Key Benefits:
(Summit 8th ordinary meeting of the Government of the People of the Autonomous Region of Mongolia on 17 June 2004 to consider the adoption of the Decree No. 135 of the Government of the People's Government of the Mongolian Self-Autonomous Region on 17 August 2004) Article 1, in order to enhance the monitoring and management of normative documents, improve the quality of normative documents, preserve the harmonization of the socialist rule, develop this approach in line with the provisions of the Regulations, the Regulations and Rules and the Internal Mongolian Self-Government Zone Administrative Enforcement Monitoring Regulations. Article 2, which refers to normative documents referred to by all levels of the people's Government and its offices, the work sector and the legal, regulatory and regulatory organizations authorized by the flag-level people's Government to administer the functions of public affairs, in accordance with laws, regulations, regulations and decisions of the superior administrative organs, orders that have been developed, issued, in accordance with the legislative authority and procedures, and are generally binding within the scope of their administration, can be applied repeatedly and stabilized within a certain period of time. The internal affairs management system developed by the Government of the people of the flag and its constituent sectors, requests and reports to the executive branch at the senior level, administrative decisions on specific matters and other non-binding administrative documents are not applicable. Article 3. Interim institutions established by the Government of the people at all levels to complete a specific mandate, institutions established by the Government and its constituent departments and those belonging to the Government of the People's Republic of Northern Ireland shall not develop normative documents. The name of the normative document may be referred to as “the way”, “rules”, “rules”, “Recommendations” and “please”. Article 5 The rule of law working body of the executive organs that are vertically administered is responsible for the review of the system's normative documents. Article 6. Governments of people at the flag district level should strengthen monitoring of the review of the normative documentation file. More than the people's rule of law institutions at the flag district level should report to the current Government on the review of the previous annual normative documents in the first quarter of each month, while transmitting the rule of law institutions of the Government at the highest level. Article 7. The development of normative documents should be guided by the following principles: (i) Compliance with constitutional and legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions; (ii) In line with existing effective policy measures in national and autonomous areas; (iii) The need to preserve the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations in order to strengthen their administration; (iv) The statutory functions of the organ, the sector or the scope of its mandate; (v) In line with legislative technical norms. Article 8 Nor shall normative documents create administrative penalties, administrative coercive measures, administrative licences, laws, regulations, and regulations, and other matters to be established by law, regulations and superior administrative organs. Article 9. The review of normative documents should uphold the principle of availability, certainty and integrity. Article 10 Normative documents should be reviewed by the body responsible for the rule of law, and adopted by the Standing Committee of the Government or the Chief Executives Board of the Department, by the principal head of the organ or by the head of the rule of law. Normative documents developed jointly by the two sectors should be issued jointly by key heads of several departments to use the host agency's books. Article 11. Non-Summary normative documents should be made available to society through media such as government bulletins, government websites or local newspapers. Article 12 Normative documents are sent by the design body responsible for the filing of requests, with specific work being undertaken by the body responsible for the rule of law. Article 13 (i) The normative documents developed by the people's governments at all levels are sent to the top-level Government; (ii) The presentation of normative documents developed by the work sector of the people of the flag district level to the Government of the people; (iii) The normative documents developed jointly by the Government of the people at the flag district level with other bodies or units, which are sent to the Government of the people at the grass-roots level; (iv) The normative documents developed jointly by the two sectors, which are hosted to submit the copies to the current people's Government; (v) The normative documentation developed by the dispatching body established by the people's Government at all levels, which is presented to the people's Government for its establishment; (vi) The submission of normative documents prepared by the legal, legislative and regulatory bodies to the Government of the people at this level; (vii) Execution of the executive body responsible for the direct management of the self-government area, the normative documents developed by its sub-sectors, which are sent to the top-level administrative authorities; (viii) The normative documents developed by the central vertically administered administrative organs and national security authorities, such as customs, financial, national tax, foreign exchange management, which are sent to the Government of the people at this level. Article 14. The normative document-making body shall, within 30 days of the date of publication of the document, submit a request under article 13 of this approach. When the normative documents are sent, the following materials should be submitted: (i) A report on the normative documentation reserve; (ii) Two versions of normative documents; (iii) The development of two notes in normative documents; (iv) The basis for the development of normative documents; (v) Develop a review of the body responsible for the rule of law. Article 16 (i) The purpose and the need for normative documentation; (ii) The main basis for normative documents; (iii) Formulation of normative documents; (iv) Other issues requiring clarification. Article 17 shall address the normative documents for the submission of the report, as follows: (i) To submit the case in accordance with article 2 of this approach; (ii) Inadequate with the provisions of article II of this approach and refund the relevant material to the backup authority; (iii) For non-compliance with the provisions of article 15 of the present approach, additional and revised referrals should be requested by the submitting authority. Article 18 provides a review of the normative documents for the submission of the report: (i) Will be contrary to the law, regulations, regulations and regulations; (ii) Are incompatible with existing policy measures; (iii) Would go beyond the statutory mandate; (iv) The appropriateness of the content; (v) Whether the provisions on the same matter are consistent between normative documents; (vi) In conformity with the procedures set out in this approach; (vii) Other elements requiring review. Article 19 Normative documents of the rule of law working body for the filing of the report should be reviewed within 30 days of the date of receipt of the request. The issues identified in Article 20 for the review of normative documents are dealt with in accordance with the following provisions: (i) Normative documents are provided in article 18, subparagraphs (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), by governmental rule-of-law institutions responsible for review, by issuing letters of administrative law enforcement oversight, by which the organ is responsible for correcting or repealing. After receipt of the letter of administrative law enforcement oversight by the institution, feedback should be given to the Government's rule of law working body responsible for the review. There is no justification for the non-requirement or refusal of implementation, and the Government's rule of law work has been brought to the Government of the people. (ii) The normative document is governed by article 18, paragraph (v), and is coordinated by the governmental rule of law working body responsible for the review, which cannot be agreed upon in a coordinated manner, and requests the Government of the people at this level to decide. Article 21, the normative document-making body may apply for review to the governmental rule of law working body responsible for the review of the case; the rejection of the decision may apply for review to the organs of that decision. The Government's rule of law body shall provide a written response within 30 days of receipt of a review request. Article 2 Article 23. The normative document formulation body shall transmit to the governmental rule of law body responsible for review by 31 January of each year two copies of the normative documents developed by this organ in the previous year. Article 24 provides that normative documents are not sent to the normative and annual directory by the competent governmental rule of law working body responsible for the review and that they are not justified by refusing to send their reports, drawing the attention of the current people's Government. Article 25 Article 26 The form of a normative document is developed by the State's rule of law institutions in the self-government. Article 27 of this approach is implemented from the date of publication. A review of the administrative normative documentation for the self-government of Mongolia (Act No. 116 of the People's Government of the Autonomous Region) was also repealed. |
