Key Benefits:
(The 13th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Liveli city of 11 April 2008 considered the adoption of Decree No. 100 of 13 April 2008 No. 100 of the Decree No. 100 of the Order of the People's Government of Livestock on 1 June 2008) Article 1, in order to enhance the management of normative documents, guarantees the legitimacy and effectiveness of normative documents, and in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Regulations of the State Department, the Regulations and Rules, and the Norms of the Regulations of the Southern Province of the River. The normative documents referred to in Article 2 of this approach refer to the general title of documents, orders, observations, announcements, notices, notices, etc., by the municipal, district (communes, districts) and their respective work sectors, as well as by the town authorities, which are generally binding on citizens, legal persons and other organizations within their purview. Article 3. Drafting, reviewing, deciding, publishing, filing, application of this approach. The development of draft local legislation, the development of regulations, internal work systems and specific administrative actions are not applicable. Article IV establishes normative documents that may not create administrative licences, administrative sanctions, administrative coercive measures and administrative charges. Article 5 Terms of normative documents should be accurate, concise and clear, specific and structurally sound, scientific and operational. The content already specified in laws, regulations and regulations is generally not repeated in normative documents. Article 6 Governments of municipalities, districts (markets, zones) and their respective work sectors should be subject to a review of legality by their rule of law bodies before the publication of normative documents; they cannot be issued without review of legality or review. Article 7. Normative documents developed by the municipality are generally drafted by the Office of the Municipal Government, or by the work of the municipality or the municipal rule of law institutions. The work sector, which belongs to the municipality, should be reviewed by the rule of law institutions in this sector. Article 8. Drafting normative documents should conduct in-depth studies, summarizing experiences of practice, listening to a wide range of views on important issues or on the interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, and should be consulted through the holding of colloquiums, symposia or hearings. Article 9. Normative documents relate to the responsibilities of more than two sectors, which should be consulted by the drafting cell. Different views should be fully consulted and agreed upon by the consultation, and the drafting cell should be accompanied by a statement of relevant information when the normative document was delivered. Article 10 The municipal government office should review the need for the formulation of normative documents, expressions, formats and drafts. The draft normative document developed by the municipal government was reviewed by the municipal authorities or by the municipal government office in accordance with the provisions of the draft normative document in conformity with the laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents, and reviewed. Normative documents drawn up by the work sector of the municipality should be submitted to the municipal authorities for the review of the rule of law institutions in the sector. Article 12 Normative documents with other municipal authorities, as well as important normative documents dealing with the interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, should also be reviewed by the municipal government review team prior to the submission of the decisions of the Standing Committee of the Municipal Government or the Government's leadership. The normative documents developed by the municipality are issued by the main leadership of the municipality. After the issuance of normative documents, the necessary text was printed by the Office of the Municipal Government. The text should contain the formulation of organs, issuances, titles of documents, adoption dates, date of application and date of issuance. Article 14. When normative documents are developed, social disclosure must be made available through the Government's bulletin, the Government website, the media, etc.; without publication, they cannot be applied in administrative law enforcement. The Office of the Municipal Government should send the text of the normative document, subject to the approval of the Public Office of Information of the Municipal Government, which will promptly send the paper and electronic text of the normative documents to the editor of the Communiqué and the municipal government information centre. Following the receipt of the text by the editor of the Communiqué and the municipal government information centre, normative documents should be published on a timely basis in the Liveli Communal People's Government Bulletin and the municipal government website. Important normative documents that directly involve the interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations should also be published in the media, such as the Loy Day. The text of the normative documents published in the Liveli City Government Bulletin is the standard text. Article 15. The municipal authorities shall make available, request or replication to citizens, legal persons and other organizations at the municipal administrative service centre, the national archives, the public libraries' normative documents. Article 16 provides for the review of normative documents and the fulfilment of the monitoring function under this approach, under the leadership of the Government's rule of law institutions in the city, the district and district sectors. Article 17 governs the application of the principle of a hierarchy of management and availability, certainty and integrity. Article 18 Other normative documents under Article 19 are submitted in accordance with the following procedures: (i) Normative documents in the work sector of the municipalities, districts (communes, districts) governments should be reported from the date of publication to the current Government; (ii) The normative documents developed jointly by the municipal, district and district authorities and with other authorities, are presented by the host sector within 20 days of the date of publication to the Government; (iii) The normative documents of the communes (communes, districts) and the town authorities should be reported from 30 days of the date of publication to the Government of the people at the highest level, and the normative documents of the Government should also be submitted to the Standing Committee of the Bench; (iv) The normative documents of the vertical management, in addition to the submission of the top-level authorities in accordance with the provisions of the system, should also be submitted to the Government for the current period of 20 days from the date of publication; (v) Normative documents of the executive branch of the municipal, district and territorial governments are reported by management to the Government of the people at this level. Article 20 Reporting of the normative documentation request shall be submitted to the following documents and materials: (i) Report on the normative documentation reserve; (ii) Three formal versions of normative documents; (iii) A review of the institution of the rule of law. Where necessary, legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents should also be sent. Article 21, Normative documentation, the relevant provisions of the municipal government should be implemented, through public exchange, mail or direct delivery, to the rule of law institutions of the municipality, the district (markets, zones). Article 22 provides for registration and review of: (i) Would go beyond competence; (ii) Does not violate the provisions of laws, regulations, regulations or superior normative documents; (iii) The inconsistency between normative documents with respect to the same matter and whether it should be altered or withdrawn; (iv) Is the content of normative documents appropriate; (v) Will be contrary to the statutory procedure. Article 23 examines matters under article 22 of this approach and shall be reviewed within 30 days of the date of receipt of the document. With the approval of the head of the rule of law body, the extension period is not up to 20 days. Article 24 Reviews the normative documents of the request and considers it necessary for the relevant organs or units to respond within the prescribed time frame; it is considered that the existence of normative documents requires the development of an organ's statement, which could send a letter of clarification to the design organs and that the designating body should respond to the request of the letter. The normative documents for the review of the request may, if necessary, be organized or heard. Article 25 has been reviewed and governmental rule-of-law institutions responsible for the review should send a proposal for a review of normative documents to the development body to require the development of organs to rectify themselves. The organs should correct and feedback from themselves within 30 days of receipt of the proposal; be corrected by the rule of law body, which requests the Government to ratify it within 60 days. The authorities of municipalities, districts (markets, districts) review normative documents for vertical management, detect violations and inappropriateness and should be submitted to provincial government rule of law institutions. Article 26 examines the contradiction between normative documents in the request and should be coordinated. The parties concerned should be implemented in a coordinated manner; there should be no agreement and should be advised to bring the decisions of the current Government. Article 27 examines the legal, appropriate normative documents or the appropriate normative document that is correcting itself, and the governmental rule of law responsible for the review shall be published in a quarterly manner and shall be sent to the People's Court. Article twenty-eighth organs or units of normative documents should submit a directory of all documents to governmental rule of law bodies responsible for review, as required. The Government's rule of law body responsible for the review should regularly verify the normative documents and their legitimacy and legitimacy. The verification units should cooperate. Article 29 State organs, social groups, business organizations or citizens believe that normative documents are in conflict with or inappropriate, may make written review recommendations to more than zonal government rule agencies. The rule of law institutions at the district level have received written review recommendations, which are under the jurisdiction of the current Government, should be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of this approach and communicated to the proposer within 30 days; and the transfer of competent administrative bodies to the extent that they are not covered by this Government. Article 33 Nor does the normative document be reviewed or submitted in accordance with this approach and is not in compliance with the statutory procedures. Nor is it appropriate for normative documents to be held accountable to the authorities and personnel in accordance with the provisions of the Government's pilot approach to administrative law enforcement in Southern Province. Article 31 establishes an effective time frame for normative documents, and normative documents should contain specific time limits. The effective period of normative documents developed by the municipality is up to five years from the date of publication of normative documents; the work of the municipal government, the municipalities (communes, districts) and their respective work sectors, and the Government's normative documents are not more than three years from the date of publication of normative documents. The organs considered that the valid expiry of the normative document would require continued implementation and should be assessed on the implementation of the document for a period of six months prior to the expiration of the effective period. Upon assessment, the content of normative documents does not need to be modified and the decision of the body to continue the implementation of the document should be issued; the content of the document needs to be modified and revised in accordance with the assessment. Article 32 provides for a period of time for normative documents involving civil, legal, other organizations' rights or other major matters to be assessed by organs; an assessment of the problems identified should be revised and refined in a timely manner. Article 33 of this approach refers to the Government-owned work sector, including vertical management, direct agencies, legal regulations authorizing the organization to administer public affairs. Article 34 Procedures for the development of normative documents by the authorities of the communes (markets, zones) and the municipal authorities, taking into account the provisions of Articles 7 to 13 of this approach. Article 55 of this approach is implemented effective 1 June 2008. |
