136/1997.
FIND
The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic
The operation of nevýherních machines is carried out on the basis of the trade
permissions. For this operation mode of Act No. 455/1991 Coll., on the
trades. Because the Act does not contain for this
the activities of the legal mandate for the municipality, the municipality may not separately regulate
the operation of the digital and light devices and gaming devices.
The exercise of control over this activity is governed by Act No. 553/1991 Coll.,
State control. Or this law, including the law No. 575/1991 Coll.,
of commercial offices, does not have a mandate for the Government to issue
generally binding decrees of distribution checks trade
surveillance and monitoring of business.
On behalf of the United States
The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic held on 4 December 2002. June 1997 in plenary on
the design of the head of the District Office in Šumperk to cancel generally binding
Ordinance of the town of Sumperk No 41/96 of 16 December 1991 December 1996 on the control of
digital and lighting devices and gaming devices in the territory of the city
Šumperk
as follows:
I. Operative Part
Ordinance of the town of Sumperk No 41/96 of 16 December 1991 December 1996 on the control of
digital and lighting devices and gaming devices in the territory of the city
Šumperk is repealed on the date of publication of this finding in the statute book.
II. Justification
1. the head of the District Office in Šumperk submission of 2 July. 4, 1997,
that occurred to the Constitutional Court on 7 December. 4. in 1997, filed a proposal to repeal
legislation generally binding decrees of Šumperk No 41/96 of
16 December 2002. 12.1996. This proposal adds submission of 28 June. 4.1997. In
his proposal drew the issue generally binding decrees belongs to
separate the scope of the city Šumperk, but because it determines the legal and
natural persons acting in the cadastre of the city of Šumperk legal obligations,
i.e.. the location and operation of digital and light devices and gaming
the device only in separate premises-gambling, a prohibition of entry into the
the game room in the days of school pupils to 16.00 hours and the need for
creation of a separate room that only as a result of the location of the nevýherních
machines in already existing premises, or any part thereof, shall be as
change in the use of the construction of the building Office, reported that a decision thereon
or order a new purpose, the town of Šumperk in its General
binding Decree (OZV) No 41/96 beyond the law, since it is
get into conflict with the provisions of section 17 of Act No. 367/1990 Coll., on
municipalities, and section 17 and section 37 paragraph 2. 1 and 2 of Act No. 455/1991 Coll., on the
trades (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The control and
supervision over compliance with the PA SYSTEM was entrusted to the staff of the three trade unions
the municipal office and city police force with the right to impose fines in the block
violations of the decree or the thing forward to control the přestupkovému Department
The municipal office in Šumperk.
The release of OZV No 41/96 of regulating digital and lighting apparatus and
gaming devices, as follows, and the appellant was indirectly a breach of
the provisions of article. 26 paragraph 2. 1 and 2 of the Charter of fundamental rights and freedoms.
2. The Text of the Decree suspended the:
Decree No. 41/96
on the regulation of digital and light devices and gaming devices on the
the town of Sumperk
Town Council in Šumperk pursuant to Act No. 367/1990
Coll., on municipalities, as amended, § 16 para. 1, § 17 and 36
paragraph. 1 letter f) approved at its meeting of 16 November 2004. 12.1996 this
generally binding Decree.
Article. 1
The purpose of generally binding decrees
General binding Decree lays down the owners or lessees of non-residential
space on ^ 1 placement and operation of digital and light
devices and gaming devices (hereinafter referred to as non-winning slots), on the basis of
Trade license ^ 2 only in separate premises ^ 3-
amusement arcades.
Article. 2
The definition for nevýherních machines
To secure public order ^ 4 is the operation of nevýherních machines
subject to their located in separate premises-room. ^ 5 entry to the
the game room is in the days of school to 4 pm. disabled pupils in
the time of completion of compulsory schooling.
Article. 3
Inspection and surveillance
Control and supervision over compliance with the generally binding decrees are
commissioned personnel of the Municipal Office of the Department of Social Affairs, housing
the economy, education and health care and the city police. Violations of the
the Decree fixes on the spot either city police block a fine, or
infringement Department of the municipal office in Šumperk. ^ 6
Article. 4
The effectiveness of the
This generally binding Decree shall enter into force on 1 May 2004. January 1, 1997.
3. the Constitutional Court, in proceedings for annulment of the Act or other legislation referred to in
the provisions of § 68 para. 2 of the Act. No. 182/1993 Coll. first must determine whether the
legislation was issued within the limits of the Constitution laid down the competence
and in the prescribed manner.
Of the sent documents, it was found that the town of Sumperk OZV No. 41/96
It was adopted the requisite number of members of the City Council in Šumperk
16 December 2002. 12.1996 and came into effect the day after the airing of the 1. January 1, 1997.
Head of the District Office in Šumperk himself confirmed that OZV No. 41/96,
adopted and published in the prescribed manner.
On 25 April. 2. the 1997 District Office in Šumperk under REF. 179/97-Bc suspended
the performance of the above and asked the Mayor of the city of a PA SYSTEM for the submission of this
suspension of the performance of Municipal PA SYSTEM for reconsideration a corporation in
Sumperk. On 12 June 2006. 3. the 1997 special session of the Town Council
in Šumperk disables OZV No. 41/96 and took on its resolution No 1071/96
of 16 December 2002. 12.1996. This was done by resolution No 1284/97.
4. The Constitutional Court had to first address the question of whether it really belongs
the issue in question in a separate scope of a PA SYSTEM, as reported by myself
the appellant, which with its position deviated from on-demand views
The Ministry of Interior of 31 July. 1. in 1997, according to which "the village is not in the
individual shall be entitled to issue a decree that would regulate the
the operation of the gaming and slot machines ".
In the article. 1 OZV itself no 41/96 States that the regulation applies to the operation of
the activities of nevýherních machines on the basis of trade licence. For
the activities of these nevýherních machines which legal regime provided for
in the Cust. No. 455/1991 Coll., on trades, as amended.
This law, however, does not have any legal authority to municipalities so that they can
separately regulate the operation of digital and light devices and
gaming device.
The town of Sumperk, in its Decree refers to the provisions of section 17 of the law on
municipalities, in conjunction with the provisions of § 14 para. 1 (b). about) of the same law,
concerning the scope of the municipality in the field of local public affairs
all right. The amendment to the Municipal Act, the establishment and infractions, IE. Act No.
279/1995 Coll., according to the explanatory memorandum was issued in order to allow the
municipalities to make effective measures according to local conditions against the negative
the consequences of prostitution. Therefore, it cannot be under the subsumovat
the power of municipalities to issue for the regulation of all activities of the PA SYSTEM, which could
to disrupt public order and especially not such activities that are
regulated by separate legislation. OZV itself no 41/96 of
Šumperk in the article. 1, which establishes the purpose, objective, OZV public
order.
Because it is a legal regime to regulate the activities, laid down in
a special law (the trade) that the village without authorising the local editing
These activities release does not fall into the scope of the PA SYSTEM separate
of the village.
As has already been held by the Constitutional Court (PL. ÚS 5/93), under the provisions of
§ 43 para. 1 (b). (d)). No. 182/1993 Coll., on the Constitutional Court, is
the proposal "clearly an unauthorized person" the reason for its refusal. To be manifestly
unauthorized person to submit a proposal should be considered as the applicant only
cases where the assessment of locus standi produces no
the doubt. Assessment of individual municipalities, also due to the
the opinion of the applicant, to the Group of bezpochybnosti cannot be marshaled, and
Therefore, the Constitutional Court had to deal with the proposal.
In his article. 1 the town of Sumperk OZV No 41/96 lays down the owners or
the obligation to place tenants and operate digital and lighting apparatus
and slot machines only in separate premises-gambling. In the article. 2,
When traffic is nevýherních machines subject to their position in the
a separate establishment-the game room is a reference to the Act No. 50/1976 Coll., on the
land use planning and building regulations, as amended, when it is necessary to
perform construction inspection, or rekolaudaci rooms for this purpose.
The above provision is contrary to section 37 of the Trade Act,
because the place and operate non-winning machines directly from the law on
the basis of the trade licence and the consent of the village came into account
only in the case of placing such vending machines outside the establishment, and before
Announcing changes to the Trade Office.
Section 17 para. 1 the Act. No. 455/1991 Coll., on trades, in
as amended, defines the space, in which the business is operated. For
an establishment for the purposes of the Trade Act is regarded as the stand and
a similar device. The town of Šumperk, it would be entitled to a PA SYSTEM to regulate the
operate the equipment to meet the needs of the citizens in the premises, which
are owned by the city. Because there is no legal warrant to do so, it cannot
However, the responsibilities of all owners or tenants of non-residential
space, where they are located or operated digital and light
instruments and play equipment on the basis of trade licence in the territory
the town of Šumperk.
Act No. 455/1991 Coll., on trades, as amended, section
60A States that "trade control carried out within its scope of
the business offices that monitor whether and how obligations are met
set by the trade law, and how compliance with the obligations laid down
trade law, the provisions of the special acts relating
the skilled trades. Under section 60b control activities in the framework of the
workers perform professional business offices. To
the control may be invited representatives of other institutions. The performance of this
checks are governed by Act No. 553/1991 Coll. on State control. No
of these laws, including law No. 575/1991 Coll., of the commercial
the offices also has no mandate for the Government to issue
generally binding decrees in the field of expanding control of trade
business and supervision as it made the town of Šumperk in the article. 3 your OZV No.
41/96.
The Constitutional Court in its established case-law, deduced that the enumeration of separate
the scope of interpretation in the sense of legal authorization to issue a PA SYSTEM
should be interpreted restrictively. Further deduced that in the interpretation of § 14 para. 2
the law on municipalities to individual municipalities belongs to only you
the matters which, by their nature, affect territorial self-governing units
(the economic, cultural and social development, the protection and creation of the
environment), if they are not assigned to other departments of special laws as
performance of State administration. So should be interpreted and amended
the provisions of § 17 with his reference to § 14 para. 1 (b). o) of the Act on
municipalities, as the place and time for the operation of digital and light
slot machines is handled by the trade law. Therefore, this cannot be
action to limit or even prohibit it OZV on certain publicly
accessible locations in the village. There would be to restrict business
things to people and their personal rights.
The Constitutional Court, although it was aware of the beneficial efforts of the town of Šumperk,
He came to the conclusion that the release of the city Šumperk OZV No. 41/96 there was a
infringement of article 81(1). 26 paragraph 2. 2 of the Charter of fundamental rights and freedoms, as the only
the law may lay down the conditions and limitations for the exercise of certain professions or
activities. Furthermore, the provisions of article has been violated. 4 (4). 1 and article. 2 (2). 2
The Charter of fundamental rights and freedoms, as well as the article. 2 (2). 3 of the Constitution.
Therefore, the Constitutional Court upheld the Ordinance of the town of Sumperk and design No 41/96 of
16 December 2002. 12. the 1996 set aside the date of publication of the finding in the journal of laws.
The President of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic:
JUDr. Kessler v. r.
III. Different views
A different opinion of the judges. Miloš Holecek, JUDr. Paul
Varvařovského and JUDr. Eva Zarembové
In the grounds of the award, accepted by the majority of the members of the Assembly, which shall be repealed;
Ordinance of the town of Sumperk No 41/96 of 16 December 1991 12. the 1996 regulations
digital and lighting devices and gaming devices in the territory of the city
Šumperk, the Constitutional Court once again returns to the original restrictive interpretation
individual municipalities. This interpretation, however, to ensure the constitutionality of the
and the legality of generally binding decrees issued by the municipality in a separate
the scope is not necessary nor appropriate. A separate range of competence in §
14. 1 of the law on municipalities is demonstratively, and therefore, according to the
in our opinion, can be supplemented by special laws on the one hand, and
extended on the basis of general competence clause contained in section 14
paragraph. 2 of this Act. The Constitutional Court should continue a trend that
He began finding in the matter of PL. ÚS 18/94 of 8 February 2005. November 1994, which
He was named under no. 231/1994 Coll., and the full text was published under no.
50 volume 2 collection of findings and resolution of the TC of the CZECH REPUBLIC. This finding, in its
justification tried to appropriate control of constitutionality and legality
While respecting the separate conflicts of traditions kept public
the effort to make the village even had some tools to populate their
self-governing functions, without whose assistance the Government becomes
void. While respecting this trend cannot agree with
a restrictive interpretation of section 17 of the law on municipalities and § 14 para.
1 (b). about) the same law. While it is true that the explanatory memorandum to the amendment to the
the law on municipalities no 279/1995 SB. States that the reason for the amendment is
above all, the regulation of prostitution as a phenomenon which threatens the public
the order, however, the explanatory memorandum undoubtedly does not have normative value.
The contested Decree of Šumperk was clearly conceived as a
Decree towards the security of public order (article 2) and its
the character also drew attention to the city when defending their
the legal opinion. According to our Court, the provisions of § 17 of the Act on municipalities
enables the village completely undeniably, in the interests of public order regulate the
certain activities and in this way cannot be in itself an obstacle that
These activities are otherwise regulated by special legislation.
1, section 3, paragraph 3. 2 Act No. 116/1990 Coll., on lease and sublease of non-residential
space, as amended.
2 section 25 of Act No. 455/1991 Coll., the Act, as amended
regulations.
3 § 17 para. 1 of Act No. 455/1991 Coll., the Trade Licensing Act, as
amended.
4 § 14 para. 1 (b). about) of Act No. 367/1990 Coll., on municipalities, as amended by
amended.
5 § 82 or section 85 of the Act No. 50/1976 Coll. on territorial planning and building
Code (the building Act), as amended.
6 § 46 para. 2 and 3 and section 48 of Act. No. 200/1990 Coll. on offences, as amended by
amended.