Key Benefits:
(Summit No. 63 of 17 April 2007 of the People's Government of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland to consider the adoption of the Decree No. 26 of 5 July 2007 of the People's Government Order No. 26 of the Greater Self-Government Zone, which came into force on 1 September 2007) Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the relevant provisions of the Protocol Visiting Regulations, in order to regulate the conduct of a hearing by the executive branch and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the respondents. Article II refers, inter alia, to the testimony of the visit, which means, in the form of a meeting, the identification of the facts by the executive branch in the course of the proceedings and the review of the matter, by means of consultation, debate, review, collation, etc., of the responsibility to deal with the activities of the mission in accordance with the law. Article 3 Article IV should be guided by the principles of openness, equity, justice and the public, to fully listen to the views of the respondents and to guarantee their statements and the right to be heard. The hearings should focus on evacuation visits, with full application of multiple ways of settling conflicts, such as reconciliation, mediation. Article 5 states that: (i) Accreditation matters are representative, with the attention of the public and social implications; (ii) There is a greater controversy between the respondent and the executive authorities regarding the facts and evidence involved in the matter of the correspondence, which requires consultation, identification; (iii) The issue of communications remains uninterrupted; (iv) Other major, complex and suspected communications matters. Article 6. The executive body decides to hold a hearing and shall communicate in a timely manner the time, place, content and other related matters to the witness. Article 7. Those who are in a position to do so may apply for hearing. The trustee shall apply for hearing, and the executive body shall take a decision within 10 days of the date of receipt of the request for hearing. The hearings should be held, in writing, to be informed of the time, place, content and other related matters of the visitor; the reasons for the non-release of the witness should be communicated in writing. The situation is urgent and can be organized. Article 8 Article 9 The moderator performs the following duties: (i) Preside over hearings; (ii) Inquired participants; (iii) To receive relevant evidence; (iv) Maintenance of the hearings order; (v) Organizing reconciliation, mediation; (vi) Organization of hearings, collation; (vii) Other responsibilities. Article 10 Hearings are staffed by administrative bodies that organize hearings or the relevant experts, legal practitioners. The number of hearings should be a number of documents (including the moderator). The hearingers have the right to ask the participants to participate in the review and discussion. Article 11. Hearings perform the following duties: (i) To check the presence of the hearing; (ii) Preparations for hearings; (iii) The production of hearings, reviews and summary notes; (iv) The collection, collation and archiving of relevant materials. Article 12. Hearing participants includes the sympathizers, the executive organs, thirds and commissioners involved in the conduct of the mission. A large number of respondents should be elected to attend hearings, with no more than five elected representatives. The executive organs involved in the event of a letter visit should be assigned to the hearing. Article 13 The following rights were enjoyed by the participants in the hearings: (i) Presentations, debates, evidence and evidence; (ii) Request for reconciliation, mediation; (iii) Recalling and updating hearings; (iv) Other rights under the law. Participants in the hearings have assumed the following obligations: (i) Participation in hearings on time; (ii) In the event of the fact of the visit and the question of the hearing; (iii) Observance of hearings. Article XIV citizens, legal persons or other organizations that have a direct stake in visiting matters may, as a third party, request to participate in the hearings and the executive branch may also inform its participation as a third party. The third was not represented without prejudice to the hearings. Article 15 entrusts the agent with the hearings, and the author shall not exceed two. Authorization should be given by the commissioner, which sets out the authority of the agent. Article 16 (i) The relatives of the respondent; (ii) Public representation; (iii) Representatives of communes, street offices, village councils, resident councils or units of the respondents; (iv) Agent representative and a member of the Government. Hearings should be subject to the hearing discipline. The hearing was checked by the hearingers and reported to the moderator, who declared the hearing discipline. Following the announcement by the moderator of the hearing, the hearing shall be declared by the hearing facilitators and the hearing facilitators, the hearing, the name of the hearing and the right and the rights of the participant. Article 19: The hearing is conducted by: (i) The letter of the Visitor or its commissioner to present and provide evidence; (ii) The facts identified in the relevant administrative statements relating to the exchange of letters, the evidence determined, the applicable law, the policy basis and the treatment of views; (iii) Presentations by third parties; (iv) Inquiries on matters related to the visit; (v) Organizational inquiries, debates; (vi) Organizing reconciliation, mediation; (vii) Final statements by the respondent, the executive body and the third party in connection with the exchange of letters; (viii) The closing of the hearing by the moderator. Article 20: A reconciliation and conciliation agreement shall be produced by the Participants. After the signing of the conciliation, conciliation agreement shall be respected by the parties. Article 21 warrants should be produced. The hearings should be checked by the participants. In the aftermath of the hearing, the facilitators of the hearing shall convene the hearing of the witnessor in a timely manner to consider the facts of the hearings, the evidence and the application of laws, policies, etc. and to form a hearing report. Article 23 of the hearings includes the following: (i) A letter visit; (ii) Basic hearings; (iii) The main points of view, facts and reasons for the statements made by the parties; (iv) The main issues and differences in the hearings; (v) Lobation, interest visit; (vi) Review, collusion. Article 24 hearings, hearings and related evidence are based on administrative bodies for processing or reviewing nuclear letters. Article 25 states that: (i) The applicant withdrew the request for hearing; (ii) The respondent and his author's failure to attend or to withdraw from the hearings without the licence of the moderator; (iii) Correspondence and mediation agreements among the participants; (iv) Other circumstances requiring the cessation of hearings. Article 26 The executive branch, in violation of the law and the provisions of this approach, has grave consequences and is responsible for the direct responsible and other direct responsibilities. The hearing is disrupted by the hearing order or by any other act that impedes the proper conduct of the hearings, which is warned by the moderator; in violation of the provisions of the security administration, by law by the public security authorities. Article 27 of this approach was implemented effective 1 September 2007. |
