(Adopted by the 29th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of Southern Susang on 7 April 2009, No. 54 of the People's Government Order No. 54 of 12 April 2009, published as effective 1 June 2009)

Chapter I General

Article 1 establishes this provision in accordance with laws, regulations and regulations such as the People's Congress and Local Government Act of the People's Congress of the People's Representatives of the People's Congress of the People's Republic of China and the Regulations of the State of State, the Regulations, the Regulations and Rules.

Article 2 The law also provides for the provision.

In violation of the provisions or in accordance with the laws, regulations and regulations, normative documents that are not published shall not be used as a basis for the administration.

Article 3 refers to normative documents referred to in this article, which are formulated by the executive organs of the province in accordance with the statutory competence and procedures, covering the rights obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations and are generally binding, including governmental normative and sectoral normative documents.

The executive organs of the province referred to in the previous paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the establishment of organs), including:

(i) Government of the people at the local level;

(ii) The work sector of the local people's government, which is part of the district level;

(iii) Police stations established by law by the local people's government at the district level;

(iv) Organization mandated by law, legislation.

The non-permanent body established by the people's governments at the local level, as well as the institutions established by the executive branch, and the institutions established under the authority, shall not develop normative documents.

Article IV

(i) In conformity with the statutory competence and procedures, uphold the administration of the law, maintain the rule of law and guarantee the freeness of the political order;

(ii) To reflect the harmonization of the powers and responsibilities of executive organs, to promote changes in government functions and to manage innovation and to increase administrative efficiency;

(iii) To uphold people-centred and to guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations;

(iv) Promote, in practice, scientific development and promote social harmony.

Article 5

Chapter II

Article 6. The executive body may develop normative documents on matters within its purview, but should be controlled in a spirit of the principles of simplification and effectiveness.

The executive body of normative documents may be established by law, which is made public by the same-level people's rule of law institutions.

Article 7 concerns matters relating to the terms of reference of the two executive organs and requires the development of normative documents, which should be jointly developed by the relevant executive bodies. More than two executive organs have jointly developed normative documents that should clarify one of the executive organs to host the institution.

Article 8. The name of normative documents may be based on “decisions”, “how”, “proof”, “rules”, opinions”, “releads”, etc.”, subject to “regulations”.

The terms of normative documents should be accurate, concise, and the content of the provisions should be clear, specific and operational.

The elements already specified in laws, regulations, regulations and regulations do not, in principle, duplicate provisions; the contents already specified in the normative documents at the superior level are no longer repeated.

In addition to the complexity of the content, normative documents are generally irrespective of chapter and section.

Article 9

(i) Administrative licences;

(ii) Administrative penalties;

(iii) Administrative coercion;

(iv) Administration forfeiture (other than legal, legislative and other provisions);

(v) Institutional matters and other matters that should be regulated by law, regulations, regulations or superior administrative bodies.

Nor does normative documents make specific provisions for the implementation of laws, regulations, regulations, or regulations, violate the obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations or limit the rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 10

Normative document formulation plans should be clearly responsible for departments, institutions or organizations that prepare normative documents (hereinafter referred to as drafting units).

The normative document has been developed by the body responsible for the rule of law (hereinafter referred to as the rule of law body of the enacting body) to organize implementation after the approval of the body.

For reasons such as changing circumstances, the rule of law institutions of the enacting body could make a corresponding adjustment to the normative document formulation plan.

The drafting of normative documents should be widely followed by the views of the relevant organs, organizations and citizens. The hearings can take a variety of written requests for views and colloquiums, hearings and hearings.

To encourage the drafting of normative documents in a manner conducive to expanding public order.

Article 12 Drafting governmental normative documents, drafting units should send draft normative documents and their statements and related materials to the development bodies; drafting sectoral normative documents should send draft normative documents to the drafting body and their notes and related materials to the rule of law institutions of the body.

The statement referred to in the previous paragraph included the need for development, the main systems and measures to be set, the status of the solicitation of views, etc.; the material, including the development of the basis, summary observations, hearings, research reports, references, etc.

The draft normative document was sent to the trial and was reviewed by the rule of law institutions in which the organ was established. The main elements of the review include:

(i) Whether the content is lawful and is consistent with other relevant normative documents;

(ii) The process is in compliance with the provisions;

(iii) Whether the main systems and measures are reasonable and feasible;

(iv) Whether the physical structure and the language are regulated.

The rule of law institutions established by Article 14 review the draft texts of normative documents, in accordance with the following procedures:

(i) Preliminary review;

(ii) To seek and hear views;

(iii) Research;

(iv) Coordination;

(v) To be tried.

As a result of exceptional circumstances, such as sudden public events, there is a need for the immediate development of normative documents that can be adapted to the procedures set out above.

Article 15 establishes a body of the rule of law of the organs subject to a preliminary review and found that the relevant material to be sent to the draft normative document is incompatible with the requirements of Article 12 of this provision and may be suspended or returned to the drafting body.

Article 16 sends draft normative documents that directly involve the interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, or where there is significant differences of opinion, and establishes the rule of law institutions of the organ should seek public advice to the society either through, inter alia, networks, newspapers or other media. The organization of the hearings is carried out in accordance with article 15 of the Regulations of the State Department.

Article 17 has different views on the draft Government's normative document, coordinated by the rule of law institutions in which it is established, and, in coordination, it is not possible to reach agreement that the rule of law organs of the organs should communicate the relevant information and address their views and report on the decisions of the organs.

The rule of law institutions established by article 18 should revise the draft texts of normative documents, form written advice after the completion of the review process and submit the draft normative documents completed and written review observations to the design organs for collective consideration, decision-making by the development of a standing body or office conference.

The normative documents adopted by the Standing Conference of the Institutions or by the Office are considered collectively by the principal heads of the organ, to be issued in the form of the organ's documentation and to be made available to society in accordance with the provisions of the public information on the Government concerned.

The form of the organ's documentation, as referred to in the previous paragraph, does not contain internal references such as the preparation of the body, the summary of the meetings.

The date of signature by the main holder of the organ was the date of publication of normative documents.

Article 19 should be established by the normative document. The normative documents developed jointly by more than two executive organs are listed only by the host agency.

Article 20 should specify the date of implementation. The date of application is fixed as the date of publication and is implemented in accordance with article 32 of the Regulations of the Department of State.

Article 21, normative documents are not retroactive, except for the specific circumstances prescribed by law, regulations and regulations.

Submitted by normative documents

Article 2 should be sent by the development body to the superior administrative body (hereinafter referred to as the supervisory body) within 15 days of the date of publication:

(i) The Government's normative documents are presented to the Government at the highest level;

(ii) Subsectional normative documents are presented to the Government of the People;

(iii) The normative documentation developed by the local government of the local population at the district level, established by law by the Government of the local population, which has been established by the institution;

(iv) To authorize normative documentation developed by the organization as a legal regulation of the sectoral administration, to be presented to the Government of the current rank;

(v) The introduction of normative documents developed by the lower-level organs of vertical management, while reporting to the Government of the current people and the top-level administrative authorities.

The normative documents developed jointly by the two executive organs are sent by the host agency.

The specific oversight relationship of the normative document is determined and made public by the Government's rule of law bodies when they are required to publish the design organs in accordance with article 6, paragraph 2.

Article 23, the rule of law body of the Procedural Oversight Body is responsible for the review of normative documents and for the implementation of the oversight functions of the review.

Normative documents to be sent to the local people's Government for a case at the district level, which can be sent to the Government's rule of law institutions.

Article 24 provides for the submission of normative documents and shall be submitted to the written reports, the official text of normative documents and the formulation of notes (one third).

Normative documents have a legal, regulatory and regulatory basis, which should be accompanied by a document.

The presentation of the normative document is to be accompanied by an electronic version of the normative documents.

Article 25 provides for the submission of normative documents in accordance with the requirements of Article 3 and Article 24 of the present article, the competent body of the rule of law of the sui generis body, which does not meet the requirements of Article 3 of the present article, shall not be registered, and the registration of the request shall be suspended in accordance with article III of this provision but not in accordance with article 24 of this provision.

The suspension is registered by the Rule of Law Agency of the Procedural Superintendent, which is notified by the competent body of the law governing body of the preparation of additional copies or resubmissions; supplementary or resubmissions are eligible for registration.

Article 26 establishes organs shall submit a directory of normative documents developed by this organ in the previous year, to the body of the rule of law that is sent to the supervisory body.

Article 27 provides for a review of the normative documentation of the submission by the rule of law organs of the competent monitoring body:

(i) Would go beyond competence;

(ii) Does any conflict with other normative documents in violation of legal, regulatory, regulatory and policy provisions;

(iii) specify whether appropriate;

(iv) Whether the procedures are in breach of;

(v) Other matters to be reviewed.

In reviewing normative documents by the Rule of Law Institutions of the Procedural Superintendent, it was considered necessary for the relevant sector or the local people's Government to make observations within the prescribed time frame; it was considered necessary to establish an organ to clarify the situation and that the designating body should provide clarifications within the time frame.

Article 29, the rule of law organs of the competent monitoring body, subject to the following provisions:

(i) The rule of law organs of the competent monitoring body require the development of organs to correct themselves within the prescribed time period, the development of organs should be rectified within the prescribed time frame and to report to the law-making body of the relevant oversight bodies on the results in writing; the establishment of the authority without justification for the delay of correction and the issuance of the Administrative Enforcement Supervisory Decisions by the competent body of the competent monitoring body, which should be responsible for the development of a deadline for corrective action; the continued refusal to rectify, and the decision of the supervisory body to withdraw or change;

(ii) Continue to implement decisions that may result in serious consequences, and prior to the reform of the body, the rule of law of the competent monitoring body may be brought to the discretion of the competent oversight body to suspend the implementation of this normative document or all of its contents.

Article 31 contradicts the normative documents of the lower-level Government or the normative documents of the superior sector or contradicts the normative documents of the superior sector, which are coordinated by the law-making bodies of the statutory bodies of the referral oversight bodies, and which involve the division of administrative responsibilities, should also be coordinated with the institution-building sector.

The rule of law institutions of the competent monitoring body consider that the normative document of the referral is based on contradictions or contradictions and that the same-level people's Government is not competent to deal, and that it should report to the Government's rule of law bodies at the highest level, which are governed by law by the law of the Government of the people at the highest level or brought to the authority.

Article 31, civil, legal or other organizations consider that normative documents are incompatible with the law, regulations, regulations and regulations, may provide written review recommendations to the supervisory body for verification, study and submission of comments by the rule of law institutions of the competent monitoring body, in accordance with the prescribed procedures.

A review of civil, legal or other organizations suggests that the rule of law of the competent monitoring body considers it necessary to establish an organ to clarify the situation and that the design body should provide clarification within the prescribed time frame; it is considered necessary for the relevant sector or the local people's Government to make observations and that the relevant organs should respond within the time frame.

Written suggestions made by organs to amend or withdraw their normative documents should be validated; it was found that normative documents developed by the organ were problematic and should be modified or withdrawn.

Article 32 establishes organs that do not require the submission of normative documents to be sent in accordance with this provision, by the rule of law of the competent monitoring body to inform the development of the institution's time frame; and in the case of serious circumstances, the body of the rule of law of the competent monitoring body is criticized.

The rule of law of the supervisory body may make recommendations to address the issue of the existence of normative documents without redress and delay, which are criticized by the rule of law institutions of the competent body responsible for direct responsibility, in the event of serious circumstances, adverse consequences.

Chapter IV Management of normative documents

Article 33 establishes the organ to clean up normative documents every two years. They should be amended or repealed in a timely manner if they are not in accordance with laws, regulations, regulations or normative documents that are not adapted to economic and social development requirements. The list of normative documents that continue to be valid, repealed and invalidated after clearance should be made available to society.

Article 34 establishes organs to undertake post-implementation assessment activities in normative documents. Specific approaches to post-implementation assessments are developed in normative documents to be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of States and provinces.

Article 33 fifteen should be developed by organs to conduct periodic reviews or compilations of normative documents and to inform the current level of government rule of law institutions in the context of the compilation and compilation.

The development organs should establish and improve the electronic management system for normative documents to facilitate free access and download by the public.

Article XVI The development organs and competent monitoring bodies of normative documents should be strengthened to ensure that institutional establishments, staffing, funding arrangements, working conditions are adapted to work mandates.

Chapter V

The interpretation of normative documents is governed by the design body to be published in the form of normative documents.

The interpretation of normative documents is equally effective with normative documents.

Article 338 amends, repeals and interpretations of normative documents, taking into account procedural implementation.

Article 39 A review of the Maang Suu Province's normative document was also repealed on 29 October 1997.