Key Benefits:
(Summit 10th ordinary meeting of the Government of the People of Blue Sea, 12 February 2004, considered the adoption of Decree No. 41 of 24 February 2004 of the People's Government Order No. 41 of the Blue Sea Province, effective 1 April 2004) Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the provisions of the Regulations and Rules of the Department of State, in order to strengthen the oversight of normative documents of the executive organs, to preserve the unity of the rule of law and order. Article 2 The regulations are submitted in accordance with the Regulations of the Department of State. This approach is not applicable in documents such as the internal system of work, management systems and the decision-making of personnel at all levels of the people's Government and its working sectors. Article III. Normative documentation files should be followed by the provisions of the National People's Republic of China Legislative Act, insisting on the principle of integrity, certainty, integrity and accountability, and the application of the “fourth, third-tier review” review system. Article IV. The Government of the people at the district level is the successor of normative documents, and its rule of law body is the review body of the normative documentation body of the people at this level, with the primary responsibility: (i) To send to the Government of the people at the highest level normative documents developed by the Government; (ii) Review of normative documents developed by the people at the next level and by all sectors of the Government; (iii) To address views on inappropriate normative documents; (iv) Oversight, guidance on the preparation of normative documents for the subordinate executive organs. Article 5 Normative documents should be developed in accordance with the procedures for the processing of public documents, which were adopted collectively by the designating organs, signed by the main heads and made available to society in a timely manner in the media, such as the Government's bulletin, local newspapers or government websites. No implementation shall be carried out without publication. The normative document should be reviewed by the establishment of the rule of law institutions before a collective discussion. Article 6. Normative documents shall be sent back within 30 days of the date of publication, in accordance with the following provisions: (i) The normative documents developed by the Government of the People of the province and by the Governments of the states (land, city) and presented to the Provincial Government; (ii) The normative documents developed by the various branches of the State (territorial, municipal) Government and the provincial-level people's governments, which are presented to the State (territory, municipal) Government; (iii) The normative documents developed by the various branches and communes of the communes of the communes of the communes of the communes and the communes of the communes, which are presented to the Government of the county; (iv) Normative documents developed by the executive organs at all levels of the executive branch in accordance with this provision to the Government of the people who have established the institution. Two or more departments have jointly developed normative documents that are presented by the host sector to the HPR. Article 7. Normative documents for the presentation of the request shall be submitted to the request report, the text of the normative document and the drafting notes, five times. The electronic text of the normative documents should be accompanied by conditionality. The format of the report of the normative document is provided by the provincial authorities of the rule of law. Drafting notes for normative documents should include the following: (i) The need for and feasibility of developing normative documents; (ii) Legal, regulatory, and policy basis for the development of normative documents; (iii) The development of normative documents to address issues and measures taken; (iv) Other issues requiring clarification. Article 9 (i) Registration in compliance with the conditions of the request; (ii) Not to be registered in cases where the status of the case is not sufficient and incompatible with the conditions for the filing; (iii) Incompatible with article 7 of this approach, the registration of the file is suspended. The suspension of the registration of the file was informed by the Government's rule of law body responsible for the review of additional submissions or resubmissions by the designating body within 15 days. Article 10 (i) Does not go beyond statutory competence; (ii) Does not violate the statutory procedures; (iii) Whether it is incompatible with the laws, regulations, regulations and WTO rules; (iv) Whether the provisions on the same matter are consistent between normative documents; (v) Whether the provisions of normative documents are appropriate. Article 11, which is reviewed, is incompatible with the law, regulations, regulations or goes beyond the statutory authority, violates the statutory procedures or provides that it is not appropriate for the Government's rule of law body responsible for the review to recommend that the body be rectified within the prescribed time frame; that it is not later corrected, and that the Government's rule of law institutions should provide comments on the decisions of the current people and inform the design organs. Article 12 Contrary between the normative documents of the lower-level people's Government and the normative documents of the work sector of the people at the highest level, the normative documents of the various branches of the Government of the current people are contradictory and are coordinated by the common top-level government rule of law institutions, which are subject to agreement by the relevant design bodies themselves; and coordination cannot be agreed upon by the responsible governmental rule of law bodies to address their views and inform the Government of the people at this level. Article 13. The normative document formulation body shall modify or repeal normative documents within 30 days of receipt of a letter of understanding of the modification of the proposal or the letter of reference to the order of correction. The Government's rule of law body responsible for the review should strengthen the oversight of the development of institutions in implementing corrective decisions. Article XIV State organs, citizens, legal persons and other organizations consider that normative documents are incompatible with the law, regulations, or normative documents, and may provide written advice or recommendations to governmental rule of law institutions that develop or report on the review, and that a body or a governmental body responsible for the review of the rule of law should study and make observations. Article 15. The development body of normative documents shall, by 31 January of each year, present the list of normative documents established in the previous year at the level of government or the rule of law body of the current Government. The Government's rule of law institutions should publish the list of registers to society in a timely manner. Article 16 introduces statistical reporting and accountability systems in the normative documents file. Article 17 Article 18 critics should be given to the rule of law institutions at the district level for failure to submit normative documents and annual inventories, non-implementation decisions or failures to perform the review function, and for the period of time to change; administrative responsibility should be held in accordance with the Provisional Approach to Accountability of Administrative Staff in Blue Sea Province. Article 19 |
