JORF n ° 0004 January 6, 2010 text no. 21 Decree of 28 December 2009 laying down detailed rules for the organisation of competitions for the certificate of qualification in the teaching of physical education and sports NOR: MENH0931346A ELI: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/arrete/2009/12/28/MENH0931346A/jo/texte the Minister of budget, public accounts, public service and the reform of the State and the Minister of national education spokesman of the Government, mindful of Decree No. 80-627, 4 August 1980 amended relating to the special status of teachers of physical education and sports;
Considering Decree No. 2002 - 766 3 May 2002 concerning the procedures for designation by the administration in the public service of the State, members of boards and committees of selection and its representatives in the advisory bodies;
Mindful of Decree No. 2004-592 of 17 June 2004 in aquatic rescue and first aid qualifications required for staff of the Minister of national education and ensuring the teaching of physical and sports education in public educational institutions and educational institutions aided secondary;
Considering Decree No. 2004 - 1105 October 19, 2004 on the opening of the recruitment procedures in the public service of the State;
Given the Decree of 19 December 2006 on the specification of the teacher training in university teacher training Institute, stop: Article 1 more on this article...
The external competition, the closed competition and the third contest of recruitment of teachers of physical education and sports with a view to obtaining the certificate of qualification in the teaching of physical education and sports, established by the Decree of August 4, 1980, above, are organized in accordance with the provisions of this order.
Article 2 more on this article...
The number of places offered to external competition, internal and, where appropriate, in the third contest and the closing date of registration records are set by order of the Minister responsible for the education, after obtaining the assent of the Minister responsible for the public service, under the conditions laid down in article 2 of the Decree of October 19, 2004 referred to above.
The opening date of sessions, registration and the centres in which the tests are incurred are fixed by order of the Minister responsible for the education. Applicants are required to register under the conditions and time limits fixed by these orders.
Article 3 read more on this article...
The external competition includes two rounds of qualifying and two races for admission.
Article 4 more on this article...
The internal competition has proof of eligibility and an admission test.
Article 5 read more on this article...
The third competition includes a test of eligibility and an admission test.
Article 6 read more on this article...
The description of each of the external and internal competitions and the third competition tests specified in annexes I, II and III of this order.
Article 7 read more on this article...
For each of the competitions, when admission tests include the realization of one or several physical benefits, applicants must submit to the Board before the beginning of admission tests, a medical certificate dating from less than four weeks, non-contre-indication to the practice of physical, sporting and artistic activities in which they must perform a physical benefit. Candidates are not allowed to make physical delivery in an activity for which they did not produce the required medical certificate. The choice of sporting activity made during registration cannot, under any circumstances, be changed after the closing date of registration records.
Article 8 more on this article...
A jury is established for each third competition and external, internal competitions. However, a jury may be common to the external competition and the third competition.
Article 9 read more on this article...
Each Board consists of a president and, as necessary, one or more Vice-Chairmen, appointed by the Minister of education, on the proposal of the Director in charge of teaching staff. They are selected from the regional inspectors-General of national education, the Pedagogical Academy-inspectors inspectors and teachers-researchers.
Article 10 more on this article...
The Board members, appointed by the Minister of education, are chosen on the proposal of president, among Inspectors General of national education, regional educational Academy-inspectors inspectors, personnel of management of institutions of education and training within the Ministry of education, members of the teachers of higher education, associate professors, professors of physical education and sports the main education advisors.
Juries may also include persons selected on the basis of their expertise.
Article 11 read more on this article...
When the president of the jury is unable to continue its mission, a Vice-Chairman or another Member of the jury belonging to one categories of officers referred to in article 9 is designated without delay by the Minister on a proposal from the Director in charge of teachers to replace.
Article 12 read more on this article...
The president, the vice-presidents and members of the Board may participate in more than four successive sessions. Exceptionally, their mandate may be extended for a session.
Article 13 read more on this article...
The subjects of the written tests are chosen by the Minister of education on proposal of the president of the jury.
They are established taking into account the curriculum in effect in colleges and high school classes.
Article 14 read more on this article...
When the Board was formed in groups of reviewers, each group includes at least two examiners but shall not exceed three reviewers on average for all the groups of this jury. For the same event, each group is made up of the same number of reviewers throughout the session.
Article 15 read more on this article...
The tests are scored from 0 to 20. For all races, the zero mark is eliminatory. When event in comprises several parts, note zero obtained one or other of the parties is eliminatory.
Article 16 read more on this article...
The fact do not participate to an event or part of test, will present late after the opening of the envelopes containing the subjects to make a white copy, failing to make the copy at the end of the event, of not respecting the choices made at the time of registration or of not submitting to the jury a folder or report, or any document to be provided by the applicant within the time limit and in the manner for each competition involves the removal of the candidate.
Article 17 read more on this article...
The written tests of the candidates is anonymized before being submitted to a double correction.
At the end of the proofreading of eligibility, the fixed jury, after deliberating, the list of candidates admitted to undergo the tests for admission.
The anonymity of the tests is thrown after the deliberation of the jury. At the end of the tests for admission and after deliberation, the jury, on the basis of the total number of points that candidates have obtained across the two series of tests and within the limits of the spaces in the fixed order of merit contest the list of candidates proposed to the Minister of education for admission to the competition.
The Minister responsible for the education stops, in order of merit, the list of candidates reported admitted to the competition.
Article 18 read more on this article...
If several candidates received the same number of points, they are mark breaker quickest as follows during the preparation of the list for admission: 1 ° for the external competition: priority is given to the one who got the highest score in the second round of admission; in case of equality of points in the second round of admission, priority is given to the candidate with the highest score in the first written examination of eligibility; If equality remains, they are mark breaker quickest best score for the first round of admission.
2 ° for internal competition: priority is given to those who received the highest score for the admission test.
3 ° for the third competition: priority is given to the one who got the highest score for the admission test. in the case of equality of points in this event, the priority is given to the candidate with the highest score in the test of eligibility.
Article 19 more on this article...
During the tests, candidates are prohibited: 1 ° to introduce in the place of the tests any document, note or hardware not authorized by the jury of the competition;
2 ° to communicate or receive information from the outside;
3 ° out of the room without permission of the invigilator in charge and be accompanied by a different supervisor;
4 ° disrupt the smooth running of the tests by their behavior.
Applicants must lend itself to the supervision and verifications.
Article 20 more on this article...
Any infringement of the regulation, any fraud or any attempt of duly established fraud causes exclusion of the contest, without prejudice to the application, where appropriate, the criminal provisions of the law of 23 December 1901 punishing fraud in examinations and competitions and of the disciplinary sanction possibly incurred if the candidate is already in the service of a Government. The same measures may be taken against the accomplices of the main author of the fraud or attempted fraud.
No immediate sanction is taken in flagrante delicto. The invigilator in charge shall prepare a report that the Rector of Academy passes to the Minister of education.
No decision can be taken without the person concerned has been convened and set State to submit his defence.
The exclusion of the contest is delivered by the Minister of education, on the proposal of the president of the jury.
The reasoned decision shall be notified without delay to the person concerned by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt.
Section 21 read more on this article...
Copying appearing suspicious during correction is indicated by the corrector to the president of the jury. Recognized fraud its author is excluded from the competition in the conditions laid down in the last three paragraphs of article 20.
Article 22 read more on this article...
The order of 22 September 1989 amended laying down the terms of the contest of the certificate of qualification in the teaching of physical education and sports is repealed.
Section 23 read more on this article...
The provisions of this order shall take effect from the session of the year competition 2011.
Section 24 read more on this article...
Annexes I, II and III shall published in the Official Journal of the French Republic.
Article 25 more on this article...
The Director General of human resources is responsible for the execution of this order, which will be published in the Official Journal of the French Republic.
Annex A N N E X E S A N N E X E I tests of competition external of CAPEPS A. ― written eligibility tests 1 ° Dissertation on the historical and epistemological physical education foundations.
The test is designed to assess the capacity of the future teacher to locate his professional action with regard to hotlines and the transformations of physical education under the influence of endogenous and exogenous determinants in the education system.
Duration: 5 hours; coefficient 2.
2 ° essay or case study on the teaching of physical and sports education using knowledge within the humanities and social sciences and, among them, sciences intervention, sciences of life and technology specific physical activities sport and art, institutional fields and technical fields.
The test is designed to assess the capacity of the future teacher to mobilize knowledge scientific, technical and professional understanding of the conditions of teaching and learning, to encourage acquisitions of students within a framework of physical education and sports of second degree programs.
Duration: 5 hours; coefficient 2.
The programme of these two tests is fixed annually and published in the official Bulletin of the Ministry of national education.
B. ― tests for admission 1 ° physical benefits and specialty lesson: total duration of the test: three hours (cumulative periods of physical benefits: sixty minutes; duration of the preparation of the statement: an hour; duration of oral: one hour).
Duration of oral specialty: one hour (presentation: 15 minutes maximum; maintenance: forty-five minutes including 15 minutes for the second phase); coefficient 4.
The test is composed of three physical benefits and specialty maintenance. The lesson presented by the candidate during maintenance of specialty must meet the needs of training for a singular group of students. This group is defined by a class level, a level of practice, features observed in the practice of physical sports and artistic activity (APSA) retained by the candidate.
The test is aimed, on the one hand, to assess the level of performance of the candidate in two APSA among those listed in the list of the programme of the competition and on the other hand, to assess the level of technical, educational and scientific expertise of the future teacher who tries to solve the problem in the statement of the question initial support from the lesson of specialty.
Each part of the test accounts for half in the assignment of the note.
Physical benefits: three physical benefits are made in three APSA entered in the competition program, one is from a list of specialty and the other two from the list of versatility. Activities selected to three benefits must meet two skills (CP) to the EPS different among the four skills selected for this event: CP 1, CP 2, CP 3, CP 4. In no case it is the own responsibility CP 5. The APSA lists shall be adopted for two years and are renewable or editable for part. They are published in the official Bulletin of national education.
To achieve the three physical benefits, the candidate chooses, at the time of registration for the contest, an APSA in each of the first four physical education and sport-specific skills identified in disciplinary programs (CP 1-CP 4).
Among these four APSA, it retains a specialty activity, the other three being the support of the draw by the jury for the realization of the second and the third physical benefits. APSA drawn are notified to the candidate in his road map, at the time of the reception of the candidates by the president of the jury.
Each physical performance assessment is carried out according to relevant APSA, either using a scale when performance is directly measurable and quantifiable, or using a repository where the performance is appreciated and considered.
The term of execution by the candidate of the two benefits of versatility, only the lowest delivery note is retained.
The final note of the physical benefits corresponds to the average between the physical delivery of specialty and versatility the lowest delivery note.
Maintenance of specialty: only the delivery of specialty is associated with a query oral, consisting of a lesson presentation followed by an interview with the jury.
The question posed by the jury and the documents provided, written, photographic and video, lead the candidate base and present its response in the form of a lesson in specialty. The candidate must be able to analyze the activity of the students, to propose one or more learning situations to solve the problem posed by the question to justify its choice. It must also show the ability to use a framework for reflection to articulate his answers during the two phases of maintenance in continuity or rupture.
From the exposed lesson, maintenance appreciates the level of scientific, technical, educational and institutional knowledge available. It consists of two phases: A phase of interrogation aimed at furthering the candidate to the original question's answer, defined by its APSA, its level of students by type of problem to solve. It can extend, as appropriate, at all levels of practice encountered in the teaching of the second degree.
During the second phase of the interview, questioning is extended to all or part of the APSA under own LOSA jurisdiction to which is attached the statement activity. In this second time maintenance allows the candidate to show its ability to use a framework for reflection articulated in continuity or rupture, with that used in the response to the original question.
2 ° test consisting of two parts: 14 points are awarded to the first part and 6 points to the second (duration non-physical delivery: preparation of two issues: two hours; duration of test: one hour and thirty minutes; coefficient 4).
First part: physical education lesson referring to programs of EPS of colleges and high schools, in a context of establishment and organized by a pedagogical project of EPS (presentation: twenty minutes maximum; maintenance: fifty minutes).
The test has to verify the level of mastery of the didactic, pedagogical knowledge and scientists of the future teacher to offer a lesson in EPS in a context of establishment and a characterized population of students, for acquisitions of skills, referred to the curriculum. The establishment is represented by the priorities in the project, school achievements, by his teaching of EPS and finally his sports association project. The population of the relevant class is defined by its EPS skills, especially in sport and physical activity concerned by the lesson, his previous experience, but also by the unique attitudes of students and their academic achievement.
The presentation takes place from a question asked by the jury, based on an institution presented in the form of document written, photographic, and/or audiovisual file. The context of secondary education is provided by the Board, physical, athletic or artistic activity; projects of establishment, educational project of physical education and sports, sports association project. project of class or group of students; characteristics of students; programming of the activities of the class or group of students.
APSA lesson support cannot fall within the three skills to the EPS already deductions for the first admission test (activity on the one hand, selected activities drawn from); It is therefore one of the two remaining competences among the five that exist in EPS.
Second part: the test consists of a query relating to jurisdiction "Acting in official State and an ethical and responsible way" (presentation: ten-minute interview with the jury: ten minutes).
From a question previously posed by the jury during the preparation phase, the candidate makes a presentation of a maximum of ten minutes, followed by an interview with a maximum duration of 10 minutes.
The question from a document provided by the Board, dealing with the themes categorized knowledge, skills and attitudes defined for the designated skill above, in point 3 of the annex to the Decree of 19 December 2006: 'professional skills of teachers. The question and answer are situated in the context of the case of establishments used for the lesson of EPS.
The purpose of the test is to assess the ability of the candidate to translate into professional acts entered in the logic of the EPLE and in compliance with the regulations in force, its response to the original question.
The statement continues by an interview with the jury for 10 minutes.
A N N E X E I tests of competition internal DU CAPEPS A i. ― written test of eligibility relative Composition in the teaching of physical education and sport, in relation with the professional experience acquired the candidate in the discipline.
The test involves knowledge of the candidate on the physical, sporting and artistic activities the didactics of physical education and sports, its education program, its organization and its implementation in the second degree.
The event builds on a program set for two years and that relates to the program of high schools and colleges.
Duration: four hours; coefficient 2.
B. ― oral admission test analysis of a situation of teaching.
This event includes a presentation followed by a maintenance; It covers organization of the teaching of physical education and sports experience in a secondary institution.
The event builds on a dossier produced by the candidate. The AMF on experience of organization of physical education and sport in college or a high school and has, in addition, two teaching sequences performed or observed in one or more classes of the level of education (college or high school) chosen by the candidate and based on two separate physical activities selected for each in two different groups of activities in reference to programs of the discipline in the schools and colleges.
A valid program for two years establishes a list of activities that can be used as a support to the two teaching sequences: this list may not exceed sixteen activities and builds in accordance with the programs of the discipline on the reality of the activities most commonly taught in colleges and high schools.
The jury chooses to interview the candidate on one or more of the items in the folder.
The folder, typed, includes regulatory, didactics and pedagogy which justify the implementation of this teaching, as well as preparations of lessons and contents of education. It features, in addition, three briefing notes, not exceeding each two typewritten pages and relating, respectively, to the experience of the physical education organization and each teaching sequences presented. The entire record, three briefing notes included, must not exceed 20 typewritten pages.
Eligible applicants must send, by mail, by registered mail, their comprising three briefing notes, to the president of jury in the conditions and the deadline fixed by the jury. Do not address the jury the folder within the time and in the manner laid down in this article causes the elimination of the candidate.
The maintenance is based on the situation of education chosen: it deals with technical and didactic of the chosen activity and is extended to other aspects of the professional experience of the candidate.
The folder and briefing notes do not give rise to notation, only the presentation and maintenance are noted.
Time of preparation: two hours.
Duration of test: one hour fifteen minutes maximum (presentation: thirty minutes; maintenance: forty-five minutes); coefficient 2.
A N N E X E I I I tests of third competition of CAPEPS A. ― test written eligibility second test of eligibility for the external competition (coefficient 3).
B. ― oral admission test first test for the admission of the external competition (coefficient 3).
The two tests for admission must also allow the candidate to demonstrate he considered the contribution that his professional experience is for the exercise of his future profession and in its relations with the school institution, by integrating and valuing the acquired experience and professional knowledge in its responses to questions from the jury.
Done at Paris, on December 28, 2009.
The Minister of national education, the Government's spokesman, for the Minister and by delegation: the Director General human resources, J. Théophile the Minister of budget, public accounts and public service, reform of the State, for the Minister and by delegation: by incapacity of the Director-general of the administration and the public service: the Director, Deputy Director general F. Aladjidi