Key Benefits:
(Summit meeting of the Government of the Northern Province of Lake Great Lakes on 13 January 2004 to consider the adoption of the Decree No. 258 of 29 January 2004 on the People's Government Order No. 258 of 29 January 2004, which came into force on 1 May 2004) Article 1, in order to preserve the unity of the socialist rule, strengthens the monitoring and management of normative documents, establishes this provision in accordance with the Regulations. The normative document referred to in article II refers to the formulation, public publication, in accordance with statutory competence and procedures, of administrative documents that are generally binding and frequently applied in relation to the obligation of the administration of the relative human rights. This provision is not applicable in documents such as the internal working system established by the people's governments and their respective departments, the decision on the removal of personnel from decision-making, the administrative handling of specific matters. Article 3 Nor shall normative documents be incompatible with the law, regulations and regulations. Nor shall normative documents create administrative penalties, administrative licences, administrative fees and administrative coercive measures. Interim institutions established by the Government of the people at the district level for the completion of a specific mandate, the management of the functions of the Government of the above-mentioned population at the district level, and the establishment of institutions within the Government's work sector, shall not be subject to the issuance of normative documents on behalf of this body. Article IV defines the principle of availability, certainty, integrity and sub-management and bottom-up. Article 5. The author of the normative document is the normative document-making body, which is the body for the development of the rule of law, or the designated body. More than 6 people at the district level should perform their normative documentation review functions in accordance with the law and strengthen the organizational leadership for the review of normative documents. More than district-level government rule-of-law institutions are specifically responsible for the registration and review of normative documents. Normative documents that are presented for review at all levels of government are sent to the Government's rule of law body. Article 7 (i) The normative documents developed by the provincial government-owned departments and municipalities, states, municipalities and forested areas, which are reported to the provincial government review; (ii) Normative documents developed by municipalities, state, forest area government-owned departments and district-level governments, which are reported to be reviewed by the municipal and state governments; (iii) The normative documents developed by the provincial-level government-owned departments and the commune (communes) government, which are presented to the district-level government review; (iv) Normative documents developed jointly by two or more sectors, to be reviewed jointly by the host sector at the top-level government desk review; (v) The normative documents developed by the following vertical management in the province are presented for review by their superior authorities, and are sent to the Government-level file. Article 8 reports to be sent to the normative documentation desk review, the formal text of the normative document and the drafting notes should be submitted and, in accordance with the prescribed format, a fascicle, two. The electronic text of the normative documents should be accompanied by conditionality. The content of the drafting note should include: (i) the purpose established; (ii) legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents or factual basis; and (iii) other information materials. Article 9 The suspension review was registered by the Government's rule of law working body to inform the development body of additional submissions for review or resubmission review; the supplementary reporting review or the resubmission review were in compliance with the requirements and the registration review. The directory of normative documents available across all sectors is published by the Government's rule of law institutions on a monthly basis. Article 10 State organs, citizens, legal persons or other organizations consider that normative documents are incompatible with legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents, or that normative documents are considered to be contradictory, may submit a review proposal to the governmental rule of law body responsible for the review of the normative document. The Government's rule of law body is governed by the prescribed procedures. Article 11 (i) Whether there is a violation of the provisions of laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents; (ii) Both or more sectors are incompatible with the same matter and whether the provisions of either party or party should be changed or withdrawn; (iii) Is the provisions of normative documents appropriate; (iv) It is in compliance with the statutory procedures and the requirements for the standardization of public languages. Article 12 Government rule-of-law institutions review normative documents, which may be consulted, investigated and requested to develop institutional notes. In the course of the review, it was considered necessary to seek the advice of the relevant departments of the current Government and the lower-level government, the administrative organs consulted should respond within the prescribed time frame; it was considered necessary to develop bodies to further provide the relevant material or to clarify the circumstances, and the designating body should submit the material or clarifications within the specified time frame. Article 13 Problems identified after the review of normative documents are dealt with in accordance with the following provisions: (i) Normative documents are incompatible with laws, regulations, regulations, superior normative documents or are not appropriate, and are dealt with by governmental rule-of-law working bodies, responsible for the self-removing, changing or correcting of normative documents by organs or bodies; (ii) The normative documents of both or more sectors are incompatible with the same matter, coordinated by the Government's rule of law working bodies, which cannot be agreed upon by the Government's rule of law body to present the decisions of the Government. (iii) The development of normative documents is not in accordance with the statutory procedures and the requirements for the legalization of correspondence, which are addressed by the Government's rule of law bodies and informs the development organs of corrective action. Article 14. The development body of normative documents shall, within 15 days of the receipt of the relevant decisions or observations, report the results to the relevant governmental rule of law bodies. Normative documents should be reviewed within 15 days, with special circumstances not exceeding 30 days. Article 15. The development body of normative documents shall, by the end of January of each year, report the form of normative documents developed in the previous year on the Government's rule of law body responsible for the review of normative documents. The Government's rule of law body should, within a first quarter of each year, review of the normative documentation for the previous year and report to the Government of the people at this level. Article 16, which has been reviewed in a case-by-case review, confirms the legal catalogue of normative documents, which is regularly published by the Government's rule of law working bodies in the present popular government announcement. Article 17 is not reported or is not submitted in a timely manner for the review of the normative documents, which is communicated by the Government's rule of law enforcement agencies to the development of the institution's deadline, which is still unsubstantiated, and the Government's rule of law agencies bring to the attention of the people at this level the executive responsibility of the principal and direct responsibilities. Article 18, with the approval of the Provincial Government, can establish a pre-emptive review system for normative documentation. Article 19 of the present provision, which came into force on 1 May 2004, was repealed in conjunction with the notification of the work of the normative documentation file, submitted by the provincial Government on 18 May 1990. |
