Advanced Search

Nanning Edible Farm Product Quality Safety Management

Original Language Title: 南宁市食用农产品质量安全管理办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Summit of the People's Government of South New York, 10 October 2004 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 24 of 19 October 2004 on the Government of the Southen Municipalities, which was launched effective 1 December 2004)

Chapter I General
In order to enhance the quality security management of the production of food products, to guarantee human health and life safety, and to develop this approach in line with the relevant national laws, regulations and regulations.
Article 2, units and individuals involved in the production, processing and operation of food products within the city's administration, must be respected.
Article 3 establishes a testing surveillance system for the self-assessment, industrial self-regulation and government regulation of food producers.
AWAE should play an industrial oversight and self-regulatory role in assisting government agencies in the management of food-use production activities.
Article IV is responsible for the regulation of primary agricultural production.
The business sector is responsible for the regulation of the area of food circulation and the production of livestock dying.
The business sector is responsible for the regulation of the distribution of agricultural products.
The health sector is responsible for the regulation of consumption components such as catering and meals.
The quality technical supervision sector is responsible for the implementation of national standards, industry standards and local standards for agricultural products, the quality inspection and certification of food-used agricultural products are carried out by law and is responsible for the regulation of the food-use production process.
The environmental protection sector is responsible for monitoring and management of the environmental protection and environmental conditions of the agricultural production base.
Food drug surveillance management is responsible for the integrated monitoring, organizational coordination and the organization of major accidents for food-use agricultural safety.
Article 5 encourages units and individuals to report to administrative authorities, such as agriculture, commerce, health, environmental protection, business and quality technical supervision, food medicine surveillance, on violations of the production, processing and operation of food products. Upon receipt of the reports by the concerned sector, it is the terms of reference of this sector that should be dealt with in a timely manner in accordance with the law; that is not within the purview of this sector, the competent branch should be transferred in a timely manner and the reporting person is informed.
The sectors receiving the report and their staff should be kept confidential; the report is valid and should be rewarded in accordance with the relevant provisions.
Chapter II Production, processing management
Article 6 Governments at all levels should be able to plan and build the food production base in accordance with the practice of the region.
Decentralized farmers are encouraged to work with the food-use production base.
Article 7. The food production base and other productive places should be in line with national and local standards of environmental quality. Toxic hazardous substances such as heavy metals, anti-personnel residues, pesticide residues are not in accordance with the standard and no production of food-used agricultural products is prohibited.
Article 8.
Article 9. The food-use production base should establish quality record files, documenting the use of agricultural inputs such as pesticides, fertilizers, veterinary (fish), feeding and feeding additiants, as well as the prevention of epidemics, quarantine, etc., to ensure the traceability of products.
Other food-use production sites should record the use of agricultural inputs in the light of the management modalities of the production base.
Article 10. The food-use production base should establish a quality test system for the use of agricultural products, carry out self-assessment of produced food-use products or entrusting institutions with the corresponding qualifications, testing, quarantine.
The food-use production base should provide the operators with the testing of qualified agricultural products and accompany quality certificates.
The producers of food-used agricultural products should use agricultural inputs in accordance with the relevant provisions.
Production materials such as organic fertilizers, microbiotics, biological pesticides and deforestables are encouraged.
Article 12. In the production of food products, the following acts are prohibited:
(i) The use of Amphetamines, phosphorus, methamphetamines (Thamphet 1605), sulphur hexaphos (1605), Xangphosphate (3911), oxin (economist), long-lasting phosphate, polyvincing, hydros, Trinwei (ogram), Integn phosphate (tinkos), mete sulfonate, inhalos, sulfonate, metoxin, and insecticide residues and pesticide residues.
(ii) The use of harmful compounds for use in countries such as salt acid Kronto (referred “female” as veterinary and feed additives.
(iii) The use of prohibited anti-biotic drugs such as vinc and harmful laser, using drugs as veterin (fish) medicines.
(iv) Other prohibited acts prescribed by law, regulations.
Article 13 producers of food-used agricultural products should strictly organize production in accordance with the production of technical protocols, improve the quality of food-use products by harvesting, sing, fishing and collecting.
The harvest of food-used agricultural products such as vegetables, fruits and fruits should be in line with the provisions of the State and the self-government zones relating to the period of safety spacing. The dying or fishing of food-using products such as poultry, water production should be in line with the provisions of the national and self-government regions for the period of time.
Article 14.
Article 15. A food-processing enterprise should establish a safe tracking system for the use of agricultural products.
The acquisition of food-use products and their raw materials by food-processing enterprises should be based on the requirement for a test of eligibility for the retention of raw materials, semi-materials.
Article 16 prohibits:
(i) The use of a sodium hydrochlorofluoroethane (HDD);
(ii) The use of hostility in the production of food products;
(iii) Violations of the use of stereotypes;
(iv) Use of other toxic substances such as sulphur hexachlorofluoro;
(v) Violations of the use of refrigerants, defence agents, etc.
Article 17, with primary processing and packaging of food products, must be used in packaging materials and containers consistent with the health standards and should be identifiers in products packaging. The mark should be shown in Chinese, product name, net content, production base, name and address of processing units, date of production, maintenance period etc.
Article 18 Livestock and their products may be sold by targeted smugglers, concentrating on quantification.
Avian livestock breeding plant, dying sites and other poultry production sites have found unacceptably or ill-treated, deadly and unaccounted for livestock and their products, zoo and her products, diarrhoea, and producers should be treated in an environmentally sound manner under the guidance of the ISPRA, or sent to designated poultry sites.
Chapter III
Article 19 introduces a market access system for food-use products. The operation of food-used agricultural products should be subject to testing, testing, quarantine, in line with national, self-government, municipal quality safety standards, without testing, detection, quarantine or testing, testing, quantification of unqualified food products.
Article 20
The products of the food production base are sold directly in the form of a certificate and a quality certificate.
Other food-for-food-for-food-producing markets, agro-industries, supra-markets, distribution centres are able to market access.
Article 21 Avian livestock and products sold at the market must be in compliance with the legal, regulatory and regulatory conditions for animal protection, as well as the supervision, inspection of an animal preventive monitoring institution, which is qualified by analytic monitoring body, and a quarantine certificate indicating that the market can be sold by the gauges.
Article 2: The food-use market, the agro-industries, supermarkets, distribution centres and large-food-processing enterprises should be equipped with safe sanitation quality testing facilities, the establishment of a fast-track inspection body for the quality of agricultural products in the planting industry, the allocation of professional or dedicated testing personnel, and the establishment of the corresponding testing protocols and management systems.
Other food-used agricultural operators may carry out their own product testing or may entrust quality testing institutions for product testing.
Unqualified agricultural products have been found, operators of the food-using market and the agro-industries should stop the sale and transfer of the distributor in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and reporting on the administrative authorities. The operators such as supermarkets, distribution centres and processing enterprises should stop sales, processing.
Article 23. The owners of the sales assessment point should establish a bill for food-using agricultural products and request relevant vouchers such as quality certificates, quarantine certificates. The products sold by the owner of the sale should be attached to the sale mark indicating the content of the commodities name, the assessment and the date of sale.
Article 24: The owners of the catering industry and unitary meals should establish the purchase of food-use grains, specifying the name, place, quantity, date, attached to the agricultural quarantine certificate, product quality certificates, etc., and the non-procurement of food products that are not certified by quarantine, product quality.
Significant public activities, procurement of food-using products by large conferences should be implemented.
Article 25. The agricultural administration should conduct a screening of food-use products on the market on a daily basis; it may also be entrusted with a qualified agricultural inspectorate for production, operation of food-used agricultural products, and will be made available on a regular basis.
The producers, operators of food-used agricultural products, who have contested the results of the testing, may submit applications to the agricultural administration within seven working days of the date of receipt of the results of the testing, or their superior agricultural administration, for review by the designated inspection body of the agricultural administration for which applications are received.
Article 26 introduces an indicative system for the quality of agricultural products. The supervisory management should address the issue of the quality of safe sanitation in the food-used agricultural market and be published in a timely manner through a variety of channels, indicating that the consumer takes appropriate identification measures. Inadequate products identified in monitoring inspections should be made available to society in a timely manner for their brands, brands, production units.
Chapter IV Legal responsibility
Article 27, in violation of article 9, provides that the food production base does not establish a quality record of the archives or the falsification of quality records in the production activities provided for by the provision, and is subject to a fine of up to $50 million by the agricultural administration.
In violation of article X, the food production base does not establish a quality test institution, undertakes self-assessment or does not accompany the quality of the product, and is subject to an order by the agricultural administration to change its period of time and to a fine of up to $500,000.
Article 29, in violation of Articles 11 and 12, does not provide for the use of agricultural inputs and is fined by more than 300,000 dollars in the agricultural administration.
Article 31, in violation of article 13, provides for the acquisition, sale of food-used agricultural products that have not reached the safe interval of pesticides, or sabotage, fishing, sale of bird livestock and water products during the recuperation period, for which the agricultural administration is responsible for measures taken to deal with contaminated agricultural products, with a fine of up to $50 million.
Article 31, in violation of article 18, imposes a fine of up to 5,000 dollars in the agricultural administration, for ill-treatment, invalidization and in the production, leading.
In violation of article 22, paragraph 1, of this approach, there is no security-health quality testing facility, professional or dedicated testing personnel, or the absence of a corresponding monitoring process and management system, to be converted by the responsibility of the agricultural administration sector; and the refusal to reform is punishable by a fine of up to $300,000.
In violation of article 22, paragraph 3, the discovery of non-qualified agricultural products, the sale and transfer, or the lack of timely reporting of the relevant administrative authorities, is subject to a fine of up to $300,000 in the business administration sector.
In violation of articles 23, 24, the owners of the sales assessment site, the catering industry and the unitary foodstuffs have not been established, and the business administration or the health administration sector have been responsible for their duration.
Article 34 punishes other practices that violate this approach by management such as agriculture, health, business, business, environmental protection, quality technical supervision, food medicine surveillance, in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations, regulations and regulations.
Article XV Staff in the agricultural administration sector and other management are not subject to statutory regulatory responsibilities in the management of quality of agricultural products, violates the rights and interests of the owner of the food-used agricultural production and administratively disposed of directly responsible supervisors or other directly responsible personnel; constitutes a crime and criminally liable by law.
Chapter V
Article 16 of this approach refers to food-using products that are planted, breeding and produced without processing or primary processing, which can be used for human food, including vegetables, fruits, food oil, livestock and poultry products and water products.
Article 37