Young/Room respectively, with assisted by
Head of the Oversight Board as secretary to
examine the Deputy Chief Justice; and
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -22-
h. All elements of Supreme Court Chief Justice
examine the Chief Justice with
led by one of the Vice Chairman of the Supreme Court
the Great and assisted Chief Oversight Board
as secretary.
(2) Tata Way inspection In accordance with
This Court of Justice refers to the Regulation
Supreme Court governing the handling of
complaint and examination of alleged violations
the behavior of the Judge and the court apparatus.
BAB VI
VIOLATION
Article 21
(1) The judge based on the results The check is proven
does not comply with the provisions regarding the work discipline
as set in this Court Regulation,
is sanctioned for the breach of the Judge's work discipline.
(2) The Chief Justice if it does not meet obligation
conduct coaching and examination of the Deputy
Supreme Court Chief of the infringement against
the provisions of the Judge ' s work discipline as set
in this Court Rules are sanctioned by
Supreme Court Chief Meeting.
(3) Vice Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Judicial field and Vice
Chairperson of the Supreme Court of Non-Judicial Field who does not
meets the obligation of conducting coaching, reporting
and/or checks against the Young Chairman/Room
for breach of the work discipline provision
The judge as set forth in the Court Rules
is hereby sanctioned by the Chief Justice.
(4) Young Chairman/Chamber who does not fulfill the obligation
does coaching, reporting and/or checks
against the Judge The Great in her room over
a violation of the Judge ' s work discipline provisions
as set out in this Court Regulation
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -23-
is sanctioned by the Deputy Chief Justice.
(5) Panitera/Judge who occupied Structural Office
on the Supreme Court, Chairman/Head of the Court and
Vice Chairman/Vice Chief Justice, which is not
meeting the duties of doing coaching, reporting
and/or an examination of the violations against
the provisions of the Judge ' s work discipline as set
in this Court Rules are sanctioned by
Vice Chairman of the Supreme Court of Non Judicial field.
BAB VII
SANCTIONS
Section 22
(1) The types of sanctions:
a. light sanctions include written reprimand and/or not
paid structural/functional benefits for 1
(one) month;
b. Sanctions are not being paid any allowance
structural/functional for at least 2 (two)
months and longest 6 (six) months; and
c. severe sanctions are not paid allowances
structural/functional for more than 6 months and
at most 2 (two) years.
(2) The examiner team in recommendrecommening mild sanction,
medium, or weight depending on the impact
and repetition of the breach.
Article 23
(1) The judge who was sentenced to be lensed is a reprimand
written remains paid Structural support/
functional, unless expressly stated not
is paid a structural/functional allowance.
(2) The Judge sentenced to moderate sanctions or severe sanctions,
not paid a structural/functional allowance.
(3) Structural/functional office improvements in paragraph (1)
and paragraph (2) are allowances as intended
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -24-
in Government Regulation No. 94 of 2012
on the Financial Rights and Judges Facility Being
under the Supreme Court and the President Regulation
No. 5 Year 2013 on Financial Rights and
Judge Ad Hoc Facility as well as Government Regulation
Number 55 of 2014 on Financial Rights and
The Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of the Constitution during
are concerned to undergo such disciplinary punishment.
BAB VIII
TRANSITIONAL provisions
Article 24
At the time the Supreme Court Regulation is starting In effect,
Supreme Court Chief Justice Number 069 /KMA/
SK/V/2009 on First Amendment Decision
Chief Justice Number 071 /KMA/SK/V/2008
on the Terms of Workforce Enforcement Provisions in
The implementation of the Judge Performance Special allowance
and the civil servant on the Supreme Court and the Agency
The Judiciary Under which it is located, as long
governs the enforcement of the work discipline in execution
granting The Judge ' s performance special allowance was declared not
applicable.
Article 25
The rules of this Court come into effect on the date
promulred.
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -25-
For everyone to know, ordered
the invitational of this Court of Justice with
its placement in the State News of the Republic of Indonesia.
Set in Jakarta
on the date 25 July 2016
CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPREME COURT
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
ttd.
MUHAMMAD HATTA ALI
Reundrased in Jakarta
on July 25, 2016
DIRECTOR GENERAL
REGULATION
MINISTRY OF LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA,
ttd.
WIDODO EKATJAHJANA
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -26-
LIST ATTENDANCE
____________________________2
Day, Date: ___________________________
No. JAM3 NAME AND NIP
SIGNATURE WORK UNIT
LISTING OFFICER PRESENT/LISTING HOME,
ttd
(_____________________________) 4
1 Doodling one in need of 2 Dicontents under the name of the Court/Working Unit 3 Filled with the arrival/return hours of the judge by listing up to the unit of minutes.
Example: 08.25 WIB 4 Conloaded with the signature and full name of the Hadir List or the Home List.
Attachment I Regulation Supreme Court Number 7 of the Year 2016 about the Enforcement Discipline of the Judge on the Supreme Court and the Judicial Agency that is below it
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -27-
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -28-
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -29-
www.peraturan.go.id
2016, No. 1075 -30-
www.peraturan.go.id
