160/2006 Sb.
LAW
of 16 December 2002. March 2006,
amending Act No. 82/1998 Coll., on liability for damage caused by
in the exercise of public authority by a decision or incorrect official procedure and
about the change of the Czech National Council Act No. 357/1992 Coll., on the notarial profession, and their
activities (notarial regulations), as amended, law No.
201/2002 Coll., on the Office of the Government representation in property Affairs, in
as amended, and Act No. 40/1964 Coll., the civil code, in the
as amended
Change: 89/2009 Sb.
Parliament has passed the following Act of the United States:
PART THE FIRST
Amendment of the Act on liability for damage caused in the exercise of public authority
by a decision or incorrect official procedure and amending the law of the Czech
the National Council No. 357/1992 Coll., on the notarial profession and their activities (notarial
order)
Article. (I)
Act No. 82/1998 Coll., on liability for damage caused in the performance of
of public authority by a decision or incorrect official procedure and amending
the Czech National Council Act No. 357/1992 Coll., on the notarial profession and their activities
(the notarial regulations), as amended by Act No 120/2001 Coll., constitutional
the Court declared under no. 234/2002 Coll. and Act No. 539/2004 Coll.,
be amended as follows:
1. In article 1 (1). 2 the words "powers conferred" shall be replaced by
"public power entrusted."
2. in article 1, the following paragraph 3 is added:
"(3) the State and local authorities in a separate scope of conditions shall be deemed to
laid down in this Act also suffered non-material damage ".
3. In paragraph 3 (b). (b)), after the words "entrusted" the words "by law or on the
under the law ".
4. In paragraph 3 (c)):
"(c)) the authorities of territorial self-governing units, if the damage occurred during
the performance of State administration, which was transferred to them by law or on the basis of
Act (hereinafter referred to as "territorial units" in by the). ".
5. In paragraph 5 (b). a), the words ' in administrative proceedings ", the words", in
proceedings under the code of civil procedure of administrative ".
6. In article 6 (1). 2, the words "on the appeal or" shall be deleted.
7. In paragraph 6 (1). 2 at the end of the text of subparagraph (a)) the following words "or
the Court executor ".
8. In paragraph 6, the following paragraph 5 is added:
"(5) the authority designated in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 4, is acting for the State as a business
the State in proceedings before the Court, unless a special law
provide otherwise. ".
9. in paragraph 6, the following new section 6a, which including the title and notes
line # 3b:
"§ 6a
Violations of the right to personal liberty
Liability of the State and of the territorial units in a separate scope for breach of
the right to personal liberty ^ 3b) shall be assessed pursuant to the provisions of this Act,
governing liability for unlawful decision or incorrect official
procedure.
for example, Article 3B). 8 of the Charter of fundamental rights and freedoms, article. 5 Convention on the
the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, as amended
protocols, declared under no. 209/1992 Coll., as amended by communication No. 41/1996
And communication No. 244/1998 Coll. ".
10. In section 8, paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be added:
"(2) if the damage caused by an unlawful decision enforceable without
regardless of the legal power, can the claim, even if the decision was
revoked or amended on the basis of a proper appeal.
(3) unless the cases worthy of special consideration, may be entitled to compensation
the damage caused by unlawful decision to grant only if the
damaged in the time limits laid down by law took advantage of all the procedural
funds that by law the injured party to protect his rights;
such device means an ordinary appeal, extraordinary
the appeal, with the exception of the proposal for revision, and other procedural
a means to protect the rights, with the application of the associated begin
judicial, administrative or other legal proceedings. ".
11. in § 9 para. 1, after the words "the decision on custody has the word
"also".
12. in paragraph 9, the end of the text of paragraph 2, the words "shall be added; This does not apply,
If the damage in these proceedings was unlawful decision or
incorrect official procedure of the authorities of the Czech Republic. "
13. in section 10, paragraph 1 reads:
"(1) the right to compensation for damage caused by a decision on the penalty, the
which it was totally or partially executed penalty if, in a subsequent procedure
He was acquitted of the indictment or if criminal proceedings against him stopped
for the same reasons for which the Court in the main proceedings decides
zprošťujícím judgment. This does not apply to orders to stop the criminal
the prosecution of the President of the Republic, the user their right to grant pardon or
Amnesty. ".
14. in paragraph 13 is at the end of paragraph 1, the following sentence "unless the law provides for the
performing an action or decision no time limit shall be considered
maladministration also infringement of the obligation to make action or
issue a decision within a reasonable period of time. ^ 8a) ".
Footnote No. 8a is inserted:
"for example, Article 8a). 5 and 6 of the Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental
freedoms. ".
15. section 14 reads as follows:
"section 14
(1) a claim for compensation shall be applied by the Office referred to in paragraph 6.
(2) if the claim Was filed with the Office which is not competent, it shall forward this
the request of the injured party to the competent authority of the Office. Effects of the preliminary application
in this case are preserved.
(3) a claim for compensation under this Act is a condition of
for any claim for damages in court. ".
16. in article 15, paragraph 2. 1 the words "central authority" shall be replaced by "the competent
the Office ".
17. In article 16(1). 1, after the word "procedure", the words "or
It provided for the same reason the reparation for the resulting non-material
injury ".
18. in section 16 paragraph 2 reads as follows:
"(2) if the decision of the local government unit shall be reviewed
by the competent authority, and was subsequently a decision of that authority and zoning
Government Unit canceled for illegality, the State may require
payment on the edge of regression, if the competent authority is that of the County, or to
local government whole. ".
19. in section 17(2). 1, after the word "authority" the words "or to provide a
for the same reason reparation for non-material damage suffered ".
20. in § 17 paragraph 2. 2, after the words "involved in the judge" the words "or
the Prosecutor, or provide the reparation for the same reason
suffered non-material damage "and the words" blame the judge "shall be inserted after
"or the public prosecutor".
21. in section 17(2). 4, the word "decision" shall be replaced by the words "performance
a public authority ".
22. in paragraph 22 of the following shall be added at the end of paragraph 1, the phrase "incorrect official
the procedure is also a violation of the obligation to make action or issue a decision
in the time limit laid down by law. Unless otherwise provided by law for the Act or
the decision any deadline, it is considered incorrect official procedure
also the breach of the obligation to take action or to issue a decision in the
a reasonable period of time. ^ 8a) ".
23. section 23 reads as follows:
"article 23 of the
Replacing a separate territorial unit in the scope of the damage caused by the
unlawful decision, when the issue is directed to the wrong legal
the opinion of the competent authority, which set aside in the original legal proceedings
the decision of the territorial unit in a separate scope, or provide a
same reason reparation for non-material damage caused, may
require payment on the edge of regression, if the competent authority is
of the county or the State, if the competent authority is the authority of the State. ".
24. In paragraph 24, after the word "damage" the words ", if provided
reparation for non-material damage suffered ".
25. sections 30 and 31, including footnote # 12:
"section 30
Compensation for loss of profit shall be granted in the established amount; If this is not possible,
then for each commenced day of custody, imprisonment, protective
education or protective treatment belongs to the victim compensation for loss of profit
in the amount of Czk 170.
section 31
(1) the compensation includes such costs that have been damaged
reasonably incurred by the cancellation or amendment of the illegal decision or to
remedy the maladministration.
(2) the injured party to pay the costs apply only if
had the chance to do so in the course of proceedings on the basis of procedural
regulations, or if the reimbursement of costs as follows already has not been awarded.
(3) the representation costs are included in the costs. Include efficiently
incurred by cash outlays and fee for representation. The amount of this remuneration shall be
determined in accordance with the provisions of the special legal regulation ^ 12) on a non-contractual
the reward.
(4) the injured party has no right to reimbursement of the costs incurred by the representation in
the context of the consultation of the claim to the competent authority.
12) for example, Decree No. 177/1996 Coll., on the remuneration of lawyers and compensation
advocates for the provision of legal services (lawyer's tariff), as amended by
amended. ".
26. under section 31 is added to § 31a, which including the title reads as follows:
"§ 31a
Reparation for non-material damage caused to the
(1) regardless of whether the unlawful decision or improper
official procedure caused by damage, is provided under this Act, whether or not
adequate compensation for non-material damage suffered.
(2) Compensation shall be granted in cash, if the non-material damage
It was not possible to replace the different and the finding of violations of the law should
was not considered as sufficient. In determining the amount of a reasonable
compensation will take into account the seriousness of the injury and the circumstances
in which non-material injury has occurred.
(3) in cases where the non-material damage was incorrect official
According to § 13 para. 1 the second and third sentence or section 22 para. 1 sentence
the second and third, is taken into account in determining the amount of a reasonable
satisfaction also the particular circumstances of the case, in particular, to the
and the total length of proceedings)
(b) the complexity of the proceedings)
(c) the conduct of the injured party which) contributed to the delays in the proceedings and to
that took advantage of the available resources of eligible to remove delays in
management,
(d)) the procedure of the public authorities during the procedure and
(e) the importance of the subject of the proceedings) the injured party. ".
27. in paragraph 32, the following paragraph 3 is added:
"(3) the right to compensation for non-material damage under this Act shall become statute-barred
for 6 months from the date when the injured party became aware of the damage incurred
injury no later than ten years from the date of the occurrence of legal
the fact that the formation of non-material damage is linked to. To
non-material damage incorrect official procedure according to § 13 para. 1 sentence
the second and third section 22(2) or. 1 the second sentence and the third, will not end the limitation
time less than 6 months after the end of the proceedings, in which this
maladministration occurred. ".
28. section 35:
"§ 35
The period of limitation does not run from the date of the claim for damages to the
the end of the preliminary hearing, but no longer than for a period of 6 months. ".
Article II
Transitional provision
The liability under this Act for non-material damage caused by the
incorrect official procedure according to § 13 para. the second and third sentence 1 and §
22 paragraph 1. 1 the second sentence and the third Act No. 82/1998 Coll., in the version in force
from the date of entry into force of this Act shall also apply to
non-material damage caused before the date of entry into force of this Act,
If it was not entitled to compensation for this injury barred; in the case that
the injured party presented before the entry into force of this law to the European Court
for the human rights of this title, in this case a timely complaint, of which
This Court has not yet gone before the final decision, the prescription of the claim
to compensation for non-material damage for 1 year from the effective date of this Act.
PART TWO
Amendment of the Act on the Office of the Government representation in property Affairs
Article. (III)
In section 8 (b). and) Act No. 201/2002 Coll., on the Office of the Government representation in
property, the words "special legislation" ^ 5) or "shall be deleted.
PART THREE
cancelled
Article IV
PART FOUR
The EFFECTIVENESS of the
Article. In
This Act shall take effect on the date of its publication.
Fort Worth Star Telegram in r.
Klaus r.
Paroubek in r.