(Adopted by Decree No. 187 of 1 February 2010 by the Government of the Hygiene State of 31 December 2009)

Chapter I General

Article I, in order to strengthen the administrative oversight of the law, expedite the process of building the rule of law government, develops this approach in line with the relevant laws, regulations and the Department of State's Comprehensive Framework for the Implementation of the Law, the State Department's decisions on strengthening the administration of the city's municipalities and the relevant provisions of the provincial government.

Article 2. This approach refers to the activities of the superior government, the Government's assessment of the administrative work of the law and the inspection.

Article 3

This approach is applied to the Government of the urban, district and territorial governments in implementing the legal administrative supervision of vertical management.

Article IV. The Government of the city leads the administration of the city and oversees the advancement of the people's administration in accordance with the law by all sectors and districts of the city's government.

The People's Government of the District (markets, districts) is leading to the legal administration of the districts (markets, districts) and oversees the advancement of the administration of the people's departments and communes (communes).

The municipalities, districts (communes, districts) government departments lead the administration of the sector in accordance with the law and provide guidance on the legal administration of the institutions and the lower-level sectors.

Article 5 is responsible for the administration of justice, and the main responsibilities of the Government of the city, the city, the district, and its sectors are the first responsible for the administration of justice.

Article 6

(i) Establish and implement the relevant system of administrative oversight under the law;

(ii) Establish and organize implementation programmes under the law;

(iii) To organize a review of the implementation of the legal administration;

(iv) Guidance exchange and inspection of the administration of justice;

(v) Coordination of administrative oversight by the relevant departments or agencies;

(vi) Other responsibilities conferred by the laws, regulations, and the State Department, the provincial and municipal peoples' governments.

Sectors such as urban inspection, ethnic, finance and preparation should be jointly monitored under the statutory responsibility.

Chapter II Oversight elements

Article 7 is governed by law by the executive supervision of organizational leadership in accordance with the law, the state of scientific democratic decision-making in accordance with the law, the management of normative documents, the introduction of administrative law enforcement responsibilities, the performance of their duties under the law, the performance of administrative review responsibilities and the sound administration of administration v. work mechanisms, the implementation of public information systems.

Article 8

(i) Implementation of the leadership and leadership functions of the legal organization;

(ii) Five-year planning, development of annual workplans and follow-up by law;

(iii) The establishment and implementation of the legal administrative statistics, the reporting system;

(iv) Leading the pedagogical law system, the law on the staff of the executive branch, and the training of administrative law enforcement personnel for learning in accordance with the law;

(v) Accreditation and management of administrative law enforcement personnel;

(vi) The inclusion of the annual review of the appraisal system in accordance with the law, in accordance with the implementation of the annual responsibilities objective of the responsibilities, in accordance with the law, and the accountability of the executive branch.

Article 9 oversees, in accordance with the law, the following matters:

(i) Establishment of major administrative decision-making mechanisms;

(ii) The exercise of the right to administrative decision-making within the framework of statutory competence;

(iii) The system of hearings of major administrative decisions, the hearings system, the legitimacy review system, the collective decision-making system and the implementation of the post-implementation evaluation system;

(iv) The establishment and implementation of major administrative decision-making responsibilities.

Article 10 Oversight of the management of normative documents primarily oversees the following matters:

(i) The formulation of normative documents is in accordance with the legislative authority and procedures and whether the content is legitimate;

(ii) Whether normative documents developed are submitted in accordance with the provisions, whether there is a strict review of the documentation, whether the normative document review recommended by citizens, legal persons or other organizations;

(iii) The establishment and implementation of the normative document.

Article 11 Main oversight of the following matters:

(i) Administrative law enforcement is based on regular streamlining, clean-up, the timely learning, dissemination of newly enacted laws, regulations, regulations, regulations, regulations and regulations, without undue application of the legal basis that has been revised or that has been repealed, invalidated;

(ii) Dealing administrative law enforcement functions by law, with unauthorized increases or expansion of administrative law enforcement functions in this sector;

(iii) Identification of administrative law enforcement responsibilities and identification of specific law enforcement responsibilities of different departments and agencies, law enforcement officials in the workplace, and the absence of accountability for misconduct, violations or inappropriate administrative acts;

(iv) The legal recognition of the qualifications of executive law enforcement and administrative law enforcement officials and the absence of an administrative law enforcement body, organization and non-administrative law enforcement qualified personnel for administrative law enforcement activities;

(v) The establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement procedures, whether procedures such as vetting, investigation, hearing, decision-making and delivery are improved and there are no procedural violations or abuses of authority;

(vi) Administrative law enforcement files are reviewed and there is no uniformity of administrative law enforcement instruments;

(vii) An internal evaluation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities;

(viii) The establishment and implementation of the coordination mechanism on administrative law enforcement functions, overlapping functions and cross-cutting coordination of settlement.

Article 12

(i) The exercise of its functions within the statutory framework, with the powerless administration and the arbitrary increase in the obligations or abuses of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, the deprivation, limitation of the rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations;

(ii) Strict compliance with the statutory responsibilities, by law and by redressing violations, with impunity, as a result of administrative inadvertentness, inclination, abuse as a damage to public interest and the relative interests of the administration and the disruption of the administrative order, which has a major social impact;

(iii) Public confidence-building situations where there is no violation of the administrative decision to amend the entry into force and the removal, modification of the administrative decision to enter into force and non-payment of compensation and compensation as provided for by the law;

(iv) The establishment and implementation of the supervisory mechanisms within the sector, the establishment, enforcement of the relevant regime governing administrative penalties, administrative licence discretion, the establishment of a system for the proper review of the rule of law of specific administrative conduct, administrative law enforcement complaints procedures, the admissibility of complaints, the absence of criminal sanctions, the absence of a specific administrative act without the rule of law, the absence of a specific administrative act, the absence of a specific administrative act of administrative action by the executive review body and the People's Court, the removal, modification or the imposition of a specific administrative act, the failure to report, reprisals or reprisals.

Article 13 Implementation of administrative review responsibilities and sound administration v.

(i) Implementation of administrative review responsibilities and sound administrations v. work-building mechanisms;

(ii) Strictly perform administrative review responsibilities, without which the admissibility, review of the review and non-decision;

(iii) Combining the implementation of the pilot process of administrative review;

(iv) Participation in administrative review and administrative proceedings shall be void, refusal to participate in the review and denial of evidence;

(v) The active implementation of administrative review decisions, the entry into force of administrative sentences, and the denial of implementation of administrative review decisions and the entry into force of administrative sentences;

(vi) In accordance with the provisions for participation in administrative review, the appearance of administrative proceedings shall be v and heard.

Article 14. Implementation of the Government's public information system primarily monitors the preparation and updating of the public directory of information provided by this organ, the improvement of the public information system, the publication of significant information on public interest, the application of public information by civil and other organizations, the public information of administrative law enforcement results, the public information of the law enforcement authorities in accordance with law enforcement procedures and work processes, and the basic information of law enforcement officials.

The Government of the superior population should also monitor the following matters in the administration of the law:

(i) The establishment of institutions under the law, the definition of the functions of the institution and the circumstances in which the administrative system is responsive;

(ii) Progress in the reform of the administrative approval system;

(iii) deepen the reform of the administrative law enforcement system and carry out relatively centralized administrative penalties, relatively centralized administrative licences and integrated law enforcement;

(iv) Financial security of administrative law enforcement funds;

(v) Administrative compensation, administrative compensation systems are established and implemented.

Chapter III

Article 16 Governments and their sectors should establish a system of statistical information on the administrative situation, in a timely manner, to collect, possess capacity-building and work on the basis of the law, and to conduct investigations, analyses and analyses of the administration of justice.

Article 17 provides that the executive supervision of the law may be carried out in a comprehensive manner, including through the conduct of inspections, special inspections, ad hoc investigations, review of the administrative reports of the law.

The implementation of significant administrative deployments under the law, the completion of important work and the processing of major matters are subject to specific scrutiny, the failure to act as a matter of major concern and administrative law enforcement in accordance with the law, incidentity, as a case-by-case investigation, and the conduct of a comprehensive review of the annual evaluation of the performance of the administration.

Article 18 The municipalities may, as prescribed, assess the implementation of laws, regulations, regulations and regulations by the lower-level government and municipal authorities.

Article 19, in accordance with the needs of the executive supervision of the State, the State's rule of law institutions, the municipalities, districts (markets, districts) the Government's rule of law institutions and the rule of law institutions in the provinces, shall make recommendations for a comprehensive inspection, special inspections, specialization, case-specific investigations, to be carried out with the approval of the Government or the principal heads of the sector.

Article 20 provides for a comprehensive inspection of the administration of the law, a specialized inspection, a case-by-case investigation, and shall consist of the inspection team or the inspection team. The inspection team or the inspection team are responsible for the commission of a team of chiefs.

The inspection team, the inspectorate may be aware of the facts and facts, including by hearing reports, accessing relevant law enforcement files and documents, holding colloquiums, survey queries and on-site surveys. The relevant units should be synchronized and, if so, provide the relevant material; the units and personnel concerned should be surveyed, enquired, and, if so, provided.

Article 21, Inspection, inspection, investigation, etc., should report to the dispatch body, submit a report on the inspection or investigation and make recommendations for the identification of problems.

The inspection team, the inspection team, the inspection team, and the issues identified in the inspection, should make recommendations to the relevant units for improvement.

Article 2: The organs of the inspection team, the inspectorate shall review the inspection or investigation reports and make decisions in a timely manner. The Group's recommendations on the treatment of the problems identified, beyond the handling of competence by this body, should be transferred to or sent to the competent organ after the examination, and should make recommendations to the competent inspectorate.

The treatment of results requires disclosure or feedback from the parties concerned and should be made available or feedback in a timely manner.

In accordance with the requirements of Article 23, superior bodies may also direct oversight of matters that should be monitored by the lower-level organs, depending on the right to refer oversight matters to the subordinate organs or, where necessary, the supervisory authority may also communicate oversight matters to or draw the participation of the relevant personnel.

Article 24, the Government of the people of the city, the city, the district, shall report at the end of each year on the state of the administration of the law and report to the same-ranking committee. The various sectors of the Government of the urban, district and territorial governments should report to the same-level Government at the end of each year on the implementation of the legislative administration.

The executive report of the law should include progress in the administration of justice in the region and in the sector, the main effectiveness, the salient problems and the organization of work. Prior to the report, collective research decisions should be led by the urban, district and sectoral governments.

The report of the Government of the people of the city, the city, the district and the territory is governed by the law, and is received and reviewed by the same level of government rule of law.

Commentary

Article 25 establishes a system of annual evaluation of the nuclear system under the law.

Governments of municipalities, districts (markets, districts) should establish administrative review appraisals under the law, scientifically set quantitative indicators, make reasonable ratings, review the results directly into the annual responsibilities objective of the evaluation, and transmit them to the same-level organizations, the human service sector, which are linked to the dismissal and punishment of the cadres, and are part of the implementation of the vertical management, and the results of the review are reproduced to the superior authorities.

units and individuals that advance the effectiveness of the administration of the law are recognized and rewarded by the Government of the people of the city, the city, the city, the district and the district.

Article 26, in accordance with the law of the executive review of the conduct of the archaeological examination, principally whether the executive branch exercises its powers in accordance with the statutory authority and procedures and performs its duties as a measure of the criteria, with a focus on the elements set out in chapter II of this approach.

In accordance with the executive social review process, the social survey body was commissioned; conditionality could be organized by the relevant departments of the Government.

Article 27 of the law governs the evaluation of the results of the archaeological examination, good, qualified and non-qualified, and provides a specific review of the rules and standards of the archaeological government.

In one of the following cases, the executive review is approved in accordance with the law:

(i) The serious mismanagement of administrative decision-making, causing significant losses or adverse impacts, or the serious consequences of the content of normative documents in violation or inappropriateness, triggering group-specific events;

(ii) Specific administrative acts are in conflict with, inappropriate or non-delivery as a result of major accidents, events, cases, serious harm to the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, causing significant loss or adverse effects or triggering larger group events;

(iii) Non-arrangement of deployment and non-recruit inspection of the administration of the law and failure to complete the annual tasks of the administration of justice;

(iv) In accordance with the law, the archaeological examination is not included in the annual objective responsibilities;

(v) Execution of administrative law enforcement responsibilities and non-implementation of law enforcement positions and responsibilities;

(vi) To reject the performance of administrative responsibilities or to reject the execution of administrative judgements, decisions which are in force by the People's Court;

(vii) To reject the administrative review decision of the executive review body;

(viii) To reject the implementation of administrative law enforcement decisions by the Government of the Municipalities or to refuse to accept administrative law enforcement inspections or conduct inspections;

(ix) Other situations that are not qualified.

Article 28 should be made public in accordance with the results of the judicial review and be made public through appropriate means.

Accountability

Article 29 is one of the following cases, which is criticized by the Government of the city, the city, the city, the city, the district, and the people's Government, which is responsible for changing the situation, in the event of serious circumstances, by the competent administrative body or by the inspectorate, in accordance with the law:

(i) Administrative inaction or incidentity, leading to confusion in administrative order;

(ii) Institutions or personnel without administrative law enforcement qualifications engage in administrative law enforcement activities;

(iii) The problems identified in administrative complaints reports and monitoring inspections are not promptly investigated;

(iv) To combat, revenge, trapped or otherwise combat, reprisals, lapses;

(v) There is no accountability for those who should be held accountable under the law.

One of the circumstances set out in article 27, paragraph 2, of this approach is addressed in accordance with the preceding paragraph.

Article 33 is one of the following cases in major administrative decision-making, and in accordance with article 19, paragraph (i), of the Ordinance on Civil Servants of Administration, the executive disposition of civil servants responsible for leading responsibility:

(i) Will be heard without hearing;

(ii) No review of legality or review;

(iii) Collective discussions should be held without collective discussion of decision-making.

Decisions should be taken in accordance with the law, without decision-making, toys negligence and miscarriage, and, in accordance with article 20 of the Regulations on Civil Servants of the Administration, administrative disposition of persons directly responsible.

Article 31 of the lower executive branch does not carry out the decisions taken by the executive branch of the executive branch of the executive branch of the executive branch of the executive branch of the executive branch of the executive branch, which is executed by an executive authority of the executive branch or by the inspectorate, in accordance with article 19, subparagraph (b), of the Ordinance on Civil Service of the executive branch.

Article 32 should be held accountable for other administrative law enforcement, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Law Enforcement Regulations of the Administration of the Southern Province and the pilot approach to administrative law enforcement in the Southern Province.

Article 33 does not participate in the administrative awards of the year, in accordance with the rules of procedure of the executive review of the results of the examination of the evaluation of the evaluation of the evaluation of the results of the examination, and the principal and supervisors shall not be appointed for the year at the time of the year's final evaluation, and the selection of all types of advanced qualifications shall be eliminated.

The staff of the executive branch are held accountable for the administration of justice or for administrative enforcement, without participating in the selection of various administrative incentives for the year. They were warned of the administrative dispositions of the civil service, which were carried out in accordance with articles 9, 10 and 25 of the Civil Service Appraisal Provisions (Time-Test-Ban Treaty) at the time of the year's annual study, and the other manner in which the responsibility for administrative or administrative law enforcement was not established as good.

In the last two years, the Government of the communes (communes, districts) and their sectors have been assessed as non-qualified or final in the administrative appraisal of the territory under the law, or have failed to perform leadership duties in accordance with the law, leading to more than three serious administrative cases in this sector, causing a serious social impact, and are criticized by the Government of the communes for the main heads of the communes (communes, districts) and their sectors and held accountable under the law (the city, the Government) and its main responsibilities.

Article 33, in cases where accountability is required under this approach, is in line with the accountability conditions set out in the provisional provision on accountability for the implementation of the party's leadership, and is accountable to the relevant leadership in accordance with the competent authority of the Ministry.

The responsibilities set out in this chapter are held accountable and, in addition to the implementation of all levels of government, are carried out in accordance with the division of responsibilities by the inspectorate, the Government and the rule of law.

Annex VI

Article 37 provides that the State and the province shall apply the provisions of the law.

Article 338 of this approach applies to the provisions of the communes, districts (markets, zones) to organizations authorized by law, regulations that manage the functions of public affairs.

Article 39 of this approach is implemented effective 1 April 2010.