Key Benefits:
| Appendix 1 | |
| Appendix 2 |
Publication of the promotion of doping-free sport
In accordance with section 1, section 8 (8), Paragraph 1, paragraph 9, paragraph 9. 3, section 9 (b) (b). 4, in the area of the promotion of doping-free sport, cf. Law Order no. 1309 of 19. November 2013 :
Definition of doping
§ 1. As doping in the promotion of doping-free sport and in this notice, the substances and methods listed in Annex 1 (translation of the World Anti-Doping Agency) shall be deemed to be doping-2013).
Paragraph 2. For parties which have entered into the Anti-Doping Denmark Anti-Doping Denmark in accordance with section 9 of the Act on Promote PE, prohibited substances and methods are restricted to substances and methods subject to the prohibition of certain doping agents ; It's like cloaking drugs for anabolic steroids.
Stable conditions for sports organisations and associations.
§ 2. It is a prerequisite for the granting of grants under the law on the encoding of profits from lottery and horses and dog wagers to Team Denmark and to the three main organisations in the field of sport, Denmark's Sport League, DGI and Dansk Firm Ori, the organisations are introducing and enforcing rules on doping control and penalties, in accordance with the rules laid down in Annex 2 (translation of the World Anti-Doping Code), except for section 4 below. In the field of exercise, rules may be introduced which deviate from Annex 2, Team Denmark and the three sporting organisations to make it a condition for the grant of grants to sports associations or associations and so on and to individual sportsmen and to individual sportsmen and women ; comply with the said rules of doping.
Paragraph 2. It is a prerequisite for the granting of grants under the law of support for popular information for public education, voluntary public information, and so on. (The public information bill) to the in section 8 of the Act on the promotion of doping-free sport mentioned sports organisations and associations and other associations in which a sporting activity is carried out for the practising, that the association / organisation complies with the rules referred to in paragraph 1. Paragraph 1 referred to the rules on doping control and sanctions. This provision shall apply by analogy to the instructions of the premises and the outdoor system, in accordance with the public information law.
Paragraph 3. Financial subsidy granted under the law on the encoding of profits from lottery and horses and dog wagers to Team Denmark, Denmark's Sport League, DGI and Danish Firm Killer Federation, or granted under the public information law to the in section 8 of the Act of Law, the promotion of doping-free sport mentioned sports organisations and associations and other associations in which a sporting activity is carried out for the practicae, may be reduced or lost in the event of a breach of the rules referred to in paragraph 1. Paragraph 1 referred to the rules on doping control and sanctions. Disposal or reduction shall be balanced against the scope and nature of the rules in question.
Anti Doping Denmark's cooperation agreements with other sports environments
§ 3. After paragraph 9 (4), 1, in the promotion of doping-free sport, Anti Doping Denmark shall seek to conclude cooperation agreements with the workings of the workings and other private or public institutions, undertakings, etc., which offer sporting activities or related activities ; activities, together with associations and associations of sportsmen and sportsmen, without association with the sporting organisations referred to in Article 2. Under the rule of law, Anti Doping Denmark may charge fees for benefits under the cooperation agreements.
Paragraph 2. In the cooperation agreements, doping must be defined in accordance with section 1. The rules on doping control and penalties provided for in the Cooperation Agreements shall be in accordance with Annex 2, except for the provision on the analysis of testing, which is regulated in section 4.
Paragraph 3. The cooperation agreements shall lay down detailed rules for the implementation of the doping controls and that the institution, the establishment or the association, etc., must make its customers, members, etc., aware of the consequences of the conclusion of the conclusion of the contract ; The cooperation agreement.
Paragraph 4. It is a condition of the validity of cooperation agreements that they have been approved by the Minister for Culture.
Analysis of the doping test carried out in the breadth and maturification
§ 4. Dopingtests carried out in the breadth and exercise of the exercise must be analysed at a WADA accredited laboratory or in a laboratory which the Anti Doping Denmark assesses corresponding requirements for quality, safety and anonymity.
Appal of anti-doping operations in the width and exercise
§ 5. Decisions on the imposition of doping operations in the width and exercise sizette in accordance with section 2 (2). 1, and section 3 may be brought to a committee of doping, set up by the body of sport and Danish Fitness and the Helse Organization. In the conclusion of a cooperation agreement in accordance with section 3, the Agreement may be dispensed with from that provision.
Register of doping anciles
§ 6. Anti-Doping Denmark shall establish and update an electronic register on an ongoing basis that contains information about the applicable doping operations.
Paragraph 2. The register contains information on the name, cpr number, and the data on the sentenced penalty, including the duration of the penalty, the expiry date, and the reason for the imposition of the sentence. The cpr number information must be encrypted and must be included in the register only in order to ensure unique identification of the person who is being searched for information. Information on the cpr number shall not be made public.
Paragraph 3. The register must be electronically accessible via the Internet for the section 9 (b) (b). This is why, in the promotion of doping-free sport, sports organisations and associations, together with other parties, have concluded a cooperation agreement with anti-Doping Denmark on the fight against doping. The register shall make it possible for the entry of a social security number to be informed of whether or not the person concerned has been given a doping operation and, if so, the duration of the sanction. Information on the basis for doping is not available through electronic searches. The Register's response must reflect whether the sanction is in a non-profit and fitness centre, cf. Section 1 (1). 2, or in the association or other sporting environments, cf. Section 1 (1). 1, including whether this is a suspension period prior to the latter, the case of a doping case.
Paragraph 4. Information concerning doping actions and their duration of specific persons shall not be available to the persons referred to in paragraph 1. 3 mentioned parties after the expiry of the penalty.
Paragraph 5. Anti-Doping Denmark establishes standard conditions for use and handling of information, including the terms and conditions that the information may only be passed on to a limited person within the limits of the persons referred to in paragraph 1. 3 the sporting organisations and associations and other parties concerned with a cooperation agreement with anti-Doping Denmark on the fight against doping.
Paragraph 6. Parties acting in accordance with the rules laid down in Annex 2 (World Anti-Doping Code) to be notified in accordance with the rules laid down in Annex 2 (World Anti-Doping Code) shall be required to report information on new doping operations, including the measures referred to in paragraph 1. 2 mentioned information to Anti-Doping Denmark. The report must take place at the same time as the assessment carried out by the penalty.
Entry into force
§ 7. The announcement shall enter into force on 1. January 2015.
Paragraph 2. Publication no. 1405 by 10. In December 2013, the promotion of doping-free sport is lifted at the same time.
Cultural Ministry, the 15th. December 2014
Marianne Jelby
-Bente Skovgaard Kristensen
Appendix 1
2015 Dopinglist
International Codex for Anti-Doping
In accordance with Article 4.2.2 of the International Code for Anti-doping, all banned substances shall be considered ' Specified substances `, except for substances in the doping groups S1, S2, S2, S4. FOUR, FOUR. FIVE, SIX. a and Forbudte methods M1, M2 and M3.
|
FORBIDDEN SUBSTANCES
S0. NOT AUTHORIZED DRUGS.
Any pharmacological agent not mentioned in any of the following groups on the Dopinglist and which have not been approved by any medicinal products for humane use (e.g. medicine during clinical or clinical trials, or stopped. Attempting, designing substances, substances only approved for veterinary use) are always prohibited.
S1. ANABOLE DRUGS.
Anabolics are forbidden.
1. Anabole androgenic steroids (AAS)
a. exogenous * AAS comprises :
1 androstenediol (5:30 -androst-1-ene-3ust, 17be-diol), 1-androstenedion (53.1 -androst-1-ene-3,17-dion), Bolandiol (estr-4-ene-3strate, 17be-diol), Bolasterone, boldenon, boldion. , (androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dion), Calusterone, clostebol, danazole. ([ 1, 2 ] oxazolo [ 4 ', 5' : 2, 3 ] pregna-4-en-20-yn-17yl -ol), dehydrochloromethyl testosterone, (4-chloro-17xo-17methyl-hydroxy-17yl -methylandrosta-1,4-dien-3-one) , desoxymethyltestosterone (17-methyl-methyl-5α-androst 2-en-17be-ol) , drostanolon, ethyl harveol. (19-norpremun-4-en-17-1-ol) , formebolon, furazabol. (170-methyl [ 1,2, 5 ] oxadiazolo [ 3 ', 4' : 2, 3 ] -5L -androstan-17yl -ol) , gestrinon, 4-hydroxytestosterone (4,17:30 -dihydroxyandrost 4-en-3-one) , mestanolone, masterolon, metenolone, methandienon (17be-hydroxy-17yl -methylandrosta-1,4-dien-3-one) , methandriol, methasterone (17-sector -hydroxy-217-dimethyl-5L -androstan-3-one) , methyl dienolone (17:30 -hydroxy-17yl -methylestra-4,9-dien-3-one) , methyl-1-testosterone (17x-hydroxy-17yl -methyl-5α-androst1-en-3-one) , methylnortestosterone (17:30 -hydroxy-17yl -methylestr-4-en-3-one) , methyl testosterone, metric bolon (methyltrienolone, 17,5 -hydroxy-17,5 -methylestra-4,9,11-trien-3-one) , miboleron, nandrolon, 19-norandrostenedion (estr-4-ene-3,17-dion) , Norboleton, norclostebol, norethandrolon, oxabolone, oxandrolone, oxymasteron, oxymetholone, prostanozole. (17-Di-[ (tetrahydropyran-2-yl) oxy ] -1 ' H-arzolo [ 3,4:2, 3 ] -5androstan) , quinbolon, stanozolol, stonbolon, 1 testosterone. (17be-hydroxy-5α-androst1-en-3-one), tetrahydrogestrinon (17-hydroxy-18a-homo-19-nor-17,5 -pregna-4,9,11-trien-3-one), trenbolon (17xe -hydroxyestr-4,9,11-trien-3-one) , and other substances with similar chemical structure or similar biological effects.
b. endogenous * *AAS when it has been added from the outside :
androstenediol (androst5-ene-3ust, 17be-diol) ; androstenedion (androthe4-ene-3,17-dion) ; Dihydrotestosterone (17:30 -hydroxy-5L -androstan-3-one) ; Prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA, 3ses -hydroxyandrost5-en-17-ene) ; testosterone and the following metabolites and isomers-include but not limited to :
518 -androstan-35.5, 17,-diol; 518 -androstan-35.5, 17:30 -diol; 517.-androstan-3β, 17,-diol; 517.-androstan-3β, 17:30 -diol; 5:30 -androstan-35.5, 17:30 -diol; androst4-ene-35-6, 17,-diol; androst4-ene-35-5, 17:30 -diol; androst4-ene-3β, 17,-diol; androst-5-ene-3de-317-diol; androst-5-ene-35-ene-35-5, 17-be-diol; androst5-ene-3ust, 17,-diol; 4 androstenediol (androthe4-ene-3ust, 17be-diol) ; 5-androstenedion (androst5-ene-3,17-dione) ; androsterone (3ses -hydroxy-5α-androstan-17-;) ; epi dihydrotestosteron; epitestosterone ; Ethiocholanolone ; 7hydr-hydroxy-DHEA ; 7x-hydroxy-DHEA ; 7-keto-DHEA ; 19-norandrosteron; 19-noretiocholanolone.
2. Other anabolics
Inclusive but not limited to :
Clenbuterol, selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs, e.g. andarin and ostarin), tibolon, zeranol, zilpaterol.
|
S2. PEPTIDE HORMONES, GROWTH FACTORS, RELATED SUBSTANCES AND MIMETICS.
The following substances and other substances with similar chemical structure or similar biological effects (s) are prohibited :
1. Erythropoietin-receptor agonists :
1.1 Erytropoiese-stimulating substances (ESAs) include, for example, Darbepoietin (dEPO) ; erythropoietiner (EPO) ; EPO-Fc; EPO-mimetic peptides (EMP) , e.g. CNTO 530 and peginal time ; and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoietin beta (CERA) ;
1.2 Non-erytropoiesis EPO receptor agonists, e.g. ARA-290, Asialo EPO and carbamylled EPO ;
2. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HF) stabilisers, e.g. cobalt and FG-4592 ; and HIF activators, e.g. argon, xenon ;
3. Choriongonadotropiner (CG) and Luteiniscing Hormon (LH) and their 'business factors', for example. bus erelin, gonadorelin and Triptorelin, for men ;
4. Corticotropiner and their 'other' factors ', for example. corticorelin ;
5. Growth hormone (GH) and its ' s 'are the' factors ', including growth hormone-release hormone (GHRH) and its analogues, e.g. CJC-1295, sermorelin and tetecelin ; growth hormone-tagogueas, (GHS), e.g. ghrelin and ghrelin mimetics, e.g. anamorelin and ipamorelin ; and growth hormone-bearing peptides (GHRPs), e.g. alexamorelin, GHRP-6, hexarelin and pralmorelin (GHRP-2).
In addition, the following growth factors are prohibited :
Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) ; hepatocyt growth factor (HGF) ; insulin-similar growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and its analogues ; mechanical growth factors, (MGFs) ; Pla-deriving growth factor (PDGF) ; vascular endotel growth factor (VEGF) and any other growth factor affecting the muscle, late or cassest protein synthesis / degradation, vascularization, energy consumption, regenerative capacity or fibertype shift,
S3. BETA-2-AGONISTS.
All beta-2-agonists , including all optical isomers, , for example. d- and I- where they are relevant are prohibited.
Except :
● Inhaled salbutamol (maximum administered dose 1600 micrograms of more than 24 hours) ;
● Inhaled presutherol (maximum administered dose 54 micrograms of more than 24 hours) ; and
● Inhaled salmeterol in accordance with the manufacturer ' s recommended therapeutic doses.
The presence in the urine of salbutamol > 1000 ng/ml or presuterol > 40 ng/ml is presumed not to be a intended therapeutic use of the preparation and will be considered an illegal analytical find, unless the sportsmen can prove-through one. controlled pharmaco-kinetic study / study-that the abnormal find was a consequence of an inhaled therapeutic dose up to the maximum permitted as indicated in the above.
S4. HORMONELLE AND METABOLIC MODULATORS.
The following hormones, and metabolic modulators, shall be prohibited :
|
5.1 Enable vators of AMP enabled protein kinase (AMPK), for example, AICAR ; and Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor. (PPARING) agonists, e.g. GW 1516 ;
5.2 Insulines ;
5.3 Trimetazidin.
S5. DIURETICS AND CLOAKING DRUGS.
The following diuretics and cloaking agents, prohibited, as well as other substances having the same chemical structure or the same biological effect (s).
They include, but are not limited to :
Desmopressin, probenecid, plasma cubic ders, e.g. Glycerol and intravenous administration of : albumin, dextran, hydroxyethylsstarch and Mannitol.
Acetazolamide, amilorid, bumetanid, canrenon, chlortalidon, etacrync acid, furosemide, indapamid, metholazon, spironolacton, thiazides, e.g. bendroflumethiazid, Chlorothiazid and hydrochlorothiazid ; the triamther and vaptaner, e.g. Tolvaptane.
Except :
● Drosperinon, pamabrom, and topian dorzolamide and brinzolamide.
● Local administration of the field agent with the anaesthesia in the dentist.
Tracing in and outside of the competition of a substance that is listed with the limit values of the doping list, i.e. presumaol, salbutamol, cathin, efedrine, methilefatdrine and pseudoefedrin at the same time as a diuretic or cloaking substance, requires a derogation from the doping list (TUE) for this substance, in addition to the derogation (TUE) provided for diuretics or cloaking matter.
FORBIDDEN METHODS
M1. MANIPULATION OF BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENTS.
The following shall be prohibited :
|
M2. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL MANIPULATION.
The following shall be prohibited :
|
M3. GENDOPING.
The following-with the potential to increase the performance of the performance is prohibited :
|
|
In addition to the categories S0 to S5 and M1 to M3 defined above, the following categories shall be prohibited in competition.
FORBIDDEN SUBSTANCES
S6. STIMULATING DRUGS.
All stimulating substances, including all optical isomers, , for example. d- and I- where it is appropriate to be prohibited.
Stimulating substances includes :
a : not specified stimulating substances :
Adrafinil ; amphehages ; amphetamines ; amphetamine-il ; Amifenazole ; bone fluorex ; Benzylpiperazine ; bromantan ; clobenzorex ; cropropamide ; crotetamide ; Fencamin ; fenetyllin ; Fenfluramin ; phenproporex ; phoneturacetam [ 4-phenylpiracial tam (carphedon) ] ; furranenorex ; cocaine ; mefenorex ; mefentermin ; mesocarb ; methamphetamine (d-) ; p-methylamfetamin; modafinil ; Norfenfluramin ; phendimetrazine ; phentermin ; prenylamine and Protantan.
A stimulating substance that is not specifically listed in the abovementioned section is a specified substance.
b : specific stimulating substances.
Inclusive but not limited to :
Benzhetamine, cathin * *, cathinon and its analogues, e.g. mephedron, methedron and pyro-pyrrolidinovalerophenon; Dimethylamhetamine ; epdrine * ** ; epinefrin * *** (adrenaline) ; stage mivan ; Ethilamamphetamine ; Ethilefrin ; famprophazon ; phenbutrazat ; phencamfamine ; heptaminol ; hydroxyamphetamines (parahydroxyamphetamine) ; isomethepten ; levine of methamphetamine ; meclophenoxate ; methylenedioxymethamphetamine ; methylefatdrin*** ; Methyl hexanamin (dimethyl pentylamin) ; Methyl phenidat ; Nikethamide ; norfenefrin ; octopamin ; oxilofrin (methylsynefrin) ; pemolin ; pentetrazole ; phenethylamine and its derivatives ; phenometrazine, phenpromethamin, propylhexedrine ; pseudoephedrin***** ; selegilin ; sibusimine ; strychnine ; Tenamphetamine (methylenedioxyamphetamine) ; tuaminoheptan ; and other substances with similar chemical structure or similar biological effects (s).
Except :
Imidazole derivatives for topian or oftalmological use and the stimulating substances included in the 2015 Monitoring Program *.
* Bupropion, caffeine, nicotine, phenylefrin, phenylpropanolamine, pipradol and synephrine : these substances are included in the 2015 Monitoring Program and are not considered to be prohibited substances.
** Cathin : Forbidden if the concentration in the urine is larger than 5 micrograms per gram. milliliters.
*** Efedrine and methyl feudine : Forbidden when the concentration of one is greater than 10
a microgram per gram. milliliters.
**** Epinephin (epinephrine) : Not prohibited by local use, such as nasal, oftalmological, or co-administration with local anaesthetic substances.
***** Pseudoephedrine : Forbidden when concentration in the urine is greater than 150 micrograms per gram. milliliters.
S7. NARCOTICS.
Forbidden :
Buprenorphine, dextromoramid, diamorphine (heroin), fentanyl and its derivatives, hydromorphon, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphon, pentazocin, pethidin.
S8. CANNABINOIDS.
Forbidden :
● Natural e.g. cannabis, hash and marijuana or Synthetic Δ9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
● Cannabis mimetics , for example. "Spice", JWH018, JWH073, HU-210 ).
S9. GLUCOCONTICOIDS.
All glucoorticoids are prohibited if they are taken oral, intravenous, intramuscularity and rectal.
|
P1. ALCOHOL.
Alcohol ( ethanol () shall be prohibited only in the event of competition in the following sports sectors. Demonstration will be made by the use of the blood of the alcohol and / or blood. The limit of the limitation corresponds to a concentration of alcohol in the blood of 0,10 g/l.
Automobile Port (FIAs)
archery (WA)
Motorsport (FIM)
Powerboating (UIM)
Air port-in Denmark, the parachute, the hanggliding, paragliding and glider (FAI) flight
P2. BETA-BLOCKERS.
Beta-blockers is prohibited in competition, in the following sports sectors, but also prohibited ; outside competition if it is indicated :
● Automobile Port (FIAs)
● Billiards (All disciplines) (WCBS)
● archery (WA) *
● Dart (WDF)
● Golf (IGF)
● Ski / Snowboarding (FIS) in ski-hop, free-style aerials / halfpipe and snowboard halfpipe / big air
● Shooting (ISSF, IPC) *
● Water (CMAS) in free-tuning with constant-weight and unfine-tuning, dynamic free-tuning with and without fins, free immersion diving, Jump Blue diving, underwater hunting, static diving, target offset, and variable weight diving.
*Also prohibited outside of competition,
Beta-blockers include, but are not limited to :
Acebutolol, alprenolol, atenolol, atenolol, betaxolol, bisoprolol, carteolol, carteolol, celiprol, celiprol, celiprol, celiprol, celiprol, celiprol, celiprol, lapriol, levobunolol, metipranolol, metoplol, metoprolol, metoplol, nadolol, dolol, metoprolol, nadolol, odolol, odolol, odolol, odolol, odolol, and Timolol.
Appendix 2
International Code of AnoldDoping
SHARE ONE
DOPTING CONTROL
INTRODUCTION
Part 1 in Codex it contains specific anti-doping rules and principles to be respected by organisations responsible for adoption, implementation or enforcement of anti-doping rules within their powers, such as the International Olympic Committee, International Paralympic Committee, International Federation of Confederation, national Olympic and paralytic committees, organisations of major sporting events ; and national antimeingorganizations. All such organisations are combined together antidingorganizations .
All Codex provisions are, in reality, mandatory and must be complied with by each antidingorganization and PE-christs or other Person. Codex does not, however, replace or eliminate the need for large-scale anti-timing rules to be adopted by each individual antidingorganization While some provisions are in Codex must be incorporated without any significant change in any individual, antidingorganization the rules of the time, laying down other provisions in the Codex the compulsory guidelines enabling the flexibility of each individual ; antidingorganization the formulation of rules or sets out requirements to be complied with by each individual ; antidingorganization , but which do not necessarily have to be repeated in the individual organizations ' own time-landing rules.
[ Comment : The articles of the code that are to be incorporated into each of the rules of each antimey organisation without any significant change is given in Article 23.2.2. For example, it is essential for the harmonization that all signatories to base their decisions on the same list of infringements of the rules of application, the same burden of proof, and impose the same consequences for the same infringements ; of the time opingers. These rules must be the same, regardless of whether there is a hearing at an international association, at national level or at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
The code of code, which is not provided for in Article 23.2.2, is nevertheless compulsory in reality, although an anti-doping organisation is not obliged to incorporate them verbatim. These provisions generally fall within two categories. First of all, some provisions are required to take certain steps to take certain steps, but it is not necessary to repeat the provisions of the anti-doping organisation's own antime-optic rules. For example, each organisation of the anti-doping organisation shall plan and carry out sampling in accordance with Article 5, but it is not necessary to repeat these Directives to the antidying organisation of the organisation ' s own rules. Secondly, some provisions are mandatory in reality, but give individual anaty organisations a certain degree of flexibility in implementing the principles set out in the provision, for example, no one necessary for a effective harmonisation to force all signatories to apply a single procedure to : resulted in handling and the conduct of hearings. At the moment, there are many different, but equally effective, procedures to result in handling and implementing consultations within various international associations and different national bodies. The code does not require complete uniformity in the handling of results and in consultation procedures, but it does require that the different approaches of the signatories comply with the principles set out in the Code. ]
Like the rules of competition, anti-doping rules are the rules of sport, which lay down the conditions for the exercise of sport. Ikiltsudeavers or others people accept these rules as a condition of participation and are bound by these rules. Every single signatories, establish rules and procedures in order to ensure that all, sportsmen and women or others people under it signatories of the party ; the authority of the Member States and its members shall be informed and agreed to be bound by the applicable anti-tidal provisions from the relevant provisions ; antidingorganizations .
Every single signatories, establish rules and procedures to ensure that all, sportsmen and women or others people under it signatories of the party ; and the authority of its member organisations accept the disclosure of their private data as required or permitted in Codex and are bound by and conforms Codex the timing of the rules and the relevant provisions ; consequences be imposed on sportsmen and women or others people that do not comply with such rules. These sports-specific rules and procedures aimed at enforcing the anti-doping rules in a global and harmonised way are different from the procedures of criminal and civil matters. They do not intend to be subject or restricted by any national requirements and legal standards applicable to such cases, although they are intended to be in force in a manner which respects the principles of proportionality and Human rights. In the case of facts and legislation in a given case, all tribunals, arbitral panels and other judgmental bodies must be aware and respect the specific nature of the time-making arrangements in : Codex and the fact that these rules represent a consensus amongst a broad spectrum of stakeholders all over the world, who want a fair sport.
ARTICLE 1 DEFINITION OF DOPING
Doping is defined as the occurrence of one or more infringements of the time-breaking rules referred to in Article 2.1-2.10 of Codex.
ARTICLE 2 INFRINGEMENTS OF THE TIME OPTING OF THE TIME RULES
The purpose of Article 2 is to specify the circumstances and the behaviour that constitutes infringements of the time rules for the anti-doping purposes. In the case of doping cases, taking place on the basis of the assumption that one or more of these specific rules have been infringed.
Ikiltsudeavers or others people is responsible for knowing what constitutes a violation of the time rules and to know the substances and methods that have been taken into account ; The Dopinglist.
The following constitutes a violation of the time-breaking rules :
2.1 Presence of one prohibited substance, or its metabolites, or Mardriver in a test from one PE-christs.
2.1.1 This is The athlete's vertigo its own responsibility to ensure that nothing ; prohibited substance, come into his or her body. Ikiltsudeavers are responsible for any form of : prohibited substance, or its metabolites, or Mardriver , found in their samples It is therefore not necessary to detect, guilt, negligence or know-how, use, from The athlete's vertigo page before an infringement of the time oping-up rules can be detected in accordance with Article 2.1.
[ Comment on Article 2.1.1 : An infringement of the anti-doping rules shall be in accordance with this Article without regard to the fault of the sportsmen and the sportsmen. This rule has been referred to in various CAS decisions as 'objective responsibility'. The guilt of an athlete must be taken into account in the decision on the consequences of the infringement of the rules on the anti-doping period under Article 10. This principle is consistent in the maintenance of the CAS ].
2.1.2 Sufficient evidence of a violation of an anti-doping rule pursuant to Article 2.1 is recorded by one or more of the following : presence of a prohibited substance, or its metabolites, or Mardriver in the A-the A-of-the-name test where : The athlete's athlete waiving the analysis of B, the test, And B- the test, are not analysed ; or where The athlete's vertigo B- test analyze, and the analysis of : The athlete's vertigo B- test Confirming the presence of prohibited substance, or its metabolites, or Mardriver that has been established in : The athlete's vertigo A- test ; or where The athlete's vertigo B-sample is shared in two bottles and the analysis of the second bottle confirm the presence of it ; prohibited substance, or its metabolites, or Mardriver found in the first bottle, .
[ Comments to Article 2.1.2 : Anitent organisation with responsibility for resulted in handling selections may be analysed by choice of the B sample even though the PE does not request the B test to be analysed ].
2.1.3 With the exception of those substances for which : Dopinglist specifically indicates a quantitative limit, the presence of any quantity ; prohibited substance, or its metabolites, or Mardriver in a PE-sumatte test a violation of the time-breaking rules.
2.1.4 As an exception to the general rule of Article 2.1, Dopinglist or international standards, establish special criteria for the evaluation of one, prohibited substance, that can also be produced endogenous.
2.2 It's an athlete's. use, or attempt to use by a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method
[ Comment on Article 2.2 : It has always been such that use or attempt to use a prohibited substance or method must be ascertainable by means of any reliable means. As stated in the comment referred to in Article 3.2, the use or attempt to use, unlike the evidence required to detect a violation of an anti-doping rule in accordance with Article 2.1, may also be ascertainable by other means : reliable methods such as the confession, testimony, documentation, findings drawn on the basis of longitudinal profiles, including data collected as part of the biological passport or other analytical information of the sportsmen or other analytic information ; which does not in any other way satisfy all the requirements for the presence of a "presence" of a prohibited substance in accordance with Article 2.1.
For example, the application can be determined on the basis of reliable analysis data from the analysis of an A test (without confirmation from an analysis of a B sample) or from the analysis of a B test alone where the request organization provides a satisfactory explanation ; on failure to confirm in the second test ].
2.2.1 It is the personal responsibility of the sportsmen and sportsmen to ensure that no prohibited substance comes into his or her body and that no one The method shall be prohibited. It is therefore not necessary to establish, guilt, negligence or deliberate application by the sportsmen of Sport, before a breach of the time rules for non-compliance is established ; use, by a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method .
2.2.2 Whether or not use, or the attempt to use by a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method success or not, is not essential. It's enough that it prohibited substance, or the prohibited method became applied or attempted attempted that this is a violation of an antidbit rule.
[ Comment to Article 2.2.2 : Demonstration of 'attempted use' of a prohibited substance or a prohibited method requires evidence of the presets of the page of the sportsmen and the supresitator. The presucement may be necessary to demonstrate precisely this violation of the time-breaking code does not undermine the principle of objective liability established for infringements of Article 2.1 and infringements of Article 2.2 concerning the use of a prohibited substances or a prohibited method.
The use of an athlete's use of a prohibited substance constitutes a violation of the anti-doping rules, unless such material is not prohibited outside competition, and the use of the sportsmen of Sport shall take place outside of competition. (However, the presence of a prohibited substance or its metabolites or markers in a sample taken under competition shall be a breach of Article 2.1, irrespective of when the substance in question may be managed) ].
2.3-exception, refuse or omit to contribute to sampling, .
The avoidance of sampling or, without compelling cause, refuse or refrain from participating in sampling, when convened in accordance with the applicable anti-tidal rules.
[ Comments to Article 2.3 : For example, it would contraveneous the 'evasion of sampling' procedures if it is found that a PE was dispenzed with the exception of a doping controller to avoid conception or trial. A non-compliance violation may be based either on deliberate or negligent behaviour on the part of the PE, while 'avoidance' or 'refusal' of sampling is presumption of intentional behaviour on the part of the sportsmen of sportsmen and women. ].
2.4-point-about-infractions.
Any combination of three failed attempted on the control and / or reporting failure of a PE-christs in a priority test group , as defined in the International Standard for Sampling and Investigative Standard within a 12-month period.
2.5 Cheat. or attempted On cheat with all the components of the doping control.
Behavior subverdigs the control procedure, but which do not fall in the second way below the definition of prohibited methods, . Cheat. includes, without limitation, intentional interference or attempted on interference in a doping control lants work, indication of false information to a antidingorganization or true attempted to threaten a potential witness.
[ Comment to Article 2.5 : For example, this Article shall ban the amendment of identification numbers of a doping control form during sampling, break-in B test glass at the time of the analysis of the B sample or the amendment of a test in the addition of an addendum ; foreign matter.
Violating behaviour towards a doping controller or other person involved in doping control, which is no other form of fraud, must be treated in accordance with the disciplinary rules of the relevant sport organisation ].
2.6 Possession of a forbidden substance, or a forbidden method.
2.6.1 One the possession of prohibited substances by sportsmen and fats, or forbidden method under competition, or one the possession of prohibited substances by sportsmen and fats, or prohibited methods outside of competition ; which is forbidden outside of competition ; unless The athlete's athlete demonstrating that : the holder ; are in accordance with a derogation for the processing of the treatment ; ("TUE") granted in accordance with Article 4.4 or other acceptable cause.
2.6.2 One possession of physical athletes ; of prohibited substances, or forbidden method under competition, or one possession of physical athletes ; of prohibited substances, or prohibited methods outside of competition ; which is forbidden outside of competition, in connection with a PE : Competition, competition, or training, unless : the supporting person of the sportsmen and women, demonstrating that : the holder ; is in accordance with one, TUE granted to a PE-christs in accordance with Article 4.4 or other acceptable cause.
[ Comment on Articles 2.6.1 and 2.6.2 : An acceptable explanation shall include, for example, no purchases or possession of a prohibited substance in order to give it to a friend or relative, unless it is done under reasonable medical conditions in which it is considered ; The person concerned is in possession of a doctor's prescription, for example, by purchasing insulin to a child with diabetes. ♪NO!
[ Comment on Article 2.6.2 : An acceptable explanation shall include, for example, a team doctor who comprises prohibited substances for use in an emergency or an emergency ].
2.7 Illegal trade or attempts at illegal trade, with each prohibited substance, or No method.
2.8 Administration or administration attempts by a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method to a PE-level athletes during competition or administration or attempted On administration by a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method, they are prohibited, outside of competition, to a PE-suave athlete outside of competition.
2.9 Conspiracy.
To encourage, encourage, encourage, encourage, conspire against, cover up or any other form of deliberate complicity involving a violation of the time-breaking rules, attempted on the infringement of the rules of application or infringement of Article 10.12.1 of another ; Person.
2.10 Forbidden Association.
Association in a professional or sporting-related capacity between one the aid of sportsmen and sportsmen and sportsmen and women ; or other person, which is subject to a antidingorganization jurisdiction, if :
2.10.1 Support the person serving a probe exclusion, period and is under an antimesingorganisation ' jurisdiction ; or
2.10.2 the support person is not subject to any antidingorganization jurisdiction and have been convicted or found guilty of a court proceedings, disciplinary proceedings or professional conduct, which would have caused a breach of the time-breaking rules, the rules of which, in accordance with Codex had done so for this person and where the exclusion has not been treated according to a resulting handling procedure, in accordance with Codex.
A disqualifying status for such a person must be valid during the longest period of either six years from the judgment of the criminal proceedings, the professional case or the disciplinary procedure or the duration of criminal proceedings imposed on the criminal proceedings or the disciplinary procedure ; or
2.10.3 the support person shall serve as a front or intermediant for an individual as described in Article 2.10.1 or 2.10.2.
In order for this provision to be valid, it is necessary that : The athlete's athlete or other person previously have been informed in writing by a antidingorganization with jurisdiction over The athlete's athlete or other person or WADA about the support person for the sport of sportsmen and persons ; disqualifying status and potential consequences of a prohibited association and that : The athlete's athlete or other person is reasonably not associated with the association. The Antiding Organization must also make reasonable efforts to inform the support person of the sportsmen and women ; which is the reason for the message, The athlete's athlete or other Person that the support person of the sportsmen shall be subject to the aid of the sportsmen within 15 days, can turn to the organisation of the organisation ; to explain that the criteria described in Article 2.10.1 and 2.10.2 shall not apply to him or to her. (Despite Article 17, this article applies even though the disqualification behaviour of the sportsmen and sportsmen of Sport took place prior to the applicable date fixed in accordance with Article 25).
The burden of proof that any association with the support staff of the sportsmen and sportsmen described in Article 2.10.1 or 2.10.2 is not in a professional or sporting-related capacity shall be added ; The athlete's athlete or other Person.
Anchor Organizations, who are familiar with the support staff of sportsmen and women ; which complies with the criteria described in Article 2.10.1 and 2.10.2 or 2.10.3, that information shall be passed on to : WADA.
[ Comment to Article 2.10 : Islaumen or other persons shall not cooperate with coaches, trainers, doctors or other support staff who are disqualified due to a violation of the anti-doping rules, or convicted in criminal proceedings ; professional or disciplinary proceedings in the case of doping. Examples of types of affiliation which are prohibited include : training, strategy, engineering and nutrition or medical advice ; get therapy, treatment or prescriptions ; provide any kind of body products for analysis ; or allow the support of the sportsmen to act as an agent or a representative. Prohibited association does not need to involve any kind of compensation ].
ARTICLE 3 EVIDENCE OF DOPING
3.1 The burden of proof and the proof of evidence.
The Antiding Organization is responsible for demonstrating that an infringement of the time opting has taken place. The proof is that the organisation of the organisation ; shall be able to demonstrate an infringement of the rules of application in a manner which satisfies the processing body when the seriousness of the charge is taken into account. In all cases, the evidence must be higher than a reasonable likelihood of doping, but it is not necessary for any doubt to be removed. Where? Codex placing the burden of proof in order to disprove a request or show specific facts or circumstances in the case of it ; PE-christs or other person that are charged with infringement of an anti-doping rule, the evidence must be reasonably probable.
[ Comments to Article 3.1 : The requirement to be met by the organisation of the anti-doping organisation may be compared with the evidence requirements applicable in most countries in connection with civil service offences. ].
3.2 Methods to determine the facts and assumptions.
The facts on infringements of the time rules may be provided by means of all reliable means, including confessions. The following rules apply to evidence in doping cases :
[ Comment on Article 3.2 : An anti-tidal organisation may, for example, detect a violation of the rules of application in accordance with Article 2.2 on the basis of the confessions, reliable evidence of third parties, reliable evidence, reliable evidence ; analytical data from either an A or B test according to the comments made to Article 2.2, or to conclusions based on the profile of a number of the blood or urine samples of the athlete, such as the data from the biological passport of physical athletes. ].
3.2.1 Analytical methods or limit values accepted by WADA after consultation with the relevant scientific environment and which have been subject to peer review, it is believed to be scientifically valid. Any PE-christs or other person, which are trying to disprove this disproving of scientific validity, as a condition for any such challenge, first grant ; WADA message of the challenge and the reason for the challenge. CAS may also give, on its own initiative, WADA Message of any such challenge. On WADA's query must CAS Panel select an appropriate scientific expert to assist the panels of the evaluation of the challenge. Within 10 days from WADA's receipt of such notification and WADA's receipt of The CAS file, must WADA also have the right to join as a party, grant a meeting as amicus curiae or otherwise present evidence in such cases.
3.2.2 There is a request for laboratories with WADA -accreditation and other laboratories approved by WADA carrying out analyses of samples and keep procedures for keeping according to it ; international standard for laboratories. The kill-man or other person to counter this request by demonstrating that there has been any deviation from it ; international standard in the field of laboratories which may reasonably have resulted in : the positive analysis result.
If The athlete's athlete or another person to satisfy the preceding constigation by demonstrating that deviation from the international standard for laboratories, which may reasonably have resulted in it ; positive analyst result , shall : the organisation of the organisation ; demonstrate that such an anomaly did not include it ; positive analytical result.
[ Comment on Article 3.2.2 : It is the responsibility of the sportsmen or the other person to demonstrate, in a reasonable likelihood, that the deviation from the International Laboratories by reason could reasonably have resulted in the positive analysis result. If the sportsmen or other person does this, the burden of proof must be transferred to the time recovery organisation to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the worker's reasonable satisfaction that the deviation did not include the positive analysis result ].
3.2.3 Deviations from any other international standards, or other time opingrules or policies listed in Codex or in a the rules of the scheduling organisation ; that did not include a positive analysis result, or other infringements of the time opting do not invalidate such evidence or results. If The athlete's athlete or another person may show that anomalies have occurred from another international standard or any other anti-doping rule or policies which may reasonably have resulted in a violation of the anti-doping rules, based on a single application ; positive analytical result , or the second violation of the time-breaking rules shall be incumcharged to the organisation of the organisation ; demonstrating that such deviation did not include : the positive results of the analysis, or shall constitute the specific background to the infringement of the time opting.
3.2.4 The facts demonstrated by a court order or a disciplinary tribunal with a competent jurisdiction and which is not the subject of a pending appeal shall be irrefutable proof of : The athlete's athlete or the other person that the decision concerned relates to such facts, unless : The athlete's athlete or the other person indicates that the decision stred against the principles of natural justice.
3.2.5 The investigating body in a hearing on infringement proceedings may be drawn up by a follow-through movement against The athlete's athlete or the other person , who are accused of committing a violation of the anti-doping rules, on the basis of : The athlete's vertigo or the second person's refusal, after presentation of a request in a reasonable period prior to the hearing, and to meet at the hearing (either in person or by telephone following the instructions of the investigating body) and to answer questions by the investigating body ; or the antidingorganization that allegation contention of violation of the anti-doping rules.
ARTICLE 4 OF THE DOPING LIST
4.1 Publication and revision of The Dopinglist.
As often as necessary, and at least once a year, publishes WADA Dopinglist as a international standard The proposed content for Dopinglist all changes shall be sent promptly in writing to the signatories to parties, and governments for commenting and hearing. WADA immediately send the annual version of Dopinglist including changes to all signatories, WADA- accredited or-approved laboratories and governments. At the same time it must be published on WADA's home page, and signatories to parties, transmitting Dopinglist to their members and members. Antidings organizationings rule sets must indicate that unless otherwise specified in Dopinglist or a revision, Dopinglist with changes in force in accordance with antidings of antidings, rules three months after the WADA has published ; Dopinglist , and without that the organisation of the organisation ; need to take further action.
[ Comment on Article 4.1 : Revision and publication of the Dopinglist shall be accelerated when required. However, in the interests of predictability, a new prohibited list shall be published each year regardless of whether there have been any amendments or not. WADA always publishes the most recent forbidden list on his website. The Dopinglist is an integral part of the International Convention against doping in sport. WADA will inform UNESCO Director-General of any changes to the Dopinglist ].
4.2 Forbidden substances and prohibited methods, appearing on The Dopinglist.
4.2.1 Forbidden substances and prohibited methods.
Dopinglist they identify prohibited substances, and prohibited methods, the use of doping at all times (both Under Competition and outside of competition, ) because they potentially improve the performance of a future competition, or because of their ability to cloud the doping, as well as the substances and methods which are exclusively prohibited ; Under competition. Dopinglist may be extended by WADA for a particular sport. Forbidden substances and prohibited methods, can be entered on Dopinglist as a general category (for example, anabolic substances) or with specific reference to a particular substance or method.
[ Comments to Article 4.2.1 : Use outside of the competition of a substance that is restricted only to competition shall not be a violation of the anti-doping rules, unless a positive analysis result is reported for the substance or its metabolites, or are markled in the context of a test taken under competition ].
4.2.2 Species of substance.
For the purposes of applying Article 10, all banned substances ' specified substances ` ; , except for substances in the classes, anabolics and hormones, and such stimulants and hormonal antagonists and modulators identified as such, Dopinglist The category of specified substances, do not include prohibited methods, .
[ Comment on Article 4.2.2 of Article 4.2.2 of the specified substances in Article 4.2.2 should not in any way be considered less important or less dangerous than other dopers. On the contrary, they are merely substances which are more likely to have been consumed by athletic and more likely to the eye than an improved sporting performance. ]
4.2.3 New groups of prohibited substances.
If WADA expanding Dopinglist by adding a new group of prohibited substances, in accordance with Article 4.1, the WADA ' s Executive Committee shall decide whether or not some or all of them, prohibited substances, within the new group of : prohibited substances, shall be deemed to be specified substances in accordance with Article 4.2.2.
4.3 Criteria for the inclusion of substances and methods The Dopinglist.
When WADA decide whether or not to include a substance or method ; Dopinglist the following criteria shall be included in the assessment :
4.3.1 A substance or method must be assessed for inclusion on Dopinglist, if WADA decides that the substance or method meets two of the following three criteria :
4.3.1.1 Medicinal or other scientific evidence, pharmacological impact or experience showing that the substance or method can improve or improve the performance of sport by itself or in combination with other substances or methods ;
[ Comment on Article 4.3.1.1 : According to this Article, it is expected that there may be substances that are not forbidden when they are used alone but which are prohibited if they are used in combination with certain other substances. A substance added to the Dopinglist because it only has the potential to improve performance in combination with a different substance is marked as restricted and is only prohibited if there are documentation relating to both substances in combination ].
4.3.1.2 Medicinal or other scientific evidence, pharmacological impact or experience to show that : use, either of the substance or method constitutes an actual or potential health hazard ; The athlete's athlete
4.3.1.3 WADA's decision to : use, either of the substance or method is contrary to the spirit of sport, as described in the introduction, Codex.
4.3.2 A substance or method may also be accepted ; Dopinglist , if WADA decide that there are medical or other scientific evidence, a pharmacological effect or experience which shows that the substance or method may be clobable use, by others prohibited substances, or Forbidden methods.
[ Comment on Article 4.3.2 : as part of the procedure each year, all signatories shall invite parties, governments and other interested parties to make comments on WADA related to the content of the Dopinglist ].
4.3.3 WADA's decision on which prohibited, substances or prohibited methods, to include in Dopinglist and how the substances are to be classified into categories on : Dopinglist, and the classification of a substance which is prohibited at any time or only ; Under competition, is final and cannot be contested by a PE-christs or another person Having regard to the argument that the substance or method is not a striking substance or does not have the potential to improve performance, does not constitute a health hazard or does not run counter to the spirit of sport.
4.4 Exemptions to the processing application ("TUE")
4.4.1 Presence of one prohibited substance, or its metabolites, or marklet, and / or use, or attempt to use, possession, or administration or administration attempts by a prohibited substance, or prohibited method should not be regarded as a breach of the time-breaking rules, if it is in accordance with an authorization ; the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), have given in accordance with the international standards for the treatment of the processing application.
4.4.2 One PE-christs, there is no one. International athletes at international level, apply for : the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), with its national antidings organisation. If it national antimeingorganization, does not comply with the application, The athlete's athlete only appeal to the complainine at national level as laid down in Article 13.2.2 and 13.2.3.
4.4.3 One PE-christs , which is International athletes at international level, shall apply to its international association.
4.4.3.1 In those cases where one PE-christs already has one the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), granted of its national antimeingorganization, for the relevant substance or method, and if so, the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), meet the criteria laid down in the international standard for : the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), then the international alliance must accept it. If the international premise considers that the derogation for the purposes of treatment (TUE) does not meet these criteria and therefore refuses to accept it, it shall communicate to the athlete and his or her national antidal organisation ; immediately on grounds. The kill-man or the national antimeingorganization, have 21 days from such a notice to refer the case to WADA for assessment. If the case is referenced WADA for assessment, it shall remain granted the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), given by it national antimeingorganization, valid during sampling, under competitions, at national level ; and outside of competition, (but not valid for competition at international level), WADA's Decision shall be decided. If the case is not referenced WADA for assessment, will be the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), invalid for any usage when the deadline of 21 days for re-evaluation expires.
4.4.3.2 If The athlete's athlete does not already have one the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), granted the body of his national antimeingorganization, for the relevant substance or method, The athlete's athlete apply directly to its international association for a the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), as soon as the need arises. If the international premia (or the national antidingorganisation organisation which has agreed to assess the application on behalf of the international association) rejects PE-sudeavers application must immediately notify The athlete's athlete for this reason. If the International Federation approves The athlete's vertigo application shall make such an application not only ; The athlete's athlete. But for his or her, too. national antimeingorganisation, and if it national antimeingorganization, assesses that : the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), does not meet the criteria as set out in the International Exemption International Standard for Processing Exemption, 21 days from receipt of such a notice to refer the case to WADA for assessment. If it national antimeingorganization, referring the case to WADA to be assessed, it shall remain granted ; the derogation for processing use ; ( TUE () valid in sampling and outside competitions at international level (but not valid on competition at national level), while WADA's decision is pending. If it national antimeingorganization, do not refer the case to WADA for assessment, it shall be granted the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), given by the international association, also valid for : competitions, at national level, when the deadline of 21 days for re-evaluation expires.
[ Comment on Article 4.4.3 : If the international premise refuses to approve a derogation for the processing use (TUE) given by a national anti-doping organisation, simply because medical records or other information is missing which is required to demonstrate compliance with the criteria of an international derogation for the processing of treatment (TUE), the case must not be referred to WADA. Instead, the material should be finalised and re-sent to the International Federation.
If the international association chooses to perform a test on an athlete who is not an international athlete at international level, it must approve a derogation for the use of the sport (TUE) given to the athlete by his or her national antimeingorganisation ].
4.4.4 One organization for major sports events may require that sportsmen and women applying for a the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), if they wish to use a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method in connection with The sports event. In such cases :
4.4.4.1 is required the organization of major sporting events ; ensure that a process is available for The athlete's athlete. So he or she can apply for the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), If he or she doesn't already have one. If the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), given, it is only valid for its PE event.
4.4.4.2 must the organisation of major sporting events ; approve it in cases where an athlete is already having a treatment for processing (TUE) in the authorization of its national anthillisation organisation or international union, and if so ; the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), meet the criteria laid down in the International Standard Exemption International derogation for the processing of the treatment (TUE). If the organisation of major sporting events ; determines that the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), does not meet the criteria and, therefore, refuse to approve it, the immediate announcement shall be : The athlete's athlete about this and explain the reasons for this.
4.4.4.3 a decision taken by a organization for major sports events not to approve or grant a the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), may be appealed only by : The athlete's athlete to an independent body established or appointed by : the organisation of major sporting events ; for the purpose. If The athlete's athlete does not appeal (or the appeal is in vain), he or she does not ; using the matter of the substance or the method referred to in the case of : The sports event, but any the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), given by his or her national antimeingorganization, or international premia for the substance or method remains valid outside The sports event.
[ Comment on Article 4.4.4.4.3 : For example, the CAS ad hoc department or similar instance may act as the independent body of appeal proceedings for specific sports events, or WADA may agree to perform that operation. If neither the CAS or WADA does the function, the WADA may keep the court (but not the obligation) to assess at all times the decisions on the derogation for the processing of the physical application (TUE) in respect of the sporting event in accordance with Article 4.4.6 ].
4.4.5 If one antidingorganization choose to take one test from one the person who is not an international or national athlete is at international level ; and that person is using a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method for therapeutic reasons, may the organisation of the organisation ; permit him or her to apply for a the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), with retroactive effect.
4.4.6 WADA must assess an international premier ' s decision not to approve one, the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), given by it national antimeingorganization, and that is referred to by a PE-christs or The national antidingorganisation of the athlete is the national anthilte. In addition, WADA assess an international premier decision to grant one the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), referred to by : The national antidingorganisation of the athlete is the national anthilte. WADA may, at any time, assess any other decision on : the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), either on the basis of a request by the parties concerned or on its own initiative ; if that decision is taken, the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), to assess, meet the criteria set out in international standard for the derogation for processing use, mixing up the treatment of the system ; WADA Don't say. If the decision concerning the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), do not meet these criteria, resend WADA It.
[ Comment on Article 4.4.6 : WADA is entitled to require a fee in order to cover the costs (a) any assessment as required by it in accordance with Article 4.4.6 ; and (b) any assessment it chooses to carry out where the decision is assessed, reversed ].
4.4.7 Any decision concerning the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), conducted by an international association (or by a), national antimeingorganisation, in which it has agreed to assess an application on behalf of an international association) which is not assessed by : WADA or are assessed by : WADA, but which are not reversed after the assessment, may be appealed by : The athlete's athlete and / or the national antidingorganisation of the sportsmen and the name of the country. exclusively for CAS.
[ Comment on Article 4.4.7 : In such cases it is the decision of the International Federation, which is an appeal, not WADA's decision not to assess the decision concerning the derogation for the processing of the treatment (TUE) or (having been adopted) ; the judgment of the decision on the derogation for the processing of treatment (TUE). The time limit for the granting of an appeal for the derogation for processing use (TUE) does not begin until the date on which WADA communicates its decision. In any case, whether the decision has been evaluated by WADA or not, the WADA must be notified of the appeal so that they can participate, as they consider appropriate ].
4.4.8 WADA decision to reverse a derogation for the processing of treatment (TUE) may be appeated solely to the CAS of the sportsmen and the national antherian organisation and / or the international union.
4.4.9 If no action is taken within a reasonable period of time on a properly submitted application for the award / approval of a the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), or on the assessment of decisions concerning : the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), it shall be regarded as a rejection of the application.
4.5 Monitor program.
In consultation with the signatories to parties, and governments establish WADA a monitoring programme for substances which are not included ; Dopinglist but as WADA want to monitor to detect possible abuses in sport. Before a sampling, publishes WADA the substances which are tested for. In the case of each sport branch, the laboratories report regularly reported ; use, or detected the presence of such substances to : WADA , as well as the samples, were collected Under Competition or outside of competition. The reports shall not include further information on the specific tests. At least once a year, WADA statistical information on the stained substances distributed on each of the sporting activities of the international associations and the international associations ; national antidings, . WADA implements measures that ensure total anonymity for each individual sportsmen and women in connection with such reports. Recommented use, or observed the presence of monitored substances does not constitute a breach of the time rules for non-compliance.
ARTICLE 5 SAMPLING AND INVESTIGATION
5.1 PURPOSE OF SAMPLING AND INVESTIGATION
Sampling and the investigation shall only be carried out in the next part-time.
5.1.1 Sampling must be carried out in order to obtain analytical evidence of a PE-sudeavers compliance (or a lack of compliance), Codex strict presence / use, by a prohibited substance, or one No method.
5.1.2 InvestiResearch must be carried out :
(a) in relation to atypical results and positive ABP results Whereas, pursuant to Articles 7.4 and 7.5 respectively, intelligence or evidence (including, in particular, analytical evidence) shall be collected to determine whether an infringement of the time rules for infringement has been carried out in accordance with Article 2.1 and / or in Article 2.2 ; and
(b) in relation to other signs of potential infringements of the rules of application in accordance with Articles 7.6 and 7.7, any intelligence or evidence (including, in particular, non-analytical evidence), must be collected to determine whether or not there has been an infringement of : the time-down rules after some of the articles from 2.2 to 2.10.
5.2 Sampling Scope
Any PE-christs may at all times and at any time be required to submit a test of a antidingorganization with authority for sampling, above him or her.
Subject to the limitations on jurisdiction of sampling, by one sporting event the following shall apply as specified in Article 5.3 :
5.2.1 Each national antimeingorganization ; has the authorisation of sampling during competition ; and outside of competition, above all PE-suamen, who are nationals, resident, licence holders or members of the sporting organisations in the country or are present in it ; national antidings of antidings ; country.
5.2.2 Each international association shall have : the authorisation of sampling during competition ; and outside of competition, above all PE-suamen, subject to its rules, including those participating in international law ; sports events or as a participant in sports events below it international premier rules, or who are members or licensed holders of the international association or its national members or members.
5.2.3 Each organisation of major sporting events ; including the International Olympic Committee and the International Paralympian Committee have the authority to take samples ; Under Competition under their sports events and the authorisation of sampling outside competition ; above all PE-suamen, have been enrolled in one of their future sporting events or, in other ways, the authority to take samples of the organisation of major sporting events ; in future sports events.
5.2.4 WADA has the authorisation of sampling during competition ; and outside of competition, as set out in Article 20.
5.2.5 Antiding Organizations may take a test on any PE-christs, which they have the authority to sampling, and who have not withdrawn, including PE-suamen, serving as a exclusion, period .
5.2.5 If an international association or organization for major sports events delegates to or enter a contract with a national antimeingorganization ; (directly or indirectly) to carry out parts of the sampling, It can be. national antimeingorganization, collecting additional samples or request the laboratory to perform additional types of analyses which are paid by it ; national antidings organisation. If further samples collect or additional types of analyses are carried out so that the international association or the organisation of major sporting events ; information on this.
[ Comment to Article 5.2 : Additional authorization to perform sampling may be attributed by means of bilateral or multilateral agreements between signatories to parties. Unless the physical athlete has identified a 60-minute period for sampling within the time period described in the following or otherwise consenting to sampling during the time period, an anti-doping organisation should be seriously and specific suspicion that the physical athlete may be involved in doping before taking a test in the time period from time to time ; Twenty-three to one. 6. An objection to the presumes of an anti-doping organisation may not be a defence of a violation of the anti-doping rules, based on such sampling or testing on sampling ].
5.3 Test sampling at the sporting event.
5.3.1 Only a single organization should be responsible for starting and searching sampling, by event places in a event period, except as otherwise indicated below. Collection of samples by international sports events ; be started and run by the international organisation, which is the responsible organisation, The sports event : (for example, the International Olympic Committee for the Olympic Games, the International Federation of the World Cup and the Pan-American Sports Oral (PASO) for the Panu.S. Lege. By national sporting events ; the collection of samples must be started and run by its country ; national antidings organisation. At the request of the responsible organization for a sporting event shall all be sampling in the event period outside the event point be coordinated with the responsible organisation.
[ Comments to Article 5.3.1 : Some organisations responsible for international sporting events may carry out their own sampling outside the event of the event and therefore want to coordinate the sampling with it ; sampling of national antidying organisations ].
5.3.2 If one antidingorganization , which otherwise would have the authority to sampling, but is not responsible for launching and searching sampling, by one sporting event, want to perform sampling on : sportsmen and women On the event point over the course of The sports event, then the organisation of the organisation ; first consult with the responsible organisation for : The sports event : so as to obtain authorisation to perform and coordinate so ; sampling. If the organisation of the organisation ; is not satisfied with the response from the responsible organization for The sports event, can the organisation of the organisation ; in accordance with procedures published by : WADA, ask WADA on the authorisation to perform the sampling and to determine how such a sampling, must be coordinated. WADA does not permit such sampling, before it has consulted and informed, the sports event responsible organization. WADA's Decision is crucial and cannot be appels. Unless otherwise specified in the authorization to perform sampling, such sampling should be considered to be samp-ups, outside of competition. The antidingorganization, which took the initiative for the test, shall be responsible for the resulting handling procedure for any such test, unless otherwise specified in the The sports event : Organization rules.
[ Comment to Article 5.3.2 : Before WADA approves that a national antidying organization can initiate and carry out sampling at an international sporting event, the WADA shall consult the international organisation that is responsible for the organization ; The sports event. Before WADA approves that a national anti-doping organisation may start and carry out sampling at an international sporting event, the WADA shall consult the national antidying organization in the country in which the sporting event is taking place. The Antidying organization, which "initiates and supervises the sampling", may, if it chooses it, conclude an agreement with other organizations which it delegates the responsibility for sampling or any other parts of the doping control process ].
5.4 Test Planning.
5.4.1 In consultation with international associations and other antidingorganizations introducing WADA a technical document under the international standard of sampling and investigation, which shall determine, by means of risk assessment, of the risks ; prohibited substances, and / or prohibited methods, which is most likely to be misused within a specific sport or sport.
5.4.2 on the basis of the risk assessment, each antidingorganization with the authority to sampling, develop and implement an efficient, intelligent and proportionate plan for the distribution of sampling, which prioritises the importance of disciplines, categories of PE-suamen, types of samples collected and types of test analyses-all in accordance with the requirements of the International Standard for Sampling and Investigative Standard. Each request organization must provide a copy of its current plan for the distribution of sampling to WADA.
5.4.3 Where it is reasonably pracable, must : sampling, is coordinated through ADAMS or any other system approved by WADA for maximising the effectiveness of the combined sampling efforts and to avoid unnecessary duplication of sampling.
5.5 Requirements for sampling.
Al sampling, shall be performed in accordance with the international standard for sampling and investigation.
5.6 Information PE-sudeavers location (s),
Ikilt suamen, which is included in a priority test group by their international associations and / or national antimeingorganisation, shall abandon their whereabouts in the manner specified in the international standard for sampling and investigation. International Federation and the national antimeingorganization, need to coordinate the identification of such products ; sportsmen and women and the collection of their whereabouts. Every international union and each national antimeingorganization, through ADAMS or any other system approved by WADA make a list available to identify the PE-suamen, that are included in its priority test group identified and specific criteria, either by name or clearly defined and specific criteria. Ikiltsudeavers message must be notified before they are included in a priority test group , and when they are removed from this test group. The information on their whereabouts they give up while they are in it ; priority test group is made available to WADA and others antidingorganizations which have the authority to perform the test ; The athlete's athlete as referred to in Article 5.2 through : ADAMS or any other system approved by WADA. This information is always kept in strict confidentiality ; solely for the purpose of planning, coordinating and carrying out doping control, giving up information relevant to : Biological passports of sportsmen and sportsmen or other analytical results to support an investigation of potential infringement of the time-breaking rules or to support legal processes that claim infringement of the time rules ; and must be destroyed after they are no longer being considered ; relevant to these purposes in accordance with the international standards for the protection of private and personal data.
5.7 Ikilt suamen, which has withdrawn and subsequently returned to competition.
5.7.1 If one at international or national level, sportsmen and women ; in a priority test group withdraws and then wishes to return to active participation in sport, may The athlete's athlete not compete with international sports events ; or national sporting events ; before The athlete's athlete has made themselves available to sampling, by giving written notification 6 months prior to its international union ; and national antidings organisation. WADA may be consulted in consultation with the relevant international union and the national antimeingorganization, give an exception to the rule on six-month written notification in cases where strict compliance with the rule would be clearly unfair to a PE-christs This decision shall be able to appeal under Article 13.
5.7.1.1 Any competition policy obtained by violation of Article 5.7.1 disqualified.
5.7.2 If one PE-christs retireys from PE in a exclusion, period and then want to return to active competition in sport, can The athlete's athlete not compete with international sports events ; or national sporting events ; before The athlete's athlete has made themselves available for sampling by giving written notification to its international union and national antimeingorganization, 6 months prior (or leave the message so long before, which is left of exclusion, the period from that day, The athlete's athlete withdrew if the period is longer than 6 months).
5.8 Post-Research and Intelligence Collecting
Anchor Organizations must ensure that they are able to perform the following where it is currently in place and in accordance with the international standard for sampling and investigation :
5.8.1 to collect, assess and process antidying intelligence from all available sources as the basis for establishing an efficient, intelligent and proportional plan for the distribution of sampling, planning targeted sampling, and / or to form the basis for an investigation of possible (s) of anti-anti-doping rules ; and
5.8.2 to investigate atypical results and positive ABP results in accordance with Articles 7.4 and 7.5, respectively ; and
5.8.3 to investigate all other analytical or non-analytical information or intelligence that indicates possible (e) infringement (s) of the anti-doping rules in accordance with Articles 7.6 and 7.7 in order to exclude the possible violation or building evidence that will underpin the start of a case against the infringement of the time opting.
ARTICLE 6 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES
Samples must be analysed in accordance with the following principles :
6.1 The use of accredited and approved laboratories.
In the case of Article 2.1, samples analyzed only in WADA -accredited laboratories or laboratories, which are otherwise approved by : WADA That. WADA -Accredited or WADA-Approved laboratory used for analysis of : samples , the power of the one shall be selected antidingorganization that is responsible for the result of a result of handling.
[ Comment to Article 6.1 : For the purposes of cost and geographical location, WADA may approve laboratories that are not WADA accredited to perform specific analyses, e.g. analyses of blood to be delivered from the collection point to The laboratory within a prescribed deadline. Before such a laboratory is approved, WADA ensures that it meets the high standards of analysis and storage required by WADA.
The submissions of Article 2.1 can only be found in a sample analysis carried out by a WADA accredited laboratory or other laboratory approved by WADA.
Experts of other articles may be found by means of analysis results from other laboratories, as long as the results are reliable ].
6.2 The purpose of analysis of tests.
Doping control samples analyzed to expose prohibited substances, and prohibited methods, that occurs on Dopinglist , as well as other substances selected by : WADA pursuant to Article 4.5 or in order to assist one, antidingorganization with profiling appropriate parameters in a PE-sudeavers urine, blood or other matrix, including DNA or genomical profiling or for purposes of other lawfully-based purposes. Samples can be collected and stored for future analysis .
[ Comments to Article 6.2 : Relevant profile information can be used as a guideline for targeted sampling or in support of a case of infringement of the time rules for infringement pursuant to Article 2.2 or both ].
6.3 Research in tests.
Samples may not be used for research without : The athlete's vertigo written consent. On samples that the use for other purposes other than as described in Article 6.2 must be removed in such a way that they cannot be traced back to a specific case ; PE-christs.
[ Comments to Article 6.3 : As is the case in most medical contexts, the use of anonymized samples for quality assurance, quality improvement or to establish a reference population is not considered as research ].
6.4 Standards for analysis and reporting.
Laboratories must be analysing samples and report the results in accordance with it ; international standard for laboratories. To ensure effective sampling, the technical document referred to in Article 5.4.1 shall establish, sample analysis menus, based on risk assessment appropriate to a specific sport or discipline, and laboratories must analyse samples in accordance with these menus, except as in the following :
6.4.1 A non-tiding organisations may require laboratories to analyse their samples by using more comprehensive menus than those described in the technical document.
6.4.2 Antimeingorganizations can only require laboratories to analyse their samples by means of less extensive menus than those described in the technical document, if they are convinced ; WADA whether a less comprehensive analysis is appropriate due to the specific circumstances of their country or sport, as set out in their test planning,
6.4.3 As specified in the International Laboratories International Standard for Laboratories, laboratories may, at its own initiative or at their own cost, analyse : samples for prohibited substances or prohibited methods ; which are not included in the test menu, described in the technical document or as specified by : the sampling authority. Results from any such analysis shall be reported and have the same validity and consistency as all other analytical results.
[ Comment on Article 6.4 : The aim of this article is to extend the 'intelligent sampling' principle to the test specimens, as effectively as possible to disclose doping, to ensure that the available resources to combat doping are available ; limited, and that an extended test analysis on certain sports or countries may reduce the number of samples to be analysed ].
6.5 Additional analysis of samples.
Any test may at any time be subject to further analysis of the antidingorganization that is responsible for the resulting operational handling, prior to both A and B test results (or the result of A- test where B- sample analyses, has been dropped or has not been communicated) the organisation of the organisation ; to The athlete's athlete as the alleged reason for a breach of the rules on the time rules referred to in Article 2.1.
Samples may be kept and at any time subject to further analysis for the purposes of Article 6.2 solely under the direction of the administration ; antidingorganization, which started and led the collection of samples, or WADA. (All retention of samples or further analysis, which : WADA has taken the initiative, paid for by : WADA () . Further analysis of samples comply with the requirements of the International Laboratories International Standard for Laboratories and the International Standard for Sampling and Investigative Standard.
ARTICLE 7 HANDLING AND HANDLING
Every anti-doping organisation that handles results must establish a procedure for dealing with potential infringements of the time opting rules prior to the hearing. The procedure shall comply with the following principles :
[ Comment on Article 7 : Various signatories have established their own procedures with regard to the resulting handling of results. The different approaches have not been fully uniform, but many have proven to be reasonable and effective systems for the result of handling. The codex does not replace the individual signatories ' systems for resulting tape management. However, this Article specifies the basic principles with a view to ensuring the basic justice of the procedure ; for results and handling, to be complied with by the signatories. Each signatories party's specific anti-timing rules must comply with these basic principles. Not all of the anti-doping cases taken by an anti-doping organisation need to be submitted for consultation. There may be cases in which the athlete or other person accepts the sanction either required by the Code, or where flexibility in setting the sanction is allowed as the antimey organization finds appropriate. In all cases, a sanction imposed on the basis of such an agreement shall be reported to parties with the right to appeal pursuant to Article 13.2.3 as specified in Article 14.2.2 and be published as specified in Article 14.3.2 ].
7.1 Responsibility for the implementation of the resulting operational handling.
The results of the results and consultations shall be, except as provided for in Article 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 below, be it ; antidingorganization responsibilities , which instigated and leved the sampling, and must be regulated by its procedural rules (or, if there is no sampling, the procedure ; antidingorganization that first give a message to a PE-christs or other person whether a alleged infringement of the time opasted rules and, subsequently, followed carefully by the alleged infringement of the time opingers ' rules. Regardless of the organisation which handles the results or consultations, the principles set out in this Article and Article 8 must be complied with and the rules identified in Article 23.2.2 to be incorporated without any substantive amendments must be followed.
If a tvist occurs between antidings ' organizations, concerning which : antidingorganization that are responsible for the result of the results, so that : WADA determine the organization that is responsible. WADA's decision may be appealed to : CAS of all the antidingorganizations ; which are involved in the dispute within seven days of the notification of : WADA's Decision. The appeal must be handled by CAS As soon as possible, and must be heard in front of a single arbitrator.
Where one national antimeingorganization ; choose to collect additional samples in accordance with Article 5.2.6, so it shall be considered to be the antidingorganization, which invocation and lead ; the sampling. Where one national antimeingorganization ; is only asking the laboratory to carry out additional types of analyses and where the costs are to be added ; national antimeingorganisation, the international association or the international association shall, or organization for major sports events however, as a the organisation of the anti-doping organisation, which initiated and searched ; sampling.
[ Comment on Article 7.1 : In some cases, the anti-doping organisation that initiated and guided the sampling and its procedural rules specify that the handling of results is carried out by a different organisation (e.g., the sportsmen of athletes) national premia). In this case, the responsibility of the timing device is to confirm that the rules of the second organisation are in accordance with the code ].
7.1.1 In those cases where one rules of national antidings ; do not give it national antimeingorganization, authority over a PE-christs or other person, which is not a national, resident, licence holder or member of an athletic organisation in the country, or national antimeingorganization, refusing to perform such authorization, the resulting handling must be carried out by the existing international union or third party, as determined by the rules of the international premier. For results and holding consultations about a test run, WADA on his own initiative or a violation of the rules of application of the anti-doping procedures, which are discovered by : WADA, carried out by the antidingorganization, is designated by : WADA. Taoisedation and holding consultations on a test carried out by the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympanic Committee or other higher organisation of sporting events ; or an infringement of the time opt-out rules discovered by one of these organizations, is to be referred to the international premia in relation to penalties, other than excluding from The sports event : , disk validation of results from The sports event : , loss of all medals, points or prizes from The sports event : or cover costs applicable to the infringement of the time opting rules.
[ Comments to Article 7.1.1 : the International Federation of the killing or other person's international association has been designated as the last selection of an anti-doping organisation for the result of the possibility of no request for an anti-doping organisation to have the authority to : manage results. It is an international association which is free to present in its own time rules, that the national antidings of sport or other person's national antidanist organisation shall deal with results ].
7.1.2 For the purpose of a potential of the potential of the non-recording device (reporting error or attempted drug control failed) must be dealt with by the International Federation or the national antimeingorganization, as the person concerned PE-christs report information on his whereabouts (whereabouts) as stated in the international standard for the sampling and investigation. The Antidation Organization, which determines whether the alert has been reported or failed for doping control, to submit the information to : WADA via ADAMS or any other system which has been approved by : WADA, where it is made available to other relevant, anti-doping organizations.
7.2 Investigation of positive analytical results.
When one antidingorganization that the result of a result of the resulting handling of a result is a message of a person ; positive analytical result , it must carry out a study to determine whether : (a) there is or will be given ; the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), in accordance with the international standard for the derogation for processing use, or (b) a clear deviation from the international standard for sampling and investigation or international standards, laboratories which led to it ; positive analytical result.
7.3 Inquiry by investigation concerning positive analytical results.
If the survey of a positive analytical result in accordance with Article 7.2, no applicable ; (TUE) Or the right to a (TUE) in accordance with the international standard of derogation for the processing operation (TUE) or any deviation that resulted in it ; positive analyst result , shall : the organisation of the organisation ; immediately notify The athlete's athlete as defined in the organisation ' s rules as set out in Article 14.1.1 and 14.1.3 and in its own rules, whether (a), positive analyst result ; (b) the overstepped antidingrule ; and (c) The athlete's vertigo right to request for an immediate request for the analysis of B, the test, or, if such a request is not made, that it will be interpreted as if : The athlete's athlete has renounced an analysis of B- the test, ; (d) scheduled date, time and place for the analysis of B- the test, , if The athlete's athlete or the organisation of the organisation ; choose to request a B- the test, ; (e) The athlete's vertigo and / or The athlete's vertigo the right of the representative to monitor the opening and analysis of B, the test, within the time indicated by the International Laboratories International Standard Laboratories if such an analysis is desired, and (f) ; The athlete's vertigo the right to obtain copies of the documentation from the laboratory analyzed A and B, the samples, , including the information required by it ; international standard for laboratories. If the organisation of the organisation ; decide not to submit it positive analyst result as an infringement of the time-breaking rules, it shall notify : The athlete's athlete and antidings ' organizations, this, as described in Article 14.1.2.
In all cases where one PE-christs has been notified of a violation of the rules of application which do not result in a mandatory application ; temporary exclusion in accordance with Article 7.9.1, The athlete's athlete offered the possibility of accepting one temporary exclusion, whereas the result of the case is pending, .
7.4 Investigation of atypical results.
In accordance with the provisions of the International Laboratories International Laboratories, laboratories must, in certain circumstances, report the presence of : prohibited substances, that may also be produced endogent, as may be : atypical results I want to investigate further. When one antidingorganization that the result of a result of the resulting handling of a result is a message of a person ; atypical result , it must carry out a study to establish : (a) whether or not a valid valid one is given ; the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), as stated in the international standard for : the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), or (b) on the existence of a clear deviation from the international standard for sampling and investigation or by the international standard for laboratories which have resulted in it ; atypical result If such an investigation does not reveal a true the derogation for the processing operation (TUE) ; () or any deviation that has led to a atypical result , shall : the organisation of the organisation ; perform the required survey. After such a study, The athlete's athlete and others antidingorganizations the information referred to in Article 14.1.2 is informed of the extent to which : atypical result will be presented as a positive analysis result. The kill-man shall be informed in accordance with the provisions of Article 7.3.
[ Comment on Article 7.4 : The "required examination" as described in this Article depends on the situation. If, for example, it has been stated previously that an athlete has a natural increase in testosterone / epiitestosterone ratio, a confirmation that an atypical result is in accordance with this previous ratio, sufficient investigation ].
7.4.1 The Antiding Organization does not notify you of any atypical result before it has carried out its study and determined whether it will make it atypical result as a positive analytical result unless one of the following conditions exists :
(a) If the organisation of the organisation ; decide that B- the test, must be analyzed before the completion of the examination in accordance with Article 7.4, may the organisation of the organisation ; perform the analysis of B- the test, after notification of The athlete's athlete , as such notification must contain a description of the atypical result and the information set out in Article 7.3 (d)-(f).
(b) If the organisation of the organisation ; receive a request, either from one organisation of a major sporting event, short before one of its own international sports events ; or a request from an athletic organisation with responsibility for compliance with an imminent deadline for selecting team members to a International sporting event, to inform you of a PE-christs on a list supplied by the organisation of a major sporting event ; or the sports organisation, has a pending version ; atypical r esultat , shall : the organisation of the organisation ; identify such a PE-christs after first given The athlete's athlete message about it atypical results.
[ Comment on Article 7.4.1 (b) : In the circumstances described in Article 7.4.1 (b), the ability to act shall be left to the organisation of major sporting events or the sporting organisation under their rules ].
7.5 Investigation of atypical ABP results and positive ABP results.
Survey of atypical ABP results and positive ABP results must take place as stated in the inter-natal standard for sampling and investigation and the International Standard for Laboratories. At that time the organisation of the organisation ; is satisfied that an infringement of the time opting has taken place, must immediately notify The athlete's athlete. in accordance with the rules laid down in its rules, on the overacceding rule and the basis of the infringement. Others antidingorganizations shall be informed as specified in Article 14.1.2.
7.6 Examination of any of the about-offenses.
Investigation of potential reporting errors and failed doping tests must take place, as stated in the international standard for sampling and investigation. At the time the international association or the national antimeingorganization, (depending on which applicable) is certain that an infringement of the time opting has taken place in accordance with Article 2.4, it shall be immediately notified by the procedure laid down in its rules ; The athlete's athlete that it claims an infringement of Article 2.4 and the basis for stating this. Others antidingorganizations shall be informed as specified in Article 14.1.2.
7.7 Investigation of other offences against the time-breaking rules which are not covered by Articles 7.1 to 7.6.
The Antiding Organization or any other investigative body set up by such an organisation shall carry out any follow-up investigations of a possible infringement of the time opt-out rules as required by the applicable anti-doping rules and policies which are : adopted in accordance with Codex or as the organisation of the organisation ; By the way, appropriate. When the organisation of the organisation ; is certain that an anti-doping rule has been violated immediately, this shall immediately be notified ; The athlete's athlete or another person , as described in the organisation ' s rules, the presureation rule which has been infringed and the background to the infringement. Others antidingorganizations shall be informed as specified in Article 14.1.2.
[ Comment on Article 7.1, 7.6 and 7.7 : An international association would typically inform the athletes of athletes through the national federations of sportsmen and women in the form of an international association.
7.8 Identification of previous infringements of the time opting rules.
Before a PE-christs or other person notification of a alleged infringement of the time opting as indicated above, shall be informed, the organisation of the organisation ; checking ADAMS or any other system approved by WADA and contact WADA and other relevant antidingorganizations to determine whether or not any prior infringement of the time opting rules exists.
7.9 Principles applicable to temporary exclusions.
7.9.1 Obligatorically temporary exclusion after a positive analysis result.
They signatories to parties, laid down below shall establish rules which make it that when one positive analytical result received for one prohibited substance, or one prohibited method , except one specified substance, I want a temporary exclusion be placed immediately after the examination and the examination, as described in 7.2, 7.3 or 7.5, where the signatories are the responsible body of one ; sporting event (so that applies to it sporting event ) where the signatories party are responsible for the selection of opinions (so as to hold selection) where the signatories party are the applicable international union ; or where the signatories of the party are another ; antidingorganization which have the power to act as a result of the alleged infringement of : the time-up rules, A Mandatory temporary exclusion may be deleted if : The athlete's athlete. shows to the consultation panel that the violation of the probability includes a contaminated product. A consultation body decision not to repeal a compulsory temporary exclusion on the basis of The athlete's vertigo allegation contaminated product, cannot be appealed.
However, one cannot be imposed on one temporary exclusion , unless The athlete's athlete be given either : (a) opportunity for a Interim hearing -before it. temporary exclusion be imposed or in a timely manner following the laying down of the temporary exclusion , or (b) the possibility of speeding up the consultation in accordance with Article 8 in a timely manner ; temporary exclusion being imposed.
7.9.2 Possibility of a temporary exclusion on the basis of one positive analytical result in connection with specified substances, polluted products, or any other infringement of the time-breaking rules.
One signatories, the adoption of rules applicable to all sports events that fall under it signatories of the party ; responsibilities, or for the selection procedures which it has ; signatories, is responsible for, or where, signatories, is the appropriate international alliance or is responsible for the resulting handling of the alleged infringement of the time-breaking rules, so that it is permitted to be imposed on the market ; non-persistent exclusions for infringements of the time rules which are not described in Article 7.9.1, prior to the analysis of : The B test of sportsmen and sportsmen or the last hearing, as described in Article 8.
However, one cannot be imposed on one temporary exclusion , unless The athlete's athlete or another person be given either : (a) opportunity for a Interim hearing -before it. temporary exclusion be imposed or in a timely manner following the imposition of a temporary exclusion , or (b) the possibility of accelerating it ; preliminary hearing, in accordance with Article 8, in a timely manner, temporary exclusion enter into force.
If one temporary exclusion be imposed on the basis of an A- test positive analysis result , and a subsequent analysis of a B- test (upon request from The athlete's athlete or the organisation of the organisation ; () do not confirm the result of A- the test, , undergoing The athlete's athlete no further. temporary exclusion as a result of infringement of Article 2.1. In case where : The athlete's athlete (or The athlete's vertigo keep, depending on what is stated in the rules of the relevant organisation of major sporting events or the international alliance) has been removed from one competition, on the basis of an infringement of Article 2.1 and the subsequent analysis of B, the test, do not confirm the result of A- the test, , can The athlete's athlete or the team resume participation in competition, if it is still possible for The athlete's athlete or the team to participate in a different way, the competition.
[ Comments to Article 7.9 : Before a temporary exclusion can be imposed unilaterally by an anti-doping organisation, the internal investigation specified in the Code shall be carried out first. In addition, the signatory party to a temporary exclusion shall also ensure that the physical athlete is given the possibility of a preliminary hearing either before or immediately after the suspension of the temporary exclusion or an accelerated consultation in the Member State of the Union ; pursuant to Article 8, immediately after the suspension of the temporary exclusion. The Islayer has the right to appeal in accordance with Article 13.2.3.
In the rare cases where the analysis of the B sample does not confirm the results of the A test, the physical athlete who is temporarily excluded, where circumstances permit, may be permitted to participate in subsequent competitions during the sporting event. The same applies, depending on the relevant rules of the international league in a holduous-kilt that, if the team is still in competition, the athlete can participate in future competitions.
Credits and other persons shall be credited to a temporary exclusion in the exclusion period, which is ultimately imposed or accepted pursuant to Article 10.11.3 or 10.11.4 ].
7.10 Execution of decisions resulting from a result of handling.
In all cases where one antidingorganization has claimed that an infringement of the anti-doping rules has been committed, withdrawing an infringement of the time-breaking rules imposed on them ; temporary exclusion or has been agreed with one PE-christs or other person whether to impose a sanction without consultation, it shall : antidingorganization notify the other, as referred to in Article 14.2.1, to others ; antidingorganizations ; who have the right to a or pursuant to Article 13.2.3.
7.11 Retreat from PE.
If one PE-christs or other person withdraws from sport, while a procedure for the resulting handling is in progress, the retracts of the system shall be maintained ; antidingorganization which carries out the jurisdiction of the resulting jurisdiction to complete its process for the resulting operational procedure. If one PE-christs or other person retracts before a process of result handling has started, has the organisation of the anti-doping organisation, which had jurisdiction over The athlete's athlete or other person in relation to the resulting handling of the time point, where : The athlete's athlete or other person committed the infringement of the time opingance rules, jurisdiction to implement its resulting handling procedure.
[ Comment on Article 7.11 : The behaviour of an athlete or other person before the athlete person or the other person is subject to an antidal organisation ' s jurisdiction does not constitute a violation of the time-breaking rules, but may be a legitimate basis ; in order to deny the athletes or the other person, membership of an athletic organisation ].
ARTICLE 8 THE RIGHT TO AN UNBIASED HEARING AND THE TERMINATION OF TERMINATION OF CONSULTATION
8.1 Unpartisan hearings.
Every antidingorganization with responsibility for the handling of results, must at least give any person, as it claims has committed a violation of the anti-doping rules, a timely impartial hearing in front of a fair and impartial consultation panel. A timely reasoned decision that specifically includes an explanation of the cause (s) of a exclusion, period , must published as stated in Article 14.3.
[ Comment on Article 8.1 : This Article shall require that the athlete or other person at a time in the resulting handling process must be given the opportunity for a timely, fair and impartial consultation. These principles are also contained in Article 6.1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and are principles generally accepted in international law. This article is not intended to replace the rules of each anti-doping organisation's own rules of consultation, but to ensure that each antidal organisation provides a consistency with these principles.
8.2 Hears under sports events.
The hearings to be held in connection with sports events , may be carried out by speeding up the procedure in accordance with the rules applicable to it ; antidingorganization And the audible panel.
[ Comment to Article 8.2 : for example, a hearing can be accelerated immediately before a higher sporting event, in which the decision of a violation of an anti-doping rule is necessary to determine whether the athletes are fit to participate in the sporting event, or during a sporting event, in which the decision on the matter affects the validity of the performance of the sportsmen and its continued participation in the sporting event ].
8.3 Disclaimer.
The right to a hearing can be deduefent either explicitly, or by The athlete's athlete or another person fails to protest at a antidingorganization claims that there has been a breach of the time-down code, within the time limit, which is apparent in the time limit, antidings of antidings, rules.
8.4 Execution of decisions.
The antidingorganization, in charge of the handling of results, a reasoned consultation decision shall be submitted, or where the right to a consultation is discharged, a justification for the measures taken to : The athlete's athlete and others antidingorganizations with the right to appeal under Article 13.2.3 as set out in Article 14.2.1.
8.5 Single hearing CAS.
Claimed infringements of the anti-doping rules against a International sportsmen and athletes or one PE-level athletes at national level , can be heard directly by CAS without requirements for prior consultation, if : the physical athlete, the anitigation organisation ; with responsibility for the resulting handling, WADA or other antidingorganization , which would have had the right to appeal from the first instance a consultation decision ; CAS, agrees with .
[ Comments to Article 8.5 : in some cases, the combined costs of holding a hearing at international or national level and then a repeat of the hearing at CAS may be significant. There is no reason why the athlete or the anti-doping organisation will incurase the additional costs of two hearings, where all parties identified in this Article are satisfied that their interests are protected in a single hearing. An antidying organisation wishing to participate in a CAS hearing, either as a party or as an observer, may make as a condition for the approval of a single hearing that it is granted right to this ].
ARTICLE 9 AUTOMATIC DISQUALIFICATION (ANNULMENT) OF INDIVIDUAL OUTCOMES
Inherit of an antidal rule in a individual sport found in a test taken ; Under Competition automatically leads to disqualification (cancellation) of the result obtained in the person concerned competition, , with the resulting thereafter consequences , including the severance of any medals, points and prizes.
[ Comments to Article 9 : for the holder-slaps, all premiums are received by individual players. However, the disqualifying of the team as referred to in Article 11 shall be disqualified. In sports, there is no holduper, but where premiums are granted for teams, disqualification or other disciplinary action against the team shall be disqualified if one or more team members have committed a violation of the time-breaking rules, in accordance with the international premier rules applicable ].
ARTICLE 10 PENALTIES ON INDIVIDUALS
10.1 Disqualifier (cancellation) of results from sporting events, where an estimated time rule was violated.
If an antidingent rule is being violated or in connection with a sporting event , if the organisation that is responsible for The sports event : , decide, lead to the fact that all The athlete's vertigo the individual results obtained by the said : athletic event shall be disqualified, (annulled) with all of the following : consequences , including the severance of all the medals, points and premiums, except in cases covered by Article 10.1.1.
Factors to be taken into account in the consideration of disqualification of other results below one, sporting event , may, for example, be the gravity of : The athlete's vertigo infringement of the rules of application and of : The athlete's vertigo tests were negative in the others, competitions.
[ Comments to Article 10.1 : Where Article 9 disqualifies the result in a single competition in which the test of the athlete is tested positive (for example 100 metres of smoke), this article may result in disqualification of all the results in all the running during the The sporting event (for example, the World Cup in Floor) ].
10.1.1 If The athlete's athlete show that there is no available, its own fault or negligence ; in the event of infringement, disqualified (Cancel) The athlete's vertigo individual results in others competitions, not unless The athlete's vertigo results in others competitions, than the one where the infringement of the time-breaking rule is carried out, presumably, by The athlete's vertigo Violation of an antidbit rule.
10.2 Exclusion because of presence, use, or attempted use or possession, by a prohibited substance, or No method.
Exclusion the period for a breach of Article 2.1, 2.2 or 2.6 shall be as follows, where possible for a reduction or suspension in accordance with Articles 10.4, 10.5 or 10.6.
10.2.1 Exclusion the period shall be four years in which :
10.2.1.1 The withdrawal of the anti-tidings rules does not involve a specified substance, unless The athlete's athlete or other person may show that the violation of the time opamination was not intentional.
10.2.1.2 The overuse of the anti-doping rules shall involve a specified substance, and the organisation of the organisation ; may show that the infringement of the time opamination was intentional.
10.2.2 If Article 10.2.1 does not apply, the exclusion period shall be two years.
10.2.3 As applied in Articles 10.2 and 10.3, the term ' intentional ` is intended to identify the PE-suamen, It's cheating. The term therefore requires that : The athlete's athlete or other person was involved in behaviour, as he or she knew, an infringement of the time opting or knew that there was a significant risk that the behaviour could constitute or result in a violation of the time-breaking rules and clearly ignored ; the risk. An infringement of the anti-doping rules, which is the result of a positive analytical result for a substance which is only prohibited ; Under competition, they must be resistible as being non-"intentional" if the substance is one ; specified substance, and The athlete's athlete can demonstrate that it banned substance was used outside of competition. An infringement of the rules of application, which is the result of a positive analysis result of a substance which is only prohibited ; Under Competition , shall not be regarded as ' deliberate ` if the substance is not one ; specified substance, , and The athlete's athlete can demonstrate that it prohibited substance, uusable outside of competition, in a context unrelated to an athletic performance.
10.3 Exclusion because of other infringements of the time opting of the time ingers, .
Other infringements of the anti-tidings rules other than those listed in Article 10.2 shall lead to : exclusion, during the following periods, unless Article 10.5 or 10.6 may apply :
10.3.1 For the infringement of Article 2.3 or Article 2.5, exclusion, the period shall be four years, unless, in the case of omission of the effect of sampling, The athlete's athlete may show that the infringement of the rules of application was not intentional (as defined in Article 10.2.3), in which case : exclusion, the period shall be two years.
10.3.2 For infringements of Article 2.4 shall : exclusion, the period of two years, with the possibility of reduced to a minimum of one year, depending on : The athlete's vertigo severity guilt. Flexibility between two years and a year exclusion, in this Article, shall not apply to : PE-suamen, where a pattern of changes in the whereabouts of the last minute or other behaviour raises serious suspicions that one PE-christs tried to avoid being available to sampling.
10.3.3 Exclusion the period for infringement of Articles 2.7 or 2.8 shall be at least four years and up to : exclusion, in life, depending on the seriousness of the offence. An infringement of Article 2.7 or 2.8, involving a minor, is considered to be a particularly serious breach and if it is carried out by a the aid of sportsmen and women, and include others other than those specified substances, is the penalty exclusion, For life of the supporting person of the sportsmen and women, Furthermore, serious infringements of Article 2.7 or 2.8, which may also constitute a breach of non-sporting laws and statutes, shall also be reported to the competent administrative, professional or judicial authorities.
[ Comments to Article 10.3.3 : People involved in the doping of athletes or are covering up to doping must be able to impose sanctions that are even more serious than those who are tested positive. As the authorisation of sports organisations is normally limited to exclusion from accreditation, membership and other sporting benefits, the report by the sportsmen and women to the competent authorities is an important step in the fight against doping ].
10.3.4 For the infringement of Article 2.9 it shall be submitted to : exclusion, period shall be at least two years and up to four years depending on the seriousness of the offence.
10.3.5 For infringements of Article 2.10 shall : exclusion, the period should be two years, with the possibility of reduced to a minimum of one year, depending on : The athlete's vertigo or other persona to the extent of guilt and other circumstances relating to the case.
[ Comments to Article 10.3.5 : Where the other person referred to in Article 2.10 is an organisation and not an individual, it may be disciplined as specified in Article 12. ♪NO!
10.4 Disposal of the exclusion, period during which : PE-christs or other person is No guilt or negligence.
If one PE-christs or other person demonstrating in an individual case that he or she is without its own fault or negligence, otherwise, it shall apply ; exclusion, period lapfall.
[ Comments to Article 10.4 : This Article and Article 10.5.2 shall apply only to the imposition of penalties ; they may not be used to determine whether an infringement of the time oping-up rules has been violated. They will only be relevant in exceptional circumstances, such as, for example, where an athlete can demonstrate that he or she was sabotaged by a competitor, in spite of all care. Reverse principle applies to the principle of being without protection or negligence in the following circumstances : (a) a positive test due to the wrong mark or the vitamin or food supplements (athletes are responsible for what they are consuming ; (Article 2.1.1) and be warned against the risk of vitamin and food supplements ; (b) the management of a prohibited substance by the personal physician or coach of the sportsmen or coach without the knowledge of the athletes who are responsible for the choice of medical personnel and to inform the medical staff that they are not allowed to do so ; get a prohibited substance) ; and (c) sabotage of the food or beverages of the sportsmen or beverages by a spouse, coach or other of the persons of the sportsmen and sportsmen who are responsible for what they are consuming and the behaviour of persons whom they grant access to ; their food and beverages). However, depending on the unique facts in a particular case, one or more of the situations referred to may result in a reduced penalty under Article 10.5 on the basis of the principle of being without any significant fault or negligence ].
10.5 Reduce of one exclusion, period on the basis of no substantial guilt or negligence.
10.5.1 Reduction in penalties applicable to specified substances, or contaminated products ; for infringements of Articles 2.1, 2.2 or 2.6.
10.5.1.1 Species of substance.
Where the infringement of the anti-doping rules involves a specified substance, , and The athlete's athlete or other person may prove to be without any significant cause or negligence, then exclusion, the period at the very least be a reprimand and no exclusion, period and as maximum two years ; exclusion, period depending on The athlete's vertigo or other persona degree of guilt.
10.5.1.2 Preunted products.
In case where : The athlete's athlete or other person may prove to be without any significant cause or negligence, and that it revealed prohibited substance, came from one. contaminated product, must exclusion, the period at the very least be a reprimand and no exclusion, period and as maximum two years ; exclusion, period depending on The athlete's vertigo or other persona degree of guilt.
[ Comment on Article 10.5.1.2 : In the evaluation of the degree of guilt of sport, for example, it will be the benefit of the athlete's benefit if the sportsmen had given up on the product, which was later condemned to be contaminated, on its doping control form ].
10.5.2 Application of the principle of being without significant fault or negligence ; in addition to the application of Article 10.5.1.
If one PE-christs or other person demonstrating in an individual case where Article 10.5.1 may not apply, that he or she is without its own fault or negligence, so, with the possibility of further reduction or waste as specified in Article 10.6, the otherwise applicable exclusions period may be reduced on the basis of : The athlete's athlete or other persona the degree of guilt, but reduced, exclusion, period must be at least half of the exclusion, period, which is otherwise applicable. Otherwise, if applicable exclusion, period is life, then the reduced period after this Article shall be at least eight years.
[ Comment to Article 10.5.2 : Article 10.5.2 may be used for any infringement of the rules of application, except for the articles in which the presets are an element in the infringement of the rules of application (for example, Articles 2.5, 2.7, 2.8 or 2.9), or an element in any one ; specific sanction (for example, Article 10.2.1), or a process of elimination as already specified in an article based on the level of guilt of sport or other persons, is already specified in an article based on the level of guilt of the physical or other person.
10.6 Disposal, reduction or suspension of exclusion, period or other consequences for reasons other than guilt.
10.6.1 Extensive assistance at the detection or detection of infringement of the time opting.
10.6.1.1 One antidingorganization with responsibility for the resulting handling of an infringement of the time rules may, in advance of a final appeal decision pursuant to Article 13 or the expiry of the time of appeal, repeal part of the appeal period, exclusion, period imposed on a person ' s case, where : The athlete's athlete or another person has provided comprehensive assistance, to a antidingorganization , penal authority or disciplinary body that spades : (i) the organisation of the time of the organisation ; discovers or causes another persona infringement of the rules of application, or (ii) resulting in a case of a criminal or disciplinary body, whether or not to raise a matter for another ; persona any infringement or breach of professional rules and the information given by the person who is giving comprehensive assistance ; made available to the organisation of the organisation ; with responsibility for a result of handling. After a final appeal decision pursuant to Article 13 or the expiry of the time of appeal may be : antidingorganization only repeal a part of the otherwise applicable exclusion, period after approval WADA and the relevant international union. The extent to which the otherwise applicable exclusion, period may be repealed, must be based on the severity of the infringement of the time-breaking rules committed by : The athlete's athlete or the other person , and the significance of the comprehensive assistance, , as The athlete's athlete or the other person has given the efforts to eliminate doping in sport. No more than three-quarters of the otherwise applicable exclusion, period may be deleted. Otherwise, if applicable exclusion, period is life, so that the non-suspended period under this Article shall be at least eight years. If The athlete's athlete or other person fails to continue to cooperate and to give complete and credible ; comprehensive assistance, on which suspension of the exclusion, period was based, so shall : the organisation of the anti-doping organisation, suspended exclusion, the period, the reintroduction of the original exclusion, period . If one antidingorganization decide to re-establish a suspended exclusion, period or decide not to re-establish a suspended exclusion, period, then that decision may be appealed by any person, which is entitled to appeal under Article 13.
10.6.1.2 To further request sportsmen and women or others people to give comprehensive assistance, to antidingorganizations on request from the organisation of the anti-doping organisation, resulting in a result of a result, or on request from : The athlete's athlete or other person, claimed that violating or breached the time-breaking rules may be : WADA at any time of the resulting handling process, including after the decision of the Board of Appeal, under Article 13, decide what it considers to be a suitable suspension of the current application ; exclusion, period and other consequences In exceptional circumstances, WADA accepting suspensions of : exclusion, the period and other consequences for comprehensive assistance, greater than those referred to in this Article, or none, or exclusion, period and / or no refund of premium money or payment of fines or costs. WADA's approval shall be subject to the same principles as to the reintroduction of sanction, as otherwise stated in this Article. Despite Article 13, WADA's decisions under this Article shall not be appealed by any other person, antidingorganization.
10.6.1.3 If One antidingorganization suspends a part of the penalty otherwise in force due to : comprehensive assistance, it shall be communicated to the other Member for the reasons of the decision ; antidingorganizations which have the right to appeal under Article 13.2.3 as set out in Article 14.2. In exceptional circumstances, where WADA decide that it will be in the best interests of the doping control, WADA the grace of one. antidingorganization to conclude an appropriate confidential agreement which restricts or exposes the publication of the agreement on : comprehensive assistance, or the nature of the comprehensive assistance, is given.
[ Comment to Article 10.6.1 : A cooperation with sportsmen and sportsmen, sportsmen and other persons who recognise their failures and are prepared to bring other infringements of the anti-doping rules out in the light is important in order to achieve this. PE PE. This is the only circumstance in accordance with the code, where the withdrawal of an otherwise applicable exclusion ; period are allowed ].
10.6.2 Concession of a violation of the time-breaking rules, in case there is no other evidence.
If one PE-christs or other person voluntarily admits to have committed a violation of the rules of application before they have received notice of an infringement ; sampling, , where applicable. observe an infringement of the rules of application (or, in the case of a second infringement of the time opingles than in accordance with Article 2.1), before receipt of the first notification of the request for infringement in accordance with Article 7), and Admittedly, the only reliable evidence of the violation at the time of the concession may be : exclusion, the period is reduced but not for less than half of the exclusion, period which otherwise would apply.
[ Comment to Article 10.6.2 : The purpose of this article is that it should apply when an athlete or other person is standing up and admitted to a violation of the time-breaking rules in circumstances where no anitrep organisation is aware that There may have been a violation of the anti-doping rules. It is not intended that it should apply to circumstances in which the concession is granted after the athlete or other person considers that he or she is close to being detected. The time that the exclusion is reduced should be based on the likelihood that if he or she had not stepped forward voluntarily, the sportsmen or other person would have been discovered.
10.6.3 Immediate admission of a violation of the anti-doping rules after having been confronted with an infringement which may be sanctioned under Article 10.2.1 or Article 10.3.1.
One PE-christs or other person, is subject to a penalty of up to four years under Article 10.2.1 or 10.3.1 (to escape or refuse ; sampling, or cheat with sampling), may immediately acknowledge the alleged infringement of the time-breaking rules after having been confronted by an anti-doping organisation and after the discretion of : WADA and the antidingorganization with responsibility for the resulting handling, receiving a reduction of : exclusion, the period of down to at least two years depending on the seriousness of the infringement and, The athlete's vertigo and other persona severity guilt.
10.6.4 Application of multiple reasons for reducing a sanction.
When one PE-christs or another person demonstrate justification for the reduction of sanction in accordance with more than one provision in Articles 10.4, 10.5 or 10.6, otherwise the applicable ; exclusion, period is determined in accordance with 10.2, 10.3, 10.4 and 10.5 prior to the use of a reduction or suspension pursuant to Article 10.6. If The athlete's athlete or another person demonstrate entitlement to a reduction or suspension of : exclusion, the period in accordance with Article 10.6 may : exclusion, the period may be reduced or suspended, but not to less than one quarter of the otherwise applicable ; exclusion, period .
[ Comment to Article 10.6.4 : The appropriate sanction shall be determined in a sequence of four steps. First, the treatment body shall determine which of the basic penalties (Articles 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, or 10.5), applicable to the infringement of the time opting of the time opting. Secondly, if the basic sanction allows for a range of sanctions, the consultation panel may determine the applicable sanction within the range in accordance with the level of blame of the athlete or other person. In a third stage, the consultation panel provides for the suspension or reduction of sanction (Article 10.6). In the end, the consultation panel determines when exclusion the period, shall begin under Article 10.11.
Several examples of how Article 10 shall be used in Appendix 2 ] shall be provided.
10.7 Recurrent's violations.
10.7.1 For one PE-christs or other persona the second infringement of the time opting rules shall : exclusion, the period shall be the longest of :
(a) six months ;
(b) half of exclusion, the period imposed on the first infringement of the time rules for non-compliance without taking any of the reductions provided for in Article 10.6 ; or
(c) the double of the otherwise applicable ; exclusion, period for the second infringement of the rules on anti-doping treatment as though it was a first offence without taking any of the reductions under Article 10.6.
exclusion, The period determined as above can be further reduced in the application of Article 10.6.
10.7.2 A third infringement of the time-breaking rules will always lead to : exclusion, in the case of life other than, if the third infringement meets the conditions of waste or reduction of : exclusion, the period in accordance with Articles 10.4 or 10.5 or in relation to a breach of Article 2.4. In these particular cases, exclusion, period from eight years to exclusion, For life.
10.7.3 A violation of the time opting rules where one PE-christs or other person has proved to be without its own fault or negligence ; shall not be regarded as a prior violation in accordance with this Article.
10.7.4 Additional rules for certain repeated infringements.
10.7.4.1 To be able to impose sanctions pursuant to Article 10.7, a violation of an anti-doping rule shall be considered only for a non-compliance with a different infringement, if applicable ; the organisation of the organisation ; can demonstrate that : The athlete's athlete or another person offend the second violation of the anti-doping rules after The athlete's athlete or another person received information pursuant to Article 7, or after the organisation of the organisation ; have made a reasonable attempt to inform them of the first infringement of the time opting of the time opting. If the organisation of the organisation ; cannot demonstrate that the infringement is considered to be a first offence, and the penalty must be based on the infringement that results in the harshest punishment.
10.7.4.2 If one antidingorganization in accordance with the imposition of a sanction for a first infringement of the rules of application, the facts involved The athlete's vertigo or another persona in the event of an infringement of the time rules which have taken place in advance of notification of the first infringement, the organisation of the organisation ; impose yet another sanction on the basis of the sanction which could have been sentenced if the two offences had been sentenced at the same time. Results in all competitions, in the period back to the first infringement of the time opting of the time ingers, disqualified pursuant to Article 10.8.
10.7.5 Repeated infringements of the anti-doping rules during a ten-year period
For the purposes of Article 10.7, the individual infringement of the time opting shall take place within the same period of ten years in order to be considered to be repeated infringements.
10.8 Disqualifier of results in competitions, after sampling, or a violation of an antidbit rule.
In addition to automatic disqualification of the results in it, competition, , in which a positive test in accordance with Article 9, all must : The athlete's vertigo other contests that have been obtained from the date on which a positive result is test (Whether or not this happens) Under Competition or outside of competition, ), or where an estimated time rule was violated until one temporary exclusion or exclusion, come into force, cancels with the severance of medals, points and premiums to follow, unless otherwise determined by the injustifying reasons.
[ Comment to Article 10.8 : Nothing in the Code prevents pure athletes or other persons who have suffered injury due to acts of a person who committed a violation of the time-breaking rules shall be in pursuit of any right, as otherwise ; it would have to claim damages from such person ].
10.9 Allocation of CAS -incurred costs and waived premium money.
Prioritizing of repayment of CAS -incurred costs and deducts from the premium shall be : first payment of costs imposed by CAS, then redistribution of deducts from the premium to others, PE-suamen, if this is stated in the rules in force in the international rules, and the third, reimbursement of costs incurred ; the organisation of the anti-doping organisation, which completed the result-handling of the case.
10.10 economic sanctions.
In their own rules, anti-doping organisations can prescribe a proportionate recovery of costs or economic sanctions because of the violation of the time-breaking rules. However, reorganisation organisations may only impose financial penalties where the maximum period for the exclusion period is imposed. Economic sanctions can only be imposed on the principle of proportionality. No recovery of costs or economic sanctions can be used as a basis for reducing the exclusions period or other sanctions which would otherwise apply in accordance with the Code.
10.11 Excavation Period Start Date.
Unless otherwise stated in the following steps : exclusion, the period in force on the date on which : The athlete's athlete in the form of a final consultation, a sanction has been sentenced in the form of : exclusion, or if the consultation is dropped, or there is no consultation, at the date of which : exclusion, the period is accepted or otherwise imposed.
10.11.1 Delays that cannot be executed The athlete's athlete or another person .
In the case of significant delays in the consultation procedure or other aspects of : doping control, , as The athlete's athlete or the other person If there is no cause, the body that imposes the sanction can speed up. the exclusion, so it shall already enter into force on the date on which : the samples, was collected or on the date of a second infringement of the time opting. All competition results obtained during exclusion, the period, , including exclusion with retroactive effect, disqualification shall be disqualified.
[ Comment to Article 10.11.1 : In other cases of infringement of the age rules other than those under Article 2.1 it may take a long time for an anitanitation organisation to detect and provide sufficient facts to detect an infringement of : the time-down rules, in particular where the athlete or other person has made conscious actions to avoid detection. In such circumstances, the flexibility given in this Article on the earlier start of the sanction must not be used.
10.11.2 Privilege granted.
If The athlete's athlete or another person immediately (which, in any case, for a PE-christs means before the athlete is competing again) grants the infringement of the time opt-out after having been confronted with the infringement of the time-breaking rules of the organisation of the organisation ; , can the exclusion, enter into force already on the date of the sampling, or on the date on which a second infringement of the rules on the anti-doping rules shall be carried out at the latest. In each case where this Article is used, The athlete's athlete or the other person atleast half of the exclusion, the period from the date on which : The athlete's athlete or the other person accepted the evaluation of the sanction, the date on which the decision on the assessment of the sanction is rendered, or the date on which the penalty is otherwise in the sentence. This Article shall not apply if the exclusion has already been reduced in accordance with Article 10.6.3.
10.11.3 Receiving of already passed temporary exclusion or exclusion.
10.11.3.1 : If one temporary exclusion be imposed and respected by : The athlete's athlete or other person That's how it's resisticounted. temporary exclusion period in it exclusion, period, as The athlete's athlete or other person , at the end of the day. If one exclusion, period has been issued in accordance with a decision, which is subsequently appealed, so that it receives : The athlete's athlete or other person the set-off of such a pass, exclusion, period in it exclusion, period, which may, in the final analysis, be imposed on appeal.
10.11.3.2 If one PE-christs or other person by voluntary and in writing, temporary exclusion from one antidingorganization with responsibility for the resulting crafts and then respect it ; temporary exclusion, such period of conferment of a voluntary basis ; temporary exclusion in the exclusion, period , which may ultimately be imposed. A copy of The athlete's vertigo or other persona voluntary acceptance of a temporary exclusion shall be immediately submitted to each party entitled to receive notification of an alleged infringement of the time rules referred to in Article 14.1.
[ Comment on Article 10.11.3.3, the voluntary acceptance of an athlete's voluntary acceptance of a temporary exclusion does not constitute a concession from the side of sport and must not in any way be used to draw a negative conclusion to the sportsmen and sportsmen ].
10.11.3.3 A period shall not be set off for a period prior to the date of the date of the date ; temporary exclusion or the voluntary temporary exclusion come into force, whether or not The athlete's athlete has chosen not to compete or is suspended by its team.
10.11.3.4 In the holdutuous, where one exclusion, period is required to hold a team, exclusion, the period starting on the date of the last decision of the consultation of : exclusion, or, if the consultation is dropped on that date, the exclusion, are accepted or otherwise imposed, unless otherwise determined in the interests of justice. Any Period of temporary exclusion from hold (either imposed or voluntarily), the total must be taken into account, exclusion, period , to be endusted.
[ Comment to Article 10.11 : Article 10.11 makes it clear that delays such as the sportsmen and the sportsmen are without cause, timely admission to the side and temporary exclusion of the sportsmen and the temporary deferral of the sportsmen and the other. only valid reasons to start the exclusion earlier than the date of the last consultation decision ].
10.12 Status below exclusion.
10.12.1 Prohibition of participation under exclusion.
One PE-christs or other person , there is excluded , don't go in any way under the exclusion, participate in competitions, activities or activities (excluding approved information programmes on anti-doping or rehabilitation programmes) approved or organised by one of the signatories to parties, , they signatories of the parties ; member organisations, or a club or other member organisation under one, signatories of the party ; member organization, or in competitions, that are approved or arranged by a professional league or organization that is organizing sports events at international or national level or any other athletic activity at an elite or national level financed by a public institution.
One PE-christs or another person on the subject of a exclusion, In more than four years, after the four years of exclusion, participate in : PE-christs in local sports events, not sanctioned or otherwise in one of the the signatories of the code ' s signatories Jurisdiction or member of one of The signatories of the code ' s party, but only as long as the local sporting event is not at a level otherwise qualified to qualify as such ; PE-christs or other person directly or indirectly to compete in (or assemrees points to) a national championship or a national championship ; international sporting event, and does not include : The athlete's athlete or other person in any way works with underage.
One PE-christs or another person that a exclusion has been imposed shall remain committed to subordinate doping control.
[ Comment to Article 10.12.12.1 : In accordance with Article 10.12.2 below, for example, no sportsmen may be excluded from a training camp, showing or training organised by the national associations or a club member of that country or a member of that country ; national federations, or funded by a public institution. Furthermore, no sportsmen can compete in a professional league which does not fall under a signatories (for example, the National Hockey League, National Basketball Association, etc.), international sports events organised by a non-signatories, or national sporting events organised by a non-signatories, without triggering the consequences of the consequences referred to in 10.12.3. The term 'activity' includes, for example, administrative activities, such as the work of official, director, functionary, employed or voluntary for the organisation described in this Article. Exclusions in the case of one sport are also recognised by other sports sectors (see Article 15.1, Mutual Recognition) ].
10.12.2 Recording of training.
By way of derogation to Article 10.12.1, PE-christs resume training with a team or to use the facilities of a club or other member organization of a signatories of the party ; Member organisation in the shortest test of : (1) for the last two months of a Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period , or (2) the last quarter of the enclosed exclusion, period .
[ Comment on Article 10.12.2 : In many Dutch and individual sporting practices (e.g. skiing and gymnastics), an athlete may not train effectively on their own and be ready for competition at the end of the exclusion of the sportsmen of sportsmen and women ; Period. During the period of training, as described in this Article, no sportsmen shall not compete or take part in other activities described in Article 10.12.1 other than training, ∙ ♪NO!
10.12.3 Prohibition of the prohibition on participation under the exclusion, .
If one PE-christs or another person declared excluded , violating the ban on participation under the exclusion, as described in Article 10.12.1, disqualified the results from such participation, and a new one ; exclusion, period corresponding to the original exclusion, period shall be added to the end of the original exclusion, period . The new exclusion, period may be adapted on the basis of : The athlete's athlete or other persona to the extent of guilt and other circumstances in the case of the case. The decision to the extent to which a PE-christs or other person has infringed the prohibition of participation, and whether an adjustment is appropriate shall be taken by it ; antidingorganization, the result of which the result of the action led to the first set of the first exclusion, period . This decision may be appealed under Article 13.
If one the aid of sportsmen and women, or other person helps one person to violate the prohibition of participation in : exclusion, n , can one antidingorganization with jurisdiction over such a the aid of sportsmen and women, or other person impose penalties on penalties for the infringement of Article 2.9 for such assistance.
10.12.4 Withdrawal of financial aid under exclusion.
In the case of an infringement of the anti-doping rules, which does not involve a reduced sanction for specified substances as described in Article 10.4 or 10.5, anything or any sport-related financial support or other sports-related benefits, as such person recipient, be held by them signatories to parties, , signatories of the parties ; Member organisations and governments.
10.13 Automatic publication of sanction.
Automatic publication is a compulsory part of each penalty as set out in Article 14.3.
[ Comment on Article 10 : Harmonisation of sanctions has been one of the most discussed and debated issues in the field of recruitment. Harmonisation means that the same rules and criteria are used to assess the unique facts in each case. Arguments to call for the reminissation of sanctions are based on differences between sports, including, for example : in some sports, athletes are professionals who have a huge profit from sport, and others are the sportsmen and women. amateurs ; in the sports sectors in which the career of an athlete is short, has a standard deferral ; period a much more significant impact on the athlete's athlete than in sports, where careers traditionally be a lot longer. One of the main arguments in favour of harmonisation is that it is simply not true that two sportsmen and women from the same country tested positive for the same banned substance must be subject to different sanctions. only because they participate in different sports sectors. In addition, flexibility in sanctions has often been seen as unacceptable opportunities for some sports organisations to be more indulgent with those who are using doping. The absence of the harmonisation of sanctions has also often been the basis for conflicts over jurisdiction between international union and national antime-chorus organisations ].
ARTICLE 11 CONSEQUENCES FOR CREW
11.1 Sampling within Holds kilt.
Assuming more than one team player in a holdutuous, have been notified of a possible infringement of an estimated period of an estimated period in accordance with Article 7 ; sporting event , the organisation shall be responsible for : The sports event : implement appropriate, targeted sampling, of the team in The event period.
11.2 Consequences of holdutuous.
If more than two teamparticipants in a holdutuous, is found guilty of having violated the anti-doping rules in : the event period , can the sports event organizing organization iconvict the team an appropriate sanction (e.g. loss of point loss, disqualification from one competition, or one sporting event or any other penalty) in addition to any other penalty ; consequences to be imposed on the individual, PE-christs that commits the violation of the anti-doping rules.
11.3 organization with responsibility for The sports event : can define more stringent consequences for Holds.
The organisation with responsibility for one sporting event may choose to establish rules for The sports event : which imposes consequences for holduets, that are more stringent than the penalties provided for in Article 11.2, for : The sports event.
[ Comment on Article 11.3 : for example, the International Olympic Committee may lay down rules requiring disqualification of a team from the Olympic Games on the basis of a small number of infringements of the anti-doping rules in the course of the games of the Games ].
ARTICLE 12 PENALTIES FOR SPORTING ORGANISATIONS
Nothing in this. code prevents one signatories, or a government that accepts Codex , in enforcing its own rules to impose sanctions on another sporting organisation, as it is intended to do so ; signatories, or member of it signatories, or government has jurisdiction.
[ Comment on Article 12 : This article makes it clear that the code does not limit any disciplinary rights which may otherwise exist between the organizations ].
ARTICLE 13 APPEAL
13.1 Decisions to be appealed.
Decisions taken in accordance with Codex or rules adopted in accordance with Codex may be appealed as listed below in Article 13.2-13.4 or in accordance with other provisions in : Codex or international standards. Such decisions shall continue to apply under the appeal proceedings, unless otherwise specified by the appeal process. Before an appeal procedure begins, all options for the examination of the decision in accordance with antidings of antidings, rules shall be exhausted provided that the examination respects the principles set out in Article 13.2.2 below (except as provided for in Article 13.1.3).
1.1.1. The extent of the examination of a decision is without limitation.
The scope of the examination of appeal shall include all matters relevant to the case and are expressly not limited to the questions or the extent of the examination by the original decision-maker.
13.1.2 CAS shall not comply with the verdict, which is appealed.
In its decision making, CAS take no account of the discretionary assessment carried out by the instansen whose decision is appealed.
[ Comments to Article 13.1.2 : CAS retenses are de novo. Previous legal processes do not limit evidence and have no meaning in the CAS hearing ].
13.1.3 It is not required that : WADA the internal remedies are exhausted.
When WADA has the right to appeal in accordance with Article 13 and no other party appealed to a final decision on : antidings of antidings, procedure, may WADA appeal for such a decision directly to CAS without having to exhaust other legal remedies, antidings of antidings, procedure.
[ Comment on Article 13.1.3 : If a decision has been taken before the final stage of an antiding organisation ' s procedure (for example, a first hearing), and no parties choose to appeal the decision to be taken at the next level at the time of the organisation of the time of the organisation, procedure (e.g. board), WADA may bypass the remaining steps of the internal procedure of the time oping-up and appeal directly to CAS ].
13.2 Appeal of decisions on infringements of the time rules for infringement, consequences , temporary exclusions ; recognition of decisions and jurisdiction.
Decisions concerning the infringement of the rules of the time rules ; decisions taken and then penalties, or not impose penalties on the infringement of the rules of application of the time rules ; decisions on the failure to comply with the rules of application ; decisions on a case of infringement proceedings may not be allowed to continue on procedural matters ; causes (including, for example, obsolescence) ; a decision by WADA not to give an exception to the claim for a six-month message for a PE-christs, that has withdrawn to return to competition, under Article 5.7.1, a decision by : WADA to grant the results in accordance with Article 7.1 ; decisions of a antidingorganization not to make a present positive analytical result or one atypical result as an infringement of the rules of application, or a decision not to proceed with an infringement of the anti-doping rules following an investigation pursuant to Article 7.7 ; and Decisions on : temporary exclusion as a result of a Interim consultation ; an antiding organisation's failure to comply with Article 7.9 ; a decision to a antidingorganization does not have jurisdiction to determine an alleged infringement of the time opting or its sanctions ; a decision to suspend or not to suspend the application ; exclusion, period or re-introduction or not re-introduction of a suspended, exclusion, period in accordance with Article 10.6.1 ; a decision pursuant to 10.12.3 ; and a antidingorganization a decision not to recognise another antidingorganization the decision pursuant to Article 15 shall be subject to only the appeal referred to in this Article 13.2.
13.2.1 Appelmatters involving at international level, sportsmen and women, or International sports events.
In the case of a contribution to the participation of a international sporting event, , or in cases involving at international level, sportsmen and women, the decision may be appealed to CAS only.
[ Comment on Article 13.2.1 : CAS decisions are final and binding, with the exception of any investigation required by the annulment or enforcement of arbitration (arbitration).
13.2.2 Appelleases involving others sportsmen and women or others people.
In cases where Article 13.2.1 is not applicable, the decision may be appealed to an independent and impartially consistent manner in accordance with the provisions of the said Regulation ; national antimeingorganization, laid down rules. The rules governing such an appeal shall comply with the following principles :
● a timely consultation ;
● a fair and unwillingness to treat the body ;
● the right to be represented by a lawyer for : personens own account ; and
● a written, reasoned, timely decision.
[ Comments to Article 13.2.2 : An anti-doping organisation may choose to comply with this article by granting the right to appeal directly to the CAS ].
13.2.3 People with the right to appeal.
In cases referred to in Article 13.2.1, the following parties shall have the right to appeal to : CAS : (a) The athlete's athlete or the other person which is the subject of the decision to be made, (b) the other party in the case in which the decision was made, (c) the relevant international union, (d) ; national antimeingorganization, i personens the country of residence or countries where : the person is a national or a licence holder (s), respectively, the International Olympic Committee or the International Paralympic Committee, where the decision may have effect in relation to the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games, including decisions which : affects the qualifying for the Olympic Games or the Paralympic Games, and (f) ; WADA.
In cases referred to in Article 13.2.2, it shall : national antidings of antidings ; the rules decide which parties have the right to appeal to an appeal body at national level, but at least it must include the following parties : (a) PE-christs or other person which are the subject of the decision to be made, (b) the other party in the case in which the decision was taken, (c) the relevant international union, (d) ; national antimeingorganization, i personens the country of residence, and (e) respectively, the International Olympic Committee or the International Paralympic Committee, where the decision may have effect in relation to the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games, including decisions affecting the qualifying for the Olympic Games or the Paralympic Games, and (f) WADA On matters referred to in Article 13.2.2, WADA, The International Olympic Committee, the Paralympanic Committee and the relevant international premise shall also have the right to appeal, CAS in the case of the national decision. A party that submits an appeal shall have the right to assistance from : CAS with a view to obtaining all relevant information from it ; antidingorganization if a decision is appealed and the information is to be made available, if : CAS order here.
The submission deadline of an appeal to be submitted by : WADA , the most recent of the following times :
(a) Twenty-one days after the last date on which any other party in the case could have appealed, or
(b) Twenty-one days after WADA's the receipt of the complete acts relating to the decision.
Regardless of any other provisions contained therein, the only persons who can appeal to them are : temporary exclusion -It's PE-christs or other person that have been imposed on a temporary exclusion.
13.2.4 Contracts and other subsequent authorised appels.
Contractable and other reports referred to in cases brought to the CAS under the code are specifically permitted.
Any party with the right to appeal in accordance with Article 13 shall submit a contract appeal or a subsequent appeal to the most recently with the part of the part of the party.
[ Comment on Article 13.2.4 : This provision is necessary because the CAS since 2011 no longer allows an athlete's right to contraappeal when an anti-doping organisation appeals a decision after the period of time for an appeal to be made available to the sportsmen and the time of appeal. This provision allows for a full consultation with all parties ].
13.3 One antidingorganization failure to depart in a timely decision.
If one antidingorganization in certain cases, the failure to take a decision as to whether there has been a breach of the time rules laid down within a reasonable time limit, WADA , can WADA choosing to appeal directly to CAS , as if : the organisation of the organisation ; had given a decision which did not contravening the provisions of the time opting. If it is treated CAS -Panel determines that a violation of the anti-doping rules has been committed, and that WADA has acted reasonably by choosing to appeal directly to the CAS, WADA's costs and legal fees in connection with the prosecution of the appeal shall be refunded, WADA of the time recovery organisation.
[ Comment to Article 13.3 : Due to the different circumstances of each investigation of infringements of the time opt-out rules and the handling of the results, it is not possible to establish a fixed period during which an organisation ' s organisation ; must make a decision before WADA can intervene by appealing directly to the CAS. Before WADA does this, however, the organisation will consult the anti-doping organisation and to give the anti-doping organisation the opportunity to explain why it has not yet taken a decision. Nothing in this Article is preventing an international association, in also having rules authoritailing it to undertake jurisdiction in cases where the resulting handling of one of its national associations has been unsuitability delayed ].
13.4 Appeller the derogation for the purposes of the processing operation (TUE).
Decisions on the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), may be appealed solely as specified in Article 4.4.
13.5 Notice of appeal decision.
Any request organisation, which is a party to an appeal, shall immediately provide the appeal to the sportsmen or other persons and the other anti-doping organizations which would have been entitled to appeal under Article 13.2.3, as appropriate ; listed under Article 14.2.
13.6 Appeus from decisions taken pursuant to Part 3 and Part 4 of Codex.
With regard to one WADA -notification of non-compliance in accordance with Article 23.5.4 or any consequences assigned under Part Three (Functions and Responsibilities) of Codex , the unit which, WADA -the reporting relates, or as, the consequences, be imposed on the basis of Codex number three alone have the right to appeal ; CAS in accordance with the provisions applicable to such a court.
13.7 Appeal of decisions suspending or repealing a laboratory accreditation.
Decisions taken by WADA about suspending or lifting a laboratory WADA -Accreditation may only be appealed by the laboratory in question and the decision may be appealed only to : CAS.
[ Comment on Article 13 : The aim of the code is to get anti-doping cases resolved through reasonable and manageable internal procedures with a final appeal. The time-making decisions of anti-doping organisations are made transparent in Article 14. Specific persons and organisations, including WADA, are therefore given the opportunity to appeal such decisions. Notice that the definition of interested parties and organisations entitled to appeal pursuant to Article 13 does not include sportsmen or their associations which may benefit from having a different competition participant disqualified ].
ARTICLE 14 PRIVACY AND REPORTING
Principles of coordinating recruitment results, public transparency and accountability, as well as respect for the right to privacy for all sportsmen and women and others people are as follows :
14.1 Information concerning positive analytical results , atypical results and other alleged infringements of the time-breaking rules.
14.1.1 Message to sportsmen and women and others people on the infringement of the time rules.
The regulation and the manner in which the notification of an alleged infringement of anti-doping rules shall be as set out in the rules of the anti-doping organisation, which shall be responsible for the handling of the resulting handling of the time.
14.1.2 Notice concerning the infringement of anti-timing rules national antidings, , international union and WADA.
The Antiding Organization with responsibility for the resulting handling, must also communicate the national antidingorganisation of the athlete is the national anthilte ; international union and WADA on the application of the infringement proceedings at the same time as the communication to The athlete's athlete and other Person.
14.1.3 Contents of an undercorrection for violation of the time opting rules.
The message must include : The name of the kill is the same. Name, country, sports branch and discipline in the sports branch, The athlete's vertigo the level of competition on whether the test was carried out, Under Competition or outside of competition, , the date of collection of the test, and, by the laboratory, the analytical analytical result and other information required by the international standard for sampling and investigation or for other infringements of the time-breaking rules other than in Article 2.1, on the subject of the rule of law and the reasons for the alleged infringement.
14.1.4 Status reports.
Except in the case of investigation, which has not resulted in a notification of infringement of the time rules for infringement pursuant to Article 14.1.1, antidings ' organizations, the referred to in Article 14.1.2 shall be updated periodically on the status and results of the investigation or judicial process carried out in accordance with Articles 7, 8 or 13, and they must be given an immediate written explanation or decision which, explain the solution to the case.
14,1.5 Confidentiality.
The receiving organizations shall not pass on this information to anyone other than those who need to know them (including the relevant staff of the relevant National Olympic Committee, the national premier and the team in a holdutuous), before the anti-doping organisation responsible for the handling of results has published them or has not published them in accordance with Article 14.3.
[ Comment to Article 14.1.5 : The individual antidingorganisation shall establish procedures for the protection of confidential information and for investigation and on the wrong disclosure of confidential information by its own time-running rules, any employee or representative of the anitigation organisation ].
14.2 Notify on a decision of violation of the rules of application and request for case files.
14.2.1 Decisions on the infringement of anti-doping rules given in accordance with Articles 7.10, 8.4, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.12.3 or 13.5 shall include the full justification of the decision, including, if applicable, why the maximum reasons for the decision, potential sanction was not imposed. Where the decision is not in English or French, the organisation of the organisation ; give a brief English or French summary of the decision and the supporting justification.
14.2.2 An anti-tidbit organisation entitled to appeal for a decision pursuant to Article 14.2.1 may, within 15 days of receipt, request a copy of the whole matter relating to the decision.
14.3 Publication.
14.3.1 Identification of a PE-christs or another person , which of a antidingorganization accruing to have committed a violation of the anti-doping rules. published by the antidingorganization that is responsible for the resulting handling, but, at the earliest, after the notification has been given ; The athlete's athlete or the other person in accordance with Articles 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 or 7.7, and for the relevant antidingorganizations in accordance with Article 14.1.2.
14.3.2 Not later than 20 days after a final decision by an appeal body under Article 13.2.1 or 13.2.2 or any such appeal has been dropped or a hearing in accordance with Article 8 has been dropped, or there is no time for it to be : in opposition to the claim that an anti-doping rule has been violated, it shall be discharged ; antidingorganization that are responsible for the handling of results, publishing the decision in the time of appeal, including the sports branch, the overacceding rule, the name of : The athlete's athlete or the other person that have committed the infringement ; prohibited substance, or the prohibited method and the attached consequences. The same antidingorganization shall also be within 20 days, publishing the result of the final appeal decisions concerning the infringement of the rules of application, including the information described above.
14.3.3 In cases where, following a hearing or appeal, it is established that : The athlete's athlete or another person did not commit a violation of the time rules, the decision may only be : published with the consent of The athlete's athlete or the other person , which is the subject of the decision. The Antiding Organization with responsibility for the handling of results, make a reasonable effort to obtain such consent, and if the consent is to be achieved, it shall : publishing the decision in its entirety or in such a form of such edited form, The athlete's athlete or the other person have to approve.
At least 14.3.4 The publication shall be carried out by placing the necessary information on : antidings of antidings, home page and leave the information for a month or the length of exclusion, period, depending on which has been the longest.
14.3.5 None antidingorganization or WADA Accredited laboratory or any representatives of these may publicly comment on the specific facts concerning a pending case (in contrast to the general description of procedures and science), except in response to public comments which may be : be applied to The athlete's athlete The other one. person or their representatives.
14.3.6 Required publication required in 14.3.2 is not required where the athlete or other person who has been shown to have committed a violation of the anti-doping rules is an underage. Any publication in a case involving a minor must be proportionate to the facts and circumstances of the case.
14:4 Statistic reporting.
Anchor Organizations publish at least once a year a general statistical report on their activities in the field of doping control, with a copy to WADA . Anchor Organizations can also publish reports that show the name of all tests sportsmen and women and the date of each sampling. WADA must, at least annually, publish statistical reports that summarize the information received from it ; antidingorganizations And labs.
14.5 Central for the exchange of information on for the control of doping.
WADA must act as central to the exchange of data and results for : doping control tests, including in particular biological passport data for sportsmen and women at international level, and sportsmen and women at national level and information on the place of residence of : sportsmen (s) (s), including those in priority test groups. For the purpose of facilitating the coordinated test planning and avoiding the various types of coordination ; antidingorganizations make unnecessary duplicity, each of each antidingorganization report any doping test, carried out, Under Competition and outside of competition, on those concerned, PE-suamen, to WADA's central to the exchange of information using ADAMS or other system approved by WADA as soon as possible after the test has been completed. In cases where it is appropriate and in accordance with the applicable rules, this information will be made available to : The sportsmen of sport, the national anthillitigation organisation of the athlete ; international union and others antidingorganizations with the authorization to be sampling ; The athlete's athlete
In order to act as central to the exchange of information on : doping control tests, and resulting tape handling decisions WADA developed a database tool, ADAMS that reflect the principles of data protection. WADA has developed in particular ADAMS in order to comply with rules and standards for the protection of personal data applicable to : WADA and other organizations that use ADAMS . Personal information concerning a PE-christs , the support staff of the sportsmen and women, or any other involved in anti-doping activities shall be carried out ; WADA supervised by the Canadian data protection authorities, in strict confidentiality and in accordance with the international standards of protection of private and personal data.
14.6 Protection of personal data.
Antidings organisations may collect, store, process, or provide personal information about : sportsmen and women and others people ; where it is necessary and appropriate to carry out their anti-doping activities in accordance with : Codex and international standards, (including, in particular, the international standard for the protection of private and personal information) and in accordance with the applicable law.
[ Comment on Article 14.6 : Note that Article 22.2 makes it possible that ' each government will introduce legislation, regulations, policies or administrative practices for cooperation and sharing of information with anti-doping organisations and sharing data between antidy organizations as set out in the code ' ].
ARTICLE 15 USE AND RECOGNITION OF DECISIONS
15.1 Understated the right to appeal, as specified in Article 13, shall be required, signatories of the party ; sampling, consultation, results and other final decisions, which are in accordance with Codex And which is inside it signatories of the party ; authority, apply globally and be recognised and respected by all others ; signatories to parties.
[ Comment to Article 15.1 : Caught by the recognition of decisions concerning the derogation for the processing of other anti-doping organisations (TUE) for other anti-doping organizations shall be determined by Articles 4.4 and the International Exemption International Standard ; processing use (TUE) ].
15.2 signatories to parties, must recognise the measures taken by other bodies which have not adopted ; Codex otherwise, in accordance with the rules of this type of organ, Codex.
[ Comment to Article 15.2 : If a decision by a body that has not accepted the code, in some respects is in accordance with the code and in other respects is not in accordance with the Codex, the signatories shall have to be signatories to the Codex. try to apply the decision in accordance with the principles of the Code. For example, if a non-signatories party, for example, in a procedure conforming to the code, has found that an athlete's suction has committed a violation of an anti-doping rule due to the presence of a prohibited substance in its body, but the current one applicable ; the exclusion period is shorter than the period specified in the Code, all signatory parties must acknowledge that a violation of an anti-doping rule has been observed, and the national antidal organisation of the sportsmen and the suave must carry out one ; consultation, in accordance with Article 8, in order to decide on the longer exclusion ; period, listed in the Codex shall be imposed ].
ARTICLE 16 DOPTING CONTROL OF ANIMALS THAT COMPETE IN SPORT
16.1 In any sports branch, which includes animals, competition, , the international association of the sporting branch concerned shall establish and implement anti-tidal rules for the animals to which the sports branch comprises. The time opting rules must include a list of prohibited substances, , appropriate procedures for sampling, and a list of approved laboratories for the analysis of : tests.
16.2 With regard to the determination of infringements of the rules of application, resulted in handling, impartial consultations, consequences in the case of animals taking part in sport, the international association of the sporting branch concerned shall establish and implement rules generally in accordance with Codex Articles 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 17.
ARTICLE 17 LAPUP OF LIMITATION
No procedural violations may commence on an infringement of an anti-doping procedure ; PE-christs or other person , unless he or she has been informed of the infringement of the time rules referred to in Article 7, or an abercion of fairness has been attempted within 10 years of the date of the offence being claimed.
PART TWO
INFORMATION AND RESEARCH
ARTICLE 18 INFORMATION
18.1 basic principle and overall objective.
The basic principle of providing information programmes for doping-free sport is to preserve the spirit of sport as described in the introduction to Codex to prevent it from being undermined by doping. The overall objective of such programmes is prevention. The aim is to prevent the fact that : sportsmen and women knowingly or unconsciously use prohibited substances, and Forbidden methods.
Information programmes should focus on providing basic information to sportsmen and women as described in Article 18.2. Information programmes should focus on prevention. Preventive programs should be value-based and addressed to sportsmen and women and the support staff of sportsmen and sportsmen, with special focus on young people through implementation in the curriculum of schools.
All signatories to parties, within their means and responsibilities, and in cooperation with each other, plan, implement, evaluate and monitor information, information and development programmes for doping-free sport.
18.2 Programs and activities.
These programmes shall provide The athletes and others people updated and accurate information about at least the following topics :
● Substances and methods Dopinglist
● Extensions of the time opingers
● Consequences of doping, including penalties, health and social consequences ;
● Procedures for doping control,
● The Lion's Lion. and the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen ; rights and responsibilities
● Exemptions to the processing operation (TUE)
● Handling of risks by food supplements
● The harmful effect of Doping on the spirit of sport
● Governing requirements for information on whereabouts (whereabouts)
The programmes shall promote the spirit of sport in order to create an environment that contributes significantly to a doping-free sport and has a positive and long-term influence on the choices that have been made, The athletes and others people shall take.
Prevention programmes must be directed mainly at young people, appropriate at their stage of development, in schools and in sports clubs, to parents, adult sportsmen, officials, trainers, medical professionals and the media.
The support of the drainers ' support staff advise and notify The athletes on anti-doping policies and rules established in accordance with Codex.
All signatories to parties, promoting and supporting active participation by : The sportsmen of athletes and the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen ; page of information programmes for doping-free sport.
[ Comments to Article 18.2 : Information and educational anti-age programmes should not be limited to sportsmen at national and international level, but must include all persons, including young people participating in sport during a party, government or other sporting organisation, which accepts the code. (See the definition of physical athletes). These programmes must also include the support of sportsmen and sportsmen.
These principles are in line with the UNESCO Convention on education and training ].
18.3 Conduct codes for professionals.
Signature Parties cooperate with each other and governments with a view to encouraging relevant, competent professional associations and institutions to develop and implement appropriate codes of conduct, good practice and ethics on sport in respect of : anti-doping and penalties in accordance with Codex.
18.4 Coordination and cooperation.
WADA act as central to the exchange of informative and educational resources and / or programmes developed by WADA or anti-doping organizations.
All signatories to parties, and sportsmen and women and others people cooperate with each other and governments in order to coordinate information activities and training in order to exchange experiences and ensure that these programmes are effective in order to prevent doping in sport.
ARTICLE 19 RESEARCH
19.1 The purpose of anti-doping research.
Antidying research contributes to the development and implementation of effective programmes in the field of doping control, and to information and training for doping-free sport.
All signatories to parties, shall, in cooperation with each other and governments, encourage and promote such research and take all reasonable steps to ensure that the results of such research are used to promote the objectives in accordance with Codex principles.
Seven-point-two forms of research.
Relevant anti-doping research may, for example, include sociological, behavioural, legal and ethnic research, as well as medical, analytical and physiological studies. Studies on the assessment and evaluation of the impact of scientific-based physiological and psychological training programmes, in accordance with the principles of Codex and respect the integrity of the human participants, as well as studies relating to : use, of new substances or methods which are the results of scientific development, shall be implemented.
19.3 Coordination of research and exchange of results.
Coordination of anti-tidal research through WADA is essential. Without prejudice to intellectual property rights, copies of the research findings on the time-ingling area shall be forwarded to : WADA whereas, where appropriate, these should be shared with the relevant ; signatories to parties, and sportsmen and women and other stakeholders.
19.4 Science-case practice.
Anticent procurement must comply with internationally recognised ethics procedures.
19.5 Research in prohibited substances, and Forbidden methods.
For the purposes of carrying out research activities, administration of : prohibited substances, and prohibited methods, to sportsmen and women Avoid.
19.6 Misusage of results.
Appropriate precautions shall be taken to ensure that research results on the recovery zone are not misusable or used for doping purposes.
PART 3
FEATURES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
[ Comment : Responsibilities of the signatories to parties and sportsmen or other persons are treated in different articles in the Code, and the responsibilities specified in this Part are beyond such responsibilities ].
All signatories to parties, must act in the spirit of cooperation in order to ensure a successful fight against doping in sport and respect for : Codex.
ARTICLE 20 ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES, SIGNATURE PARTIES
20.1 Functions and responsibilities-the International Olympic Committee.
20.1.1 The introduction and implementation of anti-doping policies and rules for the Olympic Games, which are in accordance with Codex.
20.1.2 To make demands that international union within the Olympic movement comply with Codex as a condition for obtaining recognition from the International Olympic Committee.
20.1.3 To hold part of or all Olympic support to sporting organisations that do not comply Codex.
20.1.4 To carry out relevant activities to prevent violation of Codex as stated in Article 23.5.
20.1.5 To approve and promote it independent observer programme.
20.1.6 To set requirements for everyone sportsmen and women and each the aid of sportsmen and women, , taking part as a counselor, coach, manager, crew staff, official, medical or paramedian staff of the Olympic Games, accept being bound by the rules of the time in accordance with Codex as a condition for such participation.
20.1.7 Enthusiastically to pursue all potential infringements of the time-breaking rules in its jurisdiction, including examination of whether the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen, or others people may have been involved in the individual doping cases.
20.1.8 Only accepting bids of the Olympic Games from countries where the government has ratified, accepted, approved or subjected to it UNESCO Convention , and where it is the national Olympic Committee, , the National Paralympic Committee and the national antimeingorganization, conforms to Codex .
20.1.9 to promote antidbit information.
20.1.10 To collaborate with relevant national organizations and bodies and others antidingorganizations .
20.2 Functions and responsibilities-the International Paralympian Committee.
20.2.1 The introduction and implementation of anti-doping policies and rules for the paralytic games conforming to it Codex .
20.2.2 Making demands that international union within the paralytic movement comply with Codex as a condition for obtaining recognition from the International Paralympian Committee.
20.2.3 To hold part of or all the paralytic support for sporting organisations that do not comply Codex .
20.2.4 To carry out relevant activities to prevent violation of Codex as stated in Article 23.5.
20.2.5 To approve and promote the independent observer programme .
20.2.6 To set requirements for all sportsmen and women and each the aid of sportsmen and women, in the case of a supervisor, coach, manager, team staff, official, medical or paramedical staff in the paralytic games, accept being bound by the time opting rules in accordance with Codex as a condition for such participation.
20.2.7 Enthusiastically, to pursue all possible infringements of the time-breaking rules within its jurisdiction, including examination of : the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen, or others people may have been involved in the individual doping cases.
20.2.8 to promote antidbit information.
20.2.9 To cooperate with relevant national organizations and bodies and others antidingorganizations .
20.3 Functions and responsibilities-international union.
20.3.1 To implement and implement anti-time policies and rules that conform to Codex .
20.3.2 To lay down requirements that their national premier policies, rules, and applications and other members comply with Codex as condition of membership
20.3.3 To set requirements for all sportsmen and women and any the aid of sportsmen and women, , taking part as a counselor, coach, manager, crew staff, official, medical or paramedics in a competition, or an activity approved or organised by the international association or one of its member organisations, agrees to be bound by the rules of the time in accordance with Codex as a condition for such participation.
20.3.4 To set requirements for that sportsmen and women which are not permanent members of an international association or by one of the national federations in the course of this alliance shall be made available for the collection of : samples and provide accurate and updated information on whereabouts ("whereabouts") if this is required in the context of the international premia, priority test group in accordance with the conditions of participation as specified by the international alliance or, where relevant, the person concerned ; Organisation for major sporting events.
[ Comment on Article 20.3.4 : This includes, for example, sportsmen from professional leagues ], for example.
20.3.5 To lay down the requirement that each national premibe lay down rules requiring that all : sportsmen and women and any the aid of sportsmen and women, , taking part as a counselor, coach, manager, crew staff, official, medical or paramedics in a competition, or an activity which has been approved or organised by a national union or one of its member organisations, accepts to be bound by the rules of application and antidingorganization empowerment for results in accordance with Codex as a condition for such participation.
20.3.6 requesting that national federations report any information that suggests or relates to an infringement of the time-breaking rules, to their national antimeingorganization, and international federations and cooperation with investigations carried out by : antidingorganizations with the authority to conduct investigations.
20.3.7 To carry out relevant activities to prevent violation of the Code as set out in Article 23.5.
20.3.8 To approve and promote it independent observer programme, by International sports events.
20.3.9 To hold part of or all aid to national associations which do not comply with Codex.
20.3.10 To pursue all potential infringements of the time-breaking rules thoroughly within its jurisdiction, including examination of : the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen, or others people may have been involved in the individual doping cases in order to ensure proper enforcement of : consequences and to conduct an automatic investigation of the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen in cases where an infringement of anti-doping rules involves a underage or one the aid of sportsmen and women, who have given assistance to more than one PE-christs, There has been a violation of the anti-doping rules.
20.3.11 To do everything in its power to award world championships only to countries where the government has ratified, accepted, approved or subjected to it. UNESCO Convention , and where it is the national Olympic Committee, , the National Paralympic Committee and the national antimeingorganization, conforms to Codex .
20.3.12 The promotion of information, including requirements for national associations, to carry out antidings of information in cooperation with the relevant national antimeingorganization, .
20.3.13 To cooperate with relevant national organizations and bodies and others antidingorganizations .
20.3.14 To fully cooperate with WADA in connection with the investigation carried out by WADA pursuant to Article 20.7.10.
20.3.15 To have disciplinary rules in place and to require national associations to have disciplinary rules in place to prevent : the support staff of sportsmen and sportsmen, , as use prohibited substances, or prohibited methods, without valid reason, in supporting sportsmen and women within the authority of the international or national premier.
20.4 Functions and Responsibilities- national Olympic committees, and national paralytic committees.
20.4.1 To ensure that their anti-doping policies and rules are in accordance with the Code.
20.4.2 to lay down requirements for national premier policies and rules to comply with Codex as condition for membership or recognition.
20.4.3 To respect the national antidingorganisation ; independence in its country and not interfere in its operational decisions and activities.
20.4.4 To require national federations to report information that suggests or relates to a violation of the anti-doping rules to their national antidying organisation and international federations and cooperation with investigations carried out ; of anti-doping organisations with the authority to carry out the investigation.
20.4.5 To claim as a condition for participation in the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games : PE-suamen, which are not normal members of a national union are available for : sampling, and to provide information on their whereabouts as required by the international standard for sampling and investigation, as soon as possible ; The athlete's athlete have been identified on the gross or subsequent enrollment document in connection with the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games.
20.4.6 To collaborate with their national antimeingorganization, and to work with their government to establish one. national antimeingorganisation, if there is not already one, on the condition that it the national Olympic Committee, in the meantime the responsibility is met ; national antidings organisation.
20.4.6.1 For the countries that are members of a regional antimeingorganization I want it. the national Olympic Committee, , in cooperation with the government, maintaining an active and supporting role for their respective respective countries ; regional anti-doping organizations.
20.4.7 Making claims that each national premia lay down rules requiring that any the aid of sportsmen and women, , taking part as a guidance counselor, coach, manager, crew staff, official, medical or paramedics in a competition, or an activity which has been approved or organised by a national union or one of its member organisations, accepts to be bound by the rules of application and antidingorganization empowerment for results in accordance with Codex as a condition for such participation.
20.4.8 To hold part of or all aid to a PE-christs or the aid of sportsmen and women, that have infringed the rules of application in any period in which it is : excluded from participation.
20.4.9 To hold part of or all aid to members or recognised national associations which do not comply with Codex .
20.4.10 Enthusiastically, to pursue all possible infringements of the time-breaking rules within its jurisdiction, including examination of : the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen, or others people may have been involved in the individual doping cases.
20.4.11, to promote the age of information, including making demands of national associations to carry out anonage information in cooperation with the relevant national antimeingorganization, .
20.4.12 Cooperation with relevant national organizations and bodies and other bodies antidingorganizations .
20.4.13 To have disciplinary rules in place to prevent the support staff of sportsmen and sportsmen, , as use prohibited substances, or prohibited methods, without valid reason, in supporting sportsmen and women inside the the national Olympic Committee, the power of the national paralysis committee.
20.5 Functions and Responsibilities- national antimeingorganizations.
20.5.1 to be independent in their operational decisions and activities.
20.5.2 To implement and implement anti-time policies and policies that are in accordance with Codex .
20.5.3 to cooperate with other relevant national organizations and bodies and other bodies ; antidingorganizations .
20.5.4 to encourage interconnection sampling, between national antimeingorganizations.
20.5.5, promoting anti-temporal research.
20.5.6 Where aid is granted, to hold a part of or all aid to a PE-christs or the aid of sportsmen and women, that have infringed the anti-doping rules in any period in which it is : excluded from participation.
20.5.7 Enthusiastically, to pursue all potential infringements of the time-breaking rules in its jurisdiction, including investigation of : the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen, or others people may have been involved in the individual doping cases and to ensure proper enforcement of : consequences.
20.5.8 to promote antidbit information.
20.5.9 To perform an automatic investigation of the support staff of sportsmen and sportsmen, within its jurisdiction, in the case of a minors, o the application of the rules on the application of the early termination, and to conduct an automatic investigation of a the aid of sportsmen and women, who has given assistance to more than one PE-christs, which has committed a violation of the anti-doping rules.
20.5.10 To cooperate fully with WADA in connection with the investigation carried out by WADA pursuant to Article 20.7.10.
[ Comments to Article 20.5 : for some smaller countries, their national anthem are able to delegate a number of areas of responsibility described in this Article to a regional antidbit organisation ∙ ♪NO!
20.6 Features and Responsibilities- organisations for major sporting events.
20.6.1 to implement and implement anti-time policies and rules for The sports event : , which is in accordance with Codex .
20.6.2 To carry out relevant activities to prevent violation of Codex as stated in Article 23.5.
20.6.3 To approve and promote it independent observer programme, .
20.6.4 To set requirements for all sportsmen and women and each the aid of sportsmen and women, that participate as a counselor, coach, manager, crew staff, official, medical or paramedial staff in person ; The sports event : , agrees to be bound by the rules of application in accordance with Codex as a condition for such participation.
20.6.5 Enthusiastically, to pursue all possible infringements of the time-breaking rules within its jurisdiction, including examination of : the supporting persons of sportsmen and sportsmen, or others people may have been involved in the individual doping cases.
20.6.6 To do all it can to only grant sports events to countries where the government has ratified, accepted, approved or subjected to its approval ; UNESCO Convention , and where it is the national Olympic Committee, , the National Paralympic Committee and the national antimeingorganization, conforms to the code.
8.6.7 to promote antidbit information.
20.6.8 To collaborate with relevant national organizations and bodies and others antidingorganizations .
20.7 Features and Responsibilities- WADA
20.7.1 To establish and implement policies and procedures that are in accordance with Codex .
20.7.2 to oversee the signatories of the parties ; compliance with Codex.
20.7.3 To Approve international standards, that applies to the implementation of Codex .
20.7.4 Accrediting and reaccrediting laboratories for analysis of samples or to approve other bodies for analysis of : samples .
20.7.5. To develop and publish guidelines and models of best practice.
20.7.6, promoting, implementing, initiation, providing financial support for and coordinating anti-doping research and encouraging the early termination entry.
20.7.7 To establish and implement an effective independent observer programme, and other types of indicative programmes for : sports events.
20.7.8 To carry out, under extraordinary circumstances and under the direction of WADA's Director-General, doping controls on his own initiative or on the initiative of others ; antidingorganizations and to cooperate with relevant national and international organisations and bodies, including but not limited to, to promote inquiries and investigations.
[ Comment on Article 8:7.8 : WADA is not a sampling body, but it reserves the right to perform its own tests, in exceptional circumstances, where problems have been taken to the appropriate antidal organisation ' s appropriate time ; attention and has not been dealt with satisfactorily ].
At 20:7.9, to approve, in consultation with international union, national antidings, and organisations for major sporting events ; , defined analytic programs for sampling.
20.7.10 To take the initiative to its own investigation into infringement of anti-doping rules and other activities that can promote doping.
ARTICLE 21 ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES, IKILTSUDEAVERS AND OTHER PEOPLE
21.1 Functions and Responsibilities- PE-suamen.
21.1.1 To have knowledge and compliance with all applicable anti-doping policies and rules established in accordance with Codex
21.1.2 To be available to collect samples at any time.
[ Comment on Article 9.1.2 : with due consideration to the human rights and privacy of an athlete's human rights and private life, legal antheria can sometimes require sampling late at night or early in the morning. For example, it is well-known that some athletes use low doses of the EPO during these hours, so it is impossible to trace in the morning ].
211.3 To be responsible for the timing of what they are consuming and applies .
21.1.4 To inform medical professionals of their obligation not to use prohibited substances, and prohibited methods, to be responsible for ensuring that no medical care received by them violates any anti-doping policies and rules established in accordance with Codex .
21.1.5 to inform their national antimeingorganization, and international confederation of a non-- signatories of the party ; decision that : The athlete's athlete has committed a violation of the anti-doping protocols within the last 10 years.
21.1.6 To collaborate with antidingorganizations investigating violations of the time-breaking rules.
[ Comment on Article 21.1.6 Mangel of cooperation is not a breach of the time code of the Code, but it may be the basis for disciplinary action in accordance with the rules of a stakeholder ].
21.2 Functions and Responsibilities- The support staff of sportsmen and sportsmen.
21.2.1 To be aware of, and comply with, all anti-doping policies and rules established in accordance with Codex and that applies to them or to them ; sportsmen and women that they work for.
21.2.2 To cooperate with the programme sampling for sportsmen and sportsmen ; .
21.2.3 To use its influence PE-sudeavers the values and the construction to create attitudes towards doping against doping.
21.2.4 To inform their national antimeingorganization, and international confederation of a non-- signatories of the party ; Decide that he or she has committed a violation of the anti-matter code in the last 10 years.
21.2.5 to collaborate with antidingorganizations investigating violations of the time-breaking rules.
[ Comment on Article 21.2.5 Mangel of cooperation is not a breach of the time code of the Code, but it may be the basis for disciplinary action in accordance with the rules of a stakeholder. ].
21.2.6 Ikillsudeavers Support staff do not using or have in its possession of prohibited substances, or prohibited methods, without valid reason.
[ Comment to Article 21.6.2 : In the situations in which the aid of an athlete is without valid reason or has no valid substance or has a prohibited method, and it is not a violation of the time-breaking code of the Code, it should be : subject to other sporting disciplined disciplined rules. Training staff and other sportsmen and other sportsmen are often role models for sportsmen and women. They should not have personal behaviour which is contrary to their responsibility to encourage their sportsmen and women not to use drugs.
21.3 Functions and Responsibilities- regional anti-doping organisations, .
21.3.1 To ensure that the Member States implement and implement policies, policies and programmes in accordance with Codex.
21.3.2 To require membership as a condition for membership of a Member State to sign an official form for membership of regional antimeingorganization , as clearly outlines the delegation of responsibility for the time regional antidings organisation.
21.3.3 to cooperate with other relevant national and regional organisations and bodies and other bodies ; antidingorganizations .
EUR 21.3.4 to encourage inter sampling, between national antidings, and regional anti-doping organizations.
9.3.5, promoting anti-doping research.
9:3.6, to promote antidbit information.
ARTICLE 22 GOVERNMENTS ' ENGAGEMENT
The individual Government gives its consent to Codex by signing the Berian NPA Declaration on doping control in PE of 3. March 2003, and by ratifying, accepting, accepting or joining UNESCO Convention The following Articles shall set out signatories of the parties ; expectations.
22.1 The individual Government must take all necessary measures to comply with The UNESCO Convention.
22.2 The individual government will introduce legislation, regulations, policies or administrative practices for cooperation and sharing of information with antidingorganizations and sharing data between antidingorganizations as stated in Codex .
22.3 The individual Government will call for cooperation between all public administrations and agencies and antidingorganizations to share information in good time antidingorganizations which may be useful in the fight against doping, and where this is not or is prohibited in relation to the legislation.
22.4 The individual government will respect arbitration as the preferred method of dealing with doping-related disputes, subject to human rights and fundamental rights and the national law applicable to it.
22.5 The individual Government, which does not have one national antimeingorganization ; in his country, must, along with its own the national Olympic Committee, work to establish one.
22.6 Each government will respect the independence of the national antidal organisation's independence in its country and does not interfere in its operational decisions and activities.
At the latest, a government should meet the expectations referred to in Article 22.2. 1. January 2016. The other parts of this article should already be fulfilled.
22.8 A government does not ratify, accept, accept, or accesses UNESCO Convention or meet UNESCO Convention then, it may result in exclusion from the holding of a tender ; sports events as specified in Articles 20.1.8, 20.3.11 and 20.6.6, and may result in further consequences, e.g. loss of office and posts within WADA ; disqualification or deferral from candidature for the holding of a international sporting event, in a country, the cancellation of : international sports events ; , symbolic consequences and other consequences according to the Olympic Charter.
[ Comments to Article 22 : most governments cannot be parties to or are committed by private, non-governmental instruments such as the code. For this reason, the governments are not asked to be signatories to the Codex but to sign up to the UNESCO Convention and ratify it, accept, approve or endorse the UNESCO Convention. The mechanisms of approval can be different, but the efforts to combat doping through the coordinated and harmonised programme, which are reflected in the code, are largely a joint effort between sporting movements and the governments.
This article sets out what the signatories expect of the governments. These are, however, only expectations, since governments are only 'committed' to comply with the UNESCO Convention ].
PART FOUR
ACCESSION, COMPLIANCE, CHANGE AND INTERPRETATION
ARTICLE 23 ACCESSION, COMPLIANCE AND CHANGE
23.1 Codex withdrawal.
23.1.1 The following are the signatories to the Code : WADA , the International Olympic Committee, international union, the International Paralympic Committee, national Olympic committees, national paralysis committees, major sporting events and national anthontic organisations. These bodies are acceding to the code by signing an accession declaration after approval by all their respective general bodies.
[ Comment on Article 23.1.1 : Each incoming signatory shall sign an identical copy of a standard declaration of accession and send it to WADA. The accession shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the governing bodies of each organisation. For example, the convention in an international association and the board of WADA ].
23.1.2 Other sporting organisations, which may not be under the supervision of any signatories, , can on WADA's call upon us to become a signatories, by accepting Codex.
[ Comment on Article 23.1.2 : The professional leagues that are not currently under the jurisdiction of a government or an international premier, are invited to join the Codex ].
23.1.3 A list of all accessions is published by : WADA .
23.2 Implementation of Codex.
23.2.1 You signatories to parties, implement the applicable provisions in Codex by means of policies, laws, regulations or statutes within their authority and within the framework of the responsibilities concerned.
23.2.2 The following articles, depending on what is relevant for the extent of the antidying activity, which the organisation of the organisation ; performing, must be implemented by the signatories to parties, without substantial change (taking account of any significant changes in the language of the language of reference to the organisation ' s name, sports branch, section numbers, etc.) :
● Article 1 (Definition of doping)
● Article 2 (Extremination of the time opingers ' rules)
● Article 3 (Proof of doping)
● Article 4.2.2 (Specific substances)
● Article 4.3.3 ( WADA's determination of : Dopinglist)
● Article 7.11 (Retreat from PE)
● Article 9 (Automatic Disqualification (Cancellation) of Individual Results)
● Article 10 (Sanctions against individuals)
● Article 11 ( Consequences for teams)
● Article 13 (Apples) with the exception of 13.2.2 and 13.6 and 13.7
● Article 15.1 (Recognition)
● Article 17 (Statute of limitations)
● Article 24 (Interpretation of the Codex)
● Appendix 1-Definitions
No additional provisions may be added, which alter the impact of the articles listed in this Article to one : signatories of the party ; rules. One signatories of the party ; rules must be expressly recognised, Codex comments and contemplate the comments with the same status as they have in Codex.
[ Comment to Article 23.2.2 : Nothing in this code prevents an anti-doping organisation from adopting and enforcing its own specific disciplinary rules for behaviour by the supporting persons of sportsmen and women, but which are the conduct of doping, but which : does not in itself constitute a breach of the anti-doping rules according to the Code. A national or international association may, for example, refuse to renew a coach's licence when several sportsmen and women have committed infringements of the anti-doping rules, while they were under the supervision of that coach.
23.2.3 When implementing Codex invites the parties to the signatories, to apply the best practices recommended by : WADA.
23.3 Implementation of anti-tidying programs.
Signature Parties allocate adequate resources to implement anti-doping programmes in all areas in accordance with Codex and international standards.
23.4 Compliance Codex.
They signatories to parties, can only be regarded as organisations complying with ; Codex when they have entered and implemented Codex pursuant to Article 23.1, 23.2 and 23.3. They are no longer considered to be organisations which comply Codex , when accession has been withdrawn.
23.5 Verification of compliance Codex and The UNESCO Convention.
23.5.1 Compliance with Codex controlled by WADA or in other ways by agreement with WADA. The retention of anti-doping programmes as required by Article 23.3 must be monitored from the criteria specified by : WADA's the Executive Committee (Executive Committee). Compliance with the obligations contained in UNESCO Convention , under the control of the decision taken at a conference held between UNESCO Convention Parties after consultation with the countries ; and WADA. WADA advising governments on the signatories of the parties ; implementation of Codex and advise they signatories to parties, on the ratification, acceptance, approval or accession of governments ; The UNESCO Convention.
23.5.2 In order to facilitate checks, the individual must : signatories to parties, give WADA details of their compliance with Codex as required by WADA's Board of Directors and shall indicate reasons for non-compliance.
23.5.3 There is a signatories, does not provide compliance information ; WADA is requesting in respect of Article 23.5.2, or if a signatories, does not send information to WADA according to other articles of Codex , this may be regarded as non-compliance with : Codex.
23.5.4 All WADA -compliance reports shall be approved by : WADA's board. WADA enter into a dialogue with a signatories, before the person concerned, signatories, be reported for non-compliance. One WADA -report that concludes that one signatories, does not comply Codex , must be approved by WADA's board of a meeting to be held after the date of the meeting ; signatories, have been given the opportunity to submit its written arguments to the board of WADA. If WADA's board concludes that one signatories, does not comply Codex the decision may be appealed in accordance with Article 13.6.
23.5.5 WADA be completed reports of compliance with the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, international union and organisations for major sporting events, These reports must also be made public.
23.5.6 WADA shall take a position on grounds for infringement and may, in exceptional situations, recommend to the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, international union and organisations for major sporting events, that they are temporarily accepting such an infringement.
[ Comment on Article 23.5.6 : WADA recognises that among signatories and governments will be significant differences in the experience of anti-doping, resources and the legal context in which anti-doping activities are carried out. When considering whether an organization meets the Codex, WADA will take account of these differences.
23.6 Additional consequences by a signatories of the party ; non-compliance with Codex.
One signatories of the party ; infringement of Codex may result in consequences beyond the absence of qualification to bid on : sports events pursuant to Article 20.1.8 (International Olympic Committee), 20.3.11 (international union) and 20.6.6 ( organisations for major sporting events, ), for example : unorder of empost and posts in WADA ; disqualification or deferral from candidacy for the holding of a international sporting event, in a country ; cancellation of : international sports events ; ; symbolic consequences and other consequences in accordance with the Olympic Charter.
Such consequences may be appealed to : CAS by the person concerned signatories, pursuant to Article 13.6.
23.7 Change of Codex.
23.7.1 WADA is responsible for verifying Codex development and improvement. Ikiltsudeavers and other interested parties and governments are encouraged to participate in this process.
23.7.2 WADA prepare proposals for amendments to Codex and initiate an advisory process for both receiving and responding to recommendations, and thus facilitate the review and return from sportsmen and women , other interested parties and governments with regard to the recommended changes.
23.7.3 Changes in Codex after consultation is approved by : WADA's board of two-thirds majority voting, including a majority of the deciding votes cast by the members of the public and the olympic movement members. Unless otherwise specified, changes shall enter into force three months after such approval.
23.7.4 They signatories to parties, must change their rules, so 2015- Codex work before 1. January 2015, with entry into force on 1. January 2015. They signatories to parties, must implement any subsequent change in force ; Codex no later than 1 year after approval, WADA's board of directors.
23.8 Withdrawal of accession to : Codex.
They signatories to parties, may withdraw their accession by six months ' written notice to WADA ; Codex.
ARTICLE 24 INTERPRETATION OF CODEX
24.1 WADA is responsible for the official text of : Codex to be published in English and French. In the case of inconsistencies between the English and French versions, the English version is applicable.
24.2 Comments in the form of notes for different provisions in Codex are included in order to facilitate the interpretation of : Codex .
24.3 Codex is to interpret as an independent and independent text and not as a reference to the signatories of the parties ; the existing laws and regulations of governments.
24.4 The headings used in the individual parts and articles of Codex be included exclusively for the sake of the overhead, and is not considered to be a content part of : Codex and not in any way affect the linguistic content of the provisions to which they are referred.
24.5 Codex has not retroactive effect as regards matters which have been started at a time before the date on which the date of the date of the date of the date of a time, signatories, accesses and implements Codex in his rules. Extreme rules of the early termination rules before Codex , however, will count as the ' first infringement ` or ' other infringement ', with a view to the definition of sanctions pursuant to Article 10 for subsequent infringements, Codex.
24.6 Aging, scope and organization of the international antiding-up programme ; and Codex and Appendix 1 of Appendix 2 Examples of the application of Article 10 shall be regarded as an integral part of : Codex.
ARTICLE 25 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS
25.1 General validity for 2015- Codex.
2015- Codex must have full effect from 1. January 2015 ("Effective Date").
25.2 Non retroactive force except for Articles 10.7.5 and 17 unless the principle of "lex mitior" is in effect.
However, the previous periods in which previously infringements may be considered in relation to repeated infringements pursuant to Article 10.7.5 and the limitation period referred to in Article 17 shall be rules of procedure and shall apply retroactive ; provided that Article 17 is only used retroactively if the limitation period is not already expired before the effective date of entry into force. Otherwise, in respect of any infringement proceedings initiated before the effective date, and any infringement proceedings initiated following the date of entry into force on the basis of a violation of the date of entry into force of the date of entry into force of the date of entry into force of the date of entry into force of the date of entry into force of the date of entry into force of the presumed recovery rule which took place prior to the effective date must be subject to the essential anti-doping rules, which were in force at the time of the alleged infringement of the time opting, unless the investigating body determines that : the principle of "lex mitior" is rightly in force in accordance with the circumstances.
25.3 Application of decisions taken prior to 2015- Codex.
In the case of cases where a final decision considers that an infringement of the time rules has been committed prior to the date of entry into force of the date of entry into force, but where : The athlete's athlete or another person still probing exclusion, the period of effective date of entry into force, The athlete's athlete or any other person apply, the organisation of the organisation ; with responsibility for the resulting handling of the infringement of the time rules to consider a reduction in exclusion, period in the light of 2015- Codex Such an application shall be made before exclusion, the period has expired. Antidings of antidings the decision may be appealed in accordance with Article 13.2. 2015- Codex shall not apply to cases of infringement of the rules on non-compliance, where a final decision has been made, stating that an infringement of the time rules for the anti-doping period is concerned, and where : exclusion, the period has expired.
25.4 Recurrent violations, where the first violation occurs before 1. January 2015.
With the purpose of assessing exclusion, the period of second infringement under Article 10.7.1, where the sanction of the first offence was determined on the basis of rules before 2015, Codex , shall : exclusion, the period, which would have been assessed for the first offence, if 2015- Codex had done so, applied.
[ Comment to Article 25.4 : Except for the situation described in Article 25.4, where a final decision, which establishes a violation of an anti-doping rule, has been said before the existence of the Codex or under the current code before The 2015 code, and the enclosed process of elimination has been fully unearned, the 2015 code cannot be used to render the previous violation ].
25.5 Additional code -changes.
Any further changes to Codex enter into force in accordance with the provisions of Article 23.7.
APPENDIX 1 DEFINITIONS
ADAMS : Anti-Doping Administration and Management System is a web-based database management tool for inserting, storing, sharing and reporting of data that are designed to help stakeholders and WADA with their anti-doping activities, together with data protection legislation.
Administration : Fairy, delivering, supervising, facilitators, or otherwise participating in another usage of persons or attempt to use by a prohibited substance, or No method. However, this definition must not include any actions carried out by medical professionals acting in good faith and involving one ; prohibited substance, or prohibited method used for proper and lawful therapeutic purposes or other acceptable grounds, and the definition must not include any actions involving : prohibited substances, that are not prohibited in : test-taking outside of competition ; unless the circumstances as a whole show that such prohibited substances, are not intended for proper and legitimate processing purposes or are designed to improve sporting performance.
Antidingorganization : One signatories, that are responsible for the establishment of rules for initiation, implementation or enforcement of any part of the process in connection with any one ; doping control, This includes, inter alia, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, other countries, organisations for major sporting events, that carries out sampling, by such sports events , WADA , international union and national antidings, .
Use : Utilization, use, intake, injection, or consumption of any prohibited substance, or prohibited method in every conceivable way.
Arrangement : See the sport event
Arrangements : The PE that has been designated for : The sports event : by the competent body.
ArrangementPeriod : The period between a sporting start and end in accordance with the organisation responsible for The sports event : .
Atypical ABP result : A report identified as one atypical ABP result as described in the applicable international standard.
Atypical result : A report from one WADA- accredited laboratory or other WADA -approved laboratory requiring further investigation according to the international standard in the field of laboratories or associated technical documents, prior to the determination of a positive analysis result.
Possession : Specifically, physically holding or presumi; holding (if only the person is the sole control or intention to exercise control over ; the prohibited substance, or the prohibited method, have a check on the premises in which it is provided ; a prohibited substance, or a prohibited method, ) ; in that case, the person Not like the only one has control over it. prohibited substance, or the prohibited method, or has no control over the premises in which it is provided ; a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method It's just supposed to be the presumius. holding , if the person were aware of the presence of the prohibited substance, or the presence of the prohibited method and intended to exercise control over there. There is no contravention of an anti-doping rule if the infringement is based solely on : holding , in so far as to the person before this notification has been received that they have violated an anti-doping rule, specific measures have been taken to establish that they have never intended to be in : holding of which, and has given up, the holder ; by expressly declaring this to be : antidingorganization. Regardless of any conflict with this definition, purchases (including purchases by electronic or other means) of : a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method constituforms holding from the buying-in, persona page.
[ Comment : In accordance with this definition, the steroids that are in an athlete's car will constitute a breach unless the athlete indicates that someone else has used the car ; In this case the organisation shall demonstrate that the athlete, although not the sole control of the vehicle, had knowledge of the steroids, and intended to have control of the steroids. Similarly, if there are any steroids in a medicine cabinet in the home which is under the control of an athlete and his or her own joint control, the organisation shall demonstrate that the athletes were aware of the fact that the steroids were in the closet and that : The athlete's intention was to exercise control of the steroids. The purchase of a prohibited substance in its own possession, even where, for example, the product does not arrive is received by a second or sent to a third party's address ].
Biological passports : The programme and methods of collection and comparison of data as described in the international standard for sampling and investigation and by the International Laboratories International Standard.
CAS : The Arbitration Body of Sport (The Court of Arbitration for Sport).
Participin : Any PE-christs or The support person for sportsmen and women.
Disqualifier : Look. Consequences of infringements of the time opingers in the afterfuture.
Pensation for the processing operation (TUE) : The treatment for processing using as described in Article 4.4.
Dopting control : The whole process that includes test planning and with a definitive handling of any appeal, including all stages and processes, along the way, such as the acquisition of information on location ("whereabouts") , collecting and handling samples , laboratory analyses, the derogations applicable to the processing operation (TUE) ; , resulted in handling and hearings.
Dopinglist : List of prohibited substances, and Forbidden methods.
Prohibited Method : Any method referred to in Dopinglist .
Forbidden fabric : Any substance or group of substances listed on The Dopinglist.
Tentative consultation in the case of Article 7.9, an accelerated, brief consultation taking place prior to a hearing held pursuant to Article 8, where : The athlete's athlete shall be attributable to the meeting and shall have the opportunity to present its case in writing or orally.
[ Comment : A preliminary hearing is only an initial process, which may not include a full assessment of the facts of the case. After a preliminary hearing, the athlete has the right to a subsequent full consultation of the reality of the situation. Unlike an 'accelerated consultation', as the concept has been applied in Article 7.9, a full consultation of the reality in an accelerated timetable ].
Attempt : any deliberate action that forms an essential part of a series of actions that will lead to a violation of an anti-doping rule. However, there is no infringement of an antidbit rule if the offence is based solely on one, attempted for infringement, in so far as the person voluntarily returning from the experiment before it is discovered by a third party who is not involved in the relevant party ; attempted On Violation .
Contaminated Product : A product containing one prohibited substance, that is not given on the product label or in information available on a reasonable search of the Internet.
Holdisint : An athlete in which the replacement of players is allowed under one competition, .
Sport event : A series of standalone competitions, that will be held at the same time under the auspices of a general body (for example, the Olympic Games, the World Championship of FINA, swimming or Panamerican Games).
International Plan Ikillsite : Ikilt suamen, participate in sport at international level, as defined by the individual international union in accordance with the international standard for sampling and investigation.
[ Comment : In accordance with the international standard for sampling and investigation, the international alliance itself may determine the criteria for which it will use to classify athletes as sportsmen and women at international level ; For example, at the rate of shoulist, by participating in special international sporting events, by means of licence, etc., however, it shall publish the criteria in a clear and concise manner, so that sportsmen and women can quickly and easily find out when they will be ; classified as athlete's at international level. For example, if the criteria include participation in specific international sporting events, the international association shall publish a list of international sporting events ].
Ikilt suaves at national level : Ikiltsudeavers , as a participant in sport at national level as defined by the individual ; national antimeingorganization, in accordance with the international standard for sampling and investigation.
Ikillsudeaver : Any person, compete in sport at international level (as defined by each international premise) or national plan (as defined by each individual international association) ; national antimeingorganization, ). One antidingorganization has the power to apply the application of anti-doping rules to one, PE-christs that are neither International sportsmen and athletes or PE-level athletes at national level and thereby bring them in the definition of 'athletic pumores'. With regard to sportsmen and women that are neither International sportsmen and women at international level or national plan ; can one antidingorganization choose to : perform restricted sampling, or no sampling, at all ; analyze samples from a reduced menu of prohibited substances, ; require restricted or no information on whereabouts ; or not requiring advance ; the derogation for the purposes of the processing operation (TUE).
If an infringement of the rules of application in Article 2.1, 2.3 or 2.5 is obtained by a PE-christs , as a antidingorganization has authority and which competes at a lower level than international or national level, must : the consequences, listed in Codex however, however, (excluding Article 14.3.2). With regard to Article 2.8 and in the case of information about antidings and information, anyone person , taking part in sport under any signatories, , government or other sporting organisation which has accepted this code -One. PE-christs.
[ Comment : This definition makes it clear that all athletes at international and national level are subject to the code of application of the Code, because the precise definitions of sport at international and national level must be set out in the time rules for the time being ; for the international associations and the national antime-aid organisations respectively. The definition also allows for each national anti-doping organisation if this chooses to extend its anti-athlete programme beyond athletes at international and national level to those participating in competitions at lower levels or to individuals who are active in the fitness of fitness activities, but which are no competitor at all. For example, a national anti-doping organisation may choose to test those who are competing on a timetable, but do not require the prior derogation for the use of the TUE for therapeutic purposes. However, an infringement of the anti-doping rules involving positive results or fraud results in all the consequences set out in the Code (except for Article 14.3.2). The decision as to whether there should be an impact on athletes at leisure level, which is committed to fitness activities, but which does not compete, is up to the national anti-doping organisation. In the same way, an organisation for major sporting events that will conduct a sporting event for participants at the master level may choose to test the participants, but do not analyse samples from the whole menu of prohibited substances. Participants in competitions at all levels must benefit from information on information and information ].
Ikillsudeavers Support staff : All instructors, trainers, managers, agents, team employees, officials, doctors, paramedics, parents, and all others people who is working with, treating or assisting a PE-christs which particips in or prepare for a competition, .
Individual athletes : Any sports branch that is not a Holds kilt.
International Standard : A standard that WADA has been approved in support of its assistance ; Code. Compliance with a international standard (In contrast to another alternative standard, practice or procedure), it is sufficient to conclude that the procedures as it is ; international standard concerns have been followed correctly. International standards all the technical documents issued in accordance with the international standard .
International sporting event : One sporting event or competition, , where the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympian Committee, an international alliance, one Organisation for a major sporting event, or any other international sporting organisation shall be the parent body of or designates the technical authorities ; The sports event.
Code : The International Code of AnoldDoping
Competition : a single race, a single match, a single match, or a specific sporting event. For example, a basketball game or the finals of the Olympic 100-meter race. In the case of running, divided into several stages or individual competitions and other sporting competitions, where a daily or continuous award is awarded, the difference between one competition, and one sporting event as stated in the rules of the international premier.
Consequences of infringements of the time opingers ("consequences") : One PE-sudeavers or other persona infringement of an estimated time rule may lead to one or more of the following penalties : (a) Disqualifier means that The athlete's vertigo results in a specific competition, or a specific sporting event be cancelled at the loss of points and deduction of medals and premiums ; (b) ; Exclusion means that The athlete's athlete or another person shall be excluded from participation in any specified period ; competition, or other activity or financial support referred to in Article 10.12.1 on the basis of a violation of the time opingance rules ; (c) Temporary exclusion means that The athlete's athlete or another person shall be excluded for a period of time from participation in any competition, an activity until a final decision has been reached in a consultation pursuant to Article 8 ; (d) Financial penalties means economic sanctions are imposed on a violation of the anti-doping rules or to recover costs associated with a violation of the time opinged rules ; and (e) ; publication means the dissemination or distribution of information to the general public ; or people other than those people who have the right to an earlier correction in accordance with Article 14. Holds in holdutuous may also be subject to consequences as described in Article 11.
Cursor : a chemical connection or a group of chemical compounds or biological parameters that demonstrate ; use, by a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method .
Metabolit : any substance produced by a biotransformation process.
Temporary exclusion : Look. Consequences of infringements of anti-timing rules in the previous one.
Minor Year : One person that has not yet been eighteen years.
Targeted sampling : Selection of specific sportsmen and women to sampling, based on criteria set out in the international standard for sampling and investigation.
National antimeingorganization : (n) the body (s) designated by each country as the supreme authority with the overall responsibility to implement and implement the time oping-up rules, to ensure the collection of samples , managing test results and leading consultations at national level. If this designation has not been made by the competent authority (s), the instansen must be the country concerned the national Olympic Committee, or one of the notified body.
National olympic Committee The recognised national organisation of the International Olympic Committee. The expression national Olympic Committee, it also includes national sports federations in those countries where the national sports federations are responsible for it ; national olympic commites, typical tasks on the time ingification area.
National sporting event : One sporting event or competition with the participation of : sportsmen and women on an international or national level, which is not one ; international sporting event, .
Object Responsibility : The rule which, under the Articles 2.1 and 2.2, shall make it clear that it is not necessary to : the organisation of the organisation ; to demonstrate, guilt, negligence or deliberate use of the PE, before any infringement of the rules on the anti-doping is to be detected.
Publicity : Look. Consequences of infringements of anti-timing rules in the previous one.
Extensive assistance : pursuant to Article 10.6.1, a person that does comprehensive assistance, : (1) in a signed written declaration, any information which he or she posers for infringements of anti-timing rules and (2) cooperate fully in the context of investigations and the imposition of any case ; related to such information, including, for example, testifying during a hearing, where this is requested by a person ; antidingorganization or a treatment body. In addition, the information provided must be credible and shall constitute an important part of any case being raised or, if a case is not raised, an adequate basis for redress a case.
Organizations for major sports events : continental union of national Olympic committees, and other international organisations for several different sports, acting as the overall body of any continental, regional or other, International sporting event.
Person : A physical person or an organisation or other body.
Positive ABP Result : A report identified as one positive ABP result as described in the applicable international standards.
Positive Analyst Result : A report from one WADA- accredited laboratory or other WADA -approved laboratory, which, in accordance with the international standard for laboratories and associated technical documents, identifies the presence of a prohibited substance, or its metabolites, or Mardriver (including elevated quantities of endogenous substances) or signs use, by a prohibited method in a test.
Prioritized Test Group : The group of highest priority sportsmen and women , to be determined separately at international level by the individual international union and at the national level of each individual ; national antimeingorganization, , which is subject to sampling, Under Competition and outside of competition, as part of the international premier or the person concerned, national antidings of antidings ; test planning and, therefore, the obligation to provide information on the whereabouts of Article 5.6 and the International Standard for Sampling and Investigative Standard.
Preview : Biological materials collected for the purpose of for the control of doping.
[ Comment : It has been claimed, in some cases, that the collection of blood tests is contrary to the principles of certain religious or cultural groups. It has been established that there is no basis for such an assertion.
Sampling : The parts of the process of a doping control, that includes test planning, collection of samples , handling of samples and transport of : samples to the laboratory.
Regional antidingorganization : A regional unit designated by the Member States to coordinate and manage designated areas of their national anthilment programme, which may include the introduction and implementation of the time-landing rules, planning and collection of samples , resulted in handling, assessment of the derogation for the processing operation (TUE), , hold hearings and the execution of information programmes at regional level.
Guilt : Guilt is any omission or lack of appropriate care in a specific situation. Factors to be taken into account in the assessment of a PE-christs or other persona for example, include The athlete's vertigo or other persona experience, The athlete's athlete or other person is a underage , special consideration as a handicap, the degree of risk that should have been foreseen by The athlete's athlete and the degree of care and examination, The athlete's athlete displayed in relation to what should have been the preforeseen risk level. In the assessment of The athlete's vertigo or other persona severity guilt the circumstances taken into account must be specific and relevant in the context of explaining ; The athlete's vertigo or other persona deviation from expected and normal behaviour. This, for example, is the fact that one PE-christs would lose the opportunity to make large sums of money under one. exclusion, period or the fact that one PE-christs have only a short time left of his career, or the timing of the sporting calendar, not relevant factors to take into account in the reduction of exclusion, the period referred to in Article 10.5.1 or 10.5.2.
[ Comment : The criteria for assessing an athlete's level of guilt are the same in all the articles, where the blame must be taken into account. However, it is not appropriate to reduce the penalty under 10.5.2 unless, in the assessment of the degree of guilt, the conclusion is that 'without significant fault or negligence', it is not a matter of whether or not to fall in love from the side of the athlete's or other persons ].
Cheat. : Change to the wrong purpose or improper use of influence ; improper intervention ; obstructions, misdirection or exercise of improper behaviour in order to change results or prevent the implementation of : standard procedures.
Specified Substance : See Article 4.2.2.
Independent Observer Program : A group of observers who, under WADA's supervise and provide guidance for the flow of a doping control, by certain sports events and reporting the sightings of the sightings.
Exclusion : Look. Consequences of infringements of anti-timing rules in the previous one.
Without own fault or negligence : The relationship that The athlete's athlete or other person demonstrate that they were not aware or suspected, and were not right to be able to have known or suspected, even by showing the greatest degree of care-to have applied or been treated with the prohibited substance, or the prohibited method, or otherwise violating an anti-doping rule. Any infringement of Article 2.1, except where it is a question of : underage , shall : The athlete's athlete show how it is prohibited substance, Come into his body or her body.
Outside Competition : Any time period that is not Under competition.
Without substantial guilt or negligence : The relationship that The athlete's athlete or other person demonstrate that their fault or negligence-seen in the light of all circumstances and in view of the criteria for : No guilt. or negligence, -was not critical to the infringement of the relevant estimated time code. In the event of any infringement of Article 2.1, except in the case of a minor, the physical athlete must demonstrate how the forbidden substance entered his or her body.
[ Comment : On cannabinoids, an athlete may show without any significant fault or negligence by clearly demonstrating that the context of use was not related to physical education. ].
Illegal distribution : Sales, transmission, shipment, shipment, delivery, delivery or distribution (or holding to such a purpose) by a prohibited substance, or one prohibited method (it is physically or electronically or otherwise) performed by a PE-christs , the supporting person of the sportsmen and women, or another person that is subject to a antidingorganization jurisdiction, to a third party, however, so that this definition does not include any actions carried out in good faith in medical professionals involving one ; prohibited substance, used for proper and lawful processing purposes or any other acceptable reason, and so that it does not include acts involving : prohibited substances, that is not prohibited in connection with : test-taking outside competitions ; , unless the circumstances as a whole show that such prohibited substances, are not intended for proper and legitimate processing purposes or for the purpose of improving the performance of sport.
Under Competition : Unless otherwise specified in an international premier or current sports, "governing organization" is defined " under competition ` ; the period beginning 12 hours before a competition, , in which The athlete's athlete the plan shall take part and which goods until the end of such a date ; Competition, and the procedure for the collection of samples that relates to such a competition, .
[ Comment : An international premier or sports-governing organisation may establish a period of 'under competition' which is different from the event period ].
Signature Parties : Instander who signs and agrees to comply Codex as set out in Article 23.
UNESCO Convention : The International Convention against doping in sport, which was adopted at UNESCO's 33. General Assembly on the 19th. In October 2005, including all the amendments adopted by the States participating in the Convention, and the Parties to the International Convention against doping in sport.
WADA The World Anti-doping Agency (International Anti-doping Agency).
Financial consequences : See Consequences of infringements of anti-timing rules in the previous one.
[ Commentary : These concepts include their pluralis and possessive forms, as well as the concepts used in other language classes ].
APPENDIX 2-EXAMPLES OF APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 10
EXAMPLE 1.
Facts : One positive analytical result the result of the presence of an anabolic steroid in a sample ; Under Competition (Article 2.1) ; The athlete's athlete grants immediate infringement of the time-breaking rules ; The athlete's athlete demonstrating without significant fault or negligence ; ; and The athlete's athlete providing extensive assistance.
Use of consequences :
1. The starting point is Article 10.2. Because The athlete's athlete is considered to be without any substantial guilt , is sufficient subbuilding evidence (Articles 10.2.1.1 and 10.2.3) that the infringement of the rules of the anti-doping procedure was not intentional, and exclusion, the period of two years shall be two years, not four years (Article 10.2.2).
2. The next step would be for the panel to analyse whether or not they are rinse-related reductions shall be applicable (Articles 10.4 and 10.5). On the basis of without significant fault or negligence ; (Article 10.5.2) and because the anaboliole steroid is not one specified substance, the range of penalties in force would have been reduced to a range from two to one year (minimum half of the two-year penalty). The panel will determine the applicable exclusion, period within this range based on The athlete's vertigo severity guilt. (Assume the responsibility of the panel that otherwise would impose a panel on a exclusion, period of 16 months).
3. In the third step, the panel would assess the possibility of suspension or reduction under Article 10.6 (reduce not related to guilt ). In this case, only Article 10.6.1 ( extensive assistance. (Article 10.6.3, immediate concession, do not apply, because exclusion, the period is already under the minimum of two years as laid down in Article 10.6.3). On the basis of comprehensive assistance, Could be exclusion, the period shall be suspended by three-quarters of 16 months. *I The shortest exclusion, It would therefore be four months.
(Assume the authority's fault that the panel of this example suspends ten months, and exclusion, the period of time would be 6 months).
4. Under Article 10.11, start exclusion, the period of the date of the final consultation decision. Da The athlete's athlete immediately admitted to the infringement of the time-breaking rules, exclusion, However, the period is already starting on the date sampling, , but in any case, The athlete's athlete atone at least half of : exclusion, the period of time (i.e. three months) after the date of the termination of the consultation (Article 10.11.2).
5. When it positive analyst result were committed in a competition, , the panel would have to automatically automatically disqualify the result obtained in it, competition, (Article 9).
6. in accordance with Article 10.8 all results would have been achieved by : The athlete's athlete after the date of sampling, and until the beginning of exclusion, the period shall also be disqualified unless otherwise determined by the reasons for fairness.
7. The information referred to in Article 14.3.2 shall : published unless The athlete's athlete is a underage , as it is a compulsory part of each penalty (Article 10.13).
8. The kill-man must not, in any way, participate in any competition, or another physical athletic activity under one, signatories of the party ; the empowerment of its partners, Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period (Article 10.12.1), however : The athlete's athlete return to training with a team or using a rag or a pint ; signatories of the party ; the facilities of its partners in the shortest of the following periods : (a) the last two months of one ; Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period, or (b) the last quarter of the enclosed exclusion, period (Article 10.12.2). That would be permissible for : The athlete's athlete return to training and a month and a half months before exclusion, period ends.
EXAMPLE 2.
Facts : One positive analytical result is the result of the presence of a stimulating agent, which is a specified substance, in a test Under Competition (Article 2.1), the organisation of the time the organisation may show that : The athlete's athlete intentionally, the infringement of the time-breaking rules has been committed ; The athlete's athlete is not in a position to demonstrate that it prohibited substance, was used outside of competition, in a context that was not related to the sporting performance ; The athlete's athlete does not concindly grant the alleged infringement of the time-breaking rules ; The athlete's athlete does not extensive assistance.
Use of consequences :
1. The starting point would be Article 10.2. Da the organisation of the organisation ; may show that an infringement of the time-breaking rules was carried out with a set of rules ; The athlete's athlete is not able to show that the substance was allowed outside of competition, and that the use was not related to : The athlete's vertigo sporting performance (Article 10.2.3), exclusion, the period shall be four years (Article 10.2.1.2).
2. Because the violation was committed intentionally, there is no room for a reduction based on guilt (no application of Articles 10.4 and 10.5). Based on comprehensive assistance, the sanction could be suspended with up to three-quarters of the four years. * The shortest exclusion, It would thus be a year.
3. Under Article 10.11, exclusion, the period shall start on the date of the final consultation decision.
4. When it positive analyst result were committed Under Competition , the panel would automatically disqualify the result obtained in the competition.
5. in accordance with Article 10.8, all results obtained from : The athlete's athlete after the date of sampling, and until the beginning of exclusion, the period is also disqualified, unless otherwise determined by the sake of fairness.
6. The information referred to in Article 14.3.2 shall : published unless The athlete's athlete is a underage , as it is a compulsory part of each penalty (Article 10.13).
7. The kill-man must not, in any way, participate in any competition, or any other physical activity during a signatories to the party or its partners under the authority of the Party ; Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period (Article 10.12.1), however : The athlete's athlete return to training with a team or using a rag or a pint ; signatories of the party ; the facilities of its partners in the shortest of the following periods : (a) the last two months of one ; Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period, or (b) the last quarter of the enclosed exclusion, period (Article 10.12.2). That would be permissible for : The athlete's athlete to return to training two months before exclusion, period ends.
EXAMPLE 3.
Facts : One positive analytical result the result of the presence of an anabolic steroid in a sample ; outside of competition, (Article 2.1) ; The kill-man demonstrating without significant fault or negligence ; ; The athlete's athlete demonstrating that it is also positive analyst result was caused by a contaminated product.
Use of consequences :
1. The starting point would be Article 10.2. Da The athlete's athlete in the case of under-building evidence, proof that he did not commit the infringement of the time opt-out are intentional, that is to say. He was without any substantial guilt i use, by a contaminated product, (Article 10.2.1.1 and 10.2.3) would exclusion, the period shall be two years (Article 10.2.2).
2. The next step would be for the panel to analyze the guilt -related means of reduction (Articles 10.4 and 10.5). Da The athlete's athlete may show that the infringement of the time-up rules was due to an application ; contaminated product, , and that he was acting without significant fault or negligence ; in accordance with Article 10.5.1.2, the range applicable to exclusion, period will be reduced to a range from two years to a reprimand. The panel would be in control. exclusion, period within this range based on The athlete's vertigo degree of guilt. (Assume the responsibility of the panel that otherwise would impose a panel on a exclusion, period of four months).
3. In accordance with Article 10.8, all results would have been achieved by : The athlete's athlete after the date of sampling, and until the beginning of exclusion, the period is also disqualified unless otherwise determined by the sake of fairness.
4. The information referred to in Article 14.3.2 shall be published unless the PE is a minor, since it is a compulsory part of each sanction (Article 10.13).
5. The kill-man must not, in any way, participate in any competition, or another physical athletic activity under one, signatories, the empowerment of its partners, Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period (Article 10.12.1), however : The athlete's athlete return to training with a team or using a rag or a pint ; signatories of the party ; the facilities of its partners in the shortest of the following periods : (a) the last two months of one ; Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period, or (b) the last quarter of the enclosed exclusion, period (Article 10.12.2). That would be permissible for : The athlete's athlete return to training a month before exclusion, period ends.
EXAMPLE 4.
Facts : One PE-christs who have never had one positive analytical result or been confronted with a violation of the anti-doping rules, admitting spontaneously that she used an anabolic steroid to improve performance. The kill-man also provides extensive assistance.
Use of consequences :
1. When the infringement was intentional, Article 10.2.1 would apply and the basic, exclusion, period imposed would be four years.
2. There is no room for guilt -related reductions of exclusion, the period (no application of Articles 10.4 and 10.5).
3. Alone from The athlete's vertigo spontaneous concession (Article 10.6.2) could exclusion, the period shall be reduced by up to half of the four years. Alone from The extensive assistance of sport is to be provided, (Article 10.6.1) could exclusion, the period shall be suspended by up to three-quarters of the four years. * By estimation of the spontaneous concession and comprehensive assistance, under one, the penalty in accordance with Article 10.6.4 could be reduced or suspended by up to three-quarters of the four years. The shortest exclusion, period would be a year.
4. In principle, exclusion, the period of the day of the final termination of consultation (Article 10.11). If the spontaneous concession is taken into account in the reduction of exclusion, the period of time would be premature ; exclusion, the period under Article 10.11.2 shall not be permitted. That rule seeks to prevent the PE-christs is to benefit from the same circumstances twice. If exclusion, the period alone was suspended on the basis of : comprehensive assistance, however, Article 10.11.2 may still be applied, and exclusion, period is already started from The athlete's vertigo last use, of the anabolic steroid.
5. in accordance with Article 10.8, all results obtained from : The athlete's athlete after the date of the infringement of the time opting and until the beginning of : exclusion, the period, disqualified unless otherwise determined by the sake of fairness.
6. The information referred to in Article 14.3.2 shall : published unless The athlete's athlete is a underage , as it is a compulsory part of each penalty (Article 10.13).
7. The kill-man not in any way participate in a competition or other sport-related activity under one, signatories, the empowerment of its partners, Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period (Article 10.12.1), however : The athlete's athlete return to training with a team or using a rag or a pint ; signatories of the party ; the facilities of its partners in the shortest of the following periods : (a) the last two months of one ; Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period, or (b) the last quarter of the enclosed exclusion, period (Article 10.12.2). That would be permissible for : The athlete's athlete to return to training two months before exclusion, period ends.
EXAMPLE 5.
Facts :
One the aid of sportsmen and women, Helper you circumgo a PE-sudeavers enclosed exclusion, period by enrolling on him competition, under a false name. The support person of the drainman acknowledge this violation of the anti-doping rules (Article 2.9) spontaneously before he or she is notified of an infringement of the time-breaking rules of a antidingorganization .
Use of consequences :
1. in accordance with Article 10.3.4, the enclosed exclusion, period shall be at least two years and up to four years depending on the seriousness of the offence. (Assume the responsibility of the panel that otherwise would impose a panel on a exclusion, period of three years).
2. There is no room for guilt -related reductions, since presets are an element in the infringement of the antidbit rule in Article 2.9 (see comment to Article 10.5.2).
Article 10.6.2, in the case that admission is the only reliable evidence, exclusion, the period is reduced to half. (Assume the responsibility of the panel, in this example, to impose a exclusion, 18 months period).
4. The information referred to in Article 14.3.2 shall : published unless the supporting person of the sportsmen and women, is a underage, since it is a compulsory part of each penalty (Article 10.13).
EXAMPLE 6.
Facts : One PE-christs were imposed on 14 months of sanction ; exclusion, period for a first-time infringement of the time-breaking rules out of which four months were suspended on account of extensive assistance. Now commits The athlete's athlete his second infringement of the rules of application, which is the result of the presence of a stimulant, which is not one ; specified substance, in a sampling, Under Competition (Article 2.1) ; The athlete's athlete demonstrating without significant fault or negligence ; ; and The athlete's athlete providing comprehensive assistance, If this was a first-time violation, the panel would charge The athlete's athlete a sanction on a exclusion, 16 months period and six months shall be suspended for : extensive assistance.
Use of consequences :
Paragraph 1. Article 10.7 applies to the second infringement of the rules on the time rules, as Article 10.7.4.1 and Article 10.7.5 apply.
2. Under Article 10.7.1, exclusion, the period shall be the longest of :
(a) six months ;
(b) half of exclusion, the period imposed on the first infringement of the time-breaking rules without taking any of the reductions under Article 10.6 (in this example, it would be equal to half of 14 months, which is seven months) ; or
(c) double the otherwise applicable exclusion, period for the second infringement of the time-up rules treated as if it was a first offence without taking any of the reductions under Article 10.6 (in this example, it would be equal to two times 16 months, 32), which is 32 months).
That's why exclusion, the period of second offence shall be the longest of (a), (b) and (c), which is a exclusion, 32 months period.
3. In the third step, the panel would assess the possibility of suspension or reduction under Article 10.6 (reduce-related reduction to none, guilt ). In the case of the second infringement, only Article 10.6.1 ( comprehensive assistance, ). On the basis of comprehensive assistance, exclusion, the period shall be suspended by three-quarters of 32 months. * The shortest exclusion, It would therefore be eight months. (For example, in this example, the panel suspends eight months of exclusion, period due to comprehensive assistance ; thereby reduced the attached, exclusion, period to two years.
As the positive analysis result was committed in a competition, the panel would have to automatically disqualify the result achieved in that competition.
5. in accordance with Article 10.8, all results obtained from : The athlete's athlete after the date of sampling, and until the beginning of exclusion, the period is also disqualified unless otherwise determined by the sake of fairness.
6. The information referred to in Article 14.3.2 shall : published, unless The athlete's athlete is a underage , as it is a compulsory part of each penalty (Article 10.13).
7. The kill-man must not, in any way, participate in any competition, or any other athletic activity during a signatories ; part the empowerment of its partners, Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period (Article 10.12.1), however : The athlete's athlete return to training with a team or using a rag or a pint ; signatories of the party ; the facilities of its partners in the shortest of the following periods : (a) the last two months of one ; Exclusions of sportsmen and sportsmen period, or (b) the last quarter of the enclosed exclusion, period (Article 10.12.2). That would be permissible for : The athlete's athlete to return to training two months before exclusion, period ends.
*I By Approval of WADA in exceptional circumstances, the maximum suspension of : exclusion, period of time comprehensive assistance, be greater than three-quarters, and reporting and publication may be postponed.
