Advanced Search

Harbin City Housing Management Measures

Original Language Title: 哈尔滨市城市房屋安全管理办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Health 12th ordinary meeting of the Government of the city of Harmira, 22 August 2007, considered the adoption of Decree No. 168 of 30 August 2007 of the People's Government Order No. 168 of 30 August 2007, effective 1 October 2007)

Chapter I General
Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations, in order to strengthen the security management of urban homes and to preserve the security and public interest of the house.
Article 2, this approach applies to the safe management of all types of homes that have been delivered on State land in the city planning area.
Article III of this approach refers to the management activities undertaken to secure the use of housing structures, including the safe management of homes, the safe identification of homes and the management of dangerous homes.
The safety management of fire safety and facilities equipment in the home is implemented in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations.
Article IV. Safety management of homes should be guided by the principles of prevention, control and integration and security.
Article 5 Administrative authorities in the city are administrative authorities responsible for the management of housing throughout the city.
The relevant administrations, such as the Government and the construction, planning, urban congestion of sanitation, finance, public safety fire, urban administration, should be managed in accordance with their respective responsibilities.
Chapter II
Article 6. The owners and users of the house shall be reasonably used in accordance with the structure and purpose of the house, to ensure the overall and safety of the housing structure, without unauthorized demolition of the housing structure or to affect the security of tenure.
Housing security is identified as severe damage or dangerous tiers and cannot be removed.
Article 7. The owner, the user, in addition to the planning, construction of administrative licences, and construction of construction works, shall not have the following behaviour relating to the structure and structure of the construction subject:
(i) The demolition of the base, the rest and the pillars;
(ii) Removal of concrete walls;
(iii) Explore the ground in the room and expand the floor;
(iv) To dismantle the wall linking the dumping effect;
(v) Removal of non-exclusive walls with the overall function of home resistance;
(vi) Other acts that endanger the security of the housing structure.
The main structure of the construction described in this approach refers to the structure of the housing entity, including roofs, buildings, embassies, pillars, maintenance, walls, connectivity points and foundations.
The scheme referred to the heavy structure of the house, which refers to the systematic transmission of the main structure of the house to the basement and other connecting points, including heavy walls, philosophicals, columns, framework blocks, slacks, floors, embassies, embassies, embassies, embassies, roofs, rents etc.
In addition to article 7, paragraph 1, of the present approach, the other main structure of the house and the heavy structure are to be dismantled, with the exception of the provision of the Regulations on Public Property Management in the provinces of Blackang, which shall be subject to the procedures for the clearance of house demolitions by the municipal property administration authorities; the non-communication of houses should be taken into account by the municipal housing administration authorities to handle the relocation of homes.
The approval of the urban planning administrative authorities should be made prior to the process of reconfiguration or clearance of homes, involving the protection of buildings, historic buildings or houses, and the prior approval of the urban planning administration authorities; the consent of the urban city's executive authorities should be sought in advance.
Article 9. When the owner of the house or a occupier of the house apply for the approval of the house demolition or the processing of the case, the following material shall be submitted:
(i) Removal of homes by means of a request or a supporting statement and the applicant's identity certificate;
(ii) Housing rights such as home ownership certificates or public rental certificates, property rights units agree with opinions;
(iii) Report on the safety of homes;
(iv) The design document for the design of the original design units or design units with corresponding qualifications;
(v) Other material provided by law, regulations and regulations.
Article 10. The applicant or the author shall submit the relevant material and the information to the competent municipal property administration and be responsible for the authenticity of the material.
Before the demolition of homes, the owner or the occupants of the house should communicate the content and scope of the demolitions to the housing management unit in a timely manner, and transmit the related materials approved for house demolitions to the housing management unit.
Article 12. The content and scope of housing demolitions should be consistent with the content, scope and scope of the approved or submitted demolitions and in line with the requirements of the design document.
There is a need to change the location of the Ministry of Demobilization, beyond the approval of demolitions or the duration of the case, and to re-establish the relevant procedures by the municipal housing administration authorities.
Article 13. The right of the owner or a public tenant to carry out home demolitions shall not be infringed on the legitimate rights and interests of other relevant stakeholders.
Other relevant violators may bring proceedings before the People's Court in accordance with the law.
Article 14. After the construction of house demolitions, the author should have the relevant material in the case of house demolitions to be registered by the house's right-in-householding agency for the processing of housing rights.
Article 15. The owner, the user, should conduct regular inspections of the security of house use, detect damage and guarantee the normal use of homes.
Article 16 Housing management units should conduct daily inspections of the security of tenure in the management area, finding that the use of houses in violation may affect the security of homes, should be stopped in a timely manner and reported to the municipal housing administration authorities.
Article 17 Civil, legal and other organizations have found violations of the security of homes and have the right to report or file complaints to the municipal housing administration authorities.
Upon receipt of a report or a complaint by the municipal housing administration authorities, it should be processed in a timely manner and will deal with the results of the reportor or the complainant.
Chapter III
Article 18 of this approach refers to the identification and determination of housing security in accordance with State-mandated housing safety standards and other relevant technical norms.
Article 19
The findings of the identification of the housing security accreditation body are the basis for determining the security conditions of the house.
Article 20 provides that owners, users or persons of interest may be entrusted to the housing safety recognition body for the safety of the house.
The housing safety recognition body should collect housing security clearance fees in accordance with the standards approved by the price sector.
Article 21, after the use of homes, is one of the following cases, where the owner or the user should entrust the housing safety recognition body with the identification of housing safety:
(i) Dismoval of houses that are restructured or heavily structured;
(ii) The establishment of large advertising facilities, communications facilities, etc. in the house or in accordance with the wall, which are markedly increased;
(iii) More than the provision for the design of houses that still need to be used;
(iv) Changes in the design uses that may affect the use of safe houses;
(v) Public cultural recreation sites, such as schools, theatres, sports stations, and public service places such as large commercial sites, hotels, are used for more than half of the year's design;
(vi) There are other situations in which the security of the house requires identification.
House demolitions are needed in the course of the rehabilitation of the old city, and the demolitions should be commissioned to conduct housing safety clearances in accordance with the provisions.
Article 22 provides the following material:
(i) A letter of credit for housing safety;
(ii) Authorization certificate;
(iii) Evidence of the right to housing as evidence of or in the interest of the identified house;
(iv) Other material provided by law, regulations.
In the construction of the construction of the construction of the engineering base, the construction unit should entrust the housing safety recognition body to neighbouring homes prior to construction.
Construction units should take security protection measures against neighbouring homes in the construction process. The construction units should be commissioned to conduct housing safety clearances at the end of the construction, when the owner of the neighbouring house or the use of the person requires a safe identification of the house.
As a result of the construction of neighbouring homes, construction units should be rehabilitated in accordance with the identification of views and shoulder the relevant civil responsibility.
Article 24 Safety identification should be carried out by more than two professional experts, with special complex identification projects that could involve experts or invite the relevant departments.
Article 25 Upon receipt of the authorization by the Housing Safety Identification Body, a housing safety certificate should be completed within seven working days and a report on housing safety. The complexity of the situation or the need for monitoring could be properly prolonged for the duration of the report on the identification of housing security, but it should be communicated to the author.
Article 26, which has been identified as hazardous homes in the context of the security of the home, shall notify the author within 24 hours of the conclusions and report to the municipal housing administration authorities.
Chapter IV
Article 27, which refers to dangerous homes as described in this approach, refers to severe structural damage or to heavy components as dangerous components, at all times the risk of losing structural stability and affordability and ensuring that safe houses are present and used.
Article 28 provides for the custody of dangerous homes, the responsibilities of governance (hereinafter referred to as the hazardous house responsible), and should assume the responsibility for governance such as the custody, maintenance, consolidation and severance of dangerous homes. The laws, regulations, regulations and regulations provide for their provisions.
Thanks to the damage caused by late governance to others, those responsible for dangerous homes should be liable.
Article 29 regulates the territorialization of dangerous homes. The Government of the people of the region should strengthen the management of dangerous homes in the territories and designate specialized agencies to be responsible for the management of dangerous homes within the jurisdiction.
Article 33 Designated institutions of the Government of the People of the Region shall organize regular inspections of housing security by the relevant departments and units. A safe and secret house was found in the inspection and the situation should be reported in a timely manner to the municipal housing administration authorities.
The municipal housing administration authorities should entrust housing safety recognition in accordance with the report.
Article 31, which was identified as dangerous homes, the municipal housing administration authorities should send a letter of the hazardous house to the hazardous house responsible, while informing the territorial Government of the designated institutions.
Article 32, which is identified as dangerous homes, should be treated in accordance with the extent to which the housing risks vary according to the following:
(i) Observation. Short-term use is applicable to the adoption of appropriate safety technologies measures, but it is necessary to continue to observe houses.
(ii) Treatment. A dangerous home may be removed after appropriate security measures are applied.
(iii) To stop use. They apply to unnovated values that are temporarily not dismantled and do not endanger neighbouring buildings and affect the security of others.
(iv) Overall dismantlement. The risk of renovating has not been repaired and jeopardizes the security of others or the adjacent buildings.
In accordance with the identification of conclusions and recommendations, the responsibility of dangerous homes should be maintained in a timely manner, after the notice of the hazardous house is received.
The designated institutions of the Government of the People of the Region should promote and guide the maintenance of dangerous homes by those responsible for hazardous homes.
Article 34 was identified as requiring the demolition of dangerous homes, and the territorial Government should organize the timely relocation of home users.
As identified for hazardous homes will need to be rebuilt and in line with urban planning requirements, all houseowners can do the approval process according to needs.
Article 33 fifiers, subsidiaries such as dangerous homes and their subsidiarys, routes, subsidiaries, obstructs the governance of dangerous homes and their facilities holders should be removed and relocated in a timely manner.
In the event of a risk of a dangerous house, the commune authorities of the communes and the local people's government should organize a risk response in accordance with the precautionary phase of the housing security emergency.
Chapter V Legal responsibility
In violation of article 37, one of the following acts has been changed by an administrative authority responsible for the commune property, in serious circumstances, and punished in accordance with the following provisions:
(i) No change in the technical requirements for the approval, reproduction, scope or design of documents is attributable to non-commercial actions with a fine of more than 500,000 dollars; and
(ii) In addition to the provisions of article 21, subparagraph (i), of this approach, the non-operational conduct, which is subject to a fine of more than 1000 dollars, shall apply for the security of the house to be determined and not applied;
Article 338 violates one of the following acts, which is warned by the authorities of the city's properties to put an end to the offence, the period of time being changed and, in serious circumstances, impose a fine of more than 1,000 dollars for individuals and impose a fine of up to 50,000 dollars for the unit, causing loss and liability under the law:
(i) Removal of structures and heavy structures for buildings that cannot be removed;
(ii) Removal of the main structure of the building without approval or clearance.
Article 39, in which the applicant obtains approval by means of deceasing, such as the provision of false material, or the filing of the case, was withdrawn by the municipal property administration authorities, responsible for the recovery of the demolition period and for the non-commerciality, with a fine of up to €200 million; and an act of operation, with a fine of up to €50 million. The damages to others should be borne by law.
Article 40
Article 40 states that the municipal property administration and its staff shall perform their duties seriously and shall not take advantage of provocative fraud.
In violation of the provisions of this article, the administrative disposition of the unit of which it is located or of the superior authority shall be subject to criminal responsibility by law.
Annex VI
Article 42
Article 43
Article 44 The Municipal Government's Regulation on the Management of Dangerous Houses in the city of Halkoa, issued on 6 October 1992, was also repealed.