(Summit No. 45th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Lands of 8 August 2013 to consider the adoption of the Decree No. [2013] of 24 August 2013 by the People's Government Order No. 8 of 24 August 2013 [Act dated 1 November 2013]

Chapter I General

In order to regulate administrative effectiveness inspections, the executive organs are urged to implement administrative administration in accordance with the law, improve administrative effectiveness, optimize the economic and social development environment, and develop this approach in line with the relevant laws, regulations, such as the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Monitoring Act, the Civil Service Act of the People's Republic of China, the National People's Republic of China, the National People's Republic of China, the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Monitoring Act, the Civil Service Code of the People's Republic of China, and the Civil Service Ordinance of the executive branch.

Article II applies to all levels of administration and their civil servants. Other personnel appointed by the executive branch and their staff members authorized to follow up on this approach.

Article 3. The administrative effectiveness described in this approach is a comprehensive expression of efficiency, effectiveness and effectiveness of administrative conduct.

The administrative effectiveness inspection referred to in this approach refers to the inspection authority for the purpose of enhancing administrative effectiveness, conducting inspections or investigations of problems and conduct affecting administrative effectiveness by the inspector in administrative activities, and making inspection decisions or activities to recommend inspection recommendations in accordance with inspection or findings.

Article IV. Administrative effectiveness inspection should be guided by the principle of promoting administrative effectiveness in accordance with the law and improving administrative effectiveness, administrative effectiveness inspection and administrative effectiveness, overall supervision and social oversight, accountability and improvement.

Article 5 Governments of more people at the district level should strengthen the leadership of administrative effectiveness inspections, establish sound leadership structures and work mechanisms, regulate administrative approval, administrative law enforcement and political service services, promote the marketization of public resources, optimize the governance environment, enhance efficiency of work and ensure effective administrative effectiveness inspection.

Administrative effectiveness inspection should be conducted under the guidance of the integrated leadership of the Government of the people and the superior inspection body.

Article 7

Article 8. The Government of the people at the district level should use the administrative effectiveness of the executive branch at this level as an objective responsibility for the conduct of the nuclear content.

Chapter II

Article 9. The municipal inspectorate is responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of the administration throughout the city.

In each district (zone) inspection body, the dispatched inspection body is responsible for the administrative effectiveness inspection of the Territory, this unit (sector) in accordance with its mandate.

The units entrusted by the inspectorate are responsible for monitoring the administrative effectiveness of the scope.

Article 10. The inspection body performs the following duties in administrative effectiveness inspections:

(i) Develop, implement systems and workplans for administrative effectiveness inspections and report on administrative effectiveness inspections to the Government of the current people and the superior administrative inspection bodies;

(ii) Organizing administrative effectiveness inspections within the administrative areas under the authority of the Authority;

(iii) Organization of administrative effectiveness evaluation;

(iv) Establish mechanisms for sound administrative effectiveness reporting and the admissibility of complaints;

(v) To investigate matters and acts that affect administrative effectiveness by making inspection recommendations or inspection decisions in accordance with the law;

(vi) To summarize, promote the experience and practices of administrative organs to enhance administrative effectiveness and improve administrative effectiveness;

(vii) Other responsibilities under laws, regulations.

Article 11. In administrative effectiveness inspections, the inspection body has the right to take the following measures:

(i) To request the inspectorate and its staff to provide documents, information, financial accounts and other related materials related to the effectiveness of inspection matters, for access, reproduction, storage or suspension of detention;

(ii) Request that the inspectorate and its staff provide explanations and clarifications on issues related to effectiveness inspection;

(iii) The responsibility of the inspectorate and its staff to cease violations of laws, regulations, regulations, superior government provisions and administrative disciplines;

(iv) Responsibilities required by the inspectorate and its staff for damage caused by their violations;

(v) Receiving the costs incurred by the inspectorate and its staff for refunding the charges against the law, except where the law shall be seized, recovered or paid by other organs;

(vi) Provide inspection recommendations based on inspections, findings;

(vii) Other measures under laws, regulations and regulations.

Chapter III Monitoring content

Matters and conduct affecting administrative effectiveness should be subject to administrative effectiveness inspection by executive organs and civil servants in the exercise of their responsibilities such as administrative decision-making, administrative execution, administrative licence, administration, administrative inspection, administrative sanctions and administration.

Article 13 Inspection authorities monitor matters and conduct affecting the administrative effectiveness of the inspectors in implementing administrative decisions:

(i) No decision-making in accordance with legislative authority and procedures;

(ii) The content of decision-making is incompatible with legal, regulatory, and superior provisions;

(iii) In violation of the provision for intervention in decision-making at the lower executive level;

(iv) The impact on social stability due to inappropriate decision-making leading to accidents of responsibility, cases of infraction or group-specific visits;

(v) The decision-making matters do not provide for the organization of hearings, arguments or the publication to society, which undermines the interests of the people;

(vi) Other matters and acts that affect administrative effectiveness in administrative decision-making.

Article 14. The inspectorate monitors matters and acts that affect the administrative effectiveness of the inspectors in the implementation of administrative execution:

(i) In the implementation of major decision-making deployments, the promotion of major projects, priorities, implementation of the objectives, the inefficiencies, the inefficiencies, the mismanagement of munitions and the adverse impacts or losses;

(ii) Major losses caused by retreats, misstatements, refusals, concealment and late reporting;

(iii) In the case of natural disasters, security accidents, major epidemics and other sudden-onset events, the timely and effective disposal of natural disasters, in accordance with the provisions and superior requirements of the emergency treatment programme, has serious consequences;

(iv) Other matters and acts that affect administrative effectiveness in administrative implementation.

Article 15. Inspection by the inspectorate of matters and conduct affecting the effectiveness of the administration of the inspector's subject to administrative authorization:

(i) Without a clear and centralized administrative approval function, streamlining, decentralizing administrative clearance matters, affecting or impeding the reform of the administrative approval system;

(ii) The conditions, procedures and results of administrative licences shall not be disclosed by law;

(iii) Continuation of the administrative licence project that has been cancelled, unauthorized addition of new projects or unauthorized extension of the approval component within the reservation project;

(iv) Inadmissibility of administrative licences, approval of applications in accordance with statutory conditions, or in respect of administrative licences that are not in accordance with the statutory conditions, approval of applications for infringements;

(v) The administrative licence, the approval of the matter is not taken within the statutory period;

(vi) There is no reason for requesting the applicant to repeat the material requested;

(vii) Non-compliance with regulatory responsibilities or regulatory in accordance with the law;

(viii) The payment of fees in violation;

(ix) In addition to the statutory conditions for administrative licences, the provision of compensation counselling, training, purchases, the designation of brokering services, incests, requests for sponsoring;

(x) Other matters and acts in violation of administrative licence provisions.

Article 16 monitors matters and acts that affect the administrative effectiveness of the inspectorate in the implementation of administrative expenses:

(i) Non-performance or negative fulfilment of the duties imposed by laws, regulations;

(ii) There is no administrative legitimization or a statutory basis for implementation;

(iii) Not to be imposed on the extent, time frame and standard;

(iv) Expropriation of unjustifiable or undeclared legal grounds;

(v) No payment shall be made in full, on time, to the treasury or to the financial exclusive;

(vi) Not to communicate the rights and means of relief of the licensee or individuals;

(vii) Other violations of administrative provisions and acts.

Article 17 monitors matters and acts that affect the administrative effectiveness of the inspectorate in the implementation of administrative penalties:

(i) Is the subject of administrative sanctions or are subject to administrative penalties;

(ii) Execution of penalties in violation of statutory competence, conditions and procedures;

(iii) Reimbursement of the types of administrative sanctions and the range;

(iv) No legitimate vote;

(v) No penalties shall be taken for the timely payment of the treasury or financial exclusive;

(vi) Use or destroy the seizure of property;

(vii) Produce or disparate indicators of impunity;

(viii) Be replaced by administrative penalties;

(ix) Be replaced by administrative penalties;

(x) No hearing by law;

(xi) Other violations committed administrative penalties and acts.

Article 18

(i) Consistency and diversion of funds earmarked for finance;

(ii) Financial earmarked funds should be allocated;

(iii) To deceive financially earmarked funds by means such as false reports, ventures and related transactions;

(iv) Investment in excess budget estimates in violation of provisions;

(v) Unauthorized changes in the project plan or the use of funds;

(vi) In violation of the provisions to expand the scope of use and improve the use of standards;

(vii) Arrogant investment completion or concealment and misappropriation of savings from projects;

(viii) Disadvantages of funds or resources due to poor project management;

(ix) Failure to perform or failure to perform their duties in a manner that renders the project undesirable or serious consequences as long as the implementation, the inability to continue, the failure to complete the project plan on time, or environmental pollution and safety, quality accidents;

(x) Other matters and acts that violate financial funds or project management.

Article 19 Inspections monitor matters and conduct affecting the administrative effectiveness of the inspectors:

(i) There are serious questions with regard to disciplinary and ventilation of work, with no delay or delay in leaving behind, working hours on the Internet, play, buying, screening, and carrying out work-related matters that affect the interests of the mass;

(ii) The inefficiencies of a unified public resource transaction market affecting the efficiency and quality of public resource allocation;

(iii) In the context of the building of the political environment, the ways in which to promote the construction, innovation and approval of services at the centre of government are weak and affect economic and social development;

(iv) In the absence of the provision of the executive branch, the legal basis for the conduct of business, the conditions for the conduct of the proceedings, the time frame for the processing of charges and the criteria for fees;

(v) Matters not covered by the Political Service Centre should be incorporated;

(vi) Inadequate inspection systems, such as administrative licences and non-administrative licensing matters;

(vii) To solicit tenders for project construction works, business land use concessions, State-owned asset property transactions, concealment in government procurement proceedings, misappropriation, private fraud and unauthorized access to open tenders;

(viii) With regard to the work of multiple departments, the lead department does not perform the lead duties or cooperate with the lead department, resulting in delays in work;

(ix) Inadequate job responsibilities, service commitments, time-bound closures, first-hand enquiry, one-time notification, voucher, inadmissibility, over-time tactic recognition, in absentiacing, full-time system;

(x) The arbitrary, wilful harassment of the performance of the public service or the unwarranted interest of using the job;

(xi) Reports, complaints, complaints and complaints against citizens, legal persons or other organizations, as well as requests from lower-level organs, or the failure to respond promptly to serious consequences;

(xii) Other violations of administrative regulations which undermine administrative effectiveness.

Chapter IV

Article 20 defines administrative effectiveness inspections according to the following:

(i) The deployment and requirements of the Government and the superior inspection body;

(ii) The central work and focus of the people's Government at this level;

(iii) Major project construction and dedicated financial resources of the people's Government at this level;

(iv) The public reflects the strong administrative effectiveness;

(v) Other matters requiring inspection.

Article 21 carries out administrative effectiveness inspections on important matters in accordance with the provisions and reports to the Government of the current people and the supervisory body at the highest level.

The implementation of administrative effectiveness inspection should develop a programme of work. The programme includes inspection purposes, targets, content, steps, methodologies and measures.

Article 23, prior to the implementation of administrative effectiveness inspections, the inspection notice should be sent to the relevant units, except where it is not appropriate for advance notice.

The inspection notice should contain the content, time and specific requirements of the inspection.

The inspection notice shall be issued by the Inspector General.

The inspection units must carefully cooperate with the inspection body in carrying out administrative effectiveness inspections.

Article 24 investigates cases involving administrative effectiveness, which should involve more than two individuals and present administrative inspection certificates.

Article 25 monitors, in their inspections or investigations, should be fully and objectively aware of the situation, collect evidence, identify questions and reasons, and make observations or recommendations.

Article 26, after the end of the administrative effectiveness inspection, reports of work should be submitted. The contents of the report should include basic circumstances, problems identified, causes analysis, response and basis, and recommendations for improved work.

Article 27 should be subject to inspection by the inspection body, in accordance with administrative effectiveness inspection.

Important inspection recommendations or inspection decisions should be reported to the Government of the people at the current level to agree and report on the top-level inspection body.

In matters that are not subject to administrative effectiveness inspection, the inspection authority should be transferred to the relevant functional organs or departments in accordance with the provisions. The alleged crimes should be transferred to the judiciary.

Article 28 should follow up on inspection recommendations or inspection decisions, and the executive inspectorate should follow up.

Chapter V

Article 29 of the administrative effectiveness inspection generally takes the means of routine inspections, special inspections, complaints, case surveys, performance appraisals.

Article 33 Inspection agencies undertake administrative effectiveness inspections as follows:

(i) Excise visits to monitor compliance with the statutory duties of the inspector;

(ii) Conduct specific effectiveness inspections on major decision-making matters, major project construction, management use of earmarked funds and large funds, and the disposal of emergencies;

(iii) To investigate cases where administrative effectiveness is severely affected by administrative effectiveness complaints and violations of administrative effectiveness-building provisions;

(iv) Conduct a review of the subject of inspection;

(v) Oversight, assessment and evaluation of inspectors through the establishment of monitoring points and the hiring of supervisors;

(vi) Real-time, full-range and automatic monitoring of the subject through the administrative approval of the e-monitoring system.

The executive effectiveness inspection body may organize staff and professional technicians in accordance with the needs of the executive organs, social groups, or invite representatives, members of the executive board, guest ombudspersons and relevant social personnel.

Article 31 should establish a system of complaints of good administrative effectiveness and make available to society a reference to complaints reports.

Reporting on the administrative effectiveness of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, complaints should be made by the executive inspectorate in a timely manner and to inform the author of the complaint. The grounds for the reporting and the complaint should be given to those who do not belong to administrative effectiveness reports, the extent of the complaint is admissible.

In article 32, the administrative inspector should be confidential to the reporting person and the complainant's case, without disclosure of the reportor and the complaint. However, the reporting person, the complainant's consent to the public exception.

Article 33, after receiving administrative performance reports and complaints, should be addressed in accordance with the principle of decentralized management. Significant, complex reports and complaints, which are part of this supervisory body, should be handled directly, with general reporting and complaints transmitted to the relevant administrative bodies. The processing of sub-prime inspection bodies should be carried out in a timely manner.

Article 34 of the executive inspection body shall carry out administrative performance reports and the complaint shall be closed within one month; for special reasons, the duration of the proceedings shall be extended, subject to approval by the head of the executive inspectorate at this level, but shall not exceed the statutory period.

Article 55 should establish an administrative effectiveness appraisal system. The inspectorate may conduct a review of the performance and administrative effectiveness of the inspectorate on a regular or no-time basis, and identify the reasons for the administrative effectiveness and make recommendations for change.

The evaluation of administrative effectiveness should be combined with the annual performance appraisal exercise of the head of the Dry Department. The results of the evaluation should be addressed in the following ways:

(i) To provide briefings or incentives to the three pre-auction units; to inform the three units after the evaluation, and to intervene with the principal heads of the unit;

(ii) Provision of a review assessment to organizations, the personnel sector, the objective management appraisal system, as an important basis for measuring performance in the inspection units and evaluating precipitation;

(iii) To inform society in appropriate ways.

Chapter VI Accountability

In violation of the provisions of this approach, one of the cases listed in chapter III is held accountable to the head of the unit in the following manner:

(i) Administrative effectiveness caution;

(ii) Provide a written examination and propose corrective measures;

(iii) An open apology;

(iv) To inform criticism;

(v) Other modalities provided for by law, regulations and regulations.

The above-mentioned approach could be used either alone or in combination.

In violation of the provisions of this approach, there are one of the situations set out in chapter III and those responsible are held accountable in the following manner:

(i) To caution against statements;

(ii) A written inspection order;

(iii) To inform criticism;

(iv) Removal inspection;

(v) Removal of jobs;

(vi) Removal or recommendation of dismissal;

(vii) Other modalities provided for by law, regulations and regulations.

The time and duration of the suspension should be specified when the suspension is held.

The above-mentioned approach could be used either alone or in combination.

Article 338 units and staff who are held accountable are removed from pre-emptive qualifications during the year.

Over two years of accountability for staff members, the annual evaluation shall be determined as a non-executive file.

In cases where the responsible person refuses to correct errors, interferes with, blocks administrative effectiveness inspections, misguidances, conceals the facts, combat reprisals, complainants and other cases to be dealt with again, should be dealt with either.

Article 40 concerning the active cooperation of the responsible person in investigating and correcting errors, mitigating losses or undesirable adverse impacts and other circumstances that should be addressed in a light manner, may be prosecuted from light, mitigation or immunity.

Article 40 provides one of the following cases for the executive branch and its staff and may not be held accountable for administrative error:

(i) To proactively identify administrative errors and to correct them in a timely manner, without causing loss or negative consequences;

(ii) In the event of force majeure or administrative error, the staff of the administrative organs cannot be properly judged, resulting in administrative error;

(iii) Other cases that may not be held accountable.

Article 42, in administrative effectiveness inspections, the administrative inspectorate has found that acts suspected to constitute crimes should be brought to justice by law.

Article 43 Findings of administrative effectiveness against staff abuse of their duties, in favour of private fraud, insecure and secrets, are subject to administrative disposition by law, which constitutes a crime and is criminally criminalized by law.

Article 44 shall decide to send a person to the inspector within five working days after the administrative error is held and, in accordance with the authority of management, the organizational personnel component of the distributed units shall serve as an important basis for the examination of the appointment; and shall be informed of the results.

Article 42 examines the inconsistency of the treatment of the responsible person, which can lodge a complaint to the Government of the same people or to the superior inspection body within 30 working days from the date of receipt of the administrative disposition decision, and shall make a decision to maintain, change or withdraw in accordance with the law within 60 working days.

The execution of the original decision was not discontinued during the complaint.

Article 46 was held accountable for administrative error, and the laws, regulations and regulations were provided otherwise.

Chapter VII

Article 47