(Summit of Hygiene, 7 June 2010

Article 1 enhances administrative law enforcement, implements administrative law enforcement responsibilities, promotes legal administration, guarantees the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, and establishes this approach in line with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article II applies to executive law enforcement agencies and their staff at all levels of the city.

Article 3. The administrative law enforcement responsibility described in this approach refers to the system established by administrative law enforcement authorities to ensure the proper implementation of legal, regulatory, regulatory and regulatory responsibilities.

The administrative law enforcement referred to in this approach refers to acts of administrative responsibility by executive law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials. These include the development of normative documents for the implementation of administrative licences, administrative sanctions, administrative enforcement, administrative review, administrative collection or expropriation, administrative decisions, administrative recognition, administrative oversight inspections, administrative payments, etc.

The approach refers to administrative law enforcement agencies, which are mandated by administrative law enforcement authorities and laws, regulations and regulations to the exercise of administrative law enforcement functions, as well as to organizations entrusted by the executive branch in administrative law enforcement activities under the law.

The approach refers to administrative law enforcement officials who have access to administrative law enforcement at all levels of administrative law enforcement and to staff who are responsible for administrative law enforcement tasks.

Article IV. Administrative law enforcement should be guided by the principles of legality, legitimacy, proper and efficient public, integrity and accountability.

Article 5. The Government of the city is responsible for the implementation of the responsibilities of executive law enforcement throughout the city. Regional, municipal and district governments are responsible for the implementation of the executive law enforcement responsibilities of the executive branch.

The people's rule of law institutions and the executive law enforcement body are responsible for the implementation of specific guidance, supervision, coordination and conduct of administrative law enforcement responsibilities in the region.

Departments such as personnel, inspection, preparation and administration of justice are responsible for their respective duties.

The executive heads of administrative law enforcement agencies are the first responsible for the administration of justice in this organ and are responsible for leading the administration of justice.

Article 7. The executive law enforcement authorities at all levels of the city shall establish the relevant system for the enforcement of administrative law enforcement responsibilities, which shall be carried out by the same-level people's rule of law institutions.

Article 8

The executive branch of the people of the district level, which belongs to the Government, should report annually on the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities by this organ on the same footing as the rule of law and the top-level business authorities.

Article 9. The rule of law institutions of the Government of the city should conduct regular oversight of the administration of justice responsibilities of the various branches of the city and of the people at the district level, organize regular or non-regular inspections and provide timely knowledge and access to administrative law enforcement.

Article 10

The application of the same law, legislation and regulations to more than two administrative law enforcement agencies should be clear and accountable and the functions of each division. The responsibilities are unknown and are determined by the same-ranking people's Government as the subject of law enforcement.

Article 11. Administrative law enforcement authorities should periodically streamline the law enforcement basis by delineating the content, scope, competence, responsibility, distributing to law enforcement positions on a case-by-case basis, identifying law enforcement responsibilities and producing a law enforcement process map.

Article 12. The establishment of administrative law enforcement responsibilities by administrative law enforcement authorities shall include the following:

(i) The classification of the statutory mandate, in order to follow up and identify the responsibility;

(ii) The executive body and its institutions, administrative law enforcement, responsibility and work objectives of administrative law enforcement officials;

(iii) Quantitization of administrative law enforcement responsibilities and review of the appraisal system;

(iv) The accountability system for administrative law enforcement;

(v) The public, public and publicized system of administrative law enforcement activities;

(vi) Insecution, integrity, administrative effectiveness safeguards and reporting complaints systems;

(vii) Legal knowledge training for administrative law enforcement officials, examination measures and systems for judicial enforcement and civilization enforcement;

(viii) The use, archives management and case statistical reporting system of administrative law enforcement instruments;

(ix) Other relevant administrative enforcement responsibilities.

The rule of law institutions at the district level of the Government of the Rule of Law and administrative law enforcement agencies should develop long-term and annual training plans for administrative law enforcement officials and organize implementation. Administrative law enforcement officials should be able to engage in administrative law enforcement, in accordance with the relevant training examinations, to obtain the administrative law enforcement certificate in the Honour province.

Article 14.

Article 15 Governments and executive law enforcement agencies at the district level should regularly clean up normative documents by making normative documents developed by the current Government and this unit, as required.

Article 16 provides for significant administrative penalties by executive law enforcement authorities.

Article 17 imposes accountability and compensation systems for administrative law errors. Administrative law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials shall be held accountable for the persons responsible, in accordance with the relevant provisions, if they do not carry out administrative acts in accordance with the law or in violation of the statutory authority and procedures.

Article 18 The executive branch shall designate a specific working body to investigate, comment on violations of the law, to determine the responsibility for law enforcement and the form of prosecution in accordance with the law, legislation and the present provisions.

Article 19 introduces an administrative law enforcement appraisal system. The evaluation of the executive law enforcement authorities is integrated into the objective management, which is carried out every year by the management body of the objectives of the Government of the people at the district level and with the Government's rule of law institutions.

The assessment of the results of the review is jointly approved by the various target management bodies and by the same-level people's rule of law institutions, and is also part of the evaluation of the performance of executive law enforcement authorities.

The evaluation of administrative law enforcement personnel is included in the annual work appraisal.

Article 20

(i) Leadership and organization of the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities;

(ii) The establishment and implementation of the relevant system of administrative law enforcement responsibility;

(iii) The review of normative documents;

(iv) Administrative law enforcement, such as administrative licences, administrative penalties, administrative enforcement and administrative review;

(v) The prosecution of offences committed by administrative law enforcement officials;

(vi) Other needs identified by the Government of the people at the district level to assess the content of the examination.

Article 21 Review of administrative law enforcement responsibilities may take the following modalities:

(i) A report on the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities;

(ii) On-site inspection, screening or review of documents, information and administrative law enforcement files;

(iii) The convening of a comparative colloquium on administration;

(iv) Organizing law enforcement inspections, thematic surveys and individual oversight;

(v) Legal learning and knowledge testing of the heads of administrative law enforcement units and law enforcement personnel;

(vi) Conduct questionnaire surveys to all sectors of society;

(vii) Other evaluation methods.

Article 2 is one of the following cases, which is criticized by the Government of the above-ranking people or by the superior administrative authorities, which constitute administrative misconduct, and administrative disposal of the competent and other direct responsible persons with direct responsibility:

(i) The establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities;

(ii) To reject the inspection and evaluation of the examination;

(iii) Removal.

Article 23 provides for the supervision of inspection and review of candidates in the relevant sectors, and for the supervision of inspection, evaluation of the examination of the examination, forcible fraud, forcible negligence and forys, which constitutes administrative misconduct, subject to the authority of personnel management.

Article 24