(Adopted by the 25th ordinary meeting of the Government of the People's Republic of 24 February 2010 No. 8 of the Order of 25 February 2010 of the People's Government of the City, which was launched effective 1 May 2010)

Article 1 provides an objective, accurate and timely control of emissions of pollutant sources and prevents pollution accidents, in line with the relevant provisions of the environmental protection law, legislation and regulations, in order to strengthen the regulation of contaminated sources and to develop this approach in the light of the actual circumstances of this city.

Article II applies to the construction, operation, maintenance and regulation of the automated control system of contaminated sources within the city's administration.

Article 3. This approach refers to an automated monitoring system consisting of automated monitoring facilities and surveillance centres.

Automated monitoring facilities refer to instruments, typs and related supporting facilities installed on contaminated sources as part of the pollution control facility.

The Monitoring Centre refers to the link between the Environmental Protection Administration authorities and the automated monitoring facility through communications transmission routes, for example, computer software and equipment for the implementation of automated surveillance of the sources of pollution.

Article IV Environmental Protection Administrative authorities are administrative authorities responsible for the automated control of contaminated sources and are responsible for the development of work plans and related management provisions for the activation control system of contaminated sources in this city, the establishment of a unified network of pollutant sources and the supervision and operation of the automated control system of contaminated sources.

The executive branch and the district (market), the people of the region should be able to monitor the management of the contaminated source in accordance with their respective responsibilities by law.

Article 5

The construction, operation and maintenance of an automated monitoring facility should be funded by an slander unit, and the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities and districts (markets), the people of the region could grant appropriate subsidies.

Article 6. The automated monitoring system shall be based on environmental regulation, such as environmental regulation, such as environmental control, environmental statistics, leakage fees and on-site environmental law enforcement, in accordance with the relevant provisions.

Any unit or individual has the obligation to protect the automated monitoring system and has the right to report on the irregular use of the automated monitoring system, such as sequestration, dismantling, destruction and unauthorized changes in the parameters and data of the automated monitoring system.

Article 8 includes one of the following cases, and should be established and installed in automated monitoring facilities:

(i) The use of single-spots is greater than that of fourteen megawatts (20 vacation/hours);

(ii) The use of industrial bens, or solid waste burning stoves, which amount to a single capacity greater than 14 megawatts (20 vacation/hours);

(iii) The amount of the annual sewerage is greater than 100 tons or the amount of the chemical to be added to 30 kg;

(iv) The amount of sewerage is greater than 50 tons per day in the water area or in other environmental sensitive areas;

(v) The day-to-day emissions of pollutant wastewater exceeding 50 tons;

(vi) The existence of noise and other sources of pollution that affect public interest requires priority regulation in accordance with the provisions of environmental protection legislation.

Article 9. New construction, alteration, expansion projects and technology rehabilitation projects should be constructed, installed automatically control facilities for contaminated sources, as part of the pollution control facility, in line with the requirements of the approved environmental impact evaluation documents, and are designed in conjunction with the major engineering work, at the same time.

Article 10. Including the effluence units of the automated control plan for the contaminated source should be constructed, installed automated monitoring facilities in line with the time frame established by the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities to complement the automated monitoring system.

Article 11. The construction, installation of an automated control system for contaminated sources should be subject to the following provisions:

(i) Relevant instruments in the automated monitoring facility shall be elected to use the licensee of environmental monitoring instruments designated by the Environmental Protection Authority of the Department of State, which shall be subject to the relevant national provisions;

(ii) Data collection and transmission is consistent with the technical norms of the national automated monitoring (monitoring) system data transmission and interface standards, and automated monitoring facilities and monitoring centres can stabilize networking;

(iii) The comparison of environmental monitoring instruments should be qualified in accordance with national environmental monitoring technical norms;

(iv) The installation of the slogan and sampling of the automated monitoring facility in line with the normative requirements of environmental protection;

(v) The regulation of construction at the stations should meet the requirements for stabilization operations by basic conditions such as electricity, avoidance, temperature, and wet.

Article 12 Priorities for the construction and installation of automated monitoring facilities should be reported on the installation of technical programmes to the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities.

Article 13. The automated control facility of the contaminated source should be fully operational by the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities to receive qualified parties.

Upon the installation of the pollutant control facility, the IOM should use the facility to the network of the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities and test the thirty-day operation. After the completion of the probationary operation, the discharge units should apply to the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities in a timely manner.

The inspection of the automated control facility for the new construction, alteration, expansion projects and technology rehabilitation projects was carried out in conjunction with the inspection of the polluting facilities.

Article XIV Economies apply for automated inspection facilities and shall provide the following information:

(i) Automated monitoring facility receipt requests, identification schedules, project summary and test reports;

(ii) An automated monitoring summary of 30 days of the operation of the facility, and technical information such as the automatic inspection facility probation, school qualification and testing;

(iii) Automated monitoring of the operation of the facility;

(iv) Other relevant information consistent with the requirements and requirements of the receiving technology;

(v) Authorize the operation of the professional operation units to provide the operation service contracts.

Article 15. Exclusive units may authorize the operation of an automated control facility with a qualified professional operation, or operate.

In order to entrust the operation of the specialized operation units, the slogan shall, under the supervision of the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities, take open tenders, entrust the operation of the Environmental Pollution Governance Facility, which has been licensed by the State Department's executive authorities, and enter into operational service contracts.

When the operation service contract is formally signed or changed, the operating unit will have to make the formal text of the contract within ten working days and submit the case to the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities.

Article 16 operates and maintains automated monitoring facilities and shall comply with the following provisions:

(i) The operators of the automated monitoring facility shall be trained to conduct prequalification and accreditation positions, in accordance with the relevant national provisions;

(ii) The use, operation and maintenance of automated monitoring facilities in line with the relevant technical norms should be carried out on a regular basis, test, test, comparison to monitoring, inspection of the operation of instruments, regular replacement of expendablesuffices and hard-won items to ensure that systems operate stable, data accuracy;

(iii) A robust automated monitoring facility performance record and personnel training, operation protocols, job responsibilities, regular comparisons to monitoring, regular school maintenance records, facilities failure prevention and emergency response measures should be established;

(iv) In cases where automatic monitoring facilities are not properly collected, transmitted data should be promptly inspected and reported to the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities and, where necessary, manual monitoring methods should be used.

(v) The report on the operation of the facility should be submitted to it every half a year, as requested by the municipal authorities for environmental protection, and social public oversight.

Article 17 automatically monitors the need for maintenance, suspension, removal, replacement or reactivation of the pollutant pollutant facilities, and shall be submitted in advance for approval by the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities.

The municipal environmental protection administrative authorities should be retroactive within seven days of the date of receipt of the report, which was considered to be agreed.

In cases where the automated monitoring facility ceased to operate or resulting in a failure to function properly, the slackening units should report to the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities within forty-eight hours and report in writing on the causes and facilities.

The polluter is automatically inspecting the facility or reactivated after two months, and must be re-established in accordance with the relevant technical provisions.

Article 18 The following rights and obligations exist for the operation of the pollutant automated control facility:

(i) Oversight of the facilities operation units and recommendations for improvement of services, reporting environmental violations of the facility's operating units;

(ii) Provide basic conditions for the normal operation of the pollutant automated control facility, water, electricity and mine avoidance;

(iii) In the absence of regular provision for objective reasons, operational units are required to be informed in advance, while reporting to the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities, and in collaboration with relevant emergency response efforts;

(iv) No interference with the normal work of the operating units or the normal operation of the pollutant automated control facility shall be permitted on any grounds;

(v) None of the mandatory responsibilities to be assumed shall be transferred to the operating unit.

Article 19 Administrative authorities for environmental protection should organize regular inspections and monitoring of the operation of the automated control facility of the contaminated source. Inadequate circumstances have been found to be responsible for the replacement of their deadlines; the socialization operation unit may recommend that the State's environmental protection administrative authorities conduct downgrading, suspension, and cancellation of such penalties for its operation.

Article 20, when the operational commissioning units object to the monitoring data of the automated monitoring facility, can apply for a qualitative environmental monitoring body to monitor monitoring, and the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities identify the unit of responsibility in accordance with the actual operation of the monitoring results and automated monitoring facilities and assume relevant economic, legal responsibilities by the responsible units.

Article 21, in violation of this approach, provides that the new construction, alteration, expansion of projects and technology rehabilitation projects do not have automated monitoring facilities or have no experience or experience, which is formally produced or used by the executive authorities of the environmental protection authorities that approve the project's environmental impact evaluation documents are responsible for halting the production or use of the subject matter under the Regulations on the Construction of Project Environmental Protection Management, which allows for a fine of $100,000.

In violation of this approach, existing nutrient units do not complete the installation of automated monitoring facilities at the prescribed time period, which is converted by the municipal environmental protection administrative authorities, and can be fined up to one million dollars.

Article 23, in violation of this approach, provides that an automatic control system for the use of hydrochlorofluoropollutant emissions is deliberately unusually or, without the approval of the environmental protection administrative authorities, unauthorizedly dismantled, physically removed, destroyed and damaged the automatic monitoring system for emissions of pollutant pollutants, which exceeds the prescribed criteria, is vested in the urban environmental protection administrative authorities in order to restore normal use or re-use of deadlines, and fines of up to 100,000 dollars.

Article 24, in violation of this approach, provides for the regular use of the automated control system for atmospheric pollutant emissions or, without the approval of the environmental protection administrative authorities, the unauthorized removal, sequestration, destruction of the automated control system for atmospheric pollutant emissions by the executive authorities of the city, the cessation of the offence, the relocation of the deadline, warning or the imposition of a fine of up to five0,000 dollars.

Article 25, in violation of the present approach, unauthorized removal, sequestration, destruction of environmental noise emissions automatic monitoring systems without the approval of the executive authorities of environmental protection, rendering environmental noise emissions more than the prescribed standards, and reordered by the municipal environmental protection administration authorities, with a fine of up to three0,000 dollars.

Article 26 Environmental protection monitoring managers abuse their functions, play negligence, provocative fraud, are administratively disposed of by their units or by the competent authorities at the superior level, and constitute criminal liability under the law.

Article 27 of this approach is implemented effective 1 May 2010.