Article 2 of this approach refers to the normative documents established by the executive organs of the city in accordance with the statutory competence and procedures, which involve the rights, obligations and obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, which are generally binding and apply repeatedly, in addition to government regulations.

Article 3 The system of work and management within the executive branch, requests and reports to senior executive bodies, administrative decisions on specific matters are not applicable.

Article IV. The Government of the People's Government (the city, district) (hereinafter referred to as the city, the People's Government) is responsible for the legal review of the normative documents of the Government of the people at this level, and the rule of law institutions in the area of the work of the city and the people's government are responsible for drafting and preparing normative documents in this sector.

Article 5: The following administrative organs (hereinafter referred to as the design body) may formulate normative documents:

(i) The city, the people of the district and their respective sectors of work;

(ii) The Government of the people of the town;

(iii) Police stations established by law by the city, the people of the district.

Non-permanent institutions established by the city, the People's Government's Office, the establishment of institutions within the executive branch and the establishment of institutions, shall not produce normative documents.

Article 6 There is a need to be established, with the consent of the city, the people of the district.

Article 7 establishes normative documents that should be guided by the following principles:

(i) Maintain the harmonization of the rule of law in conformity with the statutory competence and procedures;

(ii) Guarantee the exercise by the executive branch of its functions in accordance with the law and promote the transformation of Government functions;

(iii) Guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations.

Article 8 Norms should be used in the light of the content of the term “rules”, “practices”, “rules”, notice”, “orders”, “decisions”, “consider”.

Normative documents can be made in the form of provisions or paragraphs. The name is “the provision”, the approach”, “rules”, and is generally expressed in the form of provisions. In addition to the complexity of the content, chapters and sections are generally different.

The content of normative documents should be clear, specific and operational; the terms should be accurate, concise; the words and the symbols should be correctly and regulated.

Article 9. Nor shall normative documents create the following:

(i) Administrative licences;

(ii) Administrative penalties;

(iii) Administrative coercion;

(iv) Administrative fees;

(v) Administrative requisitions;

(vi) Institutional matters and other matters that should be regulated by law, regulations, regulations or superior administrative bodies.

Nor shall normative documents impose specific provisions for the implementation of laws, regulations, regulations or regulations that violate the obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, without any violation of the rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 10. The content already specified in laws, regulations, regulations or superior normative documents does not in principle duplicate provisions; there is no additional element to be developed.

The drafting of normative documents should conduct research on the need and feasibility of the development of normative documents, issues that need to be addressed, key systems to be established or key measures.

Article 12 Drafting normative documents, which should be widely heard by relevant organs, organizations, administrative counterparts or experts.

The hearings generally take a written request for the advice of the relevant units, the convening of a colloquium, and can be based on the practical need for an opinion, hearing and public consultation of the public.

The drafting of normative documents involves a major public interest or directly related to the interests of the majority of citizens, legal persons, other organizations within the jurisdiction, which should be consulted by the public. There are significant differences in public opinion, which may affect social stability or legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions that should be heard, and the drafting cell should organize hearings.

Normative documents involve major administrative decision-making and apply the provisions of major administrative decision-making processes.

Article 14. Drafting units shall study the views of citizens, legal persons or other organizations and shall be adopted.

The drafting cell should be coordinated by the executive bodies with respect to the content of the draft normative document, which cannot be agreed upon in coordination or decision by the executive branch.

Article 15. Reporting on the publication of normative documents by the municipality, the People's Government of the District and the drafting cell shall send the following materials:

(i) Request for issuance;

(ii) Draft normative documents to be delivered;

(iii) Drafting notes (including the need for development, the main systems and measures to be set, the status of consultation and the coordination of important disagreements);

(iv) Developing the basis for drafting normative documents;

(v) Other relevant materials (including relevant materials for consultation, summary observations, hearings, research reports, relevant references, etc.).

Article 16 shall refer to the material provided under article 15 of this approach to the legal review by the Government's rule of law institutions.

The legal review includes, inter alia, the following:

(i) Will be a normative document;

(ii) Would go beyond the competence of the designating body;

(iii) Whether the content is lawful and whether the procedure is in place;

(iv) Whether the main systems and measures are reasonable and feasible;

(v) Whether the physical structure and the language are regulated.

Article 17

(i) The material submitted by the drafting cell is not in accordance with the requirements of article 15 of this approach and may be suspended, require additional material from the drafting cell or returned to the drafting body;

(ii) The provision goes beyond the establishment of the statutory competence of the organ and recommends that this normative document be not developed;

(iii) The main elements are not lawful, back to the drafting body or request the drafting units to study the changes;

(iv) The main systems and measures to be established do not have the feasibility, reasonableness, the physical structure and the inscription are not regulated and propose amendments.

The draft normative document completed and the written review of the matter will be submitted to the development body upon completion of the work of the rule of law body.

The draft normative document is considered, decided by the ordinary organs of the body or by the office.

The draft normative documents are not subject to legal review or approval, nor shall they be submitted for consideration by the ordinary organs of the body or by the office.

The normative documents adopted by the review were signed by the principal holder of the design body; the date of signature by the principal head of the authority, the date of publication of the normative document.

Article 20 is one of the following cases, requiring the immediate development and implementation of normative documents, which may be brought directly to the decisions and signatures of the principal heads of the city, the veteran Government or the heads of its commissioners:

(i) Concrete incidents such as the prevention, response and disposal of natural disasters, accidents, public health events and social security incidents;

(ii) Execution of emergency orders and decisions by superior administrative organs;

(iii) Interim measures requiring immediate implementation;

(iv) Authorize the regular adjustment and publication of standards in accordance with laws, regulations and regulations;

(v) Other cases provided for by law, regulations.

Article 21 provides for uniform registration, uniformity and publication of normative documents. The normative documents developed jointly by more than two executive organs are listed only by the host agency.

Article 2 Normative documents should be made available to society, and the manner in which the publication should be accessible to citizens, legal persons and other organizations.

Nor shall normative documents not be used as a basis for the administration.

Article 23. Normative documents should be carried out after thirty days of the date of publication. With regard to national security, major public interest, and the unimplementation of normative documents beyond publication, can be carried out from the date of publication.

Article 24, which is published in normative documents, should be sent to the top-level administrative body in accordance with the provisions of the normative documentation.

Article 25 Interpretation of normative documents, which is the responsibility of the design body, is published in the form of normative documents.

The interpretation of normative documents is equally effective with normative documents.

Article 26 amends, repeals and interpretations of normative documents, taking into account procedural implementation.

Article 27 has an effective period not exceeding five years from the date of operation. However, the name of the normative document is “the notice”, which is not more than one year from the date of operation; the name is “provisional”, “a pilot”, with an effective period not exceeding two years from the date of operation.

Effective expiration, and if there is a need for continued implementation, the executive body should be given public release after the re-recognition by the designating body, which was not re-confirmed, and the normative document was automatically repealed.

Article 28 should be established on a regular basis to clean up normative documents and to revise or repeal the published normative documents in accordance with changing circumstances, as well as legal, regulatory, regulatory and national approaches, policy adjustments.

The list of normative documents that continue to be valid, repealed and invalidated after clearance should be made available to society.

Article 29 establishes a body that violates the normative documents established under this approach, which may be withdrawn or responsibly withdrawn by a superior administrative body and may be held or brought to the competent authority to hold the executive responsibility of the parties (heads).

Article 33 The procedural provisions for the development of normative documents in the city of Well State, issued on 8 November 2006, were also repealed.