Key Benefits:
(The 34th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland, held on 14 October 2005 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 12 of 26 October 2005 of the People's Government Order No. 12 of the Greater Self-Government Zone, which came into force on 1 January 2006) Article 1 establishes procedures for regulating normative documents, upholding the harmonization of the socialist rule, guaranteeing the proper implementation of laws, regulations and regulations, promoting the administration of the law, in accordance with the regulations, regulations, regulations and regulations, and other relevant laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, and in the light of the actual practice of the self-government area. Article 2, which refers to normative documents referred to in this article that, in addition to government regulations, all levels of the people's government and its working sectors, as well as organizations mandated by the law, regulations and regulations, are responsible for the management of the functions of the public affairs, are directed at non-specified individuals, legal persons and other organizations, which are generally binding decisions, orders, notices, etc. The Government of all levels and its working sectors have developed internal work systems, technical operating protocols, administrative decisions on specific matters, and documentation on matters such as personnel, finance, external affairs and other matters of direct management. Article 3 establishes normative documents that should be consistent with the principles of the rule of law, in accordance with its statutory powers and procedures, in accordance with its mandate and responsibility, democratic openness and popularity. Normative documents should be sent by law. Normative documents for the submission should be reviewed by law. Normative documents are available, the review should be guided by the principle of availability, certainty and integrity. The name of the normative document is generally referred to as “the way”, “rules”, “rules”, “rules”, notice”, “Recommendations”, “Recommendations”, etc.”, but not as “regulations”. In addition to the complexity of the content, normative documents are generally irrespective of chapter and section. Article 5 has one of the following cases, and normative documents can be developed: (i) Laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents have not yet been specified for administrative work in a particular area; (ii) Legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents do not specify or operate in a given area; (iii) Legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents authorize normative documentation. The development of normative documents should contain a quantity of quality and be conducted in accordance with the prescribed procedures. The content already specified in laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents should not be repeated. Nor should normative documents be developed by the Government's work sector, in principle, in the name of the Government of the current people or the Executive Office of the Government. Article 7 does not have legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions that affect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations or increase the obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations. Article 8. Nor shall normative documents create the following matters: (i) Administrative penalties; (ii) Administrative coercion; (iii) Administrative licences; (iv) Administrative fees; (v) Other matters to be established by law, regulations and regulations. Article 9. The Government of the people at all levels and its institutions in the work sector shall not develop normative documents. However, there are other provisions of the law, legislation and regulations. Article 10 should be developed, published normative documents should be conducted in accordance with procedures such as research, consultation, coordination of differences, review of legality, consideration of decisions, signing of the publication, publication, filing and filing. The drafting of normative documents by the Drafting Unit should conduct a study on the need and feasibility of the development of normative documents and conduct studies on issues to be addressed in normative documents, key systems and measures to be established. Citizens, legal persons and other organizations may submit proposals for the development of normative documents to the competent organs and organizations. Article 12 The drafting of normative documents by the drafting cell should be researched, draw on experience of practice and hear the views of the relevant organs, organizations, experts and citizens. Hearing opinions can take a written request and hold a variety of forms, such as colloquiums, hearings and hearings. The drafting unit drafted normative documents that have a significant impact on the region, the industry or directly related to the important rights obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, which should be made public to society and seek the views of the various communities of society. The content of normative documents drafted in article 13 is of great disagreement, and the drafting cell should be consulted; the consultations are incomplete and the design of organs is requested. Article 14. Drafting units should be sent to the development body for consideration of draft normative documents, with drafting notes and other relevant materials. The drafting note should include elements such as the need for normative documentation, the basis, the main measures provided, the views of the parties and the treatment of views. The materials included the basis for the development of normative documents (relevant laws, regulations, regulations, parent normative documents), summary observations, hearings, research reports, etc.). The draft normative document should be reviewed by the rule of law or by the rule of law body before the consideration of the body. A written review of the draft normative document should be submitted by the rule of law or by the rule of law body. The review includes the following: (i) Whether it goes beyond the statutory competence of the organ concerned; (ii) Are incompatible with legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents; (iii) Whether there is coordination and interface with relevant normative documents; (iv) Other elements requiring review. The rule of law sector or the rule of law body review normative documents and identify problems of feasibility or appropriateness, may make recommendations and observations. The development of normative documents should be considered in accordance with the following provisions: (i) The normative documents developed by the Government of the people at the district level should be considered by the Standing Committee of the Government, which should be considered by the plenary of the Government; (ii) Normative documents developed by other organs shall be considered by the executive head of the institution. The normative document adopted under consideration was signed by the principal holder of the organ or the principal holder. Article 18, which was signed, is published by the development body in the form of government bulletins, government websites or local press releases. Nor shall normative documents not be used as a basis for the administration. Article 19 provides for the development of normative documents for emergencies such as natural disasters, accidents, public health incidents and social security incidents, which may be simplified. Article 20 provides that normative documents are carried out from the date of publication and may also be determined to be carried out after the date of publication. Article 21 contains one of the following cases and is interpreted by the designating body: (i) The content of normative documents requires further clarity on specific meaning; (ii) New developments after the development of normative documents require a clear application. The interpretation of normative documents is the responsibility of the development body, with specific work being carried out by its rule of law or by the rule of law institutions. The interpretation of normative documents is equally effective with normative documents. Article 2 (i) The normative documents developed by the Government of the following people in the self-government area, which are presented to the Government of the people at the highest level; (ii) The normative documents developed by the people's work sector at the district level, which are presented to the Government of the people; (iii) The normative documents developed by the self-government area in the vertical-led sectors, which are presented to the top-level authorities; (iv) The normative documents developed by organizations authorized by the law, legislation and regulations are presented by the authorities to the same-ranking people's Government; (v) The normative documents developed jointly by the two departments, which are presented jointly by the host sector in the top-level administrative body; (vi) The documents developed jointly by the executive branch with non-administrative bodies, which are submitted by the executive branch to the executive branch at the highest level; (vii) The normative documents developed jointly by the local government sector with the central vertically-led sectors, which are presented by the local government sector in the top-level administrative body. Article 23 establishes the rule of law sector of the organ or the rule of law body to carry out the presentation of normative documents specifically, the rule of law component of the institution or the rule of law body to undertake the preparation of normative documents. Normative documents sent to the competent organs of the rule of law or the rule of law. Conditions should be met through the Government Internet platform. Article 24 Reporting of normative documentation requests shall be submitted to: (i) Reports; (ii) Texts of normative documents (conditionally attached to electronic texts) and notes on the development of normative documents; (iii) Develop a review of the rule of law sector or institutions of the rule of law; (iv) Developing the basis for normative documentation. Article 25 (i) Will be incompatible with legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents; (ii) Whether the principles enshrined in this provision and the establishment of competences; (iii) Whether the procedures are in breach of; (iv) Whether the provisions on the same matter are consistent between normative documents; (v) Other elements requiring review. Article 26 normative documents for the filing of a request shall be promptly reviewed and processed in accordance with the following provisions: (i) Submission of submissions in full, legal and written notification to the competent organ; (ii) Normative documents are incompatible with legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents, which are recommended by the law of the competent organ or by the rule of law body to reform itself, or by the competent organ's rule of law or the rule of law body to inform the competent organ of the decision-making process; (iii) Contrary to the provisions of the same matter between normative documents, coordinated by the law of the competent organ or the rule of law body. The decision of the competent organ to deal with the submission of comments is made by the rule of law of the competent organ or by the rule of law body in a coordinated manner and informs the competent organ; (iv) In violation of the development process, corrective action by the competent organ of the law of the competent organ or the rule of law body; (v) The submissions were incomplete, the suspension and the development of additional relevant materials for the duration of the organ. Article 27 states, citizens, legal persons and other organizations consider that normative documents are incompatible with legal, regulatory, and superior normative documents, as well as normative documents, and may submit a review proposal in writing to the competent organ and are dealt with in accordance with the prescribed procedures. The rule of law sector or the rule of law body should be reviewed within 60 days and informed the proposer in writing. Article 28, after the operation of normative documents, should be assessed on a regular basis by the organs and executive organs, and the assessment of the rule of law or the rule of law institutions of the competent organ of the review process. Article 29 should establish organs to clean up the normative documents that have been published in a timely manner, in accordance with the changes in laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents. The procedures for revising and repealing normative documents are implemented in accordance with the procedures established. Article 33 The rule of law of the competent organ or the body of the rule of law shall be published in society every quarter by a list of normative documents that are available. The following units should provide free access to normative documents to the public in society: (i) Establishment of organs; (ii) The editorial body of the Government's bulletin; (iii) More than the archives and libraries in the district; (iv) E-government services. The organs shall communicate normative documents to the units listed in subparagraphs (ii), (iii) and (iv) of the preceding paragraph within 10 working days from the date of publication of normative documents. Article 32 establishes organs that, in violation of this provision, do not formulate, publish and submit the normative documents in accordance with the prescribed procedures or that the drafting of normative documents is not subject to review by law, are reordered by the law of the competent organ of the institution or by the rule of law body to submit a request by the competent organ of the institution or the body of the rule of law; Article 33 of the rule of law or of the rule of law, in violation of this provision, does not seriously perform the functions of the review of the legality of normative documents and the filing of the case, with grave consequences, and is subject to administrative disposition by the relevant administrative organs or the inspectorate in accordance with the law of its principal and other direct responsibilities. Article 34 Governments at all levels should strengthen the management and oversight of the development and implementation of normative documents and establish systems of work such as statistical reports, briefings, inspections and accountability. Article XV of the Government of the people at all levels is to bring to the attention of the General Assembly and its Standing Committee the normative documents of the Committee, taking into account the provisions. Article 36 |
