Read the untranslated law here: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1974/19740646
In accordance with the decision of the Parliament, provides for: the order of the presiding judge of the jurisdiction and the form section 1 (commenced/252), the Labour Court will deal with and solves the erikoistuomioistuimena workers ' collective agreements and agreements, as well as officials of the option in the collective bargaining Act (436/1946), the law on the State civil service agreement (664/1970), municipal civil service agreement (669/1970), the Evangelical Lutheran Church, to the law on the official alternative to the agreements (968/1974), the speaker of the Parliament of the law on civil servants (1197/2003) on behalf of the Bank of Finland from 10 to 13 of the law on civil servants (671/1998) and 12 to 16 on behalf of the President of the Republic of on-site (100/2012) in Chapter 7 and 8 are based on cases the question is: 1) on the validity of the agreement, or the validity of the official criteria, the scope of the agreement, as well as a paragraph of conciliating and correct interpretation;
2 the procedure for collective bargaining, if there is any) from the official alternative to the above mentioned provisions of the agreement, or; or 3) or the official alternative to the above mentioned provisions of the contract or the proceeding sentence, however, is not a penalty or disciplinary sanction.
If the performance of a duty or the application of the collective agreement or the official alternative to the specific circumstances of the dispute, referred to above, depends on the Labour Court cannot at the same time, to hear and determine an action for it. If the Labour Court view that they can solve this kind of demand, there is a party to the show to raise an action before the competent court.
The labour court dealing with the strengthening of the collective bargaining agreement, and the services of the law (56/2001) a complaint referred to in section 9 of the collective bargaining agreement yleissitovuudesta and työneuvostosta and some of the waivers to the law on safety and health at work (400/2004) section 13 of the decision of the appeal referred to in the request for an adjustment by the Works Council. (May 19, 2004/402) 2 section (23.12.1982/1007) the chairmanship of the President of the Labour Court is deemed as being full-time refiners and the 14 members of the Council, as well as acting as the Labour Court. They shall be appointed by the President of the Republic. Members shall be appointed for a term of three years. (29 June 2006/561)
President, Labour Court Counsellor and two members shall be appointed from among persons who cannot be regarded as representing the interests of employers and employees. The appointment of the President of the Council and the Employment Tribunal and the appointment of the Judges Act provides for the eligibility requirements (205/2000). The selection board may, prior to the appointment of a judge at the conclusion of the presentation, ask the opinion of the applicants referred to in paragraph 3, the center of the Ministry of labour market institutions and organisations and Finnish Bank. Two members of the work referred to in this paragraph, if necessary, the Vice-Presidencies. They have to be the judge for the post required graduates and working conditions familiar with. Each Member shall be appointed for the same eligible two alternates. (29 June 2006/561)
Eight of the members must be familiar with the concept of labour relations. One of these members shall be appointed by the most representative organizations, as well as four työnantajayhdistysten four of the workers and the trade unions most representative central organisations of the people. The other four members must be familiar with the concept of official relations. Two of these members shall be appointed in the Ministry of finance, the Department of the municipal labour market, labour market institution of the Evangelical Lutheran Church and the Bank of Finland, as well as two officials of the Bank of Finland, as well as State and municipal and ecclesiastical centre of the most representative trade union organizations, owners of the presentation. Two alternate members shall be appointed for each of the members in the same way. (29 June 2006/561)
The Labor Court's and alternate virassapysymisoikeudesta during the period for which he has been appointed, shall be valid for a period, the permanent judge virassapysymisoikeudesta. (25 February 2000/214) (2) (a) section (8.5.2015/572), the presiding judge of the page for a member or an alternate member, for the duration of the task is to be presented before the appointment, as well as the appointment of the judges of the Labour Court shall section 14 of the law on the meaning of a statement of interests.
2. (a) section (29 June 2006/561) (2) (a) of section L:lla of 29 June 2006/561 is revoked.
section 3 in order to be respected is the umbrella in the presentations referred to in above mentioned twice as many candidates as there are the newly appointed members.
Presentations must be accompanied by a statement that the proposed persons agree to the membership.
If organizations do not, within the period laid down for that purpose make appropriate representations, however, the President of the Republic shall be appointed by the members and their deputies.
Article 4 If a member or alternate member in the middle term is forced to resign or die is in his place for the remainder of the period to appoint a new Member or Deputy member in the order mentioned above.
section 5 (8.5.2015/572) and the President of the Labour Court, the Labour Court is our official and one or more of the Secretary of the civil service.
The eligibility requirement for the Secretary's post is the second paragraph of article 2 of the degree of familiarity with the employment relationship as referred to in sub-section. The Secretary shall be appointed by the presiding judge of the President.
Työtuomioistuinta lead and its effectiveness is responsible to the President. Presiding judge of the Labour Court, the President of administration and Finance include resolves things, which are not provided for or prescribed, among other officials.
section 6 (19 December 2003/1208) presiding judge of the Member and alternate member may be appointed as a twenty years old, a Finnish citizen, who is not a bankrupt and that action has not been limited.
The industrial tribunal within the meaning of article 2 (2) of the Member and his alternate shall be fi: good oral and written communication skills, as well as the Swedish language satisfactory oral and written communication skills.
The industrial tribunal referred to in paragraph 3 of article 2 of the members shall be appointed in such a way that there is enough as well as members of the Finnish language, fluent in the Swedish language, fluent members.
President, Labour Court, a member of the Council and making the Member is obliged to resign when they fill out the 68 years. (29 June 2006/561), paragraph 7, of The who is not a sworn oath, a judge shall before taking up his duties to be done kind of oath, either before the Court or the presiding judge of the General in front of the Director.
section 8 (23.12.1982/1007), the Labour Court has a quorum, unless subject to the 2, which is the President, or as Chairman of the Labour Court Counsellor, the second paragraph of article 2 of the members referred to in paragraph 2 of article 4 (3) of the members referred to in employment relationships and projects are selected, of which two shall be the employer and employee side of the two. The Labour Court as a member of the Council may act for the President in the Chair. In this case, the Labour Court neuvokseen is applied, article 2 (2) of the members referred to in. If necessary, will be Deputy President of the absent or's instead.
In dealing with matters relating to civil servants or public office holders, the Labour Court shall not be valid unless two of article 2 (3) of the members referred to in the official relations between the projects are selected, one of which is the public choice and another official from the side, is the presence of one of the choice of the workers ' side, instead of one member. (the present appellant/252)
Article 1 of the Labour Court shall constitute a quorum for the purposes of paragraph 3, as it is the President of the labour court or the Council as Chairman and two (2) referred to in article 2 of the members, as well as one member of the employers ' and employees ' side. (covering the period/59)
You can carry out an examination of the President and two members, of which the second is private or public, according to the quality of the choice and the employee or officer.
If the importance of the solution, the wide, or any other important reason requires the President of the Labour Court, the leaders of all participating members. Unless otherwise agreed by all the members can take part in the reading, are determined by the criteria laid down in (1) and (2).
The President of the Labour Court is deciding only the preparation and issue of judgment under article 23. The President may order the preparation of the Secretary to the Labor Court, as well as to provide, on behalf of the challenges and calls for a written preparation. (12 November 1993/951)
The Labour Court has a quorum to resolve an argument the judge's disqualification, when it has a President and two members, one of which is the choice of another employee or officer. (1 June 2001/445), section 9 of the Labour Court shall be convened by its Chairman.
The distribution of the number of issues the President in accordance with article 8 of the Labor Court. The President is also confirmed by the Chairmen and the members of the session. More detailed provisions on the criteria for the Division and the members of the session what matters on the determination of the rules of procedure shall be adopted by the Labour Court. (23.12.1982/1007), section 10, if a member is absent from a session or it is found esteelliseksi and making men not available and not työtuomioistuinta things tuomionvoivaksi, is the suspension of the President to be able to be involved in an appropriate, qualified person in his stead.
section 11 (May 23/102)
The Labour Court of the dispute is the official collective bargaining or alternative on the basis of the order to leave the men's Arbitration Act (967/1992), according to the ruling, however, is not, when collective bargaining collective bargaining agreement in the State civil service law or civil service option in the option of the Contracting Party, of the laws of the municipal civil service option, the Evangelical Lutheran Church, the speaker of the Parliament of the law on the official alternative to the agreements of the officials of the law, the officials of the Bank of Finland by the President of the Republic of the Act or under the provisions of the law on the Secretariat has required julistettavaksi to be dissolved.
If the collective bargaining agreement, according to the official, on the condition, or due to riitaisuudesta is the first to be negotiated, not in bringing reconciliation to the dispute gets to the Labor Court to examine, before any negotiation has taken place, except where the circumstances show that the applicant is not to blame for the failure of the negotiations transpired.
Article 12 of the Tribunal on the date of the application notes on matters of collective agreement and the drive to the collective agreement or the employer, the latter Party on its own behalf, on behalf of, who's also the collective bargaining agreement are committed to the collective agreement. These may not be the applicant, unless an agreement to the contrary, that the participant is authorised to do so by the date of the action, or refused to or from driving.
Agreement on the part of the Association of employees to run the action at the Labour Court, in its own name on behalf of their workers and employees, who are not bound by the collective agreement, but, in its contract with the employer shall be required to comply with the provisions of the collective agreement.
The application, which shall be brought before the Labour Court, similar to the other except for the collective bargaining agreement for the application of article 7 of the law of the tarkoittavissa cases, a collective agreement or the employer, the Association and the Party on its own behalf, on behalf of the collective agreement, which are bound by it. The Association, the employer, the employee or the person against whom the application is made to the requirements, there are also be involved in the case to appear before it. The application, which means that the application of article 7, shall be borne by the employer, an employee or a member of staff in person.
matters relating to article 13 of the agreement on the application of the official criteria for the initiation and it takes to run in their own names but on behalf of the official agreement participants also on behalf of those who are civil servants as a result of its condition in the agreement. The official alternative to the contract as a party shall be bound to the plaintiff only if the shows, that the participant is authorised to do so by the date of the action, or refused to or from driving. (the present appellant/252)
The official alternative to the agreement on the participants in proceedings at the Labour Court in his own name, the Association do their officials and, on behalf of the owners, who are not bound by the agreement but with the civil servants, the conditions of employment of the State, a municipality or Federation of municipalities, the Evangelical Lutheran Church, the Congregation, the Church Association or other social kuntain syndrome, or the Bank of Finland does not prescribe or agree to in such a way that they are in conflict with the official criteria. (24.7.1997/722)
An action relating to the official agreement is responsible for the agreement on its own behalf and on behalf of the participants, that it's the official alternative to the agreement are committed to it. It is done in the application requirements, which must be called before the fact. The application, which calls for a penalty for infringement of the provisions of the agreement, or the official condition of collective action or participation in the labour market, other than a municipal body or the Evangelical Lutheran Church delegation would like to state that the Association Agreement on the basis of a decision or measure, the equivalent of the requirements, which will be done in person it. (the present appellant/252)
What in this article osallisesta, shall apply by analogy to article 6 of the agreement of the State civil servants Act, a municipal official agreement article 6 of the Act and of the official Evangelical Lutheran Church, the condition concerning article 6 of the law of the Association as referred to in paragraph 2. (the present appellant/252)
The option of the Contracting Party, of the laws of the municipal civil service option, the Evangelical Lutheran Church, the speaker of the Parliament of the law on the official alternative to the agreements of the officials of the law, the officials of the law on the Bank of Finland or to the President of the Republic concerning the application of the law on the Secretariat has other than a case referred to in paragraph 1, 2 or 3, the fact is the State, the option contract law in article 3 (a) in the cases referred to, however, hospeem or commercial establishment in, a Municipal Department of the labour market, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland, the delegation agreement or the Bank, or When the official agreement is a district, the parish, parish kuntain of the group by a Union or other effects, this, or a representative of the Association of civil servants or public office holders. (May 23/102)
The official agreement of the State of the law within the meaning of article 3 of the questions asking for an official agreement on the issue on behalf of the State shall defend the action brought and without prejudice to paragraph (3) of the State referred to in paragraph 1, the authority shall, under the procedure referred to in paragraph 2 or the Administration negotiating authority. The State initiated the negotiating authority of the State addressed. (contrary to the view/768) section 14 of the President of the Labour Court the power to hear ' is, as well as the right to use the certificate.
Section 14 (a) deliberations of the Labour Court (11.12.1997/1158) Things will be settled on the presentation or at the hearing.
section 15 (12 November 1993/951), the matter will be brought before a Labour Court delivered a written complaint.
Challenge the application shall contain: 1) to the parties and to be invited to give their views, as well as their e-mail address;
2 the applicant's specific requirements and aspects), to which the requirements shall be established;
3. on the basis of the Labour Court has jurisdiction) in fact, if it is not otherwise occur or the attached document; as well as 4), as far as possible, in case people are going to hear the witnesses and what aspects of the witness.
The challenge of the application shall be accompanied by the documents on which the applicant's claims are based.
The agent must provide to the Registrar a declaration signed by the power of Attorney, if required to do so by the Labour Court. (11.12.1997/1158) section 16 (12 November 1993/951) If the application is incomplete, the applicant shall be advised within a time limit to correct the deficiency.
section 17 (12 November 1993/951), the action is a challenge deliver inadmissible if: 1) with the document which instituted the proceedings is not called for by the fixed, and it is still so flawed that it cannot be taken as the basis of the trial; or 2) the Labour Court is not competent to deal with the challenge in the application referred to relevant.
The issue of the examination, the applicant may refer the matter to the Labor Court ruling by giving written notice to the labour court within two weeks of receipt of the decision, the decision should be mentioned.
section 18 (12 November 1993/951) not inadmissible, the labour court summons, and shall ensure that the date on which they were notified.
The summons to the defendant within the time limit to submit a written response to the calls on the Labour Court, which is to occur: 1 the position of the defendant, the plaintiff's demands;)
2) in a proceeding to dictate the course of action, if the grounds; and 3), as far as possible, be consulted which witnesses and what witnesses to prove it.
The reply shall be accompanied by the documents, to which the respondent's position is based on the.
In order to speed up the proceedings the defendant may be asked to provide a written reply to the oral reply at the hearing instead of the preparation, if it can be assumed that an oral answer to the proper preparation of the defendant or to interfere with the transmission.
The challenge shall be notified of the application and also interviewed.
section 19 (12 November 1993/951) after the written reply is submitted to a labour court or when subject to the prescribed period has expired, the matter must be prepared so that the matter can be decided by the end of the process, continuously.
The preparation is, in particular, aim to find out what the requirements and aspects are not without controversy, and what the conditions for reconciliation to be achieved, as well as whether it is uncontested.
under section 20 (12 November 1993/951) will be continued orally at the hearing, unless there are more appropriate to continue to do so in writing, either in whole or in part, or transfer to the pääkäsittelyyn.
The number of oral preparation of the session of the Labour Court, and calls to the parties and to be heard.
section 21 (12 November 1993/951) in the preparation of a party is: 1) state their claims and their criteria;
2) State of what the other party is provided by;
3 the written evidence to be presented); and 4) shall inform the claimant, for which it is intended to have examined the witnesses, and what it is intended to establish a witness kuulustuttamalla.
section 22 (12 November 1993/951), the party's failure to provide a response or requested written statements will not prevent the transmission of the oral preparation or referral to plenary for consideration.
If the applicant is left without giving any legal obstacle to appear at the oral hearing, the preparation of the case is left to the old. If the defendant or to appear before it without giving any legal barrier to get off an oral called the preparation for the session, the preparation of the end of may, despite the supply and transfer pääkäsittelyyn.
section 23 (12 November 1993/951) in the preparation of the oral hearing may be: 1) suspends the proceedings;
2) leave the action inadmissible, when missing one of the condition and the lack of a trial not repairable;
3) to strengthen the reconciliation;
4) resolve the issue to the extent that the application has been granted or the application has been abandoned; and at the end of the statement of the case 5) to provide the costs of the proceedings.
In the preparation of the case can be resolved by the judgment of the hearing when the parties concerned and at the request of and to appear before the so-called quality or other factors require processing in plenary.
The action is inadmissible, may refer the matter to the Labor Court ruling in such a way as to article 17, paragraph 2.
section 24 (12 November 1993/951) depends on the how to determine if the main proceedings related to a full hearing, it can be imposed, while the remainder of the Convention is not yet finished.
If the parties want to get in a fight and a separate judgment, the Labour Court considers it appropriate, bring the dispute to be referred to separately in the part of the claimant to prepare and might.
Article 25 if the defendant wants to make the argument that there is no legally admissible, the opposition must be expressed in the response. If the argument to be made later, it is not admissible, unless it's not a point which must be taken into account, even if the claim can be. (12 November 1993/951)
The question of the absence of the condition can be individually may be referred to the Industrial Tribunal.
section 26, (12 November 1993/951) when the preparation is complete, the case is transferred to the claimant. However, the matter can be referred to the commencement of the hearing to move the Conference not provided if the parties and the opinions indicate that they will not make the case statement or statements.
The parties concerned shall be given an opportunity to rule on the date of the main hearing, if it is haitatta.
The parties to the main proceedings are an invitation to be interviewed and the date of preparation of the session shall be communicated or written invitation.
section 27 (12 November 1993/951) Decided the applicant's claim and the reasons for such decisions. The defendant has dug in his heels, the action presented to the deniability.
A full hearing is oral. The party is not allowed to put things in writing. A party shall not, however, read the requirements document and use a written note in his memory.
Any party may, in a position to justify and as they sat in the opposing arguments, call it the evidence which is presented as the preparation.
section 28 of the main hearing shall take place without delay and without undue delay.
If a full hearing to be postponed, the labour court may be in the same order that it is still to be prepared before it comes to the plenary.
section 29 (12 November 1993/951) If a party or the party's failure to appear before the so-called has been quite legal impediment to the marriage, the case must be postponed. Poisjääneelle shall be informed of the date of the new main hearing.
If the two parties would otherwise fall to appear at pääkäsittelyyn, will remain suspended.
Acting as claimant or as defendant, without legal impediment is iced out quite the opposite side the right to have the matter resolved. If a party does not require a court order, the left suspended. To hear the ' smooth absence does not prevent the proceedings.
section 30 of the labour court may in a dispute to give a separate judgment (osatuomio).
The labour court may also separately to solve a dispute, how to determine the main proceedings related to a-depends on the ().
section 31 (12 November 1993/951) If a party or summoned by the claimant to submit evidence been called will not be notified without delay prior to the preparation of the trial, is to be brought to the attention of the Industrial Tribunal and the other party and, at the same time, you want to show as proof and the reasons that have prevented its disclosure.
Decided by the party or be consulted shall not invoke any fact or evidence, which was not in the preparation or as specified in subparagraph (1) which has not been notified to the party concerned, unless the claimant to be represented or consulted in place on the probability that his procedures is overdue to serious reasons.
32 section (12 November 1993/951) the labour court may be in order to obtain the report to hear the party itself, or any person or a representative of the community concerned, or to the detriment of the Court by or comes into force.
32 (a) of section (the present appellant/252) if the action is based on a collective agreement, or where the agreement of the parties, in addition to the other involved parties other than by an agreement or binding, the labour court may, at the request of any party, or on its own initiative, to book an agreement osalliselle, which is not a party to the case, the opportunity to make their statement. The same thing can be done, if there would be any other than the collective bargaining agreement, or where the application is based.
33 section (12 November 1993/951), the Labor Court in order to obtain an expert report on a person or kutsumalle shall be paid a premium of State resources. At the end of the case, the Labour Court shall deliver an opinion as to who it needs to be replaced or whether it's to the detriment of the State.
33 (a) section (12 November 1993/951), the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs of the opposing party in whole or in part. When the ambiguity of the matter in the event of justified doubts, the parties had in the proceedings, it may be provided that, they get to keep the costs vahinkonaan.
To hear invited, which condemns the credit memo to a fine or obliged to carry out the monetary compensation or other performance, the party may be ordered to pay the costs of the other party in whole or in part. The party, which such a claim is rejected by the kuultavaan, may be ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings be heard accordingly.
34 section (12 November 1993/951), the judgment will be taken into account only that the material that is presented or introduced in plenary. If the case shall be determined without a trial, the judgment will take into account all what the writ of summons, in the reply and the case otherwise.
The ruling will be a brief statement of the reasons for the dispute, the solution itself, the law and the collective bargaining agreement and the official alternative to the motion for a resolution, which shows the outcome of the case, which has been arrived at. The judgment shall state the names of the members who participated in the settlement of indicating whether or not the verdict of the vote. (the present appellant/252), section 34 (a) (12 November 1993/951) after the main hearing, the Labour Court can be considered a separate negotiating session, where a decision is taken on the matter. The negotiating session is to be considered as soon as possible after the conclusion of the main hearing.
Unless the judgment is declared, it shall be transmitted to the parties without delay. The Court shall be deemed to have been adopted to date by itself in time.
section 35 of the judgment of the calculation error, typographical error or any other kind of obvious inaccuracy is the President to be adjusted as well. Such an adjustment, which the President has, in writing, to the parties and invitation to be interviewed, is, if a party or to appear before it within two weeks of receipt of the correction data called the request shall be submitted to the presiding judge for review and decision.
Article 36 the Labor Court ruling is final and it can be immediately implemented in the same order as the final judgment of the General Court of Justice.
section 37 of the extraordinary appeals, chapter 31 of the code of judicial procedure, where applicable, are complied with in respect of the points in dispute, however, that the provisions concerning a complaint shall be made to the Supreme Court.
Article 37 (a) (covering the period/59) in dealing with those referred to in the third paragraph of article 1 of the compliance with the Administrative Appeals Act (586/1996), the notice of appeal, the appeal proceedings and settlement, as well as the costs of the proceedings.
38 section (12 November 1993/951) where in the law does not provide otherwise, the cases, mutatis mutandis, to what the proceedings in civil cases.
Miscellaneous provisions (covering the period/59) section 39 (the present appellant/252) in the present case, the proceedings before the Court, that requires specific collective bargaining agreement in the conditions of the knowledge-or condition, the Court may, when it is deemed necessary or required by the party concerned, shall request the opinion of the työtuomioistuimelta in this regard.
If the request for an opinion regarding a specific condition in the agreement, the right to collective bargaining or the contents of the official or the application of the right of an individual or the provision of interpretation of the agreement concerned, shall be given an opportunity to be heard. To this end, the Labour Court calls on those involved in giving its opinion within the time limit. If you are involved in this case, will take place at the discretion of the presiding judge of the case and a full hearing.
40 section (17 November 2000/959), presiding judge of the Labour Court on the advice of the President, members, alternate members and the Secretary of the civil servants accused of a criminal offence before the Court of appeal of Helsinki.
41 section (12 November 1993/951) on the preparation of the oral question and quite shall be drawn up in the minutes, which shall be entered in the requirements of the parties and the hearings ' copyrights, disclaimers, and claims, in so far as they do not appear in the documents. In the preparation of the record of the hearing and the claimant of the decisions taken. The decision, in which the case is inadmissible, however, there need to be a separate document.
In the preparation of the minutes of the oral hearing is also in the points, which the Parties shall establish a claim, only half of the statements, and the reported evidence.
Claimant for the purposes of evidence of a witness, expert, and a listening party questioning the amount of time you or any other person.
The negotiating session is to draw up a protocol to the Labor Court necessary for watching it.
Article 42 (12 November 1993/961) each of the documents is done in a separate file.
section 43 (12 November 1993/951) documents to be submitted before a labour court can be sent by post or by courier the letter of the sending of the document, where applicable, in accordance with the courts of some of the provisions of the Act (248/65).
44 section (12 November 1993/951), the notification shall apply mutatis mutandis, what chapter 11 of the code of judicial procedure.
An invitation or other service can be delivered in other ways, if a party to it.
45 section (26.7.1993/706) specifically provided for in the labour court charges.
There is no charge for delivery to the parties concerned, and not for consultation fees from them for the Protocol statements.
section 46 State and municipal as well as the rest of the body at the request of the community, the authorities have obliged to provide information and other assistance of the Labour Court.
More detailed provisions on the implementation of this law, article 47 and, if necessary, shall be adopted for the application of the regulation.
The organisation of the work of the Labour Court by the presiding judge in the rules of procedure. Established by the Labour Court, the President, after consultation with all staff groups. (8.5.2015/572) article 48 of this law shall enter into force on 1 October 1974. It repeals the Labor Court of the law of 7 June 1946 (437/46), as amended subsequently.
At the time of entry into force of this law the President of the Office of the presiding judge of the moves for the remainder of the presiding judge of the President. Presiding judge of the people are members and alternates shall remain in Office to the end of their term of Office. The appointment of the President, the members and alternate members of the first term after the entry into force of this law may be the length of the term of order 2 by way of derogation from articles, but not for an extended period of one month to three years.
The Labour Court in a case that has already been initiated before the entry into force of this law, the trial is to be determined by the provisions of the earlier law.
The change of the date of entry into force and the application of the acts: 23.2.1979/244: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 1980.
23.12.1982/1007: this law shall enter into force on 1 March 1983.
Before the entry into force of the law can be used to take measures for its implementation. The appointment of the Labour Court, the Member or substitute member of the first term, which will begin after the entry into force of this law, the term of Office may be provided by way of derogation from article 2, from less than two years, is not, however, and four years for an extended period.
In dealing with the Labour Court is one in which a full hearing has commenced before the entry into force of this law shall be subject to the previous law.
THEY are 195/82, lvk. Mrs. 8/82, svk. Mrs. contrary to the view of 172/82/768: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 1988.
THEY 239/84, the second lvk. Mrs. 3/86, svk. Mrs. 50/86 18.11.1988/955: this law shall enter into force on 15 December 1988.
THEY'RE 87/88, another lvk. Mrs. 9/88, svk. Mrs. 107/88 26.3.1993/285: this law shall enter into force on 1 April 1993.
THEY 362/92, 26.7.1993 HaVM 2/93/706: this law shall enter into force on 1 September 1993.
THEY 241/92, 12 November 1993, 25/93/951 Staub: this law shall enter into force on 1 December 1993.
THEY'RE 190/93, LaVM 14/93, the present appellant/252: this law shall enter into force on April 15, 1994.
THEY LaVM 3/5/94, 94 24.7.1997/722: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 1998.
THEY'RE 261/1996, TaVM 17/1997, EV 99/1997 11.12.1997/1158: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 1998.
THEY'RE 130/1997, LaVM 14/1997, 30 December 1998, 189/1997/604 EV: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 1999.
THEY 244/1998, HaVM 20/1998, EV 238/1998, as of 1 April 1999/457: this law shall enter into force on 1 December 1999.
THEY 146/1998, LaVM 20/1998, EV 234/1998, 25 February 2000/214: this law shall enter into force on 1 March 2000.
THEY'RE 13/109/1999, PeVL 1999 LaVM 1/2000 of 17 November 2000, EV 21/2000/959: this law shall enter into force on 1 December 2000.
THEY'RE 57/2000, LaVM 7/2000, covering the period from 101/2000/59 EV: this law shall enter into force on 1 June 2001.
THEY'RE 157/2000, TyVM 13/2000 1 June 2001/445/2000 EV 215: this law shall enter into force on 1 September 2001.
THEY are 78/2000, LaVM 6/2001, EV 33/2001 of 19 December 2003/1199: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 2004.
LA 92/2003, HaVM 11/2003, 19 December 2003 42/2003/EK 1208: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 2004.
Before the entry into force of this law for the presiding judge to become a member and an alternate member appointed in respect of language skills is eligible for assignment to the end of the period.
THEY'RE 103/2003 LaVM 3/2003, EV 81/2003 19 May 2004/402: this law shall enter into force on 1 June 2004.
THEY'RE 142/2003, (EC) No 1/2004, TyVM EV 35/2004 of 29 June 2006/561: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 2007.
Before the entry into force of the law can be used to take the measures needed to implement the law.
THEY LaVM 8/29/2006, 2006, EV 76/2006, May 23/102: this law shall enter into force on 1 March 2012.
THEY 91/1/2011, 2011, HaVM PeVL, EV 2/23/2011 2012 8.5.2015/572: this law shall enter into force on 1 October 2015.
Presiding judge of the part-time member and alternate member shall be obliged to notify the sidonnaisuutensa, when he for the first time after the entry into force of this Act shall be appointed in the performance of their tasks.
THEY LaVM 28/224/2014, 2014, EV 328/2014
Search Translated Laws of Finland