Advanced Search

Interim Measures On The Responsibility And Accountability For The Administrative Approval In Yinchuan

Original Language Title: 银川市行政审批责任及其追究暂行办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Summit No. 54 of 14 November 2002 at the 54th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of Burkina Faso to consider the adoption of the Decree No. 133 of 27 November 2002 by the Government of the Grand Sichuan City)

Article 1 guarantees and monitors the effective administration of the executive branch, protects the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, and establishes this approach in line with the relevant provisions of the State.
Article II applies to the responsibilities and responsibilities of the executive organs of the city and their staff in the exercise of administrative approval functions.
Article 3 is responsible for administrative accountability for those responsible for violations of administrative approval.
In accordance with the authority of personnel management, the relevant authorities hold administrative responsibility for those responsible for violations of administrative approval.
Article IV accountability for those responsible for violations of administrative approval should be brought before the Government's rule of law sector.
Article 5 creates and implements administrative approval by the executive branch, which must be in accordance with the statutory competence, conditions and procedures; there is no statutory basis to go beyond the statutory competence, to misuse its mandate or to implement administrative approvals in violation of the statutory procedures.
Article 6. The executive branch shall not submit any undue requirement other than administrative approval matters to the applicant.
Article 7. The executive body must establish a system of accountability for administrative approval, specifying the subjects of responsibility, content of responsibility, oversight of responsibility, accountability and accountability, and strengthen internal oversight and ensure the implementation of administrative approval in accordance with the law.
Article 8 violates this approach and the provisional provisions for the administrative approval of the city of Galichuan, in one of the following cases, by the executive inspectorate or by the superior administrative body, and by providing the responsible supervisors and other direct responsibilities, with due regard to circumstances, to be criticized or administratively disposed of in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State:
(i) Inadmissibility or non-approval of applications for administrative approval in accordance with statutory conditions;
(ii) In the absence of a statement of material to be disclosed by law in the office;
(iii) At the time when the applicant's submission is incomplete, no one-time notification of the full name and content of the material to be delivered by the applicant;
(iv) The admissibility or non-approval of requests for administrative approval shall not be justified by law;
(v) No administrative approval decision has been taken within the time period of administrative approval;
(vi) To submit to the applicant any undue requirement other than administrative approval matters.
Article 9 is one of the following cases, either by the High-level Executive Officer's duty to rescind or rescind the original administrative approval decision in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State; by the executive inspectorate or by the superior administrative body; and by law criminal responsibility:
(i) The unauthorized establishment of the matter of approval or the continuation of the approval of the matter cancelled;
(ii) Abuse of authority or exclusive decision on administrative approval;
(iii) To take advantage of negligence or in favour of administrative approval decisions on private fraud;
(iv) In accordance with the law, decisions on administrative approval shall be taken without public solicitation, auctions, or administrative approval, in accordance with the solicitation, auction results.
Article 10, after the administrative approval decision of the executive branch, does not carry out oversight responsibilities or oversight in accordance with the law, causes serious consequences, be corrected by an administrative inspectorate or by a superior administrative body, and imposes administrative penalties on the responsible supervisors and other direct responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State; constitutes an offence, and criminal liability under the law.
Article 11 provides administrative disposal in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, by an administrative inspectorate or a superior administrative organ responsible for the change of order, and by the responsible supervisor and other direct responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State;
(i) Feedback;
(ii) No charges based on statutory standards;
(iii) Non-implementation of the administrative fee “two lines of income and expenditure” management;
(iv) Separation, private separation or conversion of charges.
The costs charged unlawfully are returned or collected by administrative authorities such as price, finance, and are charged with the economic responsibility of the responsible person in accordance with the law.
Article 12