Key Benefits:
(Act No. 124 of the Japanese People's Government Order No. 124 of 20 April 2006 on 1 June 2006) Article 1 protects the lives and property security of the people, in accordance with the People's Republic of China Act on Disaster Reduction, in the light of the National People's Republic of China Act, and develops this approach in conjunction with the current city. Article 2 This approach refers to the guidelines for the construction of work to combat earthquake damage and to the parameters of seismic shocks or seismic turmoil that should be used within a certain risk level. Article 3. The authorities of the municipality, autonomous district seismic administration are responsible for the supervision of the construction of a defence requirement within the present administration. The executive authorities, such as development reform, planning, land, water, transport and housing, should be guided by their respective responsibilities, to counter the management of defence requirements. Article IV. The seismic administrative authorities shall submit a programme of work for seismic turmoil parameters to be carried out after approval by the current Government: (i) Four kilometres across the border line between the end of the earthquake peak in the area of temperature peaks; (ii) The level of seismic research and the level of detail of information, as well as the hazard of earthquake. Article 5 seismic administrative authorities should propose, in accordance with the overall urban planning, a programme of work for seismic subsectors, to be followed by the approval of the current Government: (i) Towns and centres located in the area of earthquake-focused surveillance; (ii) Large-scale plants located in complex engineering geological conditions, long-range life line works and new construction areas; (iii) Other areas where earthquakes are to be carried out. The construction, expansion and alteration of construction works in Article VI must meet the requirement of resistance. In accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and the province, the construction of seismic safety evaluations should be carried out and the requirement for resistance was determined in accordance with the assessment of seismic safety. Construction works within four kilometres of the upper scale of the earthquake peak in the area of seismic turmoil, re-exploitation of seismic turmoil parameters, as determined in response to the effects of seismic turmoil; failure to carry out seismic turmoil parameters reviewed and to identify resistance requirements in accordance with the parameters of the high threshold of the earthquake peak area. Construction works in areas where the level of seismic research and the level of detail of information are poor, should be reviewed by seismic turmoil parameters, and the requirement for a resistance based on the results of the seismic turmoil. Other construction works are required to be determined in accordance with the maps of earthquake-driven parameters promulgated by the State, but resistance to construction works in the area of earthquakes in the city of streams is required to be determined in accordance with the results of the Google earthquake. Article 7. The construction units shall apply to the seismic administrative authorities for the identification of anti-attack defence requirements prior to the presentation of the location of the project. The seismic administrative authorities shall make the following acts within five working days of the date of receipt of the application: (i) The need for a re-engineering of seismic safety evaluation or seismic turmoil parameters, which should be communicated in writing to the building units to carry out seismic safety evaluation or seismic parameters review, and to the planning of administrative authorities; (ii) The construction of seismic safety evaluation or seismic turmoil parameters will not be required and, in accordance with the provisions of the earthquake administration authorities, the construction units and the planning of the administrative authorities. Article 8 needs to carry out the construction of seismic safety evaluation or seismic turmoil parameters reviewed, and construction units should be delegated to units with corresponding qualifications to carry out seismic safety evaluation or seismic reassessment. The units engaged in seismic safety evaluation and seismic parameters review operations within the scope of this city should be granted the Quarterly Evaluative Evaluation Certificate and engage in related operational activities within the licence. Article 9. The design units for construction work should be designed to combat shocks in accordance with the anti-stereotypical requirements and the anti-push design norm. Article 10 Construction, custodial units should be rigorously designed to carry out construction, treasury. Article 11 should be carried out when the construction of seismic safety evaluation or seismic turmoil parameters are completed, and the seismic administrative authorities should conduct a test of the identified resistance requirement. Unless experienced receipt or inspection of construction works are not carried out. Article 12 establishes, within 30 days of the completion of the construction of anti-attack requirements, in accordance with the maps of seismic parameters or the results of the stream of earthquakes in the city, the construction units shall make use of the construction of a defence requirement, as requested by the earthquake administrative authorities. Article 13. The following buildings, constructions that have been constructed and no anti-speaking measures should be identified in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and, in a gradual manner, necessary measures to combat the inherentity: (i) Buildings and constructions belonging to major construction works; (ii) Buildings, constructions that may occur for serious periods of life; (iii) Buildings with significant material value and observance; (iv) earthquake-focused surveillance of buildings, constructions in defence areas. Article 14. The seismic administration authorities and the related work sector should gradually strengthen planning and guidance for the defence of public-use facilities in rural and village municipalities to enable them to have adequate resilience. In violation of article 6, paragraph 2, of this approach, construction work should be carried out with respect to seismic safety evaluation, construction units do not carry out seismic safety evaluations or do not require resistance based on the results of the seismic safety evaluation, which is rectified by the administrative authorities of the earthquake, with a fine of over 10,000 dollars. Article 16, in violation of article 6, paragraph 3, of the present approach, provides that the construction unit does not apply the precautionary requirement established by the seismic turmoil, or does not use the parameters established by the high threshold of the sequentiality of the sequential scale, with the time limit being converted by the administrative authorities of the earthquake; the improvised requirement for resistance to the shocks determined by the over 30,000 yen. Article 17, in violation of article 6, paragraph 4, of the present approach, provides that construction units do not carry out seismic turmoil requirements for the defence of shocks determined by the seismic turmoil or by the failure to adopt seismic parameters, are subject to correction by the seismic administrative authorities and fines of up to 3,000 dollars. Article 18 (i) The construction unit did not use the set-up of a resistance to shocks as set out in the parameters set out in the China earthquake-truction parameters area, which was corrected by the seismic administrative authorities; and a fine of up to 3,000 dollars. (ii) Construction works in the area of earthquakes in the city of Ben stream, where the construction unit does not use the anti-attacking requirement established by the outcome of the earthquake ministrative zone, which is redirected by the seismic administrative authorities and fines of up to 3,000 yen. Article 19, paragraph 2, of the present approach stipulates that units engaged in seismic safety evaluation and seismic parameters reprocise nuclear operations within the scope of the seismic safety evaluation are not obtained by the certificate of excellence in the assessment of the quality of the assessment of the seismic security or beyond the scope of their exclusive licences, which is modified by the responsibility of the administrative authorities of the earthquake, confiscation of proceeds of violations and fines of over 50,000 dollars. Excluding the scope of its licence to work with a serious nature, it is recommended by the earthquake administration authorities that the award of a certificate of qualifications be revoked by the departments or bodies. Article 20, in violation of article 9, article 10 of this approach, stipulates that no anti-attack-preventive design is designed in accordance with anti-attack requirements and anti-attack design norms, or is not designed to carry out construction, imprisonment, and that administrative authorities are punished in accordance with the relevant legal regulations such as the People's Republic of China Act on the Prevention of Mitigation. Article 21, in violation of article 11 of this approach, provides that the planning of the administrative authorities shall be punished in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations without the identification of the administrative authorities of the earthquake to the extent that the fire is required or is not qualified. In violation of article 12 of the present approach, construction units have not been prepared for seismic administrative authorities, which are being responsibly converted by the seismic administrative authorities, and are fined up to 5,000 dollars in 2000. Article 23 does not determine administrative penalties and may apply to administrative review or administrative proceedings in accordance with the law. Article 24 Staff of the seismic administration authorities who do not carry out their duties, play a role, abuse of authority, provocative fraud, are administratively disposed of by their units or superior authorities; constitute a crime and hold criminal responsibility under the law. Article 25 |
