Notice Of Examination And Evaluation By University Education (Exam Notice)

Original Language Title: Bekendtgørelse om eksamen og censur ved universitetsuddannelser (eksamensbekendtgørelsen)

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Get a Day Pass for only USD$9.99.
Overview (table of contents)



Title I



Exam





Chapter 1



Purpose





Chapter 2



Sample forms and organising tests





Chapter 3



The holding of samples, etc.





Chapter 4



Assessment, etc.





Chapter 5



Special tests





Chapter 6



Requirements to the curriculum





Chapter 7



Diploma, etc.





Chapter 8



Complaints about the tests, etc.





Chapter 9



Other rules





Section II



Censorship





Chapter 10



External examiners





Chapter 11



The censors





Title III



Entry into force and transitional provisions





Chapter 12



Entry into force and transitional provisions



The full text of the notice of examination and evaluation by university education (exam notice)

Under section 8 (1), (2) and (4) and section 34, paragraph 1, of the law on universities (University law), see. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 367 of 25. March 2013, as amended by Act No. 898 of 4. July 2013, fixed: § 1. The notice shall apply for the exam and censorship by bachelor's and master's degrees as well as masters courses and other part-time education after University Act, unless otherwise specified in the notice for the training.

(2). The rules on first year test at bachelor's program, see. §§ 15-17 if retaken, see. § 18, sign-up for samples at the undergraduate and graduate education, see. section 14, paragraphs 1-3, and whether the study starts trying on bachelor's degree programme, see. section 27 does not apply to students who are admitted to the bachelor's and master's programmes in accordance with the rules on part-time education, see. notice of part-time education at the universities (part-time Executive order).

(3). This notice does not apply to training sessions, which are covered by the Executive order on universities ' international training courses, unless otherwise specified in the notice of the universities ' international training courses.

Title I Chapter 1 purpose of section 2 of the Exam. The purpose of the exam is to assess to what extent the students meet the academic goals set for education subjects or elements in the curriculum. The final sample provides the basis for the issue of the diploma, without prejudice. section 31 (1).

(2). The University provides the curriculum for training precise's specifications and criteria for assessment

of corrective action for the individual subjects or elements, culminating in a sample, see. notice on the grading scale and the other judgement by university education (nature of the notice).

Chapter 2 Sample forms and organising tests section 3. The training must include a variety of sample forms to reflect the teaching contents and forms of work. Sample form to accommodate the individual subjects or fagelements purposes and can URf.eks. be oral, written and practical test and project-oriented courses as well as combinations of the different test types. The University lays down in curriculum choice of subject's or fagelementets test form.

(2). The University may establish in the curriculum, to a discipline or course/module, if the content and methodology of justifies it, in whole or in part can be justified solely by the requirements of participation in education. The University may also provide that the requirement for participation in teaching should be a prerequisite for the student can audition in the subject or fagelementet.

(3). The University may establish in the curriculum, to demands for delivery of written assignments, etc., in the course of teaching should be a prerequisite for the student can audition in the subject or fagelementet.

(4). The University may establish in the curriculum, to be preceded by the assessment of the task response to be held an oral defense of the exam paper. The assessment is done when on the basis of an overall assessment of the written task response and the oral performance, see. section 4, paragraph 4.

§ 4. The University sets out from professional considerations into the curriculum, whether a test is organised as an individual or as a group test. When a test is organised as a group test, establishes the University at the same time, how many students who may participate in each group test, and about the students instead can choose an individual try. At both an individual test as a group test must be carried out an individual assessment of student achievement and given individual characters.

(2). By an oral group test, the individual students are examined in such a way as to ensure that an individual assessment of the student's performance. By organising an oral group test should the University ensure that the time allocated for the test, the number of students participating in the test.

(3). By a written task response, prepared by several students, can only be given an independent character or other rating, if the individual student's contribution can be determined. The University lays down the requirement of individualization in curriculum.

(4). When you do not want to be given an independent character or other rating for a written task response, prepared by several students, can exam paper included in assessment by a subsequent oral examination.

Chapter 3 the holding of samples, etc.

§ 5. Oral tests are public, see. However, paragraphs 2 to 4, unless they are subject to an agreement under section 45, paragraph 2.

(2). Clinical samples with patient participation is public only with the patient's permission.

(3). The University may derogate from the provisions of paragraph 1, if there are special circumstances, including where the interests of the students speak for it. In addition, the University can limit access to try the premises of space reasons, and individuals can be denied entry or expelled if found necessary in order to ensure the necessary calmness and order in connection with the sample.

(4). The University holds an individual oral examination following a written task response prepared by several students, and as a follow-up to a possible oral group test, these students must not be present in the Chamber, before they will be examined in the individual, oral test.

(5). Audio and video recordings during a trial is not allowed, unless the footage included as part of the test cycle. The recordings made since by the University.

(6). Only the examiner and examiner must be present during their deliberations at the oral tests, see. § 20. The University may, however, provide that future examiners must attend an assessment.

§ 6. In education, offered in Danish, conducting tests on Danish, see. However, paragraphs 2 and 3, unless it is part of the test designed to demonstrate the student's skills in a foreign language. Tests may, however, be in Swedish and Norwegian, rather than Danish, unless it is part of the purpose of the test to demonstrate proficiency in Danish.

(2). The University may, incidentally, where conditions make it possible, allow students to take a test in a foreign language. It shall not, however, apply if it is part of the purpose of the test to demonstrate proficiency in Danish or in a particular second foreign language.

(3). Teaching in a profession has been carried out in a foreign language, must undergo a test in that language, unless it is part of the test designed to demonstrate the student's skills in a second language. The University may derogate from this rule.

(4). In education, offered in English or other foreign languages, conducting tests on the offered language, unless it is part of the test designed to demonstrate the student's skills in a second language. The University may derogate from this rule.

§ 7. The University offers special test conditions for students with physical or mental impairments and to students with a mother tongue other than Danish, when the University believes that it is necessary to equate these with other students in the test situation. It is a prerequisite that the offer is no change of the test level.

§ 8. The University may conduct examinations as video conferencing or using other technical measures. The University must ensure that the security measures in connection with the organisation of such a test similar to what commonly applies to the conduct of the test. University appoints or approves supervisor, who should be with the students during the test. Examiner and examiner can reside anywhere other than the student, but to examine and give its assessment in accordance with the applicable rules in General.

§ 9. The University lays down rules concerning disciplinary measures in cases of exam cheating and disruptive behaviour by exam.

§ 10. The University may establish rules on the use of computers by the samples in the curriculum.

Samples abroad



§ 11. The University may conduct examinations on a Danish representation or other places abroad, when this is justified by the fact that the students for practical or economic reasons cannot take part in the University's examinations in Denmark, and when the student and he or she try place is consent. Organisation of Danish samples abroad shall take place in accordance with the Executive order rules in General.


(2). The University shall appoint or approve the supervisors and other persons who are to be responsible for the practical execution of the test abroad.

§ 12. The University holds the Special costs associated with sample organisation abroad.

(2). By conducting tests on Danish representations abroad will find the notice of payment for service operations in foreign service application.

(3). The University may leave the student wholly or partially pay for the expenses incurred by the University has incurred in connection with the test organization. It is a condition that the student in advance in writing, have declared themselves willing to pay those costs. The University can make sample holding of that amount must be paid in advance.

Number of test attempts



§ 13. A passed test cannot be taken on, see. nature of the order.

(2). The students have 3 sample attempts to pass a test, etc., see. However, section 15, paragraph 3, section 27, paragraph 2, and section 28, paragraph 2. The University may allow additional testing, if there are exceptional circumstances. In the assessment of the existence of exceptional circumstances, can the issue of the suitability of study not included.

(3). A student who second time must have its educational participation judged without prejudice. § 3, paragraph 2, may be required to audition instead. The University may, however, provide in the curriculum that this does not apply to student starts the sample, see. § 27, paragraph 3. Educational participation, which is linked to practical exercises, can not be replaced by a test.

(4). A student receiving an offer of catch-up session pursuant to section 19, paragraph 3, article 36, paragraph 1, no. 2, or section 41 (1) (8). 2, shall not be regarded as an trial testing in accordance with paragraph 2.

Registration for the samples



§ 14. Registration for the bachelor and master education subjects or elements is done in accordance with the rules laid down in the notice on the bachelor and master degrees at the universities (Education Ordinance). The student is automatically enrolled to the sample or samples, when the student is enrolled in a discipline or course/module, which is associated with one or more samples. Unregistration can not take place, and there is used a try attempt, see. section 13, paragraph 2, if the students do not participate in the test, unless the University has granted pursuant to paragraph 3. The students do not meet the conditions laid down by the University to participate in the sample, see. section 3, paragraphs 2 and 3, there is used a try attempt, see. section 13, paragraph 2, unless the University has granted pursuant to paragraph 3.

(2). When the University has set a deadline for graduate thesis, see. the Education Ordinance, can unsubscribe does not take place, and there is used a try attempt, see. section 13, paragraph 2, if the student does not return the thesis within the time limit laid down, unless the University has granted pursuant to paragraph 3.

(3). The University may grant a derogation from the rules laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2, if there are exceptional circumstances. The University can also automatically enroll a student to a new sample tests.

(4). The University lays down rules on the registration and unregistration to samples of students who are admitted to a bachelor's and master's degree after rules on part-time education, and for students who are admitted to a master's degree and other part-time training.

First year test at bachelor's degree programme



§ 15. The University provides the curriculum for the bachelor's degree programme, which tests the student must participate in before the end of the first year of study after study start (first year examinations). The student must pass the tests, which included the latest in first year examinations, before the end of the student's second year of study after study start, see. However, paragraph 2, in order that the student can continue training.

(2). The University may establish in the curriculum, that first year examinations must be passed before the end of the first year of study after study start, so that the students can continue training.

(3). The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply regardless of whether the student has completed 3 test trials, without prejudice. section 13, paragraph 2.

§ 16. For undergraduate courses beginning 1. September, the result of the first trial experiments, see. section 15, at the latest, be granted the students before the 1. August the following year. If the test is not passed, the student will automatically be subscribed to the retaken in the same exam termin, but not later than in august, and the outcome thereof shall be communicated to the students by the end of september.

(2). For undergraduate courses beginning 1. February, the outcome of the first trial experiments, see. § 15, be communicated to the student within the 1. February the following year.

§ 17. The University can grant a derogation from the time limits laid down in articles 15 and 16, where there are exceptional circumstances.

Catch-up session



§ 18. On education, where there is exam term at the end of the fall semester, students who have not passed the test, automatically be subscribed to the retaken (2. sample tests) in the same exam termin or in immediate extension, however at the latest in February. On education, where there is exam term at the end of the spring semester, students who have not passed the test, automatically be subscribed to the retaken (2. sample tests) in the same exam termin or in immediate extension, however, most recently in august. Unregistration can not take place, and there is used a try attempt, see. section 13, paragraph 2, if the students do not participate in the test, unless the University has given a dispensation in accordance with paragraph 8.

(2). On education, where there are several exam deadlines than in paragraph 1, the students who have not passed the test, automatically be subscribed to the retaken (2. sample tests) as soon as possible, but not later than 6 months after the holding of the annual test. Unregistration can not take place, and there is used a try attempt, see. section 13, paragraph 2, if the students do not participate in the test, unless the University has given a dispensation in accordance with paragraph 8.

(3). University derogating from the rules relating to the automatic registration for catch-up session (2. sample experiments), if the University does not give the students the opportunity to meet the requirements laid down pursuant to article 3, paragraphs 2 and 3, before 2. test trials are held. The University enrolls the student as soon as possible to the 2. test trials.

(4). In those cases where registration for a discipline requires that a previous subjects have been completed and passed (academic progression), the students who have not passed the 1. and 2. test trials, automatically sign me for next regular rehearsal (3. test attempt) in the assumption the profession. Unsubscribe to 3. sample testing cannot take place unless the University has given a dispensation in accordance with paragraph 8. The University must ensure that the 3. test trials in the assumption the subject preceding the ordinary test in the later subjects.

(5). The students have not passed a catch-up session, to be held according to the rules laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2, or not participated in a catch-up session, see. (3) the student shall have the opportunity to participate in the next annual examination.

(6). It may be laid down in the curriculum that omprøven has another trial or evaluation form than the regular test, see. § 3, paragraph 1, and article 20. It shall not, however, apply to the bachelor project, Master thesis or master's project.

(7). It can be determined in the curriculum, when the students at the latest will participate in 3. test trials in a subject that is no longer offered.

(8). The University may grant derogations from the rules on participation and automatically signing up for samples and times candidates may take the meaning. paragraphs 1 to 4, if there exist exceptional circumstances. The University can also automatically enroll a student to a new test trials (1st or 2nd sample tests).

Errors or defects in the sample, etc.



§ 19. The University will be in connection with a sample point out errors and omissions, acting University, where appropriate after consultation of the competent authority or for sample responsible, decision on how the fault or defect can be remedied.

(2). By errors or omissions of the particularly serious nature, or where it may be considered the most correct way to remedy the defect or lack of, can the University to cancel the test and arrange an extraordinary retaken.

(3). By other significant deficiencies than those referred to in paragraph 2 may provide University offer of an extraordinary retaken. The offer must in this case be given to all students whose trial suffers from the specific error or deficiency. A student who has participated in the extraordinary catch-up session, can choose to keep the originally given rating.

Chapter 4 Evaluation, etc.

§ 20. The samples are either internal or external.

(2). Internal tests shall be carried out by the assessment of one or more trainers (examiners) appointed by the University among teachers at the University.

(3). By the external evaluation tests shall be carried out by one or more examiners and of one or more examiners, who are appointed by the Board of higher education, see. section II on censorship.

(4). External tests will cover essential areas of education including bachelor thesis, master's thesis and master project. At least 1/3 of a training total ECTS credits (European Credit Transfer System) must be documented by external tests. It does not apply to merit-borne samples, see. section 32.

(5). The assessment of a student's educational participation, without prejudice. § 3, paragraph 2, shall be made by the instructor by the concerned education.


§ 21. Examiner and examiner must during their deliberations take notes on rendering and character setting to use for treatment of a potential appeal. The notes must be kept for at least one year, and in addition, until a potential appeal is completed.

§ 22. When a trial is begun, must be given a rating, unless the test is interrupted due to illness, which justifies the catch-up session, see. However, paragraphs 2 and 3.

(2). Aborting a try due to eviction, there must not be given a rating, and the student has used a test trials, without prejudice. section 13, paragraph 2.

(3). If a written task response does not meet the requirements handed about individualization, without prejudice. section 4, paragraph 3, or the form requirements laid down in the curriculum, the University can reject the exam paper. If the exam paper is rejected, it shall not be given a rating, and the student has used a test trials, without prejudice. section 13, paragraph 2.

§ 23. By rating be given grades according to the 7-step-scale or rating ' Passed ' or ' fail ' or the rating ' approved ' or ' Not approved ', see. nature of the order. Bachelor thesis, master's thesis and master project be judged according to the 7-step-scale. For educational participation, etc., see. § 3, paragraph 2, provided the assessment ' Passed ' or ' fail ' or the rating ' approved ' or ' Not approved '.

(2). The rating ' Passed ' or ' fail ' or the rating ' approved ' or ' Not approved ' may be used for tests, covering 1/3 of the ECTS credits. It does not apply to merit-borne samples, see. section 32.

§ 24. In the assessment of bachelor thesis, master's thesis, master's project and other major written assignments must be in addition to the professional content also places emphasis on the student's spelling and formulation capacity, see. § 6. In the curriculum lays down rules on how the spelling and eloquence are part of the overall assessment of exam performance, as the professional content, however, weighting the longest one, unless the subject or fagelementet is language or foreign language.

(2). Bachelor thesis, master's thesis and master project must be provided with a summary in a foreign language. If the bachelor thesis, master's thesis or master's project is written in a foreign language, except for the Norwegian and Swedish, the summary is written in Danish. In the curriculum lays down how the summary is included in the overall assessment of academic achievement, and the language in which the summary can or should be written on.

(3). The University may grant derogations from paragraph 1 for students who demonstrate a relevant specific disability, unless the spelling and eloquence are an essential part of the test purpose.

§ 25. The University may impose rules on printing and converting the price tasks.

(2). The University may, in respect of each education stipulate that a thesis can be converted to a specialty. A thesis that has got the gold medal, will be converted to grade 12.

Notice of assessment



section 26. By samples, where the rating is not communicated to the students immediately after the test, the University shall determine a date for when the evaluation will be communicated to the students.

(2). The date referred to in paragraph 1 must be within 4 weeks after the test organization, see. However, section 16 and shall be communicated to the students at the same time with the announcement of the test organisation either by opening or otherwise. In the calculation of the 4 weeks July not included.

(3). For bachelor thesis, master's thesis and master project assessment must, however, be notified within 2 months after the project or thesis is submitted for assessment. In the calculation of the 2 months July not included.

(4). The University may grant an exception in paragraph 1-3 period prescribed, if there are special circumstances. If the assessment cannot be implemented for the prescribed date, the University as soon as possible inform the students about this with a statement of the reasons therefor and information on when the assessment will be announced.

Chapter 5 special samples Study starts trying on the bachelor's degree programme



§ 27. The University can determine that student in a bachelor's degree must attend and pass a Studio starts try to continue on training, see. undergraduate admission notice. Studio starts the test aims to clarify whether the student actually has begun training. The sample is internal, see. Article 20, paragraph 2, and shall be given the rating ' approved ' or ' Not approved ', see. nature of the order.

(2). Studio starts the test to be held within 2 months after commencement of training, and the results must be announced no later than 2 weeks after the test the student organisation. If the test is not passed, the students have the opportunity to participate in a catch-up session, to be held not later than 3 months after the commencement of training. The students have 2 try attempt to pass the student starts the sample.

(3). If being held Studio starts test of a bachelor's degree, shall lay down the rules on the University student starts the sample in the curriculum, including on the sample form, content and temporal location.

(4). The University may grant a derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, if there are exceptional circumstances.

(5). Chapter 8 shall not apply for the student starts the test. If the University receives a complaint about Studio time trial test, shall take a decision, which the University may be brought before the Agency for higher education, when the complaint relates to legal issues, see. section 48.

Additional tests for admission to the master's degree programme



section 28. Students in a graduate program, who must carry out additional training activity, see. the Education Ordinance, shall, not later than 6 months after the commencement of the first year of study participate in and pass it or the samples used in the supplementary training activity, in order to continue the training referred to in article 6. candidate access Ordinance. The test or tests must prove that the student has acquired the necessary technical prerequisites for continued inclusion on the master's degree.

(2). The students have 3 attempts to pass the test or the samples used in the supplementary training activity, unless the University has determined that the student only has 1 or 2 test trials, without prejudice. (3).

(3). The University provides the curriculum rules for samples used in supplementary educational activity, including the number of test attempts.

(4). The University may grant a derogation from paragraphs 1 to 3, if there are exceptional circumstances.

Chapter 6 Requirements to the curriculum section 29. In the curriculum for each training shall be based on: 1) Rules of sample forms, including whether the student may choose between several sample forms, as well as, where appropriate, requirements for participation in teaching and on delivery of written assignments, see. section 3, paragraphs 1-3.

2) rules on individual tests and group tests, including how many students who can participate in a group test, whether the student's opportunity to select an individual sample, see. section 4, paragraph 1, and about individualization of written assignments, see. section 4, paragraph 3.

3) rules for exam language, see. § 6.

4) any rules about special test conditions for students, see. § 7.

5) any rules on the use of the computer by the samples, see. § 10.

6) rules on registration and unregistration of samples, see. § 14.

7) rules on the location of the samples in the educational process, including which tests the student must participate in before the end of the first year of study at the bachelor's degree programme, see. § 15.

8) Any rules on that first year examinations must be passed before the end of the first year of study, see. section 15, paragraph 2.

9) rules on catch-up session, etc., see. § 18.

10) any rules about when the students must participate in 3. trial experiments, see. Article 18, paragraph 7.

11) Rules about which tests there are external, see. Article 20, paragraph 4.

12) Rules about which tests are given characters, and at which samples are given the rating ' Pass ' or ' fail ' or ' Approved ' or ' Not approved ', see. § 23.

13) Rules on how the student's spelling and verbal ability are included in the overall assessment of exam performance, see. Article 24, paragraph 1.

14) Rules on how the summary included in assessment, and the language in which the summary can or should be written on the meaning. Article 24, paragraph 2.

15) rules on subsamples, beståkrav, exam result, etc., see. character of the Executive order on Chapter 3.

16) any rules about Studio time trial test at bachelor's program, see. § 27.

17) any rules about tests on candidate training included in supplementary educational activity, including the number of test trials, without prejudice. section 28.

(2). It must be reflected in the curriculum, the University, if there are exceptional circumstances, may grant derogations from the rules in the curriculum, there only is provided by the University.

Orientation of the students about exam regulations



section 30. It is the responsibility of the University to inform and guide the students about the exam rules, which apply to the individual training.

Chapter 7 diploma, etc.

section 31. The University issuing the diploma for completed education, see. (2). The proof must be sent to the graduates within 2 months after the evaluation of the final test is announced. In the calculation of the 2 months July not included.

(2). The certificate shall be drawn up in the Danish, see. However, paragraph 4, and shall at least specify: 1) The name and social security number of graduates or other similar unique identifier.

2) the University's name.

3) The designation training gives a right to on Danish/latin and English.


4) Education standardisation specified in ECTS credits, including any propædeutisk teaching.

5) The bachelor's degree or other training that forms the basis for the master's degree.

6) The elements that are included in the training, which is carried out at the test in, or which in any other way is documented, with an indication of the extent of ECTS credits.

7) Merit-borne samples, see. section 32.

8) Exam language, if the sample is carried out in a foreign language, see. § 6.

9) They achieved ratings, see. Article 23, paragraph 1, and, where appropriate, the average of the total exam score, see. nature of the order.

10) a competency profile, which describes the training.

(3). The graduates can expect to get his diploma, drawn up in English.

(4). As an annex to the diploma issuing an English-language University Diploma Supplement in accordance with the model developed on the basis of the European Commission, the Council of Europe and UNESCO/CEPES's standard model, which describes the education and professional direction, content, level and aim as well as providing information about the University and about its means education and placement in the Danish educational system.

(5). The certificate must not contain information on specific test conditions, see. § 7 and § 24, paragraph 3.

(6). The certificate does not contain information about Studio time trial test at bachelor degree programme, see. § 27, or whether additional tests on the master's degree, see. section 28.

(7). Total proof of training which is carried out by several universities and other educational institutions, issued by the University where the student is admitted and enrolled for that training.

(8). Leaving the student training without completing the University shall issue, at the request of the student documentation for the successful parts of the training specified in ECTS credits. The University shall issue, at the request of the student documentation for successful additional tests on the master's degree, see. section 28.

section 32. The University has approved that a passed courses or course/module from a Danish or foreign higher education institution merit transferred, should the assessment be passed as ' Passed ' or ' Approved '. If that course/module is assessed according to the 7-step-scale by both educational institutions, transferred the assessment with the characters. If a subject or course/module is carried out by a foreign educational institution, it must be set out in an annex to the diploma, which nature has been achieved after the grading scale used by that institution, as well as a summary of the grading scale used.

section 33. The University holds the information needed to issue certificates in 30 years after the end of the test or exam. Next, the information shall be returned to the State Archives.

Chapter 8 complaints about samples, etc.

§ 34. Complaints about the tests or other assessment, included in the examination shall be submitted by the student to the University. The complaint must be in writing and reasoned.

(2). The complaint must be submitted within 2 weeks after that assessment is announced. However, the earliest period runs from the date stated for the notification of the assessment referred to in article 6. section 26.

(3). The University may grant derogations from the appeal time limit referred to in paragraph 2, if there are exceptional circumstances.

section 35. That can, among other things. complaints: 1) Legal questions.

2) Examination base (questions, tasks and the like).

3) rehearsal.

4) rating.

(2). If the complaint relates to the assessment or other matters relating to the evaluators, submit to the University immediately appeal for evaluators, which shall have a period of 2 weeks to issue an opinion on the rating guides etc. in the complaint. The University may provide that examiners are given a longer period, if there are special circumstances. In the calculation of the Examiners ' time limit included July not. The complainant shall be given the opportunity to comment on the Examiners ' opinion within a time limit of at least 1 week.

(3). The University shall take a decision in accordance with paragraph 1 of this article, see. (2) on the basis of the opinion of the evaluators and the complainant's comments on the opinion.

(4). The University will be in dealing with a complaint, point out errors or defects in a sample, find the rules in section 19 shall apply.

§ 36. The University's decision, which must be in writing and reasoned, can go out on 1) offer of new rating (reassessment), oral tests, 2) bid for new trial (retaken), or 3) to the complainant not dismissed in the complaint.

(2). The University shall, as soon as possible, give the complainant and the examiners, see. section 35 (2), notice of the decision. The decision goes out on offer for reassessment or retaken, the complainant shall be informed of that reassessment or catch-up session can result in a lower rating.

section 37. The complainant shall, within 2 weeks after the University's decision is communicated to the complainant, accept offers of reassessment or retaken. Reassessment or catch-up session must take place as soon as possible. If the diploma is issued, without prejudice. section 31, paragraph 1, should the University involve proof until the assessment is available, and, where appropriate, issue a new certificate.

(2). By reassessment and new examiners appointed by the University and retaken any examiners, see. section 61 (1) (8). 4, of the censor-in-Office.

(3). By reassessment must be provided by presenting the documents in the case, including the reviewers task, the answer to the complaint, the original bedømmeres, opinion, the complainant's comments and the University's decision.

(4). The assessment by the reassessment and catch-up session, which can result in a lower nature, shall be notified to the University by the evaluators. By reassessment of written tests shall attach to the examiners a written justification for the rating. Assessment after reassessment and catch-up session cannot be brought before another administrative authority, see. However, section 44 (1).

Appeals Board



section 38. A complainant who has not upheld the complaint without prejudice. section 36 (1) (8). 3, may refer the decision of the University academic question, see. section 35 (1) (8). 2-4, for one of the University Appeals Board set up, see. § 39, acting.

(2). The complainant shall submit the appeal to the University. The appeal must be in writing and reasoned.

(3). The appeal must be submitted within 2 weeks after the University's decision is communicated to the complainant.

(4). The University may grant a derogation from the time limit referred to in paragraph 3, if there are exceptional circumstances.

§ 39. University reduces the appeal as soon as possible after the submission of an appeal. There may be reduced permanent Appeals Board.

(2). The Committee consists of two court-appointed examiners, a teacher and a student eligible examination within the subject area.

(3). Censor-in-Office referred to in article 6. section 51, paragraph 1, shall be appointed by the two censors. The President shall appoint an examiner of the censors, as Chairman of the Board. The President can appoint himself as censor censor or as President.

(4). The University shall be appointed by the teacher and the student.

(5). The Appeals Board company covered by the Act on administrative procedures, including the rules on conflict of interest and confidentiality.

§ 40. To the Appeals Board can be a quorum, all Committee members participate in the Board's discussion, and all the documents in the case be sent to all members. The discussion can be carried out in writing, including by electronic means, if there is a consensus among the Committee members about the written treatment of the basic regulation. However, paragraph 2. The discussion must be carried out in such a way, that the complainant's personal information is protected (confidential communications).

(2). There is no consensus in the Board of appeal, ends the discussion at a meeting where all of the Committee members must be present. Ends the discussion with a vote, and there is a tie, the Chairman shall have the casting vote.

(3). The Appeals Board shall take a decision in accordance with paragraph 1 of this article, see. (2) on the basis of the material that formed the basis for the University's decision and on the basis of the reasoned appeals.

(4). The Appeals Board will be in the context of the examination of an appeal point out errors or defects in a sample, inform the Board accordingly, and University rules in section 19 shall apply.

§ 41. Appeal Board's decision, which must be in writing and reasoned, can go out on 1) offer of new rating (reassessment) by different assessors, oral tests, 2) bid for new trial (retaken) by different assessors, or 3) to the complainant not dismissed in the complaint.

(2). Reassessment and catch-up session follows the rules in § 37, and assessment cannot be brought before another administrative authority, see. However, section 44 (1).

§ 42. The decision of the Appeals Board shall be notified to the University as soon as possible and at the latest 2 months after the appeal has been filed. In the calculation of the 2 months July not included.

(2). Appeal can not be processed within the time limit laid down in paragraph 1, to the University as soon as possible, inform the complainant accordingly with a statement of the reasons therefor and information about when the appeal is expected to be finalised.

section 43. The University gives the complainant as soon as possible, notice of appeal the Board's decision. The decision goes out on offer for reassessment or retaken, the complainant shall be informed of that reassessment or catch-up session can result in a lower rating.

(2). The Appeals Board decision cannot be brought before another administrative authority, see. However, section 44 (1).

§ 44. Complaint against decisions taken pursuant to article 35, paragraph 3, article 37, paragraph 4, or section 40 (3), may be brought before the University, if the complaint concerns the legal issues.

(2). The complaint must be lodged with the University no later than 2 weeks after the decision is communicated to the student.

(3). The University may grant a derogation from paragraph 2, where there are exceptional circumstances.


(4). The University's decision pursuant to paragraph 1 may be referred to the Agency for higher education, see. section 48.

Chapter 9 Other rules § 45. The University must respect the student's intellectual property rights to the results, and similar products obtained in connection with a trial.

(2). If rehearsal involving parties outside the University, including enterprises, institutions, etc., it is agreed between the University, the students and the third party, the extent to which the University, the student or the third party under respect of applicable intellectual property rules are eligible to use the results, products and the like, obtained during the test process, including any information relating to the third party's conditions that occur in the task, must be published.

§ 46. The student can continue training under the University's handling of a complaint or appeal in accordance with Chapter 8.

§ 47. Agency for higher education may dispense with notice the rules of section i of the exam when it is justified by exceptional circumstances.

Complaints about the University's decisions



section 48. The University's final decisions in accordance with section I of the exam in this Ordinance may be brought before the Agency for higher education of the decision relates, (the complainant), when the complaint relates to legal questions. The closing date for the submission of the complaint is 2 weeks from the day the decision is communicated to the complainant.

(2). The complaint shall be submitted to the University, which shall deliver its opinion. The complainant shall be given the opportunity to comment on the University's opinion within a time limit of at least 1 week. The University will send the complaint to the Agency attached to the opinion and the complainant's comments.

Title II Chapter 10 external examiners Censorship section 49. Agency for higher education will appoint nationwide Corps of Examiners (external examiners with the appointed censors).

(2). An external examiners include bachelor's and master's degrees as well as masters courses and other part-time education after University law within the same professional or related area, as one or more universities are authorized to provide. For the humanities, natural sciences and social sciences undergraduate and graduate programmes, consisting of a central subjects, see. the Education Ordinance, there may, however, create an external examiners for each subject.

(3). In a training or a central subjects are approved by the Minister, in accordance with article 3. law on accreditation of higher education institutions, establishes the Agency for higher education, which external examiners training or the central subjects should be linked.

(4). An overview of external examiners are available on the Ministry of Research, Innovation and higher education website.

§ 50. External evaluator Corps must be composed in such a way that the total Corps 1) covers all the subjects or elements that are included in the training or the core subjects, and the employment areas, such as education and training aims, 2) that included persons who have their main employment outside the University on one of the areas of employment, education and training aims, 3) to achieve an even distribution of female and male censors and 4) that for the education or core subjects, where applicable, part censors assigned to foreign universities.

§ 51. For each external examiners shall be elected by and among the censors, see. Chapter 11, a Presidency, consisting of a Chairman and one or more Vice-Presidents of the examiner. The previous censor Presidency is organising the elections.

(2). Censor the Presidency represents the censors in the examiner Corps in the face of the universities and the National Board for higher education.

(3). The new censor Presidency inform universities ' rectors and Agency for higher education on the elections in accordance with paragraph 1.

(4). By appointment of new external examiners, see. section 49 (1), carried out the function in paragraph 1, and section 58, paragraph 1, for the first time by the University or universities in the community.

§ 52. Censor the presidency after consultation with the University or universities allocate tasks for censorship among the censors in nanotoxicology, see. However, section 58, paragraph 4. Censor the Presidency distributes tasks, how to censor the censors regularly and at least every second year is assigned the external examiners ' tasks. Where the examiner Corps covers several universities, the censors, as far as possible, be assigned tasks by more than a University examiner in appointment period, see. section 58, paragraph 3. In the allocation shall take account of any special conditions with regard to the second examiner in fagkyndighed in connection with the individual samples.

(2). Censor the Presidency must as part of quality assurance of education test and exam system 1) set the censors to appoint, in accordance with article 3. section 58 (1), (2)) to advise universities on the test form and content, see. section 61 (1) (8). 2, 3) submit an annual report to the universities on the basis of reports, see censorernes. section 61 (1) (8). 3, 4) respond to consultations on programme regulations and major changes in education curricula, which affect test and exam system, and 5), incidentally, be available to the University, including customer panels, through the development of new test forms.

(3). Censor Presidency contributes to an ongoing dialogue on the development of test and examination system's quality, including exam tasks quality, at least every two years to hold the external examiners ' meetings with censors in nanotoxicology and contact meetings between the universities, including customer panels, and censors.

§ 53. The censors shall not be employed by the University or by the faculty, if the University is divided into the main areas where they will act as censors, unless there is another training or another key subjects, see. section 49 (2) than the censoren researcher and lecturer at. The University's Rector, deans, directors, Department managers and others in similar positions may not, however, act as censors at the University. It should be avoided to the extent possible, that examiners performing censorship functions for each other (mutual censorship).

(2). Censorernes work covered by the Act on administrative procedures, including the rules on conflict of interest and confidentiality.

§ 54. By a second examiner in decay, where it has not been possible to summon a second examiner, may appoint a person as University examiner, which meets the requirements of section 57.

(2). The University will inform as soon as possible censor the Presidency for the designation in accordance with paragraph 1.

§ 55. The University creates websites, where the examiner Corps members have access to up-to-date information about the courses or core subjects that are relevant to them, including this notice, nature of the notice and training curriculum, as well as other material relevant to the censorernes company.

(2). The University must prior to individual censorship tasks provide the censors with the material necessary for the censors to perform tasks.

section 56. The universities shall bear the cost of censor of the Presidency and censorernes work, see. Ministry of finance circular on hourly paid teaching as well as circular on remuneration of the examiner. Universities provide, subject to prior agreement with the censor Presidency administrative and practical assistance.

Chapter 11 the censors § 57. In order to be appointed as examiner must the person have 1) a relevant research-based education at the graduate level, 2) incoming and current knowledge of scientific disciplines, including to the subject's theory and methods, 3) specific competence in one or more academic areas, which form part of the training or the core subjects, and 4) current knowledge of education or the central subject uses, including knowledge of the purchaser's situation and needs.

§ 58. Agency for higher education will appoint censors on the recommendation of the external examiners ' Presidency.

(2). Censor the Presidency shall consult with the universities in setting happens taking into account the provisions of § § 50 and 57.

(3). External examiners are appointed for 4 years at a time, see. However, paragraph 4. For each new appointment period replaced at least one quarter of the censors in nanotoxicology. There may, within the period are hereby appointed additional censors, including in those cases where new approved courses you want to associate the nanotoxicology, see. section 49, paragraph 3.

(4). Censor the Presidency may in exceptional cases appoint censors for stand-alone censorship tasks.

(5). Following a reasoned recommendation from the Presidency or a University can censor Agency for higher education, bring an end to the qualification in the external examiners ' period, if the Presidency considers that a second examiner in the University or work is not satisfactory.

section 59. Censor topics can be found by a proposal from the Presidency, censor censor Corps, universities and by opening in trade journals, periodicals, etc.

section 60. Examiner must ensure that the requirements for the contents of 1) of training samples are consistent with the objectives and other requirements laid down for training, including in the Education Ordinance and in the curriculum, 2) to the tests carried out in accordance with the applicable rules, and 3) that students are given a uniform and fair treatment that their performance get a reliable appraisal, that is in accordance with the rules for scoring in the nature of the notice including rules laid down to that effect in the education curriculum, and other rules for the training.

section 61. An examiner must 1) Act as external examiner at the Education Department or the Central external samples, see. Article 20, paragraph 3,


2) advise on the test system, including its form and content, and whether it works for its intended purpose and in accordance with the training or the central subject and teaching goals, 3) at the end of the make a report about terminens exam exam course for the University and the Presidency, and 4) involved in the processing of complaints and anchor of samples, see. section 35, paragraph 2, article 37, paragraph 2, and section 39, paragraph 2.

(2). Notes censor that the circumstances referred to in paragraph 60, not met, or get the examiner to suspect significant problems or deficiencies in the University's conduct of a training, the censor reporting thereon to the University, with a copy to the external examiners ' Presidency.

Title III entry into force and transitional provisions Chapter 12 entry into force and transitional provisions § 62. The notice shall enter into force on the 1. July 2014.

(2). Executive Order No. 1518 of 16. December 2013 on the exam and evaluation by university education (exam notice) is repealed.

(3). The notice shall apply from the 1. July 2014 for students who begin a bachelor's degree at full-time from the academic year 2014-15 or later, except for section 28 which shall apply from the 1. September 2014.

(4). The notice shall apply to all other full-time students and part-time students from the 1. September 2015, with the exception of section 28 which shall apply from the 1. September 2014. § 14 shall apply from the 1. July 2015 for student enrollment to subjects or elements and associated tests for the academic year 2015-16 or later. The University can automatically enroll students to 1. and 2. sample experiments, if a student in the previous year of study have been enrolled subjects or elements without participating in or pass the associated tests.

(5). For students covered by paragraph 4 shall order No. 666 by 24. June 2012 about the exam and evaluation by university education (exam notice) shall continue to apply up to and including 31 December 2002. August 2015.

The Ministry of education and research, the 19. June 2014 Sofie Carsten Nielsen/Helle Rosenvold Anderson

Related Laws