Key Benefits:
(Act No. 119 of the People's Government Order No. 119 of 17 January 2007 (Act dated 1 March 2007) Article 1, in order to preserve the unity of the socialist rule, strengthens the monitoring of normative documents, ensures the free flow of political orders, promotes the administration of the law and develops this approach in the light of the relevant laws, regulations. Article 2 The Government's regulations and the preparation of normative documents developed by the Government of the Provincial People are implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State. The normative document referred to in this approach refers to the general title of documents that are universally binding on citizens, legal persons or other organizations within a given time period and which are applicable repeatedly by the Government of the people at all levels of the province and its working sectors, relevant bodies and laws, legislation authorizing organizations (hereinafter referred to as the designating body). This approach is not applicable to the development of an internal system of work of the organs, personnel handling decisions and administrative management decisions on specific matters. Article IV (i) Maintain the unity of the socialist rule; (ii) Consistency in accordance with the legislative authority and procedures; (iii) Guarantee and monitor the exercise by the executive organs of the law and the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations; (iv) There is a need for re-entry, vetting and recklessness. Article 5 is responsible for monitoring the management of normative documents of the lower-level people's Government, the working sector of the current people, the agencies and the legal, regulatory and regulatory bodies (hereinafter referred to as government departments). The Government of the people at the district level should perform a hierarchy of oversight responsibilities and establish an annual statistical report on the management of normative documents, oversight, notification, accountability and accountability system. Article 6 The rule of law institutions of the people at the district level should assist the Government of the people at this level in its high level of oversight, through a variety of ways to monitor the development, documentation and review of normative documents, and identify problems to be addressed and informed in a timely manner. The following Article 7 bodies may formulate normative documents: (i) Government of the provincial, municipal, district-level people and communes (communes); (ii) Government departments at the district level; (iii) Organization for administrative management based on legislative, legislative and regulatory mandates; (iv) The Government of the Provincial People's Government; (v) The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of the Interior's dual management and the Department of State presence in the country. Article 8. The name of normative documents generally refers to “practice”, “Constitution”, “Decides”, “Rules”, “Recommendations”, “Renews”, “Recommendations”. In order to implement the laws, regulations and regulations, or the normative documents of the superior people's government or the superior government, the name of which is the phrase “implementation”. Nor shall normative documents be issued in the form of orders (orders). Article 9 establishes normative documents that shall not be granted administrative licences, administrative penalties, administrative coercive measures, administrative expenses and fees for tax exemptions; nor shall it create matters that should be provided by law, regulations, regulations, the superior people's Government or the superior government. Nor shall the obligation of citizens, legal persons or other organizations be limited to the rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations for the implementation of normative documents, regulations and regulations. Article 10 establishes normative documents that should be specific, clear, normative, concise, accurate, logical and operational. Matters that have been specified in laws, regulations, regulations or superior normative documents are generally not repeated. Normative documents should clarify the names of the relevant normative documents being repealed at the same time after the entry into force of this document. The development of normative documents should be open and democratic; the development of institutions should be fully researched to hear the views of the managers, the relevant units and experts, scholars and, if necessary, the holding of a validation or hearing. The views sought, suggestions were made that the body should be studied; that it should be coordinated with respect to differences, and that coordination should be explained. Article 11 provides normative documents to be issued by the Government of the people at the district level, which should be accompanied by drafting notes. The drafting note should include elements such as the need and feasibility of developing documents, the development of a basis, the issues to be addressed, the formulation of processes, the consultation and adoption of views, and the description of key issues. Article 12 establishes normative documents that should be subject to the legitimacy of the organs of the rule of law and the formulation of a review. The Government of the commune (communes) has developed normative documents that deal with the important interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, which should be issued after the implementation of the pre-reviewed review by the State's rule of law institutions. A review should be completed within 5 to 20 working days, with exceptional circumstances. Article 13 Normative documents should be considered by the Conference of the Designated Agencies, signed by the main heads and made public. Article 14. The organs should provide normative documents issued by this organ for free access by the public at their office. Article 15 Normative documents should generally be implemented after 30 days of the date of publication. However, special needs, such as security of national security, major public interest, can be implemented from the date of publication. Article 16 provides for an effective period not exceeding five years. However, procedural provisions, technical norms and the implementation of legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions. The content of normative documents is at the stage of work, and the designating body should clarify the duration of the normative documents. Article 17 shall establish organs to clean up normative documents every five years, and their revisions or repeals shall be made available to society and be sent back. Article 18 should establish specialized agencies and personnel to deal with normative documentation matters and establish normative documentation procedures and systems. Article 19 shall be established by the organ of the organization from 30 days from the date of publication of normative documents. The normative documents developed by the people's governments at all levels are presented at the highest level by the Government of the people; normative documents developed at all levels of government are presented to the Government. Normative documentation developed by the following vertical management units in the province should be accompanied by a request from the Government of the people of the location, in addition to the submission of the administrative body with which it belongs. Normative documents developed by the Ministry, the Ministry's dual management and the Department of State's presence at the head office should be sent to the Government of the province. The normative document was developed by a number of government departments and was sent by the host government office; the establishment of units in the organ was not subordinate to the same body and was sent by the designating body. Article 20 Article 21, normative documents for the submission of requests, shall be submitted to: (i) One report on the normative documentation reserve; (ii) Two formal and electronic versions of normative documents; (iii) One drafting note on normative documents; (iv) The development of the rule of law institutions for the review of one opinion. The normative document of the second article is in accordance with article 21 of the present approach and is subject to review; it is not in accordance with the provisions, to communicate the supplementary material or to return it. Article 23 examines the normative documents for the submission of requests in accordance with the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations and methods. The submissions are incomplete and are not reviewed. The Government of the people at the top of article 24 may review the normative documents reserve of the Government of the people, including through a review, designation and direct review. Article 25 Reviews, in addition to being carried out directly by the Government's rule of law bodies, may be jointly reviewed by the Government's rule of law bodies and with the relevant departments. When the Government's rule of law bodies review the normative documentation of the submission, it is necessary to establish the organ to provide the relevant material or to clarify the relevant information, and to establish the organ(s) shall, within 7 days of the receipt of the notification, provide information or clarification; and to assist the review or seek advice from the relevant units, the relevant units shall respond to written observations within the time frame. Article 27 reviews of normative documents should be completed within 30 working days of the date of receipt of the request; a more professional or special case may be extended, but the extension period should not exceed 15 working days. In the twenty-eighth review, it was found that the normative documents of the referral were in conflict with or inappropriate, and that the Government's rule of law should send a false opinion to the design body. Article 29 establishes that the organ should reproduce itself within 30 days of the date of receipt of the lapse and respond in writing to the results. The Government's rule of law institutions should be invited to withdraw or change by the current people's Government, and normative documents go beyond statutory competence, incompatible with the law, regulations, national policies, and the Government's rule of law institutions should be withdrawn directly. Article 31 establishes that the executive body shall be subject to the challenge or modification of the normative documents formulated by the organ, legal persons or other organizations, and shall be verified; normative documents are problematic and the organ should be redirected or withdrawn. The Government's rule of law bodies receive reports from citizens, legal persons or other organizations on the existence of normative documents, which are transferred to the competent body to verify the handling of the matter and to establish organs to respond to the results within the time frame; and, where necessary, the Government's rule of law institutions may review directly. Article 31 shall send a list of normative documents developed by the receiving authorities by the end of January of each year to the Government's rule of law body. Article 32 Government rule of law institutions that receive the request should establish a normative documentation database to make available to society the normative documents reviewed. Article 33 establishes a body that is in breach of the present approach by modifying the period of time by the current level or by the Government of the High-level People's Government; does not provide for the filing, the issuance of two copies in one year and the normative documents in the above-mentioned law, or is clearly in violation of the provisions of the law; causes negative consequences, and gives administrative disposal to its principal and direct responsibilities. Article 34 of the Government's rule of law bodies do not provide for a review, review and review of normative documents, or that the problems identified are not corrected, and are criticized by the Government of the people at this level; in the event of serious, negative consequences, the administrative disposition of their heads and those directly responsible. The Government's rule of law bodies have not been subject to the present approach to the preparation of a review, presentation of the normative documents, or have been found to be in conflict with the application of their approved normative documents, which are criticized by their departments for the direct responsibilities; in the event of serious consequences, resulting in adverse consequences and administrative disposition of the person directly responsible. Article 33 XV does not establish normative documents that are not publicized in accordance with the statutory procedures. Article XVI governs the supervision of normative documents of the system by the following vertical management units in the province, which may be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of this approach. Article 37 establishes specific matters relating to the management of normative documents, such as the review, preparation and review, as provided by the Office of the Government of the Provincial People's Rule of Law. Article 38 of this approach was implemented effective 1 March 2007. The provisions on the normative documentation of the administration of the province in the Province were also repealed on 25 March 2002. |
